{"meta":{"query_hash":"e7b4f8aa6eee","filters":{"topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory"},"cohort_total":648,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":648,"exported":648,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e7b4f8aa6eee","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Philosophical+Ethics+and+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W119376149","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-3227-0_11","title":"Le «besoin de la raison» dans les Lettres sur la philosophie kantienne (1786–1787)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in German idealism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Enlightenment; Sensibility; Feeling; Theme (computing); Faith; Epistemology; Humanities; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.06385447464813034,"score_gpt":0.3183792825048857,"score_spread":0.25452480785675535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W119376149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00633258,0.036432,0.000007738813,0.02267531,0.000952517,0.00038282055,0.00056732603,0.0001502405,0.93249947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91207373,0.028296033,0.000054410404,0.002106008,0.0050384663,0.00007383969,0.00007884646,0.00019772908,0.052080967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955114,0.0007663367,0.0011895399,0.0009488396,0.0005935299,0.0009903633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951398,0.003092316,0.0005000727,0.0007270333,0.00031561428,0.00022520864],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020392784,0.0011003214,0.0015497319,0.00048079563,0.0016664247,0.000249211,0.0007625874,0.0010540696,0.00035566324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044435938,0.0011007548,0.0006014439,0.000060486702,0.010956831,0.00018846345,0.0005744951,0.002586029,0.0000987555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082808394,0.00019325536,0.000016608834,0.0005345532,0.00060988567,0.0013106923,0.025606085,0.000024380302,0.000029430055,0.9647959,0.0022353136,0.004561105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006016339,0.00010001597,0.000093681956,0.0010145877,0.00012289896,0.000047915815,0.0005774018,0.000009135845,0.00000812405,0.53034496,0.46645647,0.00062316644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049768165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007558554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9057411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029258122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029461153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W132855506","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-05146-8_3","title":"The Normativity of Evaluative Concepts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Normative; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07174483384650521,"score_gpt":0.29608842382779493,"score_spread":0.22434358998128973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W132855506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006325936,0.00023671096,0.00003536908,0.0014584663,0.00032393483,0.00012858731,0.000053787553,0.000019317213,0.9977375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35294074,0.00007228654,0.00000224091,0.00044690398,0.000481063,0.000003368911,0.000007007397,0.000015159571,0.64603126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991704,0.000055506855,0.000257914,0.00011458932,0.00030458064,0.00009698546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815476,0.0010018735,0.00023477833,0.0002661435,0.00030910433,0.000033359378],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007620464,0.00015558132,0.0002571565,0.000023423267,0.00027333418,0.000046681984,0.00020857117,0.00011604873,0.007063973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073151365,0.000083801075,0.00015066603,0.0000016643893,0.0017400935,0.000027271104,0.00007511805,0.0003960201,0.00031466357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009417628,0.0000033016431,1.5147172e-8,0.00001970474,0.000062740604,2.2072376e-7,0.0028282367,1.6030293e-7,4.985242e-7,0.99220634,0.00089184655,0.003977536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045789282,0.000038140843,1.5369896e-7,0.00003320233,0.000017528237,1.063454e-7,0.000040246512,0.000014126547,0.000004661008,0.5409949,0.45874643,0.000064706735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000239615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034187004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4578546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001179833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048934788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99384373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W136671433","doi":"10.1023/a:1010744722791","title":"On Michael Smith's Internalisms","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04195958711766651,"score_gpt":0.24730682966483689,"score_spread":0.20534724254717038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W136671433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1541118,0.00016687777,0.00006511037,0.007842124,0.0009588288,0.00006191035,0.000019589885,0.00010373358,0.83667004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97884035,0.000047659618,0.000009875494,0.0039418126,0.0010407878,0.0000071701074,0.0000040829805,0.00001899398,0.016089268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930394,0.000035521014,0.00013732654,0.00016818606,0.00016679922,0.00018823305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950916,0.00012146881,0.000039321625,0.00020447346,0.00004868446,0.00007688156],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017332088,0.000114300696,0.000117271746,0.000060617345,0.0001856434,0.0001031466,0.00018897123,0.000048685877,0.0060771983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049505386,0.000090002504,0.00008563558,0.00002011146,0.00022409552,0.00007614335,0.000042269417,0.00026490373,0.0012576436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041989046,0.000060389146,0.000008776097,0.000004693761,0.000019145711,0.000033022498,0.0040364554,0.0000012050645,0.00001956911,0.9917913,0.0021793603,0.0018041064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013608664,0.00006823633,0.000020151308,0.000026776526,0.000004636627,0.0000035083597,0.00012280849,0.000031816217,0.00003200402,0.5909885,0.4084768,0.000088646986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011066084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000109468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82472855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016723661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013443709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W140636939","doi":"10.22329/p.v5i1.2857","title":"Confronting Natural Death in Hegel's &lt;i&gt;Phenomenology of Spirit&lt;/i&gt;","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Living systems; The good life; Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03145047644616329,"score_gpt":0.25513779024753463,"score_spread":0.22368731380137136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W140636939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7469199,0.0012337724,0.0000056312942,0.001915181,0.0011489547,0.000114212424,0.000021906048,0.000046343055,0.2485941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977278,0.000027514405,0.000092584276,0.00040682548,0.00076202245,0.000011433361,0.0000125553215,0.000023731924,0.0009354944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880403,0.000062420724,0.00036296106,0.0002513045,0.00017424116,0.00034502157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999214,0.00019746457,0.00013038177,0.00026443318,0.00012336856,0.00007034259],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041897982,0.0001689713,0.00032217972,0.00013908063,0.00013955958,0.00004733286,0.00029835157,0.00012619776,0.0010498752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014764463,0.00014876302,0.00009148937,0.000038627328,0.00057690154,0.00014428984,0.000113835245,0.0006228286,0.000057478996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027377377,0.00009225078,0.00014121286,0.000029212131,0.000022429904,0.00001082145,0.0029682724,0.0000014329254,0.023686059,0.971519,0.000030416977,0.0014715433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062007655,0.0000722409,0.00086268486,0.00002893763,0.000014931658,0.000005172914,0.00008891696,0.000194988,0.00068040483,0.79687804,0.20033568,0.0002179278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079037825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003176315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25080794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016406235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051249513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1411886569","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626.010","title":"Perfecting pleasures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.08420714989336162,"score_gpt":0.19813247876808718,"score_spread":0.11392532887472556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1411886569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004741616,0.00017399772,0.000014580538,0.000034173365,0.0004972874,0.00017537962,0.00021833206,0.00017764397,0.99866116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056790806,0.000060053266,0.0000040318564,0.0001883853,0.0007676163,3.673529e-7,0.00002057279,0.000057414858,0.9421108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989459,0.00004051048,0.0001579899,0.00038870494,0.0002217898,0.00024509119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897075,0.00010261282,0.00017913985,0.0003927935,0.00020967351,0.00014505802],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016126825,0.00033201743,0.00034426883,0.00013574827,0.0005315582,0.00008300695,0.00042036644,0.00030745886,0.00020170496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014842648,0.00035419836,0.00027672204,0.0000012084705,0.00079691305,0.00007868474,0.00027498385,0.00090791937,0.00008618294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005708148,0.000008361558,8.7250655e-8,0.00007041699,0.0001407621,0.00012666121,0.0012123218,8.0539834e-8,0.0000034048053,0.99442905,0.0032510422,0.0007007402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020822407,0.000052274085,4.6799042e-7,0.00014047018,0.0001659757,0.000004415325,0.000074983116,0.0000027701635,0.000025478756,0.024670914,0.9742348,0.00041918494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037746198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023184451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9709838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069001566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007105082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1433942009","doi":"10.7202/1044604ar","title":"The Psychology of Exclusivity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Immorality; Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Realm; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Romance; Rationality; Social psychology; Psychology; Process (computing); Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Morality; Psychoanalysis; Business","score_opus":0.04769576950061993,"score_gpt":0.3086178868290314,"score_spread":0.2609221173284115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1433942009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18554792,0.0002931818,0.0003112023,0.014698709,0.00050996646,0.0000902029,0.000012409961,0.000047873687,0.79848856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941493,0.00013459867,0.000044514865,0.0046438193,0.00059667847,0.000005802665,9.613846e-7,0.000010492417,0.00041381316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993249,0.00014318762,0.00015040103,0.00011013377,0.000085778716,0.00018559293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926436,0.00024171644,0.00006917775,0.00023522292,0.00014683373,0.000042695316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069855864,0.00007280211,0.00009987393,0.00002254229,0.00045681925,0.000034422075,0.00023793761,0.00011690438,0.00033071794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014367112,0.000047081765,0.00006142729,0.000019923156,0.002038504,0.000032829976,0.000053543805,0.00032519063,0.00005358781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040690185,0.000020763084,0.000028579854,0.000007664805,0.000019232659,0.0000016866524,0.004597053,2.7938583e-7,0.00037885163,0.99191797,0.0004435187,0.0025437071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082774444,0.000077916346,0.00015748086,0.000009241568,0.000004910378,0.000002348125,0.00022999507,0.000025280979,0.0004344697,0.81401145,0.1849105,0.000053640968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080944534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8086014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013554749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027730113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7510953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1475492886","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498398.006","title":"Kant Revisited","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.04699433586974875,"score_gpt":0.20069373922856318,"score_spread":0.15369940335881443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1475492886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013595784,0.0002209593,0.000014632201,0.00013178069,0.00031297278,0.0002435267,0.0007863322,0.00017811407,0.9980981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018675834,0.00013847504,0.0000068091413,0.00041108142,0.00077218737,3.336096e-7,0.00010992448,0.000056112396,0.97982925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884653,0.000028105396,0.00018967723,0.0004213231,0.0002699503,0.00024444005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887455,0.00006793584,0.00018413989,0.0004834583,0.00022060293,0.00016933531],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011596686,0.00035507302,0.00040886592,0.00015439492,0.00039436723,0.00010422241,0.00044278346,0.00032895687,0.00020714187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009608049,0.0003751332,0.00030014815,0.0000019111574,0.00084103167,0.00007477498,0.00026766682,0.0008459701,0.00010162776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005226612,0.00000949559,1.27376e-8,0.00011313948,0.00013371781,0.0003178457,0.0003677763,3.8394958e-7,0.0000027506433,0.9950283,0.0037473345,0.00022693448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038030714,0.00004784096,1.8710439e-7,0.00037906197,0.00017974255,0.000003831366,0.000029268824,0.0000027389963,0.000013796426,0.061675675,0.9368609,0.0004266329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019180431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006647134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93335265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016484591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001244599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480578946","doi":"10.1353/hms.2000.a385726","title":"Explaining General Ideas","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Epistemology; Philosophy; Order (exchange); Psychology","score_opus":0.12870223118728708,"score_gpt":0.31678383166400337,"score_spread":0.1880816004767163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480578946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22840516,0.0036333292,6.3491956e-7,0.00274172,0.00032970207,0.00004576559,0.000008217677,0.00009653843,0.7647389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761818,0.0005530607,0.000022422011,0.0016548226,0.0015765377,0.000015594584,0.0000022529723,0.00001176145,0.019981725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993864,0.00003281001,0.00013825273,0.0001406187,0.0001233139,0.00017859612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968165,0.00008741166,0.000021206566,0.00011376817,0.0000612343,0.00003473216],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016686777,0.00010319607,0.00016148346,0.000026337733,0.0005310759,0.000054374228,0.000085617015,0.000022324191,0.0055743856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037166203,0.00007833939,0.00006143851,0.000014286686,0.00045457555,0.00008847263,0.000035756293,0.0001362769,0.0005475733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095677815,0.0000144498645,0.0000055224896,0.000009908273,0.000071983566,0.0000074928244,0.028112676,0.0000034674008,0.000004930805,0.96616584,0.0017137413,0.0038803914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109240515,0.000031676278,0.000021022752,0.000018985198,0.000011209733,8.7076774e-7,0.0019870354,0.000011058083,0.00000871747,0.6632125,0.33448917,0.00009854569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026531428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000081317354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7477767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010545828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000077260065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485017808","doi":"10.1002/9781444323528.ch35","title":"Akrasia and Irrationality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Rationality","score_opus":0.03512951361659639,"score_gpt":0.24480515145248383,"score_spread":0.20967563783588744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485017808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000062521317,0.00015702823,0.000004410258,0.0020046502,0.00036503898,0.00004797781,0.000049742277,0.00009069239,0.9972742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017568871,0.000029799334,0.000034775563,0.0011206898,0.0019025459,0.000003619644,0.000021277427,0.000084164,0.9792343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996857,0.000011753396,0.000057639318,0.00011139568,0.00007746459,0.00005603818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978215,0.000028255961,0.000031805957,0.000106571315,0.000015713395,0.000035526267],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000081407285,0.00008165595,0.00009451612,0.000035089368,0.000058879497,0.00006537618,0.000050624785,0.00015516189,0.10934333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000128229285,0.000058918442,0.000022112452,0.0000027866274,0.00034968054,0.000013849633,0.000023546156,0.00027133466,0.00018905144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.613172e-7,0.000008006289,5.633716e-7,0.000015917003,0.000011293396,4.748569e-7,0.00022677367,3.652641e-10,0.0000012862464,0.9129577,0.08641581,0.00036158337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022439206,0.000002825516,0.0000017424549,0.0000066265834,0.0000033329552,2.1126576e-7,0.000009655734,4.6515808e-7,2.7105054e-7,0.45477918,0.5451249,0.00004837163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003359133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061089387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45870906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000013177878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000140275315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89147085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486963112","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511576256.008","title":"Consequences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.058886576253196356,"score_gpt":0.2073285745250651,"score_spread":0.14844199827186874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486963112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011992045,0.00018548741,0.0000045954453,0.00027367825,0.00030652896,0.0001632481,0.00034641585,0.0001471981,0.99856085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014661241,0.00011397947,0.0000058325877,0.00057185214,0.0005998034,1.8987865e-7,0.000033250813,0.000026350168,0.9839875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904776,0.000029881721,0.00014861669,0.00034073796,0.00022645779,0.00020653255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991238,0.000084816646,0.00015343733,0.00033234034,0.0001702351,0.00013535883],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009989426,0.00029111697,0.0003280017,0.000115570154,0.00036625122,0.00010155137,0.00041357498,0.00027466656,0.00010093236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000759703,0.00030408078,0.00021813888,0.0000011447308,0.001677558,0.000070188005,0.00012339473,0.00065600977,0.0000670044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003753544,0.000006156921,7.45633e-9,0.000029477433,0.00007643423,0.00027935128,0.00026347762,1.2672325e-7,0.000006908676,0.9919005,0.0061128265,0.0012871994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017802499,0.00005925952,9.309625e-8,0.00012483007,0.0001084378,0.0000051869565,0.00004072178,0.0000016293769,0.000033362856,0.0768478,0.92225647,0.00034420856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012526647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001158273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006642904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010302888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492535492","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403834","title":"The Surprise Twist in Hume's Treatise","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Sketch; Surprise; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11205246931065803,"score_gpt":0.3301092381026335,"score_spread":0.21805676879197544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492535492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10933425,0.022512106,9.994064e-7,0.038063545,0.00068396184,0.00024266382,0.000016409556,0.000113279195,0.8290328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920806,0.001722546,0.0000029096866,0.0009351498,0.00047010885,0.000014202032,0.0000012495892,0.000006977033,0.00476622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992345,0.000064178275,0.00019783845,0.00014457092,0.00014027326,0.00021866575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993185,0.0003426738,0.000043706106,0.00018311657,0.00008306153,0.000028958042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003686327,0.00012161729,0.0001880608,0.000037853093,0.0006823441,0.000101414946,0.00014358421,0.000026694117,0.00009040769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017084614,0.00007126271,0.00006320326,0.000030847816,0.00066661835,0.000071899725,0.00004335862,0.00020166063,0.00007151672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019216119,0.000043704626,0.00003178562,0.0000056018466,0.000030874184,0.0000122221745,0.02234358,6.526492e-7,0.000004157968,0.9706264,0.0013535926,0.0055282237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019676742,0.00007501452,0.0007898138,0.000029855106,0.00001041851,4.5987025e-7,0.0036691849,0.0000036914096,0.00000794429,0.8489238,0.1461921,0.0001009322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004797397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020037517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025686366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012983482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5248108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494444853","doi":"10.1353/hms.2006.a383389","title":"Hume and Locke on Scientific Methodology: The Newtonian Legacy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Ideal (ethics); Causation; Inductive reasoning","score_opus":0.29950650326561096,"score_gpt":0.35011748139926385,"score_spread":0.050610978133652895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494444853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35739428,0.021338603,0.000021993259,0.07695532,0.003195692,0.0003873719,0.000039975195,0.00019065337,0.54047614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98807836,0.00009418881,0.00004429075,0.0011851997,0.0010231308,0.000012609966,0.0000027014632,0.000011933479,0.009547592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901944,0.00017482686,0.0001653269,0.0002530834,0.00016975314,0.000217569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988566,0.0007204387,0.000055656412,0.00022385104,0.00011791655,0.000025536621],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009949517,0.00013870244,0.00020561728,0.00006391584,0.0016776957,0.0003471158,0.00014089062,0.000034993445,0.00014187016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016927176,0.00007891129,0.000058655216,0.000036819914,0.003050871,0.00010138157,0.00012534906,0.00024023111,0.00009292466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010769563,0.000026489768,0.000013399171,0.000016802325,0.00005100876,0.0000035616515,0.010788411,0.0000013180929,0.000054184235,0.9834663,0.004867407,0.0007003429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010367374,0.000047201207,0.00016173409,0.000018138548,0.0000223096,0.0000011078404,0.0028887652,0.0000046134796,0.000056922127,0.69162637,0.30498493,0.000084239895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012300648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011225144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6306841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012880351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015138741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497430573","doi":"10.1353/hms.2004.a383296","title":"The Strength of Hume's \"Weak\" Sympathy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Rogers Communications (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Philosophy; Affection; Epistemology; Criticism; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08376958146429667,"score_gpt":0.29513444380169335,"score_spread":0.21136486233739668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497430573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20216167,0.020828724,0.000003333745,0.019236922,0.0015404331,0.000241466,0.00005708802,0.00012446589,0.7558059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966663,0.001300361,0.0000072772996,0.0002203716,0.0004945535,0.000013269109,0.000001173289,0.000010280312,0.00128639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992729,0.000032352425,0.00021203225,0.000119009106,0.00018810862,0.0001756334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922526,0.00028708816,0.00008111174,0.00019949475,0.00018016266,0.000026858559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028896733,0.00011087168,0.00018923145,0.000025465688,0.00076578546,0.000045357803,0.00016875703,0.000026115435,0.00007423692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016496096,0.00006313622,0.000091566035,0.000022834594,0.0014115556,0.000057732967,0.000105795836,0.00016572041,0.000044157954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094451625,0.000041030624,0.000004226344,0.00002419103,0.00013579818,0.0000015111497,0.022571402,0.0000025136058,0.000015030493,0.9762301,0.00023533695,0.0007294073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021232128,0.00008997514,0.000034041892,0.000048318325,0.000023997116,3.7469943e-7,0.0130513515,6.52176e-7,0.00017661518,0.88947517,0.09680395,0.00008324096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000515912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055361673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79450464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018334376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026052901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.588988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508257551","doi":"10.1002/9781118522097.ch8","title":"Kant and Time‐Order Idealism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Transcendental idealism; Philosophy; Realism; Constructivism (international relations); Epistemology; Transcendental number; Order (exchange); Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.022227297273881164,"score_gpt":0.21892655585964016,"score_spread":0.19669925858575898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508257551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000029025332,0.00073810376,0.000005579814,0.0021014975,0.00022930744,0.00011244254,0.00004146637,0.00015326707,0.9966154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012284806,0.00015238691,0.000035490873,0.0023523062,0.001484181,0.000009314525,0.000019752206,0.00018736509,0.99453074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949825,0.000022518778,0.000092393966,0.00016304446,0.00010000119,0.00012378562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996598,0.000042979194,0.000047477966,0.00015745129,0.000029177707,0.00006312038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007431451,0.00015099217,0.00018902367,0.0000717351,0.000064079475,0.00012107044,0.000085503016,0.00016189803,0.23572592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001226306,0.00010200047,0.000031757067,0.000006489733,0.00033486437,0.00001662303,0.000057080975,0.00020267241,0.0039960314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.0896467e-7,0.0000047779217,1.9381458e-8,0.000018144303,0.000022244936,0.000001045666,0.00030463835,2.380877e-9,7.298117e-7,0.6369235,0.36241725,0.00030726538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046843197,0.000008957783,8.2491965e-8,0.000028897693,0.000008149217,4.3993558e-7,0.00001872025,0.0000098079045,2.5112638e-7,0.41051036,0.5892671,0.000100408295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011907284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024285422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2317299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000029070368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013182433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509185071","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.857131","title":"Love: self-propagation, self-preservation, or<i>ekstasis</i>?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Ideal (ethics); Philosophy; Ethical egoism; Economic Justice; Interpersonal communication; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03834628381784829,"score_gpt":0.22317320444533073,"score_spread":0.18482692062748243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509185071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081594184,0.0010466798,0.00011011607,0.18888643,0.003457666,0.0007291868,0.00013661926,0.00011934592,0.72391975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99040765,0.000033454176,0.00025823608,0.0048657567,0.0036246509,0.0000046162318,0.0000062690956,0.000037921534,0.0007614506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983843,0.000115198134,0.0006288034,0.00016617251,0.0003385489,0.00036700757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969329,0.00013779759,0.00035832005,0.0002718571,0.0014295395,0.00086954195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046729582,0.00020867096,0.0002938477,0.00037487329,0.00037087992,0.00040626986,0.0005251664,0.00011713362,0.009444586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002363685,0.0001593833,0.00016151453,0.00012514362,0.00027130588,0.0011325798,0.000021208158,0.0005630169,0.0008212832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011364974,0.00004895124,0.00009015361,0.000048754653,0.0001321879,0.00007935038,0.00940691,0.000006455397,0.000011632426,0.980155,0.009717762,0.0002915081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034815763,0.00016071211,0.000106558226,0.000058442565,0.00004293283,0.000046822886,0.00026239283,0.000047853777,0.000030738,0.7721199,0.22658859,0.00018692437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020974574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005632357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9088135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014912126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012610658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509349800","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12006","title":"Whither Integrity II: Integrity and Impartial Morality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Morality; Philosophy; Personal Integrity; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Deontological ethics; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10036557185115853,"score_gpt":0.2791152562305384,"score_spread":0.17874968437937988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509349800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56104916,0.00027422706,0.000028730003,0.10363589,0.00084622344,0.0004309501,0.000083656785,0.00024395566,0.3334072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951825,0.000017999306,0.000060699407,0.0024464913,0.001977377,0.000056078854,0.000013694738,0.000025881433,0.0002192766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984383,0.00017529725,0.0003621922,0.00038778316,0.00028547863,0.00035095037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988511,0.00015169026,0.00010675521,0.0003845377,0.00025855965,0.00024735197],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004327321,0.00028200014,0.0003850823,0.000077148354,0.000578649,0.00025197124,0.00030385522,0.00013914167,0.0032604593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008050588,0.00021753219,0.00013114898,0.000048619604,0.0010465995,0.00045166461,0.00028557997,0.0014205636,0.00037816103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002711317,0.00019970215,0.0001754598,0.000035711488,0.000045006804,0.0000021062376,0.0033350298,2.6193283e-7,0.000056393503,0.9940396,0.0010188816,0.0010647281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003554419,0.00013008121,0.0016626795,0.000036994476,0.000021278314,0.0000030491335,0.00016357713,0.00040474185,0.000057141766,0.9810952,0.015775701,0.00029410352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015813399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022336945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43413332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033554097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037536356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509904696","doi":"10.1353/hms.2001.a383327","title":"Hume's Recantation Revisited","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Personal identity; Epistemology; Identity (music); Perception; Causation; Reflexive pronoun; Consciousness; Nothing; Psychology; Self; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.20288334379037892,"score_gpt":0.34627068735159083,"score_spread":0.1433873435612119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509904696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07778898,0.007362338,0.000012215225,0.010065269,0.0007216093,0.00015965573,0.000015646461,0.00019574926,0.90367854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887806,0.0023098895,0.000014244901,0.001404157,0.0010737295,0.0000149193565,0.000007997045,0.000011854994,0.0063825827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933803,0.00004840667,0.00016886058,0.00015217137,0.00013919725,0.00015332382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994563,0.00013300129,0.00005438171,0.0001317128,0.00019373989,0.000030902145],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002424153,0.0001035748,0.00017426086,0.00005282555,0.00046907668,0.000060827162,0.0000781525,0.000027308759,0.00094889186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014968602,0.000079760415,0.000057281894,0.000036969017,0.00037594084,0.000116352145,0.00004837102,0.00013638134,0.00026639487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015810758,0.00001638535,0.00004904649,0.000026573793,0.00007684601,0.0000106495245,0.01446949,3.8008776e-7,0.00002309372,0.98127943,0.0021399208,0.0018923646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013749793,0.000044209446,0.00012736495,0.0000508394,0.00002471349,0.0000017387797,0.0025302642,0.0000048565175,0.000013797108,0.6716572,0.32529747,0.00011004189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022719569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014491666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91099167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018216286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008020656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512473742","doi":"10.1353/hms.2007.a383368","title":"A Response to Our Colleagues","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Classics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.1697663485614924,"score_gpt":0.3711732242814028,"score_spread":0.20140687571991042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512473742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5075101,0.0027782884,0.00002984374,0.0813705,0.001969101,0.00033371474,0.000045100976,0.0002577493,0.40570557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98231316,0.000034531324,0.000039149185,0.0036893059,0.00081655534,0.000009847543,5.1987246e-7,0.00001192983,0.013085022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922514,0.000057411347,0.00017132031,0.00015326147,0.00016455396,0.000228309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992125,0.00035628615,0.000029559615,0.00013851174,0.00018871746,0.00007439908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014587803,0.000104980645,0.00017652941,0.000098449374,0.00045622632,0.000044900175,0.000102287646,0.000026747728,0.00008302711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006159492,0.0000792637,0.000056737346,0.000038549824,0.00017352821,0.00004535612,0.00010503468,0.00011998785,0.0004010358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053315447,0.000032593452,0.000007930353,0.000010026719,0.000080172234,0.000026256224,0.06286048,3.5828091e-7,0.0001688407,0.9268262,0.009005919,0.00044809436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018692143,0.00019110227,0.00023598273,0.000038942195,0.000012077709,9.434258e-7,0.032671265,3.0996642e-7,0.00014357032,0.3768076,0.58956385,0.0001474425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018076786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052998745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58055794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027669885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001550848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51546377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512819943","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716538","title":"Hume, a Scottish Socrates?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Content (measure theory); General interest; Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04575302338287984,"score_gpt":0.22389817201039658,"score_spread":0.17814514862751674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512819943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025430739,0.0017812012,0.000018413417,0.010382895,0.0020436377,0.00007503346,0.00004658581,0.000010587999,0.9602109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950336,0.000015017195,0.000044493667,0.002688853,0.0017361895,0.0000010624758,0.0000013972898,0.000023988328,0.0004553639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989304,0.000100187186,0.00036857292,0.00010900023,0.00018680026,0.00030504473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998498,0.00006986217,0.00019499708,0.00015401344,0.00036789844,0.00071519543],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005240007,0.00013902983,0.00023554359,0.0002858503,0.00038538518,0.00019350232,0.0002604387,0.0000740805,0.004123849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026330655,0.00012214256,0.00018049042,0.000058472095,0.00053161796,0.00019125831,0.000005059516,0.0005009792,0.00013120339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044519,0.000012188985,0.00005711639,0.0000120055865,0.00004264915,0.0001653998,0.0018824562,0.0000026857524,0.0000117956,0.99580294,0.0018541337,0.00015215986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022703597,0.000100340185,0.000011046533,0.00005621503,0.000018597158,0.000056587636,0.0001161322,9.5036694e-7,0.00003772259,0.78351605,0.21573925,0.00012009886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041561516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005217204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068850306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009420131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99678653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518497514","doi":"10.1002/9780470413708.ch9","title":"Nature and Values","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Natural (archaeology); Mathematics; Geography; Statistics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02679346843879036,"score_gpt":0.2426923188761429,"score_spread":0.21589885043735255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518497514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000038103676,0.004291663,8.045333e-7,0.0010349323,0.0003654262,0.000043514043,0.00003087077,0.00013988189,0.99408907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0074066264,0.0013166952,0.00001660292,0.0022063197,0.0021170399,0.0000018279068,0.000009453156,0.00013396848,0.9867915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996595,0.000012339472,0.00004774416,0.0001240772,0.000083951665,0.00007239723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997965,0.000027729624,0.00002652163,0.00010380392,0.000011954476,0.000033479428],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000031725107,0.00010454829,0.00012460556,0.00005869913,0.000071586524,0.00003614447,0.0000612915,0.0002843923,0.026824372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009527189,0.00007122302,0.00003110399,0.0000039472407,0.00039294062,0.00001213159,0.000029836205,0.00041692774,0.00016370331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.1423007e-7,0.0000044544254,9.866327e-8,0.000013232888,0.0000138999,0.000003108312,0.00034881753,5.076352e-10,6.972367e-8,0.6096175,0.3899001,0.00009822608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028971519,0.000006302986,2.1653975e-7,0.00002421228,0.0000040619143,0.0000011489844,0.000021750133,3.755287e-7,3.4648448e-7,0.40062344,0.59922194,0.00006721837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000108092034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025971443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20932187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000018658819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009664078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97406524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519776254","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403831","title":"Complexities of Character: Hume on Love and Responsibility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Moral character; Passions; Epistemology; Feeling; Moral psychology; Philosophy; Action (physics); Moral disengagement; Moral philosophy; Moral responsibility; Psychology","score_opus":0.18457236993490228,"score_gpt":0.3426206989202132,"score_spread":0.1580483289853109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519776254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70839185,0.0020981207,3.9264197e-7,0.012437788,0.00021753095,0.00012849746,0.000059573154,0.000039490827,0.27662677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666464,0.00020225816,0.000008301969,0.0014213817,0.00032921694,0.0000014791367,0.0000020519735,0.000005331065,0.0013653457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925655,0.00007107176,0.00021404205,0.00017219732,0.00014948708,0.00013666517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992318,0.00034286405,0.00007521376,0.00017477563,0.0001444467,0.000030857045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035002994,0.00012367294,0.00029925915,0.000057588288,0.00018280602,0.00003711204,0.00007120503,0.000029703615,0.00023344149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017680324,0.00009166125,0.000056114066,0.000015114455,0.0011466258,0.00008983781,0.000047870893,0.00015602059,0.00003811406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012591433,0.00006946705,0.0000150848045,0.00004090051,0.000050755498,0.0000022252652,0.023411239,9.999953e-8,0.00009402041,0.9753241,0.00022814413,0.0006380733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019475273,0.00044990281,0.004510988,0.00007357027,0.00001647158,5.6909744e-7,0.003803146,0.0000022009406,0.00015026898,0.97455966,0.016126778,0.00011167438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011194978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006057038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2882728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011728764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009930005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4224791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523006892","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716583","title":"How to Distinguish Autonomy from Integrity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Suspect; Value (mathematics); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06079187571652715,"score_gpt":0.2361941257216291,"score_spread":0.17540225000510196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523006892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10016087,0.0009909469,0.00018151877,0.4405347,0.0027088504,0.00016305833,0.00048450043,0.000028796614,0.45474675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98008937,0.0000018744909,0.00037100326,0.0058982954,0.013182656,0.0000015266494,0.0000054269467,0.000020437716,0.00042938453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904656,0.000052615305,0.00030556752,0.00014187716,0.00018068438,0.00027268683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981284,0.00010597518,0.0001624207,0.00018546393,0.00037605298,0.0010416653],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030202846,0.00015140955,0.00025740394,0.00024449703,0.0002848447,0.00040915844,0.00042299266,0.0000756955,0.0012230673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042695334,0.00012992113,0.00016168432,0.00004441261,0.0002848791,0.00027681794,0.000018715416,0.00073544827,0.00009708147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010387102,0.000015652973,0.00006706186,0.0000045358906,0.000044079814,0.00006146834,0.007972781,0.0000042048005,0.000011099463,0.98669976,0.0016615633,0.0034473895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011714531,0.000056258832,0.00006067903,0.00005182042,0.000013859116,0.0000045322195,0.00012130023,0.0000059317954,0.000019596928,0.5303224,0.46912342,0.00010310907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003444033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045559183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8799285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002136714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008666736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524078424","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1031506","title":"Hume's Internalism Reconsidered","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04699857236337713,"score_gpt":0.23760311470306045,"score_spread":0.19060454233968332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524078424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57936424,0.0057939235,0.0007344786,0.018452542,0.0021082542,0.00013985406,0.000010235684,0.00015171514,0.39324477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846633,0.00288191,0.0000071023355,0.0009473549,0.0019413551,0.000002150796,0.000001655753,0.000022233626,0.009532954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805546,0.000083560975,0.000258815,0.00013652477,0.00021110971,0.0012545225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994718,0.000073206254,0.00011451691,0.00013264017,0.00011931249,0.00008855506],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095591135,0.00012890385,0.0001642257,0.00009063817,0.00067668926,0.00008056472,0.00024293951,0.0000576075,0.0011154364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007557289,0.00010320531,0.0001527893,0.000021226633,0.00033950078,0.00020156319,0.000033133598,0.002467471,0.00021245079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025946536,0.00003505103,0.000020662255,0.000001641354,0.000092325114,0.000024164881,0.0033058287,8.0612995e-7,0.0000235245,0.99434674,0.00019756053,0.0019257435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033229572,0.00014835274,0.000008752721,0.0000143433645,0.000012082856,0.0012029064,0.001112373,0.000007701202,0.000020578616,0.9407846,0.056222223,0.00013379971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001085785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013593589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40529907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020630987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082810357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527422774","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2141","title":"A Defense of Non-deductive Reconstructions of Analogical Arguments (AILACT Essay Competition Winner)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Schema (genetic algorithms); Metaphysics; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Analogical reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Strengths and weaknesses; Philosophy; Analogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03471161287276179,"score_gpt":0.2513523004739812,"score_spread":0.21664068760121943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527422774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5311416,0.000021796304,0.00021737731,0.00034091767,0.00026354275,0.000116904586,0.00009407061,0.000022181526,0.46778163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927545,0.000015790873,0.00022952919,0.00024408495,0.0001394457,0.0000068079607,0.00002502127,0.000004738771,0.000059122976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991843,0.000022760385,0.0003747958,0.000097520024,0.00016766047,0.00015294402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999364,0.000060091832,0.00020026742,0.00013200786,0.00018987403,0.000053734475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020197906,0.00010750073,0.00022114669,0.000105214036,0.00013800584,0.000020091165,0.00011743929,0.00007952692,0.0008713002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005199759,0.000082107275,0.00012184154,0.00005340687,0.0008599556,0.00027194826,0.00004476211,0.00021906405,0.00004329447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059481088,0.00012242045,0.000043918113,0.00003148045,0.00003653326,0.0000021675753,0.004486478,0.00017306488,0.00013858729,0.99454176,0.0000028887396,0.0003612198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005897242,0.0003910073,0.0006751403,0.00006736378,0.000024578472,0.000014551175,0.0014596907,0.000021646036,0.0005555313,0.99510485,0.00097569707,0.000120240795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000091153015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045693712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4681339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027408152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008247259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9540126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528248089","doi":"10.1111/heyj.10_12251","title":"Durable Goods: Pleasure, Wealth and Power in the Virtuous Life (Studies in Theoretical and Applied Ethics 10). By GerolPetruzella. Pp. 173, New York, NY, Peter Lang, 2013, $76.95.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Power (physics); Citation; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.13933670078620852,"score_gpt":0.31374527445128475,"score_spread":0.17440857366507623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528248089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46268734,0.12737302,0.000040169714,0.22810064,0.0013630518,0.00078204065,0.000043300694,0.00007308123,0.17953734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843578,0.007459947,0.000018228573,0.0068584285,0.00081517507,0.000007352652,0.0000019098486,0.000030156923,0.00045103283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759185,0.0007122373,0.00045682047,0.00023278699,0.000566407,0.00043989156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980581,0.0011555599,0.00015682075,0.0002513962,0.000102390426,0.00027573385],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052596387,0.0002559338,0.00039565665,0.00007353468,0.00057018956,0.00037245767,0.00033537918,0.00017560214,0.00037082497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005353888,0.00013233454,0.00005551242,0.00007798641,0.0022990785,0.00012545707,0.00013792819,0.0024420535,0.000049610582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022177034,0.00008481948,0.000042482203,0.000023193477,0.000057779722,0.00002232525,0.07932283,0.000006260877,0.000009902903,0.87062114,0.049457144,0.00013032835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014864756,0.00031042998,0.0000855286,0.00012729748,0.000038435504,0.00018056226,0.023657199,0.00004445735,0.000004786857,0.8852137,0.088607684,0.0002434845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021050937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005340094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5216704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043863965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020967037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530037991","doi":"10.7202/006277ar","title":"Thomas Hurka, Virtue, Vice and Value, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2001, 272 pages.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Value (mathematics); Vice president; Media studies; History; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Management; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.21883829882261285,"score_gpt":0.2728231496103189,"score_spread":0.05398485078770604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530037991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034648918,0.0070713544,0.000034942495,0.052728213,0.00033070613,0.0002966183,0.00009867709,0.00037515894,0.93559945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625007,0.009213523,0.0001906071,0.0076069855,0.004157161,0.0000044882554,0.000021096857,0.00006413112,0.01624132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982689,0.00017070772,0.00029173086,0.0005069503,0.0003276891,0.0004340293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998699,0.00024266448,0.0001471337,0.00042534724,0.00012014363,0.000365685],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002925659,0.00035691613,0.00038167357,0.0001257417,0.00054261513,0.00021300267,0.0004123451,0.00026523462,0.0010110812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007250795,0.0003350946,0.00014603132,0.00005633354,0.00068326696,0.00054666295,0.00021412643,0.00075823616,0.00003442255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005283587,0.00012532853,0.00002124179,0.000050900624,0.00007514401,0.0000358801,0.002123432,0.0000030396536,0.000020807409,0.9674715,0.029074091,0.000945807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000327796,0.000099428,0.000017103004,0.000042164593,0.000045773795,0.0000040016334,0.00008833182,0.00019806191,0.000028006678,0.4691793,0.52971286,0.0002571834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034790474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013696101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055672095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003318846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538861925","doi":"10.1353/mos.2011.a418765","title":"The Voice, the Body, and the Mind: Reflections in the Aftermath of Kant and Herder","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sensibility; Relation (database); Connection (principal bundle); Mind–body problem; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.05775212886966118,"score_gpt":0.2616842513321547,"score_spread":0.20393212246249354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538861925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66095144,0.0039482573,0.000006182415,0.045293115,0.00028919833,0.00048984034,0.000032605,0.000012892063,0.2889765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977479,0.00027235513,0.0000021207165,0.0013437086,0.00011582345,0.000031946307,5.9331114e-7,0.0000050634344,0.00048050107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999378,0.00020772933,0.00013168294,0.00007834578,0.00009938296,0.00010482353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991106,0.0005760233,0.000047765156,0.00022612086,0.000026482807,0.000013026435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093836244,0.00006667491,0.00007910457,0.000014103807,0.0006104169,0.00008605566,0.00018624052,0.00002695809,0.000051256473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003649089,0.000021679934,0.000032013635,0.000026630129,0.0014592076,0.000040172505,0.000047971644,0.00025399012,0.0000054648917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003792445,0.000020324762,0.000018816245,0.0000046851883,0.000015231076,8.976881e-7,0.08691045,6.553814e-8,0.000010499323,0.9123616,0.00015863999,0.00046085712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025476076,0.00003266904,0.0009965724,0.00001200251,0.000023228777,0.0000063014536,0.0050758254,0.00005357155,0.000017849623,0.85018396,0.14330037,0.000042896056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044133724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031849274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33679646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000026211487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010734926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5376511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540813654","doi":"","title":"The Possibility of Moral","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Skepticism; Epistemology; Reading (process); Moral philosophy","score_opus":0.14676323970618022,"score_gpt":0.36399997368125137,"score_spread":0.21723673397507115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540813654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7804713,0.0009963694,0.0000013270235,0.0044547613,0.00014980916,0.00008951394,0.000014053046,0.00004145821,0.2137814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878556,0.00004992636,0.000028407554,0.000119491444,0.00009336361,0.0000078714575,0.000025960011,0.000004507088,0.0008849264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993341,0.00012834086,0.00021834575,0.00007307414,0.0001505288,0.000095613075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982421,0.00018195888,0.00011270429,0.00060088374,0.0008162365,0.000046125806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008211626,0.00006418757,0.00008513643,0.000007627539,0.00065367727,0.00033357594,0.00049698655,0.000038557217,0.0000391415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038376442,0.000035170084,0.000056753295,0.000023355007,0.0023703785,0.0003282743,0.00014824157,0.00021270062,0.00003096114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003174723,0.000023734612,0.00020546428,0.0000042813094,0.000007315448,4.409246e-8,0.007775018,0.0000033784108,0.000032886248,0.9904024,0.00019082737,0.0013228933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018245156,0.000034579476,0.0010740996,0.0000098261,0.0000050738468,5.2944125e-7,0.0018151061,0.000120245895,0.0001517632,0.91195107,0.08459454,0.0000607165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002837349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000359906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21831423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027168555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002956219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87337583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545056749","doi":"10.1023/a:1005272731285","title":"Charles L. Griswold, Jr., Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.028851649329093225,"score_gpt":0.2155368482576201,"score_spread":0.18668519892852686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545056749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34426427,0.004995788,0.0000035217424,0.06716085,0.0002150534,0.00023867257,0.000051275274,0.0000636478,0.5830069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325,0.00087413745,0.000005837977,0.001952432,0.000642935,0.000021512647,0.0000035749724,0.000010409577,0.003239131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919146,0.00008826232,0.00019174212,0.00014782029,0.00021992675,0.00016080032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991934,0.0003962526,0.00006126955,0.00021144655,0.000070863476,0.00006676774],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049986056,0.000104469415,0.00018211044,0.000034662862,0.00024724388,0.00015912762,0.00019892633,0.000039957737,0.003507576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009131294,0.000059506237,0.00006287509,0.000028703804,0.00093915185,0.00017155302,0.000049763268,0.0001834718,0.00004144402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027503233,0.000060513416,0.000020906513,0.000019786832,0.00003792985,6.9854025e-7,0.0045345067,1.08775865e-7,0.000005277082,0.9748728,0.00030981944,0.02011011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005724664,0.000028389128,0.00025094624,0.000015796662,0.000015433467,0.0000015316009,0.00022136902,0.00004838747,0.000024741143,0.3439229,0.65482247,0.00007557345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035396972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017615511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65451264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000080525615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002571875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545125571","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.0015","title":"There Is Just One Idea of Self in Hume's Treatise","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Epistemology; Philosophy; Identity (music); Humility; Nothing; Interpretation (philosophy); Passion; Reading (process); Simple (philosophy); Pride; Personal identity; Sympathy; Focus (optics); Simplicity; Aesthetics; Object (grammar); Self; Psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.16027616640820577,"score_gpt":0.32653460801462963,"score_spread":0.16625844160642386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545125571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32112113,0.012729565,7.9363303e-7,0.013566223,0.00017622673,0.0001891921,0.0000460482,0.000084443556,0.6520864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573904,0.0013952453,0.000020051204,0.0009964741,0.00027713133,0.0000070705864,0.0000015058246,0.000008512706,0.0015549744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992354,0.00004189626,0.00024564908,0.00015401005,0.00015795951,0.00016508788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995093,0.00011635244,0.000071064416,0.0001630755,0.000114716226,0.000025510137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019307417,0.00012661291,0.00032324015,0.00006951218,0.00015789532,0.000022384786,0.00010600879,0.00004179732,0.00051091873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045995395,0.000097953474,0.000072732044,0.000036568825,0.00031840487,0.00007692117,0.000040554056,0.00016065904,0.000039532224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016567197,0.00019009513,0.00005358749,0.00005133778,0.00009816956,0.000006131025,0.080643825,4.240354e-7,0.000031280815,0.9169895,0.0005073034,0.0014117766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004017313,0.00021681875,0.0017871642,0.00014149914,0.00004734781,3.152053e-7,0.0062088654,0.0000039962442,0.00015501669,0.9766603,0.014226625,0.00015032587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007533018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041511093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6746179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020113343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013961051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55942017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549279719","doi":"","title":"Hegel's Psychology Of Freedom","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Rogers Communications (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.061681797705876014,"score_gpt":0.28171403654477833,"score_spread":0.22003223883890233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549279719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21834026,0.00002819342,0.000011541576,0.0007136191,0.004388902,0.00028370766,0.00006698737,0.00010728798,0.7760595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932796,0.0001465136,0.000048268666,0.000024089259,0.007154211,1.8347347e-7,0.000015453059,0.000025055662,0.059790235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635386,0.0012203563,0.00027771952,0.0006352379,0.00087007514,0.0006427708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755806,0.00050070055,0.00012309184,0.0006951753,0.00077410135,0.0003488648],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000976972,0.00024254205,0.00045598132,0.00081068487,0.001556322,0.000097421056,0.001387398,0.000319139,0.0036855915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095752795,0.00027515634,0.0003025807,0.00053814024,0.0031496899,0.00059133,0.0002993004,0.0010776506,0.00024292628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004323533,0.00039787954,0.000021582571,0.000043086064,0.00016757869,0.0010045292,0.0029747144,0.00006070166,0.0023512295,0.983965,0.0037526665,0.0009375124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032169325,0.00071348593,0.00003865722,0.00005187704,0.000080394704,0.000012264496,0.0022304254,0.00006446814,0.00067236676,0.03736118,0.9551989,0.0003590642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002582555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037805398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95144624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025350606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040900861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551385672","doi":"10.1093/0195137167.001.0001","title":"Virtue, Vice, and Value","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Virtue ethics; Value (mathematics); Environmental ethics; Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Law and economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.033145360505627164,"score_gpt":0.23231590114545095,"score_spread":0.19917054063982378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551385672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006613205,0.00055868004,0.00000536987,0.0014737274,0.00034096118,0.00008578676,0.00003964288,0.000079421225,0.9974098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040459675,0.00034170752,0.000006246722,0.004340437,0.0022627623,0.0000040700083,0.000036427253,0.000037553604,0.9889248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992887,0.000019431496,0.00016592744,0.00022639032,0.00016789648,0.00013170463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994733,0.00014213054,0.00005652066,0.00018325353,0.00006000533,0.00008479699],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015602988,0.00019734137,0.00024220212,0.0000729495,0.00018827761,0.00014905023,0.0001191477,0.000221032,0.008614457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011866915,0.00015196382,0.000074704425,0.0000046624045,0.0004909527,0.00005849593,0.00008131076,0.0005040405,0.00048405176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004720881,0.000010735979,5.9618536e-8,0.00003857126,0.000035661433,0.000013178495,0.0004838024,8.6648086e-8,1.9896095e-7,0.9827072,0.01597764,0.00072814926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050417046,0.000021465705,1.7280917e-7,0.000033630597,0.000017089515,0.0000019098275,0.000014261829,0.0000051744746,1.4678423e-7,0.50215346,0.49758726,0.0001150357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040914867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017610886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48160964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002052033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008173065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553289635","doi":"","title":"Mothering and the Sacrifice of Self: Women and Friendship in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Campion College","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Sacrifice; Virtue; Philosophy of love; Philosophy; Relation (database); Excellence; Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Theology","score_opus":0.048531228128746155,"score_gpt":0.24267641705967205,"score_spread":0.1941451889309259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553289635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89096856,0.0011451811,0.000007425414,0.008158164,0.00006515316,0.00009919795,0.0000053176427,0.00003526293,0.09951575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984084,0.00056946464,0.000031703992,0.00071218645,0.000083524035,0.000007902282,3.0650534e-7,0.000012973549,0.00017357325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992202,0.00018291359,0.00015126349,0.00013360607,0.00014990465,0.00016214183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989311,0.00075891515,0.00005954624,0.00016004361,0.000039936516,0.00005043792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001327016,0.00009488111,0.00019697945,0.000042391403,0.0002560978,0.000028243749,0.00010121402,0.00008446933,0.000049239276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001666643,0.00006408025,0.000021811731,0.00003110748,0.0012336908,0.00006396882,0.00006895089,0.00064541533,0.0000027291426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005441214,0.000020668276,0.000096095886,0.00003836201,0.000010605734,0.000002708168,0.27052006,0.0000011179574,0.000022577415,0.729174,0.0000042067186,0.000055163197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009410878,0.00005350145,0.00055127643,0.00004066592,0.0000071368854,0.0000093771605,0.008121276,0.00023835518,0.000037177346,0.978696,0.01118571,0.000118438584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003872866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028074547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26239878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015411568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003351214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4545585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560700356","doi":"10.1353/hms.2004.a383300","title":"Stability and Partiality in Hume's Moral Philosophy: A Response to Louis Loeb","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Passions; Impartiality; Philosophy; Affection; Moral philosophy; Epistemology; Feeling; Virtue","score_opus":0.20446001916201595,"score_gpt":0.3295642859989948,"score_spread":0.12510426683697884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560700356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94821584,0.0012981244,0.0000026757293,0.034676526,0.00022927987,0.00026379773,0.000051321098,0.00006375508,0.015198653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773806,0.000072820476,0.000026526966,0.0016465865,0.00037382456,0.000050575785,0.0000014828908,0.000014013551,0.00007609605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986165,0.00020631027,0.00031471127,0.00036113354,0.00020555302,0.00029576526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991508,0.00029326158,0.000046916954,0.00026336694,0.0001388523,0.00010677757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012370857,0.00019319571,0.00036451925,0.000084089595,0.0003572931,0.000083893676,0.00011309105,0.00005094201,0.00015846027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006313022,0.00015900296,0.000061775914,0.000060391012,0.0010671727,0.00013063874,0.00021770151,0.00026286743,0.00005070288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006312327,0.00013669349,0.0003404565,0.00006619285,0.000047697926,0.000022588722,0.063523054,0.000005871247,0.0001007261,0.93498456,0.000025613188,0.000115288196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006242542,0.00025223865,0.002490164,0.00008201342,0.000014800266,8.053444e-7,0.0033979781,0.0000012196282,0.00013123438,0.98612785,0.006663788,0.00021367858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029080434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022105281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06012508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009259422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047476307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64839524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566828727","doi":"","title":"Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Hume on Morality (review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.2995966113847076,"score_gpt":0.3829116439499873,"score_spread":0.08331503256527967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566828727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028661864,0.026004426,0.0000029753912,0.07381241,0.0007633073,0.00043675417,0.000036837606,0.00017001045,0.8959071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9364425,0.009916649,0.000012764148,0.04081214,0.0024289167,0.000114084425,0.000006912814,0.000032402928,0.0102336565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850017,0.00010238019,0.00038356744,0.00036440813,0.00032252868,0.000326941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889684,0.0001877111,0.00008022276,0.0004208349,0.00029098894,0.0001234054],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005350176,0.0002684498,0.000495973,0.00007816482,0.0005482246,0.000042751322,0.0002549097,0.000043099793,0.0015558884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003448149,0.00019942714,0.00017602193,0.000054912955,0.0004907843,0.00009033895,0.00018896048,0.00026653984,0.001717017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029732715,0.00008580016,0.000011037901,0.00020380002,0.000118526215,0.000020424322,0.0031232415,9.033131e-7,0.0000039420615,0.95745677,0.037827164,0.0011186887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011911101,0.00013509866,0.00003982025,0.0005081879,0.00003192533,0.0000010562546,0.00015202763,8.017695e-7,0.000006557807,0.48526934,0.51355016,0.00018589656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028388971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013068656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9335763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052825944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001696442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568696823","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511617058.005","title":"Satisficing and Substantive Values","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Satisficing; Outcome (game theory); Rationality; Absolute (philosophy); Morality; Economics; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04298503752599603,"score_gpt":0.1994260926669015,"score_spread":0.15644105514090548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568696823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004310494,0.00032815186,0.00001714933,0.00006654455,0.00022262394,0.00018850475,0.0003310416,0.00010180038,0.9983131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16551961,0.0002122003,0.000008738213,0.00013358581,0.00033684215,1.9664006e-7,0.000019653491,0.000037855025,0.8337313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990863,0.000026351672,0.00013745388,0.00036489932,0.00019448111,0.00019048054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992159,0.00013787669,0.0001372016,0.00024239096,0.00014687538,0.00011975298],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001068601,0.0002909553,0.00032855003,0.00012061796,0.0004472566,0.00010225873,0.00019816392,0.00023295423,0.00004080702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010020308,0.00031056785,0.00012641291,0.0000013824211,0.001190486,0.00008440019,0.00020590694,0.00059619703,0.000012886097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043290223,0.000004556264,1.0432846e-7,0.000080662154,0.00011675283,0.00016248433,0.0018327361,3.5590136e-7,0.0000046507953,0.9970024,0.00032586613,0.00042613037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000467267,0.00006601046,0.0000019499732,0.0004225797,0.00021213759,0.0000047938565,0.00027515268,0.0000059713157,0.000036022866,0.1499849,0.84805036,0.0004728508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027534176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019718333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8477245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009569617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007590024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586492671","doi":"","title":"A Humean Conundrum","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simplicity; Simple (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Knight; Perception; Impression; Computer science","score_opus":0.19693426574817333,"score_gpt":0.3337070908579468,"score_spread":0.13677282510977348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586492671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030123878,0.006132307,0.0000031829911,0.028434586,0.0005923802,0.00009925948,0.00001608488,0.00017007087,0.9344283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98495424,0.0002360568,0.000024205503,0.0028954928,0.0020740577,0.0000137540965,0.0000015644131,0.000011884871,0.009788753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936604,0.000027584068,0.00015035855,0.00014094893,0.00013013156,0.00018495819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955726,0.00011588331,0.00003688014,0.00013440626,0.00011716917,0.000038421374],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019222262,0.00010745329,0.00017303733,0.000037779715,0.00045327,0.000055928424,0.00009987749,0.000023984401,0.0011467222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008022032,0.0000810247,0.00006772282,0.000013509312,0.0007048957,0.000103727754,0.00007951194,0.00015347921,0.0007253286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005590472,0.000029919904,0.000005019274,0.000014392001,0.000084906475,0.0000024005558,0.025712794,8.473878e-7,0.00000963226,0.96860325,0.0034469513,0.0020842666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011386286,0.000028106455,0.000008554659,0.00001455595,0.000012257766,6.1662325e-7,0.0024935303,0.0000056460685,0.0000264747,0.45161065,0.5455986,0.00008710658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010312753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043989444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95483035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019080511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010193746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588628019","doi":"10.1353/hms.2007.a383367","title":"Hume and the Nortons on the Passions and Morality in Hume's Treatise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Empiricism; History of philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of history; Historiography; Morality; Literature; History; Art","score_opus":0.15866557684160093,"score_gpt":0.32704440774689114,"score_spread":0.1683788309052902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588628019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7042975,0.004688629,0.0000015178958,0.0734318,0.00020346143,0.00034564966,0.000031438867,0.000037278172,0.21696277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960541,0.0009379705,0.0000022818301,0.0018140759,0.00023734933,0.00002811439,9.482193e-7,0.000007846127,0.00091730856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991902,0.00012798412,0.0001921024,0.00016611228,0.00013636536,0.00018723698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980265,0.001655364,0.000049615795,0.00018262904,0.00005073076,0.000035199082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001137389,0.00013202455,0.00022020108,0.000039978157,0.0010150778,0.00007335905,0.000087356166,0.000033208074,0.00009396316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026633486,0.000058255897,0.000043035576,0.00003179821,0.0026012694,0.000049434533,0.00013137626,0.0002976239,0.000008334314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053303476,0.000033957695,0.00030671354,0.000011055802,0.00005467038,0.0000057906605,0.0330769,1.9697002e-7,0.000002530756,0.96531016,0.00029900906,0.0008457001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005952517,0.000059252256,0.0098413555,0.00006200667,0.000036191883,0.0000011502874,0.013469495,0.000007165646,0.000009743868,0.9533183,0.022484984,0.00011512613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023029505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006411242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29175663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013089746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000758956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9584485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591496887","doi":"10.1353/hms.2001.a383326","title":"General Rules and the Justification of Probable Belief in Hume's Treatise","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Superstition; Skepticism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Dilemma; Value (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09999874871150895,"score_gpt":0.2984662607870991,"score_spread":0.19846751207559016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591496887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81760544,0.0135849165,0.0000027835229,0.009392188,0.00014664966,0.00026826968,0.000013044373,0.00002448439,0.15896222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937926,0.0033038533,0.000021561907,0.00016919248,0.00021258621,0.000039103674,0.0000028226882,0.0000055757937,0.0024527041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946177,0.000061050894,0.00017924185,0.00010827599,0.00008904579,0.000100603975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957293,0.00016473561,0.00005864079,0.000108444874,0.000082644394,0.000012604649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032783928,0.00007726108,0.00018876613,0.00003867328,0.00023323316,0.000027545555,0.000063693406,0.00002134759,0.000053342912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000867891,0.000044744476,0.000029521552,0.000022830573,0.0011517773,0.000061714796,0.000049400147,0.00008795662,0.0000070360225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045218923,0.000037371257,0.0002106389,0.000036060126,0.00004056,0.0000013882656,0.025444794,0.000003154348,0.000017031383,0.97271645,0.00012220985,0.0013251272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064575864,0.00003590868,0.0012709221,0.00004756245,0.0000327014,0.0000010627398,0.0028944032,0.000037266796,0.000023299723,0.98091525,0.014023066,0.00007282386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000132725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014735376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17618716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008933967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007919491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42437714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595989314","doi":"","title":"A Treatise of Human Nature (review)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08353029943913882,"score_gpt":0.35278998183073274,"score_spread":0.2692596823915939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595989314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03870358,0.1959815,3.109702e-8,0.0032456354,0.00011605509,0.00012465341,0.00003183226,0.00004411665,0.7617526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578293,0.02940536,0.000003492688,0.001749836,0.00033712335,0.000016008533,0.000004556026,0.00000925871,0.010645065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940467,0.00003750281,0.00019366929,0.000119780685,0.00013372679,0.000110623114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995874,0.00007345598,0.000047051308,0.00015710815,0.000111575144,0.000023376228],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015115045,0.00010400038,0.00029330447,0.000024616495,0.00023889533,0.000007804558,0.00010020374,0.00003975167,0.006448559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004268679,0.00007230699,0.00009680296,0.000021121905,0.0005677411,0.00004678292,0.000027182887,0.00021514742,0.00008763197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054591324,0.000048830763,0.0000044263566,0.00037317254,0.00011481197,0.000003613572,0.007158101,7.1411506e-8,0.000012559981,0.9813882,0.0068662735,0.004024466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017435582,0.00011319484,0.00006529664,0.0007543023,0.000076341305,7.6029175e-7,0.00053459825,3.6502766e-7,0.000039752005,0.6912471,0.30686778,0.0001261538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018628145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011149314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91912574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000069663356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064558717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600489943","doi":"","title":"Rightness, Blameworthiness, and the Doctrine of Double Effect","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Doctrine; Calculus (dental); Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017611511971388442,"score_gpt":0.23774106310291113,"score_spread":0.2201295511315227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600489943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6261191,0.0022510504,0.0000064670103,0.004452461,0.0016534411,0.00027004947,0.000008307757,0.000041210693,0.36519793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798316,0.00004689231,0.000003657967,0.00019975129,0.0012134598,0.000012372641,0.0000032804382,0.000007396113,0.0005300391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948025,0.000059271948,0.00013791429,0.000070087364,0.00011708207,0.0001354032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929714,0.0003893659,0.00006663492,0.00016364997,0.000042092695,0.000041084935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000903863,0.000082869716,0.00017963085,0.000019272493,0.00015073427,0.000031187283,0.00009334105,0.00004168386,0.00052330305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040767587,0.00004073628,0.00005184099,0.000020767699,0.00076077133,0.00012239716,0.0000523711,0.00017371592,0.000025909467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019297661,0.000022333505,0.00019658593,0.000034262,0.000028366067,3.6325224e-7,0.0034249974,8.126346e-8,0.000013936776,0.99574053,0.00009671555,0.00024884814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017890291,0.000033781766,0.00022269749,0.00001771562,0.000048470432,0.0000019946776,0.0000392118,0.000007297819,0.00037570874,0.8874271,0.10995671,0.00008028541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021650147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038126633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37186408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000027225487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007318669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57298017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608072351","doi":"","title":"Hume's Reasons","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Epistemology; Sympathy; Philosophy; Prudence; Action (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Morality; Reading (process); Humanity; Virtue; Infallibility; Function (biology); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.17393156714174499,"score_gpt":0.3486896907835262,"score_spread":0.1747581236417812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608072351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027488062,0.0039910567,0.000012328109,0.004846598,0.0008692461,0.00007799029,0.000011836569,0.0001380616,0.9625648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99083704,0.0002267109,0.000023691928,0.0012474157,0.0014400646,0.0000057369375,0.0000020528423,0.000013276769,0.0062040235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924964,0.00002152745,0.00016854254,0.0001523303,0.00016130146,0.00024666902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993212,0.0002756884,0.0000435821,0.0001550586,0.00015173909,0.000052701045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059910276,0.00011386631,0.00017477498,0.00005234281,0.0005560199,0.00004380308,0.00010449207,0.000033994067,0.0005617579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018304818,0.00008575495,0.00007416937,0.000023703557,0.00075639295,0.00007433117,0.00008719392,0.00019098575,0.00027867852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001121509,0.000028967996,0.000023020459,0.000017519973,0.00008905462,0.000013733213,0.018191814,8.356858e-8,0.00001535282,0.97812456,0.0024845118,0.0010001844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009762159,0.00003763432,0.00013025514,0.000023291983,0.000016894273,9.937887e-7,0.006809932,3.3517603e-7,0.000037684313,0.63379896,0.35894173,0.000104660954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027959835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006925415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018834437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000097792845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6150855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608290063","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511806544.010","title":"CORRELATION AND CAUSE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Correlation; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.07448532463404871,"score_gpt":0.21887599599343768,"score_spread":0.144390671359389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608290063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000056174147,0.00015722527,0.00008565972,0.000040345396,0.00031241565,0.00015122301,0.00018661686,0.00008084301,0.9989295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019217331,0.000101947284,0.00000478456,0.0001891076,0.00042535865,1.15718436e-7,0.00003800891,0.000029319386,0.979994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929154,0.000016234288,0.00011922228,0.00026226672,0.00016302288,0.00014769704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931586,0.00010892607,0.00011775899,0.00021086907,0.00012858205,0.00011801596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012313914,0.00021019031,0.00021060416,0.00013083122,0.00030363668,0.00006381419,0.00013579513,0.00027879234,0.000036193993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006842332,0.00023073636,0.000086570144,0.00000104524,0.0007218936,0.00006917155,0.00015129593,0.0005663607,0.00002132987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000482971,0.000003877462,1.5688043e-7,0.000039785675,0.00007687608,0.00013280283,0.00048340115,2.4486255e-7,7.2776305e-7,0.9971621,0.0013802365,0.00067147706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024286457,0.000034474677,0.0000015408463,0.000092190305,0.00015274128,0.0000052519704,0.00004838671,0.000036671863,0.0000029368562,0.012313311,0.9868,0.00026963605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010941384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024197507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98541975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052057585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003213669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9409156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608777084","doi":"10.1353/hms.2002.a385864","title":"Hume's Associations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Association (psychology)","score_opus":0.37133747909547465,"score_gpt":0.322711400052668,"score_spread":0.048626079042806636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608777084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007571781,0.00475385,0.0000014598077,0.019281065,0.0006865195,0.000070169,0.0000430402,0.000134562,0.96745753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98107225,0.0004804264,0.0000079912015,0.0017091079,0.0009579135,0.00001490543,0.0000025482075,0.000009743146,0.015745128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994113,0.0000334855,0.00013752018,0.00011686499,0.00014340071,0.00015747189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994908,0.00018020626,0.00004758537,0.00011183739,0.00014086175,0.000028730008],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014716417,0.00008829887,0.00015644303,0.000035769408,0.00069036003,0.000060429487,0.00008226811,0.000027969605,0.0025035809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002024915,0.00006988179,0.00007041732,0.000021183383,0.0003867016,0.000087479995,0.00005636378,0.00015210155,0.0007812442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.590662e-7,0.00003941188,0.000019018387,0.0000074484715,0.000111511414,0.0000021398073,0.028922712,3.1643305e-7,0.0000031597037,0.9584706,0.012041072,0.0003820659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097655444,0.000026550832,0.00006603605,0.000010613349,0.000022066768,2.201837e-7,0.0016453917,0.000011219618,0.000004909462,0.6623163,0.33570144,0.000097574186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011791041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001745921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97350043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022927403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028643674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1675966506","doi":"10.1353/hms.2004.a383301","title":"Stability and Justification in Hume's Treatise , Another Look-A Response to Erin Kelly, Frederick Schmitt, and Michael Williams","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Philosophy; Epistemology; Normative; Computer science","score_opus":0.09897934583329224,"score_gpt":0.29838419708361635,"score_spread":0.19940485125032412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1675966506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817081,0.003768393,0.000012986491,0.009118431,0.00010385436,0.00027653994,0.00003390813,0.00004228876,0.004935466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978668,0.00054423604,0.00008302711,0.00062442775,0.00011906319,0.0000455641,0.0000018518049,0.000016670887,0.0006983351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900705,0.00010866938,0.0002338556,0.00033256217,0.00012473976,0.00019314545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935824,0.00024071547,0.000047756075,0.00020040988,0.00009362851,0.000059241353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057609286,0.00016957511,0.00026226733,0.00008815059,0.00032042156,0.0000786001,0.0000669961,0.00005061088,0.00008289645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026752267,0.000139213,0.000027181422,0.000047572543,0.0008713631,0.000119890596,0.00010849641,0.00015022994,0.000019310583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007984764,0.00022756617,0.0010046741,0.00017870165,0.00009099802,0.000016871652,0.18239143,0.000008222378,0.0037666296,0.8088638,0.000115434115,0.0025371865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019746495,0.0005797967,0.025621332,0.00028668845,0.00006405698,0.000004050715,0.030272668,0.000010662685,0.0011186057,0.895139,0.044303544,0.0006249673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025606327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028009908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15211877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056653458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024649426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5676941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W173673326","doi":"10.7202/1044605ar","title":"Friendship and the Grounds of Reasons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Pride; Morality; Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Deliberation; Moral disengagement; Focus (optics); Psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.029258444213817965,"score_gpt":0.24221632843926663,"score_spread":0.21295788422544867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W173673326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15603648,0.00040105506,0.00013612416,0.010802174,0.00017065498,0.00009172467,0.000014730218,0.00003565702,0.8323114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965468,0.0000990495,0.000053520114,0.0025153616,0.00054759294,0.000007273956,0.0000014901062,0.000010464322,0.00021842611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993963,0.00014616987,0.00012563753,0.00010273993,0.00008897863,0.00014016278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993156,0.00031901282,0.000057216082,0.00016138595,0.00010062076,0.00004616556],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077478157,0.00007654376,0.00012654612,0.000026206426,0.00028380475,0.000057630168,0.00013737926,0.00009315303,0.00027786221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017339324,0.00004699843,0.000051323746,0.000020401094,0.0030021735,0.000048766367,0.000051290124,0.00029083068,0.000010856096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085018546,0.000010576998,0.000032499553,0.0000158097,0.0000224647,0.0000012414426,0.01608113,1.2728049e-7,0.0000323819,0.9830715,0.00006151265,0.00058572646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003193967,0.00006141793,0.00008344066,0.000025366042,0.00001608023,0.0000045051856,0.0012888212,0.00006508177,0.00014187678,0.96691054,0.031017931,0.00006556373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047145362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004445928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84051037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010310245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022255943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W173975210","doi":"","title":"Concerning that reason in Hume's philosophy that is neither deductive nor inductive","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diálogos (Río Piedras)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy; Inductive reasoning","score_opus":0.14980089397403745,"score_gpt":0.2844017036433769,"score_spread":0.13460080966933946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W173975210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53605247,0.0014018064,0.00002591976,0.0057779173,0.0014737183,0.00042497017,0.000121410114,0.00012531682,0.4545965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99248356,0.00007603934,0.000036357684,0.0036941725,0.0026655002,0.00007474954,0.000023647835,0.00007448545,0.0008714908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978695,0.0001970474,0.00029602277,0.00047384726,0.00043540864,0.00072819006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987401,0.0002945682,0.00021974323,0.0004085014,0.00011813127,0.00021897265],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005715791,0.00039652165,0.00047348576,0.00019672817,0.00038126952,0.00013599618,0.0003439549,0.00023931086,0.002498265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009393524,0.0003362525,0.00017818408,0.00009160128,0.00083548244,0.00091755344,0.0001723085,0.00094387523,0.0004954122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007978344,0.00023817083,0.007886146,0.000028733313,0.00011839682,0.00000834995,0.07127871,0.0000012802702,0.000107474196,0.91832954,0.00026499268,0.001658433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009895663,0.00012218619,0.006005687,0.00020369279,0.00008353919,0.0000075064513,0.008639581,0.000026101674,0.0016579343,0.8968738,0.08458768,0.00080275617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044046686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014441281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45643112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001333125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005195997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1739769016","doi":"","title":"The Perplexing Choice in Existence Predicament: An Existential Interpretation of Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clockwork; Libertarianism; Existentialism; Contradiction; Interpretation (philosophy); Compatibilism; Freedom of choice; Epistemology; Philosophy; Orange (colour); Sociology; Free will; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07913989755574924,"score_gpt":0.328827207159178,"score_spread":0.24968730960342878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1739769016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86883914,0.06041438,0.0000035909652,0.00034132248,0.0006236513,0.00022305775,0.000034803063,0.000023117916,0.06949692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987463,0.00051808107,0.00002919323,0.00019789302,0.00027158798,0.000023727704,0.000005992092,0.0000067867913,0.00020045167],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925905,0.00011415099,0.00022612569,0.00015554031,0.00010400717,0.00014113044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950594,0.00020006389,0.00006738292,0.00014183912,0.000060831706,0.00002393953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043055014,0.000099622586,0.00016810794,0.00006406901,0.0001401018,0.00005531393,0.00012325765,0.000047657508,0.000029665525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015095616,0.000061808554,0.00003221532,0.0000623686,0.00056922145,0.00017560818,0.000071101786,0.0002725806,4.150533e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000853535,0.000042230207,0.00021562516,0.00008557573,0.000021788088,0.0000168297,0.5669078,1.2003582e-7,0.000014728089,0.4304655,0.000008852069,0.0021356025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013357726,0.0006008336,0.0036537063,0.0034936806,0.00005826993,0.000008654178,0.23937151,0.00031123988,0.000083053186,0.74147695,0.009132857,0.00047345602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016911725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023953877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3275363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010868088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000067616793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.252048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1747226846","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626.011","title":"Inappropriate passion","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06486635096977045,"score_gpt":0.1962653257182707,"score_spread":0.13139897474850026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1747226846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025849971,0.000086126354,0.00002529647,0.000073506875,0.00056085567,0.00020027981,0.00026679775,0.000154359,0.9986069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020404568,0.00013696609,0.0000050076583,0.00023515307,0.0006469648,4.9131353e-7,0.00004053512,0.000054190514,0.9784761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989556,0.00003713809,0.00016400746,0.00038998533,0.00021823862,0.00023503829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989346,0.000049647148,0.0001941494,0.00045041143,0.0002056677,0.00016551821],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012537772,0.00032857506,0.00033549702,0.00013540438,0.00038170445,0.00006539651,0.0004403025,0.0003729588,0.00018149386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000069283105,0.00032561613,0.00024724146,0.0000012985254,0.00079371396,0.00008244458,0.00036264956,0.00081718597,0.00012213874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009227421,0.00001161793,1.9777467e-8,0.0000637045,0.00010170699,0.00014236658,0.0007346584,3.1431192e-8,0.0000023866203,0.9918533,0.005781964,0.0012159687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021982749,0.00005885177,3.2482635e-7,0.00015493696,0.000108479864,0.0000020257814,0.000029273207,0.0000026227726,0.000032155906,0.07269484,0.9263135,0.00038315452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019906032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000071043837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9205316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005367712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068399524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1762560894","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2012.981033","title":"The self and the passions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Sympathy; Philosophy; Centrality; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Presentation (obstetrics); General interest; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03286595753880151,"score_gpt":0.2168803877898635,"score_spread":0.18401443025106198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1762560894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025219973,0.016198015,0.0000055343626,0.38658375,0.0035480193,0.00017312997,0.000031681917,0.000011919525,0.568228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932677,0.00011705492,0.0000060924417,0.0024921466,0.003974538,0.000001853971,2.4000326e-7,0.000009303038,0.0001310562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992643,0.00012798357,0.00020748485,0.000038707887,0.00012476047,0.00023676384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986939,0.00045985336,0.000122032194,0.0001268737,0.00012905065,0.00046829827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010923,0.000077693374,0.00011797623,0.000057935675,0.001287706,0.00017300271,0.00023496455,0.000034089655,0.00017303266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017750527,0.000034442935,0.00009437096,0.000023955547,0.001202896,0.00015874072,0.0000147637065,0.00041973146,0.000019060413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011448655,0.0000053130457,0.00003760062,0.0000027406054,0.000042446205,0.0000039171514,0.008322594,1.4325525e-7,4.642827e-7,0.9902688,0.0008590973,0.00044543578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020015436,0.000016521593,0.000063973326,0.000012943197,0.00002256834,0.000023858152,0.00027282588,0.0000024202952,9.329465e-7,0.63007855,0.3692692,0.000036040983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039673972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033979847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96804774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023986735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002303137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99041235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767128526","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00344.x","title":"Fichte's Voluntarism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntarism (philosophy); Ambiguity; Normative; Philosophy; Epistemology; Reading (process); Virtue; Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04099479778610383,"score_gpt":0.22951792431733367,"score_spread":0.18852312653122985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767128526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015453571,0.00054129295,0.0001362831,0.028548645,0.00095066323,0.000040939936,0.0000072008447,0.000033176897,0.95428824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874443,0.000024444229,0.00017441365,0.0050190943,0.0069721634,6.991835e-8,0.0000013531135,0.000021840438,0.00034235348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986463,0.00025667055,0.00050027965,0.00011056556,0.0003136759,0.00017249299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990236,0.000059357768,0.00032533455,0.00017987503,0.00024995647,0.0001618732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010366231,0.00014591418,0.00022366042,0.00014747503,0.00018590335,0.0001188502,0.00040075602,0.000019785688,0.00080574176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008546874,0.0001113829,0.00022350322,0.000034081808,0.00020718969,0.000247764,0.000028347886,0.0006091106,0.00030947197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005736501,0.00010787889,0.000002127221,0.0000050852605,0.000032658823,0.00031760897,0.003502858,0.000004364706,0.00012221905,0.9894672,0.0016930344,0.0046876217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040540437,0.00066672865,0.00014127199,0.00006448268,0.000024597315,0.000039754384,0.000051856685,0.000004125012,0.000022594484,0.8020795,0.1963783,0.00012138686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000010474278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.2876217e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9719907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017006763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027067194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88223076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17855908","doi":"","title":"Camp: Kant’s Unwritten Fourth Critique","year":2015,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08633607704869124,"score_gpt":0.2899698820821767,"score_spread":0.2036338050334855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17855908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002742862,0.00562541,0.00023301125,0.05616128,0.0034595977,0.00022715905,0.00015349961,0.00018412719,0.9312131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551985,0.00045434892,0.00008770106,0.011185887,0.0069524962,0.000012972553,0.00003863304,0.00005485613,0.02601455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979588,0.00022637946,0.000423636,0.0003959451,0.00047135926,0.00052387535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815476,0.00024672278,0.00008680706,0.00045489907,0.0005005559,0.0005562643],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009989362,0.0003201002,0.00038480296,0.000104921426,0.00036617683,0.00050419965,0.00036467784,0.0002811688,0.005713996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002801387,0.00026037561,0.00018761723,0.00004824925,0.0007578185,0.00024274687,0.0001865031,0.00078964286,0.0061577465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004786677,0.00017754175,0.000008876147,0.000050227743,0.00011588646,0.000071545284,0.008931043,0.0000030688834,0.000003805098,0.9671007,0.023011861,0.00047757436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036378216,0.0001433997,0.0000030711549,0.000047328525,0.00005476372,0.000002467982,0.0016469294,0.00017895307,0.000018227654,0.53464955,0.46264738,0.00024413418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008591152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005385675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9524557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006152321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003054213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815329976","doi":"10.1353/hms.2002.a385863","title":"The Myth of Original Existence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Passion; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Originality; Content (measure theory); Mythology; Praise; Literature; Psychology; Theology; Art; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2634793238844786,"score_gpt":0.3141646408873018,"score_spread":0.050685317002823194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1815329976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008852207,0.022593923,9.774586e-7,0.021602752,0.00087475224,0.00007280562,0.000012727344,0.00003849133,0.94595134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98479724,0.0027240468,0.0000071365293,0.0007215267,0.00056399364,0.000008387777,1.8403459e-7,0.0000050323624,0.011172437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995182,0.00002728901,0.00013170137,0.000077162615,0.00013195808,0.000113689806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994038,0.00027254905,0.000051915024,0.00012900861,0.00012725394,0.000015522312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018460464,0.00006336323,0.00011307082,0.000012963544,0.00055745477,0.000028109644,0.000118388125,0.000011961834,0.0003844482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010602728,0.000034349014,0.000048091235,0.000014862558,0.0013052291,0.00003973205,0.00004975909,0.0001024287,0.00009774877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035456785,0.000015842385,0.0000020259984,0.000016361288,0.000054274067,0.0000013822602,0.014109831,1.2157442e-7,0.0000020343646,0.9792303,0.0054485933,0.0011157114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041182073,0.00003304112,0.000002305295,0.000017186696,0.0000075754388,3.297755e-7,0.0023198228,0.0000049027203,0.00000915918,0.4668126,0.5307181,0.00003375665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008587265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043376553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97594506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000061229157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033169072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48091713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819644612","doi":"10.1353/hms.2000.a385729","title":"Reply to My Critics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Scholarship; Section (typography); Reflexive pronoun; Point (geometry); Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.1351547742627148,"score_gpt":0.328928064686276,"score_spread":0.1937732904235612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1819644612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03672482,0.0018837104,0.0000013647632,0.039689902,0.00042672205,0.000099268625,0.00002263537,0.00011854632,0.921033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94960326,0.0003106088,0.000030483363,0.02455859,0.0011325675,0.000018846997,0.000001222164,0.000012852362,0.02433154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993604,0.000025342842,0.00014507402,0.00015849154,0.00013210156,0.00017862247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951565,0.00012048994,0.000012061493,0.00017103787,0.00012553857,0.000055219112],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016457123,0.00009768937,0.00016048377,0.000030886295,0.0004276885,0.00005955433,0.00009935165,0.000017148886,0.0036853151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012339908,0.00007664816,0.000052012223,0.000020548476,0.00037814202,0.000057247846,0.000047685393,0.00012189411,0.0012324285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011103213,0.00002523422,0.0000019793308,0.000017907782,0.000049717157,0.0000071561676,0.033649333,0.0000014390697,0.0000030954157,0.9492792,0.014132929,0.0028208978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004762216,0.00004586716,0.000009883054,0.000019199679,0.000008911198,4.2826625e-7,0.0015282966,8.392904e-7,0.000010037983,0.44173986,0.556517,0.000072029165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037598325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007329055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91287845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012277013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008386273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819940597","doi":"10.1353/hms.2003.a383342","title":"Hume, Sympathy, and the Theater","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Sympathy; Drama; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.09206531771515926,"score_gpt":0.27617453311829737,"score_spread":0.18410921540313813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1819940597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05336891,0.015972741,0.000001641237,0.011440986,0.0005988909,0.00016588876,0.000007470183,0.000052479227,0.918391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934689,0.0009624037,0.0000038075345,0.0018791546,0.00027972812,0.00002376347,3.4112145e-7,0.000008683687,0.0033732303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941117,0.000114320675,0.00011658819,0.00011976339,0.00009916605,0.00013898169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994393,0.0003066895,0.000028190492,0.00013301856,0.00007095286,0.00002183807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050970115,0.000100594334,0.00017581023,0.000018465023,0.0006731102,0.000079092046,0.000065134154,0.000020676518,0.00025957415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014447367,0.00004869232,0.000049864197,0.000011215346,0.0018490064,0.000050829673,0.00005679747,0.00014232285,0.000053807416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001128184,0.00000978707,0.000011583309,0.000013611551,0.00008750439,0.0000016547683,0.036369346,9.814139e-8,0.0000020283417,0.9629065,0.0004536185,0.00013298658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037047683,0.000020268484,0.000016254415,0.00001334781,0.000025388637,0.0000015526746,0.0062319273,0.000001325044,0.00001662612,0.8179806,0.17525294,0.00006929113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013986201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006933355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94009995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005021655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000062224403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6812741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1831300186","doi":"10.5840/symposium201216230","title":"Negative States of Affairs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.028522821927579038,"score_gpt":0.24327263380421688,"score_spread":0.21474981187663783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1831300186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043268055,0.00017381879,0.00000949227,0.0028436459,0.0006161845,0.00006653181,0.000046397035,0.00003405593,0.95294183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799705,0.00002387122,0.000016365933,0.0001865579,0.00057966623,0.0000044377384,0.0000051724287,0.000009162996,0.0011777456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952936,0.00003424636,0.00011539503,0.000058676866,0.00010447597,0.0001578242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959403,0.00012988748,0.000049829363,0.0001017899,0.00006525671,0.000059225717],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018355012,0.00006441919,0.00010004426,0.000030263127,0.00007564504,0.000016209991,0.0000749925,0.000027770713,0.001217028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017602408,0.000049376726,0.000048218706,0.000014063882,0.00032155792,0.0001433922,0.000031014366,0.00009826592,0.000119833996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010361818,0.00005863689,0.00003658326,0.000018817547,0.00001813019,2.0554948e-7,0.03399834,0.0000014644926,0.0004789423,0.96511847,0.00021315903,0.000046864112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015147447,0.00006714564,0.00004057555,0.000019734649,0.000016579588,4.787722e-7,0.004386918,0.0000156273,0.004977671,0.9289935,0.06121909,0.00011120677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064802065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018644096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95472896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000072937855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010767386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1839595386","doi":"","title":"An Ethics of Philosophic Work","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Relevance (law); Meta-ethics; Applied ethics; Sociology; Western philosophy; Eudaimonia; Philosophy; Information ethics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.037896719554766985,"score_gpt":0.25709876807729165,"score_spread":0.21920204852252467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1839595386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98234445,0.000347804,0.0022061383,0.0034904329,0.0010687718,0.00007364522,0.000041203108,0.000011528412,0.01041604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976836,0.00024986983,0.00007556394,0.00008499809,0.0017074619,1.6052127e-8,0.000008129789,0.000010182999,0.00018020702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794835,0.0006639041,0.00046049617,0.00009120095,0.0006138159,0.00022223793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971192,0.00073240965,0.0010003401,0.0003644696,0.000625989,0.00015761552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00344457,0.00015165479,0.0006087312,0.0003688207,0.00037478973,0.000022574093,0.0007949986,0.00014489671,0.0008522264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113653914,0.000111346395,0.0005311012,0.0003289453,0.0010540084,0.00039737808,0.000082347244,0.00082214735,0.0000080424115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002404491,0.0006620233,0.004336388,0.00006268157,0.0044250786,0.000012740856,0.068100266,0.0031805483,0.0004887931,0.91580737,0.000063257656,0.00045637833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049776696,0.0016065539,0.01706854,0.00027580923,0.02569303,0.000043530723,0.026391419,0.0029077332,0.000037702106,0.90405947,0.015934,0.0010045222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011394428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002203354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04170885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006914383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117973825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9331281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1842393620","doi":"10.1353/hms.2000.a385725","title":"Substantive Differences between Two Texts of Hume's Treatise","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical edition; Philosophy; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Focus (optics); Classics; History; Physics; Economics","score_opus":0.15926734140606513,"score_gpt":0.33323541181768424,"score_spread":0.1739680704116191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1842393620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74170375,0.0030678727,6.0620226e-7,0.0006970798,0.00009219794,0.0000866696,0.000092558126,0.00004084288,0.2542184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939438,0.0008791881,0.000007002349,0.00009004085,0.000566564,0.0000118637945,0.0000047880553,0.000011565775,0.0044851913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990902,0.00007116644,0.00026182918,0.00018642502,0.00019924348,0.00019115659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922013,0.0003768088,0.00007601878,0.00015232372,0.00013503885,0.000039678274],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015725089,0.00016119474,0.00041892548,0.000051525785,0.00035424103,0.000033255426,0.00014215743,0.000031247786,0.0023932245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040022227,0.00011252506,0.000097035925,0.000034482367,0.0013210032,0.000094778945,0.000041852705,0.000114594506,0.000102103215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026774054,0.00007168775,0.0011108384,0.00004211104,0.00034793455,0.0000045580573,0.04887455,2.8081493e-7,0.000008258045,0.9262239,0.00015774743,0.02313141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047803766,0.00018108771,0.006667284,0.00011680923,0.000108652624,2.5547803e-7,0.0034708814,0.0000016174527,0.00013705954,0.9731625,0.015469204,0.000206665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010387837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004069153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25224003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010949037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012661995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893414730","doi":"10.29173/pandpr23422","title":"Forgotten Romantic and Enlightenment Connections: A personal approach to Mollenhauer’s seminal works","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phenomenology & Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Romance; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.031350570094421666,"score_gpt":0.2552294936601884,"score_spread":0.22387892356576672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893414730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07513211,0.0011947312,0.0023566787,0.07544046,0.0005319175,0.0004233486,0.000012006854,0.0001335616,0.8447752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98664343,0.00014332763,0.0012995071,0.010100145,0.000784533,0.00010203683,0.000008207999,0.000024678457,0.0008941278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858683,0.00024465064,0.00022802805,0.00041334945,0.00018814357,0.00033901466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844074,0.0009539647,0.00011570919,0.00021229195,0.00012011998,0.00015718599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008633966,0.00018818116,0.0002505533,0.000120853445,0.00056067173,0.00017513192,0.00015772658,0.000108714514,0.00032143254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058773166,0.00016504871,0.000045064557,0.000048928374,0.0003889744,0.00036099277,0.00013787778,0.000505772,0.00018147692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014659006,0.00027400834,0.0000079097845,0.000021700265,0.00012359243,0.0000041131784,0.02612241,0.0000030854471,0.00003999032,0.96924865,0.00027147832,0.0037364906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060996145,0.0005278937,0.000043149106,0.000032386975,0.00018334755,0.0001328976,0.015934626,0.0008952404,0.000007177168,0.41233853,0.5689633,0.0003315428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000097774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002623463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9115113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004301134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030171066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6730491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189468606","doi":"10.1023/a:1019993002329","title":"Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.09520054357920177,"score_gpt":0.24600124407950533,"score_spread":0.15080070050030356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189468606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48350647,0.00017251876,0.00004520866,0.020176997,0.0005034186,0.00030505875,0.000021260581,0.000073418945,0.49519563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977205,0.000051726678,0.000008730316,0.0015667335,0.0001559704,0.000013681746,0.000003862702,0.000008845352,0.00046994057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999503,0.000049519804,0.00012298916,0.00007507581,0.00017884871,0.00007053552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996023,0.00015053067,0.000071987386,0.00012071433,0.00003884673,0.000015573904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015172176,0.000057717374,0.00006509842,0.000025237892,0.00010656811,0.0000321661,0.000074658754,0.000014142112,0.0019467537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017010836,0.000035970475,0.000051526546,0.00002200046,0.00012567558,0.000072357405,0.000010274181,0.00008417468,0.00014412601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043456557,0.000084544714,0.0000029258422,0.000004838708,0.000023314904,2.020325e-7,0.006648478,0.0000058340497,0.00022564692,0.9904896,0.0006050958,0.0019051566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018424814,0.00013156734,0.00005201002,0.000017579534,0.00002526438,1.1746333e-7,0.00071069464,0.000411196,0.0056202426,0.9507328,0.04204168,0.00007259302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022892458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009687218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51421404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011304251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019951544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1906870716","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v3i9.65","title":"Davidson on Practical Knowledge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Generality; Epistemology; Confusion; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Neglect; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.3285005292270333,"score_gpt":0.36358061654876184,"score_spread":0.035080087321728515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1906870716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005731725,0.002225921,0.00031165406,0.06824773,0.009353341,0.00022497581,0.000024336767,0.000034537465,0.9190043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97079474,0.0000330119,0.000060482824,0.0022568246,0.006223018,0.000007943816,0.0000024426574,0.00003579894,0.020585729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852794,0.00012909115,0.00046235186,0.00017319665,0.00046760865,0.00023980602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725735,0.00130064,0.00023779488,0.00029102282,0.00058434653,0.00032883388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016277214,0.00017669937,0.00032883367,0.00014319463,0.00029001103,0.00004641108,0.00033903297,0.00009361463,0.00039690055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011248394,0.00010705236,0.0004043762,0.00003352516,0.001278287,0.00017381889,0.000045819394,0.00082856236,0.00017020576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050413015,0.00033438677,5.122425e-7,0.000021553264,0.00010878488,0.0000073669253,0.003355257,0.000012876961,0.0000023414989,0.8652065,0.13018137,0.0002649536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044795944,0.00050186657,7.331143e-7,0.00002722355,0.00009275178,0.000011912081,0.00010311703,0.00078521564,0.0000012031273,0.5025919,0.49535772,0.00007837139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000051389848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053360204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004387415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044610616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47099018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1928179361","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9205.2011.01440.x","title":"Morality and Religion: Some Questions about First Principles","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conventionalism; Morality; Obligation; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Philosophy; Rationality; Moral obligation; Nihilism; Naturalism; Morality and religion; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.20702897837618375,"score_gpt":0.274629282201171,"score_spread":0.06760030382498725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1928179361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14143911,0.0013607016,0.00005849308,0.38281783,0.0008394606,0.00060085027,0.00026729307,0.0007365234,0.47187972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99285764,0.0002021006,0.00056215754,0.0047284043,0.0012850772,0.00008510826,0.000028894634,0.000028672957,0.000221936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855137,0.0001039281,0.0004366479,0.00038825744,0.00024135108,0.00027843492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869794,0.00021547252,0.000112568145,0.00039726205,0.0001681915,0.00040854892],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034001953,0.00022629838,0.00023962655,0.00011442224,0.0010569703,0.00013229146,0.00023221465,0.00014940799,0.000543316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046200943,0.0002000656,0.00009587485,0.00007509912,0.0029248442,0.0004584194,0.00014764362,0.0005445258,0.00017416467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007665311,0.000121343626,0.00021822458,0.000037794995,0.000027635933,0.000005983024,0.004071313,0.0000040629757,0.0000075091966,0.9953792,0.0000936395,0.000025645633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016734932,0.000065772394,0.0018178435,0.00008055284,0.000046656747,0.0000061489495,0.000036826037,0.0002820674,0.000023472125,0.9552171,0.042001996,0.00025417475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004343301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036350128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85141855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002529921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064383916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933609258","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12066","title":"Interspecies Politics: Reply to <scp>H</scp>inchcliffe and <scp>L</scp>adwig","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Citation; Politics; Political philosophy; Classics; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.07353927644882724,"score_gpt":0.2858447446771747,"score_spread":0.21230546822834745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933609258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25054216,0.0010467141,0.00008842915,0.0629851,0.0020380807,0.00022339921,0.00015119265,0.00007902023,0.6828459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593198,0.000025676476,0.00018837203,0.02643938,0.012051713,0.0000046923587,0.0000037067377,0.00006386471,0.0019028104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637514,0.00024090674,0.0010765204,0.00037016746,0.00095143064,0.000985816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99331754,0.0025117006,0.00034617004,0.00040832208,0.0011615187,0.0022547175],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011697242,0.00041612674,0.00078147,0.000491792,0.00028487368,0.00041214802,0.0005753876,0.0001908295,0.000058446505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00871055,0.00033074865,0.00034321824,0.000098614924,0.0013693045,0.00048097523,0.00032333986,0.0011909717,0.0002265894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014146796,0.00021687179,0.00004978171,0.000067670066,0.00012622048,0.00011176893,0.011230019,0.0000015020469,0.000032087697,0.971571,0.016547268,0.000031606232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006224909,0.00086450233,0.00008003615,0.00014424558,0.0000751888,0.00011815684,0.004981322,0.000008395839,0.00012008779,0.7123353,0.28057674,0.00007356043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008937213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000084154735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7087776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021073344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002388766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940126738","doi":"10.5840/symposium20151913","title":"After Contingency: Toward the Principle of Sufficient Reason as Post Factum","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04334366647069509,"score_gpt":0.2657192018887196,"score_spread":0.22237553541802452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940126738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.693253,0.0003469188,0.0000053767594,0.016925154,0.00079096266,0.00017358622,0.000050800212,0.000037280148,0.28841692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966565,0.000010733153,0.0000037196166,0.0010444776,0.00040796067,0.000016772528,0.000006640263,0.00001424981,0.0018389627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991068,0.00007155997,0.00020371412,0.0001470565,0.00028648655,0.00018438243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991782,0.00007768432,0.00008576419,0.00026458479,0.00030431864,0.000089472036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049359404,0.00010875583,0.00014290606,0.00003103316,0.0000903125,0.000068113644,0.00021348525,0.000051508585,0.0005469664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105170955,0.00006546736,0.00008787942,0.000022077724,0.0003784911,0.000068221176,0.000106803935,0.0001890933,0.00020024681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008154372,0.00007563076,0.000054913708,0.000019530307,0.000018871668,0.0000041989847,0.046027046,0.0000033610413,0.0002349952,0.9533534,0.00008961571,0.000036887173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004811224,0.00051577354,0.00034708736,0.0000685658,0.000055468703,0.0000053443096,0.004306331,0.00006857864,0.0020076018,0.40517578,0.58669496,0.00027338357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024236992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000079540434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58660537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019988582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009838865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5988898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964321254","doi":"10.7710/2155-4838.1086","title":"Kant’s Implicit Suggestion of the Negative Formulation of Duty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Proposition; Philosophy; Epistemology; Ideal (ethics); Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Statement (logic); Theology","score_opus":0.06890247021224427,"score_gpt":0.3418587028960369,"score_spread":0.27295623268379265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964321254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9439859,0.00012231572,0.00012909422,0.021153377,0.00020326533,0.00016514376,0.000050369094,0.0000029399139,0.034187637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988059,0.0002790888,0.000023265446,0.000031476815,0.00022270565,0.0000049068904,0.0000016501524,0.000006468189,0.00062457623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848056,0.00021956867,0.00032725598,0.00007341889,0.00077890954,0.00012030021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962476,0.001045162,0.00038228318,0.0000744003,0.0022034652,0.000047080648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005971537,0.00007787161,0.00017660225,0.00021999785,0.00014511809,0.00008952396,0.00025144513,0.000029859228,0.00015314655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041041747,0.000047198435,0.00009369783,0.0000508805,0.0010015375,0.0005965501,0.00009879542,0.00035597602,0.0000013088766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017875573,0.0001136017,0.00039830586,0.000019725045,0.00021548591,0.0000010142338,0.0038959212,0.000007691827,0.0043313466,0.98879296,0.00015662098,0.0018885623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036487708,0.00031020146,0.0041789846,0.0001797482,0.00000945208,0.000008204278,0.0038032976,0.00008440901,0.016148295,0.9745853,0.00028207243,0.00004517659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089260447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013039705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054820005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054870903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011028244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36902067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965356735","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0001","title":"Hume's Theory of Mental Representation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Perception; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy; Content (measure theory); Mental representation; Cognitive science; Psychology; Mathematics; Cognition","score_opus":0.24378739894406293,"score_gpt":0.36214985822898316,"score_spread":0.11836245928492023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965356735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31010133,0.013336013,0.000011037926,0.0019673216,0.0018332185,0.0001961099,0.000041539734,0.00007755601,0.6724359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681556,0.00025818762,0.000011681812,0.00024068318,0.0007529819,0.000011543817,0.0000047155745,0.000008642235,0.001896031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937606,0.000082297774,0.0001650924,0.00008361073,0.00014544345,0.00014749463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994753,0.00021231735,0.000071965726,0.00012109933,0.000089405665,0.00002992903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043819397,0.00008036989,0.00016156943,0.000037645637,0.00023550984,0.000012749284,0.00006620469,0.000021111815,0.0007084018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119911696,0.000059762704,0.00006706825,0.00001724975,0.0006834885,0.00016712741,0.00008165381,0.000086939945,0.000061020437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019552313,0.00005803282,0.00016379512,0.000024533798,0.00012786622,2.6756203e-7,0.08424372,1.0373042e-7,0.00013254715,0.91386706,0.0006212237,0.00074132025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001634691,0.000041752395,0.00040948167,0.00002818663,0.000037273006,6.0469273e-7,0.025062194,7.2593343e-7,0.00075856573,0.94671243,0.026692018,0.000093280105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011597051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015886155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6867142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011436456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047428666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7756503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967744870","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0000","title":"A Conversation between Annette Baier and Anik Waldow about Hume's Account of Sympathy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Conversation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15153771442609573,"score_gpt":0.29189478424777987,"score_spread":0.14035706982168414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967744870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96516114,0.0044955458,0.0000031800746,0.0026856833,0.00024018741,0.00014189002,0.000072313356,0.000045977114,0.027154088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969785,0.0014710724,0.000010261589,0.0004445427,0.0006613718,0.000010488905,0.0000074282084,0.000012483848,0.00040385616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991573,0.00004386402,0.00024119299,0.00017815873,0.00021764498,0.0001618169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924475,0.00021653388,0.00010755326,0.00013417457,0.0002571159,0.00003986879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025417245,0.00013833154,0.00032132707,0.00006336228,0.00041811282,0.00002425179,0.000078197954,0.000050434923,0.00012754847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008893187,0.00010963941,0.00005883461,0.00002538092,0.0013344275,0.00015304178,0.00009157402,0.00016413185,0.00002209998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002748599,0.000048081434,0.0027267172,0.00017461929,0.0004162801,0.000010785387,0.20824805,7.80394e-7,0.000059221977,0.78581107,0.0016180292,0.0008588921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013861179,0.0004927184,0.04704854,0.00025366305,0.00025431396,0.000006486723,0.02538104,0.000026145692,0.0004242336,0.84989196,0.074187234,0.0006475649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000084170686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006028807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.182867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016004318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018957535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49167538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969878553","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0015","title":"The Circumstances of Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Epistemology; Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10374034170500154,"score_gpt":0.3241856297699282,"score_spread":0.22044528806492666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969878553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11062992,0.008086024,0.0000021738163,0.0106304465,0.0039815134,0.000097071585,0.000017886508,0.000049037804,0.8665059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697137,0.00057577447,0.0000063008447,0.00021300094,0.0007868719,0.000007312248,2.3464e-7,0.000004655358,0.0014344534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999569,0.000018711711,0.00012527184,0.000070235124,0.00011520208,0.00010155791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901074,0.00059239793,0.000055951212,0.0001372562,0.00018862341,0.000015007505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032069653,0.00005755877,0.00010475204,0.000012196693,0.0006859277,0.000031934225,0.00013234466,0.000017163336,0.00011491581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033122482,0.0000309748,0.000041428713,0.00001238302,0.0016351817,0.000041152176,0.000049489423,0.00019351355,0.000023453362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052379473,0.000010224611,0.0000046147616,0.000032886495,0.00005353993,4.9940553e-7,0.013255996,7.868107e-8,0.00014232579,0.98509425,0.0005951551,0.00080521725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043511063,0.000018146578,0.00002789936,0.000008732583,0.000028231287,2.192628e-7,0.007376675,0.0000014748583,0.00007350538,0.7529108,0.2394717,0.00003912793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009539023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009292025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88634145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001941994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000108542545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60248953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971274375","doi":"10.1215/00318108-110-2-291","title":"THE NEW DIALECTIC: CONVERSATIONAL CONTEXTS OF ARGUMENT; AD HOMINEM ARGUMENTS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; Citation; Download; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06217263187437377,"score_gpt":0.2968226115447535,"score_spread":0.2346499796703797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971274375","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00087820966,0.07408811,0.00002327447,0.84886473,0.0005306669,0.00071203714,0.000023996277,0.000041659103,0.07483729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91644454,0.068805926,0.0000052309897,0.011911957,0.0010929687,0.000037154135,0.000010894955,0.000021512076,0.001669842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798054,0.00028985523,0.00062039547,0.0002341363,0.0005738171,0.00030126938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751705,0.001303698,0.00027862526,0.0005390453,0.00019891335,0.00016265629],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012256688,0.00022161721,0.00041527674,0.00002606086,0.00057418976,0.000079809564,0.0006495435,0.000060462433,0.0022205142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007316029,0.00011133214,0.0002804722,0.00009689726,0.0010939434,0.00010325578,0.00013120605,0.00048678336,0.00033340388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056407727,0.000069476155,0.0000033961633,0.00012472748,0.000094498784,0.0000031118102,0.00040595589,2.5943893e-7,0.000011508564,0.98830754,0.0010523404,0.009870772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002702664,0.00006455574,0.000020791933,0.00047456747,0.000094438015,0.0000065460563,0.000011903331,0.000008967304,0.000007373557,0.7056258,0.2933129,0.00010190136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027840233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004507956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031195606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116099814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972142719","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0002","title":"A Third Type of Distinction in the Treatise","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Perception; Simple (philosophy); Epistemology; Separable space; Identity (music); Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.3004452348789169,"score_gpt":0.36761578795393657,"score_spread":0.06717055307501968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972142719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46563378,0.00706319,0.0000012293756,0.0025835647,0.0006069672,0.000107009844,0.000008255757,0.000018911105,0.5239771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987718,0.0001742216,0.00000243426,0.00019596015,0.00041941935,0.000008033932,0.0000010954618,0.0000029369817,0.000424112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963915,0.00005205293,0.000097356155,0.000041403557,0.00008230936,0.0000877111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996434,0.00018520856,0.00003209839,0.000079285855,0.00005130189,0.000008705667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033079798,0.00004769995,0.000098186014,0.000021874352,0.00011333168,0.000008361581,0.00005112947,0.000013348367,0.00009757616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012176705,0.00002561374,0.00002525592,0.000023542354,0.00029213933,0.000057780144,0.000023443474,0.000082023646,0.000025573725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010957146,0.000054278895,0.0005741134,0.000019109155,0.000022006907,3.4354264e-7,0.08410592,1.1662039e-7,0.000005238015,0.91452384,0.00035604803,0.00032804813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017722732,0.00010714335,0.0077312547,0.000044628658,0.0000384735,8.6625647e-7,0.022964282,0.0000024854291,0.00001778066,0.89850855,0.07031874,0.000088567074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046967143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025223935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.533138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000064056458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035958014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10763995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972707337","doi":"10.1111/1746-8361.12015","title":"Review of Nuccetelli &amp; Seay (2012)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"dialectica","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Philosophy; Theology; Media studies; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06862924144858859,"score_gpt":0.27576414754595796,"score_spread":0.20713490609736937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972707337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001626665,0.02031076,0.00006313018,0.011244217,0.00047460248,0.0003059242,0.000019038773,0.000057708574,0.965898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742079,0.009922953,0.00011554647,0.010401175,0.00089639175,0.000048033347,0.00001445108,0.000024961835,0.0043686256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993519,0.000048614234,0.000206469,0.00011513272,0.00012868604,0.00014915648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992379,0.00020216624,0.00006453935,0.00022657182,0.00019984084,0.000068969806],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024006015,0.00008311854,0.00019029528,0.000032651915,0.00009656787,0.000037595863,0.00012855326,0.000036585385,0.027918944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025004198,0.00006395241,0.00009194717,0.000032929576,0.0002967551,0.00012333553,0.000033027616,0.00016739576,0.0013590092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018757739,0.000060868362,0.0000019092138,0.00090758654,0.000018148112,1.6954155e-7,0.00074821746,3.728684e-8,0.0001359507,0.9838825,0.012625078,0.0016176875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005021108,0.00002237698,0.000008949409,0.00055959023,0.000016619115,7.076636e-7,0.000009682463,0.0000017473211,0.00003941825,0.39480978,0.60440993,0.00007101823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000110853085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051871462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007362279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028598648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972752880","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2013.787816","title":"Principled Tyranny: Can Korsgaard Explain Evil Action?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.18197146116590412,"score_gpt":0.36255076276636505,"score_spread":0.18057930160046093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972752880","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3186436,0.0030426588,0.000058098987,0.6177628,0.008467838,0.0003094715,0.00006211078,0.00008338839,0.05157006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877961,0.0008640314,0.00007067178,0.0031473234,0.0077500674,0.000018889461,0.0000032877767,0.000021775755,0.00032783003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977661,0.00011921702,0.00076872995,0.00018316656,0.00093548355,0.00022732437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962939,0.0004532468,0.00044714983,0.0001332795,0.0025038882,0.00016855705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005343257,0.0002187508,0.00041967217,0.00022037962,0.00024977024,0.00020528643,0.0006069625,0.00008115641,0.001484726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077939394,0.00015494529,0.00028933003,0.000047234575,0.00065803726,0.0004369044,0.00018700566,0.0006664918,0.00015777774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100864905,0.0001874071,0.00007294034,0.000017830622,0.0010851024,0.000067281435,0.004226661,0.000013469117,0.00019405212,0.98952293,0.0009345933,0.0035768498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006730819,0.00018942382,0.00019506272,0.00012370961,0.000044585413,0.000050930215,0.00116087,0.000024972835,0.000097330274,0.9510594,0.046201654,0.0001789705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004248593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007251417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66915256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015923528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006932448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973273280","doi":"10.7202/1029066ar","title":"Animal Ethics and Politics Beyond the Social Contract","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Animal ethics; Political philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10798168335657181,"score_gpt":0.31421335951440016,"score_spread":0.20623167615782834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973273280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38960662,0.00092187483,0.000063666106,0.15296634,0.00038927188,0.00019036976,0.00007832545,0.000114567796,0.45566896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766748,0.00005932439,0.000028568706,0.02137866,0.0015666633,0.000007049015,0.0000054183965,0.000019770818,0.0002597588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988768,0.00035558455,0.00015272245,0.00013715103,0.00020106236,0.00027668328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989052,0.0006000524,0.000057878882,0.000107707405,0.0001925475,0.00013662061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016028617,0.00012452391,0.0001419423,0.000024892328,0.00095833896,0.0002124799,0.0001616174,0.0003048896,0.00007591395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046452633,0.000086518114,0.000055404933,0.000016626824,0.0012358223,0.00008072038,0.00006726745,0.001761464,0.000017064549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027159444,0.000017431215,0.000022592838,0.000014664619,0.000023859475,0.000009698466,0.08724896,7.4669384e-7,0.000030215886,0.91202563,0.00037993834,0.00019908357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022976813,0.000072655,0.00008460195,0.000007898387,0.000021339807,0.000009980274,0.00571567,0.00010419979,0.00004078314,0.9049332,0.088655956,0.00012391993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005598863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003969065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58706814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048635637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015873829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7652783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974199069","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6245.2009.01347.x","title":"Enjoying the Unbeautiful: From Mendelssohn's Theory of “Mixed Sentiments” to Kant's Aesthetic Judgments of Reflection","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sublime; Beauty; Pleasure; Aesthetics; Perfection; Irrational number; Philosophy; Perception; Epistemology; Aesthetic experience; Psychology","score_opus":0.04484212593195025,"score_gpt":0.27733976827104556,"score_spread":0.2324976423390953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974199069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9590972,0.00081907917,0.00062220957,0.021010932,0.0006922815,0.0001603292,0.000034861947,0.000010245144,0.017552884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788195,0.0001723388,0.00017836028,0.0013235572,0.00017498991,9.141647e-7,0.0000016114309,0.000013634598,0.00025264765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984286,0.00017846268,0.00066411326,0.00012455213,0.00041946134,0.00018480195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988225,0.000159879,0.00035096114,0.00019570859,0.00035669951,0.00011426629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010908473,0.0001502375,0.0003539446,0.00014556073,0.00020453506,0.00007608485,0.00021864164,0.00006298116,0.00012880401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006573621,0.00010016314,0.0001556927,0.000050749037,0.00035191647,0.0001290535,0.000043180316,0.0003218137,0.000005078082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013189262,0.00026043024,0.000007634185,0.000014081219,0.000048305224,0.0000125154575,0.0075909793,0.000019130019,0.002969752,0.978239,0.00023700681,0.010469282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051193836,0.00092700677,0.00011259943,0.00026720617,0.0001242731,0.000039303184,0.001309341,0.00003626591,0.003525561,0.97333807,0.01968359,0.0001248562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007414678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006060306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03878477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016320382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003551785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4084534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979254916","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2315306","title":"Sidgwick's Axioms and Consequentialism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Certainty; Ethical egoism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Morality; Nothing; Dishonesty; Objectivism; Consequentialism; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05166272757574716,"score_gpt":0.2666611078554058,"score_spread":0.21499838027965865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979254916","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059333927,0.03474718,0.00004906002,0.80813766,0.00029152737,0.00031679263,0.000013227638,0.00008507662,0.15576616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9290254,0.018595144,0.000006353494,0.050498206,0.0016473162,0.000030246694,0.0000061583687,0.000021806385,0.00016933912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985026,0.00037684254,0.0003434446,0.00026008545,0.00027659445,0.000240397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985837,0.00061623554,0.00010123296,0.00045338855,0.00009260585,0.00015285575],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013942643,0.00019626804,0.00038579595,0.000025521655,0.00042786117,0.00010317347,0.00032898513,0.0000626184,0.001175348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056693057,0.00011063481,0.00014063263,0.00004259415,0.0016264091,0.000079416415,0.00014439445,0.0004943368,0.00036049748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055291453,0.000021510754,1.8922711e-7,0.00037537824,0.000021691822,0.0000020412608,0.0003237042,4.7733426e-8,0.000009217754,0.9936799,0.00014158666,0.0054192017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010971348,0.00004512766,0.000002866203,0.00058167294,0.000078274046,0.000012999992,0.000006370813,0.000029537921,0.0000025141553,0.7671972,0.23180503,0.00012869627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028633387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011408613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9284321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008182159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001981321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980468704","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0023","title":"Persons and Passions: Essays in Honor of Annette Baier (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Honor; Philosophy; Classics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.07120418908681683,"score_gpt":0.3148258046273805,"score_spread":0.2436216155405637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980468704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25670007,0.19996956,0.0000010691646,0.050161216,0.0012769211,0.00051320874,0.00013836093,0.00006613731,0.49117345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868196,0.011119512,0.000016996037,0.0010702857,0.00020413195,0.000024846415,0.0000012201953,0.0000070597016,0.00073634955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947953,0.00003364682,0.00016725043,0.0001206725,0.00008598048,0.00011291864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954164,0.00018742796,0.00005011797,0.00011502936,0.00007734458,0.000028433271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030944674,0.000087916975,0.00024565743,0.00004503474,0.00014429957,0.000008927917,0.00006472708,0.000029965357,0.0003516974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023947094,0.000060855007,0.000041072726,0.000021063195,0.00076032884,0.000056309418,0.00008039218,0.0002605791,0.000009383638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042474917,0.000037377275,0.0001239872,0.0003149986,0.00003897443,0.0000027852038,0.010349003,3.177068e-8,0.00011382734,0.9839693,0.003875736,0.0011697636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002651635,0.00006327261,0.00077597477,0.0007359482,0.00004388543,0.0000013971257,0.003122062,0.000004647279,0.000026517628,0.79618603,0.19860518,0.0001699229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002843566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009480259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7301195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000031385491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010568511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38508397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984055894","doi":"10.3917/rspt.852.0267","title":"L'importance de la typique pour le jugement pur pratique dans la morale kantienne","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15260258297725215,"score_gpt":0.351588089915338,"score_spread":0.19898550693808587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984055894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19195575,0.008610059,0.0016750386,0.11625042,0.0003686791,0.0004507108,0.000097721015,0.00034959998,0.68024206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93939793,0.04064168,0.006298083,0.005966968,0.0022702182,0.00012033234,0.000019930538,0.00007240542,0.0052124592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932722,0.0034720458,0.00082456897,0.0009953553,0.00038720385,0.0010486279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961625,0.0021092035,0.0004772932,0.00056897965,0.00034089145,0.0003411779],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075228387,0.0006362774,0.00068353146,0.00026669103,0.0015302883,0.00092991994,0.0012025755,0.00068986247,0.00034688856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011254714,0.0005884062,0.0003360172,0.00029555007,0.017734222,0.0012179551,0.00035372598,0.0014629168,0.00006784404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056797147,0.0007438054,0.0015981,0.00030895427,0.00007352997,0.0007143188,0.01084332,0.0002612086,0.00039320096,0.983362,0.0008543022,0.00079047115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025752292,0.0007964553,0.0006826709,0.0007393888,0.000059039547,0.00058916747,0.0015559667,0.0010077867,0.0006118418,0.891024,0.102014564,0.0006615892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017517984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015874655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7474422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004461765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016217829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984984027","doi":"10.1080/00048400802370300","title":"John Stuart Mill, Determinism, and the Problem of Induction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Determinism; Philosophy; Epistemology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05198317433303258,"score_gpt":0.24397698251844047,"score_spread":0.1919938081854079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984984027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8252344,0.0007000072,0.000021183212,0.03796066,0.00060009677,0.00028218934,0.00001885104,0.000017038514,0.13516556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772626,0.00019064947,0.0001409189,0.0002723699,0.0015129127,0.000002011925,5.987253e-7,0.000014026114,0.00014027097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987421,0.00014148654,0.00056618097,0.00010060163,0.0003066827,0.0001429427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988947,0.00014609544,0.00048498332,0.00013223746,0.00024484316,0.00009715641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000618261,0.00013645703,0.0003347588,0.00012941712,0.00026838045,0.00003307176,0.000210954,0.00006988531,0.00012621858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003418114,0.000081854305,0.00017768408,0.000044139266,0.0020366493,0.00027371748,0.00003176633,0.00052408414,0.0000054653938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019264803,0.00007751559,0.000055786488,0.000037575446,0.00010026659,0.00003551309,0.015150056,0.0000026683254,0.00009640996,0.9832014,0.00015231375,0.000897874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014108852,0.00046362603,0.00026721988,0.00010619184,0.000064922504,0.00043889685,0.00051556295,0.0000027443025,0.00020828143,0.9884483,0.0079724705,0.00010090181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009451987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036428496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17249182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009978734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058266887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7504119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986328627","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0241","title":"Moral Skepticism and Moral Naturalism in Hume's Treatise","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Morality; Naturalism; Epistemology; Wonder; Relation (database)","score_opus":0.17687503362878854,"score_gpt":0.32036777474150374,"score_spread":0.1434927411127152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986328627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7475083,0.012349476,3.4055836e-7,0.009703053,0.00047791045,0.00016243856,0.000023021621,0.00008148896,0.22969398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929287,0.0015775685,0.000013336163,0.00089590176,0.0005151146,0.000020302206,0.0000045530383,0.000014351014,0.0040301923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913937,0.00005051695,0.0002041055,0.00021410949,0.00014303942,0.00024886194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956834,0.00013613637,0.00004273194,0.00012562925,0.000078240235,0.00004889187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017988526,0.00016926538,0.0002960933,0.000091833776,0.00031042338,0.00007661224,0.00008424057,0.000052141768,0.00024499858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077939694,0.00012739636,0.00005056341,0.00003678551,0.0008457373,0.00016191,0.000105511295,0.0002640263,0.00003454092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018518636,0.0000409735,0.00067062664,0.000023588182,0.00005503846,0.00006862972,0.027585996,8.749427e-7,0.000007228763,0.96927994,0.00045934433,0.0017892506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052602973,0.00008119799,0.0025481847,0.00006434873,0.000025956528,0.0000062028794,0.004020064,0.000028211345,0.00000582459,0.9719934,0.02049629,0.00020432557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023170665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019153802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24542038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023951428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008338873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5195073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988878473","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0185","title":"Hume's Nuanced Defense of Luxury","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Assertion; Philosophy; Acknowledgement; Virtue; Pessimism; Morality; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Aesthetics","score_opus":0.09446842297566957,"score_gpt":0.29032282395330966,"score_spread":0.1958544009776401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988878473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15683426,0.0084008705,0.0000059324007,0.0027192545,0.0006127663,0.00011437713,0.000043061304,0.000093050934,0.8311764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99550986,0.0001767718,0.000026829744,0.00027949247,0.00074902596,0.000011869912,0.0000036063225,0.000012598715,0.003229953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992688,0.000027372062,0.00023612042,0.00014171124,0.00016102388,0.00016499448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937123,0.0001647723,0.00008407288,0.00015537365,0.00020545864,0.000019080397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018303639,0.00011705047,0.0002585605,0.000047504367,0.0002711846,0.00002143385,0.0000940404,0.000032692296,0.0003131954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000686966,0.0000899831,0.00009679354,0.0000239736,0.0009216646,0.00006485517,0.00007203372,0.00012388945,0.000059925173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014906173,0.000052928783,0.000023892839,0.000056774206,0.000068835936,0.000004013012,0.0059817713,0.0000029216908,0.0001081308,0.9912309,0.0022827627,0.00017217828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019587665,0.000053236774,0.00012471243,0.000042522184,0.000027630254,4.976386e-7,0.0017834408,0.000002203497,0.00025095636,0.9020196,0.095383644,0.00011563741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101043675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037549553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8386756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001170876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012120466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3669404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989123284","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0654","title":"Perceptions and Objects: Hume's Radical Empiricism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Pleasure; Empiricism; Object (grammar); Epistemology; Philosophy; Pain and pleasure; Doctrine; Order (exchange); Philosophy of mind; Psychology; Aesthetics; Metaphysics; Theology","score_opus":0.24863582731629102,"score_gpt":0.32123166863546326,"score_spread":0.07259584131917224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989123284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22396079,0.0054803714,0.000007834333,0.0029489775,0.00061850355,0.0001420535,0.000024824792,0.00016280983,0.76665384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513406,0.0008624695,0.000052325715,0.0012433522,0.00056191895,0.000020495952,0.0000016833731,0.000013112807,0.0021105933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993001,0.000047655776,0.00015821806,0.00018669076,0.00012449513,0.00018282577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999564,0.00011451622,0.00003350957,0.00013235844,0.00009276283,0.00006283866],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020035107,0.0001280297,0.00020053958,0.00005499542,0.0006599558,0.00003995711,0.00008418481,0.000044092045,0.0015171627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010012416,0.00009478964,0.000058107966,0.000018450717,0.0017634265,0.0001023811,0.00011870373,0.0002118567,0.00014670474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008251597,0.000048089103,0.000067965724,0.000023256289,0.00008822984,0.0000068173576,0.15650152,1.4192718e-8,0.000013924699,0.84187704,0.00087972573,0.00048518012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019565833,0.00012164371,0.0011409095,0.000034851786,0.00004994047,0.0000039393963,0.023922844,0.0000022913257,0.000011266065,0.9258946,0.04844975,0.00017228114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004672888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026359316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77117324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011127156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011517375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989213692","doi":"10.1007/s11098-006-9069-5","title":"Moral worth and rationality as acting on good reasons","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.19155748434171768,"score_gpt":0.3539845443446747,"score_spread":0.162427060002957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989213692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09482622,0.0013418201,0.0000061816036,0.1454524,0.000442464,0.00018683953,0.000034233697,0.00017605937,0.7575338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99191594,0.00022654523,0.000027811315,0.0047412054,0.0026232793,0.000011792027,0.0000074839572,0.000020780713,0.00042517766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862105,0.000069859845,0.000298771,0.00034130746,0.00036153814,0.00030747903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982637,0.0011912828,0.000089745976,0.00017122143,0.00012998856,0.00015402422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077599805,0.00021219878,0.00029669082,0.00006521595,0.00086362276,0.00009799577,0.00011449572,0.00008142562,0.00024125636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006827346,0.0001605581,0.00008557098,0.000050186783,0.0009846732,0.00015415228,0.0001556706,0.00051840895,0.00009072007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001173467,0.00010804887,0.00026022302,0.00002608252,0.000120619065,0.000022903236,0.003068641,7.6998424e-7,0.0000037131365,0.99450505,0.000052475632,0.0017141295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026954128,0.00016772235,0.00060065545,0.000056855617,0.000029775743,0.0000033286249,0.0007382623,0.0000044671574,0.000028046366,0.97509164,0.022810267,0.00019945757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025118457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010011298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8970897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029524574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018688454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6642375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992999690","doi":"10.1007/s10677-009-9217-z","title":"Is Divorce Promise-Breaking?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Honour; Political philosophy; Triad (sociology); Duty; Philosophy of medicine; Control (management); Sociology; Action (physics); Law; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Politics; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.05474083129432228,"score_gpt":0.32578233520191635,"score_spread":0.2710415039075941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992999690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06430797,0.00016860338,0.00010912028,0.15529184,0.0012004868,0.00022432425,0.000028843979,0.00016936533,0.7784994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9460903,0.000034865367,0.00016372484,0.04976266,0.0012270096,0.000013772804,0.0000031176062,0.000023971003,0.0026806125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982418,0.0006330603,0.00023022965,0.0003390454,0.00028602837,0.00026985348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949797,0.0041944883,0.00011929378,0.000304482,0.00020013102,0.00020191005],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004561854,0.00018540247,0.00019743945,0.0000411438,0.0006698257,0.000315054,0.00020788076,0.00041747003,0.003720642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047240546,0.00014272897,0.00008225964,0.000032394906,0.0015798884,0.00046324506,0.00014548583,0.0040911837,0.00022009734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044615718,0.00009339679,0.0000031931309,0.000027390031,0.000040511444,0.000021126129,0.013622186,8.95378e-8,0.0004298527,0.98260534,0.00026458633,0.0024461786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018990177,0.000060397844,0.000010423481,0.0000117936015,0.000041006704,0.000022709855,0.0004918826,0.000011564229,0.00011449009,0.60095984,0.39794686,0.00013910829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052613646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002782874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8817823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000048936126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047802874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999293412","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0007","title":"Hume's Touchstone","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.1200789433220049,"score_gpt":0.32920352977258815,"score_spread":0.20912458645058324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999293412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21929179,0.001447352,0.0000014252591,0.009209271,0.002767856,0.00009844128,0.000018151704,0.00016686018,0.7669988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98980993,0.00012013773,0.000021635798,0.0011684715,0.0020106812,0.000017696419,0.000002128901,0.000014119329,0.0068351794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933296,0.000019214627,0.0001460306,0.00016343815,0.00014795463,0.00019041287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994277,0.00014393599,0.000040830877,0.00019973096,0.00014073808,0.00004709265],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022277025,0.00012067302,0.0001876213,0.00004106394,0.00054705393,0.000064475884,0.00013433366,0.000042679974,0.0018875164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016282462,0.000089139154,0.00007207094,0.00001692111,0.0010727606,0.000092093665,0.00010672173,0.00039486287,0.00042794266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005434681,0.000032073378,0.000009458088,0.000017424554,0.00007147736,0.0000051218294,0.017301422,5.5422763e-8,0.0003199431,0.9789904,0.0021481102,0.0010990858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009782673,0.00003002504,0.000039362654,0.000008773922,0.00001411413,9.924843e-7,0.001782335,0.0000011454966,0.0001201306,0.6328221,0.36497918,0.00010398516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029608273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009577013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7705182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000059813324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012545813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000368625","doi":"10.1007/s10790-009-9150-3","title":"Hume, Callicott, and the Land Ethic: Prospects and Problems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06581954679639651,"score_gpt":0.27803657870002724,"score_spread":0.21221703190363073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000368625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85009557,0.012404051,0.000082215534,0.11194657,0.0006922636,0.00034160077,0.000004009445,0.000020423939,0.024413269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99340916,0.0012751922,0.0000103616185,0.0036964181,0.0014702935,7.7847955e-7,1.5425621e-7,0.0000075602356,0.00013005754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990005,0.00026718611,0.00028075906,0.00006434516,0.00025176507,0.00013544296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989361,0.0005290624,0.00021282064,0.00012673315,0.00013296197,0.000062280975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027799276,0.00010328638,0.00020558188,0.00003732787,0.00041830292,0.00014826833,0.00019461173,0.00005591538,0.000030760788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014394053,0.000043545886,0.000052968382,0.000022083957,0.0015957028,0.00013017107,0.000042443735,0.0007438713,0.0000022417532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001833278,0.00003226189,0.000018023735,0.00001649245,0.00003830734,0.00000511062,0.05637246,0.00002389309,0.000055836954,0.94227934,0.00017175323,0.00080316816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010422922,0.0003157316,0.00043882756,0.00010270231,0.0000750789,0.00014519777,0.00068245275,0.00009892133,0.000022517363,0.9898937,0.0071079778,0.00007460989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030265719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018806773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14331359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007664537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003232503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5879433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000425093","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0316","title":"Hume on Steadfast Objects and Time","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Object (grammar); Simple (philosophy); Metaphysics; GRASP; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11585866680486406,"score_gpt":0.29549101470889017,"score_spread":0.1796323479040261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000425093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19539063,0.0027278562,2.9633617e-7,0.004275869,0.0003134428,0.00010686816,0.000014605838,0.000104282764,0.79706615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832335,0.0006235968,0.0000029142998,0.0014883515,0.0007649172,0.000010727925,0.000001997996,0.000013877912,0.0138601335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993221,0.000038475744,0.00012484174,0.00018592284,0.00014297492,0.00018564593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994991,0.00020883422,0.00003597942,0.00012945221,0.00008050759,0.00004614472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018260963,0.00013576531,0.00020789355,0.000051580908,0.00049295864,0.000068198446,0.00006776078,0.00003181735,0.0006280549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008810448,0.00009963587,0.00004087797,0.00001907734,0.00062583515,0.000072540504,0.00008369047,0.00016719365,0.0005191824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002709342,0.00004279937,0.00001794672,0.000020845328,0.00009522437,0.000018774801,0.01669755,4.3649337e-7,0.000026549138,0.9806114,0.0013466149,0.0010947789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029863406,0.00026380096,0.0001441609,0.00008164192,0.000027854285,0.0000038857906,0.0034320608,0.000009569138,0.000021343447,0.83364433,0.16186932,0.00020342763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012999199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011083507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78784287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012159023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070847145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6876761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002455242","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400001989","title":"Kant on the Self as Model of Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Handwriting; Philosophy; Section (typography); Epistemology; Literature; Art; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10216184342075224,"score_gpt":0.2988549912314482,"score_spread":0.19669314781069597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002455242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022815455,0.051010065,0.00001429112,0.08083391,0.00014666753,0.00045708288,0.000021716807,0.00007004918,0.8446308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959501,0.021498222,0.00002922514,0.018186903,0.00017319752,0.00001776985,8.709196e-7,0.000008236626,0.00058456283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993336,0.0000544567,0.00021340477,0.00011307384,0.00017661434,0.000108820175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994616,0.00008101062,0.000077735676,0.0002905115,0.000053785494,0.000035368306],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033835176,0.00008654473,0.00017888188,0.000013636753,0.00012833522,0.000020915113,0.00023075915,0.000020798594,0.0022932037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006461665,0.00004699835,0.00010288236,0.000021321217,0.00019756886,0.000055581462,0.000032391297,0.00015343654,0.00038811236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015115721,0.00004226498,1.578539e-7,0.00021366344,0.00000839844,4.6889375e-7,0.0037729794,0.000003710225,0.000015811156,0.9925831,0.00041783793,0.002940109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054042604,0.00003966049,9.265671e-7,0.0019009958,0.00003268898,0.0000014935288,0.00010211942,0.0009605055,0.00023288578,0.32780853,0.66874623,0.000119919125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008028046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011076243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93668556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000606407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030700707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002513787","doi":"10.1177/0191453705051708","title":"Enlightened relativism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Presumption; Universalism; Virtue; Relation (database); Moral relativism; Commensurability (mathematics); Universality (dynamical systems); Happiness; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.06607350176528959,"score_gpt":0.27304574534811293,"score_spread":0.20697224358282335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002513787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007837389,0.0003313787,0.00003099249,0.1418118,0.00054475217,0.00013320647,0.00006135043,0.00024400988,0.8490051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721679,0.000013546889,0.000074821844,0.010649163,0.014967341,0.00002937295,0.000015068056,0.000050312487,0.0020324746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839824,0.00011230835,0.00035874933,0.00031938832,0.00039662197,0.00041466305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919677,0.00019618093,0.00007351651,0.000198353,0.0001998042,0.00013537084],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003065016,0.00024286864,0.00030356256,0.00009346244,0.0010794518,0.0001562566,0.00027326687,0.00015306254,0.0025896677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008535986,0.00022804429,0.00025428124,0.00004901404,0.00086627406,0.00038286258,0.00007892675,0.0005616335,0.0010809026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018912257,0.00014110372,0.0000010532001,0.000023039378,0.000036880054,0.000009014244,0.016365906,2.9242713e-7,0.0000738216,0.9808562,0.00064728863,0.0018265322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029366525,0.00003795149,0.00001398629,0.0000162547,0.000028621735,0.0000013905653,0.00014147746,0.000017701308,0.00007035535,0.7557063,0.24343534,0.00023694511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021007123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034065975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005763529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038103186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006244423","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0650","title":"Extreme Skepticism and Commitment in the Treatise","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Nothing; Dilemma; Epistemology; Philosophy; Face (sociological concept); Variety (cybernetics); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4531161379002982,"score_gpt":0.31232476721878594,"score_spread":0.14079137068151226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006244423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17716698,0.008737446,0.000001729308,0.005132432,0.00022331477,0.00021829683,0.00001240292,0.00003221745,0.8084752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977208,0.0005704548,0.000011634424,0.00097563077,0.0001387652,0.000031650303,6.0280513e-7,0.0000046411055,0.0005458517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995504,0.00006289722,0.0001065127,0.00009263932,0.00008167343,0.00010587607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966776,0.0001568571,0.00002252529,0.00010977155,0.000028755969,0.000014314128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026505592,0.000078952566,0.00011991166,0.0000279055,0.0002377509,0.000025154452,0.00007845734,0.00001511387,0.0002064913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031846117,0.000043075728,0.000023391014,0.000011624325,0.0005913826,0.00004447496,0.000052610987,0.00010753051,0.000022174869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005899768,0.00004472397,0.000076116,0.000008435303,0.000028074248,0.000008599033,0.19544396,1.3979907e-8,7.766888e-7,0.80329126,0.00024747773,0.0008446826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001796728,0.00007890919,0.0013970402,0.000026672777,0.000019811663,0.0000010569199,0.020983338,0.0000023239772,0.0000030673493,0.95960444,0.017634148,0.00006953283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012769506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012998263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8205538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000067371457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030859344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22609349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007144944","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0209","title":"The Vulgar Conception of Objects in \"Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Perspective (graphical); Conflation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Position (finance); Aesthetics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.07082184876666475,"score_gpt":0.3069496902908097,"score_spread":0.23612784152414495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007144944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8157458,0.0030853574,0.000023666329,0.007917393,0.00039853316,0.00036444678,0.000012475674,0.000020508507,0.17243186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986756,0.0001644177,0.000010583043,0.00036657948,0.00022145698,0.0000071069608,3.4709487e-7,0.0000060658094,0.00054784276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935585,0.000048442736,0.00020146166,0.00008408978,0.00017307395,0.00013708384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892175,0.0006298159,0.000079286954,0.00015525358,0.00019824876,0.000015624379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008123319,0.00007379629,0.00015752664,0.000032668337,0.00024142988,0.000012700251,0.00009949732,0.00001894557,0.000015270987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016914788,0.000032934062,0.000032455693,0.00004372363,0.0008417848,0.000025112422,0.00005444182,0.0001295813,0.000007525598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008748139,0.00001820226,0.000038673574,0.000019746745,0.00005249275,0.00000245413,0.087955534,0.000008158454,0.000063462736,0.91072166,0.00016973728,0.00086239877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006660462,0.00077230635,0.0025506672,0.00034862943,0.00006127828,0.0000020971609,0.15819506,0.000008497573,0.0013157467,0.7611254,0.07472498,0.00022927589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007166883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0092360815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18292983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000126311525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012983665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51539505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009350265","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0177","title":"Utilitarianism with a Humean Face","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Philosophy; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology","score_opus":0.1267060203387211,"score_gpt":0.29814931887084795,"score_spread":0.17144329853212684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009350265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056345824,0.006281321,0.00002922183,0.023664217,0.00031233602,0.00019406261,0.000024884828,0.000227885,0.91292024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916476,0.00009543618,0.000078715566,0.0019584915,0.0009591936,0.000017563394,0.000001438349,0.000015100212,0.005226449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992978,0.000027874692,0.00013321235,0.00017846598,0.00016415381,0.0001985243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954474,0.000097510965,0.000036366397,0.00016495978,0.00011828736,0.00003811445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017137926,0.00013556972,0.00018913703,0.000034543453,0.0004884301,0.000053034648,0.00010682827,0.000025683037,0.0005075188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004135782,0.000088631794,0.00004678818,0.00001759264,0.0007852205,0.00012763719,0.00006550139,0.00018084397,0.00028707596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016527503,0.000036868896,0.0000062016456,0.000016459426,0.00012406826,0.0000043248783,0.052677184,0.0000025845807,0.0000049262553,0.9452168,0.0006598572,0.0012342392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025398712,0.00012059378,0.00003223494,0.000036161327,0.000029116994,0.0000017817547,0.010581049,0.000012856109,0.00003016636,0.45118707,0.5375517,0.00016330298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022692426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011135996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9353018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020437894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015299263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5556975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009494888","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0652","title":"Hume's Epistemic Naturalism in the Treatise","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Normative; Statement (logic); Relation (database); Determinacy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.44580425692101494,"score_gpt":0.3250027445320631,"score_spread":0.12080151238895181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009494888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15200117,0.009938293,3.880463e-7,0.009317801,0.0006341163,0.00020585225,0.000019593586,0.000063663654,0.8278191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587023,0.00044895377,0.0000055252885,0.0015461552,0.00037748565,0.00003762989,0.000002049799,0.000008851008,0.0017031182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927396,0.00010415078,0.00017354774,0.00014041815,0.00013499493,0.00017291382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994713,0.00021380484,0.000045273093,0.00018564273,0.00006694012,0.000017045679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003667836,0.0001200485,0.0001797402,0.000047499918,0.00032915638,0.000036111975,0.0002046573,0.0000341656,0.00036835842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008533115,0.000065885855,0.00006542055,0.00002872342,0.00071314996,0.00008734089,0.00006055743,0.00026272685,0.000098805474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066343327,0.000033511336,0.00003068634,0.000017405793,0.000037785936,0.00001665104,0.1702914,2.6531584e-8,0.0000027733295,0.82863,0.0005456428,0.00038750807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016869974,0.00005082125,0.0006645969,0.00004441496,0.0000204076,0.0000023988348,0.016501961,0.0000010447618,0.000009516027,0.95536274,0.027063917,0.00010948069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022277702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013962418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8438691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015256708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007778567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40332666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010282090","doi":"10.3366/jsp.2013.0049","title":"Ferrier and the Myth of Scottish Common Sense Realism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scottish Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Common sense; Philosophy; Realism; Mythology; Originality; Epistemology; Content (measure theory); Power (physics); Literature; Sociology; Social science; Art; Theology","score_opus":0.026389143242182864,"score_gpt":0.23215395996661722,"score_spread":0.20576481672443436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010282090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46901107,0.0044080405,0.000013531876,0.15313575,0.0014888212,0.0005358313,0.00007725993,0.000030721316,0.37129897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99024326,0.00046481244,0.000053548247,0.0069964863,0.002026866,0.000004278629,0.0000018617658,0.000027164837,0.00018174024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980464,0.00026256824,0.00082112796,0.00014381242,0.0005100327,0.00021607343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772215,0.0005088717,0.0007356671,0.00028128034,0.00057833357,0.00017367241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010980329,0.0001958371,0.00059517566,0.00014391459,0.00027673488,0.00022551366,0.00029981465,0.0001064975,0.00048320828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016276717,0.00012088691,0.0002524202,0.000057137124,0.0020667694,0.0004975378,0.00011354569,0.00075250055,0.00002361772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001723159,0.00008123275,0.000017882036,0.00006198866,0.00014240322,0.000029945382,0.0052248384,0.000002226806,0.000078434976,0.9892186,0.0039080274,0.0010620913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016698673,0.0001913327,0.000160544,0.00026693536,0.00008601518,0.00014964008,0.00035859982,0.00003427318,0.0000538478,0.9833828,0.013500559,0.00014556924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033870072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027272315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5212322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017887689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051398412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7615098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011247240","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0012","title":"Slaves of the Passions (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Relation (database); Reflexive pronoun; Normative; Denial; Action (physics); Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.09317569630022667,"score_gpt":0.32245710960946306,"score_spread":0.2292814133092364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011247240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047619082,0.057035368,5.518231e-7,0.06360271,0.0035692032,0.00030958024,0.000054074353,0.000060963965,0.8277485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915467,0.004503009,0.000005584605,0.0015672187,0.00036101125,0.000013500899,3.6312125e-7,0.0000052131654,0.0019973835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999564,0.000030682044,0.00013627304,0.000072986506,0.000115270246,0.00008081883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942863,0.00015720612,0.00006069844,0.0002052385,0.00013214356,0.000016089873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020067813,0.00006501841,0.00015276176,0.0000113618125,0.00032497031,0.0000062836502,0.00014767869,0.000017974608,0.00068257103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033949438,0.000031435615,0.000094112766,0.00001724151,0.0010146217,0.000027219188,0.00012376119,0.00023195591,0.000027708444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.56633e-7,0.000018602685,0.000014416312,0.00011865741,0.00004090288,2.0174274e-7,0.0039317063,1.7621609e-8,0.00016075368,0.99015164,0.0050823046,0.00048005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039390416,0.000011495794,0.0001892853,0.00022156163,0.00003017938,3.3390032e-7,0.00061929226,3.5057533e-7,0.000111216454,0.6355321,0.36319652,0.00004828688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009649337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003822996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94392765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000017927632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012663306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74736744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016628427","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00295.x","title":"The Transcendental Necessity of Morality","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disposition; Transcendental number; Morality; Epistemology; Position (finance); Rational agent; Original position; Product (mathematics); Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Economics; Economic Justice; Political science; Mathematics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.3556406737071764,"score_gpt":0.37689149271565964,"score_spread":0.021250819008483246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016628427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05301493,0.0017918249,0.0000048779134,0.011857071,0.00010561327,0.0001714049,0.00002746528,0.000020448431,0.93300635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989831,0.00043295705,0.000009061504,0.00014586379,0.00020383645,0.000017786926,0.0000017957829,0.000006630361,0.00019900706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798054,0.0007145028,0.00023717694,0.00023804106,0.0004618318,0.00036790795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981502,0.001264112,0.00004110444,0.00023286995,0.00018598996,0.00012571775],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028003925,0.000106701424,0.00017987295,0.000049716637,0.0012004273,0.00010745197,0.00029066126,0.0000811587,0.00060826045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043271072,0.000060236092,0.00006776537,0.0000803886,0.0040544216,0.000080417776,0.00008126707,0.0007505652,0.000024003615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086018495,0.000139245,0.000049085076,0.000028304195,0.000022404158,0.000002531287,0.0020883651,2.1286995e-7,0.000027269356,0.9965186,0.000011964867,0.0010259626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021243149,0.00024877235,0.00005242249,0.000009445734,0.0000039822025,0.0000011183146,0.00075078895,0.000004821644,0.000038895545,0.96606696,0.032533735,0.00007663707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033083998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019946356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94596815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015612597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003403797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017035880","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0013","title":"A Problem for Hume's Theory of Induction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2947897531955726,"score_gpt":0.3203093571760183,"score_spread":0.02551960398044567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017035880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3242871,0.013184829,0.00024923566,0.0073501654,0.0019214379,0.0012711041,0.00014103153,0.00026698015,0.65132815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99526864,0.00033314887,0.00008762892,0.00019817377,0.00061994354,0.000067984096,0.0000029334649,0.000011765117,0.0034097736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994199,0.000039223127,0.00018628134,0.00012343157,0.00010584475,0.0001252955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992981,0.0002389699,0.0000813395,0.0001032029,0.00025987194,0.000018515948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033785915,0.00009106673,0.00020566066,0.00004858953,0.00047091575,0.000008108158,0.00007077886,0.00003287691,0.00011261097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012951554,0.000067013934,0.000088199944,0.000018400464,0.0010152808,0.00008049344,0.00004284105,0.00009891615,0.000010982726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041175277,0.00004895789,0.0000062983554,0.00009459859,0.00012270261,7.5970615e-7,0.04511637,7.179768e-7,0.00007937244,0.95286936,0.0008388342,0.0007808325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020858544,0.00014259045,0.00003218921,0.000035268735,0.000025847336,0.0000015813488,0.004569748,0.0000010716583,0.00021281611,0.93432933,0.060357228,0.00008373845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007956162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030041958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6709815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010287441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018888053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37408447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022973536","doi":"10.1353/hms.2013.0004","title":"Skeptical Realism and Hume on the Self","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Personal identity; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Relation (database); Focus (optics); Self; Aesthetics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.12757490684944922,"score_gpt":0.283806064577076,"score_spread":0.1562311577276268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022973536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23115017,0.0015330538,3.965956e-7,0.10433576,0.00039256984,0.0002684875,0.0000109720495,0.00013306725,0.66217554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99231344,0.00038133434,0.0000058169103,0.0044236984,0.0006713667,0.00004807703,7.0018814e-7,0.000009911406,0.002145633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993883,0.00005785706,0.000116447,0.00014100017,0.00013698288,0.00015941027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991388,0.000540132,0.000026228745,0.00015316396,0.00010339064,0.000038339196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022207764,0.00010993172,0.00014533509,0.000020971258,0.00062257005,0.000116839605,0.00008849575,0.000030167006,0.00082795933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013782804,0.000056763714,0.000038834165,0.000011300496,0.00088194787,0.000062746025,0.000103244216,0.000214952,0.00040810797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002436641,0.000024267178,0.0000040196037,0.000013347872,0.00008155319,0.0000013942556,0.015496487,3.7327165e-8,0.0000059569334,0.97639334,0.0076607224,0.00031644249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077761666,0.000075190146,0.00022625516,0.00002327081,0.000017084943,6.756131e-7,0.0032339557,0.000009091066,0.0000078264875,0.89503235,0.10121042,0.000086151944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052706186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006790061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7611633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008497333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059296294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9065574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025188704","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2011.0030","title":"Richard Gaskin, The Unity of the Proposition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press2008. Pp. xv + 455.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0852654655467508,"score_gpt":0.19857695577186912,"score_spread":0.11331149022511833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025188704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27567238,0.005260492,0.0000657783,0.052157786,0.0019478208,0.0005971964,0.0004140089,0.000020863343,0.6638637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776787,0.00012788383,0.000026395239,0.00091774855,0.00073054706,2.2887072e-7,0.0000010979711,0.000012726749,0.0004154988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990841,0.00015887778,0.0002558691,0.000101839054,0.0001901254,0.00020917044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986819,0.000072362236,0.0003042352,0.00024545996,0.00027031978,0.00042574137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036414256,0.0001344845,0.0001976527,0.000103664795,0.0006511221,0.000050634233,0.0005625198,0.00007734379,0.0005713753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006371792,0.00008124141,0.00015579398,0.00008322136,0.0011447087,0.00019595373,0.00004413302,0.00058029575,0.0000017220542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051233368,0.000021404903,0.00026937746,0.000017233933,0.0000796277,0.00002396939,0.009796064,0.0000021981111,0.000006005226,0.9875752,0.0016670299,0.0004906808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003026716,0.00015321604,0.0011777419,0.000097843375,0.00008826781,0.00003333946,0.00054566294,0.0000044301455,0.000052102718,0.8044752,0.1929658,0.00010371871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051564695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010500237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7220955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052359184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077149086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7795074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027243658","doi":"10.1080/10509585.2010.484625","title":"Natural Purposes and the Reflecting Power of Judgment: The Problem of the Organism in Kant’s Critical Philosophy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Romantic Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft","keywords":"Teleology; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Intellect; Philosophy; Critical philosophy; Subjectivity; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.03314076893739871,"score_gpt":0.2776465278783959,"score_spread":0.2445057589409972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027243658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1271045,0.08532664,0.0000014915266,0.13916893,0.0010629756,0.0017245096,0.000015293966,0.00003741126,0.64555824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99421674,0.002577141,0.0000189802,0.0028971827,0.00017041303,0.0000045944844,4.8625037e-7,0.000020072579,0.00009438036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981888,0.0007751317,0.0005025941,0.00015775877,0.00022970418,0.0001460427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986329,0.00064320414,0.0001913808,0.0004043505,0.00010465776,0.000023527984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025314568,0.00013125579,0.0003123896,0.000021122267,0.00025335318,0.0000478736,0.00048312033,0.000019460107,0.00019139571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068634184,0.000051543633,0.000127684,0.00007450567,0.0018144231,0.000064628126,0.0002466328,0.00074844516,0.00001346933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008029518,0.00003370393,0.000009221297,0.00074584334,0.00001587244,0.0000028089228,0.003498742,2.9213902e-8,0.00031847515,0.99477196,0.000044679862,0.00055061525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005897674,0.00007286403,0.0006698934,0.0057021165,0.0001619849,0.000036080368,0.0002187701,0.000009349875,0.00013044292,0.93795377,0.05426468,0.0001902672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017316888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034916317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8671122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000028829538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019896957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6685318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029616281","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2010.0007","title":"The Explanatory Structure of the Transcendental Deduction and a Cognitive Interpretation of the First Critique","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Psychologism; Transcendental number; Sensibility; Articulation (sociology); Transcendental philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.010484339825473197,"score_gpt":0.21264243316530515,"score_spread":0.20215809333983195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029616281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714659,0.0006732297,0.0000110831625,0.019506047,0.0021980337,0.00014933436,0.00022661658,0.0000015258513,0.005768228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896413,0.000010329948,0.0000014442566,0.0005445116,0.00046043523,6.9119136e-7,4.785845e-7,0.000007721112,0.000010244552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993858,0.00007327892,0.00024532838,0.000056528184,0.00014824481,0.000090849106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914896,0.00014672917,0.00023424152,0.000102991966,0.00027673054,0.00009036021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019719331,0.000076554854,0.000110798996,0.000056809396,0.00044804267,0.000041523657,0.00024856173,0.00006126675,0.00010070028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013500058,0.000038436825,0.000121008015,0.000032852193,0.0014371666,0.00010928888,0.000007818628,0.00061893056,1.6350224e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004296537,0.000009058643,0.00021889305,0.000040577466,0.00006669827,0.0000018507833,0.01859176,0.0000028686445,0.0005473602,0.97960365,0.000030851053,0.0008434809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025102822,0.00006809279,0.0013987453,0.00024763416,0.000072693794,0.000055966568,0.001792949,0.000019145002,0.0018026454,0.99242,0.0018073112,0.00006376116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041663193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070668995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07025236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014147973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026779252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9462889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029622299","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0259","title":"Three Questions about Treatise 1.4.2","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.14157350972603983,"score_gpt":0.3434001084260125,"score_spread":0.20182659869997266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029622299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03588098,0.013477108,0.00028962633,0.0049179397,0.0010728852,0.00015582476,0.000032193973,0.00024941095,0.943924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995328,0.00034451185,0.00005013464,0.00056993985,0.0012092018,0.000011240637,0.0000023398725,0.000012379857,0.0024722696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933434,0.00001285319,0.00017479974,0.00013937178,0.00013285628,0.00020576033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999349,0.0002543889,0.000040476993,0.00014900116,0.00015825675,0.000048854195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037919672,0.00011153437,0.0001654407,0.000058132766,0.0006108447,0.00004460622,0.0000840359,0.000031969557,0.0004421403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001362228,0.00008292181,0.00006683762,0.000023722994,0.0007524506,0.00007405188,0.00005570482,0.0001587588,0.00021843157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009152586,0.00003544187,0.00006016202,0.000015000973,0.000085839645,0.000010743838,0.0125743905,2.3462131e-7,0.0000069503985,0.98250186,0.0010219796,0.003678257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001236342,0.00004732873,0.0009897896,0.0000410866,0.000027868224,9.263282e-7,0.0017188863,0.000002074154,0.000013682036,0.8615549,0.13536961,0.000110179084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001017628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065113087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.959447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022141336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010833919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48411262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030182908","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0022","title":"Hume on Pride-in-Virtue: A Reliable Motive?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Virtue; Epistemology; Beauty; Form of the Good; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.07962298659059694,"score_gpt":0.30792897009464404,"score_spread":0.2283059835040471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030182908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27749375,0.0007432219,5.051536e-7,0.00774215,0.001733888,0.00019338836,0.000018353012,0.00011160361,0.7119631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907214,0.00013725217,0.0000129163,0.0012050007,0.0008973181,0.00003569269,0.0000018506494,0.000019949153,0.0069686156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999043,0.00003069027,0.00021722165,0.00025769894,0.00019790308,0.00025350502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992555,0.00026241076,0.00005640235,0.00024919707,0.00012890529,0.000047604648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042044328,0.00016878899,0.0002689165,0.000095701995,0.00039283128,0.000065267595,0.00015830937,0.00006286299,0.00059623586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032019406,0.00012743942,0.00007484665,0.000035374276,0.00071339344,0.000105395906,0.00010617677,0.0006598194,0.0004488258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023829021,0.00009593738,0.0000827981,0.000027829665,0.000047459824,0.0000144671985,0.007669518,0.0000014896486,0.00010153767,0.989654,0.0020370104,0.00024409455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028041643,0.00012087696,0.0003977584,0.000065274675,0.000011309807,7.03929e-7,0.0012908428,0.000007905819,0.000116758296,0.79500455,0.20253047,0.00017315356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006699824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015317743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7132276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019095572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020628688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6528365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032908795","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0016","title":"Sympathy and the Mechanics of Character Change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Character (mathematics); Relation (database); Epistemology; Moral character; Function (biology); Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.2277726261961615,"score_gpt":0.30436272040791085,"score_spread":0.07659009421174934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032908795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55425245,0.15956016,0.000010471891,0.056616224,0.005219418,0.0011598713,0.00013203372,0.00015007208,0.22289929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955841,0.0016960461,0.0000022851873,0.0012602282,0.0011861571,0.000032069987,6.9124815e-7,0.0000064173855,0.00023203183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956846,0.00004845321,0.00010880144,0.000056775145,0.00009140143,0.00012613361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995491,0.00020265096,0.000055933295,0.000097029326,0.000073120544,0.000022192364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005096093,0.00007217435,0.00017780025,0.000019377869,0.00021447979,0.000013841183,0.000055828517,0.000019924244,0.00008719554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006849281,0.000037379687,0.0000425991,0.000009764039,0.0005928716,0.000106577776,0.00010606264,0.000096421994,0.000015422962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014034502,0.00001638084,0.000013005456,0.000033129047,0.00007132662,1.3275968e-7,0.10863966,2.0665327e-9,0.0000067737215,0.8907524,0.000041432057,0.00041173934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035737027,0.000032145133,0.00015406586,0.000036575293,0.00005830987,8.527671e-7,0.007761374,0.000006398512,0.00003198003,0.9270213,0.06445686,0.00008275858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016206353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021534344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4413316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000033574693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019471702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21844603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035762009","doi":"10.3109/10826084.2012.723526","title":"Michael G. Farnworth on Brian Ferguson's “Is Addiction a Failure of Rationality?”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Substance Use & Misuse","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Addiction; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Gerontology; Psychiatry; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06583094937229103,"score_gpt":0.25043034053938257,"score_spread":0.18459939116709154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035762009","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048325222,0.00218574,0.000033090884,0.9140352,0.003201763,0.0008937085,0.00511735,0.00026755096,0.025940401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41162258,0.00030743808,0.000058131172,0.54901075,0.0162929,0.00008182837,0.0017623989,0.00019190421,0.020672055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751645,0.00019078281,0.0005398875,0.0005089298,0.0007547634,0.0004892076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978666,0.00041375408,0.0004720958,0.000731304,0.0004149084,0.000101386],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028874597,0.00047102102,0.0005566025,0.0002057502,0.00030816445,0.00017673343,0.00035682146,0.00071364595,0.0037982918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007022751,0.00042504506,0.00034410943,0.00007395734,0.00041957962,0.00040106446,0.00003227615,0.002110277,0.00024688005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100307654,0.000112220594,0.000027402275,0.00017114921,0.00021627119,0.00003751579,0.008475715,0.0000012539405,0.000023619497,0.38889256,0.60175467,0.00018729377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033955055,0.000057510093,0.0000324005,0.00035726794,0.00011152657,0.0000021237286,0.00006864203,0.0000038136375,0.00007972191,0.08435979,0.9141673,0.00042038813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026811115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023409408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36502442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001363056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092803224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039681279","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0024","title":"Hume's Moral Sentiments As Motives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Passions; Pride; Humility; Action (physics); Moral psychology; Pleasure; Epistemology; Hatred; Philosophy; Moral disengagement; Virtue; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.11598601147495088,"score_gpt":0.3327506644503678,"score_spread":0.2167646529754169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039681279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38133043,0.0009120769,6.2695017e-7,0.0041337716,0.001921968,0.00011372274,0.000020170757,0.000115853145,0.6114514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98686993,0.00011340877,0.000020303316,0.00087466097,0.0012135137,0.000017222628,0.000003776052,0.000016256115,0.010870953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991941,0.000031504864,0.00015913251,0.0002008378,0.00019483577,0.000219629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994396,0.00011118875,0.000053866166,0.0001837501,0.00015572805,0.000055861732],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020270575,0.00015050205,0.00020734066,0.00004905267,0.0006037408,0.00009332402,0.00014268597,0.00004463556,0.0019635104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014517408,0.00011369931,0.000088077606,0.000018018534,0.0010887955,0.00013775696,0.00015328829,0.00036269095,0.00071748387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008732207,0.000060732324,0.00007292498,0.00001838556,0.00016280191,0.000008400198,0.019112289,1.527885e-7,0.00024306688,0.97894967,0.00094707357,0.00041574746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019369292,0.00005820947,0.00019528791,0.000020470849,0.00002811544,0.0000013050011,0.0034392742,0.0000032922053,0.0002346618,0.901361,0.09431038,0.00015435324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042772055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024828938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6055395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000073118445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014097009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042299226","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0006","title":"Reason in Hume's Passions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Philosophy; Epistemology; Impossibility; Power (physics); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.33728419784110303,"score_gpt":0.3327455050442449,"score_spread":0.004538692796858146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042299226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27013898,0.007609709,0.0000014615514,0.011145763,0.00073654123,0.00013872377,0.0000179282,0.00012211603,0.7100888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932227,0.0015244872,0.000010342001,0.0006178185,0.0005098883,0.000025049223,0.0000020829934,0.000010404377,0.0040772357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999316,0.00004676691,0.00016502588,0.00015187464,0.000137426,0.00018290077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954164,0.000172857,0.000033879896,0.00013569117,0.000080507,0.00003544282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016153582,0.00010472076,0.00019962243,0.00006469301,0.00055293273,0.000015819936,0.000088791654,0.000033484623,0.0004250536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017491344,0.00007730691,0.000056453562,0.000031422616,0.00074362924,0.00008115857,0.00008461512,0.00021991237,0.00014680086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007716734,0.00005531212,0.00018567692,0.000013041196,0.000032359694,0.000036385965,0.03502073,6.815598e-7,0.000007869066,0.9616518,0.002702476,0.00028595183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023047724,0.000051115316,0.001237163,0.0000708455,0.000008522976,0.0000032086978,0.004288889,0.0000041147073,0.000016348877,0.7579885,0.23595008,0.00015073623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007699705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008642625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72308373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021710404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001811587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46540385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042417103","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0294","title":"Relations of Literary Form and Philosophical Purpose in Hume's Four Essays on Happiness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Psychology; Social psychology; Art","score_opus":0.1184411344764323,"score_gpt":0.3138282458599027,"score_spread":0.19538711138347042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042417103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.548431,0.0047284276,0.000015832235,0.014578767,0.00040803227,0.0003041591,0.000043313907,0.00006268797,0.4314278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981974,0.00023772371,0.00002423782,0.00048874033,0.00045725904,0.000013528647,0.0000041025855,0.0000135636055,0.0005634829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990239,0.000035949965,0.00035677076,0.00019504201,0.00018732273,0.0002009956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905133,0.00053522387,0.000081403894,0.00014599816,0.00013811314,0.00004792588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006146581,0.00014708082,0.00029680724,0.00018479994,0.00026337127,0.00002737263,0.00008640626,0.00007178298,0.00008738936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020313215,0.00011523405,0.00005874136,0.000060108938,0.0007701349,0.00014533309,0.00010184051,0.00031935555,0.000014160784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006320397,0.000101673744,0.00030535492,0.00007148145,0.000051940107,0.000021019687,0.02322657,7.037922e-7,0.000016532362,0.97458905,0.000053374206,0.0014990923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040189255,0.00013854471,0.0020333817,0.00017243132,0.000016676395,0.0000019323343,0.0011258585,0.000009377765,0.00002044592,0.9898899,0.0060561425,0.00013342602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015508307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003425485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44976637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021291897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012459309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4699108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043947406","doi":"10.1353/hph.2014.0090","title":"Kant on Moral Sensibility and Moral Motivation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the history of philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Sensibility; nobody; Epistemology; Philosophy; Power (physics); Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Moral psychology; Practical reason; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08887765228295902,"score_gpt":0.22215913173002552,"score_spread":0.1332814794470665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043947406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7682466,0.0005434903,0.00001411613,0.018071156,0.0051424825,0.000121009274,0.000012095002,0.000013699393,0.20783538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969888,0.0000066354132,0.000022856473,0.0012494251,0.0012964979,3.1243425e-7,3.0457187e-7,0.000010265186,0.00042491886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989318,0.00018618091,0.00037454718,0.00009587765,0.00032586514,0.00008572832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988104,0.00019334778,0.0004986605,0.00021698723,0.00021804575,0.00006253412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080865313,0.00010571996,0.00024940926,0.00008539352,0.0001101728,0.00001096302,0.00018263233,0.00005012436,0.00008327953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003037493,0.00006590293,0.00017533649,0.000015440817,0.0007935329,0.00012343178,0.000040708055,0.00039262598,0.0000033256918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012304663,0.00010408375,0.00011865564,0.000041034687,0.000025813306,0.0000012732824,0.0028949757,0.000022124608,0.00033942182,0.9951819,0.00082237093,0.000325305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035240268,0.00032786297,0.0012264198,0.000094271556,0.00003217089,0.0000064761716,0.000026435371,0.000089979396,0.000057704718,0.9768394,0.020871708,0.000075118536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013385435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049794103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22874221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013341528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005664563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29238048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045112857","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0018","title":"Hume, Malebranche, and the Self-Justification of the Passions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Philosophy; Theme (computing); Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08869480473911803,"score_gpt":0.28348838541182514,"score_spread":0.1947935806727071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045112857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5523274,0.03404458,0.0000062800095,0.06733351,0.0023337102,0.0006855396,0.00005017581,0.00010871025,0.34311008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752885,0.00061149715,0.000007055471,0.00040101891,0.0004878472,0.00002729758,4.7124186e-7,0.000005611382,0.0009303293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994656,0.00010051082,0.00013818684,0.00006678342,0.00011668117,0.00011227428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992759,0.00036907892,0.000077853954,0.0001646676,0.00009310347,0.000019352681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004880388,0.000071106515,0.0001309113,0.000013569723,0.0010451365,0.000015756543,0.00010225096,0.000022468312,0.00007484746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016656063,0.000030164494,0.000055298176,0.000022255796,0.0014357042,0.00006884443,0.00017267403,0.00013676986,0.000009115429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007512418,0.000028528317,0.00015563183,0.000033222525,0.00007427316,2.729814e-8,0.06520681,9.9212706e-8,0.000016609663,0.93390596,0.00041613803,0.000155187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041479885,0.000016194805,0.0053341324,0.000054735734,0.00015752202,0.0000013055716,0.012170744,0.0000088920915,0.00013803098,0.8605619,0.12103896,0.000102771155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000113719025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042944797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4452015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005522471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007635028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.803845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045628113","doi":"10.1007/s10677-009-9181-7","title":"Moral Self-Knowledge in Kantian Ethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Duty; Moral agency; Self-deception; Moral disengagement; Normative ethics; Moral psychology; Moral reasoning; Self-knowledge; Practical reason; Kantian ethics; Self; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral development; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10007430562326236,"score_gpt":0.35964528514855626,"score_spread":0.2595709795252939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045628113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0200198,0.0012925288,0.000082431296,0.18839887,0.0005832046,0.00023512283,0.000012202824,0.00022535106,0.7891505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958165,0.00031518875,0.00021483783,0.039871905,0.0007210015,0.0000060532534,0.0000052500136,0.000018495448,0.00068225886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583375,0.002726537,0.0003647402,0.0003910666,0.00030080052,0.0003831008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920847,0.007130163,0.000113615664,0.00026289406,0.00020844041,0.00020019605],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009744525,0.00023813764,0.00030447927,0.00010807808,0.0005313603,0.000249085,0.0002297591,0.0006939314,0.0003818249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004483606,0.00019960968,0.00008533337,0.000087614855,0.00078729086,0.000562612,0.00009064427,0.006373899,0.00013679724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000490671,0.0003601264,0.0000034877767,0.00003575897,0.000024754094,0.00006797415,0.046670057,0.0000018071105,0.000021922595,0.9499955,0.00009233312,0.0022356086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004498356,0.00023464618,0.00007961093,0.00005944057,0.00004603102,0.000019910382,0.002212157,0.000058491587,0.000019765812,0.8352289,0.16134383,0.00024735913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040595507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007785399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9381452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026448353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012776587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99591845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046309195","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0009","title":"The Social Dimensions of Modesty","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Natural (archaeology); Character traits; Psychology; Social psychology; Simple (philosophy); Trait; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.07944100043389908,"score_gpt":0.24506652677599153,"score_spread":0.16562552634209243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046309195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44258907,0.0031542757,0.000020931217,0.08699867,0.0026180074,0.00016293701,0.00018080804,0.000013288425,0.464262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746245,0.000055019915,0.000008764459,0.0005803566,0.0017242894,5.8439997e-7,7.3565724e-7,0.000011442207,0.00015633838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991872,0.00006168779,0.0003256129,0.00005545965,0.00018654543,0.00018353267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890316,0.00013653924,0.00021143569,0.00010602603,0.00038043252,0.00026243474],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003005894,0.00008251331,0.00017513386,0.00011334707,0.0013403101,0.000029193367,0.0002704096,0.00004857453,0.00015963125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101730075,0.000047911435,0.00017812634,0.000037911796,0.0014314152,0.00009682924,0.000010798926,0.00036098136,0.000011364771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012263869,0.000011006461,0.000021046886,0.000004219561,0.000040167437,0.00005118287,0.0076664807,0.0000046265,0.000014732011,0.9909424,0.0010760357,0.00015584716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001587535,0.0000746915,0.00007124503,0.000021341908,0.00001598678,0.00003626941,0.00020348113,0.000007658092,0.000017899361,0.9180713,0.08125698,0.000064361426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074673846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00429234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5548734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033215383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068203034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046508152","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0656","title":"Humean Sentimentalism and Non-Consequentialist Moral Thinking","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Consequentialism; Internalism and externalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Moral psychology; Moral philosophy; Moral reasoning; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.22692927275701721,"score_gpt":0.2956127301590041,"score_spread":0.06868345740198686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046508152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29678217,0.0032783123,0.000006987185,0.0019115381,0.001229336,0.00018705703,0.000030456951,0.00013582128,0.6964383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99695444,0.00018598515,0.00006342095,0.0010261298,0.00043829024,0.00001142168,0.00000345437,0.000014986001,0.0013018748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992834,0.0000352535,0.00016798753,0.00019014228,0.0001385372,0.00018468917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964494,0.0000455003,0.000057798075,0.0001283886,0.00007786379,0.00004551635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025155168,0.00014072214,0.00020362636,0.00004793003,0.00072631723,0.000088011766,0.000100411155,0.000031779353,0.0005660201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022315067,0.0001108277,0.000057768753,0.000013470858,0.001292191,0.00014134259,0.0001854714,0.00015148909,0.000054598648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102067515,0.000028646142,0.00010725676,0.000033315242,0.00015560507,0.000018755522,0.108659774,1.7257431e-8,0.000034219032,0.8904303,0.00041210707,0.00010981503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022190812,0.000052417054,0.00021905181,0.000051493185,0.000056296154,0.0000034781822,0.009088034,0.0000036735503,0.00022218072,0.9846686,0.0052434974,0.00016935579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002465491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030067767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70017225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011984599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008094965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6197523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047131134","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00328.x","title":"Kantian Morals and Humean Motives","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Moral psychology; Categorical imperative; Moral disengagement; Epistemology; Moral reasoning; Philosophy; Categorical variable; Psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Social psychology; Morality; Computer science","score_opus":0.3649178342739854,"score_gpt":0.37270301528475497,"score_spread":0.007785181010769582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047131134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13619952,0.0023605986,0.000008758864,0.040410798,0.000075260024,0.00024111594,0.000033942175,0.00007592592,0.8205941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752223,0.000686522,0.0000532606,0.0006988073,0.000807603,0.000024427232,0.000005850317,0.000015346097,0.00018592003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825925,0.00020438268,0.00020606306,0.00044483924,0.00039150869,0.00049393467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893814,0.00040712624,0.000031790063,0.00020268148,0.00015253415,0.00026770224],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010591252,0.0001725038,0.00024778323,0.0001716713,0.0009850741,0.00026269897,0.00022322872,0.00012185734,0.00059410813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025677675,0.00012387891,0.00004316456,0.00008406939,0.0039412635,0.00018253285,0.00031801197,0.00088409416,0.000094123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005963115,0.00013788267,0.000021273723,0.000041317468,0.000026692494,0.000021423857,0.0066881794,0.0000010991812,0.000050596067,0.9914447,0.000006226903,0.0015009586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046882333,0.0005826884,0.00009290123,0.000039155897,0.0000055037517,0.0000041046255,0.000777939,0.000004581219,0.0000156115,0.99012226,0.007720189,0.00016627318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000688507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017566636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86132276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024443854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030620857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048897331","doi":"10.1080/00201740601016205","title":"How Kantian Must Kantian Constructivists Be?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy; Transcendental number; Presupposition; Argument (complex analysis); Naturalism; Inference; Value (mathematics); Mathematics","score_opus":0.07043201872566585,"score_gpt":0.249312497352865,"score_spread":0.17888047862719916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048897331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2938326,0.0003927996,0.00025220978,0.027390162,0.0035108693,0.00018232958,0.000092186994,0.00027809443,0.67406875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923915,0.000005291611,0.00003579407,0.0010056252,0.0040060016,0.000006197275,0.000027649396,0.000024821493,0.0024970989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904567,0.000051114814,0.00016462785,0.00024180626,0.0002186407,0.00027812878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994272,0.00008333387,0.000074770796,0.00025441407,0.000091202994,0.00006909141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016153688,0.00016036582,0.00018146288,0.00008409534,0.0003922914,0.0003921137,0.0001805738,0.000092217255,0.00071347953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003067114,0.0001384159,0.00010162682,0.00003295584,0.0016322098,0.00022492923,0.00005605163,0.00028210066,0.00006601199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008725953,0.000048710743,0.000055327168,0.00002076418,0.000018444614,0.00003101754,0.0028480191,8.4431406e-7,0.00013050775,0.99384177,0.0020621484,0.00093369547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002394706,0.000029940142,0.00016351306,0.000023674804,0.00001550099,0.000010040463,0.0010975894,0.000016478221,0.00023686896,0.6196586,0.3783028,0.00020552977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022451977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063939363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6985589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015140562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029040944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78121006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050101238","doi":"10.15173/russell.v32i1.2221","title":"Was Russell's 1922 Error Theory a Mistake?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Fallacy; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Value theory; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.08945723654456401,"score_gpt":0.29794868995900725,"score_spread":0.20849145341444325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050101238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4356041,0.23419705,0.00029111875,0.028927159,0.012377538,0.0008446598,0.00008161006,0.00016145606,0.2875153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794095,0.009790329,0.000050194085,0.0015312139,0.005316351,0.0000060403027,0.0000017043411,0.00006162919,0.0038330322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965575,0.0007302889,0.0010439025,0.00018527698,0.00071719725,0.00076585275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956491,0.002482323,0.0007056571,0.00041170616,0.00046384757,0.0002873503],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005576566,0.00046963122,0.0008647274,0.00017561537,0.0013218191,0.00012421705,0.0006913478,0.00013732706,0.0010510995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030017592,0.00024528036,0.00052030815,0.00011878077,0.0016032669,0.0005094316,0.000113378424,0.0011148765,0.00018882864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080365216,0.00048105765,0.000052636184,0.00016161699,0.0015317407,0.000021374966,0.12383696,0.000019314879,0.0003352555,0.865073,0.006808595,0.00087480573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012289024,0.00036979694,0.00011772719,0.000258645,0.0010172144,0.00017165032,0.024362149,0.000008339541,0.00085642125,0.54576075,0.42535082,0.0004976016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027832923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006707031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5438054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006546523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076471384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051678757","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0003","title":"Thinking in Time in Hume's Essays","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0635058259417763,"score_gpt":0.29575201620324365,"score_spread":0.23224619026146737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051678757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47716784,0.0008918681,2.6713593e-7,0.006120661,0.00066390104,0.00011850413,0.000006718738,0.000065526605,0.5149647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970219,0.000082817125,0.00001609667,0.00071447826,0.00051119854,0.000018472398,0.0000018011467,0.000012520402,0.001620724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916947,0.00004292227,0.00020735117,0.00017280279,0.00019323218,0.00021422697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995025,0.00023402339,0.000039148985,0.00014447299,0.000056057914,0.000023843715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007749906,0.00011776964,0.00023177956,0.000114872506,0.00024843265,0.00008329751,0.00020882665,0.000057876394,0.00071725185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019322791,0.00009380025,0.000042397292,0.00003732207,0.000504413,0.00011542951,0.00016991644,0.00059736666,0.00021259996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074746413,0.000053359978,0.00036264068,0.000019338786,0.00001839612,0.000023882723,0.0397603,7.6691316e-7,0.00010460735,0.9592053,0.00019239323,0.0002515256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024044808,0.000021141277,0.00043030924,0.00006120585,0.000004668805,7.1603887e-7,0.0014387325,0.000012399273,0.000019704401,0.9758559,0.021784293,0.00013050366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008641179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061438484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.519854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001519307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013468028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7853404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052106960","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300004972","title":"La morale kantienne et la philosophie transcendantale","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Transcendental number; Philosophy; Transcendental philosophy; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Transcendental idealism; A priori and a posteriori; Moral philosophy; Critical philosophy","score_opus":0.04995364553081777,"score_gpt":0.2755358061829278,"score_spread":0.22558216065211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052106960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13612314,0.00016271978,0.000029158984,0.006549267,0.000339375,0.00008781406,0.00012633309,0.00012783859,0.8564544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627155,0.0002151175,0.000011320708,0.0019443316,0.0009212143,0.000013148779,0.00007574526,0.000028940987,0.0005186416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990594,0.00020051652,0.00016683787,0.00019916832,0.00015025237,0.00022384223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993846,0.00025601094,0.000038903752,0.00018795728,0.000042585518,0.000089979956],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004613895,0.00014574519,0.000180297,0.000070573304,0.00017521315,0.00010474651,0.00017755813,0.00011035492,0.0010372829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003796909,0.00012503064,0.00012250844,0.000039331135,0.0006535703,0.0001645784,0.00002867102,0.0003862514,0.00027537261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000301657,0.00015641737,0.000035806013,0.0000149326115,0.000021350756,0.000104711165,0.0054395813,0.0000019868335,0.00010539473,0.99214417,0.00015486505,0.0017906178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031003036,0.000037166636,0.00008482466,0.0000209729,0.000012949823,0.000015420314,0.0001255951,0.000010227404,0.000031679458,0.65411955,0.34509456,0.0001370184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012928988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033718842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8601484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007797056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024838388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053097021","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0218","title":"The Gallant and the Philosopher","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Wife; Philosophy; German; Style (visual arts); Atheism; Literature; Classics; Theology; History; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08588222628250035,"score_gpt":0.2820694580853682,"score_spread":0.19618723180286785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053097021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019952001,0.04797604,0.0000025732613,0.28851947,0.00087381585,0.00027194252,0.000008316197,0.0000767121,0.64231914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927017,0.0031569342,0.0000022802262,0.0021324721,0.00085890054,0.0000256021,2.4843624e-7,0.000007391442,0.0011144372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994793,0.000047212376,0.00011592284,0.000099068486,0.00012398548,0.00013449979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992761,0.00044847574,0.00003573163,0.00014316542,0.00007729905,0.00001919888],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045942378,0.00008918867,0.00012795428,0.000008307251,0.001584485,0.0001180866,0.00011510446,0.000015669182,0.000033667387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014188353,0.00003443215,0.000049338843,0.000010592437,0.0032428487,0.000035188124,0.00011264721,0.00016164541,0.000045670036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029802366,0.000007082085,9.881683e-7,0.0000068492272,0.000105243205,0.0000017752775,0.02653208,7.5301773e-7,8.855258e-7,0.972856,0.0001934312,0.00026509608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005027606,0.000020299614,0.0000121352095,0.000015801354,0.000019751471,0.0000014859862,0.0042108865,9.77639e-7,0.0000032008531,0.8719085,0.12325121,0.000053020955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030838353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048026154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008916503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000999196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053920063","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0302","title":"Walking the Tightrope of Reason: The Precarious Life of a Rational Animal (review)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Nothing; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Relativism; Epistemology; Teleology","score_opus":0.10252884932915744,"score_gpt":0.31028364538936676,"score_spread":0.2077547960602093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053920063","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029850982,0.6274761,0.000003952541,0.11126091,0.00032635426,0.0005160944,0.000050431252,0.000035659188,0.23047951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98426753,0.012572661,0.000010596575,0.001830174,0.0007576044,0.000020748103,0.0000012634952,0.00000604708,0.0005333758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992345,0.00010276774,0.00026168223,0.000086347834,0.0002215284,0.00009315324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990018,0.0004218251,0.00014802565,0.00016365053,0.0002500608,0.000014633756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005485023,0.00008497053,0.0002181304,0.000012921581,0.00033126774,0.000010178223,0.00017325116,0.000015802158,0.00038903634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003314538,0.000037825965,0.00009808032,0.000024402498,0.00092415273,0.00004936054,0.0001001912,0.0001457683,0.00001305033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015841026,0.00003101784,0.0000064050796,0.00012685473,0.00016899919,2.2899648e-7,0.02231151,0.0000021165422,0.00002482249,0.9723064,0.0039142976,0.0010915198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003257265,0.00022978024,0.00075301394,0.0008501918,0.00025701238,0.0000023293474,0.004154505,0.00006910907,0.00015252602,0.2743716,0.71864367,0.00019051871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016394557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018770172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9544166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007133665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003172521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4259675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054837677","doi":"10.1017/s0953820800003423","title":"The ‘Two Hats’ Problem in Consequentialist Ethics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Cognitivism (psychology); Conscience; Philosophy; Epistemology; Deontological ethics; Psychology; Internalism and externalism; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Cognition","score_opus":0.14687427661513056,"score_gpt":0.2983389804075128,"score_spread":0.15146470379238222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054837677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017169379,0.004165516,0.0000045398046,0.089537024,0.00040761934,0.00021300651,0.000028015496,0.00006545458,0.88840944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958261,0.00022428596,0.000016742262,0.0017725704,0.00016783424,0.000013360594,0.0000015143488,0.000008427901,0.0019691307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992341,0.00015233234,0.00016683269,0.00013017937,0.00013957045,0.00017700855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989498,0.00076876755,0.000028071505,0.00016087777,0.000050810428,0.000041662926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008511173,0.00007769252,0.000084000276,0.000025766407,0.0005003068,0.00015172185,0.00012056615,0.00005733943,0.00086755527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020152277,0.000051328512,0.00003210378,0.000019996429,0.0012576778,0.000059095273,0.000051431427,0.000599211,0.00010145142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048418246,0.00002199261,0.00001158032,0.00001326123,0.000006980472,0.00000498683,0.016037257,3.461356e-7,0.000004474956,0.98191047,0.0003094053,0.0016743775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013042211,0.00001508241,0.000012325643,0.000017234715,0.000003334397,0.0000014413373,0.0005284112,0.00019851344,0.000003853128,0.68921155,0.3098249,0.00005291235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040937882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030448902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97865677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012241241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014959795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9499122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059240278","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.09.006","title":"Kant’s concept of natural purpose and the reflecting power of judgement","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Epistemology; Judgement; Natural (archaeology); Teleology; Relation (database); Action (physics); Identification (biology); Power (physics); Critical philosophy; Subject (documents); Practical reason; Causality (physics); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.20633920217361915,"score_gpt":0.34041600208008843,"score_spread":0.13407679990646929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059240278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6915052,0.2757534,4.536339e-7,0.0040108063,0.0016506852,0.0003022438,0.000028523016,0.000008023886,0.026740668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388146,0.0055934917,0.00005159415,0.00022737397,0.00020583792,0.000014077315,7.826705e-7,0.0000027723206,0.000022579316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974805,0.00022749235,0.00090923626,0.0005517954,0.000530161,0.00030079126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977718,0.001324665,0.00048446696,0.00013250964,0.00021295635,0.00007361624],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034728034,0.00024528574,0.00091758906,0.00030975064,0.00053610816,0.000005398068,0.00034234967,0.00008929047,0.00003029471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007151458,0.00013495723,0.00008000455,0.00025726634,0.18775332,0.00018267601,0.00041088762,0.00028652602,1.0490068e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024525003,0.00020138032,0.0007796643,0.00034478953,0.00004597826,0.000004257843,0.039847482,7.038341e-7,0.0005194609,0.95713806,0.00008731496,0.0007856336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010080467,0.0012818999,0.00053009385,0.0005832304,0.000031115524,0.00000539613,0.007467817,0.000015541824,0.00011024863,0.9809391,0.007793166,0.00023435398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000109521025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035754132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3023763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000929751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074223855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8144572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059338219","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0011","title":"Philosophical Relations, Natural Relations, and Philosophic Decisionism in Belief in the External World: Comments on P. J. E. Kail, Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Realism; Natural (archaeology); Criticism; Projection (relational algebra); Literature; Art; History","score_opus":0.07036062624697051,"score_gpt":0.32286377797375543,"score_spread":0.25250315172678495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059338219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78916246,0.0050209793,0.0000010295746,0.15747899,0.0008880301,0.000871065,0.000027000766,0.000053492935,0.046496958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955523,0.00068751356,0.000049553073,0.0024366237,0.00089511095,0.00012825978,0.000013218927,0.000024655563,0.00021275024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771255,0.00040178586,0.00063856685,0.00049423624,0.00043727277,0.00031557807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981675,0.0012290891,0.00014755368,0.00030698293,0.00009286805,0.000056018293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016782982,0.00030929258,0.00040190786,0.0007237293,0.00071756943,0.0001616917,0.00021492215,0.0001513497,0.00004713918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005027529,0.000222123,0.000059407204,0.00024056456,0.0010564838,0.0003635607,0.00017249552,0.0021562846,0.000019959467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009415053,0.00023294499,0.0033474118,0.000024903151,0.000024252604,0.000032670694,0.014708147,0.0000031648628,0.00001704699,0.9803363,0.00012504794,0.0010539355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012128935,0.00011991887,0.030228237,0.00034008097,0.000017438751,0.00001109745,0.00079790124,0.000101038226,0.0000017579948,0.96268857,0.0042345654,0.0002465316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021720746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076934937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20638986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065782944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027069584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9368104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059453367","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.664025","title":"Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Dialectic; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Transcendental idealism; Critical philosophy; Reflexive pronoun","score_opus":0.06562803257129741,"score_gpt":0.23684473839375003,"score_spread":0.17121670582245263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059453367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35830775,0.26735586,0.0007876459,0.03457384,0.050009795,0.0031020255,0.00024740407,0.00006435512,0.2855513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970545,0.00015271989,0.00003492067,0.00044091602,0.0012826303,0.000014078758,5.243969e-7,0.000016143169,0.0010035346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989397,0.0001384958,0.00039050519,0.00007029259,0.0002875625,0.00017343572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990407,0.00040936534,0.00025422417,0.00012197957,0.000113610935,0.00006010205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015007912,0.00009701783,0.00020059523,0.000029622694,0.0009907465,0.0000310789,0.0003479823,0.00003926543,0.00016710444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105597865,0.00005387044,0.0002520398,0.000016574226,0.0023462733,0.000121773,0.00004067636,0.0004021198,0.0000016735976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014813009,0.00014565735,0.0000066423895,0.000073296535,0.0001332059,5.3204013e-7,0.049719565,8.0870086e-7,0.000100192905,0.9435339,0.000692352,0.0054456983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016995366,0.000041322022,0.00025233536,0.00020565462,0.0001601215,0.00018781173,0.0006343927,0.000011022821,0.000050688577,0.8375746,0.15906064,0.000121888006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026853544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007941611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6387468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008592556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010749657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8644942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060665499","doi":"10.1017/s0031819106000088","title":"Beliefs, Desires and Moral Realism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Moral realism; Argument (complex analysis); Realism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Moral disengagement; Moral psychology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.055393922150041824,"score_gpt":0.22007862821955293,"score_spread":0.1646847060695111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060665499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037185587,0.0010309068,0.0000074817303,0.021338694,0.00028136128,0.00010527095,0.000061723076,0.00014184004,0.9398471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942725,0.000030557963,0.000039107003,0.0015787567,0.0034696902,0.0000095965215,0.000023307857,0.000021077014,0.0005554296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924463,0.00003644459,0.00017125825,0.00020348115,0.00015982307,0.00018436104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959165,0.00007722583,0.000046681318,0.00016571247,0.000054186847,0.00006454875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014347714,0.00013593222,0.00014915412,0.00006422338,0.0003093751,0.00011866823,0.00010674807,0.000056285506,0.00025337562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015967893,0.0001141826,0.00005392997,0.00002100904,0.0005448749,0.0001352097,0.00005561752,0.00018307727,0.000069739915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011444746,0.000046711208,0.000039054856,0.000021109769,0.000009512713,0.000010201985,0.00081046735,0.0000010018832,0.000034416276,0.9982573,0.00047817585,0.0002806492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020239528,0.000043444095,0.000237202,0.00002050583,0.000011433892,0.0000032373364,0.00001832878,0.000019393132,0.000040147905,0.9598604,0.039390326,0.00015317195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047838467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010696213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95708686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009122366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011304854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4656231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062216655","doi":"10.7202/203321ar","title":"Les fictions de la raison pure","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.175633954051322,"score_gpt":0.35830367579730826,"score_spread":0.18266972174598625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062216655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008422627,0.036270592,0.0001305662,0.16604427,0.0007565433,0.00015159536,0.0002925391,0.00026032593,0.78767097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669291,0.001778693,0.00014991166,0.0022061553,0.021616276,0.000038590497,0.000046751327,0.00007259224,0.0071619707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997941,0.00055458886,0.000402098,0.00035756652,0.00025404716,0.00049067737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985137,0.000708625,0.00013320014,0.0003199161,0.00017712876,0.00014743827],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072412245,0.00034322683,0.00031270031,0.00014077063,0.0010439497,0.0004031786,0.00027177573,0.00051190506,0.0026078192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011151799,0.00034579032,0.00028045682,0.000053129435,0.0022383905,0.00027049347,0.00008338518,0.0010687965,0.00021222206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025234807,0.0004918143,0.0000771057,0.00014800661,0.00006042076,0.000056336026,0.0013576493,0.000035330355,0.000096310294,0.98651713,0.009765608,0.0013690788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001476314,0.000063093255,0.00014712068,0.00012124984,0.00005706855,0.000015909027,0.000049762817,0.000072324874,0.000086842985,0.54778457,0.45123687,0.00021755048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004927668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032229067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9585064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017134973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009351997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062407234","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0195","title":"The Bibliothèque raisonnée Review of Volume 3 of the Treatise : Authorship, Text, and Translation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Volume (thermodynamics); Translation (biology); Psychology; Literature; Art; Physics; Chemistry; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.08061987343246789,"score_gpt":0.29450610020604917,"score_spread":0.21388622677358127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062407234","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02240885,0.74261224,0.0000059125327,0.03305077,0.00029833717,0.00043875165,0.00006161174,0.000025661184,0.20109789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560988,0.04165701,0.000005088647,0.00015237943,0.00014426133,0.000012255339,8.491745e-7,0.0000062098907,0.0019231411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992925,0.00012055605,0.00027117017,0.000083392944,0.00014661041,0.00008580272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999131,0.00041687727,0.00013540198,0.00015104195,0.00015516764,0.000010511835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053568016,0.000082168444,0.00021020402,0.000047162746,0.0003880442,0.000023189888,0.00009934262,0.000022871127,0.00008818753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014864422,0.000039032482,0.00008599136,0.00009594404,0.0011738575,0.00005937719,0.000035469573,0.00010373529,0.0000018515775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076185775,0.000019326879,0.00011924262,0.0009815907,0.000049368537,1.3866372e-7,0.005008874,2.3345576e-7,0.000020042877,0.9893561,0.0017894062,0.0026480777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014316487,0.00004664086,0.0015827786,0.0014848772,0.00009227914,5.1249543e-7,0.00045907314,0.00000813765,0.00005301761,0.8362651,0.15979077,0.00007367663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009153032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080723275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93368995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005050151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016770375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43251267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065305192","doi":"10.4314/sajpem.v19i2.31311","title":"Moral Realism, Social Construction, and Realism, Social Construction, and Communal Ontology","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Moral realism; Epistemology; Realism; Rationality; Naturalism; Objectivity (philosophy); Sociology; Moral psychology; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Expressivism; Positivism; Supervenience; Philosophical realism; Philosophy; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.04131744776207573,"score_gpt":0.24242775890348056,"score_spread":0.20111031114140482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065305192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.680721,0.0007735878,0.000034600173,0.056956884,0.0010723559,0.0002058544,0.0005651417,0.00007948757,0.2595911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938203,0.00006920544,0.00027076073,0.00093816174,0.0048054326,0.0000024333715,0.000008827575,0.000026906424,0.000057934732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981149,0.0003227175,0.00069162395,0.00022192033,0.0003427097,0.0003061333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998669,0.000117528514,0.0005114627,0.000117906595,0.00037517177,0.00020892861],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053602445,0.00025549484,0.00058689056,0.00019928897,0.0012117972,0.0001688235,0.00021003948,0.00018178232,0.0008495466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004404556,0.00022461633,0.00017484764,0.00007594119,0.0046937293,0.0002606361,0.00005159548,0.0008705406,0.0000068867485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033992305,0.000041523825,0.00019411143,0.000026179789,0.00014052833,0.000026489777,0.050080482,5.4541204e-7,0.000008313487,0.94346255,0.0001901284,0.0054891985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012790288,0.0002602372,0.0003021234,0.000031430038,0.00013072064,0.00043706282,0.007647169,0.000004105665,0.0000037318864,0.97363603,0.016023843,0.00024450227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000062696214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003125868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31309932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003652555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011091587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066070446","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300003504","title":"Fichte et la première philosophie de la nature de Schelling","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Analogy; Transcendental idealism; Absolute (philosophy); Notice; Transcendental number; Idealism; Interpretation (philosophy); Doctrine; Humanities; Theology","score_opus":0.022454311044838415,"score_gpt":0.28380882764070386,"score_spread":0.26135451659586545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066070446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111595646,0.00060040277,0.00025403616,0.010356368,0.0003112016,0.00010991287,0.00009664422,0.0001733283,0.87650245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938318,0.00009190035,0.0002440383,0.004033353,0.0015966889,0.000011961254,0.000036920028,0.000029968503,0.00012333745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999102,0.00019803281,0.00013198458,0.00018039337,0.00013766049,0.00024995444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921215,0.00042149957,0.00004545206,0.00017168245,0.000048381196,0.000100838515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008536899,0.00013919026,0.00014250258,0.000056441368,0.00021416873,0.00016723841,0.00019466919,0.00033649648,0.00011864608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021823593,0.00012288189,0.00009815933,0.000028699376,0.00041356139,0.00011048534,0.000047110414,0.001191107,0.000067455825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017791723,0.00008219778,0.000020904838,0.000026208883,0.000026428837,0.000054372227,0.0056255874,0.00017653583,0.00018245235,0.9935492,0.000039117043,0.00019919567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034839255,0.000025178184,0.000043438227,0.00007387238,0.000017535502,0.000010422808,0.000090875976,0.000019555011,0.00026184533,0.9150016,0.08395881,0.00014849273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008367964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009636224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8822362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038308717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013246061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5174833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066136820","doi":"10.1017/s0263523200000422","title":"Philip T. Grier (ed.), Identity and Difference. Studies in Hegel's Logic, Philosophy of Spirit, and Politics, State University of New York Press, Albany: NY, 2007, ISBN 978-0-7914-7167-8 (hbk.). Pp. 289.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; State (computer science); Identity (music); Politics; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Art history; Sociology; Law; Political science; Art; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07958903600692244,"score_gpt":0.2573600540431931,"score_spread":0.17777101803627068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066136820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8304536,0.11917902,0.000028522365,0.03233502,0.0005549736,0.0009435647,0.001002687,0.000044681263,0.015457939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886388,0.008283581,0.00024210534,0.0004217653,0.00028273827,0.0000012100468,0.0000044868098,0.000019946743,0.0021053255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982871,0.00021157548,0.00048442604,0.00027045663,0.0003916874,0.00035477162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848104,0.00038016494,0.0004183216,0.0003516385,0.00023391373,0.00013495545],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008239398,0.0002519142,0.00070792635,0.000032131637,0.00021823152,0.000017350438,0.00037801504,0.00014993358,0.00028936326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001503068,0.00021001285,0.0002873702,0.000050459803,0.0039510853,0.00009818157,0.0005449873,0.0003377986,0.000002800855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018641644,0.00055778224,0.009484849,0.0021791188,0.00056788523,0.0000022968084,0.028198551,0.000006134196,0.0001404293,0.91835505,0.039864857,0.00045660624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015855407,0.00018133124,0.009684811,0.0007452826,0.00019514709,0.0000041658527,0.0048472146,0.000013582621,0.00029817334,0.88004327,0.10206824,0.0003332708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011163084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029030736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15818524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041160692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058930676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99875957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067391187","doi":"10.7202/1029065ar","title":"Grounding Animal Rights in Mutual Advantage Contractarianism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal rights; Cruelty; Social contract; Human rights; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06261867296012218,"score_gpt":0.27251083845677826,"score_spread":0.20989216549665607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067391187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45969808,0.0001924504,0.00010293873,0.0023892792,0.00043355842,0.00014862671,0.000017927057,0.000098945995,0.53691816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969461,0.000013954733,0.00011337177,0.0017488159,0.0007336675,0.0000132003315,0.000011723952,0.000018919323,0.0004002204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880475,0.00017687299,0.00025052723,0.00021860526,0.00018454438,0.000364722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933445,0.00018526966,0.000066955596,0.00014884099,0.000078200654,0.00018627824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008959003,0.00016257817,0.00021499558,0.00010107673,0.00019342208,0.00015020905,0.00019610302,0.00021886142,0.00026984635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000134283,0.00014076736,0.00006482077,0.00003107068,0.0003280099,0.00025535832,0.000049615053,0.0008087467,0.00010360056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001195582,0.00005652536,0.00007831796,0.000011980828,0.000014381065,0.00017916951,0.016312988,0.0000045233346,0.00020129212,0.9827896,0.000068059766,0.00016364355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061702123,0.00012456204,0.00007488717,0.000041876403,0.0000084723715,0.000014569827,0.0021342544,0.00020663037,0.00014543197,0.91760826,0.078817226,0.00020678565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016315043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003474663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.537248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016342205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007779984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5740326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069812032","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002857","title":"The Glass Shatters and Ducks Turn into Rabbits: Bad Faith and Moral Luck","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Faith; Bad faith; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.0343269982403286,"score_gpt":0.22335736073104417,"score_spread":0.1890303624907156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069812032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92663664,0.0017759902,0.000013786845,0.02164317,0.00066739594,0.00016764058,0.000051804265,0.00006261763,0.04898094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627596,0.00043861772,0.000008960579,0.0022535669,0.0005936748,0.000009419251,0.000013030073,0.000012665955,0.00039412116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999356,0.0000593189,0.00012737866,0.0001674312,0.000114084425,0.00017583408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945545,0.00024570382,0.000037375532,0.00013676206,0.000041443338,0.000083270694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021295268,0.000114319926,0.00012975898,0.000026592828,0.00083673437,0.00014400967,0.00010398507,0.000054618406,0.000044626715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000642426,0.00007185032,0.00003265102,0.000015290347,0.0012648583,0.0001149369,0.00007861339,0.00023010638,0.000020755806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025999163,0.000016958646,0.00045969294,0.000011247106,0.000024250712,0.000016078258,0.020927988,3.0761322e-7,0.000028427647,0.97585225,0.0008240758,0.0018127426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039579737,0.00007728201,0.002803705,0.000019007464,0.000014229445,0.000014654415,0.0006936885,0.00004844475,0.000028395529,0.86855,0.12717192,0.0001829027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026296914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010640998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12634784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008094239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019465717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6435569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071220481","doi":"10.1016/j.emospa.2013.11.009","title":"The family and the bonds of recognition","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emotion, space and society","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Bond; Psychology; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.024282316871497532,"score_gpt":0.21325886747531878,"score_spread":0.18897655060382124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071220481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.661627,0.002197929,0.0003933627,0.079559445,0.0004194053,0.00024603278,0.000023062572,0.000046336667,0.2554874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961169,0.001607303,0.000014976879,0.0012057528,0.00032710604,0.0000031055517,0.0000025934435,0.000004372176,0.0007179002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995957,0.00008593349,0.0000882716,0.00007306997,0.00008530507,0.0000717461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999399,0.00036455042,0.00005001351,0.000085851854,0.00007988276,0.000020681204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009527329,0.000051827057,0.00008005472,0.00000389013,0.000693258,0.00008047362,0.000042796604,0.00003773455,0.000017668634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056803496,0.000025768639,0.00005492766,0.00001302325,0.0011917691,0.00005026935,0.000025591024,0.00012610242,0.0000027262831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007730293,0.000005889654,0.0000077734485,0.000012186182,0.000016227375,1.11970095e-8,0.021539852,1.2083376e-7,0.000014665255,0.974985,0.0011978158,0.002212726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039385856,0.000030932155,0.00048177197,0.000015046206,0.000017807883,4.2633775e-7,0.006463519,0.00031985584,0.000008952233,0.9316671,0.06055743,0.000043303844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000078979014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003159414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33448988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000023415932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069672924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53320503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071692372","doi":"10.1017/s0031819109000394","title":"Human Nature, Personhood, and Ethical Naturalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Deliberation; Epistemology; Creatures; Value (mathematics); Naturalism; Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03641396381475498,"score_gpt":0.28752738270643874,"score_spread":0.25111341889168376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071692372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06575461,0.0015503351,0.0000011610852,0.18765639,0.00047528173,0.00015043368,0.000031119744,0.00020374484,0.7441769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588143,0.000023518347,0.000023092787,0.03813792,0.0027072958,0.0000037516525,0.0000138283385,0.00001694689,0.00025930617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988784,0.00007045234,0.00019654809,0.00032029927,0.00028553448,0.00024873263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993862,0.000075658216,0.000057386285,0.00022793475,0.000098820106,0.0001540272],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028034433,0.00020232063,0.00022459883,0.00009492224,0.00057868304,0.00017307403,0.00020032017,0.00044429634,0.0003667122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007140888,0.00016466042,0.000103742386,0.000034056528,0.0005326667,0.000108232365,0.000047633763,0.0024017254,0.00005830504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012569384,0.00003883909,0.0000017109014,0.000014694168,0.000016157368,0.000014372144,0.0030389754,7.8987945e-8,0.00013567145,0.9958444,0.0004084648,0.0004740332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029876016,0.00015573567,0.00015657232,0.000035012792,0.00001800211,0.000006970622,0.000060254315,0.000010795373,0.000028139944,0.9689817,0.030020295,0.00022780508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013157551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010080787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89305973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000140559105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012463516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073218254","doi":"10.1017/s001221730000754x","title":"À la rescousse du platonisme moral","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Platonism; Philosophy; Objectivism; Epistemology; Doctrine; Internalism and externalism; Theology","score_opus":0.03527293538907866,"score_gpt":0.2217534428594767,"score_spread":0.18648050747039804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073218254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2211253,0.00006981502,0.0000013032176,0.0027694514,0.00019550484,0.000043373548,0.00005290547,0.00007932697,0.775663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521714,0.00006671371,0.0000061329542,0.0016467792,0.0011278082,0.0000075928638,0.000032778098,0.0000149112,0.00188016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994309,0.000067950605,0.000113232476,0.00012753156,0.00010770957,0.00015269556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996334,0.00011914931,0.000016837557,0.00014458233,0.000024133178,0.00006192228],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021920764,0.00008687087,0.00010801651,0.000026201042,0.00019642618,0.00010294805,0.00012532808,0.000070732756,0.009789126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024626595,0.00007116595,0.000061561244,0.000014118028,0.00036500566,0.00008838397,0.000017693546,0.00022906349,0.0011907573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023430935,0.000047974918,0.000015480957,0.0000047407325,0.000009710334,0.000035330824,0.006885614,0.000004521084,0.0000061538076,0.98773605,0.0012044199,0.004026557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015129977,0.000023233128,0.00008302695,0.0000074650097,0.0000051804045,0.0000029361925,0.000057726927,0.000031871674,0.000011770927,0.60309774,0.39644545,0.00008229663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018108131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022038234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77409184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007871266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019506451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073245989","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0186","title":"The New Hume Debate (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Philosophy; Skepticism; Epistemology; Realism; Metaphysics; Art history; History","score_opus":0.192873443841314,"score_gpt":0.30929846122684046,"score_spread":0.11642501738552646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073245989","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016136096,0.47229964,0.000001173595,0.07151635,0.0006389964,0.00012576686,0.000004439817,0.0000725358,0.45517972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54822034,0.35180777,0.000007425814,0.010846058,0.0021936554,0.00003549815,0.0000012608267,0.000023785977,0.08686423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992021,0.00005397267,0.00020298477,0.00014158741,0.00017681374,0.00022257034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923927,0.0003144498,0.0000593517,0.00022416854,0.00011099378,0.00005179421],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028543756,0.0001303753,0.00020717437,0.000015209703,0.0010453257,0.00006145911,0.00019432478,0.000020194577,0.0016945883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024738265,0.000071018905,0.00010276405,0.000023583085,0.00066092703,0.00006567409,0.000105301566,0.000198257,0.0009442142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014879889,0.000011413965,4.772905e-7,0.000057242883,0.00009133354,0.000003242963,0.005719668,7.033225e-8,0.0000010946101,0.8158874,0.17239183,0.0058347215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058606587,0.000021621869,0.0000020790255,0.00011544024,0.000024453857,7.8319863e-7,0.0003927325,0.0000030158942,0.000002300443,0.4016359,0.5976727,0.00007038522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001683606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024459168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5480589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011963839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006978347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074070165","doi":"10.1080/13669877.2014.923024","title":"Using vNM expected utility theory to facilitate the decision-making in social ethics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Undecidable problem; Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Perception; Computer science; oskar; Mathematical economics; Management science; Sociology; Mathematics; Economics; Philosophy; Algorithm","score_opus":0.5376805659693374,"score_gpt":0.4835019065712265,"score_spread":0.05417865939811095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074070165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96139836,0.0003323698,0.007251397,0.007250166,0.00045315782,0.00017654548,0.00002560004,0.000010086304,0.023102319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806625,0.00004776951,0.00023491798,0.00033044626,0.0012599454,0.0000017384383,1.5144225e-7,0.000012897173,0.00004586439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935249,0.0041753054,0.00050226686,0.00014811404,0.0012793039,0.00037009097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98222953,0.016137775,0.00016119107,0.00020894666,0.0011626547,0.00009988963],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03641938,0.00009963661,0.0002457335,0.00037342886,0.0013821607,0.0002465799,0.00055866654,0.00012895302,0.0004496036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018125346,0.00006000221,0.00014293134,0.00019661407,0.00081038126,0.00014631002,0.00020821384,0.0040429956,0.000021610042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062362984,0.000074413256,0.000101991005,0.000014944208,0.00002445303,0.000013696063,0.14544742,0.00007081034,0.00004342722,0.8212032,0.00023581341,0.032146223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022365278,0.00009268112,0.0011594889,0.00015216929,0.0000070102515,0.0000037174486,0.0070966473,0.0005142406,0.000005443821,0.9595856,0.031088626,0.00007070741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014935689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007025644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13838242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000918274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022491388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076319987","doi":"10.1353/hms.2013.0002","title":"Le etiche della virtù. La riflessione contemporanea a partire da Hume by Alessio Vaccari (review)","year":2013,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Virtue; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Narrative; Humanities; Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0895035395452263,"score_gpt":0.3145196390547439,"score_spread":0.2250160995095176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076319987","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006292797,0.6190333,0.000008594501,0.060030535,0.0010135534,0.001223387,0.00027300382,0.00018463844,0.3119402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85822284,0.11973239,0.000012047767,0.0059632408,0.00076876616,0.00030997922,0.00005141155,0.00008547694,0.014853832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589115,0.0008171978,0.0011115021,0.0007936989,0.0006410672,0.00074537605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669796,0.0010711319,0.0004787984,0.0007229314,0.00072551647,0.00030366937],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012070711,0.0007470231,0.0014841376,0.00008007735,0.0018263521,0.0003841024,0.0005579513,0.00032492485,0.0026107847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047932143,0.00057278224,0.00041825834,0.00010841263,0.0026352897,0.0003535972,0.0006288583,0.0011477204,0.0017149544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027841019,0.0004475115,0.000017918797,0.001789295,0.00081993314,0.000030715022,0.011142984,6.2809806e-7,0.00025697495,0.7640427,0.2189395,0.0024840436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009213312,0.00019052024,0.000029006838,0.0043530604,0.00031208523,0.000004749466,0.0064948476,0.00001620211,0.000078439065,0.3311482,0.65569335,0.00075821276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005433672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013395162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8519301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004706339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001941777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076562610","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0136","title":"Conceivability and Modality in Hume: A Lemma in an Argument in Defense of Skeptical Realism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Realism; Metaphysics; Certainty","score_opus":0.16761218522245755,"score_gpt":0.35175253625645797,"score_spread":0.18414035103400042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076562610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693473,0.0011665631,4.6199156e-7,0.0011446694,0.00006155672,0.0001674257,0.000015743219,0.000008786694,0.028087474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952614,0.00017974328,0.000018474802,0.00017835802,0.000033487755,0.00002748124,0.0000015300311,0.000006314414,0.00002844771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867094,0.00032706413,0.00040738413,0.00025080383,0.00013811415,0.00020570199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993608,0.00029740942,0.000049552305,0.00017591492,0.00007526052,0.000041034516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012469689,0.0001254013,0.0003853524,0.000083864754,0.00006804392,0.000019025747,0.00006218297,0.000057093723,0.00006671511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042136686,0.00010455635,0.000031870004,0.000046740995,0.0011866756,0.00010178523,0.0000609163,0.0002601346,0.0000013512198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040256884,0.00023736154,0.010626411,0.0000820657,0.000012344311,0.0000115964185,0.046793636,0.0000040686455,0.000012974,0.94207597,0.000004683788,0.00009861313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066285534,0.00011024333,0.017176535,0.0000722994,0.000006107964,5.0571265e-7,0.007924633,0.000020992831,0.000022485965,0.97342306,0.0004595368,0.00012072245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005559004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013436958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038869005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005211802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026094174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7498138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081125619","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0648","title":"Projectivism and Error in Hume’s Ethics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Subjectivism; Face (sociological concept); Moral psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.6162252095896528,"score_gpt":0.38329088135945966,"score_spread":0.2329343282301931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081125619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30421373,0.0059335963,0.0000031112188,0.0064724335,0.0006761984,0.00029598753,0.000013605126,0.0001170141,0.68227434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99747205,0.00046375417,0.000029529185,0.00074659794,0.00021094068,0.0000300784,5.3445086e-7,0.000011958452,0.0010345839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928945,0.00008246403,0.00015582361,0.00018197436,0.000119178505,0.00017112306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995063,0.00021522204,0.000039679653,0.00010740843,0.00010363103,0.000027749902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005815912,0.00011633634,0.000197875,0.000074618445,0.00031312232,0.000027327907,0.000072194336,0.00006515862,0.00014299557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026763594,0.00008738005,0.000030120424,0.000022953993,0.000979874,0.00010245378,0.000118416,0.0005010258,0.00002579402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011699991,0.000036115693,0.000114649454,0.000050222203,0.000035202687,0.000007225239,0.2630786,2.0437374e-8,0.0000033170697,0.73637766,0.000061008355,0.00022431108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019557081,0.00009068591,0.00092778367,0.00006954777,0.000013806829,0.0000011045856,0.01859638,0.0000035404687,0.00001996422,0.964966,0.014975713,0.00013993317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022545124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027664653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6932583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012666641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023169916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36103868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081277561","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0311","title":"\"All Is Revolution in Us\": Personal Identity in Shaftesbury and Hume","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Personal identity; Identity (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Happiness; Law; Self; Aesthetics; Political science","score_opus":0.0984612116391918,"score_gpt":0.32908451629888186,"score_spread":0.23062330465969005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081277561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9132614,0.008807317,1.7201428e-7,0.005459274,0.00010749788,0.00008988478,0.00003086737,0.000023055201,0.07222052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99317265,0.0027509176,0.0000046730506,0.0016175176,0.00026181972,0.000013604708,0.0000029515704,0.0000073834753,0.002168471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918294,0.000053413747,0.00021722142,0.00021099148,0.00014754683,0.00018790505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974173,0.00008175743,0.000028622686,0.00007870716,0.000041306193,0.000027852737],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041167293,0.00011182495,0.00020604284,0.000083672385,0.00016830266,0.00005247681,0.00006588882,0.000044747176,0.0010396552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059982813,0.0000978483,0.000038802253,0.00004104191,0.0004913735,0.00026638195,0.000060203103,0.00023472006,0.00007461726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009574209,0.00011958366,0.0025727965,0.00011894088,0.0000706674,0.000028279332,0.15854637,0.0000013372122,0.000011567196,0.8357166,0.0011606901,0.0015574374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059789553,0.00005828937,0.020804418,0.00014925146,0.000016162217,0.000001584266,0.0037877862,0.00006982974,0.000002474168,0.9246185,0.049695823,0.00019798538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055535213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066214604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15475859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042677682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009920057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082506280","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00060.x","title":"Blackburn's Problem: On Its Not Insignificant Residue","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supervenience; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Autonomy; Moral reasoning; Philosophy; Moral philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Moral psychology; Metaphysics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.5206330726340815,"score_gpt":0.38888061912053795,"score_spread":0.1317524535135436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082506280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034989398,0.0004947357,0.0000026578916,0.052806325,0.00009554644,0.00043542497,0.000038254428,0.00010293598,0.9110347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924887,0.0010791533,0.000018713383,0.0023182495,0.0016855343,0.00009853228,0.000010846296,0.000027421776,0.0022728522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968566,0.0005215951,0.00034309144,0.0006594866,0.0008466281,0.00077262067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976706,0.0012063355,0.000056594854,0.00036730504,0.00034985546,0.00034930432],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00191565,0.00025601086,0.00033139274,0.00029116488,0.0011267018,0.0002893571,0.00045954555,0.00019896337,0.0025949907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047110743,0.00017951276,0.00007874366,0.00018094014,0.0015620022,0.00016163559,0.0003007067,0.0017018626,0.0008549415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041541865,0.00035085817,0.000010880977,0.000045589826,0.00003494177,0.00009509535,0.0027475518,0.0000024526678,0.000098433346,0.99411523,0.00015678463,0.001926734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039895254,0.0013075756,0.00003541989,0.00005307412,0.0000056828408,0.0000044226863,0.00026501776,0.000024801884,0.000039690098,0.9006969,0.09694045,0.00022803548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003888575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016482396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9574993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005304099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052120744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082794432","doi":"10.5840/monist200386321","title":"A Humean Argument for Benevolence to Strangers","year":2003,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Monism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Analytic philosophy; Teleological argument; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Metaphysics; Teleology","score_opus":0.05819118820001195,"score_gpt":0.2745608058165235,"score_spread":0.21636961761651152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082794432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07947606,0.0032543188,0.0012240905,0.122794814,0.003472712,0.0031082418,0.0009760971,0.00013734566,0.7855563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987388,0.00008506348,0.00006247358,0.0036002505,0.00060249836,0.00008325724,0.0000056935887,0.000035044326,0.008137706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986246,0.00011814033,0.00026820938,0.00029602472,0.00025501783,0.00043797118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890953,0.00028702867,0.000074970965,0.0004600488,0.00010398518,0.00016441764],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008642389,0.00022747836,0.0002211228,0.000035872996,0.0014596812,0.00042406525,0.00037644478,0.00007856755,0.0008482997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010774629,0.00015868987,0.00018213413,0.00004320133,0.000513593,0.000050304985,0.000045673463,0.00028962473,0.00026272953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060591687,0.0001043877,0.0000018228582,0.000047700647,0.0000624967,0.0000023304503,0.0098210685,0.00003803421,0.00009833219,0.98817545,0.00070125755,0.00088654563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022763385,0.00022662958,0.000009030386,0.00006634285,0.000058112753,9.2777776e-7,0.0013105822,0.00003993868,0.00035305787,0.58596236,0.41156444,0.0001809464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011677402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014258898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90791196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053968106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071266746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083102510","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2008.0005","title":"On the Value of Happiness: Herder contra Kant","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Destiny (ISS module); Tone (literature); Content (measure theory); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04026447914236973,"score_gpt":0.22899226336992035,"score_spread":0.1887277842275506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083102510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16698544,0.0011590213,0.00009133482,0.06749029,0.0018543692,0.00017040595,0.00008429961,0.000007519148,0.7621573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99303347,0.000007083946,0.000007806708,0.0050245714,0.0018143551,5.4347976e-7,8.28825e-7,0.00001648032,0.00009484443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890035,0.00006466031,0.00045109738,0.00008111373,0.0002516924,0.00025106032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983549,0.00044861846,0.000275365,0.0001824285,0.00038208105,0.0003565993],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001204553,0.00012466198,0.00023619081,0.00023046139,0.00026116995,0.00005433959,0.00035315775,0.00006638874,0.0011843852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000278495,0.000077331075,0.00018040425,0.0000545955,0.0007340383,0.000084580955,0.000007842632,0.0005052034,0.00002384624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036329468,0.00002350591,0.000010767472,0.000012862465,0.00006915884,0.000087462984,0.0031087499,0.000011439731,0.000036261434,0.9958651,0.0005179604,0.00022041255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002657469,0.00019164765,0.00008302457,0.0001402819,0.000023741712,0.000016625852,0.00029641003,0.000006743421,0.00010634104,0.9583352,0.040441394,0.00009282395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010678716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005273727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.826048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047183254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039359933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083354691","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400000637","title":"Debate: Langton on Things in Themselves: Critique of <i>Kantian Humility</i>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Presentation (obstetrics); Theology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04753771710883424,"score_gpt":0.2951035712139592,"score_spread":0.24756585410512494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083354691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02446157,0.09233725,0.000013078864,0.032618154,0.00039532766,0.0006916419,0.000046949648,0.00010944425,0.8493266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92382574,0.056833126,0.0000152467965,0.018633652,0.00017929882,0.000014025033,0.000014299423,0.000021402486,0.0004632086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987152,0.0001694185,0.00044962714,0.00023196796,0.00020953894,0.00022420242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924546,0.00014553254,0.000110742214,0.00034891767,0.00008719301,0.00006214296],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008699955,0.00016479229,0.00044307148,0.00007690885,0.00008381161,0.000029778983,0.0002624133,0.00006980923,0.001672673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016292058,0.00012602963,0.00015641926,0.00008698356,0.00024529954,0.00014889911,0.00003891126,0.0003678114,0.00015177143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012042194,0.00012807509,0.000039009097,0.0016528749,0.000012863948,0.000030269317,0.0017768195,1.5603902e-7,0.000026853435,0.99126405,0.0009351482,0.004121837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021381822,0.000093884606,0.00007666487,0.008456679,0.000035168297,0.000007774539,0.000157428,0.0000071151126,0.00012490574,0.27975127,0.7108527,0.00022262917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032725913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044174748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8993642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012372835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003191614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091781130","doi":"10.1017/s0953820814000132","title":"Ross on Self and Others","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Trilemma; Duty; Pleasure; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Theology; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.026867533460950277,"score_gpt":0.22846040373200618,"score_spread":0.2015928702710559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091781130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16316548,0.00014491331,0.0000049930923,0.0023876443,0.00020453779,0.00004458139,0.000011267919,0.00008131152,0.8339553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965974,0.00000739841,0.000011127267,0.0022794863,0.0003386411,0.0000025391003,0.0000012491367,0.000008264385,0.0007538646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996162,0.000036253325,0.00006345065,0.00011049698,0.00007551448,0.0000980791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965024,0.00015264594,0.000013605937,0.000119067,0.000018008468,0.000046445017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023480534,0.00006024325,0.00006933527,0.000019887246,0.00014569567,0.000045504774,0.000051826555,0.000029995055,0.00048871984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004474217,0.00004559993,0.000023782753,0.0000058958212,0.00019873293,0.00003289003,0.000017325037,0.00011008715,0.00011915248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007995605,0.00002306287,0.000006748737,0.0000067969513,0.000009626252,3.7400505e-7,0.0053202854,2.0985715e-7,0.000003892454,0.99182487,0.00025727737,0.0025388855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009276868,0.000066501656,0.00007014038,0.0000074378363,0.000004094267,1.9552996e-7,0.00009880243,0.000108665045,0.0000109637585,0.58090085,0.41859394,0.000045658082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003664547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045659577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83343196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004720592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53511393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091827653","doi":"10.1007/s10677-008-9128-4","title":"Bestowal Without Appraisal: Problems in Frankfurt’s Characterization of Love and Personal Identity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of love; Agape; Romance; Friendship; Personal identity; Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Self; Politics; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.07314775553887774,"score_gpt":0.3181950712441828,"score_spread":0.24504731570530502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091827653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95851046,0.000286689,0.0005212005,0.0128047,0.00024809665,0.00020141332,0.000029861372,0.000027543383,0.027370028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965834,0.00037265857,0.000040211613,0.0024501658,0.00024106626,0.000004998707,0.0000097629545,0.000014605124,0.00028310178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828124,0.00076910655,0.0002767574,0.00024234055,0.00026860874,0.00016193054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779695,0.0017236593,0.00015786539,0.00009617661,0.00013563292,0.00008968687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026766506,0.00013657106,0.0002447087,0.00006643001,0.00017404725,0.000064019005,0.00008124651,0.00024330894,0.00025111466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018421389,0.000115973635,0.00003828071,0.000046079185,0.0015343999,0.0009142603,0.000080378195,0.0012819038,0.000014973307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041799867,0.00014476919,0.00030341317,0.00008369019,0.00002458117,0.0000138836485,0.054030593,4.8058314e-7,0.0014757583,0.94324374,0.0000024012213,0.00025866434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082159333,0.0002420622,0.004284719,0.00010446406,0.00005277731,0.000077132776,0.0020506226,0.00011851123,0.00009367721,0.97800326,0.0139037715,0.00024738547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009143005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036150926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05197997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000073153687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004275905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.565356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092335477","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.520.x","title":"DESIRING THE BAD UNDER THE GUISE OF THE GOOD","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Content (measure theory); Mental state; Element (criminal law); Epistemology; Psychology; State (computer science); Aesthetics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05312159902442484,"score_gpt":0.26175964524513423,"score_spread":0.2086380462207094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092335477","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19126798,0.00048307804,0.00022211671,0.60103303,0.0011204476,0.00067469676,0.000033418535,0.00008896667,0.20507629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883067,0.000007492345,0.0000036744586,0.008546988,0.0027375342,0.00001727404,0.0000012991538,0.000034405602,0.0003446118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976144,0.000437108,0.00054836186,0.0002540799,0.00067900616,0.00046706796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621475,0.0020648886,0.00022661411,0.001241746,0.00016556947,0.00008645472],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027923642,0.00026292322,0.000247689,0.000034902772,0.001593141,0.00016349403,0.0017354719,0.00012182138,0.0003304363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008851013,0.00009213226,0.00036269776,0.00013918147,0.0032636214,0.000097533935,0.00014967402,0.0012286381,0.00010709121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057427038,0.00008596923,0.000006744364,0.000009754441,0.00007388344,0.000001971898,0.012729854,0.0000075021935,0.00015358055,0.9855238,0.000057639743,0.0012918734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024582347,0.00017699889,0.00078985316,0.00004071815,0.000085689855,0.000009961015,0.0022348303,0.000060141516,0.00010580563,0.98830533,0.007792592,0.00015227983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012570524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038368552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79703873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028077226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051859457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092336448","doi":"10.1093/mind/110.439.878","title":"Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint. Steven Wall","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectionism (psychology); Liberalism; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.051298061663296,"score_gpt":0.2433598002416468,"score_spread":0.1920617385783508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092336448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67187965,0.00012290796,0.0000031010152,0.007724211,0.00016010612,0.00004326544,0.0000059875542,0.000017146202,0.32004365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98523617,0.00003141175,0.000012959445,0.000813758,0.00055641175,0.0000034608033,0.0000038820704,0.0000086586815,0.013333271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995749,0.000026884256,0.00008382413,0.00012181914,0.00007749472,0.00011509873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999757,0.00005031197,0.000019229486,0.000090092064,0.00002827973,0.0000550872],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014022717,0.000066179695,0.00007267016,0.000029694536,0.0002269957,0.00012002828,0.000047898113,0.00004424153,0.0024523565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013964761,0.000055246623,0.000027191827,0.000010807556,0.00023504297,0.00007917099,0.000021635176,0.00015421431,0.00010552794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011903739,0.000027780075,0.00002464551,0.0000052247287,0.000011706864,0.00002359235,0.013841417,4.803186e-7,0.000043241136,0.9800956,0.00019574491,0.00571866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014059963,0.000045359648,0.00018590364,0.0000094515535,0.000006744637,0.000016835684,0.00023682755,0.000026127094,0.000016819562,0.49650294,0.5027377,0.00007472618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011899247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024622914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5025419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000071620207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010212654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092500444","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0011","title":"The Ways of the Wise: Hume’s Rules of Causal Reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Doxastic logic; Skepticism; Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Inference; Philosophy; Causal inference; Normative; Causal reasoning; Psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.16642979503140137,"score_gpt":0.30224592030479286,"score_spread":0.13581612527339149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092500444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5022759,0.0415114,0.000004595642,0.036866453,0.0022828504,0.00031710914,0.0000760967,0.000060973638,0.41660464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771,0.00032691562,0.000007763369,0.0005817444,0.0007361975,0.000009376003,4.954755e-7,0.000009212812,0.000618328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992389,0.00007443868,0.00020889558,0.00006920655,0.00020850735,0.00020003444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989319,0.0005161706,0.00013959754,0.00022827012,0.00016541938,0.000018637384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005685515,0.00009396448,0.00018300641,0.000014644712,0.00075010024,0.000017526996,0.0001980347,0.000030285932,0.00005751601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003359004,0.00004345062,0.00009877537,0.000017518947,0.0018368916,0.00006886098,0.0001898868,0.00020402376,0.000010241301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072028297,0.000021599139,0.00016782203,0.000036000776,0.00013218247,1.711342e-7,0.03074944,3.4486618e-7,0.000040797706,0.9674706,0.0011634325,0.00021042016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001090974,0.00003742833,0.0010840576,0.00010098942,0.0000623324,7.243386e-7,0.0077265687,0.0000027512142,0.00044002145,0.87016773,0.12017868,0.00008959514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005410133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096752614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49543408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009053889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014469588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6768104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094056944","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300003036","title":"Hare's Utilitarianism and the Free-Rider Problem","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Utilitarianism; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02170959486721427,"score_gpt":0.21804807703104118,"score_spread":0.1963384821638269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094056944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050670644,0.03773678,0.00014602598,0.47997612,0.0027531243,0.0006355863,0.0008019748,0.00007463029,0.4728087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986307,0.0012211443,0.00009163591,0.0060610212,0.0024420475,0.00003904977,0.000030104035,0.000031330062,0.0037766458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872035,0.00017812921,0.00028230948,0.00027537244,0.0001944399,0.00034941675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888057,0.0004332427,0.00007207473,0.00040188173,0.000091938404,0.00012031844],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008290414,0.00021573181,0.00027361733,0.000033264554,0.00084641273,0.00030232655,0.0002958341,0.00019534021,0.0006165376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021843027,0.00014460049,0.00013652586,0.000031686934,0.0038901519,0.00017545844,0.00020732553,0.00062401517,0.00023048172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006183003,0.00009185152,0.0000020218004,0.00008139286,0.00007303939,0.000021920869,0.019224105,0.000010357002,0.0000020383616,0.9786649,0.00061297393,0.0011536118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019704117,0.000056032568,0.0000422766,0.00010295747,0.000060567312,0.000009127882,0.00033779384,0.000014352498,0.000008307468,0.7402753,0.25697315,0.00014973666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070328414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030605972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034866072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001042869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094534721","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0016","title":"Practical Reasoning and Practical Reasons in Hume","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Instrumentalism; Epistemology; Foundation (evidence); Philosophy; Naturalism; Rationality; Inference; Practical reason; Law","score_opus":0.2812725221404892,"score_gpt":0.3929275633636023,"score_spread":0.1116550412231131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094534721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2826515,0.0044779163,0.000023670438,0.104473054,0.0005829934,0.00030481655,0.000021053544,0.00022556826,0.6072394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994334,0.0020676688,0.0005735765,0.00093754655,0.0005230232,0.000022411214,0.0000019565937,0.000018043747,0.0015217784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895036,0.00013088397,0.0002124767,0.00025286322,0.00019602862,0.00025735976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986933,0.00094059337,0.000061684485,0.00013903262,0.000089238434,0.00007615822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040677196,0.00014515642,0.00027666515,0.00006654891,0.0005571544,0.000057790206,0.00003785198,0.000060869585,0.00025526574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018993153,0.000115290786,0.000041702533,0.000036767462,0.0013723733,0.0003187591,0.00015697688,0.00049687526,0.000059762493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035218534,0.000088015084,0.0004296927,0.000024590698,0.00005890727,0.0003030089,0.019735534,1.0660243e-7,0.0000030489202,0.9759272,0.0033331376,0.00006158065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007191981,0.00018338869,0.0022715512,0.00021221582,0.00006300363,0.00030409277,0.012757493,0.00005124963,0.000019429892,0.74815494,0.23483546,0.00042797328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004038882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026027855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7116825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001895788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005730581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50565666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096643268","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002869","title":"Hume's Impression of Succession (Time)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Duration (music); Impression; Empiricism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Literature; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.046670127577095044,"score_gpt":0.23715906151049576,"score_spread":0.19048893393340072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096643268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5721126,0.00020933546,0.000018168561,0.0008833589,0.0005102962,0.00008915843,0.00006296018,0.00006574,0.42604837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981914,0.00004487749,0.000010122396,0.00024638153,0.0004708886,0.0000032730002,0.00003344812,0.000009787706,0.0009898305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994338,0.000045994657,0.00015993978,0.000106928775,0.00014264761,0.00011069185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995643,0.000102926875,0.000065491346,0.0001458744,0.000074500094,0.00004691903],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001316429,0.000073211355,0.00014106103,0.000044518398,0.00021105264,0.00001061198,0.00012424715,0.0000586616,0.0018708972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005552883,0.00005340489,0.000068091365,0.00001702748,0.000387838,0.000092954535,0.00005080623,0.00013553129,0.00017287258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031872143,0.0000997226,0.00006201156,0.000019376852,0.000010350191,0.000010037095,0.008349567,0.0000016352343,0.0043823514,0.9848334,0.001209963,0.0009897077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004674637,0.00013358661,0.00048475582,0.00009325853,0.000013513854,0.0000041395183,0.00010269275,0.00009049378,0.006614531,0.9028714,0.08891305,0.00021114679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015151707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020943398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42607877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000051353572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023919776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099436951","doi":"10.1353/hms.2004.a383295","title":"Pleased and Afflicted: Hume on the Paradox of Tragic Pleasure","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Kindness; Order (exchange); History; Art history; Philosophy; Art; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.19607922291863514,"score_gpt":0.29179309678411436,"score_spread":0.09571387386547922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099436951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8452421,0.007145202,0.0000022292625,0.03409399,0.0003319156,0.00030059612,0.00006511387,0.0000785673,0.11274028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980577,0.00033191612,0.0000032638657,0.001038838,0.0002755322,0.000016118518,0.0000013430939,0.00001095003,0.00026431718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928683,0.000050424696,0.00017036626,0.00014966818,0.00019561454,0.00014708142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993228,0.00030618178,0.000066343295,0.0001703283,0.00010289634,0.000031455784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002623963,0.0001283831,0.00022855117,0.00003709612,0.00043697792,0.000032719305,0.000106366766,0.000034610963,0.00013527425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015914545,0.00007534763,0.00006829367,0.00002550505,0.001169948,0.000041274376,0.00004668147,0.00021582593,0.000025306237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002714485,0.000058082387,0.000006160175,0.00003989797,0.000121512596,0.0000030948088,0.020614883,0.0000040221685,0.000055380242,0.97872835,0.00016105663,0.00018043556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004047334,0.0002051124,0.00032165824,0.000107386295,0.000039210852,9.484887e-7,0.005851866,0.000001459329,0.00021302013,0.97995186,0.012784232,0.000118525604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046217356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016662452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15281561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012059445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017057519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43107224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099605357","doi":"10.7202/1029156ar","title":"Hegel, l’intention et l’action : réflexions sur un débat récent","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.17319711495571308,"score_gpt":0.33074963708036803,"score_spread":0.15755252212465495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099605357","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07082679,0.005914376,0.0012832307,0.62314725,0.008268021,0.0009997739,0.00054167496,0.0006418963,0.288377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577655,0.014376354,0.0002220378,0.019759117,0.0038025414,0.00012051802,0.000265636,0.00013744843,0.0035508454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993452,0.0029965963,0.0009896883,0.00094117277,0.0007126539,0.0009078968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611086,0.0008820243,0.0004976065,0.0007971686,0.0010172508,0.0006950675],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044162553,0.00078847114,0.00078090624,0.00027121743,0.00051395904,0.00044219554,0.0005790932,0.0011849084,0.0009966255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013047609,0.00074589025,0.00053215405,0.00016939554,0.001470591,0.0011058885,0.00040336765,0.0031474412,0.0008066096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004134922,0.0012581596,0.000029701043,0.000185065,0.00022715858,0.00017159415,0.0037537664,0.00015175743,0.00020224255,0.9901536,0.0027082602,0.0007451828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010601531,0.0009354586,0.00008481232,0.00033272873,0.000121700796,0.000107703585,0.00045597786,0.00019995183,0.0005514597,0.77221256,0.2232781,0.0006593933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020312865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014400415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8869387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004576275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008947392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099706886","doi":"10.7202/1026684ar","title":"Sources, raisons et exigences","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.034311112354886916,"score_gpt":0.2711997895829066,"score_spread":0.23688867722801965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099706886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02849838,0.015952766,0.0023593437,0.122198805,0.0018016611,0.00018740313,0.00011089556,0.00016502739,0.8287257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96468395,0.0028820902,0.00031479885,0.017778466,0.0023244496,0.000020290678,0.000017690701,0.00005616176,0.011922123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753976,0.0008867925,0.0003432521,0.0003628502,0.00024664373,0.00062069634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834293,0.00078355096,0.00014130317,0.00032696084,0.00012961663,0.00027562998],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019774316,0.0003058879,0.000326061,0.00008598976,0.0008093544,0.0003933823,0.0003921765,0.0006086234,0.0021887005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003783545,0.0002886756,0.00028795283,0.00005254089,0.0017564207,0.00018247384,0.00011128102,0.0015216279,0.00040921016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024946494,0.00009505247,0.000058727634,0.00015980643,0.00008615619,0.000014085431,0.015249419,0.0002032897,0.00003670362,0.9757748,0.0009032801,0.0073936833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012182196,0.00012047477,0.000023836394,0.00014141815,0.000033492997,0.000010553791,0.00082621025,0.0006626635,0.00006915933,0.5247197,0.4730519,0.00021877895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00302651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013578259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93618554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007481069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001343467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101374221","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300005485","title":"Hypocrisy and the Good of Character Possession","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Hypocrisy; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03731499936768743,"score_gpt":0.22087044021638985,"score_spread":0.18355544084870243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101374221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10384983,0.048560347,0.000010435747,0.15528189,0.0031523118,0.00032263002,0.00044659036,0.000025970145,0.68835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98602706,0.0044151316,0.0000045575325,0.0016224027,0.0014472257,0.0000065224344,0.000009877931,0.000013690094,0.0064535253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909896,0.00021112712,0.00023547755,0.0001397865,0.00013696782,0.00017765936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989988,0.00057117606,0.00010619253,0.000195646,0.00006967276,0.000058480688],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042248558,0.00012369269,0.00023643601,0.000030542466,0.0002941398,0.000081288745,0.00012442227,0.000119662516,0.001935637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001084603,0.000076561955,0.00010027101,0.000023606162,0.0021197011,0.00011291871,0.00007654031,0.0003455148,0.00013313504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035622594,0.00011926055,0.000015362122,0.000073859854,0.00003671836,0.0000052332703,0.00988329,1.601074e-7,0.000028202645,0.98419076,0.00046775854,0.005143797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008008172,0.000059980466,0.00020516767,0.00011009098,0.00005536929,0.000005277455,0.00016805535,0.00013979027,0.00004148058,0.6777877,0.32052532,0.00010093667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044313865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005585864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88217723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000061628834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009781052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103169171","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00320.x","title":"NATURAL GOODNESS AND NATURAL EVIL","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Natural (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Action (physics); Function (biology); Morality; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.01787471168403942,"score_gpt":0.22444757767453527,"score_spread":0.20657286599049585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103169171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52919424,0.0040977234,0.000016027107,0.008301891,0.0019374564,0.00014948596,0.000020686712,0.00013401847,0.45614848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913189,0.000006035268,0.000009318176,0.00066053757,0.0011422344,0.0000033604526,0.00001633218,0.000006786013,0.0068365326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995946,0.000020881986,0.00009185476,0.000101160236,0.000091968046,0.00009952119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997792,0.000058607773,0.000024070041,0.000071356146,0.000047018977,0.000019718045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008322637,0.000069384696,0.000076852826,0.000021469845,0.00020953002,0.00014045948,0.00005081636,0.000026616046,0.0002014138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015979007,0.000052138897,0.000026612886,0.000011226952,0.00019546352,0.00013403341,0.000021535368,0.00017934936,0.000033476364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055350365,0.000011704799,0.000013464812,0.000008676158,0.0000046441264,0.0000023981086,0.0007988077,5.06309e-7,0.00019842428,0.9982725,0.00030951345,0.00037382857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019673975,0.000016515238,0.00051668944,0.000012063377,0.00000804267,0.0000029665368,0.00012555382,0.00039538776,0.00015139577,0.8991334,0.09931476,0.00012650322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001132604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063011696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46212462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000072398457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011713793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.220534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104708730","doi":"10.1353/hms.2013.0003","title":"Hume on the Normativity of Practical Reasons","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Action (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Reading (process); Practical reason; Relation (database); Value (mathematics); Computer science","score_opus":0.2586557929718325,"score_gpt":0.3482191373926071,"score_spread":0.08956334442077463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104708730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119469725,0.00033272489,0.0000021679014,0.08411965,0.00028166553,0.00021701003,0.000018275163,0.000041592284,0.7955172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704295,0.000097859396,0.000009954706,0.0013814637,0.00028751628,0.0000403847,6.709744e-7,0.0000068632276,0.0011323582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930656,0.00012067893,0.00015522297,0.000096025135,0.00018758488,0.00013395232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981266,0.0013607503,0.00008266005,0.0001978119,0.00020615284,0.000025989075],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038305027,0.000095231786,0.00017686105,0.000022268148,0.00039479625,0.000044283926,0.00009377134,0.000025556099,0.001488022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008031307,0.00004947185,0.00006753793,0.000018187024,0.001078984,0.0001246231,0.00009412426,0.00025482444,0.00047103385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006097069,0.000069757305,0.0000091343,0.000020641852,0.00009489631,7.8225685e-7,0.010582694,1.4753353e-7,0.000015705176,0.9787305,0.0102964,0.00017321855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007372314,0.00010258469,0.0003207308,0.000044336575,0.000020539239,6.4513875e-7,0.00653526,0.0000080621285,0.00007482047,0.94753015,0.045208436,0.000080723396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077961944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011473145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8775732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009117532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013763439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106553169","doi":"10.1017/s0012217310000193","title":"Transcendental Idealism: What Jerusalem Has To Say to Königsberg","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Transcendental number; Idealism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Transcendental idealism; Object (grammar); History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05192786967047801,"score_gpt":0.25953643140988575,"score_spread":0.20760856173940773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106553169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6782818,0.0001412017,0.0001196717,0.12840737,0.010737072,0.00071788597,0.0005492537,0.00030510998,0.18074067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801311,0.000011510355,0.000047658894,0.016598733,0.00240374,0.000036242043,0.00006335554,0.000031953055,0.00067569327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988922,0.000044353037,0.0002118212,0.00028668597,0.0002403642,0.0003245692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912953,0.00013212964,0.000025772762,0.00030051768,0.00008153783,0.00033050776],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033749238,0.00016978054,0.00020133313,0.00010329106,0.00034962693,0.00064129365,0.00031379363,0.00010987941,0.0018653311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083847954,0.0001486616,0.0001169334,0.00004509552,0.0002489582,0.00021046106,0.000058236576,0.00044826636,0.0016478194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032804393,0.000051354007,0.000005516035,0.000008516295,0.000015533155,0.000014505011,0.029139647,0.0000021415044,0.0022847655,0.9632602,0.001914827,0.0032702193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021493535,0.000098591525,0.00008992986,0.000029513603,0.000012218327,0.0000029446378,0.00069259637,0.0000035481828,0.00060959446,0.44141605,0.5565773,0.00025276755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053048966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020512175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55466247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000137517045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041840936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109738286","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0001","title":"The Normativity of Experience and Causal Belief in Hume’s Treatise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Virtue; Normative; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Reading (process); Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07754068466772332,"score_gpt":0.3082682923114094,"score_spread":0.23072760764368608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109738286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87160325,0.0025142003,0.000003809902,0.0022014666,0.0001847399,0.0000877172,0.000008263625,0.000016468242,0.12338011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878114,0.0005934159,0.0000039982647,0.00011966429,0.00011287683,0.000018892153,3.011989e-7,0.000003847445,0.0003658529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994645,0.0000773318,0.0001567477,0.00008998745,0.0000990662,0.00011235254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926656,0.00049180933,0.00005208147,0.000112081514,0.000059684553,0.00001779989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035291075,0.00007572615,0.00016443961,0.00002266534,0.000376067,0.000029161753,0.00007164982,0.00001699237,0.000022243043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022809132,0.000044223925,0.000021177408,0.000015657846,0.001356959,0.000075900454,0.000089807,0.0000989815,0.000003927119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008650039,0.000019328801,0.0003071846,0.00002231621,0.000016686066,4.9622747e-7,0.101894245,2.877899e-7,0.000015677264,0.8956313,0.000046207002,0.0020376234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028164027,0.00012681789,0.0043824394,0.00006385993,0.000010545882,5.6692176e-7,0.012587187,0.00004271184,0.00011057599,0.9554655,0.026812179,0.00011598413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013233892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002283651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12717792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006662217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005135897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4999772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110418961","doi":"10.1353/hms.2004.a383297","title":"Hume's Recantation of His Theory of Personal Identity","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Excuse; Personal identity; Identity (music); Epistemology; Philosophy; Perception; Interpretation (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Aesthetics; Law; Computer science; Self","score_opus":0.15120276562222848,"score_gpt":0.32972160309493853,"score_spread":0.17851883747271005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110418961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85991186,0.0063264454,0.00007664148,0.0017769142,0.0006342625,0.00013706285,0.000073136776,0.000039627943,0.13102408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877965,0.00038323857,0.000023897876,0.00013311714,0.00021611773,0.0000054885736,0.0000025267916,0.0000071834597,0.0004487796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993315,0.000050812785,0.00021764865,0.000104017505,0.0002022556,0.000093770366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993589,0.00014962388,0.00012490437,0.00008603782,0.00026305678,0.000017509677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004432073,0.000081589955,0.00021744147,0.000056350957,0.00017710564,0.000011674802,0.000085930835,0.000027173184,0.000324292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016668923,0.00006462586,0.00009244731,0.00002750993,0.0010806116,0.00016228764,0.000055935343,0.000100628444,0.000014812076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029538438,0.00004639943,0.000025616891,0.00012008298,0.0001386792,0.0000011896482,0.07323787,0.0000017076138,0.00022281917,0.9257875,0.000028987963,0.0003595861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025668417,0.00009117201,0.00037270697,0.00009138093,0.000046747093,4.004972e-7,0.01253091,5.013014e-7,0.00067169237,0.9851143,0.000752235,0.000071317576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000827405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003711033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13886781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021900523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028101238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39815587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110690164","doi":"10.7202/000443ar","title":"Le cognitivisme moral de Habermas fait-il face au problème de Frege-Geach?1","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Epistemology","score_opus":0.17784686790233115,"score_gpt":0.32145252318386397,"score_spread":0.14360565528153282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110690164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017920973,0.011886179,0.000634905,0.5541903,0.0005804077,0.0005482086,0.00057580473,0.00042853117,0.41323474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96002096,0.0011557686,0.0003884501,0.024641382,0.01000375,0.000050365143,0.00008353215,0.000107933876,0.0035478459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596405,0.0006608832,0.0006907164,0.0007206995,0.0004895011,0.0014741588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978979,0.00030013788,0.00028252447,0.00053038466,0.0003480383,0.00064099795],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012677473,0.00070140365,0.00072420767,0.0002033348,0.001218765,0.00047942103,0.00062530447,0.0006219584,0.00043630862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027830197,0.0007478802,0.0004366611,0.00009174015,0.0020128705,0.0007584071,0.00015084802,0.0016442135,0.000301538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011434145,0.0009920414,0.000052943073,0.00021656688,0.0001548317,0.00019599218,0.0122378515,0.000027795568,0.00030722911,0.9809264,0.0017929419,0.0029810625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000738568,0.0006591327,0.0003552594,0.0005291114,0.00015712895,0.00005551764,0.00029903787,0.00061501394,0.00092569744,0.88349134,0.11136397,0.00081022026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019975093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036211594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043101667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011662905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112883038","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300018692","title":"Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and AgencyMichael Bratman Cambridge Studies in Philosophy New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999, xiii + 288 pp., $59.95, $18.95 paper","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.10387262063268715,"score_gpt":0.26390298520201183,"score_spread":0.16003036456932468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112883038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75561225,0.022934662,0.000057611418,0.005551337,0.0016961783,0.00093243027,0.0004978565,0.0002418943,0.21247579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98907876,0.0078099025,0.0000073391466,0.0003494075,0.00039669636,0.0000050054796,0.00012994136,0.00002282331,0.0022001448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984744,0.0002091944,0.00036807725,0.00040857235,0.00024009937,0.0002996532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903387,0.00018237124,0.00018218393,0.0002411141,0.00024671142,0.00011374484],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031057096,0.00026980665,0.00043511778,0.0001170511,0.00027559436,0.00005403515,0.00021819129,0.00014440612,0.00007383815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001586415,0.00024847462,0.00011412836,0.00016026366,0.00075548555,0.00032554477,0.00014574686,0.00042392878,0.000017490198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027545204,0.00024335025,0.0004027228,0.00012325104,0.00015645595,0.000051002393,0.0038786756,0.0000051286315,0.00028667963,0.982999,0.01103809,0.00054017856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009702343,0.002347468,0.01992743,0.0026395987,0.0005969975,0.000044742854,0.0140256435,0.0005910204,0.000676071,0.575389,0.37147886,0.002580805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046543907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022477987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40760997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006331251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055393448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113814435","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.uph31-62.cemh","title":"La condition d’ouverture et l’état d’élancement vers : Métaphysique de la vie chez Hegel","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Universitas Philosophica","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.012145906725908739,"score_gpt":0.2493516822985287,"score_spread":0.23720577557261996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113814435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007892373,0.0017790349,0.00040987317,0.101676315,0.0007834944,0.0002535522,0.00047673294,0.00015300083,0.88657564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98821205,0.0016324124,0.00008468317,0.006806925,0.0018852517,0.0000071459795,0.00017449446,0.00006827918,0.0011287754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963716,0.0017347834,0.0003102717,0.0005588515,0.00043486684,0.0005896063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975859,0.0011731237,0.00021951852,0.0004680052,0.000186747,0.0003667401],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014280013,0.00048778421,0.0004645611,0.00021824871,0.0009109872,0.00025056422,0.0004850956,0.00074153056,0.0029380277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013928377,0.0005302789,0.0003464101,0.00011933777,0.0028488021,0.0004819235,0.00021016812,0.0017628891,0.0002757101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016092212,0.00046288315,0.00001320576,0.0002276205,0.00024535295,0.00016036704,0.0065112887,0.0001555485,0.00016673068,0.9880387,0.0028424,0.0010149467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008833309,0.00023528439,0.00004395788,0.00021752118,0.0001512789,0.00001771299,0.0008023121,0.00026021566,0.000023894168,0.5325042,0.46451926,0.00034103382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020292925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004633335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9803197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039364153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028653422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118633274","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9809.2010.00861.x","title":"Dissenting Heads and Hearts: Joseph Priestley, Anna Barbauld, and Conflicting Attitudes towards Devotion within Rational Dissent","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious History","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Passion; Dissent; Sublime; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.029033027929674018,"score_gpt":0.26952618984026505,"score_spread":0.24049316191059103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118633274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783449,0.006468989,0.000040356692,0.00356361,0.0018564048,0.00007785202,0.0000044058256,0.000023627934,0.009619828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973257,0.000375885,0.00025571577,0.0005359882,0.0011866139,0.0000015558733,0.0000022203224,0.000018313238,0.00029800666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988816,0.000058156358,0.00045883772,0.00014489307,0.00031062972,0.00014590453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989338,0.00013318149,0.00037882398,0.000094246294,0.00029419942,0.00016575016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093494233,0.00013949456,0.00024227197,0.00012316785,0.00031928008,0.00011361108,0.000082104205,0.00009089792,0.00008535914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026326452,0.00011462829,0.00007595444,0.000014629818,0.00069290074,0.00031624615,0.000040583356,0.0007622448,0.000002281135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009918231,0.00010853879,0.0011119427,0.00011975587,0.00007806063,0.00005172846,0.032377034,0.000004920669,0.007198409,0.9550223,0.0025038766,0.0013242634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015728567,0.0006546444,0.004638037,0.0005277731,0.00017013852,0.0010532448,0.00222552,0.00030973385,0.000363695,0.2848012,0.70296955,0.00071361335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000085595755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033942968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7004657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006866834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016924816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4674406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119510605","doi":"10.1353/hms.2002.a385862","title":"The Passions, Character, and the Self in Hume","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Reading (process); Identity (music); Character (mathematics); Philosophy; Contradiction; Self; Reflexive pronoun; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Personal identity; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Aesthetics; Psychology; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10457654206679295,"score_gpt":0.26964561986111935,"score_spread":0.1650690777943264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119510605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10764022,0.09487804,3.125122e-7,0.30512938,0.0014357726,0.00056201045,0.00001793594,0.00014872351,0.49018762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802777,0.01455731,0.0000012394139,0.0013738001,0.00045918085,0.000046506695,2.876674e-7,0.0000068619493,0.0032770764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933404,0.00012210621,0.00015898717,0.00011090387,0.00011475165,0.00015919459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998869,0.00087251526,0.000043621465,0.00014661932,0.000049058817,0.000019164143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054074824,0.000093727445,0.00015576513,0.000020462297,0.0011355939,0.00010954055,0.00011767248,0.000022620367,0.00012791998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017164748,0.000039422455,0.00004071186,0.000019404872,0.0013111277,0.000059305097,0.00012319768,0.00024674978,0.00005328863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010096346,0.000021639715,0.000016961074,0.000009562368,0.00005334151,0.0000021588996,0.04801526,2.7456172e-8,7.4119777e-7,0.9493795,0.0011791891,0.001311547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040017377,0.000016800708,0.00025389582,0.00002815629,0.000013492927,8.320361e-7,0.0047080824,0.000034804438,0.0000010629707,0.62025446,0.37422186,0.00006635024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018971825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003871741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009015461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87341845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121360315","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400002004","title":"Justice and Virtue in Kant's Account of Marriage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Duty; Subject (documents); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Law; Theology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.059091600755805634,"score_gpt":0.29918316355666086,"score_spread":0.24009156280085522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121360315","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021222785,0.48531044,0.000011018735,0.029752063,0.00035932436,0.0005586743,0.00006224414,0.000041291278,0.46268216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9452494,0.049495917,0.000031684005,0.004767852,0.00026971792,0.0000056289514,0.0000027774427,0.0000086062655,0.00016845782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993349,0.000059265236,0.00028054178,0.00012263584,0.000103542705,0.00009914399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960935,0.00008266439,0.00007676638,0.00015234131,0.000039943076,0.000038925016],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053314096,0.00008589456,0.00026572842,0.000039575156,0.00004915723,0.000022799706,0.00010195824,0.000031475338,0.0010090548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008772954,0.000066944485,0.000047198973,0.00003108401,0.00017767747,0.00011216293,0.000040979674,0.00016055524,0.00006833544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028618806,0.00003081411,0.000005044382,0.002797102,0.000006561672,0.0000035817975,0.0003958955,2.460439e-7,0.000012937688,0.98477244,0.00020924938,0.01176324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027434938,0.000038765054,0.00014119403,0.005308626,0.00018310713,0.000005787107,0.00010705897,0.000048894468,0.000020645215,0.18334231,0.8103303,0.00019896535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003107647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002458803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92402655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000067373953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017745857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122532684","doi":"10.1017/s001221730000305x","title":"Y a-t-il des sentiments moraux?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychic; Morality; Normative; Atomism; Psychology; Epistemology; Assertion; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.059027412116098556,"score_gpt":0.2538275601459565,"score_spread":0.19480014802985793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122532684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42482504,0.00016825409,0.00011012158,0.002659656,0.00089612533,0.00011549432,0.000114431066,0.00014291416,0.570968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974831,0.000019055155,0.000037828027,0.001211331,0.0006525172,0.000007462093,0.00003411933,0.000012720716,0.00054188934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999463,0.000020410935,0.00010647895,0.00012165139,0.000115045346,0.00017336667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970365,0.000030169342,0.000025426965,0.00012576506,0.000048422666,0.000066576795],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012817158,0.00008352146,0.000093447845,0.00003471215,0.00025487653,0.00008433766,0.0001066984,0.000040067338,0.00061207265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003332367,0.00006986354,0.00005949407,0.000017644801,0.00043161894,0.00010665295,0.000036834732,0.00013050002,0.00080061384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058002665,0.00007487277,0.00001358384,0.000009149227,0.000017152488,0.0000113563665,0.006354697,0.0000105767485,0.00007754539,0.9927354,0.00006273835,0.0006271407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029552984,0.00003401273,0.0000785676,0.000018193054,0.000008458676,0.0000010121457,0.00012555895,0.00000242404,0.00029769793,0.96260756,0.03643478,0.00009619044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033151545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038354218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.572658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025102985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002619745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125824432","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.503.x","title":"MULGAN'S FUTURE PEOPLE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Morality; Economic Justice; Subject (documents); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02375246985948648,"score_gpt":0.24439729856487882,"score_spread":0.22064482870539234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125824432","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14872578,0.00035078678,0.00031719747,0.47569674,0.002705895,0.0004032223,0.000045944136,0.00039473036,0.3713597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97906804,0.0000074697036,0.000017783083,0.0058092633,0.01469275,0.000011849975,0.000011470475,0.000039640825,0.0003417129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814165,0.0001126161,0.0004071683,0.00032247495,0.00047862978,0.0005374895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984502,0.0004956636,0.00010201852,0.000586149,0.0001445432,0.0002214018],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012776756,0.00026379872,0.0002749162,0.00008312955,0.00077466544,0.00017575898,0.00060808606,0.00015908128,0.0015080156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003274024,0.00016167677,0.00021929399,0.00009873246,0.0007352417,0.00017221297,0.00004267559,0.00094581593,0.00090952887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084785286,0.000111269044,0.00000486798,0.000011820903,0.00003376343,0.00001712026,0.022417365,2.4679835e-7,0.000054129243,0.97148997,0.00013447495,0.0056402115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002989766,0.0003396054,0.00023188359,0.000011448657,0.000029705177,0.000012705083,0.0019695049,0.000025836032,0.000014135777,0.9389998,0.05782525,0.00024116863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007401594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008013473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8303423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002688198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027051477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126986705","doi":"10.7202/000441ar","title":"Intentions rationnelles et acceptations en délibération","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.2543283869256371,"score_gpt":0.3900832778551951,"score_spread":0.135754890929558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126986705","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014108287,0.0076513686,0.0017107208,0.6232347,0.0010734473,0.00029376286,0.00018356572,0.0002160985,0.36422554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96376663,0.004261506,0.0004957859,0.020538636,0.0077968114,0.000033107455,0.00018091599,0.00003537097,0.0028912385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978083,0.00052467705,0.0005615297,0.000383613,0.00039141395,0.0003304741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998406,0.00041693123,0.00018371888,0.0003352614,0.0004925057,0.00016558584],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007440212,0.0003218371,0.00028922452,0.00022056844,0.00086241623,0.00052532373,0.0002728493,0.0002653539,0.0018559134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040699198,0.00032874613,0.00025982034,0.00008533721,0.00058634824,0.0011663174,0.000052357933,0.0007332066,0.0003896391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002277508,0.00047712374,0.0000025471031,0.000036671143,0.000060174436,0.000007950748,0.00956192,0.00005657444,0.00025989578,0.9837313,0.0027538,0.0030292496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002382344,0.0002792436,0.00024692476,0.00018108237,0.00008788253,0.000005767935,0.00042037835,0.00048847,0.00011381138,0.8536561,0.14396326,0.0003188275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010027974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023383647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9623558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010015848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015113199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127840338","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403833","title":"Physical Objects and Moral Wrongness: Hume on the \"Fallacy\" in Wollaston's Moral Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Relevance (law); Moral psychology; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.11041647883301023,"score_gpt":0.30104608478364064,"score_spread":0.19062960595063042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127840338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78693426,0.0018655772,3.0589945e-7,0.013477889,0.0002417963,0.00020818312,0.000010849439,0.000067032466,0.19719411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949996,0.00015167728,0.0000019929194,0.002898908,0.00083665294,0.000022894988,0.0000013032054,0.00001401599,0.001072957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886996,0.00017493659,0.00016991585,0.00026662552,0.00022345778,0.000295108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900824,0.00061072694,0.000054491855,0.00021275302,0.00007020384,0.000043562337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047103874,0.00022379465,0.0003342198,0.00006848172,0.00050388894,0.00010256788,0.00016310354,0.000041768035,0.00008782383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018398205,0.00013191122,0.00007989138,0.00004607455,0.0011225423,0.00010720102,0.00009750218,0.00040424973,0.000049909875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007812436,0.00012229061,0.000034615372,0.000013962497,0.0000484729,0.000014351351,0.036705986,0.0000040634973,0.000019237668,0.9614014,0.00028505718,0.001272419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003128195,0.00029314196,0.0013228435,0.000075829754,0.00002143937,9.950588e-7,0.008159649,0.00002703861,0.000037926588,0.98801816,0.0015450428,0.00018510246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015718924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002628741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20806535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026343392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016141532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5379183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129005847","doi":"10.1017/s001221731300111x","title":"Authenticity and the Limits of Philosophy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Essentialism; Existentialism; Epistemology; Identity (music); Virtue; Autonomy; Philosophy; Personal identity; Aesthetics; Sociology; Self; Law","score_opus":0.05067893851390196,"score_gpt":0.24123436595202385,"score_spread":0.1905554274381219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129005847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17545104,0.00023746156,0.00008234899,0.019493276,0.00054144475,0.00015862288,0.000040715593,0.000037276888,0.8039578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803126,0.00001795851,0.000003817369,0.0012246531,0.0006114582,0.000004500894,0.0000039039287,0.0000056775943,0.00009675782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953437,0.00010447883,0.000116846735,0.00008021939,0.00008732185,0.00007677789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930006,0.00044124908,0.000049987484,0.0001357148,0.000045184668,0.000027825028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000489321,0.000057957106,0.00013418855,0.000020088633,0.00013630437,0.000028356255,0.000099221244,0.000029905406,0.00008882495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019500665,0.00003299188,0.000049555667,0.000010460194,0.0011866197,0.00003367141,0.00003246187,0.000114727256,0.00001941547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028324728,0.000018614233,0.000009444061,0.000016994178,0.000012463579,1.380211e-7,0.006849921,2.673537e-7,0.000011300677,0.99240154,0.000025043197,0.00062593335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004388751,0.000029115781,0.00007302751,0.000012889726,0.000015284379,2.740802e-7,0.000036978345,0.00010987899,0.0000462823,0.98547846,0.013713484,0.000045442375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007867855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000670855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000014358932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052833616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43721497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129334298","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002705","title":"The Philosophical Challenge of September 11Tom Rockmore, Joseph Margolis, and Armen T. Marsoobian, editors Metaphilosophy Series in Philosophy Cornwall, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2005, vii + 218 pp., $38.95 paper","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphilosophy; Publishing; Philosophy; Series (stratigraphy); Art history; Theology; Political science; Art; Western philosophy; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.037158253707114536,"score_gpt":0.22464955539657286,"score_spread":0.18749130168945832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129334298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05816621,0.017684823,0.000002864328,0.20727578,0.006126271,0.0014364466,0.0010988362,0.0002797831,0.707929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734059,0.011008554,0.000028246986,0.0017604314,0.01291001,0.000105772495,0.0001663145,0.000107621425,0.0005071572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956786,0.00046376904,0.0011412901,0.00084045244,0.00093405787,0.0009418273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702036,0.0008999966,0.00043927846,0.00086718675,0.00037508985,0.0003980603],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013279243,0.0006818026,0.0009625078,0.00022558415,0.0009948128,0.0004293247,0.00092456077,0.00054745196,0.0010580032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042950446,0.0005128146,0.0003187099,0.00019638274,0.003536785,0.0016215267,0.0005112883,0.0016132542,0.00010628763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035147814,0.00044980407,0.00013674528,0.00011478681,0.00021260738,0.00010139764,0.0052590105,0.000005217293,0.000029639063,0.9617034,0.031461105,0.00017481242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010660464,0.00021612072,0.0002063058,0.00008878341,0.000048635702,0.000017604621,0.00018949603,0.000029541408,0.000020750767,0.71603024,0.28162146,0.0004650205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027180786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013153524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9152397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007014395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017209096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130501124","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0149.2006.414_3.x","title":"The Future for Philosophy ‐ Edited by Brian Leiter","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Books","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Adam smith; Philosophy; Computer science; Library science; Economics","score_opus":0.024091213370265575,"score_gpt":0.23275046046156975,"score_spread":0.20865924709130418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130501124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014218169,0.0023055503,0.00015994482,0.49331394,0.0028640453,0.0008156628,0.0005806887,0.0003205352,0.49821782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946295,0.000039326438,0.000033791075,0.006840914,0.04344926,0.000187926,0.00017177424,0.0000818998,0.0029000978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977723,0.00008415704,0.0005502709,0.00049947196,0.0004727776,0.0006210611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981744,0.00069993787,0.00015864355,0.00051466667,0.00027040756,0.00018193074],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005259433,0.0003751766,0.00033532418,0.00006592525,0.0017418133,0.00045454214,0.0005834836,0.00024801478,0.00022890494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006745352,0.0002488448,0.0003595321,0.000044235065,0.0012452238,0.00017516965,0.00009972669,0.00071407086,0.00011821008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014989355,0.00011252273,0.0000019467811,0.000026720763,0.000045574892,0.00000371559,0.0001893346,5.5305736e-7,0.00013377966,0.97762704,0.020789746,0.00091915514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040510556,0.00008383219,0.0000038231233,0.000012703119,0.000022166289,0.00000169237,0.000016086335,0.0000378739,0.000040090534,0.5290299,0.47014594,0.00020077793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003824941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010620607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9448732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040430088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040799703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133696524","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990392","title":"On Sidgwick's Demise: A Reply to Professor Deigh","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Philosophy; Suspect; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.03839211748810955,"score_gpt":0.281089518611169,"score_spread":0.24269740112305943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133696524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43889493,0.0000370241,0.00000458114,0.029026981,0.0012524906,0.00024560108,0.000052420055,0.00013042643,0.5303556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97788304,9.305262e-7,0.00005001188,0.015608654,0.0008069099,0.000036997066,0.0000059138456,0.000020343257,0.005587216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990747,0.0000416552,0.00017500798,0.0002609392,0.00020187012,0.00024580708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989497,0.0003115069,0.000032420827,0.00042990554,0.00011299385,0.0001634556],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041707227,0.00012908518,0.00013869407,0.000048371523,0.00028191457,0.000074461364,0.00021960615,0.00007640168,0.0043200664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063567027,0.00010053565,0.000074666445,0.0000292825,0.00023629222,0.00006708285,0.000066228946,0.00059611973,0.0012472653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005790527,0.00008155817,0.0000054350157,0.00001278475,0.000012506122,0.0000060158927,0.0053626867,2.0833176e-7,0.0003047168,0.9871262,0.005907275,0.0011227132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101181504,0.00009026817,0.00006399075,0.000015670596,0.0000057451075,7.158657e-7,0.00013426435,0.0000086742975,0.00015842111,0.5924939,0.40683207,0.00009510212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010502731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039566873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5389881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000102992135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039857427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135295270","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0018","title":"Reply to Radcliffe and Garrett","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Passions; Reading (process); Passion; Pleasure; Scholarship; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Epistemology; Action (physics); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.19322902718279242,"score_gpt":0.3086243724035595,"score_spread":0.11539534522076708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135295270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48874784,0.010802802,0.000005108883,0.060778465,0.0009873499,0.00024516162,0.000024261988,0.00019383422,0.43821517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98348796,0.0006902817,0.000023429628,0.010562464,0.00069181214,0.000014084795,6.4255784e-7,0.000009831404,0.004519497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943393,0.000024184461,0.00012190385,0.00016588627,0.00011279322,0.00014128114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995637,0.00013396067,0.00002283783,0.00012584688,0.000094060284,0.000059608417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014264527,0.00009519756,0.00017603175,0.000039576782,0.0006228152,0.00002447555,0.000058606238,0.000016026692,0.00015656716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017567963,0.00007106888,0.00003340444,0.000016485668,0.00066109095,0.000051494717,0.00010720169,0.00010909556,0.000110392604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132637615,0.0000151139975,0.00005488499,0.000018745379,0.000061024155,0.000018003453,0.061231047,1.4777055e-7,0.000009692009,0.9241362,0.014119705,0.00032218007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013041348,0.00008867837,0.00032157722,0.000024709196,0.0000105993795,0.0000059448494,0.0022274896,0.0000010006233,0.000020711035,0.40146312,0.5955818,0.00012392718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032106425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043391534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5814621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007915571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007731381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4790254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138030685","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0003","title":"Filling the Gaps in Hume's Vacuums","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Interpreter; Space (punctuation); Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.1722157259676711,"score_gpt":0.32769574382193845,"score_spread":0.15548001785426735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138030685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3313197,0.051159505,0.0000033029964,0.018404651,0.0024664812,0.0002770735,0.000020374348,0.000117615564,0.59623134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950586,0.0006288801,0.0000053750305,0.0012577195,0.001575636,0.000027985836,0.0000013052613,0.000011351358,0.0014331761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992443,0.00006790768,0.0001668481,0.00010023468,0.00013746986,0.00028324535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936706,0.00035262128,0.000040705017,0.0001503819,0.000058061516,0.000031145737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000636472,0.00011082153,0.00016726587,0.00003872074,0.0004919568,0.00004502997,0.0001296768,0.000028893055,0.00040121964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001321593,0.0000631756,0.000059480724,0.000028555603,0.0005225876,0.00013209104,0.00011282931,0.00026732613,0.00016456279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045032207,0.000034085162,0.00021386109,0.000019426448,0.00004773385,0.0000012274311,0.071103685,0.0000011122427,0.0000062142303,0.92750406,0.00071366376,0.00035043983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013486294,0.000021582098,0.0005600122,0.000050013306,0.000018555726,7.650456e-7,0.014050378,0.000004960713,0.000029990284,0.7047511,0.28024378,0.00013400704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044409386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003227346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6637389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018140201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000066417288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4393074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W214042703","doi":"10.7202/1044607ar","title":"Self-Other Asymmetry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Duty; Action (physics); Law and economics; Epistemology; Principle of double effect; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.030726874325509614,"score_gpt":0.25289032879706846,"score_spread":0.22216345447155886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W214042703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028799526,0.0001684722,0.00025083567,0.0037033074,0.0004153019,0.00008643184,0.000014572413,0.00024551558,0.96631604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98290765,0.000034903627,0.00047062634,0.0128545,0.0023424067,0.000008729371,0.0000022601876,0.00003320203,0.001345743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917316,0.000102378806,0.0001441717,0.00018019974,0.00012511891,0.00027497968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942166,0.00010094493,0.000047871807,0.00020997565,0.000121089,0.00009845469],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043993173,0.00012710369,0.00012584851,0.00005860274,0.0003418847,0.00011111813,0.00020170759,0.00018574859,0.0021849314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064137836,0.00010623443,0.0000775275,0.000030461215,0.0005604084,0.00007998571,0.000047524412,0.00043636508,0.00062572793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016365419,0.0000405437,0.000037872003,0.000023290146,0.000039253737,0.000006201777,0.010755755,2.2399942e-7,0.0000674688,0.9875645,0.0004838784,0.00096463645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009877447,0.00006524506,0.000013247933,0.00001470289,0.000009037975,0.0000028681256,0.0003371217,0.00009113578,0.0004711352,0.6067114,0.39206973,0.000115589464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020810631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031407003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9649703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004666974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004018737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140715034","doi":"10.7202/1072605ar","title":"Ethical Habituation and Pleasure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Virtue; Habituation; Reading (process); Psychology; Character (mathematics); Social psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.09439292826643782,"score_gpt":0.23559603912481952,"score_spread":0.14120311085838172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140715034","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11000409,0.0005321219,0.0004787359,0.6032579,0.0002782621,0.00017752018,0.000038765353,0.0002471354,0.28498545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778066,0.000022695314,0.00003480571,0.02138745,0.000657298,0.000003866283,0.000003874041,0.000007998696,0.000075371434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994959,0.00006247942,0.00009663983,0.00012902638,0.00013207956,0.00008386021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996185,0.0001546426,0.000022453223,0.000057617068,0.000052185733,0.000094647614],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024484622,0.00006169014,0.000089553,0.000013994398,0.0001622439,0.00007647167,0.000053239917,0.00008499641,0.00096376525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003818979,0.000051050967,0.00003207927,0.000016332877,0.00019996364,0.000052415482,0.00003630848,0.00038133998,0.00012104547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000111153,0.000006461149,0.00005055529,0.000022956365,0.000009918163,0.0000016991576,0.01242676,5.852993e-7,0.00008143712,0.98461956,0.0005076929,0.0022612847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016164567,0.000064188585,0.0001704104,0.000012074678,0.000018438204,5.186531e-7,0.00045285915,0.0005856379,0.000043700635,0.8052287,0.19314994,0.000111876594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029174924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000537649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86780256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000035776877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012721655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141018876","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990094","title":"Utilitarianism and Psychological Realism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Realism; Flourishing; Normative; Epistemology; Empirical psychology; Value (mathematics); Moral realism; Philosophy; Philosophical realism; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Moral psychology; Economics; Theoretical psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1057381843068476,"score_gpt":0.30573340685169004,"score_spread":0.19999522254484242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141018876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13011405,0.0007045046,0.000013410053,0.01622378,0.00027212346,0.0000926509,0.00003117129,0.0001226591,0.85242563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943565,0.00003955859,0.000053151067,0.0043714345,0.0003854938,0.0000023496493,0.0000066828,0.000005111352,0.0007797025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929476,0.00004764722,0.0001445462,0.00022183843,0.00011217776,0.00017905263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995656,0.00008441472,0.000020660422,0.00019892877,0.00003625148,0.0000941554],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025981618,0.000102595804,0.00012791851,0.00003253175,0.00020905034,0.00006425054,0.00010291616,0.000077936864,0.0014630834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006963348,0.000077518016,0.000047447786,0.000014801636,0.00040656788,0.000079375015,0.00002242692,0.0002262385,0.000082926286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019790346,0.000081922255,0.0000018677933,0.000002787555,0.000004813397,0.000008290534,0.003239009,2.3882277e-8,0.000021897866,0.98691607,0.000732125,0.008971397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001552414,0.00022746879,0.00092154054,0.000007280538,0.0000065908494,0.0000048825264,0.00022386623,0.000018009525,0.0000037858954,0.8615326,0.13681076,0.000087943896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003265228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002327192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8642425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000058467676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000049488785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142322623","doi":"","title":"Sidgwick's Philosophical Intuitions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenstarTs (Univeristy of Trieste https://www.units.it/)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Philosophy; Morality; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Intuitionism; Intuition; Internalism and externalism","score_opus":0.12804650781849417,"score_gpt":0.25975891580146815,"score_spread":0.13171240798297398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142322623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18182361,0.00037906898,0.00011595689,0.05197808,0.0012230808,0.0007481055,0.0006356481,0.00025499094,0.76284146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97425544,0.000620447,0.00014290669,0.0028852655,0.0009885477,0.000025365174,0.00024680517,0.000092531125,0.020742673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646604,0.00032072666,0.0009089909,0.00071376615,0.0008541642,0.0007363198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996153,0.00050654454,0.00045827322,0.0010240362,0.0013792856,0.00047885225],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006148632,0.0005913481,0.00096644287,0.0004086319,0.0019710113,0.00018143193,0.00094471656,0.00035325022,0.010054923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045412654,0.0005795206,0.0002921783,0.00055921345,0.004341657,0.0010416323,0.0004197578,0.0012476783,0.0011274411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024912527,0.0003303504,0.000018838038,0.000097737866,0.0001603375,0.00024898528,0.016516902,0.0000136330455,0.00008015609,0.96846616,0.01338921,0.00042858455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017623301,0.00064641907,0.00015174352,0.00034768102,0.00014801127,0.00007799733,0.0078969365,0.00023131065,0.00010013404,0.34514114,0.6425937,0.00090258074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059504923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006330456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79243183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099756246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006583132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142782002","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0234","title":"Can Hume Be Read as a Virtue Ethicist?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Subjectivism; Reading (process); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.16553087338598377,"score_gpt":0.3582634954299187,"score_spread":0.19273262204393493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142782002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038340576,0.0034294375,0.0000062360614,0.036420032,0.0011077314,0.00016402632,0.00004275045,0.00019149824,0.92029774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778447,0.00029849622,0.000014035936,0.008771628,0.0013862519,0.0000139282165,0.000006380931,0.000026098234,0.011638464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986816,0.000056433877,0.00030246697,0.00027153568,0.0003328184,0.00035516845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987471,0.0005328177,0.00008583327,0.00025661325,0.00028162304,0.00009602497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010996101,0.00020728286,0.00031209714,0.00009422571,0.0008620753,0.000080448546,0.00018382099,0.000096309646,0.00069967756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048290167,0.00016294565,0.000114070885,0.00004299289,0.0013638963,0.00007721336,0.0001561057,0.00052812137,0.00019944964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031085838,0.0000442441,0.0000075893263,0.000038943588,0.00015008304,0.000047440233,0.04823139,2.1862687e-7,0.00004047247,0.9494741,0.0011876883,0.0007467574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016746036,0.00011709743,0.000040953593,0.000048368755,0.00003144501,0.0000026356972,0.010233241,6.0554345e-7,0.000080478356,0.73479515,0.25429603,0.00018653873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004171057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006200551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93950415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004698635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038645576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76609784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145197535","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400001862","title":"Three Accounts of Respect for Persons in Kant's Ethics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical imperative; Humanity; Morality; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Kantian ethics; Theology","score_opus":0.1668940697586506,"score_gpt":0.3492429151291736,"score_spread":0.182348845370523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145197535","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016748914,0.5030012,0.00090551033,0.22654977,0.0015258259,0.0038892718,0.00076747563,0.00016124573,0.24645077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97078496,0.022779832,0.00018813698,0.005780908,0.0003023803,0.00004210999,0.000012300764,0.000024700215,0.00008468546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910027,0.000041968266,0.0003276874,0.00016895159,0.00018448384,0.00017663513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992713,0.00022273608,0.00011091813,0.00023749362,0.00011893004,0.00003864028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012329253,0.00011229563,0.00035147835,0.00005829875,0.00011427536,0.000026221749,0.00020610538,0.00008221775,0.00037862366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043284587,0.000088862536,0.00016806736,0.000055117802,0.00026585071,0.00008331936,0.000031075295,0.00041479507,0.000037620754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008529761,0.000049303937,0.0000055623304,0.0026816865,0.00001430712,0.0000032227078,0.0026939602,7.4796435e-7,0.000008565858,0.9932249,0.0001722375,0.0011369308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003278191,0.000058342008,0.00003282666,0.0056373943,0.000040423824,0.0000015323311,0.00009165599,0.0000029622424,0.000016861834,0.79266834,0.20100339,0.00011846502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018623314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033822611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95403606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022831764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014270649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41456634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147878307","doi":"10.1111/nbfr.12100","title":"Pseudo-passions: Needless Categorization or Insightful Distinction?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Blackfriars","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Niagara College","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Categorization; Citation; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04874736855995399,"score_gpt":0.2503318464308383,"score_spread":0.2015844778708843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147878307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042480033,0.00010777529,0.013438796,0.021462407,0.005708837,0.0004847377,0.000035041732,0.0006258628,0.9156565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98475987,0.000023864184,0.000077932054,0.0015938056,0.0032956148,0.000011787806,0.000036603837,0.000032147986,0.010168349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890774,0.00010406836,0.00026811438,0.00025508643,0.00024477337,0.0002201922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990808,0.00024716847,0.000099500336,0.00028120689,0.00011535709,0.00017600386],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025157156,0.00016819591,0.00019068494,0.00008919407,0.00041678696,0.00020115155,0.0001911957,0.00010993721,0.0041490966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028523753,0.00011922985,0.00007113906,0.000074346826,0.0002329268,0.00022416061,0.000054908727,0.00026688966,0.00058113405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053731274,0.00005186454,0.000009710287,0.000014904804,0.00001552312,0.0000017409931,0.003875163,0.00001548535,0.000067521156,0.98702353,0.0034176654,0.005453139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036595232,0.00007673688,0.000056604636,0.00002365349,0.000020732436,0.0000017567046,0.00030556988,0.00056744326,0.000046529673,0.6300992,0.36828184,0.00015399582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029297435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006609876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9422799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030348998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098537486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99676126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148588350","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00591.x","title":"Virtuous act, virtuous dispositions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.012406729947253012,"score_gpt":0.21369277445304574,"score_spread":0.20128604450579274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148588350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17211393,0.00024090745,0.00070284924,0.0048370734,0.0001686678,0.00006647462,0.00013987218,0.00016069712,0.82156956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99301076,0.000010732787,0.000013345741,0.0007701081,0.00069587666,0.000008641675,0.000092078786,0.000011311407,0.0053871246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922,0.00004557748,0.00019448056,0.00018689618,0.00018106909,0.00017197187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948627,0.00009378666,0.000056855864,0.00025366485,0.000056957313,0.000052461106],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001365465,0.000108926506,0.00020647552,0.00021750007,0.0004148647,0.00015637148,0.00010889213,0.000047097346,0.0029634556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012749845,0.000090457055,0.0003359918,0.00018655448,0.00022683288,0.00010939262,0.000029175388,0.00015360226,0.00031493956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004805096,0.00009520953,0.00015202019,0.0000020051282,0.0003762738,0.000014304731,0.00044744962,0.00010872368,0.000028781627,0.9981379,0.00021362456,0.00041893165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012111833,0.000033510543,0.0012871636,0.0000041717685,0.0013493127,0.0000010510364,0.00013524287,0.0009034999,0.000046587138,0.93652886,0.059375364,0.0002141181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015173545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004170914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82089686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001799333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001304397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149352425","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0007","title":"Hume and the Prince of Thieves","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1543909979795257,"score_gpt":0.2845462467529152,"score_spread":0.13015524877338946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149352425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5425658,0.027571876,0.0000026950192,0.015407086,0.00036379544,0.00020880497,0.000015255949,0.000054641267,0.41381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938158,0.0030896165,0.000007841482,0.00047167996,0.00023570089,0.000009057677,2.5986512e-7,0.0000049505998,0.0023651165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995346,0.000048464837,0.00013337315,0.000086604436,0.000111403664,0.00008552056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937326,0.0003509267,0.000052562442,0.000110986715,0.00009825421,0.000013987041],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025562634,0.00007163482,0.0001911616,0.000017296203,0.000510922,0.000011327319,0.00008014745,0.000015937574,0.00005760779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013947816,0.00003714379,0.000044267086,0.000011948803,0.0042812987,0.000046499936,0.00010915768,0.00011221507,0.000009080567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002491147,0.000012411932,0.000046419715,0.000026910047,0.00007781066,0.0000018300356,0.06866527,1.5508049e-7,0.0000056401004,0.9308453,0.00019691986,0.000096424264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004133383,0.000038468756,0.00045847695,0.000028414437,0.000021491302,0.0000029684984,0.0041779433,0.000002446181,0.00004422596,0.95570207,0.03904066,0.0000695183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024095973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006200552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45124993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000027032202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008769722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151005154","doi":"10.1093/analys/ant048","title":"Luck, Value and Commitment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Consequentialism; Morality; Normative ethics; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Ethical theories; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Value theory; Ethical theory; Section (typography)","score_opus":0.02624050733589912,"score_gpt":0.2326509081501414,"score_spread":0.20641040081424228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151005154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38084814,0.0006094214,0.0001927464,0.019549504,0.0001180746,0.0001438877,0.000023935938,0.000059416972,0.5984549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965407,0.00003330407,0.000027641148,0.0015765845,0.00013156077,0.000010444572,0.000010628123,0.000003820891,0.0016653138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959904,0.000032035976,0.0000924384,0.00010180242,0.000088206194,0.000086483684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996741,0.000067114546,0.00002452659,0.00013424072,0.000046607583,0.000053427986],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001119037,0.000056553992,0.00012698298,0.00008297778,0.00015641937,0.0001235357,0.000057442867,0.000021525753,0.0047572614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000108467,0.00004152279,0.000087840206,0.000047821442,0.0001560594,0.00007346154,0.000032383497,0.00007575746,0.00021156546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.4469447e-7,0.000019144354,0.00017041295,0.0000027506492,0.0004188539,5.8077245e-7,0.0018520901,0.0000063793445,0.000006127924,0.9963202,0.00020979127,0.0009930177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068757225,0.000019500725,0.0012447535,0.0000022295908,0.00047352188,1.2566944e-7,0.0003927657,0.0024690311,0.000009173686,0.95939904,0.035833847,0.000087255336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008857149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022953072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61569256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005082963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030904312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153697664","doi":"10.1017/s1369415414000016","title":"Kant and the Art of Schematism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Connection (principal bundle); Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020084604638509595,"score_gpt":0.22723494352329862,"score_spread":0.20715033888478904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153697664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060143834,0.19606432,0.00008366145,0.05875287,0.00017943645,0.00034629312,0.0000076075125,0.00002359984,0.7439408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477783,0.044335485,0.000031898515,0.0070149084,0.00017133096,0.00000926474,0.0000020796142,0.000007326483,0.0006494024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994583,0.0001155488,0.0001924154,0.00007334928,0.000094221,0.00006616939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999488,0.00018007583,0.000083288265,0.00018327782,0.000040454037,0.000024937252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010352647,0.00005972684,0.00025246563,0.000010166399,0.000083095176,0.000020952644,0.00009502515,0.000015625421,0.0007843479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017082338,0.000030153218,0.000068614914,0.000013291283,0.0005947392,0.000031437106,0.00003481425,0.00010595039,0.000109924564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017586731,0.0000060932102,4.8754134e-7,0.0012329848,0.000011365362,1.6103944e-7,0.00040447395,5.453231e-9,0.0000022364,0.9914441,0.00092289277,0.0059734206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119244,0.000008171751,0.000003425702,0.0014302584,0.00003355003,0.0000014908554,0.000007834088,0.000012064157,0.0000059412964,0.4748467,0.5234985,0.00003288322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007740761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012743425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9471769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":8.4210023e-7,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059862186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85880595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154407704","doi":"10.29173/pandpr23430","title":"Mollenhauer’s hermeneutics: Tempting and Risky","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phenomenology & Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.033110878914813645,"score_gpt":0.26884154040990665,"score_spread":0.235730661495093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154407704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045926012,0.00050000113,0.00005129007,0.028087055,0.00040588703,0.00009776146,0.000005590113,0.00010714014,0.9248193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99028045,0.0002070255,0.0002693411,0.0071443412,0.0008434318,0.000014967622,0.0000026199407,0.000022693515,0.0012151491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880856,0.0002980565,0.00021742593,0.00028098866,0.00011642974,0.00027855556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805194,0.0013499378,0.00016248872,0.00023862749,0.000111552516,0.0000854666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001011416,0.00014319355,0.00019676374,0.00006542593,0.00047962423,0.00011576366,0.00014245791,0.00009054866,0.000659407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093764265,0.00012800847,0.000028385548,0.000022048222,0.0005784545,0.00034506354,0.00012683237,0.00048364134,0.0002890598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045046832,0.00006813183,0.000013908074,0.000018271588,0.000060659648,0.000004181671,0.012480237,0.0000017144484,0.00006500683,0.9814449,0.000044382152,0.00575359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002029808,0.000110736284,0.00001140814,0.0000051644124,0.000039886185,0.000011791755,0.0021294632,0.00009173614,0.000007415471,0.5389122,0.4583712,0.000106060754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008023241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044800767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9443544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001786504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023244911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7220044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154618067","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403835","title":"Sympathy, Understanding, and Hermeneutics in Hume's Treatise","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Hermeneutics; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Positivism; Psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.27167225521796384,"score_gpt":0.33435099895658943,"score_spread":0.06267874373862559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154618067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32342815,0.0074863834,0.0000033880867,0.0136463465,0.0003709212,0.0002197428,0.000020344974,0.00011313326,0.6547116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633014,0.0015828856,0.000006134606,0.00093379384,0.00021483912,0.00000458212,0.0000013046636,0.000007334641,0.00091896247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993548,0.000035113586,0.00015894254,0.00016136898,0.00010706088,0.00018270884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968785,0.00010630519,0.000035467736,0.000098588294,0.000034343506,0.000037467846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017686993,0.00012549883,0.0002157996,0.00007112469,0.00029383248,0.00006486042,0.00005518529,0.00003704987,0.00007029038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003623216,0.00009903402,0.000031289073,0.000025000638,0.0004916132,0.00008639546,0.000039050294,0.00015351856,0.000010116438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009937612,0.000043147047,0.00007486419,0.000017659793,0.000029841636,0.000016010112,0.050638616,6.4498806e-7,0.00000947851,0.94836116,0.0001678895,0.00063076004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030827103,0.00014825015,0.00039972598,0.00006438108,0.000019250914,0.0000011915541,0.015752109,0.000011604963,0.00000692806,0.9788387,0.004320453,0.00012917642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014932392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005802459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.672902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005692679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009559319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.403849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154905584","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0063","title":"From Thick to Thin: Two Moral Reduction Plans","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05836533605621926,"score_gpt":0.2532884893290386,"score_spread":0.1949231532728193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154905584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24598697,0.0007140331,0.000046617133,0.28957903,0.0051254546,0.00020091065,0.00045706364,0.000036791305,0.4578531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814886,0.0000047495937,0.00009086268,0.006715486,0.011532844,6.241609e-7,0.000008873257,0.000015051456,0.00014293556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892926,0.00006443246,0.00036392544,0.00014578742,0.00023063667,0.0002659707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985159,0.000039533516,0.00015065195,0.00018650509,0.0002562171,0.0008512048],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000306262,0.00015065397,0.00024408843,0.00031483604,0.00031922112,0.00018826415,0.00034094782,0.00007390408,0.0010778068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007675174,0.00013115801,0.00014630888,0.00005877556,0.00019392799,0.0002746806,0.0000070486985,0.0006050858,0.00012426959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003956847,0.000018481222,0.000008413176,0.000002441492,0.00003312533,0.00011360714,0.013168183,0.000068104186,0.000090382215,0.9830424,0.0025207757,0.0008944876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029535027,0.0002937675,0.000075691554,0.00009519466,0.00002707587,0.00003375882,0.00031911797,0.000009084529,0.000057881414,0.9547541,0.043880876,0.00015810938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047239168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008407574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7355016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009523037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040542558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155476494","doi":"10.7202/004896ar","title":"La valeur intrinsèque chez Brentano et Moore","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2839784442685261,"score_gpt":0.33971148193377276,"score_spread":0.055733037665246676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155476494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044446513,0.03996594,0.000019807336,0.27843055,0.0012233229,0.0002371992,0.00040860218,0.0002636301,0.67500633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437895,0.018610157,0.00005911616,0.018478146,0.010525343,0.00004066696,0.000043759974,0.00012139826,0.008331918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965827,0.0010195578,0.0006331941,0.0006391958,0.00048206752,0.00064329756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978644,0.0007137039,0.0002188417,0.00061245944,0.0002400801,0.00035047703],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010829554,0.00057916524,0.0005664273,0.00020011574,0.00052611466,0.0005054003,0.0005576799,0.00056446315,0.013048005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022452536,0.0005675344,0.00037526074,0.00008323877,0.0023405172,0.00067189866,0.00028130898,0.0018365273,0.0019668147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030076346,0.0007483878,0.00002475655,0.00029882474,0.00015870345,0.0002017047,0.009481529,0.0000042574275,0.000024779556,0.97672147,0.008602657,0.0037028748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003217794,0.00014941124,0.000022266835,0.00026936462,0.00006540292,0.000038496837,0.000082597675,0.00021233574,0.00005181335,0.55960894,0.43879154,0.00038609075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003670744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010621865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9393448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014104115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051612762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156616183","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00374.x","title":"Kant and the Claims of the Poor","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Library science","score_opus":0.16208436671002435,"score_gpt":0.3277990332554144,"score_spread":0.16571466654539002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156616183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20066002,0.0006916086,7.7305975e-7,0.1001312,0.00019482241,0.00031560587,0.000025701653,0.000015107415,0.69796515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794114,0.00020587377,0.0000070955793,0.0008758491,0.0006792301,0.000029547873,8.210117e-7,0.0000073570377,0.00025310103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985234,0.00038336546,0.00019632469,0.0002227324,0.00039879442,0.0002753512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773204,0.0016611945,0.000047895464,0.00030148306,0.00016742854,0.00008994486],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023397694,0.00010574629,0.000196745,0.000048425936,0.00096253277,0.00010964217,0.0004291286,0.00010329466,0.0006011734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052254787,0.000043012144,0.000063575,0.00007372075,0.010697526,0.000054245,0.00050775835,0.0015935238,0.000013456246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001627007,0.000057603313,0.000019531604,0.000023366205,0.000020000263,9.3039114e-7,0.003922644,6.281036e-8,0.00014283959,0.99447536,0.000020109095,0.0011548741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005181903,0.000119966484,0.000086017964,0.000011859043,0.0000073268225,0.0000026194282,0.00033807172,0.000032217195,0.000023647244,0.9806629,0.018133124,0.00006408368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056007106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039705592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7972811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004052437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027113549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158543086","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0210","title":"Of Liberty and Necessity: The Free Will Debate in Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy (review)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; CLARITY; Relevance (law); Classics; Free will; Moral philosophy; Period (music); Epistemology; Law; History; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.035436704860984325,"score_gpt":0.24942280343796566,"score_spread":0.21398609857698134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158543086","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073381536,0.7174172,3.5614272e-7,0.024591377,0.00035204896,0.00030809417,0.00011756049,0.00004175834,0.18379006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85250145,0.14505811,0.0000037480495,0.0018921469,0.00032467017,0.00002047487,0.000005432737,0.000011014891,0.00018295019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990686,0.00008311114,0.00031428644,0.00018273831,0.00018213384,0.00016909477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931633,0.00023758967,0.00010436391,0.00020957457,0.000111401714,0.000020707499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033147828,0.0001294377,0.00037002176,0.00004243927,0.00026328774,0.00003616401,0.00018849767,0.00003250409,0.00012452684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010381658,0.00008794741,0.00007283939,0.000050200186,0.0012026957,0.00013204836,0.00022995366,0.00019649226,0.0000030409672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066031794,0.000073221854,0.00011511188,0.00039601538,0.00007832464,0.000013673387,0.002000109,2.9981203e-7,0.0000030188705,0.9900171,0.006082521,0.0012139679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027999497,0.000032648448,0.0013752246,0.0009539087,0.00006983552,0.000002664951,0.00036324706,0.0000042128386,0.000003344367,0.8795621,0.117220186,0.00013264455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043758357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003305981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7791199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011337087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009944107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4431382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158922194","doi":"10.1177/0969733007071358","title":"The Terminal: A tale of virtue","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nursing Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Terminal (telecommunication); Duty; Character (mathematics); Disposition; Virtue ethics; Aesthetics; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.2579158041136346,"score_gpt":0.41804988121761,"score_spread":0.16013407710397543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158922194","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.4644412e-7,0.7962889,0.0000082125825,0.0012991059,0.0010621577,0.0001586907,0.000067499364,0.000032364278,0.20108292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00030424938,0.9950203,0.000010046085,0.0001362945,0.0013211085,0.00001727941,0.00003715561,0.00005779571,0.003095781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982161,0.00040085812,0.00054617657,0.00021349972,0.0004033142,0.00022006761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617755,0.0027545614,0.00039912722,0.0004383894,0.00018760428,0.00004277128],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014150948,0.00026137035,0.0007550927,0.00007514994,0.0007573636,0.00016522613,0.0004667034,0.0005865046,0.000037475453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003185156,0.00015628572,0.00045343183,0.00004856319,0.0027025598,0.00004060041,0.00003708017,0.002813075,0.000037802267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015394668,0.000033166074,1.2965533e-9,0.0024908495,0.000020917147,0.0000034190366,0.001620304,3.7023813e-8,1.6751365e-8,0.6680355,0.00036259403,0.32743162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020486199,0.000022672122,8.4392e-9,0.010578647,0.00017652179,0.0000075020666,0.00005897377,9.771368e-7,1.2408148e-7,0.40736595,0.58166057,0.00010757986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005259411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009678787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58129793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058104175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040066242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160531423","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00370.x","title":"A Wolff in Kant’s Clothing: Christian Wolff’s Influence on Kant’s Accounts of Consciousness, Self‐Consciousness, and Psychology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Philosophy; Soul; Epistemology; Doctrine; Context (archaeology); Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Psychology; Theology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06405905668201921,"score_gpt":0.2741651518845293,"score_spread":0.21010609520251006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160531423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7968201,0.000625731,0.0000075306953,0.007797279,0.00084932457,0.00045561546,0.00013567948,0.00018994663,0.19311878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948608,0.00017681252,0.00006346832,0.004369248,0.00040594098,0.00004649169,0.000008439286,0.000049685932,0.000019108458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751556,0.00020872554,0.0007504218,0.00065171224,0.00037684367,0.0004967447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829054,0.00032022153,0.0003448244,0.00062090263,0.00023822622,0.00018530175],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006368,0.00041730053,0.0007265693,0.00040416737,0.00027557558,0.00007565036,0.0005935469,0.00023274316,0.00030404326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011327898,0.00037862966,0.000117801275,0.00013640331,0.0017398187,0.00032088405,0.00016898949,0.00082076876,0.000098301665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000274408,0.00069962954,0.002208245,0.00014338382,0.000073813586,0.00005859694,0.018439896,0.0000031735547,0.00007059206,0.97769934,0.00015404898,0.00017488287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014130374,0.00033471742,0.0065510236,0.00026064596,0.000040368788,0.000015414773,0.00025759937,0.00007386142,0.0000747555,0.98329073,0.007219308,0.00046855418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092660304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006963926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1980407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004892067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102198814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164386129","doi":"10.1017/s1369415412000349","title":"Joel Smith and Peter Sullivan (eds), Transcendental Philosophy and NaturalismOxford: Oxford University Press, 2011 Pp. 224 ISBN 978-0-19-960855-3 (hbk), US $60.00","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Sociology","score_opus":0.028122582428259595,"score_gpt":0.2218251754254519,"score_spread":0.1937025929971923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164386129","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015187312,0.68236667,0.000008876265,0.033794895,0.0006429793,0.0016196443,0.0003308468,0.00018474604,0.26586404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56691957,0.42535198,0.00004430824,0.004733289,0.00041402256,0.000008894434,0.00004132497,0.0000389417,0.0024476906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983019,0.00018710794,0.0003585335,0.00049279147,0.0002736231,0.00038604028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989575,0.000098400466,0.00015393089,0.00035721486,0.00012108864,0.00031187615],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029884258,0.000365638,0.0005840599,0.000060156002,0.00045925498,0.00019722228,0.00031594554,0.00014146714,0.0028377168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023251456,0.000294507,0.00020620048,0.00004096075,0.00080838345,0.00060568785,0.00013704409,0.0005689168,0.00007628378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028999857,0.000095711584,0.00008897634,0.004023486,0.00013984485,0.00005380888,0.0009768225,9.039454e-8,0.000009206259,0.97533303,0.014278521,0.00497151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004999119,0.000091834256,0.00035045948,0.001352947,0.00018073335,0.000027213619,0.000053342235,0.000013326145,0.000004129813,0.06175029,0.93526614,0.0004096886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048107555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007252438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9209876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020942738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040910276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167309811","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v2n4p162","title":"Human Nature: the Foundation of Politics and Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Foundation (evidence); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Focus (optics); Human science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03275764281564504,"score_gpt":0.2928940030240641,"score_spread":0.26013636020841907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167309811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5235073,0.0013561961,0.0000105048375,0.02751681,0.00044983122,0.00008663383,0.000035301273,0.000008313239,0.44702908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99249405,0.000055589036,0.00001746994,0.006344543,0.00086109526,1.2575785e-7,0.0000012634662,0.0000057464313,0.00022009622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992884,0.000044033688,0.0002956492,0.000054298125,0.0001778028,0.00013984452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931246,0.000108511085,0.00018874239,0.000088593035,0.00021380969,0.00008788029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035626703,0.00007986725,0.00016589001,0.000034208497,0.00039886692,0.0001366837,0.00009236366,0.00007542675,0.00004960215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027465834,0.000049695424,0.000059416252,0.00001085548,0.0007768991,0.00012111749,0.000019818208,0.0004279122,5.4903967e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033042459,0.000039311846,0.00000342992,0.00001744848,0.000022805725,0.0000031301304,0.0016885942,3.1234782e-7,0.00007689991,0.99802125,0.000051610587,0.00007190241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021804438,0.00024201562,0.0001797621,0.00003963382,0.000042118856,0.000022959954,0.00028544656,0.000007871021,0.00011258663,0.8890007,0.10979332,0.000055544286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017743232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012303442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46898675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001083959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023323577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30678022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170363023","doi":"10.1353/hms.2005.a383291","title":"Hume and Humeans on Practical Reason","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Virtue; Philosophy; Virtue ethics; Practical reason; Action (physics); Character (mathematics); Practical wisdom","score_opus":0.23975523015756114,"score_gpt":0.3823778521059538,"score_spread":0.14262262194839267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170363023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09821878,0.0046642916,0.0000041778876,0.08784232,0.0004620687,0.00017381327,0.000022714343,0.00016703994,0.8084448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915862,0.0008099869,0.00005433265,0.0027215017,0.0016352538,0.000013966005,0.0000016994826,0.000014922634,0.003162137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991983,0.000054705433,0.00015389147,0.000213699,0.00018332007,0.00019608265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992619,0.0003906895,0.00004611615,0.00014611955,0.000095355215,0.000059817223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028612118,0.00014112715,0.00020376872,0.000043377986,0.0005166544,0.00008105355,0.000054832566,0.00004273127,0.00033739113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003167206,0.000103590035,0.00004712347,0.000014052051,0.0007679499,0.00014200892,0.00008058298,0.00028408744,0.00023076142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027085585,0.000072727526,0.000009484816,0.000019023544,0.00008323288,0.000007303602,0.014645328,4.8328894e-7,0.000007859651,0.9797129,0.0030672355,0.0023473063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021822164,0.00016795906,0.00007787137,0.000048715912,0.000033654924,0.0000035730768,0.0027230992,0.000013497084,0.000036666257,0.4418853,0.5546367,0.00015470549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009540471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022849518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8933674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021275762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001215037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4224279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181034769","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.33971","title":"When Reason Began To Stir… —Kantian Courage And The Enlightenment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Enlightenment; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.025128676445851143,"score_gpt":0.2367957097970493,"score_spread":0.21166703335119816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181034769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33555907,0.00045346815,0.00012138518,0.05152839,0.00034125845,0.00031921183,0.000054944,0.00008707744,0.6115352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994371,0.000045715602,0.000094108604,0.002269995,0.00040501286,0.0000052130154,0.000007559297,0.000016177066,0.0027852207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899703,0.00025099833,0.00009417162,0.00018911743,0.00024659972,0.00022205448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906003,0.00033487618,0.000049310765,0.0002219677,0.000073682175,0.00026015652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009165106,0.00012912405,0.00017702702,0.00007589387,0.00030879493,0.00024012987,0.0002374193,0.00008072739,0.00020487097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109129396,0.00009402077,0.000057537367,0.00003569839,0.0007338046,0.00013984823,0.00013609615,0.00025765208,0.000064058775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015176836,0.000026986152,0.000021651807,0.0000057435577,0.000034169974,0.000042808246,0.068296395,0.0000031470122,0.000009922526,0.9252139,0.004517554,0.0016759878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011218138,0.00006485772,0.00011813671,0.00002007934,0.000039237715,0.000006032104,0.0064540305,0.000107480744,0.000012721124,0.5528629,0.43906197,0.00013074416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096727593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006368062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6588119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055114942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006631689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38340557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206361362","doi":"","title":"THE OPENNESS CONDITION AND THE STATE OF BEING ORIENTED TOWARDS: A METAPHYSICS OF LIFE IN HEGEL","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Metaphysics; Openness to experience; Epistemology; State (computer science); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021212049466391106,"score_gpt":0.23810932508568472,"score_spread":0.21689727561929362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206361362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88338,0.00015388409,0.00032873708,0.0039107027,0.000120675526,0.00019991239,0.000018609373,0.000009118152,0.11187838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994153,0.00005918253,0.00000513393,0.00035518323,0.000043128555,0.000007192543,0.000002103846,0.000004109717,0.00010869828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999434,0.000121619945,0.000203782,0.00006239502,0.00010752597,0.00007070866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991387,0.0005502537,0.00008857956,0.0001103278,0.00009441826,0.000017687846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008230085,0.000051030147,0.00015790426,0.000018467628,0.00011357216,0.000031437503,0.000092197464,0.000012503496,0.000030924577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015506758,0.00002313948,0.000035672427,0.000024135688,0.00086922426,0.00006888243,0.00005097847,0.00010112694,9.502657e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067555695,0.000018697749,0.0000060674533,0.000020148475,0.000024369756,5.079939e-8,0.008993593,0.0000048914617,0.000025434581,0.98957443,0.0000036982865,0.001261078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006189459,0.000028015429,0.00009662779,0.000020268335,0.000010555352,5.7758804e-8,0.0012537551,0.0008617697,0.00024011213,0.99524647,0.0015881893,0.000035252146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062199053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008301221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11603528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000020984567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001595036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32026932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253303401","doi":"10.1007/1-4020-2182-8_15","title":"Metaphysics as “De Insolubilibus”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.040136489322040794,"score_gpt":0.24055294371430372,"score_spread":0.2004164543922629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253303401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006923737,0.00079432805,0.000012541624,0.0023566226,0.0013838455,0.00036176047,0.00014821402,0.0003874708,0.994486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046637822,0.000028136696,0.000015436306,0.0073033227,0.0058544176,0.000042855838,0.00016890574,0.0002541788,0.93969494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967509,0.0000678828,0.0007946195,0.00079030223,0.0008417187,0.0007545828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978882,0.00028379416,0.0004739921,0.0007037346,0.00030739428,0.00034288317],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009015831,0.00076874276,0.000803842,0.00034841042,0.00040418436,0.00089191756,0.0011666944,0.0016778809,0.0033071353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010422393,0.0007189312,0.0005916393,0.000012298292,0.0016532952,0.00069303595,0.00032528196,0.005611141,0.0006081172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020052747,0.000011341273,3.5382178e-7,0.000054930333,0.00019106745,0.00002496778,0.0020501905,0.0000012572455,0.000010567646,0.8786857,0.11672602,0.0022235464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015220168,0.000029217454,2.1059174e-7,0.000089285095,0.00011169149,0.0000049300065,0.000036083926,0.0000052079795,0.0000102242375,0.5012825,0.4978568,0.0004216667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022503737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004860061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38113078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022123221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051406387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253499900","doi":"","title":"Michael Gamer,. Cambridge University Press, 2000. ISBN: 0 521 77328 8 (hardback). Price: £35.00 (US$59.95).","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; History; Art history; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.02905748946410807,"score_gpt":0.2158816386835496,"score_spread":0.18682414921944152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253499900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21176028,0.0010362213,0.000027847876,0.017031075,0.00087947026,0.00041027844,0.00017433148,0.00020176328,0.76847875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93165183,0.0015250107,0.000009999889,0.004745982,0.0011507466,0.000004442636,0.000026216896,0.00004583967,0.060839925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980805,0.0002418769,0.0002806134,0.0004292614,0.00042837247,0.0005394034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984442,0.0004275481,0.000170229,0.0006732628,0.00012231214,0.00016242436],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052024657,0.00032000913,0.0003465041,0.00007099793,0.0007506939,0.00019331253,0.00070080877,0.00015595781,0.0018384854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006855828,0.00023679748,0.00020594627,0.00008494883,0.0006596713,0.00020622382,0.00019007522,0.0007256064,0.0006750701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014680302,0.00019350999,0.000015172136,0.000020192916,0.00008952289,0.00011053861,0.001796016,0.000013116392,0.00009586187,0.94126296,0.05603832,0.00021795742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053336076,0.00016067439,0.00025437097,0.00008782754,0.00006907679,0.00001338257,0.0004334796,0.0005282792,0.00012337437,0.03207839,0.96536005,0.000357733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000741786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006900078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9093217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006497635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073982425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259744231","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0014","title":"Effects on the Mind as Objects of Reasoning: A Perspectivist Reading of the Reason–Passion Relation in Hume’s Ethics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Feeling; Reading (process); Philosophy; Passion; Argumentation theory; Perspectivism; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07113004278434121,"score_gpt":0.3100280683930019,"score_spread":0.2388980256086607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259744231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78100824,0.00065798755,0.0000019745985,0.012252885,0.00032961063,0.00026658026,0.0000030486985,0.000013496847,0.20546618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987254,0.00013560968,0.0000062580366,0.00036035327,0.0002439094,0.00001702828,5.233535e-7,0.000013040123,0.00049784605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998513,0.0005700953,0.0002358617,0.0001822162,0.00035167884,0.00014716375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543035,0.0038556284,0.00022622774,0.00025736366,0.00021200284,0.000018443445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001827028,0.00013553142,0.00026747253,0.000064836044,0.00051625195,0.00002273552,0.00016511955,0.00008796887,0.000025695595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006476947,0.00007068766,0.00010277064,0.00007608755,0.0007954027,0.000052410724,0.00011239854,0.00067976414,0.000008719655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044132736,0.00004446976,0.00012096617,0.00009442543,0.000048371687,5.788659e-7,0.11624235,0.0000049919972,0.00030774216,0.8827427,0.000067407644,0.00028184243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034333387,0.00030802624,0.0055564214,0.0019642762,0.000052053383,7.3128354e-7,0.014274582,0.00007586028,0.00449195,0.97047603,0.0023125403,0.00014416678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013903991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030610999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2177172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038153823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035986348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77539784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260214551","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0013","title":"Personal Identity, Passions, and “The True Idea of the Human Mind”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Identity (music); Personal identity; Philosophy of mind; Introspection; Physicalism; Unitary state; Analogy; Embodied cognition; Self; Politics; Aesthetics; Law","score_opus":0.08428907551968025,"score_gpt":0.3104728859049115,"score_spread":0.22618381038523128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260214551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7755871,0.0054284018,0.000005257476,0.03219426,0.0008564377,0.00023927136,0.000027064141,0.000022774691,0.18563949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970169,0.00010975568,0.0000018836561,0.0006369093,0.0004605047,0.000010701044,4.5436136e-7,0.0000060296748,0.0017568441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999279,0.00015058924,0.00016371599,0.000106501735,0.00019899408,0.00010115289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993046,0.00035531863,0.00008375778,0.0001427311,0.0000954294,0.000018178956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006562268,0.00008666721,0.00019623472,0.000019732748,0.0010471243,0.000052969302,0.0001609432,0.000023565033,0.00015467741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002594805,0.000039453975,0.00009412442,0.0000171231,0.0028913736,0.00006646958,0.00025536475,0.0001700848,0.000008587664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066316584,0.000013730099,0.0001050364,0.000030566567,0.00007452199,1.5522137e-7,0.027765954,5.378992e-8,0.000019721456,0.9712269,0.000488567,0.00026821793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039953378,0.000023878234,0.0011235412,0.000055807468,0.000052237527,6.700171e-7,0.0048805876,0.000009336,0.0000206127,0.9641892,0.029181633,0.00006299875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000692413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080514996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22142987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005248376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000067162864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262421116","doi":"","title":"Desacuerdos y descriptivismo en la filosofía del derecho","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Normative; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of law; Politics; Legal positivism; Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Law; Comparative law; Theology","score_opus":0.06088599584842349,"score_gpt":0.2744722126942788,"score_spread":0.2135862168458553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262421116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1309541,0.015619983,0.013451908,0.0467044,0.004197412,0.0053139045,0.0024326288,0.0027782638,0.7785474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766517,0.0009843699,0.005361093,0.0052116956,0.0029372503,0.00046748697,0.00025592465,0.00049985875,0.007630581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886897,0.0026177482,0.0021294286,0.002082843,0.0017972866,0.002682969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914046,0.0023376911,0.00090378977,0.0018395756,0.0014927796,0.002021594],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005596338,0.0019673635,0.0019192615,0.0008473673,0.0014478188,0.0035427085,0.0021914407,0.002189052,0.0015571191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023145159,0.0018901184,0.0009559515,0.00045353032,0.0019680355,0.0014918505,0.0010606516,0.0045577353,0.0024240552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058416417,0.0014601888,0.0018344398,0.00087940635,0.00078352337,0.00045002476,0.016642671,0.0001763666,0.00043174616,0.95566046,0.013406999,0.0076900213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00257549,0.0007930031,0.0002731198,0.0010413944,0.000556973,0.00024889965,0.0008110208,0.002541428,0.0004908295,0.72766054,0.26105163,0.001955671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026089349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041693295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84569764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010713278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002313084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266975147","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2015.1063072","title":"Expressivism, Pragmatism, and Representationalism, by Huw Price","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expressivism; Direct and indirect realism; Pragmatism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics; Realism","score_opus":0.06201376325123302,"score_gpt":0.28070878493266055,"score_spread":0.21869502168142751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266975147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2914961,0.0029815808,0.00026325547,0.11305355,0.0021587166,0.00038289014,0.00017951282,0.00008592239,0.58939844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968245,0.000037973954,0.00020755068,0.0007527571,0.0016400908,0.0000028430882,0.0000073165315,0.000023707113,0.0005032337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847424,0.00013509968,0.0005199698,0.00016450678,0.00050815195,0.0001980398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998446,0.00014714485,0.00045463836,0.0001624593,0.00039976995,0.00038997264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062969956,0.00017099504,0.00028067527,0.00012648638,0.00013171577,0.00017626512,0.00025012656,0.00007939534,0.00035733526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018996613,0.00013864988,0.000099564706,0.000044906337,0.0004987118,0.0006527797,0.00005090496,0.00047751775,0.00002408501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060716528,0.00010154885,0.000071847906,0.000027873615,0.00007893839,0.000058316935,0.008780074,0.0000042420884,0.00017203581,0.9811781,0.009154322,0.00031196134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008597016,0.0002823755,0.00007716855,0.00009638734,0.00003720768,0.00012592443,0.00083114556,0.0000063083016,0.00017482947,0.94957995,0.047767777,0.00016123103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013212093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020782725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7053284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002537312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008395537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56539774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272068766","doi":"","title":"Economic Metaphors and Equivocation: The Unfortunate Similarities of Rawls and Nozick","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Equivocation; Metaphor; Pluralism (philosophy); Invocation; Epistemology; Classical liberalism; Value pluralism; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Positive economics; Politics; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Liberalism; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04263902885306444,"score_gpt":0.22547224538776842,"score_spread":0.18283321653470397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272068766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8805825,0.013787579,0.00014208721,0.005128258,0.0003675702,0.00015768861,0.000017602484,0.000021019332,0.099795684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919165,0.0070887017,0.0000055356427,0.00019700095,0.00022211685,0.00000224826,6.700619e-7,0.00000927576,0.000557959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991079,0.000060306742,0.00020741086,0.00008585987,0.00007439777,0.0004641287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961513,0.000086780485,0.00011969947,0.00009081625,0.000046537163,0.000041036077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014036314,0.000088694665,0.0001365599,0.000049914597,0.00033539414,0.000060858638,0.00012973364,0.000036193414,0.00018467079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019549747,0.00005676546,0.000047837762,0.000009124443,0.0005811477,0.00016711607,0.000040292187,0.0007032919,0.0000033962071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026048516,0.000009693634,0.00004925827,0.00000724304,0.00010553083,4.231697e-7,0.007412481,4.0586565e-7,0.000007301762,0.9901141,0.000005514705,0.0022620326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019381127,0.00015166472,0.000069328315,0.000010269036,0.000046168825,0.00006594678,0.006752409,0.000031339474,0.000053756354,0.9895694,0.002978012,0.0000778902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015574184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018186668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11133398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043985634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030259936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30554926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274863633","doi":"","title":"William Wordsworth,. Ed. Jared Curtis, Apryl Lea Denny-Ferris and Jillian Heydt Stevenson. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press 1999. ISBN: 0801436257. Price: US$105.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art; History","score_opus":0.049458479788077284,"score_gpt":0.21247464113303274,"score_spread":0.16301616134495545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274863633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72338974,0.008576227,0.00047207405,0.014820231,0.0021211035,0.0014931728,0.00029093478,0.0004982121,0.24833828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711888,0.002220674,0.000045546654,0.0021596297,0.0010349241,0.000003868014,0.00002672717,0.00005963982,0.023260226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770725,0.0002862345,0.00035986232,0.000604461,0.00038637032,0.00065580325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812436,0.00050993176,0.00023309977,0.00069607055,0.00009373582,0.0003428121],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005370983,0.00042964524,0.00046305868,0.00009817069,0.000876726,0.00030178722,0.0006512492,0.00023186562,0.0011885359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071838265,0.00032936336,0.00017284446,0.000111375855,0.0006707482,0.00023377701,0.00022970789,0.00085059146,0.0001693738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003608603,0.00023934568,0.00035430407,0.0000471744,0.00019940877,0.00013618135,0.005967678,0.000066603454,0.00004318287,0.94027734,0.049446035,0.00286187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009738078,0.00026400035,0.0015843681,0.0001898708,0.00015269361,0.000022203389,0.000798392,0.0007873998,0.00006658857,0.12380248,0.8707969,0.00056124764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014961654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038429664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82135093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005863515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007090762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284942978","doi":"10.1111/heyj.12323","title":"Locating Hegel's <i>Aufhebung</i> and Tracing Lonergan's ‘Sublation’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Tracing; Citation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Library science; Programming language","score_opus":0.03358500776175099,"score_gpt":0.22338377133287976,"score_spread":0.18979876357112876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284942978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59336257,0.0031101531,0.00447354,0.22531223,0.00216469,0.00021144473,0.00002294405,0.00014460673,0.17119783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99509484,0.0001668906,0.000026021356,0.0009967402,0.0024038237,0.0000015945967,2.5728468e-7,0.00001837299,0.0012914484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991105,0.00011318427,0.0002368456,0.000110335866,0.00021324973,0.00021586528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991935,0.00031500752,0.00013340727,0.00013712942,0.0001239956,0.00009694599],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009065745,0.00010798074,0.00012246604,0.000040712264,0.0011959051,0.00026404238,0.00015117506,0.000039357423,0.0009923925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108565306,0.000050906572,0.00005657416,0.000021552054,0.0006394842,0.0002895067,0.000050893526,0.00036204586,0.00006214591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018000004,0.000016433298,0.00002484601,0.00000912037,0.000026050098,0.000010510432,0.0066369455,0.0000029192427,0.0006158501,0.9802346,0.00023314379,0.012171568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003929435,0.000061986866,0.00007549106,0.00011250272,0.000022309412,0.0002446435,0.00090524746,0.00005034637,0.00019421217,0.9626815,0.03512746,0.00013137206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019279874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004509338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4017323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002386056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038040896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297491993","doi":"10.14288/1.0093635","title":"Kant's subject-object distinction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Object (grammar); Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03093150814729959,"score_gpt":0.17193998404779828,"score_spread":0.1410084759004987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297491993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74379915,0.000049454487,0.00007139751,0.0000617682,0.00027236555,0.00007777824,0.00010290636,0.00007511035,0.25549006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786496,0.000039125658,0.000036183847,0.00006635606,0.00012153923,2.5768065e-7,0.000011732287,0.000010872572,0.0018489757],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993212,0.000048268488,0.00008975065,0.00022020609,0.00015406856,0.0001664954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994717,0.000036097746,0.00008362349,0.00017570268,0.00015270579,0.000080158665],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018397659,0.000034783563,0.00016274238,0.000030820214,0.00040330645,0.00007784308,0.0002137314,0.00007100379,0.0029064047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022859655,0.00011809661,0.00011593421,0.000046490106,0.00071636634,0.00026516028,0.000075985765,0.00016965429,0.00009374935],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001657952,0.0012554209,0.0046143346,0.00034960697,0.00032223496,0.0006651289,0.04133513,6.795696e-7,0.0001841679,0.13749984,0.0045941677,0.8090135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006501383,0.00018201789,0.66985375,0.000104554405,0.00006325219,0.000021697102,0.004336919,0.000027946206,0.0000014569571,0.31754887,0.0069304206,0.0002789539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16011277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47769967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80873454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022643477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003483996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2308477220","doi":"10.1093/monist/onv038","title":"Virtue, Happiness, and Well-Being","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Happiness; Disposition; Psychology; Social psychology; Eudaimonia; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019317606453166287,"score_gpt":0.2163406698533925,"score_spread":0.1970230634002262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2308477220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065429755,0.00018962695,0.00004295521,0.054366164,0.00025027807,0.000059826587,0.0000054493185,0.00005382265,0.87960213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899671,0.000054419714,0.0000022021204,0.0011567575,0.00052454177,0.000004684437,4.4036634e-7,0.000008970949,0.0082808975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996291,0.00002895297,0.000076120865,0.000090591544,0.00007666087,0.000098571196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996312,0.00014146703,0.000023654133,0.00014938344,0.000023588187,0.00003065831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002003524,0.00006459754,0.000067594185,0.000011828494,0.0004703309,0.00010706789,0.000110762216,0.000021247486,0.00045520518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022876358,0.00002818482,0.000024245226,0.000007966251,0.0007348025,0.00005935849,0.000059779097,0.000078902085,0.00019883238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079126985,0.000007146197,0.000010095929,0.000004343318,0.000008400225,0.0000017458615,0.0015842385,3.1942736e-8,0.00019930607,0.99585193,0.00015838632,0.002166445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009670887,0.0000130684275,0.000056489414,0.000020335392,0.000005864308,0.0000012453733,0.00008563711,0.0000071980244,0.000096572265,0.7767802,0.22278443,0.000052230545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057940622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006139662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92453736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004939008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006564993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49841776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315593123","doi":"10.1017/s0317167100019442","title":"THE TREATMENT OF EPILEPSY PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, THIRD EDITION. 2001. Edited by Elaine Wyllie. published by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins. 1285 pages. C$283.50 approx","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Gerontology","score_opus":0.0725943110604808,"score_gpt":0.25983335361277443,"score_spread":0.18723904255229362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315593123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85233104,0.014675757,0.000022960014,0.09759442,0.0022985025,0.0003141566,0.00015677688,0.000028640816,0.032577764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766069,0.016526464,0.00029758166,0.0048245704,0.0012327166,0.000008302615,0.000002993922,0.000016271844,0.0004842194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483335,0.0013652192,0.001113706,0.0005405488,0.0009062124,0.0012409473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932044,0.0029468713,0.0012688627,0.00021932171,0.0007233065,0.0016372063],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005524881,0.0003921477,0.00055971293,0.00043203018,0.0049073687,0.0019423764,0.0016119379,0.00021903543,0.00047920714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004846414,0.00021342818,0.00022418739,0.00047541055,0.017636282,0.0017401752,0.000054904376,0.0011647823,0.000004687643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010976082,0.0020253106,0.07457156,0.00006416296,0.00049277116,0.0033069246,0.021115383,0.0010033554,0.00035981412,0.40694314,0.45105574,0.037964236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004021459,0.03334087,0.0006710251,0.000029666266,0.00006208737,0.002605046,0.00057714415,0.0005438983,0.00001951604,0.06994002,0.8914949,0.00031364075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015247876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05176991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4404392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013535636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068392727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317890658","doi":"10.5509/2014874801","title":"Illusions of Autonomy and the Autonomy of Illusions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Illusion; Autonomy; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Cognitive psychology; Law","score_opus":0.01545243200396801,"score_gpt":0.20106860257838755,"score_spread":0.18561617057441954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317890658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026238398,0.00017383858,0.00017681238,0.0039593787,0.00021580234,0.0001448491,0.000035449273,0.000027301148,0.9926427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998249,0.000027795591,0.00006560069,0.000049478673,0.0001603612,0.000011498847,0.0000044351505,0.0000106784,0.0014211527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918884,0.00012211505,0.0002833669,0.0001377404,0.00013587261,0.00013204299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871093,0.00069951185,0.00014386108,0.00028935782,0.000098192315,0.00005812306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006800365,0.00010417783,0.0002630136,0.000057225217,0.00030607102,0.000022588914,0.00016375766,0.00005064846,0.0006730406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014159744,0.00006251568,0.00010696131,0.000032466785,0.0025026908,0.000055003584,0.00013386368,0.0001755152,0.000015668964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001964254,0.000032941392,0.0000046644227,0.000023822346,0.00002435732,1.4259051e-7,0.03829031,0.0000032123503,0.000040908606,0.9602664,0.000043935277,0.0012496714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056473934,0.000051346688,0.000022322345,0.000041987998,0.00003729326,7.3830205e-7,0.03603849,0.00082249456,0.000048742648,0.8599713,0.1022991,0.00010144364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000073169525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034200842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99562514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010487646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073840725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9221268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319260082","doi":"10.17771/pucrio.ateo.20413","title":"O HORIZONTE ÉTICO-ONTOLÓGICODA RELAÇÃO DIALÓGICA: FILOSOFIA E DIÁLOGO INTER-RELIGIOSO","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Atualidade Teológica","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Logo (programming language); Computer science; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.05737585898484309,"score_gpt":0.2802796531774102,"score_spread":0.22290379419256712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319260082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22295903,0.027089939,0.00040778262,0.034509473,0.017688494,0.002212126,0.0017053271,0.0014215683,0.69200623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96039355,0.001008767,0.00007270561,0.0049757445,0.009825898,0.00012421217,0.0001899721,0.0002813329,0.023127824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99164385,0.0010014216,0.0018995218,0.0013655145,0.0013069967,0.0027826913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935535,0.0017054465,0.00081551704,0.0019133934,0.0004262739,0.0015858376],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019470677,0.0015298518,0.0016928548,0.00042076272,0.0017142427,0.0010833162,0.0015915708,0.0012747385,0.011335472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009272404,0.0013365934,0.0011741157,0.0003425796,0.0017939729,0.0011748663,0.0010527578,0.0031774999,0.007341487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037694201,0.0009818783,0.00041074937,0.00024371345,0.00054654805,0.00007956574,0.043292906,7.466012e-7,0.00030811154,0.93170047,0.019996561,0.0020618157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020132284,0.0011971298,0.00049153133,0.00069541065,0.00072936906,0.00006794181,0.0050493656,0.00009003779,0.0003527563,0.2727543,0.7141763,0.0023826233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004987448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028166038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7374345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029805364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020179566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319530405","doi":"","title":"Lara Denis, ed. , Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide . Reviewed by","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06562663507628018,"score_gpt":0.320567801161255,"score_spread":0.2549411660849748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319530405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045882775,0.01992959,0.00036654007,0.009776137,0.0007117823,0.0001927313,0.00015773506,0.000097988835,0.9641792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939821,0.00063921825,0.0002732551,0.0027088546,0.00070568174,0.000011053385,0.000012423963,0.000017585477,0.0016498773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989229,0.000108699765,0.0003382674,0.00012217814,0.00022920257,0.0002787636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990507,0.00033943163,0.00005617397,0.00024375065,0.0001752782,0.00013471434],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064946595,0.00012983555,0.00030772178,0.000028067016,0.000115941184,0.00004376347,0.00016321905,0.000058632722,0.0033951274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030650524,0.00009321336,0.00015664285,0.00002661738,0.0005450181,0.00026527146,0.0000645013,0.0001914026,0.00017833977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046569394,0.00017494507,0.000007574222,0.000073930656,0.00003434628,4.622194e-7,0.000857123,1.7635285e-8,0.00036791782,0.97363037,0.024373239,0.00047544058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008754584,0.000032164986,0.0000021656328,0.000045111337,0.00006545746,8.5307425e-7,0.00016555956,0.00000911111,0.0011194125,0.4196474,0.57869446,0.00013075185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013306821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013995567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9893938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008145405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001931433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319956498","doi":"10.1017/s0263523200000203","title":"Logical Form and Ethical Content","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Hegelianism; Epistemology; Formalism (music); Dialectic; Nothing; Interpretation (philosophy); Logical form; Emptiness; Literature; Linguistics; Art","score_opus":0.126713164289463,"score_gpt":0.23393185750090986,"score_spread":0.10721869321144686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319956498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5136518,0.0017834696,0.00008075408,0.17552269,0.00049155205,0.0007027816,0.00014966904,0.000090526744,0.30752674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939939,0.00008719934,0.0003557853,0.00436025,0.000112046335,0.000005286885,9.790311e-7,0.000010829877,0.0010737246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999089,0.00008727501,0.00027603982,0.00015158721,0.00023056609,0.00016551216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992555,0.00021954878,0.00012288077,0.00020564029,0.00013720822,0.000059248785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007320595,0.0001144404,0.00025191958,0.000008083037,0.00018242835,0.0000138493915,0.0002463718,0.00020561255,0.0015282928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011205365,0.00007223399,0.00033240276,0.000014129805,0.00221958,0.000009506866,0.0002039271,0.0004891234,0.000009065002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046873312,0.00007216612,0.00015915094,0.00009605394,0.00005857459,6.404873e-7,0.010218527,5.8620014e-8,0.000063512205,0.984303,0.0045708264,0.00041061646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057808356,0.00020114201,0.001928691,0.00013230184,0.00004757514,0.000007164021,0.002252111,0.000021097123,0.0004573682,0.9015059,0.0927174,0.00015117589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084183365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030852683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4803421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001081602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001708347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320564641","doi":"10.1017/s001221731100031x","title":"Intentional Normativism Meets Normative Supervenience and the Because Constraint","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Supervenience; Attribution; Constraint (computer-aided design); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Mathematics; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.07714598848624295,"score_gpt":0.22393955338742563,"score_spread":0.14679356490118267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320564641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19361277,0.0002993559,0.00019878816,0.009693733,0.0007873836,0.0003566099,0.00026571008,0.00008003583,0.7947056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983008,0.000028485954,0.000023976527,0.0013722498,0.00014887968,0.000021252275,0.000013854316,0.00000505,0.000085480955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937886,0.00012272429,0.00016400368,0.00009763885,0.00011388709,0.0001228993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994329,0.0002714681,0.000051329287,0.00010364887,0.00009219546,0.00004843465],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050771027,0.000086975764,0.00012067312,0.000029613157,0.0002930079,0.00006409837,0.00013336883,0.000031838437,0.00086410425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012695669,0.0000505629,0.000058541853,0.00001434955,0.0027220973,0.00018924821,0.000074370575,0.00020359475,0.00008551675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030607906,0.000027582795,0.0000120785835,0.0000068622744,0.000023541555,0.0000026595483,0.0872017,5.4687163e-8,0.0000032085745,0.91215926,0.000042262975,0.0004902032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005410079,0.00003385167,0.0003547562,0.00002090544,0.000014580043,0.0000064330584,0.0020093536,0.00005831,0.00004075239,0.9926765,0.004153632,0.00008992359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033571743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037302624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.804688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005639557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018560262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323728376","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12286","title":"Fichte on Conscience","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Conviction; Epistemology; Philosophy; Deliberation; Doctrine; Relevance (law); Function (biology); Law; Political science; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.46504918076954155,"score_gpt":0.3855528800936209,"score_spread":0.07949630067592067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323728376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016101405,0.00023781702,0.000010355489,0.0641321,0.000117418254,0.00013727734,0.0000353568,0.00005752733,0.91917074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963903,0.00019438402,0.000013851793,0.0013061125,0.00080648187,0.000031313175,8.7630985e-7,0.000008972398,0.0012477305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981499,0.00025632107,0.00016526344,0.0004238502,0.00052085076,0.00048382557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736834,0.0019633276,0.000026428572,0.00025460508,0.00017072655,0.00021659992],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014075962,0.00012802456,0.00016251001,0.00014769821,0.000766218,0.00012467141,0.0003302944,0.000084880645,0.0027784992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000683844,0.000064363056,0.00004156907,0.00007721417,0.004166209,0.00012209285,0.00020726153,0.0004948179,0.0008088286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010320127,0.00010164128,0.000009180495,0.000008700279,0.000008811474,0.0000110781375,0.0009407668,5.430747e-8,0.00011028405,0.99062616,0.00007862173,0.008001529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026423423,0.00072926516,0.000016953287,0.000043767195,0.000001496667,0.0000011378029,0.0000912553,0.0000027619878,0.000022580136,0.9281397,0.07057177,0.00011507953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007368797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033506426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98028886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029391998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002999414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324390891","doi":"10.1017/s1358246116000308","title":"Ramsey's Cognitivism: Truth, Ethics and the Meaning of Life","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitivism (psychology); Irrational number; Pragmatism; Meaning of life; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Sociology; Cognition; Psychology","score_opus":0.07106984588787033,"score_gpt":0.2677872357752023,"score_spread":0.19671738988733198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324390891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06896811,0.0012918301,0.001127945,0.26386806,0.0035728316,0.0014226884,0.0017059805,0.00012100767,0.65792155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772054,0.00012652873,0.00010270355,0.0010493752,0.0008278353,0.000016832586,0.000013753364,0.000018091252,0.00012431858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982945,0.00021373539,0.00056898606,0.00023913986,0.00046822816,0.00021544115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784863,0.0012157074,0.00026913526,0.00027590359,0.00028392643,0.00010668328],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014677189,0.00019758174,0.00041363813,0.00007540389,0.0003455,0.000035212066,0.00026291193,0.00009490628,0.0009554511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008066335,0.00010444524,0.00014926738,0.000030033782,0.003485976,0.00014431424,0.00019308203,0.00039229993,0.000011220338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027420057,0.00008208296,0.000012858637,0.00012622718,0.00015255336,0.000002080543,0.007814603,0.0000033034303,0.00005332812,0.9905811,0.00009941659,0.0007982497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031078288,0.00015476036,0.000009102635,0.00026239667,0.000080621554,7.1316e-7,0.00037984175,0.000028152266,0.00048473393,0.9592798,0.03605103,0.00016106098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019418512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012357782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9287525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014862368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001179277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326609699","doi":"10.5840/symposium20131715","title":"Absolute Spontaneity of Choice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Absolute (philosophy); Psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027224387683292,"score_gpt":0.2322418193499577,"score_spread":0.2050174316666657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326609699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2107455,0.00005588133,0.000003816618,0.005759286,0.0004807015,0.00016226289,0.000016904693,0.000042764364,0.7827329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99476385,0.00001026709,0.000010077394,0.0005603461,0.00054231385,0.000016196434,0.000003612246,0.000009656054,0.0040836604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946195,0.000026719157,0.00015296976,0.000103138445,0.000121248064,0.00013396374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994948,0.00010596898,0.00005433116,0.00017763092,0.0001136079,0.00005369294],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011926851,0.00007296344,0.00011815652,0.00003116453,0.00008897061,0.00004398656,0.00013808819,0.000041008592,0.0046175164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022304068,0.000057993624,0.000062100444,0.000014400834,0.0002525498,0.00013494276,0.000040530307,0.00013110305,0.00056342885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036991976,0.000040200335,0.000020465326,0.00002440904,0.000014117776,9.055695e-7,0.0018783375,8.3629396e-7,0.002918832,0.994412,0.00053377205,0.00015240695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019408867,0.00007355729,0.0009711256,0.00002380551,0.0000139147605,0.0000015521457,0.00012890705,0.00006483829,0.0005150226,0.7889853,0.20888802,0.0001398258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091065123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018603451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7840184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007812985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015395692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327586245","doi":"10.5840/monist20038611","title":"Perversion and Death","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perversion; Temptation; Absurdity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mistake; Death drive; Duality (order theory); Teleology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05956421792938551,"score_gpt":0.22701568950475112,"score_spread":0.1674514715753656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327586245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2199254,0.00039368914,0.000005227681,0.005207559,0.00013687489,0.00003984951,0.0000035657329,0.000020894006,0.77426696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960682,0.00003054491,0.0000049225155,0.00069439673,0.000092666145,0.0000014233076,5.4868406e-7,0.0000042020774,0.0031031347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997477,0.00003842281,0.00003926419,0.00005527583,0.00005397604,0.00006536464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981225,0.00005180575,0.000011328208,0.000088749206,0.000013682526,0.000022210183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018729278,0.000039031365,0.00003901332,0.000006694775,0.0004890637,0.000081570994,0.000048408107,0.000013968562,0.0003834818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020214346,0.000022099543,0.000017996324,0.0000049083055,0.00019064402,0.000025657966,0.000016046964,0.00009089485,0.000049207174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002694267,0.0000074816417,0.000014910764,0.0000027281953,0.0000035895687,9.918991e-7,0.0026303797,1.5597972e-7,0.000012494542,0.9970943,0.00007082272,0.00015945407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057714464,0.000015686812,0.00004235016,0.0000033973602,0.0000052733076,0.000001588109,0.00034855527,0.00000980026,0.00004292759,0.75237197,0.24706809,0.00003264908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049448627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026772901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7761428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000037075004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005701495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41988567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328765664","doi":"10.1017/s0263523200000240","title":"Systematicity and Symbolisation in Kant's Deduction of Judgements of Taste","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Taste; Pleasure; Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Morality; Relation (database); Psychology; Cognition; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05397203452840561,"score_gpt":0.20893646505709562,"score_spread":0.15496443052869002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328765664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98793244,0.00031483153,0.000016548323,0.0013197327,0.00011096505,0.00027886222,0.00003959799,0.0000052685295,0.009981744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948263,0.000045406552,0.00020737227,0.00006651222,0.00003479835,0.000004735157,0.0000012726415,0.0000072180637,0.00015003265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990294,0.00013052092,0.0004482747,0.00009937812,0.00020530737,0.00008712416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918795,0.000095332696,0.00037445055,0.00017238334,0.00015210151,0.000017756058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008575945,0.00008092928,0.00029576107,0.000025008585,0.00005088199,0.0000040686687,0.00014104493,0.00006373868,0.00022598487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007264605,0.00006151002,0.00015289661,0.000030135952,0.000723082,0.00002423822,0.000080009595,0.000097790195,9.646523e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010667582,0.0004418223,0.003337338,0.0058715753,0.00020835786,2.2150094e-7,0.062034268,0.000012654798,0.0013616005,0.9251792,0.0010670851,0.0003791901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023493546,0.000434108,0.023926064,0.0044169687,0.00028349808,0.0000057916536,0.025718626,0.00041174857,0.016095651,0.9238305,0.0021573456,0.00037033306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020723785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047460442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036315642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013599401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015794896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31328303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330727656","doi":"10.1017/s136941541400020x","title":"Review Essay: Greenberg on Kant, Existence, and De Re Necessity - Robert Greenberg, Real Existence, Ideal Necessity: Kant’s Compromise and the Modalities without the Compromise. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008. Pp. xviii + 211, $119.00, hbk. 978-3-11-021013-2","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Philosophy; Ideal (ethics); Humanities; Epistemology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.03527945944403875,"score_gpt":0.2754823083358882,"score_spread":0.24020284889184945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330727656","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012149794,0.7517839,0.000085239546,0.10499773,0.00057532266,0.0031904767,0.00020582159,0.00026083516,0.12675086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2356802,0.7109264,0.00023422658,0.04901959,0.0010851739,0.00024401704,0.00006563081,0.00010746737,0.002637287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935445,0.0025428256,0.0012767946,0.0009772129,0.0007014108,0.0009572212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959411,0.0011414391,0.0007816558,0.0014303527,0.00025818264,0.00044725358],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059894505,0.0008445787,0.0019474003,0.00007436253,0.001916892,0.00055202056,0.0011257418,0.00023057745,0.00041429108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033521763,0.00047826214,0.00046157325,0.00017294553,0.0035355755,0.0003893972,0.00042686166,0.0012497138,0.000053212574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018581135,0.000140033,0.0004074619,0.016423801,0.00018069422,0.000039526087,0.002949482,0.0000014736773,0.0000031257105,0.95777553,0.011245532,0.0106475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002035999,0.00017956962,0.00057606,0.035885695,0.00092206453,0.0002176915,0.00019943179,0.0009913516,0.0000054171564,0.3066921,0.65134627,0.0009483374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00382856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029590323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65108347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007273169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019738612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333067331","doi":"10.1017/s1079898600002882","title":"The law of non-contradiction: New philosophical essays, edited by Graham Priest, J.C. Beall, and Bradley Armour-Garb, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004, xii + 443 pp.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Philosophy; Classics; Art history; Epistemology; Art","score_opus":0.015958983845074645,"score_gpt":0.19891253978907364,"score_spread":0.18295355594399898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333067331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0191316,0.007707803,0.00012865498,0.12060767,0.0007217493,0.0008057264,0.0004034639,0.00016652347,0.85032684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910265,0.0020350146,0.000045814697,0.00096516503,0.0014447442,0.0000045887923,0.000045011475,0.00002730921,0.0044058473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982922,0.00013274478,0.00047976547,0.00034621995,0.0003782168,0.00037087212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985504,0.00043419012,0.0003119176,0.00035557183,0.00018955191,0.00015832414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044033915,0.00027969916,0.0004638187,0.000041209543,0.0006105253,0.000087264976,0.00043495256,0.00023737909,0.00028471928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000523491,0.00021071195,0.00015764724,0.0000547974,0.002224668,0.00007108903,0.0001466697,0.00048675548,0.000004307761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017653643,0.00020421854,0.000018346585,0.00005872474,0.00007149625,0.000007449991,0.0003362307,0.000007824503,0.000056512163,0.9464722,0.052377746,0.00021271117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007355796,0.00015248917,0.00006311335,0.000037662667,0.000054314147,0.0000050221192,0.00010494646,0.000022716757,0.000060261682,0.40671676,0.5918961,0.00015097584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003096948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001448017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029473853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006643566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85925835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338197944","doi":"","title":"STRAWSON AND SELF: RECONCILING REID AND HUME","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polymath","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Personal identity; Epistemology; Variation (astronomy); Philosophy; Self; Aesthetics; Physics","score_opus":0.026177852666865085,"score_gpt":0.2058108540853628,"score_spread":0.1796330014184977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338197944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8630305,0.0009908556,0.00000254057,0.0029369562,0.00012317771,0.000081746985,0.000007539963,0.00007372969,0.13275294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790204,0.00014622646,0.00004940311,0.00075459585,0.0003150409,0.0000067967867,0.0000013744852,0.00000961381,0.0008148953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956304,0.000019772346,0.00009901083,0.00012588677,0.00006583428,0.00012643824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997058,0.00007771458,0.000027437574,0.00008374687,0.000029628649,0.000075657685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013437288,0.000075819466,0.00009573251,0.000025186915,0.00018814794,0.00017885094,0.000041343636,0.000039188726,0.0006449397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001890696,0.00005999424,0.000016136777,0.000006725051,0.00015922486,0.00015338151,0.000034567634,0.00012723396,0.00005920551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016949255,0.000015765641,0.00003469384,0.000022797793,0.000010353653,0.0000010210308,0.0073147523,2.1012749e-8,0.0001464911,0.98852694,0.000049248763,0.0038761953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018174498,0.00006121897,0.00033133448,0.000025929696,0.000010892456,0.0000058292253,0.0006257287,0.00026230435,0.000113389906,0.9768581,0.021385089,0.00013845984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002614638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004628042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13487154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004882178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009966678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70616376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338441480","doi":"","title":"Selfho od and the Unity of Consciousness","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029054080840281687,"score_gpt":0.2123371416833199,"score_spread":0.18328306084303822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338441480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.930382,0.00047029482,0.00016921273,0.0012287487,0.00020426018,0.00010471803,0.00004941569,0.00002346445,0.067367844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883044,0.000050175197,0.000019928777,0.00014274764,0.00014763449,1.5737679e-7,0.000005015078,0.0000070035558,0.00079689035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924874,0.00016431438,0.00011248845,0.000103171216,0.00018789906,0.00018336522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897814,0.0004104884,0.00014677232,0.00020997088,0.00016700252,0.00008761865],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079419184,0.000099359146,0.00024925856,0.000063511136,0.00055820466,0.000027813205,0.00022551902,0.00006963496,0.00058487966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007196479,0.000081898055,0.000106855594,0.00004737433,0.003515209,0.00027327446,0.00014868318,0.00021563118,0.000016585735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008955673,0.00006164452,0.00085811655,0.000051493254,0.00007615386,7.017477e-7,0.039582197,5.85503e-7,0.0000012209678,0.9591991,0.00006304661,0.000016231372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008820416,0.000028462138,0.0005375335,0.000013816036,0.00008599655,0.0000023810342,0.020378096,0.000017610271,5.3332496e-7,0.9744693,0.0034855246,0.00009873118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008780989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008038675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06844841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001477419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003193395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341634435","doi":"10.14288/1.0105260","title":"Logic of moral disagreement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05857071091818436,"score_gpt":0.18122460571650792,"score_spread":0.12265389479832356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341634435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79768264,0.000068305606,0.000034072717,0.00009222441,0.00012264618,0.00007574141,0.00013749092,0.000023250888,0.2017636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885076,0.000036056266,0.00007894645,0.0000662422,0.00003961459,1.3494072e-7,0.0000058364285,0.000005544127,0.000916844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994533,0.000030971172,0.00009578436,0.00014764757,0.00015040142,0.00012189939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995293,0.000021140972,0.000095966265,0.00015626544,0.00013927814,0.000058022666],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001382315,0.000026182302,0.00016986314,0.000021766318,0.00014606785,0.000022439846,0.00022812007,0.000047563663,0.0030338962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010233162,0.00008300492,0.00010448496,0.000029774807,0.00088487414,0.00014075686,0.00009543044,0.00009695847,0.0000254588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083880914,0.0014993065,0.0058190855,0.00040110227,0.0002728446,0.00027138417,0.033047613,0.000001232265,0.00013836246,0.6728441,0.0019513142,0.28366974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004595613,0.00017759876,0.38366723,0.000084818574,0.00003814512,0.0000035927026,0.0038919628,0.00001408731,0.0000012889603,0.6106731,0.00085479324,0.0001337917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094832525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22470744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37784815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012031337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002291436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343441886","doi":"10.1017/s0012217316000251","title":"Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide LARA DENIS AND OLIVER SENSEN (EDS.) Cambridge University Press, 2015; 289 pp.; $113.95 (hardback)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04634675054162722,"score_gpt":0.2702413350348032,"score_spread":0.22389458449317595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343441886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1216667,0.0118990075,0.0005421078,0.18337157,0.0046673827,0.0011202919,0.006628223,0.00081942725,0.6692853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875259,0.0027683733,0.000029242126,0.0035740328,0.0011800149,0.000002725132,0.000025068002,0.000030301073,0.004864333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839693,0.00035099318,0.00019891036,0.00039310346,0.00029282525,0.00036724898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727374,0.0019156026,0.000054014654,0.00030607297,0.00024760005,0.00020297359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051324413,0.00022622591,0.00026441988,0.000048727426,0.0004610375,0.0001231896,0.00020976154,0.00027546642,0.00019694594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010019067,0.0001609669,0.0001004423,0.000022640426,0.0013590882,0.00017714142,0.0001514741,0.00060361513,0.0001498607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001219717,0.00006496517,0.000012694158,0.00003495935,0.00005173058,0.00012469111,0.0021328602,3.5780806e-7,0.00021443404,0.95955336,0.037204597,0.00048338418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063852494,0.00014997294,0.00010340548,0.00013685846,0.000063748084,0.000011021642,0.00010755684,0.000011968292,0.00031570118,0.082542144,0.91559714,0.00032197227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011951671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060742523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8783925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004249386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106717875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65640396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399620272","doi":"10.1080/10749039.2016.1179329","title":"Looking Back to the Future: A Response to Kellogg","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind Culture and Activity","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Materialism; Dialectic; Realization (probability); Component (thermodynamics); Epistemology; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02480492889699116,"score_gpt":0.24691228588596037,"score_spread":0.22210735698896922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399620272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7624488,0.00018709808,0.00016147601,0.17154321,0.0005358263,0.00027047427,0.000081390834,0.000022025999,0.064749695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813397,0.000010336381,0.00001578579,0.003368504,0.0015943077,0.000010938695,3.8310583e-7,0.000007630385,0.013652429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932027,0.00011647924,0.000067326786,0.00020451559,0.000119615965,0.0001718109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994868,0.00014606997,0.000024029649,0.0001829497,0.000046243054,0.00011390275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000402556,0.00011261561,0.00011041437,0.000022768982,0.00037631026,0.0001182539,0.00012326626,0.000061324106,0.00069811754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006486412,0.000048217353,0.000046587662,0.000030623756,0.000116796386,0.00010737232,0.00008186176,0.00015114687,0.000396896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020233705,0.000121195575,0.000029997116,0.000019083276,0.00007349018,0.000016480262,0.09199388,9.284874e-7,0.045593508,0.6201821,0.012045729,0.22790022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014373577,0.000115161565,0.0002209808,0.000031836345,0.0000081317,0.0000023188056,0.00042691114,9.951845e-7,0.0012801818,0.03740724,0.9602418,0.000120712306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010979819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044426846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94819605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000127837275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013982134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76438975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465198904","doi":"10.1057/s41302-016-0003-z","title":"Ethical Utilitarianism and The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Adam Smith in Relation to Hume and Bentham","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern Economic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Adam smith; Happiness; Doctrine; Jeremy bentham; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Epistemology; Ethical theory; Economics; Law; Psychology; Theology; Social psychology; Neoclassical economics; Political science","score_opus":0.03664400234723964,"score_gpt":0.24018031078880336,"score_spread":0.20353630844156373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465198904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95890146,0.00035857104,0.0001952672,0.023561075,0.0003360593,0.000112417416,0.000017253871,0.0000045030374,0.016513407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983478,0.00008194789,0.000014315404,0.0006620914,0.00028771514,0.000002034686,2.1460076e-7,0.000007949059,0.0005959138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991815,0.00021854273,0.00030206,0.00011240922,0.00006353218,0.00012197186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939704,0.00031263058,0.00010785156,0.00008762096,0.000020762218,0.00007411532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001724354,0.000079414065,0.00016360669,0.000065006054,0.000120072946,0.000076650984,0.000089685076,0.00006768428,0.00048120273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061200255,0.000043298456,0.00003933094,0.0000048915317,0.00052722025,0.00015829779,0.000071523056,0.0003540828,0.000027205526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023171461,0.000011400644,0.0013610749,0.0000044110107,0.00003014799,0.0000015747721,0.007309438,0.000002284964,0.000010153101,0.9861412,0.000011017267,0.0048856074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016075941,0.00006392758,0.006599133,0.000119868135,0.000012565279,0.000018141402,0.00078904396,0.00013821552,0.000005774499,0.98899215,0.0015843648,0.00006919299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027711027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008739544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039446373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028491824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031654934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52688324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470079491","doi":"10.1111/japp.12232","title":"Overall Lifelong Fortune: A Critique of the Intrinsic Potential Account","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Human life; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021793306516657576,"score_gpt":0.22959776220603262,"score_spread":0.20780445568937506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470079491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.515673,0.0003985119,0.00028018802,0.09693801,0.0031352483,0.00046322483,0.00011782468,0.000038113525,0.3829559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930753,0.000081006925,0.000031827884,0.0026426879,0.004072594,0.000003650895,3.7813786e-7,0.00002348844,0.00006904901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984956,0.000044735385,0.00063350383,0.00012499797,0.0005136237,0.00018755088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985168,0.00017122811,0.0005960019,0.00026305878,0.00035530745,0.000097618766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051546056,0.00016336571,0.00033825074,0.0001144062,0.00016761456,0.00005140671,0.0004868199,0.00009757316,0.0004221817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006203427,0.000080482,0.00033308,0.000038325827,0.00055855163,0.00020449616,0.00011571044,0.00041679433,0.000015310925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029204186,0.000112638285,0.0000047258673,0.000035493867,0.00009536661,0.000009215469,0.0010434774,0.0000049304676,0.0025160396,0.9940179,0.0003767473,0.0014914097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008749326,0.00011129548,0.00009034528,0.00016672374,0.000054091615,0.000016558413,0.000049383372,0.0000015314868,0.0015031944,0.9796403,0.017370608,0.00012105496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006205976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050485073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47740236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038377406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012271534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46225935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474112838","doi":"10.5325/jnietstud.47.2.0212","title":"History, Genealogy, Nietzsche: Comments on Jesse Prinz, “Genealogies of Morals: Nietzsche's Method Compared”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Nietzsche Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Philosophy; Marxist philosophy; Morality; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.2906423020424702,"score_gpt":0.3710536300475008,"score_spread":0.08041132800503059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474112838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6090117,0.17135547,0.0017816129,0.1268646,0.01236692,0.0014409311,0.000355516,0.00026203977,0.07656123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841085,0.0113481805,0.00057305174,0.0017369774,0.0012143062,0.0000099930385,0.000001214608,0.000047704554,0.00096007925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638724,0.0009850427,0.0011899088,0.0002311499,0.00076631043,0.00044031578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938003,0.0030289209,0.0013391958,0.00058661005,0.0011105995,0.00013440617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003928264,0.0004142457,0.0011021465,0.00021160892,0.00042532067,0.000027603595,0.0009769517,0.000120425735,0.00034561576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000903272,0.00020100409,0.000406749,0.00006809853,0.002313365,0.00026065126,0.0003689095,0.00070131937,0.00004411672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022343886,0.001066278,0.0003718095,0.00038328118,0.0049932995,0.000049378436,0.08045547,0.00009862134,0.01032345,0.74441326,0.1478819,0.0077288817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003498323,0.002220232,0.00050672534,0.0011737477,0.0009280564,0.000070988186,0.02471817,0.000027312146,0.0077203475,0.53105456,0.42731056,0.0007710113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048979644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007024203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3750968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024763367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014481254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.852369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475106116","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716551","title":"Kant on Sensibility and the Understanding in the 1770s","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Nothing; Metaphysics; Sensibility; Critical philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.11597161719384437,"score_gpt":0.23575180517224362,"score_spread":0.11978018797839925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475106116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11145208,0.0011683073,0.00002118701,0.1377058,0.000866104,0.00023392668,0.000021829466,0.000003553346,0.7485272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993886,0.000017872064,0.0000029013668,0.005614624,0.0004538927,7.897074e-7,2.277189e-7,0.0000068635295,0.000016812428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989541,0.00038623333,0.00024456662,0.00008182076,0.00016268344,0.00017056898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989702,0.00056466204,0.000100954625,0.0001536077,0.000058641985,0.00015192032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022142585,0.00009145075,0.00016133975,0.00012887537,0.00040561173,0.00014635203,0.00017074394,0.000038104383,0.00012655923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036258076,0.0000453341,0.000082259634,0.000046300727,0.0010692079,0.000073926654,0.0000039636047,0.000583786,0.000004519662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028198341,0.000008594509,0.000030595947,0.00000566906,0.000014202053,0.00006429302,0.012229315,0.0000054979155,4.609841e-7,0.9875023,0.00008186326,0.000029054381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061183324,0.00007205255,0.000052057992,0.000048548547,0.000013145577,0.000044075554,0.0024689594,0.0000073216142,0.0000016851728,0.9847788,0.011841275,0.000060234743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006962793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014110328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88243395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008645178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023280756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7873894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478970056","doi":"10.1017/s0263523200002056","title":"The Role of Modern Irony in Hegel's <i>Philosophy of Right</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Romance; Literature; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01322378141853643,"score_gpt":0.19890942892503058,"score_spread":0.18568564750649416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478970056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58507746,0.018254993,0.000038931314,0.11501597,0.0004574398,0.0012788653,0.0005092564,0.00005883215,0.27930826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986176,0.00026890592,0.00013918609,0.0004905472,0.00014073034,0.000009079262,0.0000024210472,0.000024134584,0.00030740324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829996,0.00013124473,0.0006506721,0.00019684275,0.00047147102,0.0002497952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845904,0.00035876883,0.00041939665,0.00051840855,0.00020192064,0.00004246817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081128994,0.00018372359,0.0004425335,0.00002510014,0.00021075028,0.000014053094,0.0006928177,0.0001405507,0.00015187742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074594216,0.00011743956,0.0006267683,0.00006293464,0.0024755944,0.000026695281,0.00022193967,0.00035866944,0.0000046455207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008509582,0.00027805136,0.0001234941,0.00021318214,0.00009762965,4.7505335e-7,0.006955395,0.00018324345,0.00089986896,0.99014384,0.00045357153,0.00056613836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007763208,0.00010470367,0.00014185894,0.0003266981,0.000030671014,0.0000014946087,0.000885901,0.0000508246,0.0045898017,0.9611735,0.031798024,0.000120212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017207792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019141004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41354015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039303064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007729385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9121431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480573183","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_22","title":"Theory and Theoretical Idea","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05493717170960568,"score_gpt":0.262192762525599,"score_spread":0.2072555908159933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480573183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008979586,0.0007260648,0.00007763612,0.00095527025,0.0002716219,0.00009564869,0.000036194724,0.00008610224,0.9977425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1491617,0.00022846858,0.000015716447,0.00483873,0.0015924628,0.0000016886734,0.0000149539,0.00006214118,0.84408414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906886,0.000028039405,0.00023278437,0.00026778918,0.00021742609,0.00018508712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986887,0.0008199321,0.000057369623,0.00022803887,0.00008252288,0.00012340985],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010862588,0.00025567916,0.00027522357,0.000096890784,0.00018038627,0.0001119984,0.00013072493,0.00032148074,0.058125235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052231637,0.0001813253,0.00011563812,0.0000019237175,0.0033498565,0.000038566697,0.00011142963,0.00070778833,0.0004737722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048884547,0.0000069017497,2.3466306e-8,0.00002438045,0.000052647494,0.000021471069,0.00084027264,4.5961737e-9,2.9037696e-7,0.99468464,0.0001888569,0.004131601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055130025,0.00003252915,9.006918e-8,0.000037534763,0.000029835206,0.0000032689472,0.000033998644,8.347006e-7,0.0000010283901,0.6002834,0.3993603,0.00016205078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003610763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034939978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39917144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010820522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002275491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482603993","doi":"10.1017/cco9781139016100.006","title":"Hume’s Theory of Causation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Computer science; Internet privacy; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10069841254167759,"score_gpt":0.22067320400934393,"score_spread":0.11997479146766633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482603993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004228777,0.00021495574,0.00004156695,0.00003434741,0.00032464886,0.00017441336,0.0005237186,0.000064004314,0.99858004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060006004,0.0000344128,0.000004002776,0.00006225995,0.00038548093,2.560199e-7,0.00005994829,0.000033007615,0.9394146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990848,0.00006252133,0.00018204318,0.0002488984,0.00028127807,0.0001404896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987211,0.00012181863,0.00025263787,0.00036338097,0.00043021477,0.00011081417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003166651,0.00023048582,0.0003372679,0.00013930761,0.00015440122,0.000028832437,0.00031460312,0.00026431167,0.000093509596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019344398,0.00024144945,0.00017578428,0.0000015267229,0.0009869423,0.00007147622,0.00019342607,0.00045945743,0.000023364313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010578199,0.000009381659,2.8050083e-8,0.00007952217,0.00012676632,0.00003412081,0.0009949546,5.3352e-7,0.000006519899,0.9936223,0.0045397524,0.00048032266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024950356,0.00005379351,2.3969264e-7,0.000109895205,0.00016030039,0.0000012162399,0.000129372,0.0000037055293,0.000027382435,0.16790454,0.83113706,0.00022299618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009593906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008983824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8265973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008295218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012329727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9846023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483301427","doi":"10.1017/s0953820815000369","title":"Value and Preference Relations: Are They Symmetric?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Value (mathematics); Dilemma; Relation (database); Preference relation; Symmetry (geometry); Mathematical economics; Revealed preference; Positive economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Statistics; Geometry","score_opus":0.1859911685268948,"score_gpt":0.26814648802992597,"score_spread":0.08215531950303118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483301427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11368554,0.002409257,0.0000138063115,0.004089391,0.00031518925,0.00011531493,0.000054203363,0.00008117676,0.8792361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977367,0.000022188398,0.00003428959,0.00040504785,0.00020469651,0.000006602087,0.0000048176726,0.000007150137,0.0015785095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994462,0.000060683305,0.00010979623,0.00013474768,0.00014245974,0.00010610386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940896,0.00019811376,0.000036576548,0.00015000923,0.000107633874,0.000098719196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036358647,0.00007158816,0.00009200202,0.000058808077,0.00014279531,0.00006882797,0.0000797867,0.00004724668,0.00021274683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045791527,0.00005498008,0.000023037694,0.000024243001,0.00019494139,0.000120865174,0.000052200263,0.0001715476,0.00016746343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008141742,0.000022957433,0.00011026516,0.0000075123908,0.000009512032,0.0000012809573,0.0071449294,0.0000013020493,4.1882737e-7,0.99145883,0.0004295639,0.0008052983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014060637,0.000043321306,0.00057724916,0.000020970705,0.00001066219,8.967369e-7,0.0013672712,0.00016225319,0.000002343757,0.9095955,0.08800843,0.00007051001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016352105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013776809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88405114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015311825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028366483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23294286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483643584","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511615566.005","title":"The Axiom of Choice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom of choice; Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory; Axiom independence; Mathematical economics; Urelement; Axiom; Mathematics; Computer science; Programming language; Geometry","score_opus":0.04722474434784691,"score_gpt":0.20243934604186403,"score_spread":0.15521460169401713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483643584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022780197,0.00033683784,0.000007066155,0.00016734286,0.00044156975,0.0001667238,0.00024951427,0.000036176563,0.998572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008111465,0.00016990105,0.0000018364783,0.00020012475,0.00029586663,2.9245382e-7,0.000010493543,0.000030232688,0.99117976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913955,0.000046856545,0.00017362011,0.00022717711,0.00023342505,0.00017938665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986552,0.0003428925,0.00022673515,0.00045225758,0.00024119324,0.000081718434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016972108,0.00022268243,0.00026887533,0.00006265831,0.0005239154,0.00005811698,0.00047760655,0.00020253229,0.000029520621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002317573,0.00018416584,0.00022952491,0.0000016266067,0.0014534376,0.00004042874,0.00016501476,0.00056346745,0.000012267998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003078133,0.0000057368525,3.5153793e-8,0.000043958386,0.0001273197,0.000018064868,0.0002209121,1.4108079e-7,0.000002860214,0.9917328,0.0074820537,0.00033534478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020029502,0.000035337034,3.1308755e-7,0.0000795541,0.00011381994,0.0000012026749,0.000055165463,0.000002606829,0.000031146847,0.020182807,0.9790928,0.00020497643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015796829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002602422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9716107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043160235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059101294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7510065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489045889","doi":"10.1522/030140084","title":"kantisme et la science de la morale","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03813660685622166,"score_gpt":0.30425367723561697,"score_spread":0.2661170703793953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489045889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013333597,0.00071936095,0.000062790496,0.0040988717,0.00047276632,0.00011137572,0.000102923186,0.00008376006,0.9930148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49117315,0.002372761,0.00016136045,0.0029848912,0.0009268382,0.000006284609,0.000011941927,0.000039337934,0.50232345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784493,0.00038591883,0.00029324787,0.00044838703,0.0005334251,0.0004941105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977793,0.0013073331,0.000116864125,0.000361231,0.00018612608,0.00024911086],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002265246,0.00033081704,0.0003551888,0.00019118914,0.0012511864,0.0006010715,0.00066465867,0.00048220527,0.003098514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017970121,0.00028620134,0.0002002192,0.000049938524,0.025057063,0.00027562122,0.00028727454,0.0015630197,0.00058974006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045273428,0.00011133039,0.0000061481205,0.00007790274,0.000025903013,0.00021574354,0.0023541322,0.0000047853378,0.000025331448,0.99528515,0.001305482,0.0005835811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009476313,0.00003621149,0.00004482133,0.00012603009,0.000017021814,0.0000768661,0.00003365075,0.00005284202,0.000012825657,0.5094289,0.48986426,0.00021182308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042354758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005536446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49069133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011669829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020845253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490450163","doi":"10.1017/cco9781139016100.014","title":"Hume and Moral Motivation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12048100168954637,"score_gpt":0.21267368717323618,"score_spread":0.0921926854836898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490450163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015260701,0.00017160154,0.000008892534,0.000097774435,0.00021686444,0.00015179622,0.00028128384,0.00008353426,0.9988356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055091646,0.00003731013,0.0000041304047,0.00011634846,0.0004721318,2.2457465e-7,0.000053141328,0.000028799568,0.9441963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992573,0.000023797542,0.000109726774,0.00027268162,0.0001976773,0.00013878346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992412,0.00006157732,0.00011396327,0.00022051952,0.00022377663,0.00013897491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011734044,0.00021980393,0.0002442203,0.00010058997,0.00023419083,0.00007941418,0.00017614524,0.00022258605,0.00003010011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013432276,0.00023406283,0.00007967816,0.0000010443381,0.00072069734,0.00009559507,0.00021295995,0.00045568324,0.000014805633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039537448,0.000004479244,2.0885841e-7,0.00004099641,0.00005755667,0.000048753413,0.00047518,2.0719875e-7,0.0000015720715,0.9932045,0.005783963,0.0003430582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029136875,0.000047106427,0.0000014331127,0.0000756895,0.000089465095,0.0000024773512,0.000060849325,0.000013948074,0.0000035834921,0.066120274,0.93303484,0.00025893975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001148747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000064591613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9272509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006450331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054013202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9544805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491493561","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_36","title":"Good and Bad and Usefulness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.10017210342579433,"score_gpt":0.25008347686869414,"score_spread":0.14991137344289981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2491493561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009036335,0.00080195337,0.0000084754865,0.0006858137,0.00018978443,0.000074091746,0.00003667015,0.000043736574,0.9980691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11599347,0.00031127903,0.000014636226,0.0017182515,0.0009859452,0.0000015832117,0.000010839941,0.000039212315,0.88092476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993798,0.000005028686,0.0001506318,0.0002166071,0.00012943942,0.00011846648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995342,0.00014272783,0.000048199025,0.0001290801,0.000054412158,0.000091384536],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020396299,0.0001888355,0.00021880171,0.0000744197,0.00017518591,0.00011929066,0.000057517205,0.0002205467,0.0049750824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000069757316,0.00014446946,0.000040895757,0.000001449171,0.00067380903,0.000051614097,0.00008581905,0.00039993145,0.000061129234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006555203,0.000004245174,3.1003538e-7,0.00003068697,0.000032286098,0.0000159651,0.000757912,2.3535474e-9,1.6918067e-7,0.99505323,0.00009821717,0.004000418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006356133,0.000022003385,0.0000013493247,0.000033904143,0.00001708538,0.0000041415324,0.000022802475,8.1761476e-7,7.55842e-7,0.5366337,0.4630788,0.000121107005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003181579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044096517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46298057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000055421037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012904763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494113654","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511975622.006","title":"The ichnofabric approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06548147416380237,"score_gpt":0.18612773256872517,"score_spread":0.1206462584049228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494113654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000034229881,0.0004369679,0.00004359562,0.00005695057,0.000410152,0.00024900428,0.00017458781,0.0001320435,0.99849325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009659287,0.0002078239,0.000005442893,0.0001424678,0.0005909568,9.851001e-7,0.000024568832,0.000051645617,0.9893168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989255,0.00004148817,0.00016251666,0.0003606201,0.00024069463,0.00026915988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877787,0.00012887914,0.00018363484,0.00060508563,0.00017957426,0.0001249367],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019604621,0.0003163058,0.0002763207,0.00008208041,0.0010188958,0.00013382385,0.00077903114,0.00028562336,0.00003478647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000876314,0.00025203434,0.00026347017,0.0000018349849,0.0016753534,0.000058018817,0.00037484983,0.00089615776,0.00006542234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051969262,0.000009300628,1.17532e-8,0.000037344234,0.00016597996,0.000037830996,0.00055690133,7.295444e-8,3.8329813e-7,0.9906438,0.007544802,0.00095159747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016009588,0.000031039322,1.6991869e-7,0.00004047838,0.0001738074,0.0000035794503,0.00008147788,0.000008615281,0.0000039546653,0.05129836,0.9478835,0.0003149411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015751153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008490986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9403387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005255693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069417736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494649453","doi":"10.1017/ccol9780521859868.002","title":"Hume’s New Science of the Mind","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of science; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Natural science; Natural (archaeology); Metaphysics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.06117093599158819,"score_gpt":0.20284242562928556,"score_spread":0.14167148963769738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494649453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029505996,0.00011321611,0.000003162497,0.00011228876,0.00043591866,0.00016678155,0.00016591632,0.000018738108,0.99868894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06735893,0.000054758675,0.000005338945,0.00009286639,0.00033378624,6.560044e-8,0.0000026496673,0.000017564244,0.93213403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989324,0.000017846749,0.00014736266,0.0002979352,0.00041936312,0.0001850854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883133,0.00006169029,0.0002147792,0.00052712415,0.00023899532,0.00012606438],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000116206524,0.00020193831,0.00024851688,0.00012088534,0.00061853864,0.000041093605,0.0009466237,0.00015028377,0.000051079667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017488619,0.00016642148,0.00022301283,0.0000048553225,0.004724245,0.00007952984,0.000500192,0.0005247139,0.00001302383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001990523,0.0000054411476,5.3602577e-8,0.00002039739,0.00003328137,0.00001944086,0.001186258,3.8124423e-7,0.000025901027,0.9925638,0.0057435175,0.0003816556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018944501,0.00002579431,0.0000016857911,0.00013290725,0.000074569885,0.000004379894,0.000041268835,0.000003701822,0.00037899558,0.0061714733,0.9927763,0.00019952204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026683733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000127090825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007092264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005174124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99798435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495763765","doi":"10.1057/9780230285569_2","title":"Aristotle and Hegel on Recognition and Friendship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Virtue; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Goodwill; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0660342421526986,"score_gpt":0.22860086477661704,"score_spread":0.16256662262391844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495763765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010573001,0.00044516797,0.0000018039447,0.0002487232,0.0004334126,0.0002213423,0.0004538201,0.000067989116,0.99707043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996574,0.00014429889,0.000018143548,0.0009403822,0.0011299991,0.000013213978,0.00009547511,0.00007828826,0.0010062243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879426,0.000024401486,0.00026717945,0.00045775372,0.00023108129,0.00022534089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990258,0.00023660653,0.00015682737,0.00029846234,0.00010010915,0.0001821438],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024228728,0.0003887797,0.0003726795,0.00016130344,0.00035765787,0.00016237395,0.00010964829,0.00044758784,0.0013608356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003566699,0.0003340142,0.000099724784,0.0000019696283,0.00097121304,7.6689304e-7,0.000101952864,0.0010703384,0.0002148361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046035308,4.69555e-7,7.4167264e-7,0.000060075887,0.000045405068,0.000022325092,0.0015940827,2.5661535e-9,0.00003576467,0.98511076,3.232191e-7,0.0130840195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026800565,0.00017791938,0.000007939877,0.00018659336,0.000066196226,0.000014310161,0.00004263156,0.000001642003,0.000051013092,0.976791,0.021955917,0.0004367955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006963416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059523055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99606425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013775668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024799454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999112},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2499004455","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511584749.003","title":"The foundations of a project","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fable; Enlightenment; Epitome; Constructive; Politics; Philosophy; Action (physics); Literature; Aesthetics; Sociology; Art; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0689905604309775,"score_gpt":0.2314426239340043,"score_spread":0.16245206350302682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499004455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009053752,0.000117183044,0.000008708269,0.00016335078,0.00018068547,0.0002604423,0.0002512981,0.00004573837,0.99896353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008053617,0.00014272146,0.0000043402274,0.00008025345,0.0002842465,4.2648898e-7,0.000023442055,0.000017746097,0.9913932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992948,0.000032548483,0.00015624768,0.00018503514,0.00019292744,0.00013839705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989696,0.0001905317,0.00019907864,0.00035999462,0.00023917407,0.000041588675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013732175,0.00017543045,0.0002115919,0.000082270395,0.0005933876,0.00007349115,0.00039350174,0.00014065551,0.000011087595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014261538,0.00014272565,0.00020288915,0.0000019153877,0.0010900771,0.000045270917,0.00012419137,0.00042967213,0.000007749352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042779837,0.00000703871,6.7441923e-9,0.000025161367,0.000089953566,0.000013324262,0.00044097967,9.816218e-8,0.0000015488242,0.99353623,0.0038036762,0.0020392018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001450672,0.00005632968,2.4000252e-7,0.00008186938,0.00010750356,0.000001182612,0.00008164578,0.000006260924,0.000007701951,0.041425705,0.95793134,0.00015517806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001470999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033217504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043150438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014077395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5820183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504676013","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498855.008","title":"Motivation without Evaluation? Unintelligible Ends, Animal Behavior, and Diabolical Wills","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.10564997165283146,"score_gpt":0.26638594678467004,"score_spread":0.16073597513183857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504676013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037229978,0.00017639744,0.00003389188,0.00005041344,0.00020347256,0.00050434395,0.0002702559,0.00009412623,0.9949441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.313776,0.00009105594,0.000011775557,0.0001452568,0.0005193002,0.0000016975478,0.0001066684,0.000044049524,0.6853042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853617,0.00006067775,0.00022378999,0.00045567524,0.00047861415,0.00024506386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871254,0.00016436251,0.00018488447,0.0003073645,0.00044596003,0.00018491682],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004158124,0.00033304375,0.00035048288,0.00022859356,0.00039301132,0.00011785627,0.00023328935,0.00037836636,0.00009705612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030909454,0.0003586029,0.0001289819,0.000003991534,0.0010634817,0.00013689269,0.00021533675,0.0007171772,0.000013784186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096415075,0.00002236296,0.00000846097,0.00003336132,0.00007283152,0.000037084563,0.00049028825,3.031523e-7,0.000013972022,0.9971999,0.00044958593,0.0015754572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006121064,0.00012890596,0.00006817677,0.00014497645,0.0005541611,0.000007559725,0.00009725892,0.00007707501,0.00007571273,0.009781819,0.98793584,0.00051638257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001574223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002112396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9874863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119023185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009931054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517068224","doi":"10.35920/arf.2004.v8i2.77-90","title":"Virtude acabada e vício acabado","year":2004,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Analytica - Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Metaphysics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.037654276241029655,"score_gpt":0.2791266508381555,"score_spread":0.24147237459712587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517068224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1441642,0.012148318,0.0014779891,0.111789905,0.0020026197,0.0018821605,0.0022711742,0.0008575309,0.7234061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807153,0.00088917674,0.00008751804,0.006149246,0.0025248455,0.000018873514,0.00010037245,0.00013379192,0.009380895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956814,0.00026797483,0.0010634135,0.00095600344,0.00082744553,0.0012037589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969383,0.00042164366,0.0003867646,0.0011928014,0.0003221495,0.00073835027],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011581404,0.00077570794,0.0010286088,0.0002879022,0.0011026465,0.0013199402,0.001062663,0.00055487105,0.007256187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005401028,0.0007289176,0.000807062,0.00028661778,0.0012102432,0.00040890597,0.000390892,0.0018443038,0.0031011761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099856865,0.0004384582,0.000059035356,0.00032417398,0.00053734524,0.00028477018,0.0035672253,0.000031372394,0.00012134661,0.9918997,0.0022727142,0.00036398348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012377145,0.00046617893,0.00018546083,0.0008954758,0.0008037186,0.000035587793,0.0007027645,0.00025800487,0.000089657726,0.684682,0.3095556,0.0010878294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036057836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014432069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8365511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045953458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064845564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519821000","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2016.23","title":"Review - Ardis. Collins (ed.). Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Dialectical Justification of Philosophy’s First Principles. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2013. ISBN 978-0-7735-4060-6 (hbk). Pp. xvi+488. - Ludwig Siep. Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. Daniel Smyth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. ISBN 978-1-107-02235-5 (hbk). Pp. xxii+307.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Dialectic; Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; Queen (butterfly); Art history; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02919295449377831,"score_gpt":0.21437945072718348,"score_spread":0.18518649623340516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519821000","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010772428,0.09335133,0.00059313216,0.44928893,0.0023262566,0.0069835084,0.013697091,0.0007869349,0.42220038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7786883,0.20748724,0.00011534765,0.0016590927,0.0008627952,0.000043998454,0.00015967908,0.00014539083,0.01083816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477863,0.00095885544,0.0012153436,0.0013712677,0.0006632966,0.0010126132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995203,0.0011386432,0.0010700555,0.0014269033,0.00069692195,0.00046445982],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00129182,0.00084498024,0.0015597065,0.00016436058,0.0013385522,0.000066084445,0.0012913194,0.0005744996,0.00066556013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003263576,0.0006824534,0.00047460344,0.00017201003,0.004521532,0.0003468181,0.0006659623,0.0010425248,0.000094333984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000847012,0.0007102905,0.00004330127,0.0017676477,0.00043907142,0.0000670097,0.00067026453,0.0000272737,0.00017215514,0.88236415,0.11244563,0.00044619452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024374109,0.00047486744,0.00046153442,0.0010252704,0.0007867294,0.000026162159,0.00039299982,0.000059876867,0.00015668654,0.003654451,0.98972815,0.00079585414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066496683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003329983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8787097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036998434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031223276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524158054","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0016","title":"Setting the Standard: Don Garrett’s Hume","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Epistemology; Beauty; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Causation; Parallels; Construct (python library); Reading (process); Intentionality","score_opus":0.07203991878276786,"score_gpt":0.29442625684569,"score_spread":0.22238633806292216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524158054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035450254,0.0063000675,0.0000540571,0.068943,0.002197712,0.00027242544,0.00005083687,0.00026832812,0.88646334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99250996,0.00014916252,0.000013518475,0.002936627,0.002054208,0.000020347157,0.0000021927026,0.000017592789,0.0022964147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897516,0.0001328103,0.0001999238,0.00018541733,0.0002578738,0.00024881872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989007,0.0005587086,0.00007681418,0.00024520242,0.00018375278,0.000034794615],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010289033,0.00015017558,0.00022473316,0.0000295183,0.0013002793,0.00013536465,0.00019116567,0.00003323036,0.00043381017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039630933,0.00008500048,0.00009161618,0.000020356896,0.0009812255,0.00007805018,0.00015258379,0.00029930004,0.000103696606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011833632,0.000008533903,0.000019346819,0.000034732835,0.00009137451,0.0000012547112,0.02879663,0.0000014557799,0.000007114562,0.96438694,0.0047901217,0.0018506616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011294504,0.000054062042,0.000025270003,0.0000377488,0.000022264736,5.259856e-7,0.004932327,0.000012242273,0.000021963042,0.5635663,0.43111858,0.000095750445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022044793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002729764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9570597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020391946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000132832465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525568543","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0022","title":"Loeb’s “Standard” Questions about Hume’s Concept of Probable Truth","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue; Beauty; Honor; Reading (process); Causation; Computer science","score_opus":0.07216388733433313,"score_gpt":0.30450901370490785,"score_spread":0.23234512637057472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525568543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034435824,0.008717869,0.00021133499,0.0072579337,0.0021017932,0.00037951782,0.00022375456,0.00025089196,0.9464211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970707,0.00018667086,0.000057672776,0.00032824883,0.00073766254,0.000024663323,0.000005937523,0.0000159349,0.0015724663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989806,0.000090303176,0.00028691575,0.00019010158,0.00024174358,0.00021036899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988234,0.00035362647,0.00011616024,0.0002161887,0.00044265567,0.000047976075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004443025,0.0001496414,0.00037336242,0.000052466086,0.00044331737,0.0000470347,0.00013688824,0.000044544056,0.0003275175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005152196,0.00011327576,0.000099542594,0.000028951315,0.0015755373,0.00009871634,0.00008899555,0.00020307077,0.00003956246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015768943,0.000036905745,0.000010697128,0.00007553263,0.00010931498,7.275134e-7,0.028692516,0.000006542673,0.00000639695,0.9689935,0.0010824676,0.00096963695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028880683,0.00020191752,0.000038494916,0.00014038461,0.000047412996,4.899703e-7,0.0038695172,0.000006792926,0.00014076666,0.8566678,0.13845013,0.00014746068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004281539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036353737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022422968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033607535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58051324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526569890","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0015","title":"Skepticism about Garrett’s Hume: Faculties, Concepts, and Imposed Coherence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Interpretation (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Computer science","score_opus":0.09142697512665036,"score_gpt":0.3275651963868487,"score_spread":0.23613822126019834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526569890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3095299,0.03437966,0.00004763778,0.010681933,0.0024505684,0.0006608386,0.0001921689,0.00050029746,0.641557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930379,0.00057248794,0.000035898945,0.0016813299,0.0007743237,0.000029773239,0.00000738949,0.000018879924,0.003842052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886864,0.00009466914,0.0002554718,0.00028639348,0.00020810455,0.00028672972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990521,0.00038048913,0.00009162944,0.00019329527,0.00020132608,0.000081174236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003772992,0.00021895212,0.00037012185,0.000040450235,0.00072868494,0.00013519876,0.00014785488,0.00006281836,0.00038793348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026945196,0.00016364623,0.00006534242,0.000019958343,0.0021131816,0.00011899415,0.00015442538,0.00026795457,0.00007626138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011732717,0.00002114604,0.00005343819,0.000070702066,0.000109449684,0.0000024607846,0.03437297,3.551178e-7,0.000083415565,0.9613835,0.0019430364,0.0019477463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000557567,0.000174231,0.0004803706,0.000113997165,0.000053641284,0.0000018693796,0.006492227,0.000029065623,0.00008114691,0.70774055,0.28395107,0.00032423608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060253296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002373759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.683508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001667413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016044312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7786106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527853790","doi":"10.1007/s11153-016-9590-1","title":"Everlasting check or philosophical fiasco: a response to Alexander George’s interpretation of Hume’s ‘Of Miracles’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy of religion; Classics; Art history; History; Medicine; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05288975198086782,"score_gpt":0.32285091995142645,"score_spread":0.26996116797055864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527853790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8614272,0.00026709936,0.008435331,0.111538246,0.004106987,0.00067051244,0.0006199764,0.00004876088,0.012885916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970578,0.00007453059,0.00045381012,0.0004899287,0.0014574694,0.000014136267,0.0000057309335,0.000031039253,0.0004155726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976354,0.00013497035,0.0010532096,0.00023023228,0.0007546093,0.00019154904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958691,0.0012934648,0.00079147326,0.00018040177,0.0017336106,0.00013193839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011186978,0.0001955423,0.00039549038,0.00050209445,0.00010584208,0.000038866052,0.0005541383,0.00011684524,0.00029313294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018314708,0.00012821925,0.00037934148,0.00006121925,0.0003749727,0.00025024088,0.00010401665,0.00021271317,0.0000105207455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020087382,0.00027257105,0.000044726425,0.000089279936,0.00032875454,0.000011685164,0.0033420515,0.000052863466,0.026985956,0.94426244,0.00045930088,0.0040629935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018448406,0.0013554394,0.000072138144,0.001584973,0.000048730184,0.000041116415,0.00008001879,0.00016378536,0.0061372207,0.98278505,0.005696552,0.00019015305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026454847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016736405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13563061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009083504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015549986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5228629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529264070","doi":"10.20381/ruor-4865","title":"Autonomy and the Future","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Extant taxon; Narrative; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Literature; Law; Art; Biology","score_opus":0.004984662899766588,"score_gpt":0.13805032698420175,"score_spread":0.13306566408443515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529264070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009683608,0.0021364237,2.8962953e-7,0.0066002146,0.00076949975,0.00014592175,0.0001801958,0.0000065523195,0.9804773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9106869,0.00064521,0.000016769533,0.0022651493,0.00058070075,0.00001342515,0.000042139873,0.000024860228,0.085724816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868745,0.000060821665,0.00021990734,0.00018204481,0.0006883397,0.0001614167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993118,0.0002411034,0.00017511228,0.00015129712,7.434352e-7,0.000119965574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000015172232,0.00019610427,0.00027242544,0.0000138054675,0.00035940457,0.00005074463,0.00019651241,0.00004578404,0.00024311552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000014983492,0.00013142439,0.000035622794,0.000009939556,0.00030631587,0.0001464391,0.00005554839,0.00033523503,2.462805e-9],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004938788,0.0000063855014,0.000020462036,0.00017362069,0.00007704965,0.000009226701,0.002727389,8.691933e-8,0.000016301063,0.9918736,0.00015149008,0.0044505144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039270273,0.000026428224,0.00088716706,0.000117983975,0.000058039455,0.0000012749138,0.014099863,0.000039045102,0.0005880633,0.5973454,0.38621062,0.0002334136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004612182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2318229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9010033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000019123831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014148053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7821943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529882712","doi":"","title":"Practical Reasoning and Rationality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo; Bishop's University","keywords":"Rationality; Computer science; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032186079616125095,"score_gpt":0.24752905091051342,"score_spread":0.2153429712943883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529882712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80391306,0.00018556531,0.000003807328,0.017662972,0.0003270026,0.00018659112,0.00008461249,0.00008006592,0.17755632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50254864,0.00023010568,0.00052429835,0.00012333837,0.0002278814,1.388851e-7,0.0004972696,0.000015679787,0.49583268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937195,0.000059226102,0.000076589036,0.00019744744,0.00018294952,0.00011187029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994792,0.00007455719,0.00014075889,0.000117824115,0.00012150869,0.000066151355],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001530482,0.00012066322,0.00021444193,0.00007790603,0.00031511713,0.000053825726,0.00009208949,0.00016650214,0.0010336456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034620218,0.00012930177,0.00007272528,0.000017537657,0.0002237968,0.00024686276,0.000024149513,0.0003291909,0.000024297915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001074792,0.000040006536,0.0000056138024,0.00008086164,0.000038072652,0.000016076814,0.10257619,2.3913674e-7,0.000021341264,0.89581764,0.00060352695,0.00069296046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006091811,0.00020341614,0.0016084561,0.00035951813,0.00027173702,0.000003875159,0.21503042,0.000111254914,0.00008842485,0.7339032,0.047316704,0.0004937939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005576831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032370906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31827635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012427443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007287821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531119672","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1235856","title":"Kant’s deductions of morality and freedom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main; Simon Fraser University; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05596386193333154,"score_gpt":0.2243051721624456,"score_spread":0.16834131022911408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531119672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5555741,0.002625168,0.000086187305,0.19696777,0.0032409148,0.00015652132,0.0006254409,0.000014594493,0.24070928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980612,0.000032318425,0.00003487435,0.00028222683,0.001463592,4.936695e-7,4.1206334e-7,0.0000093737135,0.0001155043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931943,0.000046965262,0.00030134022,0.00007586246,0.000113247996,0.00014317337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989052,0.00009153968,0.00018165213,0.00012046578,0.00029603302,0.0004051278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029395137,0.00008227784,0.00019113968,0.00020315737,0.00016105863,0.000031127984,0.00014748325,0.000046927675,0.00079376885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014250795,0.000053442356,0.00009203201,0.000027152828,0.0011289959,0.00019508328,0.000009679838,0.00015937391,0.00000812646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091709235,0.000011281252,0.00015643603,0.000013686022,0.000039355855,0.000015794276,0.0012507868,5.0079393e-7,0.00013273476,0.9974234,0.00031062137,0.00063624483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002690101,0.00011096773,0.00024109,0.000111591966,0.000025545485,0.000030328334,0.00009090867,6.9524873e-7,0.00006448468,0.9640465,0.034932513,0.0000763939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016096008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072559975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4424871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031579748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033057889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86912125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535814262","doi":"10.1017/s1369415416000273","title":"Empirical Cognition in the Transcendental Deduction: Kant’s Starting Point and his Humean Problem","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Cognition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Identification (biology); Empirical evidence; Point (geometry); Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0878308471345856,"score_gpt":0.30361816924072366,"score_spread":0.21578732210613805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535814262","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051266357,0.10305659,0.00010247142,0.6733488,0.0005307363,0.0018567573,0.00009153626,0.00013781045,0.16960898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785285,0.012847459,0.000013557442,0.00819497,0.0002919067,0.000026575495,0.000005104849,0.000009708458,0.00008223239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989931,0.00021397158,0.0002912835,0.00017806838,0.00016265262,0.00016090344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999623,0.00011334243,0.00006563754,0.00012026847,0.000036703284,0.000041076288],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009099918,0.00010603767,0.00018363807,0.000031332776,0.0001760982,0.00005716913,0.00009794036,0.000032027503,0.0010574799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043940825,0.00005321047,0.00007454824,0.000033587068,0.0002799494,0.00016116294,0.000015962098,0.00017702987,0.00006431444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012478626,0.00011538535,0.00009155128,0.0013139745,0.000022996328,0.00001871188,0.0076161413,1.26068755e-8,0.00008820659,0.93856305,0.0017933397,0.050364155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045183772,0.000097312215,0.00020756522,0.0061645736,0.000101893784,0.000043763735,0.0006157455,0.0000016988595,0.000030541272,0.7360072,0.25605494,0.00022292846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014505103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020351232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9272621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012086553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017790886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2545592650","doi":"","title":"Attempt, success and action generation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Action (physics); Indeterminism; Epistemology; Action theory (sociology); Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology; Determinism","score_opus":0.07177408888941846,"score_gpt":0.2602224880405851,"score_spread":0.18844839915116668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2545592650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23622252,0.0009978018,0.00067687576,0.07285619,0.002187796,0.00046789573,0.000068738686,0.00049853,0.68602365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958161,0.00025066675,0.00014106452,0.00057497865,0.0023015626,0.00007311867,0.00006135145,0.000032290864,0.0007488791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981336,0.00022443218,0.0003858754,0.00046011634,0.00042904782,0.0003669504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988668,0.00013866842,0.00017701233,0.00029070184,0.0002650345,0.00026177586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040373157,0.00026313672,0.0002492583,0.00021937214,0.0010501506,0.00042867902,0.00022750403,0.00025378072,0.0004280917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017804997,0.00024186657,0.0001032441,0.00010838811,0.00005926855,0.0005852751,0.0000964441,0.0005039343,0.00003213267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002586683,0.00018441952,0.000036727117,0.000041143307,0.000048983427,0.000025036608,0.0037120837,0.00000796768,0.0010963507,0.99198705,0.00060415425,0.0022301911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005260348,0.000055550252,0.00024186567,0.000040560837,0.000039954342,0.00019390043,0.00025178463,0.002100884,0.00032145905,0.015908934,0.9799912,0.00032790194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021787225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003737302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001570602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055104952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556984348","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2016.61","title":"Insight and the Enlightenment: Why<i>Einsicht</i>in Chapter Six of Hegel’s<i>Phenomenology of Spirit</i>?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Faith; Superstition; Intelligibility (philosophy); Morality; Political philosophy; Politics; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.020585858005597472,"score_gpt":0.19603030457915532,"score_spread":0.17544444657355784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556984348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2705845,0.007527765,0.000034063527,0.2094233,0.000469582,0.00056573306,0.00009668723,0.000040818875,0.5112575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99614346,0.0006937913,0.000019717234,0.0025332922,0.00016510813,0.000014931341,9.855496e-7,0.00001696228,0.0004117398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988415,0.00012694094,0.0004299984,0.00021329224,0.00018244747,0.00020578069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988877,0.0005353112,0.00016766101,0.0002779242,0.00008584443,0.000045551576],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005531709,0.00014976303,0.00036866326,0.00008734882,0.00008172774,0.00001465129,0.00019402285,0.000080816695,0.0027114146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008368083,0.00007716892,0.00007878708,0.000022343262,0.0020369443,0.00003574932,0.00013036515,0.00016372156,0.000067197245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020150105,0.000075491575,0.000043367818,0.00003845932,0.000031158626,0.0000053869503,0.005656749,1.626203e-7,0.00072333316,0.9915771,0.00008874843,0.0015585594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016201338,0.000109776374,0.000048426744,0.00011165047,0.000014999664,0.0000026759014,0.00018186976,0.0000018545197,0.0007843278,0.52366066,0.47336525,0.00009838154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018579909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015401062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.725559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009298226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012802132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562804659","doi":"10.1515/kant-2016-0051","title":"Kants ethischer Kohärentismus","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kant-Studien","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Coherentism; Normative; Philosophy; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Categorical imperative; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Law; Foundationalism; Political science; Morality","score_opus":0.06340014435809127,"score_gpt":0.2400632657559008,"score_spread":0.17666312139780954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562804659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11326841,0.00074420194,0.000068571775,0.020943532,0.0022244842,0.00019421187,0.00008973214,0.00022365687,0.8622432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875063,0.000109919696,0.000011135597,0.0011751548,0.0011250417,0.000019381307,0.0000015012334,0.000023791512,0.010027814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988852,0.00006469016,0.00020666032,0.00027367103,0.00023797293,0.00033178227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992916,0.000164937,0.00006557143,0.0002701188,0.00011262711,0.00009511753],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003555221,0.00015878002,0.00020318228,0.000053170006,0.00035253345,0.00005665056,0.00021931512,0.000079329126,0.0023833064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013459123,0.00009082233,0.00010169333,0.000023829884,0.0005420477,0.00014968385,0.00014722263,0.00019610772,0.0020395995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015931051,0.000062131396,0.00015940322,0.00001321146,0.00005843163,0.00001590961,0.0049380013,3.0569787e-8,0.0002645542,0.98709923,0.0017037789,0.005669365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051057007,0.000060837578,0.0005039761,0.00010668797,0.00002420201,0.000001788812,0.00016622842,0.0000017193051,0.00009200931,0.61133385,0.38698742,0.00021072081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000059643306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004040163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87423784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024768591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023040753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99873745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586213753","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1115","title":"Book Notes: Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy, by Arthur Ripstein","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Philosophy; Political freedom; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.018898824636121993,"score_gpt":0.2335909102946059,"score_spread":0.2146920856584839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586213753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009304019,0.0030892396,0.00006471677,0.033901356,0.00080060726,0.00011753349,0.000111543566,0.000055746088,0.95255524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98810995,0.00013778004,0.00007648625,0.007401224,0.0030630135,0.0000036853398,0.0000060944512,0.00003640407,0.0011653815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847126,0.000080863334,0.0003487384,0.00027024912,0.00031579958,0.00051311846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987238,0.00027415995,0.000107269836,0.00019436031,0.00012894881,0.0005714483],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004743232,0.0002484826,0.0002940981,0.00005586941,0.0011062319,0.0007617147,0.00019497077,0.00017981039,0.0012487194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000096720236,0.00019935424,0.00009851587,0.000013645779,0.0016641738,0.000581682,0.000105623265,0.0016248135,0.000032032505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003938915,0.000071371425,0.0000088381785,0.00002437076,0.00004359037,0.000047417238,0.00042751533,1.5704279e-7,0.00070453255,0.9976598,0.000724723,0.0002483145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070358365,0.0001719697,0.0000061582864,0.00005026954,0.00003739769,0.00039799637,0.00007720015,0.00008300614,0.00013031016,0.8831789,0.11491832,0.00024487378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00144475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009740591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014024643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041746982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589061812","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2016.1","title":"Hegel on the Idealism of Practical Life","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Idealism; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Morality; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Realism; Property (philosophy); Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09831657327678317,"score_gpt":0.2700612110835483,"score_spread":0.17174463780676513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589061812","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019363774,0.000079575584,0.000030582924,0.53912205,0.00030379565,0.000121076744,0.000046162113,0.000043082633,0.4408899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879644,0.00004143911,0.000016183782,0.009803107,0.0007287203,0.00001381781,9.358748e-7,0.00001660059,0.0014148115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901325,0.00015631861,0.00022456345,0.00015604535,0.00026796106,0.00018187825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764144,0.0017771893,0.00009723259,0.00030015007,0.00010011791,0.0000838459],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064814085,0.000108408254,0.00015040113,0.000029354136,0.000173538,0.000035818524,0.00016387779,0.00006393961,0.0147449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011554679,0.00004935761,0.00009377835,0.000013688488,0.00062917016,0.000018021154,0.000059996346,0.00022551819,0.0017996975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060645925,0.00006169888,0.0000013684614,0.000009601734,0.000019898502,0.0000047091917,0.00076472445,1.1986666e-7,0.0001211792,0.9834344,0.0153225865,0.00019909973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014410508,0.00006436446,0.000011468981,0.000047715614,0.0000063746706,0.0000010830946,0.00011966374,0.0000012198475,0.00019101413,0.51968205,0.47967163,0.000059279355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010433848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96860063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009708821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044151773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591617248","doi":"10.3366/jsp.2017.0152","title":"Adam Smith's <i>Theory of Moral Sentiments</i> in 1759, 1790, and 1976","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scottish Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Adam smith; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Classics; Art history; Philosophy; Epistemology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06366548595507031,"score_gpt":0.26690613990286605,"score_spread":0.20324065394779572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591617248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5982792,0.0033674142,0.000021986098,0.013552986,0.0016072014,0.00021854624,0.00007791401,0.000014496026,0.3828603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974704,0.00032303808,0.00007950641,0.0005040852,0.0013868005,0.0000013833223,8.4496224e-7,0.000021501844,0.00021245822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984532,0.00014364079,0.0006547412,0.00015714687,0.00038589293,0.0002053905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982872,0.00014868616,0.0008744025,0.0003143261,0.00023669082,0.00013868925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014581636,0.00017214881,0.00048009606,0.00020997331,0.00028673062,0.00020202398,0.0004782114,0.00009401642,0.000238887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018279665,0.00014473118,0.00016786119,0.000022152532,0.0010825351,0.0006841624,0.00015298299,0.0005732569,0.000008542623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016722002,0.00020434872,0.0011046819,0.0000997847,0.00009356312,0.00010092253,0.0018432518,0.0000021255223,0.00017843126,0.9935959,0.00020022527,0.0024095713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012177856,0.00025167954,0.0029534893,0.0005968077,0.000048487833,0.000031379353,0.00014779539,0.000008993437,0.0001885388,0.9908664,0.0035324076,0.00015620574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040926592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022602715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39919123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022189333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072044764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5901966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592044354","doi":"10.1017/s0266267116000286","title":"THE FITTING-ATTITUDE ANALYSIS OF VALUE RELATIONS AND THE PREFERENCES VS. VALUE JUDGEMENTS OBJECTION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Parity (physics); Preference relation; Mathematical economics; Relation (database); Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.03503583966933008,"score_gpt":0.24876655152414617,"score_spread":0.2137307118548161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592044354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6597296,0.0006308912,0.0000080222635,0.033889227,0.0005112922,0.00022154328,0.00009189602,0.000011922491,0.3049056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975867,0.0014910814,0.0000087571325,0.00033217215,0.00034991946,0.000012280026,0.000006636935,0.0000064925707,0.00020591808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993444,0.00007116107,0.0002583837,0.00017185257,0.00005616464,0.00009805434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987976,0.0004507145,0.0003113745,0.00035241182,0.000050938917,0.000036939626],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007964338,0.000099133,0.0002207895,0.000059751525,0.0024112286,0.00045817898,0.00023245472,0.00004546389,0.0000468714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010106274,0.00005808576,0.00010697462,0.000015932388,0.0014570896,0.00016263193,0.00012797774,0.00015442887,0.0000040048076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004693357,0.000013398954,0.0007178826,0.0000061030482,0.0005503643,5.8112008e-8,0.0023012417,0.00010554908,2.8621676e-7,0.9957252,0.000011011283,0.00052195124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036153392,0.000033112046,0.0058725993,0.000010116039,0.00034211058,1.7345569e-7,0.00008641142,0.0057533532,0.0000025043455,0.97982293,0.007638422,0.00007675647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034668873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047105816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33785713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008037819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017502238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593034070","doi":"10.1090/stml/080/12","title":"Preferences and society","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Student mathematical library","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04660166639330743,"score_gpt":0.24485568510188854,"score_spread":0.19825401870858111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593034070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005948576,0.000499778,0.000009511404,0.0033197938,0.000148447,0.0002074567,0.00013897035,0.00014090147,0.99547565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026649678,0.0006911821,0.000112632486,0.0015220231,0.0014997645,0.00001686287,0.000015818458,0.00007923736,0.9694128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884003,0.00001565506,0.00031391787,0.00030680155,0.0003465526,0.00017704554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903333,0.00047037937,0.00010650904,0.00024151553,0.000021070104,0.00012719762],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012876544,0.00028661208,0.00039371132,0.000032000084,0.00013597797,0.00026788787,0.00027286203,0.00021186356,0.017617287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010370105,0.00017157904,0.00020167834,0.0000027065926,0.00097395724,0.00024025957,0.00041780437,0.0003881904,0.00076803565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047463764,0.000031592677,4.842647e-7,0.00020799544,0.00013440815,0.000003388889,0.0033761791,1.4118927e-9,3.0795061e-7,0.99218667,0.003260056,0.0007941609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000980274,0.000041800326,9.1482076e-7,0.00039046817,0.000039645212,0.0000011413996,0.00006836568,9.896432e-7,7.085913e-7,0.7218618,0.27730626,0.00018988868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.1358234e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.4383348e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2740462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005731295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003177985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98718005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593154368","doi":"","title":"Ontological Destruction of the Kantian Critique of the Paralogism of Rational Psychology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Id, ego and super-ego; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Dialectic; Cogito ergo sum; Impossibility; Existentialism; Absolute (philosophy); Ontology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.022402055679411583,"score_gpt":0.24619641000338677,"score_spread":0.22379435432397518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593154368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98573333,0.000047378562,0.0024581477,0.0077569536,0.00066923053,0.000069772395,0.000059798193,0.000002284507,0.0032031247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932086,0.00014339252,0.000036212026,0.000056637644,0.0002475182,2.7286752e-8,0.0000011289973,0.0000032520204,0.00019097891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835706,0.00060622534,0.00047115664,0.00008620031,0.00037588787,0.00010346617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974906,0.00048043675,0.0011869902,0.00029533263,0.0005163417,0.000030318886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009982178,0.0000955755,0.0004443214,0.00012887895,0.00020579879,0.0000052513774,0.0007598172,0.00009879016,0.00047083577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001472333,0.00004251302,0.0005947866,0.00016977626,0.002169281,0.00010304628,0.00009822956,0.0002505665,6.5339106e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016646446,0.00022907609,0.0066338247,0.00002912835,0.0018986001,0.0000034162745,0.0035037126,0.00074149977,0.009827233,0.97478485,0.00010619243,0.0005778466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025805458,0.00046361575,0.108197555,0.00014741333,0.0035368572,0.00004108116,0.0018297002,0.00042801636,0.00020780643,0.88118273,0.0012194557,0.0001652227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010585327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008038383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10156373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040321276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010826919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79928064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602236725","doi":"10.1353/hms.2015.0000","title":"“Sweden Is Still a Kingdom”: Convention and Political Authority in Hume’s History of England","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Politics; Tribute; Political philosophy; Humanism; Genius; Law; Classics; History; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Art history","score_opus":0.2964311582085897,"score_gpt":0.3482991193694427,"score_spread":0.051867961160853016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602236725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72003365,0.014919784,0.000004000731,0.006638723,0.0015684605,0.00021530826,0.000051362535,0.00005665793,0.25651205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728763,0.00006759961,0.000008314415,0.0003340456,0.00034129174,0.000008339511,0.0000018455011,0.000007317593,0.0019436269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919194,0.00008552981,0.00022258214,0.00015440457,0.00016783361,0.00017769524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994232,0.00015352505,0.000058860813,0.000096264004,0.00019103961,0.000077087956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005493042,0.000101371836,0.00026984545,0.000074766824,0.000050643896,0.000013622033,0.000056733326,0.000050409155,0.00008797121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030049303,0.00008284797,0.00004046243,0.000013210052,0.0010309705,0.00008169137,0.00009471128,0.00015899695,0.000006522304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031654534,0.00005107897,0.00040157518,0.00008349607,0.000043224205,0.0000047826325,0.0750212,4.4805766e-8,0.0000066442503,0.9233209,0.0009292297,0.00010615425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069361104,0.000118681084,0.0003635993,0.000066770575,0.000026518224,0.0000010181654,0.004666377,0.0000151953545,0.000010282133,0.79872715,0.19520755,0.00010322842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043655006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008096669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.277254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012561688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055832134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37986538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603010200","doi":"10.3138/tjt.2016-0015","title":"Kant and Theology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Philosophy; Relation (database); Theology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.045209383575568494,"score_gpt":0.2871700934440382,"score_spread":0.2419607098684697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603010200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14650264,0.0041750465,0.000068591886,0.013852037,0.002132428,0.000047528654,0.000005373052,0.000009420984,0.83320695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633735,0.0004051634,0.000041969444,0.0006772645,0.0012473571,5.6445117e-7,1.653712e-7,0.000007598319,0.001282543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936014,0.00010582985,0.00022843758,0.00007843565,0.00007844406,0.00014869373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899787,0.00017935374,0.00038752033,0.00022338543,0.00013530046,0.000076576485],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007038996,0.0000842973,0.00025504208,0.000021200985,0.0004125779,0.00007344779,0.00038047726,0.00007429872,0.003323795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024244456,0.000056214383,0.00007331993,9.779783e-7,0.0014298753,0.00027063958,0.00012353754,0.00021797187,0.0000122775455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108226,0.000025856172,0.000076278884,0.0000049530295,0.000062950196,0.00003564232,0.0041872915,1.8659726e-7,0.000066859626,0.9924906,0.00013806875,0.0028031035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040427956,0.00032296145,0.0006166058,0.00001323097,0.000030016146,0.0001489392,0.00026355713,0.000008297251,0.000022924947,0.96386117,0.034241006,0.00006700138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003157856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016964101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84983474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017529439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002899693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604954642","doi":"10.1017/s1369415415000060","title":"Accessing the Moral Law through Feeling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Assertion; Consciousness; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2973595687472745,"score_gpt":0.34794594246006155,"score_spread":0.05058637371278707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604954642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025301345,0.1934086,0.000022890317,0.03987496,0.0005256906,0.00017153754,0.0000056127487,0.000057286823,0.76568043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489465,0.009636246,0.000055599518,0.039843712,0.0010566872,0.000010607177,0.0000063989855,0.00001802713,0.00042624076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991688,0.00012119116,0.0002188091,0.00013317967,0.00019528314,0.00016273056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994263,0.00006205644,0.00007917012,0.00027298374,0.00010278725,0.000056707264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007621992,0.00010465469,0.00020767916,0.0000067734054,0.000346291,0.00021021994,0.00027707528,0.000026924617,0.0006219271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008015477,0.000057895868,0.00009975562,0.00003329054,0.00038282183,0.00024031193,0.00007612324,0.00025430936,0.00035245315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012147241,0.000009945249,0.0000012206742,0.00027187643,0.000010535056,0.000003713582,0.0018110679,3.6814168e-7,4.2421232e-7,0.9936978,0.0018037786,0.002388011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004033072,0.0000066877906,5.2349003e-7,0.00082301436,0.000027461205,0.000002348707,0.00008804046,0.0000067079714,0.000002512202,0.4606148,0.5383292,0.00005842609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014430883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000117198295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94869345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009152692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003649377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68096656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607360888","doi":"10.1017/s1369415416000078","title":"Appearances and Things in Themselves: Actuality and Identity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Transcendental number; Epistemology; Identity (music); Philosophy; Idealism; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Aesthetics; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05272384591434982,"score_gpt":0.29999510172171934,"score_spread":0.24727125580736953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607360888","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16322693,0.6497146,0.000050818377,0.06699669,0.00031582592,0.0006184886,0.00003944435,0.0000894548,0.11894777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86048466,0.13593517,0.0000063313128,0.0033437442,0.000077887096,0.000004798884,4.084425e-7,0.000004844495,0.00014218083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937785,0.000085173066,0.00017617254,0.00015885117,0.00009404826,0.00010788382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996597,0.00010511247,0.000052242005,0.00011636878,0.000022413893,0.000044118027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008069026,0.00008103174,0.00021306508,0.000021889036,0.00008582145,0.00006351598,0.00008346628,0.000026356469,0.00039921695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012439078,0.00004468466,0.000031315132,0.000019369789,0.00038154048,0.0004466074,0.0000539566,0.0000955012,0.000035260833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001902456,0.000010067085,0.00011330159,0.0009646254,0.0000061262326,0.0000019551665,0.0013653053,2.6903005e-10,0.000012446732,0.9766681,0.000042262105,0.02081387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014774628,0.0000141257215,0.0008499792,0.0050422116,0.00001620995,0.0000027808844,0.00006743279,5.17928e-7,0.0000053087774,0.81891036,0.17483403,0.00010927821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006632028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018676715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6972577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004047853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008940461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43711457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611014222","doi":"","title":"Natural law, biological knowledge, and the claims of evolutionary ethics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Philosophiae Christianae","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Skepticism; Natural law; Criticism; Epistemology; Objectivity (philosophy); Natural (archaeology); Meta-ethics; Natural order; Normative ethics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Information ethics; Political science; Philosophy of law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.09920619575025165,"score_gpt":0.31697908926184626,"score_spread":0.21777289351159462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611014222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023799138,0.021395745,0.0000034466711,0.094045736,0.0022180933,0.000532932,0.0002162771,0.000089313035,0.85769933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99538505,0.0010068455,0.00001867151,0.0011674279,0.0021983536,0.000029902694,0.000013675989,0.000019182102,0.0001608888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844927,0.00027444714,0.0003789502,0.00035060805,0.00027605807,0.00027064406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973445,0.0011838318,0.0002938245,0.0007272856,0.0003580638,0.00009249753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010525632,0.0002495853,0.0004751507,0.000046165653,0.003052305,0.00013950566,0.000706023,0.00019318998,0.00013156798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008782625,0.00014591528,0.00018748164,0.000022479306,0.012378502,0.00016339842,0.0005670776,0.0011808239,0.00004048101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001483588,0.0000930865,0.000048027585,0.000050836632,0.000120501514,0.0000061000997,0.0045253667,1.8773325e-7,0.0000074400123,0.99447125,0.00039178063,0.00013707014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012472959,0.00008923561,0.0016761324,0.00006279244,0.000052895208,0.0000039838933,0.00028599412,0.00003233811,0.000005830201,0.9399458,0.056399122,0.00019855818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046849772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007503893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001973414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011206598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611320896","doi":"10.1017/s1369415417000073","title":"David Landy, Kant’s Inferentialism: The Case Against Hume New York and London: Routledge: 2015 Pp. 308 ISBN 9781138913080 (hbk) $148.00","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09640260194232611,"score_gpt":0.30979405177809205,"score_spread":0.21339144983576594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611320896","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003472006,0.7210842,0.000022759561,0.10628803,0.0018252083,0.0010274879,0.00018071535,0.00012995518,0.16596965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8131657,0.1659705,0.000018781016,0.0114496825,0.003055135,0.000031679392,0.00005476809,0.00006583503,0.006187867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980833,0.00024748515,0.0005383632,0.0004440423,0.00027008753,0.0004167421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976769,0.00016081985,0.00039931425,0.001335319,0.0001381228,0.0002894877],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010731567,0.00037592818,0.00067672436,0.00003602901,0.0018099693,0.0010668524,0.00073708827,0.0001316825,0.0021208194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000296091,0.00023669055,0.00025785185,0.000035628527,0.00088391034,0.0003299195,0.00034599457,0.00065042125,0.00048098568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012591533,0.000056718432,0.00003929278,0.0013233921,0.0001239955,0.00049533753,0.002038801,1.3315955e-7,0.000003481442,0.83950746,0.12535758,0.031041196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000441767,0.000044852368,0.00005096805,0.0024308627,0.0002220437,0.00017916945,0.000080729005,0.0000160981,0.0000050267,0.083327144,0.91284853,0.0003528217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012597804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021479656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80969375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016521879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013201774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613584720","doi":"","title":"Assessing Rawls' Difference Principle as Practical Guidance for our Duties to Animals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Animal ethics; Extension (predicate logic); Task (project management); Law and economics; Space (punctuation); Primary goods; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.16582257862982366,"score_gpt":0.41235707870512983,"score_spread":0.24653450007530617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613584720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48743764,0.00022322181,0.007131599,0.16349766,0.00400815,0.0011488498,0.00015463136,0.00039546192,0.3360028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919918,0.00000633392,0.00077549537,0.0013778138,0.0016202622,0.00006820894,0.0000016637855,0.00002212541,0.0041362853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894774,0.000057513447,0.00023573749,0.0002698032,0.00020112703,0.0002880505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876845,0.00057139416,0.00009230133,0.00023781112,0.00020067264,0.00012937919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054479507,0.00013765025,0.00019092095,0.00003810622,0.0003005118,0.0002879371,0.00016374807,0.00006936658,0.00029818428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015336802,0.00008647319,0.00007245713,0.000019665207,0.00011357551,0.00026521922,0.000091994305,0.00011484655,0.00025492322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061455255,0.000040187966,0.000022302796,0.000019210545,0.000016420125,0.0000040599043,0.0010647855,4.952157e-8,0.0029875843,0.9939646,0.00049314264,0.0013261989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023794391,0.00013687667,0.00023421462,0.000093119976,0.000011864861,0.0000021987546,0.00033810447,0.00000517523,0.0009831031,0.76282775,0.2349747,0.0001549752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021262627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003646082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50455415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030882118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010433461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35262746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622469145","doi":"10.1353/hms.2015.0011","title":"Turnabout is Fair Play: A New Humean Response in the Old Debate with Kant","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy; Critical philosophy","score_opus":0.19907786575280337,"score_gpt":0.3199796473626689,"score_spread":0.1209017816098655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622469145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60226184,0.010867198,0.000021940785,0.18920557,0.0006845355,0.00059668184,0.000050838975,0.00014385876,0.19616754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814321,0.00011294371,0.000018968014,0.0074029006,0.00040434708,0.000022512602,0.000001099197,0.000011059871,0.010594064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989091,0.00020105591,0.00018963116,0.00019444889,0.00027415846,0.00023157329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905425,0.0004222965,0.000057619378,0.00025864376,0.00014737697,0.000059831054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001086621,0.00016439438,0.00023743414,0.000081338476,0.0002945113,0.00011708279,0.00023062137,0.000036083675,0.000056732522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028479725,0.000084969244,0.00004796534,0.000055712066,0.00056628184,0.00010364624,0.00009478085,0.00030093145,0.000047306676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005875023,0.00003560271,0.000045936038,0.000012603402,0.00008624453,0.0000412965,0.2659594,0.0000021988546,0.0000022755282,0.7232249,0.0098983785,0.00010366299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007114589,0.00032633994,0.00028530613,0.00012379403,0.000031324307,0.0000041759617,0.027616225,0.0000046767414,0.000014416844,0.74701107,0.22371367,0.00015757422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028855423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020132577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37917027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032549207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011374734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34649453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623215943","doi":"10.1353/hms.2015.0009","title":"Cultivating Strength of Mind: Hume on the Government of the Passions and Artificial Virtue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Passions; Allegiance; Silence; Philosophy; Epistemology; Epistemic virtue; Natural (archaeology); Politics; Aesthetics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.21407813748218454,"score_gpt":0.30492261918257,"score_spread":0.09084448170038548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623215943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89359885,0.00040427677,6.44155e-7,0.009168698,0.00027116697,0.0001314921,0.00006701183,0.000005926252,0.09635191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99920315,0.000023688168,0.000003938262,0.00019507551,0.00019603875,0.000008402194,2.2456031e-7,0.0000049807663,0.0003645071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921596,0.000081219034,0.00018709831,0.00008808735,0.00035008488,0.00007755691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991263,0.0004837198,0.00012692116,0.00014663115,0.00009623882,0.00002016172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038040584,0.00007977538,0.00014831155,0.000008342863,0.0003109408,0.000014015312,0.00009944658,0.000019796136,0.000046081626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000581804,0.000035566714,0.000047489822,0.000017882901,0.0008672535,0.000023674593,0.00015947904,0.00013839103,0.0000018083539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016106185,0.0000560306,0.00007045573,0.000012838876,0.00006190786,1.8885149e-7,0.021466542,0.0000019885615,0.00023268009,0.9768741,0.000388559,0.0008186058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018881995,0.00018973793,0.00043985178,0.00023233362,0.000048706483,1.9678242e-7,0.06908532,0.000030802603,0.0044855876,0.9119486,0.013244159,0.000105876854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017422171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001318107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10560427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014095281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014806497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31954318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623756022","doi":"10.1353/hms.2015.0012","title":"Reflecting Subjects: Passion, Sympathy, and Society in Hume's Philosophy by Jacqueline Taylor","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Passion; Sympathy; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Scholarship; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.183603265271832,"score_gpt":0.3472302380360504,"score_spread":0.16362697276421842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623756022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3305562,0.06916809,0.00001825205,0.05803863,0.002378757,0.0007532969,0.00015921345,0.0004922449,0.5384353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99461883,0.0011144491,0.000034260782,0.002542681,0.0011044967,0.000032765423,0.000009464375,0.000025327621,0.0005176926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987163,0.00009569989,0.0003245595,0.0003188795,0.0002426592,0.00030189406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991329,0.00023537663,0.000098449374,0.00015956177,0.00026728978,0.00010643909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008450475,0.00021723959,0.00035884837,0.00005362042,0.00045361434,0.00008723036,0.00011141291,0.000081905804,0.00004232598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003613408,0.00016684654,0.00007873365,0.0000619887,0.0007401489,0.00018452562,0.00020604068,0.00037965886,0.000020327725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003854264,0.00011156315,0.00012954982,0.000118409414,0.00013370391,0.000009727284,0.09262607,9.3800566e-7,0.000101545105,0.8930782,0.012892107,0.0007596297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070590514,0.00017120254,0.000028450952,0.00012186668,0.00002171666,0.0000017247532,0.020517062,0.000042834614,0.000085718435,0.92732334,0.050706103,0.00027409973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010278187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017741896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6640626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050264032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024877294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68038046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2629521316","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.805979","title":"Recursive Justification And Kant'S Civil Condition: Some Comments On Flikschuh'S Account Of Nomadic Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Civil rights; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07467171596940582,"score_gpt":0.2760387087627181,"score_spread":0.20136699279331227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2629521316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13421729,0.000096805015,0.00005924757,0.009298535,0.0004179376,0.00048774073,0.00079526287,0.00023549586,0.8543917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982096,0.00006050572,0.000006355813,0.00029645313,0.00031772323,5.5400065e-8,0.00040371576,0.00020977511,0.00049584033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990071,0.00013882294,0.00018747884,0.00024327521,0.000259253,0.00016408127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987597,0.000043976666,0.0002128018,0.0004627803,0.00042451755,0.00009625622],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046210116,0.000103386024,0.0001310458,0.000112777496,0.0046415217,0.0008622857,0.00058310275,0.00005119419,0.006089412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028872376,0.0000951858,0.000033275108,0.000023598124,0.0008470705,0.00039961588,0.0003660434,0.00023571603,0.0012681809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005620444,0.000116702824,4.86897e-7,0.000044531193,0.00003081087,0.000003659276,0.002681064,8.3405587e-7,0.00023996399,0.981909,0.010966646,0.003950124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004951049,0.00021984351,0.00031416988,0.00007417244,0.000017868288,0.0000062452486,0.00018304518,0.000035529054,0.00027550303,0.28546652,0.7127985,0.000113542155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035911635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030105105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8639923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041296862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025554007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736389095","doi":"10.1017/s0012217317000452","title":"Ontological Entanglement in the Normative Web","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Appeal; Normative; Moral realism; Realism; Philosophy; Sociology; Moral psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11449783153574054,"score_gpt":0.2997044206332802,"score_spread":0.18520658909753962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736389095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124206975,0.00004081983,0.0000022300378,0.019637153,0.00037921773,0.00012276197,0.000050388888,0.000013478083,0.85554695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675167,0.000015098693,0.0000026454015,0.0026302894,0.00045658043,0.00002304357,0.000011629943,0.0000027321332,0.000106290725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994839,0.000086786466,0.00010544388,0.0000834298,0.00011546208,0.00012499772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995163,0.00013953757,0.000054260818,0.0002488143,0.000021178606,0.00001992015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046214394,0.00006149169,0.0000866151,0.000017256853,0.0004900841,0.00020312809,0.0003839565,0.000032903197,0.0005152901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012568389,0.000033828263,0.000041873704,0.000004203071,0.00041415097,0.00009702745,0.000061691775,0.00021033734,0.00014896548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007457788,0.000057355348,0.00014460844,0.0000024300643,0.0000046408027,0.00001596299,0.017640064,1.3417943e-7,0.0000035742153,0.98132104,0.00029260002,0.00051015936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022847457,0.00004463216,0.0024187122,0.00000923216,0.0000038021665,7.015401e-7,0.0010530984,0.000020609066,0.000005763923,0.8660377,0.13011292,0.0000643451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026666658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067048403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8725447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000107119295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012871855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56420654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747458370","doi":"10.1017/s1369415417000152","title":"Kant on Moral Illusion and Appraisal of Others","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Illusion; Action (physics); Duty; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.09942532573441258,"score_gpt":0.33215547917960175,"score_spread":0.23273015344518916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747458370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03548755,0.07064773,0.0000047687836,0.029660067,0.0008852352,0.0004070778,0.000059633356,0.0000390584,0.8628089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97877204,0.019281806,0.0000105940035,0.0014979906,0.00018295685,0.0000027486826,0.0000020083241,0.000009382743,0.00024047792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994807,0.000037936727,0.00015813767,0.00011984873,0.000115206414,0.00008811976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999387,0.00005454585,0.00014942816,0.00032936892,0.000035521552,0.00004408796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033594985,0.00008180603,0.00023371492,0.00001730504,0.0002789971,0.00005304495,0.00016447804,0.00002665613,0.0006620228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014965658,0.000055677247,0.00006879285,0.000004689277,0.00048019554,0.00006774014,0.00006263988,0.000115728624,0.000048004247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051487873,0.000021276592,0.000015863041,0.00083193404,0.000011089572,0.0000029064354,0.00041240777,1.9845242e-8,0.000012966776,0.9820997,0.00022090091,0.016365793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026821918,0.00014500642,0.00071453495,0.0069326083,0.000069448804,0.000002990471,0.000045908906,0.000014774431,0.000033405904,0.25205314,0.73952705,0.00019290569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004963415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031938078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9432845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002076307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010530443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72486854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749192079","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqx045","title":"The Human Predicament: A Candid Guide to Life's Biggest Questions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Pessimism; Pleasure; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Social psychology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04575332984713758,"score_gpt":0.3141277224600933,"score_spread":0.2683743926129557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749192079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02659058,0.00014918705,0.000035333152,0.7399973,0.0007981812,0.00046714055,0.00009660866,0.00014694018,0.23171872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863638,0.000020085228,0.000007249517,0.005694994,0.005747273,0.00015621814,0.000007201985,0.000042508964,0.0019606357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977101,0.00024011963,0.00052592356,0.00039547725,0.00057190354,0.0005564576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671113,0.000522594,0.00023219231,0.0018707842,0.00020251273,0.00046076826],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012733313,0.00029599667,0.0002845069,0.00005591892,0.009985196,0.00166141,0.002097433,0.00011830931,0.00037534194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052702444,0.00015888266,0.00020537803,0.000032606786,0.0026076597,0.00021273724,0.00019518108,0.0008585576,0.00068062544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036607853,0.000088566005,0.00000620028,0.000006986793,0.000070293085,0.000008257415,0.0053701764,9.950278e-7,0.00006240802,0.9900822,0.0025459977,0.0017212986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029757354,0.0004375852,0.00031553506,0.000050838604,0.000046558645,0.0000035658352,0.0003122458,0.000037198817,0.000004865823,0.8075729,0.19071355,0.00020758116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010472403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019308636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95977324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044576696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000905071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749673324","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199395729.013.20","title":"Love and Economics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Selfishness; Altruism (biology); Interdependence; Positive economics; Economics; Face (sociological concept); Social psychology; Wage; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Labour economics","score_opus":0.0582412045203798,"score_gpt":0.1999620971896517,"score_spread":0.1417208926692719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749673324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000055330092,0.00007077998,0.0000021368728,0.00016090287,0.0002352147,0.00010993814,0.00027118163,0.000028561179,0.99906594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008629189,0.00073467544,0.0000054634575,0.00012271134,0.00040739443,6.981223e-8,0.0000118081125,0.000027526356,0.99006116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994489,0.000008676312,0.00008867182,0.0002596224,0.000061228915,0.00013292482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992539,0.00005281699,0.00017310272,0.00036227942,0.000058258625,0.000099643294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006900662,0.00020680903,0.0002627953,0.000061432285,0.00034944894,0.00016941171,0.00031518543,0.00023838872,0.00023837049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000036882202,0.0002235534,0.00010922383,1.155618e-7,0.000954314,0.00009337504,0.000317969,0.00041892234,0.0000058455366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036708676,0.0000027869016,7.673071e-8,0.000033047334,0.00009134087,0.000028898914,0.001285219,1.489483e-7,1.2506064e-7,0.99568564,0.00011914287,0.0027168943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013074046,0.00001980214,1.5737754e-7,0.000037481575,0.0000531994,0.0000010549169,0.000020372054,0.000004869498,9.1806515e-7,0.42289576,0.57668155,0.00015407687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047585614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001834465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5765624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033548633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041679792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9116244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751630240","doi":"10.5325/jspecphil.31.4.0575","title":"Ful-filling the Copula, Determining Nature: The Grammatical Ontology of Hegel's Metaphysics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Speculative Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Idealism; Copula (linguistics); Ontology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08480121204158414,"score_gpt":0.30991377588576147,"score_spread":0.22511256384417733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751630240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61371815,0.0036772827,0.00081919937,0.1633127,0.0028851894,0.0006124751,0.000050708073,0.000022956712,0.21490136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99599516,0.00009103049,0.000055563327,0.0011064202,0.002701329,0.000001933373,6.452745e-7,0.000020579706,0.00002735965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805635,0.00044323623,0.00062092446,0.000108709966,0.00054415653,0.00022662661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582034,0.0015081145,0.0014348591,0.0006874842,0.00048699565,0.00006222203],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020793977,0.00020935397,0.00046449725,0.000051634113,0.0016525371,0.00016537357,0.0014779445,0.00010148667,0.00011562261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054122234,0.00008471996,0.0003774325,0.000033506396,0.0033596735,0.00026999039,0.00021139302,0.0016439424,0.000010162352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013331855,0.00005047326,0.00002893954,0.000016812122,0.0003230932,0.000010970996,0.010544547,0.000038361355,0.00014050453,0.988182,0.000020398866,0.0005105674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003183876,0.00018246919,0.00050996226,0.00010997421,0.00026477664,0.000038697337,0.0008155485,0.00026561183,0.0003927267,0.9950302,0.0019605206,0.00011110532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029230283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004394587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.382277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021988048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054395194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753882011","doi":"10.3197/096327117x15002190708155","title":"Nonhuman Animals as Property Holders: An Exploration of the Lockean Labour-Mixing Account","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Values","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Animal rights; Law and economics; Politics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12422027850664591,"score_gpt":0.2837386515246297,"score_spread":0.15951837301798377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753882011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96461433,0.00007411603,0.000003788894,0.0019290328,0.00022920744,0.00018503726,0.00004090593,0.000019247413,0.032904346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972084,0.000040603685,0.000012099238,0.0003485213,0.0004620832,0.000011227219,0.0000068266345,0.000020442983,0.0018897856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991234,0.00008138059,0.00017455418,0.00019176718,0.00028992209,0.00013897917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991872,0.000019814916,0.00018979107,0.0005481893,0.00000951478,0.00004550236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000306955,0.0001248153,0.00012751736,0.000018254399,0.0012263919,0.0002449669,0.00045003617,0.000048892056,0.0010819477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034360055,0.0000703275,0.000075098455,0.0000043065897,0.0010337238,0.0010839535,0.00019534092,0.000169577,0.00008657238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031552885,0.0002381072,0.00063014514,0.000024034614,0.000033694323,0.0000026995338,0.027327545,0.000009618534,0.011972187,0.9581029,0.00003087343,0.0015966854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035358896,0.00027962367,0.00822998,0.00008140833,0.000031690965,0.0000013487206,0.006709906,0.00007498165,0.013068383,0.9565966,0.01432183,0.00025066303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028424905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009630223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032594092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031782056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011138644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758668236","doi":"10.1111/japp.12287","title":"Kagan on Speciesism and Modal Personism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Modal; Argument (complex analysis); Prejudice (legal term); Object (grammar); sort; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05970444737332933,"score_gpt":0.24973127920241586,"score_spread":0.19002683182908653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758668236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13249655,0.00007848765,0.0000035113665,0.01985879,0.00055522606,0.00006631112,0.000012289876,0.000010314702,0.8469185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929074,0.000058937127,0.00005058332,0.0015920529,0.005202666,0.0000014284703,5.2739733e-7,0.000020660476,0.00016575109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990594,0.000014821045,0.00028355847,0.00014070049,0.0003418434,0.00015972281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889725,0.00008937047,0.0004611939,0.00029683966,0.00010273932,0.00015262018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037684577,0.0001582312,0.00029116805,0.000106946936,0.00088420673,0.00039024313,0.00037878333,0.00007729352,0.0002627502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003986322,0.00011807181,0.00012607979,0.000006765955,0.0007265439,0.00018208758,0.00007349245,0.00056832563,0.000044381548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020274497,0.000075266355,0.0000024127814,0.000016998776,0.000058501253,0.000029626306,0.0037237178,0.000002092679,0.00018078914,0.9943655,0.00015609425,0.0011862429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006702244,0.00021573079,0.00014187627,0.00005013668,0.000030659892,0.000011522168,0.0001934359,0.000008903795,0.00015619915,0.96552074,0.03286077,0.00013978196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000043696755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028283448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8604108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019778252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003036531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68006927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762363945","doi":"10.1017/9781316145364.011","title":"The Harmony of Thought and Reality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Content (measure theory); Aesthetics; Computer science; Epistemology; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Visual arts; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07571880404377897,"score_gpt":0.22815577579888527,"score_spread":0.1524369717551063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762363945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003290494,0.00039409247,0.0000042609495,0.00037387956,0.0002410692,0.00015372795,0.00047971692,0.000027802702,0.99829257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032958906,0.0005894344,0.0000016974876,0.000059794216,0.00031861072,2.4304933e-7,0.000010054631,0.000019241845,0.96604204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992773,0.000038682087,0.00013926557,0.00023074094,0.0001751743,0.00013886977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986481,0.00020130105,0.00029807532,0.0005904069,0.00018113095,0.000080974045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025183495,0.00019131984,0.00027412054,0.000036314806,0.0009886614,0.00011486594,0.00047472387,0.00018005882,0.0000070092815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021738224,0.00015163269,0.00013900263,3.8455167e-7,0.0025897853,0.000056488,0.00036820574,0.0004737477,0.0000027978213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006851396,0.0000034505583,6.387805e-8,0.00006405737,0.000104894134,0.000026383303,0.0003130956,1.741709e-8,0.0000025698857,0.9937536,0.0045430157,0.0011203036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017760968,0.000027067845,0.000002614382,0.00010488698,0.00011561277,0.000001527512,0.000040754843,0.000004122845,0.000023874845,0.04528212,0.95405436,0.00016546798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002952283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049444632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94951135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002218904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000527397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9542172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763578728","doi":"10.1017/9781108363242.011","title":"Some ‘What If ?’ Thoughts: Notes on <i>Donoghue</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Psychology; Internet privacy; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Communication; World Wide Web; Art; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.061929219469450424,"score_gpt":0.2210944227812593,"score_spread":0.15916520331180886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763578728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026934815,0.0005815554,0.0000048622856,0.00048466751,0.0017531277,0.00029945726,0.0005973414,0.00016974336,0.9960823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011691473,0.001490761,0.000003729386,0.0010847935,0.0041947663,9.913531e-7,0.00006937868,0.00008419108,0.9813799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983939,0.00004832046,0.00020500827,0.00062129105,0.00038123957,0.00035025383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978513,0.00030899048,0.00035703726,0.001069914,0.00019562466,0.00021709688],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017361219,0.00054761436,0.0005715439,0.00015230081,0.0011707622,0.0006370368,0.0009633137,0.00048058957,0.000037081827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029062801,0.0005293966,0.00042513534,8.620836e-7,0.0015267842,0.0004799189,0.00043875014,0.0011729571,0.000178059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013002366,0.00002034319,2.0970074e-8,0.000081975486,0.0001751147,0.00028491695,0.00059266057,5.380624e-7,0.0000032172466,0.9933177,0.0040050666,0.0013883987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041912307,0.000102326434,2.4043018e-7,0.0006488619,0.00017170081,0.0000027772842,0.00006380083,0.0000054154143,0.00009124672,0.08325167,0.91465485,0.0005879595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000100161924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012918023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91064984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111818306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095536496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766146053","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v2i3.119","title":"A New Theory of Humean Reasons? A Critical Note on Schroeder's Hypotheticalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Ethical theory","score_opus":0.15857131203436772,"score_gpt":0.3311558494206729,"score_spread":0.17258453738630516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766146053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0939903,0.0021126647,0.0013841373,0.46730545,0.0024304716,0.00028350792,0.00013906612,0.000060886694,0.43229353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99014586,0.00024913426,0.0001923946,0.0050208513,0.0042566457,6.648356e-7,8.877025e-7,0.000027983608,0.000105547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997804,0.0005087014,0.00059048325,0.00014277436,0.00073107384,0.00022296188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959923,0.0027335845,0.00030707993,0.00013285657,0.00061929086,0.0002148578],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020487427,0.00019411198,0.00050470117,0.00015717007,0.0009656363,0.00006546529,0.00023556816,0.00034191718,0.00027364198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017596615,0.00015250347,0.00032906324,0.000044650078,0.002434283,0.00016041432,0.00005955817,0.0025290211,0.000008672473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029805166,0.00015938119,0.0000021204116,0.000063487045,0.0000678383,0.000048072943,0.049755037,3.9726365e-7,0.000052880525,0.9487036,0.00022969948,0.0006194583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006216446,0.00059305684,0.00003524857,0.00017852748,0.000069808775,0.00004632446,0.0006747797,0.0000027188435,0.000046960213,0.9884599,0.0091057755,0.00016528658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020660465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006011468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8961556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022721497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035598586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767832788","doi":"10.7202/1041766ar","title":"Metaethics, Normativity, and Value","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.031755171670297094,"score_gpt":0.25395842254642714,"score_spread":0.22220325087613005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767832788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046745997,0.029683726,0.0041473554,0.41618413,0.0021133395,0.00035523647,0.00046868526,0.00018112116,0.5001204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96887803,0.01193155,0.00030958626,0.0075415378,0.0012739877,0.000014263502,0.0000031794702,0.000049820545,0.00999807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978243,0.0007224655,0.00033974778,0.00033414585,0.00023486876,0.0005444573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978462,0.001281685,0.00013098305,0.00029398256,0.00016046476,0.00028670515],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001887367,0.0002983458,0.00034194114,0.00008508588,0.0006376755,0.00023293358,0.00022975085,0.00070637744,0.0010195554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048394257,0.00021471705,0.00014981831,0.00003544447,0.003004959,0.00035309486,0.00019447457,0.0011178363,0.00022205549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032822292,0.00006912452,0.000050530998,0.00024920056,0.00012601813,0.000041365915,0.0071879537,0.0000024367425,0.0002770572,0.9648622,0.00029569172,0.02680556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030204645,0.00009202993,0.00007347683,0.00035687897,0.000063467836,0.000029469129,0.00028955654,0.000074087635,0.00040384187,0.71840423,0.27964237,0.00026851677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015923299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004708445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.922132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012901943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119545766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767981883","doi":"10.7202/1041767ar","title":"Goodness: Attributive and predicative","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attributive; Predicative expression; GRASP; Goodness of fit; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02792952154320945,"score_gpt":0.24783638160491553,"score_spread":0.21990686006170607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767981883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08191282,0.042201933,0.004490278,0.34462124,0.0019226302,0.00069934485,0.0022989428,0.000232625,0.52162015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754724,0.009139309,0.00007986332,0.0030388609,0.0012661528,0.000034332897,0.0000073956508,0.00004023404,0.010921445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822575,0.00041305932,0.00027795578,0.00038368817,0.00017547871,0.0005240565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982367,0.0008882921,0.00013687935,0.00023529505,0.00020844996,0.00029435492],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007831864,0.0002709505,0.00029216864,0.000062277955,0.00053947035,0.00011899078,0.00020796887,0.00055956125,0.0011228835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004153154,0.00019255244,0.0001066205,0.000038916634,0.0034830808,0.00023348867,0.00015002365,0.0006973313,0.00016312985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006968862,0.00007827816,0.0002394994,0.00012178333,0.00011081265,0.000038678692,0.009750152,3.8281078e-7,0.0001915041,0.9746813,0.00045370802,0.014264167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043485622,0.00017092706,0.00038129187,0.0005520429,0.00005527107,0.000018304161,0.0011073913,0.000021475787,0.00048036856,0.7734624,0.2230576,0.0002580893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005114917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015918496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8935596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018619909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013259254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769979446","doi":"10.1177/0008429817732724","title":"Life in Contradiction to Life","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dualism; Metaphysics; Contradiction; Environmental ethics; Natural (archaeology); Harm; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.2550359646425409,"score_gpt":0.4071058039758392,"score_spread":0.15206983933329826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769979446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5127344,0.019996565,0.0000064178803,0.062111836,0.0045004524,0.0005492123,0.0000182456,0.00012451502,0.39995837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799917,0.012985543,0.000036418485,0.0061087245,0.0006425833,0.000071127426,4.923426e-7,0.000012439797,0.00015102387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980964,0.0000770793,0.00049611856,0.0004792549,0.00040999567,0.00044116622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985972,0.00044346688,0.00018078925,0.00043972183,0.00013940223,0.00019940556],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011104253,0.00020696035,0.00041989525,0.00031553832,0.0013814694,0.0003599955,0.000804101,0.00007459996,0.000028413939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007986993,0.00016160439,0.000075656164,0.00011179829,0.0027343233,0.0003775958,0.0003585291,0.00030694887,0.00010248694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003950779,0.0000594138,0.0025783724,0.0000315141,0.00002217603,0.000018016395,0.009909083,0.00009870284,0.000012957885,0.97272223,0.014390518,0.00011752893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059936417,0.00033238306,0.00220409,0.0004925066,0.000013801416,0.0000017924854,0.007240158,0.000049444832,0.000032908567,0.85514414,0.13345376,0.00043567442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030266934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007715689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46725726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006427643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032959273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770397507","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3453237","title":"<i>Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Philosophy; General interest; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.2454877351021055,"score_gpt":0.35536220760199005,"score_spread":0.10987447249988455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770397507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006520089,0.0122369565,0.000011365089,0.90825117,0.0002609754,0.000275381,0.0000299301,0.000042861757,0.07823937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86815196,0.071640596,0.0000035756423,0.0582533,0.0014393012,0.000036093308,0.0000017527726,0.000021992366,0.00045142137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835473,0.0003781238,0.000328995,0.0003031008,0.00039583552,0.00023922055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728477,0.0018645048,0.000107408814,0.00047011027,0.0001263513,0.00014688198],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016447895,0.00020602836,0.00031931847,0.000029165694,0.00049377535,0.000054185686,0.00029370954,0.00010762555,0.0022395386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011008162,0.00008591277,0.00013660353,0.00004071316,0.0011854636,0.00009591912,0.000100122554,0.0008124521,0.0009387535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002204388,0.000039942093,3.4043026e-7,0.0002475656,0.000022166098,0.000003199199,0.0003297484,1.21189645e-8,0.000037334572,0.9740007,0.00026257135,0.025034355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013098572,0.00007975298,0.000004057327,0.0018671529,0.000045060744,0.0000070130254,0.0000062127733,5.1168297e-7,0.000019268064,0.7099241,0.2877994,0.0001164687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005359203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014253022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86749995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019500105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040026316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775092391","doi":"10.4000/books.enseditions.8113","title":"Reconnaissance et praxis chez Kant","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"ENS Éditions eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Praxis; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10041137974150163,"score_gpt":0.2919739986289364,"score_spread":0.19156261888743478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775092391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001009756,0.0006613408,0.000042232736,0.014865674,0.0023778395,0.00041615634,0.003542781,0.00013472972,0.97785825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3887534,0.0003736694,0.00006327548,0.0018251961,0.0032299263,0.000064752705,0.00019634831,0.00011371085,0.6053797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977024,0.00013374847,0.00062260136,0.0006813015,0.0003673183,0.0004926127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703467,0.00049390184,0.00058469153,0.0012548047,0.00035610798,0.0002757961],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075040496,0.0006528401,0.00065725244,0.00018519923,0.0047397017,0.00056390645,0.0005912602,0.0006741089,0.014901719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016603783,0.00065372133,0.0005547169,0.0000024692972,0.0073355143,0.00016704165,0.00021422544,0.002090967,0.0025158536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019568028,0.000053559423,2.4711636e-7,0.000118789256,0.00022205696,0.00011746328,0.0024534133,9.727715e-7,0.00001790475,0.9924417,0.0015985323,0.0029557606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015923113,0.000087916414,0.0000051959632,0.0006907515,0.0000924972,0.000021891257,0.000031842173,0.0000052471432,0.000019960537,0.501636,0.4968468,0.00040265184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002255877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009017274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49524826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008902583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026424762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781867789","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2018.1415694","title":"Wilfrid Sellars and the Foundations of Normativity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.09456226524818263,"score_gpt":0.3468717373048951,"score_spread":0.2523094720567125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781867789","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3438425,0.0036544444,0.00030602803,0.5552959,0.004839113,0.00019964238,0.00007580941,0.000021374659,0.091765195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944197,0.0006459923,0.00005152991,0.0012501633,0.0035935289,0.0000017455029,6.0676206e-7,0.0000056247336,0.000031117142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987592,0.00011824375,0.0004866352,0.00007303375,0.0004815129,0.0000813835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966641,0.0009340606,0.0003948078,0.000077333876,0.0018889413,0.00004077152],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009577914,0.00009398282,0.00027065,0.00008777856,0.00023053122,0.00006139309,0.00031592316,0.000030290137,0.0001364196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009181019,0.00005177041,0.00013053208,0.000028610186,0.0041722897,0.00020211493,0.00015447506,0.00026727663,0.000008924739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025434472,0.000058988364,0.000032581003,0.00000885152,0.00060449576,0.0000043100704,0.009366602,0.0000011895967,0.000022691645,0.9886024,0.00012430847,0.0009192472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091800967,0.00015043751,0.000092745744,0.00007429832,0.000055200166,0.000027547592,0.0005705251,0.00004180106,0.00006822202,0.9847648,0.013179529,0.000056881734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011924372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036396767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6505772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022433143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030626852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783180440","doi":"10.1017/s001221731700107x","title":"Kant’s ‘Five Ways’: Transcendental Idealism in Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Epistemology; Transcendental idealism; Transcendental number; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Object (grammar); Transcendental philosophy; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.060803705345540054,"score_gpt":0.2543018042875339,"score_spread":0.19349809894199385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783180440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4234109,0.0002056791,0.00003599587,0.0043494934,0.0019677838,0.00020587322,0.00024834694,0.0000886306,0.56948733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947946,0.000014833742,0.0000034629973,0.0031984039,0.0016408369,0.0000102192025,0.00003737228,0.000014620064,0.0002856724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992392,0.000049962615,0.00018544847,0.00017680404,0.00012904088,0.00021954333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996173,0.000095231066,0.000031260573,0.0001329945,0.00005993019,0.00006330532],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023734877,0.00010791108,0.00016004246,0.00007051075,0.00015212427,0.00006171218,0.00015459843,0.00007567231,0.0012716817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003840699,0.00009241193,0.000070754715,0.000024672157,0.00071389944,0.00007821294,0.000022854128,0.0002254688,0.0005441637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033858232,0.00004402074,0.00001776002,0.0000062302547,0.000010310064,0.000015723504,0.04850066,1.1752071e-7,0.00007823351,0.9499429,0.00027799563,0.0010722247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057605474,0.000106312364,0.0001814217,0.000031232434,0.000006801225,0.0000017747957,0.0014231197,0.00003068633,0.00017764694,0.9401076,0.057202537,0.00015480054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001737263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025093673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5713837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021492426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026820097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791316405","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2018.1437990","title":"LoveKnowledge: The Life of Philosophy from Socrates to Derrida","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Philosophy; Philosophy of life; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05813468974875862,"score_gpt":0.2543327895351293,"score_spread":0.19619809978637065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791316405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07895604,0.00032909465,0.00003305543,0.028558837,0.0007401563,0.00014086948,0.000040116516,0.000054595806,0.89114726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817494,0.000008527898,0.000009929944,0.007365751,0.009596728,0.00000231192,0.0000038217786,0.000038709546,0.0012248332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869645,0.0004945222,0.0002512711,0.00018341892,0.00018705217,0.0001872924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867576,0.00036842574,0.00009537065,0.00057528855,0.00019534632,0.000089804205],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008350852,0.00014502756,0.00015124636,0.00003142911,0.0005188046,0.0002051965,0.00079007633,0.00001778579,0.001593593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025585937,0.0000726192,0.00009610967,0.000054267093,0.0012833021,0.00010258159,0.00027996814,0.00027593796,0.004019691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003560789,0.00003426793,0.0000029079715,0.0000054664806,0.000058167505,0.0000019576612,0.026622828,0.0000011250374,0.00020322732,0.9654426,0.006199404,0.0013924143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015947691,0.00010520668,0.00022485446,0.00004173336,0.000035748828,3.8825087e-7,0.0006707255,0.00001748256,0.000292223,0.78978765,0.20854133,0.00012320738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010342745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000078640274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90279335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000056135887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031854946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791763556","doi":"10.1017/s1369415417000395","title":"The Deduction: Some Suggestions for Future Work","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Idealism; Focus (optics); Manifold (fluid mechanics); Philosophy; Reading (process); Linguistics; Physics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04934110019810918,"score_gpt":0.29320454843222493,"score_spread":0.24386344823411576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791763556","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028471855,0.5182991,0.000058378795,0.3900909,0.006353641,0.0008733375,0.00004192678,0.00011990201,0.08387806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52367115,0.3318245,0.00026554958,0.044737298,0.08298966,0.00043774038,0.000049634535,0.000085063824,0.015939394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994203,0.0000496042,0.00016929155,0.00012024088,0.00008757464,0.00015302238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936825,0.000117271025,0.000059262427,0.00024579096,0.0001639354,0.000045460518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000463129,0.0000828784,0.00013106895,0.000011426524,0.0010918686,0.00009783504,0.00016899836,0.000032348544,0.00081716606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008704363,0.000047389156,0.00012535231,0.00003959639,0.00048598842,0.00007534757,0.00002169437,0.00014017164,0.0003444773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034203208,0.000009164974,2.7308644e-7,0.00018495417,0.000015188172,1.8454692e-7,0.0003127167,5.6342224e-9,2.7040184e-7,0.9496766,0.032473646,0.017323613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027601514,0.000021452655,0.0000055035325,0.0004575846,0.0000302663,0.0000012128859,0.00004926748,4.135523e-7,0.0000011985821,0.35455182,0.644804,0.000049681756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000020771788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003211796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6123304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006241534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027439692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89473957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791952610","doi":"10.1007/s10677-018-9880-z","title":"Risking Future Generations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of medicine; Political philosophy; Ontology; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Politics; Philosophy; Economics; Law; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06255532529831659,"score_gpt":0.3291942544549545,"score_spread":0.2666389291566379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791952610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012872598,0.00067106663,0.0014143222,0.16303317,0.0017649947,0.00014338821,0.000022820484,0.00014826449,0.81992936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95467395,0.000111660804,0.0003359399,0.035291366,0.0083414875,0.000006979287,0.000004801731,0.000014843831,0.0012189565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982968,0.00093321316,0.00016992123,0.00022868441,0.00018489087,0.00018647914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735934,0.0020031396,0.000078168414,0.0001841737,0.00025781442,0.000117356954],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003141532,0.00012286141,0.00012607995,0.00003519455,0.0011206006,0.0002542213,0.00011228171,0.00025093756,0.0017901476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020082367,0.00009497216,0.00004726636,0.000033344957,0.0014123678,0.00039052358,0.000080441016,0.0014715309,0.00020021336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022506161,0.000042258303,6.920915e-7,0.0000074207005,0.000031968026,0.000008438544,0.013491309,3.4339445e-7,0.00006229957,0.98239446,0.00042444622,0.0033112892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009648348,0.000081294806,0.000004439536,0.00000729189,0.000030432397,0.000009755952,0.0013719421,0.000022425655,0.000037308575,0.56330794,0.43494445,0.00008619801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020348132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003750654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94180137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007612732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034435983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791967071","doi":"10.28984/ct.v1i1.90","title":"The Sublime and Human Creations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Con Texte","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Sublime; Assertion; Extant taxon; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Point (geometry); Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Geometry; Programming language","score_opus":0.0716687553697773,"score_gpt":0.3030701255215257,"score_spread":0.2314013701517484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791967071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11584704,0.00022920704,0.0000021493843,0.013763187,0.00019991661,0.000051948533,0.000009538029,0.000024197767,0.8698728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852483,0.000035598336,8.489509e-7,0.00028142042,0.00034572085,0.000004964244,0.0000014747197,0.0000048234556,0.014076819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997245,0.000016214304,0.00006138729,0.000069603986,0.000050589846,0.00007771335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995047,0.000103103404,0.000046297962,0.00026989516,0.000044073837,0.000031973042],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001943759,0.000041969637,0.000047314486,0.000009084442,0.003960632,0.0007285205,0.00016215348,0.000019924892,0.00031363236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000846462,0.000025973059,0.000020900352,0.0000017596876,0.0010002478,0.000094743424,0.00006000801,0.00010158831,0.00005588219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001646839,0.00000510617,0.000048230966,0.0000018252882,0.0000069381686,6.09193e-7,0.0009089292,9.183262e-9,0.000026777927,0.99689585,0.0002458868,0.0018581827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006780163,0.0000132099,0.0015456743,0.0000051306124,0.000004643106,2.4778612e-7,0.00008087071,0.000005778109,0.00001032395,0.68433493,0.31389898,0.000032431344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010686363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059811975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8694013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000024295468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007581331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792832214","doi":"10.1111/phin.12199","title":"Kantian Schemata: A Critique Consistent with the <i>Critique</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Generality; Transcendental number; Epistemology; Philosophy; Schema (genetic algorithms); Bridging (networking); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07036387366470705,"score_gpt":0.2854273922296006,"score_spread":0.21506351856489359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792832214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019530907,0.00013781527,0.0002833311,0.68865454,0.00026746315,0.00036338362,0.00010643027,0.00024459566,0.29041153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95236677,0.000010919019,0.00030885453,0.04338256,0.00338224,0.000119339216,0.000028657145,0.00004102734,0.00035963955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983027,0.00019355405,0.00033272468,0.00039104387,0.0004069589,0.00037302342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795204,0.00047317875,0.000097890996,0.00055726874,0.0006207209,0.00029886953],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004675252,0.00026095525,0.00024699658,0.00007594584,0.0015807461,0.00033071986,0.00041381884,0.00012129347,0.0008881374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034796578,0.00016132536,0.00011376907,0.00014357684,0.008846848,0.00028289613,0.000105702726,0.00076678797,0.00039839873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001672812,0.0000894332,0.000009744134,0.000024260571,0.000056610963,0.00000934308,0.002918161,7.574545e-7,0.0001684879,0.9943235,0.0023522577,0.000030719042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023869827,0.00018869915,0.000015581374,0.00009721957,0.00006604567,0.000022789101,0.00029790716,0.00009842401,0.00041244912,0.892029,0.1062864,0.0002468157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010200513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007307974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9328359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022920847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016336654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796585665","doi":"10.1515/kant-2018-0003","title":"Pleasure and Purpose in Kant’s Theory of Taste","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kant-Studien","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Pleasure principle; Transcendental number; Taste; Epistemology; Transcendental idealism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Transcendental philosophy; Order (exchange); Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.058980207747529295,"score_gpt":0.24672405959694302,"score_spread":0.18774385184941372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796585665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6918251,0.0015300611,0.00001053636,0.0015418854,0.00046315716,0.00022140842,0.00006439247,0.000037600632,0.30430588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984306,0.000078607816,0.000009273938,0.00041448209,0.00048795078,0.000008887636,0.0000015948029,0.000013181061,0.0005553958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991339,0.00010287179,0.00021902724,0.00019323915,0.00014771198,0.00020324583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944305,0.00014523136,0.00006915024,0.00017612819,0.00011695282,0.000049496382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007173435,0.00011969905,0.00023702871,0.00008051593,0.0001752798,0.00002697442,0.00012972494,0.000056875317,0.00031161762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013215597,0.00009093428,0.000041500505,0.000037116268,0.0011704953,0.00008391621,0.00012907492,0.00019374561,0.000046838537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007203555,0.00006793999,0.00039335038,0.00004538905,0.00003131975,0.0000069023567,0.025029948,1.4126526e-7,0.00009605776,0.971756,0.00007621811,0.0024246862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051956775,0.00022591157,0.0018937525,0.00013257588,0.000023309849,0.0000021584142,0.002211894,0.00001854277,0.00009793338,0.9662916,0.028427232,0.00015550968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000087364744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011922605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30660555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010216706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020382651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43127388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801353767","doi":"10.3366/jsp.2018.0194","title":"The Sensation/Perception Distinction in Reid and Schopenhauer","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scottish Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Perception; Sensation; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Irrational number; Apostle; Epistemology; Subject (documents); German; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.030199009122999748,"score_gpt":0.25273217632240397,"score_spread":0.22253316719940422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801353767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7520807,0.00055217405,0.00005774474,0.04433943,0.0019829678,0.00015843015,0.000007259577,0.000017275508,0.20080404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942125,0.00022708447,0.00003727185,0.00067542976,0.0046916604,0.0000013494036,7.604681e-7,0.000010296751,0.00014362791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990449,0.00010311207,0.00038807245,0.00009735527,0.0002454957,0.000121069395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910676,0.00015537076,0.00023454065,0.00010480288,0.0003355421,0.000062973566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010140853,0.00008641949,0.00013574597,0.000102468126,0.00043406204,0.0002115911,0.000121163386,0.000052285577,0.00023444288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018624766,0.00005622161,0.000055302822,0.000046790356,0.0007254434,0.00039966684,0.000034101085,0.00038703074,0.000041329506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001374387,0.000042515443,0.000151073,0.000010981158,0.000020659507,0.000008053831,0.003128324,7.444343e-7,0.00022840548,0.9889954,0.00039584062,0.0068805935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037344382,0.00025759774,0.0026928487,0.00011312966,0.00001320992,0.00003351516,0.00035039673,0.00004483291,0.000018537716,0.9661079,0.029914556,0.00008000623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020585594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014849225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24213183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036699323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029191076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33384982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809014969","doi":"10.3138/uram.32.1.90","title":"John Woolman and his Ultimate Reality and Meaning","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07036242419149191,"score_gpt":0.28731366118115115,"score_spread":0.21695123698965924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809014969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22636774,0.0011184305,0.00017406752,0.012794063,0.00026831683,0.00041109696,0.00019078865,0.00042208825,0.7582534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967397,0.001132443,0.00025945387,0.0013051516,0.00031925304,0.000004805776,0.000033817447,0.000021860787,0.00018354351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982567,0.00014828365,0.00041180575,0.0005038769,0.00024231106,0.00043704096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989831,0.0002330832,0.00015872791,0.00025683767,0.00010428176,0.00026396025],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012908407,0.0002985041,0.00044415696,0.00008700518,0.0009973223,0.00040930015,0.00010927567,0.00014590194,0.00009082584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016777097,0.00025765348,0.00005970952,0.000039980143,0.0005604816,0.00039633032,0.0001083374,0.00044724214,0.000005741732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006152204,0.000042521664,0.000054053402,0.00014640378,0.000033980425,0.000016774688,0.018089825,0.0000035544508,0.00035374798,0.9642582,0.00008109671,0.016858304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076375797,0.00014913577,0.0014342297,0.00025314148,0.00008784778,0.00003432705,0.0011255357,0.002479133,0.00015204352,0.97194755,0.021111513,0.00046178006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011835705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005892003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7703719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029133518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001966655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809451080","doi":"10.3138/uram.35.1-2.7","title":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning With Respect to the Challenges of Our Time: Some Practical Proposals","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology","score_opus":0.13035443515210338,"score_gpt":0.3362546656986274,"score_spread":0.205900230546524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809451080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1671563,0.0031742197,0.00025210992,0.17260794,0.0005525788,0.0019247165,0.00040268243,0.00045559424,0.65347385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978752,0.00044797626,0.00050656113,0.00042687147,0.000610004,0.000017497483,0.0000069160064,0.000028183718,0.000080769016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819374,0.00034141153,0.0003542503,0.0003148676,0.0003500701,0.00044564452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867666,0.0004228482,0.0001907419,0.00032308555,0.0001503895,0.00023627518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031045482,0.00023358074,0.0004063931,0.00005894597,0.00055217627,0.00013575342,0.00012144259,0.00009590051,0.00003280657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004146145,0.00014113476,0.00004784659,0.00003848787,0.0003445883,0.000487684,0.00015943332,0.00039736586,0.000016997552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019753246,0.000089386696,0.000022745313,0.0002255416,0.00007650886,0.0000049095006,0.038634412,0.000004891541,0.00029221067,0.9587155,0.00007339155,0.0016629782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012288835,0.0006643292,0.0011244928,0.0009312633,0.00033574094,0.0001395716,0.019053007,0.0013517578,0.0013402981,0.94709986,0.02585493,0.0008758403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040536985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031920982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83071893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002279552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039429808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5755309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809599947","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11222","title":"Immanuel Kant's Response to David Hume's Regarding Cause and Effect","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Feeling; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Relation (database); Connection (principal bundle); Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024359003033581145,"score_gpt":0.28489650301472474,"score_spread":0.2605374999811436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809599947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48533985,0.00023884472,0.0000022810373,0.002240922,0.0011653795,0.00033829323,0.00006797054,0.00010643073,0.5105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85839045,0.00004710002,0.0000048396773,0.00058100984,0.00080053625,0.00004559388,0.00006428184,0.00005373141,0.14001246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985953,0.0002305218,0.0002510793,0.0004080567,0.00025221249,0.00026281836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983388,0.0009672959,0.00009072855,0.00030884828,0.00013011441,0.00016417787],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010255394,0.0003045293,0.00038004972,0.00021650067,0.00043558885,0.00028452007,0.00017388491,0.00023700554,0.0011454567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046598195,0.00019837561,0.00011339598,0.000020800937,0.000119905126,0.00013132553,0.0000516975,0.00037130364,0.00029412756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002929535,0.0000159213,0.0000044463477,0.00018004233,0.00010779306,0.00003323082,0.011259979,3.0717565e-8,0.0022040259,0.97955763,0.0005884835,0.003118876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012042354,0.00091164804,0.0004366314,0.0014568996,0.00024250179,0.000006271989,0.0013877406,0.0000017769369,0.0029775565,0.7045666,0.28569922,0.0011089263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011209107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008223942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3730506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003134424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004751548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2827986377","doi":"10.1017/s0012217318000409","title":"What Matters in Love: Reflections on the Relationship between Love and Persons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Philosophy; Branching (polymer chemistry); Epistemology; Philosophy of love; Relation (database); Replication (statistics); Aesthetics; Computer science; Chemistry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19674674247962973,"score_gpt":0.3330749269143776,"score_spread":0.1363281844347479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2827986377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41948402,0.000077666205,0.000012014919,0.30661404,0.0009193025,0.00019259578,0.00007437884,0.00002679941,0.2725992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912059,0.00001012661,0.0000025494521,0.0066399695,0.0010161833,0.0000027978108,0.000010196241,0.0000092121745,0.0011031143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994772,0.00009822464,0.00009933885,0.00012529794,0.000079193225,0.00012075489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862415,0.0011551109,0.000028034052,0.00013450488,0.000023756953,0.0000344214],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029875198,0.00007133392,0.00007737726,0.00006675402,0.00018746697,0.00018631722,0.00007465743,0.000054180135,0.00042067593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015086825,0.000049066668,0.000028059518,0.000038376667,0.00059916533,0.00015609193,0.000024336141,0.00029976244,0.0008739284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006408808,0.000012723534,0.0009023065,0.0000031165557,0.00000646521,6.8335936e-7,0.061629966,1.5079127e-7,0.0000036592207,0.9364874,0.00089445506,0.000052661024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010988315,0.00006858778,0.009888497,0.000055986486,0.000008916636,4.304567e-7,0.0060033645,0.0000041125395,0.000008331743,0.9565167,0.027252702,0.00008247607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121193385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018446627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57172185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001761232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012599353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2862073006","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-94028-1_2","title":"Our Agenda and Its Rationality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Management science; Law","score_opus":0.19682020457653707,"score_gpt":0.29822098594256186,"score_spread":0.10140078136602479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2862073006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024851708,0.0003124509,0.000002716222,0.0044119456,0.00033629045,0.00007559812,0.00012424066,0.000039666946,0.99467224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14405398,0.00007878507,0.000004016038,0.0023828195,0.00248424,0.0000017601286,0.000033970664,0.000018948675,0.8509415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994206,0.000009226495,0.00014753416,0.00018989321,0.0001525451,0.0000801999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995771,0.000038539165,0.00005925794,0.00011502072,0.00015942985,0.000050632567],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018115423,0.00014658789,0.00015822264,0.00003435248,0.00018912122,0.00009449615,0.00007347989,0.00014738353,0.028087478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016305965,0.00011277148,0.000060105445,0.0000010226485,0.00015649752,0.000055759203,0.00006500836,0.00024140671,0.0010099486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045770093,0.000003904939,1.7932841e-8,0.000024571502,0.000034241646,0.00000251418,0.0007924475,5.0975966e-9,7.807592e-7,0.99357146,0.0054493574,0.00011612836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003182362,0.000015566844,2.0545161e-7,0.00001544131,0.00001004819,5.947546e-7,0.00001789301,0.0000027248152,0.0000016281845,0.52509946,0.47472012,0.000084473424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007201254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001672977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46927077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008099562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032363747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885279518","doi":"10.1017/s0012217318000240","title":"Kantian Constructivism and the Normativity of Practical Identities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Constructivism (international relations); Humanity; Action (physics); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; International relations; Law; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.04018100168292523,"score_gpt":0.2690467258053985,"score_spread":0.22886572412247327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885279518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35632208,0.00009860565,0.0001781033,0.008918264,0.0008051023,0.00014170207,0.00007310406,0.000029261251,0.63343376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998817,0.00001918832,0.000020461022,0.00048440203,0.0005606478,0.0000031505874,0.0000024716398,0.000004156701,0.00008851374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949944,0.00012345728,0.00012281314,0.000069302776,0.00010168353,0.00008330079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992003,0.0005054851,0.00006747862,0.00010881489,0.000093833056,0.000024094485],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004687141,0.000055484707,0.00012897291,0.000022869148,0.0002206432,0.00006743151,0.000059919406,0.000030503643,0.0002703826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024105141,0.000033031643,0.000035265977,0.000012143653,0.0058525577,0.00014966996,0.00005830501,0.0001352216,0.000028349095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004003136,0.000014853212,0.000022829629,0.00001229113,0.000021478025,9.288004e-7,0.014568702,8.419419e-9,0.0000138510895,0.9849209,0.00012588319,0.0002582521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036472816,0.000037275535,0.000120981436,0.000010788645,0.000018647848,0.000006135385,0.0006824608,0.00003357636,0.0001501795,0.9917391,0.006787407,0.000048708596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018722129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036130674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6424949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000020801874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022308364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99685293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886036496","doi":"10.1017/s0012217318000252","title":"Le quasi-réalisme et l’argument de la coïncidence","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Humanities; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03181257243458541,"score_gpt":0.29208465269724687,"score_spread":0.26027208026266146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886036496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022838295,0.003985837,0.0006909491,0.09691009,0.00263709,0.00016911956,0.0003453612,0.00008596716,0.8723373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98126316,0.0007204378,0.000075261756,0.00883132,0.00393527,0.000016303065,0.000030784653,0.00003167867,0.0050957818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822706,0.00064350374,0.00024382929,0.00026528258,0.0002073294,0.00041301176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986113,0.000713224,0.00008459813,0.0002796226,0.00013528607,0.00017597503],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015896498,0.0001878234,0.0002154618,0.000049148068,0.00058646296,0.00030322507,0.0002648331,0.0002488181,0.0013480589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027164211,0.00019052338,0.00012112349,0.00003744791,0.0031393017,0.00019588198,0.00011996722,0.00052170205,0.000983473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026350162,0.0003419095,0.000026962323,0.00004490588,0.00004135874,0.000045037417,0.016426101,0.0000016381498,0.00007383661,0.97898924,0.0031379464,0.0008446878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018590206,0.00016710571,0.00008328205,0.00008405355,0.000018476674,0.000008304947,0.0002243744,0.00007978409,0.00011751935,0.5498046,0.44908372,0.00014287025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006056487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002682789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95842487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005407329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042279813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887175813","doi":"10.1017/s001221731800029x","title":"L’avenir contextualiste du constructivisme métaéthique : le constructivisme humien amendé","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.03193213242827988,"score_gpt":0.24442732165069864,"score_spread":0.21249518922241875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887175813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06878637,0.0025102021,0.00092848187,0.054777034,0.011732149,0.0006531368,0.002226706,0.00027161618,0.8581143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97883004,0.0002562632,0.00010710681,0.004306294,0.010554937,0.0000381715,0.00010582578,0.00009671263,0.0057046693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996519,0.00068150496,0.00074031536,0.00076319854,0.00038891603,0.00090706086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680555,0.0010932056,0.00036452193,0.00061616424,0.0007288239,0.00039171605],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009885633,0.00058146496,0.00080346473,0.0001748984,0.0015458446,0.0004805034,0.0005101054,0.0005798346,0.0028812645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005497729,0.000593837,0.00035055258,0.00011413523,0.02082929,0.00053247204,0.00027751556,0.0010769351,0.0011749584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011507233,0.00024744595,0.000081544684,0.000105558145,0.00019587665,0.0000921338,0.011269237,5.4617215e-7,0.00022645012,0.98062474,0.0020561116,0.004985304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000993377,0.00031012183,0.00004601026,0.00017005441,0.000070520044,0.00011843591,0.0011535918,0.00007283379,0.00046514932,0.6102453,0.38584936,0.00050523336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036981148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019731945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91004366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016797408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006709425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892779792","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12402","title":"Subjectivism, instrumentalism, and prudentialism about reasons: On the normativity of instrumental transmission","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Subjectivism; Epistemology; Normative; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03679851788301667,"score_gpt":0.23511054665569092,"score_spread":0.19831202877267426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892779792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6941592,0.0001728271,0.000043660777,0.008682597,0.000489952,0.00008501825,0.000036698533,0.000011307579,0.29631874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970345,0.00009235408,0.000045804096,0.0011379629,0.0016178774,3.854696e-7,0.0000015342561,0.000025409794,0.00004417061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981875,0.00067348237,0.00048075896,0.00012572964,0.00039747788,0.00013506981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989208,0.00014162442,0.00044541335,0.00017810336,0.00020689625,0.0001071574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012570493,0.00015898742,0.0002259549,0.000103281935,0.00033761805,0.000095212316,0.00027838052,0.000024215004,0.00045225426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006471292,0.000097844604,0.00014486985,0.000046927584,0.001174055,0.00026141797,0.00007635208,0.00043806175,0.000030260368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024313148,0.00018782847,0.000014289638,0.00003432405,0.000092398266,0.0000477987,0.014180418,2.1843172e-7,0.0012493146,0.9764915,0.000162427,0.0072963377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015710841,0.002050328,0.00087868545,0.0008370852,0.000086593835,0.00018677747,0.0007024483,0.000014115807,0.01031702,0.93587303,0.047232676,0.00025014897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000052179644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029429762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3028753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016783144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034820263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49518672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893543469","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12387","title":"<i>Kant's Modal Metaphysics</i>: A reply to my critics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Modal; Citation; Philosophy of language; Theology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.056446340594814695,"score_gpt":0.258715153573243,"score_spread":0.2022688129784283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893543469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031973515,0.00020968512,0.0007638404,0.042106874,0.002219593,0.000110729125,0.000044956872,0.000054569322,0.9225162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95995593,0.00001220074,0.00047761842,0.020721545,0.018512402,5.3546336e-7,0.0000012672741,0.00006145773,0.00025705373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979922,0.0003960888,0.0006537843,0.0002091791,0.00047034657,0.00027840273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800676,0.0001146297,0.0002949684,0.0003462159,0.0009091317,0.0003282815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014389986,0.00021497702,0.00033653344,0.0002090441,0.00033960352,0.00020494989,0.000591627,0.000018919078,0.0005385716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025187814,0.00017126874,0.00028678615,0.00008637217,0.0006618759,0.00030644436,0.00014110148,0.00053922477,0.00084896316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012754613,0.00012914835,0.0000014475938,0.000017100285,0.00010289061,0.00019744136,0.008765705,0.0000033398894,0.0005492758,0.9855329,0.0034866983,0.0010865346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003594666,0.0010840761,0.000014260882,0.00010628273,0.00005450368,0.00003114062,0.00012954998,0.000007497844,0.00029069002,0.6626143,0.33512485,0.00018336244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000037408947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001768726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9279824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019761877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050488023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902967975","doi":"10.5206/ls.2018.5448","title":"Review of Thomas Reid and the Problem of Secondary Qualities by Andrew Shrock","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Locke Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; History","score_opus":0.05961691198521518,"score_gpt":0.30949368279989325,"score_spread":0.24987677081467807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902967975","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005339855,0.6522336,0.0000019877336,0.012946951,0.00012903353,0.00030290804,0.00012791122,0.000020340833,0.3288974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.858561,0.13477573,0.000030958505,0.0037942526,0.00037254696,0.000027538084,0.0000038022408,0.000012099411,0.002422107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991416,0.00014469816,0.0003522234,0.00011842357,0.00013587634,0.000107201726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988937,0.00044375748,0.00017186886,0.00015142215,0.0003211553,0.0000181152],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007944592,0.0001077465,0.0004456806,0.000018151793,0.000249134,0.000011941144,0.00011013831,0.000024866511,0.00017186008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119145436,0.000058015587,0.0000707534,0.000025012034,0.0040191473,0.00005612024,0.00013233774,0.00012641714,0.0000030867786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039734103,0.00001730537,0.0000027949304,0.004847511,0.00017502486,1.4025954e-7,0.031465188,2.348667e-9,0.000010958675,0.9443071,0.01798248,0.0011517575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036263835,0.00014142838,0.0000023686184,0.002356514,0.00006546316,8.7123044e-7,0.005761389,4.3896375e-7,0.00023119959,0.65639764,0.3346054,0.0000746629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006945467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012772657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8532211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000038857092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023387085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905452376","doi":"10.1007/s10790-018-9676-3","title":"Virtues for the Imperfect","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12781243362665953,"score_gpt":0.33010624114839343,"score_spread":0.2022938075217339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905452376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7840131,0.009511088,0.010921821,0.11301769,0.02197682,0.0007975092,0.000042434112,0.00006574047,0.059653796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833154,0.00013487577,0.000019093075,0.0025640274,0.013721488,0.0000016442157,1.4392754e-7,0.000012463455,0.00023086327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992492,0.00014125345,0.00024084559,0.00004188947,0.00019560159,0.00013118035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777687,0.0014931503,0.00019399292,0.00017902424,0.000321707,0.00003525371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025583762,0.00007724821,0.00012317298,0.000031603227,0.00062453357,0.00007708325,0.00043970195,0.000031552136,0.00026460996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024747255,0.00003138401,0.00014652747,0.000018458677,0.0012242049,0.00010731947,0.000043876185,0.00027986505,0.000026381415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019904859,0.000023879487,0.0000010461993,0.0000063721086,0.00009817809,8.166379e-7,0.03564697,0.000013457588,0.00027257632,0.9584953,0.0030595912,0.0021827265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024107363,0.00061610644,0.000021533071,0.000035476074,0.00010628703,0.000026623436,0.0026078795,0.00017510474,0.00045004155,0.8507376,0.14492564,0.000056684654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000146727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014011217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1993023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011945382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004773285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48034704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905697073","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/10877.001.0001","title":"The Dash—The Other Side of Absolute Knowing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"The MIT Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dash; Absolute (philosophy); Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08568161660758085,"score_gpt":0.2596792442235722,"score_spread":0.17399762761599136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905697073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023089304,0.0025306016,0.0000043841364,0.0011333454,0.00080826576,0.0003977668,0.00010279749,0.00004622443,0.9949535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016096825,0.000059705435,0.0000015815183,0.0011316686,0.0042575193,0.00004537057,0.0000036636334,0.00008353209,0.9783201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839675,0.00025157392,0.00040928746,0.00022774482,0.00040443844,0.00031020984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682444,0.0014952283,0.00034090306,0.0011184918,0.00017896925,0.000041980347],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013248198,0.00029409025,0.00030833218,0.000024754692,0.0011693957,0.000249601,0.001414642,0.00018690497,0.00021827302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062144594,0.00012398137,0.00029032936,0.0000028978875,0.0036985213,0.00002791966,0.00038392885,0.00090503605,0.000093799266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033769087,0.000006549564,4.307272e-9,0.000043917797,0.0002695154,0.0000012598632,0.011517435,5.476224e-7,0.000008071003,0.97357005,0.012190939,0.0023579143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057090543,0.000022172102,1.3459949e-7,0.000120326345,0.00009278478,7.720224e-7,0.00004468318,0.000009001591,0.000036661444,0.47707424,0.52244663,0.000095472446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034501142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083263294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5102557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024440164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012423022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908572182","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12428","title":"Freedom immediately after Kant","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Action (physics); Philosophy; Transcendental number; Moral philosophy; Practical reason; Key (lock); Natural (archaeology); Natural law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.026664205756671226,"score_gpt":0.20767946402723214,"score_spread":0.18101525827056092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908572182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22824554,0.00080938666,0.000019037492,0.007676559,0.002928148,0.00008114133,0.000023406423,0.00002421466,0.7601926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906451,0.000040678286,0.000057045523,0.0018908982,0.006827006,4.224874e-7,0.0000014993384,0.00004678206,0.0004905465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846095,0.0002929564,0.0005320815,0.00014035901,0.0003734575,0.00020019246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989148,0.00009827598,0.00033021957,0.00023339131,0.00025632995,0.00016699129],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010986034,0.00016739026,0.00027060354,0.0001555453,0.00007866164,0.0001162901,0.0003927213,0.000023117484,0.0036734473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055496534,0.00012140748,0.0002635199,0.000031680884,0.0002700342,0.00027401347,0.000084448526,0.00060792605,0.0023787108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002423367,0.000107270505,0.00006306989,0.00003518613,0.000086739805,0.00048187576,0.004798646,0.000009714763,0.00020104088,0.9929252,0.00040897014,0.00063993543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011879654,0.00081647746,0.0005276129,0.00021511417,0.000044634053,0.00005389919,0.00015661279,0.000010945768,0.000035054843,0.7669786,0.22969896,0.00027412636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000014677377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.387854e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76239955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016337326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032709726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99839807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921409978","doi":"10.1007/s11406-019-00065-9","title":"Free Will, Values, and Narrative Selfhood","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Teleology; Luck; Epistemology; Philosophy; Narrative; Intelligibility (philosophy); Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of language; Value (mathematics); Philosophy of science; Articulation (sociology); Rebuttal; Law; Metaphysics; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.027135049208406887,"score_gpt":0.23604025089471273,"score_spread":0.20890520168630583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921409978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28309837,0.0009495786,0.0000034290347,0.05242414,0.0010063826,0.00034635345,0.00012125656,0.00018648236,0.66186404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944829,0.000044106964,0.000027618415,0.0024517286,0.0015390262,0.000011486669,0.00001135096,0.00003076958,0.0014010123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989322,0.000067427245,0.0001988684,0.00032465457,0.00024552888,0.00023132018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914557,0.00014279495,0.00007175714,0.0004169972,0.00010304312,0.00011984739],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024955926,0.00019414071,0.00024402075,0.000073959294,0.00033431972,0.00012536981,0.00025707606,0.000082182836,0.0026190486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006734518,0.00015985646,0.00007089764,0.000030484136,0.00040668758,0.00035150725,0.00016692885,0.00034593052,0.00027231633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024412891,0.000049712904,0.00003454676,0.00003255486,0.000046913523,0.000004059462,0.02056178,6.786715e-7,0.00006412346,0.9786449,0.00039767486,0.00013863607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055597106,0.00015794953,0.00005336164,0.000035291443,0.000018545223,0.0000039949073,0.0008471183,0.000051682167,0.000024542418,0.9680015,0.030021278,0.00022880216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003061695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016332748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71138453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017004862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002809198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2931166311","doi":"10.32396/usurj.v5i1.353","title":"Kant's Account of Our Moral Obligations Concerning Animals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.10206512423185732,"score_gpt":0.3044718320228958,"score_spread":0.20240670779103848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2931166311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91616666,0.00020081345,0.00009724529,0.018595895,0.0002808293,0.00021646457,0.00008636817,0.000024326153,0.06433137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99617904,0.00019701834,0.00012274856,0.000025192261,0.00021470008,8.5282295e-8,0.0000047978588,0.0000147325,0.0032416782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775064,0.00038617104,0.0002866615,0.00019170162,0.0009836655,0.00040115236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997657,0.00030513376,0.00027770468,0.00022588055,0.0013352305,0.00019907621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020992896,0.00012507045,0.0003326252,0.00039945202,0.0006524214,0.00011036991,0.0005489792,0.00009004201,0.00067492906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007982809,0.00012296924,0.00020360148,0.00015699913,0.0008023024,0.0003846769,0.00019307673,0.001129603,0.000098955155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023621133,0.00015192837,0.0014367135,0.00012283296,0.00024326185,0.000052461444,0.038768977,0.00011071219,0.0040441,0.9535305,0.00060262665,0.0006996596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011260181,0.0004255551,0.00036534294,0.00028552336,0.00003313785,0.000017690678,0.18602881,0.00021001785,0.00047577158,0.80058676,0.010257381,0.00018798508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014360354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001098075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15294375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011531712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007341928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73899996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936382497","doi":"10.1017/9781787443938.009","title":"Herder's Kantian Critique of Kant on the Concept of Being","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Humanities","score_opus":0.052678538162389967,"score_gpt":0.25594858225400574,"score_spread":0.20327004409161578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936382497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013658765,0.00013471267,0.000008294036,0.0044881925,0.00025517363,0.00013409622,0.00009917739,0.000018980587,0.9947248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7355924,0.000049378657,0.000005384873,0.0025033983,0.00079778465,0.00000200679,0.000008705537,0.00003222738,0.2610087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903864,0.00003428655,0.00037599466,0.00017083171,0.00026453706,0.00011574165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986537,0.00047521817,0.00021379646,0.0003459005,0.00027739606,0.000033993343],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032793763,0.0001939272,0.00035666733,0.00005817408,0.00012644735,0.00002672912,0.0002604459,0.00018980204,0.0357005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048000198,0.0001137411,0.00020403015,0.000003368668,0.0018940044,0.000027189457,0.00007074706,0.00042663646,0.000078448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012699782,0.000016841797,2.3392207e-8,0.00004244451,0.00009148945,0.0000022921263,0.0060880133,8.410852e-8,0.000008993579,0.99187946,0.001695084,0.00016254117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053674736,0.00015103401,9.6386444e-8,0.00036011904,0.000027394562,3.6307634e-7,0.0002665142,0.0000018203388,0.00046694465,0.75143033,0.24713315,0.00010856377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009051101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020060044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7354558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000073876504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047640693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.965181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944936984","doi":"","title":"Kant's intuicionism : a commentary of the trascendental aesthestetic. Toronto: Buffalo, 1995","year":2001,"lang":"ca","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Universidad de Buenos Aires)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.010308675116251036,"score_gpt":0.24249363773270097,"score_spread":0.23218496261644994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944936984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5886319,0.0038027205,0.00014309838,0.015986197,0.0022683614,0.00094073766,0.0010174621,0.00027462858,0.38693485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900389,0.001799073,0.00008109888,0.0013545897,0.001556685,0.000008727209,0.000092641734,0.00013467303,0.0049336655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943763,0.0007434578,0.0009646673,0.0010522532,0.0014477558,0.0014155791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560785,0.0010881398,0.000818212,0.0011684226,0.000449531,0.0008678564],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057004124,0.00096834946,0.0009741712,0.00050734216,0.0027712632,0.002315198,0.0020871982,0.0010010581,0.00059940194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017657584,0.0010037919,0.0012638561,0.00048211956,0.0041298373,0.0022820993,0.0009978655,0.0017025693,0.00005829748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00144371,0.0018951158,0.0020243337,0.00026413577,0.00097394775,0.004144017,0.016064253,0.00032603726,0.00074426737,0.95921373,0.008095349,0.0048111244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004938424,0.0012623573,0.0061229775,0.0023638257,0.0010603936,0.0029287743,0.024830138,0.0007931356,0.00045178965,0.093931876,0.8593685,0.0019477833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040706925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007951529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8652818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052864314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022609518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945517855","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000116","title":"Kelly Sorensen and Diane Williamson (eds), Kant and the Faculty of Feeling Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018 Pp. x + 276 ISBN: 9781107178229 (hbk) £75.00","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Sociology; Philosophy; Media studies; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.028090104898230467,"score_gpt":0.23138191954478735,"score_spread":0.20329181464655688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945517855","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085830644,0.7545147,0.000011975896,0.018623548,0.0006757746,0.0018859621,0.0008294598,0.0000887756,0.13753915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6377993,0.35469404,0.000018639339,0.0011903304,0.00022032627,0.0000029191501,0.00004023067,0.000024924371,0.006009262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852186,0.00024942134,0.00036087245,0.0003522852,0.00025040982,0.00026512425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988474,0.00022189587,0.0002591776,0.00041366013,0.00014332612,0.00011450085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084978034,0.0002464043,0.00067134213,0.000028748858,0.00027631051,0.000081747705,0.0002657048,0.000088131106,0.000121286794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007836402,0.00016119095,0.0001630152,0.000043084674,0.0009884686,0.00018156145,0.00020009921,0.00036293856,0.000043620003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059295504,0.000032054933,0.00008255171,0.0028962048,0.00010071693,0.0000113167325,0.00058731966,4.409041e-7,0.000026700485,0.9850714,0.008417392,0.002714594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009958618,0.000070104266,0.00041277526,0.0026977884,0.00028567083,0.000016013153,0.00015427152,0.00008905287,0.00003455379,0.0018321532,0.993123,0.00028878654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084129616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041295243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98470557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013693144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044475808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6573176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946229664","doi":"10.1007/s11406-019-00082-8","title":"The Worthwhileness of Meaningful Lives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiology; Meaning of life; Epistemology; Value of life; Meaning (existential); Philosophy of science; Philosophy of life; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Appeal; Meaningful life; Purpose in life; Sociology; Psychology; Metaphysics; Social psychology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02763919289767929,"score_gpt":0.2204990472417316,"score_spread":0.1928598543440523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946229664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1856034,0.0010058249,0.0000025832226,0.012200835,0.0012308022,0.00021755858,0.000024323681,0.00006515486,0.79964954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976459,0.000077102224,0.0000056058702,0.00046407836,0.00088200433,0.000009168928,0.0000037460388,0.000020588705,0.0008917841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904174,0.000062535175,0.00025948725,0.00017566202,0.00026398574,0.00019658035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885,0.000422477,0.00012775848,0.000399139,0.00014976482,0.00005087328],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003997209,0.00012696101,0.00018884958,0.000043109227,0.00028012728,0.00007282953,0.00036510345,0.000037611117,0.0010061315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006228577,0.00007955344,0.00011970982,0.000035782843,0.00053657114,0.000113954346,0.000092168906,0.00023350392,0.00040575903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035738576,0.000035441848,0.00007620458,0.000028839822,0.000039232982,0.0000011253287,0.003588349,0.0000034847344,0.00009662806,0.99552214,0.00003134464,0.00054146437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001659116,0.00007390588,0.00006427484,0.000039344253,0.000012369,9.844105e-7,0.00036571833,0.00003601949,0.00014654055,0.9412033,0.057778474,0.000113142276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029193727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039870178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81204253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000086834125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031304815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947926545","doi":"","title":"Behaviourism and Governance: A World Bereft of Freedom and Politics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Student Research Proceedings","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Virtue; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Political philosophy; Government (linguistics); Spontaneous order; Law; Philosophy; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.18533653133579592,"score_gpt":0.41911509400884045,"score_spread":0.23377856267304453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947926545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73824155,0.0003163687,7.33964e-8,0.004303233,0.00007548003,0.00017978209,0.00002548826,0.000011108143,0.2568469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99196535,0.0003427447,0.000018016728,0.000038755425,0.0006813067,0.000020356896,5.5439864e-7,0.000013703696,0.0069191963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998562,0.000013410335,0.00017067196,0.00023118823,0.0006887322,0.0003340234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989806,0.000101088175,0.0001082414,0.00015577568,0.0005088074,0.00014551889],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011302395,0.000101612786,0.0001812283,0.00008973411,0.0011947439,0.00066005165,0.00039373315,0.000047194255,0.00012062938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002742953,0.000082491,0.000028769779,0.000019572733,0.0027458759,0.00026559623,0.00073804136,0.0005480059,0.000004339086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117694635,0.00007277615,0.008146275,0.000099078556,0.00002122414,0.000003640852,0.011266314,4.0873642e-9,0.000086515,0.97940034,0.0006169895,0.00027508993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006326868,0.00026489986,0.061691895,0.00023880329,0.00001960299,0.0000023613952,0.0022690014,0.000011277545,0.000108378175,0.8857771,0.048821215,0.00016278542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094488723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036376077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2537238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022358261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030359926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950980940","doi":"10.33137/pbsc.v41i1.18309","title":"&lt;i&gt;Eric Gill in Ditchling: Four Essays&lt;/i&gt;, Peter Holliday, ed.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papers of The Bibliographical Society of Canada","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Holliday junction; Art; Philosophy; Law and economics; Biology; Sociology; Genetics; Gene; Homologous recombination","score_opus":0.02022008881694207,"score_gpt":0.20462027624373208,"score_spread":0.18440018742679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950980940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3136302,0.0043218387,0.000008007803,0.021568906,0.0016182691,0.0005802901,0.0002505942,0.00005619583,0.6579657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954008,0.0015060696,0.000084861735,0.0023519844,0.00014707311,0.000014044427,0.0000029236157,0.00003095876,0.00046132418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741286,0.00020347537,0.00056220585,0.00032227754,0.0009776956,0.0005214589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998326,0.00053172273,0.00026465717,0.00047432637,0.00020526217,0.00019804566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009532022,0.00027269198,0.00047091485,0.0004922984,0.00036761072,0.000055652414,0.0006304803,0.00019168723,0.0006579983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019148241,0.00019638297,0.0008087896,0.0021909468,0.0013275304,0.00010084963,0.00011277858,0.0005636632,9.2863485e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029687284,0.00015582885,0.0007515931,0.0001491909,0.00021934567,0.000004058436,0.0010649452,0.000042910528,0.0024253244,0.97270423,0.022343073,0.00010979076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091693725,0.00009406079,0.0057204966,0.00018608288,0.00008430652,0.0000036219199,0.00040182826,0.000071790026,0.00028324497,0.35385385,0.6378999,0.00048393654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016396953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1956282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68177056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047010137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036129422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99015296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952631439","doi":"10.22215/etd/2018-13360","title":"Humean Scepticism as an Alternative in the Moral Realism and Moral Anti-Realism Debate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Philosophical realism; Moral realism; Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Metaphysics; Moral psychology; Direct and indirect realism","score_opus":0.07371126228041468,"score_gpt":0.3170866873153614,"score_spread":0.2433754250349467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952631439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5065493,0.000077647375,6.4592723e-7,0.0011232016,0.0006063932,0.00023976069,0.00006855574,0.00003905818,0.49129546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98699766,0.00014598141,0.000016929656,0.0025560963,0.0018039373,0.000031626998,0.0010630054,0.000050414914,0.007334348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998193,0.00023964867,0.00037470515,0.00045934378,0.00041526512,0.00031802672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990225,0.000121068646,0.00017998334,0.00036926716,0.00020810502,0.00009908545],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006989742,0.00035670714,0.00038776547,0.00018241233,0.00042295002,0.0004855049,0.00046169368,0.0002651762,0.0011207009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000556536,0.00023020603,0.00009092695,0.00003929303,0.0006025676,0.00027420372,0.00003922427,0.0007380328,0.00006709482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005346692,0.00007449187,0.0000044016447,0.000035537487,0.000032890803,0.00004122765,0.10848237,3.035088e-7,0.000008598556,0.89025486,0.00026440926,0.00074742985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034606905,0.00023885732,0.00041531463,0.00011747974,0.000050977404,0.0000061493233,0.014778346,0.00014697472,0.000048472757,0.9784566,0.0050486815,0.0003460904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011955217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037134543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4839611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020111547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006098884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953210074","doi":"10.3390/genealogy3020031","title":"Artificial and Unconscious Selection in Nietzsche’s Genealogy: Expectorating the Poisoned Pill of the Lamarckian Reading","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genealogy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Conscience; Philosophy; Criticism; Darwinism; Epistemology; Reading (process); Performative utterance; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Literature","score_opus":0.023270492899490087,"score_gpt":0.2206444610579216,"score_spread":0.1973739681584315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953210074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843282,0.00020732374,0.000007692121,0.0036412633,0.0004745422,0.00020103874,0.000008938698,0.00001551554,0.011115491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871486,0.000016187572,0.000012592507,0.00070126343,0.00037752936,0.000010305228,0.000002286574,0.000012556757,0.0001524089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990117,0.00022904185,0.00026262423,0.00018213746,0.00011507242,0.0001994113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941194,0.00022767732,0.000117240925,0.00015894091,0.000059356295,0.000024829542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005144529,0.00009979406,0.00017311299,0.0000559843,0.00026326775,0.00004101206,0.00015145668,0.00008330757,0.00015790907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007248809,0.000060753482,0.00004819458,0.00006871605,0.00035588883,0.000051538394,0.00008128587,0.00029910004,0.000014433694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036474998,0.000027567741,0.0048089763,0.000024345769,0.00002153984,9.233651e-7,0.01725983,0.000054707947,0.01719394,0.9590565,0.000038999606,0.0014761824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045353454,0.00021764192,0.0071162567,0.00005300015,0.000029876213,0.000016889826,0.0045446646,0.00187951,0.0045065433,0.9738562,0.007057404,0.00026846348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006571995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0104769915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014799704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024526784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057339956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58464074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962293539","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2019.1619354","title":"Is children’s wellbeing different from adults’ wellbeing?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; York University","funders":"European Research Council; York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Psychology; Well-being; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.01732302339000507,"score_gpt":0.20149303184762307,"score_spread":0.184170008457618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962293539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109712,0.0009009915,0.0000040347063,0.013806687,0.002140808,0.00013755688,0.000312255,0.000012718518,0.071713716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057037,0.000030143872,0.000015833784,0.0047176867,0.004361198,0.0000011643872,0.000017940794,0.000042509248,0.00024316851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847716,0.00007123736,0.00051399216,0.00023321816,0.00031975546,0.00038465235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982641,0.00011267362,0.00030590137,0.00031170304,0.00023266116,0.0007730083],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019443626,0.00025313025,0.0004157007,0.00032478606,0.00028499708,0.0002163367,0.0005371089,0.00012418772,0.007915581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037466194,0.0002068322,0.00033362425,0.00004064494,0.00028706944,0.00026299467,0.000027676495,0.00078319304,0.0003595734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054541193,0.000038344777,0.007964685,0.000025443442,0.00026548418,0.000061054016,0.011063985,0.0000033302188,0.00004690583,0.9792905,0.0008165119,0.00036924437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087271776,0.00022059972,0.0048854505,0.0004195763,0.00007102511,0.00001553342,0.00019309318,0.000024258996,0.00010991069,0.9694811,0.023390692,0.0003160329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005774919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005115373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07959913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011077142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029358713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965363042","doi":"10.7710/2155-4838.1190","title":"Sympathia Aesthetica: On the Possible Significance of Intersubjective Cognitive Uniformity in the Critical-era Philosophy of Immanuel Kant","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Cognition; Epistemology; Critical philosophy; Psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.07693213321988333,"score_gpt":0.35228898701253053,"score_spread":0.2753568537926472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965363042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8358737,0.00021054468,0.000032134096,0.04680475,0.00015875221,0.0002573,0.00012127967,0.0000022356164,0.11653926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907374,0.00038134147,0.0000041146254,0.00020075183,0.00016432234,0.00001126519,0.0000018462887,0.000008943848,0.0001536423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974859,0.0007304203,0.00038254965,0.00013807973,0.0010710916,0.00019198906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99151677,0.006575989,0.00025879333,0.00011679642,0.0014867377,0.000044898483],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020908753,0.00012712303,0.00027410765,0.00033640992,0.00013644758,0.00011723745,0.00048214113,0.0000420554,0.00009316461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007663997,0.00006842428,0.00011724018,0.00009219973,0.0027735706,0.00034634274,0.000090092115,0.00097554224,0.0000036931024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013386762,0.00044833857,0.00022516576,0.00003885089,0.00020228456,0.000021273541,0.0142834755,0.00000285952,0.00032288407,0.9825981,0.000026714408,0.00049132784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005256071,0.0017578948,0.00064879475,0.0007822108,0.000013065125,0.00001594794,0.03249408,0.000033657205,0.0043334677,0.95923775,0.0000860327,0.0000714744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018025278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051468975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16320004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000632161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001767147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969367414","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12470","title":"A mereological argument for the non‐spatiotemporality of things in themselves","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Mereology; Metaphysics; Transcendental idealism; Transcendental number; Idealism","score_opus":0.05849393349855538,"score_gpt":0.2516204625390472,"score_spread":0.1931265290404918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969367414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5681201,0.00086422305,0.0004666072,0.040421423,0.001311078,0.0006144339,0.000027065615,0.000015298783,0.38815978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777424,0.00003206892,0.00011593686,0.0011677771,0.00078931253,0.0000012118852,9.709422e-7,0.000016162214,0.00010229333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865204,0.00026901992,0.00059667043,0.00010661358,0.00024754272,0.0001281042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986028,0.00047003356,0.00049603166,0.00018517114,0.00019979345,0.000046159716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027307642,0.000114189344,0.00027488807,0.00008134403,0.00007907632,0.00003774403,0.00042866642,0.000021846594,0.0002884555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012455088,0.00006254925,0.00022749063,0.00003208556,0.00030572075,0.00016619833,0.000065942375,0.00039456494,0.000024108615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021433186,0.00014471349,0.0001652073,0.000054586155,0.000064947446,0.0000111726995,0.0100677805,0.000028430333,0.00024157505,0.9883356,0.000066104345,0.0006055659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011002348,0.00080215704,0.0010105447,0.00017249846,0.000030143772,0.0000052432392,0.00046520625,0.0001351084,0.00012703339,0.9802524,0.015783262,0.00011621276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000083545965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017123383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42965418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013133586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027986836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31583855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972781377","doi":"10.5922/0207-6918-2019-1-2","title":"Types of Representational Content in Kant","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stanford Bio-X; University of Cambridge; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Sensibility; Content (measure theory); Indexicality; Object (grammar); Perception; Epistemology; Intuition; Representation (politics); Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive science; Conceptualization; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08877006854518603,"score_gpt":0.25770130450304074,"score_spread":0.1689312359578547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972781377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8330216,0.00029496677,0.000008794987,0.0028011485,0.00070632226,0.00005046034,0.000008609811,0.000004473935,0.16310363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835354,0.000027268712,0.000021663316,0.00024839825,0.00028484614,4.0952236e-7,0.0000013725647,0.000004846915,0.0010576323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994336,0.00004339983,0.00021469721,0.00006114817,0.00015669614,0.00009046548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965274,0.000059819675,0.000088438836,0.00006725244,0.00009544053,0.000036312453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032174544,0.00004385662,0.000109234534,0.00007407236,0.00004276623,0.000038829865,0.000091016824,0.00002145411,0.0049364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035155477,0.000033029988,0.0000581933,0.000014262905,0.00010274404,0.00007440403,0.000016069851,0.00023723576,0.000098009536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033114382,0.000041403207,0.0020005433,0.00001056524,0.000020891826,0.000012553364,0.0031905612,0.000029598457,0.00055301265,0.99368,0.00012343834,0.00030429353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008609456,0.00011687694,0.0053853053,0.00014470055,0.000009727013,0.000039741237,0.0017920459,0.0001579872,0.0003818835,0.97066826,0.020331379,0.00011116935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041527568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049380003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16533196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007655023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038357844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975709762","doi":"10.3998/ergo.12405314.0006.017","title":"Wolff&amp;#x2019;s Science of Teleology and Kant&amp;#x2019;s Critique","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Philosophy; Chemistry; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1268147490324613,"score_gpt":0.41675735505158934,"score_spread":0.289942606019128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975709762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85855615,0.009371669,0.00023048035,0.03167408,0.004209517,0.00054619287,0.00018565313,0.000013985822,0.09521226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874529,0.002705695,0.0017911007,0.0021485186,0.0030503361,0.0000049962437,0.000007576539,0.00007231235,0.0027665596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542236,0.00057343644,0.0015954886,0.00067617116,0.0009944577,0.0007381093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99428105,0.00064202055,0.0015927742,0.0008583828,0.0019405145,0.0006852695],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004237543,0.00051897526,0.0013286803,0.00080538966,0.00074393104,0.0021024924,0.0050226795,0.00036918162,0.005132084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055569527,0.00045250368,0.00025078264,0.00036070755,0.0056891856,0.008085178,0.0021966584,0.0016664774,0.00014980744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057937694,0.00063598953,0.0005555685,0.0004367502,0.00016885597,0.000010210873,0.0030638864,0.000036119774,0.005952002,0.9875002,0.0001622815,0.0008987462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001174223,0.0011806021,0.00043608088,0.0009798529,0.0001296395,0.00024728628,0.00018340125,0.000007315735,0.0002586248,0.89785147,0.09704537,0.0005061156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072901015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024603933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12889674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010383756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010941103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997927},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2983991409","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v7i2.235","title":"Do the Virtues Make You Happy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Flourishing; Happiness; Epistemology; Eudaimonia; Virtue ethics; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemic virtue; Philosophy; Relation (database); Ethical egoism; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029271657404241373,"score_gpt":0.24233240481612817,"score_spread":0.2130607474118868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983991409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09169049,0.00031924614,0.000010889585,0.03975667,0.0025957294,0.00071111956,0.00003237204,0.00028893293,0.8645945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97924644,0.0001488645,0.000035582525,0.009029988,0.0017857675,0.000066771114,0.00007267065,0.000072324074,0.009541575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974969,0.00017546551,0.00048499473,0.00061500364,0.0007012813,0.00052636233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980893,0.00044408074,0.00020294606,0.0008689318,0.00024285472,0.00015189519],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008721698,0.00040177032,0.0003715356,0.00013484004,0.0011655665,0.0007884586,0.0007568768,0.00014076212,0.022208622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014840644,0.00027653854,0.00025672687,0.00013744975,0.0011233505,0.00050132215,0.0001487396,0.0006827485,0.007359115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053098265,0.00007150982,0.0001078843,0.000027901722,0.00011883633,0.0000029693736,0.006802858,0.000015798143,0.00038858716,0.97541404,0.000112130445,0.01688437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042349318,0.00009762594,0.00025665635,0.00004210198,0.000053199583,0.0000062870968,0.002118188,0.00006519198,0.000036491914,0.38948902,0.6070247,0.00038697306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000092711925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018385157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88755596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094010284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010424065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989370794","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2019-0033","title":"Hegel’s <i>Phenomenology</i>: On the Logical Structure of Human Experience","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Hegelianism; Rationality; Epistemology; Perception; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.09789066430077367,"score_gpt":0.29543412268938984,"score_spread":0.19754345838861617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989370794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4324438,0.000021488324,1.4457618e-7,0.0070104813,0.00021207085,0.00028825947,0.000042549418,0.000013352699,0.5599679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941742,0.0000033731224,0.000005683238,0.004739892,0.00043930518,0.00001411809,0.000010689782,0.000017780763,0.00059494993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988873,0.00011286887,0.0002551494,0.0003033491,0.00024175111,0.00019956962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989567,0.0001910291,0.00013514816,0.00058620947,0.000077012395,0.000053892047],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017867626,0.00017149179,0.00028349512,0.00003926065,0.00035142872,0.00014116592,0.0011663884,0.000089696274,0.013658185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030339386,0.00009895027,0.000080280566,0.00004220855,0.0008233401,0.00015327873,0.0003742919,0.0004310519,0.00026514183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004773077,0.00008428327,0.000025003017,0.0000125589195,0.000023211891,0.000001914669,0.0058008065,0.0000023843968,0.002625094,0.9912622,0.0000754782,0.00003933697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026478776,0.00040030305,0.0000322164,0.00003820122,0.0000059513955,9.3600835e-7,0.000462634,0.0000035958712,0.0010007706,0.9838754,0.013768089,0.0001471043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038435097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000134843895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5617304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012018704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019629837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001579879","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2019.1664980","title":"Kant’s lectures on metaphysics: a critical guide","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Relation (database); Computer science","score_opus":0.1114586155937869,"score_gpt":0.2807317843998352,"score_spread":0.1692731688060483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001579879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018842951,0.07275093,0.0022489124,0.24788566,0.021549072,0.0009569534,0.0008116953,0.00021339467,0.65169907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97462153,0.00023894131,0.00008144522,0.016369838,0.007373002,0.000015894062,0.0000039257234,0.000046307443,0.0012491319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861956,0.00011350017,0.00043422522,0.00020360398,0.00039677694,0.0002323588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983304,0.0008297087,0.00017251002,0.00015048527,0.00032841755,0.00018845365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047223145,0.00016473811,0.00032817986,0.00004894129,0.0006835427,0.000102272475,0.00048258112,0.00006205013,0.0008047226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008693278,0.00013671504,0.0005064657,0.00002344347,0.0012150033,0.00015521138,0.00003952456,0.0007535829,0.000029099449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016195935,0.00013120372,7.847456e-8,0.00007564049,0.000120213765,0.000046372716,0.0038049223,0.00001551388,0.00009689755,0.9311388,0.06118562,0.003222777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030614302,0.00025899144,7.9463183e-7,0.00008248344,0.00006889674,0.000051492858,0.00006146549,0.000052222054,0.000015140244,0.5369906,0.46200994,0.0001018355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035749697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000147130895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103256265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013551675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8811148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004150327","doi":"10.33497/jpe.v1i1.10","title":"Is Contempt Redeemable?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Philosophy of Emotion","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05920154428405805,"score_gpt":0.26122027619843824,"score_spread":0.2020187319143802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004150327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.495274,0.00044102457,0.000046004006,0.018996192,0.001898484,0.00012798423,0.000024085499,0.000011762897,0.48318046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707913,0.000042856253,0.000037329934,0.0007460239,0.0015223811,2.4566964e-7,0.0000012465276,0.000012183495,0.0005585965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883324,0.0000610906,0.00053840264,0.00008978587,0.00037198202,0.00010550265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985387,0.000092074086,0.0006317299,0.0001550978,0.00051710237,0.00006535119],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059606717,0.000101653386,0.00031247837,0.00016376175,0.0000608071,0.000032705244,0.00018260482,0.00006924702,0.0020830296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005560894,0.00007893463,0.0002567918,0.000032682314,0.00017764731,0.00032640717,0.000022420669,0.00031293253,0.00008596196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010172548,0.00011303763,0.00005836585,0.00009478045,0.00007371706,0.0000035592725,0.0035235747,0.0000067879664,0.0011833934,0.9941887,0.00033417926,0.0003181242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006578755,0.0005877772,0.00011434465,0.00028555517,0.00003106632,0.000011242019,0.00020686485,0.000037678165,0.0007052714,0.98589915,0.011374624,0.00008854258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008587566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011829889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5018051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021274553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042597356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006256504","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000499","title":"Kant on Feelings, Sensations and the Gap Between Rationality and Morality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Feeling; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Morality; Judgement; Rationality; Hedonism; Psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.1967180067668657,"score_gpt":0.29700957945143797,"score_spread":0.10029157268457226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006256504","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009721795,0.056203034,0.000026730748,0.8885509,0.00008226257,0.0006744926,0.0002012903,0.000077238685,0.044462264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579535,0.013014832,0.000012666394,0.028543366,0.00040609032,0.0000075641515,0.00001875221,0.000005473679,0.00003773957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922675,0.00021007433,0.00020871164,0.00015169791,0.00012905833,0.0000737299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993959,0.00029559986,0.00006892594,0.00011702433,0.000050491242,0.000072057956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007364483,0.00008437706,0.00023481206,0.0000067964233,0.00029210854,0.00008264122,0.00006336135,0.000021615808,0.00023938027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022712158,0.000048884678,0.000053421947,0.000022157627,0.0004842756,0.000048488044,0.000041223924,0.00019327721,0.000032557426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005113639,0.00000459831,0.000016094122,0.00047831683,0.000018995794,4.788005e-7,0.0013873634,7.677452e-8,4.248778e-7,0.9961186,0.0003998394,0.0015701158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029977324,0.000025158652,0.00028850843,0.0005311734,0.00011652307,7.6919304e-7,0.00006405134,0.000081649036,0.0000019859624,0.6395043,0.35897684,0.00010923781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003015845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008682668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9482317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000027130668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014959163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2621046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009088715","doi":"10.1515/kant-2020-0003","title":"Syntheticity and Recent Metaphysical Readings of Kant’sCritique of Pure Reason","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kant-Studien","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Intuition; Epistemology; Pessimism; Relation (database); Computer science","score_opus":0.07081162730557851,"score_gpt":0.2494363767878167,"score_spread":0.17862474948223817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009088715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78194916,0.0033316081,0.00006840117,0.041294824,0.00023583457,0.00048183504,0.00028554932,0.00009852127,0.17225425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983561,0.00073992484,0.000025254927,0.00058465096,0.00023257804,0.000007103713,0.0000030262147,0.000013633008,0.00003771726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999044,0.00008111472,0.00027045698,0.00022541982,0.00020287973,0.00017615124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992748,0.0001692262,0.00011669774,0.00012863163,0.00021070936,0.00009996569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027394577,0.00013248925,0.00041485674,0.000029449126,0.00012102908,0.000018424329,0.00013357996,0.000058686524,0.00013183091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036847213,0.00010364429,0.000090577065,0.000047567497,0.00062569336,0.000079765916,0.00015570565,0.00023742071,0.0000069720527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006529056,0.000101357946,0.000049001577,0.00019641155,0.00008860871,0.0000061041374,0.01829512,1.9126722e-7,0.0010857692,0.97888076,0.0001451616,0.0010862437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006513421,0.000688977,0.00035786512,0.00041077286,0.0002596525,0.0000029598525,0.004453335,0.00015040832,0.008996122,0.92788386,0.05577287,0.00037185114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010077253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004868655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21640693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007557189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015930827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42264915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011924815","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12536","title":"On the putative possibility of non‐spatio‐temporal forms of sensibility in Kant","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensibility; Philosophy; Criticism; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Argument (complex analysis); Intellect; Value (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Mathematics; Literature","score_opus":0.07501238814444404,"score_gpt":0.2595617121317797,"score_spread":0.18454932398733565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011924815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89205456,0.000055200275,0.000058351314,0.015291526,0.00012257864,0.0001395902,0.000062392486,0.000004940816,0.092210874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982348,0.00000536845,0.000037315804,0.0012625408,0.00043579238,2.6627157e-7,0.0000023047678,0.000017449964,0.0000041734047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771965,0.00068723015,0.0009448494,0.00014893456,0.00037770683,0.000121622834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808335,0.00044268352,0.00079091056,0.000210749,0.00037373148,0.000098565884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002410521,0.00014357438,0.00038500677,0.00007980118,0.000070154885,0.000021375545,0.00033672218,0.000021227404,0.00017668772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006774349,0.00008259248,0.00023937775,0.00008227581,0.0006734513,0.0001409863,0.00006049011,0.0006316883,0.000013639899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084091193,0.00029157527,0.00022997762,0.00009384874,0.000076509226,0.000074290096,0.032595623,0.00011435095,0.0003772849,0.9648059,0.00004219263,0.00045751478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071286404,0.001528303,0.0017643332,0.00015522237,0.000023154336,0.0000024924047,0.0006780706,0.00019362643,0.0009179796,0.9937143,0.0002070269,0.00010263308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010150466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009583751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10618024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016832166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006354336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33680236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015257899","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-37576-8_18","title":"Interpreting the Human Form of Life: A Response to Brüllmann","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Historical-analytical studies on nature, mind and action","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Dialectic; Natural (archaeology); Reading (process); Interpretation (philosophy); Similarity (geometry); History; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.126416888102076,"score_gpt":0.32455124535613583,"score_spread":0.19813435725405984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015257899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003172088,0.009143006,0.000012767859,0.06552554,0.0026448427,0.00060997787,0.0001260711,0.00006911019,0.9186966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8792786,0.00020948976,0.000006649405,0.0042800326,0.0016123791,0.000011779689,0.0000073605775,0.00004498982,0.11454872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817413,0.00006911523,0.0005986765,0.00047796746,0.0004894964,0.00019063154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977919,0.0011869014,0.00031200543,0.000260611,0.0002548992,0.00019371818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060916494,0.00036066287,0.0007650658,0.0001664215,0.00063637574,0.000055025277,0.00020871013,0.00039733024,0.00021830368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001339367,0.00023015423,0.0003204235,0.000035245397,0.0004949421,0.000047683636,0.00018997073,0.0019199741,0.000053248747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007778342,0.00003751678,3.1840935e-7,0.00008315937,0.0004227854,0.0000084398,0.0044452925,4.783061e-7,0.000016738488,0.98304766,0.009814993,0.0013447742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001286444,0.0004566884,0.0000022435138,0.00017208196,0.00023651496,8.148807e-7,0.0003157435,0.000016473405,0.0000076076662,0.3037203,0.69472784,0.0002150672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011782586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006565272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8761065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004305157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036624133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9385417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022412015","doi":"","title":"Money and Mental Contents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Phenomenon; Point (geometry); Function (biology); Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024635308924829912,"score_gpt":0.19236334301672095,"score_spread":0.16772803409189105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022412015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78637606,0.001122784,0.037624203,0.03388438,0.002501939,0.0018356239,0.0009986879,0.00035160963,0.13530475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995213,0.00009622835,0.0000057588204,0.00021277819,0.00007385878,1.2171354e-7,0.000014068344,0.000008754616,0.00006711378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992978,0.000052090243,0.000083799874,0.0002189729,0.00017999517,0.00016736907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948424,0.00010580303,0.0000788745,0.00016682377,0.00005570338,0.0001085622],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013283346,0.00010882257,0.00020732083,0.00010779262,0.00024963275,0.00002406515,0.00021116617,0.00003697734,0.001467696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009921642,0.00011627516,0.000089133006,0.000022997958,0.0007181969,0.00022043707,0.00019951047,0.00018713315,0.00008015396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009057458,0.00006277344,0.00013249044,0.000035868958,0.00006124447,0.000006374255,0.021309575,6.8975123e-7,0.0014191864,0.97595274,0.00035211674,0.000576368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007215262,0.00011977387,0.0016406312,0.000037684713,0.000018451754,0.0000016816551,0.004155247,0.00014974974,0.0000016584146,0.9492874,0.0437305,0.00013570156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005815027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017976247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21314529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014501789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001501539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027612146","doi":"10.1111/jaac.12712","title":"Kant's Musical Antiformalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Musical; Philosophy of music; Philosophy; Formalism (music); Innovator; Fine art; Literature; Art; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Music history; Visual arts; Computer science","score_opus":0.04736726681240135,"score_gpt":0.24272151183810312,"score_spread":0.19535424502570176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027612146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60767114,0.0009269859,0.00036405495,0.26934585,0.0010679509,0.00009183679,0.000033282806,0.00003278818,0.12046612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98708475,0.00017619581,0.000103662045,0.011240871,0.001230542,2.7488522e-7,7.0787416e-7,0.000012763246,0.00015025871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991558,0.00003413417,0.00034422506,0.00008388738,0.00023046248,0.00015145743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993267,0.00006692453,0.000103250124,0.000062256666,0.00020273133,0.0002381079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026925592,0.00010072288,0.00022747379,0.00004367108,0.00016277129,0.00015318808,0.00012426902,0.00004637104,0.00031607426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008135259,0.000074566284,0.00010836854,0.000017837827,0.00040695065,0.00016817817,0.00004429171,0.00039639286,0.000035070654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027165881,0.00004971852,0.000002725441,0.000025275753,0.000013850051,0.00010798592,0.007430537,0.0000011579983,0.0001302727,0.9889374,0.0016578741,0.0016160388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031966445,0.00039659906,0.000008220738,0.000040401046,0.000029011768,0.00010641213,0.0004725342,0.00018137344,0.00006357691,0.37362576,0.6246591,0.00009733564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.823389e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014667507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6230013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000035328085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026948228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34607914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032914281","doi":"10.14394/etyka.493","title":"The Priority of the Good Over Right in Love: Challenging Velleman’s Kantian View","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Etyka","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022251776593472838,"score_gpt":0.23961899225767103,"score_spread":0.2173672156641982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032914281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1319549,0.0038069463,0.000012431354,0.17001133,0.0015102864,0.00035659896,0.000041951607,0.000032746015,0.69227284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968326,0.00043272635,8.8945393e-7,0.0003778364,0.0002987509,0.0000024491617,1.6934659e-7,0.000008719214,0.0020458542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926776,0.00009660717,0.00018656303,0.000112018206,0.00017196583,0.00016508187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992571,0.00032324236,0.00007087768,0.000291588,0.000033273973,0.000023957371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054592,0.00008199416,0.000115027535,0.000017375574,0.00017608987,0.00002939417,0.00027467692,0.00004554067,0.00089136267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006130509,0.000031967727,0.00008707067,0.000024503322,0.00041669043,0.000063664986,0.00009583506,0.00019981271,0.000083319756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000585303,0.000026825923,0.000044609802,0.000017170383,0.000012067559,9.631713e-7,0.00542525,1.2665546e-7,0.000054829266,0.992489,0.00008463232,0.0018387052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019424109,0.000012303798,0.0011364762,0.00012876706,0.000005214866,3.5965994e-7,0.00016340567,0.000005745578,0.00014344888,0.6110114,0.38713652,0.000062157895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005478888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010484611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8648777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001997777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032035266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9759796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033342401","doi":"10.1017/s1358246119000250","title":"Virtues as Perfections of Human Powers: On the Metaphysics of Goodness in Aristotelian Naturalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Metaphysics; Essentialism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Wonder; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.07559943923213526,"score_gpt":0.28139435518212236,"score_spread":0.2057949159499871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033342401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6193261,0.00027877497,0.000019346939,0.10490299,0.0011825736,0.00095536583,0.0011377695,0.000047384834,0.27214965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827456,0.000012516564,0.000021745484,0.0011269042,0.00043533611,0.000018244118,0.000057456124,0.00001571499,0.000037488284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854517,0.000089133144,0.0005696049,0.00022610469,0.00041006264,0.00015994818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991306,0.00009902904,0.00026181157,0.00028476122,0.00015564308,0.00006812011],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026381167,0.00019475579,0.00040070526,0.0001075387,0.0001675872,0.000020305502,0.00036466768,0.000062308914,0.0009942881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066573506,0.00014026856,0.00022937193,0.00010727204,0.0008742797,0.00010950097,0.00010917175,0.00039434255,0.000012983728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064548396,0.0003380701,0.000015280042,0.00013256249,0.00011844622,0.000003478296,0.010137383,0.0001632952,0.0008505182,0.9879738,0.00014917315,0.000053455817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005715637,0.0009119416,0.000041291813,0.00017162987,0.00006433714,1.80949e-7,0.0011390107,0.000062097184,0.00923785,0.96605366,0.021559943,0.00018648981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009641081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002524234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37894845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002582986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055801283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036563981","doi":"10.1017/s0953820820000138","title":"Sidgwick's Distinction Passage","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Utilitarianism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Presupposition; Epistemology; Biology","score_opus":0.09239672567249559,"score_gpt":0.23545652548527007,"score_spread":0.1430597998127745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036563981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019121218,0.00020915964,0.00012247585,0.03599037,0.00042032683,0.00008859525,0.000068065834,0.0001979132,0.94378185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943319,0.0000041236694,0.0000085494785,0.004035573,0.0010974512,0.000004459628,0.000014235001,0.000009770899,0.0004939318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994806,0.000033983233,0.000110799156,0.00014346695,0.000116056544,0.00011510746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996726,0.00007554445,0.000023019478,0.00009817038,0.000036944835,0.000093756804],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000097529206,0.000072948606,0.00008683189,0.000011821463,0.00016707975,0.000053957563,0.00008734851,0.000032759177,0.004722472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012473087,0.00006020536,0.000059003036,0.00001812792,0.00020458699,0.00007763887,0.000037180613,0.00017994376,0.00065453857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014093251,0.000018631012,0.000010964265,0.000016244492,0.000010114508,0.000004357165,0.0060198535,4.51425e-7,0.000028559914,0.99059093,0.001474606,0.0018111933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008731201,0.000052388394,0.000062385916,0.0000042714473,0.000008120754,2.2968419e-7,0.0004186785,0.00018925256,0.000024530264,0.51500076,0.48408622,0.00006588396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029791358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030331803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97521067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007166703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011369098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041386573","doi":"10.1111/phin.12287","title":"Peter Winch: “Unity: Presupposition or Demand?”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Winch; Presupposition; German; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.20586740214004492,"score_gpt":0.2881581260871868,"score_spread":0.0822907239471419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041386573","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024928493,0.00008775769,0.00052363594,0.6990983,0.00037227458,0.00045285546,0.00025735667,0.00054956024,0.27372974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9517719,0.0000124617545,0.0002744328,0.043887276,0.0036517023,0.000053455173,0.00011034194,0.00003614682,0.00020225173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983918,0.00018389271,0.0004012025,0.00038005452,0.00035843527,0.00028463235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998532,0.00034713326,0.00009561038,0.00025868716,0.00017800771,0.00058858725],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020448824,0.00022999618,0.00025430572,0.000070811766,0.00066394353,0.00022769402,0.0003028334,0.00013495793,0.0037110767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007605925,0.00018059667,0.00013324061,0.00012812602,0.0012124529,0.00039359397,0.000121623336,0.0007026677,0.0007989785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052501327,0.00007877694,0.000014332949,0.000049517446,0.00004219968,0.00001654155,0.005163688,0.000020634561,0.0002888186,0.9934015,0.0008052,0.00006626539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033681656,0.00021809782,0.000040967447,0.00003923736,0.000064487715,0.0000049410096,0.00006359138,0.0012914467,0.00016794,0.9428748,0.05463593,0.00026178334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017185233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033561377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92684346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021319862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010515231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045659376","doi":"10.2478/disp-2020-0004","title":"Human Plight, Kantian <i>as if</i> , and Public Reasons in Korsgaard’s Moral Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disputatio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical imperative; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Morality; Linguistics","score_opus":0.061253548755337416,"score_gpt":0.2633359879518932,"score_spread":0.2020824391965558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045659376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52666616,0.00029189416,0.0000327933,0.033025485,0.00012569514,0.00017753242,0.00006674816,0.00011606296,0.43949762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99296147,0.000009633167,0.000010047922,0.0062446552,0.00030106766,0.000014199087,0.000037296508,0.000022895641,0.00039876343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990316,0.00012513426,0.00020202735,0.00025638702,0.00015737896,0.0002274754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995047,0.000103151135,0.000053831358,0.00011203725,0.000051182746,0.00017508886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002504535,0.00013767133,0.00018063451,0.000062890555,0.00025405636,0.00023358696,0.00014126534,0.0000590851,0.0007550311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013920313,0.00012014721,0.00005186866,0.000058253274,0.00041666863,0.00021847566,0.00006938438,0.0003002001,0.00009909433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014301822,0.000045580236,0.00047723835,0.000027082559,0.000017760898,0.000024206298,0.020621177,0.0000019038795,0.000036929236,0.9779829,0.0002107229,0.00054020877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036862798,0.000068642716,0.0009565287,0.000021104648,0.000012877096,0.0000013645928,0.0021010754,0.000096151096,0.000012926687,0.97359574,0.022584064,0.0001809275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012995818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039169946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46629527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009962495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003623578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8267062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080521042","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v18i2.1020","title":"What Normativity Cannot Be","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Realism; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.22827052420089072,"score_gpt":0.3172305070713472,"score_spread":0.08895998287045648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080521042","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044145215,0.00080832175,0.00003094969,0.9130858,0.0012061037,0.00006897813,0.000039130147,0.000018540795,0.040596932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9497499,0.00052395853,0.000014157106,0.04372812,0.00594468,6.0687705e-7,0.0000020151404,0.000014627537,0.00002193391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858415,0.00026373434,0.00040667204,0.00010985025,0.0004849005,0.00015067079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984831,0.0004660441,0.000340596,0.00005293088,0.00048563775,0.00017166404],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012990527,0.00013868409,0.00033848063,0.000051947252,0.0007841414,0.0003815457,0.00018422113,0.00019516527,0.00015158828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032608974,0.00011201168,0.00018483706,0.0000369045,0.00070535217,0.00074817904,0.000073761694,0.0024142948,0.0000063649445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056424153,0.00003495981,0.0000025126112,0.00008190276,0.00005483095,0.000016655336,0.1488138,7.140674e-7,0.00003335888,0.85025775,0.00028462958,0.00036245747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034922487,0.00022019322,0.000010957298,0.000049130387,0.00003677238,0.0000043377577,0.0041421554,0.000018900699,0.0000138737505,0.9012064,0.09381593,0.00013217815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015888207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025957193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90560466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001551953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013591604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081837218","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-48051-6_6","title":"Well-Being as Harmony","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Sketch; Pleasure; Virtue; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.04966404295779048,"score_gpt":0.22905361956613027,"score_spread":0.1793895766083398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081837218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000016011309,0.00017090113,0.000003909639,0.018090157,0.0005094264,0.00009702193,0.000015579279,0.00016400525,0.9809474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06579371,0.00012589226,0.000006982674,0.019862285,0.0029989642,0.0000026470295,0.000032590633,0.00006888538,0.911108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907494,0.000008370334,0.0002286867,0.00029731976,0.0002503625,0.00014031181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994084,0.000097401695,0.00007910145,0.00020876125,0.000074239084,0.0001320966],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009190067,0.00026043094,0.0002929515,0.000055204884,0.00020543192,0.00016649606,0.0002158029,0.00021029903,0.09618254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017217579,0.00021258472,0.00021098765,0.000002406838,0.0003319689,0.00005516559,0.00012410311,0.0008054496,0.0153268315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009668407,0.000004564686,9.855009e-9,0.000034996414,0.00006914071,0.000052784624,0.0016575283,5.6498752e-8,0.0000010857665,0.9918909,0.0058143255,0.0004649369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040067,0.000030181032,8.245936e-9,0.000037631504,0.000022255872,8.8704115e-7,0.000018141756,0.0000039614283,0.0000035889882,0.50255424,0.4971368,0.00015222476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003792255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046302994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49132246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015732905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046951194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98543984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082726756","doi":"10.1017/s0012217320000128","title":"Replies to Kirk Ludwig and Paul Hurley","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Naturalism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Triangulation; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07933594132205281,"score_gpt":0.23387028602655688,"score_spread":0.15453434470450406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082726756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22708519,0.0006383649,0.00007903296,0.21304889,0.00090003957,0.0003374528,0.0003208378,0.00029563124,0.55729455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776772,0.000025351523,0.000021087815,0.020761142,0.0012292358,0.00000836842,0.000017410108,0.000011830969,0.0002483587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946475,0.000026707226,0.00010893972,0.00018342986,0.000088996494,0.0001271975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959004,0.000087226384,0.000019815792,0.0001095694,0.000035983172,0.0001573715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011101374,0.00008281235,0.00012657272,0.000020882884,0.0001554488,0.00010074578,0.00009039052,0.000037356032,0.00036138523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018000767,0.000068655936,0.000031644096,0.000020525862,0.00015922796,0.000055780547,0.00008202573,0.00014290103,0.00028849454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001868988,0.000010056104,0.000014765131,0.000016498358,0.000009981147,0.00000827694,0.018828034,6.933921e-7,0.00010709552,0.9769723,0.00304453,0.00096909713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111597416,0.000095475814,0.00007967776,0.000010770509,0.000007355735,5.437847e-7,0.00034384392,0.0000127259755,0.00008234167,0.5569679,0.44217324,0.000114518545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000062495565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014839825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75059205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000035933833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011812751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39569148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084066437","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12570","title":"Kant and the concept of an object","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Object (grammar); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05493437188890296,"score_gpt":0.23077315576311294,"score_spread":0.17583878387420998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084066437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19700728,0.0033195624,0.00011560965,0.11413383,0.00068002933,0.00018723856,0.000054161403,0.000030621,0.68447167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929402,0.000039147213,0.000036253823,0.003971221,0.0029812956,1.1453589e-7,6.76962e-7,0.000018034169,0.000013087901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859303,0.0006171446,0.0004082548,0.00008448131,0.0002146213,0.00008246524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910104,0.00015491353,0.00034144885,0.000107843196,0.00016128522,0.00013344758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009919055,0.00009622959,0.00024710255,0.00003302801,0.00012269088,0.000059322774,0.0002958278,0.000010675133,0.00019155923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016244366,0.000053693235,0.00012407202,0.000024302939,0.0011405126,0.00015156061,0.00006303263,0.00037840105,0.0000114571585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027834962,0.000027954366,6.972239e-7,0.000013467662,0.000052198207,0.000061969935,0.029653873,0.0000064807073,0.00009542294,0.9687204,0.000064286534,0.001024906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025125132,0.0011861325,0.000029139681,0.00007363963,0.00007074879,0.000034648583,0.0008598666,0.000071540184,0.00021890094,0.96717197,0.027650688,0.00012024342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000018671674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.4709105e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7959329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000024858948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020346743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4202266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30883871","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626.006","title":"Aristotle on <i>eudaimonia, nous</i>, and divinity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Eudaimonia; Virtue; Happiness; Philosophy; Pleasure; Meaning (existential); The good life; Epistemology; Contemplation; Form of the Good; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.056014535107144346,"score_gpt":0.187455381144123,"score_spread":0.13144084603697864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30883871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019399736,0.00012485107,0.000008406193,0.00006246215,0.00034835175,0.00019993485,0.0005733893,0.00011626692,0.9983723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11422791,0.00015113279,0.0000031670518,0.00040964322,0.00036446282,4.6966505e-7,0.000024517849,0.00004676882,0.88477194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989464,0.000036663278,0.00014786977,0.00043660915,0.00020921709,0.00022323198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989681,0.00013093349,0.00015712668,0.00042988916,0.00012513364,0.00018879707],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001269147,0.00034776606,0.00036812067,0.0001235457,0.00049979915,0.000077383695,0.00032131202,0.00031945392,0.00008455784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010425158,0.0003591158,0.00016342898,0.0000013081698,0.0011341095,0.00006333134,0.00033165384,0.0008927874,0.00006859128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102168044,0.000021396885,1.506918e-7,0.000058253034,0.00010142851,0.00013019553,0.00090258254,5.8285405e-8,0.0000016628193,0.99541396,0.002657293,0.0006108684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028075004,0.00013653346,0.000002106228,0.00013762356,0.00013572395,0.0000023461948,0.000038673774,0.0000023685745,0.000018619701,0.05788931,0.94095236,0.00040357147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038556661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028848186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93829507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057197678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004906417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093941507","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190086596.001.0001","title":"Fichte's Moral Philosophy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Epistemology; Philosophy; Morality; Normative ethics; Feeling; Moral philosophy; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Perfection","score_opus":0.10912469076690952,"score_gpt":0.22963731547400545,"score_spread":0.12051262470709594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093941507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.7600285e-7,0.00034447975,0.000005043069,0.01895452,0.00079717085,0.0001405361,0.00018665001,0.0002393043,0.97933203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011368356,0.000035316352,0.000022207047,0.013044951,0.011359607,0.000009000893,0.000220164,0.00008290877,0.9638575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878746,0.000026227579,0.00028425507,0.00036462687,0.00033302457,0.00020442058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992209,0.00011129282,0.000108581036,0.00028978565,0.00010327788,0.00016616768],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000095538046,0.00032856595,0.00042057183,0.00007253762,0.00019672322,0.00016961644,0.00035393078,0.00027324574,0.025813954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025752197,0.00026516034,0.00028289598,0.000008889411,0.00058312295,0.00007804222,0.00014471696,0.0010323182,0.004804843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011654547,0.000014636728,2.5768259e-8,0.00008728384,0.000068922374,0.00003214228,0.0010573774,1.15086074e-7,1.8414313e-7,0.87424105,0.12426403,0.00022257121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000639318,0.00004518532,2.2339943e-8,0.000039445415,0.000025539319,4.7842275e-7,0.000008021837,0.000005917933,4.301955e-7,0.5060535,0.4935717,0.00018581141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000957448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003196439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36930767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004128329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020102863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110229762","doi":"10.1017/s1369415420000540","title":"Helga Varden, Sex, Love, and Gender: A Kantian Theory Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020 Pp. xxii+ 337 ISBN 9780198812838 (hbk) £65.00","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.052121477848091916,"score_gpt":0.24138946860197513,"score_spread":0.18926799075388323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110229762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048580597,0.3381119,0.00017992865,0.037424915,0.00038208993,0.0010147787,0.0003688189,0.00023633425,0.6217954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33506444,0.6368926,0.00010620164,0.021065505,0.0013148495,0.0000058540727,0.00008811376,0.00009532922,0.005367103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974787,0.000500772,0.00048211403,0.00067980826,0.00036624176,0.000492322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985191,0.0002030141,0.0002430944,0.00047707703,0.00012400377,0.00043366436],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077212515,0.0004297756,0.00080115086,0.000031379965,0.00041391692,0.00018701222,0.00047355407,0.00015696688,0.0040257084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014271351,0.00037925426,0.00032642437,0.00012075093,0.00057686365,0.00033009227,0.00039211896,0.00070956425,0.0001521182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005294995,0.00006371279,0.00003222759,0.0042565805,0.00020354596,0.00015774101,0.0027004154,7.914587e-7,0.000006948041,0.9700835,0.015888292,0.0065533035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039744496,0.00009717067,0.000023689636,0.00091404933,0.00031505554,0.00001966378,0.00042851016,0.00007658421,0.000007896564,0.08560222,0.9116609,0.000456788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026111424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026931019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89577264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024775798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000094420866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114594491","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaa078","title":"Against ‘Good for’/‘Well-Being’, for ‘Simply Good’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Relation (database); Value (mathematics); Form of the Good; Naturalism; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.056050156438669715,"score_gpt":0.26181518939233955,"score_spread":0.20576503295366982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114594491","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011509708,0.00010571111,0.002002522,0.7838937,0.000767673,0.0015939425,0.00034800213,0.0003505553,0.19942819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464045,0.0000090866,0.00008280256,0.044002928,0.008862431,0.0002651689,0.000073590054,0.00008427251,0.0002152019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978025,0.00012446003,0.0005653379,0.0005466911,0.00035660606,0.0006043987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759585,0.0011935759,0.00016492295,0.0004640739,0.00024239006,0.00033916289],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060685066,0.0003760486,0.0004734655,0.00004744805,0.0009497206,0.00029152192,0.00079674635,0.00018384327,0.00024202248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016061126,0.0002589176,0.0005097949,0.0000696629,0.000710297,0.00018817086,0.00005189578,0.00062216143,0.00027938647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002992356,0.00010774061,0.0000011638085,0.000100962534,0.000104987135,0.0000030998779,0.016741442,0.0000033252154,0.00016189176,0.9790256,0.00070634804,0.00274421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009919411,0.0016010319,0.0000025982672,0.00002396875,0.00008133515,0.000001300228,0.0004941537,0.0012673053,0.000043613076,0.8290259,0.16613713,0.00032971954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011414011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023648938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9348948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023473405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056509805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122295076","doi":"","title":"Hegel and a Third Theory of Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Natural law; Positivism; Positive law; Epistemology; Philosophy of law; Legal positivism; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Jurisprudence; Natural (archaeology); Comparative law; Political science; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.03469750650894042,"score_gpt":0.25984549868824863,"score_spread":0.2251479921793082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122295076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23419099,0.0043283594,0.00012674832,0.007081433,0.0003758609,0.000074646545,0.000009358084,0.00001958798,0.753793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653167,0.0012559568,0.0000036159029,0.00022973896,0.000548933,9.0580517e-7,3.3334823e-7,0.00001050447,0.0014183194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892396,0.000062871055,0.00015530695,0.00008865597,0.00013293604,0.0006363001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994129,0.00007781267,0.00018472516,0.00019816717,0.00007639746,0.000050004677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001990244,0.00008327063,0.00014471133,0.00002925636,0.0009789133,0.0001759068,0.00027148897,0.00004492642,0.00009166591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008174914,0.00006115334,0.00007173725,0.0000030775393,0.0008767309,0.00021064862,0.00006119134,0.0011864487,0.000008631851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047303114,0.000024375353,0.00000784514,0.0000067540263,0.00007630138,0.0000015949898,0.0017772318,1.0061152e-7,0.00005669571,0.9952373,0.0000031143522,0.0027613952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030361657,0.00015887718,0.000030041278,0.000023805575,0.000023302999,0.000045507197,0.0009041852,0.0000037731013,0.00004090242,0.9909348,0.007454363,0.000076810225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010810103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001298714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7623407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003648328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002568214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75291085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125279035","doi":"","title":"On Essentially Conflicting Desires","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Epistemology; Moral realism; Realism; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Moral psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02631083043694923,"score_gpt":0.2771017683405813,"score_spread":0.2507909379036321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125279035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4590899,0.0012668478,0.0071077114,0.004613535,0.001314874,0.00011746392,0.0000029771177,0.000108512664,0.52637815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948056,0.000231481,0.000006294863,0.00088783074,0.0019387816,5.860402e-7,0.000001167684,0.000020493319,0.0021077993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997844,0.00004613166,0.00023856547,0.00012243493,0.00026184655,0.0014870194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993605,0.00024314172,0.00011307379,0.00009733453,0.00010216014,0.00008378507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032898684,0.00011649266,0.00011856614,0.00010412503,0.000606948,0.0001422256,0.00018925042,0.000055988763,0.00033222695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012090155,0.000092375165,0.000104146,0.000024412722,0.00015990243,0.00010749398,0.000019051658,0.0021987353,0.00009443094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007461113,0.00004509103,0.000005365891,0.0000023470386,0.000065018954,0.000010098029,0.001337508,0.0000027441656,0.00014142678,0.9923953,0.000010836006,0.0059096757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002869174,0.00024924675,0.000010693358,0.000020538151,0.000014388293,0.00006213775,0.0015871829,0.0000067383576,0.00017098067,0.98366225,0.013808977,0.00011996586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045263252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001695393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53571564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019322638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044038505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95525324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125495821","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198849933.001.0001","title":"Kant's Justification of Ethics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.18034937128469872,"score_gpt":0.2921499854867606,"score_spread":0.11180061420206186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125495821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002701464,0.00059502345,0.000032353673,0.0038338832,0.00058760564,0.00006375713,0.00008532298,0.000033565768,0.99476576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015020759,0.00028730268,0.00002268642,0.0011423028,0.0012371911,0.0000035412395,0.00026041476,0.000026842514,0.981999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908644,0.000054853637,0.0002842918,0.00018647032,0.0002998555,0.00008806035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985033,0.00048734184,0.00016028895,0.00030938262,0.00050277007,0.000036916907],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043917383,0.00013407717,0.0002625058,0.000060867565,0.00012066423,0.000054312583,0.00016098643,0.00043041984,0.009927043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015781063,0.00011270319,0.00014061974,0.000007840981,0.0005661016,0.000035091423,0.000057377798,0.001145278,0.00012714656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027629642,0.000021992204,1.2939303e-8,0.00030174066,0.00004172148,0.0000024569836,0.0043684673,2.3685294e-7,0.0000073678134,0.9868985,0.007979823,0.00037492326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023844494,0.000010009891,8.508593e-8,0.00010599047,0.000030893338,2.6760748e-7,0.00009632786,0.00000248914,0.000020605647,0.52308595,0.47654942,0.000074137504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028363695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023678031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4685696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024282715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005850479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132306378","doi":"10.7202/1076214ar","title":"Béatrice Longuenesse, \"I, Me, Mine: Back to Kant and Back Again\" and Alison Laywine, \"Kant’s Transcendental Deduction: A Cosmology of Experience\"","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Philosophy; Cosmology; Epistemology; Theology; Physics; Astronomy","score_opus":0.07541058576211176,"score_gpt":0.30385204810561994,"score_spread":0.22844146234350818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132306378","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33466324,0.47457087,0.000020007506,0.08789399,0.0011199104,0.0013998821,0.00021809105,0.000041680538,0.10007232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511061,0.042672038,0.000107751795,0.005448739,0.00045106816,0.000045513883,0.000023159178,0.000021773596,0.00012391327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983443,0.0001986646,0.0005706351,0.0004445554,0.00020868081,0.00023318946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912757,0.00015899041,0.000115024784,0.00027547055,0.00017373721,0.00014923773],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033645882,0.00023273543,0.00066095695,0.000094286515,0.000092005765,0.00004109842,0.00015152831,0.000085323714,0.0011767155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011056823,0.00020372523,0.0001066109,0.00018787314,0.00047718605,0.00016142197,0.00008821675,0.00024495253,0.00004909743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049817692,0.00026372366,0.000257261,0.0057656607,0.000051797982,0.000076431286,0.0066499244,9.213526e-7,0.0004673375,0.9844881,0.00026948532,0.0016595249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017433359,0.0004774716,0.0005500567,0.008848653,0.00023510201,0.00039877612,0.0015485069,0.000013063062,0.0007777218,0.81788385,0.16648698,0.001036477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000076746706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012847528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6164428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018637196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050397415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135387468","doi":"10.1017/s001221732000030x","title":"Kant and the Demands of Normativity: Response to Harbin","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Normative; Subjectivity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.044344802722160896,"score_gpt":0.22693381889514194,"score_spread":0.18258901617298104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135387468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7526822,0.00020524615,0.00012391502,0.19459246,0.00018431139,0.00025168812,0.00014889642,0.000036971607,0.051774297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99108547,0.000010163332,0.0000066522443,0.008619418,0.00021420619,0.000007559731,0.0000025367608,0.0000051102115,0.00004889088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945974,0.0001777781,0.00012218014,0.000076995326,0.00008877623,0.00007449938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920064,0.00057941035,0.000033219872,0.00008806454,0.000034925935,0.00006376065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063475285,0.000054947668,0.00013880746,0.000018670113,0.00010567905,0.000036863632,0.00009055767,0.000021930757,0.000093546776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049113244,0.00003241927,0.000036611713,0.000022129887,0.00039347858,0.000040796225,0.000072824005,0.00011428922,0.00003576448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008765601,0.000009680648,0.0000046928117,0.000014473982,0.000012112728,0.0000018583027,0.05869384,0.0000013622845,0.0002537173,0.9396331,0.00020726422,0.00029138158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012475871,0.00022628342,0.0002787339,0.000027577655,0.000025642275,8.5402706e-7,0.0008756588,0.0002568958,0.00053300767,0.8607249,0.13567036,0.00013245604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006375669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007644952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23840325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000021606418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017112381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14497882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137152741","doi":"10.33134/eeja.251","title":"Beyond the Pleasure Principle: A Kantian Aesthetics of Autonomy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Estetika The European Journal of Aesthetics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Hedonism; Autonomy; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Theme (computing); Key (lock); Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03550923264450717,"score_gpt":0.241125158425664,"score_spread":0.20561592578115684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137152741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27332866,0.0056870305,0.00035299477,0.0943198,0.0028135849,0.0002807474,0.0000540946,0.00004545407,0.6231176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99537045,0.00025730426,0.00017830396,0.0022057022,0.0009061238,5.084043e-7,0.0000016188379,0.000056905345,0.0010231021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966968,0.0014891053,0.00085023785,0.00014197893,0.0005678234,0.0002540465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973815,0.0002731049,0.00074611715,0.0006373966,0.00084323576,0.00011861867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035124032,0.0002115091,0.00032438803,0.000060556606,0.00043559607,0.0002040586,0.00096536084,0.000036478777,0.00021452317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000223976,0.00011266107,0.0003520754,0.00009677295,0.0012587537,0.00009462855,0.00020313614,0.0009931443,0.000047234607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029131557,0.00016139427,0.000024241497,0.000022435946,0.00008508571,0.0002564547,0.020192603,0.00012844407,0.000077998884,0.97021955,0.00045281855,0.008349823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055156625,0.00038885706,0.00016738019,0.00015869648,0.00016129928,0.00052201113,0.0023411217,0.000036428424,0.00036538698,0.26446894,0.7306497,0.0001885964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000014999579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001092652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7301969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023478438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034051161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46379304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138020732","doi":"10.1111/papq.12351","title":"A republic for all sentients: Social freedom without free will","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Politics; Focus (optics); Predicate (mathematical logic); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; The Republic; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.0519382189520884,"score_gpt":0.27408270464061174,"score_spread":0.22214448568852335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138020732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021746757,0.00044608375,0.0013469477,0.39794427,0.0045794877,0.0010122635,0.0017320588,0.0007717003,0.57042044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872541,0.000006829078,0.00021203958,0.0026262417,0.0073874467,0.00015630886,0.00022538939,0.0000888915,0.002042754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966955,0.00024065386,0.00070161995,0.000865171,0.00066808844,0.0008289525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975226,0.00035819525,0.0002055588,0.0008262417,0.00072177843,0.0003656175],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067143084,0.00042889875,0.0006231412,0.00013848627,0.001032254,0.0005816386,0.00058232,0.00032118635,0.0013853712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036522964,0.00039663585,0.0005537425,0.00011444253,0.00095182145,0.00053380185,0.000098150915,0.0007406502,0.00011568545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014812656,0.00048081306,0.0000050212047,0.000082412815,0.00018772071,0.000034966266,0.013680323,2.402439e-7,0.0002074955,0.9805342,0.0035676593,0.0010710513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015053719,0.00039667502,0.000011400536,0.000032869142,0.00007853096,0.000013854306,0.0015379477,0.00017694404,0.00002015278,0.8352277,0.16054538,0.00045312312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001219418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058700378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006704142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015281244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139516517","doi":"10.5840/envirophil2021318105","title":"Kant’s Pre-critical Ontology and Environmental Philosophy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Ontology; Philosophy; Environmental philosophy; Metaphysics; Relevance (law); Applied philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Focus (optics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024039000827956535,"score_gpt":0.2242223160471382,"score_spread":0.20018331521918165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139516517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5134731,0.009361057,0.00004716632,0.04570597,0.0018296385,0.0005459052,0.0016236542,0.0002391653,0.42717433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99155754,0.0004220987,0.00008593243,0.0048772832,0.0020131997,0.000033211552,0.00026250683,0.00006771424,0.00068049436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761814,0.00019659907,0.00043972707,0.0007892956,0.00045347432,0.0005027931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988015,0.00027840747,0.000083501225,0.00049384515,0.000006691542,0.00033604127],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017368914,0.00041920444,0.0004243881,0.00008025242,0.0006066042,0.00012091613,0.0002318248,0.00020844686,0.010897367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000472202,0.00041829763,0.00019281494,0.000023798028,0.0028916725,0.00032100602,0.000406341,0.0006658829,0.0006406093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007077285,0.00065554626,0.0003182843,0.00004831158,0.00008767934,0.00021290465,0.0026090462,0.0000015861335,0.002361759,0.9927081,0.00008912327,0.000836923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007037254,0.0002344848,0.0006217027,0.000040714574,0.00007194538,0.0001100055,0.00038361072,0.00005595267,0.00053298846,0.95552725,0.04119571,0.00052188925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011577092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012049281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47808444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092566086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020838535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151405763","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198748922.001.0001","title":"Kant's Transcendental Deduction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Philosophy; Calculus (dental); Epistemology; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.06550582024578556,"score_gpt":0.211377725781975,"score_spread":0.14587190553618945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151405763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000037012255,0.00018753881,0.000014451628,0.00555845,0.0011487054,0.00009932956,0.0000837758,0.0001438527,0.9927602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042479184,0.00006736776,0.000005376017,0.0024583703,0.0062948125,0.0000046506407,0.00015888672,0.00004326597,0.9484881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924624,0.000017078664,0.00017429757,0.00022874327,0.00021420063,0.000119414966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966836,0.000036061116,0.000049772567,0.00011537723,0.000043986172,0.00008643181],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000063046224,0.00018308978,0.000213715,0.00004460829,0.00015200872,0.00010472834,0.00014375188,0.00017589243,0.0194273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000060803513,0.00015190514,0.00019236271,0.0000046418972,0.000334212,0.000068124624,0.000021670661,0.0006448266,0.0014980873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010884141,0.000014313926,8.182193e-9,0.00005486659,0.000048175953,0.000009325894,0.0025939734,6.590321e-8,0.0000034134903,0.96410596,0.03219521,0.00096377806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051097006,0.000027387701,2.8428838e-8,0.000019334264,0.000025303423,0.0000014506699,0.00008779552,0.0000024675408,0.0000040739415,0.49913487,0.5005377,0.000108493514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001927939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016577756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46834248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004065092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012563671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153445013","doi":"10.3390/genealogy5020038","title":"The Passive Body and States of Nature: An Examination of the Methodological Role State of Nature Theory Plays in Williams and Nietzsche","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genealogy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; State of nature; Epistemology; Hegelianism; State (computer science); Morality; Idiot; Literature; Politics; Law; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029601729482333944,"score_gpt":0.2847556487234122,"score_spread":0.2551539192410782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153445013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99014056,0.0066216965,0.000019400595,0.0011721759,0.00012574112,0.000093645365,0.00013756931,0.000003331279,0.0016858771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846864,0.0010597329,0.000045809596,0.00029311198,0.000045314515,0.0000047189787,0.000012707071,0.0000064968326,0.000063482934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818915,0.0011778243,0.00023592233,0.00015481564,0.00012792756,0.000114380935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977843,0.0016726656,0.00016068535,0.00018238706,0.00017516897,0.0000247818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013669834,0.0000842304,0.00021368694,0.00002916832,0.000108292916,0.00001638293,0.0001274894,0.00017290341,0.000024725878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042120984,0.00004521483,0.00003526172,0.000044124496,0.0009785598,0.00004835236,0.00011860058,0.00053652335,6.07227e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006966368,0.000047886282,0.00013321028,0.00004027634,0.00003521838,0.0000022374943,0.008933734,0.000012947691,0.005702069,0.9763018,0.0000032638002,0.008717683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021527402,0.00012249229,0.02221669,0.00001994499,0.000017268267,0.000003192925,0.0026167743,0.00013150506,0.013110852,0.9604561,0.0010338987,0.000056036915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021467618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000542574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022083482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000049973505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037951027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36055446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158795762","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.9057","title":"The Possibility of Public Reasons","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Action (physics); Deliberation; Skepticism; Constitution; Perspective (graphical); Soul; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2651777521266677,"score_gpt":0.3797682448346463,"score_spread":0.11459049270797855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158795762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19037786,0.00018720733,0.0002934078,0.56759506,0.00045417322,0.0006644202,0.00004762166,0.00017330362,0.24020693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948735,0.0008204416,0.000014661158,0.000070115864,0.0004946748,0.00007467396,0.0000014472942,0.000024455518,0.0036260188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670404,0.0002563406,0.00047306885,0.000465376,0.0012398214,0.0008613737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931727,0.001823321,0.00017202875,0.000379718,0.00416887,0.00028338106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006744378,0.00019191841,0.000258265,0.00019507614,0.0011850854,0.00070194656,0.0010172721,0.00011607845,0.00023136761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003779852,0.000096453354,0.00011870328,0.00020127925,0.008483394,0.0006511145,0.00041312852,0.0006670489,0.00012521529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055902372,0.000077323835,0.00037314728,0.00004821958,0.000045466975,0.000001172959,0.0046730693,2.7461513e-9,0.00088679005,0.97965205,0.0012637244,0.012923132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025465142,0.00019041536,0.0001739681,0.00015612987,0.0000054324328,0.0000015472938,0.0032277757,0.000012460495,0.0006224173,0.93770283,0.05750641,0.00014597311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002730532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022583276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80449563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011328621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053435884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99421495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159421001","doi":"10.1111/heyj.13920","title":"The Art of Living Well: Moral Experience and Virtue Ethics. By PaulvanTongeren. Translated by Thomas Heij. Pp. viii, 187. Bloomsbury Academic: London, NY, 2020, $70.00 US hardcover; $34.95 US softcover; $18.87 US ebook.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Nova scotia; Citation; Virtue ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Art history; Art; Library science; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03871235373277551,"score_gpt":0.27958855286569717,"score_spread":0.24087619913292166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159421001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6873024,0.24199525,0.000358012,0.034249686,0.0026981765,0.0005571383,0.0005223094,0.00014912286,0.0321679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357853,0.054516654,0.000020318987,0.00354791,0.0009972388,0.000015299005,0.000013128662,0.00008683309,0.005017312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552345,0.0010666157,0.0010634119,0.0005073508,0.001095985,0.0007431587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954719,0.00261973,0.0005612578,0.00057030586,0.00044107923,0.00033571006],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027195276,0.0005168746,0.00065014476,0.000040698764,0.0027669172,0.0007008725,0.00083001424,0.00048330138,0.0024279624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007679744,0.00032731696,0.00033311083,0.00012591606,0.0029976522,0.0005385518,0.00027318767,0.005134687,0.000044688073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012934629,0.0009219185,0.0014788244,0.00036695693,0.001930041,0.00088654726,0.096093826,0.00013085513,0.07893908,0.5783442,0.23303857,0.0065756985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010515782,0.00038085587,0.00012520928,0.00087616325,0.00024285172,0.000936193,0.0041568903,0.00043695825,0.0070763794,0.13858402,0.84531045,0.00082245097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001873496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014943759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61227185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062832536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033411468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160960581","doi":"10.1017/9781108634038","title":"Philippa Foot's Metaethics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Foot (prosody); Naturalism; Element (criminal law); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06410891134500818,"score_gpt":0.21532006655959063,"score_spread":0.15121115521458245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160960581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015621523,0.00068057905,0.000033943,0.00028044038,0.0010202881,0.00023339142,0.0007358995,0.00018504774,0.9968148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017462719,0.00018653128,0.000013034001,0.00077225827,0.0017180966,0.0000011533155,0.00024891205,0.000073336145,0.9952404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810797,0.00019195287,0.0002446732,0.0006142959,0.00047051703,0.00037057072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979734,0.000334314,0.00022498002,0.0007280304,0.00051322393,0.0002260685],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002921813,0.00045052782,0.0006240409,0.00016312911,0.00060114905,0.0002294982,0.000700152,0.0006088508,0.00010978429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050042912,0.00049996655,0.00050121854,0.000006524731,0.0013212071,0.000109419496,0.00058599096,0.0019073301,0.000048850623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033903845,0.000024147648,1.9350061e-8,0.00021023548,0.0003228885,0.00045115672,0.0008757154,3.7936348e-7,0.0000034942084,0.94851774,0.049279824,0.00028051174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003478912,0.000042530046,1.2871773e-7,0.00022941537,0.00041009058,0.000006654447,0.00019164778,0.000009211014,0.000033802804,0.015887449,0.9822832,0.00055803097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014899731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004264793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9330033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021821707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068698666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168088971","doi":"","title":"For the Love of Metaphysics: From the Revolution in Thinking towards the Renewal of Thinking","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes; University of Toronto","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037113934014443274,"score_gpt":0.2488568123036209,"score_spread":0.21174287828917762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168088971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17808323,0.012676349,0.0009964398,0.019886894,0.0021144655,0.0016679701,0.0005560358,0.000038847116,0.7839798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969235,0.00042627088,0.000081820916,0.00006183465,0.00027454048,5.8915333e-7,0.000084186126,0.000013105992,0.0021341583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990321,0.00015497464,0.00016713812,0.00016447785,0.00035850258,0.0001228008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978305,0.00093404215,0.0005882913,0.00038037606,0.00025222043,0.000014588163],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088887324,0.00014479656,0.00035587023,0.00002136853,0.00034248165,0.000020416068,0.0008284062,0.00014633138,0.0012617337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007762726,0.000089943846,0.00030685365,0.000022202848,0.000409397,0.00014866999,0.00007989964,0.0002889747,0.00000159869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001882386,0.000024784533,0.000004281526,0.00008754742,0.00018271536,1.5284387e-7,0.29105532,0.000015544269,0.000055485856,0.7057274,0.00011454021,0.0025439935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004333224,0.000098931014,0.005092999,0.00047194492,0.0005005411,5.063963e-8,0.22694841,0.00044756095,0.000077203746,0.761865,0.0039059278,0.0001581164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2909938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4765017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81884027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065839784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009432505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169059207","doi":"10.7202/1077840ar","title":"« Devoir-implique-pouvoir » et le problème des négations de normes","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.2664731818887273,"score_gpt":0.3664271556614716,"score_spread":0.09995397377274429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169059207","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0097986385,0.04372673,0.0006490208,0.51970094,0.00057835795,0.000245496,0.00044436022,0.00025895223,0.42459747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606637,0.008498788,0.0022612878,0.018539099,0.0053885733,0.000098426695,0.0001400595,0.00011695864,0.004293121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969515,0.0007344319,0.0006074936,0.00060008303,0.00034005783,0.00076638424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973885,0.0006470698,0.00018840093,0.0005345357,0.000880879,0.00036061803],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093064964,0.00047101095,0.0004943302,0.00013651265,0.0014379323,0.0005860548,0.00035830736,0.00039733746,0.0011578623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006018687,0.0005025355,0.0003629231,0.00012555704,0.0023891577,0.0007634395,0.00025997718,0.0010882231,0.0002461419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027552453,0.00080184045,0.000046213623,0.00039476756,0.00020307959,0.00014915432,0.008510715,0.000032127544,0.00042424555,0.9867327,0.00172675,0.0009508231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031790548,0.00011685543,0.000107769316,0.0003918674,0.000088497196,0.000066361354,0.00047677383,0.00010349032,0.0016647887,0.7540629,0.24214844,0.00045435585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009193535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001987112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95086503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022969546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012429731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169599683","doi":"10.15173/russell.v41i1.4802","title":"Bertrand Russell and the Paradox of the Committed Emotivist","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivism; Objectivism; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Contradiction; Philosophy; Indignation; Rigour; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.040740658703160494,"score_gpt":0.25953551230825084,"score_spread":0.21879485360509035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169599683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74123716,0.10153819,0.00004817856,0.10467518,0.0022797699,0.0006007908,0.00005789543,0.000025349578,0.04953749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97114843,0.025165113,0.000013246105,0.0014095549,0.0006816836,0.0000031109705,8.228175e-7,0.00002942616,0.0015485965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968184,0.0010346355,0.0009911595,0.00018648131,0.0006329536,0.00033632963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942849,0.0037765224,0.00073260936,0.00048857875,0.00062887225,0.0000885017],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028537537,0.00033941958,0.0009215609,0.00005858643,0.0014871854,0.00013715537,0.0006376239,0.00009348863,0.00015037252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033715228,0.0001320866,0.00049722474,0.0001655125,0.0041799415,0.00014805589,0.0002028001,0.0010234084,0.000006462906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014858331,0.00040032648,0.00020108798,0.00035123824,0.0029057579,0.000036658745,0.12352551,0.000064155945,0.0006500689,0.8659033,0.0035454999,0.0009305748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00690956,0.00030703485,0.0012585651,0.00080602,0.0021957248,0.0003728303,0.022966174,0.00008170042,0.005540049,0.8625347,0.09655328,0.00047432628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007498215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045638383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22991128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020698735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106776104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179034764","doi":"10.5922/0207-6918-2021-2-6","title":"What is Kantian Philosophy of Mathematics? An Overview of Contemporary Studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; University of Toronto; Yale University; University of Cambridge; University of Oxford; Harvard University; Princeton University; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Philosophy of mathematics; Intuition; Epistemology; Philosophy of computer science; Philosophy of mathematics education; Mathematical practice; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy education; Subject (documents); Western philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.31212418033401096,"score_gpt":0.3671463551756287,"score_spread":0.055022174841617755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179034764","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38550857,0.42600912,0.00006306568,0.04925832,0.006077865,0.00032065477,0.00024512646,0.00006567712,0.13245158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875911,0.01009938,0.00017974716,0.0010997048,0.0007612455,9.781608e-7,0.0000046945224,0.000023505927,0.00023963796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983758,0.00016421844,0.00073107827,0.0001620397,0.00039484838,0.00017207074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981603,0.00013355588,0.00049542467,0.0003123339,0.00077168545,0.00012667032],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007183702,0.00016873087,0.00057593326,0.00011080005,0.00022310445,0.00017399952,0.00024847366,0.00006499032,0.0018045871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000796129,0.00013263505,0.00028011797,0.00006169139,0.00064715394,0.0007811812,0.00008567322,0.00038529834,0.000015508947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013580839,0.00031856322,0.000025910069,0.00061793515,0.0003995629,0.0000892426,0.046961643,5.44143e-7,0.0004167354,0.9501976,0.00032937346,0.00062932156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040770974,0.00017450257,0.000016742088,0.001911149,0.00007228467,0.00007998568,0.024413567,0.000016557242,0.0029847482,0.9613058,0.008459236,0.0001576975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000058236255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002069306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60208255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000093724175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016762567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190130898","doi":"10.1515/agph-2019-0039","title":"Kant’s Argument for Transcendental Idealism in the Transcendental Aesthetic Revisited","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Transcendental idealism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Idealism; A priori and a posteriori; Transcendental philosophy; Confusion; Cognition; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.05299381079530532,"score_gpt":0.2919299637571844,"score_spread":0.23893615296187906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190130898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1954542,0.00616248,0.0004705323,0.3815424,0.0020151087,0.0033211655,0.0018970978,0.0003344773,0.40880254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873407,0.00022319627,0.000093508395,0.010160386,0.0014908824,0.00014286886,0.00027678377,0.00007080309,0.00020091068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968928,0.0004505572,0.00068178476,0.0006769478,0.00063536986,0.0006625122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998553,0.00042395238,0.00011139501,0.00063696405,0.00011231149,0.00016242177],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088750105,0.00042297645,0.0004764694,0.0001916785,0.0006193995,0.00027263502,0.0006594879,0.00012388543,0.0005915617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052808686,0.000326102,0.0005174894,0.00014110666,0.00062581565,0.00016602463,0.000055572495,0.0009108501,0.00006840391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015074466,0.00043159275,0.000016257969,0.00012090913,0.000081542494,0.00017285811,0.02069474,0.000007500885,0.0003245574,0.97629005,0.0002137325,0.0014955329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002071369,0.00017034181,0.00016418574,0.00016052766,0.00013574645,0.00014980367,0.0011796315,0.00013224741,0.00019156086,0.9620435,0.03315481,0.00044623305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043948436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051360525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79188645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041943287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011137646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191860367","doi":"","title":"THE UNBEARABLE LICENCE OF BEING THE EXECUTIVE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0304589453333377,"score_gpt":0.23548932931066607,"score_spread":0.20503038397732837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191860367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014533912,0.000431265,0.000084102685,0.021601181,0.00041593093,0.000050022772,0.0000057867296,0.000010226579,0.9759481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958347,0.00039975,0.000010484954,0.000557448,0.00071912573,0.000002744675,1.0510366e-7,0.00001022105,0.0024654013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990556,0.00014385006,0.00023196897,0.000082545484,0.0002640694,0.00022192983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985695,0.0008059699,0.00016675978,0.00019376529,0.00020229525,0.000061709274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010287063,0.0000860706,0.00010663543,0.000012919318,0.0018123969,0.00018740726,0.0004095194,0.0000347893,0.00042068787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103092,0.000031158554,0.00010423949,0.000016913336,0.0011422009,0.00017491562,0.00006313844,0.00036214726,0.000044908695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025652678,0.00001758367,0.000004057463,0.000002182367,0.00003731949,0.00000410905,0.0031333028,7.7661167e-7,0.00028632671,0.99472547,0.00017904134,0.0015841717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015828181,0.00005163727,0.00000764368,0.000102269194,0.000013389259,0.000019930325,0.00084856065,0.0000047253743,0.0004949671,0.9152794,0.08296182,0.000057389778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008240636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00846385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017292528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035233155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192955726","doi":"10.1017/s0012217321000172","title":"Qu'est-ce qu'un constructiviste peut dire sur la question animale — ou toute autre question normative, d'ailleurs ?","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03290428832720264,"score_gpt":0.2693749751738298,"score_spread":0.23647068684662717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192955726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18177544,0.03695871,0.000664775,0.057519957,0.008869476,0.000670031,0.0035927095,0.00048098023,0.70946795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844221,0.003806554,0.00011740949,0.000895137,0.0019695163,0.00003362679,0.00057417393,0.00006861871,0.008112876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996187,0.0016456791,0.00060337584,0.00059985113,0.0004161239,0.00054799684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974044,0.00097113784,0.0002965583,0.0003973386,0.00066879933,0.00026175275],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010178739,0.0004719573,0.0005657461,0.00010902872,0.00087622344,0.0005199528,0.00021783862,0.00048185838,0.0009420513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069280475,0.0004923933,0.00028446547,0.00013932871,0.0016061771,0.00071918394,0.00017167475,0.0010836195,0.00031613396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073038456,0.00037206901,0.00021423814,0.00031740533,0.0001418126,0.00028441573,0.006857191,0.000017911954,0.00017248653,0.9788107,0.00087823294,0.011860453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009530329,0.00022462773,0.0016126726,0.00091028016,0.00021868164,0.00017235418,0.00077508047,0.000554854,0.0004898789,0.62356293,0.36979154,0.00073406525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002504678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002361097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80264664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012954621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004885339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203780436","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12800","title":"Deciding for Others: An Expressivist Theory of Normative Judgment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Expressivism; Normative; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Simple (philosophy); Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4872398578722462,"score_gpt":0.4083324099103052,"score_spread":0.07890744796194099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203780436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058106184,0.0028344882,0.000567801,0.00699777,0.00014316458,0.00048121813,0.00022648065,0.000049285245,0.9305936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981703,0.00018530972,0.0002059171,0.00045301442,0.0006290855,0.000093963965,0.000022673921,0.000015841395,0.00022386543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798596,0.0006184908,0.00028329543,0.00036315547,0.00037116843,0.00037790634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673545,0.0022174828,0.000066415894,0.00027311328,0.0005372922,0.00017025312],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002165169,0.00013859976,0.00028076392,0.00010444527,0.0006183541,0.00013150042,0.00025349535,0.000097550845,0.0010707477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070860144,0.00010295552,0.00007950892,0.00007542928,0.0015940584,0.00019008733,0.00021502937,0.0004676789,0.000011329923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028040697,0.00033099824,0.000004043096,0.00010853833,0.000054437907,0.0000061722258,0.01582715,0.0000014539307,0.00044054395,0.97881246,0.000014168995,0.004119623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042015305,0.0006847845,0.0000062518975,0.00006095557,0.000009549956,0.0000012465291,0.0055150916,0.000039140603,0.0005340591,0.9848972,0.007699461,0.00013209024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000060550665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000059309564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94006413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025096782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058585767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208510504","doi":"10.1007/s10677-021-10250-z","title":"Is Aristotelian Naturalism Safe From the Moral Outsider?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Trilemma; Epistemology; Philosophy; Counterexample; Rationality; Moral reasoning; Moral psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.09579185679022448,"score_gpt":0.3244499189331262,"score_spread":0.2286580621429017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208510504","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0152750565,0.004552721,0.00013101687,0.68811667,0.0014293129,0.00015221216,0.00018907305,0.00009833553,0.2900556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8167122,0.00028161562,0.00014210386,0.1788384,0.0014211746,0.0000064531196,0.000027112394,0.000021318046,0.0025496362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963597,0.002192578,0.00030787304,0.0004430357,0.00040389108,0.00029293718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891302,0.009776273,0.00013777456,0.00046599002,0.00032344265,0.00016634031],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00302844,0.00022880636,0.0002673556,0.000020092431,0.0009913935,0.0005300388,0.0002560236,0.00042325116,0.0038292692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059586926,0.0001497576,0.00014716413,0.000056867935,0.0014170663,0.00041998367,0.00024441755,0.0037662387,0.00022930121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035734693,0.00006606506,0.0000048491715,0.000010660116,0.000117194264,0.00011920514,0.02383208,7.0650174e-7,0.000055387452,0.9709672,0.0019047523,0.0025645683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021630389,0.000028456529,0.000049298756,0.000027387512,0.000089486864,0.00001952478,0.0032873277,0.000017868362,0.00009723421,0.6268936,0.369117,0.00015655725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035409242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010149302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80143714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016086118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010182694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212705307","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14649057.v1","title":"Collingwood’s philosophy of art as a basis for virtue aesthetics.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Aesthetics; Normative; Virtue ethics; Philosophy; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Expression (computer science); Focus (optics); Computer science","score_opus":0.06633137279792536,"score_gpt":0.27702505204336325,"score_spread":0.2106936792454379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212705307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010017191,0.00051888416,0.0008511896,0.019017339,0.0016208492,0.0007425987,0.0006569231,0.0001081623,0.96646684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909671,0.00013473109,0.0004603212,0.0023322767,0.0010880218,0.00014555638,0.0001859643,0.000058664496,0.004627395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839383,0.00007044429,0.00053669245,0.00047683928,0.00031065004,0.00021155807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806064,0.00034403012,0.0002701794,0.0005833091,0.00063489936,0.000106950414],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004449694,0.00030914106,0.0006349016,0.00012656701,0.00016833706,0.00020636551,0.0003841352,0.0002855496,0.0032390272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002154278,0.00027340796,0.0005853291,0.000020710242,0.0005370781,0.00005087711,0.0004040331,0.0006357261,0.00006358057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051439554,0.00022620945,3.964638e-7,0.0005257633,0.00015654152,0.0000068157005,0.0024984838,0.000027999426,0.000020431029,0.9958737,0.0004400679,0.00017214025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022384986,0.00016719048,2.7669088e-7,0.0004238278,0.00010288545,0.000001829754,0.00036014203,0.00019995733,0.000764041,0.9337138,0.06373121,0.0003109816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010061869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013017294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030209125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033263655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216348911","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v8i1.3336","title":"Francine and Gerison Lansdown Student Essay Prizes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Mathematics education; Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.01452889225196261,"score_gpt":0.21833089740819586,"score_spread":0.20380200515623326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216348911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730332,0.0045725536,0.000011731718,0.0007594014,0.0007285931,0.00011477299,0.00020955052,0.000011034786,0.020559179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966524,0.00015347217,0.00008797379,0.00042111144,0.0011932676,0.0000024020562,0.00002105462,0.000036904752,0.0014313868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981384,0.00013088454,0.00057298585,0.000297021,0.00014714795,0.0007135621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970362,0.0001274178,0.00024334785,0.00027990466,0.00065519847,0.0016579236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005077853,0.00027946537,0.00054395926,0.00032194238,0.0009058156,0.0003559075,0.00036795065,0.00012822544,0.0011204948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018992397,0.0002333962,0.00015551245,0.0001164649,0.0011645515,0.00035477037,0.000029352865,0.0005716215,0.000010827322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028026583,0.000059923987,0.0083886795,0.00009707641,0.00045852977,0.0022707123,0.08000129,0.000011909377,0.00006376914,0.90099156,0.0001424643,0.007486044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014606358,0.00038381698,0.04535709,0.000954187,0.00023264985,0.0029946633,0.0010323955,0.000013017779,0.00032948915,0.86066276,0.085872374,0.0007069167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02770369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8537936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8260899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037164052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073146925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217333261","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-84160-7_6","title":"“Wie die Triebe, so der Sinn; und wie der Sinn, so die Triebe”: Jacobi on Reason as a Form of Life","year":2021,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Die (integrated circuit); Philosophy; Materials science","score_opus":0.05640502350975492,"score_gpt":0.27257192643676925,"score_spread":0.21616690292701435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217333261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018058707,0.0504242,0.000066671964,0.014527358,0.002132412,0.0011183611,0.00091648253,0.00018497575,0.92882365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6350464,0.02202361,0.000074778814,0.021533268,0.007271531,0.00007006403,0.0009016391,0.00054219237,0.3125365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928276,0.00024822183,0.0022668298,0.0016773788,0.0017413434,0.0012386214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99256724,0.002410369,0.0011603802,0.0016793418,0.0012995909,0.00088309526],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012368389,0.0017676402,0.0026423733,0.00053191325,0.001875154,0.0012081004,0.000868177,0.0020038304,0.030534688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010006913,0.0014696349,0.0016368822,0.00007708851,0.003737115,0.00041432094,0.00061742926,0.0031309624,0.001955863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014038434,0.00076448557,0.0000022284032,0.0006548881,0.0029344966,0.00037879482,0.0037003062,0.000003083595,0.00002302809,0.97970074,0.0012028378,0.009231238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014185115,0.0007464774,0.0000049735186,0.0010665815,0.00086645805,0.0000042684655,0.00026000766,0.000020426993,0.00014101066,0.5114013,0.48306772,0.0010022875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014138574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00367897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6332405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023462984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001955159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W332223278","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0074-1_13","title":"Neither Logically Omniscient nor Completely Irrational Agents: Principles for a Fine-Grained Analysis of Propositional Attitudes and Attitude Revision","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Propositional calculus; Cognition; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.1365051078952021,"score_gpt":0.306098338124484,"score_spread":0.1695932302292819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W332223278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019445907,0.00037008733,0.0022997365,0.005944077,0.00029403705,0.0013485409,0.00372248,0.00007492282,0.9840015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5672894,0.00017394652,0.007868915,0.0032352828,0.0016380071,0.00008605844,0.003313351,0.000102105725,0.41629294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982196,0.000021041678,0.00064156274,0.00045798355,0.00049614336,0.0001636683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982683,0.0003821355,0.0003733719,0.0002553333,0.0006192941,0.000101545316],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053392345,0.0002980863,0.00061157707,0.00029217228,0.00037955234,0.00015277792,0.0002180417,0.00024596162,0.011030383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008588576,0.00020652951,0.00041738013,0.000022627775,0.0010285344,0.00007783085,0.00014430964,0.00033370825,0.0000137407105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007935868,0.00010946136,0.00001989104,0.00016704683,0.00093356695,0.0000015668896,0.00034165097,0.000014397805,0.00012465709,0.99785405,0.00011915154,0.00023517791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033339905,0.00025394815,0.00056785374,0.0001601845,0.0007224017,0.0000014280279,0.000007697964,0.0006295175,0.0000055166724,0.60070014,0.39628547,0.00033241528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015762806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013804784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5677086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002103334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008160022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98987365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W416282717","doi":"","title":"Special Issue: Who's Afraid Of Commodification? Introduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Economy","score_opus":0.03205196908679809,"score_gpt":0.2262325778145827,"score_spread":0.19418060872778461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W416282717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6705799,0.00006807127,0.00053926476,0.008201847,0.0010321331,0.0001362647,0.00006523495,0.000049982773,0.31932727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98288083,0.000069603644,0.000050326653,0.00007674739,0.007965892,1.7253832e-7,0.000037618072,0.000010365214,0.008908466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991078,0.0000801734,0.00017114717,0.00021069623,0.0002666321,0.00016355557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903566,0.00008050765,0.0002011382,0.00030985617,0.0003033533,0.00006951042],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031527653,0.00011428139,0.00025494487,0.00014894785,0.00043463573,0.000037156457,0.0002920022,0.00008966183,0.009525479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005085391,0.00013431921,0.00014049032,0.00009473177,0.0011471885,0.00033859693,0.00007558367,0.00021752279,0.00015755356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099639336,0.00012043454,0.00012283979,0.000033310745,0.000054971228,0.0000028463987,0.013731938,0.0000106263815,0.000006507837,0.97789013,0.0077848244,0.00014190782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028692326,0.000064340966,0.0002088954,0.000009274763,0.000035544796,0.0000018908536,0.0060576126,0.000024147272,7.648814e-7,0.7399688,0.2532394,0.000102421895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037738823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009475119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31230086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004359666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036218924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200325169","doi":"10.1017/9781108906999.006","title":"Schelling, Hegel, and Positivity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Humanity; Relation (database); Philosophy; Theme (computing); Identity (music); Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.04476261613094044,"score_gpt":0.19725766869996222,"score_spread":0.1524950525690218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200325169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021232026,0.0007176921,0.000025013213,0.00010427182,0.00025906967,0.00013477981,0.00040727618,0.000084889434,0.9980547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03468276,0.00031371316,0.000010489667,0.0002745962,0.00050150655,2.3793771e-7,0.000050841427,0.000038161423,0.9641277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990147,0.000044671764,0.0001271356,0.0004251228,0.00019425445,0.00019416174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990876,0.000117792224,0.00011764883,0.00032064976,0.00019745983,0.00015888775],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012123007,0.0002896997,0.0003555211,0.000088918096,0.00042773364,0.00014982614,0.00019950664,0.0002931612,0.000060361413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009007352,0.0003275281,0.00016553121,0.0000014517882,0.00092212146,0.00007959106,0.0003484492,0.0007725491,0.000013682511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041029696,0.000009259279,9.4925575e-8,0.000095944706,0.00013199862,0.00035744646,0.00030142424,9.3406065e-8,0.000011341697,0.9978571,0.0007647946,0.00042948697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024625962,0.00003627102,8.2631124e-7,0.00022725645,0.00016622091,0.000009386792,0.00006611086,0.000012520059,0.000054546257,0.011203948,0.9875957,0.0003809937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014197156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025178406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049166025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007695611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210574273","doi":"10.1086/713946","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Metaphysics; Moral philosophy; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Theology; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.15653136241803917,"score_gpt":0.32061704231834176,"score_spread":0.1640856799003026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210574273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020662833,0.0004140837,0.00008657562,0.23679566,0.002047839,0.00006579241,0.00009550988,0.00014771684,0.739684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97912943,0.00004920844,0.00001297222,0.018019548,0.0009177914,0.0000027880687,0.000015987027,0.000011297929,0.0018409864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992446,0.00012860668,0.000110466215,0.00014125035,0.00023553899,0.00013955538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747723,0.0019975873,0.00002773492,0.00017884861,0.00026359546,0.00005500224],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005445882,0.00008076012,0.00011093402,0.000019992076,0.00034234943,0.00011192505,0.00007965664,0.00014353397,0.0019317184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022125787,0.00006476107,0.00006986087,0.000019892905,0.0002840983,0.000038420312,0.00003604665,0.0011519301,0.0004058675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068504237,0.000042592947,0.000002960102,0.0000124233175,0.000014362714,0.000026046526,0.008830396,0.0000024316776,0.0000550643,0.9905312,0.00015966006,0.00031601236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009636372,0.000026032023,0.000008253673,0.000024078225,0.000005074335,7.582063e-7,0.00020161671,0.000007785684,0.0010875175,0.6544269,0.344047,0.00006864685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028017434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021286747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001259623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012004893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211215205","doi":"10.7202/1085679ar","title":"Lucy Allais et John J. Callanan (dir.), Kant and Animals, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2020, 258 p.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.11948613926213095,"score_gpt":0.290087004845708,"score_spread":0.17060086558357704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211215205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038890164,0.020568876,0.000024748302,0.102839686,0.00046800752,0.00033894763,0.000652649,0.00043945675,0.83577746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97559583,0.015938846,0.00011556701,0.004998828,0.0016283854,0.000003984091,0.0000795724,0.000042792377,0.0015961785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830115,0.0002561143,0.00027592035,0.00052821916,0.0002849127,0.00035368424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877137,0.000206335,0.00011476249,0.0003815087,0.0002945268,0.0002315031],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003458891,0.0002995232,0.0003855765,0.000053829463,0.00043316663,0.00023463521,0.0002662632,0.00015794762,0.0006787255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112785914,0.00028437984,0.00014664407,0.00004701335,0.0005479684,0.00031840833,0.00035119857,0.00052402576,0.0000096149615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006888309,0.00010808518,0.00004727703,0.00008702018,0.000107525026,0.00029235543,0.0020175357,0.0000011063478,0.00008276434,0.9939863,0.0028254683,0.00037566133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025322117,0.000066077344,0.00011062198,0.000040675866,0.00004073331,0.000013309722,0.00014829199,0.000034674787,0.0001167499,0.47246996,0.5264736,0.00023211462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023404494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006666737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9367057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004906354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010968773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211251895","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498084","title":"Freedom and Religion in Kant and his Immediate Successors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Meaning (existential); Faith; Exposition (narrative); Epistemology; Critical philosophy; Character (mathematics); Confusion; Literature; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.02253104033015182,"score_gpt":0.19230310744336346,"score_spread":0.16977206711321163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211251895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037718588,0.0010993482,0.0000018351905,0.00024619696,0.0002329757,0.00021852569,0.0002597752,0.000052030853,0.99411744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04731151,0.0016746399,0.0000058192986,0.00021113425,0.00067661604,8.639588e-7,0.000044812834,0.000032504275,0.95004207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893546,0.00006893199,0.0001798286,0.00040637626,0.00017167199,0.00023774388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992641,0.00015472253,0.00013429226,0.00022435491,0.00007498025,0.00014755444],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017883469,0.0002758111,0.0003763267,0.00022555667,0.00021862461,0.00009937465,0.00021580463,0.0003085827,0.0000070992037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000140884285,0.00029122934,0.000070907205,0.00000405635,0.001047987,0.0001179587,0.0003147495,0.00072459894,0.0000041254307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007270112,0.000011664189,0.000001553051,0.000119596174,0.000037179612,0.00014380617,0.0013972993,7.18141e-7,0.000002671794,0.9895816,0.008195009,0.00043621223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007353113,0.000047485195,0.000013018563,0.00024899168,0.00008937353,0.0000049688583,0.00008883427,0.00006719162,0.0000050721687,0.006821502,0.9915109,0.00036734607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009405477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025765234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9833159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011637166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009744304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212902497","doi":"10.11647/obp.0061.04","title":"4. Beyond Price","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; University of Melbourne; Monash University; University of Oxford; Dartmouth College; York University; Wake Forest University; Georgetown University; Amherst College; Australian National University; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; City University of New York","keywords":"Harm; Identity (music); Epistemology; Personal identity; Philosophy; Point (geometry); Psychology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Self; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10967371911051288,"score_gpt":0.27500637677083234,"score_spread":0.16533265766031946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212902497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.836282e-7,0.001841575,8.960358e-7,0.008916648,0.0014848218,0.00052261446,0.00013606645,0.00008328262,0.9870138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00047843083,0.0000480787,0.000019273804,0.0082005225,0.0019068761,0.000026796974,0.0002154407,0.00013115643,0.98897344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981004,0.000031003437,0.0003943644,0.0005488762,0.00059058674,0.00033476978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980094,0.00010855577,0.00028413918,0.0007107512,0.0005433349,0.0003438278],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000969041,0.0004178606,0.00053935626,0.00014555994,0.00031946314,0.005385292,0.001688321,0.00041792862,0.080405146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008831056,0.00036491608,0.00017703456,0.000009667469,0.0007405707,0.0029118527,0.0008576115,0.0011220183,0.0022228162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016488018,0.000011657258,1.9112585e-8,0.000013986879,0.00007462295,0.0000151471895,0.0009288515,1.5051315e-7,9.149961e-8,0.5941701,0.40400046,0.0007684579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016321687,0.000040549126,2.4478295e-8,0.00004816701,0.000027505332,0.0000013836469,0.000056996265,6.455004e-7,1.4096977e-7,0.49575135,0.5036459,0.0002641376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001587727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023430596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09964543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014214752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056641403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221007854","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12761","title":"Kant's Schematism of the categories: An interpretation and defence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Intuition; Object (grammar); Interpretation (philosophy); Schema (genetic algorithms); Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03475153966960281,"score_gpt":0.22425925588408235,"score_spread":0.18950771621447954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221007854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7404263,0.001132046,0.0002186448,0.0104785655,0.0014100774,0.0001353211,0.00004907644,0.000017413737,0.24613254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877214,0.0000134117645,0.000040663042,0.00064606365,0.00047386455,5.4809834e-7,8.2792184e-7,0.000015382933,0.000037081547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986151,0.0005901097,0.00035843052,0.00007904462,0.0002855986,0.00007173061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991575,0.00007793865,0.00042598625,0.00014977454,0.00013564188,0.000053161373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011290321,0.0000780573,0.00013863528,0.00006838595,0.00033251077,0.00004473065,0.0003584826,0.00000648538,0.000254575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084493724,0.000052367224,0.00008425609,0.000038736845,0.00039276973,0.00020869842,0.00016158438,0.00043451323,0.0000026270213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052853444,0.00005549116,0.000013131537,0.000024102415,0.000026265601,0.00001589628,0.024805477,0.00003271769,0.00032630668,0.9737862,0.000029831537,0.00083177735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027811632,0.0005134934,0.00015330526,0.00006605553,0.000030459358,0.000057634552,0.0013512033,0.00007544785,0.00008591854,0.99198204,0.0053266203,0.00007972906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000028991967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014608341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25834584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011586985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029859499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27874175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225876721","doi":"10.5922/0207-6918-2022-1-2","title":"Categorical Moral Requirements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical imperative; Epistemology; Philosophy; Moral reasoning; Morality; Appeal; Deliberation; Consequentialism; Moral psychology; Doctrine; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.1157293938900815,"score_gpt":0.2664138793720955,"score_spread":0.150684485482014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225876721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12167756,0.000804149,0.00020482494,0.036025066,0.008309556,0.00014055612,0.000054067634,0.00010525976,0.832679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949494,0.000009040606,0.0000151658905,0.0015770759,0.0015642132,0.0000036945066,0.0000043234018,0.000013653273,0.0018634122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989538,0.00013081272,0.00020458974,0.00010025123,0.00039033624,0.00022021354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961764,0.000022926455,0.000085618085,0.00009852835,0.0000538987,0.000121398894],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057328976,0.00007811843,0.00010511104,0.000078177116,0.0015186185,0.00018012122,0.00025162133,0.000015399259,0.02214892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019892917,0.00006648361,0.00010009165,0.00002921766,0.00014217834,0.00012882047,0.00011219718,0.00081008807,0.00009511271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021651991,0.000068569,0.000048672537,0.000002304583,0.000027347605,0.00015629939,0.0036981918,0.00001174022,0.000032330536,0.9912391,0.0037918366,0.00090197375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022122676,0.000109956396,0.000031542484,0.0000021862738,0.0000102948525,0.00015719577,0.0007958767,0.000047891328,0.0000061920546,0.7140603,0.28447437,0.00008296781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001335906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006963264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8732719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048842034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006318462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226213308","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2022.1.14303","title":"Blaming from Inside the Birdcage","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.03743475528505938,"score_gpt":0.22506190026630543,"score_spread":0.18762714498124605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226213308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10351026,0.00048701875,0.000014160655,0.033501737,0.002561172,0.00035599116,0.00094177347,0.00031035327,0.85831755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869518,0.0000021894336,0.000012831213,0.00874234,0.0034726344,0.00013320238,0.00006786595,0.000052103074,0.0005649786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805087,0.00027208196,0.0003902212,0.00040282993,0.0005530935,0.0003309302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985257,0.00051429146,0.00017086307,0.000641664,0.00004815066,0.00009936799],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004694868,0.00024558805,0.0002501932,0.00008529169,0.002366462,0.0002792502,0.00075753755,0.00004734625,0.004867161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021638874,0.00018781178,0.00020690062,0.00007985916,0.00069340947,0.00012681918,0.00014470969,0.00092967576,0.00034937123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004805421,0.000114705086,0.00000889101,0.000008467925,0.0000552551,0.000041534422,0.06037376,0.0000021901508,0.000055067852,0.93726915,0.000543836,0.0014790733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023905664,0.0003987081,0.000020116497,0.000011675589,0.00002591898,0.000004672665,0.005413272,0.000044590866,0.0000089096075,0.74141896,0.25220332,0.00021081041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035003913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008436429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88344157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053100677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061237675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230551874","doi":"10.4324/9781315717296-53","title":"Reid’s First Principle #7","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.10374558427298489,"score_gpt":0.26961568413644565,"score_spread":0.16587009986346077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230551874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000011351005,0.0001947959,0.0000020961904,0.003971318,0.00077496184,0.00011232165,0.00007575512,0.00009602731,0.9947716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028773604,0.00018256593,0.000006919542,0.00087604916,0.0027558757,0.0000047053545,0.000030436806,0.000054784367,0.9673151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915284,0.000003899214,0.00020107099,0.0002661486,0.00021824842,0.00015781207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887574,0.00007849123,0.0001672506,0.00068110565,0.00011033251,0.00008707652],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017155266,0.00024019348,0.00028283242,0.00005366436,0.00073082274,0.00026479593,0.0003939964,0.0002593946,0.044984132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003518721,0.00018523086,0.00019068949,3.9028495e-7,0.00067039864,0.00007797741,0.00017487272,0.0005833408,0.003138357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059073427,0.0000066591247,5.8795127e-8,0.00004044849,0.000046679055,0.000018393062,0.0005363235,5.332261e-8,6.032471e-8,0.996213,0.0027152193,0.00041716016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042993375,0.000017277327,1.6112048e-7,0.00006829778,0.000014033988,6.984792e-7,0.0000021369526,0.0000014305936,3.9885128e-7,0.497702,0.5020093,0.00014130068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005479154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019469819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49929404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022552684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049544287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232457087","doi":"10.1353/hms.2019.0000","title":"Transcendental Inquiry and the Belief in Body: Comments on Rocknak's Imagined Causes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Aside; Focus (optics); Set (abstract data type); Philosophy; Representation (politics); Perception; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.08205095147752492,"score_gpt":0.3112109133168477,"score_spread":0.22915996183932277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232457087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8854616,0.0043785744,3.41867e-7,0.023348618,0.0009848705,0.00038905733,0.00002355735,0.000043343767,0.08537002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948559,0.00060624717,6.700307e-7,0.0034870298,0.0002722035,0.000022205691,0.000002396524,0.000010659993,0.00074269006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928635,0.00008510107,0.00015776529,0.00016073331,0.00015153186,0.00015853891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994427,0.0003352556,0.00003392922,0.00012963681,0.000037388298,0.000021099588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029488443,0.00012809277,0.00024276684,0.000047658035,0.0002461302,0.00005618308,0.000098844845,0.00002367796,0.00014131604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035846067,0.00007486285,0.000048258513,0.000017258197,0.00096484664,0.000079123514,0.00007669658,0.00023735248,0.000070106515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013855702,0.00006870124,0.0003768591,0.00003850186,0.00010397752,0.0000040651466,0.08076207,9.0539476e-7,0.000014844334,0.9180121,0.00033801218,0.0001414261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048182975,0.00023337879,0.0024092966,0.00020232829,0.00004876173,0.000001953014,0.03344016,0.000027861219,0.0000698052,0.9214956,0.036965515,0.00028703595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066598004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000375942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109394275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016893015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063845864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35550174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233207562","doi":"10.1353/hms.2019.0011","title":"Reply to My Critics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Passions; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Passion; Context (archaeology); Politics; Capitalism; Aesthetics; Literature; History; Psychology; Law; Theology; Political science; Art; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12240789021143836,"score_gpt":0.325164783920653,"score_spread":0.20275689370921465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233207562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089902274,0.0016860428,0.0000029132732,0.036307763,0.0016555693,0.0001957759,0.000021225245,0.00011612629,0.8701123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96660674,0.000071771545,0.000023997814,0.01811861,0.00072155223,0.000012401044,0.0000010538319,0.000012346249,0.014431547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993723,0.000021901824,0.00013318472,0.00016580439,0.00013916004,0.00016763847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993874,0.00016287903,0.00002014113,0.00020091243,0.00018411294,0.00004460078],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019277491,0.00009331981,0.00017670805,0.0000399043,0.00021870442,0.00005409573,0.00010272192,0.000017461512,0.0008906315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001729887,0.000071968454,0.000052167285,0.00001817714,0.00021952408,0.00005935187,0.0001225784,0.00012627292,0.0019405319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007296633,0.000016950353,0.00001917666,0.000039031336,0.000052558444,0.0000026969,0.026231902,8.368386e-7,0.000018099185,0.96640444,0.007023817,0.00018322204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000645841,0.00006886884,0.00002077783,0.00002852313,0.000007813976,2.7319615e-7,0.004000601,0.0000011873847,0.000021475153,0.47480327,0.52090114,0.0000814708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024155574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042689655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87670445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013885366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009971914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235412235","doi":"10.15173/russell.v27i1.2109","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.06606504677866488,"score_gpt":0.30039900866303176,"score_spread":0.2343339618843669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235412235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77156204,0.034541883,0.00037178848,0.043545995,0.0053930217,0.00042704208,0.000033479053,0.000072937175,0.14405179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99093497,0.004826439,0.000012677729,0.0015755319,0.002120574,6.618678e-7,4.9489375e-7,0.000021265563,0.0005073832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823284,0.00014480946,0.00068015215,0.00010887317,0.00047762285,0.00035571677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946939,0.0041663805,0.00040846472,0.00018361238,0.00043823832,0.00010943216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038734213,0.00023782936,0.0004987886,0.00013122855,0.00077001203,0.00006374845,0.0003325623,0.00007191346,0.000178676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038603458,0.000111809226,0.00026501194,0.000065273525,0.0008343831,0.00011949146,0.00003805569,0.00068061554,0.00005972886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001030591,0.00022963835,0.00003372544,0.000046805857,0.00085256976,0.000057079815,0.03709309,0.000038869526,0.0003656305,0.95677274,0.0016318277,0.0018474351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018256808,0.0012177698,0.00026302773,0.00032969558,0.00049141847,0.000069671725,0.009088451,0.0000066707503,0.006557329,0.70644873,0.27331367,0.00038786975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026325386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019290976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27168185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040061732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031604086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5922388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238295738","doi":"10.1093/0199267677.001.0001","title":"Moral Animals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Subordination (linguistics); Moral realism; Sociology; Epistemology; Morality; Normative ethics; Objectivity (philosophy); Distributive justice; Social cognitive theory of morality; Economic Justice; Moral psychology; Distributive property; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.08775112809342979,"score_gpt":0.23878830813161847,"score_spread":0.15103718003818867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238295738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000012659422,0.00041452303,0.0000025307972,0.0018717861,0.0004345299,0.00008748524,0.000071755836,0.000120866585,0.9969953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021473762,0.000024028433,0.00001041592,0.0019387819,0.0030768428,0.0000042029187,0.00004424658,0.00004114893,0.9733866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992612,0.000010444263,0.00017837998,0.00019633716,0.00019627862,0.0001573763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995392,0.000052424497,0.000063013445,0.000197493,0.00008036407,0.00006751925],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011466186,0.00019232143,0.00024561153,0.000059214515,0.00013884486,0.00012836063,0.00018212649,0.00020525533,0.029642006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001077781,0.00014766013,0.0001544594,0.0000032182945,0.00049537496,0.00003805223,0.00005955383,0.00051425496,0.0014727201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004430678,0.000011186903,1.2688868e-8,0.000039344173,0.00003047149,0.000015411024,0.0012338472,3.2896986e-7,1.687377e-7,0.9886588,0.009862176,0.00014383842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051034123,0.000028653445,4.6263686e-8,0.000041953823,0.000011676722,5.9634505e-7,0.0000085639385,4.0087286e-7,6.8086285e-7,0.51094425,0.4887984,0.000113723414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031852647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017461627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47893623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012487087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060953596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241622744","doi":"10.1017/9781108348683.004","title":"Duress","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.045549618465698,"score_gpt":0.1941824600103856,"score_spread":0.14863284154468762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241622744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000217608,0.00014028366,0.000008654546,0.00012213175,0.0007953946,0.00025073273,0.00060333055,0.00013552241,0.9979222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01036574,0.00008096029,0.0000025596526,0.00033928835,0.0007582814,2.347674e-7,0.000056835263,0.000059035803,0.98833704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890995,0.000028789376,0.0001526495,0.00040630504,0.0002670985,0.00023517932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888176,0.00010631911,0.00016653773,0.0005261299,0.00018885185,0.00013037512],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009933369,0.00033195337,0.0003836385,0.00012996251,0.0002850221,0.0001002594,0.00050264935,0.0003491225,0.000165499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000063244665,0.00035278057,0.00027649692,0.0000011128534,0.00070804876,0.000075926284,0.00031867705,0.0008262327,0.00025914042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056035584,0.000007284778,3.0240148e-8,0.00010431074,0.00013356635,0.00013185099,0.0003025571,3.366772e-7,0.000002783302,0.987987,0.011024681,0.00024960304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031316956,0.0000429842,2.3294369e-7,0.00015859792,0.00013835476,0.0000029871596,0.000040514045,0.000009459999,0.000010381616,0.014377498,0.9844762,0.0004296334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010272451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97360945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007839299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011768633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241910029","doi":"10.3386/w26119","title":"Projective Paternalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; University of Toronto; European Commission; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Paternalism; Projective test; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.6732305711220063,"score_gpt":0.5513546392234524,"score_spread":0.12187593189855395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241910029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00081777095,0.00033583716,2.141694e-7,0.0012058474,0.0013255009,0.00040444234,0.00040132678,0.00001226282,0.9954968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90957355,0.00047100984,0.000004603493,0.000055733934,0.004801618,0.00006424479,0.00031965933,0.000042814903,0.08466679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969427,0.00017972398,0.0004959127,0.00040067147,0.0016958046,0.0002852095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947849,0.0010988719,0.0002636768,0.0002523211,0.003537653,0.00006259406],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056926934,0.0001681791,0.0004114843,0.0006181021,0.0001539664,0.0001307251,0.00047883467,0.00030391262,0.004552474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007257239,0.00014733545,0.00020038486,0.000026493793,0.0007506535,0.00013166438,0.00018817023,0.0012650844,0.0009925397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003356019,0.000047374586,0.000009126305,0.000179345,0.00016571942,0.0000020717823,0.0009828436,0.000007651853,0.00000454831,0.9795771,0.018688075,0.0003025585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013466111,0.00007015524,0.000008695085,0.00010175769,0.0000059023037,0.0000026080338,0.000075546835,0.000031120777,0.000017732165,0.7662239,0.23321292,0.00011501411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048498926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044972068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009669213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004566279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245192295","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_233-1","title":"The Great Enrichment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06075185766014125,"score_gpt":0.24131263717078774,"score_spread":0.1805607795106465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245192295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000011535594,0.0005096507,0.0000020131586,0.004278738,0.0009069816,0.000095741554,0.000021207445,0.000055238026,0.9941293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004649686,0.00036501756,0.0000020574862,0.0018387747,0.0036408708,0.0000050581834,0.000009233692,0.00003000604,0.9894593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992918,0.000008470868,0.00016995355,0.00016927594,0.00021966331,0.00014088376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992474,0.00018315412,0.000069167996,0.00032789347,0.00012127362,0.00005113644],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021997518,0.00017829443,0.00014003535,0.000024336316,0.0005913789,0.00020228041,0.00023653352,0.00012773107,0.060706567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009533226,0.00009092553,0.00013271028,0.000001170222,0.0010185583,0.000024264966,0.00009838544,0.0003319742,0.004112176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006041635,0.0000025269294,6.924262e-9,0.00000498058,0.000054307595,0.0000024859066,0.00080249406,3.8772012e-9,6.700532e-8,0.976399,0.021103065,0.0016250106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021479644,0.00002901358,1.88219e-8,0.000013954724,0.000012125731,3.6235028e-7,0.000015235952,5.7308756e-7,4.225756e-7,0.49956408,0.50026804,0.00007468425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013765674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038205174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.479165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020588583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027423492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247126131","doi":"10.1353/hms.2019.0007","title":"Précis of Reflecting Subjects: Passion, Sympathy, and Society in Hume's Philosophy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Passion; Sympathy; Pride; Epistemology; Philosophy; Virtue; Agency (philosophy); Causation; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.10353716873613164,"score_gpt":0.32526898634914053,"score_spread":0.2217318176130089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247126131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7633142,0.0063082674,4.493895e-7,0.0027453832,0.00045903953,0.00022348104,0.000015180725,0.000048571022,0.22688545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976004,0.0010371993,0.000019678078,0.0005657246,0.00032147838,0.000012543981,0.0000016379656,0.000015398711,0.000425939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905074,0.00005666302,0.00028685833,0.00023318153,0.00017368067,0.0001988781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922925,0.00031228337,0.00011371166,0.0001579762,0.00015658072,0.000030214826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047878257,0.00014585079,0.00035375074,0.000059746544,0.00021782155,0.00002699954,0.000088433466,0.00005940794,0.00010547885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011648491,0.00011168715,0.00009344527,0.000051759966,0.00052998774,0.00012370312,0.00016520533,0.00026284257,0.000015713193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018856499,0.00005101117,0.0006396067,0.00031259985,0.00010290135,0.0000017617126,0.07463782,7.2751567e-7,0.0001805513,0.9235922,0.00020453359,0.0002574292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004381858,0.0001721744,0.00063679426,0.00033708327,0.000017146154,7.24745e-7,0.016403906,0.000016103715,0.00017462469,0.976948,0.004674445,0.00018079832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052662173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083502804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23428622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019572035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017858358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.455447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247292908","doi":"10.5325/jnietstud.50.1.0179","title":"Nietzsche's Constructivism: A Metaphysics of Material Objects","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Nietzsche Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Constructivism (international relations); Eliminative materialism; Object (grammar); Realism","score_opus":0.051909931448798685,"score_gpt":0.2718801091680253,"score_spread":0.2199701777192266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247292908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9699652,0.0031152791,0.000006315596,0.0013860898,0.0019310588,0.00012353907,0.000025874746,0.000010738128,0.023435857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975649,0.0009169481,0.00005669038,0.00023947273,0.00095735985,0.0000010572255,4.0540127e-7,0.000015866824,0.00024728832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863183,0.00021535817,0.0005090064,0.00007947565,0.00038843794,0.00017589096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787027,0.000596614,0.00063127535,0.00021221454,0.0006503239,0.000039335304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012516793,0.00016503518,0.000586343,0.00007036162,0.00017366208,0.000033738837,0.0003208376,0.000042399402,0.00028489236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015429656,0.00008849837,0.00022182826,0.00005013573,0.001049007,0.00020065253,0.00013919668,0.00040259416,0.000025666832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063302804,0.00013833433,0.00010179318,0.00024412869,0.0024000995,0.000007173245,0.07579584,0.000023031873,0.009486542,0.9094094,0.0012033435,0.00055726035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010233799,0.0008079283,0.00011231818,0.00029073466,0.00054239744,0.00005231894,0.04814877,0.00000927686,0.011926401,0.92954785,0.0072926525,0.00024596142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014505396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000122750735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027647069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016187001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006630279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38651103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247604181","doi":"10.1017/9780511780240.018","title":"The Becoming of Essence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Negation; Simple (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Quality (philosophy); Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Programming language","score_opus":0.03965867606231445,"score_gpt":0.25662487565121866,"score_spread":0.21696619958890423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247604181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000029399175,0.00022343706,0.000008645406,0.001453854,0.000693058,0.000043458047,0.000014003157,0.000036542246,0.9975241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039102796,0.000085397085,0.000013273536,0.00021174896,0.0010058663,0.0000027298381,0.0000014647354,0.000080089936,0.9594966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996651,0.0000128886495,0.00008844638,0.00006928688,0.000090762725,0.00007355051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995087,0.00016659308,0.00008396247,0.00020059457,0.000023271441,0.000016917753],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014627914,0.000069991176,0.00010020323,0.000024863508,0.0001241829,0.000037176695,0.00020275668,0.00010215651,0.019786613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031989533,0.000036068795,0.000047781097,0.000004623998,0.00062273734,0.000007686553,0.00003831652,0.00030697157,0.0000855118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.3454427e-7,0.0000061952583,1.0037826e-7,0.000015165917,0.000013695819,2.5219663e-7,0.00032552014,2.5826434e-9,0.000007345439,0.9688716,0.02993499,0.0008243334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014455776,0.0000032878716,7.846312e-8,0.000020930296,0.000003134434,6.5024345e-8,0.000057369558,8.478583e-7,0.000005888133,0.44080096,0.5590617,0.00003124139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044303795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008252689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52912676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000010806573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017412249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98110944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248948922","doi":"10.1057/9781137412119_8","title":"Conclusion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Nothing; Contradiction; Determinacy; Epistemology; Dialectic; Abstraction; Teleology; Hegelianism; Philosophy; Mechanism (biology); Cognitive science; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03773266290371203,"score_gpt":0.23125672801591063,"score_spread":0.1935240651121986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248948922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013388487,0.0005225401,0.000026792404,0.00035069903,0.0010233186,0.00027120282,0.0001725609,0.00015682113,0.9974627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90465164,0.000053868924,0.000009576155,0.0018876417,0.0031742582,0.00001066815,0.00007978179,0.00012278234,0.09000979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982192,0.000039729654,0.0004531877,0.0004920885,0.00045007304,0.00034572318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984889,0.00022418977,0.00026589847,0.0006261647,0.00019571678,0.0001991422],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033978734,0.0005289886,0.00060063734,0.0001662926,0.00044111777,0.0001408101,0.00040324472,0.00042933953,0.008280174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028394361,0.0004448172,0.00036723106,0.0000020718492,0.00093355804,2.78786e-7,0.00029581686,0.00076709833,0.0015579233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023364235,1.5944713e-7,1.8630368e-7,0.000064887776,0.0000851993,0.000029595947,0.0016221007,7.94197e-8,0.000014651264,0.99132013,0.000036372425,0.006803293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019299157,0.00008314291,3.3789325e-7,0.00016329242,0.000058861468,0.0000048192214,0.0000144651485,0.000006919782,0.000012220926,0.72263575,0.2763945,0.00043270437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004401581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002673166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9074529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004315734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005835437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249469873","doi":"10.1093/owc/9780199217946.003.0006","title":"V","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.053952684854161895,"score_gpt":0.20083759992725347,"score_spread":0.1468849150730916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249469873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003661391,0.0000641103,0.000005373088,0.00016356277,0.00021749383,0.00013139193,0.00014153119,0.00013003868,0.9991428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035726337,0.0001495044,0.000010387752,0.00039714377,0.00059001485,1.276346e-7,0.000024967607,0.000029350178,0.99522585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992107,0.000016118176,0.00011704808,0.00027246305,0.0002018178,0.00018186394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993006,0.00005059377,0.000118026386,0.000317669,0.000105451865,0.000107645035],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000072013965,0.00025088087,0.00026699097,0.000099983525,0.00031768842,0.00007550642,0.0003669408,0.00027631907,0.0006514499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000030443061,0.00026264045,0.00021189978,7.8906567e-7,0.0004847888,0.000060774677,0.00014039963,0.00062794954,0.00000821844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004190156,0.0000072414664,6.7760815e-9,0.000021632211,0.00006612684,0.00008984969,0.0008379259,2.6021854e-7,4.6050675e-7,0.9897665,0.00066660985,0.00850148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112584836,0.00003737368,4.421187e-8,0.00005010998,0.000055821154,8.2428727e-7,0.000014968367,0.0000018540985,0.0000016132507,0.4322415,0.56730425,0.00017908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000255368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051134644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56663764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050748018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045999994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250750001","doi":"10.4324/9781315669052-51","title":"References","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.18607954604421936,"score_gpt":0.2731439684243684,"score_spread":0.08706442238014903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250750001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[4.9867714e-7,0.00022528085,6.4836e-7,0.0021251724,0.00060308946,0.000043818574,0.0000458914,0.00005652448,0.99689907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044854585,0.00017866695,0.0000032415753,0.0006422714,0.0019167851,0.0000015327498,0.000017764556,0.000021758773,0.9523634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994655,0.0000034266673,0.00012104691,0.0001679421,0.0001524197,0.000089644476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935454,0.000050537154,0.00011019717,0.00035634023,0.00008113429,0.000047257243],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000108539636,0.00015371802,0.00019385817,0.000038504124,0.00036181507,0.00022853108,0.00028624892,0.00017152935,0.0567581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014737373,0.00010720927,0.00010499627,1.6283998e-7,0.00065002317,0.000055351764,0.00007084948,0.00040483114,0.0024122233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025097404,0.0000023722678,1.1254034e-8,0.0000118539,0.000028816019,0.0000058694836,0.00041416142,2.7387579e-9,6.725168e-8,0.9942729,0.0022593406,0.003002094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016674503,0.000013206398,4.304142e-8,0.000038034355,0.0000091426755,2.1688295e-7,0.000004592569,2.0802167e-7,2.3188677e-7,0.5019636,0.49786648,0.00008755051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047250007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007727771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49560714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000063548464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003582028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251220923","doi":"10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah13052","title":"<i>Consensus</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Ancient History","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Rhetoric; Foundation (evidence); Term (time); Epistemology; Politics; Political science; Consensus conference; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Linguistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Library science; Physics","score_opus":0.033001309574386815,"score_gpt":0.21319362630919567,"score_spread":0.18019231673480884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251220923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022801412,0.035065226,0.0000011239684,0.00041252622,0.0058778767,0.00016295994,0.00009256701,0.00009873928,0.9582662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030221345,0.00086251966,0.000015909945,0.001461787,0.0041284664,0.00001334297,0.0000136265635,0.0002252021,0.990257],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989244,0.00008788808,0.00024075272,0.00017825924,0.0003088056,0.00025994773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889785,0.00013168993,0.00032025235,0.0005193339,0.00004750739,0.00008339097],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041413875,0.00021742136,0.00029736292,0.00012490938,0.00008053216,0.0000047356357,0.00039133898,0.00014976868,0.032421682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043758097,0.00014408171,0.00016030876,0.000016625985,0.0016130961,0.000016907436,0.0000778116,0.00040213042,0.0007709935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003669949,0.000039665127,5.0492343e-7,0.000045246026,0.000020028583,9.1803986e-7,0.0038244112,3.9365922e-8,0.0000028671209,0.44135264,0.5544442,0.00026582764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082489714,0.000020704021,0.0000023653406,0.000073657015,0.00006703297,9.423971e-7,0.00009520777,3.9358667e-7,7.1365986e-7,0.013667573,0.9858029,0.00018600446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027450378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022972439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43135872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008991873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014991693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252777720","doi":"10.1017/9781316569894.007","title":"Preface to the Second Edition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Spell; Key (lock); Reading (process); Epistemology; Philosophy; Element (criminal law); Theology; Law; Linguistics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04441174172897921,"score_gpt":0.20137043684645978,"score_spread":0.15695869511748056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252777720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008137577,0.000041428746,0.000039341092,0.00046608143,0.0009513577,0.0003515881,0.0011882473,0.000089485926,0.99679106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007780841,0.00001085639,0.0000038860258,0.0011496138,0.0030354585,0.000001042535,0.000041738043,0.000036774763,0.9879398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990562,0.000037900507,0.00012782212,0.0003415398,0.00023590606,0.00020059214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892116,0.00009347991,0.00011720788,0.0004866087,0.00024561715,0.00013591957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016409007,0.00025395516,0.00021975023,0.00008572415,0.0005891493,0.00012304641,0.00052990386,0.00021653716,0.0008368999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009052963,0.00021336989,0.00016311611,0.0000019201793,0.0007239262,0.00007142911,0.00033650044,0.0005671024,0.00036190797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043800897,0.0000041276453,3.814777e-9,0.000035153604,0.00006832653,0.000019204117,0.0012764598,1.4033104e-7,0.0000029525042,0.85296416,0.14547335,0.00011232037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013940052,0.00008013593,2.8970462e-7,0.000099133824,0.000079638456,0.000002092918,0.00010422382,0.000003957419,0.00005032535,0.015159861,0.98400414,0.00027680647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004399261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009804094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8385308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073620045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057506943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9163467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253652310","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139043281.008","title":"Book III","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Sequence (biology); Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Theology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04438042789904967,"score_gpt":0.19674375539386832,"score_spread":0.15236332749481865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253652310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000029957434,0.0033569515,0.000013033184,0.00012056486,0.0005868123,0.00022041104,0.00035421373,0.00016390224,0.99518114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031749532,0.00043674852,0.0000024726212,0.001364217,0.0015287361,5.2000644e-7,0.000053650147,0.000060584407,0.9933781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988816,0.000030024592,0.00017279552,0.00033599004,0.00026180292,0.00031778007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988724,0.00009030927,0.00017837917,0.0004672245,0.00016262,0.00022905113],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012361606,0.00035862866,0.00038492001,0.00012933758,0.00042960353,0.00007764271,0.00043683845,0.00036121794,0.0006590605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000041388575,0.0003838693,0.00028826672,0.0000010949232,0.0009485641,0.00014815005,0.0003321749,0.00084979285,0.00018392954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000529635,0.000010293741,1.1584083e-8,0.00005162581,0.0001333133,0.00007366501,0.0005543327,5.331841e-8,0.000002029609,0.9272643,0.0714024,0.0004550485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034125624,0.000030900064,1.14990634e-7,0.000107547625,0.00021964924,0.0000037592188,0.000037185666,0.0000023827492,0.000016601285,0.005304124,0.9934768,0.00045965635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111180336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047661365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92207444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000945198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006606007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256204350","doi":"10.1017/s0012217312000352","title":"Meaning in Life and Why It MattersSusan Wolf Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010, 168 pp., $25.95 (hardcover)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Art; Library science; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05152912136094042,"score_gpt":0.2268341473699936,"score_spread":0.17530502600905318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256204350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23476206,0.0045768297,0.00006318742,0.016563524,0.0027170316,0.00069208106,0.00030635306,0.0002430493,0.7400759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99448496,0.0010904925,0.00002484534,0.0028161556,0.00088690594,0.0000033827996,0.000028432501,0.0000204529,0.0006443838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988907,0.00013095443,0.00018708268,0.00023389337,0.00017644854,0.000380921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992842,0.00016488155,0.000087819775,0.0002242132,0.00004118623,0.00019767511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045895195,0.00017371713,0.00024702225,0.000051782703,0.00022885163,0.00009871627,0.00019864908,0.00011547411,0.00037915868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007350738,0.0001662158,0.000057223617,0.00003258631,0.0003445219,0.0005153616,0.00020461835,0.0003928123,0.00006311955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004809159,0.00009330011,0.0016210503,0.00005675,0.00002805975,0.0000112733815,0.009196448,0.0000037177965,0.00003302067,0.97933125,0.009440795,0.0001362554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058022665,0.000035232795,0.0013870051,0.00008057526,0.00002314337,0.0000020290813,0.000676732,0.00003956151,0.000038443734,0.042350244,0.95450014,0.00028665873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070803554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005561717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94505936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004509355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034385812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67780834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W427181296","doi":"","title":"The Life-Value of Death Mortality, Finitude, and Meaningful Lives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osaka Prefecture University Repository (Osaka Prefecture University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Limiting; Value of life; Human life; Limit (mathematics); The good life; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.016307741935291584,"score_gpt":0.18344886566820245,"score_spread":0.16714112373291087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W427181296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5690158,0.00057776185,0.00014078301,0.001180359,0.00073820923,0.0008205681,0.00006456133,0.00025847644,0.4272035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870557,0.00024076785,0.00006536205,0.00021234843,0.00034504168,8.1868734e-7,0.000015314374,0.000033510092,0.012031118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973608,0.0006697446,0.00029785797,0.00068541826,0.00048047205,0.00050568354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971473,0.0008412677,0.00036829335,0.0007664196,0.0004846023,0.0003920986],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031617732,0.0004762068,0.0005245301,0.00030727914,0.0020554292,0.0002521303,0.00095261727,0.00033207223,0.0002555527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015200328,0.00034825542,0.000349986,0.0001955985,0.0015404751,0.0006420999,0.0006106298,0.0009357261,0.00002465443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018447019,0.00013897607,0.0016167455,0.00014683815,0.0007706153,0.00012038399,0.009411239,0.000104062,0.00084422174,0.9858928,0.00044379514,0.00032590417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041618273,0.0013066499,0.03283187,0.00051499775,0.0027257518,0.0000972579,0.017795831,0.0006127768,0.0021586684,0.17723449,0.75803334,0.0025265415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012635976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064538914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80865824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012212798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020596645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283764942","doi":"10.53000/cpa.v11i22/23.766","title":"The greeks and the good life","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Estudos Filosóficos e Históricos da Antiguidade","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Greeks; Philosophy; Humanities; Epistemology; History; Ancient history","score_opus":0.04094976098283919,"score_gpt":0.26363817716441407,"score_spread":0.22268841618157487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283764942","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18708494,0.53318954,0.00041463482,0.13180554,0.0056673144,0.004940685,0.0007808,0.0005157693,0.13560076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97609997,0.00982452,0.000016947684,0.0046177343,0.004073865,0.00014108373,0.000021742091,0.0001409252,0.0050632237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936556,0.0017161816,0.0013130937,0.00067754433,0.000931237,0.0017062958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932185,0.0034115887,0.0007159579,0.0015162408,0.0002932791,0.0008444394],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059159743,0.0008726128,0.001064071,0.00012613475,0.0052434597,0.0030506174,0.0013317901,0.0004066084,0.0005889294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018950939,0.000500181,0.000585557,0.0002631011,0.00486167,0.00041210424,0.00071870093,0.0020113797,0.00045991412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031334098,0.00042152792,0.0014213974,0.00030216633,0.00046555215,0.000014814263,0.010217088,6.723917e-7,0.00002477377,0.9781676,0.006446264,0.0022048356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002471128,0.00020026171,0.0037190416,0.00040308823,0.000860084,0.00008200863,0.0026557348,0.0005510753,0.000009743971,0.049517445,0.93858963,0.0009407564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019303123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029836572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9321434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017229664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032546863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285177057","doi":"10.5840/envirophil2022531116","title":"Listening to Nature’s Voices: Human and Animal Autonomy in Hegel","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Autonomy; Active listening; Epistemology; Philosophy; Relation (database); Contemporary philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Communication; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016965331174177378,"score_gpt":0.228441642638919,"score_spread":0.21147631146474163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285177057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8434357,0.0004080085,4.585265e-7,0.0052608363,0.00019355601,0.0002348018,0.00012090206,0.000040644114,0.1503051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943434,0.00000370261,0.000020953776,0.004555429,0.0005423146,0.000077321325,0.000039546438,0.000030844236,0.00038647087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881077,0.00008303351,0.0002256359,0.00037103874,0.00027337985,0.00023615621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959546,0.00004969042,0.000054321612,0.000181142,0.0000020119446,0.00011739709],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022076747,0.00017484893,0.00017996915,0.00013792132,0.0007018154,0.000067290704,0.00019779245,0.00005512887,0.0019348392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000057314114,0.00018433096,0.000058679558,0.000032522046,0.0002871542,0.00014799241,0.00050985836,0.00085547793,0.000055198834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004788325,0.00018272063,0.0003939711,0.000011309602,0.00001445822,0.00003013939,0.009353104,0.00002393294,0.0014950471,0.9882691,0.000024466752,0.00015390081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050746324,0.00045466656,0.002244347,0.000016289297,0.000010102717,0.0000067780215,0.001221496,0.000035441124,0.000051247644,0.86847657,0.12663494,0.00034065516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005042845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030665236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15090773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016818322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010493992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285724186","doi":"10.1353/hms.2020.0003","title":"Hume's Account of the Scope of Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2203849562051002,"score_gpt":0.3174156946892291,"score_spread":0.09703073848412888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285724186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12548175,0.024003116,0.000005955843,0.041726258,0.0014116503,0.0003280749,0.00012723055,0.00005982029,0.80685616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699885,0.0005551258,0.0000061796636,0.0017000248,0.0004655894,0.0000038992525,3.7150147e-7,0.0000071741856,0.00026277947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939543,0.00003794497,0.00020020492,0.0000964068,0.00018123718,0.000088750196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993473,0.00017004178,0.00011002198,0.00013414503,0.00021836365,0.000020122783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014602112,0.00007891833,0.00021714982,0.00001215257,0.00020610007,0.000011266942,0.00019155334,0.000020347767,0.00023815635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032973272,0.00004586426,0.000085160624,0.0000329344,0.00096519786,0.00004671554,0.0001988461,0.00013528719,0.00001753972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015676902,0.000022008588,0.000008169199,0.00031259537,0.00010636664,4.910252e-7,0.033036485,0.0000032670048,0.00023729423,0.96478987,0.0013023257,0.00016543327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040506083,0.00021541998,0.0002519942,0.0002561055,0.00034569087,3.2965045e-7,0.02079708,0.000013456146,0.002985337,0.82492614,0.14960507,0.00019831778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020133311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005262412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8715171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000048008956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021244528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35563117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286492816","doi":"10.1017/s0953820822000152","title":"The Decline of Egoism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.039614504713568574,"score_gpt":0.24350493654294622,"score_spread":0.20389043182937766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286492816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08710302,0.0028167004,0.0000054683005,0.03369614,0.0012050271,0.0001363578,0.00016970118,0.00004805421,0.8748195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996831,0.000012504717,0.0000026319778,0.0010534097,0.00015366175,0.000012023833,0.00000408572,0.000005071913,0.0019256091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994843,0.000069297836,0.00012346974,0.00006309382,0.00017287594,0.000086975386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994341,0.0003111512,0.000034947323,0.00016608715,0.00003524204,0.00001848506],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005507867,0.0000378754,0.00005958682,0.000014405932,0.000634044,0.000016617381,0.00019566731,0.000008444942,0.0032202313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006365064,0.000024527202,0.000054261232,0.000015854097,0.00033765507,0.000017439274,0.00019113091,0.00017791377,0.000017929971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018120416,0.000028589824,0.000003126227,0.0000033327217,0.000010899223,8.646223e-7,0.0032544609,0.0000018713702,0.000010272922,0.9935558,0.0010908677,0.0020217982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041531184,0.000034144712,0.000011594269,6.806663e-7,0.0000026539653,2.9470573e-7,0.000788696,0.00002978591,0.000008932749,0.5221672,0.476897,0.000017450486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008466786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011565218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.909728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000073011215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019507268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291145016","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2022.25","title":"Hegel and Formal Idealism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hegelianism; Idealism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Subjectivism; Metaphysics; German idealism; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Reductio ad absurdum; Perception; Subject (documents); Skepticism; Law; Political science; Chemistry; Computer science","score_opus":0.025956239766794637,"score_gpt":0.20624047937477924,"score_spread":0.1802842396079846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291145016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11510653,0.001476934,0.000016205086,0.07404792,0.0008947992,0.00022059832,0.00019019295,0.00017135941,0.80787545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908983,0.000025439867,0.00001852547,0.0060646343,0.00045103198,0.000040314597,0.000015078388,0.000017139006,0.0024695145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917346,0.00007659824,0.00014829202,0.00016568358,0.00020706089,0.00022887504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996223,0.00009894017,0.000042483043,0.00013569821,0.00002840656,0.0000722128],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046647503,0.0000967515,0.00011915842,0.000045905254,0.0009451405,0.000078307196,0.00012784534,0.000024877489,0.017258674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025287089,0.00008943641,0.00004988137,0.000015081061,0.00022267141,0.000028008764,0.00027791839,0.00036675518,0.00016482826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026529482,0.000026627828,0.000002635716,0.000014179836,0.000009240827,0.000015362524,0.0039053576,0.0000035041433,0.000013184412,0.99112296,0.0042775567,0.00058287865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017103735,0.00005513037,0.000011284653,0.0000028136299,0.0000045672987,0.00000950638,0.0006163941,0.000021348254,0.000004632976,0.4209654,0.5780567,0.00008117896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015021485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020891648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8757918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015526915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015974112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98363966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292829047","doi":"10.7202/1089697ar","title":"Daniel C. Dennett and Gregg D. Caruso. \"Just Deserts: Debating Free Will\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08402990599624076,"score_gpt":0.2804328631704561,"score_spread":0.19640295717421535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292829047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006262857,0.43069953,0.000004569668,0.0839192,0.0007421417,0.0010140797,0.0001991685,0.00014573292,0.47701275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613084,0.021216547,0.000045894154,0.016130432,0.00075242075,0.000236626,0.000028362983,0.000044243745,0.00023703498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982156,0.0002939943,0.00047985013,0.00036830164,0.00035152183,0.00029070687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989467,0.00026692872,0.000150789,0.0004699335,0.00006203296,0.00010356859],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009740769,0.00022522167,0.00045477878,0.00010009587,0.00057838846,0.00006614353,0.00047782675,0.00003745776,0.0013240884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030663345,0.00020229141,0.00011742189,0.000118785916,0.00027442258,0.00021675265,0.0005157972,0.0006915312,0.000018593442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000791622,0.000065416665,0.000051207666,0.0013236962,0.00001995021,0.00003419754,0.0015704477,0.0000021528444,0.0000045044426,0.99357015,0.00093900564,0.0024113364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024219789,0.000073547824,0.000008794237,0.0010043357,0.000039504015,0.000017486524,0.00013253311,0.00003569476,7.8969845e-7,0.7433241,0.2548981,0.0002229113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013882785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015089812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006072771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040314804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296038864","doi":"10.1007/s40656-022-00530-x","title":"Kant, intoxicated: the aesthetics of drunkenness, between moral duty and “active play”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Duty; German; Philosophy of biology; History of science; Context (archaeology); Aesthetics; Philosophy of science; History; Theology","score_opus":0.09858534724878779,"score_gpt":0.24027737470590266,"score_spread":0.14169202745711487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296038864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7087779,0.0063304044,0.0000014392331,0.052960966,0.001988002,0.00040218985,0.00029956378,0.000043047068,0.22919649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836284,0.000032336888,0.000007913535,0.0010632738,0.00034211457,0.000011852999,0.0000015576093,0.000008964049,0.00016916219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838454,0.00028363935,0.00030686316,0.00023747588,0.0006169891,0.00017047655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889874,0.0002759223,0.00037583598,0.00031420408,0.00007475033,0.00006051909],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010118998,0.00013439235,0.00025481614,0.00008824921,0.0013343934,0.000014079999,0.001019996,0.00003239248,0.00030764597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008481802,0.00007861619,0.00013608036,0.00010962611,0.008463953,0.00012907066,0.00042254935,0.00041838005,0.0000023349826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023417138,0.00006013253,0.00018975604,0.0000190516,0.000026025335,3.7709827e-7,0.01732638,0.000025603485,0.000063968495,0.9816124,0.00046598178,0.00018691442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013318918,0.00021937903,0.00057375146,0.000020560501,0.00005435974,0.000001824641,0.0014470032,0.000042531905,0.00009505669,0.9432272,0.05406114,0.00012404019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021336468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021659227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28958493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055045548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002124547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297634280","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190887353.013.13","title":"Practical Truth, Ethical Naturalism, and the Constitution of Agency in Anscombe’s Ethics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Agency (philosophy); Constitution; Epistemology; Action (physics); Naturalism; Moral agency; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10096342353093986,"score_gpt":0.2735729852757879,"score_spread":0.17260956174484804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297634280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000085045875,0.000119403616,0.000014392537,0.0049082614,0.00034483138,0.0002772205,0.00016940525,0.00002583024,0.9940556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5765694,0.0023320524,0.00005912706,0.001649341,0.00027505434,0.0000030475264,0.00005659759,0.000037030753,0.41901836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858755,0.00034506348,0.00024220192,0.0002755182,0.00039847754,0.00015116636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973337,0.001993568,0.0002252156,0.00025801532,0.00012896764,0.00006053347],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009885504,0.00020812599,0.00038569083,0.00011430337,0.00046683426,0.000042889827,0.0002643968,0.0007085606,0.00032800506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019192041,0.00017002046,0.00015550251,0.0000042473544,0.003938178,0.00008097059,0.0003992116,0.0056020007,2.5829326e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004731112,0.000013108646,9.401457e-8,0.00009891569,0.00007387924,0.00008393321,0.010209886,0.0000012620183,5.433059e-7,0.9888419,0.000046069716,0.00015730446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005945503,0.000030997555,2.8269295e-7,0.00006367592,0.00008393167,0.000005395216,0.00017123886,0.000020843394,0.0000011426839,0.42590633,0.5730056,0.00011599615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034017354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002792663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5764843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007585624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023647324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298143496","doi":"10.1515/agph-2021-0058","title":"Kant’s Account of Epistemic Normativity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Obligation; Argument (complex analysis); Maxim; Interpretation (philosophy); Practical reason; Law","score_opus":0.04157534527812587,"score_gpt":0.25819521616285435,"score_spread":0.21661987088472848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298143496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2870939,0.000745278,0.000059022997,0.06937364,0.001562813,0.0005816081,0.0011758186,0.0002357611,0.63917214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565566,0.000035185487,0.00004800025,0.0026519834,0.001091105,0.000068870904,0.00008760467,0.00005467249,0.00030693656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733156,0.00041439603,0.0006279294,0.00042083793,0.0007662975,0.0004389698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825066,0.0004840145,0.00032646276,0.00067219796,0.000116537754,0.00015013992],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009523684,0.0003049805,0.0004709461,0.0002889888,0.0010682298,0.00006182745,0.00074376696,0.000050366118,0.0028278008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008808208,0.00028809343,0.00027995335,0.00012134658,0.000902355,0.0002579036,0.00068073993,0.0011586209,0.00012900593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012524998,0.00032193682,0.000044901113,0.00010311266,0.00013086283,0.000022005966,0.009595138,0.00007238469,0.000465399,0.9879652,0.00022413072,0.0009296253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005541764,0.00021188127,0.00015123335,0.000029817103,0.000060635874,0.000024357769,0.00039177114,0.00022641988,0.00012124489,0.9653584,0.032529633,0.00034043842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014854544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007775916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7085617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053295073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012936669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298425731","doi":"10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00152.x","title":"Justice Between the Young and the Old","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy &amp Public Affairs","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baker Hughes (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Citation; Sociology; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.11091958083031034,"score_gpt":0.27166451761747346,"score_spread":0.16074493678716312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298425731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054577296,0.0006087862,0.00004301224,0.26696512,0.0004580408,0.00027006274,0.000033451193,0.00012012479,0.7260437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98865145,0.00024470946,0.000009556207,0.0032785756,0.00605671,0.000052048832,0.000022945167,0.00003634712,0.0016476439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981494,0.00029439267,0.0003406533,0.0003361709,0.00044777937,0.0004316356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977098,0.0011933292,0.00014522925,0.0006114095,0.00017430016,0.00016593494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015342557,0.00026100298,0.00029808757,0.000086405315,0.0016262674,0.0006950144,0.000671994,0.00010240738,0.00066317205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003968611,0.00013409363,0.00016797982,0.00012265373,0.0029241373,0.00037191284,0.0002591385,0.0007466654,0.00020413857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003782487,0.000030018547,0.00007522038,0.000018427549,0.00009506133,0.0000036211406,0.007010766,4.985652e-7,8.4776417e-7,0.9916284,0.0005310753,0.0005682505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060283404,0.000021940314,0.00007078147,0.000013166528,0.0001195473,0.000013310263,0.0015779209,0.000022584061,4.1940731e-7,0.76419765,0.23319592,0.00016391528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013930042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018256331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98319376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022463826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035980956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298842318","doi":"10.47925/74.461","title":"On Desire, Discipline, and Becoming Human","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09450412137822468,"score_gpt":0.3302225555536688,"score_spread":0.23571843417544414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298842318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5143928,0.000061751845,0.0000060182806,0.0041829497,0.0004732072,0.00007847504,0.0000068910276,0.000018073837,0.48077983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964341,0.0000038216644,0.000041199626,0.0007117989,0.0025214672,0.000008664858,0.000010315308,0.00001127135,0.00025735356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947226,0.00002581685,0.00016151792,0.0001487718,0.00010549162,0.00008611656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948794,0.00008911723,0.00008705959,0.00015570603,0.00012902185,0.000051175317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015350193,0.00008513197,0.00010546047,0.00009643366,0.0003223189,0.00003532514,0.000085434345,0.000033388,0.0003336849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005006162,0.00007376113,0.000031867097,0.00002236431,0.000622735,0.00009959048,0.00002686243,0.00009945462,0.000029649835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013455864,0.00017580284,0.000016704824,0.000029976562,0.000008471187,4.9308202e-8,0.004390982,6.053748e-8,0.00014134089,0.9937026,0.00007203959,0.0014485543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010503467,0.00021252905,0.0003948857,0.00008189949,0.000011383824,3.6130442e-7,0.00019064215,0.000007874626,0.00029870393,0.9973891,0.0012214219,0.00008619707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003189784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002232637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4820413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000114788445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034586672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36536157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303615134","doi":"10.52685/pihfb.48.1(95).4","title":"Umjereni iracionalizam Alberta Bazale","year":2022,"lang":"hr","type":"article","venue":"Prilozi za istraživanje hrvatske filozofske baštine","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03920556117090273,"score_gpt":0.24482292685607726,"score_spread":0.20561736568517452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303615134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15376726,0.011435822,0.00018170409,0.0853545,0.012942754,0.003335691,0.014417196,0.0009432647,0.7176218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8824803,0.00044706184,0.00019765362,0.0086160265,0.004969303,0.00007109492,0.0019773175,0.0003851434,0.10085608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98932767,0.0011922594,0.0023641689,0.0022756949,0.0025717944,0.002268426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931075,0.0018849687,0.0011604959,0.0023041654,0.00058540085,0.00095747673],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002556389,0.0017019028,0.0017686816,0.0005565367,0.00481221,0.0009310303,0.0026035553,0.00056888675,0.1342119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008860871,0.0017930969,0.0013012651,0.00059673976,0.0017760809,0.0006663592,0.0014104907,0.004280222,0.0030239508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010270819,0.002140033,0.0001857195,0.0005021538,0.00062188564,0.00025850406,0.010845509,0.00007771956,0.00085764885,0.9569523,0.024662873,0.0018686113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023049936,0.0010207405,0.00047891552,0.00014543305,0.00033957482,0.00012804432,0.0016557295,0.00054675504,0.00009962194,0.26550636,0.7260428,0.001731012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023441724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00129466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7287131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005054158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008486632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306974200","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzac047","title":"<i>Desire as Belief: A Study of Desire, Motivation, and Rationality</i> , by Alex Gregory","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Nothing; Epistemology; Analogy; Rationality; Psychology; Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Mental state; Metaphor; Social psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.052773020575053974,"score_gpt":0.24239623169784377,"score_spread":0.1896232111227898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306974200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9470295,0.0003103313,0.0000036586264,0.00061827264,0.000086328124,0.00019290767,0.00008594056,0.000008562967,0.05166452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974217,0.0000043347845,0.0000036831286,0.00057948893,0.00009975622,0.000031064603,0.000032982116,0.00000902673,0.0018179764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917436,0.00012273117,0.00019004366,0.00015939298,0.00026934047,0.000084161744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952286,0.00017371215,0.0000777683,0.00011866054,0.00007224682,0.000034750596],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036020446,0.000076625205,0.000118525975,0.000040372528,0.00046064207,0.000034265686,0.00009308575,0.00001856129,0.002107533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053450767,0.000072463765,0.000023402354,0.00003178597,0.00017329406,0.00007285516,0.00008666426,0.00015718452,0.0000055890923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029771287,0.00053249655,0.0001768843,0.000013882259,0.000034321147,0.0000030785038,0.014666087,0.0000046196806,0.000059560247,0.9833801,0.00027250583,0.0008266846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007169225,0.0005441197,0.0006261698,0.000006549793,0.000027008844,0.0000027196347,0.009449341,0.00002565267,0.00011473307,0.94361246,0.044733293,0.00014101056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007654224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019368052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05039221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011908626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030983923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307280496","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12829","title":"Moral friends? The idea of the moral relationship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Morality; Virtue; Normative; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Criticism; Appeal; Social psychology; Moral psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral disengagement; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10292313285930213,"score_gpt":0.2391083625052267,"score_spread":0.13618522964592458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307280496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12165258,0.000668775,0.000011826436,0.063395634,0.0020202778,0.00012502533,0.00007456867,0.000015533438,0.8120358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961186,0.000004260819,0.000012595877,0.0016158235,0.0018482988,0.0000010318632,0.000001251844,0.000026450083,0.00037170463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735385,0.0013298695,0.0005348156,0.00009113382,0.00055916765,0.00013116107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985996,0.00025259194,0.0006104553,0.00031382986,0.0001679599,0.00005559244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022145784,0.00011130534,0.0001666106,0.00008048931,0.0009612879,0.000055795284,0.0008859379,0.000009917768,0.00083797984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015268262,0.000060414037,0.0003071599,0.00009502928,0.0006198856,0.00012621826,0.00029213022,0.0011364503,0.00002062983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056697674,0.00006455296,0.0002464045,0.0000072033367,0.00004640003,0.00002833118,0.0067010457,0.0002119708,0.00001830831,0.9918465,0.00065211265,0.00012048809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033215142,0.00024256935,0.0017647932,0.000026307782,0.000051627023,0.000041734733,0.0005722502,0.000015831974,0.0000110963265,0.9591009,0.037761822,0.000078899735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000036308493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014268298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.874466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023414768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054467448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9175291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309196093","doi":"10.1017/s0012217322000397","title":"What Can a Constructivist Say About Animal Ethics — Or Any Other Normative Question, for That Matter?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Creatures; Epistemology; Normative; Constructivism (international relations); Compromise; Philosophy; Expressivism; Psychology; Sociology; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.0858525431139839,"score_gpt":0.30247674289179927,"score_spread":0.21662419977781538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309196093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42478716,0.0017643133,0.001542719,0.28688496,0.019937962,0.004453153,0.021991253,0.00083295157,0.2378055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97998273,0.000025211762,0.000035940564,0.017636662,0.0006380537,0.00032466455,0.00013124105,0.000034339886,0.0011911235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876744,0.0003101769,0.0001974699,0.0002260054,0.00024699414,0.00025194496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877954,0.00071090664,0.00012472697,0.00017673091,0.00013644322,0.00007166418],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007970893,0.00015940522,0.00021377543,0.00006750854,0.0011246491,0.0003248271,0.00020201645,0.000077065946,0.0037582205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110927875,0.00012992747,0.00009408118,0.000032915217,0.0006479434,0.0002706518,0.000102507875,0.00066040456,0.00004158519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018463338,0.000054358017,0.0000779519,0.00005233105,0.000041586725,0.0000047999583,0.062228464,0.0000034501554,0.000015331609,0.9360035,0.0011381408,0.00019547589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050042063,0.00024603822,0.00016454185,0.000057712034,0.000028008775,0.00001160483,0.010268097,0.000059042282,0.00006298742,0.7567736,0.2315598,0.00026813574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047696254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030055162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55519557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006451989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001608939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311178154","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2022.2156598","title":"Nietzsche on the value of power and pleasure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Admiration; Pleasure; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Power (physics); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.09109430005875913,"score_gpt":0.26329837639133163,"score_spread":0.1722040763325725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311178154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7425123,0.00043717696,0.000002622436,0.013838534,0.00074689364,0.0000923726,0.000040790197,0.000021267942,0.24230808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963617,0.000006076411,0.0000010228044,0.0030633947,0.00021671756,0.000010511609,0.0000012786428,0.000007160683,0.00033215454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946994,0.00011127293,0.00008365322,0.00008205189,0.00018189724,0.00007116444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995336,0.00024739472,0.00003489791,0.00014261976,0.00002313524,0.000018341289],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004629671,0.0000497474,0.00006899283,0.000021803042,0.00039104692,0.000019618754,0.00011486378,0.000015888945,0.0025742343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050957336,0.000031371128,0.000036264188,0.00001515076,0.00046207555,0.000021229505,0.000098134544,0.00028114978,0.000008794173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020862843,0.00003534592,0.000008425485,0.000004523474,0.000014317107,0.0000016059903,0.024322702,0.000008205267,0.000038275724,0.97429246,0.0011211989,0.00013208548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009495968,0.00016045828,0.00010083167,0.000007444376,0.0000060450147,0.0000012685198,0.006019872,0.000020263642,0.00004650616,0.7709236,0.22256255,0.000056200188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017728973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000042438783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25384942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000057905722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012333677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313179912","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4278943","title":"Vignettes of Insight","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.017839867688138878,"score_gpt":0.21655271692531128,"score_spread":0.1987128492371724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313179912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4530099,0.016264012,0.00025285647,0.018119682,0.0016886686,0.00018586485,0.000045149987,0.00007273868,0.51036114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965615,0.00040611744,0.0000019980855,0.00045593805,0.00050168624,0.0000037067045,0.0000022732438,0.000012074748,0.0020546603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986647,0.000107629276,0.00018941617,0.00007741483,0.00026132987,0.0006995118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999646,0.0000604537,0.00011622298,0.000087440945,0.000058356803,0.000031491873],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012239057,0.000068248315,0.00011582991,0.00008322224,0.00057672086,0.00002683413,0.00023422287,0.000015341446,0.0020714721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023641564,0.0000574177,0.00009679387,0.000033629676,0.00013799178,0.0000743338,0.000069260204,0.0019458766,0.000009947377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027988977,0.000060137972,0.000008466522,0.0000026758155,0.000059958264,0.0000019775362,0.0031511965,0.000012906913,0.00011955959,0.99452364,0.000045934194,0.0019855518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019037307,0.0003401019,0.0000030534397,0.0000027255578,0.000011855004,0.00005234717,0.0030032163,0.00001215036,0.00002703062,0.89103705,0.105254225,0.00006585574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004416213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022956086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5435516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016759666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063861144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313444829","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-09722-5_16","title":"William Whiston, Experimental Lecturing and the Royal Society of London","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Archimedes","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Shadow (psychology); Dissenting opinion; Natural (archaeology); Art history; Natural philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Art; Media studies; Political science; History; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.04354700775877416,"score_gpt":0.23670376708856142,"score_spread":0.19315675932978726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313444829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067680294,0.002875391,0.00000366256,0.0010796881,0.0002967771,0.00016615921,0.000051707815,0.000053724558,0.9947961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6531137,0.00048906193,0.0000145111435,0.00046468223,0.0007763083,0.000012109256,0.000017933578,0.000059972288,0.34505168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992176,0.000024202878,0.00021398661,0.0001978967,0.000211144,0.00013511973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919015,0.00043950425,0.00011226513,0.00018450881,0.000033260247,0.000040309606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026946986,0.0001908311,0.00029298165,0.000031556185,0.0003008205,0.000049000533,0.00015865694,0.00009280457,0.00044614865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013023414,0.0001223623,0.00023601275,0.000003190126,0.0026585148,0.000023142671,0.00017982477,0.00043355156,0.000028741257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047398004,0.000008076432,2.49804e-7,0.00006485377,0.00012431119,0.0000014696496,0.01781588,0.000001471615,0.000012278797,0.9808185,0.0005456893,0.00055982603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032403678,0.000046651363,0.0000017054792,0.00014197291,0.00003478455,7.4510496e-7,0.00016939154,0.000052265157,0.00013697226,0.87286776,0.12608398,0.00013972087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009227849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000072780545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.652437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012817563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025370677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9795408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313729804","doi":"10.1093/jaac/kpac060","title":"Big Tent Aesthetics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Aesthetic value; Value (mathematics); Hedonism; Art; Beauty; Hegemony; Work of art; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.058653938833471066,"score_gpt":0.2672301062817684,"score_spread":0.20857616744829735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313729804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7430761,0.00132412,0.00012871956,0.12481174,0.0035955836,0.0001574571,0.000045205474,0.00010428796,0.12675683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938937,0.00095431285,0.000050647865,0.0017517651,0.0008333368,0.0000011587357,0.0000017657633,0.000024356696,0.0024889945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885386,0.000048255388,0.00042393766,0.000103683116,0.0003305223,0.00023971987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991475,0.000115560164,0.00013077512,0.00012953106,0.00030098163,0.00017568213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006891737,0.00013154256,0.00024919122,0.00019807264,0.000252082,0.00017996984,0.00015579307,0.000061951956,0.00011173347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007334881,0.00009851476,0.00013757416,0.00005236434,0.0005073846,0.00008521349,0.00005932261,0.0003797569,0.00011786939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014094205,0.00007489945,0.0000081974495,0.000024858311,0.000016702417,0.00015005699,0.0034220868,0.000005714683,0.00006921487,0.98591495,0.0024175646,0.007881654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023046111,0.0002685903,0.000017431676,0.00006669279,0.000024565468,0.00011457069,0.0005498766,0.000090433314,0.00003698579,0.5366357,0.46187007,0.00009462632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000016527363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006759141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4594525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009471212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041578987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40173155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641612","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.5","title":"Work-In-Progress: Evolution and Common Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Phenomenon; Relation (database); Dynamics (music); Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.046572444228166886,"score_gpt":0.2888897015098076,"score_spread":0.2423172572816407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003112958,0.44490784,0.0000013084015,0.024145655,0.00012648012,0.0003831423,0.000008625339,0.00008405305,0.5272299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97789717,0.011465217,0.00003297104,0.009977186,0.00037557364,0.000016472755,0.000006738988,0.000013922871,0.00021475118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991207,0.000102195525,0.00028121757,0.00017657665,0.00013444337,0.00018485056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954563,0.00007317499,0.00006547992,0.00021398341,0.000036611687,0.000065133485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005447481,0.00012732833,0.00030024457,0.000018085677,0.00015087967,0.00008696835,0.00011931375,0.00004921999,0.0008571999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009864531,0.00009889931,0.00006288828,0.000039173217,0.0006335945,0.00021207705,0.00005719719,0.00026084698,0.0002799175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005266463,0.00004465391,0.000028327398,0.00045404234,0.000006514386,0.0000029074106,0.0001382271,1.1779134e-7,1.3090457e-7,0.9905921,0.0001774535,0.008550243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097204145,0.000017270448,0.00005401917,0.0017810657,0.000019130448,0.0000017469952,0.0000036030285,0.000003870541,7.141589e-7,0.3702183,0.6277073,0.00009576889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025005065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032029038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031210166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008693254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9385738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317765510","doi":"10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos1626","title":"Empirical Realism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Epistemology; Philosophy; Realism; Capstone; German; Philosophy of science; Philosophical realism; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.05143971712358432,"score_gpt":0.2859507479863122,"score_spread":0.2345110308627279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317765510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000040098137,0.0022167063,0.0000066048988,0.015528255,0.0010215923,0.00020674901,0.00019599604,0.00013898566,0.980645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03253391,0.009900051,0.000037737205,0.011969248,0.011600434,0.00003952946,0.00015697473,0.00062874524,0.93313336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861544,0.0003111482,0.00033161402,0.000297322,0.0001827085,0.00026177833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867827,0.00050396076,0.0003164552,0.00040075518,0.000035830104,0.00006473926],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027643895,0.00027427493,0.00057432393,0.00006563801,0.00010697724,0.000010242208,0.0006029394,0.00048946857,0.016539663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001224877,0.000172894,0.00021934113,0.000022239235,0.0042112996,0.000014186179,0.00017477645,0.0008810374,0.0009337931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010400636,0.00002136173,0.0000017418248,0.000049313217,0.00007768021,0.000004880376,0.014411773,9.547384e-8,5.5199456e-7,0.5720091,0.41326135,0.00015179157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008765516,0.00005056173,0.0000022981733,0.00002067426,0.000047384634,6.3958e-7,0.00030220777,0.0000013699441,3.3928075e-7,0.42969158,0.5696808,0.000114485556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003060335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012365697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15641944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011434336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009576846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318406789","doi":"10.1007/s11406-023-00621-4","title":"The Volitional Self-Contradiction Interpretation of Kant’s Formula of Universal Law: A Response to Kleingeld","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Contradiction; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of mind; Law of excluded middle; Psychology; Metaphysics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03016063548645807,"score_gpt":0.25325943370395554,"score_spread":0.22309879821749748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318406789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72760797,0.00014059585,0.00015589014,0.06505405,0.0013107853,0.00062332355,0.00042902346,0.0003327738,0.20434557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990271,0.000015379013,0.000014618815,0.00039805056,0.00036913445,0.000013811853,0.0000152002685,0.000014165192,0.00013255286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990178,0.00012975701,0.00028901707,0.0001347008,0.00027096242,0.00015779684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863577,0.0007841175,0.00011276946,0.00018872293,0.00021845328,0.000060141614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000793535,0.00009647854,0.00015005548,0.00013916682,0.00027886548,0.000030369714,0.00018275013,0.00004901183,0.00008012638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000164888,0.00007404856,0.00010639277,0.00009272407,0.00031729913,0.00013942303,0.000056014345,0.00014511816,0.000051419636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010604789,0.000042850977,0.0000029416656,0.000026373458,0.000060244234,0.0000021283029,0.008790534,0.000032091997,0.0006998967,0.9889906,0.00010825248,0.00018361596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028917717,0.0002390504,0.00015655778,0.000060365845,0.000026392245,9.3873325e-7,0.0003709952,0.0013567915,0.0003136813,0.97914803,0.017954782,0.00008324707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007782106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007948287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2714191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003588821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050293194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30196127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318615699","doi":"10.18254/s271326680024029-1","title":"Apperception and Related Matters in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason and Opus Postumum","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Transcendental Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Apperception; Consciousness; Object (grammar); Philosophy; Self-consciousness; Self; Psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04577012379512681,"score_gpt":0.29167220361926366,"score_spread":0.24590207982413687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318615699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.954105,0.006503876,2.4920942e-7,0.022791471,0.00052169815,0.00032962297,0.00015562227,0.000028023498,0.015564436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769944,0.0012323516,0.0000036208987,0.0008768059,0.00007587026,0.00004375436,0.0000142321005,0.000018784673,0.000035163448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879783,0.0001675124,0.0003532698,0.00028369084,0.00021683559,0.000180857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968374,0.000092554736,0.000056586774,0.00010259913,0.00002815247,0.000036341007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038826512,0.00016320309,0.00032004778,0.00020017127,0.00023806425,0.000014808852,0.000101987374,0.000049541934,0.00013462412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016312904,0.00016066317,0.000048050042,0.00007535767,0.0009748338,0.00013178383,0.000107193264,0.00053336687,0.0000013140962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019129342,0.00021190177,0.0005581493,0.00034105,0.00007156474,0.000068768364,0.07871026,0.000010371069,0.00063478004,0.91881603,0.00003103184,0.0003547986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011287722,0.00029283078,0.0010652569,0.00018689153,0.000023209115,0.0000317428,0.021516737,0.000019147416,0.000019505846,0.97527766,0.00024316923,0.00019506236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011835462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025257672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05719352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006025317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008798118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6551654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319455236","doi":"10.1017/9781009244978.019","title":"Jacobi’s Philosophy of Faith in Fichte’s 1794 <i>Wissenschaftslehre</i>","year":2023,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Nihilism; Philosophy; Transcendental number; Faith; Harmony (color); Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.053536901198148676,"score_gpt":0.21283217896672815,"score_spread":0.1592952777685795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319455236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008554571,0.00034448615,0.000010994729,0.000690837,0.0010912229,0.00068292074,0.002567035,0.00017046284,0.9935866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30796248,0.0012859768,0.000009788049,0.0003053942,0.0010078597,0.0000019838653,0.00014668341,0.00016860537,0.68911123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966087,0.00018343735,0.0008026254,0.0010130424,0.000714255,0.0006779675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969622,0.0005485968,0.0006888711,0.0010180599,0.00045400774,0.00032829508],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048634515,0.0008813562,0.0013376132,0.00075153564,0.00045883923,0.00010290131,0.0010713409,0.0009535073,0.000059541253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045086315,0.0010184433,0.00070459006,0.00003523309,0.0025282681,0.00016304236,0.0008578234,0.002049772,0.00022991559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052144035,0.00007727396,0.0000027325912,0.00079139817,0.00048204436,0.0011914499,0.0013856711,0.000011873763,0.000050919138,0.99390405,0.0014134841,0.00016766271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021151786,0.00033516492,0.000020976124,0.002364517,0.00063247967,0.000007356678,0.00046900616,0.00010614067,0.00014708238,0.08095704,0.911397,0.0014480926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021221242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012949416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.912947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016462908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020987778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319833528","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2022.2158891","title":"Feeling Like It: A Theory of Inclination and WillSchapiro, Tamar, <i>Feeling Like It: A Theory of Inclination and Will</i> , Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, pp. viii + 173, £61 (hardback).","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03657166970285052,"score_gpt":0.24965489972518334,"score_spread":0.21308323002233281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319833528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9225869,0.0026178847,0.00060489605,0.023597363,0.0016117468,0.0008082709,0.0005114584,0.00009299625,0.047568444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938303,0.0042374013,0.00012681572,0.0003547923,0.0008772792,0.000001677699,0.000024821433,0.000044619923,0.00050229096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997176,0.0005017875,0.0010283864,0.00034688864,0.000602565,0.00034438263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967821,0.0008652548,0.0011707202,0.0002691213,0.0006812055,0.00023156297],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028314227,0.00034759034,0.0006752121,0.0004891508,0.00051228906,0.00011332571,0.0003955928,0.00025691465,0.00017717353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029336475,0.00031969845,0.00027776137,0.00022382796,0.0012572532,0.0010623544,0.00026746304,0.0008770867,0.0000022071217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066444767,0.00019459776,0.00021398273,0.00039694013,0.00031655782,0.000057322173,0.014009868,0.00011372871,0.00046515165,0.97999305,0.00028274118,0.0032916367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019433983,0.0006889266,0.00035438535,0.0009498371,0.00031349005,0.000036300175,0.0059412685,0.00024809543,0.00019649809,0.95386016,0.035108015,0.0003596285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000121435805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016276923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07124336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050771894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014165885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320031638","doi":"10.1017/s0012217322000361","title":"The Gallows Alien: Extending the Concept &lt;<i>Person</i>&gt; to Non-Human Organisms","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sacrifice; Human life; Environmental ethics; Alien; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Theology; Humanity","score_opus":0.034972998377202434,"score_gpt":0.2560493926254647,"score_spread":0.22107639424826228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320031638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1445288,0.001238711,0.00010184351,0.08646108,0.0070546204,0.0014883744,0.00062640966,0.00030847167,0.7581917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862984,0.000010897094,0.000003582037,0.008639447,0.0014205858,0.00013779396,0.000039092403,0.000034631827,0.0034155778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985725,0.00022041002,0.00019924174,0.00025374853,0.00038870372,0.00036537804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989159,0.00043567485,0.00007482033,0.00041650533,0.000060454895,0.000096620075],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009119403,0.00016163418,0.00016001891,0.000037595488,0.005047361,0.00031464285,0.0007446471,0.000033688553,0.0022874342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008076742,0.000095718206,0.00012077849,0.00007139161,0.0005569841,0.000060940783,0.0003116227,0.000522856,0.00017658796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011761744,0.000032874246,0.000002179673,0.000001897548,0.00002727656,0.00000947751,0.0409453,0.00002639747,0.0009949973,0.95040464,0.0070311683,0.00051204924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018215118,0.00014197697,0.000040313094,0.000005308598,0.00001655567,0.0000030502679,0.005142377,0.000027092125,0.0001256843,0.26997837,0.7241656,0.00017146835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017019158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067159673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8417696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051160558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004511709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320031669","doi":"10.1017/s0012217322000269","title":"Kantian Objectivism and Subject-Relative Well-Being","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Subject (documents); Objectivism; Happiness; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.02078367973298477,"score_gpt":0.21982270077676674,"score_spread":0.19903902104378196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320031669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20037074,0.00028712995,0.000026440615,0.0031740055,0.00085109303,0.0001343532,0.000047875048,0.00008458286,0.7950238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972759,0.000013203165,0.000004016896,0.0013154633,0.00042461744,0.000024936073,0.000022838454,0.000016044298,0.0009029841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992648,0.00013441396,0.000110178175,0.00018305611,0.00014509071,0.00016250505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960905,0.00016601766,0.00004139099,0.00010797999,0.000024677314,0.000050873026],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032360363,0.000093222494,0.00012471822,0.00006869209,0.0008695424,0.00006815979,0.00009467621,0.000026842772,0.0012277802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037448954,0.00008735596,0.000049299422,0.000030899893,0.00026646836,0.00011072911,0.0001520495,0.00041309508,0.00004998331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014074001,0.00003172267,0.000052734773,0.0000063594907,0.000021402833,0.000014189367,0.031658825,0.00000289308,0.00002769319,0.96772784,0.0000934853,0.00034878013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019895461,0.000083524305,0.00014816466,0.000006023025,0.000013269161,0.0000035813252,0.0010302083,0.000050677598,0.000027134842,0.9133506,0.0849618,0.00012610423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030736421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022999747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79690516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020244675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002436047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320401307","doi":"10.47925/2008.104","title":"Kantian Elements in Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Moral relativism; Universalization; Impartiality; Morality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Virtue; Moral psychology; Construal level theory; Relativism; Moral development; Adam smith; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.09286293435804027,"score_gpt":0.28338756477939336,"score_spread":0.1905246304213531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320401307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6705097,0.0005319706,0.0000057167426,0.0018678759,0.00070114987,0.0002032244,0.000030064713,0.000013727794,0.3261366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877733,0.000056920137,0.00007358302,0.00025322824,0.00041606117,0.000014054724,0.000023368482,0.000012696067,0.00037273203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899685,0.00008905996,0.00041137903,0.00015232696,0.00022266718,0.00012773124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993237,0.00006550585,0.00021600329,0.00020372344,0.00014634877,0.000044676093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030170084,0.00010682152,0.00019476181,0.0001994428,0.00008474054,0.0000067120354,0.00015954931,0.00004448025,0.00058974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004967889,0.000101846745,0.00007632126,0.000060030856,0.00042542873,0.00015818259,0.000030592764,0.00013628512,0.000020853866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047808302,0.00079351646,0.001858432,0.000081662474,0.000027574855,6.279544e-7,0.00823105,0.0000015392993,0.00012629518,0.9877265,0.000085405125,0.001019552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027889205,0.00007485875,0.003330558,0.00013687415,0.000014208149,9.41781e-7,0.00043390645,0.000010593914,0.0006027828,0.99406415,0.0009527307,0.00009948383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001022219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012281091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32826766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002322383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016700449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64572394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321605139","doi":"10.30965/23642807-bja10068","title":"Deities and Categories","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Epistemology; Identity (music); Set (abstract data type); Hebrew Bible; sort; Aesthetics; Theology; Biblical studies; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07929607294475591,"score_gpt":0.3337586723822737,"score_spread":0.2544625994375178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321605139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8532157,0.0034015486,0.0013795965,0.07229344,0.0021851875,0.00080300146,0.00016368294,0.00023553983,0.06632231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707806,0.0017898522,0.000016440874,0.00046135535,0.00020379973,0.000025329085,0.000035032794,0.000012269381,0.00037785416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992001,0.00003328803,0.0003853481,0.00011127513,0.00011632161,0.00015365316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954367,0.00017810594,0.000075686694,0.000047089856,0.00007972088,0.000075723256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006980641,0.00011431955,0.00016963208,0.0001102593,0.00083937193,0.00023070889,0.00006614853,0.00007172267,0.00000987821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000076020096,0.00009502659,0.00013415176,0.00004932863,0.00032299984,0.0007224556,0.000047066376,0.00029410535,0.000003851691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011606024,0.00001795575,0.000060962328,0.0001693583,0.0000370099,0.000004335221,0.2310996,0.0000047333124,0.0000126946115,0.76095635,0.00578003,0.0017409145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090750976,0.0001746591,0.00010849602,0.0001287715,0.000007863965,0.000036420326,0.03645167,0.001661857,0.000014876177,0.91527003,0.045097098,0.0001407365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020125259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061195366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19464794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016971277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036656125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64558554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322631638","doi":"10.1017/can.2023.3","title":"Reason in Kant’s Theory of Cognition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Transcendental number; Epistemology; Dialectic; Philosophy; Transcendental philosophy; Articulation (sociology); Normative; Extant taxon; Argument (complex analysis); Categorical imperative; Transcendental idealism; Morality","score_opus":0.05402437146103098,"score_gpt":0.22072132059148758,"score_spread":0.1666969491304566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322631638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36138374,0.0027337396,0.00001094177,0.017020425,0.0020231968,0.00019009443,0.00047926835,0.000008450824,0.61615014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983276,0.000010627454,0.0000061307487,0.00095570163,0.0005985797,0.0000029590497,0.0000064021997,0.000013868765,0.00007809418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989372,0.00022637885,0.00037716457,0.00007834956,0.00021494912,0.00016598527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914455,0.00013569384,0.00024533336,0.00010157219,0.00016364071,0.00020918397],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010516508,0.00008337961,0.0002079865,0.00048724603,0.00022495064,0.000023572857,0.00024480803,0.00003076071,0.0037533436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013021707,0.0000802324,0.000117505464,0.000076990924,0.00033278618,0.0001204105,0.000018650388,0.00056635786,0.0000059047698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006281307,0.000037217847,0.000049998263,0.000017047494,0.000027660475,0.00010361592,0.006378297,0.000033699704,0.00002625646,0.9924425,0.00013467201,0.00068623095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037910463,0.00023664335,0.0000781993,0.00006472927,0.00002151973,0.000026572994,0.0010144868,0.0000051148077,0.000026999225,0.9761318,0.021928292,0.00008655852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008249587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004882864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6369439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009027487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005376442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99715734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323237593","doi":"10.1353/rss.2021.0006","title":"Bertrand Russell and the Paradox of the Committed Emotivist","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivism; Objectivism; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Contradiction; Philosophy; Rigour; Object (grammar); Sociology; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.040740658703160494,"score_gpt":0.25953551230825084,"score_spread":0.21879485360509035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323237593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74123716,0.10153819,0.00004817856,0.10467518,0.0022797699,0.0006007908,0.00005789543,0.000025349578,0.04953749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97114843,0.025165113,0.000013246105,0.0014095549,0.0006816836,0.0000031109705,8.228175e-7,0.00002942616,0.0015485965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968184,0.0010346355,0.0009911595,0.00018648131,0.0006329536,0.00033632963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942849,0.0037765224,0.00073260936,0.00048857875,0.00062887225,0.0000885017],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028537537,0.00033941958,0.0009215609,0.00005858643,0.0014871854,0.00013715537,0.0006376239,0.00009348863,0.00015037252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033715228,0.0001320866,0.00049722474,0.0001655125,0.0041799415,0.00014805589,0.0002028001,0.0010234084,0.000006462906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014858331,0.00040032648,0.00020108798,0.00035123824,0.0029057579,0.000036658745,0.12352551,0.000064155945,0.0006500689,0.8659033,0.0035454999,0.0009305748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00690956,0.00030703485,0.0012585651,0.00080602,0.0021957248,0.0003728303,0.022966174,0.00008170042,0.005540049,0.8625347,0.09655328,0.00047432628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007498215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045638383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22991128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020698735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106776104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323521515","doi":"10.7202/1097021ar","title":"QUELLE PRO-ATTITUDE POUR LE SUBJECTIVISME À PROPOS DU BIEN-ÊTRE ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03310503883976077,"score_gpt":0.2558379437891938,"score_spread":0.222732904949433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323521515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14288384,0.006191378,0.0005519042,0.3534206,0.0029510455,0.0011226224,0.00028442644,0.0009454608,0.49164873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94399375,0.002385781,0.00016141878,0.0038883546,0.002708335,0.00010771083,0.000046304758,0.0001339501,0.04657439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970662,0.00057826866,0.00045018108,0.0005890373,0.00034256635,0.000973736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837285,0.0004456578,0.00016447544,0.00043183033,0.0002797965,0.00030538623],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014777001,0.0004416353,0.00043978443,0.00022628647,0.0013191039,0.0003863158,0.00047089744,0.0007342233,0.0009482429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032808725,0.0004265099,0.00030512703,0.000225662,0.0013804351,0.0002731116,0.00024574454,0.0016879513,0.0017613941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006923125,0.00032133856,0.0002493144,0.00057692366,0.00017471072,0.00041038968,0.013296697,0.0002041272,0.00050569465,0.9769484,0.0051605906,0.0020825746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005046471,0.00016906807,0.00027814228,0.00032195583,0.000052027797,0.000044138997,0.0024621051,0.0019644294,0.000725056,0.7732475,0.2197422,0.0004887377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046415348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012114203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8011099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022066166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077605224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323521590","doi":"10.7202/1097017ar","title":"VIRTUE, HAPPINESS, AND EMOTION","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Virtue; Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Luck; Psychology; Social psychology; Subject (documents); Eudaimonia; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03832184580603809,"score_gpt":0.2472207772864595,"score_spread":0.2088989314804214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323521590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35988027,0.00029515024,0.00022491964,0.018981414,0.0007236004,0.00017224133,0.000034121924,0.00048505873,0.6192032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946345,0.0002651095,0.000019807494,0.00213252,0.0004558292,0.00001038757,0.000013952769,0.000016924165,0.0024509465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994296,0.000061015664,0.00010806121,0.00014296152,0.000087728535,0.00017065882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965906,0.000093055154,0.000029660569,0.00010239489,0.00004836222,0.00006744017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037879622,0.00008945929,0.00009972922,0.00007304384,0.00027596156,0.00010117552,0.000076711265,0.00012021428,0.00031584973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007979611,0.00007815908,0.000037056707,0.00004370309,0.0003018742,0.00008379759,0.000048828686,0.00031327357,0.00013979212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008479552,0.000008491617,0.00004378007,0.00003697958,0.000012442551,0.00001371246,0.004130434,0.000008342612,0.00017079587,0.99302626,0.00048294768,0.0020573323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001168654,0.000027214377,0.00036635247,0.000029590456,0.0000065793683,0.0000034142608,0.0009111247,0.00061757135,0.000054056276,0.93764687,0.060111687,0.00010866194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015248856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001259829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63475424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016742306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017196386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3458333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366090632","doi":"10.3390/philosophies8020039","title":"Practical Wisdom, Extended Rationality, and Human Agency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Virtue; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Blueprint; Action (physics); Set (abstract data type); Appeal; Sociology; Practical wisdom; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.18761459439661024,"score_gpt":0.36653417982434416,"score_spread":0.17891958542773392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366090632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14962417,0.00021042302,0.000023482082,0.24104191,0.00075679173,0.00033053165,0.00009752584,0.00074948266,0.6071657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955436,0.00007768365,0.00003672151,0.0011575677,0.0019967125,0.000030014837,0.000048395454,0.000023663752,0.001085629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885654,0.00009274021,0.00024277838,0.00027447593,0.00030197785,0.00023145661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992067,0.00030809882,0.00006607152,0.00020858934,0.000104729705,0.000105801206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004896508,0.00015656566,0.0001852328,0.00015407465,0.00072333467,0.00017753453,0.00010911192,0.000068274676,0.000999206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020194497,0.00013495718,0.00006778254,0.000078847734,0.0010292223,0.0002956328,0.00015009266,0.00028581964,0.0004307263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011764657,0.00006030546,0.000015124889,0.000036990954,0.00003292899,0.000027502425,0.0029541766,4.0315692e-7,0.0002019671,0.9951349,0.00140601,0.00011793924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020252042,0.0000704123,0.00062646094,0.000016940503,0.000018285176,0.0000060095444,0.00019176424,0.000027883221,0.00003639497,0.9671843,0.03144349,0.00017554428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003577652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057638965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84591943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009455497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028190965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366679195","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-27148-9_3","title":"Drives in the Secondary Literature","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Stern; Epistemology; Action (physics); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.05409028280998698,"score_gpt":0.23688933232910597,"score_spread":0.182799049519119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366679195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004900179,0.00059102033,2.4181975e-7,0.0077697225,0.0004520231,0.00010954715,0.00013314921,0.00006544679,0.99087393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025903571,0.0003427978,0.0000011793163,0.005445958,0.0015996606,0.000007732656,0.000103863524,0.000039810395,0.9665554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992932,0.000023230607,0.00017853186,0.0001897951,0.00019069415,0.00012451604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993392,0.00028930165,0.000045562487,0.00025575224,0.000046692912,0.0000234768],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029335616,0.00018566608,0.00018460055,0.00011654569,0.00013127786,0.000264455,0.0002861149,0.00023162723,0.0073094824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013488118,0.000103333165,0.00013437738,0.0000080304635,0.00031990345,0.000059737693,0.00006270894,0.0013950185,0.0008236551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032820117,0.000005108744,2.4951337e-8,0.000038260696,0.000019503319,0.00007380677,0.016242547,3.2117693e-8,1.3439649e-7,0.97885865,0.0038297297,0.000928923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032783413,0.000012397064,8.2742264e-7,0.00010899271,0.000004615657,9.941242e-7,0.00012013121,5.641571e-7,5.79277e-8,0.5217461,0.47789225,0.000080262835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000110327155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079099933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47406253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000071273735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000332587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366779002","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.0001","title":"Spirit and Politics: Some Thoughts on Margaret Watkins’s The Philosophical Progress of Hume’s “Essays”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Virtue; Meaning (existential); Object (grammar); Reductio ad absurdum; Criticism; Metaphysics; Literature; Law","score_opus":0.13166844186641574,"score_gpt":0.33016990103785077,"score_spread":0.19850145917143502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366779002","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38808697,0.010969345,4.0406672e-7,0.50338763,0.002085969,0.0007974684,0.00032582623,0.0004500714,0.09389632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918041,0.0009543386,0.0000031682507,0.001356182,0.004857161,0.000054474454,0.000007383988,0.000028144648,0.0009350445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854374,0.00011826652,0.00031424093,0.00028575657,0.00038154027,0.00035642862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877125,0.00058143376,0.00009906849,0.00030452685,0.00017845028,0.0000652866],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052862026,0.00022342462,0.00038215177,0.0001084327,0.0008156146,0.000077937635,0.00022744304,0.000074151794,0.00004148602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018326094,0.00012994921,0.00010677684,0.00006284296,0.0031783122,0.000097832904,0.00029746955,0.0003620851,0.00007712083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022135999,0.00006208654,0.00003608214,0.00014519523,0.00018680214,0.000021409465,0.014743698,5.507841e-7,0.0000044173335,0.98316425,0.0012724356,0.00034095778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025431177,0.00021512457,0.00024744737,0.00012987814,0.00004865881,0.0000018937826,0.0022006666,0.000012210872,0.000058065947,0.9407619,0.055906657,0.00016318151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012339371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038592934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60371715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016715274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020908816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366779014","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.0011","title":"Hume and Induction: Merely Cognitive Psychology?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.3583573035622246,"score_gpt":0.4149545627631868,"score_spread":0.0565972592009622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366779014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4930845,0.0067910743,0.000002426677,0.030410958,0.0020154258,0.00021491342,0.000063000596,0.00042199835,0.46699572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927131,0.0017460942,0.0000025254624,0.0015975633,0.0008952192,0.00003252208,0.000006302865,0.000012501143,0.0029941525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993289,0.000048430542,0.00013178415,0.0002107301,0.00010780055,0.00017233328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947333,0.0002259019,0.000038339822,0.00008074743,0.00014585521,0.000035806373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026676257,0.000111325266,0.00018141394,0.00008448098,0.0005810328,0.000042767442,0.0000517887,0.000044917135,0.00026727357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016007856,0.000087295644,0.00003808394,0.000052491454,0.0012628293,0.00008870576,0.00010300722,0.00021150244,0.00041184487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019249435,0.000019360883,0.000030578678,0.000028842238,0.00020536695,0.000013055464,0.03063851,5.1659022e-8,0.000019214092,0.9623477,0.0040194853,0.0026586235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002746111,0.00010116487,0.0010628616,0.00004866221,0.000039166756,0.0000030294973,0.013282556,0.0000014305658,0.000014278819,0.9081842,0.07685258,0.00013548949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008987887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006892312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49962863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000050097888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006761255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.529357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366779016","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.0008","title":"Not Circular: Hume’s “Of the Standard of Taste”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taste; Epistemology; Verdict; Philosophy; Scholarship; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.16794580472403534,"score_gpt":0.3187877550481442,"score_spread":0.15084195032410888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366779016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6978469,0.004571137,0.0000048129623,0.021776639,0.0026241026,0.00043046044,0.00061460305,0.00017878863,0.2719526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979409,0.00025962084,0.0000023173702,0.00021796698,0.00021744685,0.0000089926225,0.0000014717251,0.000010607037,0.0013407028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999182,0.00005408099,0.00022893978,0.00011005332,0.00028873302,0.00013620385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992147,0.00021215668,0.00010214251,0.00022405433,0.00023069118,0.00001627532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040712982,0.00009019224,0.00026878214,0.00004762025,0.00028085147,0.0000129465725,0.00017446275,0.000026665799,0.00016414339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021525605,0.000054434124,0.00013669625,0.00006540391,0.0011507574,0.00003563789,0.0002049489,0.00013076176,0.000028022996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018606785,0.000013146212,0.00004276858,0.00015638735,0.0001638145,0.0000014359417,0.023551913,0.000004249832,0.00022532696,0.9745108,0.0010925148,0.00021906059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023150939,0.00010153628,0.00041944376,0.00013072122,0.00005313297,3.029822e-7,0.010253513,0.0000051516436,0.0014636359,0.9105352,0.07670012,0.00010569076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020180612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010889603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.300094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000113151345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028312816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42400137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366779092","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.0002","title":"Comments on Margaret Watkins, The Philosophical Progress of Hume’s “Essays”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patience; Demise; Feeling; Philosophy; Reading (process); Superstition; Psychoanalysis; BLISS; The Imaginary; Epistemology; Literature; Psychology; Theology; Law; Art","score_opus":0.20143410378152135,"score_gpt":0.35195274375914354,"score_spread":0.1505186399776222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366779092","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13399564,0.003459999,6.1907986e-7,0.5011308,0.0022732967,0.00080485066,0.0002824818,0.00046782856,0.35758448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556196,0.00047998628,0.0000019643085,0.002149979,0.00088332605,0.000077495766,0.000015985175,0.000024915576,0.000804392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859315,0.00013820158,0.0003059755,0.00023019247,0.00043818285,0.00029430387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876773,0.0005517109,0.000110223205,0.00033769093,0.00018932561,0.000043333068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062394526,0.00019507471,0.0003352285,0.00008682512,0.0007430745,0.000052663876,0.0003263351,0.00005727789,0.00020121978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016387354,0.00011203362,0.00013026338,0.00008456843,0.0020608339,0.000056932065,0.00030223114,0.0003637158,0.00024111151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004180468,0.0001065326,0.000071223716,0.000084200496,0.00025719768,0.000015094664,0.014891262,0.0000012608583,0.0000034361428,0.97662747,0.0071957447,0.00070475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028206664,0.00020401206,0.00022594139,0.00012245066,0.000038571226,6.5656025e-7,0.002918966,0.000013116782,0.000034902387,0.9200824,0.07593557,0.00014132517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011595774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004504297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8615663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014667425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75932276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809769","doi":"10.1353/rss.2005.0004","title":"Reply to Pincock","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophical analysis; Sociology","score_opus":0.05991899911833646,"score_gpt":0.29141679311351404,"score_spread":0.2314977939951776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809769","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32992068,0.047534455,0.00018736547,0.40637356,0.0034455087,0.00059272005,0.000027218433,0.000096832446,0.21182165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761307,0.0056952387,0.000108678876,0.011450202,0.0036413039,0.0000025202962,2.7483026e-7,0.00002580184,0.002945269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982517,0.00017115253,0.000699369,0.00013292397,0.00043627652,0.0003085836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980612,0.0007905151,0.00030440287,0.00025949214,0.00043599406,0.00014841033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018887157,0.0002252472,0.0004787577,0.0001242037,0.0007143282,0.00008430761,0.00045606904,0.00004468274,0.00036576507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017959287,0.000115983756,0.00023767966,0.00007826573,0.0004589479,0.00020445397,0.00008367509,0.00053175964,0.00020770571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008921672,0.00036958526,0.000016301588,0.00010118713,0.001351293,0.000031112435,0.17697051,0.0005082443,0.0005997444,0.7464837,0.06616447,0.0065116733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052378036,0.00036852452,0.0000283917,0.00013607193,0.00020466272,0.00005140726,0.0040197507,0.000010559997,0.000798518,0.16688594,0.8267773,0.00019513755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003489306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017642611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7606128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044965047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044478187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5494107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809835","doi":"10.1353/rss.2008.0009","title":"Russell’s Defence of Idleness","year":2008,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civilization; Argument (complex analysis); Overwork; Work (physics); Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.08128611517960466,"score_gpt":0.28323239251184795,"score_spread":0.2019462773322433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5025848,0.4628176,0.00012441256,0.009631766,0.006049045,0.0004934962,0.000112499714,0.000032517688,0.018153865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7199727,0.27593493,0.000037488415,0.0004286452,0.0025233224,0.0000025430365,0.000001543917,0.000055688408,0.001043115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944392,0.0008400058,0.002323895,0.00033501073,0.0013147559,0.0007471695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99231935,0.003275115,0.0020407606,0.000631787,0.0014699693,0.00026302927],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034997384,0.0007226537,0.0018921668,0.00030303185,0.002006508,0.00007952021,0.001247654,0.00029220636,0.00042038554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034926398,0.0004149736,0.00094339065,0.0002852185,0.004885617,0.00037987836,0.00022977887,0.0016509584,0.00013744236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041849185,0.0023889577,0.00042555764,0.0024032022,0.011986197,0.0005930966,0.29631945,0.0007581555,0.0022500895,0.66703546,0.0103905955,0.0012642869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060923873,0.0036373078,0.0008180607,0.0041267723,0.007198987,0.0009573016,0.027632752,0.00011584674,0.012767843,0.64499724,0.28971744,0.001938103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011996612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006707324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27932683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007552471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035767184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809913","doi":"10.1353/rss.2012.0008","title":"Was Russell’s 1922 Error Theory a Mistake?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Fallacy; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Value theory; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.09165941007058183,"score_gpt":0.298590488447556,"score_spread":0.20693107837697416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4256131,0.23620069,0.0002872946,0.029418005,0.012678203,0.0008527478,0.00008337203,0.00016265984,0.29470393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97915936,0.009794422,0.000049725768,0.0015651716,0.005274616,0.0000061142373,0.0000017026082,0.00006168607,0.0040872064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655545,0.0007249314,0.001050279,0.00018540284,0.00071757013,0.0007663427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956937,0.0024368989,0.00070575724,0.000411966,0.00046399544,0.00028767806],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055669583,0.00046978355,0.0008646064,0.00017607551,0.0013191222,0.00012273058,0.000691281,0.00013737807,0.0010591728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030081827,0.00024536828,0.00052031927,0.000116829375,0.00158579,0.0005057859,0.0001132458,0.0011154658,0.00019187607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007936096,0.00047699478,0.000052539795,0.00016136581,0.0015122354,0.000020753452,0.126133,0.000018809382,0.0003295074,0.86254835,0.00712851,0.00082432176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012289799,0.0003677828,0.00012005006,0.00025905654,0.0010172597,0.00017171896,0.024663469,0.000008340864,0.00082911714,0.5463578,0.42447835,0.0004980446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028464641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007140385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55354625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067127236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078290635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367602757","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad026","title":"Gareth Matthews on development and deficit","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Philosophy of Education","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Wonder; Curiosity; Relevance (law); Aptitude; Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Moral development; Social psychology; Philosophy; Developmental psychology; Law","score_opus":0.08031163195919082,"score_gpt":0.2924168924434868,"score_spread":0.21210526048429595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367602757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8766352,0.000248861,0.0000041598855,0.01235369,0.0010312941,0.0000619872,0.0000042658457,0.000011136106,0.1096494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981672,0.000043530265,0.000091486734,0.00043034574,0.001008391,0.0000020124803,0.000003153111,0.000009385497,0.0002444875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924976,0.000033552704,0.00034374677,0.0000685729,0.00022594558,0.00007841215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920994,0.00013170685,0.00029259926,0.000076382945,0.00022762289,0.00006172196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046459681,0.00007576304,0.00015230256,0.00026129585,0.00010617379,0.00002906143,0.00009543547,0.000035558707,0.000120972574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008368374,0.000058840564,0.000053246873,0.000046742312,0.000121576006,0.000096512566,0.000015698106,0.00017697253,0.0000323694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034467594,0.0001365806,0.000028039014,0.00006098571,0.000025997948,0.0000011401621,0.00854901,0.0000031348977,0.00011523606,0.9851019,0.00036758996,0.005575954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014806107,0.00017413913,0.00073807104,0.00022350517,0.000014650981,0.0000050934586,0.0009731031,0.0000036130773,0.00038602264,0.97204024,0.02522055,0.00007297791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000026542668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002343981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022217047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018069899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23994486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376636452","doi":"10.1017/9781009070652","title":"Kant on Freedom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Dilemma; Subject (documents); Element (criminal law); Causality (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Power (physics); Practical reason; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.05975326102829691,"score_gpt":0.2096272652442962,"score_spread":0.14987400421599928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376636452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021708585,0.000034392142,0.000005365759,0.00014666902,0.0013320844,0.0002369001,0.001128769,0.00036737052,0.99672675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015062705,0.00004747442,0.0000016114409,0.0003340843,0.0017507949,0.0000010373741,0.00013578938,0.00007739562,0.99614555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986582,0.000072789895,0.00016071339,0.00045499034,0.00034960944,0.00030372586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987319,0.00028167685,0.000146943,0.0005267556,0.0001513922,0.00016129315],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016057694,0.00034126028,0.00038318915,0.00021413137,0.00045377316,0.00011396149,0.0005808592,0.0003379697,0.000035993384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023050581,0.00035258042,0.00028493378,0.00000451579,0.0008616189,0.000049294256,0.00032470073,0.0010374683,0.0004273756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060669467,0.000014140826,9.706376e-9,0.00007548247,0.00011422877,0.0003061262,0.0003964633,0.0000015961089,9.591204e-7,0.8154668,0.18343584,0.0001276274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003340028,0.00009603913,4.017345e-7,0.00026454998,0.00011771704,0.000001133706,0.00007908304,0.000022911094,0.000006471507,0.015673421,0.9830003,0.00040397208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015366245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002091566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7997934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018622544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002015655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239559","doi":"10.1515/9780773564046-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.026135695086241476,"score_gpt":0.21579196989088933,"score_spread":0.18965627480464786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009153426,0.0000062861986,0.000021375234,0.0009968688,0.0019035706,0.0003353761,0.0025219165,0.00010673486,0.9940987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017668473,0.00009796765,0.000020846766,0.0015697455,0.0009787015,0.0000033930767,0.0001996099,0.00008347109,0.9793778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979836,0.00018210796,0.00027231616,0.00065081636,0.00039160583,0.0005196043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857527,0.00009726604,0.00024754117,0.0006329368,0.00022089315,0.00022609443],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012116363,0.00053710566,0.00060421025,0.00022920773,0.0009645945,0.00016037496,0.0007563175,0.00056005066,0.018094217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000063689317,0.00053998746,0.00036865586,0.0000074734216,0.00074218167,0.00014934961,0.0005173942,0.0012909499,0.011550711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008282717,0.00005425348,6.720518e-8,0.00021349265,0.00020036892,0.000096001815,0.0011881843,0.000018099832,0.0000011289962,0.90524024,0.09284462,0.000060723898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059728354,0.000058888996,5.8960916e-7,0.00027289768,0.00015128896,0.0000011041712,0.0001676062,0.0000012806252,0.00006642284,0.0308828,0.96715015,0.0006497138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005419261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004311621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8743574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030028625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103765204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378552598","doi":"10.21608/mkwn.2022.299356","title":"النزعة الأخلاقية في فلسفة توماس ريد (1710-1796) \"دراسة تحليلية نقدية\"","year":2022,"lang":"ar","type":"article","venue":"Maǧallaẗ Kulliyyaẗ Al-Adāb bi Al-Wadī Al-Ǧadīd/Maǧallaẗ Kulliyyaẗ Al-Adāb bi Al-Wadī Al-Ǧadīd","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.041304766460200794,"score_gpt":0.26256631778482364,"score_spread":0.22126155132462286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378552598","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15298608,0.05654652,0.00042498994,0.39579362,0.038096175,0.014754341,0.019667124,0.007243654,0.3144875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65406346,0.0169058,0.0010620224,0.23233753,0.008644135,0.0027105012,0.004568244,0.004618064,0.07509023],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93351775,0.007743786,0.013005536,0.015261283,0.01492919,0.015542422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96044195,0.005415186,0.007308439,0.014275671,0.0039065126,0.008652219],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015886668,0.012573871,0.011814637,0.0066898945,0.018110488,0.0075711687,0.014178282,0.0041376487,0.08519563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002313285,0.013525816,0.008404126,0.006084121,0.009636045,0.0033917404,0.0115848165,0.022040064,0.021201564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052965907,0.0078845015,0.0007345622,0.0014184099,0.007900961,0.0064771585,0.019799076,0.0038565684,0.005354922,0.26100993,0.6711275,0.0091398405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012687458,0.0052573737,0.0005456192,0.0018265336,0.0028912611,0.001305882,0.007800507,0.009624377,0.00065948715,0.10089825,0.8426235,0.013879804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011415128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076649864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5010774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005743841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006356489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378553452","doi":"10.1163/9789004494756_003","title":"Preface","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.06224187177592986,"score_gpt":0.22132838852591105,"score_spread":0.1590865167499812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378553452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001124188,0.00030448296,8.1290153e-7,0.001418849,0.00023888999,0.00007237038,0.000054847416,0.000103963604,0.99780464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013933544,0.0002505095,0.000003789714,0.0019433313,0.0014446145,0.0000019452953,0.000023094663,0.000040382263,0.9823588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941236,0.00000425383,0.00014582486,0.00017827514,0.00015357112,0.00010571515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960554,0.00004797444,0.000038892988,0.00021443039,0.000038451963,0.000054699944],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000062713436,0.0001736521,0.00017956005,0.000043604367,0.00012079289,0.000078491,0.00013815214,0.00017650834,0.2590886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002424933,0.00013274656,0.00012356634,8.478144e-7,0.00032826132,0.000036652185,0.00003021867,0.0004351314,0.0062442836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005763295,0.000004977525,2.0684363e-9,0.000009951463,0.0000296523,0.0000054899074,0.000588938,1.0880549e-7,1.0334855e-7,0.99418914,0.0022618412,0.002904022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023393275,0.000013463301,9.6364365e-9,0.000023016686,0.000009771339,3.9472306e-7,0.0000027789738,6.057597e-7,4.7964875e-7,0.50071985,0.49910685,0.00009938082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001878917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011333296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.496845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010155221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026311354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379033396","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-27345-2_10","title":"Systems of Knowledge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave handbooks in German idealism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unification; Hegelianism; Idealism; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); German idealism; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.07537443840552491,"score_gpt":0.28223994568236044,"score_spread":0.20686550727683553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379033396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059382975,0.0033801857,0.0000054129896,0.00010180344,0.00208666,0.00036609077,0.00046776733,0.00011887127,0.9934138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.559504,0.00067350914,0.000002438727,0.00009968526,0.0016982898,0.000040699448,0.00012805863,0.00015320019,0.43770015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979005,0.00006461054,0.000885036,0.00042885635,0.00037711207,0.00034389689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982829,0.00043367458,0.00038495313,0.0005370518,0.0002470157,0.0001143682],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006817079,0.00043371486,0.0008680143,0.00057658536,0.00014049512,0.00009728852,0.00040536406,0.00048444752,0.0004949563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035523666,0.0004058189,0.00029246858,0.000017018156,0.00086828554,0.000013890618,0.00019087656,0.00089689903,0.0007303652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016159545,0.0000071539657,4.246024e-7,0.00054759666,0.000094389405,0.00006266677,0.010209664,0.0000014675244,0.000008198405,0.9881174,0.00047981853,0.0004550406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025953373,0.000044623488,0.0000019736947,0.0017711092,0.00004882703,0.0000027373385,0.00004169694,0.000035291017,0.000007124924,0.81562966,0.18180557,0.00035188065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043486652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017586558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5594446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062633844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110251334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379616262","doi":"10.1353/hms.2007.a383363","title":"Hume's Reasons","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Epistemology; Sympathy; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Action (physics); Prudence; Morality; Reading (process); Virtue; Humanity; Infallibility; Function (biology); Representation (politics); Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.17393156714174499,"score_gpt":0.3486896907835262,"score_spread":0.1747581236417812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379616262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027488062,0.0039910567,0.000012328109,0.004846598,0.0008692461,0.00007799029,0.000011836569,0.0001380616,0.9625648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99083704,0.0002267109,0.000023691928,0.0012474157,0.0014400646,0.0000057369375,0.0000020528423,0.000013276769,0.0062040235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924964,0.00002152745,0.00016854254,0.0001523303,0.00016130146,0.00024666902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993212,0.0002756884,0.0000435821,0.0001550586,0.00015173909,0.000052701045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059910276,0.00011386631,0.00017477498,0.00005234281,0.0005560199,0.00004380308,0.00010449207,0.000033994067,0.0005617579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018304818,0.00008575495,0.00007416937,0.000023703557,0.00075639295,0.00007433117,0.00008719392,0.00019098575,0.00027867852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001121509,0.000028967996,0.000023020459,0.000017519973,0.00008905462,0.000013733213,0.018191814,8.356858e-8,0.00001535282,0.97812456,0.0024845118,0.0010001844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009762159,0.00003763432,0.00013025514,0.000023291983,0.000016894273,9.937887e-7,0.006809932,3.3517603e-7,0.000037684313,0.63379896,0.35894173,0.000104660954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027959835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006925415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018834437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000097792845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6150855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380232188","doi":"10.1515/9780773584594-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Government of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Front (military); Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.026620146086020053,"score_gpt":0.2183477057367787,"score_spread":0.19172755965075863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380232188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000072231796,0.000007778163,0.000012504803,0.0012826213,0.0016145837,0.00030913122,0.0025385967,0.00010548055,0.9941221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012679757,0.00014049414,0.000025108324,0.001982192,0.0018192618,0.0000033210524,0.00018574751,0.000082009865,0.9830821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979418,0.00021923086,0.00028284907,0.00064237945,0.00038778654,0.00052594196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985399,0.00012249078,0.00025204293,0.0006426408,0.00021606337,0.0002268426],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013448665,0.00053378777,0.00060246076,0.00023211948,0.00092787703,0.00015872956,0.00077159004,0.0005538093,0.029920544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000060685547,0.00053734204,0.000361712,0.000006757896,0.0006568492,0.00016656899,0.00053010863,0.0012887156,0.014606631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007369213,0.00004641309,7.4315345e-8,0.00011721927,0.00017247429,0.000046408568,0.00086917426,0.0000086025075,9.152536e-7,0.7792777,0.21919079,0.0001965425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004608878,0.00004633002,6.910014e-7,0.00016493806,0.00015322662,9.635611e-7,0.0001556601,0.000004603435,0.00004807904,0.0077114343,0.99059135,0.0006618479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031947414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061191154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7715663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020530669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058798254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380234675","doi":"10.1515/9780773583238-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; McGill University; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.03196163078361899,"score_gpt":0.2125797692251625,"score_spread":0.1806181384415435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380234675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006323253,0.000008475343,0.000010885737,0.0008812979,0.0018397666,0.00030885244,0.002539957,0.00010526864,0.9942992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010669274,0.00017408676,0.000014610566,0.0014545916,0.0010469335,0.0000033326576,0.00014160026,0.000082337436,0.98641324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791425,0.00023553887,0.0002758933,0.00065189524,0.00039643276,0.00052598445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985159,0.00012903506,0.0002511274,0.00066435407,0.00021372872,0.00022588034],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011282802,0.00053730357,0.00061429857,0.00023563101,0.0009738489,0.00016480805,0.0007646728,0.000557461,0.04467036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006709742,0.00054086023,0.00036758688,0.00000759593,0.00068243395,0.00014717803,0.00050772453,0.001292838,0.01809937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044890614,0.00004664236,7.884287e-8,0.00014025293,0.00016644695,0.00007151032,0.00094035896,0.0000040800846,6.525378e-7,0.70790154,0.29058254,0.000101045014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044679342,0.0000540756,4.7253653e-7,0.00017825108,0.00015454531,0.0000010624775,0.00014580975,0.0000070859383,0.00003395606,0.008462779,0.9898501,0.00066507433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026034683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022146112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69943875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001703283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030612387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380591050","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzad017","title":"<i>The Architectonic of Reason: Purposiveness and Systematic Unity in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason</i>, by Lea Ypi","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.023422862126735094,"score_gpt":0.2538747081067476,"score_spread":0.23045184598001253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380591050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845598,0.0025545086,0.000002935154,0.0022639597,0.00011106752,0.00035949616,0.00012041046,0.000012329524,0.010015532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990476,0.00020778635,0.0000021418791,0.00004337703,0.00004303473,0.00003358792,0.000009146256,0.000011160389,0.00060220965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989465,0.00026073706,0.00032375453,0.00013097818,0.00017413401,0.00016391632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878794,0.00074360205,0.000118249794,0.00021953933,0.00008889794,0.000041798008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010632663,0.00009888241,0.00029645668,0.000070243696,0.00013412975,0.000038237256,0.0001717001,0.00006516617,0.000039671253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031448007,0.00006844106,0.000050234496,0.00008682687,0.00052557344,0.000042953314,0.000066748806,0.00023289643,0.0000065611503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004484854,0.00006128652,0.00006523688,0.0050356267,0.00003587656,0.00001082472,0.01070979,0.0000032174582,0.0007174282,0.98265845,0.00010914834,0.0005482923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071552774,0.0002261345,0.00036315687,0.0062669036,0.00007391437,0.000012609424,0.007184358,0.00028511832,0.0029270744,0.9747042,0.0069533777,0.00028763697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018391736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011406074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144877955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009800041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037968788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27909458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382133180","doi":"10.36311/2318-0501.2023.v11n1.p167","title":"Friendship, love, and family","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Estudos Kantianos [EK]","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Conversation; Personhood; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Philosophy of love; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05361234741187657,"score_gpt":0.25786048826814983,"score_spread":0.20424814085627327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382133180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4238694,0.00043853576,0.000009002514,0.007539193,0.0009508431,0.0001648003,0.00006281867,0.00027602958,0.5666894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948953,0.00013222285,0.000010906036,0.0015006455,0.00080830633,0.000007542692,0.000014212661,0.000030332394,0.0026005674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988934,0.000052644282,0.00019963094,0.00029104648,0.00024622332,0.00031704953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993408,0.00019360194,0.00004874546,0.00023563458,0.00006382059,0.00011741842],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032361588,0.0001663462,0.00020037474,0.00012451282,0.00027128033,0.00017529701,0.00017148984,0.00008231569,0.00084033253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081517006,0.00014098684,0.00007000487,0.0000930528,0.000435353,0.00013394748,0.00015204614,0.00030338072,0.002708593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011748807,0.00003726828,0.00023182588,0.000028339931,0.000036370337,0.00004407133,0.005989274,9.73769e-7,0.00020697314,0.990117,0.0020222475,0.0012738755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043526807,0.00010533738,0.005198528,0.000045429217,0.000031236537,0.000003312089,0.0021613175,0.00018103952,0.00008923743,0.70230705,0.2891282,0.00031404675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007682303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083780076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57102585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000071173035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025721092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384203592","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2023.16","title":"The Sociality of Madness: Hegel on Spirit's Pathology and the Sanity of Ethicality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Sociality; Subjectivity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Soul; Politics; Objectivity (philosophy); Feeling; Dialectic; Psychoanalysis; Phenomenology (philosophy); Aesthetics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.05220768926701285,"score_gpt":0.27327932196705157,"score_spread":0.2210716327000387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384203592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4726969,0.0006812969,0.000007206312,0.37587452,0.0006365601,0.00042875364,0.00020161686,0.00008931578,0.14938383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965023,0.0002331547,0.0000026181474,0.0026869325,0.00024408002,0.000018233612,0.000004072447,0.000010528604,0.00029811912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820465,0.00079682574,0.000360813,0.00017299409,0.00026971652,0.00019500425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627256,0.0030412388,0.00017239958,0.00032459997,0.00015164929,0.000037576978],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004356236,0.000112133,0.00028684756,0.000024886078,0.0005854634,0.000039099996,0.00024322448,0.00013221795,0.0003815552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010092565,0.0000592538,0.00012901178,0.00004499761,0.005209463,0.000010660643,0.00016382796,0.0005687486,0.00007088548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020993076,0.000048966453,0.000018938033,0.00006811188,0.000023694229,0.000003930378,0.0054129157,6.24141e-7,0.000024561054,0.9927872,0.0008821465,0.00051900727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046846623,0.000056758578,0.0008700463,0.000026026064,0.00001642423,9.860194e-7,0.0011664737,0.000009520356,0.00007818987,0.86316776,0.1340758,0.000063556436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003336352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018586346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5238054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000074506706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003468587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384694187","doi":"10.1017/s0008423923000392","title":"James Tully: To Think and Act Differently Alexander Livingston, ed., New York: Routledge, 2022, pp. 324","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law and economics; Economic history; Political science; Sociology; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.050989067285668446,"score_gpt":0.26864075676433696,"score_spread":0.21765168947866853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384694187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7936873,0.0015210324,0.00006382832,0.11148411,0.0027468733,0.00018540597,0.00007959913,0.000047158854,0.090184726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915732,0.0000139149315,0.000020605607,0.0044614826,0.0013246476,6.2217634e-7,6.000638e-7,0.000011576429,0.0025933364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980856,0.000041911808,0.00027231223,0.00020599739,0.00041496268,0.0009791964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955675,0.0002517614,0.000058911075,0.00015074956,0.00020973831,0.003761348],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088065973,0.00013409877,0.0002170451,0.00032590804,0.0006125438,0.00059282593,0.00051726593,0.000057874706,0.0017904976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012379708,0.00010090772,0.00007260078,0.0002110277,0.0015168943,0.0002746092,0.00006942183,0.0004273468,0.00013225447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035156165,0.0000065017007,0.00017937987,0.000006495733,0.000008747326,0.00004326722,0.0043282704,9.4159526e-7,0.000044595334,0.98125887,0.0132555,0.00086389063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027279783,0.00028837295,0.0230842,0.00020078158,0.00003417813,0.000061806066,0.0034767198,0.00009594047,0.0000838631,0.89541954,0.076661766,0.00032003695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018706376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025647873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19788595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016110104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021028295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385522770","doi":"10.1515/9780773584587-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Government of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Front (military); Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.026620146086020053,"score_gpt":0.2183477057367787,"score_spread":0.19172755965075863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385522770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000072231796,0.000007778163,0.000012504803,0.0012826213,0.0016145837,0.00030913122,0.0025385967,0.00010548055,0.9941221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012679757,0.00014049414,0.000025108324,0.001982192,0.0018192618,0.0000033210524,0.00018574751,0.000082009865,0.9830821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979418,0.00021923086,0.00028284907,0.00064237945,0.00038778654,0.00052594196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985399,0.00012249078,0.00025204293,0.0006426408,0.00021606337,0.0002268426],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013448665,0.00053378777,0.00060246076,0.00023211948,0.00092787703,0.00015872956,0.00077159004,0.0005538093,0.029920544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000060685547,0.00053734204,0.000361712,0.000006757896,0.0006568492,0.00016656899,0.00053010863,0.0012887156,0.014606631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007369213,0.00004641309,7.4315345e-8,0.00011721927,0.00017247429,0.000046408568,0.00086917426,0.0000086025075,9.152536e-7,0.7792777,0.21919079,0.0001965425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004608878,0.00004633002,6.910014e-7,0.00016493806,0.00015322662,9.635611e-7,0.0001556601,0.000004603435,0.00004807904,0.0077114343,0.99059135,0.0006618479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031947414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061191154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7715663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020530669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058798254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385523123","doi":"10.1515/9780773594791-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; McGill University; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.03646187804284432,"score_gpt":0.21423118235400002,"score_spread":0.1777693043111557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385523123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000078809235,0.0000054950688,0.000015332605,0.00035590876,0.002056687,0.00030839915,0.002258006,0.000100429526,0.9948919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012302231,0.0001067485,0.00001972139,0.0012386036,0.00085582875,0.0000036167887,0.0001486508,0.000082808365,0.9852418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980416,0.0002328144,0.00026727346,0.00063418585,0.00031926055,0.0005048268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849343,0.00009716009,0.00026550575,0.0006827513,0.00023419996,0.00022693204],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001348601,0.00052402867,0.00059659214,0.00022700209,0.00086499105,0.00011522046,0.0008276273,0.00055811374,0.035420693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000058966166,0.0005173429,0.0003530778,0.000006208388,0.0007477895,0.00015098647,0.00059705233,0.0012153253,0.015107326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009708735,0.000047991154,1.268697e-7,0.00015090594,0.00019958815,0.00006135903,0.0015529923,9.789419e-7,7.913403e-7,0.8162721,0.18153703,0.00007909204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038921606,0.00006116434,9.465671e-7,0.00016879069,0.00016862272,8.5005036e-7,0.00016971592,0.0000012982665,0.00007053427,0.021473054,0.97685415,0.0006416768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058128373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039444776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7953171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013051528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055110802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386657679","doi":"10.3998/ergo.1120","title":"Everywhere Chimerical","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Harvard University; Northwestern University","keywords":"Obligation; Moral obligation; Categorical imperative; Epistemology; Reverence; Duty; Law and economics; Mainstream; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Morality; Political science","score_opus":0.19153191102449832,"score_gpt":0.40081003857070663,"score_spread":0.2092781275462083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386657679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118595384,0.0015793605,0.00008442268,0.035002723,0.0024685094,0.00016324745,0.000046141333,0.000030197596,0.84203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98973614,0.00013196556,0.00016247548,0.004664564,0.0045638066,0.000002644805,0.000008681902,0.00003416232,0.000695572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982335,0.00025448608,0.0005964285,0.00023062178,0.00046168955,0.00022325465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808055,0.00013192157,0.00042521761,0.0003436879,0.0007259564,0.00029266014],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006188171,0.00018713337,0.00045421437,0.00011248708,0.00035421376,0.0022828674,0.0023312382,0.00007613042,0.00910542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016336008,0.00014810463,0.00017920177,0.000106665655,0.00030604645,0.0037215252,0.0008167656,0.00070347224,0.0000686164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015116441,0.000439133,0.00004389055,0.000021359012,0.00011399612,0.0003337524,0.00139582,0.000010930285,0.0001339213,0.9947536,0.0011927475,0.0014096705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060283655,0.00028123384,0.0001101615,0.000101954894,0.00004216578,0.00009501306,0.00017819242,0.000011430659,0.0002605634,0.9233604,0.074749656,0.00020639515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003830255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054633107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8711407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032117583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032512282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99875283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386763843","doi":"10.1086/725812","title":":<i>The Roots of Normativity</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Permission; Reuse; Library science; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Biology","score_opus":0.12340072441999769,"score_gpt":0.3137599496110649,"score_spread":0.1903592251910672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386763843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06030348,0.0003043649,0.00003811936,0.1487999,0.0022522155,0.00016025036,0.00006915274,0.00028637273,0.7877861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602187,0.00014711279,0.0000026587948,0.00094447297,0.00031638626,0.000004795771,0.0000038796325,0.000008545374,0.0025502963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926823,0.00011929716,0.000151133,0.00006483933,0.00026151064,0.0001350029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973293,0.0022671456,0.000055962784,0.00017816862,0.00014048807,0.000028968714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018748299,0.000054541684,0.00008003754,0.000029294693,0.0005604818,0.000054124426,0.00017373005,0.000079223886,0.00009354756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006996754,0.000035258094,0.000055317243,0.00005332571,0.00070591643,0.000055303808,0.00006993353,0.0007196177,0.00030921423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047707854,0.000007864944,0.0000029002802,0.000028085411,0.000009378199,0.0000011694874,0.015837707,0.000003509305,0.000055513105,0.98233503,0.0009184717,0.0007955855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041041876,0.00001547007,0.0000417189,0.000013199177,0.000002791469,1.5402534e-7,0.00055518816,0.000059193728,0.00010526145,0.67998195,0.31914765,0.000036409467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042091702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036444212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93571836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004128801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054182714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43108293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386804386","doi":"10.1111/phib.12320","title":"Advice as a model for reasons","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytic Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Advice (programming); Action (physics); Humanity; Epistemology; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.10183071513997835,"score_gpt":0.306982048317198,"score_spread":0.20515133317721965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386804386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007415832,0.000094818184,0.00031648236,0.061391816,0.00040729082,0.00038379073,0.00028008549,0.0008130979,0.9288968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836938,0.00003088635,0.000045037454,0.004614652,0.0013866486,0.00007844902,0.00007221116,0.000041541072,0.010036795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988359,0.000023066266,0.00023584806,0.00032026006,0.00024442762,0.0003404492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898446,0.00029164908,0.00007038471,0.00034672176,0.00016463245,0.000142131],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039327692,0.00017490206,0.00024008672,0.00019674003,0.0004131028,0.000094162875,0.00027274547,0.000078775505,0.00028946862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021339305,0.00015414861,0.00024765223,0.00013090485,0.0002683088,0.0001510534,0.00007168959,0.0002013721,0.0013056829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037002726,0.000043273343,0.0000012633395,0.00004472522,0.00007182057,0.0000069940156,0.0023611423,0.00020618284,0.000010263026,0.99348193,0.0035742426,0.00016113707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026139084,0.000056945482,0.0000012206065,0.00002873848,0.000057425892,6.6243564e-7,0.00010009053,0.17993666,0.000003914845,0.79300153,0.026381485,0.00016990634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005210766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000067790264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97627795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002159576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008085921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387458949","doi":"10.1017/s1369415423000341","title":"Representation and Reality in Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Antinomy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Transcendental idealism; Warrant; Practical reason; Representation (politics); Extant taxon; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.1299848904380695,"score_gpt":0.3421508378757906,"score_spread":0.2121659474377211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387458949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28468227,0.20268503,0.0000075588177,0.07724483,0.0007158218,0.0016249411,0.00016783654,0.0002454077,0.4326263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92430377,0.074922115,0.0000047543053,0.0004400362,0.00008152048,0.000008506713,0.00002818203,0.000006854279,0.00020424224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992349,0.00012496034,0.0002725185,0.00015208483,0.000113296875,0.00010221132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995553,0.00009055118,0.00009252952,0.0001843943,0.000046965666,0.000030283669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007951866,0.00006664356,0.00025926498,0.0000567143,0.000046877278,0.00001786946,0.00007192995,0.000030007555,0.0002442299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001697881,0.00005407724,0.000053222968,0.0001240302,0.00014593331,0.00007791038,0.000042502255,0.00011917462,0.000038211452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036675506,0.000017751929,0.00036594633,0.0023393398,0.000008778858,0.000012039974,0.0010706311,1.6832233e-7,0.000015923406,0.97942466,0.00104283,0.015698249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029834732,0.000041581672,0.010450637,0.0074231667,0.00006199917,0.0000062241015,0.00031013123,0.00006559258,0.00004714565,0.7183092,0.26277256,0.00021338988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015914865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021873692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6396215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000033571039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013798516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2674146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388133135","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12545","title":"Heidegger's fundamental ontology and the human good in Aristotelian ethics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Existentialism; Naturalism; Ontology; Rationality; Parallels; GRASP; Analytic philosophy; Character (mathematics); Contemporary philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08482429848669673,"score_gpt":0.29481864546611003,"score_spread":0.2099943469794133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388133135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6882759,0.0012686295,0.0000037907719,0.2380548,0.00070322765,0.00021379559,0.0000493605,0.000037138183,0.07139338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954409,0.00008978173,0.0000025749782,0.002588625,0.0015714519,0.0000036920699,0.0000017106513,0.00002371535,0.00027754199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981278,0.00064673397,0.00050441315,0.00012168405,0.00036550578,0.00023382815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982971,0.0009890392,0.00031852687,0.00021742668,0.00010867231,0.000069233836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039557284,0.00015776033,0.00033016884,0.00015049978,0.0006925313,0.00011921935,0.00047390995,0.000110922345,0.0001816762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017671645,0.00007873434,0.00018077978,0.0000867455,0.0022737125,0.00008075713,0.000121676036,0.0018016614,0.00009606408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012581481,0.00003260591,0.000084722815,0.000015149315,0.00007413032,0.000029793697,0.098304294,0.0000074371246,0.000026980273,0.9011262,0.000026465857,0.00014639489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014264866,0.000116531344,0.00013397637,0.00007406723,0.000040277864,0.000033361113,0.008571542,0.000021545478,0.0000033364722,0.98380125,0.0056773587,0.00010025791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019758311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004759661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30716503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002348859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051376457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8377589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388215874","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198238843.003.0002","title":"Particularizing Particularism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Normative; Quarter (Canadian coin); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; History; Theology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05910414877023559,"score_gpt":0.22018579579651493,"score_spread":0.16108164702627933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388215874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009955514,0.000433102,0.000007441687,0.002145275,0.000296978,0.000105707375,0.000020705516,0.00014090669,0.99683994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11611495,0.00014980909,0.000012706503,0.0027080562,0.0015192176,0.0000071406785,0.00003211118,0.00006252587,0.87939346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895924,0.000012250912,0.00028198166,0.00027354143,0.00025472822,0.00021822506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993696,0.000067598514,0.00006989554,0.00032017156,0.00006055979,0.00011217365],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015055102,0.00025821256,0.00028886515,0.00005688013,0.00022763276,0.00017105762,0.00014439253,0.00025916172,0.09316266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008550199,0.00020458623,0.0002345388,0.0000023521895,0.0004442755,0.00006276775,0.000046203015,0.00062303286,0.004477551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005538166,0.000011092354,2.2745883e-8,0.000012087008,0.000077708486,0.000038069113,0.00082905544,6.9492876e-7,0.0000010063275,0.99620104,0.00080170954,0.0020219893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004251538,0.000014715531,4.416531e-8,0.000037754333,0.000040517476,0.000001136179,0.000006525828,0.000009376743,0.0000031279103,0.50577265,0.49391177,0.00015985336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024543084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008241235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49311006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016263968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003305781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388222761","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198243359.002.0001","title":"Title Pages","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Subject (documents); Political philosophy; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Media studies; Library science; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.06902383757564125,"score_gpt":0.2626969971526758,"score_spread":0.19367315957703457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388222761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.5153444e-7,0.0007779999,8.635156e-7,0.00081893784,0.0012767417,0.00002037236,0.000055390792,0.000018419561,0.9970306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008045775,0.0006881043,0.0000018292887,0.0011061389,0.0023662671,0.000002014776,0.00005793172,0.000012684857,0.98771924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997521,0.000008538477,0.000052827618,0.00007098823,0.00005516596,0.000060365433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99984854,0.000020819834,0.000012076032,0.000087350236,0.000012786111,0.000018393855],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000025824102,0.00006201086,0.00007924621,0.000022316512,0.000048002395,0.000049879047,0.00006974356,0.00007871398,0.85650736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000015761752,0.00004394682,0.000043102642,0.0000033597396,0.000090430556,0.000010694064,0.000010726052,0.00018724037,0.39481667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.5850073e-7,0.0000029939051,2.9527594e-10,0.0000056092726,0.0000044223184,3.59386e-7,0.000067457935,2.1445514e-8,5.7394338e-8,0.48042065,0.51859975,0.0008983046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010986068,0.000004659742,9.996401e-9,0.000009839086,0.000002894445,1.1201419e-7,0.000005471992,7.607792e-7,0.0000018061718,0.23436706,0.76554245,0.000053975127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014503181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013152204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4616907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000032674827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001897809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60565454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388705537","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2023.26","title":"Houlgate's Presupposition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Presupposition; Hegelianism; Reciprocal; Character (mathematics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Literature; Mathematics; Art; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04793673610639717,"score_gpt":0.2395165995068494,"score_spread":0.19157986340045222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388705537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039713763,0.00009509323,0.000011283692,0.061307307,0.00069811265,0.00013445466,0.000054880442,0.00059869734,0.89738643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98750114,0.000033800425,0.000008897508,0.001920481,0.00082582835,0.000021137528,0.000042138367,0.000017718276,0.009628854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935967,0.000045355533,0.00011647952,0.00014343057,0.00014798531,0.00018709688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996305,0.00010350651,0.000026030719,0.00013956618,0.000046116584,0.000054256594],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026086514,0.000078973484,0.00008470763,0.000060281032,0.0002390798,0.00008920826,0.00010236073,0.00004707273,0.010156299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004146723,0.00006805635,0.0000573591,0.000030558847,0.00016210754,0.000025867632,0.000050118044,0.00016672804,0.014392296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012377207,0.000019449899,0.0000020683356,0.000016839587,0.000008385667,0.000015078001,0.0018619698,0.0000035918,0.00007240187,0.96765214,0.02985031,0.00048538978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009425205,0.000023429233,0.00003576749,0.000012878314,0.000003959234,7.9346523e-7,0.00011645614,0.000028807797,0.000067309215,0.40631527,0.5932342,0.00006690342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046710065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000125269125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9477874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007856391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000908487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388751662","doi":"10.3998/ergo.4670","title":"The Rationality of Love: Benevolence and Complacence in Kant and Hutcheson","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Rationality; Philosophy; Feeling; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Reading (process); Philosophy of love; Interpreter; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1869135348062593,"score_gpt":0.4032298350968405,"score_spread":0.21631630029058121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388751662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603747,0.0008879043,0.0000064035144,0.022662891,0.0002409188,0.0001643782,0.000029347164,0.000004643596,0.015628818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985685,0.00073378324,0.000016304579,0.00031572525,0.0003046283,0.0000014769278,0.0000015615847,0.000007741547,0.000050297767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888057,0.00015627987,0.00044486372,0.00012776327,0.00026894474,0.00012157285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987784,0.0004616618,0.00033114426,0.00014134846,0.00020293104,0.000084493295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017000505,0.00009557134,0.00023599014,0.0001020334,0.0002178713,0.00062110636,0.00088316825,0.00003420461,0.00008342369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014683694,0.00006249778,0.000028951097,0.00009096377,0.0006060975,0.0014229345,0.000464439,0.00029479348,0.0000031156276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017153,0.000057477824,0.0010904134,0.000035340152,0.000019166557,0.0000117543395,0.00319564,0.000026746096,0.000086611595,0.99440324,0.00006460445,0.00083748106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040716626,0.00015119096,0.0108341845,0.00014963014,0.000008561514,0.0000075901903,0.000455514,0.0002445277,0.00006260773,0.98651415,0.0010823692,0.00008249413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009870204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002605906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03819379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011485259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006810745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5989343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389615864","doi":"10.5209/kant.90913","title":"Notes on the Cambridge translation of Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Con-Textos Kantianos International Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Esri (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Scholarship; Epistemology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Philosophy; Key (lock); Translation (biology); Linguistics; Computer science; Law; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0794889884301255,"score_gpt":0.2932731828748218,"score_spread":0.2137841944446963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389615864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6372336,0.001544376,0.00020835048,0.24977742,0.0075649815,0.00050488836,0.000489478,0.00005650329,0.10262037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972125,0.00022051408,0.000013767927,0.0009132603,0.0015432861,0.0000034113873,0.000015174584,0.000021925325,0.000056149765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977342,0.00019106596,0.0008425453,0.00013567008,0.0009683664,0.0001281452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964748,0.001337492,0.0010032454,0.00022884173,0.00091110426,0.000044521024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011826076,0.00017390012,0.00030416215,0.0002582632,0.00028558986,0.00015620826,0.00076053006,0.00007978803,0.00014978158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005160492,0.00009579199,0.00033085328,0.000109094144,0.0013304716,0.00020360861,0.000059121165,0.0005123218,0.00002772162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036922577,0.00008496748,0.000040605362,0.000030874962,0.00033202543,0.000016334254,0.005724596,0.0000807561,0.0011901004,0.9902227,0.0007609411,0.0011468958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006459517,0.0003496136,0.00018505944,0.00064175244,0.00009268135,0.000024498617,0.00044167455,0.00038672308,0.0076439735,0.9646168,0.02482461,0.00014671347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007212223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039935087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35997888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022308483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017653841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49021778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389919041","doi":"10.56550/d.2.1.1","title":"Totality in <i>the</i> <i>Science of Logic </i>As An Indispensable Presupposition of Hegel’s <i>Philosophy of Right</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Distinctio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Presupposition; Exposition (narrative); Philosophy; Epistemology; Practical philosophy; Humanities; Literature","score_opus":0.05178948459734896,"score_gpt":0.2856647413658171,"score_spread":0.23387525676846815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389919041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7364461,0.00002059201,0.0000055763994,0.0006729069,0.00016160512,0.00015188407,0.00014865566,0.000022290564,0.26237038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956286,0.0000078121475,0.000006067196,0.00020159777,0.00011215207,0.000011007435,0.000042509248,0.000006809194,0.000049203096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986793,0.000112830174,0.00039399342,0.00020320276,0.00043327265,0.00017742428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903786,0.00018780367,0.00020478616,0.0003363085,0.00019239377,0.000040873132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011632747,0.00009879589,0.00021860765,0.00012673892,0.00014974824,0.000024802906,0.00037802453,0.000047239682,0.00027345636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121779885,0.00007159256,0.00007195989,0.000303377,0.0020550424,0.00023433144,0.00006927347,0.00016528176,0.000017841667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005605033,0.00026768824,0.00011993464,0.00012125883,0.0000056315125,0.0000037244938,0.005435954,0.000021202437,0.0026119167,0.9912876,0.000026821197,0.000042235966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021823608,0.00025661022,0.0010798108,0.000049732535,0.000013825415,0.0000017526633,0.0005504533,0.00006949775,0.006037715,0.9911599,0.0004788825,0.0000835977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004337532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013163335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26311675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012710046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066818786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.757189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390075875","doi":"10.5840/cpsem20224","title":"Reality and Intentionality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Semiotics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10729087568086156,"score_gpt":0.2680220846864725,"score_spread":0.16073120900561094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390075875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016397335,0.00037679245,0.0000034963466,0.005086075,0.0005584579,0.00007529422,0.0005183634,0.000044262717,0.9933209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.110972434,0.0007823125,0.00001388707,0.0026594896,0.0014682064,0.0000029325497,0.00030700487,0.000054315646,0.8837394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991855,0.000026516043,0.00021898035,0.00022150521,0.00024276724,0.00010474617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934053,0.0001642182,0.000110242116,0.00023027527,0.00008939785,0.00006530882],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041102475,0.00015904238,0.00022091197,0.0000400278,0.00029582868,0.000060926002,0.00011844612,0.00012237509,0.015107321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004828511,0.00014938912,0.000102662045,0.0000025337058,0.00059766945,0.000037277976,0.00022301839,0.0007736471,0.00004288559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006931775,0.000010610931,5.508411e-7,0.00006428659,0.000049278344,0.0000077150735,0.0006260378,3.028149e-7,1.9548068e-7,0.99724525,0.0015675086,0.00042134707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029773131,0.000015288959,0.0000015845071,0.000019798365,0.000024386009,0.0000013879923,0.000019681918,0.000004021671,9.131599e-8,0.50996256,0.48983225,0.00008916802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004912934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011443657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48826474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004183274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003893299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390367276","doi":"10.1007/s11245-023-09999-y","title":"The Practical Unity of Practical Wisdom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topoi","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Sine qua non; Epistemology; Practical wisdom; Trait; Praxis; Form of the Good; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.16676864541091654,"score_gpt":0.36616134775572184,"score_spread":0.1993927023448053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390367276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081876606,0.000041560383,0.000032099902,0.18550488,0.00086098013,0.00014713587,0.000024099314,0.000164599,0.73134804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956368,0.000043926466,0.000021404452,0.0004778623,0.0004890209,0.0000060745756,0.000003785769,0.000008879252,0.0033122397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992464,0.000125857,0.00015727762,0.00008960196,0.00021619997,0.00016467215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975838,0.0019957407,0.000057988826,0.00020891611,0.00010077006,0.000052786487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008905562,0.00006054795,0.00009418688,0.000023569293,0.00034359706,0.00006373221,0.00009472332,0.000045660916,0.00067885517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011845157,0.00003670807,0.000054527973,0.00004755483,0.0008217739,0.00009599422,0.00008134539,0.0003515873,0.0004745232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032095475,0.000039921386,0.0000028883198,0.00000836971,0.000018112856,0.00001160935,0.002447823,4.1562012e-7,0.000019865,0.99334663,0.0037238637,0.00034838056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006669342,0.00003713017,0.000029406572,0.000004493177,0.000009017928,0.0000020878872,0.0010179996,0.00008818185,0.000049951122,0.64985466,0.34880254,0.000037850743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004249242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000112641676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9137602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000066740226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007742727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74329877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390720627","doi":"10.1017/9781108779968.014","title":"Values and Eudaimonia as Guideposts for Virtues","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Eudaimonia; Flourishing; Honesty; Meaning (existential); Conceptualization; Social psychology; Epistemology; Loyalty; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04125508340768164,"score_gpt":0.22659632641476837,"score_spread":0.18534124300708674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390720627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009887825,0.0013454442,0.0000140921375,0.00026535382,0.00056335545,0.00037508356,0.0009387975,0.00016943578,0.9962296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009415745,0.0002657239,0.000015684118,0.00029633823,0.0008126945,0.0000015849208,0.000047929432,0.00006883193,0.9890755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897134,0.000015887537,0.00016902399,0.00046226577,0.0001784766,0.00020300198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991029,0.00018724377,0.00009918396,0.00027614227,0.00019333584,0.00014123262],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014140042,0.00032919628,0.00034790995,0.00014232841,0.00039391796,0.00021665981,0.00026284464,0.00028575523,0.000020191397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013705768,0.00033337148,0.00022553187,0.0000013817514,0.0008763009,0.00007867434,0.00031907874,0.0004594775,0.000039590443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008127726,0.000004765822,1.864667e-8,0.00026799037,0.00021470808,0.00011759476,0.00065547106,7.2205204e-8,0.0000069795656,0.99074566,0.0072313645,0.000674087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017181467,0.00008927797,8.603477e-8,0.00023499846,0.00024105693,0.000005195875,0.00008214764,0.000016344406,0.00002457447,0.32326227,0.6755978,0.0002744262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012703126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001414018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66836643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005464897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063488165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390770244","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-7363-7_2","title":"The Source of Contemporary Utilitarianism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Interests politics series","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Connotation; Ideology; Criticism; Politics; Philosophy; Positive economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.10190588386634905,"score_gpt":0.26613721110190297,"score_spread":0.16423132723555392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390770244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006933539,0.0007610085,0.0000024519666,0.0046274625,0.0015515555,0.00014482411,0.00041806244,0.00012069626,0.9923046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37186038,0.00012087048,0.000001360788,0.0002750152,0.0008945373,0.0000048266297,0.000028063336,0.00007479383,0.62674016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862534,0.000035164627,0.0005605461,0.000221792,0.00028472912,0.00027243164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810547,0.00074920926,0.00025526705,0.0005258607,0.00027301296,0.00009120825],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027185518,0.00030145014,0.0003938002,0.00008869852,0.00040679832,0.00015462188,0.00047352692,0.00023743894,0.0004448451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014939459,0.00021240985,0.0002597188,0.000005423964,0.0032321287,0.00008774836,0.00027694623,0.000664599,0.00030335833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028746754,0.0000074798045,2.9086212e-7,0.00010018322,0.00016576123,0.00001612715,0.004730196,1.0044266e-7,0.0000010738555,0.99252313,0.002277078,0.00014985503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040608993,0.00007861819,6.1955575e-7,0.00017642525,0.000015773545,0.000002158699,0.00044784855,0.000001090032,0.000010590686,0.52303714,0.47607356,0.00011559744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027408657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009937652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4737965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026991464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018448979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390775708","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-7363-7_5","title":"The Basic Trajectory of Theoretical Evolution: Balancing the Individual and the Community","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Interests politics series","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Individualism; Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06233796381488474,"score_gpt":0.25382599641815196,"score_spread":0.19148803260326722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390775708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003629812,0.0013064569,0.0000034825189,0.0170998,0.0011971834,0.0003212507,0.0005757895,0.000075252996,0.975791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94348276,0.00025131152,9.057076e-7,0.0006348322,0.0009624735,0.000014356242,0.000015611535,0.00005028129,0.054587502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835396,0.0004278591,0.00044220546,0.00013843739,0.00035544607,0.00028208076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933882,0.005501786,0.00020062544,0.00066031597,0.00019090125,0.000058183818],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017446106,0.00027255205,0.00034796091,0.000048766313,0.0018350384,0.000292128,0.00078461523,0.00017817189,0.00020531776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004471866,0.00012290348,0.0001964349,0.000010426299,0.021668492,0.000061494866,0.00055516977,0.0018725188,0.00002453457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065142,0.000007361253,0.0000012093861,0.00006423218,0.00019446033,0.0000022111726,0.019283812,1.980796e-7,2.683868e-7,0.98004824,0.00023886848,0.000093995906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019228816,0.00009718347,0.000043057742,0.00023154874,0.00012850083,0.00001298188,0.004846891,0.0000069748116,0.000004145113,0.94996214,0.044333156,0.00014111007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002191313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023223492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003336568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114175185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390779660","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-7363-7_4","title":"The Theoretical Evolution of Utilitarianism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Interests politics series","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04350861330827796,"score_gpt":0.2518349833128953,"score_spread":0.20832637000461732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390779660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000729349,0.00035316526,0.000009277928,0.004979208,0.0016918011,0.00012561536,0.0004436456,0.00009533935,0.992229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.573555,0.000119217126,0.0000024774813,0.00008657482,0.0009583179,0.0000048821944,0.000016054,0.00005629563,0.4252012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986701,0.000040144558,0.00047485347,0.00020997845,0.0003038086,0.00030110733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982478,0.0007353477,0.00016092598,0.00046967098,0.00030393212,0.00008232188],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031209333,0.00026053967,0.0003104396,0.00008577248,0.00039148534,0.000122015204,0.00040277783,0.00025588347,0.00106014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024631814,0.00017698196,0.00023232758,0.0000062480995,0.006670408,0.00006777041,0.00022953637,0.0006339642,0.00033385097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002957188,0.000007977113,1.4572733e-7,0.00006706249,0.00010511388,0.000008754164,0.0021808092,1.05365594e-7,0.0000012998997,0.9971386,0.0003797317,0.00008082488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004186992,0.000117004405,0.0000018228066,0.0001858284,0.00003956163,0.0000035382625,0.0003703842,0.0000046328696,0.000009957855,0.7362935,0.2627949,0.00013698911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000085465814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008314783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57348204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007352194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014406153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390780131","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-7363-7_1","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Interests politics series","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Happiness; Morality; Politics; Virtue; Epistemology; Sociology; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Maximization; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.06925319944731768,"score_gpt":0.2573612148178409,"score_spread":0.18810801537052324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390780131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033881573,0.00008251184,0.0000014072727,0.017504415,0.0046296776,0.00009281521,0.00033748685,0.00031448167,0.97700334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030520927,0.0001306994,0.0000046578584,0.00056289206,0.019553898,0.0000068085697,0.00014616417,0.0001281486,0.9489458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988174,0.0000148271265,0.00033992555,0.0003146983,0.00022920327,0.00028395536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990486,0.00009846546,0.00012775278,0.00039853755,0.00022521547,0.000101443125],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001211465,0.00030761634,0.00031655893,0.00017844158,0.00023501003,0.00022714128,0.00022847463,0.0002489432,0.006534437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009095943,0.00028439917,0.00017231981,0.0000052621135,0.0011497478,0.0001444299,0.000157652,0.0007077532,0.0041397265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011497943,0.0000068548406,4.6898982e-8,0.00008613697,0.00009039258,0.000027020265,0.00212873,2.2878869e-7,0.0000015078747,0.9834264,0.014075598,0.00014559919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025086993,0.000058075708,1.9868612e-7,0.000072630806,0.000023001328,0.0000060481834,0.00007233883,4.8930843e-7,0.000009487163,0.50752336,0.49205115,0.00015810782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043563683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006058758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47797555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006149613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006410148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391759163","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-46367-9_8","title":"Natural Knowledge and Transcendental Criticism in Scepticism and Animal Faith","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave companions.","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Skepticism; Criticism; Naturalism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Faith; Transcendental philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03632519246930148,"score_gpt":0.2608838171864724,"score_spread":0.22455862471717092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391759163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024218457,0.036854,0.0000015160304,0.0020900303,0.0008916495,0.00027086856,0.000297744,0.00009048446,0.95708185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94467527,0.0007711528,0.0000088831275,0.00025789606,0.0005179929,0.000008891224,0.00006106177,0.000055288834,0.05364355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866,0.000025922336,0.00035478926,0.0004993368,0.00018787473,0.00027207343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993757,0.00020974553,0.000044676202,0.00016013211,0.00007271238,0.00013701823],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018936352,0.00040799548,0.00049412297,0.0002858662,0.00019849809,0.00025647183,0.00013789993,0.00023503706,0.00064315024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010508188,0.00036000783,0.00012843567,0.000012911241,0.0011303795,0.000037019734,0.00013069107,0.001355669,0.00009197708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028253851,0.000015956244,0.0000011464655,0.00031120572,0.00005752436,0.00006426456,0.0070827026,1.5091807e-8,0.00003870014,0.99151623,0.000068926835,0.00081507105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032007435,0.00009669465,0.00008356783,0.0006090995,0.00009152467,0.00003354978,0.00025558186,0.00016718783,0.0000024593073,0.9105341,0.08739261,0.00041357058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024414814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010487341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9422534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038825343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003572361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391859499","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44889-8","title":"Reading George Grant in the 21st Century","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Reading (process); Art; Political science; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.12771676183476194,"score_gpt":0.32227698290826823,"score_spread":0.1945602210735063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391859499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000070175134,0.0032948917,1.6660337e-7,0.019128205,0.0033681998,0.00050477847,0.00022606904,0.000119908116,0.9732876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22749294,0.029323298,0.000014214224,0.012405025,0.012899143,0.00058673415,0.000424611,0.00034974952,0.7165043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965963,0.00039068313,0.0008629028,0.0006861781,0.0007357019,0.000728231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957108,0.003299815,0.00021660385,0.00056090613,0.00012996023,0.00008195367],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015265312,0.0005921168,0.0010274226,0.00035294055,0.00042037142,0.00017922765,0.0007495498,0.0004279922,0.00013201896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048034295,0.00038314084,0.00035706215,0.00012578744,0.0024525197,0.000041274605,0.0004768663,0.0028803737,0.0003058775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021401267,0.00003818821,0.0000018496445,0.00021203961,0.0001373664,0.00031481707,0.049939472,5.758338e-7,3.1229737e-7,0.9392721,0.009288021,0.0007738246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023004555,0.000038112234,0.000014617261,0.0006358463,0.000035836423,0.0000021118483,0.003141466,0.000004638594,1.3283803e-7,0.5923925,0.40321252,0.00029215543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007562209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018060504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3939245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027498518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010640706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392322734","doi":"10.1515/9781787443938","title":"Herder's &lt;I&gt;Essay on Being&lt;/I&gt;","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Boydell and Brewer eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Art; Economics","score_opus":0.02575132060826327,"score_gpt":0.21925374328101305,"score_spread":0.19350242267274978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392322734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024451865,0.00082827144,0.000010797019,0.00062249333,0.0015077823,0.00035403512,0.00019434385,0.0001826437,0.9960551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.075152874,0.0000747091,0.00001356139,0.0047375583,0.0073469398,0.000021153264,0.000091155176,0.00015275032,0.9124093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997287,0.00009311068,0.0005680216,0.00081005436,0.0006371291,0.00060470094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980966,0.00034327243,0.00026625767,0.0006584881,0.00032517992,0.0003102318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007800537,0.0007190073,0.0007118838,0.00025313263,0.0007466301,0.0003808721,0.00043326922,0.0007638756,0.0017073768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035372654,0.00058558874,0.0003153723,0.000010188403,0.0016957463,0.000069357644,0.00025431463,0.0010148864,0.000895249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010027441,0.000053022406,7.572247e-8,0.00014996663,0.00015175146,0.000059561597,0.0041295025,6.381913e-8,0.000042748274,0.9507207,0.03978198,0.0048103034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002509009,0.00021742132,7.326515e-7,0.0002764628,0.00006839886,0.0000052281953,0.000011966586,0.0000042834295,0.00002023398,0.4846747,0.5140525,0.0004171387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001049045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003951934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47427055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009354542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003435984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019664","doi":"10.7202/1108421ar","title":"Sofie Møller, \"Kant’s Tribunal of Reason: Legal Metaphor and Normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason\"","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Philosophy; Metaphor; Chemistry; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.07912949878652227,"score_gpt":0.31636550106166983,"score_spread":0.23723600227514757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087898776,0.34798017,0.000004611942,0.20791472,0.00045088172,0.0023709924,0.0006916025,0.00009493384,0.3525933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93326867,0.06481792,0.000007669016,0.0016148655,0.00017236389,0.00006339224,0.000019677145,0.000011829697,0.000023605035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980304,0.0005805052,0.00065209647,0.00020639454,0.00032806763,0.00020251279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986482,0.0006704403,0.00020195341,0.0003229331,0.000113011614,0.000043459073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002903659,0.00017877984,0.0006849461,0.00014516283,0.0000727808,0.00002648576,0.00031470697,0.00007468304,0.0001704079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054342946,0.00011810739,0.00017016963,0.00028869728,0.00046754413,0.00020114466,0.000088292414,0.00050560327,0.0000136400195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021161472,0.00011946688,0.00003268064,0.0037062368,0.000021010503,0.00002133098,0.0019058355,3.9586484e-7,0.000007686568,0.9918662,0.0003613214,0.0019367083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003392018,0.00009641143,0.00030299637,0.004363884,0.000056033856,0.000009517718,0.00017863148,0.000025204057,0.000018690263,0.95495313,0.039501447,0.00015486086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013955434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026051787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8453699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010752592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004749497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48162794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393228764","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v27i1.2843","title":"Remaining True to Ourselves: Dementia, Value Change, and Enduring Interests","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2377638940737984,"score_gpt":0.3472678809500447,"score_spread":0.1095039868762463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393228764","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39138266,0.016710056,0.0002144445,0.50531495,0.0050171614,0.0003587689,0.00007592243,0.000095881725,0.08083012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98755777,0.00040147064,0.00006606041,0.0050623436,0.006844981,0.0000031507786,0.0000010019917,0.000027272245,0.00003592661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871916,0.00017804757,0.00038047894,0.00017618894,0.00035260236,0.00019355219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989709,0.0004986102,0.00012431182,0.00006196947,0.00019210947,0.00015206517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020853018,0.00015811346,0.00028909455,0.0002288303,0.00066547404,0.00044631804,0.00013106735,0.00018356502,0.00004483223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019037636,0.00013069846,0.00013091025,0.00004702242,0.00034721376,0.00031439128,0.00011495137,0.0018174349,0.000004941131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002761955,0.000020085026,0.0000062505223,0.00019654131,0.00017084612,0.000047362482,0.12686412,3.8662262e-7,0.00005965603,0.8709879,0.0000506873,0.0015685342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018584037,0.00022772027,0.000058021247,0.00059922296,0.00011261138,0.00001971604,0.0019257906,0.000028756827,0.000012709449,0.9636439,0.033026006,0.00015972069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024189982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004238561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59617513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022615339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007265914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7895951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393375476","doi":"10.17323/2587-8719-2024-1-217-238","title":"Джонас Прост: «Терны и волчцы» на пути Локка к толерантности","year":2024,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Journal of the Higher School of Economics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Queen's University; University of Cambridge; McGill University; Princeton University","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0551487316803276,"score_gpt":0.24408576667563298,"score_spread":0.18893703499530537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393375476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21789806,0.07265188,0.00002312883,0.18589571,0.047257427,0.00073741336,0.00097265834,0.00008974746,0.47447398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733968,0.0038353535,0.00007616115,0.0025345131,0.01640141,0.00000443548,0.000003840378,0.0001497536,0.0035977496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561226,0.00035740764,0.0024662975,0.0005153568,0.00044135697,0.0006073027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954893,0.00073671003,0.0016693618,0.0010331155,0.0005301101,0.0005413762],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019319459,0.0006937326,0.0013006146,0.00049479114,0.0004986858,0.0008697735,0.0021710426,0.0004545111,0.0051425803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018145602,0.00050309626,0.001957622,0.00017792107,0.0013172568,0.0011384614,0.0005303393,0.0029771703,0.00069565733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032206322,0.00026858196,0.0000649074,0.0005130668,0.0014755594,0.0000564876,0.0012319733,0.00038456838,0.000066458444,0.99126804,0.0039379583,0.00041034672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075616775,0.0004000999,0.00017926937,0.0014124478,0.00057256356,0.00008159153,0.0000955372,0.00018112095,0.00017498048,0.8125361,0.18314825,0.00046187348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043739023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018389128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7554987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003581888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086854555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394577350","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a924228","title":"Hume beyond Theism and Atheism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theism; Atheism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1146302510271235,"score_gpt":0.31935835562989356,"score_spread":0.20472810460277008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394577350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07257686,0.09998199,0.0000066939747,0.028387133,0.0023676855,0.00017146929,0.00007040331,0.0003854012,0.79605234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98323125,0.0019722185,0.000008387995,0.0010721545,0.0012652448,0.00001746304,0.0000022030526,0.000019502644,0.012411566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993284,0.000028965222,0.000136242,0.00021526853,0.00012166509,0.00016949853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994948,0.00027377854,0.000016599583,0.00011591048,0.000059609338,0.000039339295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026429867,0.00013758274,0.00018515097,0.000057890007,0.00041629432,0.0001909761,0.000073079274,0.000036250123,0.0003588805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004807071,0.00009282162,0.000062634004,0.000020662002,0.0008915405,0.00011960446,0.00013122964,0.0002253476,0.00019147185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029460102,0.000010762592,0.000001915664,0.00009611243,0.00017351305,0.000018080253,0.04724808,7.904801e-8,0.000020944484,0.9485038,0.0015283506,0.0023954483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004491879,0.000032920194,0.000009499364,0.00005721034,0.000026862219,0.000002097507,0.0018292598,0.000012180129,0.00001075022,0.63294965,0.3649369,0.000087748034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017775392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007630606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010669441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011902468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.392949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394577427","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a924234","title":"Hume’s Natural Philosophy and Philosophy of Physical Science by Matias Slavov (review)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Natural philosophy; Natural science; Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Philosophy of science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06341279872058642,"score_gpt":0.32751339351054554,"score_spread":0.2641005947899591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394577427","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022963043,0.65285254,0.0000015573986,0.030064445,0.0013255818,0.0004138363,0.00018449577,0.00021159284,0.2919829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862201,0.011037074,0.000008973806,0.0012932054,0.0010349517,0.00002476516,0.000005156134,0.00002113232,0.0003546239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985107,0.000046638987,0.0002943727,0.00041126818,0.00047321897,0.00026376182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990812,0.0003022532,0.00007386381,0.00022193023,0.00025005775,0.000070723916],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046607907,0.0002423745,0.00048648164,0.00012299995,0.00047094727,0.000086717955,0.00024818248,0.000027366017,0.0000853661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017567523,0.00016860363,0.00014078266,0.00013769665,0.005073946,0.00033282404,0.00027342103,0.00036575037,0.000055914817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061928167,0.000051559793,0.0000012526832,0.0020355869,0.00013466227,0.0000057121883,0.009335766,6.3887576e-8,0.0003554435,0.98396355,0.0028239004,0.0012863051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010751678,0.00014193828,0.0000049112787,0.0018437644,0.00009381685,0.0000026156365,0.00035024586,0.000058964168,0.00021703377,0.9703176,0.026639977,0.00022160952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010979866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005463462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9632571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025976675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043517102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394577535","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a924227","title":"Editors’ Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.09454764004382166,"score_gpt":0.31614784465125384,"score_spread":0.22160020460743218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394577535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074115396,0.043507025,0.000021226282,0.20550333,0.12573162,0.00018514956,0.000035920693,0.001005501,0.61659867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86810714,0.00030956496,0.0000044635135,0.00023325508,0.12391824,0.000012599038,0.0000027383376,0.000010375784,0.0074016084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995325,0.000018457222,0.000094203155,0.00014711704,0.00010728898,0.00010041035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971616,0.00009514443,0.000009745738,0.000083078114,0.00007839321,0.00001748765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001895835,0.00007279194,0.00009574145,0.000047729198,0.00024496345,0.0001095135,0.000045150045,0.00001975055,0.00079601404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008078541,0.000051268,0.00004926525,0.00002107289,0.00039929303,0.000113010596,0.000043368997,0.00016236832,0.000529234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020266239,0.000006987323,2.4275292e-7,0.000054510514,0.000086907436,0.0000039320335,0.014181145,2.881281e-7,0.0000147083,0.8393608,0.14533043,0.00095805933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013066543,0.000016825006,9.1073315e-7,0.000016156138,0.000011363004,4.9679767e-7,0.001042369,0.0000049717314,0.000014541276,0.4600853,0.53875464,0.00003936249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000064899823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002401536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8606956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017128039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009600126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8715796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394686269","doi":"10.1111/heyj.14309","title":"Hegel's Transcendent Absolute","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Transcendence (philosophy); Philosophy; Phenomenology (philosophy); Absolute (philosophy); Epistemology; Metaphysics; Dialectic; Interpretation (philosophy); Platonism; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.050566508774322436,"score_gpt":0.2605557153145418,"score_spread":0.20998920654021935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394686269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060755026,0.020219628,0.00061970635,0.22108127,0.011866431,0.00019211332,0.000045751938,0.00030609834,0.684914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99082917,0.00045510157,0.0000057055668,0.0008775032,0.00483472,0.0000022098227,7.3990253e-7,0.000021716169,0.0029731283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912244,0.00008310209,0.00020259988,0.000100126505,0.00027386783,0.0002178476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999579,0.00012061698,0.000028086593,0.0001319376,0.000055268494,0.000085107364],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007847478,0.00010418395,0.00010276635,0.000051575702,0.0007218689,0.00071401015,0.00023630481,0.00003539945,0.005831619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000126834275,0.00005493768,0.00017735967,0.000027279539,0.00044930927,0.00015912052,0.000022337184,0.00091557775,0.00063067075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113905635,0.000018488325,9.010277e-8,0.000016817272,0.00007205754,0.00010354083,0.014172848,0.0000060747257,0.0000654503,0.9798429,0.0022788555,0.0034114996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006727319,0.000037356545,0.000003511696,0.000060587317,0.00002691168,0.00022554507,0.00044970508,0.00015266998,0.000018538076,0.65186083,0.34703246,0.00006460795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018297527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003243279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93007416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002794795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006589535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960680","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.007","title":"Consequences of the Theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.04643614886233857,"score_gpt":0.20380585113619112,"score_spread":0.15736970227385255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004382022,0.00044246553,0.0000025015672,0.00020824283,0.0007361497,0.00016842768,0.0006913476,0.00005778879,0.99764925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09662003,0.000050798608,8.176815e-7,0.00014552998,0.00025812082,2.4767007e-7,0.000005174056,0.000024714807,0.90289456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922407,0.0000472461,0.00014816546,0.00023919523,0.00021680444,0.00012453663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990971,0.00018280048,0.00014802263,0.00038652614,0.00013440514,0.000051148643],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018015367,0.00020792118,0.0002527171,0.000073668816,0.00022447648,0.000049115446,0.00054297963,0.000188808,0.00007547484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000111604895,0.00015311036,0.00031018833,0.000002104955,0.003461423,0.000033140685,0.00035448145,0.00064715656,0.000024386452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032933967,0.0000036644967,2.3803809e-8,0.0001396317,0.0001703824,0.00004344243,0.0006494767,1.6393284e-7,0.000026608654,0.99718726,0.0016339389,0.00011247409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056568875,0.000014717438,7.338927e-8,0.00025534857,0.00017141967,0.0000022292215,0.00010057106,8.1151904e-7,0.00018175566,0.34204108,0.65704924,0.0001262041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008356916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007645231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6554153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003886851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011378859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960685","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.002","title":"Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.035731744464529924,"score_gpt":0.19396617647362324,"score_spread":0.15823443200909332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000054942725,0.0002410215,0.0000071416252,0.0007671898,0.0016933277,0.00014177334,0.00034212827,0.00022560688,0.9965763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002805177,0.000076983255,0.0000022781314,0.00012398808,0.0054671858,3.2864364e-7,0.000061595696,0.000051238698,0.9914112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999103,0.000013770842,0.00012715772,0.00040582498,0.00019054612,0.0001597053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993152,0.000038499813,0.00007890539,0.00033923585,0.00013557723,0.00009255255],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009584112,0.0002544187,0.00024228344,0.00015219623,0.00023708469,0.00012911746,0.0002474674,0.00023872554,0.00019584267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004889844,0.00026680165,0.00021336616,0.0000015314373,0.0006408662,0.00006694073,0.00021735407,0.0008332306,0.00035077654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030411125,0.000004146313,1.4547713e-9,0.0001071892,0.00013462549,0.00012638107,0.00030412248,2.236848e-7,0.0000034865488,0.9444759,0.05452348,0.00029005652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009216553,0.000032216576,1.8320392e-8,0.00009153075,0.00020033747,0.0000047348835,0.000043740474,0.000009099643,0.000013901592,0.0684655,0.9307688,0.000277958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006022922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061976657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8762453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097352866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004536612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960793","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.011","title":"The Transition from Nature to Freedom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Biology","score_opus":0.02391653241655055,"score_gpt":0.19500416190525913,"score_spread":0.1710876294887086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033045504,0.0007509342,0.000022053922,0.0015349159,0.001500945,0.000255772,0.002338654,0.0001427192,0.99342096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018067325,0.00009020451,0.0000039981824,0.00067983504,0.0018634022,8.614328e-7,0.00009273126,0.000049365743,0.97915226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990002,0.000024260204,0.00013408411,0.00038883928,0.00026309286,0.00018953391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990418,0.00020880498,0.000058875874,0.00041027478,0.00014464968,0.00013559154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001043572,0.00027776614,0.0002300093,0.0000843429,0.0005944222,0.00026096927,0.00048417048,0.00045088964,0.000040450122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000064989754,0.00022706817,0.00025322853,0.0000024330031,0.00055894087,0.00004888535,0.00019574891,0.0015492886,0.00014391389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000889807,0.0000033100237,1.1905513e-9,0.000027618427,0.0001860002,0.00013050815,0.0013023973,0.0000010943625,0.00000541883,0.9806297,0.01731367,0.00031133823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011270614,0.000031663665,9.6161116e-8,0.00020803158,0.00019522663,8.9013383e-7,0.00013931155,0.000022101183,0.000011175016,0.11781955,0.88120097,0.00025826396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003080688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011570708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8638873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000812057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048620896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9259571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960814","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.006","title":"Kant’s Theory of the Feeling of Pleasure and Displeasure (II)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Feeling; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04416238329118505,"score_gpt":0.19038565144974934,"score_spread":0.1462232681585643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010404986,0.0012747836,0.000004910197,0.00010199027,0.00036685835,0.00019652287,0.0008617669,0.000031963504,0.9961207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36065504,0.00007836183,0.0000010401347,0.000034402216,0.00014128671,1.6337017e-7,0.000004669031,0.000024511199,0.6390605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990688,0.00005324442,0.00020351293,0.00026830556,0.00027541607,0.00013073847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897504,0.00016106598,0.00021303692,0.0003876203,0.00020244815,0.000060788403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027747836,0.00024109414,0.00037276107,0.000092434544,0.00029894852,0.000027732307,0.00038578192,0.00024025036,0.00002251612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018188603,0.00018491184,0.00027733864,0.0000034714728,0.0016717816,0.000040031067,0.00056953344,0.0007240236,0.0000015754916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078523015,0.000008170959,3.0840326e-7,0.00047228776,0.00024491406,0.0000118883545,0.0022819894,6.762649e-7,0.0000379282,0.9962281,0.00041614068,0.00021906852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002240325,0.000056515462,0.0000030734157,0.0011049664,0.00055884867,0.0000034733223,0.00039338943,0.0000131071365,0.000139052,0.16455124,0.8326973,0.0002550254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007619653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017618659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8322811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025232986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000741876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7540486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960830","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.010","title":"The Imagination in Its Freedom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Imagination; Aesthetics; Art; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037233182123862285,"score_gpt":0.2063954344126552,"score_spread":0.16916225228879292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012711615,0.0010868986,0.0000024306387,0.0006299963,0.0007781615,0.00020627576,0.0002472927,0.000079759746,0.99695647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022776077,0.00026082247,7.0026164e-7,0.00007960885,0.00052700995,7.7447123e-7,0.000019931023,0.000033147415,0.9763019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917895,0.000025013507,0.00014179733,0.0002749842,0.00020379991,0.00017546785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929166,0.00016479832,0.00007893021,0.00025879793,0.00014886245,0.00005693125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019248515,0.00020866383,0.00017965228,0.00013186267,0.00032467363,0.00020163512,0.00038050298,0.00016804293,0.000019625006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001132087,0.00017608152,0.00013875726,0.0000025630075,0.00066414184,0.00007656273,0.00024350066,0.0008564318,0.000093714974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026884636,0.0000037736115,1.338111e-8,0.000055150773,0.000051397186,0.00013963458,0.00050535845,6.0221475e-7,0.0000018153047,0.99533236,0.0034881826,0.00039481936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014362534,0.000015633841,2.6226053e-7,0.00015851144,0.000058491834,0.0000013950691,0.00007591532,0.00011167747,0.0000052351215,0.10006861,0.899169,0.00019162317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001214073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008905612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89568084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115141615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058321228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71803963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960862","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.012","title":"Conclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04475121073514008,"score_gpt":0.2050497922920405,"score_spread":0.16029858155690044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010231389,0.000415495,0.000005690606,0.00019853127,0.00095161994,0.00017444082,0.0006129958,0.0002265436,0.99740446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010578126,0.00010639669,0.0000019253237,0.0002608363,0.0010042551,2.8374743e-7,0.000051526327,0.00005783479,0.9879388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990457,0.000015435762,0.00014010695,0.00038160698,0.00023452962,0.00018261884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924,0.00007884369,0.000086908396,0.0003315486,0.00013684378,0.00012589093],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009767153,0.00029082253,0.00029015142,0.00013870382,0.00033938984,0.00012465555,0.0003415043,0.00029703506,0.00013718264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000041353915,0.00029459893,0.00026001266,0.0000013420448,0.0007770987,0.000054419863,0.00053355115,0.00085661985,0.00027280432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032923486,0.0000042341594,2.9437113e-9,0.00012676352,0.00011982939,0.00038565518,0.0005160915,1.1026865e-7,0.000004422794,0.986038,0.012492548,0.0002793933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014610213,0.00003674316,1.9360014e-8,0.00027632146,0.00018906621,0.0000037732266,0.00004828577,0.000016071364,0.000012401782,0.08192125,0.917029,0.00032094098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000098735116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008806338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9045365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000957797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006546977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960884","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362","title":"Kant on Pleasure and Judgment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Psychology; Philosophy; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04696813025183719,"score_gpt":0.2004948626434568,"score_spread":0.15352673239161962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007386166,0.00045886863,0.0000020783693,0.0002675688,0.0006248537,0.00022188341,0.0006961675,0.00013510909,0.9975196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01016213,0.00010993098,0.0000013477704,0.00045143682,0.0008271519,8.4965524e-7,0.00004582482,0.00004325501,0.9883581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892646,0.00005025556,0.000120795754,0.00043367897,0.00026547431,0.00020335664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992948,0.000111064364,0.0000702251,0.00029846444,0.0000815526,0.00014389055],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013350097,0.00029844997,0.00030019286,0.00014426962,0.00029242362,0.0001656181,0.00024010766,0.00025038377,0.0000210557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000070610467,0.00028488564,0.00015154594,0.0000024083383,0.00063563767,0.000038215952,0.00027507925,0.0009675177,0.000068447785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055775756,0.000011866534,1.1102803e-8,0.00024247657,0.00014406523,0.00025443028,0.0008093845,2.283873e-7,0.0000013521393,0.90549743,0.09265605,0.00032690345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021708418,0.00010319924,2.2890481e-7,0.0004758097,0.00020677118,0.0000032656528,0.00009434712,0.00001560631,0.000010316224,0.01665719,0.9818937,0.0003224635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006154386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007697973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88923764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014724387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014151372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960887","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.005","title":"Kant’s Theory of the Feeling of Pleasure and Displeasure (I)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Feeling; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.046064680536834636,"score_gpt":0.19083168151426108,"score_spread":0.14476700097742645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061883306,0.0012192628,0.00000600118,0.0000819108,0.0003523578,0.00018665561,0.0008317279,0.000029524244,0.9966737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3495796,0.00007887133,0.0000010492835,0.00003247673,0.00013838598,1.5123545e-7,0.000004308365,0.000024474544,0.65014064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911094,0.000054468044,0.00019462954,0.00025386535,0.0002636214,0.00012250332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989897,0.00018350921,0.00020423133,0.00037141377,0.00019339712,0.000057747588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026750864,0.00022776272,0.00035613528,0.00008798779,0.00018807795,0.000030724586,0.00036515147,0.00022703194,0.000020272151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017869312,0.00017390995,0.00026647208,0.0000031534335,0.001641671,0.000036958972,0.000403806,0.0006894853,0.0000020286996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007520013,0.0000062669897,3.761831e-7,0.0005145556,0.00023357001,0.000012723406,0.0016122265,6.0961236e-7,0.000031612806,0.9969427,0.00034431307,0.00022586047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022774754,0.00004169364,0.0000039979877,0.0011605873,0.0005838137,0.0000036189344,0.00041699584,0.000014143331,0.0001339439,0.1731772,0.8239769,0.00025940867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007381445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016384076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82376546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023803232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007050936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7091842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395456499","doi":"10.5840/envirophil2024423138","title":"Kantian Animal Ethics, Deep Dignity, and the Moral Game","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Environmental ethics; Applied philosophy; Philosophy; Moral philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.043157592686238436,"score_gpt":0.23534444314135078,"score_spread":0.19218685045511236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395456499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19931996,0.016772326,0.00004620184,0.19491099,0.0017560764,0.0007594274,0.00031791299,0.00038097863,0.5857361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99381167,0.000350622,0.000007876082,0.0035547903,0.001865636,0.000018665756,0.000023713274,0.00004007944,0.00032695272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870926,0.000167766,0.0002129169,0.00034004138,0.00034152542,0.00022849315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922425,0.00040953737,0.000033964465,0.00022786878,0.0000044133158,0.000099991004],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057027454,0.00021485378,0.00019079015,0.000053245683,0.00047056118,0.00034678317,0.00020548941,0.00011310431,0.0014517141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027212578,0.00014023909,0.00014128022,0.00002157731,0.0035142037,0.00023341883,0.00023515493,0.0010918078,0.0005164154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007761855,0.0000479327,0.000014464861,0.000043589174,0.0000652389,0.000027791331,0.013371839,0.0000011307476,0.0000955524,0.9856833,0.000035681547,0.0005358209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044065338,0.00008900005,0.0001231738,0.000041380143,0.000052215135,0.000011950962,0.0003502398,0.00047091825,0.000028681914,0.9639663,0.034225494,0.00019997025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003552642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017390113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7944917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028694738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000116008105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397011071","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198849933.002.0004","title":"Preface","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.08285513915378967,"score_gpt":0.23257000754742496,"score_spread":0.1497148683936353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397011071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.424925e-7,0.00076551514,0.0000036778033,0.0023044653,0.00048755723,0.00004988173,0.000041137308,0.00006868628,0.9962782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0063779172,0.00015461179,0.00000876507,0.002049533,0.0015334345,0.000001773703,0.000041397576,0.000036432066,0.98979616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994088,0.000005680048,0.00013851248,0.00019259592,0.00016033623,0.000094113566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994988,0.00006392699,0.000045704437,0.00023127138,0.000108834276,0.000051460334],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007347605,0.00015683987,0.00019452759,0.000030836447,0.00011052818,0.00010784318,0.00011047832,0.00016642235,0.1337704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000925348,0.00012468283,0.00014080717,0.0000010640819,0.00025191263,0.000030521274,0.000078499324,0.00044819817,0.0013923057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016543089,0.000005185646,3.868341e-9,0.000022762437,0.00004489872,0.00001713078,0.0004891543,4.5693415e-8,5.654407e-7,0.9964779,0.0022513396,0.0006893304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020085961,0.000007936001,9.485246e-9,0.000036956408,0.000011126432,5.765375e-7,0.000012432352,5.0062795e-7,0.000002056949,0.49971384,0.5001024,0.000092118564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010683668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017839223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49785104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011702918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048945385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398144917","doi":"10.1007/s10670-024-00800-z","title":"The Janusian Nature of Moral Ought","year":2024,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Indexicality; Epistemology; Ontology; Internalism and externalism; Moral disengagement; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.024792118629470377,"score_gpt":0.2636773742916849,"score_spread":0.23888525566221455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398144917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004880024,0.29726258,0.000009963471,0.084736265,0.017925054,0.00029922265,0.00067618716,0.00014054828,0.59407014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97572863,0.0030747172,0.0000072230096,0.0008116701,0.0055734515,0.000008768598,0.000021446012,0.000043102653,0.014730981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841994,0.00014086324,0.00037700564,0.000300403,0.0003987192,0.00036305602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857056,0.0006819194,0.000076776814,0.0004470065,0.00012232622,0.00010138555],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073231943,0.00023707861,0.0002538398,0.0000735678,0.0006917936,0.00065019645,0.0004433845,0.00034891456,0.0013745343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103403065,0.0001458798,0.000319617,0.00010210715,0.0012039675,0.00012456815,0.0001500028,0.0017303883,0.0007688036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036532754,0.000044978835,0.0000026494859,0.00021329502,0.00030829353,0.0000527174,0.006056875,8.5594996e-7,0.000019818008,0.9768763,0.0113145765,0.0050730617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055100983,0.000055307668,0.000012151582,0.00017141986,0.00007686935,0.0000012263134,0.00026062725,0.00022182116,0.00005274598,0.47417846,0.5248077,0.00010657822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006566928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011170043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002814358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014467673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398173901","doi":"10.3138/tjt-2023-0046","title":"Kant and the Moral Need to Limit Theoretical Reason: An Expansion of Hare's Concept of Rational Instability","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Instability; Philosophy; Epistemology; Physics; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.03301717777654028,"score_gpt":0.2768741589016875,"score_spread":0.2438569811251472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398173901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9355411,0.0065824636,0.00049032044,0.020223042,0.00096293783,0.0002045329,0.0000565741,0.000012275411,0.03592675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990106,0.00006278021,0.00007280961,0.0003572955,0.00044523005,0.000001202324,0.000001500297,0.000006803774,0.000041783947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987654,0.00041780874,0.00042595537,0.000098824734,0.00019155447,0.000100427795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985721,0.0008036974,0.00013427877,0.00014042977,0.00027188534,0.000077596196],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001487557,0.00008690359,0.0003228914,0.000030391859,0.000066605695,0.000027863001,0.00018911799,0.000063806176,0.002686284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002947573,0.00004662993,0.000110401976,0.000012752401,0.0026076424,0.00018804618,0.00006932777,0.00021398062,0.0000010767465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001082085,0.000050572533,0.000008623969,0.000021286965,0.00005924675,0.000004932017,0.029774394,0.0000102581225,0.00020587468,0.9673706,0.000042509484,0.0013695696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000566869,0.0007721969,0.00015515277,0.000065536005,0.000053847187,0.00003343598,0.0026764828,0.00041660914,0.00034400457,0.9940432,0.0008167173,0.000055982287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014350611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002117484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06346949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023892924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009184712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399176698","doi":"10.3828/shandean.2015.26.13","title":"Measurement and Immeasurability: Burke and Sterne","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Shandean.","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.20421420030986084,"score_gpt":0.2484011858264215,"score_spread":0.04418698551656067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399176698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7600586,0.0060627274,0.000032310476,0.020509364,0.0004471193,0.00028954732,0.000014244287,0.000079505175,0.21250658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852973,0.000036338763,0.000002424883,0.00073293137,0.00032463067,0.0000062974937,5.485194e-7,0.0000081586095,0.0003589663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992736,0.000088761095,0.000106588406,0.00013279782,0.00027688287,0.00012138623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995151,0.000051255385,0.000028169,0.00016565261,0.00013849068,0.00010131652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016403353,0.000086557964,0.00010667684,0.000016614662,0.00018661714,0.00013080292,0.000085457476,0.000027067532,0.00006521351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011908075,0.000049766208,0.000020205362,0.000010118278,0.0005006125,0.000068151865,0.00008179928,0.00014817789,0.000018564284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043664604,0.000023609842,0.00009877892,0.000018449577,0.00002732238,0.0000012392981,0.0124482075,2.660373e-7,0.000045227778,0.9834249,0.00010504087,0.0037632808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040437377,0.00008453299,0.00034306198,0.00002723439,0.000023417271,0.000004183537,0.0012337875,0.000057734454,0.000036068664,0.9452312,0.052457023,0.000097362274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013095925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002471085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2384711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016306027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025211395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2029407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399977672","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-61113-1_3","title":"Physics for Humans: Kant, Physics, and the Neo-Aristotelian Natural Power Grid","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Engineers Without Borders Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Natural (archaeology); Natural science; Theoretical physics; Power grid; Power (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics; Geography; Astronomy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03618662705412899,"score_gpt":0.23720781270415733,"score_spread":0.20102118565002836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399977672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004861979,0.004168666,0.00004405895,0.005632959,0.0026791168,0.00048145893,0.00045152023,0.00011646318,0.98642087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.107163906,0.00030806632,0.000014095454,0.0036220755,0.010092942,0.000032380398,0.00013296148,0.00013359304,0.8785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988125,0.000012710244,0.00028546707,0.00041575826,0.00024270921,0.00023087063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998912,0.00039642837,0.00011448812,0.00035001207,0.00017048263,0.0000565941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026084212,0.00041472327,0.00046904956,0.00003503517,0.0004946078,0.00044557598,0.000248994,0.00019143538,0.0007598498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014526816,0.00023597793,0.00043512692,0.000006043673,0.001831648,0.000096734126,0.00015691292,0.0010795603,0.00018923679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057474044,0.000010045,1.0576522e-8,0.00012608629,0.00024584096,0.0000035949975,0.0033360634,2.021401e-7,6.954256e-7,0.99040186,0.004714803,0.0011033202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023989426,0.000031332856,3.451163e-8,0.00008873277,0.00010719222,6.740701e-7,0.000058451158,0.00003426931,0.0000013746724,0.5333721,0.46586305,0.00020289184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049637358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017158312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46114823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022225737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039030914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9622901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400378802","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzae035","title":"<i>Socializing Minds: Intersubjectivity in Early Modern Philosophy</i> , by Martin Lenz","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intersubjectivity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.04076836199753831,"score_gpt":0.25651573298144437,"score_spread":0.21574737098390606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400378802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71030235,0.0016227057,0.000039820756,0.005148036,0.0006824269,0.000121210716,0.000097316755,0.00005779403,0.28192836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971653,0.00000940451,0.000005368116,0.00042872186,0.0008069076,0.000016707312,0.000009507333,0.000028360566,0.00152971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895924,0.00007685194,0.00021746985,0.00030666453,0.00018333764,0.00025645574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996091,0.00014218273,0.000029425977,0.0001348305,0.000025043713,0.000059398248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003891999,0.00015337688,0.00017818657,0.000109289176,0.00012483355,0.00029085993,0.00014707555,0.00009605354,0.00059079827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003250918,0.00014101452,0.000101249156,0.00005536043,0.00026443618,0.00025289954,0.0000655953,0.0004908263,0.000251202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049999904,0.0001391437,0.00006129218,0.000087568435,0.000049290633,0.000067351146,0.07487564,0.0000010802211,0.0012825116,0.90754074,0.0013275829,0.01451782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002094789,0.00006444446,0.000014200272,0.0001967654,0.000014142023,0.0000013173861,0.0003055744,0.0004553173,0.00063370424,0.9056948,0.092178024,0.00023223324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027699684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057259336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28686297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051476494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036116606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6468827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400595503","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v17i1.797","title":"The Hardness of the Practical Might","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hardness; Materials science; Metallurgy","score_opus":0.07007429948625031,"score_gpt":0.2851017810942362,"score_spread":0.21502748160798585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400595503","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16343956,0.010519941,0.00013073103,0.5398695,0.03348347,0.00071907014,0.00045905777,0.000058533322,0.25132012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99425507,0.0009465918,0.000020338415,0.00068895303,0.0032558094,0.0000074332247,0.0000012136126,0.000017683165,0.0008069224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993178,0.000044307897,0.0003029345,0.000116951705,0.000061530605,0.00015646346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990006,0.00061675295,0.00010602164,0.00013796671,0.00007129686,0.00006734004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075610547,0.00010308695,0.00013827422,0.00003161698,0.0011461866,0.00051966927,0.0001828619,0.000054004384,0.000078175166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009776388,0.00005238228,0.00020666143,0.000015030159,0.00058174494,0.00022851529,0.000054782584,0.00046817958,0.0000074448476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056428773,0.000016574972,0.0000018362134,0.00004064498,0.00009755264,0.0000014968955,0.001911566,0.0000044682893,0.0000035322257,0.99562854,0.001014437,0.0012229092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009685499,0.000039306367,0.0000024698468,0.0000347345,0.000025561973,0.000042902317,0.000109841865,0.00034462655,0.000018216098,0.6048077,0.3944287,0.000049098315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000028504728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023921868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8308155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019858824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091726186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88156563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401255719","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2024.2385739","title":"Why Hume’s Censure of the Monkish Virtues Is Not Question-Begging","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Denunciation; Begging; Philosophy; Prejudice (legal term); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Law; Psychology; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.0358858892084236,"score_gpt":0.24919772590994332,"score_spread":0.2133118367015197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401255719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049502384,0.0013860724,0.000036544618,0.074782185,0.0019132011,0.0001661706,0.00007973444,0.0002238925,0.8719098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856221,0.000030777046,0.0000033470894,0.008051339,0.0017044962,0.0000015008194,0.000002090866,0.00004045742,0.0045438735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987472,0.000488427,0.00021028501,0.00017021851,0.00023505755,0.00014878887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921054,0.0002248013,0.000056156314,0.0004062837,0.00007160829,0.000030643714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001021561,0.00012556474,0.00011096754,0.000035201796,0.00050128374,0.00055252097,0.00048027595,0.00002005041,0.00048489418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076402874,0.00006405783,0.00014991855,0.000053300766,0.0007718124,0.00020315404,0.00017958024,0.00047600953,0.0002433684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061413716,0.000015272295,0.0000018698202,0.000039394083,0.000036744314,0.000007501988,0.018706735,0.000005935292,0.00018745587,0.97266483,0.005766629,0.0025614877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057168334,0.000019308514,0.000107799126,0.00021590911,0.000037232327,0.0000026545376,0.00041281182,0.00011567304,0.00028850738,0.35701075,0.6416331,0.00009911151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018003852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042148713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93611974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000098524015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002683162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5327973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401522098","doi":"10.18254/s271326680031476-3","title":"Kant: Transcendental Mind and Intelligible Mind","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Transcendental Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Philosophy; Transcendental philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.14220625799461886,"score_gpt":0.34655475683122056,"score_spread":0.2043484988366017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401522098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4611498,0.09668524,0.000023896971,0.01588545,0.0066029723,0.00086706196,0.00059945695,0.00020310392,0.417983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99561214,0.002321473,0.000021559006,0.0003199931,0.001323221,0.000031614618,0.000016540673,0.000049695813,0.00030374606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979671,0.000076167016,0.000499786,0.0006454183,0.00037889258,0.0004326282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993549,0.00026499914,0.0000305366,0.00018396931,0.0000455236,0.00012009118],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038564473,0.0003880382,0.00045136243,0.0003337526,0.0002926489,0.00018726614,0.00022612113,0.00012206001,0.00065205625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001895436,0.00032981735,0.00019294013,0.00013061162,0.002304994,0.00037190918,0.000057799505,0.0007355124,0.00019439531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103384504,0.00018630813,0.00003387884,0.0006632668,0.00034065265,0.0003206186,0.08916362,0.0000020480584,0.00029786985,0.9006381,0.000058787584,0.008191457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066146936,0.00025409358,0.000018030514,0.00084132067,0.00010601848,0.000052128322,0.010110928,0.000068328416,0.00058645406,0.9680652,0.018739386,0.00049661536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004008897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005477808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53446233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008415966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029052306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401549937","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12586","title":"Preparing the particular: Kant on the imagination's role in judgment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Power (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Imagination; Psychology","score_opus":0.032848372017029684,"score_gpt":0.24699547904191083,"score_spread":0.21414710702488116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401549937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28878978,0.0066471454,0.00002838879,0.46612996,0.0013237564,0.0004147712,0.00003778542,0.00004834652,0.23658007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956033,0.00003405039,0.0000015313009,0.0021344991,0.0020242964,0.0000100259795,3.860435e-7,0.000021231945,0.00017068555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986408,0.00028787242,0.0003518531,0.00010847476,0.00043769757,0.00017332737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988646,0.0005973054,0.0001374513,0.00027250458,0.00008960957,0.000038562386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022215932,0.00013393215,0.00014263307,0.00007314943,0.00034975374,0.000323307,0.00052324985,0.000028645538,0.00029867055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090595015,0.000050091196,0.00020670866,0.000067095396,0.00044987703,0.00010204807,0.00006531272,0.00086991274,0.00018966504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004018029,0.000048671012,0.000003481296,0.000009914529,0.00008672045,0.0000141083265,0.047371026,0.00015856844,0.000056111352,0.951311,0.00012148741,0.00077872636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012468621,0.000078644516,0.0000078519115,0.00020742287,0.000045170076,0.000012947058,0.0033694005,0.0006317057,0.00006612825,0.9678594,0.027524173,0.000072472285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020450936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026910138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7068135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040214723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004918185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37793863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402109969","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v23i3.44265","title":"On \"My Moral Judgment\"","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0745592945700603,"score_gpt":0.31627907797449195,"score_spread":0.24171978340443165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402109969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18065363,0.00019162067,0.0000124252065,0.065439254,0.004800628,0.00004755697,0.000013675835,0.0000056661142,0.74883556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97566354,0.0000104381115,0.00023436228,0.0034259537,0.013339255,0.0000012751022,0.0000019111762,0.000009398915,0.0073138746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992334,0.00004269188,0.00025894665,0.00007007508,0.0002880999,0.0001067368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988367,0.00034350512,0.00019970773,0.000093661205,0.0004388179,0.00008762616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035450418,0.00007542437,0.000113948125,0.00010253606,0.00020726539,0.00007696228,0.00017281753,0.000030754112,0.00965628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021622678,0.00005423553,0.000096477015,0.000029626042,0.00032425378,0.00015566939,0.00001482349,0.00024534922,0.0003545245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054104195,0.00019785849,0.000016110464,0.000003604434,0.000029407618,9.75147e-7,0.0017177535,0.0000013740121,0.00002488426,0.98230886,0.015445831,0.00019920428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013614884,0.00024165875,0.00017703777,0.000037574395,0.000010140173,0.000009606033,0.00013054827,0.000003563718,0.00007064438,0.76759934,0.23153004,0.000053704243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000038852513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009784801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7950099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003634453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018423461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402162107","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-5634-0_28","title":"The Precept of the Common Good in the Principle of Just Ends","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Precept; Philosophy; Geology; Theology","score_opus":0.06870745449965274,"score_gpt":0.276973154134272,"score_spread":0.20826569963461924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402162107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023722013,0.0009016145,1.4926128e-7,0.0053720973,0.0004502991,0.00023306777,0.00010696034,0.000011330356,0.9926873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5921958,0.00013091639,3.4405036e-7,0.00029609428,0.00024203694,0.000006981996,0.0000037626294,0.000017467113,0.4071066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989622,0.0000547465,0.00038623024,0.00013641897,0.00034476706,0.00011559548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855983,0.0006341926,0.00016258037,0.0005640218,0.000065283704,0.000014079997],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000742539,0.00016605583,0.00023710477,0.00003756618,0.0001804408,0.000064709784,0.0007311152,0.00014524785,0.0012960465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020131869,0.00006141712,0.00023837836,0.000012274974,0.0011058773,0.000021268526,0.00025053608,0.0008847321,0.000030773997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008820225,0.000019463549,7.288284e-7,0.00008884715,0.000054943976,8.0644065e-7,0.0062813694,6.9751286e-7,0.0000013834406,0.9930233,0.00019705704,0.00032258674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003147441,0.00002637351,0.0000029842436,0.00011391832,0.000029682396,4.7140418e-7,0.00024736507,0.0000049082514,0.000011435177,0.5429881,0.4564972,0.000046111127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007193161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5919586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000127705125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049607883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402449079","doi":"10.1017/s0266267124000166","title":"Narrowly person-affecting axiology: a reconsideration","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of St Andrews; London School of Economics and Political Science; McGill University","keywords":"Axiology; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.06650113448350334,"score_gpt":0.23606095185339657,"score_spread":0.16955981736989323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402449079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45850497,0.002737995,0.0000084802095,0.04195196,0.0019178515,0.00014327888,0.00006277556,0.0001456873,0.494527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516547,0.00029041813,0.000025001338,0.0014852337,0.0027422656,0.000009449159,0.000013406249,0.000023052698,0.00024568653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935806,0.00003601122,0.0001579753,0.0002813527,0.000024400813,0.00014221943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953413,0.00023973452,0.000033384902,0.00010398548,0.0000217967,0.00006693964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003252554,0.00012931945,0.00015671212,0.000091049675,0.00032416283,0.00039684636,0.0000549234,0.00007596433,0.00045376073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025144967,0.000117779135,0.000077663855,0.000012671472,0.00023604237,0.00022167261,0.000025174768,0.00025215262,0.00013879016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008402811,0.000008186439,0.000004926266,0.000043636537,0.000045003002,0.0000050540925,0.007658593,0.0000050636763,0.000012676076,0.9892704,0.00013270153,0.0028053462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008974374,0.00006935226,0.000004347375,0.0000399594,0.000012928977,0.000013951081,0.00022354288,0.0022209901,0.000013655118,0.9219819,0.07518065,0.00014903018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025934176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061105304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53666055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002040859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034498295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49683616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402632863","doi":"10.7202/1113565ar","title":"Étienne Brown, \"Moral Judgement: An Introduction through Anglo-American, German and French Philosophy\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"George Brown College","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; German; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07842517541256724,"score_gpt":0.3203051863580741,"score_spread":0.24188001094550685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402632863","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009905615,0.35598528,0.000020359119,0.38711286,0.002753728,0.0013755953,0.0001932457,0.00054650934,0.2421068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9420468,0.041518334,0.00007822379,0.008540862,0.0074055577,0.000112194655,0.00011219492,0.000061169274,0.00012466496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976662,0.00023667452,0.0006201606,0.0007531981,0.0003383683,0.00038543626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989956,0.00009629668,0.00012743475,0.00052740227,0.00011110656,0.00014213579],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071186933,0.00037039476,0.00062670704,0.00017357362,0.0002120708,0.00022459195,0.00028171655,0.00006901508,0.0011210986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007207708,0.00030899007,0.00016013459,0.00028907586,0.00092644716,0.0008702381,0.0001167352,0.00066847913,0.00020162124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008202154,0.0001302623,0.000011025631,0.0030489345,0.00004506292,0.000033477972,0.0019489881,4.7984713e-7,0.000009205404,0.98306024,0.0015829192,0.0101212235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107690634,0.00017955646,0.000023160126,0.0013882511,0.000065494045,0.000011869279,0.000018193616,0.000031068386,0.000002700544,0.650804,0.34710342,0.0002646121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015166582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008243458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9321412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006311677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038119168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402793858","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-66249-2_1","title":"Smoke and Flickering Shadows: Strawson and Evans on Truth and Factuality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Synthese Library/Synthese library","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Flicker; Smoke; Philosophy; Art; Computer vision; Psychology; Computer science; Geography; Computer graphics (images); Meteorology","score_opus":0.06270557572097085,"score_gpt":0.23431321507345987,"score_spread":0.17160763935248902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402793858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01818579,0.00956011,6.738771e-7,0.010800554,0.0006604215,0.0005692502,0.0027153553,0.00086320896,0.95664465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7777776,0.0061904048,0.00006872737,0.0022248316,0.0023138858,0.000043648106,0.00016033827,0.00058249483,0.21063808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964185,0.00013251544,0.0007778269,0.0015286368,0.00051684136,0.00062570575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957077,0.0026432856,0.00024540277,0.00080036704,0.00001675499,0.0005864705],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002869329,0.0011970985,0.0011795749,0.00055542943,0.0004773754,0.0020708935,0.00048459406,0.0008075997,0.0076011135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010006466,0.00097619183,0.00028170264,0.000036621317,0.0020874161,0.0024906471,0.0010432954,0.0019676415,0.00016387302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019441107,0.00004637852,0.000013537471,0.0010130532,0.0003310977,0.0001675851,0.0059363595,2.1971684e-7,0.0000072950425,0.9804033,0.00036430784,0.011522469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014021042,0.00017691976,0.000029687717,0.0019129395,0.00013159365,0.000019896446,0.0003163991,0.000051634375,0.00010987484,0.6602579,0.33605868,0.000794333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000236317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000063702746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7595918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014959777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011360885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403451698","doi":"10.1080/1354571x.2024.2410662","title":"Animality in contemporary Italian philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modern Italian Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Philosophy; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.2577002335989322,"score_gpt":0.35617598852099747,"score_spread":0.09847575492206528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403451698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2672405,0.20880607,0.00005664196,0.07070875,0.004704249,0.00027423725,0.00015132145,0.000120537516,0.4479377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966126,0.00039220377,0.000017105185,0.0006041956,0.0017122052,0.000003482268,0.0000011979222,0.00002439564,0.000632584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984631,0.00010726478,0.000685781,0.00017977727,0.00036886364,0.00019522631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912286,0.00024228843,0.00016312505,0.00012837455,0.00025826026,0.00008511957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009958287,0.00019160614,0.00048059327,0.0002561043,0.00013190832,0.00017391557,0.00020283861,0.000061926694,0.000089979956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013462968,0.0001373225,0.00025214258,0.00006392237,0.000540495,0.0005548543,0.00007899904,0.0005739821,0.00003498164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008807721,0.0001137667,0.00010064241,0.0002887019,0.00044312363,0.000630771,0.03913959,0.000004686753,0.00004496174,0.9547562,0.0031774137,0.0012120785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002758907,0.00020849005,0.00008193833,0.00071899185,0.000031661206,0.000025301963,0.0028246783,0.00006769403,0.000015584441,0.9567735,0.03881372,0.00016255771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016789296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007213841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72937214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008182431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001050089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55998486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403634150","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198854586.013.4","title":"Kant on the Metaphysical Deduction of the Categories","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05448379132986782,"score_gpt":0.1978982881470101,"score_spread":0.1434144968171423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403634150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018693638,0.000055828994,0.0000014878838,0.0010869803,0.00063646963,0.00017816281,0.00014937694,0.000035403853,0.99766934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21120274,0.00004246628,5.347768e-7,0.00010772107,0.00037204014,5.584104e-7,0.000003771835,0.000019506757,0.7882506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993023,0.000034795627,0.00010952483,0.00019494176,0.00025274846,0.00010566757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992395,0.00014997354,0.000116283925,0.00037412823,0.0000907713,0.000029308912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010419968,0.00018691187,0.00019915478,0.00004830364,0.00037112317,0.000055653734,0.00041111294,0.00013080894,0.00012790352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000059797026,0.00010458805,0.00031598582,0.00000303159,0.0012701179,0.000031289048,0.0002464724,0.0007420681,0.0000035102717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003789097,0.00000887993,9.922597e-9,0.000047535483,0.00020084884,0.000005215542,0.002482582,0.0000014381479,0.000004681474,0.9966439,0.00033568832,0.00023130293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026993463,0.000021730635,9.249211e-8,0.00006640865,0.0001420803,3.7492097e-7,0.00013064143,0.0000041628905,0.00006915785,0.477193,0.5222786,0.00006672957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066804765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062876396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5219429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003514824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047639598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46798024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403634164","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198854586.013.5","title":"Kant on the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Calculus (dental); Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0508357876640591,"score_gpt":0.19348795922219147,"score_spread":0.14265217155813237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403634164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002514979,0.00006837424,0.0000012962765,0.0008777254,0.0008090037,0.00019736314,0.0002446189,0.000034627516,0.9975155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31312618,0.00005745913,2.5019673e-7,0.00008040291,0.0002384725,3.755786e-7,0.000004187701,0.000017064489,0.68647563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933875,0.000026379153,0.00011027308,0.00018041459,0.00024093073,0.000103274324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994379,0.00008493619,0.00009369416,0.00029380742,0.00006201165,0.000027641188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009375614,0.00017839289,0.00015876465,0.00004912758,0.0003811607,0.00005098072,0.00038928646,0.00014299504,0.00021170409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000026280181,0.000105213374,0.00027410442,0.0000023070381,0.0011183412,0.000029925364,0.0001169396,0.000686946,0.00000251824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052714568,0.0000079358215,2.4462539e-8,0.00006165209,0.00013304695,0.000007387132,0.0047086617,0.0000011565419,0.000006391445,0.994591,0.00019264275,0.00023738897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043505006,0.000024477502,1.2969996e-7,0.00009808171,0.000104894636,9.805588e-7,0.00030448684,0.0000023245914,0.00008328093,0.43583018,0.5634351,0.00007257033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079752244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015339437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56324244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044272547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045914694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4290477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403734468","doi":"10.1007/s11406-024-00792-8","title":"The Categorial and the Relational in Rational Choice: On Chrisoula Andreou’s Choosing Well","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Linguistics; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.044646008064095445,"score_gpt":0.2663845919467018,"score_spread":0.22173858388260634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403734468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035536245,0.0067983354,0.000017489207,0.44853294,0.0042361966,0.00055032526,0.000049004637,0.00012200286,0.5041574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909857,0.00015814084,0.0000024962808,0.0014021173,0.00693551,0.000035684207,0.000016434129,0.00001806611,0.00044585305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890125,0.00014580956,0.00024946636,0.00022764494,0.00030765167,0.00016819798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748755,0.0022299355,0.00003949267,0.00015768166,0.000044388256,0.00004093409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009376629,0.00013619226,0.00012465002,0.000069198206,0.0007888036,0.00045218586,0.00014213323,0.00006616722,0.00026416534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018684247,0.00007153777,0.00007199542,0.000051936826,0.0009424265,0.00014755741,0.000051355193,0.00065657764,0.0001331929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012942562,0.000018184632,0.000011589534,0.000011670613,0.000025852347,0.000004021308,0.0020607258,0.000022957667,0.0000044880185,0.997033,0.00038520567,0.00029290444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000579453,0.000022747281,0.00014173164,0.00004173836,0.000012031734,0.000002554088,0.000043198834,0.00150192,0.0000025075344,0.8173877,0.18017916,0.00008527223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006189086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017590346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95544946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030242683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006260899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60669196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403800152","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2024.2416983","title":"Timeslice Prioritarianism, Prudence, and Weak Pareto","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Pareto principle; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Economics; Epistemology; Operations management","score_opus":0.0330754927230233,"score_gpt":0.2620185579520702,"score_spread":0.2289430652290469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403800152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076395504,0.006603948,0.000100944104,0.10261281,0.0045019225,0.00028622925,0.00008383184,0.00015491228,0.8092599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943574,0.00013347683,0.00010993282,0.00034719566,0.0041528204,0.000001547609,0.0000015147527,0.000028930586,0.00086716167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987215,0.00006669048,0.00046637276,0.00018864192,0.00033463616,0.00022215971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919486,0.00015665352,0.00013295503,0.0001391506,0.00015377176,0.00022258838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005267108,0.00018919822,0.00027645382,0.00022540921,0.00017047711,0.00039461808,0.00024182767,0.00009531416,0.00074582384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048297552,0.00014508155,0.0001704531,0.00006869324,0.00049918157,0.0005777256,0.000043445772,0.0007748868,0.00009790657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023352857,0.000037502592,0.000014516112,0.00010380933,0.00011619505,0.00020576613,0.0041411933,9.98657e-7,0.00009395406,0.9929456,0.00080785184,0.0015092728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017682034,0.00031926797,0.000052886673,0.00036700297,0.00007486004,0.00022232032,0.0003130023,0.00001607498,0.000035612007,0.84059817,0.15767574,0.00014824419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000059403483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000062276017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9179619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002566053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109742636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8166248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404464264","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2024.2418619","title":"Schelling’s Metametaphysical Critique of Hegel","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1132134972055257,"score_gpt":0.38269788466052457,"score_spread":0.26948438745499886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404464264","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22547214,0.10836681,0.0012786534,0.5608069,0.024053339,0.00029066662,0.0003145809,0.00018020361,0.07923675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99122626,0.001436912,0.00013494135,0.0008154386,0.006293118,0.0000028051722,0.0000015891385,0.000018178524,0.00007073743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980668,0.000088059984,0.00074428023,0.00015657065,0.00080964825,0.00013463812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971718,0.00085949595,0.0002004816,0.000090740396,0.0015974671,0.00008000901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007191628,0.00016245281,0.0004514787,0.0002623994,0.00007010689,0.000112946254,0.00045525742,0.00006261588,0.00024252798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060599635,0.0001115017,0.00047894192,0.00005570863,0.00094413524,0.00031716042,0.00012033964,0.00064989465,0.000028075265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010823211,0.00016462286,0.000003133302,0.00007600811,0.0019083318,0.00017126714,0.0038977482,0.000011945641,0.00044047544,0.99094087,0.00020354212,0.0020738537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020347704,0.00019528969,0.0000072192847,0.0004338506,0.00011934954,0.00003376623,0.0004461323,0.00009294582,0.0006730665,0.9648244,0.032860156,0.0001103688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007379568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047836265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76575416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049972896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007348591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45469075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404530785","doi":"10.1017/s0012217324000052","title":"The Art of Being with Steven Burns: A Celebration of a Life in Philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Advanced Research Projects Agency","keywords":"Philosophy of life; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Art history; Art; Epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.028359381432823023,"score_gpt":0.22940749800568064,"score_spread":0.20104811657285762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404530785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4366517,0.0025051853,0.00015508567,0.023408327,0.00078431645,0.0004961843,0.00012700919,0.000078505196,0.53579366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999342,0.000045699137,0.000005193936,0.00015958714,0.00031781808,0.000012472171,0.00001273593,0.0000092061,0.00009525178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994417,0.00005027094,0.00020554296,0.00008848892,0.00013165809,0.00008235669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994886,0.00028786773,0.00004611112,0.000106405576,0.000050121744,0.00002087453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033189956,0.000060571256,0.0001249892,0.000060884457,0.00005806283,0.000043426066,0.000085949534,0.00003154754,0.000045937126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063416715,0.000035536686,0.000041056814,0.000050128863,0.00035833372,0.00008112596,0.00001941137,0.00015450729,0.0000127399935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036666584,0.000026606245,0.000036287835,0.000086005246,0.000025538688,0.0000030807403,0.009509619,0.000009228149,0.000071161805,0.9898679,0.000047005626,0.00028084908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013249026,0.00010009875,0.000035804118,0.0002077691,0.000009476758,2.618768e-7,0.00033659182,0.00017554754,0.00008019256,0.9903323,0.008536472,0.00005299294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101833815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009722297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5626903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006786005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059808823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1449144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404614732","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a944570","title":"A Virtuous Way of Doing Philosophy: The Moderation of Curiosity and Hume’s Philosophical Method in A Treatise of Human Nature","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Moderation; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07158601419422901,"score_gpt":0.35926988944735494,"score_spread":0.28768387525312594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404614732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81538343,0.06030282,0.00008750512,0.02556707,0.00048689693,0.000759084,0.00021994284,0.00008408098,0.09710918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99886817,0.00049568637,0.00008406936,0.00014740354,0.00031838974,0.000018059185,0.0000034684356,0.00001528196,0.000049481852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987468,0.00018781953,0.00045367243,0.000236131,0.00024881956,0.00012673168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884295,0.0006507484,0.00012414546,0.00019084942,0.00016838149,0.000022914179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007176648,0.00016935522,0.00049574603,0.00015250419,0.00021971695,0.000028750319,0.00010635407,0.00011220162,0.000040826628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115788054,0.00010766959,0.00011878627,0.0000764909,0.0010714551,0.00012291785,0.0001386257,0.00052574795,6.802656e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041961102,0.00008420179,0.00002528806,0.0006336315,0.00021284915,0.0000074275767,0.04060059,0.000010748909,0.00097031874,0.9566057,0.000013834425,0.0007934701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025275128,0.00021115648,0.0001234117,0.00051372906,0.00009745807,0.0000022845416,0.0011226308,0.00034352855,0.0008620563,0.9961211,0.00024191826,0.00010799457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010661619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031440638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18348473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017976794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023798444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43906385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405483114","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.40","title":"Kant on Hope’s Value and Misanthropy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Shanghai","keywords":"Humanity; Hatred; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05974680944149803,"score_gpt":0.24922708153567022,"score_spread":0.18948027209417218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405483114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30891714,0.0013198099,0.0000040564305,0.14636447,0.0035804273,0.00016091479,0.00020395765,0.00004631638,0.5394029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943734,0.00007493768,0.0000064516425,0.002923404,0.0023647118,9.174458e-7,0.0000026826492,0.000021491072,0.00023204119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914473,0.00005555946,0.0002519428,0.000113255264,0.00018460333,0.0002498949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989292,0.00012752145,0.00010794055,0.00012472467,0.00012992218,0.00058068644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041453834,0.000122050165,0.0002000758,0.0004171187,0.00037797948,0.00012814187,0.00018387062,0.00005912388,0.00057850266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013072294,0.00009796305,0.00009802815,0.0000675647,0.0005991107,0.0001164973,0.000012415974,0.00040331698,0.00015938727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014025728,0.0000081895,0.000018677221,0.000016391172,0.000036243324,0.0002940412,0.0033842267,0.000009916953,0.000013586211,0.9933897,0.0022109165,0.00060406997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023760453,0.00023928376,0.00010131669,0.000110181805,0.00001601724,0.000023525163,0.00020227143,0.000020692554,0.000018183444,0.86429995,0.1346182,0.000112747985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082913844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021557903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6854562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003879176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029828053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6334199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405598758","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-69654-5_5","title":"Performativity and Truth in Fichte","year":2024,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Abhandlungen zur Philosophie","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Performativity; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.045937208575189244,"score_gpt":0.24633500852719814,"score_spread":0.2003977999520089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405598758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043178326,0.05038115,0.0000014512711,0.013780565,0.0029530693,0.00075052766,0.0010871916,0.00016761459,0.9265606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95652413,0.011204158,0.000010659827,0.000987156,0.008352295,0.00004899818,0.00020077795,0.00026018772,0.022411618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956373,0.00011487586,0.0012785753,0.0013601661,0.00077584264,0.0008332647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735737,0.00081829313,0.00036130424,0.0008361277,0.0001847347,0.00044219109],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012973368,0.0013132459,0.0014618405,0.00087092485,0.00065832475,0.0006752143,0.0005333059,0.0011591956,0.0043060184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107004606,0.0011880627,0.00048423314,0.00007600448,0.0019931972,0.0004368213,0.00066633377,0.0035695815,0.0043434827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018944862,0.000113723785,0.000008071297,0.0011903674,0.0007229861,0.0004229562,0.004611916,0.0000021691617,0.000007760133,0.99064744,0.000068501424,0.0020146368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007155643,0.00032444615,0.000016955786,0.0016013974,0.00063893234,0.00002569259,0.000062295,0.00025821454,0.00000822346,0.78839964,0.20685828,0.00109034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008924629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002255589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001660038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015008135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406400636","doi":"10.1007/s10892-024-09506-4","title":"Tusian Perfectionism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectionism (psychology); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychotherapist; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07609038762312755,"score_gpt":0.31918329603523465,"score_spread":0.24309290841210712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406400636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031071486,0.0012541612,0.0007877537,0.24841723,0.0032350742,0.00006330664,0.000003531146,0.000019271636,0.7151482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98995775,0.00026985898,0.000010508113,0.006419202,0.0007815381,2.5027336e-7,1.2792225e-7,0.000004622994,0.002556158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992006,0.00025945323,0.00021888674,0.00003139642,0.00020680891,0.000082875325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982673,0.0011030848,0.000121919475,0.000115270595,0.0003647598,0.0000276785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00306712,0.000055804343,0.00010370299,0.000065041335,0.0005856493,0.000074611395,0.0002321296,0.00008124145,0.00030895264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048911176,0.000031075186,0.000084097104,0.000032765212,0.00049508805,0.00007502844,0.000034854867,0.0018073801,0.00001716267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030194271,0.000021364092,0.0000021831659,0.000015036933,0.00004092976,0.0000018135374,0.020206107,0.000012727504,0.00006414263,0.978685,0.000520531,0.0003999439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011113852,0.000053687985,0.000022986822,0.00006462223,0.00004369289,0.000009549492,0.001332155,0.000015362766,0.00007509432,0.8099326,0.18830845,0.00003068709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038946604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012610572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95888627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017138029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017813957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78522676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407551551","doi":"10.70902/t41qnq51","title":"Burckhardt, Hesse and Nietzsche: Which Pathway?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philanthropia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035650696970418054,"score_gpt":0.25469559309472456,"score_spread":0.2190448961243065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407551551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101027295,0.020436596,0.00012703396,0.062420074,0.004347414,0.0003140815,0.00032194733,0.00095641793,0.8100491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957951,0.00053012837,0.000009525407,0.0005890819,0.0017768834,0.000012545989,0.000015847074,0.000029283896,0.0012416187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915254,0.00003570224,0.00015736026,0.00028073863,0.00016445263,0.0002092196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995075,0.00014175578,0.000018364082,0.00017206032,0.000065064014,0.00009525652],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002174737,0.00014793467,0.00015433924,0.00006807551,0.00027175326,0.0003742827,0.00010482197,0.00006721686,0.0022824372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042132742,0.000113406604,0.000050811544,0.000048332164,0.00045690953,0.00017986985,0.00007293041,0.00035014443,0.00039104494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071066916,0.000024317409,0.000011802894,0.00012835077,0.000037592366,0.000031259835,0.005014257,2.7193315e-7,0.00010046328,0.9915692,0.0012439797,0.0018313979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073160336,0.00003876706,0.000017269866,0.000085509506,0.000014712891,0.0000080663085,0.0001857003,0.00023347235,0.00006760907,0.5202083,0.47893345,0.00013398737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008971413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002145603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8947678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011415557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044856017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407554605","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.003.0008","title":"The Abuse of Philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.04655405374230435,"score_gpt":0.20458565918227709,"score_spread":0.15803160543997274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407554605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007957417,0.0006783989,0.0000015721637,0.0002354326,0.00051597576,0.00016102627,0.00029858583,0.00007306926,0.998028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012826528,0.0010717664,0.0000022332829,0.00007195552,0.00055547256,4.2547202e-7,0.000010410376,0.00004138814,0.9854198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991613,0.000016737458,0.00017604964,0.00024032255,0.00024901185,0.00015655927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904025,0.00018898826,0.00015101847,0.00040946668,0.00014339482,0.000066887784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012841965,0.00023120648,0.00025125436,0.00008607065,0.00039139378,0.00008453889,0.0005264403,0.00020743972,0.00007333548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000034567129,0.00017644171,0.00029125475,0.0000018773957,0.0013911627,0.000043318603,0.00021232145,0.0006839664,0.000006538369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006231867,0.000006639243,6.4508883e-9,0.000121983896,0.0002638475,0.00003066717,0.002492684,3.2702397e-7,5.950637e-7,0.9960833,0.0003009226,0.0006366893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006176574,0.000023367536,8.501598e-9,0.00012516938,0.00010762504,3.4644378e-7,0.000031869968,0.00000347528,0.0000033009135,0.48736042,0.5121806,0.000102037615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025157588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052205713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5118797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034414876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004426399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7195084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407554656","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.002.0005","title":"Note on Translations and Key to Abbreviations and Citations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Information retrieval; Computer science; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.05241310228352645,"score_gpt":0.2933695845954659,"score_spread":0.24095648231193947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407554656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000043078735,0.0007065646,0.00018096143,0.023782214,0.00022050741,0.00017128627,0.0003847502,0.00012491246,0.9744245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03979248,0.00016926172,0.00021542328,0.0024004902,0.0006671763,0.000029541772,0.00002614916,0.00015328598,0.9565462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995462,0.000015716007,0.00009591966,0.00018593615,0.00008115469,0.000075105985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968517,0.000104705156,0.00001717207,0.00010140847,0.000018609991,0.000072910305],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006347894,0.00011700853,0.00011884406,0.00022361519,0.000106869964,0.00015336994,0.000035484398,0.000084988555,0.00473467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002082716,0.00009215796,0.000030577434,0.000025410416,0.00013150627,0.000020120273,0.000013899944,0.00018441128,0.0006764969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.8253506e-7,0.000009610737,6.6534824e-8,0.00004946732,0.000023325885,6.3954883e-7,0.005428052,2.0268403e-7,7.851592e-7,0.9160031,0.07787227,0.0006116111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029318662,0.000018725988,0.0000016002095,0.000096590345,0.000025542222,1.961984e-7,0.000053031614,0.0000075021585,1.1158581e-7,0.42946237,0.57023156,0.000073464755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012007253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039265514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49235928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000041548697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013796772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407554859","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.003.0012","title":"G. F. Meier on the Fate of the Soul","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06053781809066057,"score_gpt":0.1981144745212826,"score_spread":0.13757665643062206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407554859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000049722858,0.00006108085,8.452057e-7,0.0009758239,0.00047258052,0.00020648947,0.00030293717,0.00003767036,0.99789286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06614813,0.00006366794,5.0322006e-7,0.00037591608,0.00025311433,4.246194e-7,0.0000030281503,0.000028464474,0.93312675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924386,0.000032617554,0.000120005956,0.0002072965,0.0002682839,0.00012792679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990938,0.00017944822,0.00012612107,0.00048383547,0.00008073319,0.000036070614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001374105,0.00020567089,0.00019710817,0.000054305656,0.00035642544,0.000057999176,0.00062689284,0.00017780431,0.00046360405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000060100415,0.00011646452,0.00031758694,0.00000226891,0.0010579594,0.000022325608,0.00039980793,0.0008677056,0.000007516104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035502653,0.0000052820474,1.4809947e-8,0.000052224827,0.00016075757,0.00001153179,0.0022271308,0.0000010976539,0.0000016553101,0.99650836,0.00065975264,0.00033669593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003992153,0.000018295128,6.066816e-8,0.00014598235,0.00008874423,2.770985e-7,0.00006593927,0.000004237878,0.000017942983,0.45895308,0.5405868,0.0000787233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003792858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006729014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53992707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031753152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042601736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5076139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407555015","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.001.0001","title":"Wolff and the First Fifty Years of German Metaphysics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"German; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Art; History; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0267773118693139,"score_gpt":0.20385924642188824,"score_spread":0.17708193455257434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407555015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017414092,0.00039009703,0.0000023424695,0.00024577876,0.00021552238,0.0001861712,0.00027166933,0.00004099683,0.9984733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023812015,0.00033727926,0.0000031026077,0.00019076209,0.0003365747,8.242251e-7,0.000015648715,0.000027780974,0.975276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993089,0.000041872085,0.00012620172,0.0002100228,0.00018868691,0.00012431452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922043,0.0002640057,0.00012069782,0.00028504472,0.00006581974,0.000044030432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016823657,0.00017074791,0.0003287319,0.0000683255,0.00020428207,0.00007855243,0.00033211792,0.00015129523,0.000042289637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005348632,0.00013715519,0.00022018667,0.000004012078,0.0018467535,0.00004845312,0.0003759652,0.0005818632,0.0000015005866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007750541,0.000006519231,1.8876714e-8,0.00021836901,0.00026505903,0.000023275335,0.009133521,3.5683414e-7,1.1901963e-7,0.9866807,0.002688904,0.0009056875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022361959,0.000013647712,2.4671206e-7,0.000091108275,0.00023342685,4.5459143e-7,0.00004824443,0.000014340911,0.0000011885543,0.41013557,0.5891459,0.00009224285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008566535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011156395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.586457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002822701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074183845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.680444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407555370","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.003.0007","title":"Women and the Wolffian Philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mesonephric duct; Biology; Endocrinology","score_opus":0.03997915463896819,"score_gpt":0.18992097601160637,"score_spread":0.14994182137263817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407555370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000027739901,0.00040044836,0.000001225725,0.0013528081,0.00032650607,0.000238544,0.00021415109,0.00010977149,0.9973288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034563825,0.0004138379,0.0000016699329,0.00046657812,0.00077326177,0.0000016594122,0.0000086029,0.000044144697,0.9637264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999104,0.000028135386,0.00013257786,0.00032470524,0.00020191251,0.00020863395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992494,0.00016020639,0.00009002089,0.0003215114,0.000064765874,0.00011408001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020745983,0.00028040068,0.00032586907,0.00010275349,0.0004520488,0.00019401583,0.0003544689,0.00021629347,0.00030644535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004383571,0.0002056112,0.00016797139,0.0000018479258,0.0022755326,0.000056919,0.00044104093,0.00086781103,0.000007780034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018649013,0.000003458353,8.0613125e-9,0.000113783906,0.00023599698,0.0000659089,0.0105620865,1.1937831e-7,1.0063083e-7,0.9877756,0.00018088763,0.0008755621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027234186,0.000020820702,1.2131912e-8,0.000069015696,0.00006485503,0.000001490051,0.000091331225,0.000005868836,1.5276133e-7,0.49628907,0.50305355,0.0001314658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030753807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029326357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5028727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062670915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000368811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8384581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407555402","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.003.0010","title":"Reason beyond Proof","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.041253572849884144,"score_gpt":0.20470233715127503,"score_spread":0.16344876430139088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407555402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000064117235,0.00038168294,0.000004350063,0.00026440335,0.00059427833,0.0002416825,0.00044082451,0.00017626696,0.9978901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057226303,0.00016246809,0.0000069479715,0.0001531801,0.0007958505,7.1743665e-7,0.00004684542,0.00006526554,0.9930461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895173,0.000014981406,0.00014534357,0.0004077417,0.00026602714,0.00021418859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992224,0.00006534918,0.00010391364,0.0003652409,0.000119895645,0.00012321804],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000107677646,0.00031675532,0.00030671406,0.00014379523,0.0002920697,0.00014891603,0.0003810046,0.00034218057,0.0007635013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000037697525,0.0003130392,0.00026305884,0.000001785105,0.0006415636,0.000075170894,0.00034176398,0.0009339161,0.000018696848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051737505,0.000008141443,1.2401767e-8,0.00016530133,0.00018020035,0.00020107933,0.0017490701,2.8855794e-7,7.5540675e-7,0.9941765,0.001333406,0.00213351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079900274,0.000035248017,1.1678985e-8,0.00014265059,0.00012778954,0.0000015711237,0.00003120117,0.0000060975512,0.0000054030024,0.47582936,0.52354527,0.0001954831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042290445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010913834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52221185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079327205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006840385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407666274","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2025.2466694","title":"Three grades of self involvement and the deduction of objectivity in <i>The Practical Self</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07279050464082575,"score_gpt":0.31217791442225234,"score_spread":0.23938740978142659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407666274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94207865,0.00060238485,0.00020527282,0.02417865,0.0006005965,0.00037477468,0.000005286313,0.000024818279,0.031929538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990594,0.00007159946,0.000043718246,0.00061406055,0.00018287709,0.000017090008,6.3086094e-7,0.000002726356,0.000007935269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993382,0.00017418648,0.00018244013,0.000092744835,0.00013883524,0.00007357756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989145,0.0007912481,0.00007122223,0.0001583305,0.000055748664,0.000008980576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012187369,0.00005944231,0.00013285478,0.000044814187,0.00011330106,0.000026266513,0.00009204152,0.00003958957,0.000013023382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011445364,0.000032162086,0.000040789186,0.000051140338,0.0010179229,0.000078137615,0.00005495346,0.0002283466,5.546859e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005638768,0.00020790605,0.00015818683,0.00007351598,0.000035620058,5.9773305e-7,0.046507865,5.6724167e-7,0.000022536413,0.9525781,0.00015752968,0.00020118826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046688752,0.000049045793,0.0009064719,0.000039371385,0.00004155425,0.0000011459368,0.0053796615,0.00006130325,0.00020036196,0.98821896,0.0045975414,0.000037667258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023794884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000601648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056980684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010222301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042819982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37505794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407864969","doi":"10.1017/9781108580588","title":"Sidgwick's Ethics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06386592709856423,"score_gpt":0.23121938208570256,"score_spread":0.16735345498713833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407864969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000034812829,0.00021284583,0.000043563905,0.00047644443,0.0009892532,0.0002611326,0.00087695476,0.0002233272,0.996913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009956508,0.00012243321,0.0000068368913,0.001346826,0.0009802879,8.994533e-7,0.00013825523,0.000037608912,0.9963712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984555,0.0001707635,0.00020438865,0.0004876304,0.00037059572,0.0003111008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980709,0.00061420305,0.00017338169,0.000588058,0.00040310412,0.00015034995],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030774932,0.00038189214,0.00045513944,0.00021394306,0.00072345854,0.00015272302,0.0007413593,0.0008016342,0.00004272629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071277136,0.0004233698,0.000328764,0.000005287763,0.0012765423,0.00007787835,0.00051449763,0.0028031948,0.000044786964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042962918,0.000014177774,1.46622945e-8,0.00029418702,0.0001545934,0.00012566289,0.0010672306,3.4287376e-7,7.7483577e-7,0.863569,0.13453372,0.00019729832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030496292,0.000034990517,1.2487124e-7,0.00039354185,0.00024099274,0.0000013452617,0.00011916214,0.000009818898,0.0000121392195,0.022521084,0.97593236,0.00042945665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002297473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002930116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84139866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002290811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001057459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407946188","doi":"10.1007/s10892-025-09512-0","title":"The Moral Worth of Mixed Actions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Moral philosophy; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.18644264202956898,"score_gpt":0.3461628066321411,"score_spread":0.15972016460257213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407946188","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14624986,0.0044457973,0.000903328,0.48939303,0.006209268,0.00018965313,0.000027439204,0.000023187004,0.35255843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643576,0.0007609798,0.000009773926,0.001038733,0.00035460966,4.0297016e-7,1.6540693e-7,0.0000043481164,0.001395224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898267,0.00032490666,0.00031564286,0.00002844482,0.00025690428,0.00009142291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995824,0.0032350703,0.00025052874,0.00017129278,0.0004948268,0.000024289408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035249454,0.00005660746,0.000120493976,0.000044149572,0.00072444865,0.000047708618,0.00035505777,0.000069795016,0.000067885914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007657741,0.000025747355,0.00011126459,0.000046178087,0.00095958554,0.00006059299,0.000049380164,0.0016570197,0.000003395073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007152475,0.00002505582,0.0000071544646,0.000013009821,0.000079979094,6.545722e-7,0.007381988,0.000018818082,0.000084921136,0.99139076,0.00050469436,0.00042141447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011325126,0.00005160997,0.00012073881,0.00007540259,0.00006543392,0.0000032047717,0.0020762498,0.000015481088,0.0001678863,0.90224355,0.09504004,0.000027166197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034478784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004576263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85018593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000112550115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021998897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7199018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408017332","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2024-0060","title":"Future People as Future Victims: An Anti-Natalist Justification of Longtermism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.02848644227320614,"score_gpt":0.2708779099556877,"score_spread":0.2423914676824816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408017332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51290303,0.0015527827,0.000015010824,0.06680352,0.0025783167,0.00030825153,0.00078678475,0.00012791614,0.41492438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99071926,0.000121271085,0.000023880873,0.0028480077,0.0054966775,0.0000066771645,0.0001475082,0.000016895452,0.00061985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896395,0.000071416434,0.00029967885,0.00026070795,0.00017704463,0.00022720623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991622,0.0000552854,0.0000998316,0.0003543927,0.00020228529,0.00012601205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015146052,0.00019633891,0.0002846906,0.0001283533,0.00041554758,0.00011173318,0.00020611445,0.00017384705,0.00018238726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002065826,0.0001724099,0.00008348603,0.000071420705,0.0005096248,0.00023692861,0.00006348812,0.0003280787,0.000012474146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021009166,0.00012485363,0.000084398474,0.00029263852,0.000034684675,0.0000040226682,0.0053896974,0.0000011770427,0.000034655568,0.99345094,0.00021122408,0.00035072188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002688015,0.000100680845,0.0005592618,0.000057826845,0.00007006757,0.000003555267,0.0010924743,0.0000614328,0.00016528628,0.9555846,0.041856367,0.00017968268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013262255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006045893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4778162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016051066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006773327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7030672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408266428","doi":"10.1017/9781009304559","title":"Kant on Marriage","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"","keywords":"German; Relation (database); Context (archaeology); Element (criminal law); State (computer science); Sociology; Gender equality; Population; Philosophy; Gender studies; Epistemology; Political science; Law; History; Mathematics; Demography; Linguistics","score_opus":0.036787036915423614,"score_gpt":0.20305867667819544,"score_spread":0.16627163976277182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408266428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012008745,0.00007437921,0.0000101754,0.00016219869,0.00091452076,0.00026912778,0.0010414895,0.00015939747,0.9973567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021969406,0.000045793055,0.000002237511,0.0009162287,0.0008812987,9.578705e-7,0.00010989793,0.000030537405,0.9958161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987799,0.00008978748,0.000159403,0.00044356319,0.00026602406,0.00026134774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988051,0.00024588275,0.00013293837,0.0005389412,0.00015108929,0.00012606577],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013854202,0.00034007308,0.00039179577,0.0002127367,0.00044112332,0.00011213946,0.00057236117,0.00033887266,0.000061198094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020821648,0.00035359227,0.00027819243,0.000003620725,0.00063782564,0.00004655389,0.00032219876,0.001022192,0.00006731622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008851528,0.000018640872,8.846529e-9,0.00013325272,0.00011983271,0.00018947593,0.00024747997,3.3147268e-7,8.353831e-7,0.82768327,0.17121695,0.000301405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035910087,0.00006884701,2.132775e-7,0.00040334236,0.0001536908,7.7598145e-7,0.00004713102,0.000007784747,0.000018189601,0.015944982,0.98263764,0.00035828122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000950023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008799032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8117383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021785941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032670234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408727117","doi":"10.1177/00483931251327336","title":"Foresight as Consolation: Kant on the Capability of Future Making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consolation; Futures studies; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Theology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08244627859248173,"score_gpt":0.3258579510535721,"score_spread":0.2434116724610904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408727117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1198005,0.00012571862,0.0000015829065,0.19686344,0.000695219,0.00015672467,0.000019831801,0.000009887509,0.6823271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682903,0.000004453249,0.0000034974605,0.0022511017,0.00080753566,0.0000047243884,1.8956689e-7,0.000002098479,0.00009734793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901885,0.0001729577,0.00020064974,0.00013648748,0.00035980906,0.00011124001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912685,0.00043389198,0.00016838615,0.00015411752,0.000107639135,0.000009122965],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000910977,0.000078642115,0.00014106401,0.000035536454,0.0015141611,0.00004236852,0.0005888176,0.000046654764,0.00023736297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018343268,0.00003784298,0.0001660952,0.00014553862,0.004314582,0.00006251091,0.00009616447,0.00018555266,0.0000030599465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021032285,0.00003599065,0.00005899401,0.00002308934,0.00001561165,4.9277713e-8,0.007471354,0.0000027500391,0.000023695691,0.9920747,0.00011412743,0.00015858846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052396488,0.00004671715,0.0004234211,0.00006109059,0.000014977312,5.8731864e-8,0.001132784,0.00002183186,0.00022336292,0.993929,0.004049528,0.00004482993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006263053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006673395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8770285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014448616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010769507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408775883","doi":"10.63485/zft4z-td978","title":"Free philosophy pledge","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10891045535284118,"score_gpt":0.26036252378800234,"score_spread":0.15145206843516118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408775883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012534012,0.00044873968,0.00003212576,0.013367686,0.0021386773,0.00019772259,0.00036964545,0.00029553016,0.98189646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811906,0.00048481848,0.00006633407,0.0030262887,0.0071650823,0.000042858366,0.00009028133,0.000054083666,0.00787962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860823,0.000059585862,0.00032284835,0.00044152536,0.00031581987,0.00025197738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984643,0.000121526595,0.0001155738,0.0009993566,0.00017380482,0.00012545192],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017538771,0.00031917583,0.00036459,0.00011746758,0.00040249832,0.00016379541,0.0008500573,0.00032559896,0.0061490317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088095265,0.00025751296,0.00030586417,0.000011423178,0.0008026945,0.00006160658,0.0014087555,0.0014285458,0.00052416936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103052735,0.00007781647,8.9433877e-7,0.00010386114,0.000065481254,0.00002168725,0.0042765066,0.0000053689096,6.045847e-7,0.9881615,0.0071165175,0.0001594814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015111483,0.000021787793,0.0000020663003,0.00006288149,0.000015816418,0.0000017376399,0.000032336204,0.00005382893,0.000007564014,0.76999354,0.22937727,0.000280075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022663551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020828619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97993726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029743464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009019704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409089001","doi":"10.7202/1117241ar","title":"L’idée de Dieu dans la pensée éthique kantienne","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.022694414935674676,"score_gpt":0.28861578991944176,"score_spread":0.26592137498376706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409089001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03879764,0.0038185902,0.0012568292,0.3168795,0.0021227177,0.00056406483,0.00033728796,0.00037562495,0.63584775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93012094,0.014564195,0.00033642093,0.03526757,0.0022871075,0.00016677816,0.00006487663,0.000120600635,0.01707148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99245906,0.0039139856,0.0009809202,0.0010386008,0.0003631261,0.001244307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947337,0.003152944,0.00033008974,0.0009962227,0.00040638653,0.0003806386],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046734987,0.0008914136,0.00095480995,0.00035930992,0.00078108656,0.0004672685,0.0010954379,0.0021210732,0.00042565915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015305708,0.0008658211,0.0006284358,0.00023826682,0.0050197905,0.00045366192,0.0006396204,0.004699026,0.00021183338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025445834,0.0008654725,0.00012469491,0.0005495954,0.00035540888,0.0006655531,0.006387743,0.00006973617,0.0006715354,0.9866679,0.0028618756,0.0005260464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065181206,0.0002745684,0.00028344465,0.0007212136,0.00013280277,0.00008750195,0.00047347436,0.00010508743,0.00073892885,0.6732854,0.32266378,0.00058197475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011864775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001368442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8913233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038349026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012500504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409184114","doi":"10.1111/phpr.70002","title":"Is Kant's critique of metaphysics obsolete?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of mind","score_opus":0.2882508546577211,"score_gpt":0.4160416371722606,"score_spread":0.1277907825145395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409184114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012771948,0.0023049247,0.00003245395,0.03507233,0.0001095784,0.00020225589,0.00007178273,0.000036043686,0.9493987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961657,0.0005704284,0.00003308246,0.0020198817,0.0003545816,0.00003646652,0.0000049261876,0.000009042394,0.00080590637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823296,0.0003098153,0.00030335938,0.00036833962,0.00039604193,0.00038950198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979542,0.0011529417,0.00004204311,0.00030816536,0.00043505538,0.00010760615],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011697821,0.0001532512,0.00034087448,0.00023396507,0.00048898,0.000098883254,0.00036232115,0.00013805537,0.0009474955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003369402,0.00011410115,0.0001043591,0.00019204897,0.0027467378,0.000113643255,0.0003340408,0.0009040709,0.000037053396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008725062,0.00021003788,0.000016843134,0.00016203217,0.00008112278,0.000004122108,0.0028696603,2.198796e-7,0.000092622395,0.9943638,0.00016335951,0.0019489656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023908642,0.00027423995,0.000021212181,0.000069216374,0.000014006626,2.8213327e-7,0.00044125156,0.00002486351,0.00015125457,0.96652067,0.032132156,0.000111789566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052658528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004759077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9833937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018469525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006248814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409445394","doi":"10.59277/rrp.2024.68.2.04","title":"Kant’s Argument in the Third Analogy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue roumaine de philosophie","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.05622683160464379,"score_gpt":0.27521534867015457,"score_spread":0.21898851706551078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409445394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024606409,0.0045683207,0.00006539369,0.30942336,0.0010345647,0.00037246544,0.00007012954,0.00020644459,0.65965295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98866343,0.00026452704,0.000017099386,0.0046067294,0.00588515,0.000058341942,0.00002379647,0.000031600488,0.00044934082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854434,0.00019838376,0.0003380996,0.00032508126,0.00021576937,0.0003783209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990203,0.0004550587,0.00004056171,0.00037275368,0.00003898578,0.00007238391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001247615,0.0002010767,0.00024172575,0.00021572867,0.0002143656,0.0002516642,0.0004209842,0.00009924784,0.0005304385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085554006,0.00013915155,0.00017017034,0.00014083153,0.0003102711,0.00014582621,0.000066697066,0.00077491254,0.00034932548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014031267,0.00009108231,0.000008060575,0.0001434989,0.000037585134,0.00033478142,0.01049607,0.000017271263,0.000024033721,0.98740363,0.00058267964,0.0008472963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013138168,0.000075728596,0.000027939937,0.00016024116,0.00002768205,0.000047339363,0.00021940815,0.0006372652,0.000004984785,0.80893046,0.1895858,0.00015176149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000091125316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027512875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.964057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009243466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006526426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58079296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409780598","doi":"10.1017/s1369415425000147","title":"Much Ado about ‘Something ( <i>Etwas</i> )’: ‘Noumenon’, ‘Thing in Itself’, and ‘Transcendental Distinction’ in Kant’s Meta-metaphysical Thought Experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Noumenon; Transcendental number; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05134330559465825,"score_gpt":0.3074323804039058,"score_spread":0.25608907480924753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409780598","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026174663,0.8253011,0.00019222403,0.02750785,0.0011903715,0.001561088,0.000067373585,0.0001557526,0.117849566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544751,0.03836958,0.00010543098,0.0061767264,0.00013846181,0.00012400789,0.00001622497,0.000023803397,0.0005706671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780357,0.0003654048,0.00070424745,0.00049538683,0.000280461,0.00035092962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921536,0.00024275042,0.00011081603,0.0002980769,0.000047628055,0.00008533794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013792715,0.00030359518,0.00091894536,0.0001939716,0.00024095966,0.00016368438,0.00023681879,0.000085703694,0.00064804027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009566466,0.00023970798,0.00028459897,0.00021959095,0.00027431786,0.00028362934,0.000106869906,0.00073433423,0.0000258496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015127889,0.0002538812,0.000035472953,0.0023524533,0.00024070792,0.0000307451,0.0039425315,9.893396e-7,0.00018348919,0.9858424,0.0001498295,0.0069523435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015079315,0.00009822124,0.0004940572,0.0137985125,0.0015455661,0.000012932424,0.0013182721,0.00015470693,0.0005400609,0.34714356,0.6323747,0.0010114793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001504817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050464936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92830044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005604818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053379772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97750074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409845283","doi":"10.1111/rati.12446","title":"The Motive of Duty, Emotional Motives, and the Kantian Criterion of Summonability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Social psychology; Psychology; Kantian ethics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.01497038065176664,"score_gpt":0.24603274913944248,"score_spread":0.23106236848767583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409845283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6848969,0.0018840363,0.00041006535,0.054548528,0.0005741372,0.00050850195,0.00013772237,0.000019079078,0.25702104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992166,0.000055168843,0.0000036201243,0.0001719074,0.000061467596,0.0000040161767,0.0000025833324,0.0000018161859,0.00048282152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994786,0.00014264429,0.00016552894,0.00007002771,0.00009269998,0.000050549224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989821,0.0006764192,0.000058341036,0.0001203508,0.00015366671,0.00000912465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005632514,0.0000452552,0.00009960986,0.000015902762,0.00026688777,0.000034398472,0.000086347456,0.000018178682,0.00007360372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002155706,0.000022753078,0.000046059646,0.000019355215,0.0017686656,0.00004462427,0.000049605005,0.00009861165,6.762519e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056400604,0.000024551697,0.000107975735,0.000027873923,0.000027727901,5.360537e-8,0.004864077,0.000002023213,0.000035205827,0.9942876,0.000042464777,0.000524037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026183418,0.000018121487,0.0062307892,0.00002865857,0.000012947739,9.7443696e-8,0.00077538,0.00034010163,0.00021472262,0.9889724,0.0031219486,0.000022962411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117368414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031037998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31431973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000048919774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003567656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65167224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409957464","doi":"10.7203/rek.10.1.27492","title":"On missing elements in Kant's metaphysics: Beauty and Life","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Estudios Kantianos","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Beauty; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.026583611401708004,"score_gpt":0.2736689222578809,"score_spread":0.2470853108561729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409957464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8970126,0.004115411,0.00012443046,0.009194048,0.000342168,0.00048103015,0.000030165924,0.00008430134,0.08861586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577254,0.00026571797,0.00004207382,0.003583753,0.00018494259,0.000014193164,0.0000036048482,0.000013204078,0.00011999202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988877,0.00012477317,0.00031067556,0.00026461636,0.00014490442,0.0002673132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993245,0.00027296078,0.00007399493,0.00020536511,0.00004266702,0.000080483806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005579736,0.00016137084,0.00031037358,0.00014571506,0.00024589503,0.00023246712,0.00013310373,0.000054790256,0.00009740734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032281622,0.00014010441,0.0000737345,0.00008322821,0.00020483344,0.000082555045,0.000078787125,0.00032283005,0.000021179936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023733226,0.00011121263,0.0005370132,0.00014165214,0.000088568515,0.000014050386,0.0013640282,0.0000017286211,0.000051654537,0.9943031,0.00026842806,0.0030948264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011715115,0.000118687625,0.0025255238,0.0012318875,0.00015472471,9.989978e-7,0.0005580095,0.00037630252,0.00010809101,0.79889953,0.19444229,0.00041241452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048348007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000426898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19540355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004834532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008920844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5713292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410132230","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.11","title":"Kant on the Theoretical Use of the Ideas of Reason: A Transcendental Interpretation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Princeton University","keywords":"Philosophy; Transcendental number; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); General interest; Transcendental philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Transcendental idealism; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04577995721313702,"score_gpt":0.23030685003607468,"score_spread":0.18452689282293766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410132230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6386092,0.002940227,0.000084095016,0.17104204,0.004139616,0.00041242898,0.00063449284,0.000014379068,0.18212351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983429,0.000013936189,0.0000033232939,0.0010338173,0.0005572023,0.0000010350268,8.2424253e-7,0.000014217768,0.00003275675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989944,0.00016614291,0.00036865566,0.00007991612,0.00026654755,0.00012431866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989198,0.00046758313,0.00013071518,0.00017068052,0.000166548,0.00014467794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048117587,0.00010093353,0.00017296668,0.00013789782,0.00012713872,0.00009545578,0.00031442242,0.000051766285,0.0008351384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022455977,0.000050652423,0.0003122771,0.00006525908,0.0014978491,0.00012211213,0.000009040665,0.0005206444,0.000006301801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053204247,0.000016449176,0.000008467229,0.000039356364,0.00008598797,0.000025591064,0.009170082,0.000011383061,0.00005854831,0.9900004,0.00017470782,0.00035582334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089068984,0.00017959464,0.00004110591,0.00076740375,0.00006275597,0.000025590267,0.00024134367,0.00018550285,0.00022118594,0.9927959,0.005332201,0.000058349728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031563547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001240834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3597337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042272848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003754463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.914418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411044418","doi":"10.1111/phib.12378","title":"From Moral Supervenience to Moral Contingentism (In One Easy Step!)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytic Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation","keywords":"Supervenience; Epistemology; Philosophy; Moral dilemma; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Social psychology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.08882184717245818,"score_gpt":0.2768946346016341,"score_spread":0.18807278742917594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411044418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3343139,0.0006057651,0.00014741444,0.041718323,0.0010931084,0.00041742786,0.00017744179,0.00013514335,0.6213915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991006,0.000011455811,0.00009731124,0.005867619,0.001054414,0.000026554639,0.000026128295,0.000019575064,0.0018909074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998215,0.00009248613,0.0004722478,0.0005073564,0.00032312656,0.0003897346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989798,0.00019717825,0.00008678749,0.00046208125,0.00012114624,0.00015302931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003663539,0.0002344458,0.000453028,0.00033882467,0.00020363803,0.00018371148,0.00048476175,0.00009831066,0.0009072885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001859734,0.00023039337,0.00018358245,0.00022617026,0.00034714802,0.00021111719,0.000187971,0.0004097744,0.00034789502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005336775,0.00019485483,0.0006417669,0.000026617083,0.00008709644,0.00003002365,0.0018936091,0.000012545698,0.0000830275,0.9961696,0.00022625059,0.0005812366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005689148,0.00006977348,0.0013305495,0.0002647348,0.00006318637,2.177535e-7,0.00015771478,0.0006339925,0.00006030339,0.9900689,0.0065208212,0.00026089977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002230371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010076845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65669215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065084736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070269896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411502960","doi":"10.5840/dap2022-2023312","title":"Preface","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Directory of American Philosophers","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.06604111705334738,"score_gpt":0.2954824279219166,"score_spread":0.22944131086856923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411502960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35576797,0.00012849183,0.0000023200303,0.004776356,0.0005518464,0.00012151219,0.000069896145,0.00045474374,0.6381269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772745,0.00005545573,0.000018769788,0.00066314195,0.00052109483,0.0000131633215,0.000013378392,0.000032707634,0.0009548586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895394,0.000075392185,0.0002262374,0.00022449499,0.00027918592,0.00024075911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991641,0.00022658566,0.00015302429,0.00026743594,0.000088766705,0.000100081386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025172284,0.00014443754,0.0002850664,0.0001507188,0.00013891835,0.000022446098,0.00023056955,0.000024437202,0.00086732715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089113615,0.00013102002,0.00013841702,0.00020000948,0.0019651875,0.00008877579,0.000055902452,0.00017548447,0.00036649886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034344714,0.000049609494,0.00008951426,0.000030716787,0.000067786066,0.0000063861294,0.0055619753,0.000020447296,0.00065968285,0.98786795,0.0012867037,0.004324879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021691555,0.00017315621,0.0006073078,0.000038651015,0.00002647718,5.3058517e-7,0.0016045654,0.00007543668,0.00046340423,0.82782114,0.16866589,0.000306556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020506656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023956505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6419595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017969722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000376133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9496624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411701558","doi":"10.1515/dzph-2025-0008","title":"Edward Wilmot Blyden and Fichte’s Nationalist Philosophy of History","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0397799791501612,"score_gpt":0.2695225108264432,"score_spread":0.22974253167628197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411701558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010174528,0.006979179,0.00003807827,0.034963526,0.0014512888,0.0003613258,0.0001744995,0.000175611,0.945682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905719,0.0002421663,0.00011171697,0.005219051,0.0018086892,0.000043310392,0.00006997121,0.000050967363,0.0018822163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975176,0.00016130036,0.00075430854,0.0006120256,0.0005727537,0.00038203178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793047,0.000494259,0.0002857529,0.0006097768,0.0004966434,0.00018308953],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069316383,0.0004298257,0.0006322348,0.00054606545,0.00038949176,0.000071159,0.0005280482,0.00026864288,0.001188894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032309417,0.00040188016,0.00024934285,0.00014069628,0.0020214904,0.00036548736,0.00028061308,0.0006991057,0.00008356776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011017415,0.00021916881,0.00007779586,0.00030154744,0.00022398651,0.000011860509,0.0018223268,0.0000032424462,0.00037910303,0.9943754,0.0018779418,0.0005974378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058690045,0.00007673352,0.00014111503,0.00015562172,0.0000918485,0.0000034016232,0.000055971523,0.000034601657,0.00015889785,0.58635336,0.41206786,0.00027371856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011144185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048020156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9803974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003460459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027181467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411814584","doi":"10.1163/18795811-50120040","title":"What is ‘Real’ in Fichte? Being, Activity, and (In-)Determinacy in the Jena Period","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fichte-Studien","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Determinacy; Period (music); Philosophy; Mathematics; Aesthetics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.04315797764955567,"score_gpt":0.27585780738545895,"score_spread":0.23269982973590328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411814584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92521006,0.00089323864,8.895367e-8,0.014436697,0.000368454,0.00027886123,0.000028655075,0.000016451137,0.058767505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996716,0.00053178676,0.0000013197042,0.0017856768,0.00018693347,0.00014614154,0.0000046077357,0.000017664794,0.00060982374],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850637,0.0002672763,0.00024392783,0.0003421363,0.00030468308,0.00033558428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992752,0.00033466646,0.00006834038,0.00026496447,0.000021879636,0.000034933902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009863661,0.00017755837,0.00028237098,0.00017099916,0.0004705661,0.00022865817,0.00032081964,0.00004877561,0.000521034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040557217,0.00013811771,0.00006027095,0.00012108294,0.00025698333,0.00032475643,0.0004373557,0.0007622781,0.000013027769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016297455,0.00062412466,0.0044372384,0.00007699136,0.00003444701,0.00036619976,0.565539,0.000017227714,0.000037545862,0.42261866,0.00038555532,0.0057000713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023605747,0.0005990652,0.04089422,0.00021252914,0.000042852418,0.000022392738,0.08550152,0.00078893424,0.000024079962,0.6921685,0.17656901,0.0008163259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007564973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008588382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48003745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008373046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033047996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57049567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411933491","doi":"10.1515/agph-2024-0107","title":"Getting at the Root of Evil: Kant and Fichte on the Murderer at the Door","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Universität Heidelberg; Concordia University; Syracuse University; Rice University; Yale University","keywords":"Root (linguistics); Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.032152990000784774,"score_gpt":0.2684333903151958,"score_spread":0.23628040031441103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411933491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3248437,0.002219849,0.0000050993476,0.3246947,0.00040466533,0.0005400609,0.00010698913,0.000048378693,0.34713653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804447,0.0001594186,0.0000050426597,0.014689537,0.00096712256,0.000057694197,0.000016011676,0.000041096693,0.0036193328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975354,0.0005117753,0.0005235566,0.00048720773,0.000492391,0.00044965473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99468184,0.0038216994,0.00023317382,0.0010691814,0.000111244284,0.00008285337],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013466395,0.00036960273,0.0003551819,0.000106286,0.0024947927,0.00015850096,0.0007517155,0.00009205487,0.00078885525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003577848,0.00016675658,0.0002465203,0.00010998679,0.0026905632,0.00007997292,0.00093594636,0.00099536,0.00013249001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017021976,0.00006922253,0.000056058183,0.00006555946,0.0002629761,0.0000055561195,0.0064003966,0.000021998812,0.00043818777,0.9891437,0.0018067544,0.0015593423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004070183,0.00008670361,0.00070196885,0.00018424151,0.00014880902,0.000006947594,0.00029243442,0.00015930134,0.00067074405,0.9052899,0.091832586,0.00021936763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000085675005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001079809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.655601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035279678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006416976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412537762","doi":"10.1093/analys/anae050","title":"Relational virtues and the charge of normative superfluity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Charge (physics); Literature; Philosophy; Art; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.04200824617128574,"score_gpt":0.24462011165657468,"score_spread":0.20261186548528895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412537762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39322376,0.007846081,0.00071473944,0.03304767,0.00024206223,0.0001438003,0.00028288833,0.0000770502,0.56442195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998689,0.00011001905,0.000003969691,0.00022170499,0.0001173525,0.000002961387,0.0000119303,0.0000023579842,0.0008407206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996017,0.000060137885,0.0001164988,0.000070187816,0.00010929892,0.00004215241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994406,0.00040279274,0.000019208486,0.00007311831,0.000050285515,0.00001399361],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043877334,0.000041260108,0.00012373005,0.00008523088,0.00012165383,0.000051955183,0.00004411304,0.000018111754,0.0015387055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003698168,0.000022239628,0.00013137524,0.00008732919,0.0005243012,0.00009136991,0.000024043322,0.000107363194,0.000029677974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008193145,0.00000600662,0.000046307534,0.000009030822,0.000686004,4.1593353e-7,0.014410218,0.0000027285944,0.0000044452386,0.9845524,0.000029905179,0.00024436897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000822578,0.0000079544925,0.00020086762,0.000008549365,0.0006089164,1.6010227e-7,0.00035700868,0.0070991376,0.000020976413,0.9811696,0.010404691,0.000039898532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014598347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012463694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60546523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000032645112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009005697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413001238","doi":"10.1163/17455243-20254686","title":"A Theory of Imposition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05403297771204898,"score_gpt":0.2659840794786118,"score_spread":0.21195110176656282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413001238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12732117,0.0017866791,0.0003001733,0.02568621,0.0016610083,0.000116387935,0.000032682947,0.000019680334,0.843076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742866,0.000033495144,0.00005031793,0.0012798365,0.0009851353,7.4425344e-7,0.0000010690638,0.000007247633,0.00021349723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905175,0.00010622441,0.00046836314,0.00006683333,0.00021218574,0.00009463654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989799,0.00017072172,0.00032736274,0.000120827295,0.00035453055,0.000046626647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067684846,0.00009198519,0.0002627859,0.00022879853,0.000091699585,0.00003185959,0.00020564823,0.000054690558,0.00030471376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008326292,0.00006793822,0.00022944415,0.000051970346,0.0003648427,0.0001832201,0.000036893118,0.0003294915,0.0000068196737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028053214,0.00013345393,0.000015966136,0.000059097532,0.0001036625,0.000010662576,0.0010719553,0.0000057221214,0.00046573137,0.9965613,0.00023925114,0.0010526764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043253595,0.00024159928,0.00006154565,0.00021413794,0.00006445816,0.000005670773,0.00012702656,0.000006764562,0.0005503671,0.9945392,0.0036951962,0.0000615158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035516757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012244653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8701075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019438314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068431764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3336402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414105455","doi":"10.1017/9781009604987.007","title":"On Virtues","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Information system; Key (lock); Variety (cybernetics)","score_opus":0.03680738335512897,"score_gpt":0.2009238492090021,"score_spread":0.16411646585387313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414105455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009111444,0.0000783889,0.00001691264,0.00014694656,0.000561392,0.00017837463,0.0006127501,0.00014526746,0.99825084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0064708344,0.000060465794,0.0000028267023,0.00079367636,0.00041514653,3.935781e-7,0.000042795895,0.0000282681,0.9921856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907804,0.000029803768,0.00013194463,0.00036821273,0.00021493438,0.00017707731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990169,0.00021076154,0.00010842834,0.00042152693,0.00014474109,0.0000976777],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008268844,0.00030145305,0.00031846156,0.00018447232,0.00037085888,0.00008395561,0.00040727892,0.00028374261,0.00008813324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014506433,0.00031663937,0.00024245848,0.0000014049326,0.0006412244,0.00004305299,0.00023795657,0.0007706246,0.00007103138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009040536,0.000010601172,4.6611324e-9,0.00006621199,0.0001272394,0.000113316404,0.00016591972,2.6662502e-7,8.445756e-7,0.972892,0.025773475,0.0007597268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022145915,0.000063873835,6.234072e-8,0.00029038618,0.00011211686,5.209137e-7,0.0000231784,0.000005662883,0.000014142778,0.09691975,0.90205675,0.00029211707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000801603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000075401877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8762832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008650911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000841333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414105677","doi":"10.1017/9781009604987.009","title":"On Happiness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Relation (database)","score_opus":0.0399013399125833,"score_gpt":0.19981636809969563,"score_spread":0.15991502818711234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414105677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007444607,0.00006429963,0.000023287754,0.0001771077,0.000678323,0.00020584198,0.0006136429,0.00014435114,0.9980857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0068501234,0.00004150784,0.000002138992,0.00071305793,0.00045026725,5.2614627e-7,0.000052725278,0.000030048273,0.9918596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990181,0.000027810047,0.00014241207,0.00039375332,0.00022388391,0.00019405219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894917,0.00018583136,0.00011768491,0.00045603892,0.00018942845,0.000101866186],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008459524,0.00032306186,0.00034652703,0.00019819163,0.00038163905,0.00008460802,0.00044600022,0.00030104825,0.00009719159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000149528305,0.0003397774,0.00024039904,0.0000018705903,0.00063761784,0.000042658303,0.00025092805,0.00078893633,0.00006456407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008975367,0.000011737754,4.729787e-9,0.00009808299,0.00012948191,0.00012912977,0.00015458777,4.3341174e-7,7.3586796e-7,0.96727234,0.031550225,0.00056346145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028267916,0.00004646819,8.537641e-8,0.00034596855,0.00011855207,7.368608e-7,0.000021475918,0.000010389135,0.000009097127,0.0638577,0.93497765,0.0003291811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008870548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007856504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9034274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008833144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000988414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414105765","doi":"10.1017/9781009604987.046","title":"On Whether or Not There Are Ideas of Individuals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Information system; Context (archaeology); Variety (cybernetics)","score_opus":0.057917800545045,"score_gpt":0.22331720076849437,"score_spread":0.16539940022344937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414105765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019977205,0.00010016199,0.0000061515384,0.00015959021,0.0002810367,0.00027068876,0.002123419,0.00006906511,0.9967901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05391335,0.0000626332,0.0000034411526,0.000638199,0.00020962703,6.389067e-7,0.00002483033,0.000035795125,0.94511145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988417,0.000062276355,0.00021730528,0.00036689662,0.00032447482,0.00018733536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845314,0.0003860372,0.000337412,0.0005049663,0.00023024571,0.000088201006],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015503468,0.00033718874,0.0005180878,0.00020564608,0.00023799064,0.00005068242,0.0005283131,0.00037832427,0.00026426872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003263684,0.00029474116,0.00027259983,0.000003156844,0.0007571941,0.00004567032,0.0002958536,0.00073692325,0.00002314883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003490596,0.000023369756,1.5977461e-7,0.0002207218,0.00030247832,0.000091496404,0.0005157738,5.2982693e-7,0.0000019648185,0.98748285,0.010719359,0.0002922225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046380007,0.00010574536,0.0000022928173,0.001002875,0.00021839772,7.354377e-7,0.00014095969,0.0000023896246,0.000066766304,0.04158535,0.9560769,0.00033374276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121423574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026576117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9458975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005904369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012937574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414141462","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2025.2554624","title":"Acting Solely from Good Motives and the Problem of Indifference","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Mechanism (biology)","score_opus":0.02940299023779971,"score_gpt":0.25067025211202987,"score_spread":0.22126726187423015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414141462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6182277,0.001178233,0.00016544065,0.06596126,0.000524787,0.0002788464,0.00006973563,0.000018521736,0.31357545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987587,0.000056808134,0.00015852848,0.0002975705,0.00058756664,0.0000015267607,8.5154306e-7,0.000007954413,0.00013051796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988923,0.00015042063,0.00050565245,0.00011199841,0.00020556412,0.00013406262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998635,0.00053157797,0.0004741483,0.00012417416,0.00017497329,0.00006010941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004964569,0.00013541633,0.00035925675,0.00012209671,0.00018855633,0.0000884531,0.00030405913,0.0000653574,0.00011307218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007120562,0.000081294274,0.00015019313,0.000049129696,0.0011586731,0.0001985818,0.00006517723,0.0006181671,0.0000018569631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015714754,0.000054765904,0.00022191062,0.000047384336,0.00020072487,0.0000058777387,0.015725,0.0000011835663,0.000121532365,0.9815104,0.000016539701,0.0019375237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011463197,0.0001173197,0.00068198924,0.00043083783,0.00009655059,0.0000040681352,0.0013097816,0.00000588041,0.0003097917,0.99505526,0.00077091216,0.00007126593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030190224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010849437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38053095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009672229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006346184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42691794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414239603","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v7i1.8212","title":"Seeing Differences Differently: Peter Best and Morally Relevant Differences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Normative; Treaty; Argument (complex analysis); Human rights","score_opus":0.13228138722616667,"score_gpt":0.2867569309677777,"score_spread":0.15447554374161104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414239603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83987373,0.0006623039,0.000022549752,0.07646153,0.0017408989,0.00014707263,0.00009188265,0.000040514147,0.08095952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659127,0.00015325665,0.000045673438,0.000999125,0.0018894925,0.0000030966821,0.0000036045867,0.000028012202,0.00028644528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982147,0.00017931755,0.0005161727,0.00022973107,0.00038566702,0.00047438405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974464,0.00084526365,0.00026914323,0.00017024591,0.0002636094,0.0010053293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053891825,0.00023969055,0.00043706063,0.0004346537,0.0005439761,0.00048696523,0.00027290612,0.0001209795,0.00077403523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089962594,0.00017499366,0.00014659384,0.0000988745,0.0010407189,0.00051559444,0.0000502084,0.0009625969,0.00014306701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035363988,0.00003686444,0.0015135478,0.000045124074,0.00009531639,0.0005639582,0.0035272622,3.6730492e-7,0.000029909012,0.9931851,0.00027385083,0.0006933367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032830142,0.00041840406,0.0041388837,0.00021326152,0.00008812639,0.0000918043,0.0006798478,0.00007018306,0.000004723779,0.98117095,0.012538072,0.00025745312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005670879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00305857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15671757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046628305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045122544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84751433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414239607","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v8i1.7798","title":"Is The Naturalistic Fallacy Really a Fallacy?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Naturalism; Statement (logic); Term (time); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.09336740934882677,"score_gpt":0.2919711157261695,"score_spread":0.19860370637734276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414239607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005710139,0.001022373,0.0000167953,0.634164,0.0023115121,0.00017477173,0.00019626676,0.000013980153,0.35639018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663495,0.000015809215,0.0000368806,0.030552937,0.002510579,0.00000621634,0.000004267039,0.00002925316,0.00049460033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794847,0.0003937996,0.0005054699,0.00017498841,0.00059725967,0.00038000505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746937,0.0008389133,0.00035873044,0.00030634165,0.00038708674,0.00063957274],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001279373,0.00017745397,0.00026300544,0.00022385878,0.0016237224,0.00030563233,0.0006362061,0.000057539437,0.009724234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009607193,0.00012442684,0.0002761783,0.000094679424,0.0007596196,0.00032546284,0.00007828501,0.0022558642,0.000100773796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006631072,0.000038537717,0.000011104963,0.000010488162,0.0001011578,0.0005126448,0.0055768755,0.000009485473,0.0000045598476,0.9802289,0.013274528,0.00016538342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017356494,0.00017598808,0.000016894039,0.000010605303,0.00004823813,0.0002305999,0.0004933876,0.000018348836,9.815487e-7,0.57940006,0.41932878,0.000102543076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023090288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003786634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9606393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021694443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015933659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414995708","doi":"10.48106/dial.v76.i2","title":"The Metaphysics of Relational States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"dialectica","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stanford Bio-X; University of Cambridge; Leverhulme Trust; Harvard University; University of Oxford; McMaster University","keywords":"Metaphysics; Status quo; Relational view; Proposition","score_opus":0.05622375956589613,"score_gpt":0.2652545114499816,"score_spread":0.20903075188408546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414995708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007580186,0.0021723385,0.000010697326,0.0026074185,0.0029433826,0.00011092217,0.00061863096,0.000010597208,0.9914502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42079988,0.003294512,0.000015776042,0.0011474988,0.005177976,0.00016076205,0.0012950099,0.00010444149,0.56800413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989546,0.00016649938,0.00024654806,0.00014748427,0.00033658187,0.0001483081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977838,0.0016395863,0.00018654697,0.00022245965,0.0001384293,0.000029183986],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003399043,0.0001294243,0.00021695583,0.00004359328,0.00078866293,0.00007466526,0.00022996322,0.00006255073,0.032784622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010226478,0.00008761913,0.0001716428,0.00003935749,0.00066961936,0.000036067122,0.00009924658,0.0007080467,0.0008841684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002042937,0.00003311334,8.515789e-8,0.00002471839,0.000143522,4.5804896e-7,0.0023136518,0.000025110643,0.0000014293007,0.92294097,0.074228734,0.00026776062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032682365,0.00003120334,4.4715853e-7,0.000005533732,0.00002728062,1.274196e-7,0.0000802062,0.00001196969,0.0000055978426,0.45805398,0.5416909,0.000060078648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000708582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004640251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46746218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025120245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001697118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415393455","doi":"10.5840/idpp2011/2012172","title":"Preface","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Index (typography); Latin Americans; Information system","score_opus":0.11708777771361777,"score_gpt":0.2775593941484039,"score_spread":0.16047161643478614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415393455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03207236,0.005250848,0.000014587767,0.0048823585,0.004296645,0.0003354225,0.00064278365,0.00008702018,0.95241797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933213,0.0016789756,0.00013724138,0.000998481,0.0029899143,0.000021539996,0.00002826074,0.00007918862,0.00074507785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672544,0.00022583074,0.0010511852,0.00078426336,0.0007899845,0.0004232901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767834,0.00031231876,0.00062315736,0.00048746873,0.0005385385,0.00036016616],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058890437,0.00061525794,0.0006952188,0.00039038176,0.0003754895,0.00010029367,0.0008372918,0.00032441688,0.01036898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015348714,0.0006140015,0.00043014207,0.000104134306,0.0031552205,0.00061774004,0.00031320046,0.00075204135,0.00011867274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006780895,0.0007242292,0.00036101625,0.00027435386,0.0009058983,0.000030652092,0.01435962,0.0000019663446,0.00023673136,0.98054945,0.00008847484,0.0017895424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008868723,0.00037339135,0.0007406689,0.000494431,0.00017717996,0.000010537766,0.00025343528,0.00007569217,0.0005970936,0.97277206,0.022989668,0.0006289676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030046946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015542379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96124893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006180409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001030373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415462494","doi":"10.1007/s11406-025-00907-9","title":"Love’s Concern","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Manitoba Beekeepers' Association","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Simulacrum; Cultural assimilation; Impermanence","score_opus":0.07733230905404669,"score_gpt":0.29126189770343014,"score_spread":0.21392958864938344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415462494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026296426,0.0005113667,0.000030933887,0.072694734,0.0010211377,0.000097351454,0.000023974064,0.00009825292,0.92289263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802623,0.000024115916,0.000010799562,0.009080001,0.0014003696,0.0000063076004,0.000006776798,0.000013310555,0.009196035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992001,0.000037907346,0.00019888117,0.00021878374,0.00014526072,0.00019903317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939233,0.00012620486,0.000042452153,0.00027429825,0.00010439827,0.00006034045],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017497654,0.00013671792,0.00017321832,0.00009753322,0.00018083726,0.00010635582,0.0002466043,0.00006322468,0.0032722142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066019944,0.000117806645,0.00009828409,0.000046267614,0.00051381026,0.000109553985,0.000085442894,0.00027455183,0.0015508493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018913932,0.000048160593,0.000012257892,0.000025018042,0.000039215087,0.0000048779434,0.001418948,9.3627966e-7,0.00003412085,0.9962672,0.0013692257,0.0007611302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017782318,0.000017019214,0.000013016627,0.000026972555,0.000014349342,3.4236638e-7,0.000064131666,0.000026855532,0.000046883088,0.67052037,0.32900208,0.000090196976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003890942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035635152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97763264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025141393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005313641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415647448","doi":"10.5840/idpp2013/2014182","title":"Preface","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Index (typography); Latin Americans; Information system","score_opus":0.0416839147548366,"score_gpt":0.2671651852120273,"score_spread":0.2254812704571907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415647448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07228557,0.0061716475,0.000010666048,0.039237615,0.0041327877,0.0006769686,0.0004913416,0.00009602297,0.8768974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909184,0.001468913,0.00007310229,0.0018015387,0.004166671,0.000062051244,0.000042327392,0.00007885885,0.0013881477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654084,0.00022582081,0.0010859589,0.0007805077,0.0009073993,0.0004594429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716246,0.0005666927,0.00058636995,0.0004769835,0.00080092123,0.00040657804],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042342625,0.0006313925,0.00071760453,0.00037029202,0.00041052757,0.00032354397,0.00078529987,0.00032545213,0.016935313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001927966,0.00061275857,0.00041225704,0.00010581644,0.0027978348,0.0009750064,0.0003190421,0.00078878173,0.00044666094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013991877,0.00044890298,0.000230713,0.00029645197,0.0007420685,0.00000806967,0.003336424,0.000012709961,0.00083427987,0.9899753,0.00050467585,0.0034705317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008518215,0.00024238242,0.0007351571,0.00048403765,0.00010616197,0.0000075001867,0.00020540826,0.00033612954,0.00024498592,0.9608165,0.035350174,0.0006197353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051945786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009252927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007584745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000094874515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415647460","doi":"10.5840/idpp2013/2014183","title":"Countries Included","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Directory; Government (linguistics); Developed country; Developing country","score_opus":0.03631581074579993,"score_gpt":0.26959971282324524,"score_spread":0.23328390207744532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415647460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08634784,0.0075264275,0.000009753825,0.0604589,0.0048478055,0.00073239364,0.00080146466,0.00011527776,0.83916014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887892,0.0022555855,0.00005302697,0.0032022,0.0045956546,0.00006578289,0.000056856592,0.00008035047,0.0009013355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621254,0.00023533395,0.0012330333,0.0007664311,0.0010666543,0.00048599442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966379,0.0007531967,0.00067155436,0.00046769314,0.001076591,0.00039308486],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052076177,0.00067827303,0.0008263639,0.00043887697,0.00057339977,0.00041643612,0.0008215409,0.00035686928,0.018751157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020789832,0.0006577023,0.00040194983,0.00010448361,0.003865219,0.001086247,0.00039552397,0.00076760515,0.0004891786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020287174,0.0003612313,0.00035045538,0.00036184545,0.00081902766,0.000011120621,0.0044580945,0.000007687351,0.00039527655,0.9911001,0.00058876467,0.0013435507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009761206,0.00023697189,0.0006597289,0.00052542833,0.00011713108,0.000008098703,0.00023040017,0.00022785932,0.00024430087,0.93788695,0.058234658,0.00065234216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006360718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016044862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9024414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009764634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013132756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416278692","doi":"10.3982/te6114","title":"Ex post approaches to prioritarianism and sufficientarianism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Tohoku University; Seoul National University","keywords":"Ex-ante; Axiom; Independence (probability theory); Extension (predicate logic); Class (philosophy); Independence of irrelevant alternatives","score_opus":0.06318566698365898,"score_gpt":0.21320165427321064,"score_spread":0.15001598728955168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416278692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3214016,0.0000456995,0.00030469126,0.039224576,0.00048378063,0.00021274098,0.00005577514,0.00005307596,0.63821805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921759,0.0000141841365,0.0001977048,0.0067076264,0.00024173736,0.000008557914,0.000008239753,0.000014723042,0.0006313397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991581,0.00004180305,0.00022922283,0.00029629585,0.000039100272,0.00023550946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931145,0.0002602701,0.000025022493,0.00023428652,0.000030344381,0.00013860743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043095823,0.00014441193,0.00021270284,0.00008889067,0.00022936314,0.0002291971,0.00019554692,0.00008728603,0.0008958943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001000364,0.00012929583,0.00005548391,0.000020009493,0.0012800803,0.000069554284,0.00019444234,0.00022765217,0.00014332023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052636995,0.000054366043,0.0000025299848,0.000014702484,0.0000263395,0.0000010102848,0.003815725,0.0000053328913,0.0000104650135,0.99463236,0.000022516833,0.0013619937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020133224,0.00007689278,0.00004162997,0.0000146541215,0.00002272329,0.00000120968,0.00077630556,0.0004923271,0.000038811897,0.970236,0.02794309,0.00015501487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031015257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009815483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6707743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034821038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005922938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416623191","doi":"10.1515/kant-2025-2027","title":"Introduction: Kant and the Berlin Academy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kant-Studien","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Doctrine; Institution; Competition (biology); Connection (principal bundle); Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.021298276072605284,"score_gpt":0.2525311577615372,"score_spread":0.23123288168893188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416623191","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023775324,0.005071048,0.000022365453,0.5253872,0.001687754,0.0003400839,0.000016458232,0.00009903977,0.4436007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98540395,0.00038885092,0.000005473461,0.004277415,0.0028001238,0.000029613135,0.0000013479483,0.0000066590037,0.0070865694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992431,0.00008385723,0.00017840932,0.00021458781,0.00011421832,0.00016584965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995268,0.00020505421,0.000041538882,0.00014467015,0.000052917563,0.000029031231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006194266,0.00010927582,0.00019143212,0.000042347605,0.0006847578,0.00009130985,0.00014544776,0.000053453077,0.00025026692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012841036,0.00006276958,0.000056791872,0.000040983596,0.0011898533,0.00006682092,0.0001701642,0.000389721,0.00006299522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053077714,0.000019991994,0.000011681152,0.000021417414,0.00007545639,9.795691e-7,0.0062079974,5.740343e-7,0.000005013624,0.98740166,0.004525443,0.00167671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004161085,0.0000106314765,0.00009576187,0.000017225615,0.00003530387,9.885442e-7,0.00055865565,0.000024073595,0.0000107152,0.5574381,0.44133812,0.000054322176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058174883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009847062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012800721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015330848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52666724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416758761","doi":"10.1007/s11245-025-10331-z","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on the Principle of Charity in Argumentation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topoi","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.030866923382628947,"score_gpt":0.2871933432045827,"score_spread":0.2563264198219537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416758761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28340614,0.000012441685,0.000008784788,0.34199634,0.0014484613,0.00028136524,0.0000089454525,0.0000100608095,0.37282747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844904,0.0000039054935,0.0000017793682,0.0023877656,0.009112418,0.0000129977825,0.0000020432105,0.00000184787,0.003986868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996393,0.00005270811,0.00009854331,0.00007416859,0.00008159764,0.00005371334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997267,0.0000786619,0.000022126751,0.0001368373,0.000028799017,0.0000068708646],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038921656,0.000035405224,0.000050710456,0.000034125856,0.00011159302,0.000024402536,0.00009639625,0.000015821523,0.002456683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009279409,0.00001928511,0.00001872719,0.0000405565,0.0000830736,0.000024809568,0.000027728885,0.00013110528,0.00009016941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025903522,0.000033341617,0.0000059837525,0.0000050997824,0.0000039267484,9.2280175e-8,0.0054573743,0.000012440634,0.000028460821,0.9898201,0.003122695,0.0014845774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000422545,0.000021088668,0.00031910563,0.000007734663,0.0000021030514,2.1884226e-8,0.00031091663,0.000011535259,0.00056573894,0.41176865,0.5869342,0.00001665429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006604296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000452328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70108426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017585271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011867338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416983807","doi":"10.5840/idpp2007/2008152","title":"Preface","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Index (typography); Fifteenth; Latin Americans","score_opus":0.08048677221267354,"score_gpt":0.2799047370671111,"score_spread":0.19941796485443758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416983807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12078885,0.009069657,0.000012622596,0.017814694,0.0044493666,0.00037560868,0.0008172385,0.00010268232,0.8465693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98717165,0.0051066447,0.00006505755,0.0012700659,0.004824319,0.00001981142,0.00004600969,0.00007861235,0.0014178297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964203,0.0002281844,0.0010688762,0.00080346334,0.001047541,0.00043161272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742794,0.000538752,0.0005916096,0.00047490993,0.0005961459,0.00037065378],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044893747,0.0006290909,0.0007765653,0.00039333032,0.000750682,0.0000858087,0.0007488186,0.00032358282,0.00409888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020477841,0.00063533295,0.00046727798,0.000118687865,0.004636214,0.0006035556,0.0002905724,0.00082974933,0.00011720514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047287694,0.000572585,0.00050703855,0.00023634087,0.0007719745,0.0000744835,0.0073093325,0.000021060418,0.0003888685,0.9886062,0.000310276,0.00072895444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011656075,0.00030068512,0.0007738434,0.0004192694,0.00011004392,0.00005528688,0.0001133318,0.0001603124,0.00031747832,0.93056595,0.065355316,0.0006628584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015954797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007923252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8663828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079986734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016728655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417000655","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5679443","title":"&lt;p&gt;Setting Boundaries and Standards in Transportation: In Between Principles of Sufficient Arianism and Limitarianism&lt;/p&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Work (physics); Set (abstract data type); Context (archaeology); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.021494946273267507,"score_gpt":0.25856163480793337,"score_spread":0.23706668853466586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417000655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9323128,0.040580988,0.0012844135,0.007888506,0.00079732464,0.0008511751,0.0012790298,0.000027569486,0.014978184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96737427,0.031352375,0.00007679863,0.00008133362,0.0006103266,0.000019266632,0.000051800114,0.00004714793,0.00038668708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922538,0.00058030995,0.002437747,0.0009050237,0.0013038664,0.0025192546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689883,0.00073245435,0.0010627883,0.00036969117,0.00072302483,0.00021321657],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014166421,0.0007598091,0.0015046647,0.0008900746,0.001273768,0.0010113145,0.00055275456,0.0007418904,0.00009125813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050187635,0.00075264886,0.00028148084,0.0002006944,0.002115832,0.0003302535,0.00025512537,0.008254867,6.758436e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039303908,0.0001987111,0.0014708808,0.0005936839,0.00041779203,0.000028071516,0.030673156,0.0002016855,0.000043780186,0.96098095,0.0000013409989,0.004996908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002135776,0.0007392276,0.0073728166,0.0020434249,0.0002912844,0.00002843194,0.0040804623,0.00019681435,0.000028850844,0.95402634,0.028396273,0.0006602997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045609334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07440301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073946916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001657565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018153513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417155380","doi":"10.1353/hms.2025.a976688","title":"From Moral Theology to Moral Philosophy: Cicero and Visions of Humanity from Locke to Hume by Tim Stuart-Buttle (review)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Cicero; Humanity; Moral theology; Moral philosophy","score_opus":0.09262444428748452,"score_gpt":0.3382264091885602,"score_spread":0.24560196490107566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417155380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46309698,0.18685426,0.000059803733,0.090589814,0.0020917952,0.0015911858,0.0038926662,0.00023598938,0.2515875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98525745,0.003024008,0.00007369648,0.00989435,0.0005793661,0.00006756991,0.0000530494,0.000020260222,0.0010302556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843353,0.00013180914,0.00046532828,0.00047074084,0.0002196059,0.00027899118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859214,0.0005078955,0.00010141242,0.00040894895,0.00027542637,0.00011415093],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027634276,0.00028561434,0.00079604186,0.000089889516,0.0004798495,0.000035554327,0.0003039841,0.00007606515,0.0010583035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027452057,0.00022966918,0.00011612024,0.00007594426,0.0008149351,0.00008513543,0.0006288448,0.00029199236,0.000115062976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067971596,0.000149155,0.00012843574,0.00016434162,0.00048918056,0.0000043131863,0.013419628,0.0000010720349,0.00017557418,0.93722206,0.047258534,0.00091974257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032161485,0.00022376148,0.00041679337,0.0006820388,0.0001722705,1.1075496e-7,0.0016274829,0.0000036516437,0.00014557721,0.9464598,0.049705245,0.00024169634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011343814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011027353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5221605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028967113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024753659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417155575","doi":"10.1353/hms.2025.a976679","title":"Christianity in Crisis: David Hume and the Genesis of Thomas Reid’s An Inquiry into the Human Mind, on the Principles of Common Sense","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Atheism; Common sense; Epicureanism; Calvinism; Christianity; Enlightenment; Relativism; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.1694936195391003,"score_gpt":0.35817630664358285,"score_spread":0.18868268710448255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417155575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9495115,0.010606363,7.429985e-7,0.014227881,0.0001541028,0.00030063378,0.000013141394,0.000011355777,0.025174277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720204,0.0012380724,0.0000034675727,0.0010819632,0.00016917208,0.000043359778,0.0000017980838,0.000009192437,0.0002509434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984289,0.0006019348,0.0004236564,0.00019672792,0.00020521054,0.00014359399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997848,0.0013008688,0.0001761178,0.00050184294,0.00015666996,0.000016522063],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018657095,0.00016796541,0.00040679777,0.00007321804,0.0009272978,0.00004914822,0.00028376916,0.0000496813,0.000023660532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030066224,0.00007405825,0.00008814065,0.00006773515,0.0040103965,0.000060731436,0.00033739101,0.00031996318,0.0000013410131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008452095,0.000087721244,0.0001240081,0.00008188946,0.000153134,0.0000016403278,0.20763458,0.0000034165103,0.00003197085,0.79136425,0.00026133508,0.00017154748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055514945,0.0001330248,0.00412958,0.00021358735,0.00012158594,4.5469338e-7,0.14241588,0.000019466272,0.000349534,0.8407426,0.011198928,0.000120221746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014615343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066289757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065218695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016343607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022031614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417155606","doi":"10.1353/hms.2025.a976680","title":"Humean Loyalty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Loyalty; Virtue; Relation (database); Self","score_opus":0.13247372223163484,"score_gpt":0.3602470128070686,"score_spread":0.22777329057543377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417155606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009751101,0.0052907076,0.0000078720705,0.011204988,0.0010831633,0.00007314023,0.000009248932,0.000112857124,0.97246695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97344244,0.00023753245,0.000007902791,0.0026058997,0.0004346471,0.000014534587,0.0000014423499,0.0000059394047,0.023249652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994531,0.000030190224,0.00013796793,0.0001415722,0.000090817426,0.00014631152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995195,0.00015289661,0.000025440595,0.00014741099,0.00013474036,0.000019993498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001951734,0.00009576118,0.0001703976,0.000057629994,0.0005130214,0.000052094976,0.00010848308,0.000024745534,0.00041644607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013241947,0.00007169195,0.00006462136,0.00002652627,0.0006610523,0.000049673527,0.0001150066,0.0001530926,0.00014985491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006236263,0.000023472352,0.000019266616,0.000046474193,0.00013192985,0.0000024075493,0.008635874,3.052517e-7,0.0000051437414,0.9831359,0.006981426,0.0010115913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008565497,0.000015027667,0.000036142108,0.00003687677,0.000016734095,7.291461e-8,0.0020537043,0.0000019447318,0.000021031516,0.65930957,0.33836538,0.00005786142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019945748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024224409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96369135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016636359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017574535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45597926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417343760","doi":"10.1017/9781009292030","title":"Law and Morality in Kant","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Morality; Autonomy; Punishment (psychology); Politics; Jurisprudence; Moral philosophy; Legal realism; Private law","score_opus":0.03696465850082356,"score_gpt":0.21850641712965022,"score_spread":0.18154175862882665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417343760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00071634306,0.00089934346,0.0000071570075,0.00033416727,0.00055616826,0.0004563856,0.0013635424,0.00006526412,0.99560165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1372098,0.00053244916,0.000005519898,0.00114312,0.00040740948,0.0000012836622,0.000109569264,0.00002591285,0.86056495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978971,0.00033227005,0.00033759957,0.00072538015,0.00026646222,0.00044118045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985052,0.00036846256,0.00018705535,0.0005533757,0.00017509906,0.0002108258],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040601895,0.00048766466,0.0007310473,0.00024038175,0.0006390263,0.00022151558,0.0005148502,0.00060668803,0.000015789401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024546029,0.00055694266,0.00021194006,0.000011553876,0.0024678237,0.00012388825,0.00086615025,0.0015407895,0.000014135443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020781478,0.00005894522,0.00000161332,0.0007106935,0.00017774585,0.0004744283,0.0007341111,0.0000011359464,0.000002767156,0.99476975,0.0027319838,0.00012902368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010032628,0.00006151142,0.000011770905,0.0008322127,0.00028575034,0.000002043293,0.00020731684,0.00007962323,0.000015109212,0.016840622,0.9801042,0.0005565734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039032863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020517575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9779291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002565023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032671628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417415662","doi":"10.1007/s11098-025-02426-5","title":"The structure of critical sets","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Equivalence (formal languages); Population; Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Interval (graph theory)","score_opus":0.0811562597054753,"score_gpt":0.35464581364954345,"score_spread":0.27348955394406815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417415662","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032234754,0.019859154,0.0000142792205,0.73526263,0.0029090066,0.00027914837,0.00014619066,0.00011424347,0.20918061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698085,0.00027580283,0.000012488962,0.0019858468,0.00056881673,0.0000061179594,0.000001460963,0.000008512415,0.00016009722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988531,0.00010314565,0.0003467963,0.00020310984,0.0002547765,0.00023908106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968489,0.0023860543,0.000051588788,0.0002646579,0.00040346774,0.000045366505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024817893,0.00015787451,0.00030352737,0.000045933477,0.0009731808,0.000058409154,0.00029928487,0.00007335534,0.00010668255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018370113,0.00008828428,0.00012268931,0.00006682447,0.004092846,0.000058469697,0.00023569076,0.0004207369,0.000011541226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000394489,0.000049566464,0.000009364975,0.00010892055,0.0001692692,0.0000020788732,0.0016239056,6.478869e-7,0.00005174442,0.99680495,0.00032642245,0.0008136865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013595758,0.000049761828,0.000034567605,0.00006244879,0.00005258784,5.3598717e-7,0.00055120606,0.000012950062,0.00018394913,0.97661465,0.022208415,0.00009296715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008864072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007642335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001986867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003177631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417513414","doi":"10.1086/738314","title":": <i>Kant’s Reason: The Unity of Reason and the Limits of Comprehension in Kant</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Comprehension; Limit (mathematics)","score_opus":0.09361536783431028,"score_gpt":0.31371269324973977,"score_spread":0.22009732541542948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417513414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48176047,0.0058896914,0.000021531305,0.20683032,0.00060580345,0.0004362741,0.00004721286,0.000028395125,0.3043803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996003,0.0010791332,0.0000063819134,0.0024941876,0.000061487954,0.0000037510015,0.0000021409844,0.0000048914944,0.00034505254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987472,0.0005885523,0.00025223548,0.00010595817,0.00020914892,0.00009689939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507964,0.0043190615,0.00010513686,0.00027623828,0.0002029397,0.000016981858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025577515,0.00008393226,0.00021625221,0.000039258164,0.00024780756,0.000025489106,0.00020165666,0.00013831696,0.000027171809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009342759,0.00004345444,0.000054551645,0.00007215358,0.0021536588,0.000036197765,0.000112149064,0.0011790991,0.000001110282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012174322,0.00004013595,0.00004312859,0.00011103073,0.000017252287,6.6318717e-7,0.021606505,0.0000049045107,0.000048660946,0.97726685,0.00008518109,0.0006539727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006183344,0.000031860698,0.0005171499,0.0003391705,0.00002803096,6.138495e-7,0.0017086236,0.00022758992,0.00025682992,0.96189654,0.034322627,0.000052616764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079490157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016568444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51424253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006108906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009334618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7935245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47482545","doi":"10.1023/a:1017543131839","title":"Fiona Cowie, What's Within? Nativism Reconsidered, Philosophy of Mind Series.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minds and Machines","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Epistemology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.04566698216266881,"score_gpt":0.2510462193455794,"score_spread":0.2053792371829106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47482545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76775897,0.0024131807,0.000006434312,0.016539255,0.0008579758,0.00016425268,0.00006174283,0.000029593743,0.21216863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956478,0.00044723589,0.000091156624,0.00068812177,0.0006021112,0.000008341531,0.000016303517,0.000017901593,0.0024810655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991293,0.00004537137,0.00029024904,0.0002193009,0.00016156818,0.00015423831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938047,0.0001293852,0.00012454457,0.00016657248,0.000118464304,0.0000805887],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026429992,0.00017228271,0.00026443822,0.00009528722,0.00022968306,0.00015869598,0.00010325006,0.000078148674,0.0013325358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005696951,0.00013134711,0.00007181145,0.00003790313,0.0006394214,0.0005225323,0.000062735075,0.00020500935,0.0000139505755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008562922,0.000084750776,0.00008353124,0.000051328818,0.00005145936,0.000019035337,0.011269896,9.179123e-7,0.00009325651,0.9705874,0.000089746034,0.017583081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039609463,0.0001560225,0.00009468194,0.00011512088,0.000024606341,0.00003719953,0.0009613155,0.000078310455,0.00013519712,0.9509612,0.0468514,0.00018887194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008755648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000408269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22788882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000048526936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029714523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W572001530","doi":"","title":"Heiner Bielefeldt , Symbolic Representation in Kant's Practical Philosophy . Reviewed by","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08514676212067014,"score_gpt":0.3228521717228403,"score_spread":0.23770540960217018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W572001530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023796773,0.0007656318,0.000114185736,0.1553248,0.00034914704,0.00034595467,0.000016433894,0.00012557347,0.8191615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99181026,0.00038003596,0.00008513634,0.006117202,0.00060369703,0.0000267284,0.000028751936,0.000018367995,0.00092980725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885994,0.000089901805,0.00033423235,0.0002681373,0.0002351967,0.00021256384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993812,0.00014610722,0.00006905028,0.00024079689,0.000078813144,0.00008402022],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034055932,0.00013727913,0.00022453805,0.000080783015,0.00011775951,0.000100173034,0.00010640071,0.00008283719,0.0016539484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025341025,0.00010635592,0.000080237885,0.00007307412,0.00023849659,0.0003290949,0.000043097833,0.00037938767,0.000350155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020102008,0.00018210676,0.000010578266,0.000026906073,0.000011948454,0.000015162106,0.0013985577,0.0000046373507,0.00011738215,0.99703336,0.000868723,0.00031052838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052201946,0.00005561248,0.000017841969,0.00006794577,0.000010863508,0.0000039062006,0.00013100046,0.00001564526,0.00015444246,0.93756044,0.061304435,0.00015584304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043441076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024106905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9680135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000345454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045912228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W587872364","doi":"10.1002/9780470776377","title":"The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02478602166072085,"score_gpt":0.25022691787397094,"score_spread":0.22544089621325009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W587872364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000010875165,0.00035378474,0.00001589315,0.0063659716,0.0005052858,0.00023338631,0.00009495135,0.000098256554,0.9923314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00038099824,0.000074961245,0.0000144900205,0.0036528588,0.003968049,0.000020538424,0.00006221399,0.000056102806,0.9917698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987958,0.000036353544,0.00033706878,0.00026778318,0.00029883918,0.0002641653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998739,0.0004431062,0.00008380524,0.00048373392,0.00014968445,0.00010065038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031010155,0.00027101752,0.0002556816,0.000059740683,0.0006264587,0.00037894744,0.00041973742,0.00017690563,0.00443325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003570839,0.00015469988,0.00019189517,0.000008761627,0.0005255502,0.00003521662,0.000115347604,0.00044850176,0.0029227783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004380681,0.000007041909,1.3371217e-8,0.0000063766934,0.000018935745,0.0000043658865,0.0002469528,4.853798e-7,1.1954837e-7,0.5316594,0.46716124,0.0008906619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041730735,0.00002912711,1.2805347e-7,0.000024609133,0.000018349281,3.1482068e-7,0.0000138196865,0.0000013111821,9.0661433e-7,0.48913905,0.51060224,0.0001283844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003275173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057859537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043441042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000791353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015774503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W634572341","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0010","title":"The Moral Sentiments in Hume’s Treatise : A Classificatory Problem","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12537655131939265,"score_gpt":0.30236279971171254,"score_spread":0.17698624839231988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W634572341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0801123,0.0062772306,0.000004110199,0.015655842,0.0008896617,0.0004579928,0.000017209955,0.00014270934,0.89644295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929849,0.00035030994,0.000010464008,0.00040838143,0.0003937702,0.00007779276,0.0000017870585,0.000013923049,0.0057586827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990086,0.00013780383,0.00023647152,0.000191113,0.00017753108,0.00024849217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930555,0.00030443736,0.000068525515,0.00021022596,0.000075847485,0.000035442314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057644263,0.00013787895,0.00020300923,0.000046350593,0.00072889705,0.00009908979,0.00015872525,0.000032651802,0.00008010362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008736588,0.000082542596,0.00006464788,0.000027240641,0.00092386093,0.00007644796,0.000103224185,0.00021636742,0.00012519697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014975329,0.000051427607,0.00021588277,0.000023245322,0.00007342809,0.0000021293881,0.014556419,8.4148604e-7,0.000008627947,0.9808761,0.0012683495,0.0029085798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029930778,0.000055451652,0.00053082686,0.000052870986,0.000017302016,2.7274467e-7,0.0029376242,0.000042667958,0.000009892374,0.823121,0.17281416,0.00011859114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042455806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011494692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9128726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003272974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014038081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5606161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W67419089","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-9077-6_10","title":"Value, Obligation, and Luck","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Library of ethics and applied philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Obligation; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.06003138342664225,"score_gpt":0.22574842878053294,"score_spread":0.1657170453538907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W67419089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018067753,0.0035231367,0.0000020264708,0.01676201,0.00017693585,0.00025106006,0.00030630338,0.0000862144,0.9787116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86169136,0.021304645,0.0003273344,0.013520577,0.0041140253,0.000021437365,0.00037976136,0.0002664556,0.098374404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983461,0.000034823206,0.0005190402,0.00050168094,0.000413238,0.0001851565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983848,0.0007062058,0.0003286424,0.00033357023,0.000069108326,0.00017772622],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026274798,0.00043572113,0.0006144635,0.00019001476,0.0005804132,0.000119283955,0.00022546516,0.0007884113,0.0007232412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018522116,0.00039745893,0.00012854917,0.000015892674,0.0028048565,0.00023157426,0.00027316803,0.002359719,0.000025105188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047496396,0.000021996124,6.127979e-7,0.00043827711,0.00009911839,0.0000054447296,0.0054982384,6.8515146e-7,0.0000074014943,0.9927164,0.00071674463,0.00044759014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019778544,0.000061679755,0.0000020713278,0.00020483382,0.00004066077,0.0000034640366,0.000019263216,0.0000035918283,0.000025535845,0.68054944,0.31859154,0.0003001539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000050179215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001349015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88033724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000037159782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011339591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6925259134","doi":"10.17863/cam.119474","title":"Knowledge and Cognition in Kant","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Apollo (University of Cambridge)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Corpus Christi College, University of Cambridge; Arts and Humanities Research Council; Gates Cambridge Trust; University of Toronto; Mitacs; Cambridge Trust","keywords":"Transcendental number; Transcendental philosophy; Meaning (existential); Cognition; A priori and a posteriori; Experiential learning; Experiential knowledge","score_opus":0.023240461045839593,"score_gpt":0.23106836654627763,"score_spread":0.20782790550043803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6925259134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39937282,0.002072608,0.0000012497917,0.00039920997,0.00054551306,0.00011294044,0.000113514434,0.000029592844,0.59735256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558419,0.00046378252,0.0000038813323,0.00002613584,0.00012867418,2.9674902e-7,0.00030609834,0.00001502487,0.043214224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999437,0.000034123394,0.00010393429,0.00020650327,0.00010872358,0.000109756525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996411,0.00006783118,0.00007127647,0.000086494096,0.00008784645,0.0000454389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014335531,0.00012715567,0.00023862878,0.00026755052,0.00011847648,0.000030235935,0.000102405196,0.00015784171,0.00022678824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010678474,0.0001485658,0.000088056164,0.00004341686,0.00022144744,0.00010425126,0.00003605771,0.00036914984,0.00010573229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007309386,0.0000488008,0.0000020910848,0.0005650111,0.000055710665,0.00003280083,0.030448783,7.908881e-8,0.000065265485,0.9655883,0.00080523797,0.002314879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015517452,0.00024927198,0.0020962644,0.0030397612,0.0007160081,0.000005324001,0.08032842,0.00038517863,0.000101336176,0.6299757,0.28059557,0.0009554821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008455987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010690918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5564691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022187922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007861288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60583377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6932104910","doi":"10.5683/sp3/cccidb","title":"Graves et al. 2024 data for \"Investigating the potential uptake of microplastic-derived carbon into a boreal lake food web using carbon-13 labelled plastic\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Borealis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Food web; Stable isotope ratio; Carbon fibers; Carbon-14; Isotopes of carbon; Boreal; Dissolved organic carbon","score_opus":0.06381898251837159,"score_gpt":0.28751704111535153,"score_spread":0.22369805859697994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6932104910","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014258507,0.0008295821,0.0000068362297,0.0023816496,0.0032113963,0.0005996023,0.9898004,0.00005882941,0.0016858735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011242547,0.0002904332,0.00013335171,0.0011559707,0.002999414,0.000064399275,0.9839668,0.000121288576,0.000025777084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969029,0.00021515277,0.00091394474,0.00085917854,0.00060512125,0.00050374144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965176,0.001098259,0.00048679355,0.0014549989,0.00028243123,0.00015991119],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010363318,0.0006253432,0.000805567,0.00022525903,0.0003406129,0.00043462968,0.0013376742,0.00033602375,0.00011515502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010627263,0.0004495966,0.00024055548,0.00009368423,0.0012801051,0.00009034071,0.0010461693,0.0012084114,0.000003336327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008923139,0.00007605916,2.2716644e-7,0.00085490634,0.00068827573,0.000018760338,0.0014230676,0.000025025114,0.0003780092,0.041128583,0.9552758,0.00004206322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051363563,0.00021530039,0.0000014428032,0.00071896147,0.0011022703,0.000008152524,0.0005005977,0.008612116,0.000023081899,0.09281623,0.8950257,0.00046251598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025352314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3296286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30427626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036832942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072440435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6948086381","doi":"10.48336/85kk-ft75","title":"Hegel's critique of modern presupposition and Plato's aporetic moment. Masters thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Hegelianism; Greeks; Hubris; Dialectic; Skepticism; Reading (process); Materialism","score_opus":0.03888665199409196,"score_gpt":0.24907607056375722,"score_spread":0.21018941856966525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6948086381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7309979,0.000198628,0.0006095843,0.0013896859,0.005820532,0.00080780743,0.00042579664,0.00013150828,0.25961858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870113,0.00031716202,0.00010146659,0.000011760895,0.0024429276,1.1920717e-7,0.00005552821,0.000027708731,0.010032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957048,0.0015522431,0.00032538277,0.0007735635,0.0010630265,0.00058096054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996471,0.0007607612,0.00026824613,0.0006164009,0.0014832586,0.00040035654],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009062836,0.00031446767,0.00066609273,0.0007059784,0.0013976124,0.00013460452,0.00083002547,0.00038130337,0.00040215653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013574839,0.00038969025,0.00031896078,0.00046404303,0.0025761065,0.0008678412,0.0008373098,0.00088064757,0.0000093587305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0071918108,0.0005376752,0.00012873847,0.00037719597,0.0004799326,0.0021622267,0.01022157,0.000081027174,0.021167666,0.95650244,0.0006577541,0.00049197744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.033550214,0.0042265155,0.00058263016,0.0014453726,0.0021284148,0.00017329294,0.07768212,0.002230357,0.046056088,0.34832913,0.48050407,0.0030918133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003649275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013067002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6081733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046457088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095459225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958336980","doi":"10.60692/6m1c5-y6894","title":"International Asteroid Warning Network Timing Campaign: 2019 XS","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Abbey Ridge Observatory; Dominion Astrophysical Observatory","funders":"","keywords":"Asteroid; Observer (physics); Minor planet; Position (finance); Astrometry; Near-Earth object","score_opus":0.06384253954195869,"score_gpt":0.21572681037637328,"score_spread":0.15188427083441458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958336980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14738819,0.000033829383,0.0047161845,0.0021428843,0.012020099,0.0005970373,0.0006920275,0.0007096109,0.83170015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964053,8.811737e-8,0.000030493797,0.001165269,0.0010783416,0.000057034093,0.00008501951,0.0000112418,0.0011672329],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987372,0.000100569036,0.00043431701,0.00010785709,0.00041033383,0.0002097147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993709,0.000017361312,0.00026251766,0.00017860041,0.000115844916,0.000054807228],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007031308,0.00012403703,0.00014620711,0.00013958492,0.0008344783,0.00034127987,0.00026432323,0.000034930796,0.0016313752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000110321735,0.00011056537,0.00007789855,0.000044460277,0.000048187485,0.0005460793,0.00021497195,0.00028841273,0.0007222442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010252329,0.0000041518624,0.0013691289,0.00011068037,0.000116494426,0.000006868764,0.59623545,0.013019869,2.8111276e-7,0.38600034,0.002172891,0.00086134375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014340614,0.00014665235,0.00045768605,0.00018506426,0.000044225508,0.000072142895,0.093747385,0.022787735,0.000007140744,0.002251298,0.878211,0.000655608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000074387253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.115848e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87603813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011296418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022745688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983364804","doi":"","title":"Meaning and Social Phenomena","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Oxford","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Narrative; Intelligibility (philosophy); Social life; Ask price; Meaning-making","score_opus":0.03421032326991803,"score_gpt":0.21971280199186452,"score_spread":0.18550247872194647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983364804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000082566294,0.00037092707,0.0000016512953,0.0018136778,0.00036911227,0.0001679375,0.0083274795,0.0020445185,0.9868221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14555123,0.00012447369,0.000020822941,0.0021612681,0.00792732,0.000034094188,0.0010413175,0.0031973873,0.8399421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984426,0.00005417712,0.00029463245,0.00047463,0.00032684146,0.00040713235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992846,0.00015100374,0.00017037727,0.00021239262,0.000016188329,0.00016543458],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013302396,0.00041429055,0.00042401662,0.00026547347,0.00030589546,0.0022635555,0.00033309357,0.00032881318,0.008403376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006933308,0.0003671943,0.00016275323,0.00006554041,0.0005561346,0.0008807488,0.000345285,0.00086386746,0.006120226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015275207,0.00003713275,0.00003836595,0.00013286415,0.00010251444,0.000025571968,0.00045221872,1.37295855e-8,3.1920308e-7,0.93517745,0.05992008,0.0040982263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013799967,0.00001742204,0.0000025013223,0.00010909484,0.000016233027,7.169705e-7,0.00006916481,0.0000013587606,8.0801533e-7,0.3770877,0.6222613,0.00029568333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000119246715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041792322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5623412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014929709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048009013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987119502","doi":"","title":"\"The Self-Preference Principle: Benthamâs Transition to Epistemological and Democratic Radicalism\"","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Democracy; Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.04197352052778993,"score_gpt":0.2212308065869384,"score_spread":0.17925728605914845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987119502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8881364,0.00035028046,0.000102138096,0.021677235,0.00020658378,0.0004949231,0.0010348733,0.0005157629,0.0874818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99472344,0.00009021063,0.00011538042,0.0035110349,0.0003647654,0.000036907895,0.00010211825,0.00003826128,0.0010178792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982361,0.00015620748,0.00041867595,0.00039769875,0.00037152148,0.00041974857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862283,0.00051794975,0.000072131064,0.00029586998,0.000048120615,0.00044307084],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002677013,0.00026093924,0.00024913985,0.00006694753,0.0012054361,0.0011766864,0.00039985243,0.00013580316,0.00037418536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002584013,0.00017398802,0.000111827394,0.000095120915,0.00072886335,0.0012766424,0.0001822065,0.000605416,0.0006732559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012088242,0.00015985331,0.0005946771,0.00003860991,0.000038735798,0.000066179855,0.0008758053,0.0000014813301,0.000010619539,0.9955321,0.00067048945,0.0018905768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002902041,0.00015224806,0.0008438765,0.000046367626,0.000013895813,0.000046080506,0.00005179866,0.000100372796,0.00006380434,0.6098392,0.38825363,0.00029851063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000019039326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036937406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38758314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019445579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077376026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987126486","doi":"","title":"Scanlonian contractualism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Dismissal","score_opus":0.08657595891514842,"score_gpt":0.31472968086596126,"score_spread":0.22815372195081285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987126486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011645759,0.00045254012,7.6800814e-7,0.002441399,0.00049945456,0.0002600548,0.00036339398,0.0000061100914,0.99596465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010840859,0.000044348908,0.00011804961,0.00086312357,0.004172174,0.000010198604,0.00006020302,0.00021622557,0.9836748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922866,0.000036873837,0.0001527163,0.0002578868,0.0001430576,0.00018082035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943113,0.000045425928,0.00012553044,0.00028871367,0.000023892295,0.000085285494],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019779982,0.00018584676,0.00028037486,0.000076040196,0.00010330722,0.00047992787,0.0005497571,0.00020551439,0.63355356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018791923,0.00015248578,0.000065390486,0.000009260217,0.00031102158,0.00006472878,0.00013277993,0.0003304466,0.010537945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007885646,0.000057960166,6.0491764e-8,0.0000067010947,0.00007234715,0.000016405746,0.0036276255,4.0594003e-8,9.3772013e-7,0.7510849,0.1569201,0.088205025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022228873,0.000017890732,2.0715449e-7,0.00013004783,0.00002759619,0.0000012563819,0.00009774626,0.0000012797514,0.000003925965,0.029355954,0.96991163,0.00023017621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006038464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00857938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81299156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013325655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007187853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99023247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6988134770","doi":"","title":"Williams, Scanlon, and the Normativity of Morality","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Nucleofection; Hyporeflexia; Circumstantial evidence; Pretext; Demotion","score_opus":0.011271308674741772,"score_gpt":0.1887796122043005,"score_spread":0.17750830352955874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6988134770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18888734,0.00014604977,0.000004973556,0.08894193,0.0007314278,0.0006083969,0.00049185456,0.00012883726,0.72005916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8103589,0.00042301128,0.0000135417995,0.0002193417,0.00009971095,5.404805e-7,0.00026689155,0.000022790251,0.18859528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882865,0.00029523676,0.00017232297,0.00026712898,0.00025713647,0.00017951986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987665,0.0003555573,0.0003311033,0.0003715949,0.00009613429,0.00007911226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015223243,0.00024611552,0.00047440513,0.00013658972,0.00033195634,0.00010670673,0.0003978391,0.00022343041,0.00076533755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003078656,0.00018919219,0.00018933199,0.00007165193,0.00087814865,0.0008332242,0.00014697459,0.00062337425,0.000029001536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004680296,0.000039266266,0.0000845191,0.0003567845,0.00009904652,0.000005171586,0.0100745745,0.000001212179,4.017512e-7,0.98242265,0.006339109,0.0001092352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002112925,0.00014149019,0.0021436873,0.00049216015,0.0003641709,1.584179e-7,0.01915147,0.00001810141,0.00027828937,0.4475234,0.52699864,0.0007755031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076396377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045320092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6214715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018422534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015457846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995233423","doi":"","title":"Opposites","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Sketch; Attunement; Phenomenon; Irony; Economic Justice; Moral imperative","score_opus":0.03049832940574171,"score_gpt":0.20238350923627177,"score_spread":0.17188517983053006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995233423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7778972,0.00009897319,0.0000029698604,0.0015509769,0.00027682958,0.00012863266,0.000050316226,0.000060973332,0.21993314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787823,0.000015972451,0.000077733595,0.00035571094,0.00014558078,1.410187e-7,0.000022661112,0.000019628564,0.02058029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987827,0.000111128924,0.00013953645,0.00031970016,0.00036372716,0.00028321784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896586,0.00015705124,0.00013656897,0.0004102966,0.00018012147,0.00015008514],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047574894,0.00016599201,0.0002805543,0.00017008434,0.00047505525,0.000055007415,0.0005479558,0.00015295576,0.015992256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038598315,0.00018442978,0.00021640578,0.00007621321,0.00049753836,0.00061772665,0.00026386045,0.00046948384,0.0026062846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020702108,0.0001166676,0.012148017,0.00007875082,0.000107233245,0.000019289753,0.010558848,0.000004235861,0.00405769,0.97212815,0.00014897849,0.0004251077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003283249,0.00058314693,0.041195035,0.0002682144,0.00018485852,0.000013298754,0.0079400055,0.000077591445,0.001969397,0.62386405,0.3195171,0.001104018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008964908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026395044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3482641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048235226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048446425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995602450","doi":"","title":"Parfit’s non-identity problem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Library of the Belarusian State University (Belarusian State University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Harm; Debt; Metaphysics; Proposition; Term (time)","score_opus":0.011290764659028308,"score_gpt":0.1676481942448039,"score_spread":0.1563574295857756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995602450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11589673,0.00016760832,0.00044506017,0.0045260983,0.0007670199,0.00058650994,0.006425901,0.0005425266,0.87064254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8660336,0.00020921747,0.000071737595,0.0001855371,0.00010866401,1.5890959e-7,0.00012222854,0.000060916478,0.13320796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978112,0.00015682369,0.00031878182,0.0006283818,0.000513715,0.0005710707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863946,0.00015788028,0.00020263722,0.0005819535,0.00011021284,0.0003078275],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016112404,0.00041569365,0.0004167164,0.0006833247,0.0008205043,0.00079191657,0.0015564531,0.00013212286,0.00081612857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012132035,0.0003767281,0.00055908505,0.0008269464,0.0015432668,0.007359305,0.001287659,0.00074661546,0.0002726783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024871988,0.00018154841,0.0002348039,0.0002639154,0.00039829873,0.0010723462,0.008456657,0.0000392408,0.000029617919,0.982745,0.0020098777,0.004319995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052707654,0.0001128177,0.00015031232,0.0003058515,0.00010512726,0.000011334096,0.002664165,0.00011948045,0.00010493363,0.21396618,0.7814487,0.00048397126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015681083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019286684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77943885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013071026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039836369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995764778","doi":"","title":"Peter R. Sedgwick, Nietzsche's Justice: Naturalism in Search of an Ethics, Montreal, McGill-Queen's University Press, 2013, 239 pp.","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.024615876166471904,"score_gpt":0.2679951710354603,"score_spread":0.24337929486898838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995764778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74336594,0.0009331469,0.000039414837,0.02895776,0.0008850819,0.00072449155,0.003765926,0.00019394708,0.22113426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861865,0.0079949275,0.00006527982,0.00038759105,0.0004086037,0.0000010471883,0.000040888175,0.000055259778,0.0048598754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958085,0.001869542,0.0003225528,0.0006612643,0.0006199345,0.00071822974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590784,0.0023610566,0.00024672638,0.0006567199,0.00044113444,0.0003865428],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014851571,0.00041988946,0.0005842805,0.00035270135,0.00065220415,0.00016936917,0.0008498382,0.0010602473,0.0005600312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023442344,0.00037910414,0.0002676595,0.00015179999,0.0023439773,0.0010011507,0.0004077642,0.0019241672,0.000047861253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004798119,0.00035821812,0.00008264921,0.00037748713,0.00015501332,0.0004857075,0.010377017,0.000037983922,0.00037896997,0.9843472,0.0015448064,0.0013750918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007489281,0.00074175984,0.011802906,0.0015212854,0.00079336023,0.000015241914,0.01077287,0.0006677152,0.00060720753,0.18287893,0.78107816,0.0016312975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0213676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012161634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8014683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028664904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003584713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998875239","doi":"","title":"Avoiding Anthropomoralism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Sentience; Morality; Animal rights; Appeal; Discounting; Utilitarianism; Abortion; Natural (archaeology); Animal ethics","score_opus":0.04459174136700354,"score_gpt":0.22969386312302126,"score_spread":0.1851021217560177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998875239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12032082,0.00011041833,0.0006205451,0.0077308873,0.00066491653,0.0003890848,0.0040655914,0.0029163593,0.86318135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921041,0.00016335915,0.00001389499,0.0003225967,0.00017333297,0.0000024096864,0.0001872561,0.00005008381,0.0069829742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807966,0.00013558283,0.0002920214,0.00044090077,0.00034634463,0.00070551166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986784,0.000348967,0.00012351951,0.0004568158,0.00010414572,0.00028816843],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039068892,0.00031876488,0.00033626,0.0008245649,0.0012643534,0.00027296063,0.00062287156,0.00012427413,0.0005238263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009778281,0.0003208188,0.00026440315,0.0006144907,0.0012247541,0.00050649804,0.00044007154,0.0007845359,0.0020963661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046510242,0.000085508465,0.000030892654,0.000022807551,0.00006661126,0.000354981,0.0011462234,0.000016346956,0.0001267924,0.9923583,0.0018018397,0.0039431658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042541418,0.00007510446,0.000024935664,0.000058050515,0.000033515516,0.000009687947,0.002011702,0.00030056105,0.00029130673,0.21338332,0.7829178,0.0004686162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028922365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003060052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87178326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001256191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085071166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998904995","doi":"","title":"Beyond abstract morality: towards a Hegelian conception of solidarity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Solidarity; Hegelianism; Work (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.04504143773802319,"score_gpt":0.2798442735391176,"score_spread":0.23480283580109443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998904995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45268288,0.00041129452,9.318524e-9,0.00014636506,0.0026327542,0.00032416897,0.0038393915,0.00019023728,0.5397729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881992,0.00022179991,0.000021446316,0.00043061655,0.00050513656,0.000072477895,0.0016500137,0.00018587834,0.008713437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598044,0.00021308288,0.0012112376,0.00095896877,0.001054818,0.0005814548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974385,0.00019153746,0.00063326815,0.0006920411,0.0007497978,0.00029488272],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013712653,0.00075841893,0.0010004338,0.0004218441,0.00093389547,0.00028803633,0.0006397963,0.0009600322,0.003128466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003476891,0.0007261555,0.0007234646,0.00016832784,0.00048078145,0.0006233286,0.00013733453,0.0029621068,0.0006579315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017399459,0.00020921083,2.8656083e-7,0.0014144265,0.00028911623,0.00004724375,0.0003381244,0.0000020268346,0.0039171968,0.95750946,0.000010856508,0.036088064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003302909,0.00017473401,0.000053930384,0.0007558402,0.0003028655,0.0000035707385,0.001056789,0.0000067986693,0.0069907294,0.8813832,0.1082153,0.00072595786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013359236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050383657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5355163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002860269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001417274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999305668","doi":"","title":"Collected Essays in Speculative Philosophy, by James Bradley, ed. Sean J. McGrath, Edinburgh University Press, 2021","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Litmus; Power (physics); Reputation; Obituary; Commonwealth","score_opus":0.011889428259699616,"score_gpt":0.20894465564439182,"score_spread":0.19705522738469222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999305668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67074996,0.0040085437,0.0047652693,0.020387469,0.0036708317,0.00061115075,0.0012476392,0.00009049005,0.2944686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918947,0.0020872166,0.000020070334,0.000036877627,0.00084582425,2.3574733e-8,0.00003263302,0.0000125167235,0.0050700977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981159,0.0004741467,0.00039356708,0.00023269834,0.0005339021,0.00024977207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818975,0.00064880244,0.00041101984,0.0002543648,0.00037309976,0.00012298684],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010361206,0.00022743244,0.00067122374,0.0005675854,0.00039685212,0.00009481934,0.00073536014,0.0001285519,0.0015368705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053158048,0.00018602613,0.0005718144,0.00066566747,0.00089469453,0.00042330666,0.00016240959,0.0007656317,0.0000060616608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003906257,0.0005417414,0.000343245,0.00010029943,0.009111954,0.000828107,0.027602542,0.0053007393,0.00042418626,0.9328734,0.018314557,0.00065292855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077112075,0.0011597635,0.00065041805,0.00076598563,0.015817566,0.00006038093,0.02548291,0.06775711,0.000023543287,0.5670876,0.31204185,0.0014416667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007465209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065095816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36578584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037679976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000263445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7013478337","doi":"","title":"Human Agency","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Praise; Position (finance); Moral agency; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.08111947190717722,"score_gpt":0.3080374774594442,"score_spread":0.226918005552267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7013478337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08652903,0.000055126562,0.000005589745,0.021207336,0.0015409495,0.00026008996,0.000018961771,0.0002265791,0.8901563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855086,0.000044373235,0.000037188638,0.0024654684,0.0026728504,0.000049252656,0.00006715498,0.0000638312,0.009091284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978747,0.00007933448,0.00045022435,0.00056596514,0.0005080816,0.0005216939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782175,0.00008533793,0.00037306253,0.0012480087,0.00023898244,0.0002328379],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000571028,0.0003582135,0.0003414022,0.0001325889,0.0064680446,0.0014807533,0.0010889294,0.00013464707,0.016906226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003127141,0.000328569,0.0002223347,0.00002865383,0.001991466,0.0011981189,0.00020298988,0.0005104451,0.0023031458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013477603,0.00009184716,0.000080561935,0.00002474562,0.000085442145,0.0000125111055,0.0040896186,0.0000013247018,0.0011317298,0.98147714,0.00018839346,0.012803199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062696583,0.0000844314,0.002558329,0.000040535822,0.000058625574,0.00000406267,0.00026802535,0.00001496585,0.000073979754,0.7010185,0.294769,0.0004825742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031320803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006875842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89897954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008529128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007799747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016083406","doi":"","title":"Virtue (Charles F. Sawhill) Papers, 1917-1975","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Subject (documents); Work (physics); Head (geology); Miller","score_opus":0.02582201142802676,"score_gpt":0.2142024013344702,"score_spread":0.18838038990644343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016083406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021527195,0.00007399193,0.00017781327,0.0018446774,0.00031501023,0.00022200096,0.001905737,0.0006059689,0.9733276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99129325,0.000071904884,0.000031967196,0.0007642111,0.0003805241,0.0000016619243,0.00008249533,0.00004186802,0.0073321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983727,0.00007007635,0.0002792279,0.00045081912,0.00030192488,0.00052526436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865043,0.0001786186,0.00014178586,0.00057174027,0.00018254704,0.0002748634],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018748944,0.00032984794,0.00031692628,0.00047393207,0.0007642612,0.0002368485,0.00068020844,0.00013214651,0.001318823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057170728,0.00031769046,0.00024345591,0.00025459653,0.0019556836,0.0003981498,0.0003693317,0.00040963388,0.0013401352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093211434,0.00012105573,0.00004830457,0.000012879216,0.000080811515,0.000060575716,0.0005029584,0.0000011464413,0.00018178322,0.9925132,0.0008872162,0.0054969057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041255806,0.00016225243,0.000022820625,0.000047847818,0.00003648813,0.0000063204648,0.00055882504,0.000032568383,0.00029217443,0.12617381,0.87183654,0.00041778837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017163996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097616756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9697661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010440702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008853741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016401929","doi":"","title":"سوق المدينة | ولاية نينوى","year":2022,"lang":"ar","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brother; Islam; Supporter; State (computer science); Hinduism","score_opus":0.011753707548999364,"score_gpt":0.18730986946588066,"score_spread":0.17555616191688128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016401929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001030728,0.0010872297,3.3728703e-8,0.0016554082,0.001271664,0.00058315473,0.001007692,0.00016610947,0.99412566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014713027,0.0008054962,0.000052735973,0.0022059795,0.0011658275,0.000041498766,0.00048456242,0.00018531496,0.98034555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628806,0.0003188695,0.0013329878,0.0004211893,0.0010246014,0.00061430334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721813,0.0003757277,0.001079004,0.00074724614,0.00031873878,0.00026117364],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008115565,0.0007013351,0.0008621361,0.00015538624,0.0007113678,0.00026712543,0.00085505645,0.0005967673,0.98219407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025441498,0.00069332856,0.0005298688,0.000007688245,0.000885984,4.0618238e-7,0.00044389075,0.0014618583,0.11948252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018215373,0.00013799615,3.5464015e-7,0.0008394228,0.00021856512,0.000049646158,0.0030208095,0.00015777345,1.01543996e-7,0.101598434,0.8929269,0.0008678895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075415993,0.00043865724,0.0000014362065,0.00025282992,0.000162583,0.00004942692,0.0013364418,0.000021327494,0.0000013491903,0.008003991,0.9882047,0.00077305257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005698396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014824254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86271155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013094384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010245549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026721917","doi":"","title":"Anxiety, alexithymia and attitude to the disease in children with severe bronchial asthma","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"DSpace BSMU","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alexithymia; Toronto Alexithymia Scale; Anxiety; Asthma; Personality; Disease; State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; Trait","score_opus":0.011492421747186652,"score_gpt":0.23936510110490444,"score_spread":0.2278726793577178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026721917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403202,0.00052198156,0.0000011631284,0.0051280786,0.00034385765,0.00058379926,0.00020922492,0.000036914065,0.052854788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875248,0.00009261053,0.00002023539,0.0011733398,0.0018072465,0.000059613605,0.0003932341,0.000050239112,0.008878657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890614,0.000055785207,0.00014199868,0.00037268526,0.00027991558,0.00024349648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935544,0.00003148697,0.000078138524,0.0002987528,0.00007309717,0.00016310647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001794456,0.00026587368,0.0002161678,0.00008237827,0.00029974562,0.00022974524,0.00023822866,0.000121458426,0.00041893448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032757867,0.00016715557,0.00005559874,0.000041503048,0.00021879798,0.000085999935,0.000055207907,0.00047854314,0.00010845221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010789637,0.00014323159,0.01295757,0.00017240962,0.00019928491,0.00001056596,0.046703678,0.000012084547,0.0000021433264,0.9324679,0.0038123333,0.0024398803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012801231,0.0004419672,0.5553633,0.0013009367,0.00015374896,0.000010954532,0.0024124978,0.000030431618,0.0000072067733,0.18422543,0.25353503,0.0012383829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051316316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036332853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74824244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022884467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010637523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98125154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027603648","doi":"","title":"Dave O Rama Interviews Humans","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Qualitative research; Identity (music); Negotiation","score_opus":0.023955301482155782,"score_gpt":0.21231783260774487,"score_spread":0.1883625311255891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027603648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000036775527,0.00064541976,6.2708345e-8,0.0005224922,0.00070730975,0.00028118238,0.000429716,0.00018200431,0.99722815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011482319,0.00016732345,0.00004753318,0.0012710694,0.00097008276,0.000012530485,0.0003156324,0.00014016342,0.99592745],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984216,0.000100018304,0.00062428927,0.00018043327,0.00042268322,0.00025095622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985935,0.00007718087,0.00051429734,0.00040058367,0.00027574928,0.0001387004],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043572474,0.0003356935,0.0004852452,0.00008574713,0.00009051127,0.00011965971,0.00040908402,0.00029648878,0.7859913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000116264135,0.00029215176,0.00018601299,0.000002250889,0.00046588035,1.9708501e-7,0.00012861512,0.0004670631,0.03148658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003147898,0.00004370256,1.955435e-8,0.00037053984,0.00006904226,0.000008904194,0.0026996902,0.0000050530853,1.675677e-8,0.033434905,0.962729,0.0006076935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034615246,0.00013367741,4.7425385e-8,0.00033485127,0.0000504204,0.000007841306,0.00038284028,0.0000035638357,4.2538116e-7,0.0072994977,0.99111104,0.00032964797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033264118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070720734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75450474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003440975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038751623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027907590","doi":"","title":"Does Jordan Peterson's Appeal to Authenticity Make Him a Hypocrite?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Situated; Vision; Essentialism; Autonomy; Argument (complex analysis); Self; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.027322632330618535,"score_gpt":0.24264662072184706,"score_spread":0.21532398839122852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027907590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41479117,0.00009628147,0.00005600807,0.16118233,0.007879679,0.0015521133,0.0004225768,0.00079496537,0.4132249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97437954,0.000014872417,0.00011838941,0.01516161,0.0017381819,0.00033696584,0.0001971459,0.00009663998,0.007956671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628186,0.00034842768,0.0005875659,0.0008872627,0.0011068851,0.0007879818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981907,0.0003124182,0.00020377885,0.0006881496,0.00020006427,0.00040488484],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095355214,0.00048067162,0.00046675408,0.0003734442,0.0032754294,0.00054392876,0.00085116934,0.00007465285,0.02352644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021959947,0.00037712077,0.00030437304,0.00025411198,0.00066892843,0.00038002655,0.0005099093,0.0009104288,0.0009266333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018088317,0.00027723025,0.000053973723,0.00004669256,0.00014832239,0.000029907334,0.02256552,0.000057791323,0.00066332787,0.9655103,0.00042574748,0.010040269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066373625,0.00027298706,0.00017157223,0.000021435168,0.000083459585,0.000013199969,0.0050319037,0.000086324646,0.00004601329,0.3390138,0.6539369,0.0006586618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000326154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007514448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65351117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034772133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015343558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038742711","doi":"","title":"Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Idealism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Indiana University Bloomington; Freie Universität Berlin","keywords":"Transcendental idealism; Transcendental number; Idealism; Interpretation (philosophy); Doctrine; Metaphysics; Transcendental philosophy","score_opus":0.03243054876433981,"score_gpt":0.2468130016851886,"score_spread":0.2143824529208488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038742711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002032068,0.0016878549,0.0000037117068,0.008287599,0.003433604,0.0005933148,0.0005707341,0.0003240139,0.98489594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4078188,0.001089122,0.000024895182,0.001993139,0.0058526634,0.000066960056,0.0019257925,0.00029325538,0.58093536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591464,0.00010309354,0.0012300836,0.0009818821,0.0011879373,0.0005823505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977484,0.00040449947,0.00046980992,0.00075107825,0.0003727005,0.0002535634],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062207127,0.00088554376,0.0010920168,0.0005954496,0.00047121375,0.00039340084,0.0007950574,0.0005569561,0.019802667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007533315,0.0008120314,0.0008258983,0.00010722239,0.0021844653,0.00032801597,0.00014417346,0.0016616127,0.0025491389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079563026,0.00007638585,3.8971612e-7,0.00077322574,0.000678757,0.000045872766,0.006259674,0.0000031592215,0.00017493257,0.9821994,0.0034606424,0.006248038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036917932,0.00010788185,0.0000015135807,0.00039219466,0.00037355136,0.000012507895,0.00015907075,0.00000861038,0.000026383823,0.49980557,0.49822104,0.0005224896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010414563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046634235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4947604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003757147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007103528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7065916663","doi":"","title":"Fixing the Hole in the Ozone Layer: A Success in the Making (continued)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Ozone layer; Treaty; Ozone depletion; Harm; Ozone; Sustainability","score_opus":0.04660181927348792,"score_gpt":0.27699521286803097,"score_spread":0.23039339359454306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7065916663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62216824,0.0011053518,0.00001308194,0.06209495,0.00034741874,0.0004634267,0.000018836634,0.000045911398,0.3137428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798314,0.000020870011,0.000007853396,0.018980479,0.0008999559,0.00007100876,0.0000036032186,0.00001794707,0.00016691393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983757,0.00036372078,0.00030301014,0.00022573768,0.00036706438,0.000364737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988984,0.00045313028,0.00008604234,0.0004959853,0.000040290775,0.000026185278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021635948,0.00016882368,0.00017781732,0.00004669378,0.0006535503,0.0006295156,0.00096177415,0.000078592944,0.00027785276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013520023,0.00008186865,0.00010137714,0.0001243779,0.00047677255,0.00025087592,0.000094482435,0.0011553598,0.00012947609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015704112,0.00008203245,0.00015840572,0.000013034635,0.0000083154155,0.000042146323,0.026144091,0.00009082801,0.000013082386,0.97318345,0.000082479055,0.00016643477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056551385,0.00003833135,0.0009840823,0.00015455771,0.000011974003,0.0000063282896,0.0053306674,0.000020399775,0.000016834521,0.85199606,0.1407124,0.00016286854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029448536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04540844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35766312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036522484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041509797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9720104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067812600","doi":"","title":"Neonatal Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants from Taiwan: Comparison with Canada, Japan, and the USA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"NTUR (臺灣機構典藏)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Incidence (geometry); MEDLINE; Gestational age; Birth weight","score_opus":0.03724361868299009,"score_gpt":0.24167353696305788,"score_spread":0.2044299182800678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067812600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013042177,0.004106554,0.0000026786693,0.0016772893,0.00077320106,0.0004052875,0.0025600367,0.000043429252,0.97738934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8614689,0.00003797318,0.000020702513,0.00077272597,0.0006717322,0.000014580155,0.00012255915,0.00015046664,0.13674033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985637,0.00009623318,0.00029662298,0.00028374788,0.0005455904,0.00021407037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880636,0.00021838638,0.00033745007,0.0004245302,0.000102310165,0.00011097982],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019616344,0.00032280976,0.0007458756,0.00005922523,0.000113492606,0.00008454984,0.00034349947,0.00018188883,0.002849922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000523981,0.0001745585,0.0000591863,0.000021065272,0.0012463984,0.0000437941,0.00011278468,0.0005035366,0.000012191792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005798875,0.00006204483,0.0044375416,0.00014549373,0.0010016751,0.000021735741,0.021180883,0.0000017509503,7.364922e-7,0.791703,0.17888807,0.0019771988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016345072,0.00006432603,0.0011211955,0.00020621499,0.00014646615,0.0000015423769,0.00069909974,0.00002984617,0.0000021113099,0.044945516,0.95080316,0.00034598785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5781176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9612731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84842676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002667658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033211682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070895101","doi":"","title":"Remarks on the historical mis-statements and fallacies of Mr. Goldwin Smith, in his Lecture \"On the foundation of the American colonies,\" and his Letters \"On the emancipation of the colonies\".","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Particle Physics","funders":"","keywords":"Emancipation; Empire; Globe; Newspaper; Foundation (evidence); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.013991162121120676,"score_gpt":0.19486867195887503,"score_spread":0.18087750983775436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070895101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6808286,0.000008859606,0.000005614258,0.31300917,0.0000771593,0.00025734067,0.000016686283,0.000007678292,0.005788928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541515,0.00006342791,0.000004683574,0.0025845743,0.00003830926,0.0000021396916,0.000002213505,0.000010648655,0.0018788262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985045,0.00074014696,0.00015921226,0.00017394043,0.00028989246,0.00013229164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979062,0.0012916841,0.00036741796,0.0003638163,0.000046479498,0.000024415853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030216688,0.00014373176,0.00020917278,0.00007216229,0.00044746144,0.00003985315,0.00038251842,0.0000507344,0.000063000254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015605518,0.000066731765,0.00008184994,0.00015641087,0.0013465388,0.0001653878,0.0001433368,0.0003604348,7.824459e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042419985,0.00010205017,0.003270045,0.00005364673,0.00006424699,6.868572e-7,0.017140867,0.000073463816,0.00009048314,0.96495,0.0136524085,0.00017788321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002263949,0.0028253656,0.14336607,0.0010966337,0.000308659,5.0652784e-7,0.019022085,0.00031988215,0.009043351,0.22571924,0.5951874,0.0008468224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020895584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046970995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73923075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010582178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004631752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49613783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071973731","doi":"","title":"Towards a reintegration of the human being in law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Samsung","keywords":"Private law; Aside; Set (abstract data type); Human being; Philosophy of law; Public law; Abstraction; Center (category theory)","score_opus":0.032177322110815004,"score_gpt":0.257196271858799,"score_spread":0.225018949747984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071973731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3941903,0.000060403192,9.908312e-9,0.000047737285,0.00089342793,0.00028311944,0.00022934237,0.000035847726,0.6042598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881998,0.000037374433,0.000014254812,0.0006220486,0.00009109187,0.00006364993,0.0002560881,0.000101854384,0.010613847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696296,0.0005062286,0.0009111919,0.00054772827,0.0006806839,0.00039122664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820125,0.0001382004,0.00053869764,0.00061820773,0.0004080704,0.00009555307],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011682408,0.00047719924,0.0005982317,0.0002285458,0.0013413839,0.00011032255,0.00063821644,0.0005701045,0.00070434634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040013116,0.00037523435,0.00040800293,0.000162614,0.0003873818,0.0003889209,0.0000743042,0.002224798,0.000036734884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038261893,0.00012521617,0.0000012880644,0.00021339761,0.000055312434,0.000007030351,0.00023061786,0.0000025250713,0.004605621,0.9913391,8.1418654e-7,0.0033808025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035737074,0.00007533236,0.000037732858,0.0007243951,0.000076106495,0.0000016077638,0.00051570084,0.0000020883087,0.018542578,0.9316675,0.047592446,0.0004071333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018540635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036146313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59400946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026721007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005805028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093711843","doi":"","title":"Rebecca, Rebecca!","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; George (robot); Association (psychology); Natural (archaeology); Representation (politics)","score_opus":0.01970118115522036,"score_gpt":0.18194312431588489,"score_spread":0.16224194316066454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093711843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36659673,0.0004150811,0.000023685629,0.0011193819,0.0005667953,0.00022821504,0.0006007815,0.00005109447,0.6303983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95447934,0.00013222905,0.000012339989,0.00021046263,0.00025402466,8.3269114e-8,0.00011103304,0.000035000357,0.04476546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979846,0.00005948183,0.00031048147,0.00059399224,0.0005276426,0.0005238351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814016,0.00026114448,0.0003350671,0.0006702711,0.00031822195,0.00027514523],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024164595,0.0003626816,0.0006381014,0.00023449943,0.0005286269,0.00031539873,0.0007868311,0.00029917576,0.021511357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048720973,0.0004368443,0.0005442289,0.00014232897,0.0017170536,0.0016290159,0.0005661252,0.0006426343,0.003275232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003056418,0.00036478371,0.00026881692,0.00033305972,0.00024067749,0.00006844406,0.013092717,0.0000070780525,0.000059653117,0.9779385,0.001159657,0.0061609917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016601946,0.0007550069,0.0008756361,0.00046687297,0.00016695679,0.000006028657,0.020693399,0.00030975608,0.000020486405,0.51380104,0.46038583,0.0008588104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042770655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004532323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58788264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008312732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015445992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094516476","doi":"","title":"Commentary on G. Thomas Goodnight’s “Blind Spots, Moral Hazards &amp; Wounded Narratives”","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Exposition (narrative); Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.07105078200492114,"score_gpt":0.2583237676240499,"score_spread":0.18727298561912875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094516476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7995241,0.00060539076,0.000035258796,0.09867234,0.0014327656,0.0007051828,0.0014642741,0.00012697114,0.097433686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632571,0.0003451092,0.000118133124,0.004176667,0.0009489189,0.000001603541,0.00012014636,0.000110720146,0.030921616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99335676,0.0014699127,0.0007692351,0.0014625665,0.0016472399,0.0012942796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995223,0.0008964656,0.00088056416,0.0016096792,0.0006470703,0.0007432089],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022267238,0.0010314565,0.0013004573,0.00077958993,0.003741477,0.0002888975,0.0019191408,0.0010239256,0.017535169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019500223,0.0009487313,0.0010472772,0.00034781857,0.004667651,0.0020437373,0.0010890584,0.0021455258,0.001951314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009215452,0.001929069,0.0034062918,0.00025468247,0.0013323023,0.00023944932,0.043569278,0.000004443557,0.0035341694,0.92512256,0.008365221,0.0030270882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010041399,0.0011582627,0.01161691,0.0014140757,0.00037085506,0.000015098383,0.0066636945,0.000006070603,0.00059791637,0.46871087,0.49776915,0.0016357084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022509332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017034954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4894039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006793799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036135662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100979348","doi":"","title":"Research Khandor et al. Access to primary health care among homeless adults in Toronto, Canada: results from the Street Health survey","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Odds ratio; Logistic regression; Odds; Primary health care; Confidence interval; Primary care; Health equity; Public health","score_opus":0.10526070855743104,"score_gpt":0.36463023057373295,"score_spread":0.2593695220163019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100979348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62870574,0.0018688408,0.0000022374495,0.2845613,0.000547612,0.0017704425,0.004564726,0.00005275177,0.07792638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9116317,0.00031474596,0.000006642907,0.08671826,0.00022530612,0.0000804437,0.00076442625,0.000025915082,0.00023254074],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954309,0.001855048,0.0006099702,0.0005268401,0.00084070925,0.000736551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959928,0.0023180742,0.00012438408,0.00059945905,0.0005586649,0.0004066419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004097493,0.00019889935,0.00043436256,0.000058269547,0.000620114,0.00048114412,0.0008498482,0.00005923606,0.00076899136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032196983,0.00012920728,0.000037552032,0.00010400442,0.00024165084,0.00042249326,0.00041147255,0.00079403655,0.00001560589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005838484,0.00018114629,0.003086648,0.0000953666,0.000043854154,0.0000074662726,0.08170029,0.000016022754,3.147969e-7,0.19746241,0.7060407,0.010781958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019642734,0.00036701525,0.8795348,0.0004288306,0.0000014116009,1.09565725e-7,0.04867274,0.000026464832,0.0000038963294,0.012581541,0.05600421,0.00041475368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8764481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001381693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027149168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84199166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115036270","doi":"","title":"The I and the absolute: Schelling’s adaptation of Kant and Fichte from 1795 to 1800","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Normative","score_opus":0.03152030364449513,"score_gpt":0.2373509052225219,"score_spread":0.20583060157802677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115036270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78493613,0.00554083,5.7459624e-7,0.0009358121,0.0017834022,0.0009367067,0.0021268774,0.00007725616,0.20366243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899236,0.0019636722,0.00004795149,0.00061843183,0.00014421811,0.00008767357,0.0002182789,0.00005293711,0.006943218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976443,0.0003627247,0.00067352597,0.0005379485,0.00047578296,0.00030572413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661297,0.0019508448,0.000390193,0.0004839543,0.00042895062,0.00013309528],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014215825,0.00040059804,0.00053165044,0.00013573741,0.0023419275,0.00028695757,0.0004458567,0.00032344478,0.00009603289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008855429,0.00025628236,0.00017192545,0.000093222494,0.00042517998,0.00020096969,0.00014443831,0.0012066949,0.00002490881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061098905,0.0000285261,2.3206623e-7,0.000113322174,0.0001960492,0.0000026668813,0.00067584764,0.000008329706,0.00023511947,0.9505329,0.0000032070268,0.04759282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007230124,0.000075354525,0.000052326246,0.00044863042,0.00023899453,6.620618e-7,0.002705491,0.00015274074,0.00055417843,0.8475325,0.14720522,0.00031086858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020656928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01450275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2049875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050776205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050026247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115174133","doi":"10.1017/9781009530453.001","title":"Introduction","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Proposition; Interpretation (philosophy); Exposition (narrative)","score_opus":0.030353121817797004,"score_gpt":0.1994217351295651,"score_spread":0.1690686133117681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115174133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000305576,0.00032387188,0.00014118412,0.0016362573,0.0028568618,0.00050850486,0.0009303659,0.00016557875,0.99340683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018850159,0.0007404617,0.000011536713,0.00038521228,0.0050238515,8.2785897e-7,0.00010959042,0.00005351653,0.97482485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974814,0.00013592142,0.00042888132,0.0010513571,0.00042181747,0.00048061638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755615,0.0002128322,0.00037013224,0.0009787724,0.00061894726,0.00026318195],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030995044,0.00072136376,0.0007511289,0.00042076502,0.0014734343,0.00027549264,0.00077619107,0.00079663727,0.00034759488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042487805,0.0008647,0.0005923452,0.0000075984026,0.0021740242,0.00018630094,0.00077597727,0.0019056059,0.00010921679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003397584,0.00003793558,4.4716824e-8,0.00034062244,0.0005037763,0.00015500606,0.00028214703,0.0000015830594,0.000013976847,0.97030824,0.025938999,0.002077893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006347508,0.00012110004,5.2179973e-7,0.00036035146,0.00073452404,0.0000063826424,0.00016119532,0.000059179685,0.00008519758,0.0105534755,0.98648965,0.00079365954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030645257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006634272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96055067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026306874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002408846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115811089","doi":"","title":"PESSIMISM, WELL-BEING, AND THE GOODNESS OF LIVES","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Value (mathematics); German; German philosophy; Human life; Principle of sufficient reason; State (computer science); The good life","score_opus":0.015693442894742865,"score_gpt":0.2056361753891572,"score_spread":0.18994273249441435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115811089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039390507,0.00042186963,0.000004922422,0.00043007467,0.0004971655,0.00017455526,0.000023850671,0.000027713884,0.9944808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31708696,0.00020027242,0.0000037855082,0.00013157341,0.0001152841,7.303144e-7,0.00004007714,0.000012394482,0.6824089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912894,0.00014058134,0.00017633016,0.000248724,0.00016146661,0.00014396843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917984,0.0002596514,0.00018824202,0.00019217597,0.00013698013,0.00004308319],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013865641,0.00021229628,0.000355413,0.000116524665,0.00031683737,0.00008596521,0.00035807205,0.00015188877,0.042775664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002000675,0.00016054804,0.00015157899,0.000070374364,0.0005283607,0.00010131184,0.00009916129,0.0004231978,0.000011365896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038489798,0.000028703853,0.0000044579074,0.00040334847,0.00014696122,0.000010823682,0.025102448,9.990451e-7,0.0000028104716,0.9539775,0.00008275134,0.0198543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011911028,0.000037849582,0.000018228917,0.00048428995,0.00032861318,4.587457e-7,0.036712766,0.000034366018,0.00006256514,0.32825348,0.63264066,0.000235627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028497097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020200112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63255787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016709704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007815294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95809937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115938682","doi":"10.5287/ora-5jenna7pe","title":"Kant &amp; Moral Character","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sympathy; Moral psychology; Analogy; Moral disengagement; Moral character; Character (mathematics); Moral authority; Value (mathematics); Raising (metalworking); Element (criminal law)","score_opus":0.08238631716031282,"score_gpt":0.29089175270558737,"score_spread":0.20850543554527456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115938682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12403844,0.00007559625,0.00005747275,0.0016776822,0.00057247584,0.0005805667,0.0017187881,0.00008924471,0.8711897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6041536,0.0032513184,0.0003298824,0.000046242178,0.0005986144,5.1730774e-7,0.0041209054,0.00008272995,0.38741624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962022,0.000521189,0.00023236187,0.0008431218,0.0012539797,0.00094716775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962939,0.00044575005,0.0005196155,0.0011535607,0.0011058296,0.0004813162],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010490044,0.0004594658,0.0008045682,0.0013389569,0.0038997736,0.00020764413,0.0028591545,0.00043861463,0.0051519703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016732328,0.00055855577,0.0006245953,0.00014931471,0.0030099736,0.00087683485,0.0006919464,0.0026716127,0.00016505989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023732523,0.00032475125,0.0001515785,0.00051801914,0.00044556247,0.00037685322,0.030421037,0.0000014597066,0.00023259637,0.9536158,0.005005986,0.006533137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000878522,0.0002510232,0.0014734251,0.00036363778,0.00012050342,0.0000022611266,0.017252479,0.000045606892,0.000011681258,0.18005924,0.79904485,0.00049678795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029719633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03813501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79403883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021703615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007617585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116746772","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.9704","title":"Paley’s Principle:","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Miracle; Argument (complex analysis); Obligation; Norm (philosophy); Empirical evidence","score_opus":0.04450280406767941,"score_gpt":0.2860722504427748,"score_spread":0.24156944637509536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116746772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011105122,0.00008922669,0.000046691406,0.0023672418,0.0005074421,0.00006587,0.000009031773,0.00008830978,0.98572105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803388,0.0000127603635,0.000017818242,0.007910115,0.00021768847,0.000009441802,0.0000065717545,0.0000028176312,0.011483993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950665,0.000010616919,0.00016276396,0.0000710687,0.00008883595,0.00016004589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996812,0.00005962649,0.00003044973,0.0001362708,0.000060018596,0.00003246083],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017886206,0.000075319374,0.00008961118,0.00005972615,0.00021509199,0.00009162762,0.00015594755,0.00005123237,0.0016493344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060037197,0.000055046414,0.000053187658,0.000027318136,0.00022342165,0.00015416338,0.000086404696,0.00020329705,0.0003763509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014008224,0.000015094781,0.00002295996,0.00002067052,0.00001088168,0.0000023543769,0.0010074555,0.0000046704577,0.00000212731,0.99665135,0.00019141998,0.0020569954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083416766,0.00002027227,0.00017832432,0.000009922525,0.0000033988708,3.539698e-7,0.00007517684,0.000038290327,0.00001345945,0.5257984,0.47373158,0.000047450412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015196578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004791927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008405338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041598287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117233543","doi":"10.1017/9781009214049.012","title":"<i>Ambiguity and ‘Atheism’ in Hume’s</i> Dialogues","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Perspective (graphical); Natural (archaeology); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.04761060009206845,"score_gpt":0.2061732080574886,"score_spread":0.15856260796542015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117233543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013293757,0.00090646936,0.00002475729,0.0003405458,0.00072084443,0.0006386925,0.0016724383,0.00009132141,0.99427557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24503393,0.0022541403,0.0000067828773,0.0005689572,0.00047362017,0.0000014753092,0.00006381139,0.00004441425,0.7515529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722093,0.00020830682,0.0005313069,0.0010841768,0.00036005225,0.0005952024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978562,0.00051455264,0.00031678763,0.0007321611,0.0002747779,0.00030555058],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048247154,0.000813876,0.001055121,0.0005132847,0.00096237194,0.00028624796,0.0007336263,0.0009077375,0.00003555924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005093194,0.0009535232,0.00036568375,0.0000112396,0.003040099,0.00019246773,0.001331356,0.0020183234,0.000013658994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030371145,0.00006143036,0.0000045253632,0.00048919057,0.0002185756,0.00045297804,0.0011315424,5.540088e-7,0.000011248911,0.994833,0.00078182446,0.0017114107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013721645,0.00012681604,0.000023469,0.0011585271,0.00036592697,0.0000037202128,0.00021648427,0.000061388964,0.000043376313,0.03601934,0.9596591,0.00094966596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020866292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018350226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9588773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018566765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021666451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117244175","doi":"10.59209/ircep.v5i15.131","title":"Scientific, Philosophical, and Practical Elements of Two New Philosophical Group Practices: Dialectic into Dialogos and the Socratic Search Space","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Interdisciplinary Research in Counseling Ethics and Philosophy - IRCEP","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Socratic method; Dialogical self; Virtue; Transformative learning; Utterance; Argumentation theory; Intelligibility (philosophy)","score_opus":0.2406726697131141,"score_gpt":0.484614496418173,"score_spread":0.2439418267050589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117244175","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124720246,0.0181173,0.00030410077,0.8310683,0.0015373125,0.002793434,0.00010915216,0.000052797757,0.021297375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826625,0.012106071,0.00040071708,0.001669133,0.0026299565,0.00014390219,0.000032046715,0.00010635355,0.00024932853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795786,0.009872592,0.002667933,0.0026415102,0.003496201,0.0017431398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95371735,0.04116198,0.00089758413,0.0014392729,0.0019056424,0.0008781952],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.050377265,0.0010159097,0.0017713852,0.0017770993,0.007613943,0.0035703734,0.0011073147,0.0012276917,0.00014775684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009410935,0.00079777086,0.00033032897,0.0013691417,0.03364078,0.0011938172,0.005259239,0.018868448,0.000021141219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045572734,0.0010099534,0.00013732075,0.0034814058,0.000476643,0.00016427897,0.08567693,0.000012299757,0.00028917246,0.90267026,0.000116311625,0.0014081676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063101477,0.0013268933,0.000032320208,0.00429944,0.00031935913,0.0000697596,0.0051534423,0.011501086,0.000023475213,0.96871257,0.0015529,0.00069860043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014050268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014867294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8579422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002558763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027665498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117318996","doi":"10.1017/s1369415425101131","title":"Alternative to Ontology or Alternative Ontology? Allison on the ‘Proud Name’ of Ontology (A247/B303)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Sketch; Idealism; Metaphysics; Process ontology; Ontology components; Transcendental number","score_opus":0.09990276976493487,"score_gpt":0.3499085954415656,"score_spread":0.25000582567663077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117318996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0100668445,0.06404004,0.00042890784,0.25900763,0.003106563,0.0025374535,0.00018329009,0.00010065609,0.6605286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91103417,0.017330233,0.00006803393,0.066177,0.00042132675,0.00018508515,0.000013759423,0.00002742018,0.0047430005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756545,0.0006759623,0.00066991517,0.0004709271,0.00023782755,0.000379924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755573,0.0011375715,0.00031257328,0.00060379424,0.00030303805,0.00008731288],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009051572,0.00030368552,0.0009310063,0.0001331685,0.0002481664,0.000037585593,0.000819566,0.00012284143,0.00372413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009175106,0.00017509125,0.00023887407,0.00011940934,0.00081359374,0.00006816519,0.00017692913,0.00059188344,0.00030684745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012034241,0.00013719495,0.000012363637,0.00063662406,0.00024986852,0.000029829156,0.0029813948,0.000001425877,0.0000065294607,0.9804562,0.0029508292,0.012417437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002665629,0.00041579866,0.0000423281,0.0032874555,0.00012484574,0.0000068778945,0.00019254754,0.000024852669,0.00011055419,0.45415455,0.5411847,0.00018890719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008841034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005633572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9009673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054136566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013566663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117386559","doi":"10.1111/phpr.70080","title":"On the Practical Necessity of the Categories","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Causation; Set (abstract data type); Point (geometry); Rational agent; Common knowledge (logic); Existential quantification","score_opus":0.31819024795289513,"score_gpt":0.40220212197564315,"score_spread":0.08401187402274801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117386559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024310365,0.0002463357,0.0000047988697,0.21399105,0.00012326632,0.00019260205,0.000012888092,0.000013062856,0.76110566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965741,0.000079445126,0.0000033264062,0.0023825245,0.00022205856,0.000032224212,7.892562e-7,0.000004270198,0.000701252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981819,0.00070792896,0.00018646289,0.00022582678,0.00043184048,0.00026605645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944276,0.004902399,0.00004358883,0.00036191978,0.00021503933,0.00004940938],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018336917,0.000104425526,0.00016287893,0.00006638992,0.0012465621,0.000112329726,0.00042686885,0.000090506655,0.00066940434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021376873,0.00004418591,0.00006466785,0.00016422842,0.004627837,0.00005580987,0.0004627284,0.0012806851,0.000024533922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012660393,0.00015889117,0.000019941212,0.00003199483,0.000030330562,0.0000013752135,0.001670431,4.4060513e-7,0.000009632137,0.9973192,0.00031010873,0.00032105803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011128166,0.00017079225,0.00007974397,0.00003652724,0.00000688156,3.4133637e-7,0.0005616085,0.0000143801035,0.000033852008,0.9824809,0.016452352,0.00005138348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036169586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012968326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97226375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018814075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008355147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99808097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118363983","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10048","title":"Aiding the Impermissible? Kant and the Morality of Medical Assistance in Dying","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; Università di Catania; University of Toronto; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; McMaster University","keywords":"Morality; Duty; Public morality; Applied philosophy; General interest","score_opus":0.04104709792010615,"score_gpt":0.27069176917266174,"score_spread":0.2296446712525556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118363983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2992142,0.009921386,0.000030297013,0.5438629,0.001053196,0.00018245183,0.000026752441,0.0000041425405,0.14570469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966383,0.00009804122,0.0000034838754,0.0028279258,0.0003895572,0.0000015341487,2.3945978e-7,0.0000050983253,0.000035809182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988402,0.00020566898,0.00044194024,0.000078757264,0.0002730268,0.00016040733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988741,0.000494711,0.00017434522,0.00014513318,0.00013144912,0.00018023058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026031248,0.000086117594,0.0002541219,0.00016611579,0.0003285822,0.00010739884,0.00043931947,0.00006554815,0.00017407261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005368339,0.00004522485,0.00009125552,0.000087566295,0.0017034786,0.00009113065,0.00003007354,0.000671992,5.742468e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035682726,0.000006783761,0.00023992814,0.00003859605,0.000035702516,0.000034161138,0.004614044,0.0000030179897,0.0000039570805,0.99444646,0.000074729425,0.000466953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006741916,0.000017345084,0.00028982034,0.000424322,0.000022792996,0.00001080827,0.00060814415,0.00013764498,0.000010679282,0.9901539,0.007599862,0.000050507275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040561077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0219645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6974241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004344088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079453737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118552910","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzaf068","title":"<i>Lectures on Ethics, 1946</i> , by P. F. Strawson. Edited by Jonathan Dancy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Agnosticism; Analytic philosophy","score_opus":0.029308814001741856,"score_gpt":0.27557681911132853,"score_spread":0.24626800510958669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118552910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031819418,0.003822142,0.00008136853,0.09815378,0.002513006,0.00025774035,0.00090128696,0.0000948397,0.8623564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96220154,0.00007114583,0.000006247028,0.014344028,0.0006818874,0.000011072577,0.00011583913,0.00001701046,0.022551209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892884,0.00009618201,0.00019235036,0.00027708206,0.0002633203,0.00024221317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991107,0.0004588025,0.000048224912,0.00022807374,0.00008486894,0.00006931863],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033617436,0.00017338352,0.00017321928,0.00006809532,0.00042266725,0.00015916218,0.00022600999,0.00021731647,0.001530672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017176045,0.00014309795,0.00007728581,0.00004460834,0.00039105417,0.000057111585,0.000041816944,0.0010507342,0.00011176626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029975086,0.00012482004,0.0000018541984,0.000024307614,0.000038172853,0.000002902624,0.0035932912,6.7443466e-7,0.0006735198,0.7258334,0.2671836,0.0024934858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020766916,0.000063118816,0.0000023423559,0.000051304185,0.000012497096,1.5354067e-7,0.00012641304,0.0000075432754,0.0029939583,0.3184408,0.6779765,0.00011772003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001524344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027236523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93038213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002304312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006298863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7123337286","doi":"10.33182/agon.v19i1-2.3586","title":"Truthful Dying","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"The Agonist","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Perspective (graphical); Philosophy of technology; Literal (mathematical logic); Semantics (computer science); Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.03651175782869591,"score_gpt":0.27466874136997516,"score_spread":0.23815698354127923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7123337286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009392529,0.0041411077,0.000078095414,0.0836769,0.002810685,0.00022350367,0.0000397203,0.000064261454,0.8995732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534674,0.0003491083,0.0000032358046,0.0077989907,0.0012491305,0.00001498853,0.0000054138536,0.00002020442,0.037091523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984172,0.0002316373,0.00040977966,0.0003010184,0.00022667451,0.00041371718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833465,0.0006725891,0.00011214242,0.00070035167,0.00011479314,0.000065490196],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009872487,0.0002551338,0.0002853257,0.00007232583,0.0032337767,0.0009827337,0.00072496606,0.00013386326,0.0023164018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012139082,0.00016772398,0.00022375198,0.00010484374,0.0020760428,0.00009124326,0.00031879847,0.00089629507,0.0006042735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006686326,0.00008248458,0.000002659287,0.00008879084,0.00014406431,0.000007001906,0.0072195036,0.000004134821,0.000049505074,0.9867769,0.0009395759,0.004618556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019923554,0.000029100447,0.000023619896,0.000123465,0.00009812113,9.600839e-7,0.0011075147,0.00015019735,0.00008550994,0.6320964,0.3659526,0.00013323654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023264879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009802898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94407487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048604226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019304849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125381077","doi":"10.7202/1122714ar","title":"Matthew Cipa, 'Is Harpo Free? And Other Questions of the Metaphysical Screen'","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy of religion; Analytic philosophy","score_opus":0.06505757702677761,"score_gpt":0.30713422006050595,"score_spread":0.24207664303372833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125381077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011701443,0.1546167,0.0000087064345,0.20722437,0.00027351585,0.0007069092,0.00026936867,0.000034757824,0.6356955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95458704,0.0099152485,0.000026284473,0.034775864,0.000238692,0.000052523545,0.0000017814459,0.000015790987,0.00038675065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900293,0.00017268771,0.00035344114,0.00018803688,0.00015989518,0.00012302387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991093,0.00017595751,0.00009877129,0.00051591336,0.00006688432,0.00003314331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004049741,0.00013823909,0.00038697605,0.00005847108,0.00012480692,0.000026089274,0.0003589994,0.000043874286,0.00048335403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014363776,0.000086349326,0.00017751289,0.00012508892,0.0006340259,0.000063049614,0.0001648991,0.000301329,0.000020399828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035111282,0.00007278825,0.000050379076,0.0011878293,0.000039418625,3.8117113e-7,0.00028773805,9.173564e-8,0.0000047363474,0.99699193,0.00065355026,0.0007076414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012435022,0.000011651702,0.000100355894,0.0044169435,0.000082008555,3.8487147e-7,0.000006301424,0.000005883943,0.000011482474,0.83103645,0.16412826,0.000075924676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013560404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007645588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95341694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009354693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032593554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52923876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127146086","doi":"10.5860/choice.240037","title":"Review Of \"Engaging Raz: Themes In Normative Philosophy\" Edited By A. Marmor, K. Brownlee, And D. Enoch","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Normative; Economic Justice; Politics; Interrogation","score_opus":0.06431062789699452,"score_gpt":0.36851198622094056,"score_spread":0.304201358323946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127146086","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026608502,0.66587037,0.00011066315,0.02708245,0.0009138903,0.0051917117,0.0019301568,0.00011188148,0.27218038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7768086,0.21455257,0.00015368371,0.0023410819,0.0005367576,0.00041683583,0.00015574436,0.00009987906,0.0049348357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821749,0.009666852,0.0023985314,0.0017484596,0.0023350143,0.0016762802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867099,0.0073343827,0.000805841,0.0013950751,0.0030649542,0.0006898724],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012935206,0.0011154409,0.0021648884,0.0018976397,0.0028519568,0.00059454725,0.0014531896,0.00087844796,0.0036672205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007043146,0.000955545,0.00044998847,0.0024167756,0.0055980813,0.002022691,0.0020679736,0.00928504,0.000046961057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032613627,0.0021884553,0.00049959373,0.02275776,0.0006122947,0.00015692462,0.022033112,0.00000817052,0.0030855727,0.8801089,0.049875677,0.015412187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004372385,0.0005605622,0.0004170388,0.31020376,0.00015035368,0.000005811523,0.01580499,0.00015458014,0.006512768,0.55433303,0.106328495,0.0011562378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018011486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059411068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7502001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039662194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089000654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128504655","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10049","title":"On the Possibility and the Form of Acquired Rights to External Things","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Surrey","keywords":"Rest (music); Root (linguistics); Lying; Action (physics); Human rights; Practical reason","score_opus":0.021248925732625618,"score_gpt":0.2517292418604598,"score_spread":0.23048031612783418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128504655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8078739,0.0009162454,0.000076727345,0.05381159,0.000659165,0.00020647435,0.000023266148,0.0000035014216,0.13642915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99038005,0.000008364701,0.00001363888,0.009115358,0.00014874553,0.0000018275755,7.362789e-8,0.000003575909,0.00032834293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913496,0.00010690584,0.00031513115,0.000091046124,0.00018834267,0.00016361971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984975,0.0007165074,0.00014541837,0.00021333605,0.00023544,0.00019181971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013777842,0.00008927406,0.00018924089,0.00006651668,0.0005973825,0.00016985415,0.00048527037,0.000038693033,0.00022920956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023158848,0.000042455507,0.0000961322,0.000039454513,0.001494322,0.00015541585,0.000027199858,0.0002298783,0.0000035725882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008896247,0.0000068125664,0.00001035078,0.0000104845685,0.000023369459,0.000011436626,0.013352433,0.0000010224734,0.000016577089,0.98605794,0.00020567894,0.00021491645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024812587,0.00007748918,0.0002247897,0.00029987431,0.00002234429,0.000006956,0.00018699295,0.000011451568,0.00018588228,0.9775165,0.021170547,0.00004905868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01510757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06923228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18250619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041655127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003006393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132886440","doi":"","title":"Thinking as a Mere Citizen of the World: Kantian Morality in a Pluralist Frame","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Pluralism (philosophy); Objectivity (philosophy); Normative; Relativism; Normative ethics; Cultural relativism; Cultural diversity","score_opus":0.03995933792849681,"score_gpt":0.3546798353822807,"score_spread":0.3147204974537839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132886440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24163319,0.0013333401,0.0000014933828,0.0304542,0.0016406089,0.0006737489,0.000099281315,0.00003524606,0.7241289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9142984,0.00014676433,0.0000115190505,0.00170843,0.00030387138,0.000032025564,0.00010785245,0.000038616465,0.083352506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967049,0.00054806605,0.0008738109,0.0005778227,0.0008331683,0.0004622699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739283,0.00063459715,0.00071946677,0.00081848307,0.0003463976,0.00008822883],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010818031,0.00053040375,0.0008917376,0.0004005936,0.0007718813,0.00036311298,0.0011435897,0.0005035766,0.003626055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004268846,0.00040859476,0.0005321887,0.0004648218,0.0007086186,0.00011334581,0.00028166466,0.0024147972,0.000029096444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018852967,0.00013414846,0.000052815656,0.00095041224,0.00013262975,0.000009271797,0.1212948,0.000016642021,0.000068662215,0.87687665,0.00010256937,0.00017284827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004977019,0.000044779965,0.0007567718,0.004723329,0.00019343497,6.666701e-7,0.027787745,0.00008990428,0.000452559,0.94393975,0.02106721,0.00044613605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014018129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059607208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67266524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010173049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059257966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132891940","doi":"","title":"Kant on Personhood","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Personhood; Natural (archaeology); Intentionality","score_opus":0.0582900250561272,"score_gpt":0.35454930737636425,"score_spread":0.29625928232023707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132891940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07306328,0.0046466356,0.0000011598494,0.012073459,0.006773511,0.00032583557,0.00007677734,0.00015249588,0.90288687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7721381,0.000618801,0.0000024335025,0.0010099903,0.003083829,0.00003328546,0.00024267992,0.00012255154,0.2227483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975375,0.00011494361,0.00039448673,0.0007920176,0.00066075963,0.00050028606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986449,0.0002841734,0.00017661473,0.00048648665,0.00019074607,0.00021710209],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040683936,0.00065419567,0.000557094,0.00028040874,0.0007474703,0.0007823512,0.00035137872,0.00058566144,0.013715571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103266204,0.00055632245,0.00050834625,0.00007770165,0.00031680462,0.00006583102,0.000054661614,0.0024428759,0.01022721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014781044,0.0001415701,5.7036743e-8,0.00064783025,0.00019540578,0.00007313978,0.24249929,0.0000024033602,0.00006481238,0.7543071,0.0009685586,0.00095203944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002106177,0.00050752785,0.0000041342983,0.0016761149,0.0003057207,0.000002407794,0.07723758,0.00019667206,0.00016610268,0.64389443,0.27513203,0.0006666758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035153952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036187604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69907486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009104733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024750567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132932394","doi":"","title":"A Pragmatic Approach to Metaethics","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Normative; Normative social influence; Ask price; Normative model of decision-making; Expressivism","score_opus":0.10634494074943343,"score_gpt":0.3724882655684867,"score_spread":0.26614332481905323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132932394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010842322,0.000777379,0.0002526128,0.009108723,0.0037575106,0.00147065,0.00008578512,0.00037196762,0.97333306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6402923,0.0004433929,0.0004281686,0.0026897923,0.0028290446,0.00050563813,0.0012780881,0.000390941,0.35114267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959172,0.00043375182,0.0007825617,0.0009678818,0.0011197085,0.0007788868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665034,0.0010161569,0.00040573583,0.00085924804,0.0005963438,0.00047220074],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021172445,0.00078438607,0.0010394104,0.00050180877,0.0011929397,0.0007935177,0.0007675262,0.00090932177,0.0014225412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012358472,0.0007306197,0.00045923618,0.00035384996,0.00036480598,0.000114587405,0.00017764505,0.002772062,0.0056542447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007400125,0.00019839362,8.733372e-8,0.0014097095,0.0002585771,0.00000761125,0.311805,0.00005584782,0.00004020749,0.6851307,0.00066709955,0.00035275662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003338867,0.00022069184,0.000013864326,0.000803282,0.0005321369,0.0000023879627,0.12692198,0.00092851924,0.0000409643,0.75386274,0.11523917,0.0011003886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008658998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006336707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62944996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087130895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042121304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132935350","doi":"","title":"Belief Internalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Temptation; Normative; Moral psychology; Externalism; Incompatibilism; Philosophy of mind; Theism","score_opus":0.057995336808069675,"score_gpt":0.32969145854763554,"score_spread":0.27169612173956587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132935350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039213922,0.0009218907,8.9973423e-7,0.0011444318,0.0020690972,0.00007171437,0.000011552428,0.00007910595,0.95648736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5652743,0.0003309855,0.000004319018,0.0005378455,0.0017224879,0.000007454467,0.0002566129,0.000038051297,0.43182793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927527,0.000025969153,0.00014719264,0.00018636158,0.00021373977,0.00015149312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994793,0.00005225108,0.000106451225,0.00018938865,0.00011353335,0.00005906492],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000074409625,0.00017689147,0.00020519448,0.00007510809,0.00018564612,0.00007707052,0.00019887391,0.00016931271,0.0052188523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035706915,0.00015422002,0.00012684276,0.000012196884,0.0001244148,0.000040331815,0.000016716856,0.0005744989,0.000834564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002527917,0.000026152939,1.5264277e-7,0.00004722391,0.000034479777,0.000019730187,0.11128943,1.0656472e-7,0.00001909864,0.8844301,0.0036458378,0.00046238778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009381405,0.00003324485,0.0000066059197,0.00012365691,0.00002101066,0.0000021207854,0.0044851154,0.0000028346637,0.00009934232,0.36811304,0.6268172,0.0002020007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057595037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013952041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6231714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018449871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053034986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132952705","doi":"","title":"The Epigenesis of Pure Reason: Systematicity in Kant&apos;s Critical Philosophy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Critical philosophy; Epigenesis; Interpretation (philosophy); Doctrine; Transcendental number; Interpreter; Critical theory","score_opus":0.07605054091404408,"score_gpt":0.3603520321066351,"score_spread":0.284301491192591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132952705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.237212,0.007391737,0.000002289743,0.010182938,0.0019883502,0.0008186056,0.000053326585,0.00006508974,0.74228567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874573,0.00024030774,0.000008663538,0.00010384529,0.0007046904,0.000101167534,0.00005570656,0.000042169202,0.011286147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998246,0.00025321275,0.0005315893,0.00025932968,0.0004350835,0.00027477907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765503,0.0012016826,0.00025149845,0.0004332777,0.00038012175,0.000078410136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006532284,0.00026664353,0.0005486222,0.00009560495,0.0003122709,0.00014369035,0.00038783575,0.00030116367,0.0008678789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007331026,0.00017512517,0.00018645087,0.000052434978,0.00039469948,0.00007625067,0.000033469543,0.0006168546,0.000136137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004874833,0.000069871225,0.0000017779607,0.0019475989,0.000042568823,0.000005201001,0.027339011,6.409278e-7,0.00004502905,0.9702035,0.00017401374,0.00012203833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013726421,0.00006689684,0.000049239687,0.0017720242,0.00007888847,0.0000010113531,0.016038757,0.00004583803,0.0001884287,0.97835976,0.0029994994,0.00026237773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055607705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020878543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75024533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003351252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008835919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95026654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132987147","doi":"","title":"Hegel&apos;s critique of the concept of consciousness, its relevance to contemporary epistemology and philosophy of mind","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Philosophy of mind; Social epistemology; Philosophy of science; Foundationalism; Contemporary philosophy","score_opus":0.06902495950848384,"score_gpt":0.3491712184850695,"score_spread":0.2801462589765856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132987147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4688239,0.0088579655,0.0000026242944,0.007318544,0.0008854598,0.0006695287,0.0003424309,0.000012372943,0.51308715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887758,0.00018425792,0.000009487735,0.00028728266,0.00019382489,0.000013152764,0.000049644284,0.00002843787,0.010458115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986897,0.00017048353,0.00051159953,0.00025344812,0.00023382354,0.00014092654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980028,0.0005033221,0.00056424056,0.00031793554,0.0005520525,0.000059646223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024857896,0.00021792401,0.0006616281,0.00009197641,0.000091834685,0.000010550464,0.0002738615,0.00025941723,0.00029617836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031324686,0.00016909807,0.00013380914,0.0000586439,0.0009640303,0.00004773101,0.000051534375,0.00036552138,0.000003347895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020832928,0.00006909284,0.000010384834,0.00071457203,0.00006347326,0.000004479664,0.042914473,0.000001649893,0.00095151307,0.9547198,0.00024147099,0.00010078203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005625433,0.00034777512,0.000055475844,0.0016742583,0.000078337835,0.000004972122,0.00915211,0.000003488837,0.02350438,0.94510996,0.019197594,0.00030907438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040749524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068315247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5199519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010021463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019952477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68956196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132997561","doi":"","title":"The virtue of freedom, the development and meaning of Hegel&apos;s idea of the good life","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Virtue; The good life; Form of the Good; Meaning of life","score_opus":0.05426385654528011,"score_gpt":0.31011933263222835,"score_spread":0.25585547608694825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132997561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2996756,0.002156751,0.000003484212,0.002446567,0.0006554007,0.00031626582,0.000018660332,0.000011347154,0.6947159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99076766,0.00014844161,0.000012312366,0.0000693233,0.00015968183,0.000010502026,0.0000115335,0.000020037747,0.008800532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989101,0.00010775014,0.0003860522,0.0001230331,0.0003524855,0.0001205312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840355,0.0005428188,0.00050278613,0.00030475997,0.00021654073,0.000029545197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006623482,0.00015546911,0.00026649746,0.00003106946,0.0004112989,0.000034765537,0.00038144595,0.00010928692,0.00008095255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020703924,0.00007220705,0.00010253509,0.000042737844,0.00052852946,0.000023883264,0.00007045606,0.00037245092,0.0000016307174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004730451,0.000022603344,0.000007713939,0.00012880105,0.0001058997,1.6489126e-7,0.08445291,0.000005916414,0.000111643014,0.91461825,0.000039900064,0.00045886147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004326328,0.00010449734,0.00068562065,0.000875048,0.00019022814,0.00000112355,0.0956505,0.000042438238,0.0039879857,0.8308506,0.066885635,0.00029368832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003795522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00543499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.691092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009493815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018607367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31634203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133025982","doi":"","title":"Analysis, Systematicity and the Transcendental in Hermann Cohen&apos;s System of Critical Idealism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Yale University","keywords":"Transcendental number; Hegelianism; Judgement; Absoluteness; Transcendental idealism; Intuition; A priori and a posteriori; Empiricism; Critical philosophy","score_opus":0.041456558155238306,"score_gpt":0.34588992448901623,"score_spread":0.30443336633377793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133025982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71107036,0.0041504563,0.000017187484,0.002116835,0.00079904596,0.0010214122,0.00010431805,0.000059755454,0.28066063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973141,0.000027599133,0.0000021490391,0.000058459562,0.00015553221,0.00005709694,0.00009514018,0.000018790257,0.002271138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842197,0.00035744224,0.00050100725,0.0002116463,0.00034075463,0.00016715714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987541,0.0006070147,0.00018580267,0.0002357834,0.000160587,0.00005671554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077294547,0.00020167591,0.0007979611,0.00017154834,0.00013440281,0.00011457109,0.00019041626,0.00019143577,0.0002973378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081517435,0.0001288154,0.00022476184,0.000069415226,0.0005632559,0.0000444725,0.000013891741,0.0004420084,0.000016295946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070160684,0.000027939719,0.0000035020323,0.0042230287,0.00023536618,0.0000042119095,0.10319103,0.0000018785476,0.0000118607,0.8922133,0.000009243389,0.000008500547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035323505,0.00013866123,0.0010222386,0.005989618,0.007071381,0.000013383981,0.59356415,0.0069643646,0.00016473778,0.3800186,0.00036292718,0.0011576135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004056658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054554953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5121947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029274008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031539574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61324805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133050802","doi":"","title":"Kant&apos;s Hypothetical Imperative","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Temptation; Categorical variable; Stupidity; Categorical imperative; Set (abstract data type); Consequentialism","score_opus":0.08213387461769794,"score_gpt":0.3879207960383661,"score_spread":0.30578692142066816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133050802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08489593,0.0015910114,0.000040800707,0.01341009,0.0032702042,0.00051953905,0.00017601287,0.000110151,0.89598626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83282226,0.00087999867,0.000014532885,0.00078075053,0.0030975544,0.00005296588,0.00013162663,0.00012492161,0.16209541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667406,0.0003289551,0.00065013353,0.000872535,0.00069275755,0.0007815525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971455,0.00088680297,0.00035464572,0.0006296288,0.00060634717,0.0003771085],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005343847,0.0008090392,0.0008513917,0.00019548062,0.0014044229,0.0004926129,0.0005133618,0.000852837,0.03331983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032845206,0.0005861477,0.00050594506,0.000057581285,0.0013614255,0.00018060586,0.00009658615,0.0014725045,0.0041898717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030750624,0.00016930919,5.9410905e-7,0.00014618246,0.00020220429,0.000029775236,0.11272917,1.5860253e-7,0.0014661547,0.8822162,0.0002413172,0.0024914024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007694085,0.0004329801,0.0000145643435,0.0008320024,0.00021609504,0.000006110079,0.018123642,0.000026392181,0.0022165375,0.85266876,0.12367553,0.0010179841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020180871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025486157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7479263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010035271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003925237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139614570","doi":"","title":"Commentary on Patrick Bondy, âBias in Legitimate Ad Hominem Argumentsâ","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Exposition (narrative); Meaning (existential); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03566149692537196,"score_gpt":0.22982000567798336,"score_spread":0.1941585087526114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139614570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89455235,0.00061069906,0.000010124338,0.06230291,0.00083124934,0.00065031956,0.0012293828,0.00007279218,0.039740164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98711705,0.0008606294,0.000046534664,0.0038483173,0.0003918069,0.0000015935635,0.000057699413,0.000080537626,0.00759582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502945,0.0008278486,0.00072995876,0.0011479323,0.0011089654,0.001155843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964546,0.0009435658,0.0006628933,0.0011015076,0.00028290355,0.000554558],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018724675,0.00075377716,0.0010514352,0.00093176094,0.0014189797,0.00015630171,0.0014256992,0.0006759213,0.0092051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001711912,0.0007334113,0.0006571965,0.0003334106,0.0020270988,0.0015918366,0.00096498214,0.0015329325,0.0013685684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0133250095,0.0070572784,0.043174576,0.0011134425,0.0016397763,0.0021113658,0.047289986,0.000027959128,0.0074538104,0.8391087,0.011509468,0.026188599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027900856,0.003734082,0.07460488,0.0058557983,0.0007807871,0.00002675085,0.010281629,0.00006928708,0.0022509967,0.4830788,0.38761657,0.0037995342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003815436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015579491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37610713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006715446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015878926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148366894","doi":"10.5406/21521026.42.4.09","title":"Kant's Epochal Lecture Announcement on Teaching and Autonomy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Autonomy; Doctrine; Absolute (philosophy); Term (time)","score_opus":0.02633811095443788,"score_gpt":0.23019797121769883,"score_spread":0.20385986026326094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148366894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016122727,0.0019328615,0.00013739867,0.009354713,0.0017715408,0.00019098968,0.000031048752,0.000079687394,0.97037905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934674,0.0000035821413,0.000043883858,0.0024056106,0.0005524388,0.00001533207,0.000008641157,0.000013632291,0.0034894648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989061,0.0001276017,0.00029995947,0.00029654676,0.00019656302,0.00017327988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999323,0.0001489996,0.00011845813,0.0002760496,0.00007050877,0.00006299218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036855295,0.00019618151,0.00027677167,0.00020775097,0.00026711475,0.00002867472,0.00016319858,0.000084400854,0.000287436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021640803,0.00017754833,0.000103791856,0.000015558997,0.00065701397,0.000115078656,0.000018032815,0.00055964146,0.0000248195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006331962,0.00014917616,0.0000018142472,0.00010912844,0.000050824216,0.0000043968075,0.03101935,0.0000011675224,0.00018854684,0.9586286,0.0011299724,0.0086536845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027429315,0.0005151851,0.000008640123,0.00011025479,0.000022626858,5.737157e-7,0.0001997356,0.000030552557,0.000004917025,0.65483457,0.34387687,0.000121761295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065351735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025638616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9773447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027288444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018230514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7240211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148495683","doi":"10.36253/ds-15898","title":"Scottish Common Sense Philosophy: Twelve Theses","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Diciottesimo Secolo","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Common sense; Principal (computer security); Common knowledge (logic); Period (music); Questions and answers; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.026587456107829897,"score_gpt":0.27927632885038234,"score_spread":0.2526888727425524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148495683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09174577,0.007171801,0.000022030232,0.042109385,0.0043963147,0.00096286274,0.0004978138,0.0002732035,0.8528208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9598005,0.0009961354,0.000014382257,0.030129876,0.0025933655,0.000063571555,0.000069038535,0.00009732214,0.0062358505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509835,0.0006994152,0.0012667412,0.0011014532,0.00064670737,0.0011873151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995079,0.0024740954,0.0003991163,0.0012382276,0.00045453987,0.00035502875],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012239564,0.00090481545,0.0012797836,0.00052756426,0.0022008654,0.000978863,0.0007796041,0.0007326271,0.008186167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046962468,0.0008682169,0.00065794395,0.000334512,0.0027479017,0.00039926884,0.0006353718,0.0021500185,0.0009664175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002635209,0.00085697696,0.00037612498,0.00062076235,0.0006051221,0.0002394738,0.0039128917,0.000013928657,0.00004881422,0.985868,0.0040177265,0.0031767003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010701473,0.00035875014,0.0006398467,0.0010240177,0.00033933102,0.0000052605205,0.0009075596,0.0002782578,0.0002480869,0.8019231,0.19246523,0.0007403996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044342523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010209001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8680547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022192633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045137937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7152338500","doi":"","title":"How to Leap Without Looking: The Role of Habits in Rational Life","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; King's College London","keywords":"Rationality; Narrative; Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Practical reason; Period (music); Dialectic; Rational agent","score_opus":0.028257363818882643,"score_gpt":0.24155050928394525,"score_spread":0.21329314546506262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7152338500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034735323,0.0014088028,0.000004989032,0.064849734,0.0012668584,0.00091118034,0.000120923,0.000116211704,0.93097395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65029466,0.00013038637,0.000025932495,0.004655203,0.0039349003,0.0001731894,0.0003401441,0.00016864706,0.34027696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966958,0.00014701199,0.00079779216,0.0008064155,0.001079845,0.00047309182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772197,0.0006057942,0.00035701017,0.0006752236,0.0004099167,0.0002300609],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081629545,0.00064325944,0.0007552575,0.00052826206,0.00051909126,0.0007824267,0.00082183856,0.00036522766,0.0020469232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004928071,0.0004910866,0.00035047941,0.00015298477,0.0013322571,0.00041593827,0.00024179876,0.0014407284,0.0008867917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007222836,0.000058603022,0.00000846139,0.00015566502,0.00031427052,0.0000051647426,0.009545634,0.000031542757,0.00011810181,0.98350906,0.0012413335,0.0049399175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019216536,0.00006619894,0.000010868744,0.00027446097,0.000098809156,0.000002240709,0.0005915114,0.000038299302,0.000013359852,0.457793,0.5405714,0.0003476632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000063000996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012268084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6499473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003077363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001109996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7157158287","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10043","title":"Agency and Objectivity: Gomesian Faith or Cartesian Clarity?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Faith; Agency (philosophy); Objectivity (philosophy); CLARITY; Omniscience; Defeasible estate; Denial","score_opus":0.03544088546000915,"score_gpt":0.24543252651944825,"score_spread":0.2099916410594391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7157158287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06513289,0.0032960149,0.00007311254,0.08791132,0.002252187,0.00022663659,0.00012652572,0.000024766556,0.8409565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994562,0.00003885135,0.000032133652,0.0032818653,0.001159479,0.0000017871708,0.0000015456556,0.000015720727,0.0009066622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989699,0.00009664012,0.00034670022,0.0001576162,0.00014476394,0.0002843949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987857,0.00012722507,0.00013837106,0.00017489234,0.00023277556,0.00054108945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042987967,0.00016728498,0.00032056344,0.0005350249,0.0005064249,0.00022882235,0.0002481531,0.000111793655,0.0006488156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018945351,0.0001308276,0.00012236346,0.0001066287,0.00062634505,0.00027084022,0.000020263811,0.00063050934,0.000010087003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029038092,0.000017925133,0.00019370127,0.00005458139,0.00008580106,0.00025060473,0.0040349527,5.21384e-7,0.000008165463,0.99222267,0.0004931862,0.0026088716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034918232,0.00016628648,0.0006120627,0.0001668211,0.000054799748,0.00004112493,0.0002670271,0.0000062437575,0.000008807261,0.91034,0.08784666,0.0001409849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022107505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04655164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92942905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008677919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013346265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9708463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164842621","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-27828-0_327-1","title":"Moral Authority","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.09152466457761864,"score_gpt":0.2586174774799579,"score_spread":0.16709281290233924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164842621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.2680635e-7,0.00021450485,0.0000060238026,0.00394451,0.0009150576,0.00007763863,0.000109468114,0.000117230564,0.9946153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01063432,0.000052056075,0.000012432432,0.0019524319,0.0014143754,0.0000024347617,0.00003459133,0.00001835365,0.985879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933666,0.0000074857107,0.00017610835,0.00020669136,0.00015766967,0.00011536932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947524,0.000085564294,0.00004841737,0.000236121,0.00010166452,0.00005302168],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013314694,0.00018859796,0.00024027431,0.00007605055,0.00018107764,0.00009649841,0.00016794141,0.00023812424,0.03651209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014605636,0.00015047214,0.00017032005,0.000001920088,0.00036481605,0.00003553119,0.00009576967,0.00064526196,0.0007111929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004765472,0.0000064696637,3.0913405e-8,0.000036901256,0.000043555418,0.000007049871,0.00025569863,1.9591576e-8,4.6156355e-8,0.98512065,0.012832184,0.001692614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002604229,0.000010236601,3.7712606e-8,0.000038579823,0.000018025665,1.2705966e-7,0.0000049117857,0.0000027330984,2.9209056e-7,0.50712407,0.49267995,0.00009498419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043839762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021902725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47984776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019254601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006878684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96436864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165005367","doi":"10.7202/1126061ar","title":"Incertitude et présomption de bonté dans les premières Lumières allemandes","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Christian tradition","score_opus":0.17443432998590233,"score_gpt":0.3788036414641195,"score_spread":0.20436931147821716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165005367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023397941,0.039447874,0.0007952454,0.38959882,0.0014294046,0.0004798229,0.00024880943,0.00036098392,0.54424113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680047,0.00838886,0.0002275755,0.011185411,0.0047511267,0.00010802879,0.00006675817,0.0000627161,0.007204808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970241,0.0006880853,0.0006681017,0.0006068106,0.00036419538,0.0006486802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981969,0.00063051144,0.00020662758,0.00050724926,0.00029919445,0.00015951628],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010974422,0.0005201188,0.0005268625,0.00026857716,0.00096555945,0.0004914171,0.00055238575,0.00043551787,0.00067265896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024014834,0.0005066953,0.000323881,0.000070220245,0.0018604855,0.000529422,0.00030526062,0.0010862229,0.00007653203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014455855,0.0005651062,0.0004613114,0.00089461444,0.0003339101,0.00003185862,0.011170915,0.00007598995,0.00053032895,0.97936,0.0043247226,0.0021067013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032787162,0.00014046961,0.0010338328,0.0010075088,0.0001551066,0.0000049264954,0.00029686277,0.00035053128,0.0005993697,0.71351534,0.28220254,0.0003656294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030890158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004081919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9446068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033450843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003187297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165028081","doi":"10.7202/1126080ar","title":"Maria Baghramian, J. Adam Carter et Rach Cosker-Rowland (dir.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Disagreement, New York : Routledge, 2024, 548 pages","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Cover (algebra)","score_opus":0.1580012003171719,"score_gpt":0.33397807200073604,"score_spread":0.17597687168356413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165028081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00071040646,0.26917443,0.0006113321,0.27299142,0.0037755342,0.0012404026,0.0011312978,0.000109135675,0.45025605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940294,0.011604091,0.00017223854,0.008346656,0.007891506,0.000081311264,0.00012561139,0.00012105434,0.031363532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948552,0.0010221547,0.0016972767,0.0008666184,0.0007824455,0.00077630096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952852,0.0015661066,0.0007982941,0.001412598,0.0006376456,0.00030015587],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001562597,0.0009094156,0.0014269678,0.00037946407,0.00063251966,0.0002849275,0.0012246142,0.00059800444,0.0026924326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003297928,0.0007012678,0.00082420016,0.00028296793,0.002967568,0.00044537563,0.00062696903,0.0015519339,0.000106648025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037973622,0.00076050626,0.00035836434,0.0011678573,0.00095676084,0.0000144520445,0.0054908474,0.000013784357,0.00013678469,0.9136662,0.074542396,0.0025123102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011821269,0.00039922603,0.00024069687,0.0028080004,0.000580528,0.0000032481032,0.00020793037,0.00011836881,0.0005176981,0.73781526,0.25563204,0.00049488986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019130614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012594484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9395836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014551241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005770914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W852737998","doi":"","title":"Review of: Freedom and Anthropology in Kant's Moral Philosophy by Patrick R. Frierson.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moral philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.029669555535469117,"score_gpt":0.2375459646578869,"score_spread":0.20787640912241778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W852737998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80654275,0.07369989,0.00029097527,0.022711443,0.00044323187,0.00047945906,0.00042166002,0.00007674557,0.09533387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900107,0.008766125,0.00007493152,0.00084078836,0.00011980898,1.4677764e-7,0.000027827708,0.000008102841,0.00015156445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899215,0.00011931042,0.0002233164,0.00025497464,0.0001873682,0.00022287774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992346,0.000109263485,0.00020536919,0.00022077962,0.00013408333,0.0000958833],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036173663,0.0001582798,0.00047417355,0.00015651091,0.00025023028,0.00001796741,0.00025653612,0.00012035898,0.00097181177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006561067,0.00017286697,0.00013181483,0.00010944832,0.0017888554,0.00026808959,0.00007628813,0.00029510562,0.000013262033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044317516,0.0001203017,0.00022817911,0.000545881,0.000030198376,0.000012600975,0.0035472221,8.159815e-7,0.0000032106886,0.99398327,0.0014026364,0.00008138103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005915432,0.00025930608,0.00012005669,0.00047009243,0.000054829037,0.000003051524,0.0017751113,0.000027635882,1.8161533e-7,0.9915036,0.0050159115,0.00017868265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008131841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036655884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18346798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031550506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004014271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W913265252","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498855.004","title":"The Basic Framework: From Desire to Value and Action","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Physics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.10529191476721482,"score_gpt":0.24629593162357225,"score_spread":0.14100401685635744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W913265252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037503647,0.00024012175,0.00030648542,0.00023378154,0.0005554526,0.00023772965,0.00028261158,0.00007461998,0.99769413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033594012,0.00021700791,0.000034942776,0.00073825143,0.0010939867,5.2720327e-7,0.00001967786,0.000041126194,0.96426046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903685,0.00003991145,0.00013306609,0.0003450763,0.00022768248,0.00021743424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864423,0.0005672905,0.0001084828,0.00037691457,0.00012816522,0.00017490248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019816813,0.00025076623,0.00022392365,0.000084635,0.00090260897,0.00017713357,0.00031095554,0.0003472106,0.000020950065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026894664,0.00021874833,0.00011573646,0.0000022008107,0.0006723994,0.000058004298,0.0002715104,0.00087778724,0.000025833642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012636685,0.000003603476,7.0860736e-8,0.000016247619,0.00010058825,0.000045377546,0.0005861045,2.7280498e-7,0.0000022914446,0.99228984,0.0008725716,0.005956655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109429406,0.000034863227,0.000004791396,0.0001532452,0.00010927358,0.0000010886632,0.0001639483,0.000008772322,0.000020866535,0.13150658,0.86764586,0.00024130232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038297815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057760386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86677325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080862614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041583953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8920298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W91372609","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0418-3_17","title":"The a priori Grounds of Proof of the Existence of a supremely perfect, necessary, independent Being.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in German idealism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Subject (documents); Philosophy; Existence of God; Computer science","score_opus":0.06522169258240189,"score_gpt":0.308290350920019,"score_spread":0.2430686583376171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W91372609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014210405,0.0067497357,5.598937e-7,0.0018104226,0.0017440089,0.00070299977,0.00017359531,0.00001366287,0.9745946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692538,0.0012624569,0.000005330201,0.00011805459,0.00043625344,0.000028080934,0.0000036831298,0.00003741723,0.028854929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978267,0.00008818035,0.00089577737,0.00027768494,0.00067728345,0.00023435843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711376,0.0007014108,0.0008696057,0.0007358111,0.0005502667,0.00002911929],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010851844,0.00031047955,0.0007488987,0.000109526154,0.00037701003,0.000025370993,0.0008435813,0.00024020963,0.00006563815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018979583,0.00017668896,0.00031801447,0.000025895139,0.0055749244,0.00004343024,0.0007427761,0.0011946107,0.0000013234255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004043537,0.000025184649,0.0000065126655,0.00053557125,0.00024240695,0.000004093561,0.041410964,3.1040273e-7,0.0000359534,0.9572034,0.00006156081,0.0004335939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002167534,0.00010836572,0.000048748207,0.00086936686,0.000092417584,0.0000027384615,0.0007021064,0.000001622867,0.00016164177,0.9472139,0.050407384,0.00017494168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030367676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064905724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004483471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012375522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99713135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W963884259","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0002","title":"Hume on Art Critics, Wise Men, and the Virtues of Taste","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Beauty; Taste; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Exposition (narrative); Epistemic virtue; Clearance; Psychology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.06293815843604779,"score_gpt":0.2829823822691093,"score_spread":0.22004422383306155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W963884259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023722412,0.004680895,0.0000074480486,0.020902665,0.0004663089,0.00018743779,0.000030740066,0.000049131973,0.94995296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436706,0.0006474439,0.000004840105,0.0015962159,0.00049080764,0.000012463476,0.0000011022435,0.000009433402,0.002870621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993165,0.00011203037,0.00017574313,0.00012626658,0.00015196942,0.0001174998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886936,0.0007455928,0.000056859546,0.00016658039,0.00013731916,0.000024297642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000570989,0.00010983091,0.00026559207,0.00003001974,0.00037214512,0.0000397707,0.00009084116,0.000022542476,0.000091502145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037324298,0.000060890758,0.00005683477,0.000010279929,0.0026965733,0.000044254633,0.0000952669,0.0001438394,0.00004613675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048130612,0.000024869632,0.000004405015,0.000053189913,0.00009609572,4.882993e-7,0.015430836,5.242082e-7,0.000008846717,0.98170424,0.0022458627,0.00038251173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047786054,0.00013519739,0.00002850938,0.000071145005,0.00004172787,2.9362477e-7,0.0036422226,0.000021022124,0.000053593045,0.89877135,0.09667727,0.000079808626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014758571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007014963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97064465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000042528145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004301891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98105299","doi":"10.22329/p.v3i1.296","title":"Hegel's Guilty Conscience: Three Forms of &lt;i&gt;Schuld&lt;/i&gt; in the &lt;i&gt;Phenomenology of Spirit&lt;/i&gt;","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Shame; Forgiveness; Confession (law); Phenomenology (philosophy); Psychoanalysis; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Feeling; Punishment (psychology); Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.06116282654042276,"score_gpt":0.2638228221457751,"score_spread":0.20265999560535236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98105299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6505344,0.0043370826,0.00006249077,0.005659721,0.0006121594,0.0005752371,0.00020253046,0.000077610115,0.3379388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967398,0.0006626497,0.000086628075,0.0011383869,0.0005588421,0.0000732613,0.000031794858,0.000050723364,0.0006578947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960117,0.00026439084,0.0011836749,0.0006639754,0.0009712554,0.0009050532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969089,0.0007802811,0.0005282664,0.0011698954,0.0004243919,0.00018823678],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018971438,0.0004886778,0.00092144706,0.00037572617,0.0006821889,0.000073903255,0.0016726954,0.00031133657,0.0012792406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041181306,0.0003477118,0.00035392912,0.00034025882,0.0053340835,0.0004232041,0.00040356413,0.0006280432,0.00011306214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010297137,0.00051990803,0.000097647266,0.00009304248,0.00007394904,0.000044333236,0.011037017,0.000030398476,0.018551208,0.96785915,0.00062994054,0.0009604545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013404485,0.0005211341,0.0014256642,0.0000857581,0.000055038345,0.00004378527,0.00023303337,0.00021970746,0.0009508696,0.8124,0.18226951,0.0004550437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000589316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002906412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3462054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007732742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034387072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W997711300","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i4.3833","title":"Reason in the Balance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.0743684308359901,"score_gpt":0.26310020116898947,"score_spread":0.18873177033299937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W997711300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06933426,0.00023729201,0.0000031509933,0.0020913032,0.00023746127,0.000053314638,0.0000042546903,0.000019224948,0.92801976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927228,0.000014943285,0.0000057808998,0.006361076,0.00060758047,0.000008749057,0.0000037620673,0.00000227451,0.0002730316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954444,0.000025569077,0.0001012464,0.000030985033,0.00010488066,0.00019290448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997451,0.00008787426,0.000025762823,0.00010179048,0.000014422905,0.00002510714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054219255,0.000051667557,0.00005485913,0.000020422302,0.00010032092,0.000047994603,0.00014897618,0.000031580566,0.000554368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004373935,0.000027716313,0.000027224793,0.000018575372,0.00013069775,0.0002995582,0.000024363333,0.00021055508,0.00034387704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005755258,0.000022473325,0.000325591,0.0000044809226,0.0000012731842,9.1055887e-7,0.013803216,8.692882e-7,6.7779456e-7,0.98498285,0.00010711522,0.0007447682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000999696,0.000031672847,0.0034802142,0.0000075500434,0.0000020168043,0.0000040745763,0.0010064961,0.000029508445,0.0000031845636,0.5156583,0.47960573,0.00007124962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036746987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038080416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000047577855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000062187987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60699415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}