{"meta":{"query_hash":"e7b4f8aa6eee","filters":{"topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory"},"cohort_total":648,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":648,"exported":648,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e7b4f8aa6eee","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Philosophical+Ethics+and+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W119376149","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-3227-0_11","title":"Le «besoin de la raison» dans les Lettres sur la philosophie kantienne (1786–1787)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in German idealism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Enlightenment; Sensibility; Feeling; Theme (computing); Faith; Epistemology; Humanities; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.06385447464813034,"score_gpt":0.3183792825048857,"score_spread":0.25452480785675535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W119376149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07084927,0.10178644,0.0054926225,0.052562464,0.0061687706,0.000036334568,0.00024478225,0.00007317838,0.7627862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7703367,0.017472645,0.0024044085,0.003931216,0.001886022,0.000060616945,0.00009282059,0.0002075039,0.20360804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808747,0.0009537285,0.00007612072,0.00028514405,0.00030847834,0.0002889342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994854,0.0002940296,0.00006926877,0.000041265586,0.00007309419,0.000037050602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022427475,0.0006348072,0.00037283523,0.0022481733,0.0046378467,0.0045497837,0.0005297344,0.0025084992,0.003813831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002696339,0.00039510353,0.00025843948,0.002611743,0.019341711,0.0052492716,0.0022072701,0.0045717373,0.00076454075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023008055,0.0000048520255,0.0000704219,0.00003357823,0.0000024839503,0.000035363613,0.007837468,0.00009468949,0.00007875439,0.97791755,0.007082291,0.0068196394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001849452,0.000018484117,0.0015727489,0.00021177773,0.0000066228736,0.00015267952,0.0022143342,0.000119057855,0.0004337497,0.17439553,0.82082933,0.000027200562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025141684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03162669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025141684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009789643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042734398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071029186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W132855506","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-05146-8_3","title":"The Normativity of Evaluative Concepts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Normative; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07174483384650521,"score_gpt":0.29608842382779493,"score_spread":0.22434358998128973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W132855506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007924821,0.010062965,0.10345382,0.020858724,0.0011899997,0.0000511842,0.0001047366,0.00007980648,0.8562739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8265367,0.0050851367,0.03750616,0.0056236545,0.0023167431,0.0005128538,0.00014155288,0.00030216124,0.12197501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881364,0.007911191,0.00042832067,0.00083487295,0.0023119336,0.00037729854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98861045,0.008510584,0.0004563495,0.0010031424,0.0012606584,0.00015879452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009088198,0.0006023596,0.000591716,0.00138408,0.0025623182,0.00912328,0.001234829,0.002498542,0.005778419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013768973,0.00052000623,0.00048536793,0.0014138577,0.03666613,0.012195149,0.002368827,0.0051677534,0.0009740656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014068481,0.0000018891893,0.00001385471,0.000008616773,9.32904e-7,0.0000031575244,0.00036824186,0.000022319282,0.000016896038,0.9972692,0.0007985639,0.0014948162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017949535,0.0000018095146,0.00004240733,0.000030760206,0.0000012368471,0.000011191221,0.00018181604,0.0000885483,0.00006349359,0.9839655,0.015608725,0.0000027544506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017827768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017794941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00912328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042148614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027812014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048063576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W136671433","doi":"10.1023/a:1010744722791","title":"On Michael Smith's Internalisms","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04195958711766651,"score_gpt":0.24730682966483689,"score_spread":0.20534724254717038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W136671433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008538469,0.003849619,0.02032452,0.16151795,0.002342569,0.000027822314,0.00008534528,0.00011016161,0.8032035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6769572,0.0035843418,0.0102790315,0.039595027,0.0035393797,0.00024407751,0.000076697725,0.00040742345,0.2653168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621695,0.0019481211,0.000119597324,0.0004537775,0.00083462335,0.00042690878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730825,0.001543982,0.00017833806,0.00031113805,0.00044939297,0.00020889218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037113922,0.0006563469,0.00066927745,0.0019779408,0.007672966,0.008706494,0.0014309639,0.0047847973,0.014386981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072444007,0.0004616382,0.0005323272,0.0015483533,0.035614982,0.012254947,0.0064775697,0.011230055,0.0026524074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002182166,0.0000017212972,0.00001000379,0.0000038310404,6.765362e-7,0.000007528749,0.00068770093,0.000017184506,0.000008174055,0.99371225,0.004635947,0.0009127224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041086028,0.0000019559468,0.000027416205,0.000029629933,0.0000015733092,0.000020408823,0.00061145244,0.000067007866,0.000039364328,0.94286513,0.056327518,0.000004365817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060938755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063330703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014386981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065280357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003192231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04812926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W140636939","doi":"10.22329/p.v5i1.2857","title":"Confronting Natural Death in Hegel's &lt;i&gt;Phenomenology of Spirit&lt;/i&gt;","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Living systems; The good life; Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03145047644616329,"score_gpt":0.25513779024753463,"score_spread":0.22368731380137136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W140636939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2845613,0.018068034,0.06741637,0.11579036,0.0019144439,0.00009243064,0.00010469918,0.00012369848,0.5119287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781,0.0017924565,0.0027240075,0.004745684,0.00020123158,0.00007202886,0.0000145833965,0.000039079336,0.012310923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966365,0.0026914494,0.000036456462,0.00015237232,0.00025281488,0.00023036868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826247,0.00125879,0.00012233495,0.00012696862,0.000092923234,0.00013648532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042666947,0.00028473773,0.0002932221,0.0010567443,0.0061270394,0.005305329,0.0007478163,0.0023924375,0.0013606068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039109057,0.00019295285,0.00029909718,0.0006900724,0.06874332,0.0072936956,0.0059134536,0.0041286475,0.00022447457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010496241,0.000005715476,0.00010947342,0.000026797263,0.0000014339076,0.00012471282,0.065199755,0.00008740426,0.000054703334,0.9313716,0.0015907872,0.0014172109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012913801,0.000022136956,0.00018598577,0.00017507123,0.0000037210652,0.0003754079,0.087228,0.00027642987,0.00025700204,0.78900945,0.12243796,0.000015992866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022559145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025037287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061270394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004298539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022268137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03118825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1411886569","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626.010","title":"Perfecting pleasures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.08420714989336162,"score_gpt":0.19813247876808718,"score_spread":0.11392532887472556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1411886569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00796852,0.003791148,0.013850591,0.004123439,0.00045594433,0.000029167679,0.00006748237,0.00009187664,0.9696218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73557323,0.0053888042,0.0088894665,0.0019987945,0.00072667137,0.00009404338,0.00011209338,0.00023030181,0.2469867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998665,0.00048675606,0.00005176757,0.00020152969,0.000375081,0.00021983862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999047,0.00031617537,0.000071009556,0.00024568476,0.00018748641,0.00013270986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019042043,0.0006530449,0.00040206112,0.00091973547,0.0029570593,0.00543407,0.00058678637,0.0011942151,0.011040628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032878346,0.00042380212,0.00046120782,0.0005602596,0.021414807,0.007581624,0.0059118364,0.0029492723,0.0024549179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004468058,0.0000028347556,0.000047436817,0.000020019252,0.0000015327344,0.000018046672,0.00093431404,0.00006166881,0.000059252667,0.99223036,0.002772219,0.0038477804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010799252,0.000022038017,0.000239795,0.00009774504,0.0000048586026,0.00012328436,0.0006929962,0.00016989131,0.00022990545,0.7843595,0.21403772,0.000011364525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001840355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027509574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011040628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024221845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017795924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036934555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1433942009","doi":"10.7202/1044604ar","title":"The Psychology of Exclusivity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Immorality; Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Realm; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Romance; Rationality; Social psychology; Psychology; Process (computing); Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Morality; Psychoanalysis; Business","score_opus":0.04769576950061993,"score_gpt":0.3086178868290314,"score_spread":0.2609221173284115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1433942009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16784044,0.0062188995,0.052474637,0.031364672,0.00030887185,0.000046758367,0.00007020701,0.000110426176,0.7415651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992062,0.00061834854,0.0017467182,0.0009854884,0.000095404735,0.000035588528,0.000014254544,0.000027566404,0.0044145826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99206805,0.0055185966,0.00017633666,0.00089169195,0.0009858145,0.00035943495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912525,0.005268718,0.0010936528,0.0012691236,0.0005927672,0.00052328187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005726879,0.000348251,0.00035519776,0.0015280509,0.004622172,0.0073518096,0.00091570884,0.0027988728,0.0048596724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010015792,0.00047389566,0.00045474074,0.0009003373,0.067915335,0.014003785,0.00615212,0.003531858,0.00043191962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012260762,0.000010552919,0.00040125442,0.000018438857,0.000004941928,0.000036295092,0.0067094658,0.00007317456,0.00014639218,0.98896104,0.0003909197,0.0032351918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019905252,0.00003173454,0.0012827466,0.000074892014,0.000010560353,0.00021742245,0.0052774716,0.0003543941,0.00018037214,0.95713854,0.035396196,0.000015751906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015229927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008383145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073518096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026695887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013228933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030286968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1475492886","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498398.006","title":"Kant Revisited","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.04699433586974875,"score_gpt":0.20069373922856318,"score_spread":0.15369940335881443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1475492886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038860615,0.035020895,0.005994224,0.09728964,0.0028367601,0.000016780374,0.0001354161,0.00006714172,0.8547531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42983985,0.017029053,0.0041804416,0.07924951,0.0039505274,0.00012744033,0.00017202362,0.00030372155,0.4651474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839956,0.00077246217,0.00003570388,0.00024042351,0.0003262586,0.00022566471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994048,0.00027732132,0.000038896498,0.00009395219,0.00012908783,0.00005596483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014940283,0.0006102892,0.0003868747,0.0011363687,0.0037997228,0.0049293144,0.0008664564,0.005191562,0.014655768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029625273,0.00029347913,0.0004847086,0.000906105,0.011706081,0.0056747086,0.0025903755,0.009130053,0.0037014438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074620534,0.0000027438691,0.000030706633,0.000015151792,0.0000023372772,0.000018758097,0.00033828264,0.000051514053,0.000013982253,0.97768444,0.01873802,0.0030964946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008600724,0.0000036592312,0.00013510368,0.00010596605,0.000003866102,0.00009336448,0.0004139357,0.00012161865,0.00009477417,0.73619,0.26282212,0.000006890357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058450927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006291938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014655768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053442367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002752467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049028456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480578946","doi":"10.1353/hms.2000.a385726","title":"Explaining General Ideas","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Epistemology; Philosophy; Order (exchange); Psychology","score_opus":0.12870223118728708,"score_gpt":0.31678383166400337,"score_spread":0.1880816004767163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480578946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0152882,0.028079495,0.1140425,0.106803454,0.0020996612,0.00016064214,0.0005811538,0.00044644187,0.7324986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7888346,0.016916174,0.046299193,0.020219184,0.0030721389,0.0005320696,0.0011403908,0.0004938342,0.1224924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966197,0.002036186,0.00010724468,0.00048453285,0.0004893753,0.0002629331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955903,0.0027800365,0.00029156974,0.00070404407,0.0004931376,0.00014081842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048271874,0.0011066635,0.0005172049,0.002460643,0.003495339,0.006217461,0.0017769854,0.004580617,0.01757727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009101046,0.0004012071,0.0008811291,0.0018685147,0.024271363,0.013294001,0.0038365705,0.005424748,0.0029948044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038766425,0.0000046071577,0.00007492079,0.00003150683,0.0000039077445,0.000029781828,0.0017422439,0.00014345192,0.000023889965,0.9895188,0.005653822,0.0027692174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054249726,0.0000046486407,0.00010704626,0.00007773127,0.0000035527319,0.00004983377,0.00079892995,0.000291969,0.00004673571,0.9263395,0.07227036,0.000004366702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027135063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020663803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01757727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005285815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022687076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05880177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485017808","doi":"10.1002/9781444323528.ch35","title":"Akrasia and Irrationality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Rationality","score_opus":0.03512951361659639,"score_gpt":0.24480515145248383,"score_spread":0.20967563783588744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485017808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071566957,0.0071460735,0.0040312484,0.010495947,0.0005954871,0.000010533856,0.000040293995,0.00006184617,0.97046196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6282014,0.013757146,0.0047934093,0.003259684,0.0014045434,0.00008598982,0.00012112708,0.00022947571,0.34814715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982072,0.000901519,0.0001004594,0.0002203731,0.00041070406,0.00015977383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718046,0.001628526,0.000211,0.00045078844,0.00040141933,0.0001278299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016538209,0.00041854582,0.00037469505,0.0016056892,0.0029847878,0.006994053,0.0006368245,0.0017574565,0.02456027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004363265,0.00016518762,0.00030553297,0.0022031215,0.011685556,0.006098429,0.002676961,0.0037605495,0.0041820393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039241445,0.000004791913,0.00006072083,0.000024080791,0.0000014339248,0.000030769384,0.001215452,0.00004744397,0.000024860321,0.9872891,0.0053308057,0.005966594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035684893,0.0000025212985,0.00017650788,0.00007660403,0.0000031924556,0.00011662086,0.0013017849,0.00014677671,0.00011926594,0.85105014,0.14699526,0.000007684289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021394244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023973228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02456027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045275227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019013011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08216232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486963112","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511576256.008","title":"Consequences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.058886576253196356,"score_gpt":0.2073285745250651,"score_spread":0.14844199827186874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486963112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005399291,0.0018183695,0.008453592,0.030554986,0.003106421,0.0001768186,0.0013680184,0.00027766317,0.948845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3249435,0.0038418598,0.009376791,0.054212853,0.0017019452,0.00046757833,0.0019601576,0.00071257894,0.6027827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929153,0.0014803621,0.0004318875,0.00139461,0.0024394875,0.0013383074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99328303,0.0012596264,0.0005451029,0.0013088715,0.0029622137,0.0006410447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005720865,0.00093101576,0.0005965289,0.0010528844,0.003805736,0.005572075,0.0019321571,0.0039643203,0.15073791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018312614,0.00032282775,0.0010689349,0.0008099801,0.0041344627,0.0048958343,0.004573506,0.0054056486,0.029699853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095015974,0.000046939163,0.0027867737,0.00017585518,0.000029481014,0.00075031933,0.0008941503,0.00026557443,0.0005276111,0.8423604,0.11888787,0.033180073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030160787,0.00003619819,0.0022375663,0.00038419393,0.000027996079,0.0009781121,0.0014006046,0.00023822305,0.00059986324,0.20570877,0.7883284,0.000029908268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008161242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008998967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15073791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040859734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043435926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5042685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492535492","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403834","title":"The Surprise Twist in Hume's Treatise","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Sketch; Surprise; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11205246931065803,"score_gpt":0.3301092381026335,"score_spread":0.21805676879197544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492535492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01103651,0.013791527,0.020706445,0.22728924,0.0032780792,0.000018755829,0.00007532528,0.00012256912,0.7236816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7779769,0.006565569,0.005962526,0.061714888,0.00664839,0.00013629589,0.00006946683,0.00026252182,0.14066342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99380374,0.003922165,0.00008555985,0.00046353918,0.0012564897,0.00046846078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597245,0.0031062397,0.0001681589,0.0002773905,0.0003305662,0.00014522688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036525112,0.00034529038,0.00040933426,0.0010183913,0.0063428455,0.007095101,0.00082015287,0.004124133,0.0046663648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009390727,0.00023757841,0.000375751,0.0009943618,0.01915355,0.006716417,0.0026463794,0.006986691,0.0010797689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048635998,0.0000025559364,0.00003449054,0.000013893437,0.0000017026257,0.000027274195,0.001930179,0.000048738544,0.000019253255,0.9754504,0.019878538,0.0025879897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049130404,0.00001110809,0.00012760515,0.00010063736,0.0000031918953,0.0000617644,0.0012650095,0.00017649979,0.00016596408,0.7257852,0.27228847,0.000009681574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025848425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004142353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007095101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004682309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029808385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03397262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494444853","doi":"10.1353/hms.2006.a383389","title":"Hume and Locke on Scientific Methodology: The Newtonian Legacy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Ideal (ethics); Causation; Inductive reasoning","score_opus":0.29950650326561096,"score_gpt":0.35011748139926385,"score_spread":0.050610978133652895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494444853","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0109207295,0.17909844,0.13999443,0.46723515,0.00870979,0.00010612615,0.00023610999,0.0002176716,0.19348156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5817939,0.10451629,0.10820774,0.10639837,0.03288449,0.00076256535,0.00015001075,0.000526475,0.06476019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739687,0.017475579,0.00068707357,0.0019851208,0.005315563,0.0005679897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9401323,0.05176694,0.0012534921,0.0031589863,0.0029453726,0.0007428944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02787909,0.0008351687,0.0015558582,0.00470631,0.0050155595,0.0075189136,0.0018321745,0.00666393,0.0028460543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040505577,0.0008335953,0.0010305758,0.0032679494,0.065669164,0.015845004,0.0051154788,0.0122433165,0.001233869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008740886,0.000009717113,0.00008580906,0.000059477494,0.000010721872,0.000017760502,0.0009794162,0.00015240068,0.000024345163,0.98587406,0.0072105997,0.0055670175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008399456,0.000008428568,0.00007902883,0.0001254056,0.0000034532732,0.000021947231,0.00015495953,0.00021098889,0.000051851413,0.9517765,0.047549687,0.000009486531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033632847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029144734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99498445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069212294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005517832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1474405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497430573","doi":"10.1353/hms.2004.a383296","title":"The Strength of Hume's \"Weak\" Sympathy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Rogers Communications (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Philosophy; Affection; Epistemology; Criticism; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08376958146429667,"score_gpt":0.29513444380169335,"score_spread":0.21136486233739668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497430573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043117918,0.03575948,0.0024344043,0.16779408,0.001287564,0.000019547979,0.000040412062,0.000028637975,0.74951804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94032234,0.0076840348,0.00037907888,0.013438814,0.0013029153,0.000024045732,0.000012425262,0.000031924457,0.03680442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963257,0.0025569778,0.000059647722,0.0001704347,0.0006651383,0.00022216245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992942,0.0053327875,0.00037373762,0.00028361965,0.0005952517,0.00047262528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00305581,0.0003319321,0.0003123483,0.0011235902,0.006468743,0.0055537974,0.00046657023,0.0021003115,0.0043988847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009640579,0.00018311411,0.00009472312,0.00095327245,0.028348675,0.004818171,0.0033404836,0.003368096,0.0008129013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002431017,0.00001315461,0.00098397,0.00008154439,0.000009947743,0.0001658582,0.062174175,0.000057050638,0.00016430639,0.86202174,0.055258512,0.019045357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001766138,0.000036177298,0.003934439,0.0004679836,0.0000108592885,0.00043039012,0.03114094,0.00013984332,0.00029999958,0.39217755,0.5713242,0.000019941845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025013385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033895401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006468743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021259957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012949106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016160846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508257551","doi":"10.1002/9781118522097.ch8","title":"Kant and Time‐Order Idealism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Transcendental idealism; Philosophy; Realism; Constructivism (international relations); Epistemology; Transcendental number; Order (exchange); Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.022227297273881164,"score_gpt":0.21892655585964016,"score_spread":0.19669925858575898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508257551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011339108,0.01462069,0.017059544,0.028508175,0.00053825864,0.00002020345,0.00007368348,0.00007894145,0.9277613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79231364,0.009010799,0.00890814,0.004034695,0.0009369347,0.000091538284,0.0000877739,0.00018472066,0.18443178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978248,0.0011912538,0.000049897673,0.0001969821,0.00050042616,0.00023671532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988111,0.00063963013,0.00009447681,0.00017104915,0.00017916209,0.00010456922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020984754,0.00049402134,0.00034505298,0.0011123259,0.0035377753,0.006210332,0.00067223044,0.0024836124,0.005437279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024997103,0.00026140333,0.00044834937,0.0013704272,0.0236291,0.0053836717,0.0022056806,0.004261764,0.0012683456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023868104,0.0000022830036,0.000011909348,0.000006122829,7.412125e-7,0.0000068946993,0.00037722898,0.0000795117,0.000010951887,0.99672794,0.0018238487,0.0009502466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002626898,0.0000018206823,0.000048845723,0.000026469068,0.0000010652589,0.00001826553,0.0002996218,0.00015971038,0.00006371655,0.95501506,0.0443593,0.0000035028836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004120676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032243088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006563304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006563304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034431263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047620356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509185071","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.857131","title":"Love: self-propagation, self-preservation, or<i>ekstasis</i>?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Ideal (ethics); Philosophy; Ethical egoism; Economic Justice; Interpersonal communication; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03834628381784829,"score_gpt":0.22317320444533073,"score_spread":0.18482692062748243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509185071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16466247,0.0073998994,0.023370402,0.04128179,0.0009064951,0.000042458076,0.000054119304,0.00007564228,0.76220673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876473,0.0007229582,0.0005859794,0.000932571,0.00016043667,0.000014599742,0.000009114433,0.000012632746,0.009914347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998885,0.000591425,0.00003886641,0.00013408507,0.00017237302,0.00017833711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988349,0.00036660038,0.0002343485,0.00028154827,0.00013605609,0.00014654068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016082802,0.00018562762,0.00021319935,0.00038887045,0.002063147,0.0058369716,0.0005248229,0.0018563502,0.0036749437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036503961,0.0001478692,0.00019255475,0.0005703486,0.01692125,0.0072949873,0.0028708975,0.0019337881,0.00053977483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021307125,0.000015198818,0.0008007149,0.000026676691,0.000003442448,0.00010207221,0.012226969,0.00005269824,0.00012616381,0.9749391,0.0026084797,0.009077158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016070675,0.000054172106,0.0025857538,0.00015908969,0.000008363796,0.00081125175,0.025569214,0.000775771,0.0004958335,0.89058876,0.0789109,0.00002483119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009857706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068284676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058369716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010642974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006047546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012293935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509349800","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12006","title":"Whither Integrity II: Integrity and Impartial Morality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Morality; Philosophy; Personal Integrity; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Deontological ethics; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10036557185115853,"score_gpt":0.2791152562305384,"score_spread":0.17874968437937988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509349800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06823818,0.014504309,0.07357478,0.18361521,0.00224223,0.000062135965,0.000079898295,0.00009596797,0.65758735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757479,0.0020591917,0.0021749358,0.005256861,0.00060168304,0.000030438423,0.00002104591,0.000048951413,0.014058983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890643,0.006798302,0.00029226544,0.0010534142,0.001960609,0.00083112746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98198074,0.009871877,0.0015546764,0.002625951,0.002862901,0.0011038108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011203775,0.0004095243,0.00057070696,0.0014142428,0.0046716677,0.01066558,0.0012952756,0.0060732174,0.006906631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01897348,0.00030103966,0.00046468212,0.0010967333,0.06527289,0.013580956,0.008662581,0.009224924,0.001019769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008801411,0.0000044053895,0.00010713534,0.00002038598,0.0000033701103,0.000029046058,0.0014747592,0.000087222856,0.000044063374,0.99489367,0.0014543606,0.0018727889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005638509,0.000013847239,0.00020105185,0.0001279578,0.000005059188,0.00006341382,0.0013037736,0.00026758242,0.00021076403,0.9698555,0.027936075,0.000009332893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001588644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010610926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011203775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004041658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029327269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059251964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509904696","doi":"10.1353/hms.2001.a383327","title":"Hume's Recantation Revisited","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Personal identity; Epistemology; Identity (music); Perception; Causation; Reflexive pronoun; Consciousness; Nothing; Psychology; Self; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.20288334379037892,"score_gpt":0.34627068735159083,"score_spread":0.1433873435612119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509904696","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062310374,0.08359376,0.0023099591,0.62163866,0.0074678017,0.000015921998,0.0000638921,0.00007573414,0.2786032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5304852,0.035165615,0.0018383586,0.25019276,0.021755029,0.00017041054,0.00008101153,0.00050277007,0.15980895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851046,0.010153907,0.00024514933,0.0013253412,0.00228353,0.0008874907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98977685,0.007242397,0.0004650416,0.00075868005,0.0014080778,0.00034903723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008604692,0.00082585815,0.0010161361,0.0024803707,0.015624313,0.011650188,0.0028785588,0.016435105,0.007912058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019804774,0.0005423984,0.0005663173,0.002808677,0.05134718,0.014527015,0.0057731643,0.020693894,0.0022745088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013545349,0.000009110445,0.00006294905,0.000040255673,0.000004176367,0.00010269191,0.010571966,0.000045254754,0.00001612811,0.8763391,0.107142374,0.005652458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013301681,0.000009094085,0.00018140429,0.00030716026,0.0000034838542,0.00021117389,0.0055835573,0.00010577223,0.00008172222,0.25818956,0.735297,0.000016708438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020301467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015309638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020301467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014537702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005630073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10547888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512473742","doi":"10.1353/hms.2007.a383368","title":"A Response to Our Colleagues","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Classics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.1697663485614924,"score_gpt":0.3711732242814028,"score_spread":0.20140687571991042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512473742","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012968174,0.0019638634,0.000106415915,0.93504673,0.058898192,0.000010320762,0.00007194372,0.000052957348,0.0037198903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023816933,0.0013525703,0.00024159368,0.9455508,0.020573031,0.000063516636,0.000054848933,0.00012831324,0.02965367],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847799,0.005299754,0.00095259247,0.0022189168,0.005378007,0.0013709838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95747185,0.011778305,0.0021394186,0.001609442,0.020400092,0.006600946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009575675,0.0020551886,0.0019169973,0.0015542293,0.010102802,0.011094613,0.0037791312,0.025553841,0.040590912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07036122,0.0007591766,0.001308078,0.0020367156,0.007049312,0.013231087,0.0075921332,0.046055432,0.027732214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032973094,0.0000022411834,0.000024954248,0.000022082488,8.713726e-7,0.000032574793,0.000369303,0.0000025391093,0.000014976782,0.00070591585,0.9976248,0.0011964528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037134987,0.0000070197098,0.0001456809,0.00014256564,0.000003018385,0.0001418684,0.0024961622,0.000014063533,0.00004066838,0.0006685889,0.9963163,0.000020207155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00749283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011790915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040590912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008823753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010735472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13579011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512819943","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716538","title":"Hume, a Scottish Socrates?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Content (measure theory); General interest; Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04575302338287984,"score_gpt":0.22389817201039658,"score_spread":0.17814514862751674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512819943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034882993,0.014753086,0.00076539913,0.27298036,0.006445144,0.000035642654,0.00026861118,0.0001404,0.6697284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30978307,0.0036004859,0.0004352348,0.076645285,0.0009118807,0.0000182464,0.000078549005,0.00012875188,0.6083985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811566,0.00077939115,0.000046441564,0.00019529334,0.00032516388,0.0005381033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981731,0.00033869155,0.00013423715,0.00018280746,0.00040007147,0.0007711286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040913248,0.00037775672,0.0004429169,0.00069147727,0.015744299,0.0061077974,0.00066406303,0.0028320893,0.041255176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056606596,0.00023289213,0.00022768657,0.00061995775,0.011924946,0.0044613094,0.0035381299,0.0042047407,0.007825068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012799632,0.00003519006,0.0018194678,0.00010114292,0.000011716687,0.0010682327,0.037555464,0.000041236526,0.00021630207,0.33347008,0.57245964,0.05309353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056471813,0.000017130762,0.0011213176,0.0000864228,0.000002628616,0.00027208994,0.011181649,0.000025311154,0.00011288849,0.0076905806,0.9794688,0.000015466292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061967816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15773037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061967816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004009543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048916526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13801229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518497514","doi":"10.1002/9780470413708.ch9","title":"Nature and Values","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Natural (archaeology); Mathematics; Geography; Statistics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02679346843879036,"score_gpt":0.2426923188761429,"score_spread":0.21589885043735255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518497514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008065015,0.0061248387,0.0010633385,0.012783339,0.0008807121,0.000014639078,0.000030604704,0.000020729003,0.9782753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.097868875,0.0146742435,0.002179343,0.009985109,0.0024617256,0.00018163669,0.00011561861,0.000204318,0.8723291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979182,0.00086665695,0.00006756747,0.00022370888,0.00075272267,0.00017124928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869484,0.0007226938,0.000064600725,0.0001801627,0.00019264557,0.00014510428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019375288,0.0005057727,0.0004424641,0.0012601803,0.0053904545,0.011069795,0.000747652,0.0032230618,0.03748727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029194565,0.00024794365,0.00024335462,0.0025751241,0.015802016,0.009026091,0.0033783957,0.0049022296,0.0050891577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017627519,0.000008451645,0.000040100313,0.000024010917,8.2467074e-7,0.000012464744,0.0021368598,0.000023959312,0.000023754797,0.9501586,0.035045058,0.012524188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001476746,0.0000023271593,0.0001224561,0.000120159406,9.1347783e-7,0.000027223481,0.0013467185,0.000017691596,0.00003224423,0.16402605,0.8342997,0.000003047163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067721815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01430403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03748727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059207547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005912153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1254074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519776254","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403831","title":"Complexities of Character: Hume on Love and Responsibility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Moral character; Passions; Epistemology; Feeling; Moral psychology; Philosophy; Action (physics); Moral disengagement; Moral philosophy; Moral responsibility; Psychology","score_opus":0.18457236993490228,"score_gpt":0.3426206989202132,"score_spread":0.1580483289853109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519776254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11538955,0.020167505,0.0126026375,0.12567672,0.0010636955,0.000032551765,0.00003705338,0.00005114171,0.7249791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96896106,0.0022932752,0.00086642284,0.0060089612,0.0003334921,0.000018710823,0.000005395674,0.000026590347,0.021486096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995776,0.0032219829,0.000038332553,0.00020634115,0.00041363167,0.00034366408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976247,0.0014245857,0.000187925,0.0001483584,0.00027461126,0.0003398102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002573595,0.00031906547,0.0003179856,0.0007697062,0.007979996,0.0063768476,0.0005528366,0.0025789998,0.0021681695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042102668,0.00020624306,0.0002713038,0.00041469428,0.036058325,0.0083676,0.004848425,0.004230089,0.00041495962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001706688,0.000016888696,0.0004819493,0.000022665145,0.000004755859,0.0001879832,0.041669343,0.00013717907,0.00008064557,0.94416696,0.0060215606,0.007193056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010813087,0.000026020714,0.0009013055,0.0001202385,0.0000057629777,0.00034622627,0.020213332,0.0003494178,0.00020412607,0.84133965,0.13646059,0.00002254705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031930367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028138943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007979996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003805839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016115108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027613461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523006892","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716583","title":"How to Distinguish Autonomy from Integrity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Suspect; Value (mathematics); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06079187571652715,"score_gpt":0.2361941257216291,"score_spread":0.17540225000510196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523006892","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0110283205,0.009785675,0.049200438,0.55514234,0.008042361,0.00014909075,0.0001539737,0.00027191287,0.3662258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7805796,0.005493435,0.032707743,0.106969334,0.0037718327,0.00052732474,0.00015281329,0.0005941936,0.069203705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768138,0.013362064,0.001330504,0.002001763,0.004308283,0.0021836958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97837514,0.01308824,0.0010392934,0.0019439125,0.0037022831,0.001851169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015308474,0.0009416945,0.0012976805,0.0015018256,0.0075806053,0.011160805,0.0021936065,0.01037053,0.008554686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037221156,0.00065820105,0.00091497233,0.0010530504,0.07933734,0.03575824,0.01008334,0.017270692,0.0040010684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000988036,0.000005166125,0.00012964898,0.00004201851,0.000004738854,0.00007188153,0.007866759,0.000044175595,0.00006572145,0.9733088,0.01417563,0.0042754966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013872777,0.000008936777,0.00021635812,0.00015690914,0.0000049356727,0.00014039366,0.0054355296,0.00014388045,0.00014914075,0.8442799,0.14942499,0.000025079975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010579874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008683215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015308474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065591643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00770083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080959916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524078424","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1031506","title":"Hume's Internalism Reconsidered","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04699857236337713,"score_gpt":0.23760311470306045,"score_spread":0.19060454233968332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524078424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03540187,0.0017570555,0.039771233,0.10535168,0.0017955316,0.000048343478,0.000119228556,0.00013016144,0.8156249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9359626,0.00041452772,0.005222914,0.011260303,0.0010612264,0.00009956334,0.00004324028,0.0001663865,0.045769207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948791,0.002612821,0.00014009398,0.00086785975,0.00083983236,0.00066028547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99493414,0.0026174237,0.00029148624,0.000959437,0.0008159395,0.00038155357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006014336,0.0005637049,0.0010028688,0.0018100216,0.004956233,0.007087299,0.0017122894,0.0061400556,0.010745965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00971619,0.00046195337,0.00091975,0.0010231896,0.041691236,0.012335536,0.0072322944,0.0083961515,0.002089315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055450064,0.0000033474062,0.00004378301,0.000006592103,0.0000031714978,0.000013254457,0.0009918425,0.000030784577,0.000015155295,0.9960271,0.0015804963,0.0012788781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007912103,0.000002864571,0.000051801348,0.000017566008,0.000002763612,0.000029329372,0.00047318533,0.000098056094,0.00005794409,0.99018574,0.009068568,0.000004258026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018472659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020912795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010745965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044217985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027748276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035948873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527422774","doi":"10.22329/il.v24i2.2141","title":"A Defense of Non-deductive Reconstructions of Analogical Arguments (AILACT Essay Competition Winner)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Schema (genetic algorithms); Metaphysics; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Analogical reasoning; Deductive reasoning; Strengths and weaknesses; Philosophy; Analogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03471161287276179,"score_gpt":0.2513523004739812,"score_spread":0.21664068760121943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527422774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04012452,0.0024136982,0.25401515,0.099676125,0.001473109,0.00021996922,0.00019021198,0.00034455143,0.60154265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9172501,0.0006944583,0.04254837,0.007830723,0.00082978327,0.00032113478,0.00009655769,0.00015075936,0.030278055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883471,0.006664462,0.00039718786,0.0012279835,0.0027656127,0.000597625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837309,0.010319099,0.0010773358,0.0023368015,0.0020763024,0.0004595986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013629186,0.00071074185,0.000787284,0.0032551915,0.0042726565,0.00693076,0.003870141,0.006727713,0.010639412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033244956,0.0005527868,0.0012000535,0.0016332275,0.028354986,0.013436217,0.0068506585,0.0101665715,0.0016281278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059869362,0.0000069458088,0.000034692628,0.000011000315,0.000003013379,0.000019738558,0.0003095564,0.00011817726,0.000021186339,0.996965,0.0007574306,0.0017472606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130400695,0.000008003944,0.0000431994,0.000022480996,0.0000031240847,0.00004583521,0.00016866825,0.00087122497,0.000102457125,0.98907346,0.009642527,0.000005884659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016122014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012592629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013629186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039284583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024032898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07207888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528248089","doi":"10.1111/heyj.10_12251","title":"Durable Goods: Pleasure, Wealth and Power in the Virtuous Life (Studies in Theoretical and Applied Ethics 10). By GerolPetruzella. Pp. 173, New York, NY, Peter Lang, 2013, $76.95.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Power (physics); Citation; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.13933670078620852,"score_gpt":0.31374527445128475,"score_spread":0.17440857366507623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528248089","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001606126,0.86047745,0.001955992,0.03892619,0.0018095905,0.000014247388,0.000109812645,0.000058642305,0.09504187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16305768,0.6462681,0.0034420425,0.009281539,0.00444932,0.00014768737,0.00023545968,0.00011959437,0.1729986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994842,0.0002608363,0.00002424992,0.00005446583,0.000118402575,0.00005779463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943954,0.00033798008,0.00006042282,0.000035614703,0.000054808228,0.00007164106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011110789,0.0014892905,0.0006262148,0.001410513,0.001420006,0.0065244273,0.0009820112,0.0031766996,0.019439863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019143369,0.00077300327,0.0003996409,0.001976025,0.00865933,0.010852528,0.003063051,0.0031188799,0.004997225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059501133,0.000041403542,0.00048332466,0.0006692465,0.00002917688,0.00015657203,0.004025162,0.0002700087,0.00016679105,0.42539898,0.4422079,0.1264919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019228763,0.000030351193,0.0022831957,0.001966115,0.000020134705,0.00034460583,0.004349472,0.00028003968,0.00014487492,0.40337855,0.587162,0.000021359965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007156369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014533632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019439863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037140062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021432545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06503284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530037991","doi":"10.7202/006277ar","title":"Thomas Hurka, Virtue, Vice and Value, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2001, 272 pages.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Value (mathematics); Vice president; Media studies; History; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Management; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.21883829882261285,"score_gpt":0.2728231496103189,"score_spread":0.05398485078770604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530037991","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005057161,0.9493331,0.0021046624,0.012204588,0.0029943364,0.0000115058465,0.0002474645,0.00010882287,0.03248976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016787972,0.9069845,0.0032900402,0.0031617128,0.0063316296,0.00006435703,0.00043534063,0.00017130659,0.06277317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994374,0.00014905224,0.00007189572,0.00006975632,0.00022491241,0.000047003778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871993,0.00081317505,0.00012627878,0.0000636498,0.00019153733,0.00008537225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011433515,0.0016012898,0.0014400587,0.004819307,0.0017737689,0.004595458,0.0013191685,0.00258498,0.030303998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003037812,0.0010490612,0.000698668,0.0063109156,0.003582741,0.008302215,0.0013943425,0.003148506,0.013476192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071895374,0.00003884135,0.00035121993,0.0016994969,0.00006799831,0.00014681237,0.0018191134,0.00039094468,0.00027090742,0.14301485,0.75169736,0.100430675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018190707,0.00001288864,0.002446183,0.0018416916,0.000040443883,0.00044961524,0.0010019083,0.00028058444,0.0003230246,0.16365947,0.8298935,0.00003243648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008158251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019348953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030303998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024765108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020653305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10137695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538861925","doi":"10.1353/mos.2011.a418765","title":"The Voice, the Body, and the Mind: Reflections in the Aftermath of Kant and Herder","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sensibility; Relation (database); Connection (principal bundle); Mind–body problem; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.05775212886966118,"score_gpt":0.2616842513321547,"score_spread":0.20393212246249354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538861925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19485253,0.09775595,0.01584468,0.26179522,0.0037646263,0.000042147076,0.000052531483,0.00006247443,0.42582986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96813154,0.0080500385,0.0008428966,0.0058412864,0.0006216919,0.000017995944,0.0000072697985,0.00005512307,0.016432237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958105,0.003123923,0.00004903932,0.00024068603,0.00044509998,0.00033081457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575186,0.0037411766,0.00010923267,0.000120264165,0.00014811434,0.00012935037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006451946,0.00039931416,0.00055426906,0.0013180193,0.0088182995,0.008780673,0.0008082472,0.0057033678,0.002746491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063164234,0.00037878426,0.0003494989,0.0012024582,0.07463461,0.012103338,0.005270718,0.009118082,0.0003601462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026748034,0.000009211725,0.000107562504,0.000040049952,0.0000029006553,0.00014133916,0.11862324,0.00009358498,0.00011571014,0.8744329,0.0025223973,0.0038844629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021680602,0.000049335584,0.0006111363,0.00064047053,0.000010151333,0.000372749,0.12480778,0.00030416792,0.0005978565,0.60710555,0.2654497,0.00002951012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007711072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0094842035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0088182995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008556284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003186001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062080503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540813654","doi":"","title":"The Possibility of Moral","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Skepticism; Epistemology; Reading (process); Moral philosophy","score_opus":0.14676323970618022,"score_gpt":0.36399997368125137,"score_spread":0.21723673397507115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540813654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012987578,0.008359082,0.0620184,0.08488067,0.001663255,0.00003856967,0.0001447768,0.00013053327,0.82977706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388252,0.0026305513,0.013732617,0.009455758,0.0022465393,0.0001633525,0.000096865886,0.00012042641,0.032728806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915447,0.0048698904,0.00020336792,0.0011601212,0.0015925164,0.0006292938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929671,0.004085816,0.00038650836,0.0010333876,0.0010561483,0.00047110542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007271925,0.0005782791,0.0005740066,0.0015590369,0.0065018632,0.010818984,0.0012141158,0.0064026923,0.011164978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013091692,0.0004258663,0.00073566154,0.00076399127,0.042816173,0.015988346,0.006615408,0.00893787,0.0020656658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018723974,9.827652e-7,0.0000081883945,0.0000049571995,6.0039895e-7,0.0000069688854,0.00015751974,0.00001987071,0.000010832777,0.9988055,0.000540187,0.0004424819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002822718,0.0000032119838,0.00002165625,0.000025371945,0.0000011244541,0.00002648611,0.00017228982,0.00012812873,0.00005607858,0.9779674,0.021590566,0.000004847976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013168713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007575423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011164978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043963837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027944283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03845811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545056749","doi":"10.1023/a:1005272731285","title":"Charles L. Griswold, Jr., Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.028851649329093225,"score_gpt":0.2155368482576201,"score_spread":0.18668519892852686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545056749","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027257774,0.1806321,0.002254542,0.72486246,0.0030565,0.000020590422,0.000094889794,0.000019961279,0.08633316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3745977,0.32838723,0.005916065,0.13141824,0.013443654,0.00013781991,0.0000987003,0.00013211256,0.14586852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768853,0.0011521436,0.000093595605,0.00021553253,0.00069589616,0.00015436561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99197453,0.005522404,0.00053674716,0.00030151586,0.0011689255,0.0004958183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004762741,0.00047434084,0.00049683824,0.0013684721,0.0039074225,0.0063535743,0.00084684807,0.008180084,0.005564885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012253169,0.00039988972,0.0002811615,0.0018861503,0.015645485,0.006408261,0.0015173604,0.00772276,0.0015645474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031555912,0.000023887758,0.00030390162,0.00011168833,0.0000120955965,0.000059056278,0.0010454183,0.00026830507,0.000054072698,0.701466,0.28274134,0.013882657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021041713,0.000009964553,0.0008549148,0.00046760458,0.000006900783,0.000065652246,0.001266709,0.00013903712,0.00012018267,0.6832891,0.3137354,0.000023508499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0153445415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03453079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0153445415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039429152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004584012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030510426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545125571","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.0015","title":"There Is Just One Idea of Self in Hume's Treatise","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Epistemology; Philosophy; Identity (music); Humility; Nothing; Interpretation (philosophy); Passion; Reading (process); Simple (philosophy); Pride; Personal identity; Sympathy; Focus (optics); Simplicity; Aesthetics; Object (grammar); Self; Psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.16027616640820577,"score_gpt":0.32653460801462963,"score_spread":0.16625844160642386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545125571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018122248,0.018669657,0.05486195,0.12404486,0.003457385,0.00005428099,0.0001258596,0.00018529156,0.7804784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.760352,0.008266031,0.014869433,0.035186574,0.0043292902,0.00022598675,0.00008732654,0.00021356692,0.17646968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997004,0.0018828539,0.00007723154,0.0002428309,0.0005677651,0.00022536368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980286,0.0012136486,0.00015098909,0.00019465752,0.00027977853,0.00013225409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023586585,0.0005365571,0.00043819554,0.0014062626,0.0037906577,0.0049184086,0.0007319967,0.003023964,0.0035472433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033836674,0.00018139872,0.00047677758,0.0007611753,0.023520758,0.005348088,0.0027622695,0.00436149,0.0010834556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009589712,0.0000068201016,0.000102619444,0.000036960337,0.0000038006274,0.000045222732,0.0060473746,0.00004843139,0.00005274156,0.97811913,0.010984635,0.0045427387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000790523,0.00003294141,0.00040998028,0.00024528493,0.000009372289,0.00019723122,0.003931242,0.0003131573,0.00039477012,0.60958314,0.38485634,0.00001861424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020985962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030859036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049184086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023958462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018637272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017383218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549279719","doi":"","title":"Hegel's Psychology Of Freedom","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Rogers Communications (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.061681797705876014,"score_gpt":0.28171403654477833,"score_spread":0.22003223883890233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549279719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016159963,0.012012118,0.01352485,0.054222047,0.00051053835,0.000022694932,0.00007589423,0.000056690464,0.90341526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.890449,0.0058593648,0.0031056206,0.011279975,0.00047835766,0.00010469342,0.00004537241,0.000066606684,0.0886112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998178,0.00096936134,0.000038551872,0.00021222224,0.0003769488,0.0002248532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986958,0.0007902808,0.00008310582,0.00013093947,0.00015168615,0.00014819426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025919098,0.00036801488,0.0003058139,0.0012309507,0.004658571,0.0040053576,0.0004517258,0.0020531437,0.003544854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003639753,0.0001748295,0.0002854643,0.0007073258,0.042776942,0.0054177553,0.0038844284,0.004134514,0.0006024681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026292062,0.0000019656945,0.000020323181,0.000004756303,6.95486e-7,0.0000053806302,0.0008352629,0.000036973423,0.000010223114,0.99630165,0.0017691784,0.0010108976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062277386,0.0000051109255,0.00008448761,0.000028284694,0.0000011387107,0.000020516905,0.00056192203,0.000046809582,0.00004629751,0.9516001,0.047594953,0.0000040415325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00507139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004504303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00507139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049272333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031310653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035749733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551385672","doi":"10.1093/0195137167.001.0001","title":"Virtue, Vice, and Value","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Virtue ethics; Value (mathematics); Environmental ethics; Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Law and economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.033145360505627164,"score_gpt":0.23231590114545095,"score_spread":0.19917054063982378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551385672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005216414,0.026877534,0.0054061934,0.016589677,0.00089402375,0.000013908664,0.000097547585,0.000057437872,0.9448472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69639754,0.024523163,0.0032389457,0.004956662,0.0019320138,0.000074094576,0.00019488878,0.0000759604,0.26860672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949133,0.00025195157,0.000012147425,0.00005693962,0.00013889627,0.00004864775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942786,0.00024974483,0.00004104241,0.00006750957,0.00014339588,0.000070462986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058497436,0.00039420734,0.00035629084,0.00070411403,0.0015608238,0.0059066685,0.00037801685,0.0009748752,0.008115154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001534172,0.0001757258,0.00021359205,0.000798631,0.011227027,0.0038559167,0.0011073295,0.0025032156,0.0012727646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035274097,0.0000038675676,0.00007936161,0.00001965402,0.0000021726642,0.000010818121,0.00029998555,0.000079045654,0.000026519052,0.98283434,0.011464216,0.005176587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039459355,0.000009173577,0.00041756796,0.00013997877,0.0000037679501,0.00006888535,0.00068322296,0.00024492346,0.000062917265,0.80329037,0.19507049,0.000004763421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026322298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002294628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008115154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002620299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012856134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02714783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553289635","doi":"","title":"Mothering and the Sacrifice of Self: Women and Friendship in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Campion College","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Sacrifice; Virtue; Philosophy of love; Philosophy; Relation (database); Excellence; Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Theology","score_opus":0.048531228128746155,"score_gpt":0.24267641705967205,"score_spread":0.1941451889309259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553289635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17007302,0.015882444,0.01046661,0.031712677,0.0003033376,0.000023960456,0.00002560721,0.000035009216,0.77147734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809722,0.0010141452,0.00077712577,0.00075663556,0.00005964041,0.000013740744,0.0000029321484,0.0000073921174,0.016396213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977598,0.0016293424,0.000031751777,0.00013681033,0.00020314133,0.00023907427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995521,0.00022401939,0.000051766332,0.000049062168,0.00005573912,0.000067359106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018319024,0.00031368373,0.00026609527,0.0005468133,0.009207978,0.0035237216,0.00044372363,0.0022266803,0.001439226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014254411,0.00016390983,0.00012421576,0.00046543486,0.024040958,0.0030587427,0.0023646532,0.0016116197,0.00023111762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006555369,0.0000042118363,0.0002066657,0.0000081173575,0.0000012246708,0.00009444779,0.021845283,0.00006235703,0.000034654196,0.9738217,0.0009719232,0.0029427933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012092538,0.000036722522,0.0013092397,0.00012622676,0.0000067770275,0.00028182665,0.024376545,0.0004982698,0.00028804207,0.7380797,0.23496686,0.000017810054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01225863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015806703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01225863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048496835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001760226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035187125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560700356","doi":"10.1353/hms.2004.a383300","title":"Stability and Partiality in Hume's Moral Philosophy: A Response to Louis Loeb","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Passions; Impartiality; Philosophy; Affection; Moral philosophy; Epistemology; Feeling; Virtue","score_opus":0.20446001916201595,"score_gpt":0.3295642859989948,"score_spread":0.12510426683697884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560700356","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022921126,0.026372327,0.00012468835,0.9627419,0.0070009665,0.00000366296,0.0000075292496,0.000007931053,0.0035117248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028779918,0.04689034,0.00071334373,0.8181512,0.042329952,0.000076166296,0.000027900078,0.000118652075,0.06291249],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99221706,0.00499723,0.00024118954,0.0006383233,0.0013456239,0.00056066434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98750454,0.008524749,0.00041057332,0.00030027403,0.0020024378,0.0012574026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009413123,0.0011149405,0.0017284383,0.001568837,0.011707036,0.011274634,0.0020440347,0.018384054,0.006328988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016912345,0.0006328709,0.00086908124,0.0020180496,0.019426858,0.013961723,0.0064790854,0.033208247,0.0027660802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015350932,0.000021742137,0.0000870629,0.000058228772,0.000005086862,0.00007404154,0.0023984304,0.00006160615,0.00003743386,0.04227223,0.94906735,0.0059013334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000145794775,0.000015040001,0.00026287988,0.0005424817,0.0000045685524,0.000115900955,0.0037013239,0.00012261244,0.00004300122,0.04569588,0.94944125,0.00004044193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014139719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022661965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018384054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013486065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071428632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09784871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566828727","doi":"","title":"Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Hume on Morality (review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.2995966113847076,"score_gpt":0.3829116439499873,"score_spread":0.08331503256527967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566828727","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031182865,0.5514065,0.0115785245,0.045735285,0.010452293,0.00026649947,0.0033911862,0.00062402885,0.37623388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045964303,0.46436936,0.01123686,0.013360593,0.0035988756,0.0008402758,0.002114485,0.000696852,0.4991863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983687,0.0005930923,0.0001239733,0.00010475152,0.00070392876,0.00010548745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582076,0.0020064865,0.00022809347,0.00027504246,0.0015156565,0.0001539242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027610247,0.0013581475,0.0020248804,0.00927673,0.0020801113,0.0041873725,0.0016740933,0.004473255,0.13219814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008039753,0.0007848955,0.00062345486,0.015963824,0.003372254,0.008470797,0.002919347,0.0031548112,0.06515682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009952627,0.000008425237,0.000027023825,0.0018094969,0.000005833409,0.000057794994,0.00045571773,0.00007839472,0.000076879674,0.02667158,0.7770911,0.19370793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002013359,0.0000018040752,0.000052420437,0.0009165713,0.0000017969389,0.000027910279,0.000121876976,0.000009729374,0.000027943543,0.0063867373,0.99244845,0.0000027910157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019077329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04135766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13219814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042876583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009609157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44224685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568696823","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511617058.005","title":"Satisficing and Substantive Values","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Satisficing; Outcome (game theory); Rationality; Absolute (philosophy); Morality; Economics; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04298503752599603,"score_gpt":0.1994260926669015,"score_spread":0.15644105514090548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568696823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009741096,0.0035935573,0.02485692,0.008799306,0.00020345669,0.00003984885,0.000076193006,0.00006140554,0.95262814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86665004,0.0032360507,0.013692746,0.0023562142,0.0005062537,0.00020139205,0.00022321468,0.00013933227,0.112994894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729055,0.0016013676,0.00009237777,0.0002450314,0.00055219425,0.00021843296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979982,0.0011295434,0.00014041249,0.00032226124,0.00030327766,0.00010637319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028028814,0.0004704812,0.00032963534,0.0011972911,0.0021172685,0.0059879627,0.001013335,0.0019039469,0.007925379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006145954,0.0002556898,0.00031146157,0.0013416826,0.019167649,0.005996412,0.002428962,0.0031052995,0.0011028486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010238965,0.0000015558544,0.000025226342,0.000008111968,8.223326e-7,0.0000054174925,0.00021536108,0.00008718743,0.0000135283635,0.99682546,0.00091647723,0.0018999134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003094213,0.0000041950793,0.000087657005,0.000031163006,0.0000016534417,0.000019385403,0.00020040695,0.00020803741,0.000049805567,0.9746382,0.024754157,0.0000022351383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015146141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015524767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007925379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00490548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021074233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0355919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586492671","doi":"","title":"A Humean Conundrum","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simplicity; Simple (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Knight; Perception; Impression; Computer science","score_opus":0.19693426574817333,"score_gpt":0.3337070908579468,"score_spread":0.13677282510977348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586492671","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009006952,0.009991986,0.03211066,0.7074789,0.0057043405,0.000050224913,0.00016416555,0.00025717495,0.23523562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.606336,0.008672813,0.02784147,0.19568425,0.014936922,0.00030354492,0.00015496729,0.00050519774,0.14556481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889043,0.0064033396,0.00029753128,0.0016916816,0.0022521908,0.00045097678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976213,0.013162544,0.0008584813,0.0040142285,0.0043828916,0.0013688362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014467039,0.00073416386,0.0009261907,0.0018890089,0.00540098,0.008154301,0.003043626,0.007467023,0.017289657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035280768,0.00029285334,0.0005745531,0.0012098933,0.04425404,0.017965192,0.0065035853,0.009914677,0.0049126544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020280826,0.0000113281185,0.0001552449,0.000041402644,0.000010027384,0.000037531234,0.002037005,0.00009074208,0.000054391152,0.94471306,0.042375814,0.010453071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013504279,0.000013189943,0.0002019482,0.00017710331,0.0000048975066,0.00012952213,0.0022600684,0.00044105863,0.00014647417,0.81152904,0.18506555,0.000017656928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026710313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025396938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017289657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033902118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035524552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07650995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588628019","doi":"10.1353/hms.2007.a383367","title":"Hume and the Nortons on the Passions and Morality in Hume's Treatise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Empiricism; History of philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of history; Historiography; Morality; Literature; History; Art","score_opus":0.15866557684160093,"score_gpt":0.32704440774689114,"score_spread":0.1683788309052902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588628019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039035329,0.15291402,0.0035412353,0.15026586,0.0062321313,0.000037561753,0.00010242956,0.000060639486,0.6829427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21027523,0.07115494,0.0032727595,0.04699352,0.0132303145,0.00018071927,0.00010002611,0.00026169978,0.65453076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972579,0.0017253226,0.000040332183,0.00014211057,0.0006622298,0.00017225549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986488,0.00086688047,0.00009563823,0.00006883191,0.00020947181,0.000110406625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021090524,0.000603764,0.00038690676,0.0014155592,0.0066124853,0.0060518775,0.00065438123,0.0031561386,0.007750651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003898487,0.00025580026,0.00021832323,0.0015998847,0.014619804,0.0039988174,0.001846395,0.003950149,0.0019606927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008072755,0.000008582723,0.00005426507,0.000036695357,0.000002413167,0.0000425027,0.005281338,0.00007781495,0.0000359083,0.8083747,0.17731877,0.008758904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032463017,0.00000484804,0.00016111192,0.0002800615,0.0000016140397,0.000036809473,0.0013019947,0.000054922686,0.00004368091,0.09785858,0.90024656,0.000006629482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025199976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040255617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025199976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008744206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005711551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06344396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591496887","doi":"10.1353/hms.2001.a383326","title":"General Rules and the Justification of Probable Belief in Hume's Treatise","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Superstition; Skepticism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Dilemma; Value (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09999874871150895,"score_gpt":0.2984662607870991,"score_spread":0.19846751207559016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591496887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07872824,0.013678605,0.13377492,0.04469169,0.0009633889,0.00011141124,0.00025388668,0.00015459482,0.7276433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691835,0.0027326958,0.011964274,0.0016099629,0.00092108286,0.00010697784,0.00010512683,0.000067354355,0.013309006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99425805,0.003289021,0.0002444327,0.00039927228,0.0013584924,0.000450759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899831,0.0072767846,0.0005648986,0.0008913586,0.0011046674,0.00017915781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070769917,0.00038938032,0.0005621007,0.002433113,0.0028654484,0.0051424038,0.0010313139,0.0031542971,0.002967732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019316878,0.00038904045,0.0006869717,0.0018093281,0.018743066,0.006929228,0.0022075514,0.00404837,0.0005354403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067776286,0.000004387093,0.00007920779,0.000018556673,0.000006390938,0.000026139445,0.000686519,0.0004427097,0.000024329187,0.99577266,0.0010764367,0.0018559089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004387781,0.0000029237815,0.0001151508,0.000021296346,0.0000030901763,0.000012173121,0.000095561,0.00033917773,0.00003288436,0.9946853,0.0046832375,0.0000047620283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003677223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040532174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070769917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038348052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019408772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037427187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595989314","doi":"","title":"A Treatise of Human Nature (review)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08353029943913882,"score_gpt":0.35278998183073274,"score_spread":0.2692596823915939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595989314","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000071671595,0.9893975,0.00014447277,0.004743999,0.0022140387,0.0000060635334,0.0000331479,0.0000044787917,0.0033846037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017647452,0.98893845,0.00026639272,0.004085056,0.0017470962,0.000026566648,0.000056608802,0.00000791323,0.0031073142],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894637,0.00036854064,0.00009081034,0.00008818276,0.0004255917,0.00008049518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970101,0.0019426497,0.0002919563,0.000102921775,0.00054946635,0.000102964776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022628834,0.0006261393,0.0013969037,0.004964885,0.0009209662,0.0031483339,0.0010428781,0.0025617895,0.009308636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052850074,0.0003202302,0.000722291,0.01017687,0.002131295,0.002803524,0.0017775461,0.0024972588,0.002775919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006146257,0.00003252649,0.00019960217,0.01810882,0.00018474634,0.00016231513,0.00053181197,0.00014916879,0.00039243736,0.016616372,0.5239305,0.4396302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001007732,0.000012195432,0.00046239668,0.009223676,0.00008240019,0.0001480106,0.00016249277,0.00000913177,0.00005448034,0.0020075103,0.98782223,0.0000053111753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067011807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016859222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009308636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020659608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005959998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031140506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600489943","doi":"","title":"Rightness, Blameworthiness, and the Doctrine of Double Effect","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Doctrine; Calculus (dental); Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017611511971388442,"score_gpt":0.23774106310291113,"score_spread":0.2201295511315227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600489943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09679341,0.006516426,0.10058159,0.062317718,0.0010263883,0.00006310499,0.00007126177,0.00010819807,0.73252183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740941,0.00053511816,0.0045583667,0.0030501126,0.00027348258,0.00004993114,0.00000969393,0.00004874761,0.017380377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993148,0.0032671352,0.00029559934,0.0012401493,0.0013690881,0.0006800072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980489,0.012479255,0.0011379163,0.0036570574,0.0017390655,0.00049769966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009459499,0.00051899534,0.00081342785,0.0011431419,0.0048766783,0.0066479202,0.0015540156,0.008282095,0.0061204173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0207257,0.00047662924,0.00084374903,0.0007183326,0.055441342,0.011675709,0.0046811006,0.01030634,0.00065618363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074541335,0.000005542623,0.00007106536,0.000008612611,0.000003229606,0.000022209346,0.00047936558,0.000065863445,0.000039503393,0.9981211,0.00033458747,0.0008413104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000100238685,0.000004854401,0.00008672482,0.000022576236,0.00000382445,0.000037055917,0.00018543832,0.00019418911,0.00009133572,0.99546283,0.0038946867,0.0000064335336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002750234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025417323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009459499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003035723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029764092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05002719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608072351","doi":"","title":"Hume's Reasons","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Epistemology; Sympathy; Philosophy; Prudence; Action (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Morality; Reading (process); Humanity; Virtue; Infallibility; Function (biology); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.17393156714174499,"score_gpt":0.3486896907835262,"score_spread":0.1747581236417812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608072351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074696024,0.0028048956,0.041261837,0.043978933,0.0008542317,0.00007406029,0.00014613903,0.00012893749,0.9032814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8011826,0.001811453,0.021000598,0.015387146,0.000912506,0.00021758882,0.00013589585,0.00015309842,0.1591991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943693,0.0026562256,0.0001954118,0.0008259147,0.0014228685,0.00053020654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507576,0.0023995459,0.00033509996,0.00066915667,0.0011797595,0.00034062282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052988054,0.0006011417,0.0004776703,0.0018952471,0.0046312343,0.0052522128,0.00097639684,0.00464024,0.008689867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010920313,0.00033997835,0.00059740053,0.0007719723,0.023614723,0.005186863,0.0033122778,0.0042364867,0.0022575743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004914744,0.0000040814502,0.00008463599,0.000013645403,0.0000030756005,0.000027482969,0.0009799527,0.00006825577,0.000030336654,0.9899699,0.0057260585,0.0030875602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006821876,0.0000083330515,0.00019431373,0.00005467835,0.0000049022115,0.00008227494,0.00053407677,0.00022885666,0.00020628661,0.8384818,0.16018668,0.000011073547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024191272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032223694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008689867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034245653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034829625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029070556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608290063","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511806544.010","title":"CORRELATION AND CAUSE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Correlation; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.07448532463404871,"score_gpt":0.21887599599343768,"score_spread":0.144390671359389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608290063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012348533,0.014570803,0.123226754,0.037919026,0.0017825888,0.00033308446,0.00019309731,0.00014619253,0.8094799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83162564,0.008423189,0.035254765,0.008674493,0.0013979663,0.00094964285,0.00029727936,0.00020971462,0.113167346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936872,0.0035828967,0.00022873847,0.0008795322,0.0010958315,0.0005258043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942749,0.004161244,0.0003269548,0.00062659313,0.0004789425,0.00013132927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006674411,0.0007016697,0.00091596233,0.0020242801,0.004330595,0.0042779204,0.0014385922,0.0032497577,0.018827977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010239832,0.00059464964,0.0011334853,0.0015916495,0.023638451,0.0084310565,0.0045277565,0.0056970273,0.0018769661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035342093,0.0000042274755,0.00016992696,0.000034738285,0.0000055810447,0.00006741755,0.0011006752,0.000099266035,0.00002445209,0.99411005,0.0022243436,0.0021556362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010166795,0.000013382058,0.00040950754,0.00019814732,0.000013972345,0.00030588734,0.0011573356,0.00030000927,0.00018848048,0.8793382,0.11805397,0.000010908574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026945446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030762397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018827977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048644547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034424919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06298584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608777084","doi":"10.1353/hms.2002.a385864","title":"Hume's Associations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Association (psychology)","score_opus":0.37133747909547465,"score_gpt":0.322711400052668,"score_spread":0.048626079042806636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608777084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005994807,0.008026372,0.021256082,0.050938986,0.0012243484,0.000051064384,0.000119898534,0.000113439084,0.91227496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77918506,0.007146913,0.017155508,0.013990321,0.0020806354,0.00023909067,0.00013928118,0.00020407508,0.17985907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987329,0.008350819,0.00032597565,0.0011200205,0.002053217,0.0008208163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928093,0.0038619328,0.00044541954,0.00096522865,0.0012553947,0.0006627738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008347947,0.0005051473,0.0005098702,0.002525971,0.008321175,0.007945993,0.00078670535,0.003828528,0.006834401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015993988,0.00029962006,0.000353172,0.0018790558,0.028528038,0.0072853104,0.0053717378,0.005121508,0.00294688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062958798,0.000003607082,0.00011010918,0.0000149731695,0.0000022684605,0.000024992498,0.0025232164,0.00007042016,0.000016844599,0.97797453,0.012944582,0.0063082282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043895243,0.000006554591,0.0001826146,0.00007313448,0.000002253811,0.00007870263,0.0007687959,0.000117794494,0.0000877376,0.7287869,0.26988345,0.000007677495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029957257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028783784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008347947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004158433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051374687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044148684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1675966506","doi":"10.1353/hms.2004.a383301","title":"Stability and Justification in Hume's Treatise , Another Look-A Response to Erin Kelly, Frederick Schmitt, and Michael Williams","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Philosophy; Epistemology; Normative; Computer science","score_opus":0.09897934583329224,"score_gpt":0.29838419708361635,"score_spread":0.19940485125032412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1675966506","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022732073,0.072802864,0.0024816783,0.7888346,0.0050093764,0.000014826537,0.0000618858,0.00003232699,0.12848929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33144224,0.0556441,0.0041985773,0.26478142,0.02952711,0.00021388834,0.00015656481,0.00032818847,0.31370798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960998,0.0025916484,0.00007671305,0.00028734174,0.00065030647,0.0002941278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973417,0.0017456519,0.00015072079,0.00014024106,0.00045199532,0.00016965027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003101551,0.0005645991,0.0005500784,0.001657725,0.007082442,0.007828938,0.001059318,0.0067411033,0.00866977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008528454,0.0003107675,0.00043887983,0.0018892795,0.016326737,0.00967187,0.0025754538,0.0074740658,0.0018636679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001016145,0.000011113734,0.00008013305,0.00004025318,0.000004344297,0.000039062226,0.0021789393,0.0000844997,0.000034825094,0.6182533,0.3719142,0.007349178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074133045,0.000008556072,0.00022744056,0.00032062145,0.000003418017,0.000042719937,0.0020810708,0.00010401652,0.0000756279,0.35873288,0.63838136,0.000014887243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011250458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019159418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011250458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008992726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048854314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06524712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W173673326","doi":"10.7202/1044605ar","title":"Friendship and the Grounds of Reasons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Pride; Morality; Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Deliberation; Moral disengagement; Focus (optics); Psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.029258444213817965,"score_gpt":0.24221632843926663,"score_spread":0.21295788422544867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W173673326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13112713,0.008819617,0.046338975,0.04430783,0.0004933124,0.0000620555,0.00006745607,0.00007031232,0.76871336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98890954,0.0005118941,0.0028896502,0.00052667264,0.0000789589,0.00003006509,0.000013762661,0.00002285537,0.007016585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918324,0.005743285,0.00021010307,0.0008273806,0.0007372221,0.00064963277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938625,0.0036705637,0.0005127793,0.0008159461,0.0006059004,0.0005323723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005857317,0.00037243933,0.0004295019,0.0015736799,0.005698478,0.0071893586,0.0010152922,0.004292178,0.006118717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008516109,0.00030165192,0.00060423696,0.0007109362,0.038796056,0.007869503,0.0055600503,0.0034143364,0.0005958351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048610677,0.0000043553973,0.00021317111,0.000010866321,0.0000041536787,0.00004113448,0.001838592,0.0000731256,0.00003586907,0.9954268,0.00035776265,0.001989187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009409951,0.000014588434,0.00073179253,0.000054971133,0.0000068305794,0.00009854771,0.002731707,0.0003808905,0.0001222857,0.96317124,0.032666788,0.000011037878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019494968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021140922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071893586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031490016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014455203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030976832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W173975210","doi":"","title":"Concerning that reason in Hume's philosophy that is neither deductive nor inductive","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diálogos (Río Piedras)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Deductive reasoning; Philosophy; Inductive reasoning","score_opus":0.14980089397403745,"score_gpt":0.2844017036433769,"score_spread":0.13460080966933946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W173975210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029083138,0.010830434,0.22727183,0.111939035,0.0044782762,0.00013930218,0.000261901,0.00038827572,0.6156078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8529737,0.0022707956,0.057196174,0.017759733,0.0023377852,0.00039168104,0.000093061506,0.00027318145,0.06670389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99501157,0.0024926888,0.00018793269,0.0010190592,0.0008851363,0.00040370433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939891,0.0041615437,0.00026396863,0.0008789016,0.00053840945,0.00016798722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007039752,0.00053612946,0.0010653619,0.0018768045,0.0056637772,0.0051560556,0.0015133071,0.006360264,0.005452325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009710594,0.0005368223,0.0012373851,0.0011924885,0.044324774,0.011699535,0.003943646,0.009712236,0.0011378846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037751988,0.000002685701,0.00002493036,0.000013349174,0.0000037957257,0.000011424111,0.00093326153,0.000034411674,0.000020179003,0.9968305,0.0009023764,0.0012192653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048587217,0.00000334203,0.00003077438,0.000027059408,0.000003943819,0.000025520743,0.00026066529,0.0000897681,0.00007932493,0.98367846,0.015790788,0.0000054956913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018353183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020176568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007039752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041512693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028255067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037230253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1739769016","doi":"","title":"The Perplexing Choice in Existence Predicament: An Existential Interpretation of Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clockwork; Libertarianism; Existentialism; Contradiction; Interpretation (philosophy); Compatibilism; Freedom of choice; Epistemology; Philosophy; Orange (colour); Sociology; Free will; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07913989755574924,"score_gpt":0.328827207159178,"score_spread":0.24968730960342878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1739769016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100547224,0.007974234,0.025127698,0.09974067,0.0013970033,0.000048367972,0.00006216223,0.0000665764,0.7650361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629077,0.001479075,0.0025605212,0.0038861188,0.00024273353,0.000044996566,0.000016044662,0.000058671812,0.028804237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974905,0.0017510583,0.00003748946,0.00023036893,0.0002508458,0.00023968358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998019,0.001377105,0.00015809733,0.00013522188,0.00014244246,0.00016815496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037362897,0.00045752042,0.0003734706,0.0010103321,0.0081485445,0.007413516,0.00083532947,0.0031435888,0.003974302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042781984,0.0002933969,0.00036294264,0.0006795753,0.059618358,0.008786656,0.006003425,0.0048332387,0.00032757618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008323672,0.000004055945,0.00004230368,0.00001265049,0.000001094378,0.000110297406,0.03266669,0.00005580838,0.000060586823,0.96342224,0.0027677843,0.0008482433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019498613,0.00002427,0.00025211973,0.00024647874,0.000007006719,0.00043712283,0.06185703,0.0004146669,0.0003190337,0.57483906,0.3615572,0.00002653625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003667798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039465856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0081485445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041172374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015343722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029872775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1747226846","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626.011","title":"Inappropriate passion","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06486635096977045,"score_gpt":0.1962653257182707,"score_spread":0.13139897474850026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1747226846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06790653,0.0026298333,0.049807712,0.008439823,0.0010075428,0.000099721685,0.000101067824,0.00018965369,0.86981803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94048405,0.000746763,0.0025220541,0.002028077,0.0002164453,0.00008148794,0.00006604099,0.00013333054,0.053721733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938513,0.002493696,0.0003465912,0.0008770124,0.0017860495,0.0006454128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983747,0.000456015,0.00023012761,0.0004439635,0.0003910774,0.0001040031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027993226,0.0006500912,0.00047668308,0.000721385,0.0033054687,0.004807973,0.0008429764,0.0025258341,0.0033769305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004761936,0.00034045204,0.00062741945,0.0005251529,0.025781462,0.005232437,0.004578993,0.005410371,0.001244742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013522795,0.0000060776365,0.00023977247,0.00003491137,0.0000072427115,0.00015459157,0.00903137,0.000077788034,0.00031769025,0.9846713,0.0021060605,0.003339578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016186563,0.00007573047,0.0010199157,0.00022787528,0.000026833157,0.0010148825,0.0071423203,0.0006340533,0.0012101287,0.747137,0.24145395,0.000041071627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013923502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017640919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004807973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023678648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019686962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017180145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1762560894","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2012.981033","title":"The self and the passions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Sympathy; Philosophy; Centrality; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Presentation (obstetrics); General interest; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03286595753880151,"score_gpt":0.2168803877898635,"score_spread":0.18401443025106198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1762560894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02971608,0.023572877,0.004521439,0.20862114,0.0033634994,0.000020659474,0.00003876575,0.000081420054,0.7300641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84126014,0.005485354,0.0015398858,0.021610018,0.0013454339,0.000043348107,0.00002184991,0.0001276111,0.12856625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950866,0.003278075,0.00006842149,0.0003299341,0.0007520011,0.00048492776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731207,0.001414477,0.00018040015,0.00025162727,0.00043730994,0.0004041905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004712043,0.0003532742,0.00038015208,0.0010160378,0.010114807,0.00944264,0.0005842914,0.0026816833,0.005040081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068556597,0.00017275827,0.00029965775,0.00053609704,0.051558714,0.0094435215,0.004704781,0.0053626373,0.00088516413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008234954,0.0000055102323,0.000089852714,0.0000117813,0.0000021296153,0.00005398713,0.014051349,0.000023968023,0.00003869005,0.96769845,0.014999716,0.0030162705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011063483,0.000015623214,0.00030763703,0.000176745,0.0000043089035,0.00016185564,0.017127423,0.000093104056,0.00021308845,0.5493282,0.432541,0.000019861374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007505592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103719095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010114807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055216923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045797145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040062904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767128526","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00344.x","title":"Fichte's Voluntarism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntarism (philosophy); Ambiguity; Normative; Philosophy; Epistemology; Reading (process); Virtue; Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04099479778610383,"score_gpt":0.22951792431733367,"score_spread":0.18852312653122985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767128526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060489662,0.0032237445,0.09385798,0.0655805,0.0012747094,0.00009701219,0.00008463667,0.00014642942,0.7752454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96565986,0.00049939036,0.0067767343,0.0042729774,0.00042635232,0.000112402224,0.00003559076,0.00006503134,0.022151558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915549,0.0037811778,0.0003319986,0.0013975038,0.0023063694,0.0006280079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98989457,0.00596344,0.0006662539,0.0017649224,0.0013273781,0.00038342693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010151166,0.0004166003,0.0005501062,0.0013081309,0.0041873585,0.00432863,0.0014085975,0.0053869947,0.0058840243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014656574,0.00030329797,0.0007162075,0.00075791817,0.026279083,0.008241237,0.0046625948,0.005208417,0.0009147915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033671874,0.0000041009102,0.00003916422,0.0000064829073,0.000001310176,0.000017379596,0.0006984548,0.000050764404,0.000024602623,0.9975037,0.0007707073,0.00088001805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000088284105,0.000009761076,0.00012264385,0.000046949288,0.0000030825424,0.000085848544,0.0002476262,0.0005493162,0.00017557887,0.97548485,0.023256944,0.000008577272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017062236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091632025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010151166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053296187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025112424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05368513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17855908","doi":"","title":"Camp: Kant’s Unwritten Fourth Critique","year":2015,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08633607704869124,"score_gpt":0.2899698820821767,"score_spread":0.2036338050334855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17855908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012225428,0.006048079,0.034776364,0.1591273,0.00580967,0.00006942384,0.00023755219,0.00014051299,0.7815657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71934885,0.0016866684,0.012734446,0.028900752,0.0034417172,0.00028029745,0.000107573316,0.00034337226,0.23315632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944173,0.0029848833,0.00017005861,0.0006504723,0.0011081761,0.00066914636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995743,0.0024171642,0.00015965033,0.0008546767,0.00062351313,0.00020194112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046554436,0.0010839201,0.0009922165,0.0033665374,0.007834088,0.008242129,0.0023116164,0.010219419,0.011367415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009854084,0.00067771366,0.0011935157,0.0015093273,0.043914277,0.009017198,0.005963745,0.016364103,0.0023321484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007178792,0.000003012771,0.00001026401,0.00001027838,0.0000024913234,0.000009221067,0.00083356735,0.000041627325,0.000015735544,0.99344134,0.0048568216,0.00076842116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013203943,0.0000034957882,0.000038164813,0.000059886872,0.000004962962,0.000030414094,0.0004947823,0.00014471335,0.00012154098,0.9400762,0.059005275,0.0000074831228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066057113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007544902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011367415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008802959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039778086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06387031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815329976","doi":"10.1353/hms.2002.a385863","title":"The Myth of Original Existence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Passion; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Originality; Content (measure theory); Mythology; Praise; Literature; Psychology; Theology; Art; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2634793238844786,"score_gpt":0.3141646408873018,"score_spread":0.050685317002823194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1815329976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016953817,0.03816779,0.0076588257,0.09589643,0.001751439,0.000023588063,0.00011894528,0.00009385902,0.8393354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81284237,0.009996796,0.0027865653,0.012143715,0.002531011,0.00007576659,0.00010348227,0.00019467149,0.15932561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962334,0.0024858029,0.00007160054,0.00032215434,0.00063519046,0.00025175163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740714,0.0015209416,0.00017663138,0.00040017793,0.0003246698,0.00017036979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034716737,0.00037675333,0.00032337912,0.0014549133,0.006280378,0.00791502,0.0007999483,0.0026499436,0.007859703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058285412,0.00025661077,0.0003021559,0.0010957265,0.038275275,0.01017638,0.0038504677,0.004527011,0.00127377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004765996,0.0000040291325,0.00006134627,0.00001592904,0.0000013896663,0.000023725352,0.008210069,0.000020473413,0.00001945809,0.97402894,0.0144761205,0.0031337051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009691619,0.000015956106,0.00030706858,0.00021914771,0.00000423713,0.00015077121,0.0050191744,0.00008915699,0.00012543544,0.40600297,0.5880489,0.000007549539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003469599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034873877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00791502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042790435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026280405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031046808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819644612","doi":"10.1353/hms.2000.a385729","title":"Reply to My Critics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Scholarship; Section (typography); Reflexive pronoun; Point (geometry); Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.1351547742627148,"score_gpt":0.328928064686276,"score_spread":0.1937732904235612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1819644612","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017428826,0.0012853392,0.00017886859,0.9540698,0.041557286,0.000008389749,0.000033967048,0.000061690844,0.0026304186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032287624,0.0007727098,0.0002529728,0.96323264,0.022649126,0.00004199736,0.000022274358,0.0001071798,0.00969241],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98384386,0.004433222,0.0010660875,0.0028619417,0.0057640006,0.0020309077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479719,0.02188566,0.0033718117,0.0027850377,0.019629426,0.004356208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01921844,0.0019085666,0.0023397696,0.002724958,0.0111536225,0.015276291,0.006464393,0.04639877,0.012603657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116892606,0.0010391601,0.0021603445,0.0038318625,0.013666383,0.013707736,0.007758205,0.07050295,0.011926125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007123277,0.000005955616,0.0000863668,0.00003130538,0.0000050386316,0.00008693791,0.0005575526,0.0000212846,0.000024731291,0.0064022164,0.99061793,0.002153753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009190545,0.000010431705,0.00036510493,0.0003301114,0.000014973799,0.00019282129,0.0026245937,0.00013929636,0.00012465303,0.0059352005,0.99021065,0.000043047516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009224828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009188692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04639877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01010553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009322653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10163808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819940597","doi":"10.1353/hms.2003.a383342","title":"Hume, Sympathy, and the Theater","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Sympathy; Drama; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.09206531771515926,"score_gpt":0.27617453311829737,"score_spread":0.18410921540313813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1819940597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044304024,0.02897084,0.0065883216,0.028521307,0.0007111697,0.000016102858,0.000022846125,0.00004580929,0.89081955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603634,0.004702447,0.00083047576,0.0023604033,0.00040799694,0.000023082524,0.00000832135,0.000026143209,0.031277675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962327,0.0029254372,0.00003655684,0.00019547445,0.00030110654,0.00030880197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978668,0.0014919823,0.0001967895,0.00012150343,0.00013578119,0.0001872644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002436713,0.00038173687,0.00031839727,0.0012964618,0.006361246,0.007275327,0.0005742539,0.0025689404,0.0070939427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004128381,0.00013854005,0.000197804,0.0008212485,0.037826218,0.005590808,0.0037186176,0.0025938498,0.0007630465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020503354,0.000012077879,0.00021977753,0.00005126897,0.000005258701,0.00008027877,0.014182775,0.00012803102,0.000083395076,0.97162825,0.0045712665,0.009017197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020101495,0.00003460227,0.0010609542,0.0002493365,0.000007463559,0.00030667303,0.017932525,0.0003076532,0.00037014025,0.7587008,0.22099009,0.00001959783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016472427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018505412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007275327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027395124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014634897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02373159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1831300186","doi":"10.5840/symposium201216230","title":"Negative States of Affairs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.028522821927579038,"score_gpt":0.24327263380421688,"score_spread":0.21474981187663783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1831300186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041159246,0.0032668386,0.09537853,0.019474452,0.0010553038,0.00011907262,0.00022158946,0.00017681671,0.8391481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94346386,0.0017819764,0.0147690615,0.0043286094,0.00058110175,0.0003088251,0.00020438625,0.00015189507,0.034410354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945029,0.0022439833,0.00029917524,0.0010439883,0.0012511774,0.0006586386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955715,0.001673022,0.00043856425,0.00096051407,0.0010337884,0.00032257402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005009196,0.0007860992,0.000501185,0.0019137502,0.004624026,0.007501008,0.0011059822,0.0029713477,0.0070393193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007060274,0.00049335073,0.0010551132,0.0008733589,0.0327343,0.012749256,0.0059776125,0.0049660914,0.00101923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033614785,0.0000033958263,0.000059988444,0.000014227595,0.0000029362877,0.00002203596,0.0008492635,0.000034957797,0.00009017235,0.9975414,0.00054433604,0.00083388994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045097977,0.000009885519,0.0001502242,0.000037620324,0.000008707001,0.000095739895,0.0005296881,0.00019106489,0.00022551346,0.9738858,0.02484902,0.00001224133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015934592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010756503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007501008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033709046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020525956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026491463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1839595386","doi":"","title":"An Ethics of Philosophic Work","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Relevance (law); Meta-ethics; Applied ethics; Sociology; Western philosophy; Eudaimonia; Philosophy; Information ethics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.037896719554766985,"score_gpt":0.25709876807729165,"score_spread":0.21920204852252467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1839595386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075408393,0.006849773,0.037819687,0.24390143,0.0018856972,0.00010104875,0.0000607082,0.00014131134,0.7016995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7502464,0.004021708,0.019464962,0.035483096,0.0040735663,0.00076051196,0.00009043252,0.0002653411,0.18559389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784818,0.01417679,0.0006403419,0.001645269,0.0035116295,0.0015441668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864879,0.0061937217,0.0010178424,0.0026842766,0.0019374171,0.0016788382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011227291,0.00056840817,0.00061745924,0.0016305083,0.011347085,0.015888376,0.001488505,0.0064754365,0.006768017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0156629,0.00054253184,0.0004623567,0.0012897969,0.08836086,0.01089228,0.009079871,0.011267615,0.0023427433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013386075,0.0000037485006,0.000028135937,0.000010984041,7.539066e-7,0.000008094314,0.0014791786,0.000024182309,0.000017592334,0.99484766,0.0027958162,0.00078256894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006173004,0.000007662642,0.00010976433,0.00012396848,0.000001724837,0.000043865864,0.001693172,0.0001657912,0.0000518953,0.80063593,0.19715485,0.0000051643037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003366176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025603704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015888376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010026937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014122866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07275081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1842393620","doi":"10.1353/hms.2000.a385725","title":"Substantive Differences between Two Texts of Hume's Treatise","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical edition; Philosophy; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Focus (optics); Classics; History; Physics; Economics","score_opus":0.15926734140606513,"score_gpt":0.33323541181768424,"score_spread":0.1739680704116191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1842393620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02455902,0.012043162,0.005129556,0.09619909,0.005668792,0.00010811874,0.00023882832,0.00008305911,0.8559704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.673451,0.005635031,0.0026902545,0.0216368,0.004911288,0.0004976304,0.00028784107,0.00026827588,0.29062182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368817,0.0033767319,0.00014959848,0.00041964694,0.0019603074,0.0004054645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893134,0.0077603627,0.0005734906,0.00076385564,0.0012359583,0.0003528955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005715565,0.0003903085,0.00041104655,0.002147414,0.00676569,0.009002523,0.00094591914,0.0033988084,0.009194545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022584707,0.00024992783,0.00018732208,0.0022323476,0.019352881,0.003821912,0.0031641359,0.0055655977,0.0010885234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017832335,0.000015532634,0.00014743631,0.000027029759,0.0000033046706,0.000061495484,0.012195352,0.000055542183,0.00007749021,0.9259721,0.055881985,0.005544989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028998862,0.000036941914,0.0021753754,0.00057054515,0.000008193823,0.000112094225,0.0130587565,0.00022770683,0.0005726843,0.26955953,0.71360785,0.00004137077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009250053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011040106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0097154295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0097154295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052538076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07049066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893414730","doi":"10.29173/pandpr23422","title":"Forgotten Romantic and Enlightenment Connections: A personal approach to Mollenhauer’s seminal works","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phenomenology & Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Romance; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.031350570094421666,"score_gpt":0.2552294936601884,"score_spread":0.22387892356576672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893414730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042401798,0.012257648,0.069382295,0.092320815,0.0024276925,0.00014694434,0.00019247542,0.00019934558,0.780671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90310293,0.0058562374,0.0137620345,0.006659421,0.0007008868,0.00022180984,0.000090428344,0.00021696233,0.06938928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946812,0.003608023,0.000114652285,0.00057441974,0.0006124841,0.00040930914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929142,0.0051185586,0.00032541,0.0008779755,0.0004707078,0.00029312455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006847681,0.0006233842,0.00042784633,0.0028022937,0.009538964,0.0095024835,0.0020732975,0.0056231576,0.009108234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014874824,0.0004570366,0.00045942722,0.0022236777,0.042980652,0.016666008,0.007607752,0.006468504,0.0013725249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011287118,0.000011448344,0.00009330994,0.000033044307,0.0000035194691,0.000068741705,0.045570172,0.00006988705,0.000059682374,0.9423231,0.0056257807,0.0061300583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012822809,0.000018306617,0.00031731479,0.00040350072,0.0000072285516,0.00033179793,0.033758245,0.00039684967,0.0005170982,0.5915574,0.37265176,0.000027596576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002345749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042684535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009538964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068032485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002819183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04936123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189468606","doi":"10.1023/a:1019993002329","title":"Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Political communication; Communication studies; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.09520054357920177,"score_gpt":0.24600124407950533,"score_spread":0.15080070050030356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189468606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012996769,0.05655358,0.13624455,0.19628687,0.002751808,0.00013606674,0.0003414883,0.00020443344,0.59448445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8179347,0.01881339,0.061794177,0.022190236,0.0053684856,0.0004957581,0.00020663995,0.00034098845,0.07285563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98728675,0.0091538215,0.00050150714,0.0009487586,0.0016684136,0.00044081084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96916807,0.026601499,0.0007688418,0.0016483624,0.0014373229,0.00037580187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010121373,0.001128001,0.0019239151,0.004074245,0.0061852382,0.012360065,0.002107355,0.010794548,0.008986511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02553549,0.0011524096,0.0014415008,0.0034586657,0.0421583,0.01831907,0.0028440778,0.009904088,0.0015733091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005043334,0.000005228502,0.000029669429,0.00002384963,0.0000048967795,0.000012885139,0.00031439314,0.00014407054,0.000012310749,0.9963045,0.0022606996,0.00088242674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008177552,0.000001954126,0.000025555939,0.00003676042,0.0000049614596,0.000010767514,0.00009700407,0.0001966594,0.000025835196,0.9914021,0.008186758,0.0000033841347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008366453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059002154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012360065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008945476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044889837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06490433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1906870716","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v3i9.65","title":"Davidson on Practical Knowledge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Generality; Epistemology; Confusion; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Neglect; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.3285005292270333,"score_gpt":0.36358061654876184,"score_spread":0.035080087321728515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1906870716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034188733,0.037249085,0.009704903,0.3877181,0.0050662532,0.000036081274,0.00013778466,0.00008044753,0.5565885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54832315,0.028036227,0.012288272,0.12067467,0.00680753,0.00024703416,0.00020779541,0.00035907797,0.28305635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965252,0.0017267453,0.00013028558,0.00063789194,0.0006885071,0.0002913052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660814,0.0018073184,0.00014051556,0.00041351136,0.0007597333,0.00027077307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036049935,0.0006101208,0.0006708404,0.001119358,0.0061351256,0.0059330966,0.0012923946,0.005263391,0.0063811904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007057303,0.00044095606,0.0005188559,0.0009915697,0.023875145,0.0070224483,0.003962748,0.008625634,0.0022527515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058574237,0.0000031556215,0.00003698675,0.00002292122,0.0000021236085,0.000022615151,0.0013979576,0.00006198393,0.000016877597,0.9642211,0.03034043,0.0038680576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073616266,0.0000052256037,0.00007336183,0.00008622811,0.0000022665859,0.000031180913,0.0008533172,0.00009804593,0.000044004315,0.66950476,0.32928696,0.0000072833723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012884533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012801886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012884533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008594281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044732867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062356114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1928179361","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9205.2011.01440.x","title":"Morality and Religion: Some Questions about First Principles","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conventionalism; Morality; Obligation; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Philosophy; Rationality; Moral obligation; Nihilism; Naturalism; Morality and religion; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.20702897837618375,"score_gpt":0.274629282201171,"score_spread":0.06760030382498725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1928179361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06592575,0.026654838,0.06777071,0.3744263,0.0018156869,0.00007352305,0.000102251244,0.00011815402,0.46311286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683382,0.0030502062,0.007734166,0.007806677,0.0016315619,0.00010347429,0.00002326033,0.000047057973,0.011265354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546236,0.0030192833,0.000095794945,0.0003409962,0.0007720951,0.00030953376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888405,0.008330136,0.0006296353,0.00073472003,0.0009093376,0.0005557741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009175659,0.00038422138,0.00076321047,0.002023759,0.004521479,0.0074843066,0.0018044541,0.006337477,0.0058524986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009661772,0.00033477772,0.0008330767,0.001065324,0.046365794,0.009864404,0.0038593158,0.008384473,0.00061038113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001935382,0.000008247552,0.00003440589,0.00001364166,0.0000015735445,0.000015150702,0.00054221496,0.00009186311,0.00001321876,0.99752825,0.0006934189,0.0010561604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003075614,0.0000040260275,0.000039493003,0.000021113996,5.710061e-7,0.000012070904,0.0001466491,0.0001940561,0.000011078341,0.9961965,0.0033692035,0.0000021695087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002206615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013058909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009175659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004660402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017176004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04852611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933609258","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12066","title":"Interspecies Politics: Reply to <scp>H</scp>inchcliffe and <scp>L</scp>adwig","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Citation; Politics; Political philosophy; Classics; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.07353927644882724,"score_gpt":0.2858447446771747,"score_spread":0.21230546822834745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933609258","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021713556,0.0011321694,0.00007323096,0.9890836,0.007888436,0.0000042497427,0.000027774086,0.000007717927,0.0015657567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039610215,0.0007099197,0.00009984428,0.9811204,0.011223322,0.000027921446,0.00001789116,0.00003602448,0.0028035901],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990189,0.0026825855,0.00079950574,0.002405301,0.0022315665,0.001692121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93760073,0.04668757,0.0020354786,0.0020634474,0.008233655,0.0033791093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015607249,0.0017483359,0.0030029565,0.0024068602,0.017672818,0.016403994,0.006942855,0.11949151,0.0095383385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069515094,0.0021792992,0.0020555768,0.0038904385,0.015803263,0.01501156,0.008051493,0.101063654,0.0053591947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002181259,0.000008151695,0.0001147648,0.000044219785,0.000011610847,0.00009985347,0.0005756076,0.000049010185,0.00004037281,0.011470315,0.9863972,0.0011670019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010697869,0.000017280343,0.0017491443,0.0008614563,0.000083508545,0.00032314623,0.0057645906,0.00056467945,0.00048296503,0.0436433,0.9461686,0.00023423946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053804778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058996093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11949151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015745688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0134439105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11424345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940126738","doi":"10.5840/symposium20151913","title":"After Contingency: Toward the Principle of Sufficient Reason as Post Factum","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04334366647069509,"score_gpt":0.2657192018887196,"score_spread":0.22237553541802452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940126738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03756511,0.0059360135,0.39267904,0.13337,0.0039363126,0.00018948464,0.00024760942,0.000275332,0.4258011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9027789,0.0013115776,0.06025208,0.00750455,0.0015843225,0.0003069007,0.00012303705,0.00028519778,0.025853334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992307,0.004352823,0.0003061342,0.0013491827,0.0009982539,0.0006866273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98463374,0.010202763,0.0007655445,0.0025209468,0.0013156197,0.00056138803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014544502,0.0006685293,0.0011560257,0.0020133283,0.006603577,0.008269712,0.0025002037,0.007327258,0.00901973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022674117,0.0009393391,0.0016871587,0.0012252353,0.0390167,0.019374076,0.006311382,0.014574892,0.0012055248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007044203,0.0000032884072,0.000028854085,0.000009267337,0.0000033842869,0.000015053422,0.00033440776,0.00009202469,0.000022794136,0.9979875,0.00074079755,0.0007555389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004788037,0.0000036584427,0.00002944219,0.000022944649,0.000003892673,0.0000104386245,0.00013385966,0.00022356212,0.000054063457,0.9935282,0.0059812274,0.0000038702074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001906221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022886372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014544502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004398457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054534837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076919615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964321254","doi":"10.7710/2155-4838.1086","title":"Kant’s Implicit Suggestion of the Negative Formulation of Duty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Proposition; Philosophy; Epistemology; Ideal (ethics); Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Statement (logic); Theology","score_opus":0.06890247021224427,"score_gpt":0.3418587028960369,"score_spread":0.27295623268379265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964321254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049599167,0.0028844653,0.26524746,0.13294367,0.0033148124,0.000106039246,0.00018065979,0.00027368087,0.54545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410054,0.00073793216,0.027253225,0.01300641,0.0008449322,0.00013726008,0.000056894103,0.00010505443,0.016852908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860715,0.00723859,0.00076007936,0.0017397511,0.003376565,0.00081343943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934369,0.0031250156,0.0007544439,0.00091668125,0.0014230873,0.0003438163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011102856,0.00071356306,0.00059877866,0.0015005956,0.0027994518,0.0046081175,0.0021942307,0.0057531428,0.003889899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011504017,0.00054583175,0.0011195223,0.0006842365,0.040594496,0.009099742,0.005751206,0.008982695,0.0014348679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007956544,0.0000036757979,0.000059302085,0.000024200071,0.0000024881037,0.000015496038,0.00061184156,0.00009592148,0.00007572449,0.9973621,0.0008124529,0.00092887337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008560363,0.000014599213,0.000089011366,0.000042886844,0.0000061848978,0.00008586025,0.00031877198,0.00047727372,0.00028405755,0.9785689,0.02009052,0.000013380698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008084922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063180894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011102856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034440055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024383327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058718204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965356735","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0001","title":"Hume's Theory of Mental Representation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Perception; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy; Content (measure theory); Mental representation; Cognitive science; Psychology; Mathematics; Cognition","score_opus":0.24378739894406293,"score_gpt":0.36214985822898316,"score_spread":0.11836245928492023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965356735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011488893,0.008421794,0.19761533,0.02899017,0.00064054166,0.000099648205,0.00022155241,0.00020506396,0.752317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86993796,0.006225899,0.051455,0.00551032,0.0012826005,0.00045594762,0.00017801854,0.00012228398,0.06483198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972989,0.001500972,0.000089644855,0.0003217067,0.00057418004,0.00021454006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981299,0.0011791333,0.000118032025,0.00027124942,0.00022527613,0.00007649731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026635942,0.00071471016,0.0005690953,0.0024338171,0.0023482474,0.0055166436,0.0013116378,0.0032978957,0.0048847473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004211317,0.00032855076,0.0009832756,0.001433752,0.027194992,0.0073101306,0.0024650476,0.0032831049,0.0013438053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002582641,0.0000021076871,0.000019680505,0.000016423835,0.0000032517753,0.000013113144,0.0005414713,0.00016702859,0.000018455517,0.99650925,0.0010468464,0.0016597037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047892595,0.0000051061106,0.000080220496,0.00003119566,0.0000036453741,0.00004752522,0.00013810548,0.0003455305,0.00008338415,0.97732645,0.021929098,0.000004946238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026843855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016451433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055166436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046153343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018246007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033486784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967744870","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0000","title":"A Conversation between Annette Baier and Anik Waldow about Hume's Account of Sympathy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Conversation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15153771442609573,"score_gpt":0.29189478424777987,"score_spread":0.14035706982168414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967744870","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012762084,0.019843139,0.0037566447,0.9216544,0.0058205696,0.000012431053,0.00003266817,0.000026416867,0.036091708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5249833,0.017833939,0.0049550263,0.38534695,0.0081604365,0.000103255654,0.00004149582,0.00018426735,0.05839141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930815,0.005374579,0.00008469086,0.00032589468,0.00072845625,0.0004049618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795243,0.018752934,0.00030018948,0.00021855856,0.0005488712,0.0006550129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010509525,0.00050003384,0.0009023486,0.000993272,0.011380901,0.006958822,0.0012506341,0.009604302,0.0045360993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015384356,0.00047160056,0.00041734462,0.0013269868,0.02141784,0.014681524,0.0036016724,0.017100539,0.0007656698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006594724,0.000025146459,0.00042175697,0.00009368498,0.00002069778,0.00088253396,0.078231744,0.00018829652,0.00036042236,0.69214505,0.21598364,0.011580971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022203667,0.000029608573,0.0009872707,0.0004741272,0.000016024334,0.0008255799,0.04992373,0.00049370545,0.00056639494,0.27595946,0.67061114,0.00009072864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010739199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015072295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011380901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004491422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016250304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055580318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969878553","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0015","title":"The Circumstances of Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Epistemology; Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10374034170500154,"score_gpt":0.3241856297699282,"score_spread":0.22044528806492666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969878553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043553893,0.0064609568,0.0745328,0.064276785,0.0013847002,0.00015995778,0.00015576094,0.00008825346,0.8093869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734368,0.0018723826,0.006249533,0.004740316,0.0007725236,0.00021458261,0.000050816896,0.000082651844,0.012580493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97532237,0.013824498,0.001088694,0.0025946223,0.004004826,0.003164987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98124576,0.01081054,0.0015707597,0.002846878,0.0022706047,0.0012555349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016653534,0.00043623688,0.0010283779,0.0018740284,0.011802783,0.013043336,0.001548298,0.0061775367,0.004570156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031999674,0.00055800955,0.0008891989,0.0010746276,0.04854221,0.015846359,0.012217675,0.0074374243,0.00076384644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053846347,0.000004688739,0.00016557088,0.000014911898,0.000003687161,0.00005880315,0.0014685851,0.00008922735,0.000027997674,0.9957925,0.00080224057,0.0015664541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037261411,0.000007645275,0.00014833742,0.000074206386,0.000004519859,0.00006969044,0.002554466,0.00012236128,0.000090748814,0.9604606,0.036454715,0.000008918538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024384428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019842708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016653534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043760706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006469911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08807337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971274375","doi":"10.1215/00318108-110-2-291","title":"THE NEW DIALECTIC: CONVERSATIONAL CONTEXTS OF ARGUMENT; AD HOMINEM ARGUMENTS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Argument (complex analysis); Dialectic; Citation; Download; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06217263187437377,"score_gpt":0.2968226115447535,"score_spread":0.2346499796703797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971274375","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007362714,0.9611477,0.00090626394,0.01599005,0.0019829303,0.0000071432855,0.000027134362,0.000019194593,0.019846011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010236385,0.9422781,0.0015389924,0.0076799877,0.0067731394,0.000081606326,0.00012187146,0.00005533062,0.031234663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535227,0.002573351,0.00015562258,0.00037455998,0.0013727379,0.00017136992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958615,0.002611763,0.00035897724,0.00020580187,0.00070557726,0.00025650125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030090185,0.0014259755,0.0015150815,0.0064892746,0.0016381183,0.007734232,0.0015518257,0.0041361516,0.014254371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00726187,0.0007405031,0.0006029839,0.009527079,0.010912029,0.013194674,0.0022661036,0.006584823,0.006191417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028968718,0.000024885298,0.00013669369,0.0032968356,0.000048932965,0.000099163706,0.0012417194,0.00021801946,0.00019740986,0.23807305,0.6200544,0.13657984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063109446,0.000006153867,0.00016619524,0.0015440679,0.000010932355,0.00012655869,0.00039414305,0.000061839746,0.000038790622,0.05661013,0.94102484,0.000009826999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063893017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008649492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014254371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008727479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075534186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063322544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972142719","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0002","title":"A Third Type of Distinction in the Treatise","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Perception; Simple (philosophy); Epistemology; Separable space; Identity (music); Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.3004452348789169,"score_gpt":0.36761578795393657,"score_spread":0.06717055307501968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972142719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013819533,0.012155333,0.1131786,0.1380887,0.004377677,0.000059349186,0.00014679877,0.00012812702,0.7180459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.750074,0.005584132,0.02421125,0.0634434,0.0061591314,0.0004795835,0.00020404799,0.00034741525,0.14949693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99288577,0.0037576803,0.0002091467,0.0010130259,0.0014406879,0.00069369934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971917,0.0016530849,0.00018670685,0.00043066926,0.0003651919,0.0001726035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057826256,0.00044541198,0.000579316,0.0013484714,0.004634722,0.0071844626,0.0018271409,0.0049161874,0.0076078274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006309337,0.00028256912,0.001038176,0.0012011112,0.018941991,0.0103574665,0.0041643754,0.011083674,0.0014764849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035455878,0.0000025902573,0.00002669833,0.000014727396,0.000002210084,0.000009393838,0.0006790087,0.000032914475,0.000037257207,0.99593997,0.0022075027,0.0010441178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011911818,0.000019227678,0.00019565063,0.00019358599,0.0000109013445,0.00008220244,0.000863088,0.0003072365,0.00024343727,0.70752203,0.29053566,0.00001495448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021831736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002768974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076078274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004804084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033827445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03485626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972707337","doi":"10.1111/1746-8361.12015","title":"Review of Nuccetelli &amp; Seay (2012)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"dialectica","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Philosophy; Theology; Media studies; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06862924144858859,"score_gpt":0.27576414754595796,"score_spread":0.20713490609736937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972707337","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049978594,0.94357306,0.00065696373,0.012636182,0.0042557167,0.0000223791,0.00034644967,0.000012883729,0.037996642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008372242,0.94878346,0.0013357581,0.011424571,0.0031613158,0.00007912833,0.00035587058,0.00003994494,0.026447654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897814,0.00035762187,0.00009211428,0.000123522,0.000380163,0.00006850204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995673,0.0026960692,0.0002774587,0.00018349098,0.0009596666,0.00021021883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022180036,0.0008222383,0.0012360769,0.011660362,0.0014221789,0.0036800941,0.0009884782,0.0019055333,0.021941382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067150975,0.0002951456,0.0003778765,0.014230276,0.0018047626,0.0037094636,0.002619153,0.0016022804,0.00701809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059111804,0.000059555536,0.00059180113,0.013131507,0.00006188646,0.00011936687,0.0012294102,0.0001562022,0.00031894736,0.04763601,0.48672444,0.44991174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023013756,0.000006250802,0.00076817285,0.0038805346,0.000023483166,0.000099780475,0.00025662102,0.000011673281,0.000049348117,0.0020258224,0.9928718,0.0000041707517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012094539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031081045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021941382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035265991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084910905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07340127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972752880","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2013.787816","title":"Principled Tyranny: Can Korsgaard Explain Evil Action?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.18197146116590412,"score_gpt":0.36255076276636505,"score_spread":0.18057930160046093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972752880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014955364,0.007524529,0.058452077,0.112211,0.0029911932,0.000054889373,0.00017246664,0.00023751397,0.8034011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90042335,0.002314968,0.011579273,0.016270742,0.0013875001,0.00018590437,0.00010695645,0.00045090678,0.06728039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979944,0.0008951369,0.000067334484,0.00039165182,0.0003654653,0.00028596763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845815,0.00090536993,0.00011152719,0.00026967877,0.00018087756,0.00007430814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034734593,0.00074376276,0.00057436805,0.0010855948,0.0031918276,0.0046007633,0.0017818657,0.0050619384,0.014105395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063349344,0.00043273895,0.0009918228,0.00064747076,0.020469218,0.009727906,0.003374843,0.0056568957,0.002909525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061757746,0.0000028516063,0.000034883167,0.000009648324,0.0000013997366,0.000040116938,0.00079295086,0.000081860635,0.000014373012,0.9944325,0.0035826955,0.0010006367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008006772,0.0000031357931,0.000060975643,0.000041310068,0.000002221448,0.00005946007,0.00033897866,0.0004308325,0.000044939097,0.9648039,0.034199577,0.000006671884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004508359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036798073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014105395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032722263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001574523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04718727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973273280","doi":"10.7202/1029066ar","title":"Animal Ethics and Politics Beyond the Social Contract","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Animal ethics; Political philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10798168335657181,"score_gpt":0.31421335951440016,"score_spread":0.20623167615782834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973273280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043707803,0.011611276,0.07978206,0.13814819,0.0007595499,0.000058576734,0.000047175356,0.00005137091,0.725834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95049083,0.0033692052,0.009320069,0.009173537,0.0008930502,0.0001072538,0.000020882077,0.000040579453,0.026584614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99125916,0.006343812,0.00014682837,0.0005238734,0.0011334809,0.0005927904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947944,0.0036085318,0.00034004494,0.0005733972,0.00034941567,0.0003342734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008585214,0.0003269902,0.0005068219,0.0011068038,0.0057003153,0.008278008,0.0008175603,0.0059067337,0.0056111324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004882796,0.00025177063,0.000541174,0.0010712612,0.04167094,0.006915634,0.004251875,0.0054133506,0.00062158174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010623587,0.0000026138819,0.0000402278,0.0000029916278,7.2213277e-7,0.000009529877,0.00035871932,0.000074103154,0.000020738345,0.99870706,0.00021342494,0.000568797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034033937,0.000009807707,0.00011678089,0.000027913511,0.000001142408,0.000022286895,0.00045127995,0.00030911542,0.000034100136,0.96338606,0.035634466,0.0000037277266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032690598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025322805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008585214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044437996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034673477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04540348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974199069","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6245.2009.01347.x","title":"Enjoying the Unbeautiful: From Mendelssohn's Theory of “Mixed Sentiments” to Kant's Aesthetic Judgments of Reflection","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sublime; Beauty; Pleasure; Aesthetics; Perfection; Irrational number; Philosophy; Perception; Epistemology; Aesthetic experience; Psychology","score_opus":0.04484212593195025,"score_gpt":0.27733976827104556,"score_spread":0.2324976423390953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974199069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043647747,0.017656522,0.024486573,0.08014405,0.0013922527,0.000031202024,0.000050637533,0.00017734444,0.83241373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510994,0.0031008637,0.0027922122,0.0052103023,0.00083881116,0.000044098473,0.000023463312,0.00015718256,0.03673377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971831,0.0018281383,0.000041528507,0.0002674962,0.00044643055,0.00023339313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867696,0.0007551417,0.00009303472,0.00019791345,0.0001403964,0.0001365696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031466356,0.00054765726,0.00033190646,0.0011615343,0.00592459,0.009104546,0.0011004752,0.003490292,0.004785181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044919974,0.00028908177,0.00038099743,0.00081900007,0.049739853,0.013754017,0.0050069075,0.0055197496,0.00076916756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017827053,0.0000090596595,0.00008000671,0.000023489716,0.00000237843,0.00006527572,0.013144557,0.00006008328,0.00008720091,0.97732157,0.0039210264,0.005267595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009665746,0.00001626431,0.00025227427,0.00011081257,0.0000035210517,0.0001219344,0.0080234865,0.00019848386,0.00015124862,0.88672394,0.10437611,0.0000121209605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039858934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038031065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009104546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005332666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018183291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038691342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979254916","doi":"10.1215/00318108-2315306","title":"Sidgwick's Axioms and Consequentialism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Certainty; Ethical egoism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Morality; Nothing; Dishonesty; Objectivism; Consequentialism; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05166272757574716,"score_gpt":0.2666611078554058,"score_spread":0.21499838027965865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979254916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019817445,0.004121482,0.1257669,0.043804634,0.001420251,0.000105053085,0.0007100852,0.00026597484,0.80398816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8771603,0.0019552072,0.0678252,0.0065444726,0.00090508664,0.00021908466,0.00045272717,0.00014661145,0.044791218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927447,0.0031048867,0.00064215675,0.0011922708,0.0017714647,0.0005445508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99233454,0.0045559984,0.00043707207,0.0012097888,0.0011622616,0.00030029038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073320153,0.00063343113,0.00070913765,0.0022493429,0.003470768,0.005795769,0.0017712084,0.0029915087,0.0064515127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011343139,0.0005625262,0.0015522594,0.001440043,0.02197504,0.009325647,0.0032128356,0.006008087,0.0010523243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012449183,0.0000012819153,0.00002785869,0.000006484506,0.0000010449564,0.000007833997,0.00010848103,0.00006079851,0.000008355773,0.99801135,0.00094764907,0.0008175598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000687841,0.0000021090702,0.00008727897,0.000017708577,0.0000017534702,0.000023996108,0.00005916069,0.00023305575,0.000052096326,0.98162407,0.017887486,0.000004407446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007496242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004839116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008704584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008704584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040550176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063156486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980468704","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0023","title":"Persons and Passions: Essays in Honor of Annette Baier (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Honor; Philosophy; Classics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.07120418908681683,"score_gpt":0.3148258046273805,"score_spread":0.2436216155405637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980468704","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005569894,0.9647459,0.000040337385,0.020949831,0.0127202235,0.000011466786,0.000023100323,0.000006573321,0.0014468434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014503569,0.9423961,0.00015018582,0.030382365,0.016655985,0.00010030231,0.00010686325,0.00002218956,0.008735626],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972741,0.0009372431,0.00029909244,0.00028926705,0.0010129801,0.00018727082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99342793,0.0029792062,0.0009470237,0.0001588991,0.0018275584,0.00065936823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00408344,0.0018098672,0.0029705411,0.0030272736,0.0010552111,0.0040694615,0.0018647477,0.0037623295,0.011881386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016611317,0.0008694354,0.0010196883,0.005281757,0.0024662814,0.005707877,0.0026376594,0.005870401,0.0070535084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036973586,0.000012319047,0.00008595182,0.004650863,0.00004951946,0.000086247666,0.0002346027,0.00003318384,0.000082644634,0.00068067707,0.9338013,0.060245715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018248209,0.000016744269,0.00059754314,0.008363003,0.00003547007,0.00021587685,0.00028027565,0.0000072667403,0.00003088861,0.0005308922,0.9898865,0.000017252412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004600846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006396265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011881386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028656486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067261774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03974718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984055894","doi":"10.3917/rspt.852.0267","title":"L'importance de la typique pour le jugement pur pratique dans la morale kantienne","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15260258297725215,"score_gpt":0.351588089915338,"score_spread":0.19898550693808587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984055894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066559374,0.008749452,0.17294417,0.04646684,0.0020597612,0.00009407627,0.00024067936,0.0002455092,0.7026402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9222491,0.0025067208,0.017777113,0.0028755213,0.0005521011,0.00019791922,0.00011436698,0.00021371352,0.053513393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99283713,0.004642378,0.00024149522,0.0007231082,0.0010855078,0.00047033225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433595,0.0031531574,0.00052546663,0.0008447985,0.0008480759,0.0002924874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004541917,0.0006911706,0.000691528,0.0014740778,0.0042357747,0.009799244,0.0011502003,0.0029247832,0.0140158385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055359285,0.00041545357,0.000702399,0.0014317102,0.0279167,0.009198882,0.005057546,0.007634092,0.0020035296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071282348,0.000004636785,0.00022854979,0.000028656847,0.0000037468917,0.000027548298,0.0032347485,0.00013454558,0.000060135106,0.9935694,0.0006897806,0.0020110828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018070783,0.000032493987,0.0008427403,0.00017788917,0.000013801056,0.00016541214,0.0054723695,0.0007095881,0.0003720368,0.8614384,0.13072552,0.000031720145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047384575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046914844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0140158385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055079055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004038093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046887577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984984027","doi":"10.1080/00048400802370300","title":"John Stuart Mill, Determinism, and the Problem of Induction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Determinism; Philosophy; Epistemology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05198317433303258,"score_gpt":0.24397698251844047,"score_spread":0.1919938081854079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984984027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018805135,0.14196253,0.029784486,0.28458214,0.005149329,0.00006869016,0.0004583762,0.00025625463,0.51893306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75862205,0.04977415,0.016183501,0.02221254,0.011293036,0.00020518863,0.00024690098,0.00022297117,0.14123975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982181,0.00065427064,0.00009021295,0.0002595316,0.0006191161,0.00015873839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947143,0.004152696,0.00019365025,0.00022151099,0.00056399015,0.0001538673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024325554,0.00032517657,0.00056219817,0.0017844015,0.004024955,0.0043416023,0.000751898,0.0020411888,0.00462972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006297584,0.00058530085,0.000498452,0.0018988214,0.01083106,0.0055394946,0.0014840538,0.004437787,0.0008566493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012492877,0.000013407543,0.00009894312,0.00002692467,0.0000030610674,0.000036991987,0.00026068935,0.0002903558,0.000025826736,0.97130233,0.023756007,0.004172993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082104025,0.0000037059458,0.000114449795,0.000053675463,0.000002781362,0.000028630957,0.00008399671,0.0004277629,0.000078163874,0.9306719,0.068519525,0.000007319587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008864805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006452295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002928572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04681486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986328627","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0241","title":"Moral Skepticism and Moral Naturalism in Hume's Treatise","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Morality; Naturalism; Epistemology; Wonder; Relation (database)","score_opus":0.17687503362878854,"score_gpt":0.32036777474150374,"score_spread":0.1434927411127152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986328627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012134884,0.0625649,0.003582515,0.30247632,0.0027213537,0.000026665526,0.00004486963,0.000041247316,0.6164071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8114537,0.019839874,0.0016298129,0.06157391,0.008104212,0.00016076819,0.000041882613,0.00012558993,0.09707022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98738366,0.0099384915,0.00014321093,0.00041717463,0.0013667656,0.00075065653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926819,0.005732471,0.00042774773,0.00032564302,0.0005309565,0.0003011993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008337809,0.00051055494,0.00055025856,0.0019690879,0.013983204,0.010340486,0.0010136985,0.00819779,0.0037481668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009942819,0.00028968073,0.00040736143,0.002076228,0.041985698,0.005883662,0.003399487,0.009740049,0.00069686724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006736194,0.000010962824,0.000066399385,0.000027045078,0.0000032793823,0.00004748139,0.0072853244,0.000091002046,0.000015315569,0.95065236,0.039576564,0.0022175303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014374333,0.000011910527,0.00031822617,0.0004974981,0.0000047772196,0.00008568727,0.003649478,0.0002195009,0.000084469524,0.610052,0.3850429,0.000019145455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009332844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010333071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013983204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011071957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045855655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080332994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988878473","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0185","title":"Hume's Nuanced Defense of Luxury","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Assertion; Philosophy; Acknowledgement; Virtue; Pessimism; Morality; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Aesthetics","score_opus":0.09446842297566957,"score_gpt":0.29032282395330966,"score_spread":0.1958544009776401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988878473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04275952,0.026210679,0.02938796,0.42993894,0.0042671678,0.000053332347,0.00017586748,0.00015092203,0.46705565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8643993,0.0036459193,0.0028194955,0.076879606,0.003237064,0.00008380161,0.000027757316,0.00007044008,0.04883665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364763,0.0041783564,0.0001309736,0.00057677424,0.0009381669,0.00052808895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99493533,0.0035912874,0.0002934944,0.00028174144,0.00068071735,0.0002173849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041530337,0.00059007935,0.00044580386,0.0011655727,0.004223646,0.005646825,0.0014711405,0.010233112,0.003042583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008545215,0.00026253329,0.00050039426,0.00091830164,0.02799697,0.005832875,0.003639758,0.0061890297,0.0006093285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017596372,0.0000058807623,0.00012601353,0.000048781163,0.000005205686,0.00013712494,0.0058437972,0.000098872755,0.000090516754,0.9708902,0.020210506,0.0025254716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013925146,0.000031819487,0.0007013271,0.00030355665,0.000009812235,0.00034201704,0.0057667703,0.0005705736,0.00062152866,0.54155904,0.45004225,0.00003731751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038629028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004228705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010233112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030723712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013726164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02229166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989123284","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0654","title":"Perceptions and Objects: Hume's Radical Empiricism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Pleasure; Empiricism; Object (grammar); Epistemology; Philosophy; Pain and pleasure; Doctrine; Order (exchange); Philosophy of mind; Psychology; Aesthetics; Metaphysics; Theology","score_opus":0.24863582731629102,"score_gpt":0.32123166863546326,"score_spread":0.07259584131917224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989123284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039911263,0.03147558,0.09837922,0.15308589,0.0020229388,0.000089128946,0.00015811394,0.00014694936,0.6747309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94548804,0.0063336766,0.016490577,0.010281003,0.0017188016,0.00021582597,0.00006647721,0.000120410376,0.019285174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917572,0.0056405882,0.00015043748,0.0007172794,0.0013626046,0.00037195094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359953,0.0046382356,0.00027944022,0.0007303405,0.0005121122,0.00024035785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008078539,0.00071407564,0.0011672465,0.0032034228,0.005164036,0.010243297,0.001822195,0.0043669906,0.003080315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008810997,0.00051931426,0.0007651928,0.0015539393,0.084381156,0.0151482755,0.005946616,0.008978731,0.0005951945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043840682,0.0000054979773,0.000046696012,0.000018004994,0.0000036974495,0.000018008497,0.0016263482,0.000102638835,0.0000127991125,0.9961941,0.0007409445,0.0012269018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006875504,0.0000036515419,0.00005919059,0.000042751577,0.0000018849249,0.0000137099105,0.00045708945,0.00021022584,0.000027954376,0.98831195,0.010860968,0.0000037426516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056270603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029581066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010243297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063085984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030789755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045772314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989213692","doi":"10.1007/s11098-006-9069-5","title":"Moral worth and rationality as acting on good reasons","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.19155748434171768,"score_gpt":0.3539845443446747,"score_spread":0.162427060002957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989213692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089690715,0.0062810793,0.08056916,0.037801918,0.00073019415,0.0001255981,0.00009771333,0.00007872812,0.78462493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696129,0.0010064124,0.012114179,0.001049163,0.0002786046,0.000112774665,0.000033231663,0.000062561725,0.015730234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98915035,0.0072613056,0.00031440164,0.00078335573,0.0016887686,0.0008018465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980827,0.012588902,0.0014577856,0.002746088,0.0015434265,0.00083683326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011609513,0.0010461251,0.0010638833,0.0031761546,0.0036370235,0.012863335,0.0022855918,0.0075634667,0.006839277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016684046,0.00080254383,0.0010434138,0.0022412029,0.060460143,0.015376144,0.004072893,0.0070646214,0.0006294871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030743188,0.0000050018043,0.000036326714,0.000006689389,0.0000027639662,0.000008213688,0.0004753042,0.0001354666,0.000010253918,0.9986425,0.00014362794,0.00053084455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004714212,0.000002207569,0.00004343104,0.000010724336,0.0000027632746,0.000007987607,0.00028034355,0.00016537383,0.000018810097,0.9978529,0.0016085847,0.0000021497717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001726561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015308055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012863335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046003615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00304068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06139767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992999690","doi":"10.1007/s10677-009-9217-z","title":"Is Divorce Promise-Breaking?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Honour; Political philosophy; Triad (sociology); Duty; Philosophy of medicine; Control (management); Sociology; Action (physics); Law; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Politics; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.05474083129432228,"score_gpt":0.32578233520191635,"score_spread":0.2710415039075941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992999690","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03135136,0.0040362566,0.05009642,0.4907456,0.0035444696,0.00010093413,0.00022259341,0.00017314352,0.41972923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91442865,0.002026506,0.0069857407,0.031272616,0.0014849937,0.000283855,0.00011392017,0.00027818806,0.043125536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727604,0.014242156,0.0010341068,0.0028978635,0.005617344,0.003448093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.933672,0.04055525,0.0037160125,0.012058898,0.00628642,0.0037113568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047853686,0.0005837818,0.0016809818,0.001474626,0.012223484,0.018067174,0.0049486174,0.015655365,0.036655787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13862239,0.0010529617,0.0016263461,0.0022050468,0.063442476,0.04261527,0.0127971005,0.028484559,0.0058263782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012420344,0.000010693281,0.00015578521,0.000016375057,0.000006843732,0.00003808342,0.0016976972,0.00004641354,0.000013748605,0.9901444,0.0042456337,0.0036118198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008165111,0.0000045289667,0.000053924072,0.000051267212,0.000003858165,0.000034900473,0.0018225394,0.0001080844,0.000037611233,0.985134,0.012733792,0.0000073435026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049391077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038127983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047853686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071313074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014404821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25307757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999293412","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0007","title":"Hume's Touchstone","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.1200789433220049,"score_gpt":0.32920352977258815,"score_spread":0.20912458645058324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999293412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071187313,0.041761577,0.017227748,0.22936529,0.0036241165,0.000030198737,0.0001089956,0.000072973315,0.70069027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6051275,0.023173787,0.009816345,0.077641554,0.0055530993,0.00020359024,0.000082743136,0.0001777422,0.27822357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412125,0.0040335828,0.00010207247,0.00049171865,0.0008994181,0.00035205498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954217,0.0032161619,0.00017521615,0.00040805584,0.00047984807,0.00029891354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003292316,0.000565986,0.00050424197,0.0015852088,0.005231062,0.0058223745,0.0008854256,0.00472827,0.0075376285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065130075,0.0002499631,0.000348585,0.0010906996,0.03389215,0.006928942,0.0031229153,0.006558971,0.001548514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063049183,0.000007829495,0.00007455537,0.000024974968,0.0000027508133,0.00003907176,0.0040459046,0.000065515494,0.000028254017,0.9602937,0.02842335,0.0069878804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025738793,0.00000856164,0.00014732066,0.00013699108,0.0000013029698,0.000061746185,0.0020779108,0.000116000556,0.00008618062,0.6716109,0.3257441,0.0000064415663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048300084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057187364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075376285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040086005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029065127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029084623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000368625","doi":"10.1007/s10790-009-9150-3","title":"Hume, Callicott, and the Land Ethic: Prospects and Problems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06581954679639651,"score_gpt":0.27803657870002724,"score_spread":0.21221703190363073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000368625","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046154995,0.04436395,0.009858124,0.50773937,0.0007482679,0.000047021706,0.00015084732,0.00003906133,0.39089838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9248068,0.015900284,0.006398612,0.022560198,0.0013305377,0.00010642814,0.00005507089,0.00006670776,0.028775461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996335,0.0020032704,0.000088392015,0.00043743974,0.0007254344,0.00041046698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831012,0.013100454,0.00061437074,0.0009878767,0.0014502855,0.00074578234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01079634,0.00039946949,0.0017288612,0.002725335,0.007776326,0.012027397,0.0020591463,0.011506984,0.01770976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020991849,0.00032747377,0.0004319464,0.0045301304,0.04778421,0.022968438,0.004273507,0.0050221295,0.001063595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017322209,0.000016827637,0.0001526862,0.000023900682,0.0000033448505,0.00001898134,0.00057042536,0.00009929665,0.000008820292,0.98866546,0.005033984,0.005388902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007902303,0.0000032170567,0.00015795174,0.000053272393,0.0000015564414,0.00001681239,0.0012422575,0.00013272231,0.000022612196,0.9853357,0.013019101,0.000006948385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015377408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025751263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01770976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071558272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076828506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05924505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000425093","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0316","title":"Hume on Steadfast Objects and Time","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Object (grammar); Simple (philosophy); Metaphysics; GRASP; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11585866680486406,"score_gpt":0.29549101470889017,"score_spread":0.1796323479040261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000425093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013445856,0.07577026,0.0038557516,0.06038282,0.0009444143,0.000021736229,0.00010407422,0.000060802948,0.8454143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7091855,0.0296491,0.002474888,0.012720803,0.0019068778,0.00009787215,0.00011128583,0.00015330518,0.24370037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985852,0.0009146794,0.000026968366,0.00014378007,0.00020335865,0.0001260375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883133,0.000748375,0.00008082211,0.000102239,0.00013111645,0.00010614468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001376355,0.00053175696,0.00035922942,0.001528235,0.0077198227,0.005375718,0.0007340736,0.0022641919,0.010587224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002470735,0.0002773733,0.00025803398,0.0017205284,0.025734663,0.008909497,0.0024937452,0.003036751,0.0016810818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058271135,0.0000045720785,0.0000773352,0.000016183278,0.0000012945676,0.000019575811,0.0078841485,0.000031718755,0.000017110202,0.9707959,0.018164769,0.0029814783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010341812,0.000011759548,0.00049434486,0.00015960644,0.0000033526887,0.00009882121,0.0064127026,0.00006491431,0.0000752826,0.4294502,0.56321144,0.000007244668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011839629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013052253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011839629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054672156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020051617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039667666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002455242","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400001989","title":"Kant on the Self as Model of Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Handwriting; Philosophy; Section (typography); Epistemology; Literature; Art; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10216184342075224,"score_gpt":0.2988549912314482,"score_spread":0.19669314781069597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002455242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019520245,0.016526476,0.01759958,0.03198405,0.0007624378,0.00002777549,0.00012623417,0.000107350985,0.9133459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93320876,0.004126041,0.003913074,0.0030313798,0.00047783623,0.00008253526,0.000070429385,0.00009275088,0.054997176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953881,0.0031273798,0.000100161174,0.00037971584,0.0005833239,0.00042138775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998587,0.00065082393,0.00009306219,0.0003390728,0.00017585748,0.00015421376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030049302,0.000646593,0.00044632005,0.0014302977,0.0044733207,0.01022008,0.00092536374,0.003397416,0.004490746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029811547,0.0002849906,0.0004797054,0.0011374311,0.044693064,0.012764319,0.0043565496,0.004235262,0.0012466403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003146148,0.0000016926967,0.000018368715,0.0000063179928,6.4887723e-7,0.000011640943,0.0016848777,0.000064321765,0.000010055554,0.99641955,0.0011433737,0.0006360002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000425174,0.000004087498,0.000041399995,0.00003125274,0.0000011228278,0.00003180332,0.0011223167,0.00013057716,0.00003126839,0.966656,0.031941965,0.000004041395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003338119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023631677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01022008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073714093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003363849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053483605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002513787","doi":"10.1177/0191453705051708","title":"Enlightened relativism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Presumption; Universalism; Virtue; Relation (database); Moral relativism; Commensurability (mathematics); Universality (dynamical systems); Happiness; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.06607350176528959,"score_gpt":0.27304574534811293,"score_spread":0.20697224358282335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002513787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019638976,0.017466608,0.061483327,0.10678201,0.0034237942,0.00006920906,0.0001303482,0.00015196117,0.79085386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8927832,0.005384304,0.012031155,0.016413055,0.0035561463,0.00015450362,0.00009637447,0.00019197559,0.06938929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923538,0.0043918453,0.000196037,0.0012268472,0.0012339968,0.0005975117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955253,0.0023891623,0.0003734843,0.0007836141,0.0006692001,0.00025915232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008893898,0.000620268,0.000606804,0.0020919323,0.005403675,0.0070611234,0.0012504518,0.004412488,0.006454123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010300792,0.0003746511,0.00079929864,0.0009429636,0.028706294,0.008272529,0.00604596,0.008162608,0.001390542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033834542,0.000003649375,0.000038825157,0.000012488046,0.0000028012983,0.000012214047,0.0008492613,0.00005279808,0.00002487707,0.9956831,0.0020174813,0.0012990922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065926056,0.0000074241784,0.0001014067,0.000053276373,0.0000055301084,0.000036813446,0.00037234765,0.00016689573,0.00009167861,0.92215014,0.07700095,0.0000069723496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00252696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019719433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009151484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009151484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002137844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06639898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006244423","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0650","title":"Extreme Skepticism and Commitment in the Treatise","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Nothing; Dilemma; Epistemology; Philosophy; Face (sociological concept); Variety (cybernetics); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4531161379002982,"score_gpt":0.31232476721878594,"score_spread":0.14079137068151226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006244423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015626665,0.01099185,0.012066603,0.12702586,0.0028811668,0.000031433872,0.00003468728,0.000070606126,0.8312711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7854393,0.004210087,0.003472996,0.027314307,0.0040305443,0.00020572865,0.00006412359,0.00021313646,0.17504975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98123896,0.01252779,0.00036799474,0.0010963173,0.003379234,0.0013896489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437934,0.0036927264,0.0003664835,0.00059786177,0.00061882497,0.00034478292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009181162,0.00044127018,0.00045287065,0.0012259061,0.0099686505,0.013682507,0.0013857717,0.0072848075,0.005174936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016676467,0.00034407506,0.0005472964,0.0015127582,0.027690914,0.007733324,0.005558495,0.013401844,0.0012705044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005509813,0.0000046156483,0.00002661229,0.000012595499,0.0000023311,0.000043138003,0.00252682,0.000100532336,0.000034600074,0.9826733,0.0126016885,0.001968447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009360961,0.000013795697,0.00014096108,0.00018965747,0.0000040588175,0.000066096945,0.0020994982,0.0002937304,0.00012376394,0.72669566,0.2703432,0.000020167678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040694885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041749324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013682507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076380013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005113319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055417895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007144944","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0209","title":"The Vulgar Conception of Objects in \"Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Perspective (graphical); Conflation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Position (finance); Aesthetics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.07082184876666475,"score_gpt":0.3069496902908097,"score_spread":0.23612784152414495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007144944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05325976,0.0031232429,0.109304756,0.034632508,0.0016938079,0.00010317863,0.00009321146,0.00015130782,0.7976383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577382,0.0008883121,0.0086568,0.008670508,0.0008761062,0.00017997879,0.00004642312,0.0000996825,0.022843838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99202514,0.0041592987,0.00034589262,0.0010314595,0.001918812,0.00051932357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933955,0.003636327,0.00078948314,0.0010284788,0.0008110822,0.00033911594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073966286,0.0005861332,0.00054007286,0.0017369228,0.004038528,0.008214613,0.0012777275,0.0053944956,0.002437485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007822903,0.00035390913,0.00082441693,0.0009845237,0.07084636,0.01017055,0.0051293494,0.007718088,0.0007051149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008066548,0.0000032283353,0.0000934758,0.000022951885,0.0000024872477,0.000028776858,0.0046449034,0.000032695207,0.00008201048,0.9928799,0.0009705621,0.0012309446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012494548,0.000039464623,0.00048953743,0.0001124769,0.000010432501,0.00022793033,0.0037174486,0.00027745243,0.00047662723,0.9329779,0.06163229,0.000025931882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014979552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011764304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008214613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030767852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023384765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039117575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009350265","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0177","title":"Utilitarianism with a Humean Face","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Philosophy; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology","score_opus":0.1267060203387211,"score_gpt":0.29814931887084795,"score_spread":0.17144329853212684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009350265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019099388,0.023325678,0.010374785,0.12802808,0.0011768263,0.000020017926,0.000028663393,0.000042288124,0.81790423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9077802,0.0049558096,0.0022023658,0.010100224,0.0025546672,0.000065775326,0.000016499425,0.00007405693,0.072250366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951509,0.0035510003,0.00006664968,0.00024514453,0.00074845937,0.00023776136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943393,0.004227475,0.00022654861,0.0004088484,0.0005284031,0.00026949096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004863098,0.00045487538,0.00039537367,0.001015243,0.005114127,0.0068399706,0.0007515237,0.0035557735,0.0068242424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006636465,0.00027227038,0.0002625821,0.000866031,0.032408252,0.007011317,0.003482999,0.005466575,0.000986424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040294867,0.0000069249804,0.00005439335,0.0000093975605,0.0000014469564,0.0000164941,0.0025752834,0.00005996178,0.000014690876,0.9880534,0.0068432353,0.002360691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007864495,0.000009765174,0.00021419248,0.000093879105,0.0000023603654,0.000052824977,0.0013324377,0.00018818692,0.00004425831,0.89868104,0.09936749,0.000005707916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002198418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019399694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068399706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004449795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016991388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03228569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009494888","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0652","title":"Hume's Epistemic Naturalism in the Treatise","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Normative; Statement (logic); Relation (database); Determinacy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.44580425692101494,"score_gpt":0.3250027445320631,"score_spread":0.12080151238895181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009494888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011834397,0.020927269,0.07199712,0.07533485,0.0016359064,0.00006237752,0.00020926524,0.00013594415,0.8178629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7710989,0.008666162,0.020029346,0.024706762,0.0040920246,0.000512248,0.00018820341,0.00015328375,0.17055298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996292,0.0019846628,0.00009067499,0.0004374173,0.0007846339,0.0004107913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986089,0.0009610402,0.00008949439,0.00014788884,0.00013219794,0.000060426635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028250634,0.0004682067,0.00040680318,0.0015499294,0.0037281674,0.004386923,0.0008136732,0.0043674987,0.004658757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037671817,0.00023139855,0.0008971303,0.0011486155,0.014141786,0.0053219344,0.0020004618,0.005806946,0.0009074973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036776469,0.00000308957,0.000026862717,0.00001383724,0.0000019371003,0.000018312057,0.0005074722,0.00012777763,0.000018412855,0.9925289,0.005046073,0.0017036644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044457383,0.000008202926,0.00011738664,0.000074105395,0.0000033366402,0.00004606762,0.0001843552,0.00028491992,0.00011309415,0.8663809,0.1327738,0.000009508848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047995173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003641671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004810787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004810787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025089646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034904838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010282090","doi":"10.3366/jsp.2013.0049","title":"Ferrier and the Myth of Scottish Common Sense Realism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scottish Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Common sense; Philosophy; Realism; Mythology; Originality; Epistemology; Content (measure theory); Power (physics); Literature; Sociology; Social science; Art; Theology","score_opus":0.026389143242182864,"score_gpt":0.23215395996661722,"score_spread":0.20576481672443436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010282090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059894785,0.013603517,0.02730758,0.21999882,0.0016390235,0.00006351567,0.00021247461,0.00018571586,0.67709464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586214,0.0018938011,0.0034305556,0.011540474,0.0008049196,0.00006014646,0.000039108643,0.00006451352,0.023545114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442565,0.0027018362,0.00015688718,0.0007067482,0.0013816762,0.00062729383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99584985,0.0022904184,0.0003664342,0.00056424,0.0006124784,0.00031650873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080424985,0.00051252067,0.00062322046,0.001849234,0.0078528905,0.008187294,0.0013953649,0.0039435015,0.0054210112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012150884,0.00025366014,0.00078277383,0.0012302692,0.035394095,0.008769504,0.0050879023,0.0042641102,0.00062749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004788233,0.000003050706,0.000046585923,0.000007712403,0.0000020284924,0.0000243546,0.0012997491,0.00004413709,0.000015964173,0.9949627,0.0023931786,0.0011957884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014967759,0.000008432317,0.00023270646,0.000058578124,0.0000053631948,0.000052556836,0.0010847175,0.00020974752,0.00008014602,0.9306675,0.06757222,0.0000129753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022433262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01768934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022433262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009833355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004389393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07134628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011247240","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0012","title":"Slaves of the Passions (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Relation (database); Reflexive pronoun; Normative; Denial; Action (physics); Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.09317569630022667,"score_gpt":0.32245710960946306,"score_spread":0.2292814133092364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011247240","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004850124,0.997431,0.000017196944,0.0011682214,0.0007346886,0.0000061752917,0.00004587877,0.000004845766,0.0005434695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007322856,0.9956697,0.000040954303,0.0018624357,0.00072157464,0.000015263786,0.00011376283,0.0000041459134,0.00083979947],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919826,0.00016584317,0.00015798328,0.00015094392,0.00025515756,0.00007191623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745446,0.0010009988,0.0006201097,0.00005666216,0.00060010137,0.00026761086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011092421,0.0010282947,0.0025283343,0.0033214982,0.00045519482,0.0027235989,0.002225513,0.0019215067,0.024373295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005226922,0.0005423605,0.0011070543,0.0049931724,0.00075110234,0.0028275964,0.0012664637,0.0025493416,0.0061927373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012332971,0.000034294382,0.00044344147,0.13084444,0.00041048275,0.0002554353,0.0002444013,0.00010714283,0.00025278956,0.0014180907,0.3941234,0.4717427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048972022,0.000054400258,0.0032168366,0.069940075,0.0005529352,0.0010288244,0.00034805542,0.000033034372,0.0001075688,0.00072180096,0.923908,0.000039466257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041201925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008700475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024373295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011864908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004581482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08153677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016628427","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00295.x","title":"The Transcendental Necessity of Morality","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disposition; Transcendental number; Morality; Epistemology; Position (finance); Rational agent; Original position; Product (mathematics); Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Economics; Economic Justice; Political science; Mathematics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.3556406737071764,"score_gpt":0.37689149271565964,"score_spread":0.021250819008483246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016628427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05242228,0.009093073,0.06156377,0.13611588,0.0011437606,0.00007057935,0.00008208606,0.00011963481,0.73938894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695053,0.0015200464,0.009013263,0.0064279027,0.0005231542,0.00011021023,0.000022551936,0.00007157578,0.0128059415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99111825,0.0059514428,0.00018079275,0.000907334,0.0011397798,0.00070232386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921938,0.0049773795,0.00045290886,0.0011315694,0.0008114611,0.00043279267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008059128,0.00056588615,0.00066834205,0.0010718094,0.0048226407,0.007328951,0.001230683,0.0040159556,0.0044827443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0097579835,0.00044673355,0.0008698829,0.00061732216,0.06842102,0.012511779,0.005413143,0.008569326,0.00085237663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004101419,0.0000035633134,0.000034819503,0.000008509302,0.0000025235818,0.000015826918,0.0005359007,0.00008055304,0.000026445661,0.99792624,0.0006696986,0.0006917783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009081893,0.0000044228486,0.000053248314,0.000015127764,0.0000015304822,0.000017393279,0.00021095475,0.00015917412,0.00005011828,0.9904881,0.008986207,0.000004679436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026424169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016526144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008059128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004753993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024916797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042621255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017035880","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0013","title":"A Problem for Hume's Theory of Induction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2947897531955726,"score_gpt":0.3203093571760183,"score_spread":0.02551960398044567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017035880","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005381327,0.006963812,0.4227907,0.3506367,0.004001571,0.00019995295,0.00035636427,0.000956159,0.20871346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5916908,0.006178602,0.2560104,0.060579315,0.016313836,0.001966948,0.00024831743,0.0009904697,0.06602126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96770984,0.016653176,0.0010887939,0.0048962114,0.0088176625,0.0008343893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93081635,0.05062628,0.002027953,0.008937472,0.00678643,0.00080549857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03829836,0.0010342445,0.0023650052,0.0029386922,0.004892481,0.0059286235,0.005886142,0.007297857,0.009229502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07464679,0.0010171056,0.0018221075,0.002231235,0.046139713,0.018237753,0.006574958,0.01590513,0.0046858657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001747941,0.000009118026,0.00005993053,0.000041316096,0.000012631643,0.000020386271,0.0005224217,0.00013861686,0.00002424065,0.9868775,0.006831338,0.005444981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014483814,0.000006847818,0.000026259708,0.000025778434,0.000002908081,0.00003481299,0.000058215945,0.00037552216,0.00005341426,0.9852828,0.014111853,0.0000072559783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001905897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001136091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03829836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046975384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00430781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2025435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022973536","doi":"10.1353/hms.2013.0004","title":"Skeptical Realism and Hume on the Self","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Personal identity; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Relation (database); Focus (optics); Self; Aesthetics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.12757490684944922,"score_gpt":0.283806064577076,"score_spread":0.1562311577276268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022973536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085985094,0.007311909,0.038636666,0.11289694,0.0006321365,0.000041346935,0.00006383591,0.000072928764,0.7543591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980409,0.00092008756,0.0026248212,0.0044883285,0.00031674496,0.0000383572,0.00001735244,0.000030189658,0.011155166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98755777,0.009255758,0.00020015605,0.0007739274,0.0016292705,0.00058308453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910494,0.0061164065,0.00074794877,0.0009389497,0.0008260551,0.00032119887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008328817,0.00038190052,0.00043851644,0.0014833799,0.0060957014,0.0068087857,0.0009547403,0.0050550243,0.0031357165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009663095,0.000256203,0.00051703805,0.0008762137,0.06202995,0.007891316,0.005402007,0.0058407723,0.0006164996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047359963,0.0000037406694,0.0000481754,0.000012975424,0.0000013504581,0.000029299943,0.0050295447,0.00007246013,0.00003431517,0.9933583,0.0007373233,0.0006677753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007022075,0.0000065473037,0.00010910051,0.000059972703,0.0000017149258,0.000052127452,0.0022916107,0.00024677653,0.000103680664,0.97554797,0.02156786,0.00000572771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015176191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001157284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008328817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046223276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022135589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044047475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025188704","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2011.0030","title":"Richard Gaskin, The Unity of the Proposition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press2008. Pp. xv + 455.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0852654655467508,"score_gpt":0.19857695577186912,"score_spread":0.11331149022511833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025188704","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045874392,0.9289849,0.0021375841,0.023087889,0.0016256376,0.000012660949,0.0003163154,0.00009154076,0.043284755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033004805,0.8614846,0.0069761807,0.008772563,0.004356979,0.00011823775,0.0005652083,0.0003396262,0.08438186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990398,0.00036138832,0.0000895342,0.00013560517,0.00028614874,0.00008744113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794453,0.0013387003,0.000166024,0.00010879399,0.00033852892,0.00010336937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016278806,0.0017255825,0.0011290938,0.0046513556,0.0023293155,0.0042069275,0.0016917145,0.0032109316,0.032648608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037054992,0.0012355684,0.0009495857,0.0044820295,0.007030742,0.012295927,0.0014749152,0.004535744,0.012764264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007791469,0.000025617735,0.0003385985,0.0009889978,0.000037131744,0.00023761038,0.002548869,0.00032268572,0.0001467368,0.20678803,0.71285444,0.07563332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020932614,0.0000091401425,0.0014540642,0.0013959635,0.000025338779,0.0003486747,0.0011462729,0.000112864574,0.00017435354,0.18775554,0.807529,0.000027914584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024998052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04293556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032648608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042805555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003453804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109220445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027243658","doi":"10.1080/10509585.2010.484625","title":"Natural Purposes and the Reflecting Power of Judgment: The Problem of the Organism in Kant’s Critical Philosophy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Romantic Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft","keywords":"Teleology; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Intellect; Philosophy; Critical philosophy; Subjectivity; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.03314076893739871,"score_gpt":0.2776465278783959,"score_spread":0.2445057589409972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027243658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048425004,0.16437042,0.062116995,0.29838035,0.0022764711,0.000050643324,0.00008499419,0.00010657662,0.42418855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586551,0.0171744,0.005006897,0.0067754844,0.0015470409,0.00005021218,0.000019455927,0.000052793574,0.010718558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872422,0.009870967,0.00024438204,0.0004531985,0.0017759168,0.00041330003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98792833,0.009520668,0.0005214888,0.0006608372,0.0011322856,0.00023648005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010143181,0.00040646788,0.0004396851,0.002487656,0.002146851,0.0077570304,0.0010874133,0.003363905,0.0016174158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01050732,0.00027684594,0.00035433585,0.0018776557,0.046784367,0.00872505,0.0022363225,0.005254159,0.00040247905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006392157,0.000003220628,0.000041290255,0.00003991427,0.0000029642492,0.000023971834,0.0020616227,0.00015109614,0.000036713634,0.99261636,0.002299677,0.0027166782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005492548,0.0000037403308,0.00013779766,0.0001299692,0.000002670546,0.000028737923,0.0011134351,0.00022481113,0.0000901732,0.9759631,0.022293346,0.0000067355695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034095675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019338045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010143181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061781197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027695799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05364287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029616281","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2010.0007","title":"The Explanatory Structure of the Transcendental Deduction and a Cognitive Interpretation of the First Critique","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Psychologism; Transcendental number; Sensibility; Articulation (sociology); Transcendental philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.010484339825473197,"score_gpt":0.21264243316530515,"score_spread":0.20215809333983195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029616281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027473716,0.008118429,0.17706951,0.2512487,0.0033747538,0.000093868766,0.00030625513,0.00029054584,0.53202426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90520316,0.0018712952,0.035092257,0.017849712,0.0030115522,0.00030777295,0.00014084666,0.00018551927,0.036337923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99424756,0.0028445746,0.00014841987,0.0006640327,0.001439974,0.0006554909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882847,0.007566587,0.00079942675,0.0012849324,0.0016458862,0.0004185081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061748596,0.0007751328,0.00083631696,0.004033428,0.003909522,0.008847351,0.0029663001,0.0071006934,0.009064426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016596127,0.0003207322,0.0015553464,0.0019392208,0.035514105,0.0096285585,0.0046339673,0.007218938,0.0010471945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004216692,0.0000039745582,0.000023735289,0.00001057907,0.0000015347784,0.000022231228,0.00064867054,0.00007510514,0.000016253054,0.9971161,0.0013682764,0.00070946536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001232094,0.000006154055,0.000065519096,0.000036161906,0.000002772636,0.000038217717,0.00041734322,0.00047282822,0.000076955155,0.9807803,0.018083908,0.0000074557865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049606957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041627977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009064426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062058778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035100235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045026958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029622299","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0259","title":"Three Questions about Treatise 1.4.2","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.14157350972603983,"score_gpt":0.3434001084260125,"score_spread":0.20182659869997266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029622299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050057825,0.004050067,0.009258633,0.42530552,0.006603365,0.00011416905,0.00051929185,0.00021508083,0.5489282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22638415,0.0028656223,0.0056273676,0.28594613,0.011530301,0.0011317766,0.00044810804,0.0004860995,0.46558052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463344,0.0016796254,0.00018327143,0.0008093436,0.0018400339,0.00085421867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929934,0.0043107173,0.00041927557,0.00079012645,0.0011782863,0.00030808986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009021047,0.0003883394,0.0005300026,0.0011774153,0.00522347,0.007990451,0.0022958335,0.012819911,0.04219646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021823375,0.00035447048,0.0011636934,0.0013601345,0.012683399,0.009400539,0.0027674234,0.013030789,0.0131981885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017269547,0.000013282845,0.00010647077,0.000040057355,0.0000047855833,0.00004328879,0.0010630133,0.000049367343,0.00011762412,0.92145777,0.07368021,0.0034069247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026219217,0.000020526737,0.00055689696,0.0002504677,0.000011870156,0.00007768208,0.0012790248,0.00022649947,0.00035868245,0.40868282,0.5884682,0.000041092117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010111341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069497298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04219646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006877531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039199404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1411612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030182908","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0022","title":"Hume on Pride-in-Virtue: A Reliable Motive?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Virtue; Epistemology; Beauty; Form of the Good; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.07962298659059694,"score_gpt":0.30792897009464404,"score_spread":0.2283059835040471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030182908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06553425,0.007372799,0.013898574,0.6095873,0.0015502288,0.000046254452,0.00022415655,0.000091761474,0.30169457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9292311,0.001990244,0.0012245856,0.04961158,0.0017304796,0.00005878622,0.000039058352,0.00004778967,0.016066309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948025,0.0032632002,0.00012761143,0.0006467751,0.00069630076,0.00046358685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793352,0.014825636,0.0013303448,0.001695157,0.0023195785,0.0004940929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076308413,0.00033390019,0.0005215132,0.0009456114,0.0031813025,0.003530333,0.0015323566,0.006368873,0.0075082704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023327673,0.00022877262,0.00042109436,0.0007086236,0.0259426,0.00829652,0.0030570796,0.0055854633,0.0011996215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024327604,0.000010604,0.0009830437,0.000078982244,0.0000110212,0.0001209184,0.007986252,0.00008136578,0.000080669175,0.9716985,0.014968691,0.0039554765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035207075,0.000044140364,0.006555389,0.0005274048,0.000015317215,0.00024997944,0.014153713,0.00083953433,0.00078182115,0.7466999,0.23002961,0.000067878944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033618899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028114696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076308413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025292966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011121046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04035622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032908795","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0016","title":"Sympathy and the Mechanics of Character Change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Character (mathematics); Relation (database); Epistemology; Moral character; Function (biology); Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.2277726261961615,"score_gpt":0.30436272040791085,"score_spread":0.07659009421174934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032908795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3737653,0.0014639245,0.070332676,0.009681031,0.00028659587,0.000105704035,0.00007204527,0.00020174288,0.5440909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882039,0.00014046652,0.0026463363,0.00014758791,0.00004623673,0.000035666337,0.000009543938,0.000022272241,0.008748031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985336,0.00067030976,0.000028886592,0.00026231515,0.0003106967,0.00019413627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976023,0.0012423715,0.00032372808,0.00036288617,0.00020068765,0.0002680224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013980131,0.00018996342,0.00022948897,0.00084458286,0.0020197595,0.003481331,0.0007201943,0.0014664326,0.0095068645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074396706,0.00024251154,0.0003764776,0.00036592022,0.011803995,0.004400679,0.0025814346,0.0014691092,0.00085951836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018170686,0.000015841108,0.0014473725,0.000022941418,0.0000072480793,0.00012803874,0.0025409074,0.0012483035,0.0006559901,0.9853381,0.00066168833,0.007915386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014599941,0.00003039832,0.004613779,0.000022814758,0.0000049926175,0.0002070256,0.0013322005,0.0059497613,0.0003950435,0.9779479,0.009461263,0.000020258958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009329658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005527375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095068645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015240845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005435282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031803608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035762009","doi":"10.3109/10826084.2012.723526","title":"Michael G. Farnworth on Brian Ferguson's “Is Addiction a Failure of Rationality?”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Substance Use & Misuse","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Addiction; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Gerontology; Psychiatry; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06583094937229103,"score_gpt":0.25043034053938257,"score_spread":0.18459939116709154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035762009","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017338597,0.0016326074,0.000049268885,0.9904717,0.005435033,0.0000057265597,0.00002653177,0.000010546445,0.0021951417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013975796,0.000528156,0.00007514743,0.9887861,0.002790598,0.000017502778,0.000008364802,0.000011488163,0.0063851294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455726,0.0015580251,0.00038133413,0.0008212244,0.0018856114,0.0007966581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862302,0.008729643,0.0005992605,0.00035833594,0.0020515306,0.0020310455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072321817,0.0011859174,0.0016051441,0.00085011916,0.009575992,0.005522931,0.0033372657,0.06067231,0.007994924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030094309,0.0012075342,0.0014993215,0.00075945887,0.0063476316,0.008643875,0.0029720427,0.074769944,0.005582066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023759281,0.000013427656,0.00014627154,0.000021672968,0.000005740191,0.00021711872,0.0002517173,0.000016693164,0.000050517272,0.0033633956,0.9928597,0.003030008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007440488,0.000038048354,0.0010801267,0.0004776909,0.000017924021,0.00060022547,0.001869655,0.00017942603,0.00024651372,0.020376997,0.97494966,0.0000893075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07656458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06067231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00492459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008646065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08194822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039681279","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0024","title":"Hume's Moral Sentiments As Motives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Passions; Pride; Humility; Action (physics); Moral psychology; Pleasure; Epistemology; Hatred; Philosophy; Moral disengagement; Virtue; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.11598601147495088,"score_gpt":0.3327506644503678,"score_spread":0.2167646529754169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039681279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15479644,0.0055585243,0.05860953,0.048043687,0.00068652065,0.00007097632,0.0001797847,0.00018887206,0.7318657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624186,0.0008110372,0.0073804413,0.0016704034,0.00014906925,0.000046179368,0.000031023264,0.000057438163,0.02743578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821556,0.0011305385,0.000038449267,0.0001678889,0.00024201258,0.00020554567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873024,0.00047637566,0.00020024831,0.000114745235,0.00029299603,0.00018536639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019513615,0.0004779741,0.00026039564,0.00097486546,0.0019180293,0.0042426507,0.0005016407,0.0018535499,0.002815582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031994055,0.00025469466,0.00043056018,0.00042523735,0.014647328,0.0039856285,0.0019318691,0.0022317828,0.0007524133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017000175,0.000011880015,0.0008472292,0.000035280686,0.000009258908,0.00008097748,0.008635488,0.00033000213,0.00030679812,0.9791645,0.0030328888,0.007528657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017285023,0.000027287148,0.0028517873,0.000074058305,0.000014610521,0.00012927051,0.003690309,0.0013458728,0.0005727235,0.91333205,0.07791016,0.00003452641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021241657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018117419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042426507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018742462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094587763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01359874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042299226","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0006","title":"Reason in Hume's Passions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Philosophy; Epistemology; Impossibility; Power (physics); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.33728419784110303,"score_gpt":0.3327455050442449,"score_spread":0.004538692796858146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042299226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063068315,0.010283151,0.033883415,0.06370123,0.00075560046,0.000047681788,0.00005614318,0.00012582427,0.8280786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607458,0.0012038493,0.0032001531,0.0034083603,0.00024132441,0.000041715437,0.000013679654,0.00004708316,0.031098044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531686,0.0031463807,0.00009130735,0.0003571258,0.00064972776,0.00043860852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725,0.0017130388,0.00020960275,0.00026774564,0.00031555403,0.00024405317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048670755,0.00039558386,0.00038127264,0.0011935385,0.0063343216,0.0065504326,0.00062824157,0.004056553,0.0023821138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056421333,0.000293332,0.00047220357,0.00062085706,0.052330278,0.0070454213,0.004020702,0.0047393884,0.00057705626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005482008,0.0000032383107,0.00007037095,0.000008598942,0.000002362989,0.000042077714,0.0069979383,0.00007741225,0.000032864114,0.9899216,0.001432741,0.0014052844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007371796,0.000007915076,0.00018739808,0.000037337588,0.0000033681604,0.00007655392,0.0020030139,0.00016489397,0.00011000093,0.9312665,0.06612681,0.000008971445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003378762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028265547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065504326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036934058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025308575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026797652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042417103","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0294","title":"Relations of Literary Form and Philosophical Purpose in Hume's Four Essays on Happiness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Psychology; Social psychology; Art","score_opus":0.1184411344764323,"score_gpt":0.3138282458599027,"score_spread":0.19538711138347042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042417103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45924342,0.012101578,0.03536395,0.033359837,0.0034737056,0.00013437982,0.0001041513,0.00021743015,0.45600143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781984,0.0013642774,0.0028462426,0.0010850227,0.00045281363,0.00009055443,0.000028821547,0.0001430763,0.015790755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901838,0.0077530295,0.00022701893,0.00028766933,0.0011100635,0.0004385191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98390055,0.012394825,0.0012185602,0.0005405691,0.0013139193,0.00063165784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006462847,0.0005935571,0.0004601085,0.0035112433,0.0069704135,0.007913717,0.0007282655,0.0014780619,0.0015621827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024094949,0.0003340072,0.00034842218,0.0017296169,0.028586375,0.0050135395,0.0076698437,0.002768961,0.00028089093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011356539,0.000041306055,0.0016795669,0.00026054896,0.000019782265,0.00045846315,0.4294522,0.00027273557,0.001018531,0.5388688,0.0065019997,0.021312498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036016456,0.00014315329,0.0080764685,0.00146561,0.000045301724,0.0008626523,0.27544415,0.0008773,0.003604876,0.2986492,0.4106695,0.00012583057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067332655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012559257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007913717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002561541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010704701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03417921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043947406","doi":"10.1353/hph.2014.0090","title":"Kant on Moral Sensibility and Moral Motivation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the history of philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Sensibility; nobody; Epistemology; Philosophy; Power (physics); Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Moral psychology; Practical reason; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08887765228295902,"score_gpt":0.22215913173002552,"score_spread":0.1332814794470665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043947406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019020086,0.02040305,0.02744483,0.05622488,0.0012555892,0.00004739651,0.00016563546,0.000073303025,0.8753652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9131845,0.0065760594,0.011349562,0.0096246265,0.00085043535,0.00016035109,0.00008319873,0.00008746052,0.058083676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996461,0.0023262382,0.000102225706,0.00026965834,0.00047880775,0.00036202537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977424,0.0014155367,0.00012803727,0.00025952273,0.00032061178,0.00013394882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003853908,0.0006902013,0.00052183995,0.0012439673,0.002988572,0.0056462707,0.0008645341,0.0045641223,0.004775834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005020373,0.00040063422,0.000520007,0.0008049265,0.026162324,0.0061909007,0.0028185304,0.00587471,0.0010311219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004918834,0.0000029825303,0.00002931306,0.000013252119,0.0000022874613,0.000012314377,0.00043857083,0.00011326629,0.000019783429,0.9968196,0.0016973765,0.0008462765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005148262,0.0000031401803,0.000063181236,0.00003303498,0.0000018066759,0.000015325917,0.0001568144,0.00008467696,0.000035733297,0.9863008,0.013295741,0.000004510197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021682582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00217147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056462707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003853421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002317276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027958691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045112857","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0018","title":"Hume, Malebranche, and the Self-Justification of the Passions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Philosophy; Theme (computing); Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08869480473911803,"score_gpt":0.28348838541182514,"score_spread":0.1947935806727071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045112857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01916401,0.024875902,0.020557135,0.09460411,0.0012222531,0.000053813226,0.00006995807,0.00006469891,0.83938813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84244084,0.008255584,0.0063368976,0.012586439,0.0018461986,0.00020347955,0.00005412614,0.00012233452,0.12815402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949928,0.003415859,0.000077875935,0.00031726368,0.0008505101,0.00034569713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99512875,0.0038180244,0.0003300897,0.00024499744,0.00033545782,0.00014255157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029386084,0.00048823835,0.00044688713,0.0017838606,0.006261319,0.0062355213,0.00087957055,0.0051213936,0.0048229746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006085927,0.00025713904,0.0004009471,0.0014021337,0.0415105,0.006654609,0.0026571152,0.004855705,0.00080829696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038473713,0.0000030211615,0.000050416646,0.00002247104,0.0000019414035,0.000033300115,0.0042087864,0.00005632666,0.000015121634,0.9877346,0.0059510544,0.0019190692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009321702,0.000014638085,0.0003555529,0.00022557382,0.0000043944046,0.00011052839,0.003569251,0.00020986186,0.00024095502,0.79073244,0.20451306,0.0000143773195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042079464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006618386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006261319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051452173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003030192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037331402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045628113","doi":"10.1007/s10677-009-9181-7","title":"Moral Self-Knowledge in Kantian Ethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Duty; Moral agency; Self-deception; Moral disengagement; Normative ethics; Moral psychology; Moral reasoning; Self-knowledge; Practical reason; Kantian ethics; Self; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral development; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10007430562326236,"score_gpt":0.35964528514855626,"score_spread":0.2595709795252939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045628113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044660036,0.007788746,0.10193559,0.05250622,0.0008331742,0.000076247285,0.00008945754,0.00007662882,0.79203403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710585,0.0011014413,0.008464928,0.0018115063,0.0004411961,0.00010375062,0.000033165692,0.000047825957,0.016937787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888181,0.007157828,0.00043413925,0.00091277226,0.0019009163,0.000776279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98366284,0.011976826,0.0006029757,0.0017803865,0.0013485582,0.00062840735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012582792,0.000647693,0.0009519917,0.002488264,0.0065700547,0.010613008,0.0019262672,0.008276309,0.006215935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015025083,0.0008278527,0.00072075316,0.0022056764,0.070558876,0.015747298,0.005533616,0.009429989,0.00092732447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015917428,0.0000053816134,0.00001885606,0.000009571118,0.000001549216,0.0000071321047,0.00083882443,0.00009297801,0.0000066984207,0.99805105,0.000263569,0.0007027695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024255824,0.0000012340258,0.000018471723,0.0000129901,0.0000010806582,0.000007778292,0.00016981097,0.000113475275,0.000016398755,0.99787915,0.0017753855,0.000001942732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028479549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023289598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012582792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063221604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005733801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06654495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046309195","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0009","title":"The Social Dimensions of Modesty","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Natural (archaeology); Character traits; Psychology; Social psychology; Simple (philosophy); Trait; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.07944100043389908,"score_gpt":0.24506652677599153,"score_spread":0.16562552634209243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046309195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17821448,0.0024362209,0.020091245,0.026948527,0.00020355562,0.00004649241,0.00009100567,0.00006387898,0.7719046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935819,0.00039317983,0.0010378389,0.00042653063,0.00006646056,0.000024581663,0.00001530435,0.000011585716,0.0044427356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959422,0.0023520738,0.00013543815,0.00039400224,0.00078628917,0.00038990437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965287,0.0013783079,0.0006695096,0.00042583942,0.0004205348,0.0005770625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031071824,0.00031345384,0.00024292484,0.0013680846,0.005007109,0.0045020864,0.000452464,0.001255766,0.0035865663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052178036,0.00016246462,0.0002923119,0.00085081335,0.039234713,0.00390207,0.004973335,0.0021575573,0.00035293994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011707654,0.000010970835,0.0016617811,0.000019024725,0.0000100378575,0.000085330415,0.010193695,0.00014125799,0.0001995546,0.9816772,0.001139447,0.0048499815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015754566,0.000047560836,0.007059273,0.00007472386,0.0000122590955,0.00023129252,0.009413289,0.00056909217,0.00022023809,0.89612573,0.08620854,0.000022194119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027600322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025277487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005007109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029765803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014890898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02159673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046508152","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0656","title":"Humean Sentimentalism and Non-Consequentialist Moral Thinking","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Consequentialism; Internalism and externalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Moral psychology; Moral philosophy; Moral reasoning; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.22692927275701721,"score_gpt":0.2956127301590041,"score_spread":0.06868345740198686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046508152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117414534,0.004409201,0.099695615,0.06272791,0.00089099363,0.000044478445,0.000068251255,0.00015002073,0.714599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98024243,0.00073943863,0.006031523,0.0027425583,0.00032626977,0.00003344901,0.000014022299,0.000037568978,0.009832664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968335,0.0018905228,0.000073042014,0.0003622139,0.00057008653,0.00027066597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684334,0.001862691,0.0004287792,0.00032817127,0.0003849513,0.00015221773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053563355,0.0003459253,0.0003798159,0.00089793035,0.0022878654,0.0038434619,0.0007796004,0.0022905967,0.002815712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061643864,0.00022281095,0.00068930833,0.0005636036,0.020926584,0.0042170975,0.0019320338,0.0034993857,0.0004926064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007408793,0.000008225066,0.00014004613,0.000017813174,0.000003839414,0.0000308135,0.0013387743,0.00013093896,0.000082348815,0.9950251,0.0010453067,0.0021693448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000531915,0.0000062987933,0.00025909356,0.000021843443,0.0000022796385,0.000029914503,0.0002951332,0.00043590044,0.00014446622,0.99076897,0.008027003,0.0000038162852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090505445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083368976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053563355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025999758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010809432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028327405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047131134","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00328.x","title":"Kantian Morals and Humean Motives","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Moral psychology; Categorical imperative; Moral disengagement; Epistemology; Moral reasoning; Philosophy; Categorical variable; Psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Social psychology; Morality; Computer science","score_opus":0.3649178342739854,"score_gpt":0.37270301528475497,"score_spread":0.007785181010769582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047131134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079951726,0.003560384,0.13794994,0.030516079,0.0003880534,0.000056527835,0.00014418337,0.00019022245,0.7472429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706779,0.00052804156,0.010748846,0.0015074803,0.00016042906,0.0000642542,0.000039342245,0.000040520325,0.016233291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534553,0.002876633,0.00011774453,0.00035310947,0.0008560148,0.00045100594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632484,0.0017262977,0.00054246286,0.00048216182,0.00062766194,0.0002965534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00379062,0.00031705023,0.0003380334,0.0011965419,0.0022109665,0.0038412497,0.00080804393,0.0024554303,0.0038024993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006556915,0.00027839115,0.00047505234,0.0007645233,0.02395656,0.0042347433,0.0033008263,0.0029816933,0.00085061596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000406097,0.000002858612,0.00007019756,0.000011802965,0.0000015092154,0.0000064875367,0.0006677324,0.000091659625,0.000033291297,0.99759454,0.00040268493,0.0011131485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038498965,0.00000429632,0.00019993984,0.000017660075,0.000001620384,0.000022831851,0.0003000236,0.0002260431,0.00008448499,0.98895895,0.010175239,0.0000051048387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010544353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011944615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038412497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028515537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001834025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020689607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048897331","doi":"10.1080/00201740601016205","title":"How Kantian Must Kantian Constructivists Be?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Epistemology; Philosophy; Transcendental number; Presupposition; Argument (complex analysis); Naturalism; Inference; Value (mathematics); Mathematics","score_opus":0.07043201872566585,"score_gpt":0.249312497352865,"score_spread":0.17888047862719916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048897331","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035703544,0.019992191,0.06291547,0.62545437,0.0032693215,0.000060388793,0.0002722122,0.00033017338,0.25200236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9129755,0.0047979746,0.017406046,0.038209118,0.0017391642,0.00017613237,0.00013612013,0.00027915815,0.024280848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99044293,0.0049401214,0.00026583593,0.0012182246,0.0020615696,0.0010711523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931277,0.0030055123,0.0006536408,0.0010419347,0.0014011146,0.00077006035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013488831,0.0006921089,0.0009904135,0.0018714756,0.004231238,0.010224065,0.0020528995,0.008695426,0.0058157593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01828909,0.0005617373,0.00090256875,0.0010924725,0.03869053,0.022176431,0.0037969258,0.011513195,0.002234153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014964812,0.000009683649,0.0001309996,0.000025031008,0.000010368333,0.000011747718,0.00073292945,0.00015574906,0.00003403415,0.9925804,0.003271828,0.00302225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007712106,0.0000033404835,0.0001313722,0.000035742676,0.0000034869688,0.000013194531,0.00050940446,0.00017419714,0.00006847802,0.9851531,0.013891346,0.000008713205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002982113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028517626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013488831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052060876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033245604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07133663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050101238","doi":"10.15173/russell.v32i1.2221","title":"Was Russell's 1922 Error Theory a Mistake?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Fallacy; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Value theory; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.08945723654456401,"score_gpt":0.29794868995900725,"score_spread":0.20849145341444325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050101238","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03910249,0.023240741,0.18610105,0.44893807,0.009540892,0.00009947385,0.00021606179,0.00052724266,0.29223403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79639333,0.008611327,0.053175133,0.06846613,0.006936032,0.00025762813,0.000109485896,0.00063086016,0.06541996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98516893,0.0058785225,0.0006522609,0.0019054688,0.00559211,0.000802776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98356736,0.011642205,0.00074723695,0.001252179,0.0022533268,0.0005377528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016679464,0.00084809447,0.0011397343,0.0030024783,0.0034816917,0.0056818947,0.002845965,0.007106875,0.002577873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03043634,0.0006551332,0.0011207061,0.0015601469,0.03892686,0.013955791,0.0042147012,0.011372545,0.0010866434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013827702,0.000005479401,0.00009296403,0.000021331396,0.000004543883,0.000037347654,0.001106644,0.00013907325,0.00002545995,0.9864368,0.006585997,0.0055304305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015291627,0.000017470416,0.00012884881,0.0001094497,0.000005755338,0.0001071644,0.00037912055,0.00054555706,0.00016247896,0.9442834,0.054222137,0.000023312365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003995374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002519935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016679464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0082032895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003888015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08821052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051678757","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0003","title":"Thinking in Time in Hume's Essays","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0635058259417763,"score_gpt":0.29575201620324365,"score_spread":0.23224619026146737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051678757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0532289,0.031380605,0.020454556,0.12479647,0.019458978,0.00008100939,0.00013766448,0.00025274005,0.7502091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8511244,0.0052229073,0.004563419,0.011555723,0.0058101723,0.00010514372,0.000062459185,0.00024621756,0.12130951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99015486,0.007353785,0.00019930708,0.00054786325,0.0011606673,0.00058347883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99034566,0.0068460642,0.00063714857,0.0005428553,0.0008595028,0.0007687758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005804912,0.0005550237,0.00041358924,0.0024628805,0.008424625,0.012349383,0.00084196974,0.002602784,0.0044604796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01714331,0.0002179231,0.00035563996,0.0014011019,0.02641792,0.009908808,0.0038260573,0.003671309,0.00077924767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026518128,0.000015004075,0.00018735103,0.00005336831,0.000004939018,0.00014562067,0.057110317,0.00011028292,0.00010520992,0.9007206,0.033940513,0.0075802747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010108387,0.000019794508,0.0002744904,0.00029939326,0.0000038508015,0.00019478843,0.032087266,0.00017433285,0.00023805966,0.2514423,0.7152356,0.00002004888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001394326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002197876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012349383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004264888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021691797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030944109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052106960","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300004972","title":"La morale kantienne et la philosophie transcendantale","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Transcendental number; Philosophy; Transcendental philosophy; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Transcendental idealism; A priori and a posteriori; Moral philosophy; Critical philosophy","score_opus":0.04995364553081777,"score_gpt":0.2755358061829278,"score_spread":0.22558216065211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052106960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024237635,0.060725547,0.06054827,0.109748244,0.0030956252,0.000035137873,0.0000804736,0.0001459077,0.74138314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8974064,0.018953636,0.013284692,0.008451072,0.0025529847,0.00016056366,0.00006283268,0.00009635038,0.059031405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98901165,0.007156096,0.00022931806,0.00069449603,0.002263454,0.00064500014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572635,0.0025497433,0.0003123187,0.0004946024,0.0006884868,0.0002286228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008021349,0.0007192927,0.0007506064,0.0020559162,0.003499853,0.0127238035,0.00085460284,0.005164665,0.0057785613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006547337,0.00033998583,0.00094902853,0.0016367455,0.038238343,0.0075483234,0.0049542584,0.012202384,0.0011409264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002278595,0.0000041008966,0.000017977729,0.000012178977,0.0000022015736,0.000012820502,0.00036174155,0.00009147108,0.000042238742,0.9972282,0.00060121185,0.0016235261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011955634,0.000009390235,0.00019671368,0.000109534645,0.0000033403007,0.00007078019,0.0004723596,0.00055546424,0.0001604442,0.912232,0.086166956,0.00001102975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004581895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030243103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127238035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077184937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038678935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056001842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053097021","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0218","title":"The Gallant and the Philosopher","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Wife; Philosophy; German; Style (visual arts); Atheism; Literature; Classics; Theology; History; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08588222628250035,"score_gpt":0.2820694580853682,"score_spread":0.19618723180286785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053097021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005966684,0.086196296,0.0014504021,0.34600303,0.0039181216,0.000028099352,0.00012798209,0.00012609203,0.5561832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17538048,0.022037035,0.001310815,0.059100565,0.0030889262,0.00005506769,0.00008489141,0.000227014,0.73871523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984085,0.0009168653,0.00004237699,0.00021759087,0.00028628332,0.00012840629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867475,0.0007328473,0.000100689605,0.00015099725,0.00015421864,0.00018650794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017148048,0.00059407356,0.00029269618,0.0011362329,0.008175179,0.007584326,0.0004962322,0.0034291234,0.024007505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004668545,0.0003101397,0.00017496674,0.0011472174,0.0118347425,0.0064617572,0.0030841029,0.0036482483,0.0051719984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022700275,0.000021792825,0.0003677673,0.00007202577,0.0000045359175,0.00009474817,0.019988336,0.000032556607,0.00014954688,0.46414948,0.49252453,0.022572022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003186856,0.0000046408645,0.00024746018,0.000108175824,0.0000014556772,0.000056618297,0.003144512,0.000016165186,0.000049366405,0.012438097,0.9839271,0.0000032200703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01963419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024007505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004313705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002940937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08031309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053920063","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0302","title":"Walking the Tightrope of Reason: The Precarious Life of a Rational Animal (review)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Nothing; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Relativism; Epistemology; Teleology","score_opus":0.10252884932915744,"score_gpt":0.31028364538936676,"score_spread":0.2077547960602093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053920063","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000030886687,0.99883157,0.000016920829,0.0007360367,0.00016681079,0.0000015774527,0.0000052801297,0.0000014058388,0.00020959009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005052262,0.997993,0.00004963473,0.0008238578,0.00024067401,0.000005212046,0.000015732803,0.0000013465778,0.00036538983],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945647,0.00016163968,0.000078012374,0.00006947874,0.0001739607,0.000060382485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851495,0.00088901387,0.00025048997,0.000028116605,0.00020758703,0.000109908506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010491912,0.00078260753,0.0015487648,0.003029688,0.0004446397,0.0029058286,0.0010370036,0.001748946,0.005082443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026544477,0.00053666503,0.0008177111,0.0040352885,0.001133508,0.004073568,0.0011600947,0.00269025,0.0016496629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010905555,0.000045778983,0.00036052262,0.0465991,0.00034866075,0.00013139578,0.00040311538,0.00021914202,0.00024614,0.004899964,0.21477772,0.73185945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003230179,0.00008050191,0.0020966774,0.03677872,0.00030338197,0.0007005703,0.00037982015,0.000056860932,0.00010271941,0.0035529884,0.95588565,0.00002987484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039915997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010337432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005082443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019280777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035476326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017002404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054837677","doi":"10.1017/s0953820800003423","title":"The ‘Two Hats’ Problem in Consequentialist Ethics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Cognitivism (psychology); Conscience; Philosophy; Epistemology; Deontological ethics; Psychology; Internalism and externalism; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Cognition","score_opus":0.14687427661513056,"score_gpt":0.2983389804075128,"score_spread":0.15146470379238222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054837677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011533327,0.00556798,0.19267128,0.23102243,0.0033366915,0.000061120925,0.00010684807,0.0003340565,0.5553662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8217988,0.0024053138,0.048028328,0.039175436,0.0040367357,0.00027847738,0.00007080294,0.00049074204,0.083715454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891234,0.0053404737,0.000437653,0.0014320922,0.002959372,0.00070694945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98519033,0.008524541,0.00069760275,0.0034658376,0.0015349363,0.0005866443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015867222,0.0006597687,0.00078261417,0.000861801,0.0050124195,0.006453423,0.0021588411,0.007305326,0.013063117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027130485,0.00062945345,0.00090665737,0.0006818469,0.041829947,0.013157926,0.004540584,0.01298193,0.003288711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006027639,0.000003704812,0.000038232156,0.000014267169,0.0000036234794,0.000014603792,0.000311135,0.000045553472,0.000033745422,0.9930514,0.003916862,0.0025608488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008144552,0.0000077667555,0.00005751622,0.000023873059,0.000002237188,0.000054994845,0.00014784162,0.00018085194,0.00007433078,0.97102755,0.02840744,0.0000073979763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015972462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018687272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015867222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031835262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022929225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083914876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059240278","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.09.006","title":"Kant’s concept of natural purpose and the reflecting power of judgement","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Epistemology; Judgement; Natural (archaeology); Teleology; Relation (database); Action (physics); Identification (biology); Power (physics); Critical philosophy; Subject (documents); Practical reason; Causality (physics); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.20633920217361915,"score_gpt":0.34041600208008843,"score_spread":0.13407679990646929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059240278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014239226,0.007991741,0.179654,0.035447486,0.0012978378,0.000119301425,0.00021064612,0.00014045298,0.7608993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9073712,0.0023327563,0.053149015,0.006224476,0.001080798,0.0003317633,0.000085599524,0.00015978893,0.029264454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.983602,0.011203749,0.00076536206,0.0015112396,0.0020565474,0.00086119864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853505,0.010337674,0.0006055115,0.0020149031,0.0013372294,0.00035426478],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014874363,0.0008454553,0.0011461524,0.0037000582,0.0046325955,0.008938255,0.002417395,0.0071693463,0.0043026144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015385345,0.0010040447,0.0016498523,0.0024753155,0.08356321,0.015011236,0.004543844,0.009429615,0.0009224649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002776646,0.0000014239737,0.00001471379,0.000009291331,0.0000022652102,0.0000038343705,0.0005115047,0.000062038656,0.000011762952,0.99860185,0.0003471971,0.00043133192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046918813,0.0000022955003,0.00003135631,0.00001690277,0.000002085388,0.000011944665,0.00008549792,0.00010417304,0.00004153533,0.9930816,0.006612466,0.000005462599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035561281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028958265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006512508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004069432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078664124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059338219","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0011","title":"Philosophical Relations, Natural Relations, and Philosophic Decisionism in Belief in the External World: Comments on P. J. E. Kail, Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Realism; Natural (archaeology); Criticism; Projection (relational algebra); Literature; Art; History","score_opus":0.07036062624697051,"score_gpt":0.32286377797375543,"score_spread":0.25250315172678495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059338219","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013654843,0.017985761,0.0013224181,0.94988465,0.0054000984,0.000025748132,0.000062096835,0.000034360233,0.0239194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18917814,0.049592465,0.00417839,0.6036913,0.05003446,0.00062390097,0.00019924535,0.00042291087,0.10207914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994913,0.0023540591,0.00015658265,0.00065576506,0.0014506445,0.0004699664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97682047,0.018991908,0.0007431785,0.00035293013,0.0026573983,0.00043409638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078339735,0.0011209602,0.0010382858,0.0022212998,0.00888312,0.0074293227,0.0035281663,0.014434287,0.0063060164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022144834,0.0007052056,0.0009915588,0.0029830884,0.02306236,0.012810367,0.004690797,0.016447397,0.0019503383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003234901,0.000021892716,0.00009498387,0.00015100674,0.000005849462,0.00021360735,0.006250919,0.00024167955,0.00010578597,0.3441711,0.6436574,0.0050534345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038911538,0.000024514697,0.0007780794,0.00082499324,0.000013680067,0.00026570298,0.0066315928,0.00059608795,0.00028229554,0.30705422,0.6834004,0.00008945128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017491898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015487389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017491898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010452136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005224394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07583588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059453367","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.664025","title":"Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Dialectic; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Transcendental idealism; Critical philosophy; Reflexive pronoun","score_opus":0.06562803257129741,"score_gpt":0.23684473839375003,"score_spread":0.17121670582245263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059453367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17325522,0.014328008,0.039757457,0.052789494,0.00043525264,0.000045742792,0.000045032284,0.00012424508,0.7192195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98907614,0.0006852563,0.0019003655,0.00084401586,0.000056738085,0.000017528377,0.0000069929774,0.000012003682,0.007400938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923739,0.005268954,0.00016800669,0.0005574593,0.001315047,0.0003166798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943198,0.0035930262,0.00046140185,0.0005541201,0.0007943773,0.00027714844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069593983,0.00029795276,0.00033464815,0.0019431924,0.003151646,0.0068293153,0.00091003487,0.0023495348,0.0020784403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006581352,0.000213806,0.00031027902,0.0011959665,0.05522422,0.0050368137,0.0052780635,0.0050602336,0.0002875737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049058235,0.0000038421626,0.00007326388,0.000012429317,0.0000019994122,0.000037526308,0.0058650803,0.00010957559,0.00006557888,0.9918988,0.00031017014,0.0016170094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011635958,0.000009458145,0.00025015432,0.00006009358,0.0000027295887,0.00006338659,0.0020878266,0.00039757648,0.00019538341,0.9769746,0.019938933,0.000008269485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025313569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017403135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00853536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00853536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003972274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06192863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060665499","doi":"10.1017/s0031819106000088","title":"Beliefs, Desires and Moral Realism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Moral realism; Argument (complex analysis); Realism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Moral disengagement; Moral psychology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.055393922150041824,"score_gpt":0.22007862821955293,"score_spread":0.1646847060695111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060665499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052065715,0.006737389,0.03617432,0.0941712,0.0006374812,0.000041326493,0.00011323984,0.000058624526,0.81000066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710161,0.0011965036,0.004106479,0.0042645037,0.00037866936,0.00006340312,0.000027658858,0.000031302578,0.018915381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691284,0.0019260229,0.000090458656,0.00030492348,0.00045523245,0.0003104232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99694306,0.0017970173,0.0002828042,0.00033052158,0.00032588022,0.0003206964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004049664,0.00033713385,0.00033949252,0.00080070406,0.0028545083,0.00626053,0.00082339125,0.0034983917,0.005196879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006496771,0.00030514377,0.00047410213,0.0005085558,0.026822975,0.006734112,0.003973432,0.0072258576,0.0006860008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028154507,0.0000031651218,0.000035979592,0.00000768677,0.0000015691606,0.000010062497,0.00047014144,0.00006172975,0.00002243974,0.9984255,0.00044341016,0.0005154876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065504278,0.0000035532873,0.00006693464,0.000020222758,0.0000017262645,0.000016755379,0.00028601915,0.00014836497,0.00004057728,0.9912917,0.008114508,0.000003017215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018399338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001927183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00626053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033806572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015882114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024528503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062216655","doi":"10.7202/203321ar","title":"Les fictions de la raison pure","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.175633954051322,"score_gpt":0.35830367579730826,"score_spread":0.18266972174598625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062216655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043226134,0.010754786,0.05978445,0.06669674,0.00181863,0.000033636232,0.00006979027,0.00012309598,0.8174928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034304,0.0033035313,0.0055952338,0.0082032755,0.0010099671,0.00007552748,0.000042340016,0.0001792407,0.0781604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939115,0.0035907184,0.00011610386,0.0005553127,0.0014296737,0.00039669382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960336,0.0025477805,0.00025318848,0.00039418312,0.0006246279,0.00014660499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045968737,0.0006906281,0.0005381461,0.0015918502,0.0062454953,0.008219013,0.0011335803,0.0036079714,0.0056734686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075602354,0.0003229743,0.0006767523,0.0011789404,0.04266412,0.009037725,0.0049426123,0.007067278,0.00081735704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037189407,0.0000021085987,0.000030658655,0.000021689526,0.0000017167342,0.00002898819,0.002802098,0.000029895113,0.000082145845,0.9948309,0.0011028908,0.0010631345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007956404,0.00001845595,0.00023659083,0.00012344416,0.000010354548,0.00026006257,0.0063422644,0.00024078319,0.0007529647,0.80827224,0.18371837,0.0000164894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002542095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003521273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008219013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039679366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026180758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02878958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062407234","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0195","title":"The Bibliothèque raisonnée Review of Volume 3 of the Treatise : Authorship, Text, and Translation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Volume (thermodynamics); Translation (biology); Psychology; Literature; Art; Physics; Chemistry; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.08061987343246789,"score_gpt":0.29450610020604917,"score_spread":0.21388622677358127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062407234","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018096204,0.6176093,0.0033595392,0.18269162,0.07542174,0.000072972856,0.0008041844,0.00019823559,0.118032716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12000531,0.5628113,0.004428874,0.09502943,0.10857538,0.00060048426,0.0022460627,0.0009963873,0.10530677],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880895,0.0050308425,0.0007153478,0.0006487644,0.004810562,0.0007050772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97224337,0.011897901,0.002683775,0.0014943015,0.010943349,0.0007373466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008339331,0.0006881232,0.0011394069,0.010027534,0.003258478,0.008635691,0.0010388409,0.003294036,0.013903778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047572803,0.00035810977,0.0007828425,0.011456678,0.0040614796,0.002745283,0.0017672335,0.0038459823,0.004276275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032919703,0.000008801552,0.0001600934,0.0021729742,0.00003627939,0.00014667478,0.0019889046,0.00014038515,0.00031743175,0.07510726,0.87253225,0.04735602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052481214,0.0000074307627,0.00046527144,0.0024830715,0.0000142046065,0.00009121617,0.00029529643,0.000025373261,0.00013977951,0.0032043564,0.99325484,0.000013986332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016090255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016463898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016090255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012816253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015457615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09298885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065305192","doi":"10.4314/sajpem.v19i2.31311","title":"Moral Realism, Social Construction, and Realism, Social Construction, and Communal Ontology","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Moral realism; Epistemology; Realism; Rationality; Naturalism; Objectivity (philosophy); Sociology; Moral psychology; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Expressivism; Positivism; Supervenience; Philosophical realism; Philosophy; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.04131744776207573,"score_gpt":0.24242775890348056,"score_spread":0.20111031114140482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065305192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13881652,0.010151284,0.13657117,0.054147564,0.00043282082,0.0000835238,0.00008749822,0.00008799201,0.6596216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889277,0.00077175203,0.0049879737,0.0005502366,0.00015363388,0.00005531474,0.000024568977,0.000020222227,0.0045085247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535584,0.0033606202,0.00009380019,0.00027565937,0.00057704,0.0003370319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956399,0.002716711,0.0005800148,0.0005714278,0.00022392347,0.00026793306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042968513,0.00039295419,0.00045455137,0.0014933677,0.003904098,0.0049564,0.00086053414,0.0020536135,0.0034767403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004591374,0.00025717483,0.0005315193,0.0016855724,0.044026285,0.006182009,0.004520022,0.0033368373,0.00022456599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014838358,0.0000021829308,0.00006736728,0.0000059624617,0.0000012461093,0.0000073011893,0.0005293839,0.00009679707,0.000017303591,0.9986576,0.00010417027,0.00050924654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033684378,0.0000039904944,0.00021920684,0.000016085174,0.0000014740095,0.00001958009,0.00048168484,0.0003544389,0.000035105753,0.99175006,0.0071119466,0.000002904384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026472795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024301533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005042327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005042327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020664237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036584854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066070446","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300003504","title":"Fichte et la première philosophie de la nature de Schelling","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Analogy; Transcendental idealism; Absolute (philosophy); Notice; Transcendental number; Idealism; Interpretation (philosophy); Doctrine; Humanities; Theology","score_opus":0.022454311044838415,"score_gpt":0.28380882764070386,"score_spread":0.26135451659586545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066070446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054914195,0.047302008,0.020556018,0.12314362,0.0021546902,0.000025775738,0.0000791913,0.00010314288,0.7517214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357348,0.0061265607,0.0034324115,0.0063367076,0.0010398708,0.00004397125,0.000024723357,0.00004549186,0.04721548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789184,0.0010165961,0.000068736525,0.00027443108,0.00052318553,0.00022520221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990338,0.0006278437,0.00008088322,0.00007537823,0.00012862733,0.000053471253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002322156,0.00033402693,0.00031724223,0.0013624935,0.0024412328,0.0035338136,0.0004185732,0.003394018,0.0039406386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026112949,0.0001533486,0.00030486519,0.0007695818,0.019165091,0.0036052521,0.0015212108,0.0031495267,0.00045847916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030602139,0.0000023206176,0.00002164045,0.000008412471,7.792542e-7,0.000014888349,0.0006448709,0.000069520735,0.000049350507,0.996962,0.0010699945,0.0011530924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000101348,0.000009536302,0.00022161099,0.00010620821,0.0000028885995,0.00009662706,0.00054879754,0.00033781715,0.0002686674,0.81677353,0.18161204,0.000012187116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071061756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070630996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008280208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008280208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026267262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06007737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066136820","doi":"10.1017/s0263523200000422","title":"Philip T. Grier (ed.), Identity and Difference. Studies in Hegel's Logic, Philosophy of Spirit, and Politics, State University of New York Press, Albany: NY, 2007, ISBN 978-0-7914-7167-8 (hbk.). Pp. 289.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; State (computer science); Identity (music); Politics; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Art history; Sociology; Law; Political science; Art; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07958903600692244,"score_gpt":0.2573600540431931,"score_spread":0.17777101803627068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066136820","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024980842,0.9679501,0.001082522,0.012077909,0.0026288058,0.000011503829,0.00012162946,0.000059954134,0.01581779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061036157,0.95121086,0.002244442,0.002605388,0.0022602857,0.00004060701,0.00018063722,0.000106772815,0.0352474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882776,0.00034524582,0.000103303995,0.00017624412,0.0004661881,0.00008128437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998273,0.0010079843,0.00019105253,0.00005784992,0.00031190837,0.00015817785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018349392,0.0022914906,0.0018342338,0.0035057084,0.0014857677,0.003510439,0.0015840206,0.0028920346,0.025762234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025183032,0.0016333448,0.00070321443,0.0054349173,0.0035988397,0.0085753035,0.0017178383,0.00416683,0.023057401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006648148,0.0000471054,0.00033912738,0.0018574026,0.000027619757,0.00012950102,0.0024654565,0.00025100692,0.00025726465,0.020179652,0.7117774,0.26260212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002466333,0.000026772252,0.0011816027,0.0031123322,0.00002825387,0.0006179548,0.0014524406,0.00013151536,0.0002913192,0.03261227,0.96048653,0.00003437084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010702827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017694578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025762234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022846654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039165253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08618325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067391187","doi":"10.7202/1029065ar","title":"Grounding Animal Rights in Mutual Advantage Contractarianism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal rights; Cruelty; Social contract; Human rights; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06261867296012218,"score_gpt":0.27251083845677826,"score_spread":0.20989216549665607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067391187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06507963,0.0016659616,0.21799575,0.05615941,0.0004711634,0.00015873424,0.00006620872,0.0000872318,0.65831596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96148413,0.00043945468,0.017050402,0.004105926,0.00029326443,0.00020393397,0.000024141742,0.000038159644,0.01636051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820681,0.010136457,0.0006594993,0.0020402786,0.00324865,0.0018470522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98914415,0.005478395,0.0012943577,0.0021216364,0.0011342658,0.0008272808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022340402,0.00044584318,0.0007409991,0.0012464717,0.0059067383,0.0068803946,0.0019401716,0.006687635,0.0067153135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016571328,0.0005147534,0.0009414635,0.00082030677,0.057942785,0.011305895,0.012056528,0.0064061484,0.00076886825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018969605,0.0000029500106,0.00005012252,0.0000032789762,0.0000013262368,0.000008849032,0.0003785924,0.0000742301,0.000016727028,0.9987801,0.00013518802,0.0005467445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009539813,0.000010132171,0.00012691459,0.000021726135,0.0000028889963,0.00003744582,0.00021759902,0.0004892697,0.00006252787,0.98655397,0.0124610495,0.000007090348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037403228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026580037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022340402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064392644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043834536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118148744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069812032","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002857","title":"The Glass Shatters and Ducks Turn into Rabbits: Bad Faith and Moral Luck","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Faith; Bad faith; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.0343269982403286,"score_gpt":0.22335736073104417,"score_spread":0.1890303624907156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069812032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29094246,0.0035715497,0.035593994,0.05729706,0.0005205105,0.000051702114,0.000031834585,0.00012424486,0.6118666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937801,0.00018514428,0.00070258236,0.0007792829,0.000024055895,0.0000076228707,0.0000025291579,0.000014980385,0.0045037195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99228185,0.00583396,0.00014059091,0.00045159124,0.0008011673,0.0004907447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344254,0.0041823178,0.00067942374,0.0007382288,0.00051718723,0.0004402645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006397692,0.00035415802,0.00046429603,0.0008869096,0.0053039296,0.009146085,0.00096112816,0.0043452405,0.005270428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011047127,0.00041656438,0.00033359157,0.00056388194,0.07288684,0.007981121,0.006026363,0.0046617608,0.0004970301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019465102,0.000017770193,0.0004779272,0.000028315291,0.0000062284075,0.00019760727,0.057129446,0.00021761317,0.00022810037,0.9375732,0.0015674493,0.00253681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016097283,0.000045986173,0.0007780731,0.00019167375,0.000013204366,0.00033626286,0.054942533,0.0011543168,0.0006644035,0.872062,0.06975589,0.00003954095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030519671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003099162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009146085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031845733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013613028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033834636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071220481","doi":"10.1016/j.emospa.2013.11.009","title":"The family and the bonds of recognition","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emotion, space and society","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Bond; Psychology; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.024282316871497532,"score_gpt":0.21325886747531878,"score_spread":0.18897655060382124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071220481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17809708,0.01152377,0.028309759,0.05592087,0.0005834543,0.00004460287,0.000066734225,0.000052506934,0.7254013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913589,0.00061407953,0.0010253979,0.0005567073,0.000064220556,0.000016629903,0.000008440817,0.000018896466,0.0063368976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994156,0.0042469692,0.000096729214,0.0005464677,0.00045975958,0.00049409346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541605,0.0023257951,0.00054080324,0.0005810322,0.0004008306,0.00073547766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006087672,0.000346098,0.0004999478,0.0011947517,0.0073976973,0.009641972,0.0012735879,0.0040835836,0.008463055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010136362,0.0002743681,0.00025878145,0.000958748,0.060419504,0.0100228395,0.0049470845,0.0034280368,0.0005724732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023427898,0.000017099399,0.0006206573,0.00001552353,0.00000678537,0.00008231934,0.02182598,0.00018538834,0.000084563166,0.970393,0.0011414388,0.005603834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016472548,0.000025292267,0.0012976641,0.00007788524,0.000006729265,0.0002064223,0.017535966,0.00033824096,0.00011651888,0.9380646,0.04229481,0.000019414127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006873162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045789713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009641972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038535383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036745598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03219509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071692372","doi":"10.1017/s0031819109000394","title":"Human Nature, Personhood, and Ethical Naturalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Deliberation; Epistemology; Creatures; Value (mathematics); Naturalism; Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03641396381475498,"score_gpt":0.28752738270643874,"score_spread":0.25111341889168376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071692372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08940788,0.019721387,0.05350555,0.26337647,0.0011602446,0.000055802928,0.000065423534,0.000078803714,0.5726285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97992206,0.0013261555,0.0052305725,0.005161777,0.00030527633,0.000040659164,0.000014362938,0.000013307104,0.007985893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955081,0.0034171913,0.00008315503,0.00034398303,0.00048544418,0.00016203053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958246,0.0027168249,0.00030578623,0.00037449764,0.0004308668,0.0003473656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056229923,0.00021431052,0.00027917046,0.00088047364,0.003600726,0.004879227,0.0006228862,0.0025528325,0.0030938175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035653913,0.00015617731,0.00025411157,0.00047587833,0.04369929,0.004055062,0.003205386,0.0034543457,0.00025208792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024565584,0.000007137782,0.00008680628,0.000008538882,0.0000015931573,0.00001769503,0.00065654446,0.000113000766,0.000027669985,0.99701834,0.0010368773,0.001023343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004757149,0.000005260248,0.000121182704,0.000027641225,0.0000010031091,0.000028438693,0.0005454554,0.00026128674,0.000034968984,0.9809878,0.01797877,0.0000034452112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019172836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017171957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056229923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036927795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021098293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029737592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073218254","doi":"10.1017/s001221730000754x","title":"À la rescousse du platonisme moral","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Platonism; Philosophy; Objectivism; Epistemology; Doctrine; Internalism and externalism; Theology","score_opus":0.03527293538907866,"score_gpt":0.2217534428594767,"score_spread":0.18648050747039804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073218254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035703525,0.021970239,0.11744097,0.13367252,0.005158946,0.000047143632,0.00012963219,0.0003230312,0.68555397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.900621,0.006558614,0.016223906,0.006341341,0.0043597394,0.00015922551,0.00008254384,0.00019200146,0.065461636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99196666,0.0053573623,0.00012803989,0.00053746795,0.0016367908,0.00037355145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943744,0.0036443893,0.000272876,0.0007299004,0.00067414105,0.0003043621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065475414,0.00083708396,0.0008267557,0.0014225459,0.004292926,0.0077765505,0.00085316476,0.0043049664,0.008148668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011634523,0.00030922593,0.00090592634,0.0011976417,0.030726545,0.007504964,0.003224082,0.015568958,0.0014776059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004431277,0.0000040121918,0.000024178898,0.0000071185623,0.0000015511869,0.000019330339,0.0004312814,0.00005491739,0.000046497014,0.9968155,0.0010129788,0.0015781553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015924694,0.000012968506,0.0001789851,0.0000793925,0.0000036327444,0.000121038785,0.0005860971,0.001233893,0.0001936483,0.9091657,0.0883954,0.000013306924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005374194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026362147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008148668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059326775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030131212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043044746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073245989","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0186","title":"The New Hume Debate (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Philosophy; Skepticism; Epistemology; Realism; Metaphysics; Art history; History","score_opus":0.192873443841314,"score_gpt":0.30929846122684046,"score_spread":0.11642501738552646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073245989","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017388267,0.9968322,0.000012515475,0.0021854974,0.00047927353,0.0000024164308,0.000011396795,0.0000020309128,0.00045726798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00048359763,0.99570775,0.000028384997,0.0025023792,0.0009144645,0.000009961117,0.00003019522,0.0000021128658,0.0003210562],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982291,0.00063263107,0.00021160638,0.00021684833,0.0005580658,0.0001517815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938114,0.0037780944,0.000846915,0.000121837365,0.0010105321,0.00043109411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025911557,0.0009860548,0.0027368783,0.0043164706,0.0007457375,0.004734041,0.0023179871,0.0039253063,0.012721402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011662356,0.0007234976,0.0012608081,0.006450324,0.0017902162,0.00466215,0.0019753848,0.0042858813,0.0046086884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001034312,0.00003540948,0.0002221903,0.06326877,0.00036882787,0.00018749238,0.00031277188,0.00012837946,0.00010933809,0.004274045,0.40638837,0.52460104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003739261,0.000034819925,0.0009475591,0.050704677,0.00022675128,0.00052330305,0.00021631003,0.000024053315,0.00003821997,0.0021427441,0.9450842,0.000019910762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044288384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008860176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012721402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034596373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008959251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0425573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074070165","doi":"10.1080/13669877.2014.923024","title":"Using vNM expected utility theory to facilitate the decision-making in social ethics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Undecidable problem; Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Perception; Computer science; oskar; Mathematical economics; Management science; Sociology; Mathematics; Economics; Philosophy; Algorithm","score_opus":0.5376805659693374,"score_gpt":0.4835019065712265,"score_spread":0.05417865939811095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074070165","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041391677,0.0008186404,0.96242535,0.0027360378,0.00018074027,0.00006483057,0.000039345286,0.000055232125,0.029540688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42875677,0.0010762485,0.55957466,0.00061415846,0.00027366244,0.0006356601,0.00006984796,0.00007471699,0.008924383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868241,0.01101214,0.0003319271,0.00042836866,0.0011779976,0.00022541065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98657775,0.011474745,0.0004609728,0.00072657166,0.00055730174,0.0002025778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012291972,0.00095015444,0.0010632338,0.0025825778,0.0014316298,0.0047491128,0.0021713101,0.0021093464,0.0044846213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016757198,0.00056692056,0.0016104777,0.0018642996,0.009917293,0.00642725,0.0041812295,0.0043264623,0.00061727216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003179442,0.0000077055765,0.000051018917,0.000030518462,0.0000075133644,0.00004155882,0.00021271632,0.0043270355,0.00004053564,0.9915549,0.00029379525,0.0034295658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005144897,0.000009846557,0.00004381754,0.00005034492,0.000003649444,0.000026063486,0.00007256052,0.021086235,0.00009052308,0.97361,0.004991618,0.000010138031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018688267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024627412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012291972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004562526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025437581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06500691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076319987","doi":"10.1353/hms.2013.0002","title":"Le etiche della virtù. La riflessione contemporanea a partire da Hume by Alessio Vaccari (review)","year":2013,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Virtue; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Narrative; Humanities; Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0895035395452263,"score_gpt":0.3145196390547439,"score_spread":0.2250160995095176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076319987","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000032370783,0.9960479,0.000020370118,0.002130542,0.0012148883,0.0000027680737,0.000015466856,0.0000024656483,0.000533242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00092447695,0.9908317,0.00007335073,0.0032782524,0.00281485,0.000015795187,0.000082246755,0.00000633218,0.0019730139],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989962,0.00025322937,0.00010976953,0.00021249791,0.00034664312,0.00008156663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751174,0.0011850178,0.0004448188,0.000052724314,0.00057647604,0.00022916032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001313246,0.0012253881,0.0017629443,0.0032534313,0.0006138114,0.0037340736,0.0013237635,0.002159847,0.013774446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044714697,0.0005667039,0.0008870977,0.004486691,0.0013667126,0.003996482,0.0014740671,0.0041449205,0.0056222007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100707635,0.000047862337,0.0004581249,0.041961968,0.00019117458,0.00015966245,0.00036800926,0.00018802502,0.00032042476,0.0040396433,0.5816008,0.3705637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023859662,0.000049712922,0.0017551746,0.030287188,0.00015149738,0.00072161964,0.00030716354,0.000056490284,0.00009649415,0.0024503605,0.9640697,0.000030785905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043624546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051122326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013774446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017049764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055108806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046080112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076562610","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0136","title":"Conceivability and Modality in Hume: A Lemma in an Argument in Defense of Skeptical Realism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Realism; Metaphysics; Certainty","score_opus":0.16761218522245755,"score_gpt":0.35175253625645797,"score_spread":0.18414035103400042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076562610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07584712,0.021277118,0.10165186,0.24738786,0.0012157698,0.000112415015,0.0001553773,0.0002646018,0.5520878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763849,0.0018626935,0.0057580033,0.0056162067,0.00084268296,0.00010630442,0.00002379703,0.000059551356,0.009345895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567103,0.002973091,0.00011036891,0.0003783325,0.00062364055,0.0002435608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98070174,0.016524637,0.0008307432,0.0008358623,0.0008267622,0.00028019075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006624044,0.00035447924,0.000669376,0.001997051,0.004436144,0.006977537,0.0012205057,0.005414467,0.0056784498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013338596,0.00040956007,0.0009305399,0.0013341963,0.040403448,0.014044228,0.0053703287,0.007178798,0.0007609062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011125864,0.0000040998875,0.000057851797,0.000019292846,0.0000020942653,0.000047934394,0.002435547,0.00003923688,0.000053100404,0.99559385,0.0010179431,0.0007178543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019281804,0.000012639409,0.00016504095,0.000048562324,0.0000048940983,0.000118116164,0.0012512575,0.00026752183,0.00016561251,0.97877413,0.019163158,0.00000986913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008700901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060898304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006977537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003327777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011440057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035031736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081125619","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0648","title":"Projectivism and Error in Hume’s Ethics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Subjectivism; Face (sociological concept); Moral psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.6162252095896528,"score_gpt":0.38329088135945966,"score_spread":0.2329343282301931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081125619","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09918086,0.010178826,0.4237782,0.111954615,0.0011601084,0.00017435638,0.00008693886,0.00032976174,0.35315627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686349,0.001055438,0.017277764,0.0019569723,0.00031989143,0.00014250154,0.000017141434,0.00008526205,0.01051014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96823543,0.022495318,0.0009073727,0.0016786931,0.0055062235,0.0011769468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688746,0.02307817,0.0013583708,0.0037072224,0.0024777956,0.00050383393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025690049,0.0006342055,0.00075541745,0.0019435541,0.004408504,0.008152774,0.0014321472,0.004756249,0.0016422106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036580466,0.00048490503,0.000605543,0.0014903899,0.062002018,0.01179266,0.006679891,0.006095019,0.0003620621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073948518,0.0000045658576,0.00011809734,0.000016780063,0.0000040727246,0.000027289068,0.0030502283,0.0004686104,0.000021110538,0.9929235,0.0005270412,0.0028311783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005871434,0.0000052602086,0.00003917723,0.000025519674,0.0000017516755,0.000026074727,0.0003631516,0.00071674876,0.00009175188,0.99222785,0.0064921845,0.000004720706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023228365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094399427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025690049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004818978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003923144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1358636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081277561","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0311","title":"\"All Is Revolution in Us\": Personal Identity in Shaftesbury and Hume","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Personal identity; Identity (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Happiness; Law; Self; Aesthetics; Political science","score_opus":0.0984612116391918,"score_gpt":0.32908451629888186,"score_spread":0.23062330465969005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081277561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0800748,0.062797405,0.0023629016,0.23422675,0.0017705832,0.000057773974,0.000068111134,0.000028961866,0.61861265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92506725,0.008109851,0.00042393492,0.0090561835,0.0004555572,0.000033146996,0.000014514876,0.000019811254,0.056819737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968047,0.0018790913,0.0000479293,0.00024888274,0.0005950551,0.00042438332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807715,0.0010562908,0.00020935989,0.0000998294,0.00024303178,0.0003142879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037867292,0.00042940388,0.0003903608,0.0012525974,0.017694486,0.009373771,0.0008262588,0.0036005052,0.0050314423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004873158,0.00028469134,0.00017305701,0.0019014776,0.051066816,0.00817462,0.003834102,0.004200726,0.0005037863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011221007,0.000015137839,0.00035551918,0.000022484612,0.0000019239235,0.000116191935,0.15478237,0.000040569805,0.00006136037,0.80843526,0.029034773,0.007123157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015541103,0.000021052054,0.0035144659,0.00042532865,0.000006572652,0.00027597568,0.1143353,0.00014779945,0.00022537983,0.24363022,0.6373622,0.000040227755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1877905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18147586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1877905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017633103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008288646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3733949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082506280","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00060.x","title":"Blackburn's Problem: On Its Not Insignificant Residue","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supervenience; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Autonomy; Moral reasoning; Philosophy; Moral philosophy; Philosophy of mind; Moral psychology; Metaphysics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.5206330726340815,"score_gpt":0.38888061912053795,"score_spread":0.1317524535135436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082506280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040955646,0.008968343,0.032103255,0.785932,0.005880141,0.000056961468,0.0001789147,0.00015776223,0.16262712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4192174,0.014557749,0.045158982,0.32771462,0.015240647,0.00072952156,0.00026789066,0.00071752054,0.17639561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939014,0.0023331512,0.00021551693,0.0015717278,0.0016178775,0.00036034067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842343,0.010430117,0.00053384295,0.0018486369,0.002342615,0.0006105554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01186608,0.00094586634,0.0015494241,0.0017740019,0.0060548033,0.0051936703,0.0036366018,0.011250575,0.019673986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033896215,0.0006564851,0.0009629256,0.0012923336,0.03578503,0.023733623,0.006292987,0.025917387,0.0043557906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026819656,0.0000137440575,0.00006802495,0.00005284225,0.000010082167,0.000025419356,0.0007130919,0.000071360075,0.000031533153,0.9410867,0.050895527,0.007004782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013005995,0.000004657704,0.000063580344,0.00009884221,0.0000046547902,0.00003715601,0.0003332545,0.00017396486,0.00007294614,0.92130387,0.07788416,0.000009955651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009080072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059349756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019673986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051787794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037704343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065815985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082794432","doi":"10.5840/monist200386321","title":"A Humean Argument for Benevolence to Strangers","year":2003,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Monism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Analytic philosophy; Teleological argument; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Metaphysics; Teleology","score_opus":0.05819118820001195,"score_gpt":0.2745608058165235,"score_spread":0.21636961761651152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082794432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036575105,0.0020823902,0.0056024166,0.082521155,0.00086902396,0.000017792503,0.000047936464,0.000027101594,0.872257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504316,0.0005303624,0.0005736532,0.011777842,0.0005876853,0.000024185747,0.000014472658,0.000031319163,0.036028925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543864,0.0025763838,0.000094778545,0.00041692262,0.00078244746,0.00069083157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932201,0.003635888,0.0005942611,0.00084102975,0.00081894046,0.0008897262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004591971,0.00030368858,0.0006250464,0.0010687354,0.009793254,0.0051480415,0.0010610254,0.00761011,0.014381707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014787846,0.00022033014,0.00042113647,0.00094609574,0.034364007,0.0060943896,0.0060010552,0.00670106,0.001540446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021133157,0.000008138364,0.00016062509,0.000011885691,0.000003560586,0.00012158811,0.0016395075,0.00003615252,0.000039005034,0.99179256,0.004620207,0.0015457502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028629116,0.000019654504,0.0007735979,0.00011943347,0.000009132614,0.00033402446,0.0036394873,0.00025174493,0.00016383668,0.92780656,0.06683483,0.000018989798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045860424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006171246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014381707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037705905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018682496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048111618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083102510","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2008.0005","title":"On the Value of Happiness: Herder contra Kant","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Destiny (ISS module); Tone (literature); Content (measure theory); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04026447914236973,"score_gpt":0.22899226336992035,"score_spread":0.1887277842275506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083102510","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008097215,0.26522937,0.0053048315,0.51406586,0.0061728675,0.00002522722,0.00032650513,0.00008486729,0.20069318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52444977,0.13744807,0.0049464824,0.21998435,0.02172551,0.00020063575,0.00023108059,0.00017096101,0.09084316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972868,0.0013183801,0.00007609477,0.00047921602,0.0006084196,0.0002311228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983411,0.0012321011,0.00011211927,0.00007618263,0.00018471264,0.000053825745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026666007,0.0004804172,0.00061537186,0.0013480051,0.0021355096,0.0048454534,0.00090598885,0.004531201,0.0035676043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004905359,0.00029656637,0.00032579966,0.0015586443,0.02000555,0.0071187047,0.0027561018,0.0073386673,0.0012331676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022622007,0.0000048798083,0.000096182004,0.000105818566,0.0000061207793,0.000045794037,0.0022227184,0.00011819018,0.00003640144,0.9313857,0.05827735,0.0076782913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008069351,0.000017250259,0.0003814557,0.000584648,0.000007863983,0.000111858295,0.0009968316,0.00015504533,0.00008717152,0.6819528,0.31567773,0.00001924666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004779834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002334143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048454534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040022335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015862421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02903831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083354691","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400000637","title":"Debate: Langton on Things in Themselves: Critique of <i>Kantian Humility</i>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Presentation (obstetrics); Theology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04753771710883424,"score_gpt":0.2951035712139592,"score_spread":0.24756585410512494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083354691","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050514583,0.09050444,0.0026744711,0.8509737,0.0054069096,0.000008940227,0.000025713563,0.000021306989,0.045333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38347018,0.06384116,0.0033775878,0.4523654,0.025573047,0.00018968787,0.000061778905,0.00024993008,0.070871115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99316615,0.0046250885,0.00016371695,0.00061955274,0.001173909,0.00025154467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977344,0.019386634,0.0008104965,0.0004909208,0.0015901427,0.00037774513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010983602,0.00044438522,0.00090240536,0.0018284703,0.0055522597,0.011763882,0.0018571148,0.0130333165,0.0033939518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020963537,0.00026254827,0.0004440052,0.0021120852,0.02202263,0.014843796,0.003874898,0.014233922,0.001041008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003300322,0.000010464259,0.000111268346,0.00018471554,0.000011771332,0.00007721039,0.008361334,0.00010330847,0.000073924384,0.8756957,0.10630685,0.009030431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020584728,0.000019540445,0.00039886904,0.0011979322,0.000018573286,0.00013225946,0.006343483,0.0003252796,0.0004049344,0.47297817,0.5181263,0.00003399504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004628415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005187483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0130333165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005836017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005727232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058087528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091781130","doi":"10.1017/s0953820814000132","title":"Ross on Self and Others","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Trilemma; Duty; Pleasure; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Theology; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.026867533460950277,"score_gpt":0.22846040373200618,"score_spread":0.2015928702710559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091781130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012013347,0.07662728,0.0037342268,0.17723115,0.00280098,0.000021998081,0.00007082023,0.000046524303,0.7274536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.602113,0.035608266,0.002782898,0.02772391,0.0026358191,0.00008061849,0.00007724576,0.00015983773,0.32881847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998281,0.0010889615,0.000032453845,0.00018612406,0.00025544898,0.00015593453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877316,0.00058490585,0.00009001975,0.00014838565,0.00023430899,0.0001691562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015719179,0.00049551256,0.00030563146,0.00089026697,0.0042968006,0.005198506,0.00047572164,0.0025550737,0.007733328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002689099,0.0001624705,0.0003192864,0.00068714353,0.010620211,0.0064224377,0.0024700523,0.0032083169,0.0018652802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079658275,0.0000072332814,0.00013216348,0.000026423448,0.0000025796742,0.0000449637,0.0040289545,0.00004789014,0.00004222072,0.9509808,0.039169263,0.0055095227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006780632,0.000012907764,0.00027111307,0.00023264298,0.0000037474,0.00012250214,0.00372591,0.000102805745,0.00008927465,0.46978065,0.52564263,0.000009046728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053287162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074632536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007733328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030557837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017685445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025870502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091827653","doi":"10.1007/s10677-008-9128-4","title":"Bestowal Without Appraisal: Problems in Frankfurt’s Characterization of Love and Personal Identity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of love; Agape; Romance; Friendship; Personal identity; Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Self; Politics; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.07314775553887774,"score_gpt":0.3181950712441828,"score_spread":0.24504731570530502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091827653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23058002,0.0139734605,0.083848014,0.30710036,0.0029147007,0.00016220678,0.00012914644,0.00012031311,0.36117184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814105,0.00062333856,0.0076790657,0.0041757957,0.0003061278,0.00010193565,0.000025002666,0.000052120868,0.005626062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822369,0.011806833,0.00083199324,0.0011450337,0.0030026,0.0009766305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758415,0.015025597,0.0014118566,0.0030605712,0.0038024513,0.00085795904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02338507,0.00042239373,0.00094411423,0.0043529975,0.008036449,0.010340457,0.003249469,0.005289439,0.0028040973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0556944,0.00046836826,0.0005495609,0.0026230186,0.046337616,0.01772723,0.0074404133,0.0063721333,0.0003931629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021918666,0.000012861427,0.0006532784,0.000035636866,0.000005822054,0.000096689946,0.051860012,0.000043386834,0.00006744306,0.92238814,0.0038955666,0.020919321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010874085,0.000013576672,0.002718545,0.0003071119,0.00000924645,0.0004021966,0.03909862,0.0006770395,0.00021741848,0.92202514,0.034485325,0.00003483469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012100614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014951194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02338507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007817583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048041204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1236735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092335477","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.520.x","title":"DESIRING THE BAD UNDER THE GUISE OF THE GOOD","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Content (measure theory); Mental state; Element (criminal law); Epistemology; Psychology; State (computer science); Aesthetics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05312159902442484,"score_gpt":0.26175964524513423,"score_spread":0.2086380462207094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092335477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034169354,0.0030746493,0.032516006,0.046728726,0.00079108804,0.000034701858,0.00005111727,0.0001016565,0.8825328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458971,0.0013061845,0.0037537266,0.005736151,0.00035821093,0.000042942058,0.000018764595,0.00008079088,0.04280607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978005,0.0013628022,0.000051767467,0.0002160585,0.0003531344,0.00021575046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823207,0.0007183014,0.00021360903,0.00031055845,0.00024589553,0.0002796382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002549919,0.00032191005,0.00029991387,0.0006260823,0.0032528515,0.00603042,0.0004890626,0.002303162,0.004809335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003909955,0.00017715919,0.00037802817,0.00048641674,0.029621443,0.0058068912,0.00348616,0.0036636074,0.0009103635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000118134185,0.0000064446135,0.0001827512,0.000017514,0.0000035722064,0.000034760527,0.0040491996,0.00004761575,0.00011695596,0.990466,0.0020345787,0.0030288934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109492685,0.000060434137,0.000863538,0.000112704765,0.000016448465,0.00036705704,0.008141886,0.00048510786,0.0006044881,0.8247373,0.16457258,0.000027451584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012456748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021252595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00603042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014532731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011947595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016088903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092336448","doi":"10.1093/mind/110.439.878","title":"Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint. Steven Wall","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectionism (psychology); Liberalism; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.051298061663296,"score_gpt":0.2433598002416468,"score_spread":0.1920617385783508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092336448","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022998169,0.32736835,0.0016066858,0.44290498,0.0036482431,0.000013250071,0.00011818864,0.00003074256,0.20131133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64282066,0.19906153,0.0014370525,0.027988851,0.004452686,0.000029892475,0.00007886983,0.00006445719,0.124065995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956006,0.00021748978,0.000016122558,0.000057115616,0.000107486325,0.000041734387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982864,0.0011568363,0.00011385248,0.00004967561,0.00021220603,0.0001809876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010402933,0.00038545902,0.0004480435,0.00076143467,0.0020756945,0.0029378557,0.00037630321,0.0017146188,0.0047393795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028037012,0.00040072014,0.00013939182,0.0011066219,0.007547959,0.0034733023,0.0012998484,0.0034950536,0.000806122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061482075,0.00009431446,0.0016364268,0.00018750697,0.000019747868,0.00020688413,0.006449017,0.0004903179,0.00018475934,0.70509195,0.22952244,0.05605519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027615359,0.000026204856,0.0026349027,0.0006786701,0.000013597545,0.0004774654,0.004431757,0.00045075204,0.00016652589,0.6388978,0.3521674,0.000027436303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076166135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015745621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076166135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014900331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016282923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015854776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092500444","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0011","title":"The Ways of the Wise: Hume’s Rules of Causal Reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Doxastic logic; Skepticism; Virtue; Epistemic virtue; Inference; Philosophy; Causal inference; Normative; Causal reasoning; Psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.16642979503140137,"score_gpt":0.30224592030479286,"score_spread":0.13581612527339149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092500444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035463776,0.0039169593,0.3561725,0.059609495,0.00090645975,0.00015560378,0.00043804862,0.0005409823,0.5427961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8971199,0.0010104472,0.07549108,0.0038441657,0.00046591362,0.00020329603,0.00011815921,0.0001559944,0.021591075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921989,0.004862704,0.0002313759,0.0010281991,0.0012487955,0.00043010208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886097,0.008268923,0.00043868192,0.0015389436,0.0008542344,0.0002896143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010830349,0.00038918588,0.0007272228,0.0017811406,0.0035200485,0.008592798,0.0014001102,0.0037950308,0.0031594303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018214468,0.0005932644,0.0009385546,0.0008978888,0.026234487,0.009487452,0.003176473,0.005236976,0.000992582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005296296,0.000003425444,0.00011217913,0.000008366339,0.0000036957751,0.000030309502,0.0010213058,0.00034297083,0.000020394278,0.99442106,0.0016104457,0.0024204906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049822515,0.0000010329761,0.000038882175,0.000009886689,0.0000014774972,0.000017562295,0.000098226745,0.0004851911,0.000028362563,0.99353266,0.005778094,0.0000036136719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005602264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007732399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010830349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003163037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026491296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057277024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094056944","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300003036","title":"Hare's Utilitarianism and the Free-Rider Problem","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Utilitarianism; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02170959486721427,"score_gpt":0.21804807703104118,"score_spread":0.1963384821638269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094056944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043954477,0.0070965574,0.07081998,0.07614261,0.0005696961,0.000055125412,0.000082718805,0.00004961749,0.80122924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365157,0.001652684,0.0042937123,0.0031102716,0.00040822738,0.000096048134,0.000018897368,0.0000434779,0.053860914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99341875,0.0044533294,0.00017310843,0.000517637,0.0008053462,0.00063177355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99242675,0.0051520555,0.0005045616,0.0008357289,0.00076234934,0.0003185745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007674705,0.0005158001,0.0006344044,0.0016338619,0.0040077497,0.0061332597,0.0012537828,0.0047252914,0.011400929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009700324,0.00035095582,0.00062217924,0.0012866938,0.033095993,0.008186648,0.005517036,0.004768087,0.00086641556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024546644,0.0000029904204,0.00004076907,0.000008923108,0.0000015521762,0.000012017778,0.0005661367,0.00015505608,0.00000942078,0.9974789,0.0007532438,0.0009685129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005606915,0.000005318199,0.000081210754,0.000028080894,0.0000017994452,0.000026276186,0.00056388025,0.00031354852,0.0000290018,0.9830488,0.015891867,0.000004649652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019018303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019334503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011400929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004310511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016628578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0405882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094534721","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0016","title":"Practical Reasoning and Practical Reasons in Hume","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Instrumentalism; Epistemology; Foundation (evidence); Philosophy; Naturalism; Rationality; Inference; Practical reason; Law","score_opus":0.2812725221404892,"score_gpt":0.3929275633636023,"score_spread":0.1116550412231131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094534721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023488367,0.016968532,0.1387731,0.07471069,0.0005920027,0.00009496414,0.00010995377,0.0003036412,0.7449587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92099243,0.003069898,0.03208044,0.0078098816,0.00071536424,0.00022209558,0.000061499806,0.000110628425,0.034937795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892944,0.0077965665,0.00023392364,0.0007852831,0.0011906595,0.000699104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992215,0.005777633,0.0003940496,0.000756988,0.0005893815,0.00026703786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008641583,0.0005948095,0.00071980216,0.0020750496,0.0053646727,0.008100987,0.0012437867,0.0051714317,0.0045373137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010530531,0.0004417045,0.00071806915,0.00147411,0.059867866,0.008518252,0.0046052113,0.0053300564,0.0009346816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024115473,0.0000024687731,0.000026710726,0.000011242103,0.0000014117338,0.000016420196,0.0011587611,0.0001177463,0.000012328232,0.9969689,0.0006066545,0.0010749645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046618484,0.0000033870515,0.000045496832,0.000027664077,0.0000014175904,0.000021667198,0.0003790295,0.00023152557,0.000043324333,0.97826684,0.020971226,0.0000037070113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030684248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023334979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008641583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051526325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037534696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045701623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096643268","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002869","title":"Hume's Impression of Succession (Time)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Duration (music); Impression; Empiricism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Literature; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.046670127577095044,"score_gpt":0.23715906151049576,"score_spread":0.19048893393340072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096643268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38254827,0.0019534987,0.051781453,0.010647192,0.0007434456,0.000037487054,0.00014966505,0.00020493244,0.551934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951999,0.00009261545,0.00096233183,0.00016886769,0.000029741721,0.0000046243385,0.000012802982,0.000014543586,0.0035144468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767226,0.0013595656,0.00007630415,0.00018919782,0.0005422423,0.00016044536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945549,0.0027097226,0.0007867482,0.0005344117,0.0008759367,0.00053825474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024790603,0.00029938505,0.00021592964,0.0015999989,0.0020703224,0.004867526,0.0003920668,0.0010431082,0.0052680685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01127743,0.00015434557,0.0002418615,0.0005709181,0.013420084,0.0057711094,0.0035926534,0.001849034,0.00035865864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038528471,0.000033238313,0.0033429787,0.00014471951,0.000020623855,0.0004383844,0.12035892,0.0007744523,0.0042190654,0.84208,0.0033861222,0.024816193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071909875,0.000429535,0.014425129,0.00045142949,0.000046954334,0.0014637884,0.1315197,0.0043751774,0.0048894165,0.63004005,0.21212703,0.00015999124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012303436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009042878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052680685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016690515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074628746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017623425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099436951","doi":"10.1353/hms.2004.a383295","title":"Pleased and Afflicted: Hume on the Paradox of Tragic Pleasure","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Kindness; Order (exchange); History; Art history; Philosophy; Art; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.19607922291863514,"score_gpt":0.29179309678411436,"score_spread":0.09571387386547922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099436951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02862035,0.07157922,0.0019648368,0.31055,0.0029449428,0.000027846601,0.00007354059,0.00006782867,0.58417135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84173256,0.019125892,0.00051432755,0.065977134,0.0031859912,0.000065316926,0.000028046388,0.00013676823,0.06923397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650276,0.0024380751,0.000039838535,0.0001857197,0.00038483064,0.00044882362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963045,0.0022697288,0.00026634327,0.0002347765,0.0003160447,0.00060855283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034344771,0.0006378149,0.0005752118,0.0013010622,0.02230685,0.016982866,0.0011417374,0.006364837,0.007415204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00530068,0.0003897086,0.00028428287,0.0014121118,0.06640263,0.015676476,0.009278133,0.010513712,0.0011425806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026482248,0.000021270156,0.0002783816,0.00006597239,0.00000809858,0.00029865286,0.14258526,0.00007363634,0.000059146518,0.7643305,0.084444106,0.0078085256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026847743,0.000024425992,0.0006746398,0.00038298423,0.0000056738513,0.0005014659,0.11311649,0.000092538416,0.000092487324,0.27817565,0.6068749,0.000031997013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01421371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020497154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02230685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008728122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051734215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06332719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099605357","doi":"10.7202/1029156ar","title":"Hegel, l’intention et l’action : réflexions sur un débat récent","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.17319711495571308,"score_gpt":0.33074963708036803,"score_spread":0.15755252212465495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099605357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02932811,0.21891466,0.029659819,0.27486464,0.0030779904,0.000023850032,0.00010716115,0.0000895945,0.4439342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8063761,0.10612934,0.004764493,0.021908924,0.0033295145,0.00008439448,0.000073910116,0.00015462725,0.057178758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955537,0.0027170351,0.00011214208,0.000488439,0.00077698595,0.00035166548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264246,0.005879237,0.00034361298,0.00036961786,0.00050867774,0.0002563174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004514001,0.0005747043,0.0005379543,0.0019527095,0.0035563493,0.007946324,0.00122728,0.004799734,0.005951524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056426153,0.000303743,0.00051183987,0.0022135105,0.045442294,0.010399933,0.0035123008,0.0082735345,0.0010462302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008024267,0.0000045099805,0.00007940307,0.00007652828,0.0000040701093,0.00001918974,0.0057514207,0.000083968866,0.000024681882,0.98666745,0.0028899102,0.0043909675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001183943,0.0000191085,0.00047363303,0.00053716864,0.000012655471,0.00009520496,0.00927949,0.00025047816,0.00029017095,0.77646345,0.21254584,0.000020988484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012255374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01039234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012255374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076021883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062365555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05515796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099706886","doi":"10.7202/1026684ar","title":"Sources, raisons et exigences","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.034311112354886916,"score_gpt":0.2711997895829066,"score_spread":0.23688867722801965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099706886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026193542,0.009027082,0.06344432,0.037874654,0.0015197432,0.00010847647,0.00043513768,0.0003458405,0.8610512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7903394,0.006896052,0.015528376,0.003993143,0.00133307,0.00028075677,0.00052253954,0.0008271101,0.18027958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864195,0.0064392956,0.00061658176,0.0018236034,0.0038097661,0.0008913243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892721,0.0050819027,0.0008855133,0.0020392074,0.0022962927,0.00042485353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009624917,0.001145695,0.000733273,0.0034971584,0.0051830653,0.0153528005,0.002069676,0.0037977428,0.017145824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017263977,0.0008672262,0.0007153483,0.0032289743,0.01825426,0.017542753,0.0072232103,0.006068519,0.003912275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009667177,0.0000056675826,0.0002442463,0.00004977568,0.000009028848,0.00011224014,0.008468086,0.00005260354,0.000085791355,0.9836104,0.0025239335,0.004828648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002623336,0.00002337312,0.00078742264,0.00048729914,0.000030994754,0.00033730382,0.012563632,0.00031793673,0.0006283829,0.6565234,0.32823256,0.000041531133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029893874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002432899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017145824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005431838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043870723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057358444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101374221","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300005485","title":"Hypocrisy and the Good of Character Possession","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Hypocrisy; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03731499936768743,"score_gpt":0.22087044021638985,"score_spread":0.18355544084870243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101374221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08350043,0.0073883515,0.006203678,0.041011617,0.0003373124,0.000022122162,0.000042091808,0.000041458883,0.8614528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779544,0.00080213766,0.00022899937,0.0007867437,0.00010848622,0.000011761438,0.000005860309,0.000008919668,0.020092659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590045,0.002947501,0.00007674115,0.00024392031,0.00042356228,0.00040781742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965423,0.0017755595,0.00055228715,0.00040181735,0.0003663489,0.00036164944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029187915,0.00029838856,0.00030628953,0.0009904748,0.004128375,0.006789842,0.0005079306,0.0020002848,0.008867683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042632297,0.00018991053,0.00017595635,0.000760238,0.042839713,0.005263825,0.0043759644,0.0033134555,0.00059004617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008332175,0.000003491344,0.00016872944,0.000019717847,0.0000016526249,0.000057437315,0.005993971,0.00007436635,0.0000555752,0.9907684,0.0010057176,0.0018426767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017203673,0.00003750939,0.0013192941,0.00019602844,0.000008269808,0.0003610301,0.013111189,0.00036201807,0.00024905507,0.8476155,0.13670301,0.000019885441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031683636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002862111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008867683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045174714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022829454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032776654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103169171","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00320.x","title":"NATURAL GOODNESS AND NATURAL EVIL","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Natural (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Action (physics); Function (biology); Morality; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.01787471168403942,"score_gpt":0.22444757767453527,"score_spread":0.20657286599049585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103169171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08715881,0.0056011104,0.0669075,0.050525878,0.00078480016,0.00005189426,0.00013761153,0.000115894014,0.78871655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989677,0.0003600534,0.0031756472,0.0014040078,0.00016394784,0.000031523196,0.000025539879,0.000036566707,0.0051255673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945152,0.0036282032,0.00015117209,0.0004769333,0.0008269841,0.00040146665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99452484,0.0032001447,0.00046736153,0.0005986545,0.00081361004,0.0003953515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039021834,0.000402018,0.0005023049,0.0022822202,0.0032280502,0.0054515856,0.0007671878,0.002275862,0.006195972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009449135,0.00020750883,0.0005006419,0.001140079,0.049462304,0.0063736974,0.0042428277,0.0038194184,0.00048008098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059085205,0.0000039459583,0.00014137039,0.000012448646,0.0000023569921,0.000020799778,0.00043420718,0.00011222185,0.000028607772,0.99772614,0.0004847413,0.0010272121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031692427,0.0000056612957,0.0001928359,0.000020837779,0.0000019975357,0.000037996637,0.00033238443,0.00021652381,0.00003932027,0.99258703,0.006558578,0.0000036685824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012911488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010986719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006195972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003575767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009949034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025944173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104708730","doi":"10.1353/hms.2013.0003","title":"Hume on the Normativity of Practical Reasons","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Action (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Reading (process); Practical reason; Relation (database); Value (mathematics); Computer science","score_opus":0.2586557929718325,"score_gpt":0.3482191373926071,"score_spread":0.08956334442077463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104708730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03240937,0.011048085,0.102707915,0.04567054,0.00083535607,0.00005906112,0.0001867668,0.00018791202,0.8068951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94021314,0.0017979635,0.016503865,0.0040188157,0.00064211467,0.00014315796,0.00008779809,0.0001364938,0.036456667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98962283,0.00709541,0.00033513387,0.0010765501,0.0012843496,0.0005857438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914204,0.0058967187,0.0004893867,0.0010567496,0.0008995843,0.00023716774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005939014,0.0005266068,0.00058919843,0.0013422545,0.0041828793,0.0061827092,0.0009813252,0.0030370178,0.0036127628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00940906,0.00035392432,0.0009274406,0.0009219979,0.040014412,0.007984603,0.0030059416,0.0043427036,0.00084711483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004548333,0.0000018959912,0.000044098902,0.000012492818,0.0000017341459,0.000012967379,0.0011459203,0.00009111444,0.000027792601,0.9967334,0.0007867259,0.0011373437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057766074,0.0000048715588,0.000100053236,0.000040166567,0.0000021793298,0.00002756801,0.00044449195,0.00023998822,0.000077184966,0.9622752,0.036776792,0.0000058427495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029721428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002594691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061827092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041861897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022508693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031408846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106553169","doi":"10.1017/s0012217310000193","title":"Transcendental Idealism: What Jerusalem Has To Say to Königsberg","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Transcendental number; Idealism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Transcendental idealism; Object (grammar); History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05192786967047801,"score_gpt":0.25953643140988575,"score_spread":0.20760856173940773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106553169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046050206,0.05625713,0.007396683,0.29118958,0.004320156,0.000018916824,0.00008121656,0.00013351353,0.5945526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958581,0.0061626444,0.001386632,0.012067731,0.0014536083,0.000028543456,0.000044367356,0.00010697893,0.020168552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995621,0.0026918205,0.00012078453,0.00037474887,0.000748077,0.00044344715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966299,0.0020900397,0.00020123796,0.0003484393,0.0004003444,0.00033003258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064875283,0.00048553472,0.00084417046,0.0017107982,0.00810788,0.009800307,0.0010509399,0.0030120383,0.0054896465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007963954,0.00024424188,0.00030290204,0.0012096461,0.04261291,0.008277471,0.0043132706,0.0053762486,0.0009344817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012941339,0.000011453239,0.000049352046,0.00002994318,0.0000023379973,0.000027210794,0.005295583,0.00004808158,0.000025681662,0.9843531,0.006278153,0.0038661559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017672057,0.000011781999,0.00020049227,0.00024816016,0.0000048746547,0.00004520531,0.0046487036,0.00017151482,0.00007416679,0.83222735,0.16233496,0.000015036803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006517548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00581343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009800307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008066687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002671509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058528185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109738286","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0001","title":"The Normativity of Experience and Causal Belief in Hume’s Treatise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Virtue; Normative; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Reading (process); Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07754068466772332,"score_gpt":0.3082682923114094,"score_spread":0.23072760764368608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109738286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03249963,0.018350402,0.20043877,0.080257684,0.0012643235,0.00007246675,0.00014488533,0.00015179986,0.66682005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510044,0.0038197231,0.014137223,0.0053665345,0.0013881724,0.00014826628,0.00004815747,0.00008101521,0.02400654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949221,0.0034212938,0.00013989603,0.00051515986,0.0006237988,0.00037759138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588144,0.0031150584,0.00024171371,0.00034427355,0.00031024346,0.000107334716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046549,0.0005361489,0.00052761694,0.0015962062,0.003671703,0.005735634,0.0011460831,0.004182973,0.00243386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006104811,0.00030898605,0.0007949735,0.0011492228,0.03291874,0.007567165,0.0022068354,0.005012053,0.00042519902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024959265,0.000001899096,0.00002900221,0.00000902531,0.0000016866298,0.0000116575175,0.0010543665,0.00009745308,0.0000114910445,0.9976547,0.0004786171,0.0006476485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042305173,0.0000059398876,0.00009245583,0.00004096608,0.000003578852,0.000022263037,0.00033819844,0.0003578627,0.000072377414,0.98121476,0.017840426,0.000006979781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037450239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003137968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005735634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004913468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018140138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035649836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110418961","doi":"10.1353/hms.2004.a383297","title":"Hume's Recantation of His Theory of Personal Identity","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Excuse; Personal identity; Identity (music); Epistemology; Philosophy; Perception; Interpretation (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Aesthetics; Law; Computer science; Self","score_opus":0.15120276562222848,"score_gpt":0.32972160309493853,"score_spread":0.17851883747271005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110418961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017309846,0.04820508,0.020427579,0.4140125,0.004494818,0.000039784827,0.00011893334,0.00012992971,0.49526158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79861516,0.012659886,0.0057308236,0.048295934,0.0044322843,0.000110238194,0.00007454331,0.0001756984,0.12990554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921383,0.005321994,0.00015932259,0.00067462336,0.0013706681,0.00033502933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933809,0.00413037,0.00032620318,0.0007242236,0.0010859614,0.00035237402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005769364,0.0006286174,0.0006029627,0.0016678117,0.007693692,0.0071342518,0.0012274255,0.0055340943,0.0037440935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011219269,0.0003435678,0.00043299186,0.0012032464,0.042500205,0.009115239,0.0039164284,0.008857613,0.0014444751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072567236,0.0000058161017,0.00011212118,0.000018391362,0.000003525616,0.000043158765,0.008862046,0.000056904464,0.000016740112,0.9600649,0.026619198,0.0041899546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011826424,0.00001657493,0.00037523473,0.00021039527,0.000004477043,0.00026492475,0.0045036604,0.00024721352,0.0001238923,0.6321305,0.36209664,0.000014749965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070443004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051218793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007693692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006521847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032129162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04731953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110690164","doi":"10.7202/000443ar","title":"Le cognitivisme moral de Habermas fait-il face au problème de Frege-Geach?1","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Epistemology","score_opus":0.17784686790233115,"score_gpt":0.32145252318386397,"score_spread":0.14360565528153282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110690164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050115395,0.015212879,0.089448586,0.3194079,0.0023782798,0.0000474134,0.00010724548,0.00021307594,0.52306926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90749305,0.004155915,0.0116838245,0.014037067,0.001013418,0.00008132906,0.000047182322,0.00017362034,0.0613146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580413,0.002397815,0.00008512276,0.00066442473,0.0007230406,0.00032544864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713385,0.0014884996,0.00027570076,0.000478495,0.000469858,0.00015362819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051744226,0.00063200376,0.00057851616,0.0009869166,0.0046589538,0.00705735,0.0014027194,0.005606667,0.008626723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008324367,0.0003439901,0.00049862405,0.0010866051,0.026906123,0.0138189215,0.0033321101,0.007833436,0.001603725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004328732,0.0000028420645,0.000047798658,0.000008607505,0.0000013126461,0.0000073774086,0.0011546104,0.000027849672,0.000024203875,0.9959258,0.0013304283,0.001464908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004777902,0.000010032966,0.00018702204,0.000070914044,0.000004342736,0.000052583273,0.0021534462,0.00023595241,0.00013952122,0.9428127,0.054317072,0.000011609678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005919666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006555825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008626723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058758184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041516284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042632163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112883038","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300018692","title":"Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and AgencyMichael Bratman Cambridge Studies in Philosophy New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999, xiii + 288 pp., $59.95, $18.95 paper","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.10387262063268715,"score_gpt":0.26390298520201183,"score_spread":0.16003036456932468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112883038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024940036,0.2724074,0.013489244,0.19121854,0.0064676963,0.0000448288,0.0001004503,0.00004044429,0.4912914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71631426,0.11906455,0.004090183,0.0101688,0.004716791,0.00014312702,0.00011170644,0.00013798944,0.14525272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856144,0.00091565517,0.00004720087,0.0001273341,0.00024829208,0.00010004696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705327,0.0024334795,0.000105416606,0.000093392155,0.00018276196,0.00013163862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025670326,0.0006550183,0.0004260868,0.00078492885,0.0029455954,0.00542464,0.00058786507,0.0023344883,0.006704787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048683435,0.00039594775,0.00038698385,0.0011787724,0.012446804,0.008741669,0.0013896981,0.0041107764,0.0009292215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002740741,0.000030531293,0.00029590743,0.00012266713,0.0000078082285,0.00010364747,0.024921242,0.00013345838,0.00011485449,0.9029034,0.055645887,0.015693106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021253387,0.000030040588,0.002190618,0.00079442165,0.0000135354985,0.0001896038,0.021717085,0.0003006703,0.00022624189,0.50395155,0.47053948,0.00002546734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034921996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003967509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006704787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028983238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017354871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022429705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113814435","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.uph31-62.cemh","title":"La condition d’ouverture et l’état d’élancement vers : Métaphysique de la vie chez Hegel","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Universitas Philosophica","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.012145906725908739,"score_gpt":0.2493516822985287,"score_spread":0.23720577557261996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113814435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14593373,0.010875457,0.0687295,0.022651488,0.0005973042,0.000036578364,0.00008276491,0.00011419717,0.750979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96033293,0.0016213576,0.0034220337,0.0007426686,0.00016640333,0.00003253478,0.000022068763,0.00005601005,0.03360398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997638,0.0012435183,0.00008241237,0.00029866278,0.000420452,0.00031696275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988397,0.0006944669,0.00009841438,0.00016261403,0.0001359828,0.00006884119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023356348,0.0003512346,0.00039348067,0.00092493754,0.0034192658,0.0054998063,0.0006307912,0.0027266159,0.005771722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031065429,0.00030629945,0.00038013124,0.0007077499,0.030323017,0.00780665,0.0034069552,0.004359407,0.0007061455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032371788,0.0000014514277,0.000044359484,0.000009396918,0.0000010800752,0.000018131768,0.0028704938,0.0000522371,0.00009057804,0.9958087,0.0002001878,0.0009001165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071265245,0.0000118884145,0.0004035442,0.00006163504,0.0000041681033,0.000120654026,0.005391584,0.00029194253,0.000503343,0.95553225,0.03765411,0.000017886956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061339713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053051123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061339713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005444018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025554164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039499342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118633274","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9809.2010.00861.x","title":"Dissenting Heads and Hearts: Joseph Priestley, Anna Barbauld, and Conflicting Attitudes towards Devotion within Rational Dissent","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious History","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Passion; Dissent; Sublime; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.029033027929674018,"score_gpt":0.26952618984026505,"score_spread":0.24049316191059103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118633274","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09020146,0.015228706,0.0038227558,0.75456053,0.00262078,0.00002911132,0.00001866553,0.000047839618,0.1334702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92249674,0.0021645434,0.0017823768,0.06075047,0.0013709479,0.000047287074,0.00000621573,0.000056719113,0.011324627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824974,0.012834617,0.00024209717,0.0012766023,0.002164877,0.00098441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96609885,0.027333783,0.0014887298,0.0008863708,0.002068567,0.0021236707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020098347,0.0004303144,0.00071407633,0.0017950123,0.020115212,0.013704192,0.002769315,0.012483266,0.002580735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03769942,0.00053906895,0.00035641924,0.00094026007,0.05937114,0.009253427,0.006410669,0.015315255,0.0005287679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044577813,0.000028272138,0.00037230478,0.000035679528,0.000010886614,0.00029150586,0.08427231,0.00012187517,0.00013589897,0.8830939,0.026970828,0.0046219006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070844624,0.000034325785,0.0010775824,0.00049377047,0.000023290357,0.000309264,0.07723281,0.00092864933,0.00052178773,0.74251765,0.17668897,0.000100980156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101396255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012471251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020115212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072768806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003953045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10629147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119510605","doi":"10.1353/hms.2002.a385862","title":"The Passions, Character, and the Self in Hume","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Reading (process); Identity (music); Character (mathematics); Philosophy; Contradiction; Self; Reflexive pronoun; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Personal identity; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Aesthetics; Psychology; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10457654206679295,"score_gpt":0.26964561986111935,"score_spread":0.1650690777943264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119510605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01808485,0.12833056,0.0023031314,0.063964985,0.0012188051,0.000030673178,0.00005569067,0.000047403002,0.78596395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7390102,0.041923612,0.0011383109,0.011681971,0.0027860217,0.00008587821,0.0000443238,0.00008276978,0.2032468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984113,0.0011345727,0.000021701733,0.000075248536,0.0002358368,0.00012138333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998701,0.0008799411,0.00010040535,0.00006602596,0.00012295796,0.00012970946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001364063,0.0004869184,0.00033661566,0.0010801882,0.0060201427,0.0077183363,0.0004693942,0.0019713806,0.0040926947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025051474,0.00015475246,0.00013646066,0.0013173549,0.024550825,0.004413858,0.0020087634,0.0026511753,0.00091321475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013438323,0.00001715473,0.00031703874,0.00006372796,0.0000028907584,0.00008716778,0.05192615,0.00005235878,0.000046570553,0.8903244,0.044969324,0.012179705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010615034,0.000017262517,0.0012723248,0.000500921,0.0000041856842,0.00021407804,0.025141021,0.0000792379,0.00010997201,0.2610507,0.7115872,0.000012499148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008694798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012132627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008694798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005069434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027311721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03678149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121360315","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400002004","title":"Justice and Virtue in Kant's Account of Marriage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Duty; Subject (documents); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Law; Theology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.059091600755805634,"score_gpt":0.29918316355666086,"score_spread":0.24009156280085522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121360315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01911882,0.10692526,0.017608246,0.041090928,0.00072785304,0.000030193074,0.00010736272,0.00006237313,0.81432897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8908818,0.020290682,0.004019298,0.007665684,0.0013186199,0.00008493234,0.000063331245,0.00003046809,0.07564522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985928,0.00088192074,0.00002759732,0.000105181505,0.0002447162,0.00014774872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971634,0.00014485802,0.000025133975,0.00003441503,0.00005037499,0.000028848552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013683263,0.00031509335,0.00031656606,0.001031085,0.0028328178,0.0043787244,0.0006276551,0.0023444758,0.0031800081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013317257,0.0001805511,0.00028772728,0.0011902949,0.012991911,0.0036982554,0.0014304032,0.0026039358,0.0005627772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023564944,0.0000017798885,0.000025128344,0.000008725349,6.940434e-7,0.00000775399,0.00027724725,0.00007446674,0.000005241191,0.9968527,0.0014462606,0.0012976466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032671776,0.0000034638576,0.0001346385,0.000029354163,0.000001403472,0.000026294216,0.00020136965,0.00012621537,0.000015582375,0.96251744,0.036938496,0.0000025132442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006106886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057240427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006106886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044976454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024660162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032632887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122532684","doi":"10.1017/s001221730000305x","title":"Y a-t-il des sentiments moraux?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychic; Morality; Normative; Atomism; Psychology; Epistemology; Assertion; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.059027412116098556,"score_gpt":0.2538275601459565,"score_spread":0.19480014802985793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122532684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14987972,0.015068431,0.019517753,0.167204,0.005785131,0.00005934482,0.00036031567,0.00023486985,0.6418904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9218006,0.0033002193,0.0019182293,0.005512128,0.001152616,0.000042819403,0.00007367156,0.00006201212,0.066137746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998257,0.0010964323,0.00003421574,0.00016621349,0.00028706083,0.00015902155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895954,0.00049612613,0.0001574012,0.00004603808,0.00024040013,0.00010037092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018904266,0.00044007928,0.00036882074,0.00060501316,0.0025472897,0.0046668435,0.00024273824,0.0020930942,0.009031573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051756403,0.00014713262,0.0004109075,0.00048879994,0.004549637,0.0033523317,0.000931679,0.0032777288,0.0016275219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024969698,0.00004072298,0.003541884,0.0001457459,0.00006123466,0.0011611402,0.019625492,0.00045044537,0.0030046836,0.9056857,0.03888142,0.027151788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006066045,0.00010621932,0.009588564,0.00034619117,0.00003885932,0.0015590865,0.03671337,0.0029189053,0.002087846,0.15597469,0.7905175,0.00008820759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010458432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005061081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010458432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003966885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070451945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030213594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125824432","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.503.x","title":"MULGAN'S FUTURE PEOPLE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Morality; Economic Justice; Subject (documents); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02375246985948648,"score_gpt":0.24439729856487882,"score_spread":0.22064482870539234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125824432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006455258,0.016258802,0.0047124824,0.19537711,0.0048804022,0.000029412597,0.00010076433,0.000059812814,0.77212596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2874595,0.013951922,0.004217043,0.06492119,0.0020687045,0.00017732348,0.00010217071,0.00011734995,0.62698483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998971,0.000539337,0.000020551524,0.00012079746,0.00022097267,0.00012731904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992424,0.00039218555,0.000052847332,0.000056308832,0.00014894147,0.00010726062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014416929,0.00036631795,0.0002580069,0.0006261879,0.004451929,0.0030644247,0.00049516244,0.002532449,0.012034403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026827203,0.00017608826,0.00021763695,0.00038702777,0.0062780096,0.005927101,0.002003563,0.0037257774,0.0017823755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008622547,0.000007602683,0.00009157709,0.00003117715,0.0000012844047,0.000047388476,0.0041029616,0.00003533259,0.000034124892,0.8408622,0.14532197,0.009455789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030266344,0.000009024486,0.00018887814,0.00012523758,0.0000013868155,0.00013806332,0.0022005215,0.000091305636,0.000060924838,0.14994466,0.84723026,0.0000067680385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037170846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008697621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012034403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023968266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019928587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040259123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126986705","doi":"10.7202/000441ar","title":"Intentions rationnelles et acceptations en délibération","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.2543283869256371,"score_gpt":0.3900832778551951,"score_spread":0.135754890929558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126986705","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22632325,0.002539668,0.4345542,0.018695815,0.0005681164,0.00020988859,0.00014785375,0.00031403554,0.31664717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575631,0.00047824392,0.03174525,0.00073513796,0.00009373258,0.0001781827,0.000054805758,0.0000779876,0.009073597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96554935,0.021088816,0.0019772514,0.0032862094,0.0069495314,0.0011488033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581138,0.024567202,0.005582102,0.0050932104,0.005498999,0.0011447242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020986455,0.0006672067,0.00058648584,0.0012257729,0.0020785173,0.00943674,0.0012674545,0.0026052797,0.0045070597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04017696,0.0005358329,0.0011660168,0.0010931159,0.022467937,0.010251673,0.005003132,0.0044144597,0.00073217467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005405712,0.000021308406,0.0013758711,0.00010484965,0.0000315805,0.000049204504,0.00594547,0.001027289,0.00033421908,0.9840326,0.00029871392,0.006724888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056885696,0.00010111604,0.002491911,0.00016909867,0.000046079436,0.00013979575,0.0050736354,0.00450306,0.0014833197,0.96588737,0.01998373,0.000063970685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028615734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022157065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020986455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036571159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032883785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11098832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127840338","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403833","title":"Physical Objects and Moral Wrongness: Hume on the \"Fallacy\" in Wollaston's Moral Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Relevance (law); Moral psychology; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.11041647883301023,"score_gpt":0.30104608478364064,"score_spread":0.19062960595063042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127840338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06926648,0.024697224,0.087499835,0.23123446,0.00233277,0.00005861486,0.00007828096,0.00013516234,0.5846971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465944,0.003933032,0.008936676,0.013259573,0.00079608936,0.0000762725,0.000019770332,0.000094772695,0.026289346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942694,0.0040155887,0.00010903686,0.00037137434,0.00093937095,0.00029533936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443084,0.004062631,0.00033747128,0.00050812034,0.000465853,0.00019503868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061023002,0.00053876534,0.0006244179,0.0016623029,0.0055873757,0.0064372728,0.0011080767,0.0050761173,0.0026299122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077897306,0.00036670282,0.00042058103,0.0010326648,0.074463375,0.010101953,0.0048307003,0.006370611,0.00054068473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005167544,0.00000517979,0.00007169483,0.0000142753415,0.0000020199298,0.000038567105,0.0032496788,0.000101864214,0.000020186751,0.9919208,0.002395785,0.0021747109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039550105,0.0000054437337,0.000099755925,0.000057691923,0.0000019782817,0.00003441163,0.001141435,0.00016100719,0.000059704733,0.9792077,0.019219844,0.0000070315123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00354109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025600733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064372728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032376032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018749393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0322724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129005847","doi":"10.1017/s001221731300111x","title":"Authenticity and the Limits of Philosophy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Essentialism; Existentialism; Epistemology; Identity (music); Virtue; Autonomy; Philosophy; Personal identity; Aesthetics; Sociology; Self; Law","score_opus":0.05067893851390196,"score_gpt":0.24123436595202385,"score_spread":0.1905554274381219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129005847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059066344,0.03911142,0.09338283,0.12991746,0.0010426962,0.00008186129,0.00006438241,0.00016850528,0.6771645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703563,0.0045621637,0.010813899,0.00389117,0.0005997346,0.00012138813,0.00002313538,0.000071887785,0.009560195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97717446,0.017273517,0.00054987107,0.0015296318,0.002667459,0.00080513535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98311114,0.011915433,0.00072893244,0.0024849758,0.00096674287,0.0007927355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016205031,0.0005448384,0.0008744364,0.0017623721,0.0071698516,0.013942816,0.001371957,0.0045876643,0.0029127183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014314056,0.00045463737,0.0006325072,0.00096313574,0.10903571,0.017346835,0.011189337,0.009329723,0.0006627836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026548196,0.0000042759193,0.000033064145,0.0000149438665,0.0000014257056,0.0000121114845,0.0019058384,0.000046058412,0.000020993511,0.9963811,0.00023934759,0.0013381788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003245715,0.000004942102,0.000026198151,0.00003880656,8.124416e-7,0.000023602039,0.00059773924,0.00011289192,0.000023572029,0.9880163,0.011149532,0.0000022998302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012584656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006718942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016205031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061870413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046049627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085701406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129334298","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002705","title":"The Philosophical Challenge of September 11Tom Rockmore, Joseph Margolis, and Armen T. Marsoobian, editors Metaphilosophy Series in Philosophy Cornwall, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2005, vii + 218 pp., $38.95 paper","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphilosophy; Publishing; Philosophy; Series (stratigraphy); Art history; Theology; Political science; Art; Western philosophy; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.037158253707114536,"score_gpt":0.22464955539657286,"score_spread":0.18749130168945832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129334298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038517552,0.047010332,0.00056719495,0.8922946,0.018685466,0.000006623653,0.000044481803,0.000027324484,0.040978815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05945268,0.15040118,0.005262959,0.31465757,0.097433366,0.00021057074,0.00029162536,0.00065960654,0.37163043],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926428,0.0037962333,0.00019408067,0.0006498796,0.0021867545,0.0005302831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893852,0.0067152125,0.0002748137,0.0003501757,0.0015876801,0.0016870317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010632669,0.00072004367,0.0011139086,0.00110414,0.0069510825,0.010986119,0.0013416627,0.007782881,0.031582724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014095882,0.00072680437,0.00059022615,0.0012271438,0.0111583,0.015564129,0.0062586763,0.018753374,0.010052553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013538512,0.000011832465,0.000028822446,0.0000446772,0.0000025407173,0.000032622287,0.00081238156,0.000031040334,0.00002803041,0.06960756,0.9209412,0.008445713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067838837,0.000004124188,0.000114952076,0.00020507634,0.0000015913237,0.000040846444,0.0011630754,0.000035515393,0.000028053944,0.035383705,0.9630087,0.000007663957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011063049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020153029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031582724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009731636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008966405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10565472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130501124","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0149.2006.414_3.x","title":"The Future for Philosophy ‐ Edited by Brian Leiter","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Books","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Adam smith; Philosophy; Computer science; Library science; Economics","score_opus":0.024091213370265575,"score_gpt":0.23275046046156975,"score_spread":0.20865924709130418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130501124","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008698682,0.4341228,0.0029621713,0.13884768,0.04363241,0.000035733945,0.0002913374,0.0002295458,0.37900847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022138283,0.15793097,0.0023223904,0.018082488,0.008825458,0.00008201387,0.00020589402,0.0002131996,0.7901993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996222,0.00015190653,0.000017275419,0.000040164217,0.00013402737,0.000034371707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994099,0.0002664706,0.000028629745,0.000057954367,0.00016110216,0.00007602919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009375241,0.0008189744,0.00061239116,0.0013929178,0.0017836068,0.004246109,0.0006211107,0.0016076548,0.029033182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018036796,0.0005237073,0.00035249407,0.001447783,0.0036956999,0.0046611633,0.002118633,0.0046933023,0.009741057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012525676,0.000011078332,0.000036890007,0.00014099559,0.000003962915,0.000018766003,0.00069900765,0.000111069225,0.0000991517,0.20680065,0.75482184,0.03724418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032050066,0.000002370311,0.00007274553,0.00016854267,0.000001183015,0.000029674064,0.00030066617,0.00004112997,0.00003874748,0.045426503,0.9539124,0.000002895482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004880086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011488806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029033182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002631086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00394998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09712565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133696524","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990392","title":"On Sidgwick's Demise: A Reply to Professor Deigh","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Philosophy; Suspect; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.03839211748810955,"score_gpt":0.281089518611169,"score_spread":0.24269740112305943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133696524","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018609599,0.0031038013,0.00008441329,0.98881054,0.006834145,0.0000021969895,0.000007416756,0.000004687335,0.00096667866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0064349743,0.0024944618,0.0002257638,0.97698385,0.009916982,0.000016982838,0.0000074047903,0.00003555686,0.0038839846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865306,0.005562493,0.0010368694,0.002146165,0.003549373,0.0011743947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9438223,0.04342759,0.0013915703,0.0013677819,0.006171544,0.0038191802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020786002,0.0012391183,0.0017400625,0.0014999048,0.012105402,0.009528446,0.0055632764,0.052327156,0.0050149527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060508683,0.0009174245,0.0014594976,0.0021416221,0.029343901,0.019495329,0.009275302,0.08949943,0.0020870455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029145478,0.000011554209,0.00012827986,0.00007567999,0.000008414785,0.00029682633,0.0029569636,0.00004221045,0.00007801542,0.054187823,0.93654066,0.005644338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026538622,0.000018246288,0.00026112693,0.00048275883,0.000007849158,0.0003633083,0.0051539643,0.0001105467,0.00020756567,0.036810096,0.9564915,0.00006660695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038500976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047079425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052327156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010643067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0151701085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10992819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135295270","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0018","title":"Reply to Radcliffe and Garrett","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Passions; Reading (process); Passion; Pleasure; Scholarship; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Epistemology; Action (physics); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.19322902718279242,"score_gpt":0.3086243724035595,"score_spread":0.11539534522076708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135295270","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000107789114,0.003038849,0.00004612482,0.954256,0.04097177,0.000008681213,0.000025831027,0.000027900474,0.0015170876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001374456,0.0012391115,0.00007581528,0.97658324,0.014000171,0.000033339755,0.000012033014,0.00003518057,0.0066467077],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489623,0.0014451954,0.00044379596,0.001040366,0.0016562887,0.0005181071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796561,0.010763335,0.0010563225,0.0009618734,0.0049218824,0.0026404979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008468687,0.0016474443,0.002255994,0.0019164964,0.0058664116,0.0064589563,0.0044462387,0.04484709,0.01324961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05001412,0.0015426655,0.0015815098,0.0018387572,0.006356393,0.007303237,0.0036310323,0.0604287,0.009689154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005457851,0.0000032625826,0.000030493513,0.000018054976,0.0000016662275,0.00006545827,0.00007927539,0.000004478041,0.000010632837,0.00059647486,0.9980835,0.0011013927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002043465,0.000016685513,0.0004257968,0.00045139014,0.000013038337,0.00064970576,0.0010607284,0.000059519713,0.00013068246,0.0025803654,0.9945422,0.000049511294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013030568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013658693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04484709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092906505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076986114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06740868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138030685","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0003","title":"Filling the Gaps in Hume's Vacuums","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Interpreter; Space (punctuation); Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.1722157259676711,"score_gpt":0.32769574382193845,"score_spread":0.15548001785426735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138030685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04817782,0.025230912,0.116852984,0.17016426,0.0023337572,0.000052341045,0.00011107038,0.00027370584,0.6368032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562701,0.0039109583,0.00902502,0.008176684,0.0009022274,0.00011537391,0.000032211978,0.00015044065,0.021416884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98644626,0.009344411,0.00032752406,0.00089418195,0.0019708385,0.0010167295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99009144,0.0073609375,0.00059302506,0.0008705855,0.00078879204,0.0002953325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010683537,0.0006386252,0.0008881971,0.0031107306,0.010092797,0.008251095,0.0013741053,0.005180538,0.0041530496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015974825,0.00047199678,0.0007051455,0.0021776285,0.050120864,0.018349946,0.0076059015,0.008521466,0.000796226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002788749,0.0000019042315,0.000016208303,0.000011570469,9.0046683e-7,0.000013668182,0.0025716447,0.00003602563,0.00000788347,0.99523973,0.0009966705,0.0011010207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004170552,0.0000046648934,0.00003729366,0.000082702994,0.000002227287,0.00002408204,0.0014279333,0.00014772902,0.00007503605,0.9634646,0.034723096,0.000006424385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030971267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026744173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010683537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070037995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00424338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056500614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W214042703","doi":"10.7202/1044607ar","title":"Self-Other Asymmetry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Duty; Action (physics); Law and economics; Epistemology; Principle of double effect; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.030726874325509614,"score_gpt":0.25289032879706846,"score_spread":0.22216345447155886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W214042703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021728514,0.0015606962,0.08732472,0.025666181,0.0013311991,0.00007097423,0.000119987315,0.0001738868,0.86202383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91609734,0.0010542772,0.012394506,0.008507074,0.0010761268,0.00017810737,0.00012137797,0.00021595598,0.0603552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934633,0.0023375347,0.0002378748,0.0011299623,0.0021317939,0.00069961883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994072,0.0021641555,0.0005367391,0.0017395905,0.0010185573,0.00046894583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00639641,0.0005237922,0.00085115916,0.0012369645,0.0037683109,0.00525456,0.0017503019,0.0039898255,0.017758584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009063055,0.00030081588,0.0011270634,0.000614313,0.014704559,0.011813666,0.0066510574,0.0069380007,0.002793679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038167027,0.0000032870796,0.000039154107,0.000011391299,0.0000021240476,0.000022228358,0.00026973156,0.00002484238,0.0000579125,0.9975656,0.0006351082,0.0013647898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000101073865,0.000013565947,0.00013580528,0.00003779166,0.000007551976,0.00015162432,0.00024882337,0.00031746275,0.00025976068,0.9621392,0.03667045,0.000007878295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008793515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005761561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017758584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002452075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019936468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059408367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140715034","doi":"10.7202/1072605ar","title":"Ethical Habituation and Pleasure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Virtue; Habituation; Reading (process); Psychology; Character (mathematics); Social psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.09439292826643782,"score_gpt":0.23559603912481952,"score_spread":0.14120311085838172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140715034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22622882,0.006988222,0.016119644,0.02367692,0.0005056475,0.00006001086,0.000049056056,0.00009807277,0.7262736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98811185,0.00077026244,0.0009748453,0.001226314,0.00012238562,0.000026768099,0.000010833396,0.00001873856,0.0087380605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800175,0.0011213162,0.00006010881,0.00023734983,0.00027748584,0.00030200245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971963,0.0012420123,0.0002896417,0.00046227884,0.00023431619,0.0005753756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025931504,0.00015530086,0.00024705756,0.00051221123,0.0015833155,0.003590957,0.00039059698,0.00121796,0.0046688174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049566114,0.00013818264,0.00032455157,0.00035432132,0.02621391,0.003837555,0.0041523576,0.00256225,0.00049139996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019043347,0.0000354974,0.0015894335,0.000031573305,0.0000057660873,0.00014599237,0.0056005954,0.00010364591,0.00021061592,0.97899765,0.0018119877,0.011448206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001855789,0.000053602238,0.005143511,0.00009831451,0.000004940653,0.000498935,0.003537962,0.0003188791,0.0002888059,0.94313824,0.04687815,0.000020026102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067821535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050954876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046688174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011073912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011043014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015618801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141018876","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990094","title":"Utilitarianism and Psychological Realism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Realism; Flourishing; Normative; Epistemology; Empirical psychology; Value (mathematics); Moral realism; Philosophy; Philosophical realism; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Moral psychology; Economics; Theoretical psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1057381843068476,"score_gpt":0.30573340685169004,"score_spread":0.19999522254484242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141018876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034559827,0.016200604,0.13273503,0.12477648,0.0012331693,0.000084696745,0.00010135241,0.000136701,0.6901722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9515641,0.002960895,0.012668331,0.00698156,0.0017560615,0.00018984373,0.00005666225,0.00010752277,0.02371514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843919,0.010076971,0.0005536177,0.001170196,0.0029531922,0.00085406966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863963,0.009172293,0.00087350653,0.0015727197,0.0013753147,0.00060980726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013135987,0.0006355982,0.00075307867,0.001919272,0.0033660512,0.008025675,0.0014390273,0.0051006,0.0039392654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014937457,0.0004104966,0.00083092664,0.0012780725,0.049361728,0.008162454,0.0054592565,0.008130444,0.0009547503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021428048,0.000002691914,0.000023089493,0.0000107289,0.0000016075442,0.0000071924583,0.00030243013,0.00008126548,0.000018484898,0.9985537,0.00036308749,0.0006334991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038289686,0.0000030482283,0.00002849126,0.000019524881,0.0000010003505,0.000011210796,0.00008451244,0.00015724191,0.000019367379,0.99312747,0.0065416917,0.0000026167836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097644667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006956543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013135987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061314055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022673125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069470584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142322623","doi":"","title":"Sidgwick's Philosophical Intuitions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenstarTs (Univeristy of Trieste https://www.units.it/)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Philosophy; Morality; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Intuitionism; Intuition; Internalism and externalism","score_opus":0.12804650781849417,"score_gpt":0.25975891580146815,"score_spread":0.13171240798297398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142322623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034505952,0.004033641,0.14166114,0.058719326,0.0012196855,0.00012878902,0.00050099776,0.00020723633,0.75902325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8799822,0.0020207244,0.06106061,0.0109478505,0.00053379056,0.00031947202,0.00021992576,0.00008389058,0.044831533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366564,0.0020932655,0.000495368,0.0013042646,0.0019665898,0.00047487838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647224,0.0014158584,0.00029991235,0.00077939715,0.00075668807,0.0002759028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008668665,0.0007740112,0.000624595,0.0023745063,0.0031370344,0.0059616193,0.0016044222,0.0031797271,0.0050728987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008693166,0.0004978029,0.0015586977,0.0012195093,0.022596957,0.008167725,0.0064192647,0.00650431,0.000883202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024388949,0.0000023984996,0.000029701765,0.000008704972,0.0000010941595,0.000009702618,0.00032454514,0.00008034511,0.000027402344,0.9978841,0.00069824717,0.0009312409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076095534,0.0000055072687,0.000115768264,0.000026616393,0.0000024224667,0.000050894116,0.00016095671,0.0003950496,0.000091801114,0.9713004,0.027834252,0.000008546125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036720051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024854064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008668665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069681597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036798986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050557733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142782002","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0234","title":"Can Hume Be Read as a Virtue Ethicist?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Subjectivism; Reading (process); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.16553087338598377,"score_gpt":0.3582634954299187,"score_spread":0.19273262204393493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142782002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028375529,0.020598786,0.031853195,0.39816856,0.005814612,0.000037946793,0.00006297505,0.00014309284,0.5149452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8766143,0.006357064,0.0074945358,0.043561228,0.003938437,0.00008850327,0.000039894552,0.000106777414,0.061799303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969562,0.0022010857,0.000055946195,0.00020781597,0.00036088887,0.0002179052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949149,0.0032419537,0.00042966995,0.00043389125,0.00061437563,0.00036517295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054884152,0.00036565258,0.00061069237,0.0010690296,0.004095444,0.0073564076,0.0009823982,0.0050896425,0.0059607355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011302804,0.00015888267,0.00030049658,0.00072049984,0.029978693,0.010065014,0.0028171209,0.005037514,0.0016947606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014809633,0.0000102064,0.00015116995,0.000051617993,0.000003667215,0.00003876183,0.0049034404,0.000050469698,0.00004895326,0.978462,0.008514402,0.0077504637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008677118,0.0000200992,0.00027798425,0.00018802145,0.000004618189,0.000070205235,0.004971702,0.00026496797,0.0002031888,0.88421994,0.109757625,0.000012874668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012630257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019557388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073564076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017603835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019044852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029025853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145197535","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400001862","title":"Three Accounts of Respect for Persons in Kant's Ethics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical imperative; Humanity; Morality; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Kantian ethics; Theology","score_opus":0.1668940697586506,"score_gpt":0.3492429151291736,"score_spread":0.182348845370523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145197535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019616256,0.031526495,0.049610645,0.05429712,0.0008240449,0.00009155802,0.00016360162,0.00012934438,0.8437408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87916404,0.017252216,0.020158203,0.011538276,0.0014570489,0.00045416076,0.00015930322,0.00014340361,0.069673344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944489,0.002600073,0.00020975084,0.00039254184,0.0016404414,0.0007082859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729246,0.0014459928,0.00031696178,0.00029853143,0.0004095253,0.00023650037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005874318,0.00056955544,0.0006157931,0.003022313,0.003376186,0.009252513,0.0016963902,0.0052210367,0.0046897396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062407744,0.00031777954,0.00060736696,0.0031819209,0.023194732,0.007496519,0.004310243,0.0045262547,0.0009050895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051486004,0.0000035824205,0.000053763197,0.000021329186,0.000001574514,0.0000097718275,0.0009847148,0.000055694254,0.000012600107,0.9959293,0.001203164,0.0017194201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009050515,0.000008751581,0.00027741882,0.00013630994,0.0000065845215,0.000051617415,0.0010791938,0.00020256269,0.000106025334,0.9380749,0.060037,0.000010596625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003107683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024041885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009252513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005989836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032624882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043459475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147878307","doi":"10.1111/nbfr.12100","title":"Pseudo-passions: Needless Categorization or Insightful Distinction?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Blackfriars","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Niagara College","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Categorization; Citation; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04874736855995399,"score_gpt":0.2503318464308383,"score_spread":0.2015844778708843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147878307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064120464,0.0041988967,0.20752597,0.27258593,0.004791656,0.0001943538,0.00040557038,0.00035875753,0.44581833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9150797,0.0012875218,0.032212146,0.020455485,0.002367092,0.0003866203,0.00023806198,0.00046233748,0.02751108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937643,0.0031134957,0.0003493979,0.001073585,0.0012208926,0.00047831913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98364604,0.007826369,0.0012735819,0.0037048613,0.002707868,0.0008413043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012653583,0.00078119553,0.0012220208,0.0024826133,0.0056247716,0.0083297575,0.00327513,0.0060948664,0.016191892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04157475,0.00054830365,0.0007905934,0.0013729236,0.038203478,0.041038625,0.0060555213,0.011748165,0.0021108366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012221369,0.0000066496896,0.00014251737,0.000016925915,0.0000030735052,0.000027709999,0.0021736526,0.000024512641,0.000032270334,0.9898212,0.0036325902,0.0041066613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008801939,0.0000052859177,0.00016341718,0.00004534423,0.000004650991,0.00006882558,0.002069799,0.00035383165,0.00007036983,0.9837389,0.013460677,0.0000100790085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024100568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026837154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016191892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027418165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031398435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06691939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148588350","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8284.2006.00591.x","title":"Virtuous act, virtuous dispositions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.012406729947253012,"score_gpt":0.21369277445304574,"score_spread":0.20128604450579274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148588350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049062386,0.00628661,0.014267468,0.031745687,0.00081732514,0.0000650404,0.00015438002,0.00006560293,0.89753556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665936,0.0029212446,0.0023984916,0.0019715854,0.00031042573,0.000073781535,0.00007443257,0.0000453957,0.025610993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959396,0.0023632927,0.00011722395,0.00035440284,0.0008417115,0.00038370548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943889,0.0030103663,0.0005821472,0.00072510884,0.0005620764,0.0007313164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003072028,0.00030872927,0.00029077564,0.0017972763,0.0042243144,0.008482544,0.00057801214,0.0016360895,0.0121059045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01085646,0.00018570888,0.00026131212,0.0024818953,0.027570195,0.00816262,0.004293476,0.0024497362,0.0011260916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012484494,0.000014229866,0.00059546134,0.000052022944,0.0000044683266,0.00006575181,0.005563909,0.00007190403,0.000035914745,0.9836782,0.0041955854,0.0057100975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010066824,0.000018196113,0.0022379577,0.0002526161,0.000007858855,0.00021696584,0.012060172,0.00021332319,0.00008285155,0.88664603,0.09824307,0.0000108409795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001679446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017961962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121059045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002433192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002748704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040498316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149352425","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0007","title":"Hume and the Prince of Thieves","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1543909979795257,"score_gpt":0.2845462467529152,"score_spread":0.13015524877338946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149352425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051397957,0.015848394,0.0037375817,0.09844264,0.0011596727,0.00002273726,0.00002970148,0.00005790138,0.8293035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8380912,0.0035230848,0.0009196184,0.012199329,0.0004281177,0.000023742943,0.000010386748,0.00004496283,0.14475955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961593,0.0029363781,0.000038247967,0.00020247824,0.0003530849,0.00031052035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722844,0.0015363626,0.00023630979,0.00023730415,0.00036430368,0.0003973316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026528814,0.00029091485,0.00027088742,0.00083655934,0.012738902,0.00712749,0.00044843912,0.0034208877,0.004604149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004919564,0.0001931347,0.00017535422,0.00046878099,0.035309285,0.005379284,0.003409741,0.0045044227,0.0012386669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001760421,0.000015618705,0.0003623076,0.000040959407,0.000005481181,0.00025359992,0.07226496,0.00006575815,0.00008724659,0.89677143,0.02270217,0.007412888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009074534,0.000028899161,0.0008074007,0.00024015595,0.0000064549445,0.0005383354,0.048372835,0.00015976651,0.000435902,0.273074,0.6763077,0.00001949096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045625325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008382788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012738902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028689192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026262128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020815551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151005154","doi":"10.1093/analys/ant048","title":"Luck, Value and Commitment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Consequentialism; Morality; Normative ethics; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Ethical theories; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Value theory; Ethical theory; Section (typography)","score_opus":0.02624050733589912,"score_gpt":0.2326509081501414,"score_spread":0.20641040081424228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151005154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037051756,0.062241137,0.0072654146,0.23381956,0.001825823,0.000047006393,0.000043893695,0.000038375598,0.657667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91043365,0.012406309,0.0017266606,0.013871482,0.0011828562,0.00008382636,0.000026674727,0.00008829232,0.060180202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893183,0.0075766537,0.00016248313,0.0005431723,0.001497211,0.00090213283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966074,0.0019679011,0.00028270925,0.0002671142,0.00030038474,0.0005745398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061677406,0.00051911455,0.00044170744,0.0010840374,0.006352518,0.012486671,0.0011641785,0.0048295725,0.0040693064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009402499,0.00031232028,0.00023650014,0.0014308617,0.060807377,0.009705172,0.0066546374,0.0071554333,0.00072306854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064465607,0.000005531401,0.00006599755,0.000020528552,0.0000014741773,0.000027087484,0.0066701365,0.000043771066,0.000028248733,0.9843084,0.0058945366,0.0029278402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007651738,0.000018278757,0.00044978884,0.0002602668,0.000002166496,0.000087234264,0.009398135,0.0001155427,0.0000719152,0.8157825,0.17379175,0.000014787827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051315273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003473855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012486671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008680888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004730447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062984586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153697664","doi":"10.1017/s1369415414000016","title":"Kant and the Art of Schematism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Connection (principal bundle); Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020084604638509595,"score_gpt":0.22723494352329862,"score_spread":0.20715033888478904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153697664","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013993329,0.5364594,0.01602209,0.14587268,0.0033140536,0.000020689133,0.00012239689,0.000085125524,0.28411022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81793547,0.13084766,0.0042491085,0.016456636,0.0037242987,0.0000640911,0.00009635868,0.00010755956,0.026518859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99156535,0.0059465603,0.00019421995,0.00037283613,0.001682066,0.00023897277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99350727,0.0044022244,0.00037760683,0.00054023875,0.0010496859,0.0001230187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005703909,0.00035728762,0.0005494287,0.0031179623,0.0018087934,0.006072412,0.0008306464,0.0027801543,0.003297344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009542249,0.00023858332,0.00037798603,0.0031279887,0.02075831,0.0052642794,0.0017973541,0.0047166185,0.00067275343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000796308,0.0000023730402,0.000036152553,0.0001599139,0.000007759618,0.000016175887,0.00084042415,0.0001583239,0.000037503112,0.9869889,0.006469467,0.0052751414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010489299,0.000010396818,0.00028234217,0.0011629929,0.000012906969,0.00009586382,0.0012366017,0.0002803628,0.00027310962,0.7135126,0.2831085,0.000013844238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030451082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022934536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006072412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049872412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038022231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036185145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154407704","doi":"10.29173/pandpr23430","title":"Mollenhauer’s hermeneutics: Tempting and Risky","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phenomenology & Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.033110878914813645,"score_gpt":0.26884154040990665,"score_spread":0.235730661495093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154407704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017370535,0.006795122,0.1545261,0.13976523,0.0033344382,0.00017554789,0.00021496929,0.00021307865,0.67760485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85262495,0.0032396882,0.038718,0.0116159795,0.0009691676,0.00034243453,0.00007399937,0.0002804675,0.09213523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902598,0.006966138,0.00028194,0.0007259872,0.0013326092,0.0004334648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911644,0.00638565,0.00039230887,0.0010762346,0.0007615895,0.00021973567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008961952,0.0005555471,0.00039893234,0.0013146019,0.0038744872,0.0067279013,0.0010255958,0.004888914,0.009431321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025342563,0.0004839464,0.00060481316,0.0009667764,0.03743426,0.011854428,0.00395795,0.0063146874,0.0016505632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007351255,0.0000034031577,0.0000475137,0.000015118344,0.0000020558484,0.000033646822,0.0031758014,0.00007162097,0.000030059853,0.9890155,0.004823787,0.0027742211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008560207,0.0000064779515,0.00013552677,0.00013063397,0.0000032488647,0.000109537614,0.0021175242,0.0006034506,0.0002217677,0.9031596,0.09348646,0.00001715615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002675579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035014746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009431321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037039942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029201186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047395885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154618067","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403835","title":"Sympathy, Understanding, and Hermeneutics in Hume's Treatise","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Hermeneutics; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Positivism; Psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.27167225521796384,"score_gpt":0.33435099895658943,"score_spread":0.06267874373862559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154618067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017236082,0.025924386,0.019601226,0.058296435,0.0014554649,0.0000433997,0.00005104691,0.00007469404,0.8773172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8352429,0.008102615,0.005903596,0.015419781,0.003143631,0.00029183965,0.000053901564,0.00012371395,0.13171801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99252445,0.0054243244,0.000110305446,0.00051793776,0.0009261358,0.00049686804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979665,0.0015486293,0.00012238842,0.00012907304,0.0001239542,0.00010937377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00426774,0.000531516,0.00046795636,0.0017404336,0.0077259513,0.008185641,0.00079541863,0.0041762963,0.0035684078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051594838,0.00020710124,0.00036068098,0.0015294185,0.04140459,0.0067664906,0.0031423385,0.0054616025,0.0005543782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034287727,0.0000030254657,0.000021797983,0.000010676965,0.0000010276268,0.000016832071,0.004973497,0.000050213723,0.00001217204,0.9903038,0.0030893262,0.0015140992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000616193,0.000011995454,0.0001666722,0.0001487097,0.0000034698462,0.000055649423,0.0034150658,0.00018478246,0.000109594796,0.7974455,0.19844005,0.000012409854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044417875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045111007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008185641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005531373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030321388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04013312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154905584","doi":"10.1353/cjp.0.0063","title":"From Thick to Thin: Two Moral Reduction Plans","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05836533605621926,"score_gpt":0.2532884893290386,"score_spread":0.1949231532728193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154905584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0308849,0.0016051033,0.14601526,0.051827215,0.001005416,0.00034608523,0.00030681488,0.00024880155,0.76776046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7772809,0.0012516666,0.10222224,0.009900704,0.00064069487,0.0011277441,0.00033385903,0.00042081278,0.106821194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942267,0.002507756,0.00018728636,0.00064469053,0.0018799903,0.000553567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956541,0.0016628529,0.00032541482,0.0008607283,0.0009913075,0.00050558243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055559888,0.0010144337,0.0005868157,0.0019781827,0.005329786,0.0070988582,0.0018598913,0.0039311256,0.0137366215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011632632,0.000752295,0.0011604743,0.0010292748,0.0301456,0.013018621,0.009320856,0.011027505,0.0021432012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007890822,0.000011110738,0.000035457284,0.000011399905,0.0000013885398,0.000016633541,0.00046353505,0.0000756047,0.00005007231,0.9958916,0.0014622477,0.0019730276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012902299,0.000008433885,0.00008787748,0.00002588817,0.000004108411,0.0000308399,0.00055035506,0.00044652986,0.0001436593,0.9848968,0.013784547,0.000007989254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024379117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003208956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0137366215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005430836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035303882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04595363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155476494","doi":"10.7202/004896ar","title":"La valeur intrinsèque chez Brentano et Moore","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2839784442685261,"score_gpt":0.33971148193377276,"score_spread":0.055733037665246676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155476494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057262693,0.028066186,0.053460483,0.22580029,0.00446585,0.0000561099,0.00020299299,0.00020002319,0.6304854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8146408,0.007020268,0.01348029,0.02623557,0.0015361118,0.00016863544,0.00006599068,0.0003512108,0.1365011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720407,0.0012344789,0.00010071493,0.0005311562,0.0007314569,0.00019823559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972752,0.0017078603,0.00020337851,0.00021459778,0.00042961512,0.0001693425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002060746,0.00058922905,0.0003935874,0.0008701618,0.0041393917,0.005520734,0.00068622344,0.00313896,0.0064278436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007887621,0.00038383182,0.00048331483,0.00094665255,0.0131018795,0.008156333,0.0028971196,0.007276384,0.001042169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018598837,0.000005732892,0.00021655597,0.000027051834,0.0000036873264,0.000054471588,0.0062935622,0.00007693485,0.00017531769,0.98083204,0.007153078,0.005143033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018813605,0.000028727565,0.0009532099,0.0001940914,0.000014572882,0.00024189042,0.0046511106,0.0004768579,0.0010429649,0.60590553,0.38641044,0.00006175854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010302629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012766499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010302629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005758117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028208299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041778266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156616183","doi":"10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00374.x","title":"Kant and the Claims of the Poor","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Library science","score_opus":0.16208436671002435,"score_gpt":0.3277990332554144,"score_spread":0.16571466654539002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156616183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077807605,0.011651856,0.008989982,0.18697067,0.0006460872,0.00002861339,0.000073480674,0.00005692308,0.71377474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776689,0.0016369278,0.00094534055,0.0069068996,0.00016561917,0.000025480964,0.000009918849,0.000028901373,0.012612171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884871,0.008545244,0.00019318615,0.00052803353,0.0010929715,0.0011535161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99207777,0.004936431,0.0005921986,0.0010607279,0.00073063606,0.00060226716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010262991,0.00046788072,0.00064484734,0.0019112362,0.013705674,0.008809872,0.0010816663,0.0063689156,0.0027241183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009431539,0.0004331182,0.00042574594,0.0018150967,0.1180086,0.009422692,0.00934762,0.0071727918,0.00043491958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008241772,0.000004813411,0.00015986686,0.00002522326,0.0000033747544,0.000027963413,0.011861284,0.00010665652,0.000017238113,0.98404205,0.0024008558,0.001342567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072083294,0.0000044212147,0.00023627531,0.000101964004,0.000003835335,0.00006207942,0.011177803,0.00009355423,0.000053971038,0.93042904,0.05781876,0.000010965489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003616369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037898081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013705674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007475637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004607374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054276586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158543086","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0210","title":"Of Liberty and Necessity: The Free Will Debate in Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy (review)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; CLARITY; Relevance (law); Classics; Free will; Moral philosophy; Period (music); Epistemology; Law; History; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.035436704860984325,"score_gpt":0.24942280343796566,"score_spread":0.21398609857698134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158543086","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006369779,0.99717283,0.000012140394,0.0018070986,0.00025150695,7.8533503e-7,0.0000032039666,7.3087784e-7,0.0006879353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018245436,0.995453,0.000023737975,0.0011321903,0.00049193524,0.000003150094,0.000011016929,0.0000013735544,0.0010590301],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992118,0.00024713043,0.000062275,0.000074638134,0.0003104076,0.00009365648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984023,0.0008819438,0.00018192721,0.000027388114,0.0003673373,0.00013907466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011291616,0.0005343668,0.0012884794,0.0025017408,0.00090442004,0.0031866494,0.00072055095,0.0019979647,0.0050614416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003282376,0.00036471087,0.000350596,0.006589638,0.0029425886,0.004376004,0.0010665659,0.0024054616,0.0011095622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000707237,0.000033439002,0.0006034706,0.022279046,0.000099583856,0.00017936552,0.0020299177,0.0001587441,0.00017052502,0.018479947,0.33867493,0.6172204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015535406,0.00003458277,0.005109167,0.01599078,0.00006290994,0.0005097017,0.0011833336,0.00003555954,0.00003632229,0.0052262195,0.9717756,0.000020134587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030495008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058240484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030495008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004774703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007204445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06063503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158922194","doi":"10.1177/0969733007071358","title":"The Terminal: A tale of virtue","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nursing Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Terminal (telecommunication); Duty; Character (mathematics); Disposition; Virtue ethics; Aesthetics; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.2579158041136346,"score_gpt":0.41804988121761,"score_spread":0.16013407710397543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158922194","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035448275,0.80529976,0.0023086353,0.029433766,0.003621762,0.00006502002,0.000082846906,0.00008069871,0.15556267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10783287,0.7783598,0.004499021,0.029449597,0.002376436,0.00017177846,0.00014198963,0.00007850069,0.07709006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999488,0.0002984574,0.000022986354,0.000029317483,0.0001356492,0.000025571942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948335,0.0003146923,0.00005023115,0.000018953178,0.000073271316,0.00005945514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006733089,0.0003137935,0.00040336407,0.0011500261,0.0013713222,0.0025409793,0.0004284612,0.00139399,0.0060047857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021931117,0.00013107804,0.0001937892,0.0014531285,0.0026289406,0.002637573,0.0010739276,0.0022138278,0.0014841654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059904727,0.000040782415,0.0005184018,0.005356629,0.00004515813,0.00088278914,0.010996772,0.00014300774,0.0005347054,0.14442328,0.41511956,0.421879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030641004,0.000018171993,0.00081028644,0.0014131648,0.0000062572535,0.0010786792,0.0025867296,0.000031414533,0.000076903874,0.0043764613,0.9895913,0.000007600969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039380603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009856853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060047857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010501647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017102364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020088017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160531423","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00370.x","title":"A Wolff in Kant’s Clothing: Christian Wolff’s Influence on Kant’s Accounts of Consciousness, Self‐Consciousness, and Psychology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Philosophy; Soul; Epistemology; Doctrine; Context (archaeology); Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Psychology; Theology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06405905668201921,"score_gpt":0.2741651518845293,"score_spread":0.21010609520251006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160531423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097326204,0.060923975,0.034433283,0.3608445,0.0046994793,0.00003004563,0.000095743235,0.0001611892,0.4414856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728625,0.003881601,0.0024632907,0.008410875,0.0013148913,0.000017897148,0.000010387375,0.00007894755,0.010959585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948489,0.003881043,0.00007975482,0.00027776283,0.00065149914,0.00026111575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938538,0.004744414,0.00025178798,0.00042616387,0.00044845202,0.00027544904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065092137,0.000351984,0.00047992493,0.002107326,0.0038857774,0.0051672235,0.0005930261,0.0038584229,0.002274116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008376983,0.00029187163,0.00030041608,0.0011280199,0.038071502,0.0054283743,0.0028005193,0.0065127267,0.0003670284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013155142,0.00000932696,0.00009738892,0.000017571454,0.000004774429,0.000041084284,0.002826976,0.00019815851,0.000051510655,0.9886751,0.005288252,0.0027766365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057496372,0.0000065160125,0.00021407331,0.00011584348,0.0000040485397,0.00004999649,0.0011773618,0.00041942933,0.00014365885,0.9384282,0.059419278,0.000015787178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029011336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002461838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065092137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004526066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020810498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034424424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164386129","doi":"10.1017/s1369415412000349","title":"Joel Smith and Peter Sullivan (eds), Transcendental Philosophy and NaturalismOxford: Oxford University Press, 2011 Pp. 224 ISBN 978-0-19-960855-3 (hbk), US $60.00","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Sociology","score_opus":0.028122582428259595,"score_gpt":0.2218251754254519,"score_spread":0.1937025929971923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164386129","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014652479,0.9837314,0.00076675374,0.0043506245,0.0014327702,0.0000044222265,0.000098256474,0.000028281733,0.00944097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035976795,0.97286856,0.0016319249,0.0008356965,0.0012494958,0.000026501239,0.00015878453,0.000056301218,0.019575015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888974,0.0003629981,0.00011613707,0.00014362832,0.0004158556,0.0000717144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967055,0.0021836709,0.00029683847,0.00017146776,0.00046712786,0.00017540783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025650677,0.0016526073,0.0018166241,0.0038209627,0.0012015891,0.0043866057,0.0012634287,0.0021510147,0.040316943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043368503,0.0015754888,0.0008083624,0.005396113,0.002667142,0.007921613,0.0015235659,0.003712085,0.017428843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008851472,0.000045194454,0.00041242564,0.006187004,0.00007492157,0.00012852179,0.0021864723,0.0004803175,0.00043647113,0.039116852,0.6324741,0.31836918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102958775,0.000014443089,0.0014969397,0.003980934,0.000041718435,0.0003445719,0.0007122132,0.000092694725,0.00017585687,0.02408437,0.9690222,0.000023803907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009434319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023916671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040316943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027289365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005130116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13487357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167309811","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v2n4p162","title":"Human Nature: the Foundation of Politics and Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Foundation (evidence); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Focus (optics); Human science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03275764281564504,"score_gpt":0.2928940030240641,"score_spread":0.26013636020841907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167309811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02526744,0.027999667,0.061841197,0.123868875,0.0011642786,0.000063776184,0.00016423415,0.000086457054,0.7595441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952657,0.0070211124,0.009809889,0.006424877,0.0011951164,0.00012026206,0.00005771899,0.0000706185,0.022643358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689263,0.0018072673,0.00007247175,0.0003817305,0.00050967897,0.00033622186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958305,0.0028818094,0.00023952007,0.00049166934,0.00030701797,0.00024949582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041000363,0.00028011054,0.0006622419,0.0014371524,0.004912636,0.00916117,0.00086095114,0.0040216814,0.0047378954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045915856,0.00032464968,0.00046010653,0.0010754337,0.05017349,0.008573366,0.002791403,0.0047813496,0.0006306911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.8342415e-7,0.0000018889169,0.00003139536,0.000006196214,7.9360944e-7,0.000008648987,0.0001840289,0.00008069924,0.000012329768,0.9984995,0.00046989528,0.00070371793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021190074,0.0000025973172,0.000076328804,0.00002497426,8.55807e-7,0.000010288383,0.00018386621,0.00020475993,0.000019519583,0.9828689,0.01660343,0.0000023861703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054395767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002972044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00916117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055444455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046621035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04022789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170363023","doi":"10.1353/hms.2005.a383291","title":"Hume and Humeans on Practical Reason","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Virtue; Philosophy; Virtue ethics; Practical reason; Action (physics); Character (mathematics); Practical wisdom","score_opus":0.23975523015756114,"score_gpt":0.3823778521059538,"score_spread":0.14262262194839267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170363023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0329422,0.021546284,0.10082658,0.05088388,0.0008479983,0.000063430394,0.00008371846,0.00010123802,0.7927047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.921392,0.006528004,0.016466405,0.00781924,0.0011188897,0.0001800845,0.000056316567,0.00006661933,0.04637249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621695,0.002577866,0.00008904585,0.00030225114,0.00048740293,0.00032648086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940196,0.0045573916,0.00029478068,0.00048717405,0.00037707682,0.00026391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003900986,0.00045039522,0.00056731375,0.001995269,0.003026046,0.0042825006,0.0008159061,0.002730672,0.00546167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062817824,0.0002058945,0.00056058384,0.0011083052,0.03693133,0.0063698296,0.0038911079,0.0034066786,0.0010665837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026664861,0.0000027577469,0.000051703933,0.000013070969,0.0000013176808,0.000013235214,0.0010310191,0.000067236404,0.000016543481,0.9966196,0.00059015484,0.0015908226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036378935,0.000008530591,0.00014976773,0.000053961292,0.0000019960166,0.000036359943,0.0007122788,0.00017985038,0.000069766866,0.96187985,0.03689997,0.000004156392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001360829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013016453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00546167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017029154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020630658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181034769","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.33971","title":"When Reason Began To Stir… —Kantian Courage And The Enlightenment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Enlightenment; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.025128676445851143,"score_gpt":0.2367957097970493,"score_spread":0.21166703335119816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181034769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05535981,0.033594757,0.04608536,0.13231106,0.0019345114,0.000047354933,0.00008417394,0.00013968947,0.73044336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494399,0.0029052063,0.003991829,0.005843728,0.0005088718,0.000045407745,0.00001814043,0.00010766156,0.037139293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951407,0.0028641042,0.00012369118,0.0006147859,0.0006263999,0.00063029194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969228,0.0017181629,0.0002907596,0.00039170054,0.00037100867,0.00030545887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004944435,0.0005210154,0.0004437044,0.0013261138,0.0058566723,0.009849796,0.0007551847,0.0037958454,0.0030996099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060155047,0.00034877978,0.0006060376,0.00083401153,0.06184499,0.012155293,0.00510473,0.007855688,0.00065789535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008784621,0.0000021173296,0.000048212223,0.000010332193,0.0000021626186,0.000022991542,0.003436325,0.000059614656,0.00003350665,0.99437076,0.0007962053,0.0012089526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011725555,0.000010166512,0.0001483749,0.000090137284,0.00000389935,0.00005187228,0.0028170212,0.00011434708,0.000170548,0.8982366,0.09832858,0.000016896252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055375067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004616274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009849796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008489802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030888536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061598122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206361362","doi":"","title":"THE OPENNESS CONDITION AND THE STATE OF BEING ORIENTED TOWARDS: A METAPHYSICS OF LIFE IN HEGEL","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Metaphysics; Openness to experience; Epistemology; State (computer science); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021212049466391106,"score_gpt":0.23810932508568472,"score_spread":0.21689727561929362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206361362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17410788,0.0032419295,0.0794456,0.02970407,0.00050021283,0.00009427852,0.00012635438,0.00009222718,0.7126875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98869306,0.00026097347,0.002997824,0.00047275712,0.00008977562,0.000057396646,0.000015016496,0.00002701892,0.007386009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977956,0.001131114,0.00008833041,0.00030177887,0.0002787527,0.00040437162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971807,0.0016907208,0.00020753733,0.00038823378,0.00023193986,0.00030089822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042568035,0.00032179346,0.0005268686,0.0012873269,0.0048059947,0.0063825115,0.0007375263,0.0029216504,0.0035760826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057692025,0.000333736,0.0006100676,0.000979097,0.046153005,0.013059718,0.004059459,0.005333116,0.00035485576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053986305,0.0000024538024,0.00003476686,0.0000035739813,9.718049e-7,0.000008575384,0.0016661345,0.0000677917,0.000027122382,0.9976451,0.0001123693,0.0004257578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041806848,0.0000030418407,0.000059165082,0.000005654546,0.0000010279472,0.000010089647,0.00045528618,0.00010858551,0.000034038305,0.99779284,0.0015221981,0.000003866494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029549482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019707622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063825115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037995456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024167509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027567744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253303401","doi":"10.1007/1-4020-2182-8_15","title":"Metaphysics as “De Insolubilibus”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.040136489322040794,"score_gpt":0.24055294371430372,"score_spread":0.2004164543922629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253303401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005088278,0.0107223615,0.023253685,0.023305457,0.0012730933,0.0000396205,0.00010156709,0.000119893695,0.936096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58914393,0.008853658,0.012632646,0.009249236,0.005128587,0.0003839305,0.000251767,0.0004717978,0.37388438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714357,0.0014509029,0.00012938966,0.00030950026,0.00073194766,0.00023456516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881965,0.0005089441,0.000108742555,0.00031094818,0.00019219983,0.00005949436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028006993,0.00090579863,0.0007300597,0.0020217078,0.003392073,0.008668291,0.0011985998,0.004844237,0.01474304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004001325,0.00057703373,0.00043687483,0.0016824283,0.030713454,0.010863707,0.003833436,0.009123219,0.0034557658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.789183e-7,0.0000018281625,0.0000034017164,0.0000049820783,5.573964e-7,0.0000023701134,0.00020718107,0.000017038927,0.000013877779,0.99772626,0.0012835508,0.0007379872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035968562,0.000002501173,0.000025716543,0.000024632709,0.0000016313888,0.000019199877,0.00013151842,0.000110534565,0.000056450524,0.9372847,0.062336717,0.0000027683745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027426903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030297514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01474304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00553992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00272334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04932034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253499900","doi":"","title":"Michael Gamer,. Cambridge University Press, 2000. ISBN: 0 521 77328 8 (hardback). Price: £35.00 (US$59.95).","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; History; Art history; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.02905748946410807,"score_gpt":0.2158816386835496,"score_spread":0.18682414921944152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253499900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00097259996,0.44689578,0.0051873433,0.013251148,0.006527564,0.00010778752,0.0026357183,0.001415971,0.5230061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034499671,0.11613359,0.0022709896,0.0009950725,0.0005391779,0.00007529623,0.0009718706,0.0004680083,0.87509596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999622,0.000047865185,0.00003652204,0.00008495201,0.00017118001,0.000037474663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994362,0.00018311228,0.000065482134,0.000040297266,0.00015808013,0.00011672362],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071954535,0.001955936,0.0014267606,0.0022893394,0.00082434696,0.004216483,0.0015318607,0.0019974094,0.31941375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018872335,0.0012668847,0.0005272972,0.0029932614,0.00075051887,0.007575198,0.0019392503,0.0022108972,0.2898958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006032161,0.000014197265,0.000078923695,0.00063609955,0.000009503075,0.000053589833,0.00016337486,0.0001472798,0.00037400943,0.0056319837,0.8017522,0.19107854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012112932,0.000010484,0.00039598005,0.0005260371,0.000010256112,0.00015349705,0.00014959295,0.000099561184,0.00012024981,0.0029199147,0.9955922,0.000010123803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005110453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014551578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31941375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012276751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010778157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9707737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259744231","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0014","title":"Effects on the Mind as Objects of Reasoning: A Perspectivist Reading of the Reason–Passion Relation in Hume’s Ethics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Feeling; Reading (process); Philosophy; Passion; Argumentation theory; Perspectivism; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07113004278434121,"score_gpt":0.3100280683930019,"score_spread":0.2388980256086607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259744231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09880435,0.005864481,0.24830405,0.067336634,0.000821237,0.00008234921,0.00018741119,0.00025526356,0.5783442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97013634,0.0010594154,0.017218918,0.0018347945,0.0004529996,0.000096269854,0.000053292268,0.000106451924,0.00904146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578923,0.0027837902,0.00008749332,0.00038746788,0.0007183821,0.00023361765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99533194,0.0032736764,0.0002736005,0.0006590286,0.00031674746,0.00014496528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053505064,0.00063089555,0.0006172733,0.0021273738,0.0029255245,0.008015273,0.0015085678,0.004113948,0.002715187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005383771,0.00062743976,0.001133893,0.0008770641,0.044936944,0.0131935505,0.0047909794,0.0060895854,0.00047375922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071917016,0.0000053232175,0.00006380625,0.000011124129,0.0000030726758,0.00003169066,0.005277472,0.00021285267,0.00009486825,0.9932225,0.0002603204,0.0008097852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012246961,0.0000088848055,0.00014340252,0.000026947851,0.00000709363,0.00003088773,0.00080818584,0.000545139,0.00017843276,0.9911686,0.007065561,0.0000045794504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025563547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014373624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008015273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038307488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015115552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02829647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260214551","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0013","title":"Personal Identity, Passions, and “The True Idea of the Human Mind”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Identity (music); Personal identity; Philosophy of mind; Introspection; Physicalism; Unitary state; Analogy; Embodied cognition; Self; Politics; Aesthetics; Law","score_opus":0.08428907551968025,"score_gpt":0.3104728859049115,"score_spread":0.22618381038523128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260214551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07866676,0.023686055,0.040223513,0.099015415,0.0016419414,0.00005553819,0.00010908509,0.00013093269,0.7564707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95731294,0.003674905,0.004788901,0.0056544407,0.00084310595,0.00006760403,0.00004798673,0.000031237836,0.027578818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973259,0.0015979673,0.0000526962,0.00030999613,0.00044345183,0.00026998844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900144,0.0005033103,0.0001254402,0.00016010374,0.00010847542,0.00010126335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024722514,0.00038263501,0.00027467744,0.0009861792,0.0037242183,0.0057643745,0.0008041882,0.002086261,0.0034272382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025186925,0.00017538566,0.00031640765,0.0007165044,0.04435754,0.008317305,0.0030849678,0.0042380663,0.00060344586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033108015,0.000003249872,0.00008517492,0.000011167,0.000001584198,0.00002346489,0.005038181,0.00004009543,0.000015155751,0.9913084,0.0015674412,0.0019027508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004365727,0.0000100262205,0.00032313765,0.000048079204,0.0000023019986,0.00007652366,0.0034813867,0.00016427391,0.00009011052,0.92814153,0.06765099,0.000007179172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002927337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001887555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057643745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028139958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014619317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020417035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262421116","doi":"","title":"Desacuerdos y descriptivismo en la filosofía del derecho","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Normative; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of law; Politics; Legal positivism; Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Law; Comparative law; Theology","score_opus":0.06088599584842349,"score_gpt":0.2744722126942788,"score_spread":0.2135862168458553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262421116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22353102,0.032998517,0.17996654,0.10750205,0.001723242,0.000079837904,0.0002488158,0.0004420339,0.453508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97892684,0.004317088,0.006848683,0.0016273193,0.0006303947,0.000076250086,0.000059460694,0.00009102993,0.0074230167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926294,0.0049600066,0.0002535495,0.0007179927,0.0010025755,0.00043637093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941729,0.0038414933,0.0006019227,0.00070042704,0.00055449974,0.00012874976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009016934,0.00056176085,0.00056755525,0.002547537,0.0040866025,0.00981052,0.0010030675,0.0034415626,0.0018849166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010014331,0.00041345914,0.00058586034,0.00234099,0.03949862,0.009793757,0.004222,0.0060435366,0.00031741677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031446264,0.0000016506602,0.00011600883,0.000012053424,0.0000012908919,0.000014029193,0.0027014427,0.00006594438,0.000035433335,0.9955655,0.00024703608,0.0012365427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013705887,0.000011353566,0.00043056885,0.00019685808,0.00001546639,0.0001125682,0.005036477,0.0010749967,0.00040713727,0.9348927,0.057789855,0.000018271561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064135403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004574322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00981052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068172426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032530695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049462736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266975147","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2015.1063072","title":"Expressivism, Pragmatism, and Representationalism, by Huw Price","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expressivism; Direct and indirect realism; Pragmatism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics; Realism","score_opus":0.06201376325123302,"score_gpt":0.28070878493266055,"score_spread":0.21869502168142751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266975147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011186004,0.33477378,0.0179117,0.17225377,0.013738846,0.000042558015,0.00021063376,0.00014541084,0.4497373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46000233,0.14305902,0.008849665,0.017564062,0.018750513,0.00015600829,0.00023956233,0.00036436244,0.35101447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993228,0.00028078165,0.000024471008,0.00010900224,0.0002082189,0.000054855213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994894,0.0003229506,0.000039946775,0.0000490663,0.00006815405,0.000030456953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010426531,0.0006185719,0.00026262715,0.00072052144,0.0018101541,0.004191833,0.00066964526,0.0015039087,0.0033452099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034009619,0.0003507556,0.00031975488,0.0016460073,0.008076193,0.008038832,0.0015943584,0.0033706147,0.0009966794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021692364,0.00001805948,0.00012371063,0.0001220345,0.000009138293,0.000053739623,0.0020429401,0.0003344817,0.00020404682,0.8369604,0.13892844,0.021181269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009027859,0.0000152000985,0.00048576924,0.0001989756,0.0000061347037,0.00013581812,0.0009891926,0.00057232304,0.0002642311,0.515966,0.48134133,0.00001602556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058486965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053223157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058486965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032813372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020419883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023807883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272068766","doi":"","title":"Economic Metaphors and Equivocation: The Unfortunate Similarities of Rawls and Nozick","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Equivocation; Metaphor; Pluralism (philosophy); Invocation; Epistemology; Classical liberalism; Value pluralism; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Positive economics; Politics; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Liberalism; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04263902885306444,"score_gpt":0.22547224538776842,"score_spread":0.18283321653470397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272068766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072868854,0.014839677,0.13618992,0.3460359,0.0026842146,0.000085084874,0.0001360371,0.00014228924,0.42701805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9423043,0.0042810217,0.017167551,0.015618581,0.001420964,0.00018358082,0.000037806232,0.00023686631,0.018749185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907323,0.0059609436,0.00024590874,0.00072750094,0.0019532177,0.0003801403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910054,0.0065426095,0.00052075693,0.000793107,0.00085166394,0.00028652395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010348995,0.0006216867,0.0007673315,0.0027580396,0.004552981,0.009203728,0.0018100406,0.004172029,0.0034101899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019221593,0.0004820105,0.0006756113,0.0021435318,0.05059277,0.019103395,0.006947476,0.007962489,0.0005660329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003488479,0.00000315908,0.000032945725,0.000007538673,0.0000013856613,0.000018514571,0.0016011753,0.000034007102,0.0000144293,0.9970035,0.00063035026,0.00064948824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007520984,0.0000042475576,0.0000661705,0.000035253324,0.00000234561,0.00006459058,0.001466968,0.00028200142,0.000052168707,0.9702524,0.027758025,0.000008293259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018207307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016462784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010348995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043648495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022800418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05473137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274863633","doi":"","title":"William Wordsworth,. Ed. Jared Curtis, Apryl Lea Denny-Ferris and Jillian Heydt Stevenson. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press 1999. ISBN: 0801436257. Price: US$105.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art; History","score_opus":0.049458479788077284,"score_gpt":0.21247464113303274,"score_spread":0.16301616134495545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274863633","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052193215,0.8225038,0.0022994764,0.035798423,0.012655091,0.000059969123,0.00078272575,0.00031447082,0.12506403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005166662,0.4318299,0.0020356702,0.0052915826,0.003764543,0.00007098492,0.00058934075,0.00032000412,0.5509312],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991565,0.0001525692,0.000083169696,0.0001405,0.00040827808,0.000058984355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986052,0.00044994644,0.00013684425,0.00009619467,0.000546273,0.00016548761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014918554,0.001758679,0.0010622704,0.0027465078,0.001762138,0.0038072076,0.0013837749,0.0023728905,0.08594979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004199186,0.0011985719,0.0005291682,0.0033840456,0.001685399,0.009037541,0.0013495595,0.0026949262,0.06885525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023989436,0.000010504645,0.000072093164,0.0003533812,0.0000051237066,0.000037271868,0.00025431695,0.000044795863,0.00009690682,0.005599534,0.9145036,0.07899851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036143838,0.000005595729,0.00023150307,0.00040019053,0.0000032949852,0.00012099837,0.00020317188,0.000016422,0.000057257985,0.003992579,0.99496114,0.000004222947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012071634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03284062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08594979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001733977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003139445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28753072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284942978","doi":"10.1111/heyj.12323","title":"Locating Hegel's <i>Aufhebung</i> and Tracing Lonergan's ‘Sublation’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Tracing; Citation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Library science; Programming language","score_opus":0.03358500776175099,"score_gpt":0.22338377133287976,"score_spread":0.18979876357112876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284942978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0530365,0.0018656504,0.0100895455,0.014537407,0.00049916847,0.000036797755,0.00004310636,0.0000971719,0.9197946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90160656,0.0005269207,0.0031654013,0.0029141775,0.00011558277,0.00006602669,0.00003688066,0.00025126128,0.0913173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971409,0.0015180333,0.00007991935,0.0004212858,0.0003383729,0.0005015299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980641,0.0010257523,0.00016994777,0.00030277605,0.00028058156,0.00015693081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032883813,0.00052141753,0.000412057,0.0019329184,0.0081322435,0.00715619,0.0011758001,0.0027632418,0.007947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005156171,0.0003287516,0.00032160236,0.0013312446,0.03771388,0.006790781,0.0052741743,0.005371047,0.0012839583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008396173,0.0000038755315,0.000065668086,0.0000108450095,9.137845e-7,0.000022111248,0.013432187,0.000014309639,0.00006190327,0.9828305,0.0015520514,0.0019972287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027032278,0.000036025358,0.001044186,0.0002637936,0.0000131915285,0.00024921872,0.033068728,0.00040145926,0.0014081885,0.6271328,0.33631274,0.000042568237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014660542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029968737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014660542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076126354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060977847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055233777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297491993","doi":"10.14288/1.0093635","title":"Kant's subject-object distinction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Object (grammar); Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03093150814729959,"score_gpt":0.17193998404779828,"score_spread":0.1410084759004987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297491993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011424204,0.009375926,0.09881302,0.025247145,0.001019574,0.00009350673,0.00016773333,0.00017492213,0.8536839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81018245,0.0072693187,0.043765884,0.010437683,0.0021194331,0.0007956422,0.000247043,0.00038916612,0.12479335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896494,0.0053966837,0.00036878057,0.0010199794,0.0028918672,0.0006732792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757665,0.0014465975,0.00014536969,0.00037015218,0.00035220035,0.00010908878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064267507,0.0008055373,0.00086708786,0.001963136,0.0038027742,0.007900875,0.0014520737,0.005403242,0.0040504024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047264574,0.0006559041,0.00090082386,0.0014053342,0.035944197,0.008577437,0.0035951103,0.006674964,0.0016048638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025003396,0.0000020692319,0.000016350134,0.000012171937,0.0000017956005,0.000006979151,0.0007507182,0.000056017503,0.00002215403,0.9976683,0.00070930336,0.0007516462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007145053,0.0000069226016,0.00008433906,0.00004610438,0.0000044194467,0.000029726287,0.00020443783,0.00015528964,0.000106836436,0.9571791,0.04216949,0.0000060470766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023573055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013862712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007900875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005463468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033698445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039640427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2308477220","doi":"10.1093/monist/onv038","title":"Virtue, Happiness, and Well-Being","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Happiness; Disposition; Psychology; Social psychology; Eudaimonia; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019317606453166287,"score_gpt":0.2163406698533925,"score_spread":0.1970230634002262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2308477220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16886657,0.051987708,0.015141435,0.17478572,0.0009572375,0.000063928885,0.00019266135,0.000054149765,0.58795065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98591447,0.0051033963,0.0019735838,0.0026619215,0.00030737053,0.000044446606,0.000021363048,0.0000066192383,0.0039669005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770516,0.0016315894,0.00005203712,0.00019170837,0.00022580993,0.0001936512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754864,0.0013168877,0.0003645545,0.00018114348,0.00020211196,0.00038652474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031602085,0.00021716475,0.000487236,0.00090780866,0.0014021811,0.0043969057,0.0004658101,0.0018686809,0.0043587736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036048135,0.0001390773,0.00027889354,0.00089500484,0.019843731,0.0042742067,0.0024250988,0.0025979436,0.0003691449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013493921,0.00002128227,0.0012169626,0.000053459808,0.000009113941,0.000033291086,0.0025517447,0.00011430946,0.000053106953,0.98802257,0.0011222949,0.006788306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000823358,0.000035908924,0.007993871,0.000185069,0.000008797209,0.00010448703,0.0032177905,0.00035604546,0.00007301372,0.96257985,0.02541797,0.000019027868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019157496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015843885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043969057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015379493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001147166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016712964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315593123","doi":"10.1017/s0317167100019442","title":"THE TREATMENT OF EPILEPSY PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, THIRD EDITION. 2001. Edited by Elaine Wyllie. published by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins. 1285 pages. C$283.50 approx","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Gerontology","score_opus":0.0725943110604808,"score_gpt":0.25983335361277443,"score_spread":0.18723904255229362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315593123","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065729284,0.86490756,0.010033407,0.025200145,0.010090657,0.00016728078,0.0013379368,0.00060267164,0.08700299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008414667,0.79315776,0.0145128155,0.0047037425,0.0039781253,0.00038572648,0.0012894783,0.00039432093,0.17316334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995852,0.00008194728,0.00008108168,0.000034084267,0.00018869014,0.000028997736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940264,0.00015668829,0.0001002219,0.000035183006,0.00022437051,0.00008096789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013021705,0.0014989589,0.0011579202,0.002184037,0.0004139383,0.0019318555,0.0011806565,0.0015559196,0.03369037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025492436,0.0006376973,0.00055200123,0.0018497453,0.0011749382,0.00172261,0.0014975136,0.0023912804,0.020046696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034448574,0.00002851552,0.00013714902,0.0009558055,0.000015801412,0.00018311098,0.00026793065,0.0002530276,0.0003092697,0.005171544,0.5899371,0.40270633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023053246,0.000034078905,0.0007262796,0.0016352313,0.000011512556,0.0013881397,0.0001519838,0.00014376422,0.00012891786,0.0069881678,0.988755,0.000013966028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007095078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01378991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03369037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014543716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035543325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11270547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317890658","doi":"10.5509/2014874801","title":"Illusions of Autonomy and the Autonomy of Illusions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Illusion; Autonomy; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Cognitive psychology; Law","score_opus":0.01545243200396801,"score_gpt":0.20106860257838755,"score_spread":0.18561617057441954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317890658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17385492,0.0040960195,0.062439077,0.06283699,0.00052186754,0.00007499618,0.00008401665,0.000058868933,0.69603324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99430215,0.00026325797,0.0018136922,0.00081812026,0.00010870064,0.00003114106,0.000010499192,0.000016116188,0.0026363346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920466,0.0050931647,0.00029173522,0.0006867292,0.0012274198,0.0006543449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810044,0.013027317,0.0012893114,0.0022756574,0.0014217426,0.0009816149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008180134,0.00039305064,0.00043023727,0.0015869606,0.0046538464,0.007569059,0.0011511681,0.0046552094,0.0034770705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01980084,0.0003722294,0.0005103219,0.0010196631,0.08034066,0.011870883,0.006109789,0.007869354,0.00022593146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004791672,0.000004033119,0.00010140899,0.0000058467967,0.0000015131207,0.000016453829,0.0022146285,0.000064126834,0.000029033275,0.9967527,0.00019613122,0.00060936157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007888619,0.0000033313438,0.00016007456,0.000012641081,0.0000019370516,0.00002765124,0.0010044947,0.00020034294,0.00005324861,0.9953153,0.0032085073,0.000004678954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030372026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019036018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008180134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030048972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036677576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04326117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319260082","doi":"10.17771/pucrio.ateo.20413","title":"O HORIZONTE ÉTICO-ONTOLÓGICODA RELAÇÃO DIALÓGICA: FILOSOFIA E DIÁLOGO INTER-RELIGIOSO","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Atualidade Teológica","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Logo (programming language); Computer science; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.05737585898484309,"score_gpt":0.2802796531774102,"score_spread":0.22290379419256712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319260082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10926233,0.011681317,0.13332069,0.0425366,0.0009274992,0.00016596746,0.00049883843,0.00035856233,0.7012482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430127,0.0023476707,0.014025944,0.0015518933,0.00022201781,0.0001385968,0.00016941929,0.00018177977,0.038349982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946109,0.0035945661,0.00014809018,0.00072229543,0.00053349463,0.00039061462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701333,0.0014418047,0.00032313206,0.0004973483,0.00037251148,0.00035180614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037399605,0.0007070704,0.00053168245,0.0024312574,0.006926407,0.0132441055,0.0012241465,0.0032039129,0.015612656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005721907,0.00045012136,0.00062045985,0.002511111,0.028272085,0.016659407,0.008568468,0.004401914,0.0015066542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016461592,0.000013559596,0.0006234429,0.00007641307,0.0000066519087,0.0001768202,0.049084444,0.00013387206,0.00043513844,0.9417363,0.0012730398,0.00642392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017066413,0.00003230884,0.0019149274,0.0003307474,0.000018723866,0.0003927211,0.053318992,0.0010707541,0.00063883926,0.7421802,0.20004594,0.00003871485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008833992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006115595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015612656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007515335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004662984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05452788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319530405","doi":"","title":"Lara Denis, ed. , Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide . Reviewed by","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06562663507628018,"score_gpt":0.320567801161255,"score_spread":0.2549411660849748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319530405","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014836629,0.94748384,0.0023668394,0.02892499,0.0065411855,0.000013589736,0.00016907128,0.00005717631,0.014295025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007388454,0.9398142,0.0043188157,0.008909741,0.01003154,0.0001109801,0.00028311045,0.00013540422,0.029007742],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984627,0.00068008265,0.000112727575,0.00017565324,0.00050733704,0.00006156989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956827,0.0030485832,0.00018047164,0.00010890847,0.00084744307,0.0001319299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002613106,0.0025282875,0.0014604137,0.0066799773,0.0022077688,0.00395441,0.0018063997,0.003817287,0.016770592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057317247,0.0010708342,0.0008259494,0.0053058774,0.0055147917,0.008982788,0.0017622052,0.007379498,0.010533648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003349052,0.000024982257,0.00012603226,0.0011209246,0.000026450893,0.00008446506,0.0012480834,0.00031800263,0.000094911295,0.06837555,0.84554696,0.08300024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011711637,0.000008453486,0.00044619752,0.0024828378,0.00001432193,0.00026358082,0.00081666664,0.00015664185,0.00012927741,0.06731173,0.9283327,0.00002588894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008925722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014772904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016770592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025061534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036276267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05610323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319956498","doi":"10.1017/s0263523200000203","title":"Logical Form and Ethical Content","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Hegelianism; Epistemology; Formalism (music); Dialectic; Nothing; Interpretation (philosophy); Logical form; Emptiness; Literature; Linguistics; Art","score_opus":0.126713164289463,"score_gpt":0.23393185750090986,"score_spread":0.10721869321144686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319956498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036543828,0.0058160964,0.0732521,0.04803504,0.0005545131,0.0000847021,0.00014664677,0.00021076071,0.8353563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357109,0.0014995034,0.015923733,0.004695488,0.00056715903,0.00020299146,0.00012891238,0.00018143153,0.04108988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920512,0.0049391785,0.00030056533,0.00094361434,0.0012449845,0.0005204622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933009,0.004188903,0.00045507576,0.00082008564,0.00094260176,0.00029254038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069609936,0.00050693884,0.00053400325,0.002225529,0.004145163,0.008922888,0.0012273747,0.0031007696,0.007367164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011067118,0.00038682637,0.0006320113,0.0011744262,0.04769311,0.011182797,0.0062163007,0.0040105674,0.0012607913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016457036,0.0000018870999,0.000025410895,0.000006675526,7.7734865e-7,0.000005985535,0.0006014013,0.000035301982,0.000016697673,0.99815947,0.0004049786,0.0007397355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056668723,0.0000036412675,0.00003502269,0.000021316691,0.0000017854356,0.0000146142,0.00031691173,0.00015992566,0.000054680073,0.9856646,0.0137192365,0.0000026496573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017120652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010329492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008922888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076731835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032861098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055673122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320564641","doi":"10.1017/s001221731100031x","title":"Intentional Normativism Meets Normative Supervenience and the Because Constraint","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Supervenience; Attribution; Constraint (computer-aided design); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Mathematics; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.07714598848624295,"score_gpt":0.22393955338742563,"score_spread":0.14679356490118267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320564641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13101843,0.00084689143,0.15052311,0.045870528,0.00097406266,0.00013233443,0.00017069175,0.00022585828,0.67023814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878116,0.00017600693,0.006566762,0.0013708775,0.00028251563,0.000081511425,0.000035820744,0.00005337652,0.003621518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98762417,0.006659717,0.00060853205,0.0018698891,0.0021008647,0.0011368768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98143345,0.010213538,0.0014419951,0.0030960697,0.0031736046,0.0006413685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013641242,0.00033786424,0.0010318087,0.0012307204,0.0038923891,0.006153155,0.0015042616,0.0041870587,0.007198782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019612616,0.00052711304,0.0009771098,0.0009374499,0.027980842,0.011941801,0.0056092143,0.0059920624,0.0007723998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007652676,0.0000055744,0.00009171644,0.000010773163,0.000003841964,0.00003191712,0.00044160304,0.000057864756,0.00006263484,0.99813205,0.00030641883,0.0008480715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001027855,0.000004215357,0.00014621038,0.000016293665,0.0000044866974,0.0000302225,0.00030835476,0.00043382865,0.00014729924,0.9963973,0.0024954285,0.000006280432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031825562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002795521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013641242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035807157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032652013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0721426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323728376","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12286","title":"Fichte on Conscience","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Conviction; Epistemology; Philosophy; Deliberation; Doctrine; Relevance (law); Function (biology); Law; Political science; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.46504918076954155,"score_gpt":0.3855528800936209,"score_spread":0.07949630067592067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323728376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044242,0.019518862,0.02023548,0.102899365,0.0018529836,0.00004648523,0.000059030706,0.000052916697,0.81109285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94831985,0.0030677817,0.002993673,0.010155809,0.0010266418,0.00008801492,0.000024361878,0.000036111294,0.034287725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961118,0.0022662694,0.00009666788,0.00039475993,0.0007058455,0.00042467515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581784,0.003012748,0.00020552966,0.0002929948,0.0004547116,0.00021623893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032997879,0.0003636823,0.00033743322,0.0013673707,0.004046209,0.0028713727,0.00055610744,0.0030268347,0.003458334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008987272,0.00012263423,0.00038207715,0.0005530416,0.030443102,0.004584941,0.0027191471,0.0037915152,0.00047311437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049289956,0.0000045748857,0.000100331046,0.000020626578,0.0000013400424,0.000043505184,0.0030752774,0.000069862705,0.000034116587,0.9902534,0.00295241,0.0034395354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061817136,0.000015277594,0.00044867478,0.00014256325,0.0000022590182,0.000117539385,0.0009222289,0.00023184081,0.000097052856,0.90820843,0.08979816,0.000009765211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030605407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016203445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004046209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033299096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018816387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024160266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324390891","doi":"10.1017/s1358246116000308","title":"Ramsey's Cognitivism: Truth, Ethics and the Meaning of Life","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitivism (psychology); Irrational number; Pragmatism; Meaning of life; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Sociology; Cognition; Psychology","score_opus":0.07106984588787033,"score_gpt":0.2677872357752023,"score_spread":0.19671738988733198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324390891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06890016,0.027959935,0.05846211,0.23810165,0.0028588255,0.000066466455,0.00010414603,0.00014805974,0.6033987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97206205,0.0026680534,0.0049746362,0.0055571147,0.00067124487,0.000045222452,0.000019682826,0.000041883046,0.013960017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612397,0.0026969123,0.00013251556,0.00032133932,0.00057825574,0.00014692666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543226,0.0031361415,0.00032366128,0.00028603076,0.0005646408,0.00025727812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055417223,0.00039306658,0.00051149214,0.0016854721,0.0029274041,0.007962119,0.0008389753,0.0038176463,0.0036651012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008532866,0.000249713,0.00033433945,0.0009494935,0.040865503,0.010661776,0.0039319787,0.0058799316,0.00048493344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056434546,0.0000049323176,0.0000333868,0.000018370192,0.0000015909808,0.000039044702,0.0037959833,0.000074026095,0.000034143526,0.9931346,0.0014470638,0.0014111551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043022937,0.0000061027677,0.00007695094,0.00005715973,0.0000020057673,0.00005500585,0.0014012688,0.00031953797,0.00005898194,0.9791445,0.01886844,0.000005817923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003658619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001903637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007962119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00394673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002144144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029307783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326609699","doi":"10.5840/symposium20131715","title":"Absolute Spontaneity of Choice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Absolute (philosophy); Psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027224387683292,"score_gpt":0.2322418193499577,"score_spread":0.2050174316666657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326609699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07382749,0.006821256,0.15081273,0.065930046,0.0018399755,0.000061543156,0.00020880227,0.00013755537,0.70036066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9604312,0.0008332842,0.010786642,0.0016291763,0.0006266131,0.00012062898,0.0000520467,0.00009090092,0.025429573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99318564,0.0036668433,0.00032661247,0.0010891024,0.0012384327,0.0004932938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857675,0.009799784,0.00056023285,0.0022961532,0.0008935547,0.0006828416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010442588,0.000337943,0.0008131171,0.0010320137,0.0039558434,0.0066481344,0.001418289,0.0032147174,0.01063331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020981958,0.000571207,0.000986541,0.0010368031,0.02201654,0.011400822,0.0051089767,0.0080386875,0.0006859236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023831085,0.000001905369,0.000018739418,0.0000050722206,0.0000014079193,0.0000036823533,0.00021242777,0.00003454077,0.000020294805,0.9989427,0.0002377352,0.0005191223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025644842,0.000002321835,0.000027728223,0.000008718327,0.0000013925583,0.000008926574,0.0000750145,0.00010414891,0.00003304025,0.9965379,0.0031963727,0.0000018262863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000702039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066498516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01063331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026628408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024169118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055226326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327586245","doi":"10.5840/monist20038611","title":"Perversion and Death","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perversion; Temptation; Absurdity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mistake; Death drive; Duality (order theory); Teleology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05956421792938551,"score_gpt":0.22701568950475112,"score_spread":0.1674514715753656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327586245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06636092,0.017144082,0.012204295,0.068034135,0.000894088,0.000032253673,0.00005484192,0.00005757505,0.8352178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94854045,0.0020940802,0.00083609414,0.0045869374,0.00025544045,0.000028193375,0.000017419683,0.000023846333,0.043617647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997262,0.0016161591,0.000078789155,0.00032607402,0.00035412525,0.00036277345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801,0.00097343925,0.00025608155,0.00031792515,0.0002624976,0.00018021402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027201404,0.0002738595,0.0002792602,0.00061927654,0.004990138,0.003924547,0.00060242304,0.003227888,0.0046479926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040351003,0.00014965222,0.00031563695,0.00038133442,0.048453618,0.0045999554,0.005403593,0.0048517645,0.00062208524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053107233,0.0000027812785,0.0001250739,0.000011007232,0.0000018370004,0.00003236761,0.0039284257,0.000041842086,0.00002903883,0.9932821,0.0009075219,0.0016328519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007706765,0.000017982846,0.0003191205,0.000079617894,0.0000038539615,0.00017569648,0.0031297756,0.000075481126,0.00018823505,0.9002278,0.09576481,0.000009808247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018512206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019054182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004990138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035980975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018680443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02610612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328765664","doi":"10.1017/s0263523200000240","title":"Systematicity and Symbolisation in Kant's Deduction of Judgements of Taste","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Taste; Pleasure; Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Morality; Relation (database); Psychology; Cognition; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05397203452840561,"score_gpt":0.20893646505709562,"score_spread":0.15496443052869002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328765664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16038808,0.006644371,0.22805867,0.029229935,0.0011669132,0.00010934524,0.00031659214,0.0003259089,0.5737601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671536,0.0007911519,0.021627452,0.00067637063,0.00023030158,0.00009639195,0.00006192025,0.000077371755,0.009285266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933989,0.0034425396,0.00030629372,0.0007320055,0.0016005281,0.0005198315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966434,0.0018704678,0.00021975735,0.0005931089,0.00055037945,0.00012293868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059760087,0.00040517226,0.0006102665,0.0021525885,0.0027139075,0.004973193,0.0009736912,0.001762044,0.0016307506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008585558,0.00050410576,0.0009870243,0.0011725494,0.037756875,0.005603257,0.0039860923,0.004224934,0.00042194457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000881366,0.0000032302041,0.00006688497,0.00001783139,0.0000028203535,0.000020524605,0.0014770755,0.00021648957,0.00011031411,0.99597234,0.00034666123,0.001756993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005186009,0.0000041566445,0.00010251562,0.0000114346385,0.0000019917854,0.000011977675,0.00015906424,0.00026837955,0.00009739875,0.9953921,0.003940538,0.0000052755145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036046116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002358498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059760087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005605846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030183569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040673435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330727656","doi":"10.1017/s136941541400020x","title":"Review Essay: Greenberg on Kant, Existence, and De Re Necessity - Robert Greenberg, Real Existence, Ideal Necessity: Kant’s Compromise and the Modalities without the Compromise. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008. Pp. xviii + 211, $119.00, hbk. 978-3-11-021013-2","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Philosophy; Ideal (ethics); Humanities; Epistemology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.03527945944403875,"score_gpt":0.2754823083358882,"score_spread":0.24020284889184945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330727656","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009329323,0.8918351,0.00032334068,0.084341444,0.013926605,0.000004777471,0.000050786828,0.000009213702,0.009415434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060444656,0.8937365,0.00059596397,0.039705765,0.026472175,0.000032170858,0.000111549576,0.00005352207,0.03324783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782264,0.0008672762,0.000106543506,0.00026400673,0.00081063504,0.0001288744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954797,0.002631713,0.00035437604,0.00012031251,0.0011854448,0.00022848531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003281824,0.0012842561,0.0015298089,0.004561283,0.00156874,0.0052609895,0.0016468053,0.0050045843,0.018832438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007755493,0.00046548698,0.00087802485,0.0059453035,0.0056753354,0.008462023,0.002351513,0.0070992783,0.008926494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017623152,0.000009132348,0.00005578355,0.0012418525,0.000027682518,0.000026696818,0.0002822626,0.00010348677,0.000063969266,0.028206486,0.928424,0.04154113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010025282,0.0000077111,0.0003278942,0.004560694,0.000025608026,0.00013674615,0.0005182956,0.000046405712,0.00006160958,0.026860917,0.9674237,0.000020509488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050449762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077642603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018832438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00488797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008945573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0630008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333067331","doi":"10.1017/s1079898600002882","title":"The law of non-contradiction: New philosophical essays, edited by Graham Priest, J.C. Beall, and Bradley Armour-Garb, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004, xii + 443 pp.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Philosophy; Classics; Art history; Epistemology; Art","score_opus":0.015958983845074645,"score_gpt":0.19891253978907364,"score_spread":0.18295355594399898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333067331","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034846785,0.5482374,0.020248612,0.19311386,0.005551612,0.000033177454,0.00014700202,0.00010592512,0.2290777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23086318,0.54998046,0.024216257,0.03813395,0.010725608,0.0003582439,0.0002724421,0.00055758853,0.14489229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982712,0.00087001437,0.00007535396,0.00015487305,0.0005132221,0.000115295006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758923,0.0016337095,0.00020735266,0.00016230409,0.00027943516,0.0001279389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034282957,0.00089978025,0.0010543645,0.0020034849,0.0031942665,0.0081053525,0.0016086793,0.0039601573,0.009988162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062782117,0.000982635,0.00070828095,0.0031398106,0.022699546,0.016066998,0.0028757164,0.006795066,0.0022875986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144261,0.000017429167,0.00009576102,0.00030057217,0.000014613702,0.00013958175,0.0046993326,0.00019243058,0.00012443462,0.8172976,0.15505551,0.022048272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011959643,0.000005225499,0.00037864206,0.00063124014,0.00000794117,0.00023317752,0.0016636861,0.00015333107,0.000109968874,0.57433844,0.42245132,0.000015064535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068895207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0109936185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009988162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058299727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005282509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04229963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338197944","doi":"","title":"STRAWSON AND SELF: RECONCILING REID AND HUME","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polymath","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Personal identity; Epistemology; Variation (astronomy); Philosophy; Self; Aesthetics; Physics","score_opus":0.026177852666865085,"score_gpt":0.2058108540853628,"score_spread":0.1796330014184977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338197944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070494674,0.011957836,0.08844056,0.088853285,0.002188198,0.000048995687,0.00007037611,0.00015102504,0.73779505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95682967,0.002143085,0.010224374,0.0057396744,0.00044389704,0.00005622936,0.000028567,0.00008822076,0.02444634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905634,0.006842249,0.0001915737,0.00070932956,0.0011962183,0.0004973173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958735,0.002476694,0.00030978626,0.00058926584,0.0005390452,0.00021170078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0098181395,0.0004983508,0.0007106779,0.0029029823,0.0068151797,0.0067441883,0.0012094951,0.0038969542,0.0038632953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010853197,0.00029991643,0.0004889314,0.0019348531,0.04761196,0.012897312,0.007803027,0.0034490954,0.00070079527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032664584,0.0000025496379,0.000049973147,0.000006523495,0.0000014577221,0.000021615118,0.0039914097,0.00005213043,0.0000065139952,0.99288756,0.00089905225,0.0020779346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040606947,0.000009948926,0.00010592633,0.000048643207,0.0000030856481,0.000084789244,0.0033995148,0.00024137832,0.00010230773,0.9300439,0.06594734,0.000009089703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038127694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033011357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098181395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005751296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035378376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05192387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338441480","doi":"","title":"Selfho od and the Unity of Consciousness","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029054080840281687,"score_gpt":0.2123371416833199,"score_spread":0.18328306084303822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338441480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43970594,0.02394153,0.052035853,0.07014286,0.001116222,0.00005247685,0.000037549642,0.00006338887,0.41290414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99336493,0.0010392494,0.0019619,0.0005758971,0.000079890146,0.000011959655,0.0000039117444,0.0000060010652,0.0029561361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983606,0.0011360915,0.00003525701,0.00015602923,0.00018317532,0.0001289146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849725,0.000894172,0.00017328929,0.00015540885,0.00012271666,0.00015710136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020925526,0.0001580192,0.00024136945,0.00073832687,0.0020441485,0.004673034,0.00033466858,0.0010874496,0.0014049361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022687928,0.00011856221,0.00020067766,0.00037841563,0.02492615,0.004365842,0.0030707857,0.0025212516,0.0001417298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014408143,0.000013638638,0.00036079943,0.000020041824,0.0000022457796,0.00003742713,0.006886474,0.0001094964,0.00019925504,0.9860963,0.0005160242,0.0057439324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060265743,0.00002981262,0.00062936003,0.00003981095,0.000002779593,0.000099665245,0.0039468776,0.00040843134,0.00035244407,0.9689645,0.025512911,0.00000732416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075436756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006000704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004673034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017004877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013332246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012337983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341634435","doi":"10.14288/1.0105260","title":"Logic of moral disagreement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05857071091818436,"score_gpt":0.18122460571650792,"score_spread":0.12265389479832356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341634435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024477025,0.006933478,0.252172,0.11840967,0.0017827103,0.00027432194,0.00022047444,0.0002727293,0.5954577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9067687,0.002190472,0.05738361,0.010289984,0.0017121284,0.00066686084,0.00020882652,0.00016624763,0.020613255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9536433,0.028385762,0.0018235991,0.005282554,0.00854793,0.0023168735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655574,0.023990858,0.002192348,0.003248738,0.0042453776,0.000765286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035132267,0.0008330274,0.0013257741,0.0047735684,0.009565207,0.012368438,0.00395333,0.008720353,0.01161023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047118448,0.00072970183,0.0018904911,0.0029396287,0.066361785,0.024233839,0.010214784,0.011761359,0.0013491967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001924926,0.0000020493173,0.000030170037,0.000011379805,0.0000017954043,0.000011451691,0.000495924,0.000062979256,0.000009110314,0.99835974,0.0003665663,0.00064699276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082729075,0.0000027170777,0.000032022526,0.000035101377,0.0000025076315,0.000026181155,0.00035510858,0.0005132733,0.000032968182,0.99027693,0.008707857,0.000007052808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025576719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011833468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035132267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012263781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005741257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18579942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343441886","doi":"10.1017/s0012217316000251","title":"Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide LARA DENIS AND OLIVER SENSEN (EDS.) Cambridge University Press, 2015; 289 pp.; $113.95 (hardback)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04634675054162722,"score_gpt":0.2702413350348032,"score_spread":0.22389458449317595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343441886","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008009268,0.7667806,0.01532782,0.069299094,0.0049697473,0.00004661651,0.0002601511,0.00018241844,0.14233267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07565641,0.71327287,0.023465743,0.013689314,0.007197616,0.00039821424,0.0004173086,0.00060317904,0.16529946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612135,0.0025314465,0.0001660795,0.00022413368,0.00079142227,0.0001654743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679047,0.0024248827,0.0001723852,0.00013724479,0.00032004726,0.0001549297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050828094,0.0016717823,0.000904873,0.002993317,0.0026265925,0.006875926,0.0010817235,0.0032578274,0.012624426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055905026,0.001045025,0.00057159865,0.002991304,0.0112224175,0.0077724713,0.0021016272,0.00690306,0.007113332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004365371,0.000031190997,0.00012036818,0.000820157,0.000018505909,0.00010674552,0.00518687,0.0005869386,0.00017600536,0.41941854,0.4723443,0.10114672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070131105,0.000008038501,0.0002944961,0.0016329461,0.000005902934,0.00017029172,0.0014465577,0.00013452131,0.00012679723,0.23249796,0.7636544,0.00002101045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004599344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007645581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012624426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057961703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054140463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04223287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399620272","doi":"10.1080/10749039.2016.1179329","title":"Looking Back to the Future: A Response to Kellogg","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind Culture and Activity","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Materialism; Dialectic; Realization (probability); Component (thermodynamics); Epistemology; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02480492889699116,"score_gpt":0.24691228588596037,"score_spread":0.22210735698896922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399620272","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039268716,0.003418495,0.00012349246,0.98445904,0.009016328,0.0000034234763,0.000011266201,0.000011523015,0.002563793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012424278,0.002846382,0.00032712764,0.9725186,0.004903823,0.000018920711,0.000011043312,0.000058521942,0.0068912874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928758,0.003184754,0.00033730658,0.0009659411,0.0016658163,0.00097038783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97215086,0.019844096,0.00069794274,0.0008179033,0.0036997872,0.002789493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015284313,0.000910665,0.001515064,0.0012533368,0.014014337,0.01287027,0.0031523544,0.036538105,0.009718301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0374233,0.000626387,0.0011535414,0.0015787174,0.02509415,0.026254114,0.008432791,0.06693953,0.0026377349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034929388,0.000028759161,0.00011475854,0.000081933,0.000007060867,0.0003615702,0.00907985,0.00006514098,0.00009712671,0.07782709,0.9067516,0.0055502104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042101812,0.000021480913,0.00019450403,0.000509474,0.000007632706,0.00033648027,0.017227955,0.00014837882,0.00012638056,0.084706515,0.89660513,0.00007391395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0161126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02856241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036538105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011026942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015760725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080832124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465198904","doi":"10.1057/s41302-016-0003-z","title":"Ethical Utilitarianism and The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Adam Smith in Relation to Hume and Bentham","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern Economic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Adam smith; Happiness; Doctrine; Jeremy bentham; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Epistemology; Ethical theory; Economics; Law; Psychology; Theology; Social psychology; Neoclassical economics; Political science","score_opus":0.03664400234723964,"score_gpt":0.24018031078880336,"score_spread":0.20353630844156373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465198904","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033417303,0.10242225,0.022163227,0.51344573,0.004131298,0.00004295665,0.00007097242,0.000037340676,0.32426885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132973,0.01939606,0.0066172816,0.01629182,0.004182789,0.00007707069,0.000019806626,0.00009096445,0.04002707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551696,0.003522636,0.00009372657,0.00028425214,0.00040925437,0.00017309727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881346,0.010063969,0.0003795529,0.00029820754,0.00079940597,0.00032428862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058197086,0.00058680004,0.0008775949,0.0014653528,0.004765791,0.007350477,0.0010216828,0.0056457673,0.0031738412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013353446,0.0005401532,0.00040481996,0.0025274795,0.0379238,0.011044919,0.00281316,0.009682983,0.00043066096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001099348,0.0000102282365,0.00007782883,0.000031841133,0.000006865957,0.000041332376,0.004617664,0.0003169996,0.000021908083,0.98441386,0.0074391896,0.0030112371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044488684,0.000003513707,0.00008049835,0.00004997813,0.0000024820813,0.00001900003,0.0008591733,0.00023422482,0.000027502354,0.9821342,0.016577551,0.0000074773093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006713335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075109466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007350477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065256916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002881236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047347426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470079491","doi":"10.1111/japp.12232","title":"Overall Lifelong Fortune: A Critique of the Intrinsic Potential Account","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Human life; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021793306516657576,"score_gpt":0.22959776220603262,"score_spread":0.20780445568937506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470079491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07769085,0.0067191045,0.047243156,0.16176935,0.0007554092,0.00004935898,0.00016381177,0.00008143518,0.7055275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98638946,0.0007054379,0.0018326369,0.003894777,0.00029790212,0.000047390342,0.000024923325,0.000038678798,0.006768889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611616,0.0019480224,0.00012052889,0.00057238986,0.00089271634,0.0003501506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99235135,0.0038929447,0.00071129884,0.0007560372,0.0014384631,0.00084983197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053401804,0.00045102806,0.00054041145,0.0016044726,0.003244458,0.004774581,0.0016409007,0.0033420792,0.0055171433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010511331,0.0002007904,0.00047696417,0.0010281556,0.028795179,0.00767542,0.0051033157,0.006158678,0.00057755667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005609022,0.000005982041,0.0002227182,0.0000134602205,0.00000278543,0.000025881027,0.0005520301,0.00013566263,0.000013145332,0.9959693,0.0011869386,0.001866503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004285901,0.0000073622637,0.00053252425,0.00005480301,0.0000033289812,0.00004455576,0.00067860686,0.00044938183,0.00003451162,0.98782223,0.01036074,0.00000771951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040965215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004658319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055171433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045901276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023059149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033303857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474112838","doi":"10.5325/jnietstud.47.2.0212","title":"History, Genealogy, Nietzsche: Comments on Jesse Prinz, “Genealogies of Morals: Nietzsche's Method Compared”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Nietzsche Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Philosophy; Marxist philosophy; Morality; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.2906423020424702,"score_gpt":0.3710536300475008,"score_spread":0.08041132800503059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474112838","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018859616,0.048226044,0.011651208,0.8260535,0.0048314617,0.00005975724,0.0001598281,0.00011228701,0.09004636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7153709,0.033886813,0.009805001,0.15452358,0.012025639,0.00047383126,0.00009950123,0.0004556904,0.073359124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99513274,0.0037605045,0.00007928268,0.00037307508,0.0004855213,0.00016883358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915274,0.0072936187,0.00026695107,0.0002313788,0.00050288305,0.0001778437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008468046,0.00061135076,0.0006337397,0.0026891131,0.008039703,0.007626852,0.0022539117,0.0054001985,0.004158315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016506046,0.00043081923,0.00034688765,0.0027347007,0.032315467,0.008823999,0.0038268424,0.007999338,0.0007745443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000155072,0.000012961743,0.00022749776,0.000047382073,0.0000067230917,0.00016886054,0.022821808,0.00019338421,0.00007268733,0.8989036,0.07362685,0.003902654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013527855,0.000015046001,0.0005754319,0.00048274518,0.000010630192,0.0001929116,0.01757893,0.00055065943,0.00030837127,0.40791124,0.57232314,0.00003740914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019721529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02510999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019721529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008130367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025770662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05899024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475106116","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2003.10716551","title":"Kant on Sensibility and the Understanding in the 1770s","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Nothing; Metaphysics; Sensibility; Critical philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.11597161719384437,"score_gpt":0.23575180517224362,"score_spread":0.11978018797839925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475106116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026007613,0.0652597,0.014125951,0.05328316,0.0012588083,0.000032790304,0.00014115857,0.00006823177,0.8398226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9076831,0.014766591,0.004556534,0.0070647015,0.0008756583,0.00011410458,0.00008162896,0.00012101647,0.0647367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940177,0.0038805897,0.0001603996,0.00045632603,0.0009319591,0.000552959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983041,0.0010528517,0.00012247374,0.00019555443,0.00021062866,0.000114299466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060365973,0.0009847948,0.00074040226,0.002863622,0.007364682,0.010553232,0.0009762704,0.004883503,0.0035845952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005624574,0.00059459696,0.0006549922,0.0022767922,0.05818391,0.010958294,0.0047319965,0.007423708,0.0011546094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003964557,0.0000015026782,0.000019401281,0.000008656137,9.62336e-7,0.000008950275,0.00244807,0.00007094603,0.000014592436,0.995388,0.0010772407,0.0009578445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051836105,0.0000038516478,0.0000823986,0.000098669385,0.0000020577058,0.000018000504,0.00091985025,0.000056701385,0.00006383771,0.9448715,0.05387089,0.000007108363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011392935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008908499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020051943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020051943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058134845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14548773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478970056","doi":"10.1017/s0263523200002056","title":"The Role of Modern Irony in Hegel's <i>Philosophy of Right</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Romance; Literature; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01322378141853643,"score_gpt":0.19890942892503058,"score_spread":0.18568564750649416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478970056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0533506,0.019518005,0.08247738,0.065989465,0.0014064271,0.000041079464,0.00006464735,0.00017055406,0.7769819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93388146,0.0035163686,0.010989679,0.0062661483,0.0011527392,0.00006781857,0.00002614963,0.00010611204,0.043993484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968611,0.001576627,0.000101281126,0.00030229866,0.00067580375,0.00048296084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967108,0.002072166,0.00026583893,0.00043898867,0.00032079968,0.00019142235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005360885,0.00052979094,0.00063673715,0.0016401635,0.0045130993,0.0057938215,0.00093268044,0.0032899384,0.0039530336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004590104,0.0003912598,0.0005464168,0.0008520587,0.049752276,0.00863292,0.0033065684,0.004956821,0.0007752111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051735046,0.0000042273787,0.000056801495,0.000014320146,0.0000016175917,0.000019629324,0.001108969,0.000073235526,0.000030109075,0.9961021,0.00081783393,0.0017659747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075615617,0.000016618602,0.00019962885,0.000065942695,0.0000035455637,0.00007076522,0.00050880184,0.00028821133,0.00017716792,0.9670671,0.031585332,0.0000093783865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003803999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033449442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057938215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043773213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022843536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031759858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480573183","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_22","title":"Theory and Theoretical Idea","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05493717170960568,"score_gpt":0.262192762525599,"score_spread":0.2072555908159933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480573183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027995429,0.0041437983,0.04984924,0.03954611,0.0016170001,0.0001138298,0.00013668436,0.0000961194,0.90169775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46417677,0.006608531,0.05463268,0.02555514,0.0039572665,0.001752763,0.00055912574,0.00048169048,0.44227603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965507,0.0019956762,0.00009670973,0.00048535952,0.00066110666,0.00021045329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978346,0.0013126491,0.000070313225,0.00035761815,0.00028860054,0.0001362565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038181231,0.00081353594,0.00092398364,0.0025173966,0.0041953675,0.0098247565,0.0022992317,0.004989492,0.026415678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037271653,0.00056473474,0.0006833933,0.0017247061,0.03536047,0.010806565,0.003606645,0.009279957,0.006489471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.2300046e-7,0.000003500131,0.000004149019,0.0000073416954,4.6090585e-7,0.000003385088,0.00018870793,0.000017705459,0.0000061971145,0.99762315,0.0015629382,0.0005818958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032568626,0.0000020864422,0.000010830458,0.0000332832,0.000001071176,0.000017422348,0.0002561011,0.0001548138,0.000023199214,0.9647876,0.03470864,0.0000018033627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017268651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013240459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026415678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005441107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044611082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08836925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482603993","doi":"10.1017/cco9781139016100.006","title":"Hume’s Theory of Causation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Computer science; Internet privacy; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10069841254167759,"score_gpt":0.22067320400934393,"score_spread":0.11997479146766633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482603993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026097305,0.015221641,0.15532671,0.018358354,0.0010617597,0.00006713654,0.0004211666,0.00016447443,0.80676895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5441365,0.022792542,0.09141024,0.009471774,0.0020235947,0.0004609228,0.00055321446,0.0003040723,0.3288472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796957,0.0011211416,0.00007174119,0.00025583658,0.00046412388,0.00011765661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981766,0.0012743017,0.00007832685,0.00019986395,0.00021887298,0.00005218887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025860476,0.0008121325,0.0006672652,0.0023525478,0.0021730857,0.0033468604,0.0011229438,0.0024281773,0.013128524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042939046,0.0004789259,0.0009525234,0.0016756663,0.011503979,0.0047579156,0.001843025,0.0030223457,0.0033268677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018793102,0.000001642343,0.000036831603,0.000028320408,0.0000041452704,0.000027242408,0.00023210545,0.00019977319,0.000012942568,0.99233043,0.0037196951,0.0034049377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027335088,0.0000026383336,0.0000612131,0.00004886844,0.0000029985124,0.000056602872,0.00006355814,0.00021255805,0.000050377013,0.9549392,0.04455574,0.0000035948842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002869836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003198583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013128524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003089137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025320132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043919265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483301427","doi":"10.1017/s0953820815000369","title":"Value and Preference Relations: Are They Symmetric?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Value (mathematics); Dilemma; Relation (database); Preference relation; Symmetry (geometry); Mathematical economics; Revealed preference; Positive economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Statistics; Geometry","score_opus":0.1859911685268948,"score_gpt":0.26814648802992597,"score_spread":0.08215531950303118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483301427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1546749,0.0061500273,0.33346933,0.040941462,0.0008924854,0.00020058328,0.00060160435,0.00022481922,0.4628448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97615474,0.0010288092,0.015056424,0.0016213668,0.00038378008,0.00016247449,0.00012965337,0.00005845853,0.0054042647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98787874,0.0068025556,0.0005685087,0.0015049357,0.0023716185,0.00087357993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98627484,0.006805373,0.0018853727,0.0025854053,0.0018716401,0.0005772831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01056171,0.00068861037,0.0013226866,0.0021281596,0.0017667313,0.0071703545,0.0015884361,0.0030948236,0.010671937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024427952,0.0006744055,0.0011723852,0.0021471984,0.021126937,0.028200394,0.003726671,0.004013439,0.0016254808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015932326,0.0000076279116,0.000170009,0.000023323095,0.0000101132955,0.000015419448,0.0003534743,0.00007889666,0.000071906965,0.99306315,0.0003274604,0.005862666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009094885,0.0000075959883,0.00022784532,0.000013626607,0.0000035502,0.000031722928,0.0002071414,0.000348826,0.00006662815,0.9974638,0.0016141839,0.0000059242984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015995471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009051817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010671937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003127107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015359743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055856287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483643584","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511615566.005","title":"The Axiom of Choice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom of choice; Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory; Axiom independence; Mathematical economics; Urelement; Axiom; Mathematics; Computer science; Programming language; Geometry","score_opus":0.04722474434784691,"score_gpt":0.20243934604186403,"score_spread":0.15521460169401713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483643584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023259672,0.005962814,0.04641439,0.010531358,0.0005498629,0.000029403576,0.0004483609,0.00007513302,0.9336628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45355424,0.014478071,0.04329475,0.0090952935,0.0020507548,0.0004535,0.0008432172,0.00033977506,0.47589037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792826,0.00078304263,0.00010338138,0.00042308986,0.00059657893,0.00016566936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984251,0.00089038815,0.0000637201,0.00026867338,0.00028361843,0.00006853343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002071076,0.00048186784,0.0006399473,0.0009844314,0.0021162794,0.004802714,0.0007809578,0.0021442447,0.022463743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031469513,0.0003995969,0.00088337786,0.0011001889,0.010549036,0.007633492,0.0018285774,0.0035961303,0.0047294465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020103005,8.640351e-7,0.000011750546,0.000012500675,0.0000012726924,0.000005191528,0.00004479897,0.000036044356,0.000019226407,0.99525,0.0031582676,0.0014581275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054200714,0.0000037313218,0.000059107613,0.000033419445,0.0000025556253,0.000039370214,0.000041668107,0.00017491575,0.00006425991,0.9233057,0.07626637,0.0000033826327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034952527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027026832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022463743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033509396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019621956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0751487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489045889","doi":"10.1522/030140084","title":"kantisme et la science de la morale","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03813660685622166,"score_gpt":0.30425367723561697,"score_spread":0.2661170703793953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489045889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008509703,0.059893016,0.017994272,0.04122756,0.0020368774,0.000027377242,0.00009477646,0.00007880448,0.87013763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70881045,0.02791217,0.010888495,0.007864423,0.0025890844,0.00019647309,0.00011033393,0.00016497631,0.24146359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966092,0.0020440219,0.000098172895,0.00028681775,0.0006757347,0.00028606324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976513,0.0013804489,0.00017026642,0.00032702548,0.0003625266,0.00010844323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003036751,0.00074917474,0.00059627625,0.0014015496,0.0039073224,0.0068648993,0.00097387074,0.0033141137,0.006210494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004168902,0.00043417772,0.00054290507,0.0014039751,0.03170233,0.0074887425,0.0022277315,0.0069468403,0.0016703488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049432592,0.0000018507616,0.000023531567,0.000032187527,0.0000025381416,0.0000069338103,0.00063939753,0.000121635836,0.000021911941,0.99430734,0.0028331485,0.002004561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061962314,0.0000049909586,0.00014675519,0.00008758423,0.000002734134,0.000029938701,0.00035560186,0.00016207443,0.00008204396,0.91551906,0.08359559,0.0000074578625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050539193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059715747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008091567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008091567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005733752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058708727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490450163","doi":"10.1017/cco9781139016100.014","title":"Hume and Moral Motivation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12048100168954637,"score_gpt":0.21267368717323618,"score_spread":0.0921926854836898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490450163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010823397,0.03122445,0.005286473,0.019597752,0.00044826153,0.000022978922,0.000049325958,0.000035179466,0.9325123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76077664,0.017522983,0.0033808823,0.004370114,0.0006703062,0.00010781347,0.000060079437,0.000058003687,0.2130532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998833,0.00077572966,0.00001572535,0.00008655974,0.0001620505,0.00012689175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921846,0.0004638497,0.000057937632,0.0000755299,0.00009882092,0.000085395965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017789241,0.00033212328,0.00033264107,0.0007455748,0.0020372246,0.0039572055,0.0004263058,0.0017979908,0.009620254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002446393,0.00014278691,0.00026412754,0.0006273178,0.01343944,0.0028510508,0.0016223174,0.002199618,0.0015512855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037616364,0.000004350635,0.00006225715,0.000031809064,0.000002010853,0.00001328214,0.00092230487,0.000074209245,0.000026565203,0.98683655,0.0054021445,0.00662074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005194665,0.000009239294,0.00044807687,0.00019199855,0.0000025707807,0.000049790302,0.0009911271,0.00015873156,0.00010454561,0.8672942,0.13073787,0.0000066841935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014690568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019218579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009620254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031321144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002113324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032182932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491493561","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_36","title":"Good and Bad and Usefulness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.10017210342579433,"score_gpt":0.25008347686869414,"score_spread":0.14991137344289981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2491493561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00355574,0.010489688,0.008710335,0.0236902,0.0010835484,0.00002834137,0.000049876122,0.00004608399,0.95234627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55148786,0.009519467,0.008218044,0.012029213,0.0039070593,0.00027866082,0.00009694968,0.00022070746,0.41424206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944273,0.0031542385,0.00015208503,0.00045651823,0.0015475702,0.00026222336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462056,0.0035920138,0.0002566201,0.00064826844,0.0006289726,0.0002535607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041030026,0.0007116958,0.0007075287,0.0022291436,0.0028152328,0.011388875,0.00080149143,0.0036051578,0.013560643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010661681,0.00043084347,0.000258032,0.0022516458,0.028778283,0.014643915,0.0032262527,0.0056673572,0.0030825108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003134494,0.0000044281715,0.000071816336,0.00001907866,0.0000015028282,0.000011878746,0.0011108804,0.000025803089,0.000019659856,0.98449785,0.0068339086,0.0073999926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031581856,0.0000054278003,0.00015817599,0.00010728536,0.0000039834367,0.000060060996,0.00090032804,0.0000901717,0.00004618887,0.89952785,0.099091925,0.000005434762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013155725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024229507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013560643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026349877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029990275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045364916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494113654","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511975622.006","title":"The ichnofabric approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06548147416380237,"score_gpt":0.18612773256872517,"score_spread":0.1206462584049228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494113654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001277847,0.0070263296,0.005025786,0.0074509894,0.0005397152,0.000008310103,0.00004662779,0.00004143453,0.97858286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1417807,0.00852203,0.0076617007,0.007898918,0.0016234467,0.00016844485,0.00017091937,0.0001874295,0.8319864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917907,0.0003332439,0.00001427108,0.00012509762,0.00020899762,0.00013919375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968195,0.000107884676,0.000022107984,0.000065856875,0.00008531101,0.00003688273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077245466,0.00056404347,0.00033223856,0.0014666065,0.00476794,0.004364321,0.0009368334,0.0017825824,0.03297714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015178055,0.00020191177,0.0003344657,0.0012099117,0.007051969,0.0035987282,0.0030077468,0.0028734664,0.008626172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039981774,0.000003955688,0.000044509266,0.000014473861,9.832551e-7,0.000017332924,0.0007663429,0.000034636818,0.000023832796,0.9665973,0.023345826,0.0091468375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003222335,0.0000058014202,0.00018716903,0.00007110629,0.000002432817,0.000067925845,0.0005727252,0.00012717018,0.00005940949,0.19165918,0.8072398,0.0000040899567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008199706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013386235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03297714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004032378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018912995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110319495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494649453","doi":"10.1017/ccol9780521859868.002","title":"Hume’s New Science of the Mind","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of science; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Natural science; Natural (archaeology); Metaphysics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.06117093599158819,"score_gpt":0.20284242562928556,"score_spread":0.14167148963769738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494649453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002710467,0.04390644,0.02988373,0.039311346,0.0022435132,0.000032186992,0.0000943178,0.00011578253,0.8817022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38770357,0.043596447,0.035263713,0.02112498,0.0050566504,0.00033772187,0.00016753799,0.00027787822,0.5064716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838126,0.0008412874,0.00004396407,0.00020665777,0.00042669452,0.000100184705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987219,0.00077904575,0.000065011736,0.00013043637,0.00020086575,0.000102763544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001568504,0.0006409483,0.00037646614,0.0016295989,0.0027487853,0.0042542457,0.00075389,0.0023246207,0.0049370225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024680204,0.00025689718,0.00036348143,0.0009323005,0.02062932,0.0069083283,0.0019756462,0.0050903647,0.0018575585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004017294,0.0000032618188,0.00003705257,0.000035235607,0.0000020803102,0.000028485834,0.0017784735,0.00007781532,0.000036975125,0.97295153,0.018496603,0.0065484033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033728877,0.0000058630594,0.000110431334,0.000101805155,0.0000017823044,0.000116786985,0.00043385776,0.00015218783,0.00008674736,0.64360005,0.35538122,0.000006040843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032683625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005096807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049370225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003531452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033186232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025622606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495763765","doi":"10.1057/9780230285569_2","title":"Aristotle and Hegel on Recognition and Friendship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Virtue; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Goodwill; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0660342421526986,"score_gpt":0.22860086477661704,"score_spread":0.16256662262391844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495763765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015829133,0.013631635,0.011265609,0.013698784,0.00041571917,0.00002495495,0.000033114593,0.000032254033,0.9450688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8606387,0.004437211,0.0040316684,0.0030755952,0.00038501498,0.00009242395,0.00003055181,0.000040132298,0.12726872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983677,0.0009162671,0.00003729716,0.00018921473,0.00030350746,0.00018607882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958783,0.0001890114,0.00003819339,0.00005791556,0.00008624572,0.00004077578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001358383,0.00045204384,0.00030018875,0.0008391504,0.00484938,0.0031850017,0.0005536624,0.0030020473,0.0031686677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017070262,0.00020501354,0.00018599028,0.00072011777,0.028994199,0.0059892535,0.0027005034,0.002402324,0.0009536967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028407321,0.0000013252221,0.000017176942,0.000004746147,4.696307e-7,0.00001414548,0.0016975038,0.0000349859,0.000009523018,0.9953241,0.0014417393,0.0014514377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046272517,0.000007716084,0.00012827718,0.00006039418,0.0000014200926,0.00005043472,0.0011971862,0.00010681134,0.00005744537,0.91433036,0.084049895,0.0000053861613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008871221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011054511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008871221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005477243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00200064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039740443},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2499004455","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511584749.003","title":"The foundations of a project","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fable; Enlightenment; Epitome; Constructive; Politics; Philosophy; Action (physics); Literature; Aesthetics; Sociology; Art; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0689905604309775,"score_gpt":0.2314426239340043,"score_spread":0.16245206350302682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499004455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005717237,0.0050128656,0.036180474,0.14852482,0.0051693902,0.00029201066,0.00020669703,0.00032310275,0.7985733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27012587,0.0070077474,0.045786735,0.03051228,0.002832234,0.0011367348,0.0006041951,0.0007056196,0.64128864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904101,0.0053230943,0.00027898693,0.0013795381,0.0016145208,0.0009937624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98916304,0.0021568616,0.0003602785,0.0024464568,0.0018960692,0.0039773155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011632796,0.0005664026,0.00038615766,0.0014868829,0.011720694,0.020125275,0.0023612643,0.005586901,0.03735845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012643746,0.0004707371,0.00045173912,0.0013670347,0.018301949,0.014148182,0.015887383,0.0068806647,0.012066022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009082368,0.000026802569,0.0001279904,0.00002104735,0.0000021267513,0.000051063842,0.0014825122,0.000060574443,0.000047781745,0.9577112,0.031562496,0.008897221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009128854,0.000022457762,0.00012863395,0.00016799606,0.0000018633864,0.00005689641,0.002218155,0.00020087867,0.00007697335,0.24122597,0.7558844,0.000006574351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040710713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041827364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03735845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005125538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020957781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124976516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504676013","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498855.008","title":"Motivation without Evaluation? Unintelligible Ends, Animal Behavior, and Diabolical Wills","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.10564997165283146,"score_gpt":0.26638594678467004,"score_spread":0.16073597513183857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504676013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01724498,0.012451821,0.008714427,0.03950365,0.00044305954,0.000022819651,0.000025227853,0.000046968325,0.921547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8447858,0.004868349,0.004627287,0.0058082924,0.00043040022,0.0001204613,0.00003517365,0.000070274444,0.13925382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875927,0.0007158216,0.000023207398,0.00009084201,0.00027343628,0.00013732848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992586,0.00035545012,0.0000660569,0.000085233085,0.00012488669,0.000109819615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021391425,0.000279501,0.00025005869,0.000441755,0.0019582803,0.004463239,0.0005391047,0.0014825615,0.0024728866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022430206,0.0001626134,0.00021258512,0.00034592647,0.023781572,0.0048059993,0.0019484218,0.0033443528,0.0005888616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018396553,0.0000046616815,0.000037535356,0.000006805566,6.184799e-7,0.0000072475145,0.00082754303,0.00003250692,0.000021171203,0.99449944,0.0022424192,0.0023182891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053976405,0.000007866984,0.00022491832,0.00007196305,0.0000014789479,0.000028481203,0.00088962476,0.0001992033,0.00008280415,0.9136334,0.08484926,0.000005563098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017299133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026456823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004463239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035780563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022583457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025960684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517068224","doi":"10.35920/arf.2004.v8i2.77-90","title":"Virtude acabada e vício acabado","year":2004,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Analytica - Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Metaphysics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.037654276241029655,"score_gpt":0.2791266508381555,"score_spread":0.24147237459712587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517068224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30398998,0.0030154525,0.015093435,0.0019477342,0.00016367213,0.000055043016,0.00013661124,0.0000826325,0.6755155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850885,0.0008229905,0.0014228323,0.0001129726,0.00003817768,0.000029130655,0.000046800014,0.000038343558,0.012400191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979347,0.0006097526,0.00007558019,0.00028166256,0.0008242112,0.00027422782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665475,0.0017963108,0.00040149016,0.00035379452,0.0005509905,0.00024265372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017142368,0.0002523693,0.00029095533,0.0024282685,0.0019358174,0.008408544,0.00039561666,0.0006930676,0.00879029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005038035,0.00014176751,0.0003794041,0.002139169,0.008461439,0.0050092386,0.0033212393,0.0012288006,0.0004061648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096008436,0.000021805787,0.0079250075,0.0002348234,0.000035176057,0.00016481997,0.056945946,0.0002653797,0.0021323685,0.9009153,0.001315051,0.029948222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030531053,0.00024747837,0.06511101,0.0007081235,0.00015365842,0.000915694,0.15523529,0.002472927,0.0035174151,0.33668816,0.43484315,0.000076483535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026439251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043536574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00879029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025389898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017073179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029406428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519821000","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2016.23","title":"Review - Ardis. Collins (ed.). Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Dialectical Justification of Philosophy’s First Principles. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2013. ISBN 978-0-7735-4060-6 (hbk). Pp. xvi+488. - Ludwig Siep. Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. Daniel Smyth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. ISBN 978-1-107-02235-5 (hbk). Pp. xxii+307.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Dialectic; Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; Queen (butterfly); Art history; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02919295449377831,"score_gpt":0.21437945072718348,"score_spread":0.18518649623340516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519821000","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015467735,0.99384236,0.00008221909,0.0030366243,0.0013754605,0.000020989826,0.00014659794,0.000012767083,0.0014675091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00040739725,0.99529994,0.0001292639,0.0017012095,0.00081591646,0.000048846843,0.00024832794,0.00001020458,0.0013389052],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961301,0.0008669995,0.00057809585,0.00054959056,0.0017071508,0.0001681257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839982,0.008383277,0.0015739659,0.000541432,0.0050703348,0.00043276322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003912011,0.0026617202,0.0040189093,0.013077159,0.0010582241,0.004562258,0.0032959182,0.0038519935,0.028392296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018775124,0.0012184497,0.002199012,0.018648136,0.0021462606,0.0061457846,0.0023480945,0.004346115,0.017913125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032553606,0.000016056189,0.00018161377,0.07094176,0.00023848243,0.00011845784,0.000260409,0.00013935586,0.0001408593,0.0027270427,0.6995896,0.2256138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019763547,0.00001691861,0.0007737827,0.0559564,0.00028878846,0.00034794628,0.00017325976,0.00002518633,0.00007238946,0.002127107,0.9401735,0.000024964293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012978234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018065788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028392296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054168506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011643739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09498167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524158054","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0016","title":"Setting the Standard: Don Garrett’s Hume","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Epistemology; Beauty; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Causation; Parallels; Construct (python library); Reading (process); Intentionality","score_opus":0.07203991878276786,"score_gpt":0.29442625684569,"score_spread":0.22238633806292216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524158054","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033066398,0.06330565,0.005846424,0.72352993,0.017425116,0.000030441395,0.0000838326,0.00019605667,0.18627591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18780029,0.031356376,0.009159081,0.43944058,0.017013824,0.00016585465,0.00013244667,0.00060723897,0.3143243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960206,0.0019528595,0.00009376729,0.00061329774,0.0009978254,0.00032162084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964277,0.0017694716,0.00014210578,0.00031887778,0.0007993512,0.0005425959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041029206,0.00067713065,0.00073267584,0.0015374618,0.0058046314,0.007512586,0.0010054862,0.005818285,0.008731506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011508095,0.0004535902,0.00033692838,0.00091138756,0.012922085,0.00999084,0.0028995574,0.008220898,0.0042833914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024277339,0.000020035102,0.000154551,0.000064386026,0.0000035568414,0.00007082382,0.00464162,0.00008529445,0.000107884836,0.33730224,0.6345127,0.023012633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003088582,0.000008455176,0.00013416349,0.00022597388,0.0000021940962,0.000068476445,0.0012274506,0.000078929865,0.00009377776,0.07325309,0.9248921,0.000012279048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008787312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012240139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008787312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008005966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033658224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058087587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525568543","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0022","title":"Loeb’s “Standard” Questions about Hume’s Concept of Probable Truth","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue; Beauty; Honor; Reading (process); Causation; Computer science","score_opus":0.07216388733433313,"score_gpt":0.30450901370490785,"score_spread":0.23234512637057472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525568543","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051632226,0.023253921,0.023937814,0.7458495,0.0045081736,0.00004730889,0.00018478901,0.00007715209,0.1969781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6170705,0.009140816,0.01334791,0.28401998,0.017455695,0.00044519152,0.00021803312,0.0002542687,0.058047578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869751,0.008428359,0.0005176789,0.0012978447,0.0023119776,0.00046908003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828106,0.01269194,0.0008005886,0.0010314229,0.0020423043,0.00062317326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013503509,0.00064385124,0.00087535556,0.002130426,0.0043122876,0.0096301045,0.0019845087,0.011704538,0.007532187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039356798,0.00056322746,0.00072709256,0.0019054925,0.04336033,0.024963247,0.0039165476,0.013875114,0.0020569938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078871535,0.0000062926742,0.000041443185,0.000021177182,0.0000031335792,0.000012370969,0.0011876192,0.000030313053,0.00001951542,0.9662665,0.030120838,0.0022828747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009252749,0.0000059705158,0.0001103288,0.000104236286,0.0000019424358,0.000037170706,0.00060477684,0.000109321445,0.000049166927,0.92459995,0.07435567,0.0000122472675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003399865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026625555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013503509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008029636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028462736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07141423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526569890","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0015","title":"Skepticism about Garrett’s Hume: Faculties, Concepts, and Imposed Coherence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Interpretation (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Computer science","score_opus":0.09142697512665036,"score_gpt":0.3275651963868487,"score_spread":0.23613822126019834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526569890","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035473637,0.04308127,0.017386073,0.486731,0.003853841,0.00003980819,0.000056234996,0.00021092358,0.41316724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89776486,0.009151088,0.003398437,0.058780547,0.0028419036,0.00007628253,0.000037255606,0.00021432457,0.02773541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888362,0.007283353,0.0002858815,0.0010319795,0.0019884862,0.0005740824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98251706,0.013167442,0.0011060078,0.0011675284,0.00124038,0.00080159114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010843988,0.00048957096,0.00078023144,0.0017122468,0.008652215,0.013017268,0.0010946624,0.0059736297,0.003053849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022878796,0.00055715605,0.00041388863,0.0016051633,0.07605792,0.018439181,0.0062624672,0.012482802,0.0011311123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018333649,0.000008184191,0.000222652,0.00006606988,0.0000058262235,0.000104750834,0.03321868,0.00007721162,0.000088968816,0.92108613,0.034581065,0.010521972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001326458,0.000021265052,0.0006549779,0.0004988527,0.000008021578,0.00037831537,0.016490698,0.00022742116,0.00023821126,0.7514468,0.2299862,0.000036028407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004128093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052539473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013017268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080443965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004276706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058366418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527853790","doi":"10.1007/s11153-016-9590-1","title":"Everlasting check or philosophical fiasco: a response to Alexander George’s interpretation of Hume’s ‘Of Miracles’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy of religion; Classics; Art history; History; Medicine; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05288975198086782,"score_gpt":0.32285091995142645,"score_spread":0.26996116797055864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527853790","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014401694,0.002825893,0.00059070875,0.97167194,0.012361328,0.000005529498,0.000015341813,0.000020574853,0.01106853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060140636,0.00103663,0.0005842784,0.90979016,0.012994599,0.000029054325,0.00001302756,0.00017769015,0.015234008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895948,0.005010925,0.00043338526,0.0013862675,0.0018673643,0.0017072177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98286635,0.012363708,0.0009418016,0.0007817611,0.001738271,0.001308107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008662057,0.0010268204,0.0011638014,0.0010443361,0.018317295,0.010983674,0.0031857677,0.049502403,0.0064679952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03320775,0.0007290922,0.0009652256,0.0011080201,0.047026284,0.013458978,0.010735325,0.060836673,0.0019544845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034773897,0.000013012855,0.0001444824,0.00008201515,0.00001531325,0.00062365463,0.042780656,0.00007103934,0.00023201077,0.41312712,0.5393752,0.003500745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021110705,0.000010708245,0.00022108128,0.00031498974,0.0000075772236,0.00033477842,0.021320276,0.00013735853,0.00023034507,0.106804624,0.870525,0.00007212666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013901548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02854357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049502403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007076348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070722355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051342785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529264070","doi":"10.20381/ruor-4865","title":"Autonomy and the Future","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Extant taxon; Narrative; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Literature; Law; Art; Biology","score_opus":0.004984662899766588,"score_gpt":0.13805032698420175,"score_spread":0.13306566408443515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529264070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016822204,0.010871469,0.0051924866,0.03922005,0.0005465327,0.000028247658,0.000051300805,0.000038172566,0.9272296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9068608,0.0073301406,0.001861558,0.0054007927,0.00061313965,0.00006403763,0.00007337177,0.000038139442,0.077758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801314,0.0010369436,0.00004586236,0.00028602235,0.00026915118,0.00034900662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989448,0.0003600382,0.000117053394,0.00014653247,0.00010966009,0.000321951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022878894,0.00037158586,0.00022966694,0.000677466,0.00518534,0.0063340547,0.00055716804,0.0020870792,0.00945975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002579991,0.00013301073,0.00036038898,0.0005035369,0.025456551,0.0075729038,0.0057218825,0.0035606122,0.0011527763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030717156,0.0000038616968,0.00010924926,0.00000833844,8.834155e-7,0.000030932795,0.0034950129,0.00006725429,0.000017649803,0.99021506,0.0026819834,0.0033666953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000762971,0.000013872127,0.00037855576,0.0001272515,0.0000020838345,0.00012344416,0.0037421307,0.00012758833,0.000042597458,0.6399499,0.35547683,0.000008234796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003991588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035670178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00945975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004028527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003741364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031646073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529882712","doi":"","title":"Practical Reasoning and Rationality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo; Bishop's University","keywords":"Rationality; Computer science; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032186079616125095,"score_gpt":0.24752905091051342,"score_spread":0.2153429712943883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529882712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012387992,0.03646129,0.09658535,0.12840511,0.0010581731,0.00015257091,0.00014816124,0.00012368619,0.7246777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82173175,0.021810943,0.0662054,0.016979173,0.002315815,0.0004774766,0.00023265713,0.0001791147,0.07006768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827367,0.010416174,0.0007658455,0.0018351007,0.003236689,0.0010095186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987404,0.008721474,0.0008475134,0.0013772607,0.0012165654,0.0004332338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0127726905,0.0008088571,0.00091483205,0.0017624341,0.0039651203,0.01027728,0.0017387517,0.006236839,0.0084168445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017070742,0.00046430132,0.00088289735,0.0015160932,0.06012088,0.010269814,0.004338417,0.0066988766,0.0018282466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021011717,0.000003327183,0.000035550962,0.000022245082,0.0000029608107,0.000010555006,0.00036218262,0.00017879497,0.000013855954,0.9962931,0.0011161007,0.0019591735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055115834,0.0000036001563,0.000066947134,0.00006988674,0.0000018882791,0.00001934057,0.00023326368,0.00023576227,0.000026665435,0.97262347,0.026709385,0.0000042354886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005042325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026222102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127726905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086704595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064958506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06754929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531119672","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1235856","title":"Kant’s deductions of morality and freedom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main; Simon Fraser University; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05596386193333154,"score_gpt":0.2243051721624456,"score_spread":0.16834131022911408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531119672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042905375,0.002799134,0.1039627,0.042354494,0.0010840175,0.00008266664,0.00019746224,0.00013481331,0.80647945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764473,0.0004753609,0.0084213335,0.0021974274,0.00035788585,0.00007305959,0.000063031715,0.00006171856,0.011902784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890693,0.005938533,0.000342477,0.0008808098,0.002842458,0.0009263773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99173003,0.004880039,0.00042850574,0.001301075,0.0012034709,0.00045672138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009321243,0.00063177885,0.0010429467,0.0028285256,0.0039731963,0.007086752,0.0013640599,0.0046086293,0.005256303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014399616,0.0005261079,0.0013381686,0.0009454402,0.058821376,0.006521322,0.0067416904,0.008610189,0.00083791715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035572818,0.000002914688,0.000017556307,0.0000068311833,0.0000021114179,0.00000983847,0.0002552831,0.00015579138,0.00001971365,0.9986437,0.00042239827,0.00046033048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055718638,0.0000016996273,0.00003075074,0.000017168426,0.000001243455,0.000006373107,0.00007903293,0.00014828345,0.000043098487,0.995832,0.0038318594,0.0000029236064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029390347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018848098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009321243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074385046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003996047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053970397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535814262","doi":"10.1017/s1369415416000273","title":"Empirical Cognition in the Transcendental Deduction: Kant’s Starting Point and his Humean Problem","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Cognition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Identification (biology); Empirical evidence; Point (geometry); Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0878308471345856,"score_gpt":0.30361816924072366,"score_spread":0.21578732210613805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535814262","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02812423,0.4772629,0.109470576,0.21812376,0.0037216586,0.000031520034,0.0001237517,0.00011112387,0.16303043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.875796,0.076642394,0.017086118,0.0162083,0.00446315,0.000065398315,0.00007981554,0.00009112761,0.009567671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98995626,0.0077071986,0.00021584102,0.00043138364,0.001507271,0.00018213496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850643,0.01206988,0.0004032995,0.0009615824,0.0013133975,0.0001874679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011989832,0.00041351983,0.000890631,0.0038265444,0.0013080917,0.0045955624,0.0014962679,0.0034338408,0.001785088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012874166,0.00029310444,0.0005890634,0.0022334983,0.03425034,0.008149686,0.0020118062,0.0058028894,0.0004668886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075033195,0.000004801167,0.00003937064,0.00009415711,0.000007872941,0.000021020192,0.0005782999,0.00021330953,0.000028595885,0.9925248,0.0017591938,0.0047210357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045101597,0.0000041342655,0.000101685764,0.00023364798,0.0000031211302,0.000030978532,0.00029796723,0.00025414233,0.000064973654,0.9732545,0.025744818,0.00000551303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017290522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011237843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011989832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042362874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002646639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06340903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2545592650","doi":"","title":"Attempt, success and action generation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Action (physics); Indeterminism; Epistemology; Action theory (sociology); Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology; Determinism","score_opus":0.07177408888941846,"score_gpt":0.2602224880405851,"score_spread":0.18844839915116668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2545592650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1891159,0.0039471374,0.2273335,0.014726344,0.00026684627,0.00022879228,0.00019089277,0.00040638976,0.56378424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682102,0.0007338125,0.015910544,0.0003409684,0.00007573601,0.000117203934,0.000075752694,0.000060810977,0.014475025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958835,0.0019280082,0.00019472303,0.0006443029,0.00087020156,0.0004792569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99495476,0.0029989604,0.0005580628,0.00060025847,0.00048182585,0.00040612282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043918006,0.0004970467,0.00039149594,0.0015660193,0.0022344645,0.005108368,0.00095854973,0.001739621,0.0051236805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006785997,0.00031416916,0.0007471627,0.0008319676,0.016398717,0.007367241,0.004866274,0.0022406122,0.0006095533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071286086,0.000008133226,0.00033489818,0.000017143557,0.0000050248236,0.000040500912,0.0011732393,0.00032699958,0.00007298442,0.99369353,0.00025633737,0.0040639928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001178173,0.000020395559,0.00045804158,0.00003210441,0.000009435196,0.00006847053,0.0007520587,0.001317465,0.00024653846,0.98539865,0.011675724,0.000009279248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013874057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097257545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051236805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002485066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014260304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02322638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556984348","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2016.61","title":"Insight and the Enlightenment: Why<i>Einsicht</i>in Chapter Six of Hegel’s<i>Phenomenology of Spirit</i>?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Faith; Superstition; Intelligibility (philosophy); Morality; Political philosophy; Politics; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.020585858005597472,"score_gpt":0.19603030457915532,"score_spread":0.17544444657355784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556984348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3289279,0.026631512,0.047501642,0.16632009,0.0019218773,0.00015924187,0.00023033941,0.00018299425,0.4281244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793866,0.0029692901,0.0021159053,0.0035843109,0.00021354262,0.000055057346,0.000033523454,0.00006371767,0.011578074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663806,0.00249241,0.00006966192,0.00018296848,0.00035833946,0.00025862383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961599,0.0029691618,0.00023775853,0.00019022023,0.00025865683,0.00018432418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004303756,0.00031260628,0.00035967695,0.0011059063,0.004191849,0.006563603,0.00065440964,0.0023453997,0.002524926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054787993,0.00021264511,0.00032544264,0.0013798546,0.04251507,0.0077653993,0.004087235,0.006174282,0.00032159596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017315468,0.000010684651,0.00025367312,0.000054868615,0.000003182872,0.00017390212,0.2330808,0.000080084006,0.0002179406,0.7606212,0.0028211155,0.0026652443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017971604,0.000039050028,0.0010910918,0.00070728606,0.000011441983,0.00045322423,0.24785367,0.00031509358,0.00094953395,0.4573648,0.29115453,0.00004243091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048988974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039594276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006563603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00470539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018668151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03414011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562804659","doi":"10.1515/kant-2016-0051","title":"Kants ethischer Kohärentismus","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kant-Studien","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Coherentism; Normative; Philosophy; Epistemology; Moral philosophy; Categorical imperative; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Law; Foundationalism; Political science; Morality","score_opus":0.06340014435809127,"score_gpt":0.2400632657559008,"score_spread":0.17666312139780954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562804659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020372368,0.01772509,0.08174817,0.06580271,0.002407194,0.000070024325,0.0006175999,0.0005244032,0.8107324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8614221,0.013980366,0.03112726,0.007595696,0.0015441256,0.00020585877,0.0006363963,0.0001925568,0.08329555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974445,0.001125063,0.00015982312,0.00032948374,0.00071072445,0.00023039235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991585,0.0003463437,0.00007331131,0.00015524683,0.00021103662,0.000055604745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032196136,0.0005296561,0.00043212407,0.001127197,0.0015041756,0.004101376,0.00057078013,0.0027057633,0.010932671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030523224,0.0003236126,0.00048891554,0.0009447082,0.0066927024,0.00388938,0.0036822103,0.005415772,0.0041586226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012783575,0.00001032273,0.00012026013,0.00009158738,0.000011471762,0.000053985204,0.00028718627,0.000516799,0.00013400106,0.97864294,0.008311635,0.011806988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011867506,0.000009177094,0.00017225911,0.00010343292,0.00000716725,0.000106961576,0.00019348782,0.00083455985,0.00025250376,0.9191641,0.079133414,0.00001098983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014775187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001046275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010932671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031989156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017848585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03657347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586213753","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1115","title":"Book Notes: Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy, by Arthur Ripstein","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Philosophy; Political freedom; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.018898824636121993,"score_gpt":0.2335909102946059,"score_spread":0.2146920856584839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586213753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015965583,0.09454736,0.0062900214,0.43238404,0.011703043,0.000032706866,0.00031620733,0.00010498736,0.453025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.065792896,0.06720421,0.005109056,0.116565846,0.021110311,0.00019658873,0.00023794292,0.00039959556,0.7233835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907637,0.0003156565,0.000031961885,0.0001558712,0.00035259596,0.00006754559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964199,0.0027730204,0.00010174337,0.00015805822,0.00044177144,0.000105421605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015221374,0.00075991097,0.0006432376,0.0021996568,0.0044374755,0.007119787,0.001209001,0.007630224,0.02166847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005005176,0.0006402767,0.00033826794,0.00339436,0.016649513,0.0140306,0.0019587034,0.012500831,0.0070326794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055247256,0.000013038751,0.000029960438,0.000041815143,0.0000017134677,0.000016365397,0.0006079807,0.00010265615,0.000023295037,0.57587314,0.4165753,0.006709243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081538865,0.000005131432,0.00018189705,0.0002264487,0.0000036244785,0.000042959582,0.00061659195,0.000100965386,0.00008658994,0.41019607,0.5885156,0.000015976157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01817398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037810642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02166847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041822637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038765895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07248825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589061812","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2016.1","title":"Hegel on the Idealism of Practical Life","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Idealism; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Morality; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Realism; Property (philosophy); Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09831657327678317,"score_gpt":0.2700612110835483,"score_spread":0.17174463780676513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589061812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03894276,0.0041426765,0.07672766,0.08236867,0.0006308162,0.000058296268,0.000060845687,0.00012107154,0.7969472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702581,0.0010787616,0.006330646,0.0031413357,0.00026774584,0.00008467212,0.00002831264,0.000054738757,0.018755738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99175304,0.005408694,0.00018256354,0.00058188295,0.0014221122,0.00065166625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99444085,0.003095723,0.00032345182,0.0008538387,0.0008476503,0.000438613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007905702,0.00046056637,0.0005343095,0.0013573309,0.0045190696,0.0075265644,0.001145915,0.0027934161,0.0041082613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007928698,0.00033635343,0.0004936005,0.00067903026,0.07924775,0.009528496,0.006062531,0.006466531,0.00085142604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001721858,0.000001883916,0.000010436005,0.0000039965043,5.7196615e-7,0.0000066279194,0.00047260127,0.00007574568,0.000010231022,0.99881965,0.00031969813,0.00027676538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004041194,0.000003438868,0.000016012922,0.00002228211,8.9908815e-7,0.00001615442,0.0005165504,0.00020607965,0.000041249197,0.988112,0.011058506,0.0000029100386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024611566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001342934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007905702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006665698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038371084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04836321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591617248","doi":"10.3366/jsp.2017.0152","title":"Adam Smith's <i>Theory of Moral Sentiments</i> in 1759, 1790, and 1976","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scottish Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Adam smith; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Classics; Art history; Philosophy; Epistemology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06366548595507031,"score_gpt":0.26690613990286605,"score_spread":0.20324065394779572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591617248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065380014,0.05189096,0.00761958,0.09567688,0.005352783,0.00006245273,0.00021354137,0.00009755541,0.7737063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8705131,0.013416622,0.0015324974,0.0049875495,0.0021692186,0.0000507755,0.000042646083,0.00006651337,0.1072211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824476,0.00093447196,0.000065747154,0.00015956009,0.00038446084,0.00021107438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988551,0.0006606761,0.00015803643,0.000053271346,0.00017440933,0.00009842867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017788631,0.00056127727,0.00028890488,0.0020897752,0.004865037,0.004120803,0.00045654105,0.0017285206,0.0043436065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004642749,0.00024866383,0.00021908268,0.001628724,0.024718285,0.0038003905,0.0020366586,0.0025755798,0.0009393458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026835478,0.0000045642173,0.0004636465,0.00007245765,0.000005202513,0.00017279499,0.03331631,0.00017511367,0.00012621374,0.91257477,0.03471202,0.018350216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009267419,0.000021278332,0.0014475435,0.00025293106,0.000006970642,0.00014144415,0.007262065,0.00008302331,0.00038135165,0.1896871,0.80068535,0.000021746195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016757205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018155843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016757205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009621958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004863331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069812536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592044354","doi":"10.1017/s0266267116000286","title":"THE FITTING-ATTITUDE ANALYSIS OF VALUE RELATIONS AND THE PREFERENCES VS. VALUE JUDGEMENTS OBJECTION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Parity (physics); Preference relation; Mathematical economics; Relation (database); Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.03503583966933008,"score_gpt":0.24876655152414617,"score_spread":0.2137307118548161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592044354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4139911,0.00089741015,0.177992,0.024504613,0.0004060116,0.00012014144,0.00023370836,0.0001827839,0.38167217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99292713,0.00007179604,0.0050327564,0.00046624753,0.000076327575,0.000034282057,0.000029134619,0.000020030751,0.001342287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910444,0.004789163,0.0004899834,0.0010034366,0.0020426249,0.00063040486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98599863,0.0070706955,0.0015374736,0.0024520797,0.002131007,0.00081019785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008460939,0.0006456631,0.00061340496,0.002089469,0.0019990744,0.0056018573,0.0014177172,0.0036629795,0.00868921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018591,0.00039763743,0.00095393247,0.002015674,0.020246388,0.01308985,0.004934783,0.0059629004,0.0007718226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005493764,0.000035834997,0.00096136774,0.00003747676,0.000012866085,0.000069418486,0.0015696329,0.00028178934,0.0005858858,0.98978347,0.00045953164,0.006147832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018062128,0.000038846458,0.0015995041,0.00004072821,0.000014329147,0.00012154387,0.0011949622,0.0019286345,0.00060848665,0.99161035,0.002804215,0.000020369029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007667449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041453107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00868921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026054012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007217144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04474628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593034070","doi":"10.1090/stml/080/12","title":"Preferences and society","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Student mathematical library","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04660166639330743,"score_gpt":0.24485568510188854,"score_spread":0.19825401870858111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593034070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028332253,0.0026280342,0.0027180994,0.0039960407,0.00013539597,0.000007393937,0.00004456564,0.000011461853,0.9876258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27182665,0.0053458004,0.0016568763,0.001722988,0.0004754651,0.000074705524,0.000112914444,0.00007416913,0.71871024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995809,0.00019123481,0.000012250617,0.00006156523,0.00010573103,0.000048260703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998184,0.00007250949,0.000014019133,0.00003576724,0.000033629574,0.000025734378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059066,0.00045821615,0.00024494174,0.0006279438,0.0016733492,0.004570533,0.00040547329,0.0011978814,0.03857252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014892565,0.00016900658,0.00015033127,0.0010000413,0.005169668,0.0038705694,0.0016888469,0.0019953733,0.0049649086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018695243,0.000003374795,0.000029491614,0.0000072842613,8.6858904e-7,0.0000056691542,0.00027510963,0.00005719514,0.000018981205,0.98599654,0.006583843,0.007019719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021462843,0.0000020933549,0.000091281305,0.000030558702,0.0000012019648,0.000020481208,0.0003936324,0.00008700476,0.000030831936,0.8648633,0.13447542,0.000002019521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024695084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036462173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03857252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022877727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012028889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12903792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593154368","doi":"","title":"Ontological Destruction of the Kantian Critique of the Paralogism of Rational Psychology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Id, ego and super-ego; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Dialectic; Cogito ergo sum; Impossibility; Existentialism; Absolute (philosophy); Ontology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.022402055679411583,"score_gpt":0.24619641000338677,"score_spread":0.22379435432397518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593154368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025249446,0.006782921,0.08972426,0.21497507,0.0020896434,0.000049685073,0.00019315272,0.00025323406,0.66068256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.918426,0.001916541,0.016825866,0.01915464,0.0018314999,0.00014592899,0.000071340066,0.00028292448,0.041345354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925046,0.0033274582,0.00021049163,0.0009358191,0.0025589922,0.0004627044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99435705,0.002496936,0.00037392098,0.0011039014,0.0013004341,0.00036773438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071506146,0.0005522349,0.0007115283,0.0017103448,0.005034754,0.008169355,0.001594007,0.0049584205,0.0052803517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00976618,0.0003759321,0.00068890443,0.00090247934,0.054522112,0.009088807,0.0051025846,0.010935641,0.0011021864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003988678,0.0000030791882,0.000018505936,0.0000074700965,0.000001257355,0.000005103193,0.0005133153,0.00004204469,0.000032726613,0.99733907,0.0011409766,0.0008924112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056416957,0.0000056054096,0.00008086965,0.000028030496,0.0000024578578,0.000019303643,0.00034047329,0.0002620194,0.00010645312,0.96902007,0.0301236,0.000005442159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00485204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045717373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008438849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008438849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070001516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061228454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602236725","doi":"10.1353/hms.2015.0000","title":"“Sweden Is Still a Kingdom”: Convention and Political Authority in Hume’s History of England","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Politics; Tribute; Political philosophy; Humanism; Genius; Law; Classics; History; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Art history","score_opus":0.2964311582085897,"score_gpt":0.3482991193694427,"score_spread":0.051867961160853016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602236725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32646942,0.042910766,0.0017475184,0.07710929,0.0011958873,0.000026180283,0.000055455017,0.00003500617,0.55045044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930485,0.0019258391,0.00019861836,0.0025898,0.00007944647,0.000013546216,0.000011647316,0.000018566087,0.06467758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968514,0.0020165783,0.00010372772,0.0002254384,0.00025412167,0.00054883526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989189,0.00061777927,0.00010005261,0.00007606914,0.00014010617,0.00014709882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028566103,0.00023304317,0.00033589633,0.00094722677,0.010077059,0.0086711105,0.0006178616,0.0037014876,0.0025416503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038183737,0.00025678013,0.00016056726,0.0008122215,0.024152309,0.004073365,0.0042268666,0.0030662229,0.0005386894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004149364,0.00001374129,0.0008126745,0.00006020351,0.000004845205,0.0006539484,0.18225917,0.00016026032,0.000110207926,0.80138844,0.007638687,0.0068562883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025567679,0.000042210373,0.0033989812,0.0006845875,0.000010926481,0.00049561803,0.104430534,0.00014600715,0.00033850275,0.10590894,0.78445625,0.000061949504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07879916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1425087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07879916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010329888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.156681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603010200","doi":"10.3138/tjt.2016-0015","title":"Kant and Theology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Philosophy; Relation (database); Theology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.045209383575568494,"score_gpt":0.2871700934440382,"score_spread":0.2419607098684697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603010200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01294697,0.07146207,0.012129783,0.11112751,0.0025554546,0.000027916381,0.00006313882,0.00007980877,0.7896073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86672956,0.022464298,0.004520993,0.016310021,0.0027267884,0.0000695028,0.000054397886,0.00011977519,0.087004624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994189,0.004020838,0.00014678131,0.00038440293,0.0007534805,0.0005055455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975115,0.0014678508,0.00022701552,0.00031469925,0.00025391043,0.00022508696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004511679,0.0004057799,0.00044826986,0.0015142325,0.006485338,0.007967933,0.00075760076,0.0035470424,0.005119764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044044997,0.00023516273,0.0003302739,0.0014413443,0.049514305,0.0056000114,0.0035299608,0.0054910528,0.0011509669],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036374931,0.0000018091,0.000036009573,0.000015248444,0.0000010877476,0.000010703696,0.001389632,0.000046589448,0.000010182892,0.9937843,0.0027410148,0.001959809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053001568,0.000005604577,0.00016152915,0.00012221231,0.0000019644442,0.000050342005,0.0014263901,0.00007538428,0.00004920243,0.8378961,0.16019878,0.000007151279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064151054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063334964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009301388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009301388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005653573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067486644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604954642","doi":"10.1017/s1369415415000060","title":"Accessing the Moral Law through Feeling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Assertion; Consciousness; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2973595687472745,"score_gpt":0.34794594246006155,"score_spread":0.05058637371278707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604954642","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067224787,0.70154876,0.008825831,0.10698932,0.004928086,0.000018523373,0.000059964244,0.000049135513,0.17085795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4621152,0.47744635,0.0027047868,0.033697017,0.006364069,0.000061248036,0.000101908634,0.00010548051,0.01740391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99269694,0.0053048218,0.00018208755,0.00041103308,0.001153115,0.00025192072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944565,0.0039421055,0.00036792379,0.0003768312,0.0007147648,0.0001418509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006933363,0.00040605542,0.0007352946,0.001763009,0.0016236826,0.007168854,0.0013002651,0.0040284544,0.006493349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009947232,0.00017401208,0.00036886873,0.0015871426,0.020320015,0.009571488,0.0031611747,0.0060142986,0.0010986228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025638547,0.0000110273695,0.000103782564,0.0011239205,0.00001957701,0.00007567795,0.0052860905,0.00011057821,0.00028608998,0.9258597,0.022804495,0.044293452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001200114,0.000026957563,0.00067890884,0.005590512,0.000026849955,0.00022867777,0.006059425,0.00009991984,0.00047989568,0.23820038,0.74857503,0.00002144699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003007534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025240171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007168854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035865102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042445003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036667585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607360888","doi":"10.1017/s1369415416000078","title":"Appearances and Things in Themselves: Actuality and Identity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Transcendental number; Epistemology; Identity (music); Philosophy; Idealism; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Aesthetics; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05272384591434982,"score_gpt":0.29999510172171934,"score_spread":0.24727125580736953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607360888","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032326765,0.5385655,0.037155434,0.08807206,0.0019684026,0.00003366729,0.00019916444,0.00006451891,0.30161446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85704744,0.12596509,0.0036417702,0.004482971,0.0013094672,0.000038821672,0.000120332945,0.000045362987,0.007348773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214584,0.005541613,0.00029475326,0.0005106702,0.0013125287,0.00019461612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99183965,0.0054126605,0.0006834127,0.0007208024,0.001176355,0.00016713534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065526087,0.00028212657,0.0005840651,0.002223112,0.0011355166,0.007293802,0.0009796956,0.0016704338,0.004443652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010354124,0.00021132852,0.00033051017,0.0022314505,0.023686107,0.009776206,0.003054491,0.0034400127,0.00051732396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094612105,0.000004317219,0.00015152655,0.00024463577,0.000008144857,0.000018949211,0.0013393133,0.00006240928,0.000035411103,0.98829365,0.0015136623,0.008318424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071396844,0.000014143628,0.0011071487,0.0017444775,0.000020287498,0.0001909246,0.002902473,0.00022439228,0.00015410302,0.8609629,0.13265912,0.000012915309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022889408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015009671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007293802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002899942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021183335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034653902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611014222","doi":"","title":"Natural law, biological knowledge, and the claims of evolutionary ethics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Philosophiae Christianae","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Skepticism; Natural law; Criticism; Epistemology; Objectivity (philosophy); Natural (archaeology); Meta-ethics; Natural order; Normative ethics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Information ethics; Political science; Philosophy of law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.09920619575025165,"score_gpt":0.31697908926184626,"score_spread":0.21777289351159462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611014222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061296098,0.03331416,0.060964596,0.2537921,0.0012533909,0.00003635641,0.00007709456,0.000050444305,0.5892158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960563,0.0058034332,0.00851225,0.011321565,0.0014809872,0.0000777616,0.00003570924,0.000037167374,0.012168254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952054,0.0028822,0.00012862709,0.00050203607,0.0009644977,0.00031723132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880073,0.009104132,0.00075169886,0.0010168332,0.00067788694,0.00044212694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009704704,0.00034193712,0.0004990625,0.002049565,0.004389895,0.0059002717,0.0014144523,0.0065021375,0.0038953149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010162307,0.00023992649,0.00043147683,0.0012044458,0.07668745,0.010158826,0.00458453,0.005531064,0.00044600872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016170864,0.00000429916,0.000063442254,0.000011650374,0.0000013721376,0.000019414967,0.00054777635,0.00011485728,0.000016152868,0.99746275,0.00031607345,0.0014406785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021343965,0.0000028785862,0.00009426686,0.000030368645,8.587001e-7,0.000016863201,0.0002475483,0.0001497007,0.000025919557,0.9897379,0.009688494,0.0000030359538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018257918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014162341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009704704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037791221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024841013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05132401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611320896","doi":"10.1017/s1369415417000073","title":"David Landy, Kant’s Inferentialism: The Case Against Hume New York and London: Routledge: 2015 Pp. 308 ISBN 9781138913080 (hbk) $148.00","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09640260194232611,"score_gpt":0.30979405177809205,"score_spread":0.21339144983576594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611320896","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043621386,0.9404679,0.0028695369,0.032793272,0.0013116101,0.000010520094,0.00012455537,0.000041267416,0.02194517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08255451,0.82739574,0.008348792,0.016430505,0.00608367,0.00016791673,0.00029917897,0.00026125452,0.058458477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525034,0.0031387622,0.00026271935,0.00031478706,0.0008497556,0.00018374537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919207,0.006247191,0.00041874952,0.00032524377,0.00090776547,0.0001803121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050364146,0.0012682339,0.0010536761,0.0042496626,0.0028170003,0.006062905,0.0014864272,0.0045572775,0.011525732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011531105,0.0010037185,0.0006859962,0.0046963836,0.013566699,0.014517259,0.0020815113,0.0059095,0.0040158164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010268086,0.000027203076,0.00031189626,0.0015952261,0.00005489882,0.00018178145,0.007918292,0.00043577957,0.00021260939,0.4852564,0.4162855,0.08761776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023545543,0.000013782909,0.0010126822,0.0021180303,0.000025682399,0.00020730168,0.001912504,0.0001188853,0.0002721984,0.36400267,0.63026,0.000032645883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013772483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024217388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013772483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004983303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061323056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03855735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613584720","doi":"","title":"Assessing Rawls' Difference Principle as Practical Guidance for our Duties to Animals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Animal ethics; Extension (predicate logic); Task (project management); Law and economics; Space (punctuation); Primary goods; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.16582257862982366,"score_gpt":0.41235707870512983,"score_spread":0.24653450007530617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613584720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037068672,0.004380149,0.17850666,0.11990946,0.0011804283,0.00014582246,0.000117489864,0.00012462,0.6585666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8991023,0.0011577379,0.057691786,0.014167496,0.00061321835,0.0002773931,0.000084749336,0.00012622992,0.026779184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784712,0.012931527,0.0007252192,0.0021963886,0.0046706046,0.0010050872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854337,0.009602349,0.0009827995,0.0017970946,0.0016967009,0.00048738596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024339382,0.0005566587,0.0007879197,0.001782596,0.005945768,0.0075893453,0.0025066016,0.007992655,0.0054216133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023148812,0.00047743812,0.0010915799,0.0010550447,0.05193899,0.013367714,0.0070423097,0.009695113,0.0011291509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015455187,0.000002665064,0.000022993238,0.0000042296983,8.798755e-7,0.0000068479926,0.00040814208,0.00003584801,0.000013617651,0.99835616,0.0005282458,0.0006188198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000668702,0.000007691466,0.000058872803,0.00002303402,0.0000015615256,0.000029279348,0.00030110133,0.00025343717,0.000060677594,0.98194516,0.017306544,0.0000060185675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026101922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024516454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024339382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060122292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004510741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12872046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622469145","doi":"10.1353/hms.2015.0011","title":"Turnabout is Fair Play: A New Humean Response in the Old Debate with Kant","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy; Critical philosophy","score_opus":0.19907786575280337,"score_gpt":0.3199796473626689,"score_spread":0.1209017816098655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622469145","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02330676,0.010201806,0.051863886,0.5375451,0.0025891701,0.000035407076,0.000101988364,0.00018118577,0.3741748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9036858,0.0019942308,0.0076907063,0.05117819,0.002448937,0.00007583403,0.00003309656,0.00018690171,0.032706354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881585,0.007528565,0.00022784683,0.0014616288,0.0017177637,0.0009057285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98965245,0.007489051,0.0004086704,0.0010266773,0.00091525645,0.0005078746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012986317,0.00069597986,0.0008007613,0.0020187602,0.00878032,0.013023102,0.002341745,0.013693721,0.005404616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016833626,0.00045200594,0.00066437543,0.0014973312,0.078091435,0.018141756,0.0063372967,0.013421082,0.00086247956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007698123,0.0000026981932,0.000032042706,0.000008045789,0.0000021178441,0.000018320123,0.0026286624,0.000045632823,0.000014481536,0.99381775,0.0026319611,0.0007905859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049708947,0.0000036297022,0.0000414592,0.00004780447,0.0000025636775,0.00002770687,0.0016093687,0.0001928934,0.00007717218,0.9570005,0.040982395,0.000009454932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048945826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005592979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013693721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0093838535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003924003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068679035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623215943","doi":"10.1353/hms.2015.0009","title":"Cultivating Strength of Mind: Hume on the Government of the Passions and Artificial Virtue","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Passions; Allegiance; Silence; Philosophy; Epistemology; Epistemic virtue; Natural (archaeology); Politics; Aesthetics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.21407813748218454,"score_gpt":0.30492261918257,"score_spread":0.09084448170038548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623215943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14277768,0.020401323,0.049575593,0.20912103,0.0008369479,0.000057018442,0.000035517587,0.0000882756,0.57710654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98231596,0.0019280134,0.0025139765,0.005764824,0.00020400403,0.000029639485,0.0000033547922,0.000023064133,0.007217134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99358636,0.0052588056,0.000078035526,0.00027544712,0.00047604067,0.0003253388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899177,0.00794836,0.00056720874,0.0006615528,0.00054005673,0.00036516495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077239517,0.00025084981,0.00037149433,0.0012865517,0.0050091003,0.006027303,0.0006999059,0.003191791,0.0014322542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070781275,0.00019705326,0.00026346982,0.00072068453,0.0719974,0.007098307,0.004542121,0.003721567,0.00026321723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007255757,0.00000763057,0.0001881818,0.000021288994,0.0000029043445,0.000058383743,0.013350931,0.00013091145,0.00007765773,0.98071826,0.0014252078,0.0040114853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009428378,0.000017355356,0.00048584677,0.00014107792,0.0000049362666,0.000092249276,0.007187537,0.00034401627,0.00046338426,0.92563194,0.06560631,0.000015940846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016616494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021695967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077239517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034125438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026391994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040848672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623756022","doi":"10.1353/hms.2015.0012","title":"Reflecting Subjects: Passion, Sympathy, and Society in Hume's Philosophy by Jacqueline Taylor","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Passion; Sympathy; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Scholarship; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.183603265271832,"score_gpt":0.3472302380360504,"score_spread":0.16362697276421842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623756022","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002730679,0.50071365,0.0018385298,0.3341744,0.029277183,0.000057023877,0.00006595623,0.00008829985,0.13105434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13207652,0.37106946,0.0031231656,0.07552851,0.056976404,0.0003066765,0.00013430441,0.00047227112,0.36031267],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668556,0.0019729957,0.0000823074,0.0003339107,0.00074369065,0.00018150773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99602085,0.002513477,0.00022342136,0.00007455092,0.00071304245,0.00045470023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038794812,0.0009554906,0.0008793251,0.0015351928,0.006095389,0.006477922,0.00077891466,0.0027201432,0.0088995155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006341108,0.0004740176,0.00040233484,0.0018387362,0.008349744,0.0075355605,0.0025466878,0.0070967376,0.004175008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031425985,0.000029265098,0.00015129842,0.00031157752,0.000009842449,0.00011354142,0.014741825,0.00013571735,0.00013406022,0.1335435,0.81681997,0.03397787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000648657,0.000014828407,0.00043377958,0.00075094413,0.0000044814883,0.0001245463,0.0038992183,0.00007097226,0.000051585874,0.021019232,0.97360533,0.000018632152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010793789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00963468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010793789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065119495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005218474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047247767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2629521316","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.805979","title":"Recursive Justification And Kant'S Civil Condition: Some Comments On Flikschuh'S Account Of Nomadic Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Civil rights; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07467171596940582,"score_gpt":0.2760387087627181,"score_spread":0.20136699279331227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2629521316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031422965,0.019965643,0.04751208,0.2522804,0.001575694,0.00005170662,0.00020572974,0.00015898368,0.6468268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9101286,0.0032016376,0.007999851,0.020577036,0.0024555558,0.00018639232,0.00008592485,0.00016473807,0.05520032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959859,0.0020596415,0.000121264,0.00048339678,0.0008236881,0.00052620703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963517,0.0028156543,0.00015091663,0.00028883194,0.0002880771,0.00010475347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053056004,0.00057497,0.00059365976,0.0020189083,0.0062721637,0.0070612067,0.0018794772,0.008744218,0.007719461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006869351,0.00040020456,0.0009707439,0.0021476042,0.031116577,0.012612532,0.0036894788,0.007685734,0.0009283154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012288888,0.0000012949532,0.000008153265,0.0000033574568,3.9382664e-7,0.00000766597,0.0003682697,0.00003424746,0.0000076170422,0.99829584,0.0009306315,0.00034127157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053485537,0.0000027534356,0.00007980871,0.000026189926,0.0000016333478,0.000017185703,0.00025252375,0.00020168077,0.000033261163,0.96883494,0.030537039,0.0000076126225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011184246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011669695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011184246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010327772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002451346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07493359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736389095","doi":"10.1017/s0012217317000452","title":"Ontological Entanglement in the Normative Web","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Appeal; Normative; Moral realism; Realism; Philosophy; Sociology; Moral psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11449783153574054,"score_gpt":0.2997044206332802,"score_spread":0.18520658909753962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736389095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060734347,0.008185453,0.100476414,0.06132947,0.00048128556,0.000047043035,0.0001499737,0.0001891199,0.7684068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97186273,0.0012814787,0.011915188,0.0022849776,0.00028354474,0.00011340821,0.00007042515,0.00009875833,0.012089438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99117845,0.0058847475,0.0002724372,0.0008755522,0.0013023593,0.00048646313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885366,0.00854526,0.0004350751,0.0012627168,0.0007577745,0.00046259692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009185918,0.00036636437,0.00081106374,0.003623138,0.007893022,0.013556735,0.0010651312,0.004192884,0.006712795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014279934,0.0005387633,0.0005182731,0.0024916606,0.033847038,0.022297908,0.0090699475,0.0051362645,0.00066337833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010183711,0.0000020401258,0.000021409829,0.0000037196155,9.444802e-7,0.000011469039,0.0004980546,0.000053306318,0.000010496718,0.9987153,0.0002772098,0.0004051361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018457501,7.711068e-7,0.000026862102,0.000017256792,0.0000012558302,0.000010965539,0.00023458932,0.000339449,0.000022714408,0.9917672,0.0075742863,0.0000026987573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040093143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032776932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013556735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066191447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027000718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048580408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747458370","doi":"10.1017/s1369415417000152","title":"Kant on Moral Illusion and Appraisal of Others","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Illusion; Action (physics); Duty; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.09942532573441258,"score_gpt":0.33215547917960175,"score_spread":0.23273015344518916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747458370","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061765756,0.8944968,0.007103708,0.027267927,0.0014199066,0.000007727913,0.00002306099,0.000019864428,0.06348451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47139487,0.509713,0.0017401028,0.0065756654,0.0026342059,0.000026756514,0.00003876301,0.000033240038,0.007843423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936428,0.004602554,0.0001836394,0.00032420325,0.0010323931,0.00021442855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924494,0.0055143614,0.00053935195,0.00033734148,0.0010068726,0.00015262836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060152765,0.00041504705,0.000759304,0.002458503,0.00092289125,0.0039318837,0.0009101307,0.002355149,0.0028689557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008539033,0.00018572835,0.00043760362,0.0023806468,0.012291185,0.0044715838,0.0019017862,0.0039587375,0.00044878336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038185397,0.000010464405,0.0001624808,0.0014100055,0.000038320777,0.00007688251,0.0020255458,0.00056528434,0.0001661551,0.95024025,0.007005843,0.03826051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010908852,0.00003396437,0.0011512924,0.005155868,0.000054081305,0.00031097315,0.0017917008,0.0004903919,0.00045914826,0.7613542,0.229158,0.000029516972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001543248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087746244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060152765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031609447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022948268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03181219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749192079","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqx045","title":"The Human Predicament: A Candid Guide to Life's Biggest Questions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Pessimism; Pleasure; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Social psychology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04575332984713758,"score_gpt":0.3141277224600933,"score_spread":0.2683743926129557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749192079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023014096,0.34076566,0.027749859,0.41762584,0.022638358,0.00017356913,0.00060870044,0.00042036368,0.18771628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10040155,0.2537389,0.032117747,0.30351573,0.0693705,0.0014617777,0.0010288466,0.0018500296,0.23651496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778336,0.0015501977,0.000058390695,0.00014066248,0.0003120552,0.00015525495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949727,0.0039002742,0.00013341618,0.00023921063,0.00040167087,0.00035270027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034086946,0.0019055043,0.0010930138,0.0029474853,0.0045986148,0.009077305,0.0030234738,0.0072260187,0.01235588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077182925,0.0005121529,0.00063237944,0.0028548352,0.018317994,0.015526583,0.005312946,0.016345218,0.0064849444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003132467,0.000063141764,0.00017497361,0.00019252772,0.00000972001,0.00018164418,0.009566214,0.00020553666,0.00014425341,0.52552754,0.42782268,0.036080536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073123565,0.000011965594,0.00009464766,0.00047783906,0.0000014263986,0.0001205724,0.0029397616,0.0001692781,0.000036106958,0.20643932,0.78968877,0.000013053798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044812784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006459149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01235588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004023254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026705526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04133457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749673324","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199395729.013.20","title":"Love and Economics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Selfishness; Altruism (biology); Interdependence; Positive economics; Economics; Face (sociological concept); Social psychology; Wage; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Labour economics","score_opus":0.0582412045203798,"score_gpt":0.1999620971896517,"score_spread":0.1417208926692719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749673324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057661557,0.05462139,0.0053804615,0.034378,0.0011207632,0.000020073176,0.00004032595,0.000023514629,0.8986494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54765874,0.08445256,0.003505647,0.01642726,0.0041281334,0.00012694523,0.00009186779,0.00011464992,0.34349412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924433,0.00044194423,0.000017849154,0.00006794973,0.00016369708,0.00006431922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992951,0.00047314807,0.000034948192,0.000052775424,0.00008177565,0.000062356274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092343974,0.00031335434,0.00034193174,0.00088064565,0.0023058206,0.0033920058,0.0003612183,0.0015715865,0.014284182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013700619,0.00013041453,0.00023866502,0.0007516949,0.010290287,0.0036685523,0.0017764821,0.002838524,0.0015284343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020677608,0.0000044399735,0.000038338618,0.000021632812,8.8842745e-7,0.000016638303,0.00039059678,0.000082444996,0.000022527196,0.98878366,0.005621371,0.005015304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029302794,0.00001001533,0.00025234165,0.0002605545,0.0000015832112,0.00010855371,0.0006858643,0.0001623378,0.000059330523,0.6202069,0.3782453,0.000004344331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011181468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008305134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014284182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002549424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000992885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0477854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751630240","doi":"10.5325/jspecphil.31.4.0575","title":"Ful-filling the Copula, Determining Nature: The Grammatical Ontology of Hegel's Metaphysics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Speculative Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Idealism; Copula (linguistics); Ontology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08480121204158414,"score_gpt":0.30991377588576147,"score_spread":0.22511256384417733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751630240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10663577,0.0034283386,0.28804582,0.041966848,0.0007004177,0.00012755491,0.0002735701,0.0003831707,0.5584385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781863,0.00045909337,0.013527308,0.0009979372,0.00017504867,0.00005599984,0.000032278633,0.00009184818,0.006474072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701047,0.0019249663,0.00011279466,0.00024952216,0.00051319465,0.00018907935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966883,0.0020546403,0.0001830566,0.00039356636,0.0005246963,0.00015573179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040615937,0.00034756743,0.00045974745,0.001894055,0.0029026375,0.0049446155,0.0008178054,0.0014726523,0.0026011246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007360253,0.00034286286,0.00037018416,0.0010157194,0.041975677,0.007310792,0.0027852114,0.0029488576,0.00042470035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002323325,0.0000020107948,0.000029046038,0.000005379878,7.676638e-7,0.000008796924,0.0011711086,0.000059418642,0.000038687165,0.9978662,0.0002621248,0.00055407535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004493421,0.0000030322524,0.0000552042,0.000015696269,0.0000022324207,0.000019378793,0.000681111,0.00034511648,0.00011305378,0.99134266,0.0074134,0.00000462246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053734807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005398867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053734807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052789245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032897943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038301468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753882011","doi":"10.3197/096327117x15002190708155","title":"Nonhuman Animals as Property Holders: An Exploration of the Lockean Labour-Mixing Account","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Values","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Animal rights; Law and economics; Politics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12422027850664591,"score_gpt":0.2837386515246297,"score_spread":0.15951837301798377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753882011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16343129,0.0064855944,0.117823064,0.04867805,0.0002062254,0.000049891987,0.000057551035,0.000048223967,0.66322017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842933,0.0008632311,0.0028385606,0.0011354656,0.00010998106,0.00004685397,0.0000108362365,0.00002638146,0.010675479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963607,0.0023865255,0.00005941772,0.00035299093,0.00040484814,0.00043546513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99542785,0.0032872024,0.00034236285,0.00050635164,0.00018493396,0.00025136126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061858366,0.00035835514,0.00039995761,0.0013077684,0.003874627,0.0058147637,0.0012703623,0.0042416155,0.007439741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048718723,0.0003034666,0.00069749577,0.0011782191,0.041150916,0.013832307,0.0071872384,0.0035125997,0.00052950776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022912382,0.0000035797661,0.00007505237,0.0000049817627,0.0000010175621,0.000023013348,0.0011963143,0.000055083303,0.000022233455,0.9979704,0.000100674355,0.0005454056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053717285,0.0000060901307,0.00014284169,0.00003075989,0.0000025823092,0.000041126794,0.0010627795,0.00044816927,0.000069896014,0.9870936,0.011092941,0.0000037964107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001439326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013047949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007439741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026116674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012363777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032714188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758668236","doi":"10.1111/japp.12287","title":"Kagan on Speciesism and Modal Personism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Modal; Argument (complex analysis); Prejudice (legal term); Object (grammar); sort; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05970444737332933,"score_gpt":0.24973127920241586,"score_spread":0.19002683182908653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758668236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09574447,0.006343631,0.039241277,0.14139232,0.0010960649,0.000043769276,0.00008853398,0.0001134332,0.7159365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795107,0.0008536825,0.0028236632,0.006227838,0.00023556514,0.000041150128,0.000014415273,0.000035018074,0.010257912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966846,0.0023082006,0.00006654538,0.0002894627,0.00041086014,0.00024036375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971758,0.0018744455,0.00017216313,0.00022983023,0.00040083504,0.00014693459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028788506,0.00029811103,0.00043002592,0.0009731817,0.0031819646,0.0027349112,0.0006825299,0.0019807704,0.004111618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042363056,0.00023282864,0.00043656823,0.00058621867,0.024056569,0.005971201,0.0033819603,0.0035693236,0.00045381577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000119570095,0.0000064633896,0.000108695785,0.000018793158,0.0000042600786,0.000030713545,0.0016583734,0.00008931662,0.000086638596,0.9940738,0.0024880322,0.0014229334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006990658,0.000008643118,0.00018837492,0.00003862536,0.000004598028,0.000047481153,0.00079763914,0.00027222626,0.00011802645,0.9828095,0.015699754,0.000008150522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024941415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017628815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004111618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024469877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000990926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017754257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762363945","doi":"10.1017/9781316145364.011","title":"The Harmony of Thought and Reality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Content (measure theory); Aesthetics; Computer science; Epistemology; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Visual arts; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07571880404377897,"score_gpt":0.22815577579888527,"score_spread":0.1524369717551063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762363945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043367106,0.028356511,0.01957596,0.033171877,0.001083028,0.00002888477,0.000062396044,0.000103448816,0.91328114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62435305,0.023777107,0.019556317,0.008373367,0.0019336684,0.00030250574,0.0001615598,0.00046368688,0.32107872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475795,0.0033681695,0.000101978214,0.00050556427,0.0009293245,0.00033693455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976635,0.0014495049,0.000105523475,0.00043625667,0.00019261242,0.00015265142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003717134,0.0005634777,0.0006174966,0.0014720353,0.0039253547,0.012371608,0.0010224087,0.0022629965,0.010468469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052139712,0.00043226147,0.0004913445,0.0014573789,0.04750468,0.012310343,0.0043115895,0.0055659725,0.002509905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035122732,0.000002383946,0.000026637952,0.000030366624,0.0000017133866,0.000019542007,0.0034841183,0.000052125688,0.000036553833,0.9861719,0.005192183,0.004978925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004792811,0.0000060870716,0.0001418778,0.00019452389,0.0000020740476,0.000048659687,0.0025394314,0.000138815,0.00007210431,0.8274105,0.16943505,0.000006036022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039980216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039798818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012371608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056622303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048931404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04108256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763578728","doi":"10.1017/9781108363242.011","title":"Some ‘What If ?’ Thoughts: Notes on <i>Donoghue</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Psychology; Internet privacy; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Communication; World Wide Web; Art; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.061929219469450424,"score_gpt":0.2210944227812593,"score_spread":0.15916520331180886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763578728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013953927,0.048650164,0.003448733,0.2133038,0.02432505,0.00007880973,0.0005983382,0.00023884687,0.70796084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020556953,0.022492725,0.0025712266,0.050503314,0.0055689043,0.0001540114,0.00039571553,0.0008758396,0.8968813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889463,0.00037574445,0.000031361484,0.00014693652,0.00041005434,0.00014128337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818665,0.0010973389,0.000045207267,0.00007674966,0.00042003221,0.00017401509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002376214,0.00073989795,0.0004267738,0.0014781858,0.005416049,0.0059618233,0.001164985,0.0023932117,0.072128765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005380047,0.00037831697,0.0004755589,0.0019018966,0.0071858848,0.009212682,0.0025724105,0.0056845243,0.020294461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009886486,0.000010240767,0.000030486197,0.00005493993,0.0000014004471,0.000052163967,0.0026241627,0.00002742255,0.00006982508,0.084644444,0.8986075,0.013867477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011731254,0.0000011959027,0.000044568198,0.00009401396,3.7317255e-7,0.000020746604,0.00093314063,0.000009776255,0.000039212646,0.005964265,0.9928871,0.0000043872064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029864091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06868072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072128765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008056365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039783777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2412948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766146053","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v2i3.119","title":"A New Theory of Humean Reasons? A Critical Note on Schroeder's Hypotheticalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Ethical theory","score_opus":0.15857131203436772,"score_gpt":0.3311558494206729,"score_spread":0.17258453738630516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766146053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038947735,0.009674697,0.14549582,0.31973556,0.001830623,0.00012830723,0.00021651055,0.00011322676,0.48385754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94298184,0.0024101832,0.0238882,0.013334296,0.0010531701,0.00023235504,0.00008096106,0.000079803074,0.015939193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887876,0.008082881,0.00024006382,0.0009774006,0.0013452844,0.00056673435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820952,0.014621846,0.0006377491,0.0010790483,0.001083203,0.00048302714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013761334,0.00060066144,0.00085432443,0.0024873281,0.0051325453,0.006462562,0.002173702,0.0061901584,0.0060371007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015922656,0.0005071326,0.0015352733,0.0013473565,0.05752577,0.015911184,0.005069064,0.008069324,0.0008137632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002129719,0.0000018141521,0.000021368181,0.0000064879123,0.0000010456479,0.000013553277,0.0005018426,0.00006238456,0.0000050201484,0.99851555,0.00049109856,0.00037779292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057912857,0.00000365464,0.000034732075,0.000020875337,0.0000016198107,0.000024855271,0.00046155404,0.00030658947,0.000017308657,0.9889486,0.010170194,0.000004160861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003618476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030696618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013761334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062116124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036758974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07277775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767832788","doi":"10.7202/1041766ar","title":"Metaethics, Normativity, and Value","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.031755171670297094,"score_gpt":0.25395842254642714,"score_spread":0.22220325087613005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767832788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058743816,0.019036174,0.1442212,0.1865125,0.0016088131,0.0001496993,0.00016336051,0.00010583702,0.5894585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680855,0.001518301,0.015936276,0.0053472286,0.00087921304,0.00031182717,0.00004341685,0.000058157482,0.007820095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9590189,0.0319908,0.0012616063,0.0025941199,0.0039200904,0.0012145443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553711,0.0317392,0.0026055556,0.0058955774,0.0032161695,0.0011725063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03898016,0.00071740465,0.0014490733,0.0024558776,0.006746009,0.012076246,0.0019985654,0.006420615,0.0033701633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040955946,0.0006616328,0.0008884197,0.0018023683,0.077927195,0.014160006,0.00500449,0.008294453,0.00043375968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050627564,0.0000059105573,0.00008301209,0.000013969189,0.0000041895582,0.0000058047503,0.00041277395,0.000055354067,0.000016180098,0.99807954,0.00028156108,0.0010366319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006913026,0.000004247407,0.000057298403,0.000033893022,0.0000021284918,0.000008663571,0.0002346214,0.00011428156,0.000031611,0.99682355,0.002679044,0.000003709084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030063274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002470581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03898016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067181448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007835982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20614922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767981883","doi":"10.7202/1041767ar","title":"Goodness: Attributive and predicative","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attributive; Predicative expression; GRASP; Goodness of fit; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02792952154320945,"score_gpt":0.24783638160491553,"score_spread":0.21990686006170607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767981883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09307107,0.025419412,0.12137688,0.044087008,0.0009749217,0.00007731054,0.00027442418,0.00025710592,0.71446186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822192,0.002056453,0.006851379,0.0017355715,0.00049182755,0.000054291933,0.00007406178,0.000101753314,0.006415525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915487,0.00487603,0.00037289978,0.0007968627,0.0017486522,0.00065687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98932505,0.006233664,0.0009496821,0.001630243,0.001209002,0.0006524313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008102861,0.0005111285,0.0007116378,0.003061687,0.0026527015,0.009363043,0.0012061439,0.0029066533,0.006654924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012337378,0.00036310946,0.00057232095,0.0039023033,0.047117636,0.017219247,0.005547999,0.0033606438,0.0008262045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010018009,0.0000062288004,0.00046116998,0.00003150964,0.0000050042845,0.000026893113,0.0021318682,0.00009576556,0.0000375505,0.9914928,0.0007175421,0.0049836556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034976626,0.00000834727,0.00082915067,0.00006649343,0.000003874965,0.0000879114,0.0016168857,0.00022493322,0.00006876963,0.9815152,0.015565061,0.00000994231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015508285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012967143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009363043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038166272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013633072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04285258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769979446","doi":"10.1177/0008429817732724","title":"Life in Contradiction to Life","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dualism; Metaphysics; Contradiction; Environmental ethics; Natural (archaeology); Harm; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.2550359646425409,"score_gpt":0.4071058039758392,"score_spread":0.15206983933329826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769979446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018833036,0.0061301393,0.014664294,0.07546001,0.0026746113,0.00005160473,0.0001379215,0.000097119046,0.88195133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8674142,0.003272586,0.005040115,0.026599364,0.0011317005,0.00017388273,0.00021861756,0.00016635467,0.0959833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370146,0.003882179,0.00016963728,0.0007937311,0.0008037486,0.000649278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745065,0.00080997124,0.0002496171,0.0005965935,0.00047540522,0.00041780478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037463529,0.00053070375,0.0005804791,0.00085375115,0.008257536,0.0076353676,0.00094157696,0.0037147792,0.0102428375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066073253,0.00019124612,0.00038649334,0.0007356401,0.04199361,0.008464895,0.0082843285,0.0066737537,0.002520019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004245073,0.000003951492,0.000066209985,0.000015191873,0.000002338582,0.000043271426,0.0043106694,0.000026256363,0.00005035626,0.99064225,0.0032872204,0.0015481255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065250592,0.000015617257,0.00014306164,0.00010774685,0.0000033327376,0.00016518937,0.007254884,0.00009717217,0.00012967148,0.55875313,0.43331203,0.0000117040045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002333317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022716247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0102428375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043170424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030163287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034265757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770397507","doi":"10.1215/00318108-3453237","title":"<i>Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Philosophy; General interest; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.2454877351021055,"score_gpt":0.35536220760199005,"score_spread":0.10987447249988455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770397507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036064486,0.09477952,0.014207296,0.060060762,0.0030336226,0.00002963993,0.00016506479,0.00017031198,0.8239474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34399,0.10985383,0.016713189,0.033725776,0.009607449,0.00029640476,0.00029906371,0.00039271315,0.48512158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893266,0.00048367103,0.000029734845,0.00009518509,0.00033191504,0.00012684331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994318,0.00030665693,0.00006372955,0.00005638851,0.00009298782,0.00004841174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008179893,0.0005026073,0.00027732807,0.0008990313,0.002496571,0.0051309727,0.0006068479,0.0017910319,0.00886568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016084618,0.00024902634,0.00022569527,0.0013324958,0.009468314,0.005154234,0.0016724103,0.003293457,0.0025155188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059080685,0.000006238641,0.000094870666,0.000089882575,0.0000038369817,0.000024390654,0.0013325657,0.0001073588,0.00007807071,0.8717937,0.111679,0.014784195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024505262,0.000008536536,0.000575442,0.00034302275,0.0000038363087,0.00008741355,0.00073420926,0.0001695778,0.00027349358,0.34989172,0.6478992,0.00001116839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003715898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005315444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00886568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027990073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030800353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029658675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775092391","doi":"10.4000/books.enseditions.8113","title":"Reconnaissance et praxis chez Kant","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"ENS Éditions eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Praxis; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10041137974150163,"score_gpt":0.2919739986289364,"score_spread":0.19156261888743478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775092391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040446818,0.029055046,0.03408335,0.03706463,0.0011278173,0.00004138506,0.00014049673,0.00016614013,0.8578744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8212937,0.007762467,0.0065542683,0.0032939725,0.0004575976,0.0000872812,0.00006986679,0.00022160994,0.16025923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662554,0.0022056585,0.00007377613,0.00036799486,0.00042605793,0.00030102627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989072,0.0006020728,0.000102617094,0.00018925632,0.00013482319,0.00006397701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024811788,0.0005437052,0.000366999,0.0010843286,0.0045458353,0.0076254164,0.0007642254,0.0028553838,0.0058843563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033066815,0.00033508168,0.00041809285,0.0014021551,0.03251649,0.008138577,0.0035377417,0.006609247,0.0013473654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069994867,0.000002991507,0.000050587274,0.00002224551,0.0000017944533,0.000023439476,0.0068940036,0.000102452774,0.000056561665,0.9888692,0.00170641,0.0022633409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011747889,0.000015110894,0.0004064863,0.00021120392,0.000006604943,0.00018356193,0.009331086,0.0004129942,0.0004631699,0.7279689,0.26096565,0.000023536291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008253355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007639379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008253355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007469773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040747407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05419725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781867789","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2018.1415694","title":"Wilfrid Sellars and the Foundations of Normativity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.09456226524818263,"score_gpt":0.3468717373048951,"score_spread":0.2523094720567125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781867789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014599929,0.07817367,0.027237799,0.115880154,0.0035612197,0.00003656608,0.00016973546,0.00013706669,0.7602039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78971434,0.031136306,0.012811485,0.012616974,0.003938464,0.00019130696,0.0001254496,0.0002415364,0.14922406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974437,0.0012639742,0.000094314004,0.00036033054,0.00064155326,0.00019611638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979831,0.0013265741,0.00014335952,0.00015289399,0.00029088932,0.0001031447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026555613,0.00046984368,0.00045113728,0.0013569967,0.0042620436,0.0061688866,0.0006840191,0.0020731024,0.005485488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004601718,0.00034117582,0.0003652749,0.0013648734,0.019879268,0.0090053305,0.002305488,0.0041632303,0.0014227777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055262612,0.0000030130063,0.000028383654,0.0000138799605,0.0000015910258,0.000016997166,0.00055144844,0.000063682055,0.000022784712,0.9912854,0.005852634,0.0021547356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061264573,0.000004547928,0.000087505934,0.000048644557,0.0000019899733,0.00002631407,0.00045151485,0.00010534405,0.00006325259,0.914425,0.08477255,0.000007190553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048756925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004676961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061688866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004432273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023697342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032158554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783180440","doi":"10.1017/s001221731700107x","title":"Kant’s ‘Five Ways’: Transcendental Idealism in Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Epistemology; Transcendental idealism; Transcendental number; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Object (grammar); Transcendental philosophy; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.060803705345540054,"score_gpt":0.2543018042875339,"score_spread":0.19349809894199385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783180440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03885499,0.015947599,0.15920678,0.04516414,0.0013890178,0.00007268208,0.00013845495,0.00014817616,0.7390782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632002,0.0022849052,0.02024864,0.0018877652,0.0004116826,0.00010933207,0.000037708232,0.00007769555,0.011742126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990812,0.0069926693,0.00017234393,0.0006009815,0.00091462984,0.0005072838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977658,0.0012511408,0.0001554786,0.0004374559,0.0002131388,0.00017706802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007488835,0.00076585216,0.00059016986,0.0023011072,0.0046996833,0.010092792,0.001466584,0.0036872101,0.0023780104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005306257,0.00042558103,0.00072663464,0.0014772177,0.057161067,0.013277291,0.005568652,0.0060433587,0.000567386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036726522,0.0000011783142,0.000016462447,0.0000059460126,9.958442e-7,0.000010639107,0.0015324625,0.000058734648,0.000014363418,0.9975279,0.0002841348,0.0005435197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036173358,0.0000030258723,0.000024405086,0.000021553255,0.0000012088672,0.000023202436,0.00067263993,0.000118391064,0.000042418236,0.9872362,0.011849131,0.00000419064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017189762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017158042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010092792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052775224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029522649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0396052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791316405","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2018.1437990","title":"LoveKnowledge: The Life of Philosophy from Socrates to Derrida","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Philosophy; Philosophy of life; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05813468974875862,"score_gpt":0.2543327895351293,"score_spread":0.19619809978637065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791316405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02599222,0.07135003,0.004533998,0.14758743,0.0078878235,0.000021741167,0.00005018171,0.000102366095,0.7424742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6950903,0.0279168,0.0017529253,0.030290943,0.0036798243,0.000051993415,0.000035418943,0.00031141532,0.2408705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996097,0.0025281338,0.00007194,0.00023846993,0.00057422195,0.0004901637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977616,0.0012090042,0.00011211352,0.00015711847,0.00024001683,0.0005200192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004424575,0.00051807304,0.00055441726,0.001312062,0.016339684,0.012880355,0.0005809056,0.002767801,0.00663944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050876443,0.00027134057,0.00033228574,0.0011610836,0.035017848,0.00829749,0.005403834,0.0071404763,0.0014662951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030213398,0.000017831975,0.00016957615,0.00006468383,0.0000050482317,0.00015185132,0.10721786,0.00006635608,0.000086140666,0.8342666,0.042703707,0.015220264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040702103,0.000023828146,0.00026139882,0.00029466362,0.0000026401462,0.00018896656,0.03102554,0.0000643174,0.00014818412,0.074436605,0.89353055,0.000019225423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009821477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017737154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016339684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007831257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004012555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056820035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791763556","doi":"10.1017/s1369415417000395","title":"The Deduction: Some Suggestions for Future Work","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Idealism; Focus (optics); Manifold (fluid mechanics); Philosophy; Reading (process); Linguistics; Physics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04934110019810918,"score_gpt":0.29320454843222493,"score_spread":0.24386344823411576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791763556","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044418736,0.05109081,0.042185422,0.8104976,0.0326128,0.00043634724,0.00071839965,0.0008352677,0.057181463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32152787,0.07457284,0.15324958,0.2794682,0.07366527,0.0036420138,0.003960153,0.00095262233,0.08896143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724047,0.018375603,0.0014495412,0.0028740168,0.003264141,0.001631928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8939286,0.057375643,0.0027592857,0.013294919,0.030104987,0.002536551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033106647,0.0021654107,0.0033149566,0.0051415865,0.004422949,0.008396763,0.00870968,0.009832066,0.077076524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09669039,0.0012196661,0.0041339877,0.007566409,0.018624006,0.041482765,0.006563111,0.0142551875,0.015763337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030087554,0.00040693377,0.00070045784,0.0016056714,0.00015816155,0.00067482743,0.0031179786,0.0010495756,0.00021240869,0.6648365,0.25932965,0.06760689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001264692,0.00003983224,0.0009036975,0.0016349372,0.000047055757,0.00023954887,0.0074613625,0.0021084913,0.00028120607,0.7997321,0.18728729,0.00013792625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0153041985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076605403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077076524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008883572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011041393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25784665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791952610","doi":"10.1007/s10677-018-9880-z","title":"Risking Future Generations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of medicine; Political philosophy; Ontology; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Politics; Philosophy; Economics; Law; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06255532529831659,"score_gpt":0.3291942544549545,"score_spread":0.2666389291566379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791952610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04703338,0.0032466147,0.019496871,0.110209055,0.0023409324,0.000063182575,0.0000638658,0.000078873214,0.8174672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7483567,0.0017858063,0.0045914305,0.015278734,0.00075860147,0.000080015656,0.000046553054,0.000089361616,0.22901289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959973,0.001990964,0.00009149044,0.00054702064,0.0008117719,0.000561345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993389,0.0021415118,0.0006328987,0.0012876001,0.001246422,0.0013026097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064295647,0.0004382839,0.0002908541,0.0006054536,0.005717698,0.0064361687,0.0010004606,0.004996338,0.024732318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019664139,0.00021171814,0.00036621213,0.000322502,0.008748213,0.008249082,0.004894067,0.0060021617,0.0035062248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011661573,0.000017073793,0.0006255423,0.0000132703035,0.000005257702,0.00019512586,0.004785052,0.00013038621,0.00011463268,0.9732955,0.008265491,0.012541021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006461116,0.000023986868,0.0004215574,0.000110600035,0.000008814309,0.0003917639,0.0055225496,0.0002997877,0.00022104938,0.7448443,0.24813631,0.0000128045685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001749762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027919395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024732318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022388168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003766029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08273786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791967071","doi":"10.28984/ct.v1i1.90","title":"The Sublime and Human Creations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Con Texte","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Sublime; Assertion; Extant taxon; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Point (geometry); Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Geometry; Programming language","score_opus":0.0716687553697773,"score_gpt":0.3030701255215257,"score_spread":0.2314013701517484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791967071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065887846,0.016787749,0.036990322,0.02199659,0.00048005703,0.000054283646,0.00005561177,0.00013983772,0.85760766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699589,0.0020999366,0.0039625503,0.0010352394,0.00020240329,0.000059440717,0.000019841207,0.000059492442,0.022602294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966884,0.0022714003,0.000068325804,0.00033252322,0.00036792335,0.0002713463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796873,0.0011173707,0.00018523917,0.0003649808,0.00018563849,0.00017804529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034255353,0.0003465001,0.00033378403,0.0011575966,0.003459198,0.007420547,0.00068699423,0.0016384536,0.005417359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034912091,0.00020516216,0.000366682,0.00071642554,0.04472681,0.007845586,0.0050151455,0.002770519,0.00067916233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005705669,0.0000038495605,0.000062397914,0.000016795966,0.000001084411,0.000016958498,0.002689516,0.00004565613,0.00005222678,0.9950197,0.00041768994,0.0016685067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007282914,0.000010776267,0.00029627106,0.000070662274,0.0000027167066,0.000094879135,0.002121282,0.00020678992,0.00018467518,0.942167,0.05483044,0.0000072383073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007014698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006049616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007420547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033101519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014567398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024016976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792832214","doi":"10.1111/phin.12199","title":"Kantian Schemata: A Critique Consistent with the <i>Critique</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Generality; Transcendental number; Epistemology; Philosophy; Schema (genetic algorithms); Bridging (networking); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07036387366470705,"score_gpt":0.2854273922296006,"score_spread":0.21506351856489359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792832214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04149575,0.008758931,0.15010026,0.2372856,0.0016360381,0.00010241418,0.0003413536,0.00030212963,0.5599775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93865806,0.0022277397,0.026041295,0.011663608,0.0009979415,0.00019390641,0.00010987248,0.00021462499,0.019893019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898519,0.006160392,0.00040793183,0.0008518696,0.0023302129,0.00039768408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990768,0.005110374,0.0007272643,0.0015567439,0.0015146602,0.00032287615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012619951,0.0004827151,0.0007908766,0.0028915051,0.003453486,0.008491379,0.0023746802,0.005904491,0.004507648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011591324,0.00043795267,0.0010469377,0.0023933572,0.047632843,0.009576453,0.004629573,0.008532386,0.0011230599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015620979,0.0000016018954,0.00001378375,0.000007839818,0.0000013166243,0.0000038189496,0.00044847166,0.000046912395,0.000013454475,0.998547,0.00059566274,0.00031853002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051056986,0.0000028759107,0.000041038846,0.00004075841,0.0000025168174,0.000018537818,0.00041522618,0.00026260718,0.000071008246,0.9857167,0.013419648,0.000004017259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002477128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017479272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012619951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005143338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035714628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066741526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796585665","doi":"10.1515/kant-2018-0003","title":"Pleasure and Purpose in Kant’s Theory of Taste","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kant-Studien","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Pleasure principle; Transcendental number; Taste; Epistemology; Transcendental idealism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Transcendental philosophy; Order (exchange); Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.058980207747529295,"score_gpt":0.24672405959694302,"score_spread":0.18774385184941372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796585665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072609566,0.004835229,0.08674596,0.02154404,0.0005749842,0.000051606105,0.00011003738,0.000112109694,0.8134165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97810054,0.000616909,0.0052600144,0.0010879255,0.00017818417,0.000049230635,0.000023435665,0.000047729576,0.014636052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674326,0.0018621052,0.000109053595,0.00025738488,0.0006603314,0.0003678527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984817,0.00075461325,0.0001054989,0.00021832917,0.00026409794,0.00017584262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036525943,0.0004265241,0.0005035873,0.0013187508,0.0028499626,0.0085821375,0.0009208368,0.002920874,0.0035249407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030364087,0.00037749376,0.00095376844,0.00083211745,0.038008068,0.0069590784,0.0049707447,0.0045377812,0.0006864896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006738324,0.000003446828,0.000058116435,0.000011760175,0.0000022495774,0.0000146234825,0.00092551904,0.00015598739,0.000035263456,0.99768937,0.0003241957,0.0007727601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007852398,0.0000070207693,0.00013276929,0.000027755663,0.000003307637,0.000026258065,0.00035937942,0.00029545763,0.00006771899,0.9904751,0.008590907,0.0000065791382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013398329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012242525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0085821375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004513172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022880286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03274554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801353767","doi":"10.3366/jsp.2018.0194","title":"The Sensation/Perception Distinction in Reid and Schopenhauer","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scottish Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Perception; Sensation; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Irrational number; Apostle; Epistemology; Subject (documents); German; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.030199009122999748,"score_gpt":0.25273217632240397,"score_spread":0.22253316719940422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801353767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045170877,0.06772695,0.027489055,0.14704959,0.0038327374,0.000042369204,0.00013089011,0.00012295367,0.70843446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88488835,0.014809383,0.004993312,0.015342196,0.002382594,0.00007715652,0.000036535417,0.00015169934,0.07731872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976737,0.0011504713,0.000068832276,0.00032870693,0.000591042,0.00018723012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983827,0.0011447986,0.00011399776,0.00011229014,0.00017751205,0.0000687422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003193752,0.0004736035,0.00039407396,0.0009309492,0.0026473652,0.0044499403,0.00069248496,0.003946458,0.0039282287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062522674,0.00034452346,0.00039570738,0.0009670772,0.025789183,0.00765916,0.0025803973,0.0036359057,0.0010066527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013553784,0.0000048652273,0.000061864106,0.000020075086,0.0000022393142,0.000037702146,0.0036136,0.0000700974,0.00007116808,0.9875803,0.005157924,0.0033667232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014470284,0.00002888662,0.0005374607,0.00012480942,0.0000069821413,0.0001674174,0.0015889673,0.00018583075,0.00036675765,0.7816464,0.21529855,0.000033487566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042855395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033176518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044499403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037646359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002160217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027314425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809014969","doi":"10.3138/uram.32.1.90","title":"John Woolman and his Ultimate Reality and Meaning","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07036242419149191,"score_gpt":0.28731366118115115,"score_spread":0.21695123698965924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809014969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009761064,0.08615724,0.020270513,0.28241944,0.00982117,0.00004313253,0.00008223972,0.000050785526,0.5913944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51851755,0.030645898,0.008836715,0.048851877,0.008137747,0.00014297868,0.00006147572,0.00030400956,0.38450173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478537,0.0031089114,0.00016629515,0.00059108756,0.0009686335,0.00037973354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938074,0.004676807,0.00020422992,0.00040264125,0.0005897326,0.00031921425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00523705,0.00071296387,0.00084590813,0.001785575,0.009125684,0.0093159955,0.0010452409,0.0063877306,0.0072111636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008968791,0.00062395807,0.00037095937,0.0017893915,0.0433956,0.013659746,0.0034170013,0.011320903,0.0010496721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033656602,0.0000040110326,0.000018144563,0.000012778304,0.0000016660703,0.000013879119,0.0021789917,0.000031762836,0.000008498259,0.98374605,0.012552942,0.0014280961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051028055,0.0000040003633,0.00005546382,0.00010923449,0.0000024334827,0.000031195486,0.0016291079,0.00007843487,0.000051917486,0.8214373,0.17658597,0.000009752625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01635663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028052734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01635663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066064554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004144588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04793346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809451080","doi":"10.3138/uram.35.1-2.7","title":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning With Respect to the Challenges of Our Time: Some Practical Proposals","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology","score_opus":0.13035443515210338,"score_gpt":0.3362546656986274,"score_spread":0.205900230546524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809451080","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011619963,0.011786978,0.049564295,0.62888294,0.0036819486,0.00020176423,0.00007997396,0.0000708072,0.29411134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80961794,0.011076516,0.041779757,0.08161518,0.0071784956,0.0017221055,0.00013148364,0.00018997525,0.046688575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838234,0.011138592,0.0005459868,0.001217573,0.0017548744,0.0015195559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805884,0.01330822,0.00077950675,0.0016471937,0.0020299482,0.0016467846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028293485,0.001563869,0.0020641694,0.0021360738,0.014815389,0.021512607,0.00671454,0.032936975,0.01202933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030345535,0.0010827256,0.0016843867,0.002135337,0.11670182,0.043053873,0.015817687,0.025055764,0.0015406823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064216983,0.000008364562,0.0000142041945,0.000020038215,0.0000019574597,0.00004048881,0.0014617161,0.00006888666,0.000016288033,0.9955884,0.0016721206,0.0011011359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010835814,0.0000051222264,0.000020749467,0.00008169529,0.0000029571022,0.000036640864,0.003263142,0.00018329627,0.000023509134,0.983417,0.0129454,0.000009560502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006356625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00795295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032936975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011613037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013168399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1496321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809599947","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11222","title":"Immanuel Kant's Response to David Hume's Regarding Cause and Effect","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Feeling; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Relation (database); Connection (principal bundle); Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024359003033581145,"score_gpt":0.28489650301472474,"score_spread":0.2605374999811436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809599947","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036695548,0.018319966,0.012893757,0.89928985,0.010296459,0.00003124388,0.000068537774,0.000057428424,0.055373132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2978879,0.01201353,0.01218077,0.59446377,0.018420704,0.000293834,0.000052651943,0.0001900057,0.064496845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99003917,0.0062011303,0.00034469506,0.0009660728,0.001959286,0.000489537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885444,0.009496784,0.00036227787,0.00037845797,0.00088201556,0.00033599077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008371593,0.00078276196,0.0008195255,0.0010013679,0.0050185113,0.0057494803,0.0017681279,0.015491848,0.003662812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017072886,0.0005679752,0.0010155671,0.0011473895,0.037604354,0.008658197,0.0038580273,0.030148374,0.0013163364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041184274,0.000011216766,0.000085432046,0.00006026542,0.000010164031,0.0001392392,0.0032597096,0.00026215482,0.00013195857,0.8995346,0.0926347,0.0038293775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017032795,0.00001334326,0.00014235961,0.00018656721,0.000006949082,0.00019271231,0.0012325803,0.00027267865,0.00037165033,0.722167,0.27536327,0.000033832013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035907335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033006854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015491848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059515852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024339221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044273734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2827986377","doi":"10.1017/s0012217318000409","title":"What Matters in Love: Reflections on the Relationship between Love and Persons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Philosophy; Branching (polymer chemistry); Epistemology; Philosophy of love; Relation (database); Replication (statistics); Aesthetics; Computer science; Chemistry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19674674247962973,"score_gpt":0.3330749269143776,"score_spread":0.1363281844347479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2827986377","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07933296,0.038323987,0.01117329,0.43507618,0.003797636,0.000054268305,0.00004556085,0.000039605326,0.43215644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92674136,0.008569276,0.0013399464,0.030492274,0.0014389894,0.00007558389,0.000014315666,0.00008160628,0.031246765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98651695,0.0113041615,0.00014587394,0.00042084174,0.0007748411,0.00083737884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884317,0.009879731,0.0003335088,0.0003395254,0.00040783692,0.00060777925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012305167,0.00050114177,0.00078858895,0.0011929992,0.023837613,0.012831537,0.0015572566,0.009479801,0.004064048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0119777,0.0004676072,0.00071245513,0.0014047875,0.07356818,0.01962333,0.008369911,0.014150359,0.0006037442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001662706,0.000019152529,0.00019102375,0.000040328134,0.000003723095,0.00044986946,0.40042856,0.000040150495,0.00007672761,0.5866037,0.009231826,0.0028983194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015866292,0.00003653877,0.0005021813,0.00033540174,0.0000075673097,0.00080472813,0.41331938,0.00013191048,0.00020742437,0.2881073,0.29650468,0.00002701674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009199186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011498123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023837613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006364671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027099666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06507671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2862073006","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-94028-1_2","title":"Our Agenda and Its Rationality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Management science; Law","score_opus":0.19682020457653707,"score_gpt":0.29822098594256186,"score_spread":0.10140078136602479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2862073006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026613458,0.0040137935,0.013719831,0.06104966,0.0010960748,0.000039430914,0.0000590116,0.000045004555,0.9173159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48452643,0.004013726,0.012620848,0.021597665,0.0023280508,0.00048721078,0.00013707398,0.000373206,0.47391582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933528,0.0036125116,0.00017178938,0.0008389454,0.0014132296,0.0006107213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970613,0.001624295,0.00011710029,0.0005128612,0.00047647077,0.0002079267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068989983,0.0008134747,0.00088050263,0.0014946195,0.007090958,0.015431819,0.0019916582,0.007862065,0.01663783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009861996,0.00066651904,0.00053445797,0.001331443,0.04192653,0.013682063,0.0049384586,0.011573545,0.004149612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010172818,0.0000021352942,0.0000050935437,0.0000039251227,4.962972e-7,0.0000029290184,0.00032141682,0.000018910723,0.0000058127566,0.99644876,0.0024857,0.0007038023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027823814,8.458475e-7,0.000010692224,0.000030214867,8.578806e-7,0.000004075302,0.00028824288,0.00007303821,0.00001830043,0.9633472,0.03622154,0.0000022375066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006522413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071206563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01663783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009083393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008895509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065904915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885279518","doi":"10.1017/s0012217318000240","title":"Kantian Constructivism and the Normativity of Practical Identities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Constructivism (international relations); Humanity; Action (physics); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; International relations; Law; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.04018100168292523,"score_gpt":0.2690467258053985,"score_spread":0.22886572412247327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885279518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08167872,0.0050999536,0.25592217,0.05744886,0.00056308106,0.00006697593,0.000107060514,0.00016921051,0.59894395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707809,0.0006237251,0.018642826,0.0015903509,0.00017618714,0.00010773782,0.000034168985,0.000060948314,0.007983105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98037523,0.013501644,0.00065031013,0.0015723818,0.0031025363,0.0007979812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98950243,0.00601879,0.00087871915,0.0017547945,0.0014216886,0.00042348524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013723404,0.000600123,0.000692676,0.0018878774,0.00583306,0.008959358,0.0016592835,0.0050692586,0.0024690197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118672205,0.00043119272,0.0006831673,0.0013428401,0.07623416,0.012323917,0.006122108,0.0055194567,0.00050672935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016844282,0.000001674485,0.00001824017,0.0000048173524,7.6770107e-7,0.0000036290776,0.00069742644,0.000073164214,0.000013376903,0.99875355,0.00008842744,0.00034329167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035569321,0.0000022884255,0.00003167944,0.000013547106,0.0000011319607,0.000008699119,0.00033565416,0.0002089416,0.00005062669,0.9947739,0.0045671547,0.0000029671191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021813274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017503226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013723404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073622875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051829987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07257718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886036496","doi":"10.1017/s0012217318000252","title":"Le quasi-réalisme et l’argument de la coïncidence","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Humanities; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03181257243458541,"score_gpt":0.29208465269724687,"score_spread":0.26027208026266146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886036496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05459247,0.008891511,0.34075657,0.11523585,0.0022721195,0.00008144753,0.00016011951,0.00014732496,0.4778625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93523115,0.0021505195,0.024972659,0.0058815037,0.0008692033,0.00020954883,0.00006469136,0.0001760188,0.030444793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898593,0.006843557,0.0003032619,0.0010896043,0.0014067118,0.0004975846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915284,0.005950015,0.0005915318,0.0010164137,0.0006142961,0.0002992506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009008442,0.0005045511,0.00079763733,0.0013582258,0.0046335235,0.006872475,0.0013392039,0.0038399254,0.007017558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010682267,0.00058899936,0.0011636257,0.0011165816,0.036356963,0.014747835,0.0055457945,0.007850279,0.0008027366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019184952,0.000001180207,0.000015531168,0.0000077631585,8.817813e-7,0.0000077864925,0.00033095528,0.00003125657,0.000023587376,0.9990903,0.00020188431,0.00028690454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008463258,0.000011496,0.000075965414,0.000042175,0.0000032672049,0.000047739835,0.0005531803,0.00027948283,0.00012524531,0.9763703,0.022476455,0.0000062683184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015600764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001226413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009008442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039492724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029678151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047641754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887175813","doi":"10.1017/s001221731800029x","title":"L’avenir contextualiste du constructivisme métaéthique : le constructivisme humien amendé","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.03193213242827988,"score_gpt":0.24442732165069864,"score_spread":0.21249518922241875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887175813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034642294,0.046900004,0.19689846,0.31294528,0.0068299305,0.00014267451,0.0002562089,0.00035898772,0.40102616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8516756,0.010693555,0.041544784,0.032977827,0.003914348,0.00040159022,0.00012956402,0.00041513346,0.058247585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929622,0.0046288,0.00021771467,0.00076388713,0.0010312083,0.00039617473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939587,0.004151792,0.00039495088,0.00064084947,0.0006350591,0.00021856696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062529785,0.00079625746,0.00073196605,0.0023021311,0.0039642127,0.008303899,0.0015767487,0.0049596606,0.0054098265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007833139,0.00042164445,0.0010790902,0.0015578802,0.036706768,0.0102935955,0.0043065445,0.009606666,0.00093872397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010389049,0.0000052165838,0.000098539786,0.00006152119,0.000007573845,0.000027540149,0.0043551475,0.0001030973,0.000082167884,0.98987585,0.0022611334,0.0031117953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012631031,0.00002923387,0.00050501607,0.00031352913,0.000015347801,0.000098023374,0.0033537517,0.00057015463,0.0004811274,0.80709547,0.18750055,0.000025173258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053972774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068029584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008303899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058386265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004444424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04236245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892779792","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12402","title":"Subjectivism, instrumentalism, and prudentialism about reasons: On the normativity of instrumental transmission","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Subjectivism; Epistemology; Normative; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03679851788301667,"score_gpt":0.23511054665569092,"score_spread":0.19831202877267426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892779792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15894389,0.005756514,0.2801813,0.07232691,0.0008029567,0.00011427829,0.00017964463,0.0001758078,0.48151872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878808,0.0005555385,0.006849375,0.0011927745,0.00028766834,0.000074243726,0.000026659158,0.000041390966,0.003091399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873251,0.008657839,0.00046903276,0.000959478,0.0020031214,0.00058548525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97468036,0.018702302,0.0015138232,0.0021386843,0.0022197883,0.00074491714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015645213,0.00041712564,0.0008012612,0.0019849648,0.0025085444,0.006898593,0.0013737599,0.0030691293,0.0032392915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016230395,0.0004469981,0.0009713142,0.0011355669,0.049398392,0.009535168,0.0045087286,0.0056594093,0.00037467948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005086028,0.000004504038,0.000056257297,0.00000741637,0.0000029266635,0.000012166122,0.00039361313,0.00012418325,0.000026245265,0.9987165,0.0001531094,0.0004980427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040647546,0.0000030281249,0.00007053683,0.000015918558,0.0000018136851,0.000008911977,0.00015880917,0.0003387113,0.00004866974,0.9978911,0.0014552573,0.0000032376681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014190814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008034797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015645213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040587243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002228222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08274084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893543469","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12387","title":"<i>Kant's Modal Metaphysics</i>: A reply to my critics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Modal; Citation; Philosophy of language; Theology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.056446340594814695,"score_gpt":0.258715153573243,"score_spread":0.2022688129784283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893543469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008273271,0.0030799129,0.0008012594,0.9804985,0.0056105,0.000004005206,0.000020373993,0.000018047138,0.00914016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.100470275,0.0033864356,0.0015312821,0.84466344,0.03702211,0.000081816215,0.000029443416,0.00022845613,0.0125866765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840239,0.007890875,0.0009392634,0.0019929828,0.0039151353,0.0012377774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9430457,0.041105226,0.002478454,0.003069081,0.008656935,0.001644728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019639807,0.00088500214,0.0017301867,0.002682641,0.01034135,0.015754484,0.005625934,0.0438385,0.0057389084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05909574,0.0010121409,0.0015204058,0.0032956097,0.051917054,0.019536534,0.008011668,0.071006104,0.003319994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043261512,0.000015415926,0.00017114161,0.00012282569,0.000035219156,0.00009544533,0.005745319,0.00012019619,0.000083799634,0.6176689,0.37204543,0.003853052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048334954,0.000013786789,0.00054163486,0.00075641513,0.00005105807,0.00020307531,0.0074196127,0.00061057217,0.0003852917,0.62296605,0.36691537,0.00008871001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009068371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0084188385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0438385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0082155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005732483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10386646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902967975","doi":"10.5206/ls.2018.5448","title":"Review of Thomas Reid and the Problem of Secondary Qualities by Andrew Shrock","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Locke Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; History","score_opus":0.05961691198521518,"score_gpt":0.30949368279989325,"score_spread":0.24987677081467807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902967975","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006881261,0.9239762,0.00010547066,0.061225742,0.009693492,0.000003214841,0.000021550914,0.0000049614255,0.0049005845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003130002,0.9359472,0.00018245574,0.034102537,0.0154540595,0.000017051672,0.000041494863,0.000027679365,0.011097467],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973144,0.0009285757,0.00017737014,0.00030172223,0.0011076969,0.00017016592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928013,0.0040513007,0.00033058578,0.00021024977,0.0021592816,0.00044726374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003787733,0.0008444641,0.0014174012,0.0039898483,0.0020845076,0.004148542,0.0014597513,0.0040052775,0.0077087856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013390682,0.0005566767,0.0004990332,0.0060918285,0.0067922478,0.0077587254,0.0028207279,0.007610877,0.0044366326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020192587,0.0000070896162,0.000047356945,0.0014067501,0.0000135903165,0.000072321054,0.00063451176,0.000086595275,0.00004721201,0.0407912,0.9106658,0.046207357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031267039,0.0000036860586,0.000097894364,0.0011070508,0.0000042770735,0.000085800544,0.00016125638,0.000006647047,0.000014546814,0.0041848207,0.994323,0.000007893375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02294148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031414136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02294148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072844275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008353452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05285251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905452376","doi":"10.1007/s10790-018-9676-3","title":"Virtues for the Imperfect","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12781243362665953,"score_gpt":0.33010624114839343,"score_spread":0.2022938075217339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905452376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040487535,0.00546241,0.039045166,0.13456513,0.0014182384,0.00006890693,0.0001886431,0.0001604296,0.77860355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95117486,0.00094717316,0.007699157,0.010840759,0.0010427644,0.00012362665,0.000058617883,0.00014690553,0.027966287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921119,0.004037787,0.0003025818,0.0012219936,0.0015452086,0.0007805319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819255,0.008706439,0.0010893309,0.004855962,0.0023211627,0.001101614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011527307,0.00043624124,0.0012717649,0.0015798189,0.0072137523,0.010554179,0.0012559897,0.0059973984,0.00943211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02837595,0.0004696442,0.0006307428,0.0010260117,0.052538432,0.014063072,0.004931359,0.008736505,0.0011869813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005849578,0.000004291155,0.000105836,0.000007959137,0.000003064546,0.0000112137495,0.00033600436,0.000056111385,0.000014736402,0.99673045,0.001728452,0.0009961923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051876914,0.00000276053,0.000071214774,0.000016055055,0.0000025411264,0.000013462868,0.0001916885,0.0001247385,0.000019919213,0.99091595,0.008632904,0.000003598134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040149433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004336677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011527307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003956356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045698234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060962975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905697073","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/10877.001.0001","title":"The Dash—The Other Side of Absolute Knowing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"The MIT Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dash; Absolute (philosophy); Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08568161660758085,"score_gpt":0.2596792442235722,"score_spread":0.17399762761599136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905697073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015454567,0.004335345,0.02265141,0.059113923,0.0023006788,0.000017188531,0.00012756458,0.00028815574,0.8957111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.760727,0.0032934654,0.006403223,0.014459965,0.0015931147,0.00007155867,0.00015450115,0.00044992313,0.21284726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607843,0.0014370958,0.00014236083,0.00080301287,0.0011417121,0.00039741633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523854,0.0021397632,0.00024210195,0.0012131014,0.0007629349,0.0004034817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023929498,0.00046168992,0.0007078174,0.0010616133,0.005193126,0.010649446,0.0013301838,0.003985632,0.017994966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009117608,0.00030810767,0.0004573822,0.001094532,0.028582111,0.020010673,0.0068283607,0.008644856,0.0047326344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020695765,0.0000061366536,0.00006372282,0.000025759147,0.000002564721,0.00003434001,0.0026493804,0.000041943174,0.00016231093,0.9839129,0.006271206,0.006809053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000146350985,0.00004337928,0.0002646952,0.0001629483,0.000010107828,0.00021207718,0.0050496003,0.00025444993,0.0006029999,0.6655504,0.3278071,0.000027632777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028148072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026359465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017994966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030110546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003537429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0601992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908572182","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12428","title":"Freedom immediately after Kant","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Action (physics); Philosophy; Transcendental number; Moral philosophy; Practical reason; Key (lock); Natural (archaeology); Natural law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.026664205756671226,"score_gpt":0.20767946402723214,"score_spread":0.18101525827056092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908572182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027873509,0.005624583,0.03230192,0.03460024,0.001148509,0.000035554425,0.00019076202,0.00012622701,0.89809865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.913794,0.0010197199,0.0030019963,0.004608382,0.00043464708,0.000045278022,0.00010036578,0.00008929306,0.07690626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670213,0.0014883716,0.000079088786,0.00050412386,0.00075696985,0.00046930983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819285,0.00086010736,0.00009104558,0.00036974842,0.00033476026,0.00015154341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025345243,0.0003775281,0.00035047365,0.0011183455,0.0037632787,0.004492629,0.00054021337,0.002506852,0.007005915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047181295,0.00019020919,0.00053755654,0.0006438043,0.023786094,0.003997904,0.0030879783,0.004944088,0.0012158847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039627885,0.0000022384652,0.000025470323,0.0000043666146,9.5272503e-7,0.000010792098,0.00037708346,0.000083671264,0.000024474935,0.99701166,0.0012131118,0.0012422152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030248434,0.0000047397916,0.000055563356,0.000026072736,0.0000015964299,0.000024499048,0.00013722532,0.00010998848,0.00009386091,0.96014595,0.039392583,0.000004968633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048911697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002580881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007005915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00572303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028373566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041523695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921409978","doi":"10.1007/s11406-019-00065-9","title":"Free Will, Values, and Narrative Selfhood","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Teleology; Luck; Epistemology; Philosophy; Narrative; Intelligibility (philosophy); Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of language; Value (mathematics); Philosophy of science; Articulation (sociology); Rebuttal; Law; Metaphysics; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.027135049208406887,"score_gpt":0.23604025089471273,"score_spread":0.20890520168630583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921409978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07745414,0.0072044865,0.032845065,0.04059139,0.0004408008,0.000061850325,0.00008934853,0.00004097299,0.841272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827528,0.0007751747,0.0019721312,0.00078446866,0.000111879075,0.000046412428,0.000020357058,0.000018687047,0.013517992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622464,0.002617634,0.000098674805,0.00031350032,0.00041487426,0.000330655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947943,0.0033989106,0.0004078776,0.0005680596,0.0003970598,0.000433897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006217269,0.00036033144,0.00043547677,0.0012756323,0.0058386787,0.010856331,0.0008686177,0.0031585204,0.0057411324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008171047,0.0003077058,0.0003338025,0.001335247,0.055400915,0.009758588,0.00416682,0.0036712633,0.00057226425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036524777,0.0000048192987,0.00006377302,0.0000057177995,0.000001137317,0.0000073342,0.0020755436,0.000034492383,0.000010867368,0.996675,0.00033498838,0.00078257924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045448364,0.0000026385196,0.00007466586,0.000017473538,0.0000014240942,0.000016182019,0.0015844639,0.00006864001,0.000029265153,0.98965186,0.008546542,0.0000023830926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020282702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021716417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010856331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032720133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003316923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032880485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2931166311","doi":"10.32396/usurj.v5i1.353","title":"Kant's Account of Our Moral Obligations Concerning Animals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.10206512423185732,"score_gpt":0.3044718320228958,"score_spread":0.20240670779103848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2931166311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015964648,0.0067818845,0.080344915,0.03755064,0.00047008204,0.000048404516,0.00028589938,0.00012104217,0.85843235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84759855,0.0048716348,0.035370674,0.008174543,0.0005989605,0.00017907827,0.00015299694,0.00008862565,0.102964945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692184,0.0016575343,0.00010033713,0.0002438533,0.0007869369,0.00028942834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998955,0.00046455202,0.00012518019,0.00017072973,0.00019923641,0.00008529191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023560477,0.0006743521,0.00032428032,0.001047936,0.002913451,0.004670925,0.0012476803,0.0052024364,0.0049855993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019087765,0.00033806983,0.0003554654,0.0009751084,0.019093804,0.003985326,0.0022463207,0.004876204,0.001454279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034309228,0.0000031504912,0.00004205413,0.000012332789,0.000001709868,0.000014491554,0.00070593774,0.00017779325,0.00005454065,0.9959194,0.0016871432,0.0013779902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038664925,0.000006817814,0.00021613485,0.000047566045,0.0000041815724,0.000066536166,0.00022384417,0.00038564028,0.0001637907,0.9465929,0.052277837,0.000010779909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004415084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056397766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052392865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052392865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032864532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038013935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936382497","doi":"10.1017/9781787443938.009","title":"Herder's Kantian Critique of Kant on the Concept of Being","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Humanities","score_opus":0.052678538162389967,"score_gpt":0.25594858225400574,"score_spread":0.20327004409161578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936382497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023011385,0.03723066,0.018829413,0.047313277,0.00092718477,0.000031834265,0.00017592401,0.00009685963,0.8723834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7863429,0.016050315,0.009543861,0.010502319,0.000979394,0.00012727866,0.00009009267,0.00009289811,0.17627095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903935,0.0004053679,0.000029150935,0.00015753586,0.00024060902,0.00012791427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995912,0.00024663977,0.000043339438,0.00003564607,0.000055113127,0.000028024746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011197148,0.0005210698,0.00034426866,0.0011226219,0.0022179014,0.0031045158,0.0006345783,0.0023654995,0.0039126077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015466898,0.00025358782,0.000286413,0.0012288474,0.015080877,0.0050793816,0.0019785545,0.0033474201,0.0007841383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054477478,0.0000017625832,0.00004138825,0.000022611512,0.0000013750465,0.00001386953,0.002041998,0.000057302383,0.00004873501,0.98827773,0.006329816,0.0031578995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005573326,0.0000121084,0.00047913796,0.00017132943,0.0000061377486,0.00010177628,0.00081116706,0.00016207923,0.0002246493,0.763049,0.23496379,0.000013378909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004565936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005953555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004565936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043166797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023151515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031319797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944936984","doi":"","title":"Kant's intuicionism : a commentary of the trascendental aesthestetic. Toronto: Buffalo, 1995","year":2001,"lang":"ca","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Universidad de Buenos Aires)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.010308675116251036,"score_gpt":0.24249363773270097,"score_spread":0.23218496261644994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944936984","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002126966,0.23178755,0.0022201135,0.6026789,0.010281569,0.000023451454,0.00019943547,0.00005033875,0.15063164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27160087,0.18186203,0.0028200652,0.2700732,0.017131424,0.00032204232,0.00015501174,0.0004513464,0.255584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705315,0.001565326,0.000116481955,0.00024319561,0.0007141446,0.00030769556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965957,0.0025885873,0.00013806412,0.00009527881,0.00042534445,0.00015705674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004175729,0.0008075609,0.0007442807,0.0018665297,0.0098964935,0.005897115,0.0018014575,0.009853596,0.007762556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070611537,0.00085151615,0.000413887,0.004102196,0.033333596,0.008884735,0.0029341746,0.017806916,0.0010862625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022487335,0.000005969203,0.00007107135,0.000099538156,0.000004402077,0.000067688816,0.009073647,0.00009981973,0.000028187123,0.5589233,0.42526156,0.006342321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023901646,0.0000070350975,0.00075572135,0.0006604824,0.00000793964,0.000073251074,0.0080535775,0.00011948476,0.00012551331,0.12785327,0.8622926,0.00002722691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22578563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40180343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22578563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019040564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011533916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44894278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945517855","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000116","title":"Kelly Sorensen and Diane Williamson (eds), Kant and the Faculty of Feeling Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018 Pp. x + 276 ISBN: 9781107178229 (hbk) £75.00","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Sociology; Philosophy; Media studies; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.028090104898230467,"score_gpt":0.23138191954478735,"score_spread":0.20329181464655688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945517855","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014053003,0.98521703,0.00046181228,0.0055769226,0.001589296,0.0000031343016,0.000053221447,0.000025772242,0.0069322633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049401787,0.9656572,0.00088488305,0.001250865,0.0021693173,0.000026456755,0.000109521614,0.000059903276,0.024901664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989448,0.00038680574,0.00009490914,0.00014471942,0.0003427203,0.000086057924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738735,0.0017648224,0.00023111458,0.000110561785,0.0003400908,0.00016604905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021397064,0.0017017468,0.0015110335,0.0034405047,0.0011259243,0.0050850427,0.0010055021,0.0022719102,0.03919289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004706873,0.001440316,0.0006332183,0.004305708,0.002560027,0.00865008,0.0018607377,0.0034226275,0.01706491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008556955,0.000033581142,0.0002983906,0.0037895595,0.00004051911,0.00009540084,0.0018319554,0.00030403057,0.00025818913,0.036327288,0.69222957,0.26470593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013740473,0.000013890275,0.0014358555,0.0045088353,0.000030803527,0.0003443502,0.0009813743,0.0000847457,0.00014833825,0.029512897,0.9628973,0.000027828346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064531574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0148911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03919289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026791084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035454216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13111329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946229664","doi":"10.1007/s11406-019-00082-8","title":"The Worthwhileness of Meaningful Lives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiology; Meaning of life; Epistemology; Value of life; Meaning (existential); Philosophy of science; Philosophy of life; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Appeal; Meaningful life; Purpose in life; Sociology; Psychology; Metaphysics; Social psychology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02763919289767929,"score_gpt":0.2204990472417316,"score_spread":0.1928598543440523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946229664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057206027,0.012340503,0.05802799,0.08525109,0.001514852,0.00011608051,0.00018221284,0.00010672259,0.7852545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736734,0.0013483564,0.0063894736,0.002203533,0.0006775682,0.00021987855,0.00007836527,0.00008101339,0.015328463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895726,0.007152047,0.0003048429,0.0009081152,0.0012028347,0.0008596492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98221797,0.010283762,0.0011151783,0.0028041005,0.0017484087,0.0018305752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009483137,0.0006780942,0.0010040972,0.0023664436,0.009120792,0.010767401,0.0016515448,0.0052817627,0.009272638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01768678,0.0006052153,0.0007006864,0.0016928287,0.07408426,0.018320257,0.008248193,0.0066674943,0.0007876543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004292888,0.0000035770386,0.00003734668,0.0000124512035,0.000001863623,0.000010947941,0.00090317545,0.000026769545,0.000018850054,0.997834,0.00046064035,0.0006860628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068855315,0.000004430439,0.00006737639,0.000020061643,0.0000033684687,0.000024691686,0.00069833786,0.00005324688,0.000031527343,0.9889957,0.010091492,0.0000028465186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014911878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020440298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010767401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036788757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003946372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050152242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947926545","doi":"","title":"Behaviourism and Governance: A World Bereft of Freedom and Politics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Student Research Proceedings","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Virtue; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Political philosophy; Government (linguistics); Spontaneous order; Law; Philosophy; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.18533653133579592,"score_gpt":0.41911509400884045,"score_spread":0.23377856267304453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947926545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046062566,0.013849149,0.053361617,0.29691768,0.0016869011,0.00005389624,0.000052802807,0.00011692558,0.5878985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447154,0.0043975194,0.006723416,0.015100869,0.00093513436,0.00009662298,0.00003527864,0.00010988337,0.027885757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907663,0.006469935,0.00015111557,0.0007129395,0.0013836782,0.0005161274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532336,0.0024946213,0.0005141799,0.0007219386,0.00042201646,0.0005237904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005641368,0.00030659512,0.00038171868,0.0010990482,0.005073002,0.009302078,0.0008169548,0.0033961895,0.0027446223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056617497,0.00022956097,0.00030816114,0.0012695839,0.06741056,0.008632564,0.0045119445,0.0067733596,0.0004115708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002938171,0.0000065372687,0.00014029848,0.000012580167,0.0000015590094,0.000014417897,0.005020958,0.0000667493,0.000039067752,0.99007714,0.0020089864,0.0026088473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007405842,0.000013708312,0.0006055326,0.00013877344,0.000002554616,0.000055175995,0.004596499,0.00028005216,0.000121722864,0.8187159,0.17545119,0.000011571729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057021887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004285991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009302078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070706047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051949173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051301062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950980940","doi":"10.33137/pbsc.v41i1.18309","title":"&lt;i&gt;Eric Gill in Ditchling: Four Essays&lt;/i&gt;, Peter Holliday, ed.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papers of The Bibliographical Society of Canada","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Holliday junction; Art; Philosophy; Law and economics; Biology; Sociology; Genetics; Gene; Homologous recombination","score_opus":0.02022008881694207,"score_gpt":0.20462027624373208,"score_spread":0.18440018742679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950980940","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015277732,0.44677728,0.0015894579,0.30366883,0.033327878,0.00005507195,0.0005638601,0.0001135442,0.21237637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029499337,0.26578745,0.0020309987,0.0503586,0.012134079,0.00014172267,0.00049294916,0.00049614353,0.6390587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985719,0.00036437897,0.00007523976,0.00016212964,0.00062165817,0.00020469849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972977,0.0013381739,0.0001333117,0.00010546688,0.00087587634,0.00024959023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021868506,0.00087767193,0.0006612193,0.004159863,0.0066593606,0.0067440798,0.0011671559,0.0038438104,0.027625551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008409692,0.00053964136,0.00035839036,0.0074156877,0.004481131,0.008146919,0.0027269104,0.0037337611,0.009482192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071262716,0.0000051462366,0.00007369335,0.0001292223,0.0000019873992,0.00003304813,0.001851915,0.000019179122,0.00004788943,0.013425301,0.9625875,0.021817984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011597638,0.000001052432,0.00033334768,0.00039363644,0.0000024865885,0.00002596903,0.0018801888,0.0000066280386,0.0000652287,0.0028757055,0.99440753,0.000007101583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.124578014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26459014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124578014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010143952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008213068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24770576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952631439","doi":"10.22215/etd/2018-13360","title":"Humean Scepticism as an Alternative in the Moral Realism and Moral Anti-Realism Debate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Philosophical realism; Moral realism; Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Metaphysics; Moral psychology; Direct and indirect realism","score_opus":0.07371126228041468,"score_gpt":0.3170866873153614,"score_spread":0.2433754250349467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952631439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118532054,0.019941539,0.038331278,0.31067094,0.0021713753,0.000056021687,0.00004810763,0.00007391831,0.5101748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96417326,0.002752723,0.00601361,0.0121005755,0.0010277934,0.00006252204,0.00001869156,0.00005765241,0.013793175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98230666,0.012712185,0.00026615316,0.0008904652,0.003077869,0.0007467084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98500407,0.010778792,0.0009222716,0.0011407099,0.0014442977,0.00070988893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014549047,0.00040501647,0.0006430393,0.002089463,0.0050721457,0.011893142,0.0015417308,0.0062671904,0.0024084453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018737204,0.00029185019,0.0004951582,0.0016914802,0.06335675,0.009432841,0.005857428,0.011496742,0.00054128445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009354731,0.0000071111267,0.00008589941,0.000016880738,0.0000024145595,0.000042073876,0.00447923,0.000064449414,0.000038921957,0.9921117,0.0011280936,0.0020137897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018202629,0.000014019363,0.00018267416,0.0001995304,0.0000053124395,0.00008513085,0.0038977794,0.00058010675,0.00022267208,0.9675974,0.027185738,0.000011437231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023583905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020540906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014549047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006925679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005592266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076943636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953210074","doi":"10.3390/genealogy3020031","title":"Artificial and Unconscious Selection in Nietzsche’s Genealogy: Expectorating the Poisoned Pill of the Lamarckian Reading","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genealogy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Conscience; Philosophy; Criticism; Darwinism; Epistemology; Reading (process); Performative utterance; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Literature","score_opus":0.023270492899490087,"score_gpt":0.2206444610579216,"score_spread":0.1973739681584315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953210074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09482004,0.014494677,0.051894296,0.35911658,0.0033808618,0.00003992136,0.00020107673,0.0002643085,0.4757883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9425026,0.001995273,0.006864637,0.014045241,0.0013261337,0.000050149436,0.000046106732,0.00015482614,0.033015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981566,0.0010945601,0.00003787906,0.00029803766,0.0002943363,0.00011857878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969041,0.0022088022,0.00018036763,0.00031897423,0.00030001742,0.000087699016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027499278,0.00033986007,0.00035335368,0.0013066916,0.002678963,0.0053243735,0.0012008214,0.0037689623,0.0030416907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007789387,0.00023896078,0.00027111248,0.0005644783,0.024931107,0.0073828762,0.0018501107,0.0042106565,0.00056242547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006372458,0.000004634165,0.00011984393,0.000011525635,0.0000017343353,0.000044937835,0.0047707283,0.000074626914,0.000060331462,0.98983115,0.0035108323,0.0015633496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009132137,0.0000073431706,0.00031048481,0.000055533685,0.000004192248,0.00011851378,0.0023988641,0.00064495666,0.00019904568,0.8700699,0.12616679,0.000015169909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031943908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004241853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053243735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002947296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010151337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02138424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962293539","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2019.1619354","title":"Is children’s wellbeing different from adults’ wellbeing?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; York University","funders":"European Research Council; York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Psychology; Well-being; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.01732302339000507,"score_gpt":0.20149303184762307,"score_spread":0.184170008457618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962293539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41476068,0.027265022,0.02313574,0.2936096,0.0011153659,0.00006483596,0.00068026275,0.00006949266,0.23929903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98901457,0.0036012605,0.0012517931,0.0037988564,0.00014593228,0.000024927196,0.00009324643,0.0000149338775,0.0020544748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775046,0.0010862584,0.0000939089,0.00047134724,0.00030420453,0.00029369481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614006,0.0017789539,0.00069925655,0.0002957774,0.0006156863,0.0004702011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00429637,0.0003198479,0.00047368815,0.0010726219,0.0015601328,0.0035742077,0.0006163207,0.0016401277,0.0031003084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065980675,0.00015005817,0.00035363255,0.001049774,0.021388572,0.0058852714,0.0032028153,0.0039041762,0.00025122176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004362297,0.000020011345,0.012696141,0.00016796186,0.000045876153,0.00021975786,0.029100044,0.00027353741,0.0003209299,0.9340414,0.003769066,0.019301603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014694839,0.00006225324,0.037323892,0.0006091283,0.00005201066,0.00042560016,0.041322637,0.00033793133,0.00044176055,0.8247011,0.09465725,0.00005183596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009956638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008314265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009956638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033512579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001943259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024315178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965363042","doi":"10.7710/2155-4838.1190","title":"Sympathia Aesthetica: On the Possible Significance of Intersubjective Cognitive Uniformity in the Critical-era Philosophy of Immanuel Kant","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Cognition; Epistemology; Critical philosophy; Psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.07693213321988333,"score_gpt":0.35228898701253053,"score_spread":0.2753568537926472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965363042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06986321,0.0078689195,0.07998244,0.14249055,0.0028603014,0.00007065732,0.00006529134,0.00023038773,0.69656825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97339207,0.0008592804,0.0067099635,0.0044838693,0.0009289237,0.000092378345,0.000016230935,0.00014683699,0.01337054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475265,0.0036481197,0.00010605133,0.0005951937,0.0005693187,0.00032869732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904756,0.007148749,0.00038314614,0.0010840609,0.0006305233,0.0002779333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008769417,0.0005085187,0.00058876927,0.0015540688,0.005395647,0.0077567217,0.0017263028,0.0034503299,0.0040352596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016139489,0.00034615974,0.00055441994,0.00097610755,0.06745008,0.014862483,0.0062625087,0.008686327,0.00050186075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009329735,0.0000042956194,0.000039120692,0.000007291237,0.000001882026,0.000014809664,0.0024307068,0.00005580422,0.000031351337,0.9956409,0.000656416,0.0011081194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009439764,0.0000052629866,0.000088233945,0.000022345019,0.0000033436386,0.000029038916,0.0010242112,0.0002623331,0.000085840315,0.9896617,0.00880138,0.000006799356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016931149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014577778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008769417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029619725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022380212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04637772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969367414","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12470","title":"A mereological argument for the non‐spatiotemporality of things in themselves","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Mereology; Metaphysics; Transcendental idealism; Transcendental number; Idealism","score_opus":0.05849393349855538,"score_gpt":0.2516204625390472,"score_spread":0.1931265290404918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969367414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19341442,0.0049644755,0.23913345,0.041779432,0.0019890075,0.00005070155,0.000244655,0.00017511305,0.51824874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791173,0.0006287435,0.0105721,0.0008968306,0.00047656687,0.00005252419,0.00006827788,0.000052490443,0.008135106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970192,0.0013745361,0.00019193867,0.00044407437,0.00078529463,0.00018500327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464005,0.0024056998,0.0006599587,0.0010386767,0.00095253275,0.0003031379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036921864,0.00022896161,0.0003954008,0.0011937858,0.0024553733,0.0037296913,0.0011131209,0.0020342623,0.003532157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054088393,0.0003655571,0.00068997673,0.00084367034,0.02210332,0.0070904666,0.0040867263,0.003546923,0.00043886478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003981199,0.0000026302973,0.000028388933,0.000009446157,0.0000015327355,0.00001766578,0.0002455809,0.000055516928,0.00008247059,0.99913055,0.0001988754,0.00022341554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008112357,0.000008607456,0.00013769172,0.000021660306,0.000006360385,0.0000726542,0.00031128508,0.00050315924,0.00022736477,0.98428637,0.014410475,0.0000064123496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006208225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052832125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037296913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020190447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011272834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019526362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972781377","doi":"10.5922/0207-6918-2019-1-2","title":"Types of Representational Content in Kant","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stanford Bio-X; University of Cambridge; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Sensibility; Content (measure theory); Indexicality; Object (grammar); Perception; Epistemology; Intuition; Representation (politics); Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive science; Conceptualization; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08877006854518603,"score_gpt":0.25770130450304074,"score_spread":0.1689312359578547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972781377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062316034,0.0031236277,0.24931501,0.009211544,0.00064400927,0.00012254438,0.0003002786,0.0004906144,0.67447627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95113224,0.0007933655,0.026102634,0.0010194932,0.00027532497,0.00018326101,0.00019090984,0.00023553701,0.020067211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934336,0.0031761958,0.00034796633,0.00065484026,0.0015766696,0.0008107908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662894,0.0016054567,0.00020996762,0.0008527573,0.0005703746,0.00013254014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004487526,0.00056589,0.0005237218,0.0022128052,0.0031846007,0.008110265,0.0012065851,0.0035882606,0.0048780744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072012227,0.00053011044,0.0011815954,0.0016900266,0.02168741,0.013469677,0.0043119993,0.0035363485,0.0012212006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050157455,0.0000017489425,0.00004605493,0.000013135684,0.000002424048,0.00001543805,0.0008013935,0.00009284101,0.000058730926,0.9978957,0.00021809973,0.00084922457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046002224,0.0000063624707,0.00009851009,0.000025663705,0.000005632613,0.00005854542,0.0003843635,0.00043641904,0.00023534903,0.9878897,0.010846183,0.000008687273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008103379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046219653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008110265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041929656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014440728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03042221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975709762","doi":"10.3998/ergo.12405314.0006.017","title":"Wolff&amp;#x2019;s Science of Teleology and Kant&amp;#x2019;s Critique","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Philosophy; Chemistry; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1268147490324613,"score_gpt":0.41675735505158934,"score_spread":0.289942606019128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975709762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025359685,0.024117593,0.025102228,0.17947294,0.0023253541,0.000025904412,0.00017671988,0.00012399007,0.7432956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8564971,0.0061598863,0.004898689,0.024393644,0.002071148,0.000100307916,0.00006639826,0.00015620126,0.1056566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971528,0.0013851231,0.000087102686,0.00037029426,0.0006937921,0.00031076279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989114,0.0006561205,0.00008367638,0.00012388937,0.0001552626,0.00006958165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024167555,0.000500041,0.00043008535,0.0014767325,0.0037166926,0.0052074455,0.0009052154,0.0074823233,0.006066474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036340456,0.0002879048,0.0004872451,0.0012580736,0.023471573,0.007007474,0.0024928937,0.00440556,0.001131669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043084106,0.0000030609651,0.000026319876,0.000012785734,0.0000012397103,0.000022687074,0.0008073781,0.00009657241,0.000018405382,0.99253684,0.0047284644,0.0017418697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062553927,0.0000046647965,0.00016375023,0.00008712183,0.0000020568614,0.00006996011,0.0006363131,0.0002282471,0.00009164643,0.84735024,0.15134965,0.000010112648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005530938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034862063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008009902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008009902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002658995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058116138},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2983991409","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v7i2.235","title":"Do the Virtues Make You Happy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Flourishing; Happiness; Epistemology; Eudaimonia; Virtue ethics; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemic virtue; Philosophy; Relation (database); Ethical egoism; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029271657404241373,"score_gpt":0.24233240481612817,"score_spread":0.2130607474118868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983991409","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015518296,0.008400263,0.013096737,0.71361566,0.010651428,0.000026620788,0.0002962559,0.000082124425,0.23831266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7554304,0.008325023,0.005280127,0.15864408,0.009477685,0.00018608384,0.0002908936,0.00013374464,0.062231924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983778,0.0008797021,0.00006378949,0.0002690108,0.00026257054,0.00014708196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949536,0.002683495,0.00066346454,0.00043243315,0.0007488735,0.00051812094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036198928,0.00026630974,0.00040648397,0.0004256705,0.0024280376,0.0025341867,0.00045457864,0.0035535945,0.021265516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01284522,0.00014094141,0.00027085026,0.00046794116,0.01053759,0.007302992,0.0019144214,0.00322746,0.0054487837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003735506,0.000027140668,0.0009905443,0.00009141946,0.000011152177,0.000044905228,0.003391859,0.000044345343,0.00008897062,0.8612219,0.11607525,0.017975304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016190665,0.000035445573,0.0017578203,0.00017136363,0.000009554368,0.00014472147,0.0046347016,0.00013409168,0.00018619327,0.65124804,0.34164262,0.000019299232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009278454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012184156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021265516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006589254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007980186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07114023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989370794","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2019-0033","title":"Hegel’s <i>Phenomenology</i>: On the Logical Structure of Human Experience","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Hegelianism; Rationality; Epistemology; Perception; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.09789066430077367,"score_gpt":0.29543412268938984,"score_spread":0.19754345838861617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989370794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17036444,0.010008974,0.14594172,0.055718992,0.000660288,0.00016858819,0.0002787271,0.00024378569,0.61661446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98372793,0.0013669103,0.005373169,0.0016605892,0.00009681237,0.000064608146,0.00003447776,0.0000409748,0.0076344465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978974,0.0015642956,0.00005097567,0.00014956956,0.00020138938,0.00013629351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975783,0.0017332978,0.00013581316,0.00026301536,0.0001853434,0.000104155384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030498668,0.00030730446,0.0002766243,0.0013248817,0.0030340166,0.0053209076,0.0005740498,0.0014944188,0.0026626433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037124555,0.00023367394,0.0003516184,0.000888971,0.05902542,0.008962245,0.0029978072,0.0029686692,0.00032037005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013157619,0.0000064764536,0.00012793543,0.000038363905,0.0000033834253,0.00007289875,0.03616638,0.00025632014,0.00020064093,0.9602066,0.0013861352,0.0015216823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019631247,0.000023066186,0.00028050246,0.00018341129,0.0000064592546,0.00026007884,0.03352298,0.0006906931,0.0004885292,0.89824986,0.06624717,0.000027601529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027204936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012565217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053209076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003821186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017788156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027724743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001579879","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2019.1664980","title":"Kant’s lectures on metaphysics: a critical guide","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Relation (database); Computer science","score_opus":0.1114586155937869,"score_gpt":0.2807317843998352,"score_spread":0.1692731688060483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001579879","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014378323,0.3776259,0.05311589,0.24254555,0.010311518,0.00015242986,0.000840575,0.00028706502,0.31368318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19230472,0.3793654,0.0925391,0.084144376,0.027831664,0.0010960307,0.0013604959,0.0010852633,0.22027291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965412,0.0020354656,0.00017944018,0.00023004698,0.00082910917,0.0001848164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950566,0.0039059538,0.00016041572,0.00020545677,0.00051115546,0.00016047416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004324717,0.001662784,0.0008520716,0.0045204316,0.0027880177,0.0059935106,0.0017190686,0.004994968,0.009992675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067023993,0.0008735978,0.0006386793,0.0038846056,0.017896162,0.009507475,0.0024064998,0.012021913,0.004592924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012083567,0.000017212285,0.000044252025,0.00017511634,0.000007794405,0.000055057728,0.0017384464,0.0004071895,0.00010390122,0.8386964,0.1432649,0.015477683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005219389,0.000004999053,0.00010195584,0.000409279,0.0000022329277,0.000060396003,0.00039902897,0.00017116028,0.0000779041,0.4584731,0.54028213,0.000012686389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055340123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006086123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009992675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073731365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047796294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053496122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004150327","doi":"10.33497/jpe.v1i1.10","title":"Is Contempt Redeemable?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Philosophy of Emotion","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05920154428405805,"score_gpt":0.26122027619843824,"score_spread":0.2020187319143802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004150327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029711338,0.016156644,0.042346172,0.36612388,0.0071256305,0.00006641795,0.00004876864,0.00013840749,0.5382827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8714602,0.008490483,0.006094965,0.06883752,0.0052996892,0.00020969234,0.000040471306,0.00018956666,0.039377395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861908,0.007053265,0.00034749234,0.0020254296,0.0030906876,0.001292227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842243,0.010550306,0.0016932987,0.0014944221,0.0012094849,0.00082813296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01573677,0.000515687,0.00089498644,0.0006840041,0.0039352616,0.011508225,0.002374624,0.010828322,0.006398756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041953776,0.0003678672,0.00078197353,0.0006538498,0.05008308,0.016165344,0.0071774903,0.020389372,0.0018285197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036533598,0.000015079918,0.00022695797,0.00007894818,0.000008028115,0.00016741376,0.0055762213,0.000054978278,0.00019156776,0.97921294,0.004373682,0.010057603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001496831,0.000025525069,0.00033780915,0.00036714957,0.000010506964,0.00024334123,0.003825779,0.00020887374,0.0003807826,0.913987,0.080579385,0.000018934914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011159265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008911556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01573677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030292259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003442387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08322501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006256504","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000499","title":"Kant on Feelings, Sensations and the Gap Between Rationality and Morality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Feeling; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Morality; Judgement; Rationality; Hedonism; Psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.1967180067668657,"score_gpt":0.29700957945143797,"score_spread":0.10029157268457226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006256504","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04110964,0.40473005,0.070408985,0.14364423,0.0030465608,0.000021605636,0.00021625157,0.0001667267,0.3366559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9142052,0.05483885,0.0041398234,0.009819931,0.0017588008,0.000033784483,0.000061390696,0.00009009771,0.015052129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99460703,0.0036708587,0.00012556605,0.00029913464,0.0010403513,0.0002571222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961259,0.0028102538,0.00018617249,0.00026789846,0.00050013815,0.000109682034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051732617,0.00044913817,0.00064079807,0.0017300639,0.001410321,0.006288034,0.0009549128,0.0029903569,0.0035053284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006421969,0.0002670229,0.00043207654,0.0017872544,0.027175428,0.0074078543,0.0024076323,0.0054642376,0.0006410479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008115137,0.000002525419,0.00002767565,0.00007285661,0.000004658096,0.000012057191,0.0006615563,0.00018913306,0.000043744927,0.9936207,0.0022067563,0.0031502943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034951697,0.000005127097,0.00017949552,0.00029649178,0.0000047341036,0.000026379845,0.0005738322,0.00020215608,0.00011295029,0.96227807,0.036309574,0.000007644833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002174101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009994003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006288034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042614527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002098701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030919135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009088715","doi":"10.1515/kant-2020-0003","title":"Syntheticity and Recent Metaphysical Readings of Kant’sCritique of Pure Reason","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kant-Studien","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Intuition; Epistemology; Pessimism; Relation (database); Computer science","score_opus":0.07081162730557851,"score_gpt":0.2494363767878167,"score_spread":0.17862474948223817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009088715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07204167,0.017024085,0.11550749,0.14064446,0.0015295357,0.000043189157,0.00018643831,0.00022599897,0.6527971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981591,0.0013905305,0.0063868887,0.0023591577,0.00061656954,0.000051410418,0.00004354113,0.00006677793,0.0074940817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99332774,0.004571628,0.00022792637,0.00050498045,0.0011291361,0.00023847353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99171597,0.0057578287,0.00053550024,0.0010081398,0.0006861325,0.00029631343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00978468,0.00047462076,0.0005159174,0.0023811574,0.0033022405,0.008286726,0.0013839073,0.004127693,0.0038559607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009334974,0.00041163102,0.0006399512,0.001323333,0.050815593,0.009371898,0.0030433699,0.0077404147,0.0005078698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037059344,0.0000032358275,0.000011778603,0.000008367651,0.0000013619531,0.00000530634,0.0005899423,0.00010457924,0.000018980038,0.99870014,0.00021783468,0.0003346922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004461324,0.0000023715322,0.000029341809,0.000014871549,0.0000010614486,0.000007483649,0.00018465039,0.00031700794,0.000052383308,0.9946354,0.004748111,0.0000028185668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012055328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013955886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00978468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00807855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017390315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058614194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011924815","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12536","title":"On the putative possibility of non‐spatio‐temporal forms of sensibility in Kant","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensibility; Philosophy; Criticism; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Argument (complex analysis); Intellect; Value (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Mathematics; Literature","score_opus":0.07501238814444404,"score_gpt":0.2595617121317797,"score_spread":0.18454932398733565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011924815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16294318,0.0070285895,0.090060316,0.044112027,0.00088890205,0.00004925741,0.00013864062,0.00026265724,0.6945165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893093,0.00060853997,0.0031014413,0.0011217833,0.00013118696,0.000039074923,0.000019667434,0.000042794312,0.005626151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930019,0.004613969,0.00022582417,0.000656125,0.00096929783,0.0005329009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127847,0.00622956,0.0005540664,0.00095928425,0.00068327296,0.00029525318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074208383,0.00038783424,0.0006218019,0.0017966707,0.0035742042,0.009364919,0.0013029334,0.004421381,0.0040020435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009626131,0.00059147243,0.00086612254,0.0011093741,0.050244607,0.012725391,0.00657765,0.0049202084,0.0007244104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001048843,0.0000030710232,0.000048572667,0.000014397721,0.0000022076736,0.00003558027,0.0017369685,0.00019406863,0.000060755745,0.9969908,0.00032663697,0.0005764232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049747528,0.0000041175736,0.000065291795,0.000030054463,0.000002484196,0.000031173622,0.0006581081,0.0003333632,0.00009175754,0.99445564,0.004312854,0.000010077963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001287533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008571367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009364919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046184654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015708789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039245605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015257899","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-37576-8_18","title":"Interpreting the Human Form of Life: A Response to Brüllmann","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Historical-analytical studies on nature, mind and action","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Dialectic; Natural (archaeology); Reading (process); Interpretation (philosophy); Similarity (geometry); History; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.126416888102076,"score_gpt":0.32455124535613583,"score_spread":0.19813435725405984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015257899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014504363,0.05485907,0.0043112235,0.88381565,0.008794572,0.00002302055,0.000056336732,0.000044710636,0.04664506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.253435,0.075142965,0.015391768,0.5168816,0.023666965,0.0003325768,0.00012613114,0.0009102178,0.114112794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935395,0.0041500307,0.00020550773,0.0007987779,0.00095589715,0.0003502639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98809737,0.009982988,0.00023485631,0.00034398993,0.0010261908,0.00031460353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0092325285,0.0010566934,0.001100408,0.0021734517,0.0062152725,0.008019258,0.0020018371,0.013445114,0.004511116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014523331,0.000735828,0.0005268747,0.0023005109,0.037542608,0.026722128,0.0051810374,0.021245884,0.0015273133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024136822,0.000010409889,0.00003771771,0.000075914366,0.0000033012132,0.000058456168,0.010707066,0.000100406985,0.00007273295,0.810082,0.17228454,0.006543398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012328433,0.0000069370913,0.00010505785,0.00044436488,0.0000048025627,0.00014744687,0.005809664,0.00018791619,0.00021501117,0.33237576,0.66065335,0.000037386795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015918331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019309964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015918331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008154698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005076387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05916679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022412015","doi":"","title":"Money and Mental Contents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Phenomenon; Point (geometry); Function (biology); Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024635308924829912,"score_gpt":0.19236334301672095,"score_spread":0.16772803409189105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022412015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11263289,0.0033164518,0.013610802,0.018301617,0.00030174444,0.000030807914,0.00020150434,0.00010184521,0.85150236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826493,0.00094137277,0.0018390624,0.0008352956,0.00009605655,0.00003292853,0.00010287866,0.000051466686,0.013451693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999203,0.00038704855,0.00002187735,0.00010864194,0.00015254009,0.00012684824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985696,0.0007220645,0.00015275089,0.00022894611,0.0001609093,0.00016568654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009857673,0.0004000064,0.00020709452,0.001323195,0.0020290888,0.008462891,0.0006474806,0.0017846785,0.013619786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057062046,0.00019066986,0.00028285375,0.00082941254,0.016792,0.0129489275,0.0041011325,0.002093665,0.0011660246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001242478,0.0000057885604,0.00037947088,0.000021653603,0.000003960714,0.000039437622,0.0037064776,0.000083292856,0.00008983493,0.99032414,0.001304749,0.0040288186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010939908,0.000012264941,0.0019449496,0.000101380785,0.00001010937,0.00013383232,0.005352112,0.00042182434,0.00025946528,0.94784045,0.043895066,0.000017580027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020225162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013621749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013619786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002470607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008743202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045562685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027612146","doi":"10.1111/jaac.12712","title":"Kant's Musical Antiformalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Musical; Philosophy of music; Philosophy; Formalism (music); Innovator; Fine art; Literature; Art; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Music history; Visual arts; Computer science","score_opus":0.04736726681240135,"score_gpt":0.24272151183810312,"score_spread":0.19535424502570176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027612146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013967703,0.0033766548,0.04656603,0.030634582,0.00083687773,0.000028644972,0.00011557298,0.00011767163,0.90435624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90503025,0.0020319868,0.014347454,0.0063493084,0.0010134043,0.00011561797,0.000070324546,0.00013259382,0.07090901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99434775,0.0027923293,0.00017630367,0.0005437775,0.0016517622,0.0004880931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978696,0.0009466799,0.00013904329,0.00040564072,0.0004841351,0.00015488028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004014825,0.00049968367,0.0004061725,0.0011067779,0.0034236868,0.0057395534,0.0010539402,0.0029223019,0.0045960797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054430165,0.00031723225,0.00057122123,0.0007171596,0.026801117,0.005043119,0.0036525459,0.005364459,0.001237829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026696478,0.0000013722969,0.00000990519,0.0000050516464,6.796881e-7,0.0000043086484,0.00020401586,0.000065443564,0.000017175213,0.9983637,0.00079645944,0.0005291923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000674545,0.0000035372714,0.000045901965,0.000017240098,0.0000017361126,0.000014606163,0.00009097834,0.0002762765,0.00005001254,0.97790945,0.021579849,0.0000037878765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029887313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023655004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057395534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057073873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029648663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04141015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032914281","doi":"10.14394/etyka.493","title":"The Priority of the Good Over Right in Love: Challenging Velleman’s Kantian View","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Etyka","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022251776593472838,"score_gpt":0.23961899225767103,"score_spread":0.2173672156641982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032914281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055604313,0.013718005,0.024467269,0.10920188,0.0010226885,0.000021651676,0.00003745376,0.00003047892,0.79589635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96068454,0.002459652,0.002794954,0.007951187,0.00053676934,0.000038140566,0.000013468972,0.000044983102,0.025476355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570256,0.0029576013,0.00007135603,0.0002739016,0.0006180785,0.00037648564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732083,0.0017885981,0.0001451695,0.00023111745,0.00030357312,0.0002108004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004340846,0.00028258422,0.00056438387,0.00096092816,0.007515595,0.007516075,0.00078696,0.0036434396,0.0022966354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043698964,0.0002759884,0.0004093912,0.00083861727,0.043861683,0.008666767,0.005404324,0.006472385,0.00042235444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008097077,0.0000048769375,0.000042849715,0.000009029195,0.0000015295469,0.000031480202,0.0034380693,0.00005253698,0.0000294168,0.9933733,0.0014129899,0.0015958535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064312926,0.0000072112084,0.00016092746,0.000039144325,0.000002542921,0.00005980101,0.0028820266,0.00015417082,0.000083501676,0.96895164,0.027645236,0.000007322079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00312274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038242529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007516075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003810365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018757265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027646244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033342401","doi":"10.1017/s1358246119000250","title":"Virtues as Perfections of Human Powers: On the Metaphysics of Goodness in Aristotelian Naturalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Metaphysics; Essentialism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Wonder; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.07559943923213526,"score_gpt":0.28139435518212236,"score_spread":0.2057949159499871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033342401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12174757,0.007726307,0.10327824,0.06633492,0.0007848035,0.00008129885,0.00017391006,0.00016348857,0.69970936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912403,0.0005143435,0.0038145257,0.0011301597,0.00023258949,0.000034949247,0.000017745604,0.000015944357,0.0029993528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697554,0.0017329172,0.000106834035,0.00023263152,0.0007048553,0.00024722816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574053,0.0027448644,0.00027774755,0.00041768234,0.0005206396,0.00029851636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047297203,0.0003037792,0.0005829919,0.002183031,0.002563024,0.0049052406,0.00075452536,0.0023793809,0.002695793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058193523,0.00027156936,0.0004732553,0.00095918746,0.035474584,0.0069822655,0.0028024097,0.003000546,0.00026627647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002078881,0.0000023901998,0.000030730538,0.0000046112355,9.355089e-7,0.000008373497,0.00029832945,0.000106068735,0.000011003238,0.9989366,0.00021228612,0.00038660102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030904685,0.000002173674,0.0000749974,0.000008883202,8.299072e-7,0.000008743589,0.00010622524,0.00024254103,0.000010272669,0.99732506,0.0022144995,0.0000026602684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003293992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002382269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049052406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004382686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015509785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03179878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036563981","doi":"10.1017/s0953820820000138","title":"Sidgwick's Distinction Passage","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Utilitarianism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Presupposition; Epistemology; Biology","score_opus":0.09239672567249559,"score_gpt":0.23545652548527007,"score_spread":0.1430597998127745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036563981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022588272,0.0048481063,0.01944504,0.1543745,0.0049807285,0.00008555469,0.00027658037,0.000055655048,0.7933455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.833541,0.0016619812,0.0077744545,0.055732697,0.0016421315,0.00030308665,0.00014830378,0.00011154541,0.099084854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477875,0.0017252526,0.00020257554,0.0014149499,0.0012919717,0.00058646756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740785,0.0015140042,0.000113377886,0.00029940656,0.00048126382,0.00018394362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048168562,0.0005438832,0.0005998108,0.0011963437,0.006341745,0.0067806677,0.0020067624,0.009172685,0.008053089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009448546,0.00039795082,0.000756124,0.0009810171,0.02456904,0.0077420888,0.004927902,0.014993986,0.0015714817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055873415,0.000002105087,0.00001766103,0.000004995271,9.762248e-7,0.00003850581,0.0008243338,0.000012901792,0.000041259245,0.99301696,0.0054149856,0.0006197873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001871535,0.000012493747,0.00016484316,0.00012882114,0.0000059501504,0.00014700797,0.0009124687,0.00015187208,0.000392022,0.7259838,0.27206182,0.000020123649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008925849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054575196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009849852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009849852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00324116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07146597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041386573","doi":"10.1111/phin.12287","title":"Peter Winch: “Unity: Presupposition or Demand?”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Winch; Presupposition; German; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.20586740214004492,"score_gpt":0.2881581260871868,"score_spread":0.0822907239471419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041386573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031204965,0.020023653,0.038530722,0.17719953,0.0040152413,0.00008889615,0.00017313572,0.000160725,0.7286031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293707,0.0041523115,0.0050437497,0.010666694,0.001497117,0.000116623116,0.00007734244,0.00012825594,0.04894719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717283,0.0014977681,0.00007416679,0.00046547895,0.00055498956,0.00023470429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820805,0.001148589,0.00010652359,0.000185804,0.00026127652,0.000089763555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025338274,0.0004671568,0.0003945412,0.0010891525,0.0035202727,0.004028674,0.00078034634,0.0031743587,0.0070485175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073352363,0.00032168088,0.00027929933,0.001000178,0.02550146,0.009130864,0.0035740326,0.004653533,0.0010224949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006437042,0.0000021320927,0.000018735156,0.000014591985,0.000001077557,0.000023478477,0.00094375707,0.00004145725,0.000033316443,0.9917282,0.00523751,0.0019492493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009264228,0.0000075642997,0.0001651191,0.00012160125,0.0000043668933,0.000065297056,0.00083645136,0.00025469778,0.00027240106,0.8941894,0.10406356,0.000010241918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061233295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003802093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070485175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041972566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022715405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030453384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045659376","doi":"10.2478/disp-2020-0004","title":"Human Plight, Kantian <i>as if</i> , and Public Reasons in Korsgaard’s Moral Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disputatio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical imperative; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Morality; Linguistics","score_opus":0.061253548755337416,"score_gpt":0.2633359879518932,"score_spread":0.2020824391965558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045659376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04242588,0.0044771484,0.11453426,0.059585992,0.00096209056,0.00005548114,0.0001232235,0.00014938081,0.7776866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638863,0.00053327414,0.013634929,0.0026423833,0.00028034867,0.00007338232,0.000027435563,0.00006687516,0.018855065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934788,0.004084278,0.00020982299,0.00059894886,0.0011396693,0.00048848154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667126,0.0017865546,0.00024483862,0.0006849455,0.0003880434,0.00022438876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074522123,0.00057639385,0.0007044728,0.0018336838,0.0046482,0.009172244,0.0013657458,0.004910494,0.003943848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051951194,0.0005539984,0.0010252515,0.0011362009,0.052755006,0.0075429594,0.0043257456,0.0073010046,0.0007672748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014100543,0.0000023460743,0.000012706003,0.000003523847,7.072235e-7,0.00000632601,0.00040153315,0.00006928458,0.000008239789,0.9990159,0.00022410088,0.0002538565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035491312,0.0000021978751,0.000027892662,0.000017008118,0.0000015421009,0.0000128376305,0.00025768083,0.00023555868,0.000038282033,0.9931092,0.006290452,0.0000037809607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037182006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031069843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009172244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072010895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035935326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052247822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080521042","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v18i2.1020","title":"What Normativity Cannot Be","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Realism; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.22827052420089072,"score_gpt":0.3172305070713472,"score_spread":0.08895998287045648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080521042","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017888734,0.010948328,0.049828794,0.46822727,0.0068693827,0.000043040593,0.00032212486,0.00019898856,0.44567335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.861757,0.0056607495,0.010546043,0.07376535,0.0042940066,0.00020360282,0.00033993192,0.0003597327,0.04307364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99059033,0.00489914,0.00030618836,0.0017137562,0.0017640874,0.0007264383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894399,0.005497674,0.00059006776,0.0016508019,0.0020505744,0.00077093183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009957559,0.0005292406,0.0008142061,0.0012745946,0.0055120233,0.008755659,0.0014553567,0.004459624,0.0119183855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018451199,0.00034440652,0.00075663003,0.00064451556,0.029034015,0.02192644,0.0036413113,0.0072806217,0.0029913879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005919408,0.000005509219,0.00007482088,0.000022829287,0.0000039398415,0.000015157933,0.0005151255,0.00003755795,0.000028227263,0.9929974,0.0041160397,0.0021773276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049499276,0.0000045411657,0.000075344804,0.00006423573,0.0000026679056,0.000023903405,0.00055957376,0.000096254415,0.00006825199,0.96325785,0.035835642,0.0000066451967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004112249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002767268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119183855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031447413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036189577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0526613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081837218","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-48051-6_6","title":"Well-Being as Harmony","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Sketch; Pleasure; Virtue; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.04966404295779048,"score_gpt":0.22905361956613027,"score_spread":0.1793895766083398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081837218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041368385,0.004252988,0.0032814075,0.007440492,0.0003580625,0.000023083323,0.000030286805,0.000015719796,0.98046106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63707554,0.0065221,0.004796314,0.0056743505,0.0007974338,0.00026183686,0.00013010425,0.00012928939,0.34461308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877256,0.00065098895,0.000027835467,0.00015131218,0.0002189928,0.00017825498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994923,0.00017700874,0.00004237313,0.0000838142,0.00007792401,0.00012658427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015794707,0.0004780657,0.0005020703,0.00080144446,0.003024365,0.0074946457,0.0008765849,0.002132207,0.0141215585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015958544,0.00020590078,0.00025536577,0.0011456127,0.020226851,0.0058098095,0.0042849006,0.0035074214,0.0021184413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033670317,0.0000083979385,0.00003281138,0.000012422018,0.0000020715668,0.000010554079,0.0011961113,0.00004733421,0.000034008375,0.99033445,0.0035779355,0.004740596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042502006,0.000010496339,0.00027079426,0.000061577026,0.0000027911055,0.000046937097,0.0019379086,0.00006562478,0.00006164866,0.87695247,0.120580904,0.0000045970573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022609055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0141215585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022440623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019109552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04724133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082726756","doi":"10.1017/s0012217320000128","title":"Replies to Kirk Ludwig and Paul Hurley","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Naturalism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Triangulation; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07933594132205281,"score_gpt":0.23387028602655688,"score_spread":0.15453434470450406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082726756","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007701816,0.0030941335,0.00025270626,0.9811499,0.008169615,0.0000065953964,0.00002763177,0.00001975149,0.0065093674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06413961,0.0054068603,0.000865736,0.87682414,0.009029116,0.000118223164,0.000060748796,0.00015956498,0.043395963],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99354315,0.0039896653,0.00022033298,0.0008866557,0.0009955427,0.0003647025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98048866,0.015174731,0.0004976732,0.00056471745,0.0022036484,0.0010705928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085871825,0.0006409376,0.0011239557,0.0010048724,0.008101968,0.0060486086,0.0017103789,0.014375267,0.013609085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03270169,0.0006781249,0.00054296816,0.0014503242,0.011233285,0.0074112876,0.005057685,0.025738599,0.0036963369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022080838,0.000013349883,0.00009186041,0.000053970904,0.0000066280872,0.0001269952,0.0032550297,0.000066376546,0.00005429837,0.060706463,0.93271613,0.0028868234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002167146,0.000014676262,0.0002524862,0.0003487744,0.0000112320095,0.0001826164,0.0071391906,0.00025879144,0.00020700136,0.039922737,0.9515741,0.00006660152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012341656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008170924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014375267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008233656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035478133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05973959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084066437","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12570","title":"Kant and the concept of an object","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Object (grammar); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05493437188890296,"score_gpt":0.23077315576311294,"score_spread":0.17583878387420998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084066437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024929898,0.02129917,0.049528245,0.0392873,0.0013898778,0.000055574248,0.00012368927,0.000102447004,0.8632838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9328336,0.0052217143,0.013946713,0.004673883,0.00096697814,0.00012790694,0.000078064266,0.000107515814,0.042043693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912407,0.0056984187,0.00031496328,0.0005843471,0.0016389218,0.0005227509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589753,0.0022276219,0.00037390002,0.00049630494,0.00069303537,0.0003115997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065626297,0.0006686357,0.00060593075,0.0022294396,0.00494749,0.007899952,0.0010381048,0.0037105246,0.0031943484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049920827,0.00048867834,0.00064323394,0.0017090663,0.049397293,0.011863362,0.0050234706,0.0053866906,0.0008040188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026939608,0.0000019280358,0.000016608166,0.00001094153,0.0000012165095,0.000008179626,0.0004182817,0.00004884974,0.000012155661,0.9984841,0.0004812293,0.000513753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034878221,0.0000038644907,0.000040784886,0.000041294225,0.0000022153165,0.000025481011,0.00019034893,0.000117740674,0.000034042583,0.9802335,0.01930205,0.000005145512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022928647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001379138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007967097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007967097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030962639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057805598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30883871","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626.006","title":"Aristotle on <i>eudaimonia, nous</i>, and divinity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Eudaimonia; Virtue; Happiness; Philosophy; Pleasure; Meaning (existential); The good life; Epistemology; Contemplation; Form of the Good; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.056014535107144346,"score_gpt":0.187455381144123,"score_spread":0.13144084603697864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30883871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016989578,0.03054807,0.0070590745,0.019875899,0.001705859,0.000020616664,0.00010315936,0.000043368113,0.9236544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75850123,0.015704952,0.004120357,0.01114933,0.0029694042,0.00008954646,0.00014214791,0.000106080464,0.20721692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922025,0.0003458022,0.000018931498,0.00013574147,0.00019820874,0.00008109993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967587,0.00016222344,0.000025026498,0.00003681166,0.000067214714,0.000032915854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079862145,0.00038038424,0.0003713428,0.00087127765,0.003929798,0.004305692,0.000445725,0.0014129323,0.004146754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011744737,0.00013891348,0.0001809156,0.00064102834,0.015249545,0.0031648837,0.0012702304,0.002848173,0.0010071017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054617904,0.0000026145299,0.000048022088,0.000012884505,0.0000010247153,0.000014030283,0.0013471731,0.000045025838,0.00003446231,0.9903784,0.0050575007,0.0030534377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006370863,0.000015070667,0.00051691325,0.0001551611,0.0000023662355,0.000051125775,0.0013001079,0.000110570356,0.00010479229,0.7283646,0.26936358,0.000009249171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005602264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006254754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005602264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032998212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016678046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023941934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093941507","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190086596.001.0001","title":"Fichte's Moral Philosophy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Epistemology; Philosophy; Morality; Normative ethics; Feeling; Moral philosophy; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Perfection","score_opus":0.10912469076690952,"score_gpt":0.22963731547400545,"score_spread":0.12051262470709594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093941507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002068287,0.009868008,0.005884104,0.015918497,0.0011702735,0.00001792096,0.000038722195,0.000041601448,0.9649926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30395052,0.011551844,0.006430805,0.008187415,0.0023954543,0.00013393148,0.00013407742,0.00012488145,0.667091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865437,0.0005769796,0.000023418717,0.00011774498,0.00050351646,0.00012394527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920624,0.00041017993,0.000036159934,0.000068832975,0.000211064,0.000067458175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011258149,0.00044439753,0.000280316,0.0011537183,0.0035003936,0.003965228,0.00051102065,0.00175487,0.007751949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001885787,0.00015143953,0.00026889966,0.0006550383,0.01460737,0.0032242676,0.0013183753,0.003347234,0.0019712858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018890685,0.0000038924977,0.000015848582,0.000016266002,6.827798e-7,0.000017344204,0.0010452111,0.00007331784,0.000027626422,0.9650602,0.028446984,0.00529064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028329086,0.00000731499,0.0000911488,0.00016221008,0.0000010025268,0.00009446609,0.000530162,0.00025626255,0.000069281145,0.2936562,0.7051245,0.0000046836344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004402271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003557764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007751949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062685627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027407398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0454818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110229762","doi":"10.1017/s1369415420000540","title":"Helga Varden, Sex, Love, and Gender: A Kantian Theory Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020 Pp. xxii+ 337 ISBN 9780198812838 (hbk) £65.00","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.052121477848091916,"score_gpt":0.24138946860197513,"score_spread":0.18926799075388323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110229762","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001583805,0.98120934,0.00037543316,0.012172696,0.0010807237,0.000002655728,0.000046266276,0.000009394205,0.004945048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012698134,0.9637228,0.0010612563,0.0044078548,0.002275656,0.00003480341,0.00012386532,0.000055238794,0.015620365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981997,0.001024196,0.000112304035,0.00013725858,0.00042961986,0.00009696107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966505,0.0023168947,0.0002675985,0.00012335306,0.00046470677,0.0001770051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030367088,0.0011108657,0.0011844181,0.0041572447,0.0014835664,0.004223568,0.0015227245,0.0030650264,0.018271372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058930237,0.0008831527,0.00056736625,0.0040011522,0.005588521,0.009035825,0.001808808,0.004113614,0.005072603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100630714,0.00003228508,0.00045962672,0.0037214074,0.00008042945,0.00015733646,0.0049262457,0.00042442372,0.00020627593,0.16812171,0.6572266,0.16454299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001616905,0.000016342055,0.002263429,0.007342416,0.000048576192,0.0002981473,0.002776894,0.00009419238,0.00018252722,0.112275906,0.87465775,0.000027706246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007579759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013781644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018271372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032240024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004493896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06112379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114594491","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqaa078","title":"Against ‘Good for’/‘Well-Being’, for ‘Simply Good’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Relation (database); Value (mathematics); Form of the Good; Naturalism; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.056050156438669715,"score_gpt":0.26181518939233955,"score_spread":0.20576503295366982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114594491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039727084,0.0042516585,0.025055962,0.14248708,0.0020002748,0.00005592026,0.000068255766,0.00006294981,0.78629076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639079,0.00086592586,0.0029357572,0.015359291,0.0006142603,0.000062057115,0.000028740038,0.00007149408,0.016154474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841043,0.010148405,0.000412153,0.0014488602,0.0028752182,0.0010110477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901182,0.0045155347,0.0012532724,0.0009446524,0.0024534888,0.0007148682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011225772,0.00058373786,0.0007544718,0.001403719,0.003522605,0.009548453,0.0011880615,0.0045806123,0.0057857684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015181361,0.00022010862,0.00045449132,0.000940244,0.052422266,0.008845214,0.0044787815,0.0075296564,0.001115511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117930085,0.0000055236515,0.00009395936,0.00002486282,0.0000052279875,0.0000249509,0.0021394321,0.000036399648,0.00007486151,0.9933008,0.0027303447,0.001551737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012312929,0.000024348466,0.00055355794,0.00023795314,0.000015997808,0.00009033198,0.0054501635,0.00022892482,0.00042293983,0.9063247,0.08661856,0.000020234678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00213432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018807093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011225772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038063957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028511025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059368253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122295076","doi":"","title":"Hegel and a Third Theory of Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Natural law; Positivism; Positive law; Epistemology; Philosophy of law; Legal positivism; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Jurisprudence; Natural (archaeology); Comparative law; Political science; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.03469750650894042,"score_gpt":0.25984549868824863,"score_spread":0.2251479921793082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122295076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036149275,0.008692422,0.081328504,0.07036622,0.00079620373,0.000076970835,0.000118057455,0.00015256324,0.8023197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8884847,0.0031894094,0.022067452,0.010567636,0.0005546897,0.00021069984,0.00008305092,0.00008082933,0.074761555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964683,0.0015386213,0.00013638978,0.00055752974,0.0008459218,0.0004532693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752027,0.0013299576,0.00019274812,0.00039945805,0.00038461658,0.00017300666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003941071,0.00049636204,0.00052756263,0.0024599675,0.0033450143,0.005495515,0.0013269193,0.003361337,0.004383375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004399645,0.00030577456,0.0007482693,0.0008229186,0.03832714,0.009925954,0.003607303,0.004786746,0.0007210936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012662387,0.0000022516256,0.00001320895,0.0000034608802,7.1979383e-7,0.0000045776424,0.00017662041,0.00003970957,0.000009603414,0.9990663,0.00032567015,0.00035663505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061830797,0.000005648263,0.000029613388,0.000021981903,0.0000015372464,0.000017182758,0.00020946763,0.00016853475,0.000081407044,0.9845146,0.0149400765,0.0000037799036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044172686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037674839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008778772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008778772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053089936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063694715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125279035","doi":"","title":"On Essentially Conflicting Desires","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Epistemology; Moral realism; Realism; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Moral psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02631083043694923,"score_gpt":0.2771017683405813,"score_spread":0.2507909379036321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125279035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091649905,0.0035370935,0.17708296,0.031017346,0.0005796994,0.0001244207,0.00025349404,0.000119274366,0.6956358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94592464,0.0012307679,0.02602673,0.0039964574,0.00034177597,0.00017358818,0.00012470767,0.00008113251,0.022100223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99176824,0.005033334,0.00035457825,0.0008923249,0.0013784214,0.00057304866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931786,0.0039496566,0.0005856834,0.0011170254,0.0008186634,0.00035031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007010056,0.0006858909,0.00064542744,0.001465025,0.0037507836,0.006432776,0.0015660505,0.004325444,0.0061303796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011818839,0.00062615477,0.0009914653,0.0011470431,0.021019826,0.010401794,0.007077135,0.0045013,0.00071385416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008169127,0.000003232572,0.0000894654,0.000011770917,0.000005510397,0.000068039095,0.0006743363,0.00018516193,0.000060466882,0.99745935,0.00029557684,0.0011390276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000846352,0.000006709232,0.00008481479,0.00003183398,0.0000060541165,0.00007630255,0.00038230664,0.00057104643,0.000068450034,0.9916536,0.0071040057,0.000006404406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013354517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011011007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007010056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033950212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012630238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037073195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125495821","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198849933.001.0001","title":"Kant's Justification of Ethics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.18034937128469872,"score_gpt":0.2921499854867606,"score_spread":0.11180061420206186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125495821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028842578,0.009310325,0.024482083,0.04004788,0.0010604844,0.000034930217,0.00011215191,0.000069452195,0.9219984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66392446,0.0096921455,0.01663182,0.014249956,0.0027740512,0.0003101016,0.00025191953,0.00018970022,0.29197577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958681,0.0021669753,0.000084104606,0.00024247513,0.0014222733,0.00021626057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975083,0.0014653263,0.00009831845,0.0002119921,0.0006041532,0.000111882575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032274523,0.000563163,0.00045614413,0.0016019851,0.0025503568,0.0049689715,0.0009776456,0.0032754724,0.005351798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058296323,0.00024987853,0.0003297727,0.0009976997,0.019802919,0.0038604944,0.0017933301,0.005865992,0.0016369068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014758269,0.0000019366216,0.000007413832,0.000010722548,7.4416033e-7,0.0000074777895,0.00014256377,0.00012605505,0.0000132947225,0.9935913,0.0046309065,0.0014661166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020767689,0.0000017127012,0.000024275038,0.00005870048,9.3029536e-7,0.000011031492,0.00007853352,0.00023254562,0.000038535505,0.941893,0.057656184,0.0000026513228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002183107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020878431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005731216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005731216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040394794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04158306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132306378","doi":"10.7202/1076214ar","title":"Béatrice Longuenesse, \"I, Me, Mine: Back to Kant and Back Again\" and Alison Laywine, \"Kant’s Transcendental Deduction: A Cosmology of Experience\"","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Philosophy; Cosmology; Epistemology; Theology; Physics; Astronomy","score_opus":0.07541058576211176,"score_gpt":0.30385204810561994,"score_spread":0.22844146234350818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132306378","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019275933,0.7848787,0.00067297195,0.19618274,0.010609288,0.000013893489,0.000066545865,0.000018401654,0.0073647904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017012088,0.60248274,0.002137574,0.30269226,0.021805296,0.00022112393,0.0002521844,0.00019732238,0.05319943],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99428767,0.003156848,0.00022674153,0.0005391367,0.0015615294,0.00022813793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98668134,0.009377959,0.00078045315,0.00023622661,0.0024739616,0.0004500999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056790262,0.0010308479,0.0010796249,0.0028057832,0.0026525725,0.004765133,0.0015724179,0.0057651643,0.013322013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024088575,0.0005803635,0.0006240636,0.0048489403,0.0045515485,0.014385885,0.0028343634,0.010685356,0.0057960986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056121175,0.000016405671,0.0002538188,0.0018849886,0.000036540307,0.00006450237,0.0025297434,0.0000318349,0.00007761239,0.058342725,0.8933568,0.04334896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013511038,0.000015467363,0.0006490591,0.0019771282,0.000012205483,0.00011810036,0.0010518765,0.000022503613,0.0001269704,0.021495402,0.9744941,0.000023713603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014719428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02885036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014719428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029657716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045922394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04456663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135387468","doi":"10.1017/s001221732000030x","title":"Kant and the Demands of Normativity: Response to Harbin","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Normative; Subjectivity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.044344802722160896,"score_gpt":0.22693381889514194,"score_spread":0.18258901617298104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135387468","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018386742,0.0049791387,0.0041815946,0.9197294,0.0020914392,0.000019766509,0.000021963846,0.00003263272,0.050557286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7791597,0.0024948935,0.0017648287,0.19789478,0.0034255849,0.00011053852,0.000014150307,0.00011354449,0.015021842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98096126,0.01466465,0.00033039038,0.0011566823,0.0019128114,0.00097422197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564653,0.038172822,0.0010072563,0.0011980988,0.0023272955,0.00082929514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020878509,0.00051441154,0.0009716997,0.00093187124,0.008551937,0.008384381,0.0018307918,0.016942361,0.0027176994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032012507,0.0005186017,0.0005625761,0.0010646791,0.055966288,0.012599551,0.007330658,0.02301523,0.0005173555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039776693,0.000014100158,0.00011188348,0.000039794413,0.000005543884,0.00015029487,0.013214791,0.00019665922,0.000082092105,0.9552232,0.028819833,0.0021020079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003142445,0.000010926057,0.00021378243,0.00017086993,0.0000063669227,0.000095816074,0.0110215815,0.00062093284,0.0002633647,0.8724113,0.11511245,0.00004122653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008069576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056611407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020878509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009433875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003789664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110417426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137152741","doi":"10.33134/eeja.251","title":"Beyond the Pleasure Principle: A Kantian Aesthetics of Autonomy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Estetika The European Journal of Aesthetics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Hedonism; Autonomy; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Theme (computing); Key (lock); Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03550923264450717,"score_gpt":0.241125158425664,"score_spread":0.20561592578115684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137152741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033248886,0.0020476056,0.11377548,0.03459018,0.00057457574,0.000035071967,0.00005769478,0.00010842404,0.8155621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564643,0.0005180576,0.0077529326,0.0024494624,0.00039250118,0.00006988524,0.000026298776,0.00008716981,0.032239437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996154,0.0016967859,0.00010094978,0.00045472456,0.0011132247,0.0004803353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978801,0.0008825942,0.00016289452,0.0005231175,0.0003109758,0.0002404534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040602395,0.00038499027,0.00044089617,0.0007944968,0.0033703633,0.0060499785,0.0011047786,0.0024750107,0.004152608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041412455,0.00023704964,0.00078025,0.00051161693,0.039385863,0.006591108,0.0051598363,0.0053424095,0.00089715124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050675885,0.0000028453012,0.00005355772,0.000006095029,0.0000010338348,0.000014545959,0.0010120927,0.00009279786,0.000065256834,0.9967463,0.0005408837,0.0014595636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062001263,0.00000844442,0.00019447203,0.000018988929,0.0000019376816,0.00004888157,0.00048732344,0.0002970295,0.00012961848,0.9755003,0.023300294,0.0000065753975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013891039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012957698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060499785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023500803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023369885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021472871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138020732","doi":"10.1111/papq.12351","title":"A republic for all sentients: Social freedom without free will","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Politics; Focus (optics); Predicate (mathematical logic); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; The Republic; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.0519382189520884,"score_gpt":0.27408270464061174,"score_spread":0.22214448568852335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138020732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0591681,0.002263577,0.032074712,0.08997135,0.00059799827,0.000073364725,0.000101644124,0.000045438173,0.81570387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98055226,0.0005819593,0.0024865335,0.003941927,0.00025850863,0.00007140958,0.0000254558,0.000023296594,0.01205853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951805,0.0029735002,0.00014428426,0.00047567402,0.0006481585,0.00057802175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959061,0.0019071529,0.00034820236,0.00086133956,0.00047046336,0.0005067266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060697533,0.00027450544,0.0005234715,0.0007250147,0.005392968,0.0056526004,0.0006442374,0.0041255374,0.005443068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054000425,0.0002237167,0.00057299883,0.0005523128,0.053773485,0.006955336,0.00627944,0.0059069013,0.0005898654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002039965,0.0000029799644,0.000030698255,0.0000039483607,0.0000011889606,0.000013406343,0.00038889106,0.000057222845,0.000025886095,0.99860793,0.0004641075,0.00040171613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004595848,0.0000056046024,0.000089845445,0.0000206876,0.000002097969,0.000024324281,0.00029338629,0.00016251463,0.000043172622,0.98771685,0.0116323205,0.0000044360077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002479935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002034452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060697533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028823072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031643647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03210026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139516517","doi":"10.5840/envirophil2021318105","title":"Kant’s Pre-critical Ontology and Environmental Philosophy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Ontology; Philosophy; Environmental philosophy; Metaphysics; Relevance (law); Applied philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Focus (optics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024039000827956535,"score_gpt":0.2242223160471382,"score_spread":0.20018331521918165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139516517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04173134,0.016492955,0.18666176,0.07438364,0.0011333707,0.00011019016,0.00014453991,0.00012521716,0.6792169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436629,0.0046277437,0.022070885,0.0058822175,0.0005052515,0.00015576108,0.00007362532,0.0001390693,0.02288263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995943,0.00229552,0.0001316175,0.00041859038,0.0008476937,0.0003635119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975545,0.0013018784,0.00020642167,0.00027743715,0.0004843576,0.00017545464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044770916,0.00060021796,0.00046047813,0.002356922,0.0043125926,0.0047773556,0.0011812528,0.0033575199,0.0029672876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033081183,0.00036887877,0.00056141213,0.0014777137,0.04754889,0.0074740057,0.0035798857,0.0052494435,0.000653212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018398432,0.0000027446074,0.000029545607,0.000013218956,0.0000012301033,0.00000912071,0.0005210084,0.00011299405,0.000025523788,0.99811304,0.000457732,0.0007119958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020915088,0.000003410849,0.00007254835,0.00004111745,0.0000014445172,0.000024877047,0.00047770422,0.00020010964,0.00009732478,0.9739304,0.02514438,0.0000046434548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024880995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022362778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077537834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077537834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004513491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056257963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151405763","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198748922.001.0001","title":"Kant's Transcendental Deduction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Philosophy; Calculus (dental); Epistemology; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.06550582024578556,"score_gpt":0.211377725781975,"score_spread":0.14587190553618945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151405763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005477952,0.004103884,0.04036463,0.00803159,0.0007523393,0.000023718885,0.00009020399,0.00010394185,0.9410519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8298763,0.0047336086,0.019966424,0.0045164097,0.001006203,0.00013671491,0.00017294817,0.00016163276,0.1394298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968862,0.001511984,0.00007491452,0.00022018055,0.0011513905,0.00015528673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979894,0.001107089,0.00006830638,0.0003143619,0.0004547351,0.00006614221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002432112,0.00045171782,0.00040901673,0.0013779859,0.0018698233,0.0039738,0.0007812618,0.0015485744,0.0036377406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003779388,0.0003125437,0.0005022326,0.00078731024,0.019222893,0.003958514,0.0018946634,0.004689735,0.0014657178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023597684,0.0000026378548,0.0000075038497,0.000012022504,0.0000013885109,0.000012540843,0.00021565075,0.0001641741,0.00002844046,0.9962537,0.0017908963,0.0015086152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029104308,0.0000025526126,0.000020243298,0.00001811556,0.0000013520039,0.00001883271,0.00005454183,0.00032089505,0.00008662122,0.97863847,0.020832572,0.0000029079004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017908479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014676243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043056654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043056654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001729379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031239927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153445013","doi":"10.3390/genealogy5020038","title":"The Passive Body and States of Nature: An Examination of the Methodological Role State of Nature Theory Plays in Williams and Nietzsche","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genealogy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; State of nature; Epistemology; Hegelianism; State (computer science); Morality; Idiot; Literature; Politics; Law; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029601729482333944,"score_gpt":0.2847556487234122,"score_spread":0.2551539192410782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153445013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17894779,0.040222242,0.114933215,0.07561797,0.0011161191,0.00014256354,0.0001774281,0.000106287094,0.58873636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9517428,0.0075116204,0.013086625,0.0031281007,0.0005165766,0.00026261347,0.000059943566,0.00017711098,0.02351457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641454,0.0026449177,0.00005891872,0.0003151733,0.00037908615,0.0001873662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421567,0.0051069735,0.00018853747,0.00020127422,0.0001975703,0.00009000047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057478044,0.00062509463,0.0007347153,0.0028908674,0.005269968,0.008329971,0.001646487,0.003994055,0.00422355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070040305,0.0005155027,0.0006849297,0.0026229513,0.043129984,0.014410516,0.004646706,0.0041273558,0.0004756004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004224817,0.000005717769,0.000076720484,0.000015217544,0.0000018091896,0.000030011928,0.01001407,0.000041603464,0.000040845116,0.9882969,0.00029957268,0.0011731659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010049714,0.000015133153,0.00044509853,0.00016820454,0.000010634848,0.000077637334,0.010274173,0.0005352492,0.00021575019,0.93759507,0.05063905,0.000013906682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046044816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003937382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008329971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055748476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016847814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040448546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158795762","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.9057","title":"The Possibility of Public Reasons","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Action (physics); Deliberation; Skepticism; Constitution; Perspective (graphical); Soul; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2651777521266677,"score_gpt":0.3797682448346463,"score_spread":0.11459049270797855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158795762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026082475,0.0042955163,0.08031433,0.0863769,0.0009129932,0.00009914289,0.00013517447,0.00016279332,0.8016206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95704377,0.0013514878,0.009552309,0.00550546,0.00061613997,0.00018741254,0.00007876962,0.00012219755,0.025542371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97729343,0.013084808,0.00066893245,0.002948454,0.003726424,0.0022779477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803547,0.010397092,0.0013786972,0.004945472,0.0018899848,0.0010340852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017978992,0.00061771646,0.0008351297,0.001622841,0.008656216,0.018637119,0.0017663025,0.009956554,0.009979603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025021369,0.00068234326,0.0014930612,0.0011304897,0.050474297,0.02341432,0.012664114,0.009517063,0.0016586937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029450769,0.000003250261,0.00005859613,0.000009776254,0.0000023796795,0.00002199974,0.00094581366,0.000041111234,0.000018782504,0.9972656,0.0006321322,0.0009976855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008214205,0.0000064012384,0.0000740365,0.00006499882,0.0000071963236,0.00007474274,0.0010238598,0.00018597301,0.000119141965,0.9474708,0.050955188,0.000009384683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016727742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014627617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018637119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005822267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007444376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09508318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159421001","doi":"10.1111/heyj.13920","title":"The Art of Living Well: Moral Experience and Virtue Ethics. By PaulvanTongeren. Translated by Thomas Heij. Pp. viii, 187. Bloomsbury Academic: London, NY, 2020, $70.00 US hardcover; $34.95 US softcover; $18.87 US ebook.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Nova scotia; Citation; Virtue ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Art history; Art; Library science; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03871235373277551,"score_gpt":0.27958855286569717,"score_spread":0.24087619913292166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159421001","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063826574,0.88775194,0.0006945264,0.04085413,0.0052955616,0.000014910742,0.0001670549,0.00003460846,0.064548925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.077507995,0.62920845,0.0032392282,0.013285763,0.00800012,0.00015631293,0.00041615724,0.00016563162,0.26802036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995066,0.00021837786,0.000026768757,0.00006596311,0.00014053783,0.000041763888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994197,0.0003197566,0.00006752228,0.00003158284,0.000098987875,0.00006245606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010310797,0.0013595225,0.00058216514,0.001499992,0.0015569052,0.0035987573,0.0006711355,0.0018667564,0.019394638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022416753,0.00067887077,0.00035586514,0.0017037247,0.006915051,0.0058875177,0.0019936915,0.0034045551,0.005634789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042972857,0.000030959156,0.00017512112,0.0009943931,0.000016828992,0.00009103925,0.0046957806,0.00021709579,0.00018037172,0.11309858,0.7362909,0.14416613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010733518,0.000016390857,0.0014589374,0.001783287,0.0000063393745,0.00030302722,0.0021381949,0.00011848183,0.00008338591,0.09464352,0.8994218,0.000015916241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009636924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017240636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019394638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027380304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022436834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0648815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160960581","doi":"10.1017/9781108634038","title":"Philippa Foot's Metaethics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Foot (prosody); Naturalism; Element (criminal law); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06410891134500818,"score_gpt":0.21532006655959063,"score_spread":0.15121115521458245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160960581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057751853,0.009542575,0.022141479,0.08220832,0.0020738665,0.000050817536,0.00013782019,0.00014712648,0.87792283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53244025,0.008919995,0.01641518,0.033317506,0.0029694608,0.00047458542,0.00015850177,0.00029821976,0.40500635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851733,0.0006442379,0.000032117565,0.00018006009,0.0004632485,0.000162921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848586,0.00087728037,0.000078930985,0.0001491898,0.00030198996,0.000106822554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016642824,0.00046642928,0.00025618417,0.0013516716,0.0030894936,0.005088769,0.0008363972,0.0022506209,0.008146402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004061661,0.00023465429,0.00037980397,0.0011212624,0.009459879,0.0042304164,0.002329986,0.0044880053,0.001352007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035638818,0.000005929477,0.00003657184,0.000022661352,0.0000014298517,0.000040815492,0.0008972703,0.00008193301,0.000040537125,0.9708137,0.022404375,0.0056512277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057790157,0.000009583923,0.00015409244,0.00013560432,0.000003112548,0.0001249987,0.00056116533,0.00033901326,0.00015742639,0.54527026,0.45322874,0.000010231409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049214456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051589184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008146402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004759433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035089233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03453225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168088971","doi":"","title":"For the Love of Metaphysics: From the Revolution in Thinking towards the Renewal of Thinking","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes; University of Toronto","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037113934014443274,"score_gpt":0.2488568123036209,"score_spread":0.21174287828917762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168088971","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01130109,0.08274329,0.028543793,0.6991467,0.007848739,0.000031659703,0.00012418098,0.00024598953,0.1700146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7139156,0.041905865,0.025416464,0.10403189,0.021238767,0.0001783828,0.0001707353,0.00075654767,0.09238586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933559,0.004404214,0.00012714279,0.00052752654,0.0012154302,0.00036983058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934638,0.0037999458,0.00034733507,0.001201192,0.0006616787,0.0005260256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008802256,0.0006271322,0.000797336,0.0016393843,0.0059450353,0.013047068,0.0013160895,0.006051439,0.0066745346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012026496,0.0004272704,0.0007383702,0.0013432628,0.04925055,0.022636894,0.0066104345,0.016672112,0.0021865861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015482781,0.0000060254115,0.000060061102,0.000037592476,0.0000035753148,0.000022006898,0.0025468955,0.00007698249,0.000054591415,0.9772589,0.01490087,0.0050169053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007023806,0.000010878736,0.00006897384,0.00014194955,0.0000023432267,0.0000386239,0.0012975617,0.0001534769,0.00008651439,0.8315963,0.16658768,0.000008607044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030912505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023782945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013047068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00787895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006126682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05716598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169059207","doi":"10.7202/1077840ar","title":"« Devoir-implique-pouvoir » et le problème des négations de normes","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.2664731818887273,"score_gpt":0.3664271556614716,"score_spread":0.09995397377274429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169059207","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05693049,0.012310477,0.50808495,0.09175,0.0013741356,0.00009271237,0.0003280979,0.00022152903,0.32890758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8734997,0.0041139903,0.09543297,0.006559568,0.00071154017,0.00022185389,0.00015723216,0.00015258443,0.019150658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892391,0.0063302265,0.0005022232,0.0016766168,0.0018546409,0.00039718932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98286176,0.011204515,0.0014755732,0.0017173621,0.002365209,0.0003755088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0115477005,0.0007951235,0.00085361494,0.0016315093,0.0035206021,0.0065514664,0.0018786954,0.0041530044,0.0051022964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019115483,0.00066275964,0.0011270805,0.0016536893,0.034362398,0.01749851,0.003968755,0.007147342,0.0006457767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009177179,0.0000039760253,0.00013572573,0.00003294646,0.0000055316527,0.000026960139,0.00097401993,0.00008766112,0.00008652037,0.9958663,0.00047052826,0.0023007256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072860703,0.00000912502,0.00017596479,0.000047233843,0.0000065672425,0.000056644032,0.0006611388,0.0005187606,0.00023538384,0.98666567,0.011607005,0.000009055037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044146376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035695354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0115477005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004324314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034444488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0610708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169599683","doi":"10.15173/russell.v41i1.4802","title":"Bertrand Russell and the Paradox of the Committed Emotivist","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivism; Objectivism; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Contradiction; Philosophy; Indignation; Rigour; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.040740658703160494,"score_gpt":0.25953551230825084,"score_spread":0.21879485360509035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169599683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049414363,0.010510745,0.06010147,0.17625596,0.0011923532,0.00004883608,0.000048305294,0.00029408114,0.70213395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436096,0.0016107024,0.012575923,0.012406061,0.0005428973,0.00006596646,0.000021428657,0.00022367858,0.02894384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891082,0.0070483526,0.00023539674,0.0009806075,0.002115624,0.00051178335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901288,0.0073074764,0.0005870678,0.00072087545,0.0008258224,0.00042980607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010588063,0.00052985357,0.0007883703,0.0014737605,0.007378415,0.0092910845,0.0018104013,0.0077922037,0.0033744662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01840492,0.0006794044,0.00059568125,0.0010694385,0.032297935,0.011535177,0.004098232,0.01053249,0.00079623284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007555854,0.0000043685122,0.00002857705,0.000009882192,0.0000019046289,0.000029703417,0.001138117,0.00007476837,0.000030859163,0.99587846,0.0017678207,0.001027935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008869702,0.0000054926163,0.000047473357,0.000026885755,0.0000027468147,0.000059672555,0.000455924,0.00040930725,0.000078799174,0.9841064,0.0147891985,0.000009173337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004475821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030691614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010588063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00617756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022376466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055995703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179034764","doi":"10.5922/0207-6918-2021-2-6","title":"What is Kantian Philosophy of Mathematics? An Overview of Contemporary Studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; University of Toronto; Yale University; University of Cambridge; University of Oxford; Harvard University; Princeton University; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Philosophy of mathematics; Intuition; Epistemology; Philosophy of computer science; Philosophy of mathematics education; Mathematical practice; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy education; Subject (documents); Western philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.31212418033401096,"score_gpt":0.3671463551756287,"score_spread":0.055022174841617755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179034764","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018471931,0.9347261,0.0023746367,0.019977568,0.00095577823,0.00000349356,0.000025129655,0.000019122012,0.040071063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11146297,0.8699513,0.0017334496,0.0047595147,0.0066443137,0.000025976984,0.000059979448,0.00005179894,0.005310658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975522,0.0012426741,0.00010300494,0.00024614297,0.00063945266,0.00021657321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980659,0.0013538625,0.00014027036,0.00007359366,0.00026800024,0.00009832361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022390063,0.00061426905,0.0008255439,0.006770078,0.0027897088,0.0075415326,0.000879158,0.0026085058,0.0052392194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003015563,0.00041269875,0.00043649122,0.010444529,0.011436514,0.010241678,0.0018681438,0.004406355,0.0012122355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032624983,0.000021690312,0.00040860946,0.0014527241,0.000026971207,0.00004483827,0.0031217658,0.00038901018,0.0001411201,0.9110149,0.023148606,0.06019706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004038487,0.000019057272,0.001376555,0.0022916582,0.000013666222,0.00017785952,0.002268559,0.00032754953,0.00010165628,0.43887386,0.5545267,0.000018793387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027550876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026783654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075415326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005358503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032984398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038878858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190130898","doi":"10.1515/agph-2019-0039","title":"Kant’s Argument for Transcendental Idealism in the Transcendental Aesthetic Revisited","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Transcendental idealism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Idealism; A priori and a posteriori; Transcendental philosophy; Confusion; Cognition; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.05299381079530532,"score_gpt":0.2919299637571844,"score_spread":0.23893615296187906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190130898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045069747,0.0041557234,0.12737031,0.07166511,0.0018905295,0.000054311728,0.00012125713,0.00018020507,0.74949276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96649396,0.0006855621,0.011470991,0.0031606988,0.000521891,0.000056827157,0.000032865173,0.0000904901,0.017486643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399537,0.0032491668,0.00013935896,0.000538239,0.0016069233,0.00047101142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961694,0.0018660111,0.00027756472,0.00076035655,0.0006710475,0.0002556934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056644212,0.00052778446,0.00068426266,0.0021026826,0.0030256463,0.006757242,0.0018889325,0.004435738,0.007254319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071967444,0.00038136536,0.0010989378,0.00094410346,0.03876896,0.008096337,0.0054163164,0.009085273,0.0012677532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005183419,0.0000032205398,0.000010211037,0.0000065047266,0.000001614695,0.000011968645,0.00024825954,0.00011767574,0.000021497752,0.99874794,0.00037373937,0.00045202763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062007944,0.000004007254,0.000027648657,0.000019041501,0.0000020353611,0.00002957633,0.00017876369,0.00044652217,0.00007101267,0.9916865,0.007523078,0.0000055734313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088149734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007079314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007254319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005198647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015327272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03771895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191860367","doi":"","title":"THE UNBEARABLE LICENCE OF BEING THE EXECUTIVE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0304589453333377,"score_gpt":0.23548932931066607,"score_spread":0.20503038397732837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191860367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018909616,0.0024152976,0.0024245935,0.20599087,0.004138166,0.000018716946,0.000038988786,0.000051597293,0.7660122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.571232,0.0009931995,0.0006115401,0.10500606,0.0022113123,0.00006470153,0.000025131985,0.00013889642,0.31971714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942941,0.0024080863,0.00014182963,0.0005860659,0.0011663924,0.001403434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99317753,0.002755764,0.00042947364,0.0010118003,0.0010818932,0.0015435026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005957936,0.0003108146,0.00048698342,0.00085128733,0.015217369,0.010077583,0.0009441922,0.011110963,0.016577795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019538864,0.00041327102,0.00032548018,0.00057544344,0.032489754,0.009660649,0.005345509,0.018238492,0.0032059494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001961438,0.000014934731,0.0002718458,0.000010382306,0.000004631155,0.00021387987,0.005167548,0.000035887424,0.00008432078,0.8956791,0.09245552,0.0060424125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013518526,0.000026223071,0.0007257262,0.00016397345,0.000007408586,0.00039684097,0.009897229,0.00012019642,0.00018483405,0.33627915,0.65215194,0.000032917615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009829883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016466763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016577795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033867916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047977935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055458307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192955726","doi":"10.1017/s0012217321000172","title":"Qu'est-ce qu'un constructiviste peut dire sur la question animale — ou toute autre question normative, d'ailleurs ?","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03290428832720264,"score_gpt":0.2693749751738298,"score_spread":0.23647068684662717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192955726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043918405,0.014447299,0.11633047,0.1842758,0.001895607,0.000075822325,0.00016707492,0.00016265224,0.63872683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93463457,0.006051041,0.013729598,0.008814047,0.0008125043,0.00019842086,0.00008632809,0.0002093896,0.03546404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99122506,0.0065396987,0.0001644952,0.00074858736,0.0009138112,0.00040839295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893405,0.007195662,0.0006194332,0.0014065111,0.0010530994,0.00038483547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009977398,0.0006079415,0.0006828217,0.0018452932,0.005297531,0.010437385,0.0013765666,0.0037467945,0.010109051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012014185,0.00026532868,0.0004992989,0.0015715281,0.074188486,0.014406805,0.004648158,0.005269556,0.0013595199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007298708,0.0000071459845,0.00016791416,0.00003474754,0.000004434547,0.000017867507,0.0068937475,0.000054514425,0.00008542137,0.98877865,0.0010767793,0.0028713783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006562714,0.000016577425,0.00039004654,0.00027192137,0.000008698928,0.000056069854,0.014882738,0.00019563081,0.00024675514,0.8828965,0.101015925,0.00001246424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005402573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057170554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010437385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048028897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004496994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052766144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203780436","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12800","title":"Deciding for Others: An Expressivist Theory of Normative Judgment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Expressivism; Normative; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Simple (philosophy); Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4872398578722462,"score_gpt":0.4083324099103052,"score_spread":0.07890744796194099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203780436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065432966,0.00082464603,0.35305333,0.028918188,0.0004651086,0.00016027695,0.00023748197,0.00023534238,0.5506727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95628047,0.00025238685,0.03219604,0.0014442612,0.00021773194,0.0001342699,0.00010125234,0.000086035565,0.009287501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902636,0.0055763125,0.00039471165,0.0010188677,0.0021133649,0.0006332281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99138314,0.004824612,0.0006107427,0.0013005777,0.0015445625,0.00033647456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010314956,0.00052525377,0.0006041693,0.0017410849,0.0026808798,0.008781794,0.0021936167,0.0039055732,0.007139195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012045622,0.0004424158,0.0010333566,0.001090541,0.017876253,0.012952939,0.0034111608,0.0051038703,0.00084396295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005135157,0.0000065454547,0.00004223886,0.000008035283,0.000002657355,0.000018317538,0.0007062397,0.00030118844,0.000049047678,0.99776936,0.0003278146,0.00076335453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008297019,0.0000044306885,0.000043456024,0.000020036332,0.0000036322392,0.00001728759,0.00028623952,0.0028104105,0.00009527083,0.9927133,0.003992237,0.0000055186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029566162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025059185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010314956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057686474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022962256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054551363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208510504","doi":"10.1007/s10677-021-10250-z","title":"Is Aristotelian Naturalism Safe From the Moral Outsider?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Trilemma; Epistemology; Philosophy; Counterexample; Rationality; Moral reasoning; Moral psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.09579185679022448,"score_gpt":0.3244499189331262,"score_spread":0.2286580621429017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208510504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033917375,0.008934233,0.050668776,0.2335009,0.002053837,0.000033609493,0.000079949954,0.00008610752,0.67072517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405446,0.0017896642,0.009185943,0.016770825,0.0018158063,0.000116718234,0.00004503744,0.00014231136,0.029589131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884948,0.007275223,0.00023158656,0.0011631501,0.001972333,0.00086289475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872684,0.008398293,0.00066964916,0.0016836567,0.0014495947,0.0005304549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012452391,0.00049013924,0.0014491417,0.0012727991,0.008841336,0.009550167,0.0018848339,0.0075237406,0.0064794044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020434337,0.00045240877,0.0008463847,0.00087163725,0.051485397,0.016037062,0.0036831866,0.011737817,0.0016580415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050139965,0.0000057390275,0.00004316941,0.000008786186,0.0000029436098,0.000008382493,0.0004967546,0.00003400659,0.000009558549,0.9969267,0.0014184954,0.00104048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004253987,0.0000020656412,0.000034414945,0.000018804674,0.0000014017568,0.000007783517,0.0002763411,0.000075856304,0.000018558,0.99216014,0.007397716,0.0000026223402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003362115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036043632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012452391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004471892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004650327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065855324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212705307","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14649057.v1","title":"Collingwood’s philosophy of art as a basis for virtue aesthetics.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Aesthetics; Normative; Virtue ethics; Philosophy; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Expression (computer science); Focus (optics); Computer science","score_opus":0.06633137279792536,"score_gpt":0.27702505204336325,"score_spread":0.2106936792454379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212705307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009008054,0.0072884914,0.04641095,0.021156091,0.0010032337,0.00004163399,0.000044894074,0.000076069664,0.91497064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77274203,0.0049491646,0.028857872,0.008597152,0.0012717072,0.00018936287,0.000055164255,0.00017042909,0.18316711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978719,0.00094711006,0.000063477964,0.00029209722,0.0006812153,0.00014410741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988771,0.0005783074,0.00007918725,0.00014396096,0.00023192976,0.00008942406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023049682,0.0005057028,0.00024182578,0.0013290991,0.0035223523,0.004551637,0.0005369052,0.0028162824,0.0047879727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024054823,0.0001957152,0.00037214917,0.00059664005,0.020162927,0.0038256322,0.0020936013,0.0034237776,0.0010966768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002096692,0.000002248757,0.000024381818,0.000010916013,7.089504e-7,0.000010741929,0.0006711472,0.000054523098,0.000023404671,0.9948225,0.002363878,0.0020133418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003695709,0.0000072518187,0.0001513051,0.00005590446,0.0000019901731,0.000074531206,0.00040760433,0.00032644518,0.00010603168,0.8755165,0.12334368,0.000005196677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025671462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035703632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047879727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033223662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020552825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024105549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216348911","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v8i1.3336","title":"Francine and Gerison Lansdown Student Essay Prizes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Mathematics education; Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.01452889225196261,"score_gpt":0.21833089740819586,"score_spread":0.20380200515623326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216348911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023507432,0.01694404,0.0007774372,0.31288362,0.2446084,0.000111397094,0.0009202496,0.00020948617,0.42119467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006224887,0.0017813973,0.0001767821,0.005624388,0.008238956,0.00002886758,0.00010613983,0.00007769845,0.9777409],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621093,0.00046975163,0.000110907284,0.00042507684,0.0021746578,0.0006085885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888653,0.0008898267,0.00018031057,0.00037785998,0.0050242404,0.0046623982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003453325,0.0010766597,0.001017439,0.0021450499,0.0058494057,0.00868574,0.0011496098,0.004450194,0.1603249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011036047,0.00035245993,0.00064836186,0.0011338515,0.0014661681,0.0029125563,0.0040716785,0.0037922608,0.047250155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011523711,0.000010809069,0.000046643574,0.000009738359,0.0000018497324,0.000020981024,0.000034776465,0.000018689188,0.000033062533,0.0038899279,0.9880918,0.007830203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006721877,0.000009177445,0.00032428894,0.000036859466,0.0000021535304,0.000031039344,0.00021987334,0.000039423565,0.000047669768,0.0016088871,0.9976671,0.000006887762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018673263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05859907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1603249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007287929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006349975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53634024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217333261","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-84160-7_6","title":"“Wie die Triebe, so der Sinn; und wie der Sinn, so die Triebe”: Jacobi on Reason as a Form of Life","year":2021,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Die (integrated circuit); Philosophy; Materials science","score_opus":0.05640502350975492,"score_gpt":0.27257192643676925,"score_spread":0.21616690292701435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217333261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047089574,0.18768956,0.013023383,0.18800186,0.006991072,0.000071627604,0.00015836993,0.00009599669,0.59925926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4351485,0.045397174,0.012543969,0.06210623,0.0061240653,0.00032447846,0.00017688033,0.00035954945,0.43781924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977738,0.0013446175,0.000057281475,0.00026815213,0.0003567965,0.00019921767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881834,0.0008076843,0.00006606685,0.000089705434,0.00014629083,0.00007182166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031354586,0.00078734703,0.00057798426,0.0009679617,0.0051499642,0.0078137005,0.0011702803,0.0070458916,0.004833881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032492047,0.0005349615,0.0003977284,0.0017859727,0.040185254,0.012266531,0.0023600839,0.007930127,0.0018020836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049385744,0.0000046334317,0.0000299938,0.00003032529,0.0000019399033,0.000011120688,0.0051106648,0.000036476547,0.000029510325,0.9628879,0.028908927,0.0029437188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010280677,0.000006937651,0.00011816066,0.00016698895,0.0000030458154,0.000053349722,0.0030114565,0.00007235985,0.00010626223,0.719875,0.27656248,0.000013707314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022469224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036632586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022469224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052992096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007957679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0446769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W332223278","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0074-1_13","title":"Neither Logically Omniscient nor Completely Irrational Agents: Principles for a Fine-Grained Analysis of Propositional Attitudes and Attitude Revision","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Propositional calculus; Cognition; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.1365051078952021,"score_gpt":0.306098338124484,"score_spread":0.1695932302292819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W332223278","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032523762,0.0026227143,0.7517354,0.021328187,0.00037796918,0.00013133696,0.0002739171,0.00034542658,0.19066125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7724252,0.00082420686,0.20534357,0.0016461499,0.00038324847,0.00038594595,0.00020047909,0.00022326104,0.018568002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970667,0.0014886605,0.0001920683,0.000361576,0.0006464972,0.00024459636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952396,0.002859543,0.0003079269,0.0008902821,0.00052893395,0.00017383556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004589324,0.0006922843,0.0008920872,0.001270743,0.0020138572,0.0066692224,0.0024143734,0.0031445066,0.0044637625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008374935,0.001045849,0.0013344695,0.0012138712,0.020327272,0.013816854,0.0023732472,0.007579658,0.0010092311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039309352,0.0000060899656,0.00003301738,0.000008603746,0.0000041697353,0.0000072773305,0.00029189285,0.00022315048,0.000061834064,0.9970758,0.00050507725,0.0017792697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019872912,0.0000014623155,0.000029740579,0.000004192452,0.0000018412946,0.0000064453657,0.000034646495,0.00058275193,0.000042849148,0.9981938,0.0010981539,0.000002186291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021309645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021796974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066692224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029130534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020247186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024270952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W416282717","doi":"","title":"Special Issue: Who's Afraid Of Commodification? Introduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Economy","score_opus":0.03205196908679809,"score_gpt":0.2262325778145827,"score_spread":0.19418060872778461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W416282717","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053008954,0.024480546,0.00068258715,0.20559008,0.7168724,0.00009918088,0.00039913668,0.00014417169,0.051201727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060755895,0.019741116,0.00065890513,0.09091547,0.75634944,0.00020284242,0.00047279272,0.00031462256,0.12526919],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701095,0.0005639526,0.00025121612,0.00045013707,0.0012807337,0.00044292596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908517,0.003600247,0.0006246931,0.00033404282,0.0025248297,0.0020645258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031732332,0.0016978564,0.0020130188,0.0036846064,0.0038852512,0.01047086,0.0017702584,0.009984706,0.061860878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010182674,0.0006872296,0.0011101142,0.0018622518,0.003498827,0.0077323876,0.0052543557,0.011101584,0.014754191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011091935,0.00001918945,0.00008714879,0.00016974464,0.0000028439865,0.00006914718,0.00019743959,0.000013157211,0.00008678064,0.0049272347,0.98450214,0.0099141095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050118097,0.000018690449,0.00037390384,0.00030208184,0.00000557844,0.00012227755,0.00026009686,0.00003068838,0.000034752746,0.0023763624,0.9964616,0.000008908746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002381316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041399677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061860878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032292425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040756445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20694524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200325169","doi":"10.1017/9781108906999.006","title":"Schelling, Hegel, and Positivity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Humanity; Relation (database); Philosophy; Theme (computing); Identity (music); Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.04476261613094044,"score_gpt":0.19725766869996222,"score_spread":0.1524950525690218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200325169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011261764,0.00999547,0.0049870317,0.008578069,0.00042182166,0.000018046207,0.00004373119,0.000049400438,0.9646447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7232479,0.009860768,0.0037444422,0.0031879127,0.00063468417,0.00009598807,0.00007107763,0.000119968165,0.25903735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946064,0.00023395765,0.000016633623,0.0000803469,0.0001383248,0.000070005466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950886,0.00031053188,0.000029762356,0.000055503635,0.00006516928,0.000030090765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070033123,0.00041982415,0.00022866491,0.0008882576,0.002566199,0.003131306,0.00043863017,0.0010752139,0.0065374128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016795044,0.00015399011,0.0002603775,0.0006869121,0.018701712,0.0043542357,0.001561689,0.0022226593,0.0012781742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051595525,0.00000312026,0.000032917327,0.000019955301,0.0000010226398,0.000026833464,0.0027944066,0.00006064924,0.000074432835,0.9886901,0.004451959,0.0038394923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005652094,0.000012778229,0.00015378592,0.0001159035,0.0000025171446,0.00016182468,0.002472153,0.00011908114,0.00030565978,0.73719573,0.25944635,0.000008661714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022435554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028277459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065374128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037352976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014972741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027101636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210574273","doi":"10.1086/713946","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Metaphysics; Moral philosophy; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Theology; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.15653136241803917,"score_gpt":0.32061704231834176,"score_spread":0.1640856799003026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210574273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004372259,0.002687291,0.0011279329,0.011114573,0.032920174,0.00026376007,0.006311597,0.0009547625,0.9441826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014443768,0.0009284369,0.00035956257,0.0017328693,0.0017893777,0.00009817873,0.001881525,0.0004984701,0.99126726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729294,0.000379513,0.00019095419,0.00048069487,0.0013679971,0.00028786127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99198663,0.001271037,0.00030553702,0.0012839762,0.004269497,0.00088333245],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016615071,0.0010723849,0.000906961,0.00342207,0.0036241845,0.0068583163,0.0021942777,0.0021876653,0.7976208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017057497,0.00044564917,0.0006734187,0.0036356032,0.00089490553,0.005622382,0.0046491288,0.003307247,0.69363505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011053638,0.0000077761015,0.000038007707,0.000051417508,9.906173e-7,0.000018840245,0.00007060542,0.000011260037,0.0000448557,0.0045664827,0.97105443,0.024124272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015238134,0.0000022368997,0.000047415655,0.000050114642,4.9440695e-7,0.000014405734,0.000050249215,0.0000056128274,0.000023320346,0.00045258037,0.99935,0.000001988142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037140923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052008843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7976208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026614761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030485825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28866935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211215205","doi":"10.7202/1085679ar","title":"Lucy Allais et John J. Callanan (dir.), Kant and Animals, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2020, 258 p.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.11948613926213095,"score_gpt":0.290087004845708,"score_spread":0.17060086558357704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211215205","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012228565,0.96382326,0.00072479947,0.022309812,0.005216016,0.0000061205833,0.00015601276,0.00005635543,0.0075853914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0064352057,0.88190675,0.0023565453,0.011911924,0.009677922,0.00007685365,0.00036853447,0.0002894441,0.08697681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766207,0.00078174524,0.00014863926,0.00034655014,0.0008837096,0.00017734096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985637,0.0007541899,0.00020807624,0.000053691616,0.00030053552,0.00011979243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026694376,0.0024437923,0.0016069653,0.0034734048,0.0025371825,0.0047952263,0.0013092122,0.0040938025,0.029715454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033299967,0.0015600949,0.00077745644,0.0044437577,0.0039588897,0.008513412,0.0021237067,0.0059408075,0.029653916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065604574,0.000011588204,0.000112078815,0.0009672579,0.000024040415,0.00007186841,0.00087764475,0.00009860792,0.00014168941,0.022234946,0.89539504,0.07999972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008652413,0.0000070397446,0.00069673575,0.0006014354,0.000009287219,0.00012122043,0.00027877925,0.000029414517,0.000116902986,0.010396576,0.9877115,0.000022526623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027821237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04766295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029715454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042311274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030246484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09940809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211251895","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498084","title":"Freedom and Religion in Kant and his Immediate Successors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Meaning (existential); Faith; Exposition (narrative); Epistemology; Critical philosophy; Character (mathematics); Confusion; Literature; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.02253104033015182,"score_gpt":0.19230310744336346,"score_spread":0.16977206711321163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211251895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05836458,0.06319049,0.0035007596,0.04597155,0.00078541646,0.000019681822,0.000041905754,0.000044463486,0.82808125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9070854,0.005884385,0.00084528315,0.0024405138,0.0003807278,0.00002037514,0.00001625886,0.000027545488,0.08329948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850994,0.00090369594,0.000022996428,0.000099288634,0.0002440292,0.00022004002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991917,0.0004635936,0.00005958717,0.000100684774,0.000076883895,0.00010763338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020535453,0.00031043703,0.00030824167,0.0009729039,0.0045222514,0.0059938347,0.00046461017,0.0021667876,0.0015291009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002141388,0.0002329792,0.00019909863,0.0009552048,0.035111804,0.0035301466,0.0021978605,0.003528805,0.00035367065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008363738,0.000009742848,0.00006167102,0.000013216612,0.0000014095475,0.000018949446,0.0045354753,0.0000997094,0.00003166295,0.98849446,0.0027578804,0.00396749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010389241,0.000014527349,0.00041912304,0.00009193957,0.0000024448223,0.000058510726,0.0020920977,0.00018307765,0.000105033636,0.7874141,0.20959574,0.000013067565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063129286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073112003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007018991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007018991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029781687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050926626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212902497","doi":"10.11647/obp.0061.04","title":"4. Beyond Price","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; University of Melbourne; Monash University; University of Oxford; Dartmouth College; York University; Wake Forest University; Georgetown University; Amherst College; Australian National University; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; City University of New York","keywords":"Harm; Identity (music); Epistemology; Personal identity; Philosophy; Point (geometry); Psychology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Self; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10967371911051288,"score_gpt":0.27500637677083234,"score_spread":0.16533265766031946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212902497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010977229,0.008572948,0.00256872,0.097893074,0.0053011845,0.000023275636,0.000080133366,0.00006117791,0.88440174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05595654,0.0045738923,0.0017012815,0.078535594,0.0038152644,0.00010370905,0.00006807856,0.0002979168,0.85494775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979538,0.00048384033,0.000057678793,0.0003700344,0.00084001786,0.00029463647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985537,0.00048237207,0.000064758984,0.00018559751,0.00058725505,0.00012633389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018764676,0.0005205103,0.00036264813,0.00080065907,0.004924987,0.007181637,0.0016438586,0.0071451194,0.049776692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007772464,0.000256288,0.00057838025,0.0007255421,0.008157341,0.011679572,0.0031086951,0.0077451523,0.015405228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008298806,0.000005782588,0.00005212719,0.00002720978,0.0000018664525,0.000026931582,0.0005559838,0.000031570456,0.000027037146,0.8655337,0.12366389,0.010065641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005512989,0.0000069911575,0.00009150704,0.000105050705,0.0000019815761,0.000045691668,0.0004430714,0.000047244244,0.00005732659,0.1261074,0.87308156,0.000006674446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010930195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017256383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049776692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035525495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032475467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16651958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221007854","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12761","title":"Kant's Schematism of the categories: An interpretation and defence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Intuition; Object (grammar); Interpretation (philosophy); Schema (genetic algorithms); Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03475153966960281,"score_gpt":0.22425925588408235,"score_spread":0.18950771621447954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221007854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04910363,0.012851613,0.15312517,0.085896,0.0019139763,0.000085947555,0.00041260727,0.00027907384,0.69633204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458447,0.0027946103,0.017740957,0.006966875,0.0009595769,0.00017779005,0.00014514413,0.00016816039,0.025202155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99434185,0.0033013944,0.00015133109,0.00044913052,0.0014161973,0.0003400108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969593,0.0016472377,0.00023092378,0.0005673515,0.0004556685,0.00013956327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050963424,0.00059609953,0.000701767,0.0030103393,0.0029064945,0.0073350933,0.0016289551,0.004997187,0.0043222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055325064,0.0005296584,0.0010950764,0.0025089525,0.03475072,0.0074852803,0.005036226,0.0069578923,0.00079332606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023143648,9.564708e-7,0.000008506415,0.0000056257013,0.0000010277907,0.000005810472,0.0002668433,0.00007861198,0.00001616278,0.9988586,0.00041772053,0.0003378975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000470198,0.0000027239926,0.000025538799,0.000022957303,0.0000016515816,0.000014708865,0.00018935117,0.0002877033,0.000042848966,0.9877823,0.011621909,0.0000035638595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002074535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013100342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073350933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00623798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018681074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045259953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225876721","doi":"10.5922/0207-6918-2022-1-2","title":"Categorical Moral Requirements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical imperative; Epistemology; Philosophy; Moral reasoning; Morality; Appeal; Deliberation; Consequentialism; Moral psychology; Doctrine; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.1157293938900815,"score_gpt":0.2664138793720955,"score_spread":0.150684485482014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225876721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021723563,0.0015853938,0.21397644,0.02182573,0.00085291895,0.000109612134,0.00035885948,0.00026294612,0.7393045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9086428,0.00070152787,0.042287026,0.0064949747,0.000746571,0.00039085918,0.0003942019,0.00016812535,0.040173877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926715,0.0025814897,0.00038797848,0.0012807314,0.002272218,0.0008061207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99198467,0.0033110564,0.0006043768,0.001745613,0.0018921399,0.00046208902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053788964,0.0003335693,0.0005671259,0.0011016935,0.0031535341,0.004310214,0.0015087955,0.003177426,0.010678856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011757725,0.0003814455,0.0009524299,0.00062245026,0.01454632,0.0062672673,0.0049093827,0.0053977557,0.0020080053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001392717,0.000001487326,0.00002713845,0.0000075808684,7.2749157e-7,0.0000037218683,0.00008912113,0.000046660592,0.000033204713,0.9985085,0.0004818583,0.000798665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052335145,0.000007508233,0.00012310084,0.00002517735,0.0000022882857,0.00003753547,0.00010539077,0.00032720997,0.00011919254,0.95013094,0.049108773,0.000007812108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015575814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015633769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010678856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037316123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029001613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035724342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226213308","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2022.1.14303","title":"Blaming from Inside the Birdcage","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.03743475528505938,"score_gpt":0.22506190026630543,"score_spread":0.18762714498124605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226213308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15660317,0.005972586,0.10638117,0.20860603,0.0048451726,0.00010159691,0.00006917202,0.0011358301,0.51628524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8493598,0.0010684176,0.015635094,0.04879514,0.00044918593,0.00004390706,0.000034754452,0.0003788841,0.0842347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976816,0.0012887884,0.000027085685,0.0003815713,0.00039105237,0.00022983104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972339,0.00092228386,0.000433034,0.0005169243,0.0005526117,0.00034110056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003487469,0.0005280542,0.00026270427,0.00035148853,0.004968785,0.0023203657,0.00081599434,0.0036015112,0.009033592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006259258,0.00023547819,0.00034611073,0.00015563515,0.010903624,0.0031917333,0.002118011,0.005789146,0.0022562023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109715234,0.00011296073,0.006402045,0.00014220893,0.000081046055,0.0014061911,0.03636496,0.0009017226,0.004478365,0.7387659,0.14714229,0.064092524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024200011,0.00029150714,0.003833769,0.00045681413,0.000049770788,0.0024947403,0.016240008,0.0025165617,0.0057051117,0.19894102,0.769342,0.00010453892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069832774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012035383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009033592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017988133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016668703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03022039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230551874","doi":"10.4324/9781315717296-53","title":"Reid’s First Principle #7","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.10374558427298489,"score_gpt":0.26961568413644565,"score_spread":0.16587009986346077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230551874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012338282,0.01785467,0.38305458,0.08080022,0.0030803594,0.00021958948,0.0010840058,0.0005483576,0.5010199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7750571,0.00842722,0.13681057,0.009890244,0.0042742137,0.00061507156,0.00040997422,0.00066769146,0.06384791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823001,0.007885091,0.00082988536,0.0030156127,0.005378465,0.0005908262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96502507,0.024012798,0.0015096162,0.004059998,0.004959296,0.00043321942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012880761,0.0009939285,0.0011611417,0.0026085046,0.0024780275,0.005777959,0.0024249833,0.0043220464,0.0077347807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03803368,0.0011889905,0.0018158453,0.0020049498,0.018720532,0.009732896,0.0040302933,0.006882741,0.0036117996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011683284,0.0000031098857,0.00011608977,0.000069233676,0.000009333293,0.000020104446,0.00048880745,0.0004490634,0.00005101185,0.98724556,0.0052465643,0.0062893694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012882867,0.000013965709,0.00019814445,0.00009248626,0.000013479875,0.00014273239,0.00012695004,0.0007731925,0.0001934236,0.9474737,0.050936725,0.000022170216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005152293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023193294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012880761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055721044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040168827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06812078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232457087","doi":"10.1353/hms.2019.0000","title":"Transcendental Inquiry and the Belief in Body: Comments on Rocknak's Imagined Causes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Aside; Focus (optics); Set (abstract data type); Philosophy; Representation (politics); Perception; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.08205095147752492,"score_gpt":0.3112109133168477,"score_spread":0.22915996183932277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232457087","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011171652,0.008456119,0.0020963605,0.92953044,0.0027306478,0.000022343815,0.00004983604,0.000045525772,0.045897126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6549547,0.0148435095,0.0033362058,0.26323178,0.01098991,0.00036482213,0.0000824691,0.00028979196,0.051906846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378926,0.0037271963,0.00018481346,0.0006363177,0.0011677151,0.00049460295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96562374,0.030402986,0.0010145444,0.0006454903,0.0016580678,0.00065510155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093698045,0.00077198877,0.00093442516,0.0011914916,0.011607188,0.0075092274,0.0034640736,0.017861305,0.0036390128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0215367,0.00061615126,0.0007658635,0.0017841223,0.052635953,0.014730773,0.006162272,0.022090154,0.0010232803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038517337,0.000022993238,0.0001905813,0.00010518878,0.000005244183,0.0007081751,0.052195456,0.00018251852,0.00014174811,0.8076096,0.13599706,0.002802935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055869972,0.00008023462,0.0012188511,0.00086777436,0.000020307916,0.00113443,0.08605571,0.001127211,0.0006894009,0.3621082,0.54651904,0.00012292244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012064045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010467802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017861305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006399608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039989827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049552858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233207562","doi":"10.1353/hms.2019.0011","title":"Reply to My Critics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Passions; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Passion; Context (archaeology); Politics; Capitalism; Aesthetics; Literature; History; Psychology; Law; Theology; Political science; Art; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12240789021143836,"score_gpt":0.325164783920653,"score_spread":0.20275689370921465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233207562","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010583753,0.0020342695,0.00015790664,0.9088292,0.08658476,0.000019636858,0.000058206948,0.0000728395,0.002137336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017706895,0.0008789242,0.00024314878,0.9557709,0.030770626,0.00008923549,0.000029664016,0.0001007262,0.010346204],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838681,0.004069482,0.0014267527,0.0028847456,0.0058713676,0.0018795097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9494892,0.016077617,0.0034610755,0.0026388774,0.023198348,0.0051349453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016810479,0.0023137971,0.00299184,0.0027495448,0.010190337,0.013558712,0.006877684,0.054926407,0.017228175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13371822,0.0012652852,0.0031076963,0.002531274,0.011396131,0.012323818,0.008323619,0.09910157,0.02011438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006435633,0.0000065208096,0.00005470737,0.000027734846,0.000005229668,0.00009170694,0.00024962958,0.000011557954,0.000028284994,0.0017296044,0.99608505,0.0017036047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010316758,0.000012705692,0.00019941857,0.00032465407,0.000012996645,0.00027244218,0.0011511041,0.00007816377,0.00009459378,0.0024817735,0.995317,0.000044752363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008121421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006454166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054926407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010615898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011375107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08890337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235412235","doi":"10.15173/russell.v27i1.2109","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.06606504677866488,"score_gpt":0.30039900866303176,"score_spread":0.2343339618843669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235412235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070990185,0.009186209,0.0013562205,0.06062567,0.17923568,0.00025011972,0.005203163,0.00056496414,0.7428681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027039987,0.0019869863,0.0002923002,0.003629136,0.0075158803,0.000058662878,0.00088123267,0.00016093868,0.98277086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916565,0.00014150524,0.00004583963,0.0001454834,0.000414701,0.00008679079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513876,0.0009773443,0.0001583982,0.00042273954,0.0027382735,0.00056440354],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011129264,0.00052844035,0.0007789648,0.0020729317,0.0024301615,0.002543475,0.0012645826,0.0013448116,0.45730832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009411931,0.00020885342,0.00035543184,0.0019506671,0.00048190894,0.002308581,0.001786114,0.0019495859,0.28171825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007254665,0.0000052080804,0.000025577856,0.000031774016,6.6272315e-7,0.000009945898,0.000034765882,0.00000914862,0.000032360982,0.0035189113,0.985329,0.010995345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024548203,0.0000022095587,0.00013103869,0.00006396769,0.0000010420786,0.0000105985,0.000059791684,0.000011677568,0.00003806783,0.0011532989,0.99852365,0.0000022617735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005352278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075718784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45730832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018581835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001505522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7740838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238295738","doi":"10.1093/0199267677.001.0001","title":"Moral Animals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Subordination (linguistics); Moral realism; Sociology; Epistemology; Morality; Normative ethics; Objectivity (philosophy); Distributive justice; Social cognitive theory of morality; Economic Justice; Moral psychology; Distributive property; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.08775112809342979,"score_gpt":0.23878830813161847,"score_spread":0.15103718003818867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238295738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012387015,0.0059049763,0.008823203,0.00821855,0.0013040077,0.000033475557,0.00008545161,0.00007214183,0.97431946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11737647,0.0062196134,0.007334586,0.0068828096,0.001390161,0.00019344894,0.00023923528,0.00017639024,0.86018735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992747,0.00036099614,0.000021752361,0.00010021547,0.00018699125,0.000055263703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936706,0.00026632656,0.000041094,0.00011471246,0.00015609285,0.000054715627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007882355,0.00045335141,0.00033195014,0.00076880044,0.001996443,0.004515058,0.00063167734,0.0017839753,0.027781213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013984698,0.00020381623,0.0002788587,0.000606,0.00771209,0.0032039678,0.0015215541,0.0037947043,0.006776154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002529543,0.000005467081,0.000027217568,0.000029368957,0.0000016514012,0.000017796532,0.00066018954,0.00008452417,0.00006162339,0.95652485,0.03291659,0.009668203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026938862,0.000008867957,0.000075019925,0.00010227911,0.000001438656,0.0000761806,0.00037617862,0.000121187906,0.000069259324,0.20995791,0.78920555,0.0000035490184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014224213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014373789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027781213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002281077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011499373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09293741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241622744","doi":"10.1017/9781108348683.004","title":"Duress","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.045549618465698,"score_gpt":0.1941824600103856,"score_spread":0.14863284154468762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241622744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003822607,0.0036670193,0.014514758,0.0062639113,0.0006572036,0.000071611496,0.0005249167,0.00014265395,0.9703352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4343537,0.009829829,0.01227847,0.009887688,0.001045462,0.0005106836,0.0011800451,0.00041177546,0.5305023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946585,0.0018902932,0.00034683265,0.0010438111,0.0013486217,0.00071183493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418926,0.002283841,0.00044142522,0.0017345308,0.0010737826,0.00027719294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047715683,0.00084962364,0.00077146594,0.0013181751,0.0027310343,0.0054651857,0.0014878744,0.0026947919,0.049316164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013827683,0.00038532325,0.0010318186,0.0010864452,0.008971648,0.004374324,0.0029449991,0.004971521,0.012030736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146095235,0.0000064153996,0.00016322795,0.000053642485,0.000010258518,0.0000681332,0.0004530086,0.00020338607,0.000063417676,0.97219735,0.016498022,0.010268518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019760642,0.00003312613,0.00086557,0.00039073048,0.000033361306,0.0006195522,0.0003872745,0.00058998965,0.00052180834,0.56593364,0.43056792,0.00003732795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045132986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004454235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049316164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039417804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034612142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241910029","doi":"10.3386/w26119","title":"Projective Paternalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; University of Toronto; European Commission; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Paternalism; Projective test; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.6732305711220063,"score_gpt":0.5513546392234524,"score_spread":0.12187593189855395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241910029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8399786,0.00028229595,0.029792264,0.0023421007,0.00016637713,0.00028353895,0.00012248766,0.00008812978,0.1269442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98869485,0.00010858293,0.007029095,0.00032743457,0.000025156533,0.00021203399,0.000043336124,0.000015229683,0.003544297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898087,0.0064370884,0.00021459305,0.0012975504,0.0019246374,0.0003174136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766501,0.01232459,0.0041889823,0.0045501986,0.0012534688,0.0010326887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064009815,0.00055457104,0.00031156433,0.00038476186,0.0016666442,0.0015728058,0.0009757678,0.0007878645,0.0111644305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029703656,0.00042562402,0.00030554345,0.00033283234,0.0052676415,0.0017995131,0.0026598196,0.0023780004,0.00083356065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021422836,0.008792988,0.16603921,0.0008211425,0.000239546,0.0006420225,0.034207087,0.0042155976,0.027609767,0.5887173,0.006615724,0.15995745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001772959,0.0136697795,0.17247726,0.0005340805,0.00037472934,0.0022233624,0.024669785,0.030523796,0.040231273,0.61912876,0.09413722,0.00025699273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011475644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013708697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0111644305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010810539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014630528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037348747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245192295","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_233-1","title":"The Great Enrichment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06075185766014125,"score_gpt":0.24131263717078774,"score_spread":0.1805607795106465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245192295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013124846,0.010982673,0.0030141363,0.05133228,0.006538703,0.000015749289,0.000066906876,0.000087558365,0.9266495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053776965,0.007908526,0.0024368828,0.026716566,0.0050763213,0.000072951065,0.00012241075,0.00034402395,0.9035453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820745,0.00070938154,0.000035040237,0.00022191418,0.0006319703,0.00019428843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874145,0.0004414872,0.000041734304,0.00026335043,0.00028422795,0.00022778889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017460006,0.00051980803,0.00046578568,0.0010426899,0.0038261137,0.007480429,0.00083166524,0.0030068278,0.04751751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041052187,0.00023745181,0.0003020977,0.00082523195,0.0102357585,0.009108028,0.0057247696,0.005638766,0.015138852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001034789,0.000011278921,0.00005233256,0.000055406726,0.000002414225,0.00002047673,0.0010541806,0.000029874613,0.00007047397,0.78716344,0.18008006,0.0314497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026183006,0.0000027491576,0.000064801185,0.000119423035,0.0000012442604,0.00003456353,0.0005259908,0.00003134513,0.000041735377,0.11518405,0.8839882,0.0000033035165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024107988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062507745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04751751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027426512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040082103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15896189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247126131","doi":"10.1353/hms.2019.0007","title":"Précis of Reflecting Subjects: Passion, Sympathy, and Society in Hume's Philosophy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Passion; Sympathy; Pride; Epistemology; Philosophy; Virtue; Agency (philosophy); Causation; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.10353716873613164,"score_gpt":0.32526898634914053,"score_spread":0.2217318176130089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247126131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037714247,0.11167971,0.017126465,0.30328947,0.0061031934,0.00017474065,0.00007739722,0.00010494578,0.52372986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82573766,0.027750853,0.005355024,0.044907108,0.006900716,0.0006170482,0.00003238344,0.00011871856,0.0885805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562067,0.0035013938,0.000053075455,0.00027773558,0.00039922012,0.00014792236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946315,0.004562446,0.00018989797,0.00019368493,0.00023928874,0.00018307491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052072583,0.00038936082,0.0004915419,0.0010760798,0.0052714334,0.0055894875,0.00068902096,0.0028126102,0.0025671904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004146405,0.00028319863,0.0002919434,0.00081137946,0.043056678,0.00629899,0.0023077673,0.005770628,0.00045516857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001779898,0.000021558713,0.00013829094,0.00006469616,0.000003841232,0.0000479067,0.020228349,0.0001261164,0.000096041054,0.95410985,0.017774573,0.0073710303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022969149,0.00007074334,0.0009025047,0.00045001297,0.0000072610014,0.0001124482,0.008517999,0.00031065478,0.00034418795,0.7525279,0.23670837,0.000025041296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042282534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00428009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055894875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047888313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022484846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034745574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247292908","doi":"10.5325/jnietstud.50.1.0179","title":"Nietzsche's Constructivism: A Metaphysics of Material Objects","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Nietzsche Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Constructivism (international relations); Eliminative materialism; Object (grammar); Realism","score_opus":0.051909931448798685,"score_gpt":0.2718801091680253,"score_spread":0.2199701777192266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247292908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031094184,0.020086179,0.16111712,0.07426084,0.0011725614,0.00008194605,0.00029460472,0.00018601354,0.7117065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90036356,0.0077783125,0.032845203,0.0067702876,0.0013953343,0.00034251576,0.00019703346,0.00022115091,0.050086565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969132,0.0012984483,0.000102938655,0.0003851841,0.0010311783,0.00026903203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831295,0.001052524,0.00011386931,0.00026614513,0.00018432786,0.00007013538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035517598,0.0007656187,0.00046973128,0.0019038863,0.0035165176,0.0070666987,0.0014995235,0.0035471825,0.0030046015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004667337,0.00046351904,0.0007298625,0.0017547439,0.038525477,0.01667073,0.0041264663,0.0058816625,0.00049818266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011380864,9.2279123e-7,0.000011841909,0.0000054843003,6.782344e-7,0.0000060481398,0.00068681233,0.000035924153,0.00001807283,0.99841607,0.0003999514,0.00041703266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000325912,0.0000022474987,0.000048107242,0.0000241557,0.0000014335745,0.000017970468,0.0003428179,0.00014644251,0.000052384068,0.97316307,0.026194593,0.0000035556407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004472554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003711126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070666987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064162486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029489177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046553314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247604181","doi":"10.1017/9780511780240.018","title":"The Becoming of Essence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Negation; Simple (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Quality (philosophy); Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Programming language","score_opus":0.03965867606231445,"score_gpt":0.25662487565121866,"score_spread":0.21696619958890423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247604181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008115646,0.0020304522,0.012541058,0.009464804,0.00048628298,0.00003173759,0.00009572367,0.000092644346,0.96714157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7526787,0.0040097553,0.009433397,0.0050759455,0.00058431993,0.00012169676,0.00022617221,0.0003037712,0.22756627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784935,0.000841619,0.00007854633,0.00039392902,0.0006104161,0.00022615441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989605,0.00026157973,0.000081131446,0.00035000767,0.00018541742,0.00016143532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016798099,0.00042822582,0.0003558933,0.00093168125,0.0038499502,0.008948229,0.0006439476,0.001917333,0.014232832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032709653,0.00019549698,0.00036828162,0.00082479767,0.024945844,0.010625088,0.0055949073,0.0035074446,0.002223591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030058823,0.000002139789,0.000055577624,0.00001242478,0.0000013194456,0.000016817043,0.004484402,0.00002015441,0.00009278068,0.98939335,0.0023963612,0.003521736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004686343,0.000012850914,0.00042203043,0.00008547987,0.000004536644,0.00020011583,0.0045169243,0.000084548075,0.00016177678,0.41307902,0.581417,0.0000109272505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026606761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002367512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014232832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031706083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026649425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04761362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248948922","doi":"10.1057/9781137412119_8","title":"Conclusion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Nothing; Contradiction; Determinacy; Epistemology; Dialectic; Abstraction; Teleology; Hegelianism; Philosophy; Mechanism (biology); Cognitive science; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03773266290371203,"score_gpt":0.23125672801591063,"score_spread":0.1935240651121986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248948922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004157429,0.0052109053,0.013251665,0.08793861,0.0069296784,0.000070461065,0.0006597726,0.00028603838,0.88149536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21557586,0.0057050306,0.011168892,0.07606485,0.0033820649,0.00019980282,0.0015129554,0.0005310614,0.6858595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981488,0.00042868612,0.00006987272,0.00051194004,0.0005604959,0.00028021203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795973,0.00040694754,0.000083704996,0.000270619,0.0010322514,0.00024671154],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020376397,0.0005308725,0.000358705,0.0010456947,0.0024147846,0.006090835,0.0013780422,0.00276233,0.07788675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005472142,0.0001596986,0.0006442359,0.0006568513,0.004318051,0.0050854725,0.0032136175,0.0040822984,0.024120387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004081046,0.000019688574,0.00033156908,0.00012711699,0.000010731456,0.00009966087,0.0011664205,0.000119942895,0.00018586034,0.86622643,0.110858805,0.02081287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008433774,0.000010201851,0.00038239363,0.00033709803,0.0000070922506,0.00009479377,0.0013451676,0.00011634364,0.00033337844,0.2311487,0.76620805,0.000008324246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004361974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041684783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92211324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043157637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034296284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249469873","doi":"10.1093/owc/9780199217946.003.0006","title":"V","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.053952684854161895,"score_gpt":0.20083759992725347,"score_spread":0.1468849150730916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249469873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006268545,0.0020148198,0.00085172366,0.0033635313,0.001552062,0.00002710007,0.0002128163,0.00016994157,0.99118125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007870767,0.0011256034,0.0004098576,0.002352639,0.00030855436,0.000026151467,0.00025804274,0.00016637515,0.98748195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946505,0.0001030853,0.000015963324,0.00011593795,0.00022803481,0.00007188667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943155,0.00008315039,0.00002970272,0.00006381311,0.000309957,0.00008183356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044603634,0.0004081472,0.00020762539,0.00085537357,0.0019864144,0.004305242,0.00071140187,0.0012570735,0.26008824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016465129,0.0001877822,0.0003045825,0.0007334495,0.00093787827,0.0025585953,0.001692259,0.0021823365,0.14597426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023748644,0.000016571574,0.00024905993,0.00011703703,0.0000049915348,0.00006639904,0.00069773826,0.00007705333,0.0004898104,0.15438616,0.78379476,0.060076583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.3422784e-7,0.0000032144435,0.00013392321,0.000053243646,7.882081e-7,0.000050052135,0.00014320436,0.000026340002,0.00012431764,0.0033493452,0.9961123,0.0000024208098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01264761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01529741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26008824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00228754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013259818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250750001","doi":"10.4324/9781315669052-51","title":"References","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.18607954604421936,"score_gpt":0.2731439684243684,"score_spread":0.08706442238014903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250750001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047530752,0.011721426,0.0017818358,0.023503987,0.01716432,0.0001363443,0.011238525,0.0004278729,0.93355036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049225865,0.007676852,0.0013760307,0.0040448867,0.0029485086,0.000093206705,0.008188772,0.0005158201,0.9702333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989924,0.0001411185,0.000052368483,0.00012303526,0.0005933994,0.00009767602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645233,0.000644789,0.00013256607,0.00030241773,0.0022462688,0.00022162647],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000792242,0.0004765879,0.0005801473,0.0038806845,0.0027021796,0.002752373,0.0014207636,0.0012991212,0.47571847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085762525,0.0002015838,0.00043330816,0.005512402,0.0006081014,0.0025703802,0.0015299916,0.002000304,0.2784521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004876423,0.0000065123695,0.00005696761,0.00007045679,0.0000011082051,0.000021947097,0.00008549698,0.000030084706,0.000024323197,0.011690143,0.9727778,0.015230413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011406664,0.0000015091441,0.00017077393,0.00013647786,8.623687e-7,0.000020943513,0.000067307024,0.000008858591,0.000024827978,0.0020166766,0.99754745,0.0000030814415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028500803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031441055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5242815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038523136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031375163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251220923","doi":"10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah13052","title":"<i>Consensus</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Ancient History","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Rhetoric; Foundation (evidence); Term (time); Epistemology; Politics; Political science; Consensus conference; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Linguistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Library science; Physics","score_opus":0.033001309574386815,"score_gpt":0.21319362630919567,"score_spread":0.18019231673480884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251220923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017822387,0.0016231065,0.03305977,0.013502626,0.0017078834,0.00008414092,0.00044595374,0.00043255193,0.94736177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3271501,0.00594494,0.03217013,0.0064802165,0.0025858474,0.0005988736,0.0018983781,0.002097589,0.6210739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899137,0.0045051584,0.000636802,0.0013356595,0.0030680806,0.00054060615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99015534,0.0034421743,0.00072326465,0.0019611823,0.003064333,0.00065360434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058697416,0.0006477007,0.000536236,0.0024746798,0.004401655,0.010912606,0.0020355452,0.002831416,0.07627084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015632873,0.00026313594,0.00048000683,0.005596059,0.009771978,0.012685386,0.005618579,0.0035047624,0.022252714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001333146,0.000008132836,0.00006934581,0.00014405462,0.0000035465307,0.00006358495,0.0019365185,0.0001702485,0.000117455165,0.9054775,0.070215665,0.021780647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005685134,0.000009643148,0.00012775893,0.00031432544,0.0000049540868,0.00018175635,0.0013276087,0.0004501695,0.00034807625,0.20608325,0.7911285,0.000018120847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00407759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003167564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07627084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055981106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044730385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2551514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252777720","doi":"10.1017/9781316569894.007","title":"Preface to the Second Edition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Spell; Key (lock); Reading (process); Epistemology; Philosophy; Element (criminal law); Theology; Law; Linguistics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04441174172897921,"score_gpt":0.20137043684645978,"score_spread":0.15695869511748056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252777720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052875036,0.010555834,0.0018913026,0.014899895,0.06746161,0.00012922124,0.004699905,0.0007228577,0.8991107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024577295,0.0032140026,0.0006891509,0.001760066,0.0066041322,0.00008231593,0.002218024,0.00045385855,0.98252064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991391,0.00009967206,0.000044165263,0.00012884446,0.0005285475,0.000059562783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980191,0.00044665998,0.00006856249,0.00021783629,0.0010414433,0.0002063928],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085055793,0.000932123,0.0007367104,0.0027682185,0.0018917486,0.004937006,0.0011751726,0.0012728592,0.4273007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005100181,0.00031146573,0.0004456823,0.0026660592,0.00095830095,0.0037252111,0.0017873606,0.0033521468,0.2577379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011827781,0.000010684236,0.000029848625,0.00009108237,8.49569e-7,0.000025647021,0.00012846963,0.000026315887,0.00008985689,0.010751253,0.96233284,0.026501365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.654758e-7,0.000002802273,0.000079480546,0.00006992374,3.9381644e-7,0.000022670776,0.000044119068,0.00000870789,0.000025457346,0.0013784593,0.9983652,0.0000018314752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041829213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006181464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4273007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026995416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019134451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81688607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253652310","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139043281.008","title":"Book III","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Sequence (biology); Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Theology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04438042789904967,"score_gpt":0.19674375539386832,"score_spread":0.15236332749481865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253652310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000439203,0.0063249785,0.0035606145,0.0029363208,0.0024771465,0.000043949312,0.00048671637,0.00025368604,0.9834774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028167048,0.002024252,0.0008070418,0.00097440527,0.00047029147,0.00003148957,0.00035604907,0.00016543473,0.9923544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995933,0.000058817262,0.000013592785,0.000088360706,0.00020115341,0.00004480337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961334,0.00008034485,0.000022396123,0.000062508516,0.000169792,0.0000516785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041049483,0.00070439285,0.00039082268,0.0012685704,0.0018143868,0.0041543418,0.0007567797,0.0013554604,0.22739764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013065744,0.0003336797,0.0004273684,0.0010916267,0.00131139,0.0030051258,0.0013247177,0.002463601,0.115664326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016850341,0.000025334564,0.000100764286,0.00016856956,0.000004066629,0.000053481523,0.0005447227,0.00018939667,0.00041858107,0.29036686,0.63217276,0.07593859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.248704e-7,0.0000034032028,0.000079990605,0.0000757666,8.915473e-7,0.00004185007,0.00005466874,0.00003109523,0.00011052587,0.008817632,0.9907808,0.0000026146618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036612065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068068192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22739764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002106518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014667049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256204350","doi":"10.1017/s0012217312000352","title":"Meaning in Life and Why It MattersSusan Wolf Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010, 168 pp., $25.95 (hardcover)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Art; Library science; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05152912136094042,"score_gpt":0.2268341473699936,"score_spread":0.17530502600905318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256204350","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007014762,0.79718995,0.0012161026,0.074246936,0.0026410758,0.000008690459,0.000268659,0.000081014536,0.12364619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057963066,0.63807666,0.0030473797,0.015447512,0.0028918826,0.00011758082,0.00057448476,0.00035636258,0.28152508],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918014,0.00032051821,0.000058673642,0.00010823985,0.00023483764,0.000097523094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991021,0.0005308941,0.00007228548,0.000058591177,0.00012461767,0.00011151018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016972116,0.0011560852,0.000887134,0.0016535415,0.002586799,0.007197096,0.00093901344,0.003542305,0.038169723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031228054,0.0009836508,0.00038231286,0.003540062,0.006303964,0.010522874,0.0019651842,0.0045158016,0.010882753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038895207,0.000022980936,0.0003569434,0.00073331315,0.000016840846,0.0001524288,0.005103671,0.00015197622,0.00015841593,0.1741095,0.7193886,0.09976644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000444828,0.0000047705735,0.0009923854,0.0012951673,0.00000741316,0.00013095305,0.0033621986,0.00004529809,0.00004422796,0.08154778,0.9125552,0.000010112991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014630702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040981587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038169723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004116553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00456287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12769043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W427181296","doi":"","title":"The Life-Value of Death Mortality, Finitude, and Meaningful Lives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osaka Prefecture University Repository (Osaka Prefecture University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Limiting; Value of life; Human life; Limit (mathematics); The good life; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.016307741935291584,"score_gpt":0.18344886566820245,"score_spread":0.16714112373291087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W427181296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31223935,0.02407409,0.012632873,0.049289618,0.0008835953,0.00004107241,0.000344212,0.00003175292,0.6004634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933221,0.0013064562,0.00044394075,0.00074680184,0.00018548142,0.000016813186,0.000034421715,0.0000064646392,0.003937597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813205,0.0010722775,0.000060159557,0.00015197125,0.00028873474,0.00029476866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975809,0.00087997864,0.00038718918,0.00021185796,0.00032167858,0.00061838934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002171345,0.0002932484,0.0002961609,0.0010992121,0.0027741904,0.0036908519,0.00051085796,0.0010807568,0.0036132364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005335714,0.00010066465,0.000241453,0.0008055584,0.022143753,0.0040297364,0.0043695583,0.0026635814,0.0003240992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005697423,0.0000323423,0.0029039946,0.000039643473,0.0000132375035,0.000104311956,0.0055261888,0.00019584977,0.00009308575,0.9762648,0.0022070261,0.012562622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001798388,0.000077926,0.0093486905,0.00017418819,0.000015713518,0.00029442922,0.0067518656,0.00029210479,0.00021493294,0.93858236,0.044203766,0.000026081883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018938475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021812287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036908519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029950766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009313968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0217309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283764942","doi":"10.53000/cpa.v11i22/23.766","title":"The greeks and the good life","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Estudos Filosóficos e Históricos da Antiguidade","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Greeks; Philosophy; Humanities; Epistemology; History; Ancient history","score_opus":0.04094976098283919,"score_gpt":0.26363817716441407,"score_spread":0.22268841618157487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283764942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083056204,0.024044566,0.003347043,0.06244832,0.0015120441,0.000027525955,0.000055753804,0.000046512887,0.825462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948017,0.004966967,0.0007468049,0.0027312494,0.00034405678,0.000018874118,0.000017849456,0.00003358325,0.043123744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619293,0.0028045925,0.000083730854,0.00018133014,0.00036334107,0.00037396813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747473,0.0012269364,0.00030905227,0.0004243103,0.0002396238,0.00032531758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024380127,0.00048191563,0.0004103671,0.0016322442,0.009008217,0.009921798,0.0005825848,0.002390722,0.0079737585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044014063,0.0001980499,0.000334584,0.0019819029,0.045194395,0.006247431,0.005303542,0.0040529193,0.0010423844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011777677,0.0000073049805,0.00030240888,0.0000312121,0.000002191287,0.00009671487,0.038209334,0.00006435059,0.00003399881,0.9527824,0.0038290403,0.0046292925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015163082,0.000021527709,0.00093927677,0.00027020177,0.0000048193947,0.00026656262,0.059580043,0.00013697222,0.00011152874,0.5640802,0.374557,0.000016828062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055396026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009921798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005165275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028577175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037476897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285177057","doi":"10.5840/envirophil2022531116","title":"Listening to Nature’s Voices: Human and Animal Autonomy in Hegel","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Autonomy; Active listening; Epistemology; Philosophy; Relation (database); Contemporary philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Communication; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016965331174177378,"score_gpt":0.228441642638919,"score_spread":0.21147631146474163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285177057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14317702,0.007045728,0.037129875,0.041606896,0.00049331284,0.000028636896,0.000023543558,0.00006746871,0.7704274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889414,0.00085328193,0.0011832821,0.0013671578,0.000088020846,0.00001602927,0.000005852489,0.00001838322,0.0075265034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704546,0.0019680697,0.000053028576,0.0002070867,0.00044585628,0.0002805514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983949,0.0012216103,0.00009038456,0.000110586865,0.00007882745,0.00010378217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003181579,0.00024203151,0.00024251039,0.00063081464,0.003632204,0.0046653664,0.0005119423,0.0022644277,0.001367598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026633218,0.00016507394,0.0002226007,0.00040029213,0.06505764,0.005425466,0.0041782423,0.003029724,0.00026515598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072900925,0.0000048927873,0.000081791404,0.00001201375,0.0000016323365,0.000034104905,0.028199045,0.00011542448,0.0000880436,0.9695795,0.0003548903,0.0015214782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012195658,0.000016686285,0.0002019265,0.00007803208,0.0000039819115,0.00010728951,0.016618593,0.0002584086,0.00030828427,0.93083555,0.051546592,0.000012586511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002216781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027849467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046653664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028278397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019809608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020517468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285724186","doi":"10.1353/hms.2020.0003","title":"Hume's Account of the Scope of Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2203849562051002,"score_gpt":0.3174156946892291,"score_spread":0.09703073848412888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285724186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0091979345,0.008314664,0.06554078,0.052352257,0.00047123435,0.000056007255,0.00011800739,0.000070330614,0.8638787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88991344,0.00582567,0.017840518,0.01638949,0.0013689431,0.0003289658,0.000088490655,0.000095062096,0.068149365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953436,0.002269267,0.00014271321,0.00060594926,0.0010685389,0.00056996016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959157,0.0026437284,0.00024735235,0.00038772926,0.00054855703,0.00025689788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004882437,0.00058013597,0.0007092999,0.0024626076,0.005256921,0.0061833565,0.0013319668,0.0057376,0.005113637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005695696,0.00032081536,0.00084585446,0.0014234892,0.03822046,0.009056257,0.0042259833,0.0048644873,0.0008805383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014153077,0.0000022003615,0.000023849565,0.000008038423,0.0000013557171,0.000012875117,0.0005052609,0.00007106821,0.000010758764,0.9974826,0.0011419567,0.000738649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030866258,0.0000028687252,0.00006802063,0.00002798507,0.0000017140139,0.000022937778,0.000172312,0.0001372425,0.000031111682,0.97953826,0.019990973,0.000003563213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033399533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034717035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061833565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004099912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038452186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02974701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286492816","doi":"10.1017/s0953820822000152","title":"The Decline of Egoism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical egoism; Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.039614504713568574,"score_gpt":0.24350493654294622,"score_spread":0.20389043182937766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286492816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04727261,0.0165381,0.0065171137,0.32161292,0.0010519987,0.000019632333,0.00008046324,0.0000712254,0.6068359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9459894,0.0038975773,0.0012497166,0.01581715,0.00069602655,0.00003205064,0.000026017631,0.00009649563,0.032195643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99302614,0.004297757,0.00012713621,0.00072044064,0.0012686788,0.0005598563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98852926,0.006622243,0.00064788584,0.0013341644,0.00204899,0.00081739755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076535554,0.0002724246,0.0004573757,0.0012986091,0.003949689,0.008054094,0.00081087556,0.0034754302,0.00660394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01253267,0.00023717871,0.00029737243,0.00095385336,0.037162673,0.010526563,0.005055871,0.009656052,0.001044568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070841643,0.0000042645815,0.00010210117,0.000012638745,0.0000015227153,0.000011281222,0.0015981443,0.000036812056,0.000033966102,0.98764706,0.0057599265,0.004785114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009393021,0.000016473903,0.00055114925,0.00013953095,0.0000027654066,0.000068861365,0.0018107733,0.00030387464,0.00022431284,0.7718739,0.22498891,0.000010164135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005577375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034270738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01079768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01079768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004037065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078343034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291145016","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2022.25","title":"Hegel and Formal Idealism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hegelianism; Idealism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Subjectivism; Metaphysics; German idealism; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Reductio ad absurdum; Perception; Subject (documents); Skepticism; Law; Political science; Chemistry; Computer science","score_opus":0.025956239766794637,"score_gpt":0.20624047937477924,"score_spread":0.1802842396079846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291145016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033637,0.0064412067,0.08155787,0.05038096,0.00095875305,0.000054178716,0.000113856,0.00023200785,0.8266243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95882046,0.0013153608,0.009139661,0.0030265576,0.000512531,0.00009004191,0.000055454697,0.00010017664,0.026939826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953418,0.0025226756,0.00014947947,0.00041661697,0.0011695238,0.0003998592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959007,0.002342223,0.00026566893,0.0005644708,0.000684711,0.00024231084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005115688,0.00042731647,0.00053378165,0.0019865674,0.0030731105,0.004865023,0.0010731682,0.001727045,0.0059259012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006372598,0.00029024328,0.0006708372,0.0009280855,0.041917626,0.0062847417,0.004168025,0.0039978526,0.0007908368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014309987,0.0000018538608,0.000007800417,0.0000043100595,8.578851e-7,0.0000040949353,0.00015120256,0.00007157673,0.000008516666,0.9990965,0.0003680856,0.00028381482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035231715,0.0000016927302,0.000009146189,0.000009998769,8.422012e-7,0.000007307467,0.00009462488,0.00016370666,0.00002629716,0.99405694,0.00562415,0.0000018248801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034454358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022604526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008670058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008670058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033336338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06290597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292829047","doi":"10.7202/1089697ar","title":"Daniel C. Dennett and Gregg D. Caruso. \"Just Deserts: Debating Free Will\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08402990599624076,"score_gpt":0.2804328631704561,"score_spread":0.19640295717421535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292829047","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013803566,0.766367,0.00036375044,0.22363453,0.0055154082,0.00001082931,0.000094876756,0.000013665595,0.0038618196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014037559,0.84611803,0.0009802076,0.11858648,0.0099496925,0.000110577275,0.00012480411,0.000043854383,0.010048809],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675804,0.0015342494,0.00020842184,0.0002125924,0.0011380232,0.00014871306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97712827,0.015425596,0.001435541,0.00030024673,0.0048009297,0.0009094447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005980217,0.00076242647,0.00094241434,0.004722803,0.0019485571,0.003426364,0.0017606616,0.0048600757,0.005907545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029388364,0.00046359727,0.0004807101,0.0063930596,0.0032796317,0.008638598,0.0017782248,0.0059306105,0.0024810338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005165705,0.00001078669,0.00028954868,0.0017179193,0.00003576552,0.00003882555,0.0008495092,0.000049018487,0.000027577897,0.032878604,0.9304747,0.03357604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005683956,0.000021166072,0.0018257505,0.0068090553,0.000092741546,0.000093461524,0.0011719661,0.0000713493,0.00019374509,0.05607463,0.93355626,0.000032938402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018835222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04677096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018835222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031349147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058874646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037451148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296038864","doi":"10.1007/s40656-022-00530-x","title":"Kant, intoxicated: the aesthetics of drunkenness, between moral duty and “active play”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Duty; German; Philosophy of biology; History of science; Context (archaeology); Aesthetics; Philosophy of science; History; Theology","score_opus":0.09858534724878779,"score_gpt":0.24027737470590266,"score_spread":0.14169202745711487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296038864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05028202,0.01914588,0.02823118,0.13876049,0.0020490221,0.0000440962,0.000109377965,0.00014925934,0.7612286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9488988,0.0011579162,0.0019085021,0.007336105,0.00044997607,0.00004919742,0.000018608987,0.0001613663,0.040019553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943633,0.0041506523,0.0001074515,0.000357718,0.0005122892,0.0005086109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693143,0.0019419844,0.00022602873,0.00038163253,0.00030975652,0.000209179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053447997,0.0007845288,0.00045563935,0.0016446532,0.01039905,0.011999857,0.00168544,0.00880566,0.004837472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009557368,0.0005978007,0.0004927851,0.001412649,0.097277366,0.013596813,0.004862401,0.01253873,0.00084683474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001432833,0.000004280724,0.00006967195,0.000014166735,0.0000024817448,0.000038490343,0.021567976,0.00006261611,0.000037214835,0.97291803,0.004063249,0.0012075288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021164597,0.000009946559,0.00023652088,0.000096311116,0.000007629055,0.00014865478,0.02004702,0.00024634093,0.00013901693,0.9039073,0.07512059,0.000019498351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008949708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009738895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011999857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042958865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029391493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031168997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297634280","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190887353.013.13","title":"Practical Truth, Ethical Naturalism, and the Constitution of Agency in Anscombe’s Ethics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Agency (philosophy); Constitution; Epistemology; Action (physics); Naturalism; Moral agency; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10096342353093986,"score_gpt":0.2735729852757879,"score_spread":0.17260956174484804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297634280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009195912,0.0056372494,0.027016362,0.027385494,0.00058284856,0.000045721372,0.000033822125,0.000043159846,0.93005943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84502244,0.0030347607,0.012193605,0.0043873833,0.000577567,0.00025439318,0.000051569332,0.000077814366,0.13440037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961428,0.0024057287,0.00011250664,0.00032471685,0.00074839167,0.0002660122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997736,0.0013741867,0.00009513391,0.00031271216,0.00033663085,0.00014541384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003760657,0.00034832305,0.00041908803,0.0008515072,0.0038682038,0.0070915553,0.00073466316,0.0028002704,0.00405954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040022032,0.00030926426,0.00033053066,0.0007288199,0.03428867,0.0056657293,0.0027768195,0.0049343104,0.00061658915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.928879e-7,0.000001489085,0.0000071676486,0.0000029403773,2.730486e-7,0.000006280173,0.0003699875,0.000040434374,0.0000067077585,0.99834025,0.0007310521,0.0004928269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027368703,0.0000025262862,0.000047743495,0.00003110378,7.59613e-7,0.000017667671,0.00028086113,0.00023769023,0.000028075574,0.9433393,0.056007873,0.000003681562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005884878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055697267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070915553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006439554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035604532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046722412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298143496","doi":"10.1515/agph-2021-0058","title":"Kant’s Account of Epistemic Normativity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Obligation; Argument (complex analysis); Maxim; Interpretation (philosophy); Practical reason; Law","score_opus":0.04157534527812587,"score_gpt":0.25819521616285435,"score_spread":0.21661987088472848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298143496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017446516,0.0029989502,0.1176658,0.028112728,0.0006133081,0.000035492503,0.00020389631,0.00017531274,0.832748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527537,0.0010794419,0.0124669345,0.004201792,0.0008955931,0.00013793839,0.000103499944,0.000113665505,0.028247468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98797345,0.006834761,0.00047246707,0.001249906,0.0027358904,0.0007334265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99343914,0.0036691437,0.00043750452,0.0009982164,0.001203817,0.00025222212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007840706,0.0006083205,0.0006470229,0.0015523983,0.003433113,0.008041376,0.0015144907,0.003963565,0.0055622603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008105526,0.0005193284,0.00094576186,0.0012070973,0.025049498,0.009245011,0.0044267345,0.005948012,0.0009870906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000221983,0.000001782167,0.000012032123,0.000005570693,0.0000014995118,0.0000054583893,0.00015414106,0.00016074564,0.000013988236,0.99893624,0.00044186905,0.0002643931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032509352,0.0000010992743,0.000017042295,0.000012380667,0.0000015748736,0.0000059436015,0.000045482277,0.00029593246,0.000028506796,0.994232,0.005353988,0.0000027880646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002660203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017114631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008041376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00686096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002256419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04977995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298425731","doi":"10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00152.x","title":"Justice Between the Young and the Old","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy &amp Public Affairs","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baker Hughes (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Citation; Sociology; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.11091958083031034,"score_gpt":0.27166451761747346,"score_spread":0.16074493678716312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298425731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22237504,0.02346588,0.0031881486,0.2258233,0.0025532057,0.00003711071,0.000096198404,0.000025567335,0.5224355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340833,0.0019958848,0.00024101658,0.017204175,0.0007621071,0.0000121246185,0.000011201532,0.0000206012,0.0456696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958055,0.0018270244,0.000093275725,0.00033015138,0.00056806224,0.001375939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933782,0.0025297208,0.000386421,0.0002967767,0.0006860887,0.0027227306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007713287,0.00018181709,0.0005342914,0.00085585006,0.011907288,0.01139287,0.00056393,0.0038125357,0.004839584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01024319,0.00019221063,0.00021638989,0.00058523583,0.020172944,0.007485422,0.0049435296,0.00708263,0.00065453345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004843788,0.000039264745,0.0018093789,0.000017257065,0.0000050963554,0.00023078623,0.032853577,0.000035449673,0.0001259482,0.9391462,0.012618498,0.013070101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021117543,0.00006630096,0.0046020607,0.00024780494,0.000011928409,0.00034583986,0.050012983,0.000114313436,0.00026960814,0.5926326,0.3516491,0.00002640796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010817801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018124886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011907288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005783341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006900635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041961253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298842318","doi":"10.47925/74.461","title":"On Desire, Discipline, and Becoming Human","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09450412137822468,"score_gpt":0.3302225555536688,"score_spread":0.23571843417544414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298842318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033120632,0.031045707,0.019073399,0.0916635,0.00078482216,0.000031418524,0.000059232527,0.000020166271,0.82420117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533912,0.0117906835,0.0028001778,0.006670707,0.0005585418,0.00010273283,0.000029987194,0.000025796544,0.024630206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967468,0.002377012,0.00007096575,0.00018592397,0.00036581824,0.00025352882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99436474,0.004627057,0.0002293428,0.00025251732,0.00029178432,0.00023454764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004746999,0.00039646274,0.0005125725,0.0012730482,0.004392989,0.0056596855,0.0008426757,0.0041667586,0.0052201063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061495695,0.00022861389,0.00030545288,0.0016322567,0.046967074,0.007035168,0.0030820773,0.0049373033,0.00040638304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002937813,0.0000047575118,0.000048518385,0.000010140468,8.085653e-7,0.000014527378,0.0019388616,0.00004085272,0.000009010504,0.99604946,0.0006693338,0.0012108256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050944013,0.0000065644263,0.00021162913,0.00008286559,0.0000018537086,0.000036172587,0.002147052,0.000086925334,0.000028339895,0.97790146,0.019487979,0.0000041644926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005382936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059668557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056596855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003787623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00377102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027481258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303615134","doi":"10.52685/pihfb.48.1(95).4","title":"Umjereni iracionalizam Alberta Bazale","year":2022,"lang":"hr","type":"article","venue":"Prilozi za istraživanje hrvatske filozofske baštine","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03920556117090273,"score_gpt":0.24482292685607726,"score_spread":0.20561736568517452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303615134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29444417,0.003842406,0.0061836685,0.02179762,0.00029787404,0.00020257203,0.0015189294,0.00034537292,0.6713673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7612742,0.0031651747,0.0059136944,0.001592631,0.00009216513,0.000100077894,0.00081495196,0.000089241206,0.22695775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873656,0.0001771558,0.000029746025,0.00013989689,0.00049361103,0.0004229749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989048,0.00014274873,0.00015000698,0.000067107045,0.0004157461,0.00031959097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086244836,0.00033945809,0.00024423815,0.0015984785,0.006730629,0.0067306613,0.0011302448,0.0011942965,0.03116532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001634079,0.00023428723,0.0002658944,0.003221308,0.0031217558,0.0014901798,0.0038257919,0.0015461618,0.0023908834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003720686,0.00033468186,0.14172243,0.0007934137,0.00012952245,0.0025927234,0.057576332,0.002033715,0.005894896,0.3731468,0.07529445,0.340109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026245825,0.00009893081,0.10388218,0.000387313,0.00005890158,0.00045236046,0.046595614,0.00078871776,0.0017844037,0.017882656,0.8279661,0.00007652557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5300694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77840155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5300694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014531783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030143788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9453962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306974200","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzac047","title":"<i>Desire as Belief: A Study of Desire, Motivation, and Rationality</i> , by Alex Gregory","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Nothing; Epistemology; Analogy; Rationality; Psychology; Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Mental state; Metaphor; Social psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.052773020575053974,"score_gpt":0.24239623169784377,"score_spread":0.1896232111227898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306974200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027752602,0.2457561,0.019262338,0.33706927,0.0023238643,0.000060809103,0.00016215608,0.00012288208,0.36749002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70546263,0.081955545,0.017886909,0.058095925,0.0044751763,0.0002639581,0.00015634944,0.00023850653,0.13146505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929404,0.00035728322,0.00001823127,0.0001121113,0.00014259071,0.000075702636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929523,0.00047950173,0.000070186994,0.000028876359,0.00006426198,0.000061947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009446866,0.00047625776,0.00036484562,0.0009236311,0.0020928374,0.003028444,0.0008036233,0.002209011,0.0023681126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021525065,0.00029412142,0.00043319172,0.0014702064,0.007997942,0.0055952873,0.001538344,0.0032007943,0.0005506486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019031271,0.000024797324,0.00062405807,0.00009442395,0.0000124082835,0.00009465737,0.0033115372,0.00020867694,0.00018741749,0.90873694,0.07605891,0.010627021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001135382,0.000030704992,0.0025473332,0.00037479398,0.000011588921,0.00028247962,0.0020470144,0.000902804,0.0001735687,0.64003384,0.3535592,0.000025417297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071613407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007879029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071613407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032959464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014668956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02391386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307280496","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12829","title":"Moral friends? The idea of the moral relationship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Morality; Virtue; Normative; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Criticism; Appeal; Social psychology; Moral psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral disengagement; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10292313285930213,"score_gpt":0.2391083625052267,"score_spread":0.13618522964592458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307280496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11192669,0.00510826,0.058430184,0.075222865,0.00087978557,0.00005614056,0.000047974485,0.0000958955,0.7482323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990633,0.00052276865,0.0017228553,0.0012087625,0.00019886531,0.000021222577,0.0000085418205,0.000018563147,0.0056654373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99089605,0.0073196907,0.000115678544,0.00065241026,0.00066179567,0.00035436766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930102,0.003172353,0.000981759,0.0008259327,0.0008180989,0.0011916058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059152874,0.00028090162,0.00037235112,0.0013670549,0.0053081503,0.008494367,0.0012345022,0.003841954,0.0072381073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008212727,0.00028184187,0.00034766863,0.0008493836,0.04214853,0.013658532,0.005449895,0.004171522,0.00082022086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004464053,0.0000067586902,0.00010628711,0.000008244986,0.0000022886748,0.000026386473,0.0022402047,0.00005408363,0.000020039819,0.9960452,0.00049903686,0.000987128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012148692,0.000019851486,0.00029648826,0.0000478359,0.000009524302,0.00013076168,0.0045543285,0.0008280644,0.000057129306,0.96420115,0.029831849,0.000010773681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014278248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008663764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008494367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031567346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013313073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03128338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309196093","doi":"10.1017/s0012217322000397","title":"What Can a Constructivist Say About Animal Ethics — Or Any Other Normative Question, for That Matter?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Creatures; Epistemology; Normative; Constructivism (international relations); Compromise; Philosophy; Expressivism; Psychology; Sociology; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.0858525431139839,"score_gpt":0.30247674289179927,"score_spread":0.21662419977781538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309196093","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014167081,0.008329518,0.056259587,0.765773,0.002905752,0.000031771215,0.00013083493,0.00013228391,0.15227021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8598713,0.0069527654,0.02287615,0.086524196,0.0032918456,0.00021909866,0.00013087633,0.00032135096,0.019812442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99010557,0.0069007576,0.00021533917,0.0006888816,0.001606918,0.00048259384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811467,0.01179807,0.0011967398,0.0018912482,0.002805769,0.0011614289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019092448,0.00061213877,0.001143492,0.0018628006,0.0052515203,0.0127255535,0.0023360383,0.009554096,0.0078092027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021887075,0.0003514604,0.000707523,0.0011882727,0.07022882,0.020580562,0.003884934,0.012313659,0.0021366766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001058414,0.000016954169,0.00010032094,0.000046654815,0.000009738338,0.000018179664,0.0012614599,0.00016135785,0.0000868467,0.991293,0.0048020026,0.0021928183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005618475,0.000005239782,0.00006538741,0.00014045947,0.0000045000597,0.000016827857,0.0013240838,0.0002141063,0.00012684929,0.9726098,0.025478521,0.000008598238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00291049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020485453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019092448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004430739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052750427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10097176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311178154","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2022.2156598","title":"Nietzsche on the value of power and pleasure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Admiration; Pleasure; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Power (physics); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.09109430005875913,"score_gpt":0.26329837639133163,"score_spread":0.1722040763325725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311178154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021746188,0.012373515,0.011425332,0.06544692,0.0006119273,0.000024794665,0.00009799533,0.00002709442,0.8882463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9162311,0.004618428,0.0038547972,0.0062677455,0.00060672616,0.00008395869,0.00003900753,0.000057708192,0.06824049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974722,0.0013889384,0.000058935715,0.00030705848,0.0005156587,0.00025708968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978788,0.0014019345,0.000102638034,0.00024754796,0.00025169147,0.00011741142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026701235,0.00046181097,0.00042053752,0.00089490885,0.0035553665,0.0063807433,0.00067159906,0.003607197,0.005968281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004957369,0.00023996973,0.00038391785,0.0007905169,0.029031986,0.0074777487,0.0036264155,0.0033560488,0.00097229145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002678786,0.0000015153931,0.000031443622,0.0000058682795,0.0000010219056,0.000009261562,0.00045740276,0.000033340908,0.000015576428,0.9974246,0.0012307719,0.00078645424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004205143,0.000004026383,0.00009536003,0.000038516006,0.0000021551632,0.000028604163,0.00045776047,0.0001039375,0.000064516935,0.9525153,0.046680547,0.0000050320723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028800238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037459366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063807433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003226012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017204179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023406446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313179912","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4278943","title":"Vignettes of Insight","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.017839867688138878,"score_gpt":0.21655271692531128,"score_spread":0.1987128492371724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313179912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11139813,0.002861908,0.007934226,0.27958187,0.009629715,0.00082643336,0.00091078103,0.0002762996,0.5865807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6528473,0.0032203845,0.008036727,0.06847864,0.0012337315,0.0012507356,0.00060366315,0.00022759152,0.26410118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962819,0.0022720834,0.00008082891,0.00018939923,0.00046207564,0.0007136345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567467,0.0025591042,0.00018050187,0.00019660375,0.00050579687,0.00088337855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028752226,0.00077568623,0.0004565091,0.0015249476,0.014380233,0.0060556964,0.0014961825,0.0070981793,0.03383844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016233677,0.00031724526,0.0006024925,0.0021410955,0.0061050537,0.0042408262,0.0071306494,0.011938763,0.0050985483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018954948,0.0002507712,0.0005327407,0.00016046266,0.0000079453675,0.007921083,0.22742918,0.00026919003,0.00058257004,0.45981312,0.28171128,0.02113206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004328353,0.000044616758,0.0005475881,0.00024323397,0.0000046491464,0.0021169477,0.1945743,0.00028391625,0.00019087085,0.043283485,0.75863117,0.000035911482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008980021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015744276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03383844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059669293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031847868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1132009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313444829","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-09722-5_16","title":"William Whiston, Experimental Lecturing and the Royal Society of London","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Archimedes","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Shadow (psychology); Dissenting opinion; Natural (archaeology); Art history; Natural philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Art; Media studies; Political science; History; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.04354700775877416,"score_gpt":0.23670376708856142,"score_spread":0.19315675932978726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313444829","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001419539,0.5092156,0.0015465261,0.110761985,0.014401464,0.00005202765,0.00031967295,0.00015322666,0.36212987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04000619,0.16284084,0.0016732633,0.01044193,0.005331541,0.00011390843,0.0001678179,0.00017816448,0.77924633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986714,0.0005428783,0.00008772539,0.00022684662,0.00035928702,0.000111803216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768484,0.0013870912,0.00014509111,0.0002099855,0.00036872167,0.00020432968],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026033388,0.00091775844,0.0007201394,0.001607876,0.0035560082,0.004733412,0.0009045579,0.004762162,0.07040685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004742399,0.00067010935,0.00022729699,0.0019833946,0.0056119356,0.008189413,0.0022055504,0.0039545074,0.015276334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004844097,0.000034724682,0.00012144262,0.00025997404,0.000005306845,0.00008354841,0.0010161748,0.00007556454,0.00013421748,0.2683074,0.66715,0.06276324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010988997,0.0000058880305,0.00022804708,0.00018044224,0.0000014493065,0.00006456695,0.00034376286,0.000019813233,0.000057646685,0.03368747,0.9653904,0.000009485483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010601633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034206633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042417985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032776059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23553437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313729804","doi":"10.1093/jaac/kpac060","title":"Big Tent Aesthetics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Aesthetic value; Value (mathematics); Hedonism; Art; Beauty; Hegemony; Work of art; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.058653938833471066,"score_gpt":0.2672301062817684,"score_spread":0.20857616744829735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313729804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013715412,0.0028830634,0.020751452,0.024521604,0.0036241384,0.00007111323,0.000080047146,0.00036327267,0.9339898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75533664,0.00159007,0.01131757,0.0042581894,0.0011126072,0.00016663624,0.0001060128,0.0004905616,0.22562172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628675,0.0015498948,0.000111710615,0.00032571354,0.0013218442,0.00040404094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965976,0.00096140406,0.0002537671,0.00093650375,0.0008195172,0.00043123172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037920645,0.0008011276,0.0005400703,0.0025374615,0.006877798,0.00937571,0.0015648119,0.0036720084,0.03451136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008285476,0.00042077815,0.0007753197,0.001733372,0.027606698,0.00928492,0.0068762028,0.0048470194,0.005145051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019668023,0.0000119652295,0.00015837172,0.00004620609,0.0000029299385,0.00011410004,0.0030035323,0.00018163574,0.00011572047,0.9723672,0.014248774,0.009729956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012289543,0.000034374145,0.00024745206,0.00022271335,0.0000073894703,0.00030368843,0.0038711042,0.00070252945,0.00020480562,0.6189472,0.37543207,0.000014392411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013812562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017395341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03451136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054463814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028582176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11545199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641612","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.5","title":"Work-In-Progress: Evolution and Common Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Phenomenon; Relation (database); Dynamics (music); Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.046572444228166886,"score_gpt":0.2888897015098076,"score_spread":0.2423172572816407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08001886,0.014787412,0.09029565,0.1253936,0.0007484453,0.00027906348,0.00039897294,0.00019834893,0.6878797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563776,0.002813158,0.012197872,0.0037320787,0.00048842764,0.00029040978,0.000098598546,0.000080335,0.023921553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862677,0.0070240707,0.0004431826,0.0029533869,0.0018092146,0.0015025531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779928,0.012323979,0.001952366,0.0032479707,0.0027808377,0.0017021159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015879834,0.00054548896,0.000977417,0.0029089125,0.0071618524,0.010167464,0.0028073096,0.0066638472,0.011649634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028355876,0.0003682707,0.0007045419,0.0025369953,0.05644857,0.01418561,0.005636617,0.0046423706,0.0010054925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070892993,0.000011473045,0.000660316,0.000016498794,0.0000084216335,0.00006758051,0.001319847,0.0004837291,0.000026309992,0.9912845,0.0012918918,0.0048223417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008641018,0.000011673348,0.00078319677,0.000050030816,0.000004140142,0.000060494815,0.0006166271,0.00081444276,0.000028562268,0.9843188,0.013290513,0.0000128802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011964175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073045827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015879834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010892507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005854185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08398163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317765510","doi":"10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos1626","title":"Empirical Realism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Epistemology; Philosophy; Realism; Capstone; German; Philosophy of science; Philosophical realism; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.05143971712358432,"score_gpt":0.2859507479863122,"score_spread":0.2345110308627279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317765510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009076376,0.006829153,0.01613998,0.021765802,0.0011369559,0.00007206044,0.00037943263,0.00012022959,0.9526487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34353384,0.022298837,0.03913301,0.036637567,0.0074882032,0.0011030873,0.0026121396,0.0010095302,0.5461838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99188226,0.0040135058,0.00038744084,0.0012460967,0.0020337054,0.0004369587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939213,0.0028883626,0.00032106112,0.001417987,0.0011459147,0.00030548105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006429102,0.0009079147,0.0006288736,0.0024232618,0.0030502423,0.008917939,0.0015632102,0.0040261,0.03968528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014813335,0.00036292657,0.00064774754,0.001784552,0.013881763,0.008048649,0.004930381,0.005389021,0.012660664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017021025,0.0000030479746,0.00002570271,0.000022775117,0.0000011707922,0.000007361036,0.00019611008,0.000028543658,0.000016697119,0.9855461,0.010226294,0.0039244485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036556987,0.000003949128,0.00008419454,0.00020183815,0.0000018688834,0.000046611,0.00021570908,0.00010614996,0.000060291975,0.46479243,0.5344784,0.000004843032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023221658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019665295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03968528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058304253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038955125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13276047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318406789","doi":"10.1007/s11406-023-00621-4","title":"The Volitional Self-Contradiction Interpretation of Kant’s Formula of Universal Law: A Response to Kleingeld","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Contradiction; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of mind; Law of excluded middle; Psychology; Metaphysics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03016063548645807,"score_gpt":0.25325943370395554,"score_spread":0.22309879821749748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318406789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092613116,0.005088716,0.19728012,0.2449789,0.0041100783,0.00010616819,0.00017888405,0.0003468717,0.4552971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96638495,0.00051504775,0.012677334,0.008887154,0.0004210863,0.00008615064,0.00003018743,0.00012925196,0.010868807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98835456,0.007017468,0.00038659933,0.0010411111,0.0025584195,0.00064197474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916087,0.0052774185,0.0004934749,0.0010479012,0.0012818796,0.00029059206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011102107,0.0004784505,0.00092689646,0.0017709874,0.003261096,0.005773397,0.0021835037,0.0056567932,0.0034136826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018330242,0.0004886136,0.0009400007,0.0010530504,0.04283882,0.0074830134,0.0073113595,0.009940783,0.00052467163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049497894,0.0000030195479,0.000020946029,0.000009588712,0.0000022408428,0.000022674143,0.0009165796,0.00011254071,0.00003629633,0.99758637,0.00087368186,0.00041114245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008808487,0.0000043572004,0.000033910477,0.000023910477,0.0000022728873,0.000035580026,0.00044506724,0.00057242974,0.000112302754,0.9896443,0.009108155,0.000008876134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016365413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010868588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011102107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071609267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027420497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05871427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318615699","doi":"10.18254/s271326680024029-1","title":"Apperception and Related Matters in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason and Opus Postumum","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Transcendental Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Apperception; Consciousness; Object (grammar); Philosophy; Self-consciousness; Self; Psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04577012379512681,"score_gpt":0.29167220361926366,"score_spread":0.24590207982413687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318615699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058640026,0.050482724,0.052648347,0.14486364,0.0023302832,0.000060745257,0.000095894735,0.00010909388,0.6907692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9327951,0.0050968765,0.009072757,0.011061517,0.0015036582,0.00016864385,0.000027312226,0.000120083176,0.04015396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941273,0.003447404,0.00014117648,0.00058612204,0.001153118,0.00054496346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970235,0.0020975638,0.00018543721,0.00026649534,0.00029817352,0.00012880494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062443027,0.0005051719,0.00067918206,0.0015057764,0.0062684673,0.0072429907,0.0014625312,0.006487504,0.0024807847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006723365,0.0003296228,0.000777489,0.0018745913,0.0480721,0.008290798,0.004732507,0.008758038,0.00052050187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023132666,0.0000014315359,0.0000132528385,0.000005389715,6.101057e-7,0.000007925648,0.00093795307,0.000019437339,0.000007657591,0.9981675,0.00032473146,0.00051168393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004576552,0.0000042496545,0.00006806136,0.000036929545,0.0000012771014,0.000021116583,0.00043539025,0.00010240691,0.000051598923,0.9681197,0.031150326,0.000004382563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036778187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003155608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072429907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066503743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032740373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048252046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319455236","doi":"10.1017/9781009244978.019","title":"Jacobi’s Philosophy of Faith in Fichte’s 1794 <i>Wissenschaftslehre</i>","year":2023,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Nihilism; Philosophy; Transcendental number; Faith; Harmony (color); Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.053536901198148676,"score_gpt":0.21283217896672815,"score_spread":0.1592952777685795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319455236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01401281,0.05046802,0.0037913485,0.03506935,0.0011471763,0.000026227539,0.000051736704,0.000037293703,0.8953961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6375016,0.014764704,0.0026506523,0.008920785,0.0010587135,0.000051007264,0.00005571475,0.00008001132,0.33491683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990702,0.00036405044,0.000020026077,0.0001016724,0.00029236684,0.00015166691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995684,0.00026723157,0.000022319318,0.000038224494,0.000067515844,0.000036272322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011080211,0.0003555357,0.0002196539,0.0012283892,0.004556542,0.0036841808,0.0005099686,0.0024020188,0.0029597105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016204895,0.00017914442,0.00017966874,0.0009852392,0.018007273,0.0027604222,0.001255537,0.003520254,0.0006951831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035793942,0.000005155025,0.000036530575,0.000015271562,9.3379066e-7,0.00002661166,0.0073618493,0.000042276544,0.00005344812,0.9760031,0.010580918,0.005870279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052128703,0.000013377223,0.0004338573,0.0001972215,0.000001837798,0.00011642618,0.0028045976,0.0001232421,0.00023346327,0.33078146,0.6652797,0.000009547642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016326077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029169345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016326077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008530599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037165126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06189412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319833528","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2022.2158891","title":"Feeling Like It: A Theory of Inclination and WillSchapiro, Tamar, <i>Feeling Like It: A Theory of Inclination and Will</i> , Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, pp. viii + 173, £61 (hardback).","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03657166970285052,"score_gpt":0.24965489972518334,"score_spread":0.21308323002233281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319833528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015279995,0.26818746,0.017530978,0.2372621,0.003423219,0.00006902087,0.0001873732,0.00007464651,0.45798525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7667062,0.10571734,0.008769404,0.026548255,0.0029497228,0.0002556828,0.00016029329,0.0001434602,0.08874955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983859,0.0009412671,0.00004532224,0.00017243945,0.00026528476,0.00018975594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988795,0.0005787822,0.0001370749,0.00006522932,0.00013728344,0.000202095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00282299,0.0007144371,0.00046688592,0.0014022365,0.0029653893,0.0062746634,0.001108858,0.0034980257,0.0065474855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003460645,0.00045027005,0.00069214613,0.0019159593,0.022989973,0.010988384,0.0023083757,0.004636273,0.0016074415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017082659,0.000026239828,0.00026081616,0.00007480794,0.000008292697,0.00007474832,0.0061197914,0.000120548146,0.00004062151,0.94411117,0.03751747,0.011628473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001794732,0.000019347084,0.0012153208,0.00030664128,0.000009362869,0.00020510395,0.004122066,0.00022818283,0.000046357316,0.83860904,0.15520297,0.000017622644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069403797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075010364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069403797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004718535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031355107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034235597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320031638","doi":"10.1017/s0012217322000361","title":"The Gallows Alien: Extending the Concept &lt;<i>Person</i>&gt; to Non-Human Organisms","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sacrifice; Human life; Environmental ethics; Alien; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Theology; Humanity","score_opus":0.034972998377202434,"score_gpt":0.2560493926254647,"score_spread":0.22107639424826228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320031638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05071311,0.0064204643,0.0300896,0.056329634,0.0014543388,0.00006526421,0.00005949746,0.000063318956,0.8548049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582704,0.001792837,0.005478654,0.0064674052,0.00055216474,0.00008130042,0.000034584722,0.000077997516,0.0272446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543875,0.0031859563,0.00009662577,0.00038215582,0.0005160341,0.00038052615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759066,0.0012789449,0.000256783,0.00031228844,0.00023285211,0.00032852692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047580237,0.0004992059,0.0003692431,0.0018862276,0.0060318722,0.0067323735,0.000977559,0.0027554715,0.003985004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028740484,0.00023642348,0.00053095777,0.0010778789,0.06621525,0.007291838,0.010023781,0.004831528,0.00055243255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068440017,0.0000039540146,0.00013508913,0.000017853212,0.000001840177,0.000064335065,0.013003877,0.000043410724,0.00008367972,0.9836834,0.001277657,0.0016779709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001262324,0.000034492037,0.0009803299,0.00023481596,0.000015926104,0.00031762602,0.019984003,0.00048059862,0.00025741255,0.6777318,0.29991877,0.000031648528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005710619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052782013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067323735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042087096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017260623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030536473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320031669","doi":"10.1017/s0012217322000269","title":"Kantian Objectivism and Subject-Relative Well-Being","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Subject (documents); Objectivism; Happiness; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.02078367973298477,"score_gpt":0.21982270077676674,"score_spread":0.19903902104378196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320031669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0663032,0.0065840925,0.17372288,0.03218552,0.0007739317,0.00008148689,0.000102933955,0.00012316422,0.7201228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97903126,0.0010093554,0.009840058,0.0014698644,0.00025042408,0.00010738953,0.00003655101,0.000066939065,0.008188213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98914194,0.0077082277,0.0003191357,0.0009494298,0.0014160473,0.0004653025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418443,0.00312161,0.00064776174,0.0009312544,0.000746774,0.00036815615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011808289,0.0005501424,0.00073325133,0.0017877581,0.0033028335,0.007002297,0.000969801,0.002695324,0.0040815286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068325633,0.00033734267,0.0007232998,0.0012844726,0.04412969,0.008073073,0.0057042707,0.0053123464,0.000489427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033304573,0.0000046635487,0.000045793593,0.000014061654,0.0000038679104,0.000008952386,0.0008943871,0.00012536686,0.000036717105,0.9980299,0.00014677657,0.00068620074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000389064,0.000004404311,0.000072328294,0.000023654628,0.0000030106341,0.000014271696,0.00031268556,0.00016854887,0.00005432194,0.994762,0.0045772945,0.0000036808663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008220616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055520865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011808289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037242768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016110345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06244898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320401307","doi":"10.47925/2008.104","title":"Kantian Elements in Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Moral relativism; Universalization; Impartiality; Morality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Virtue; Moral psychology; Construal level theory; Relativism; Moral development; Adam smith; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.09286293435804027,"score_gpt":0.28338756477939336,"score_spread":0.1905246304213531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320401307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041628733,0.0055539445,0.07218661,0.07216071,0.0008016981,0.000059673264,0.00014459653,0.0001308886,0.80733323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481371,0.0010967194,0.01228983,0.0041132746,0.00039833935,0.00008722776,0.000033471748,0.00005119021,0.033792865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746966,0.0014556113,0.00006421209,0.00023677308,0.00053407473,0.00023961456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989874,0.00048099345,0.00011923699,0.00009854559,0.00020745225,0.000106366984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023408271,0.00049593835,0.00035257675,0.0012685704,0.002738361,0.0041262074,0.0008581276,0.00252468,0.0030622839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002958502,0.00031084038,0.00045139066,0.0008817851,0.018312588,0.0038323887,0.002125474,0.0041346434,0.0006625121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031345628,0.000003059989,0.000047526315,0.000008578335,0.0000019266083,0.000012181789,0.0008598919,0.00013603817,0.000027124705,0.9966911,0.0010991144,0.0011101594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043844684,0.0000039090514,0.00010656323,0.0000149681,0.0000024539745,0.000017727336,0.00023428076,0.000244215,0.00005939084,0.9787377,0.020570109,0.000004211451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022750122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023407403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004508791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004508791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015004649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03271371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321605139","doi":"10.30965/23642807-bja10068","title":"Deities and Categories","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Epistemology; Identity (music); Set (abstract data type); Hebrew Bible; sort; Aesthetics; Theology; Biblical studies; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07929607294475591,"score_gpt":0.3337586723822737,"score_spread":0.2544625994375178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321605139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027825145,0.012438583,0.028245308,0.0154360095,0.0008146646,0.00005461693,0.00025546944,0.00009418007,0.9148361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400708,0.0031905542,0.009266095,0.0020571887,0.0007393678,0.00013707195,0.0001927241,0.00007814491,0.044267964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657494,0.0020651594,0.00016486178,0.00048965163,0.00043607122,0.00026918552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973284,0.001427624,0.00023217165,0.0005084843,0.000329749,0.00017354063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030126125,0.00037002505,0.00041432757,0.002536643,0.0050753783,0.0060835714,0.0006991013,0.0016448497,0.0064717657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003143157,0.00024401981,0.00036473208,0.002101306,0.04193248,0.0069256458,0.0040790215,0.0033869524,0.0008749482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011784716,5.482393e-7,0.000016580541,0.000004469283,4.7720704e-7,0.000004503082,0.00083771907,0.000015223056,0.000015137467,0.99814177,0.00039852603,0.00056385726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004338863,0.0000045490847,0.00007566596,0.000031652766,0.0000010879803,0.000039302216,0.00081792765,0.00008583313,0.000042870564,0.9071184,0.09177503,0.000003384696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028328046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024023296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064717657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049718935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012057321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036073744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322631638","doi":"10.1017/can.2023.3","title":"Reason in Kant’s Theory of Cognition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Transcendental number; Epistemology; Dialectic; Philosophy; Transcendental philosophy; Articulation (sociology); Normative; Extant taxon; Argument (complex analysis); Categorical imperative; Transcendental idealism; Morality","score_opus":0.05402437146103098,"score_gpt":0.22072132059148758,"score_spread":0.1666969491304566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322631638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039320577,0.0133995395,0.20746371,0.045517422,0.0011146318,0.000072842646,0.00024820233,0.00024443213,0.6926186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454909,0.002027288,0.03193994,0.0024642346,0.00047987595,0.00010633784,0.00009444886,0.00007912492,0.01731792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955728,0.0025503251,0.00014116983,0.0004561625,0.0009869685,0.00029259358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971322,0.0017807096,0.00015173448,0.00040218962,0.00037727132,0.00015578851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00518957,0.0005411668,0.0007453795,0.0024444622,0.0023592948,0.0063279835,0.0012763136,0.0032067862,0.002922249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00455774,0.00038260198,0.0010062141,0.0012914255,0.03236026,0.0061209616,0.0028630118,0.004315864,0.0005891324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031146178,0.0000018856733,0.000018177745,0.000009720979,0.000002041413,0.000007868341,0.00031234286,0.00026463286,0.00001460946,0.9983394,0.0003038884,0.00072225445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034866987,0.0000019654528,0.000032980017,0.00001446145,0.0000016928179,0.000009113158,0.00007052666,0.00029094677,0.00002436548,0.99408567,0.005461688,0.000003068702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029002815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022990631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063279835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060503515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029805326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043898582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323237593","doi":"10.1353/rss.2021.0006","title":"Bertrand Russell and the Paradox of the Committed Emotivist","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivism; Objectivism; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Contradiction; Philosophy; Rigour; Object (grammar); Sociology; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.040740658703160494,"score_gpt":0.25953551230825084,"score_spread":0.21879485360509035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323237593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049414363,0.010510745,0.06010147,0.17625596,0.0011923532,0.00004883608,0.000048305294,0.00029408114,0.70213395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436096,0.0016107024,0.012575923,0.012406061,0.0005428973,0.00006596646,0.000021428657,0.00022367858,0.02894384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891082,0.0070483526,0.00023539674,0.0009806075,0.002115624,0.00051178335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901288,0.0073074764,0.0005870678,0.00072087545,0.0008258224,0.00042980607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010588063,0.00052985357,0.0007883703,0.0014737605,0.007378415,0.0092910845,0.0018104013,0.0077922037,0.0033744662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01840492,0.0006794044,0.00059568125,0.0010694385,0.032297935,0.011535177,0.004098232,0.01053249,0.00079623284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007555854,0.0000043685122,0.00002857705,0.000009882192,0.0000019046289,0.000029703417,0.001138117,0.00007476837,0.000030859163,0.99587846,0.0017678207,0.001027935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008869702,0.0000054926163,0.000047473357,0.000026885755,0.0000027468147,0.000059672555,0.000455924,0.00040930725,0.000078799174,0.9841064,0.0147891985,0.000009173337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004475821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030691614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010588063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00617756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022376466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055995703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323521515","doi":"10.7202/1097021ar","title":"QUELLE PRO-ATTITUDE POUR LE SUBJECTIVISME À PROPOS DU BIEN-ÊTRE ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03310503883976077,"score_gpt":0.2558379437891938,"score_spread":0.222732904949433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323521515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10805365,0.010190882,0.049814105,0.079320885,0.002748269,0.00010360948,0.000104466635,0.00010398595,0.7495602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93805444,0.0031607866,0.005983068,0.00632676,0.0010267358,0.00009088084,0.00007335888,0.0001352804,0.045148745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931034,0.0040456117,0.00019791244,0.00086637476,0.0011552958,0.00063132076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951023,0.0017423071,0.0005880138,0.00052905676,0.0012408108,0.0007975038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005760462,0.0006773275,0.0005260234,0.0014626997,0.005565091,0.010675426,0.0009662189,0.0031786815,0.007957559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067837993,0.00030491024,0.00060323917,0.0010943807,0.026498672,0.013326013,0.0038563213,0.007378216,0.0017542513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023107523,0.000023530469,0.0011345441,0.000075648095,0.000013967172,0.00013831024,0.03772112,0.000060547976,0.00042377412,0.95049006,0.001918341,0.007976932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024858138,0.00011062711,0.004511622,0.00054024754,0.000036757538,0.00058888504,0.059757337,0.00049238343,0.0007260305,0.6793464,0.25378627,0.00007855313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005299516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046782796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010675426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003926779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041362694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03046459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323521590","doi":"10.7202/1097017ar","title":"VIRTUE, HAPPINESS, AND EMOTION","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Virtue; Virtuous circle and vicious circle; Luck; Psychology; Social psychology; Subject (documents); Eudaimonia; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03832184580603809,"score_gpt":0.2472207772864595,"score_spread":0.2088989314804214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323521590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13649261,0.106419615,0.010955958,0.09290342,0.0009580507,0.000047689577,0.00017124678,0.000076508775,0.6519749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97014725,0.0126876915,0.001843922,0.0042278897,0.00040115684,0.000043801327,0.00004039734,0.000013365837,0.010594531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992017,0.0005414351,0.00001766345,0.00008243558,0.00008609024,0.00007064308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951494,0.0002615423,0.00006763836,0.000033515742,0.000048093174,0.00007416268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011884063,0.0002338411,0.0002441476,0.00053266884,0.0012230928,0.0036186634,0.0002370259,0.001399779,0.0034551583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012961574,0.00009909866,0.0002001058,0.00055159786,0.010302708,0.0025584556,0.0016992715,0.0017022331,0.00032430535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044522312,0.000031331634,0.002083112,0.00016458111,0.000019754245,0.00010253202,0.010589651,0.00032479837,0.00034830626,0.9525481,0.008015989,0.025727294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017916602,0.00004258958,0.011002429,0.0002667399,0.0000135771315,0.00017523252,0.0077388324,0.0005172742,0.000118906486,0.89446783,0.08561452,0.000024218054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001345146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010108593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036186634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011962211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055548386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011558652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366090632","doi":"10.3390/philosophies8020039","title":"Practical Wisdom, Extended Rationality, and Human Agency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Virtue; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Blueprint; Action (physics); Set (abstract data type); Appeal; Sociology; Practical wisdom; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.18761459439661024,"score_gpt":0.36653417982434416,"score_spread":0.17891958542773392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366090632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07695747,0.013999133,0.1468944,0.039541945,0.00033094242,0.000071225004,0.00009084657,0.00014448044,0.72196954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96202326,0.0023934548,0.020999266,0.0012386412,0.00016450812,0.00007899625,0.0000433297,0.000029734403,0.0130289085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99391127,0.0036710345,0.00020835763,0.0008674575,0.0008665025,0.00047541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445266,0.0031657056,0.0005492697,0.0010122729,0.00048492002,0.00033527965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063855397,0.00041868634,0.00066109706,0.0012099124,0.0026931253,0.00758508,0.0010500087,0.002952026,0.0029121214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060099186,0.00027852578,0.0007385672,0.0010736759,0.032134466,0.007143797,0.004039144,0.0035063731,0.0005503894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000349325,0.0000035134299,0.00006964308,0.000013097247,0.00000401461,0.000016739401,0.00053657906,0.00036407533,0.000023758565,0.9966851,0.00024030956,0.002039612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004013879,0.0000038059188,0.00008894473,0.000020056175,0.0000020627165,0.000020024334,0.0002098165,0.0003183739,0.000022770555,0.99294996,0.006356236,0.000004006372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029450548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025554697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00758508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034290485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035058833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033770323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366679195","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-27148-9_3","title":"Drives in the Secondary Literature","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Stern; Epistemology; Action (physics); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.05409028280998698,"score_gpt":0.23688933232910597,"score_spread":0.182799049519119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366679195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038470372,0.0059445645,0.0020462412,0.0053045712,0.00032881074,0.000021285663,0.00006741726,0.000020087315,0.98241997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44717798,0.00892446,0.0015274652,0.002674748,0.001625234,0.00015276713,0.00020143368,0.0001624429,0.5375535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981067,0.0010197385,0.000053594213,0.00018764466,0.0004679278,0.00016435134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997686,0.0012217399,0.000121827274,0.00028192933,0.00045490346,0.00023362043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018972902,0.0005571693,0.00059468084,0.002701622,0.0056459303,0.009589827,0.00095220405,0.0019103341,0.02896598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00511216,0.00028420833,0.00024309884,0.003276385,0.01350696,0.005689855,0.0027782435,0.0027016401,0.004257042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002701682,0.0000067775723,0.000041911502,0.000022831984,8.610892e-7,0.000014167672,0.0015543103,0.00002823668,0.000013072999,0.98863643,0.0067093847,0.0029693334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006965506,0.000010935416,0.00026474564,0.00024391348,0.000002150307,0.00008058931,0.0032077609,0.00014980556,0.000093050105,0.6613519,0.3345834,0.000004830095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003813641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005861875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02896598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049407696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003765614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09690088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366779002","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.0001","title":"Spirit and Politics: Some Thoughts on Margaret Watkins’s The Philosophical Progress of Hume’s “Essays”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Virtue; Meaning (existential); Object (grammar); Reductio ad absurdum; Criticism; Metaphysics; Literature; Law","score_opus":0.13166844186641574,"score_gpt":0.33016990103785077,"score_spread":0.19850145917143502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366779002","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048218244,0.16580676,0.0036488583,0.7038389,0.034050584,0.00004213086,0.00005098039,0.000080096856,0.087659895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.287771,0.086733475,0.0063447924,0.3652331,0.09096066,0.00031060708,0.00008886236,0.0005502417,0.16200732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933561,0.004796973,0.00010755621,0.00040126962,0.00090111,0.00043704992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931253,0.0047740545,0.00035872142,0.000180439,0.00089624483,0.0006652236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066397763,0.00092159957,0.0006249901,0.0030177238,0.008592327,0.00948019,0.0015136617,0.0061297435,0.004957689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012736515,0.00036983832,0.0004983256,0.002130637,0.026207512,0.01137323,0.004994305,0.0084724035,0.0016632417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029026638,0.000036317222,0.00020900356,0.00018349075,0.000009933919,0.00026384104,0.046124227,0.000111849986,0.00022192961,0.56685317,0.37418035,0.011776893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051847605,0.000016753427,0.00017797122,0.00044191166,0.0000027644726,0.00011362784,0.0087831225,0.0000707032,0.00008484319,0.07392395,0.9163578,0.000021498125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057109683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008605515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00948019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006579429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019369473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0477373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366779014","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.0011","title":"Hume and Induction: Merely Cognitive Psychology?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.3583573035622246,"score_gpt":0.4149545627631868,"score_spread":0.0565972592009622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366779014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022456588,0.028045168,0.13852902,0.2947864,0.0023333014,0.00008464482,0.0001467172,0.00038628932,0.51323193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8484258,0.0083289845,0.04263531,0.048972867,0.0041232803,0.0002853073,0.00012291867,0.00033564688,0.04676985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940076,0.0036168224,0.00013769322,0.0006376033,0.0011089034,0.0004914428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98818934,0.008785625,0.0006331652,0.0011662106,0.00088194094,0.00034362194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007228321,0.00051686657,0.0007953262,0.0019502726,0.0032049592,0.0047609783,0.0012570112,0.003998056,0.0050378507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011624603,0.0004062771,0.0006975005,0.0013668524,0.054036327,0.012273738,0.0035460044,0.005860414,0.0015282058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011343015,0.000008524482,0.00012028907,0.000037678918,0.000005325584,0.000023812456,0.0010965968,0.0000977244,0.000050193514,0.9902811,0.0033140976,0.0049533104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008724065,0.0000048409474,0.00010790987,0.00004255764,0.0000022441543,0.000022542261,0.00023861985,0.00015106033,0.00012781881,0.96687204,0.032416128,0.0000054856528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033456406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023929998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007228321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00496099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030908333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03822744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366779016","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.0008","title":"Not Circular: Hume’s “Of the Standard of Taste”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taste; Epistemology; Verdict; Philosophy; Scholarship; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.16794580472403534,"score_gpt":0.3187877550481442,"score_spread":0.15084195032410888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366779016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037179865,0.008444946,0.056309093,0.55809045,0.00393158,0.000088534136,0.00013452035,0.00014458681,0.3356765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82134193,0.0013444638,0.01656588,0.11610044,0.0018289214,0.00019626711,0.000048900103,0.00012615994,0.0424471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865471,0.008321843,0.00036696214,0.0016889188,0.0022147328,0.00086048356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98959386,0.0055889282,0.0007412813,0.0013131634,0.002150143,0.000612697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012145013,0.00045573927,0.0008401025,0.0015063738,0.007907838,0.008015951,0.0014403845,0.008668238,0.0027080625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024741694,0.00034475853,0.0007031842,0.00086230907,0.051122762,0.011124326,0.0042562983,0.009481583,0.0008593447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010566539,0.0000070446886,0.0001389382,0.000017752856,0.000004585566,0.00003752149,0.0044441894,0.000057599405,0.00004591743,0.97964394,0.012751559,0.0028404722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011249484,0.000013450305,0.00025412624,0.00009969252,0.000004593305,0.00007480859,0.0020517532,0.00025072668,0.00023658905,0.9211414,0.0758368,0.000024925317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006019831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005383424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012145013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041646045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049513206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06422973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366779092","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.0002","title":"Comments on Margaret Watkins, The Philosophical Progress of Hume’s “Essays”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patience; Demise; Feeling; Philosophy; Reading (process); Superstition; Psychoanalysis; BLISS; The Imaginary; Epistemology; Literature; Psychology; Theology; Law; Art","score_opus":0.20143410378152135,"score_gpt":0.35195274375914354,"score_spread":0.1505186399776222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366779092","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040615912,0.006970895,0.0002292043,0.8999111,0.08088557,0.000023087523,0.000116529896,0.000079745485,0.01137773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010097189,0.0039486177,0.00035517858,0.8341224,0.06340737,0.00010349522,0.00009158524,0.00028884545,0.08758533],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919391,0.0029247846,0.00049223134,0.00094748964,0.003013963,0.00068236433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684768,0.0123445615,0.0024754265,0.0006809692,0.013395678,0.0026266177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007371877,0.0012896133,0.0011620567,0.002394626,0.0094072465,0.005020085,0.0021889587,0.011201621,0.023620619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066552445,0.0005885516,0.00080846256,0.0019362496,0.0062858914,0.0067151035,0.0038642061,0.015801325,0.0136403255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055405176,0.0000013133366,0.000021747268,0.000020407022,0.0000011598161,0.000050742987,0.0005633724,0.000004154744,0.000025762447,0.0010265636,0.997273,0.0010061903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023111445,0.000003659422,0.00016503182,0.0001589369,0.000002018748,0.000099094425,0.001472335,0.000012499959,0.00006232023,0.00063898193,0.99736977,0.000012984508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020576593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03382378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023620619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009089249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005118646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07901877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809769","doi":"10.1353/rss.2005.0004","title":"Reply to Pincock","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophical analysis; Sociology","score_opus":0.05991899911833646,"score_gpt":0.29141679311351404,"score_spread":0.2314977939951776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809769","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001196811,0.0035979033,0.00015087985,0.9612852,0.029831758,0.0000104447,0.00008089622,0.00010858455,0.00481458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039625503,0.0035116677,0.0003050937,0.94807583,0.017564844,0.000058621637,0.000044552184,0.00012924348,0.026347518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962597,0.00067466474,0.0002903294,0.000921937,0.00150051,0.00035287233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858123,0.0068432805,0.0008849999,0.00053648587,0.0047181253,0.0012048171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004390906,0.0014178272,0.0017631945,0.0019110652,0.0032048847,0.005932638,0.0025141023,0.022628726,0.040560458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04213797,0.0010933726,0.0011794413,0.001934635,0.003981035,0.0073491237,0.003667906,0.031030744,0.026450012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004932944,0.0000016252858,0.000017995637,0.00002329928,0.0000016759826,0.00003624418,0.000047194346,0.00000732375,0.000012338767,0.0011446276,0.9966749,0.0020279344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010711707,0.000012625654,0.00022226555,0.00023792776,0.000008356778,0.00037718518,0.00047057276,0.00004892711,0.00014827529,0.0039356938,0.9944865,0.00004090205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066343816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067789042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040560458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003957476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049773008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13568825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809835","doi":"10.1353/rss.2008.0009","title":"Russell’s Defence of Idleness","year":2008,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civilization; Argument (complex analysis); Overwork; Work (physics); Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.08128611517960466,"score_gpt":0.28323239251184795,"score_spread":0.2019462773322433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011945773,0.008833413,0.06982412,0.06869625,0.0010532725,0.000040799754,0.00008102633,0.00017806399,0.8393472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8432913,0.0043523796,0.024981365,0.023323208,0.0022473442,0.00021482832,0.00007484874,0.00034267287,0.101172015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929462,0.0031731466,0.0002929026,0.0010845746,0.0018145306,0.00068862416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946819,0.0029521266,0.00036958177,0.00073641347,0.0008325398,0.00042748693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064065675,0.00088891166,0.00075785245,0.0019660888,0.0051770406,0.005050177,0.002118386,0.0070304554,0.004070969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007710077,0.0005302853,0.00097393757,0.001253027,0.048586536,0.0077297282,0.005228425,0.0092367735,0.0013330951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026539687,0.0000016408017,0.000015131747,0.000007395479,0.000001219724,0.000011596415,0.0004926954,0.000033743454,0.000022823906,0.9973545,0.0013725588,0.0006840264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006445202,0.000008686874,0.00006859518,0.000035285,0.0000025336797,0.000059139737,0.00023345381,0.00014307826,0.00007190318,0.9500758,0.049288146,0.0000068896143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031901787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023481827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070304554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039199926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024848958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033881545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809913","doi":"10.1353/rss.2012.0008","title":"Was Russell’s 1922 Error Theory a Mistake?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Fallacy; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Value theory; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.09165941007058183,"score_gpt":0.298590488447556,"score_spread":0.20693107837697416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040359303,0.0223617,0.18710719,0.44461513,0.009052246,0.00009554846,0.00020999253,0.00048897514,0.2957099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8012591,0.007935615,0.05287994,0.06642493,0.006673523,0.00024121368,0.00010903129,0.0006006102,0.063876115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858064,0.005749496,0.0006081168,0.0019211,0.005148365,0.00076659466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851437,0.010444962,0.0006835982,0.0011684758,0.0020669021,0.00049234304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015934205,0.0007960439,0.0010426879,0.002812463,0.0033860898,0.0053830817,0.0026689959,0.0068266345,0.002591704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028933734,0.0006213638,0.0010929941,0.0014692413,0.037305005,0.013221509,0.0039821453,0.010753078,0.001100568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013805716,0.0000055400333,0.000094379684,0.000020646357,0.0000045334828,0.000035390018,0.0011160226,0.00014074834,0.0000259997,0.9865133,0.006394626,0.0056349346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014830987,0.000016798725,0.00012787517,0.00010286934,0.0000055752257,0.000097901604,0.00036517243,0.00054363254,0.00016747208,0.9443082,0.05422696,0.000022719743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037694103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024228632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015934205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007903971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036845868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08426911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367602757","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad026","title":"Gareth Matthews on development and deficit","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Philosophy of Education","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Wonder; Curiosity; Relevance (law); Aptitude; Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Moral development; Social psychology; Philosophy; Developmental psychology; Law","score_opus":0.08031163195919082,"score_gpt":0.2924168924434868,"score_spread":0.21210526048429595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367602757","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03568402,0.047545988,0.0044578505,0.5121564,0.0021510408,0.000025638152,0.00008590077,0.00009005801,0.3978031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89698184,0.017445555,0.002464177,0.03178746,0.0020952146,0.00006754462,0.000028855007,0.00006906606,0.049060207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865437,0.00062759785,0.000044435026,0.00020545059,0.0003005393,0.0001675619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738425,0.0015350984,0.00025159697,0.00015926755,0.00041145607,0.00025826492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016808648,0.0002325704,0.00029162684,0.0010145269,0.0020653747,0.0023571386,0.0006430985,0.0022641497,0.004257036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004467599,0.00015580843,0.00014225567,0.00042376335,0.021439979,0.0038470805,0.0032231044,0.0040665134,0.00044431133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007153108,0.000009908092,0.0003113405,0.000043014534,0.0000014856971,0.00013972403,0.004617322,0.00007168108,0.000073831114,0.9652703,0.021703344,0.007750999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009837223,0.000020009935,0.0009167163,0.00042973147,0.000004550202,0.0003744751,0.0029752525,0.0002223061,0.00030159476,0.68526036,0.309474,0.00001108874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005703127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040242076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005703127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043810136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023652732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03178662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376636452","doi":"10.1017/9781009070652","title":"Kant on Freedom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Dilemma; Subject (documents); Element (criminal law); Causality (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Power (physics); Practical reason; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.05975326102829691,"score_gpt":0.2096272652442962,"score_spread":0.14987400421599928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376636452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035108496,0.023254724,0.009089701,0.027014699,0.001014349,0.000030503094,0.000118392854,0.000055632037,0.9359111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4883184,0.021058137,0.010421149,0.019561373,0.0017928696,0.00026974894,0.00022770165,0.0002526769,0.458098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973254,0.0014144251,0.000061082705,0.00026093575,0.000592689,0.0003453852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989925,0.0005411242,0.000051897863,0.00015767712,0.0001609713,0.00009576223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021464098,0.00083580555,0.0005140513,0.0013747207,0.0044055786,0.0055066855,0.0006585597,0.0037806306,0.00546907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032487062,0.00037644958,0.00046272285,0.0010760004,0.025470084,0.0063413912,0.0033456406,0.006255474,0.0023384786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045847614,0.000002821962,0.000019577632,0.000010752466,0.0000011094636,0.000012976419,0.0005026028,0.000120228375,0.000018857869,0.9895738,0.0076281056,0.002104555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047189315,0.0000036861857,0.000061701125,0.00007165986,0.0000014850038,0.000026244094,0.00024121607,0.00011822289,0.000054506694,0.86868036,0.13073021,0.000006066126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055753603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048226197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006067443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006067443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004029537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04402256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239559","doi":"10.1515/9780773564046-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.026135695086241476,"score_gpt":0.21579196989088933,"score_spread":0.18965627480464786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007674966,0.0019482392,0.00026430257,0.0060389964,0.0021683043,0.000027072763,0.00094512204,0.0003361126,0.9875043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035423487,0.0010815681,0.00015671829,0.0018682565,0.0003902301,0.000012260676,0.000497254,0.00014152742,0.9923098],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919134,0.0000830324,0.00003821656,0.00023262308,0.00032144287,0.00013333333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879694,0.00023439793,0.00007182998,0.00014973509,0.00036742367,0.00037966814],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055310223,0.00084159797,0.0005752019,0.0011834792,0.0022305155,0.006694782,0.0010022427,0.0048043095,0.8717212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025396913,0.00023436229,0.00043402644,0.0011259909,0.0013775601,0.0028921375,0.002762995,0.001731735,0.7803379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006785326,0.000039949253,0.00060667703,0.00033847423,0.0000075095654,0.00028595718,0.00022463003,0.0000614858,0.0006733678,0.021576477,0.8138682,0.1622495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040716536,0.0000051769734,0.0003698633,0.00007987782,0.000001194457,0.00008927295,0.000113239155,0.000022044784,0.00007764805,0.0008416592,0.99839395,0.0000019672282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023201539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003821144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8717212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001636747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016515668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18297416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378552598","doi":"10.21608/mkwn.2022.299356","title":"النزعة الأخلاقية في فلسفة توماس ريد (1710-1796) \"دراسة تحليلية نقدية\"","year":2022,"lang":"ar","type":"article","venue":"Maǧallaẗ Kulliyyaẗ Al-Adāb bi Al-Wadī Al-Ǧadīd/Maǧallaẗ Kulliyyaẗ Al-Adāb bi Al-Wadī Al-Ǧadīd","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.041304766460200794,"score_gpt":0.26256631778482364,"score_spread":0.22126155132462286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378552598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0144988205,0.0042037615,0.0014926564,0.007038223,0.0037634578,0.000115086485,0.0029702503,0.00021332849,0.96570456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039474215,0.0026078706,0.0011474626,0.0018385088,0.00045658083,0.00014706659,0.0016582335,0.00038420802,0.9522858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992291,0.00012807663,0.000045823832,0.00012138304,0.00030698502,0.00016861867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995958,0.00006834309,0.000036774472,0.000032881653,0.000182529,0.00008354555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074209896,0.0006250434,0.0002658019,0.0011164141,0.0035833353,0.004663489,0.00047645252,0.0014528857,0.14739124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018106677,0.0003504959,0.0003067916,0.0019930883,0.0017773388,0.0020561845,0.0021258642,0.0044420804,0.10027503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046660705,0.00009146824,0.0046436903,0.0006532021,0.000025273539,0.0013566724,0.019341702,0.0002894452,0.003202333,0.30376506,0.49865115,0.16751337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067350684,0.0000120995255,0.0034553718,0.000105726205,0.0000021102862,0.00012967564,0.0019455085,0.000013054913,0.0005938994,0.0017479522,0.99197537,0.000012497853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027660074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056553006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14739124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004618812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004014621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4930728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378553452","doi":"10.1163/9789004494756_003","title":"Preface","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.06224187177592986,"score_gpt":0.22132838852591105,"score_spread":0.1590865167499812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378553452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013300793,0.01324683,0.003244754,0.047308907,0.1337748,0.00042503735,0.00984088,0.0010615133,0.7897671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077002645,0.0077615012,0.0015488726,0.011293759,0.020497153,0.00032704248,0.009135125,0.000839034,0.9408972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987668,0.00022416383,0.000085160355,0.0002564816,0.0005124559,0.0001550095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99613273,0.0006188128,0.00017962459,0.00037355113,0.0019744288,0.00072081265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016380606,0.0010072083,0.0007673564,0.0022863704,0.0038476926,0.004857839,0.0016139101,0.0015854797,0.46018988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010412903,0.0003942626,0.0005908385,0.0024296874,0.0010510344,0.0040418054,0.0030812817,0.0040682517,0.30865481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018083347,0.0000110389365,0.00008093912,0.00007125142,0.0000013298715,0.000033514258,0.00013325007,0.00002071013,0.000054541084,0.004828802,0.974176,0.0205706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002027083,0.0000073190513,0.0002051758,0.00009471652,6.422453e-7,0.000030755877,0.00012793444,0.0000081820945,0.000027279084,0.0011562429,0.9983369,0.0000027902843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005290887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061687874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46018988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00310258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031172242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379033396","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-27345-2_10","title":"Systems of Knowledge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave handbooks in German idealism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unification; Hegelianism; Idealism; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); German idealism; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.07537443840552491,"score_gpt":0.28223994568236044,"score_spread":0.20686550727683553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379033396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043502697,0.00480558,0.047838826,0.0092941895,0.0004134658,0.00009119926,0.0004140103,0.00021609223,0.9325763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5719895,0.0052298177,0.040841006,0.0019296645,0.0007229957,0.0007330924,0.001331497,0.0003379686,0.3768845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975567,0.0010552658,0.0001319291,0.00052500673,0.00051158614,0.000219607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819404,0.00059598935,0.0001107663,0.00072805607,0.0002675206,0.00010368197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022424958,0.0007088323,0.00073670404,0.002363114,0.0029589885,0.0143312635,0.00165481,0.0035135113,0.036753982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004298453,0.0005983978,0.0005652522,0.0030400758,0.016277835,0.014692496,0.0050396817,0.002230666,0.007072028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.832442e-7,0.000001939733,0.00001898101,0.000009284837,0.0000016146034,0.0000060879834,0.0002916949,0.00007036526,0.00001356103,0.99521625,0.0018334736,0.0025360023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003311714,0.0000031074526,0.000051616033,0.000036053872,0.0000026832483,0.000024633639,0.00033717044,0.0002936152,0.000041816806,0.9225613,0.07664156,0.0000032189275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004756676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003444429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036753982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060367803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035499595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12295431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379616262","doi":"10.1353/hms.2007.a383363","title":"Hume's Reasons","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Epistemology; Sympathy; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Action (physics); Prudence; Morality; Reading (process); Virtue; Humanity; Infallibility; Function (biology); Representation (politics); Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.17393156714174499,"score_gpt":0.3486896907835262,"score_spread":0.1747581236417812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379616262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068311305,0.0027418102,0.036778755,0.043022145,0.0008326014,0.000068341535,0.00014489403,0.0001258747,0.9094544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7804656,0.0019093709,0.0208316,0.016172096,0.0009244603,0.00020483961,0.00014446546,0.00015576124,0.17919193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945943,0.002571872,0.00018548462,0.0007770503,0.0013560894,0.0005152817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953561,0.0022499217,0.00031115895,0.00062277296,0.0011337305,0.00032636337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005024763,0.00059887336,0.00045897023,0.0018907028,0.0047020107,0.005191003,0.00092874846,0.004431135,0.009424556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010662496,0.00032915897,0.00057045923,0.0007787436,0.022037243,0.005133217,0.0033054529,0.0040643974,0.002417656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005106152,0.0000042199927,0.000087243745,0.000014013658,0.0000030798458,0.000029328809,0.0010902438,0.0000715138,0.00003099879,0.9880754,0.0069940323,0.0035947622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006602819,0.000008173277,0.00018882427,0.00005596314,0.0000046616983,0.00008398483,0.0005762653,0.00022240813,0.00020493651,0.8085861,0.1900509,0.000011196567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026414795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035632218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009424556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003454855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035379434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031528294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380232188","doi":"10.1515/9780773584594-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Government of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Front (military); Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.026620146086020053,"score_gpt":0.2183477057367787,"score_spread":0.19172755965075863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380232188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035955894,0.0011016431,0.00022395243,0.0032455712,0.0018926811,0.000020932142,0.0007785676,0.00028338277,0.99209374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018890167,0.00078281586,0.00013140729,0.001026198,0.00035868282,0.000011229655,0.00038619436,0.00012668833,0.9952878],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992293,0.000070982365,0.000033530174,0.0002187055,0.00033966484,0.00010775708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989189,0.00019120458,0.000064131025,0.00015717534,0.00032488912,0.0003437094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047244513,0.0008737576,0.00077087805,0.0011679027,0.0023089095,0.008848079,0.0012692962,0.0042522503,0.9080465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025757833,0.00029152955,0.00047510513,0.0013158765,0.0014097965,0.0032222471,0.0026319607,0.0022032724,0.86346996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005014275,0.000032361226,0.00036174982,0.0002729766,0.000006406609,0.00014874256,0.0001676316,0.000047272115,0.0005321228,0.017454218,0.8403773,0.14054912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034245877,0.000004872903,0.00023007739,0.00008527091,9.127423e-7,0.000043543358,0.00008118957,0.000024419556,0.000059283942,0.0010768266,0.9983882,0.0000019692666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021312293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041738143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091953516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017129928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018593408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13116044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380234675","doi":"10.1515/9780773583238-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; McGill University; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.03196163078361899,"score_gpt":0.2125797692251625,"score_spread":0.1806181384415435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380234675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036847306,0.0009500603,0.00035108713,0.0025424869,0.003068491,0.000030443645,0.0009552343,0.0004915549,0.9912422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009761224,0.00054703414,0.00017100036,0.0008741531,0.00033059623,0.000011640871,0.0004766721,0.00015188215,0.996461],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993585,0.000041469386,0.000027513059,0.00017706727,0.00031506797,0.00008035692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991755,0.00013541008,0.000043961634,0.00013255377,0.00025867077,0.00025390869],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041816736,0.00084971794,0.00073253934,0.0012044905,0.0018400169,0.0073937587,0.0011277506,0.0035285535,0.8994263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002003566,0.00029436266,0.00055137684,0.0011148661,0.00088689855,0.0028306905,0.0023179462,0.0018776889,0.87414515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004632065,0.00003899723,0.0002588345,0.00021965826,0.0000043078835,0.00011924279,0.00009994589,0.000048106864,0.0007016654,0.009264302,0.82810277,0.16109589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034078316,0.000006410168,0.00018282085,0.00007177668,8.9499764e-7,0.00004928742,0.00005895659,0.000023907623,0.000086088825,0.00082151033,0.9986928,0.000002125138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013691839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029643646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10057372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001160728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001243783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14345622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380591050","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzad017","title":"<i>The Architectonic of Reason: Purposiveness and Systematic Unity in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason</i>, by Lea Ypi","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.023422862126735094,"score_gpt":0.2538747081067476,"score_spread":0.23045184598001253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380591050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00719538,0.17149168,0.026041407,0.4421118,0.0060170987,0.000041344087,0.00021690909,0.00022057004,0.3466638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6005975,0.07400812,0.022660485,0.055953503,0.011815563,0.000344131,0.0002685501,0.00059541647,0.23375675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970907,0.0019211645,0.00009012602,0.00020830517,0.0005335247,0.00015611338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971052,0.0020834196,0.00016431189,0.00020104344,0.00034584707,0.00010020697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032939562,0.00063049636,0.00049726636,0.0015856072,0.0028941487,0.007212205,0.0008362935,0.0032916416,0.0062671998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048232353,0.00038977552,0.0005709684,0.002442577,0.027421396,0.010004574,0.0036686028,0.0073130485,0.001843942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017001837,0.000006229363,0.000101281286,0.000093093695,0.0000082911,0.000035647325,0.0027264755,0.00014945467,0.00008634295,0.8995132,0.08902087,0.008242109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082801325,0.0000069170424,0.0003461536,0.00023701631,0.0000043665245,0.00006368819,0.0013958674,0.00026967571,0.00019879788,0.81857014,0.17888245,0.0000164928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004291646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004560774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007212205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005330969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033848656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038679063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382133180","doi":"10.36311/2318-0501.2023.v11n1.p167","title":"Friendship, love, and family","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Estudos Kantianos [EK]","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Conversation; Personhood; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Philosophy of love; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05361234741187657,"score_gpt":0.25786048826814983,"score_spread":0.20424814085627327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382133180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034554213,0.065327846,0.0060823723,0.19355538,0.012049841,0.00005883238,0.00045532844,0.00031101794,0.6876052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53403485,0.02203692,0.0023591048,0.013768183,0.0027236266,0.00008719461,0.0002266922,0.00035284518,0.42441058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984829,0.00095512834,0.000023453493,0.00012812509,0.00024036586,0.00017014674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883324,0.00044007454,0.00011533406,0.000111043955,0.00018990925,0.00031031072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014054566,0.00046679223,0.00045511586,0.0008033648,0.006096915,0.004289216,0.00055936375,0.0009729378,0.013077935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002811543,0.0002581233,0.00025344375,0.00066175486,0.00547319,0.005740231,0.0025610025,0.0042781862,0.0033884563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059381397,0.000033194232,0.0017917912,0.00014155963,0.000028527504,0.00041339285,0.104865104,0.00023210753,0.0002942637,0.4182557,0.41470435,0.059180636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032768037,0.000015920119,0.0012411912,0.00016520877,0.0000041419044,0.00031351205,0.023966592,0.00007423293,0.00016473835,0.019448854,0.95458263,0.000019655574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047708144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00946446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013077935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001956896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001128424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043750107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384203592","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2023.16","title":"The Sociality of Madness: Hegel on Spirit's Pathology and the Sanity of Ethicality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Sociality; Subjectivity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Soul; Politics; Objectivity (philosophy); Feeling; Dialectic; Psychoanalysis; Phenomenology (philosophy); Aesthetics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.05220768926701285,"score_gpt":0.27327932196705157,"score_spread":0.2210716327000387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384203592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24401896,0.022100879,0.03589912,0.17505105,0.001816156,0.00009449935,0.000058324116,0.00020748985,0.5207535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990598,0.0017339535,0.0014189043,0.002440416,0.0002498441,0.000029113718,0.0000055398896,0.000024765133,0.0034993133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945405,0.004230195,0.000082984014,0.00022353481,0.0005529955,0.0003698635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99602735,0.0027881188,0.0003666897,0.00020128593,0.00032727784,0.00028936507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051619685,0.00050307583,0.00047600403,0.0019623814,0.0057037245,0.0062045665,0.0006501919,0.0022152616,0.0013934273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045096898,0.0002026731,0.0003159898,0.0009803262,0.107538566,0.00586195,0.006559683,0.005339897,0.0002489651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005912868,0.000007819126,0.000096988224,0.00001629307,0.000002749841,0.00008487812,0.03447535,0.00010678203,0.00008848877,0.9627185,0.0010966115,0.0012996573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010417891,0.000025230793,0.00017302949,0.00012280363,0.000005111336,0.00015892593,0.025983626,0.00034863866,0.00020291105,0.9358211,0.037130617,0.000017497121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023297311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016442334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062045665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054815123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003590795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03977132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384694187","doi":"10.1017/s0008423923000392","title":"James Tully: To Think and Act Differently Alexander Livingston, ed., New York: Routledge, 2022, pp. 324","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law and economics; Economic history; Political science; Sociology; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.050989067285668446,"score_gpt":0.26864075676433696,"score_spread":0.21765168947866853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384694187","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050459756,0.7679999,0.0061974027,0.14836411,0.0046358095,0.000031753672,0.0002569406,0.00018968339,0.07181974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024056137,0.7909866,0.01232717,0.029498363,0.0053755357,0.0003036661,0.00037073513,0.0006742313,0.13640764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995271,0.0024510762,0.00027993837,0.00038076242,0.001348185,0.00026912245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915006,0.0060484456,0.00036920098,0.00029541372,0.0012690036,0.00051732233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007167415,0.0013136137,0.0010378126,0.002967114,0.00407524,0.008483923,0.001631527,0.0044853366,0.018059418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014967242,0.0016259234,0.0007285946,0.0033386853,0.009211189,0.015583829,0.0022990566,0.007115767,0.011735285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041516087,0.00002010618,0.00018469455,0.00056128425,0.000015390986,0.000065075226,0.004181759,0.00021198105,0.000102322054,0.11074238,0.7940434,0.089830086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012663466,0.000005125479,0.0004958959,0.0013369898,0.000008789823,0.000064738,0.0016617889,0.00012922034,0.00009978929,0.09015136,0.90600485,0.000028902965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065799676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091282986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065799676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008013085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015440926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13083339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385522770","doi":"10.1515/9780773584587-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Government of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Front (military); Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.026620146086020053,"score_gpt":0.2183477057367787,"score_spread":0.19172755965075863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385522770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035955894,0.0011016431,0.00022395243,0.0032455712,0.0018926811,0.000020932142,0.0007785676,0.00028338277,0.99209374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018890167,0.00078281586,0.00013140729,0.001026198,0.00035868282,0.000011229655,0.00038619436,0.00012668833,0.9952878],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992293,0.000070982365,0.000033530174,0.0002187055,0.00033966484,0.00010775708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989189,0.00019120458,0.000064131025,0.00015717534,0.00032488912,0.0003437094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047244513,0.0008737576,0.00077087805,0.0011679027,0.0023089095,0.008848079,0.0012692962,0.0042522503,0.9080465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025757833,0.00029152955,0.00047510513,0.0013158765,0.0014097965,0.0032222471,0.0026319607,0.0022032724,0.86346996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005014275,0.000032361226,0.00036174982,0.0002729766,0.000006406609,0.00014874256,0.0001676316,0.000047272115,0.0005321228,0.017454218,0.8403773,0.14054912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034245877,0.000004872903,0.00023007739,0.00008527091,9.127423e-7,0.000043543358,0.00008118957,0.000024419556,0.000059283942,0.0010768266,0.9983882,0.0000019692666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021312293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041738143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091953516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017129928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018593408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13116044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385523123","doi":"10.1515/9780773594791-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; McGill University; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.03646187804284432,"score_gpt":0.21423118235400002,"score_spread":0.1777693043111557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385523123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030261517,0.00082535896,0.00033648335,0.0026224614,0.0029370761,0.000027050155,0.0010699886,0.0004982828,0.99138063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009465946,0.00055250747,0.00017543651,0.0009002134,0.00033388374,0.000012385071,0.0005463729,0.0001802037,0.99635243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926585,0.00004755798,0.000029347662,0.0001882654,0.00037625027,0.00009269033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908113,0.00015267907,0.000050559494,0.00015211053,0.00028201813,0.00028147726],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004544721,0.0008515648,0.00073917134,0.0012688169,0.0018888015,0.008178637,0.0011456176,0.003557051,0.90024394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023759832,0.00030391826,0.00054557034,0.0012099302,0.0009926737,0.003036172,0.0026088583,0.0020534662,0.8721309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003921915,0.000031964984,0.00021313435,0.0002043311,0.000003792482,0.00009336812,0.00009910978,0.00004546495,0.00059578405,0.009116195,0.85156286,0.13799468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028161805,0.000005211052,0.00015127228,0.00007237097,7.426673e-7,0.000039229013,0.00005699297,0.000020135078,0.000074259726,0.00083540083,0.99873954,0.0000019303911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015271977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034179692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09975606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013697299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014883463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14228994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386657679","doi":"10.3998/ergo.1120","title":"Everywhere Chimerical","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Harvard University; Northwestern University","keywords":"Obligation; Moral obligation; Categorical imperative; Epistemology; Reverence; Duty; Law and economics; Mainstream; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Morality; Political science","score_opus":0.19153191102449832,"score_gpt":0.40081003857070663,"score_spread":0.2092781275462083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386657679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005280131,0.00399987,0.030822221,0.032905955,0.005130048,0.00003318571,0.0002017388,0.0005183891,0.9211084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38574454,0.0035167325,0.0152572,0.017732104,0.0027623056,0.00014992013,0.00041974688,0.0021619303,0.5722556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967294,0.0014789478,0.00007191423,0.00070918136,0.000616491,0.00039412003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980413,0.0004420318,0.0001544495,0.0008032792,0.00034353026,0.00021549693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025547661,0.0008545748,0.00049639493,0.0011211194,0.008707046,0.010043547,0.0017019244,0.0031381424,0.04448009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072568185,0.0003370789,0.0008039346,0.00097640615,0.021681705,0.011452024,0.008782001,0.0074843806,0.014051514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010894894,0.0000043591067,0.000081796774,0.000020362595,0.0000036942802,0.000073789415,0.0043775104,0.00004863049,0.00010163844,0.9641787,0.02443487,0.0066637914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002835891,0.0000090393,0.00007982903,0.000078133075,0.000005281122,0.00022076278,0.0020531113,0.00015410637,0.00019563067,0.17735136,0.8198388,0.000011054753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036449442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005135013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04448009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039507137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021925608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14880073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386763843","doi":"10.1086/725812","title":":<i>The Roots of Normativity</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Permission; Reuse; Library science; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Biology","score_opus":0.12340072441999769,"score_gpt":0.3137599496110649,"score_spread":0.1903592251910672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386763843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010329127,0.02072445,0.026974259,0.4512942,0.0067701163,0.00004449946,0.00022075855,0.00014826548,0.48349437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7697628,0.00805678,0.013079913,0.11812253,0.010824638,0.00032939456,0.00016011331,0.00040845288,0.07925539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613875,0.0025752236,0.000101405305,0.00043391113,0.00051062374,0.00024005782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921799,0.005384997,0.00051489583,0.0005704718,0.0010537276,0.00029609603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005191478,0.00051627815,0.0005254514,0.0011894001,0.0043236925,0.010286855,0.0015993378,0.006512557,0.009671057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009177584,0.0003182892,0.0004469378,0.0018394969,0.049415033,0.017767396,0.0027236145,0.008199202,0.0021308663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040359078,0.0000031195973,0.00004581352,0.000022237604,0.0000018828682,0.000009878007,0.0013489184,0.000021918873,0.000020139014,0.98178893,0.015455254,0.0012779338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005993943,0.0000037559282,0.00022654702,0.00013667831,0.0000041927633,0.00006026307,0.0018367432,0.00014602668,0.00011890389,0.91252553,0.08492448,0.000010854612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064940047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00498625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010286855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035185881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040530423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032352924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386804386","doi":"10.1111/phib.12320","title":"Advice as a model for reasons","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytic Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Advice (programming); Action (physics); Humanity; Epistemology; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.10183071513997835,"score_gpt":0.306982048317198,"score_spread":0.20515133317721965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386804386","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0250587,0.0019562645,0.48902217,0.08154633,0.00071403635,0.00036238713,0.00034348888,0.00060200354,0.40039465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8335833,0.00072852656,0.13625532,0.003419492,0.0002802463,0.00045094846,0.00023322055,0.00022295081,0.02482604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779413,0.014501984,0.0010263848,0.0018123055,0.0035952434,0.0011228751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95221406,0.031433724,0.0027186885,0.0049907505,0.006869075,0.0017736107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01774662,0.0008143678,0.0008032745,0.0036478722,0.004115763,0.009669408,0.0034335016,0.007975644,0.012787393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038996257,0.00070430426,0.0017470373,0.002476379,0.035329934,0.016663445,0.0054411353,0.006210367,0.0020286553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008744291,0.000007244186,0.0001217262,0.00002719635,0.000002845057,0.000033887034,0.001216629,0.00065698463,0.000024022564,0.9953499,0.00085542194,0.0016952821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002020036,0.000012073096,0.00006438478,0.00007460058,0.000007332542,0.000052211886,0.00055016595,0.0038215304,0.00006998993,0.9703658,0.024950719,0.000011125906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059849126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046571144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01774662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007591687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008027399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09385419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387458949","doi":"10.1017/s1369415423000341","title":"Representation and Reality in Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Antinomy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Transcendental idealism; Warrant; Practical reason; Representation (politics); Extant taxon; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.1299848904380695,"score_gpt":0.3421508378757906,"score_spread":0.2121659474377211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387458949","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017519457,0.5847611,0.046301305,0.14530344,0.0050551733,0.000021873375,0.000103929444,0.000114683404,0.20081909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82797164,0.1301135,0.006202672,0.01800196,0.005738923,0.000059222133,0.00007106255,0.0001320853,0.011708975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99038166,0.0067559374,0.00025530037,0.0005694421,0.0017754344,0.00026227048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924816,0.005829197,0.00040495576,0.00042797864,0.0007401429,0.00011609382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007750229,0.00042466656,0.00077514385,0.0027797243,0.001542177,0.006407633,0.001123039,0.003988054,0.002730893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009253952,0.00033147135,0.00053479784,0.0021414135,0.025288904,0.00828626,0.002315817,0.007291369,0.00071383954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012466177,0.0000028472743,0.000035413366,0.00013258772,0.0000075145363,0.000014221053,0.0003426617,0.0001220929,0.00003427815,0.9932997,0.0020221535,0.003973962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000083757195,0.000010816754,0.0002487372,0.00069776137,0.000013467523,0.00007287393,0.00038055264,0.00027261412,0.00017723463,0.89401203,0.104091845,0.000013737036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014991645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009557205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007750229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003667268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002329844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04098761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388133135","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12545","title":"Heidegger's fundamental ontology and the human good in Aristotelian ethics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Existentialism; Naturalism; Ontology; Rationality; Parallels; GRASP; Analytic philosophy; Character (mathematics); Contemporary philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08482429848669673,"score_gpt":0.29481864546611003,"score_spread":0.2099943469794133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388133135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07986833,0.011499002,0.12431008,0.07966087,0.00072099216,0.00010802786,0.00012887681,0.00011714599,0.70358664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685702,0.001611291,0.0112306485,0.002282782,0.00025118262,0.000092821814,0.000023196515,0.000029929648,0.015908081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961158,0.0025474585,0.00010208568,0.0002800547,0.0006840417,0.00027043963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782383,0.0012982662,0.00016715263,0.00025285356,0.000271249,0.00018674575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005174558,0.00038370895,0.00053742004,0.0015012065,0.0040883883,0.0047208867,0.0008655644,0.0033287532,0.001732096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034531758,0.0002650551,0.00041923547,0.00094985624,0.043998748,0.0059560924,0.0029569915,0.0035176321,0.0002677206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.387538e-7,0.0000019686518,0.000011550982,0.0000031340026,4.1674787e-7,0.0000045550005,0.00046959208,0.000075158765,0.0000099181325,0.9988059,0.00026800414,0.0003489063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024662024,0.0000019662543,0.000030402161,0.000011708129,7.310828e-7,0.000007984744,0.00018156946,0.00022301266,0.000017697437,0.99282503,0.0066953106,0.0000020704147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063776085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005076156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008740503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008740503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005482339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06341708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388215874","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198238843.003.0002","title":"Particularizing Particularism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Normative; Quarter (Canadian coin); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; History; Theology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05910414877023559,"score_gpt":0.22018579579651493,"score_spread":0.16108164702627933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388215874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0425856,0.0074229105,0.040637176,0.03229903,0.000509367,0.000033169064,0.00005829279,0.00008043239,0.876374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602086,0.0028862457,0.0042611714,0.0054580844,0.00050947355,0.000050704395,0.00004548464,0.000059556365,0.026520677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997997,0.0010938055,0.000052042218,0.0003597851,0.00030204424,0.00019530438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981912,0.0009798938,0.00016168357,0.00027989727,0.00024563354,0.0001416736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023622212,0.0002813857,0.00032632594,0.0010205052,0.0016607312,0.002600165,0.00054815365,0.0017839525,0.003918952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027769303,0.00019129591,0.00050790975,0.0005924719,0.019578751,0.0040513487,0.0032362216,0.003931109,0.0004674245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027462943,0.0000027311507,0.00017238676,0.000020729492,0.0000034631823,0.000024123348,0.0006694722,0.00008854419,0.00007027413,0.995125,0.001404862,0.0024157853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051308543,0.000008560697,0.0004535857,0.0000726157,0.000007484168,0.00013138975,0.0005419484,0.00021736657,0.00014148225,0.93831927,0.060095865,0.0000051663733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014932076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020047429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003918952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027799623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001144258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020170093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388222761","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198243359.002.0001","title":"Title Pages","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Subject (documents); Political philosophy; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Media studies; Library science; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.06902383757564125,"score_gpt":0.2626969971526758,"score_spread":0.19367315957703457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388222761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031444812,0.0026426474,0.0006192813,0.0032713274,0.015494789,0.00012606836,0.0068185977,0.0006074545,0.9701054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014403666,0.0019852244,0.00016581152,0.00073610665,0.002274966,0.00008760481,0.002844561,0.00050578144,0.9899596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911946,0.00013735349,0.00004644852,0.00015980961,0.0004198846,0.00011713505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776816,0.00032192376,0.00010450198,0.00032349423,0.000847464,0.000634467],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010060458,0.0011458915,0.0018717243,0.004903367,0.0021817696,0.012549499,0.0012504071,0.0019246615,0.8489384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049352283,0.0004563194,0.000571004,0.0075580887,0.0011907314,0.0045568403,0.0029654626,0.0024132298,0.7958604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014061749,0.000028212267,0.00006048122,0.00021191512,0.000002500075,0.000007924661,0.000040456278,0.000039642808,0.00007865387,0.0062256604,0.9627497,0.030540686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008353358,0.000010531766,0.00030065925,0.00024382494,0.0000030490792,0.000010461821,0.000056480614,0.000032644515,0.000050005892,0.0025046407,0.99677545,0.0000039835204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040929047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005698546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1510616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037627744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038926846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21547103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388705537","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2023.26","title":"Houlgate's Presupposition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hegel Bulletin","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Presupposition; Hegelianism; Reciprocal; Character (mathematics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Literature; Mathematics; Art; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04793673610639717,"score_gpt":0.2395165995068494,"score_spread":0.19157986340045222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388705537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009409235,0.0016730822,0.022581803,0.03373437,0.000988558,0.00003147914,0.00023529626,0.00017332923,0.9311729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8129533,0.0013366995,0.00796158,0.021261165,0.0007926128,0.00017806333,0.00022136851,0.00020601136,0.15508926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712795,0.0011302532,0.00007287119,0.0008229545,0.00050704094,0.0003389069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853504,0.000657548,0.000052160533,0.00031027073,0.00035193708,0.00009296634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023371708,0.00041724817,0.0006346049,0.00077838224,0.00359433,0.004175606,0.0009129416,0.0032766683,0.012180632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064547164,0.00027406088,0.00051077176,0.00055083394,0.017400065,0.00597395,0.003469851,0.004869628,0.003386291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010814333,0.0000028945058,0.000036420388,0.000009865436,0.0000020783982,0.000021831058,0.0006535479,0.000034833105,0.00004131771,0.994079,0.0035603778,0.0015471993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009796268,0.000009241105,0.00012767334,0.000042775,0.00000516556,0.00007164592,0.00044217083,0.00020776936,0.00025095828,0.88629,0.112534136,0.000008764935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005157184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038296373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012180632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032474126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021769365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04074824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388751662","doi":"10.3998/ergo.4670","title":"The Rationality of Love: Benevolence and Complacence in Kant and Hutcheson","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Rationality; Philosophy; Feeling; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Reading (process); Philosophy of love; Interpreter; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1869135348062593,"score_gpt":0.4032298350968405,"score_spread":0.21631630029058121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388751662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13080716,0.026983596,0.016669028,0.07318156,0.00062387,0.00003426998,0.00005444561,0.000045586425,0.75160044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806215,0.0016776022,0.0010938948,0.002138914,0.0001542469,0.000018521838,0.000010108309,0.00001968408,0.014265589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963021,0.0022828088,0.00007535759,0.0003398287,0.00061612483,0.000383784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997575,0.0017431428,0.00015836101,0.0001960917,0.00016738,0.00016002524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004231216,0.00037016737,0.0005767552,0.00089192565,0.0043798676,0.007653598,0.0008713196,0.0044211396,0.002511097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044169165,0.0003672057,0.0004018061,0.00078772975,0.056125686,0.007335216,0.003917452,0.0045157094,0.00039660733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010612355,0.000004145547,0.00007287609,0.000008465775,0.0000019435086,0.000035336383,0.0039101024,0.00010192482,0.000029226274,0.99409014,0.0007414259,0.0009938088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011964,0.0000068832405,0.00036036567,0.00005126278,0.0000039457445,0.00007124283,0.0024805747,0.00028945814,0.0001120557,0.97441804,0.022177579,0.000016653576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007612617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057962444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008028242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008028242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002048549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058249235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389615864","doi":"10.5209/kant.90913","title":"Notes on the Cambridge translation of Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Con-Textos Kantianos International Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Esri (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Scholarship; Epistemology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Philosophy; Key (lock); Translation (biology); Linguistics; Computer science; Law; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0794889884301255,"score_gpt":0.2932731828748218,"score_spread":0.2137841944446963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389615864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017185474,0.047909204,0.0155682685,0.33075953,0.042293794,0.00009662833,0.0006299463,0.0002241343,0.5453331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5327231,0.021183198,0.015105462,0.09428191,0.0259189,0.00042965473,0.0004932122,0.001069764,0.30879483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994752,0.0025303941,0.00026689877,0.00047399692,0.0016603881,0.00031634737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418455,0.0045094215,0.00024107943,0.00030685798,0.00064083276,0.000117335636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037990585,0.0008532291,0.00044543494,0.0019444117,0.0036376005,0.0029460115,0.0008976404,0.0029980638,0.01083915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011456559,0.0002961462,0.0004266965,0.0015918784,0.013032587,0.0033593678,0.0020989128,0.007703604,0.0025680463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006285548,0.000009266472,0.00011088786,0.00013755163,0.0000070563406,0.0003420967,0.010751373,0.000121493926,0.0003717163,0.8585619,0.12078028,0.008743539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000325866,0.00004748947,0.0011910654,0.0006643856,0.0000112970265,0.00031886526,0.0033079502,0.0002956738,0.0011113083,0.14167076,0.8512913,0.00005738521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020260228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018665954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020260228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005998845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021862865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04352492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389919041","doi":"10.56550/d.2.1.1","title":"Totality in <i>the</i> <i>Science of Logic </i>As An Indispensable Presupposition of Hegel’s <i>Philosophy of Right</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Distinctio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Presupposition; Exposition (narrative); Philosophy; Epistemology; Practical philosophy; Humanities; Literature","score_opus":0.05178948459734896,"score_gpt":0.2856647413658171,"score_spread":0.23387525676846815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389919041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032360256,0.020311577,0.10287894,0.02721836,0.0010012664,0.000028476974,0.00013335726,0.00020842637,0.8158594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85429573,0.008915617,0.01792532,0.006004103,0.00089085544,0.000082840896,0.00013750201,0.00028981702,0.11145819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978295,0.0010771933,0.00007827572,0.00029751408,0.0004940714,0.00022333898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998538,0.0009100318,0.00011574584,0.00017533846,0.00017111494,0.00008978261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020238957,0.00038238047,0.0003746404,0.0012336446,0.0028890069,0.0076313363,0.00059567555,0.0014273972,0.0039927466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024620525,0.00030545142,0.0006469141,0.0013975538,0.025056772,0.0084960535,0.0030110788,0.004530846,0.00077826355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028489346,0.0000013226456,0.000029407813,0.000014225952,0.0000017485249,0.00001138872,0.0015326054,0.000057695994,0.000060614875,0.99605274,0.0009417939,0.0012935374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037536781,0.000012473183,0.00015443767,0.00007364069,0.0000065766303,0.00008470795,0.0012454761,0.0002517953,0.00037067782,0.9249677,0.07282023,0.000008559688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002828414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003780679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076313363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037700604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030946292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027353764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390075875","doi":"10.5840/cpsem20224","title":"Reality and Intentionality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Semiotics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10729087568086156,"score_gpt":0.2680220846864725,"score_spread":0.16073120900561094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390075875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001259617,0.006298139,0.007890556,0.0032672915,0.00040515434,0.000022127984,0.000047508012,0.000031008654,0.9807786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2228548,0.007847381,0.0060548126,0.002502358,0.0008815225,0.00026624027,0.00018794757,0.00021767708,0.75918734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998857,0.0006569165,0.000029589632,0.00011939985,0.00024489398,0.000092203474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936384,0.00037818527,0.000028728855,0.000102277605,0.00008444444,0.000042477728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010463748,0.0008896759,0.0006246,0.0012812396,0.0037618952,0.0090933945,0.0008442381,0.0026327556,0.017441006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015793564,0.00042664097,0.00033060755,0.0014627924,0.016423332,0.0075795287,0.0030556892,0.003754661,0.004762454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014201036,0.0000035320984,0.000007910654,0.000013234416,6.6021113e-7,0.000010480044,0.0008678109,0.000028234283,0.000022812872,0.9913536,0.0051305178,0.0025597862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030904916,0.000004607771,0.000043236563,0.000071985276,0.0000019937586,0.000063294145,0.0011449918,0.00010013466,0.00007727955,0.7709774,0.22750817,0.0000037939456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040266067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053556603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017441006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032551652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024723893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058345973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390367276","doi":"10.1007/s11245-023-09999-y","title":"The Practical Unity of Practical Wisdom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topoi","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Sine qua non; Epistemology; Practical wisdom; Trait; Praxis; Form of the Good; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.16676864541091654,"score_gpt":0.36616134775572184,"score_spread":0.1993927023448053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390367276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0143642165,0.00376075,0.05195882,0.049915154,0.0010158921,0.000078392266,0.000115707204,0.00012284954,0.8786681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94496775,0.001321142,0.017741064,0.0033506195,0.0010262276,0.00025376052,0.00010742037,0.00014940577,0.031082619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863657,0.008021803,0.00054583943,0.001360139,0.0025954167,0.001111192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97921115,0.012453576,0.0008102525,0.0038090043,0.0025130957,0.0012029596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011899526,0.0007225671,0.0011501571,0.003653658,0.010479712,0.019521115,0.0027110723,0.0063140057,0.012589572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019386206,0.0008462234,0.00084041234,0.003932939,0.097461134,0.021366315,0.008146969,0.009492821,0.0015766248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019071858,0.0000027617543,0.000027974755,0.000010122446,0.0000014593367,0.000009707701,0.0010891423,0.000029539453,0.000007973396,0.99747986,0.00063995447,0.00069955736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008030181,0.000002957817,0.000052619205,0.000026619693,0.0000032831567,0.000021821195,0.0010675015,0.00014567198,0.0000270158,0.9845313,0.014110069,0.0000031433653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058628423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004574952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019521115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074058664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010240039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06293148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390720627","doi":"10.1017/9781108779968.014","title":"Values and Eudaimonia as Guideposts for Virtues","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Eudaimonia; Flourishing; Honesty; Meaning (existential); Conceptualization; Social psychology; Epistemology; Loyalty; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04125508340768164,"score_gpt":0.22659632641476837,"score_spread":0.18534124300708674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390720627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020115472,0.01196651,0.0048811063,0.005767462,0.00042455597,0.000019374285,0.000015674103,0.000032904012,0.956777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8320368,0.008654994,0.00581629,0.0016481673,0.0003657913,0.000079531186,0.000034529625,0.00004792387,0.15131593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914837,0.00049484236,0.000020397154,0.00006293452,0.00018238726,0.00009113108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999613,0.0001823143,0.000037245514,0.000046636043,0.000061612205,0.000059179478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010526984,0.00031966192,0.00027835826,0.00084433425,0.0022428553,0.003862672,0.00028748406,0.000847357,0.0026436285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012240934,0.00013755242,0.0001936815,0.0007741282,0.014609662,0.0031128102,0.0018134925,0.0030296203,0.0005755161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032452392,0.0000058592786,0.000086389846,0.000015467338,9.3471436e-7,0.00001708674,0.0019034889,0.000047063997,0.000060912247,0.9880193,0.0017703272,0.0080699315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061437213,0.000023276336,0.0010905587,0.00017828154,0.0000029321673,0.00013232054,0.0023646469,0.0002158388,0.00022460986,0.8008132,0.1949375,0.000010646646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088183675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002121307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003862672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019260233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001440285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013974309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390770244","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-7363-7_2","title":"The Source of Contemporary Utilitarianism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Interests politics series","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Connotation; Ideology; Criticism; Politics; Philosophy; Positive economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.10190588386634905,"score_gpt":0.26613721110190297,"score_spread":0.16423132723555392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390770244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007127586,0.0076062353,0.01671061,0.041852653,0.0008125746,0.000019460515,0.000070174974,0.000049846145,0.92575085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73084366,0.0049602306,0.0051784646,0.010404454,0.0033791685,0.00017707316,0.00007729353,0.00047083304,0.24450895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476767,0.0029636621,0.00010165238,0.0005348115,0.0012361765,0.00039609778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916801,0.005846447,0.00027244774,0.0011849543,0.00079770974,0.00021826499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006840278,0.0005336221,0.0006202928,0.002195093,0.0045502093,0.013219121,0.0014827386,0.0054832175,0.012460205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010385884,0.00054955436,0.00032110422,0.002840521,0.035898563,0.009993209,0.00378387,0.01120953,0.0018767901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001008445,0.0000017772134,0.000007912708,0.0000045073857,4.0961052e-7,0.0000029286937,0.00045007587,0.000015968004,0.000005619953,0.996707,0.0018295052,0.0009731563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005566166,0.000002421486,0.000061004688,0.00006655177,0.0000012298981,0.000023366234,0.0003957134,0.00015466903,0.00005722635,0.9091277,0.09010068,0.0000038038618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023923158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032143828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013219121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069239372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002899356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05023694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390775708","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-7363-7_5","title":"The Basic Trajectory of Theoretical Evolution: Balancing the Individual and the Community","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Interests politics series","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Individualism; Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06233796381488474,"score_gpt":0.25382599641815196,"score_spread":0.19148803260326722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390775708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045201108,0.010396702,0.09488701,0.196161,0.0007887918,0.00018335323,0.00017566225,0.00015799903,0.65204835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89156127,0.0039582276,0.058247197,0.005359472,0.0004707398,0.00039303396,0.00013238705,0.0003716957,0.03950597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351406,0.0047416226,0.00009903751,0.00048576418,0.0008501683,0.0003093475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99053746,0.0064509083,0.00026934224,0.00087328785,0.0010225564,0.0008464192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011251561,0.00039188503,0.000564215,0.0021644775,0.005591616,0.012376532,0.0019152627,0.0041853115,0.008891721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014245481,0.0005044436,0.00029977778,0.0021216008,0.047468524,0.017621798,0.004805568,0.0073983413,0.001220486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031655995,0.000008483501,0.000049035585,0.000007918533,8.3516136e-7,0.000007774466,0.0011610477,0.000051270345,0.00002795531,0.9949051,0.0011437015,0.0026335747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053328513,0.000005306506,0.00012237436,0.000047677506,9.008048e-7,0.000021185759,0.0018056055,0.0004696124,0.000100730096,0.9751085,0.022309281,0.0000034209106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033280696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004035495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012376532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008344486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074993894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060543776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390779660","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-7363-7_4","title":"The Theoretical Evolution of Utilitarianism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Interests politics series","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04350861330827796,"score_gpt":0.2518349833128953,"score_spread":0.20832637000461732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390779660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018071353,0.006266178,0.04959764,0.029714981,0.00037366155,0.0000374202,0.00007009211,0.00004160812,0.89582705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9266336,0.0023134386,0.014390416,0.002693579,0.00058825436,0.00013184831,0.00004269452,0.0001652339,0.05304101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943012,0.0039770356,0.0001068779,0.000595412,0.0006904957,0.00032900783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98992014,0.0077314237,0.00030144895,0.0010312133,0.00077048666,0.00024532387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00798037,0.00043769958,0.0004960173,0.0015445917,0.0030979055,0.0091670975,0.0014208157,0.0036230779,0.007911823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107591115,0.0006021948,0.00048726966,0.0017208493,0.039493967,0.009323634,0.002745659,0.0077789235,0.0009853392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012936425,0.0000015913774,0.000014434579,0.0000023862308,4.780064e-7,0.0000024643928,0.00020603051,0.000048149872,0.000007651211,0.9987778,0.00028732838,0.00065038324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004130258,0.000001942052,0.00005360646,0.000021196296,8.811977e-7,0.000012133878,0.00015602073,0.00028151873,0.00003764574,0.9876189,0.011809657,0.0000024914355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031285402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027655622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091670975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008309843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027227793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060292423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390780131","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-7363-7_1","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Interests politics series","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Happiness; Morality; Politics; Virtue; Epistemology; Sociology; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Maximization; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.06925319944731768,"score_gpt":0.2573612148178409,"score_spread":0.18810801537052324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390780131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023350219,0.00080957083,0.0021219426,0.0032308893,0.003166095,0.0001059595,0.0019490924,0.0004865262,0.9878963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009549367,0.0004804884,0.00069774606,0.0011018615,0.0004622456,0.00006584088,0.0011535907,0.00016525079,0.9949181],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918634,0.00010889001,0.00002578427,0.00015562619,0.00042991617,0.000093478666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988096,0.0001852588,0.00003923498,0.00016325833,0.00055852643,0.00024402978],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009257875,0.00073130644,0.0004549055,0.0017032534,0.0017978735,0.005258073,0.0014944474,0.001960868,0.66476214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00321794,0.0002939605,0.00047569696,0.0015374881,0.0006787909,0.0031641554,0.0026124462,0.0020620604,0.5587497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015637934,0.00002774671,0.00008911675,0.00007474221,0.0000011181412,0.00002942337,0.00011701995,0.000061536695,0.00014202339,0.039535556,0.8663753,0.09353079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014105203,0.0000030885556,0.000062219915,0.000039730465,4.568136e-7,0.00001383474,0.000046313824,0.000014354963,0.000033557477,0.0033341614,0.99644923,0.0000016297786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004548272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006981188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33523786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019234915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029703164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47817612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391759163","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-46367-9_8","title":"Natural Knowledge and Transcendental Criticism in Scepticism and Animal Faith","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave companions.","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Skepticism; Criticism; Naturalism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Faith; Transcendental philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03632519246930148,"score_gpt":0.2608838171864724,"score_spread":0.22455862471717092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391759163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013353848,0.033761587,0.009630748,0.04390154,0.0006981998,0.000025387073,0.000049987513,0.000045916724,0.8985329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8528039,0.009004732,0.0032778485,0.005832746,0.0008963152,0.000096085685,0.000044864875,0.000102368365,0.12794109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817634,0.0013034312,0.000036574547,0.00011341796,0.00026370265,0.000106601605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971921,0.0021669208,0.00009380517,0.00025634991,0.00021911386,0.00007182093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023623821,0.0003207857,0.00035251252,0.001100235,0.002826997,0.0047162487,0.000831388,0.0028324192,0.0052651213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004868071,0.00020736225,0.00023950137,0.0011369847,0.03695489,0.0067379363,0.001899042,0.004142076,0.00076677883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030756285,0.0000033323413,0.000028754741,0.000014144667,9.605823e-7,0.000027931703,0.0023404744,0.000043855067,0.0000142113395,0.99048984,0.00480046,0.0022328512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045798743,0.00000508251,0.00010476746,0.000109392764,0.0000013401099,0.000051341274,0.001854227,0.00012610905,0.00006343872,0.92300344,0.07467248,0.0000037615723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037441128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066181105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052651213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045341467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019280169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03289765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391859499","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-44889-8","title":"Reading George Grant in the 21st Century","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Reading (process); Art; Political science; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.12771676183476194,"score_gpt":0.32227698290826823,"score_spread":0.1945602210735063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391859499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002091167,0.08865559,0.00062173355,0.2284946,0.009098836,0.000018771663,0.00014081932,0.000030822175,0.67084765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.072968185,0.030190531,0.0005676484,0.0480958,0.005387771,0.00006626044,0.00006758201,0.00011918932,0.842537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986873,0.0003919342,0.000034302706,0.0002186267,0.0005217632,0.00014600935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880064,0.00053524406,0.000044632838,0.000080868354,0.00037986896,0.00015880361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012230887,0.0005465194,0.00067391817,0.0014645605,0.006956555,0.005764309,0.0009893375,0.005108814,0.023509853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005270298,0.00030664567,0.00021295718,0.0020608285,0.013018578,0.007957785,0.0035319636,0.005590455,0.0036809247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006529604,0.000011763941,0.000048760274,0.000036519235,0.0000017065537,0.000028297734,0.0018723625,0.00004658092,0.00003095702,0.64770097,0.34183675,0.008378851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029218597,0.0000024032613,0.00010643802,0.00009150992,9.422398e-7,0.000014234785,0.0010090058,0.000015344107,0.000019375118,0.08464307,0.91408944,0.0000052331507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082053155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14557783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082053155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009559192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007386322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16315109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392322734","doi":"10.1515/9781787443938","title":"Herder's &lt;I&gt;Essay on Being&lt;/I&gt;","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Boydell and Brewer eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Art; Economics","score_opus":0.02575132060826327,"score_gpt":0.21925374328101305,"score_spread":0.19350242267274978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392322734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027190825,0.059986617,0.003545807,0.14490317,0.009684956,0.00005024072,0.0005908746,0.00019936473,0.75384814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3475706,0.026020044,0.0042295624,0.021524725,0.0032563524,0.00010974511,0.00035760488,0.00024201233,0.5966893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964476,0.00008535178,0.000017730465,0.0000653877,0.00013341496,0.000053280317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997008,0.000132148,0.000038275084,0.000023635936,0.000067781315,0.000037418904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048536004,0.0003234636,0.00020320421,0.000692285,0.0021323997,0.0022595753,0.00037048245,0.0013271866,0.0102638975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017982398,0.00015610809,0.00016549569,0.0007772474,0.0035403664,0.0018908251,0.001025738,0.0013658558,0.002269692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001560701,0.00001245059,0.00039140083,0.00011138929,0.0000037116909,0.00017928857,0.010113748,0.000051878644,0.00056214153,0.20020612,0.7488173,0.0395349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019813076,0.000007071948,0.0013821336,0.00018599836,0.0000033683805,0.00009350391,0.0021481537,0.000043953147,0.00031388557,0.00649881,0.98931396,0.0000070926567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014291833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022788972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014291833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028846504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018052341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03433615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019664","doi":"10.7202/1108421ar","title":"Sofie Møller, \"Kant’s Tribunal of Reason: Legal Metaphor and Normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason\"","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Philosophy; Metaphor; Chemistry; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.07912949878652227,"score_gpt":0.31636550106166983,"score_spread":0.23723600227514757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019664","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014598253,0.7618999,0.00047302266,0.22643276,0.0058142096,0.000006345505,0.00007563788,0.0000105243535,0.0051415483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022998935,0.7450636,0.0014907481,0.1969036,0.016534844,0.00014328271,0.00023120148,0.00007796211,0.016555794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936307,0.0030859555,0.0003158269,0.00045764513,0.0022420592,0.00026788958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98870754,0.007631069,0.00075143186,0.0001812809,0.0024741057,0.00025468608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007523363,0.0009008122,0.0011327071,0.0029841268,0.0020913929,0.0038348397,0.0015817741,0.006771957,0.004680145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020606484,0.00061605143,0.00074092456,0.0041591953,0.0058568898,0.010150567,0.0020307116,0.007755856,0.0024430417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049196013,0.00001116825,0.00019226881,0.001479387,0.00004716084,0.00005576531,0.001622464,0.000071483926,0.00007520277,0.07714458,0.89423895,0.025012357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003314329,0.000018864228,0.0014386612,0.0038751524,0.00004882101,0.00009932236,0.0011746022,0.000049133538,0.00021467423,0.06781017,0.9252056,0.000031708536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023630403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035714176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023630403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005485306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008124597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046985745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393228764","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v27i1.2843","title":"Remaining True to Ourselves: Dementia, Value Change, and Enduring Interests","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2377638940737984,"score_gpt":0.3472678809500447,"score_spread":0.1095039868762463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393228764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36376062,0.031779364,0.016607465,0.25747126,0.0010999377,0.0000807356,0.000052613515,0.00005299928,0.32909504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902632,0.0021054551,0.0012342725,0.0043283654,0.0001400926,0.000023470302,0.000008646569,0.0000068165173,0.0018895662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864798,0.009966342,0.00031200142,0.00059093686,0.0013639006,0.0012870324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98623276,0.00789761,0.0015598277,0.00092885474,0.0013562801,0.0020247577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013767399,0.00034332668,0.00041767256,0.0015203933,0.0068613566,0.009922595,0.0012843277,0.0045911954,0.0015210087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016207768,0.00022107213,0.00054460217,0.0010805828,0.059819937,0.012601431,0.008910924,0.0075080753,0.00021197103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052158626,0.00009021929,0.004140835,0.00009792214,0.000021942093,0.0009354775,0.18062381,0.0001329406,0.00014200201,0.78444695,0.0032720903,0.026043603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030723775,0.00007174331,0.0028292157,0.00045107762,0.000021592337,0.0018640031,0.07377443,0.00039781575,0.00026701746,0.8747176,0.045520715,0.000054138785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005442588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004093216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013767399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006423962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004802229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072809875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393375476","doi":"10.17323/2587-8719-2024-1-217-238","title":"Джонас Прост: «Терны и волчцы» на пути Локка к толерантности","year":2024,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Journal of the Higher School of Economics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Queen's University; University of Cambridge; McGill University; Princeton University","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0551487316803276,"score_gpt":0.24408576667563298,"score_spread":0.18893703499530537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393375476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01681414,0.0056384024,0.034224696,0.013671332,0.0012560742,0.0001250722,0.00039402995,0.00030452124,0.9275717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5360126,0.007718889,0.04266865,0.0038939458,0.00093075744,0.00047377133,0.00053742545,0.00076726335,0.40699682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962769,0.0011638949,0.00017104868,0.00062751176,0.0013655495,0.00039506983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977428,0.00061494735,0.00020688835,0.000364538,0.00082943303,0.00024138384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00213719,0.00073523505,0.00042574454,0.001849248,0.004756218,0.0116387615,0.0009265385,0.0023420614,0.03592312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056503685,0.0005368036,0.000655423,0.0017983133,0.008515791,0.00550907,0.0039262925,0.0037380513,0.012567019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000376559,0.000021844085,0.0006851308,0.00012395527,0.000014138858,0.00022933017,0.006235321,0.00022896391,0.00085652387,0.94691324,0.013141102,0.031512678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018749344,0.000028832123,0.002005558,0.00025079123,0.000026517631,0.00038738354,0.00509645,0.00037378084,0.001487423,0.19691463,0.7933559,0.000053918688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011383588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011642685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03592312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055168374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006851635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120174825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394577350","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a924228","title":"Hume beyond Theism and Atheism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theism; Atheism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1146302510271235,"score_gpt":0.31935835562989356,"score_spread":0.20472810460277008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394577350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06256172,0.012897592,0.05151964,0.093970984,0.00161172,0.000051398325,0.000055983477,0.00010239202,0.7772286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965661,0.0016268942,0.004007744,0.0058978265,0.0005217884,0.000036877023,0.000016003798,0.000036422756,0.022195514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567044,0.0032178569,0.00007075026,0.00024889846,0.0006045589,0.00018756655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507964,0.0032603699,0.00027302373,0.00045184323,0.0007058139,0.00022921676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004200558,0.00032355922,0.00036334147,0.0014223143,0.003498604,0.004046336,0.0006711086,0.0019001359,0.0031708165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049970634,0.00014066751,0.0002635824,0.00059291447,0.031741604,0.00371677,0.0028925075,0.0039447662,0.0006680195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067868855,0.000008023773,0.000088806395,0.00002266087,0.0000025941017,0.000020624517,0.0020804661,0.00007618402,0.00004331881,0.99360055,0.0016483808,0.0024016118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008379968,0.000014313792,0.00017954948,0.0001106283,0.0000037741697,0.000060229188,0.0013705584,0.00027338343,0.00030654948,0.92967397,0.06799271,0.0000060873135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001794587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015727931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004200558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028821728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026373283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02221495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394577427","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a924234","title":"Hume’s Natural Philosophy and Philosophy of Physical Science by Matias Slavov (review)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Natural philosophy; Natural science; Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Philosophy of science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06341279872058642,"score_gpt":0.32751339351054554,"score_spread":0.2641005947899591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394577427","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025429865,0.9952884,0.000046245576,0.0024633394,0.0014774513,0.000004324502,0.000021651394,0.0000037597654,0.00066954026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005979601,0.9928806,0.000087148444,0.002422051,0.002322872,0.000017052678,0.000081975115,0.0000064691403,0.0015838979],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989208,0.0002469357,0.00012821576,0.00020133387,0.00043276534,0.00007000189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976209,0.0012289489,0.00028821008,0.000050946284,0.0006446325,0.0001665279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014860498,0.0013441195,0.0021103173,0.0037015474,0.0006439065,0.0033668957,0.0014106622,0.0024125732,0.010269237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005306273,0.00066135445,0.0009166779,0.0063580913,0.0016652842,0.0049931747,0.0015343752,0.005577656,0.0068411273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053950385,0.000029621155,0.00021004115,0.0221458,0.0001284203,0.00009478489,0.00026340666,0.00024716795,0.00021324567,0.0057536927,0.6551967,0.31566325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001312033,0.000022279432,0.0008504448,0.011921848,0.000048959508,0.00045409292,0.00012359268,0.000036554662,0.000046554796,0.0020738977,0.98438543,0.000023162835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048914086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004405706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010269237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023948571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051182364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03435397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394577535","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a924227","title":"Editors’ Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.09454764004382166,"score_gpt":0.31614784465125384,"score_spread":0.22160020460743218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394577535","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019557045,0.009146005,0.0012625091,0.048483994,0.791416,0.00041850907,0.0028891296,0.0014489904,0.14473937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024000143,0.0131676,0.0023344096,0.039785627,0.36451873,0.0006516077,0.003403751,0.0014834434,0.57225484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994493,0.0006041544,0.0005655752,0.0009617079,0.0028345287,0.0005410654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734334,0.003978503,0.001384394,0.0014786845,0.016516225,0.0032089006],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050474256,0.002362036,0.0019048024,0.0051140497,0.002730415,0.009845342,0.004282649,0.0043572425,0.4377572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032626085,0.0009038407,0.0018776166,0.0026592312,0.0013537039,0.005602936,0.0035108842,0.0051248595,0.35208592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006781655,0.0000059696035,0.000016565256,0.00009960714,0.0000010809127,0.000014276332,0.000014324692,0.00001661272,0.000030112144,0.00037881095,0.9862374,0.013178447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043194127,0.0000074468167,0.000059286136,0.00011735879,0.0000015261212,0.000027700515,0.000022821969,0.000012494415,0.00002613783,0.0003285754,0.99938715,0.000005071575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014983845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00201132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4377572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027497448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049574655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80197114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394686269","doi":"10.1111/heyj.14309","title":"Hegel's Transcendent Absolute","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Transcendence (philosophy); Philosophy; Phenomenology (philosophy); Absolute (philosophy); Epistemology; Metaphysics; Dialectic; Interpretation (philosophy); Platonism; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.050566508774322436,"score_gpt":0.2605557153145418,"score_spread":0.20998920654021935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394686269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07410831,0.004306356,0.041606233,0.014099773,0.00068622275,0.00003143168,0.00006619623,0.00010756674,0.86498785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729135,0.000950306,0.0028701974,0.0010408661,0.00012712304,0.000026780566,0.000022021237,0.000032391632,0.022016926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978193,0.0009864308,0.00006457117,0.00029924884,0.0006483153,0.00018216063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998442,0.00078903895,0.000096572796,0.000273952,0.0002878853,0.000110567926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020466868,0.0004190932,0.0004119433,0.0011263539,0.002543844,0.003881793,0.0007377066,0.0013036404,0.0038082262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032343518,0.00018691298,0.00038203542,0.00054723874,0.03736587,0.0045925467,0.0040701395,0.004380552,0.0005939145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031455445,0.00000310459,0.00002579077,0.000014465076,0.0000018272782,0.000016225118,0.0022737745,0.00005623158,0.000086499014,0.99629116,0.00030576004,0.000921971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000730148,0.00001933334,0.00011094577,0.00008027942,0.0000052634336,0.00009195903,0.0025020381,0.00016911112,0.00042747735,0.9595791,0.036998603,0.000008505586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017095754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014020503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003881793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033337718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021430443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02418834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960680","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.007","title":"Consequences of the Theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.04643614886233857,"score_gpt":0.20380585113619112,"score_spread":0.15736970227385255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005411425,0.0029845834,0.029874172,0.12045336,0.004032838,0.00010549578,0.00040885384,0.00015772162,0.83657163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6444041,0.0041158926,0.031875104,0.10126178,0.008198962,0.0011064932,0.0009057863,0.0004133062,0.20771854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936906,0.0023172488,0.00023374285,0.00140442,0.0015057015,0.0008483179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992712,0.0034439706,0.00030497764,0.0013394596,0.0016124549,0.00058712746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070055802,0.00077283673,0.0009125546,0.00177281,0.0050831083,0.0068267058,0.0022795321,0.00567062,0.04392462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016160544,0.0003963758,0.0011874349,0.0011203245,0.021758705,0.008450943,0.004947615,0.009600716,0.0064232196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006975053,0.000007904147,0.000050408285,0.0000117570025,0.0000022747734,0.000031653308,0.00010447938,0.00006972842,0.00001720921,0.99129325,0.006926475,0.0014778896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014598223,0.000006264192,0.00012317188,0.00003519694,0.0000034279763,0.00009171356,0.00017897286,0.0002951056,0.000060653318,0.9548835,0.04430126,0.00000603506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046960786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002761248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04392462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005419783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044447575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1469425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960685","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.002","title":"Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.035731744464529924,"score_gpt":0.19396617647362324,"score_spread":0.15823443200909332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006265703,0.0067028888,0.002911734,0.009133688,0.0043605193,0.00004393611,0.0008418887,0.00019324479,0.97518563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012744108,0.004896242,0.0022522036,0.005412655,0.0018687288,0.00006865679,0.0009194288,0.00022717487,0.97161084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899966,0.00019848841,0.00004057677,0.00024590775,0.00041992555,0.000095423966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907684,0.0002570248,0.000042393265,0.00012556362,0.00038685853,0.000111350084],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008417239,0.0006068011,0.00036784122,0.0011547694,0.0022477326,0.0049214526,0.0013893361,0.0025907527,0.25631413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002923061,0.00021959755,0.00035190748,0.0012900855,0.0018075376,0.0039998963,0.0023088688,0.0025634884,0.114142686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000229445,0.000020400606,0.00017314749,0.00015304264,0.0000024628146,0.00007954769,0.0010894007,0.00008099001,0.00014545761,0.38281468,0.53161484,0.0838031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.675208e-7,0.0000031831887,0.0000658615,0.00006557783,4.3080922e-7,0.00004149533,0.00010419894,0.000013361652,0.000025938898,0.011438877,0.98823845,0.0000018664344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033777778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004663936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74368584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025601927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018739749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8574562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960793","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.011","title":"The Transition from Nature to Freedom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Biology","score_opus":0.02391653241655055,"score_gpt":0.19500416190525913,"score_spread":0.1710876294887086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015991325,0.007612358,0.012322627,0.021687666,0.00069860544,0.000018301,0.00007524262,0.000054006337,0.94153994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8382572,0.004204142,0.0054252995,0.0055168774,0.0005244841,0.00010260318,0.000069595684,0.00011468274,0.14578508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984073,0.00066992786,0.000030547046,0.00024403902,0.00040218412,0.00024599105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993506,0.0003145635,0.00003388646,0.00015310818,0.000053514228,0.0000944227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014291186,0.00024564218,0.0002853696,0.0006038466,0.0028319168,0.0053261896,0.00047907117,0.0015775379,0.00542735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017103432,0.00020046251,0.0003438067,0.00051662547,0.032793522,0.0066204774,0.0043151323,0.0039576567,0.0008214458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004265676,0.000002249925,0.000044274213,0.000007991645,5.8569003e-7,0.000013749496,0.0012492756,0.00005602563,0.000069643356,0.99287134,0.001781844,0.0038987254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003887461,0.00000798331,0.0002836206,0.000051140298,0.000001237996,0.000060181097,0.0008320336,0.00015015497,0.00009697563,0.80253154,0.19597362,0.000007661091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033955488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038903428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00542735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003447401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023753357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025012732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960814","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.006","title":"Kant’s Theory of the Feeling of Pleasure and Displeasure (II)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Feeling; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04416238329118505,"score_gpt":0.19038565144974934,"score_spread":0.1462232681585643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006385405,0.007241963,0.059398424,0.0149482135,0.0007575314,0.000037218182,0.00010186745,0.00009246073,0.91103697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8178384,0.0051510436,0.023047013,0.0073483195,0.001099752,0.0002826833,0.000113595735,0.0001753728,0.14494397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978264,0.0011151562,0.00006791131,0.00020437271,0.0005292841,0.0002568295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994435,0.00028072027,0.000043387245,0.00008036084,0.00009671991,0.00005536478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018801581,0.0006321155,0.0004002969,0.0011092415,0.0022056387,0.0053067734,0.00096719794,0.0029676545,0.0054060845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019668862,0.0003083663,0.0007245885,0.00086253585,0.023267454,0.0051773987,0.0027936685,0.004909851,0.001545342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030299796,0.0000018071555,0.000011949222,0.000014468988,0.0000015930518,0.0000076056226,0.00050997303,0.00006430015,0.000024598054,0.99658823,0.0015741583,0.0011983322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004488653,0.000007859971,0.00009008214,0.00003859534,0.0000031045026,0.000059144055,0.00031071925,0.00017422409,0.000092725015,0.9472211,0.05199183,0.0000059804574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012913242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008282828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054060845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034983782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014359826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025382638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960830","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.010","title":"The Imagination in Its Freedom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Imagination; Aesthetics; Art; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037233182123862285,"score_gpt":0.2063954344126552,"score_spread":0.16916225228879292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065782843,0.007577941,0.014245647,0.0209373,0.0005839829,0.000020021958,0.000057473637,0.000058406393,0.9499409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7837667,0.0050292853,0.006288061,0.006522745,0.0014921986,0.00014713714,0.00012883192,0.00021169307,0.19641326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965244,0.0020144833,0.000085790154,0.00041602307,0.0006627314,0.00029652286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973556,0.0013330171,0.00010116876,0.0006870355,0.0002685448,0.00025461757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034540505,0.00058175554,0.00048372272,0.0010306652,0.003945673,0.011335307,0.00090975745,0.0022885567,0.0067346343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004867073,0.00025721555,0.00045344065,0.000691849,0.051663198,0.009080175,0.006110044,0.0047608903,0.0020017074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000394094,0.0000028451464,0.000025991929,0.000011299314,0.0000011286513,0.000013007887,0.0024147378,0.000044179535,0.00005616602,0.99287826,0.002372988,0.0021754457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079621705,0.0000068684367,0.00009422865,0.00007939504,0.0000017928738,0.00004365226,0.0016789202,0.00011088701,0.00009672651,0.8092686,0.18860547,0.0000055222554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021561207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016441629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011335307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034299952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035914946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024886489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960862","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.012","title":"Conclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04475121073514008,"score_gpt":0.2050497922920405,"score_spread":0.16029858155690044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015166894,0.0062556877,0.018172968,0.104567245,0.008651092,0.00043079976,0.006828657,0.0010656938,0.838861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28054133,0.008298959,0.022025786,0.07195035,0.0034833672,0.00077339704,0.010842365,0.0015269273,0.6005575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963074,0.0007472646,0.00014273795,0.00077055895,0.0013993239,0.0006327006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888532,0.0025394843,0.00045501124,0.0012838949,0.006105146,0.00076324184],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005088776,0.0008592817,0.00058734673,0.0020588827,0.0024572308,0.0070614577,0.002455956,0.0021928218,0.18778688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019471236,0.00018773138,0.0008020439,0.0017686624,0.00127522,0.0048968988,0.0039171968,0.0020625002,0.06713695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004157889,0.00016965206,0.009314694,0.0010477784,0.00007068556,0.00032083612,0.0046848245,0.001019492,0.00073967036,0.26260418,0.55907667,0.1605358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029315517,0.0000693413,0.0065918756,0.0011645793,0.000052120246,0.00016149943,0.012136156,0.0004693463,0.0013023136,0.074835405,0.9031582,0.000029835126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069604227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005176176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8122131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003037252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003770105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960884","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362","title":"Kant on Pleasure and Judgment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Psychology; Philosophy; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04696813025183719,"score_gpt":0.2004948626434568,"score_spread":0.15352673239161962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043670307,0.02886087,0.00651272,0.018872537,0.00062858703,0.000016170887,0.000051466355,0.000040294133,0.9406503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70065403,0.01878466,0.0056180377,0.008344506,0.0013928978,0.000109339024,0.000079235564,0.00014590449,0.26487127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979367,0.0011280421,0.00004369293,0.00015238381,0.00051766983,0.00022145364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908864,0.00049989496,0.000053613232,0.00011737006,0.00017616442,0.0000643794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001609846,0.00055032515,0.0003814897,0.0010370259,0.0033388485,0.0063333497,0.0005634943,0.0021026386,0.003967967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034669042,0.0002400292,0.00031763685,0.0010408722,0.024512503,0.0056145927,0.0024698433,0.004392574,0.0013940472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003393938,0.0000025934025,0.000024601532,0.0000111021955,0.0000010588612,0.000013862679,0.00094957143,0.00008334671,0.000023731916,0.98968107,0.005938332,0.0032672803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032756157,0.000004419039,0.000109770466,0.00007219899,0.0000015332616,0.000037632253,0.00063498865,0.00011452703,0.00007549214,0.8774665,0.121474594,0.0000050092763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037425533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004368421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063333497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050502466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034260235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036642253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960887","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.005","title":"Kant’s Theory of the Feeling of Pleasure and Displeasure (I)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Feeling; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.046064680536834636,"score_gpt":0.19083168151426108,"score_spread":0.14476700097742645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008713709,0.009325495,0.06863757,0.016165072,0.0009697734,0.00005040574,0.00014059049,0.00013445698,0.89586294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81951374,0.0068171574,0.02377679,0.007869597,0.0011061889,0.00029328157,0.00011083112,0.00015160641,0.14036071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770504,0.0011295589,0.00009706805,0.0002057017,0.00057672313,0.00028600305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918264,0.00042388315,0.000084322746,0.00010336327,0.00013722325,0.000068517824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019303068,0.00088418124,0.00048724897,0.0015766091,0.0020568105,0.0054232306,0.00095411425,0.003206608,0.0048551406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025329767,0.00040711957,0.0007273303,0.0010461161,0.024131466,0.0053607477,0.0030157233,0.0048256894,0.0015572454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006436592,0.0000031614632,0.000034995028,0.000035192752,0.0000035209825,0.000017056924,0.001121361,0.00010341201,0.000055840945,0.99289846,0.0029480406,0.0027725487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008151777,0.000014229622,0.00018751933,0.0000792908,0.0000061061683,0.00014695278,0.00048486257,0.00021968856,0.00022811253,0.922974,0.075637184,0.000013935524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012701959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010887946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054232306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033722713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016888444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024467647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395456499","doi":"10.5840/envirophil2024423138","title":"Kantian Animal Ethics, Deep Dignity, and the Moral Game","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Environmental ethics; Applied philosophy; Philosophy; Moral philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.043157592686238436,"score_gpt":0.23534444314135078,"score_spread":0.19218685045511236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395456499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08054279,0.0067773303,0.11689968,0.056989558,0.00042793658,0.00006765034,0.00005622956,0.000045602883,0.7381932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705776,0.00096937217,0.008909395,0.0030583742,0.00011012986,0.00007565413,0.000016272435,0.000020027277,0.016263193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595886,0.002641455,0.00010499856,0.00029254434,0.0006490999,0.000353096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976546,0.0012853009,0.0002279989,0.00029689228,0.0002574834,0.00027771702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004914366,0.00048452013,0.00036234714,0.00075469905,0.0030979132,0.004363169,0.0010175218,0.0047251075,0.0024757204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041741887,0.00021962269,0.0003465893,0.0005333747,0.041435022,0.005830569,0.0045328275,0.0044364096,0.00036542886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021061062,0.0000027262945,0.000033269334,0.000005399242,8.6536215e-7,0.000010383965,0.00036530997,0.00015188812,0.000026038002,0.99851114,0.00017541935,0.00071547553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031584152,0.0000050435433,0.00005155091,0.000019440895,9.235454e-7,0.000019906478,0.00020015833,0.00024547754,0.000042025265,0.99111474,0.008294675,0.0000028946674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018790639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016884281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004914366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041461294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024202045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030082405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397011071","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198849933.002.0004","title":"Preface","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.08285513915378967,"score_gpt":0.23257000754742496,"score_spread":0.1497148683936353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397011071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009522749,0.006315893,0.0019532687,0.013663103,0.037932925,0.0002895911,0.010430679,0.0006082154,0.92785406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049742158,0.0035910443,0.00091737875,0.0028668402,0.0073121544,0.00018916327,0.007422726,0.00051884545,0.9722076],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994419,0.00007916277,0.00003747628,0.00009951286,0.00029716504,0.000044680237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761164,0.00041512336,0.000105353494,0.00022648685,0.0014123963,0.00022903644],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006823013,0.0007156112,0.0005246566,0.0027835683,0.0024338309,0.0038486158,0.0009619802,0.0010172751,0.47933105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053604,0.00030240547,0.000367372,0.0026547268,0.00071313855,0.0030141568,0.0018117194,0.0023641922,0.29450363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000183143,0.000012305646,0.00006966705,0.00013077729,0.0000011750749,0.000041155457,0.00015431039,0.000031763942,0.000113720795,0.0077565494,0.96202546,0.029644726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012923377,0.000004049503,0.00017933814,0.00010221596,5.2539195e-7,0.000030819203,0.000083218605,0.000008678865,0.000035901954,0.0011819422,0.9983701,0.0000019102101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046220315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005276654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.520669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002438524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018091653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398144917","doi":"10.1007/s10670-024-00800-z","title":"The Janusian Nature of Moral Ought","year":2024,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Indexicality; Epistemology; Ontology; Internalism and externalism; Moral disengagement; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.024792118629470377,"score_gpt":0.2636773742916849,"score_spread":0.23888525566221455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398144917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030235915,0.0038534512,0.048319604,0.030127086,0.00072365894,0.000038982384,0.00008305771,0.00007449344,0.88654375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506135,0.0010058347,0.009089756,0.0026335483,0.00080853386,0.00013522901,0.000043183554,0.000080491984,0.035589952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944358,0.0030368182,0.00021745467,0.0007865849,0.0010851078,0.00043830217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935767,0.00411174,0.00033006622,0.0009692635,0.0006678301,0.0003443921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006285463,0.00045582093,0.0008468227,0.0026049775,0.007924165,0.009892009,0.001774551,0.004412488,0.008887289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010340511,0.0006508665,0.0005308403,0.0017308498,0.046903796,0.015529979,0.0053468305,0.006762896,0.0010477139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010277765,0.0000013691048,0.000009841427,0.0000028968639,5.087193e-7,0.0000047536955,0.00032995065,0.000009697465,0.000007874973,0.999121,0.00020325714,0.0003079132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019912713,8.695687e-7,0.000021449117,0.000007530347,8.232895e-7,0.000013808461,0.00016970247,0.000050429786,0.000014678563,0.99585295,0.0038641898,0.0000016525389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019963668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002428949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009892009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032950535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028430829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033241093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398173901","doi":"10.3138/tjt-2023-0046","title":"Kant and the Moral Need to Limit Theoretical Reason: An Expansion of Hare's Concept of Rational Instability","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Instability; Philosophy; Epistemology; Physics; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.03301717777654028,"score_gpt":0.2768741589016875,"score_spread":0.2438569811251472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398173901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09109839,0.016752308,0.14648388,0.18760826,0.0011321973,0.0000724992,0.000080754995,0.00020015457,0.5565715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760084,0.0014918819,0.010180666,0.003975272,0.00046337536,0.0000641143,0.000010725443,0.000070985734,0.007734569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990368,0.006559636,0.00020596795,0.0006433062,0.0014595991,0.00076351385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99115,0.0061085513,0.0005722531,0.00095824205,0.00078020996,0.00043079545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008654927,0.0005341582,0.00080869603,0.0022004189,0.004647141,0.008932672,0.001484451,0.0056290426,0.0018638434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009429874,0.0005222731,0.00076183927,0.0014737992,0.078427,0.010941316,0.007365383,0.007996441,0.00031832836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004188524,0.0000038563903,0.00003197739,0.000007297013,0.0000017441361,0.000016039572,0.0016932896,0.00016895014,0.000020087686,0.99695814,0.0003887745,0.00070572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004509842,0.0000023689547,0.00004194854,0.000016430857,0.0000015465074,0.000015604268,0.00048491813,0.00035956004,0.000028961074,0.99269354,0.0063449177,0.0000057079646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033088084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003151087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008932672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008117054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038779818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05889362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399176698","doi":"10.3828/shandean.2015.26.13","title":"Measurement and Immeasurability: Burke and Sterne","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Shandean.","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.20421420030986084,"score_gpt":0.2484011858264215,"score_spread":0.04418698551656067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399176698","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03160645,0.29473922,0.15313332,0.271562,0.0051406072,0.00014409765,0.0003733195,0.00015723237,0.24314386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8739775,0.053540427,0.028673524,0.013153248,0.0024607775,0.00021260395,0.00010265562,0.00017319214,0.027706113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99348783,0.004317265,0.00025150474,0.0007317513,0.0010133404,0.00019824902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97495407,0.01876187,0.00079368334,0.0020733732,0.0031319945,0.00028504245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012121271,0.0011169927,0.0011783751,0.0027267453,0.00275476,0.007334962,0.0012689015,0.003066459,0.0034992609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04767977,0.000641237,0.0005706471,0.0038942806,0.02620865,0.018346243,0.0037342135,0.0060642837,0.00090862345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022042052,0.000012971034,0.00056700903,0.000056615125,0.000015188252,0.000024358036,0.00094695383,0.00041431573,0.000033765966,0.9770797,0.0071055004,0.013721672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004199929,0.000006753825,0.00029091895,0.000120097946,0.000007950509,0.000028240602,0.00025239537,0.00043168437,0.000080759004,0.9836394,0.015123987,0.000013520533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009592268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006174274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012121271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048190188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038718653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0641042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399977672","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-61113-1_3","title":"Physics for Humans: Kant, Physics, and the Neo-Aristotelian Natural Power Grid","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Engineers Without Borders Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Natural (archaeology); Natural science; Theoretical physics; Power grid; Power (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics; Geography; Astronomy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03618662705412899,"score_gpt":0.23720781270415733,"score_spread":0.20102118565002836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399977672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014333681,0.023811396,0.030358199,0.046088163,0.0010029982,0.00002198678,0.00010059367,0.00007267379,0.88421035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8543357,0.009522049,0.007913793,0.005426356,0.0009883703,0.000092903574,0.00007776069,0.00009446916,0.12154857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923825,0.0004253492,0.0000173524,0.00007560836,0.00016451774,0.00007894144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940276,0.00037861482,0.000029163317,0.000074665986,0.00007687117,0.00003796221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010797564,0.00033074088,0.00035005744,0.0006983302,0.0028373825,0.0046977634,0.00059476047,0.002492646,0.005635823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019829585,0.00021283742,0.000289344,0.0011483626,0.01626328,0.0073690824,0.0016439698,0.003332571,0.00094424834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015880569,0.0000022263716,0.000010669008,0.000005523207,4.8654425e-7,0.0000043910004,0.0002207816,0.0001058423,0.0000084946205,0.99668616,0.0015522902,0.0014015383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012910962,0.0000014043911,0.00003557551,0.000016566017,5.450946e-7,0.000008588084,0.00017580723,0.00014799993,0.00001972354,0.971882,0.027708221,0.0000022448571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004401728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005156596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005635823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036624067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030927483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026572764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400378802","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzae035","title":"<i>Socializing Minds: Intersubjectivity in Early Modern Philosophy</i> , by Martin Lenz","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intersubjectivity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.04076836199753831,"score_gpt":0.25651573298144437,"score_spread":0.21574737098390606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400378802","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027205418,0.24622035,0.0040073246,0.6331189,0.015310317,0.000016315553,0.00007915547,0.000091263486,0.098435864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25835493,0.22214556,0.005274914,0.1543732,0.050255265,0.00025283874,0.00016722565,0.00073781476,0.30843824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901366,0.0005548612,0.000028098928,0.00013748703,0.00019295202,0.00007288891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987809,0.00085144385,0.00006479949,0.00005327846,0.00015317464,0.00009653852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015730305,0.0008169868,0.0005853382,0.0013208354,0.0042680036,0.005989569,0.0007115917,0.0032740654,0.002905515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025694526,0.0003935852,0.00038983123,0.0016104516,0.013076525,0.009292626,0.0028500399,0.007900004,0.0011515679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018012683,0.0000110019255,0.00013054855,0.00016980781,0.000011021627,0.00004160931,0.0044734483,0.0001716763,0.0001230738,0.6168301,0.3653238,0.012695865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009208905,0.0000076026486,0.0004013156,0.0003790909,0.000008676273,0.00010634748,0.0021446354,0.00023581597,0.00018451794,0.23995528,0.7565478,0.000019635323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013179087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016632454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013179087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050961133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026828311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036975026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400595503","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v17i1.797","title":"The Hardness of the Practical Might","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hardness; Materials science; Metallurgy","score_opus":0.07007429948625031,"score_gpt":0.2851017810942362,"score_spread":0.21502748160798585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400595503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02156535,0.0020446852,0.13614494,0.044288676,0.0005669296,0.00013991828,0.00036398103,0.00027683142,0.7946088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8474868,0.0010697833,0.044512935,0.007063659,0.00056636863,0.0003991005,0.00034807943,0.0004142148,0.09813913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873167,0.005038196,0.0006174905,0.0033019155,0.0025977409,0.0011279989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98675364,0.006196761,0.0006057986,0.0044145123,0.0013509765,0.0006782442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008290524,0.0010235591,0.00095810276,0.0015328805,0.0067190644,0.0111004785,0.0024445981,0.005878992,0.037689455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024824396,0.0009780914,0.0014919754,0.0012487598,0.026502967,0.020585641,0.008900209,0.009472004,0.0046828734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010756559,0.000004515917,0.000076652905,0.00001675016,0.0000029783698,0.000020164394,0.00023487462,0.00013451028,0.000043945125,0.99509025,0.0015313529,0.0028331992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010568095,0.000014451017,0.0001904151,0.000041190167,0.000006053116,0.00007567966,0.00026219233,0.00088836515,0.00014539802,0.9565986,0.041753136,0.000013859342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003499477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029691714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037689455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005652362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028089548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12608379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401255719","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2024.2385739","title":"Why Hume’s Censure of the Monkish Virtues Is Not Question-Begging","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Denunciation; Begging; Philosophy; Prejudice (legal term); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Law; Psychology; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.0358858892084236,"score_gpt":0.24919772590994332,"score_spread":0.2133118367015197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401255719","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03502681,0.010264808,0.020259859,0.63849026,0.0026449454,0.00002299641,0.00007785641,0.00015194184,0.29306048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85918885,0.0019603798,0.0037581667,0.093036816,0.0015918657,0.000048256963,0.000027607557,0.00017605785,0.04021205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497366,0.0027651663,0.00012165513,0.00075521367,0.0007296389,0.0006546359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932828,0.0038555937,0.00044574548,0.0007285333,0.0011453916,0.0005419636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00905906,0.00031654464,0.0006054796,0.00080368604,0.005335664,0.0062844977,0.0011303314,0.007078822,0.004396603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014379295,0.00022580118,0.00042616503,0.0005474785,0.03821467,0.009171702,0.0032898416,0.008025201,0.0012806747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014743261,0.000007817872,0.00022097617,0.000022541008,0.0000065064432,0.000055778568,0.003753277,0.00006132063,0.000057033667,0.97657055,0.015491698,0.0037378012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013075584,0.000010654063,0.00037520332,0.00009555393,0.0000052390574,0.00011171515,0.0029999642,0.0002510742,0.00029178665,0.87090605,0.124916725,0.000023019691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005088962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006433142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00905906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027635507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019271977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04790944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401522098","doi":"10.18254/s271326680031476-3","title":"Kant: Transcendental Mind and Intelligible Mind","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Transcendental Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Philosophy; Transcendental philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.14220625799461886,"score_gpt":0.34655475683122056,"score_spread":0.2043484988366017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401522098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040394943,0.07758603,0.052187026,0.06322245,0.0019001402,0.000041621406,0.0002007275,0.00019471697,0.7642723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94793737,0.009596871,0.008290539,0.005027677,0.0007460264,0.000064721244,0.00009600253,0.00009229269,0.028148463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964121,0.0023944955,0.00011860476,0.00027433058,0.000510968,0.00028946606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977272,0.0012869627,0.00021621495,0.00027055468,0.00034649347,0.00015262116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027326685,0.0005497304,0.00037433338,0.0021731085,0.0026474935,0.0054183616,0.000750196,0.003783755,0.0045036357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004382345,0.00032563572,0.0006288005,0.001811591,0.020708151,0.010458639,0.00319401,0.0054461155,0.0010536355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012018408,0.000004234671,0.00007412702,0.00002774686,0.0000036315384,0.000029833658,0.0012970841,0.000106852094,0.000045737506,0.9939521,0.0018723418,0.0025741388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005358023,0.0000063996636,0.00026870088,0.000059027832,0.0000039417564,0.00007378486,0.00054591976,0.00015122209,0.00013235756,0.976926,0.02181837,0.000008798648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016762799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012918968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054183616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034365212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015132164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024933815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401549937","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12586","title":"Preparing the particular: Kant on the imagination's role in judgment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Power (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Imagination; Psychology","score_opus":0.032848372017029684,"score_gpt":0.24699547904191083,"score_spread":0.21414710702488116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401549937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09750488,0.018013755,0.04306322,0.20149592,0.0011995777,0.000041182604,0.000078194535,0.00013367466,0.6384696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862766,0.0018331151,0.0022747617,0.0034264969,0.00029689752,0.0000129267955,0.000009578806,0.000032904656,0.0058366666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378645,0.0047727316,0.00012707956,0.0002820217,0.0006145527,0.00041719354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99232775,0.005876782,0.0003053414,0.00046868515,0.0006121373,0.00040924968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006877382,0.00033897668,0.0003416328,0.0011705969,0.0034007293,0.008273241,0.00067777216,0.0030389891,0.0026407735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008880009,0.00026854762,0.0003273411,0.0007746794,0.03946762,0.008263642,0.003856413,0.0062109027,0.00054704316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014999478,0.0000063012662,0.00009366471,0.000023972594,0.0000034151026,0.000073404706,0.0062142187,0.00024878196,0.00010001565,0.9875886,0.002652272,0.0029802911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008161809,0.0000058791456,0.00014558113,0.000062746534,0.0000035310768,0.000034096487,0.002701117,0.0002764502,0.00014743449,0.97791517,0.01868914,0.000010768165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023388024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001978788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008273241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003270639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024022062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03637147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402109969","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v23i3.44265","title":"On \"My Moral Judgment\"","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0745592945700603,"score_gpt":0.31627907797449195,"score_spread":0.24171978340443165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402109969","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043861175,0.0041241148,0.00051626784,0.9399669,0.020828284,0.000015676036,0.00009917845,0.000037905356,0.03397308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01755553,0.0012152384,0.00034454186,0.94305277,0.014772761,0.000070897,0.000041457584,0.000042102136,0.022904731],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991928,0.003629399,0.00028739907,0.0010355928,0.0022858789,0.0008338356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905912,0.0050872597,0.0004907393,0.00045020098,0.0027756006,0.0006048205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005757186,0.0008678193,0.00085670565,0.00088083994,0.007347489,0.0059193093,0.0048140567,0.025710983,0.013272482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02122118,0.00038592267,0.0011063156,0.00072016893,0.014423443,0.0073949383,0.0039278893,0.038077407,0.0072981752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018517581,0.000009192131,0.00007538356,0.00004987061,0.0000036893061,0.00009296314,0.0015252688,0.000023151768,0.000057817324,0.14532906,0.84922224,0.0035927733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017491197,0.000015910675,0.0009350692,0.000597464,0.00000725952,0.00018209705,0.002957268,0.00014387957,0.00014603791,0.08227441,0.91268975,0.000033423486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027317272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033333704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027317272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056043733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004489576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05431658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402162107","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-5634-0_28","title":"The Precept of the Common Good in the Principle of Just Ends","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Precept; Philosophy; Geology; Theology","score_opus":0.06870745449965274,"score_gpt":0.276973154134272,"score_spread":0.20826569963461924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402162107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003429726,0.006644631,0.051940672,0.03060611,0.0015521667,0.00006219176,0.00007835278,0.00006572368,0.9056205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6465977,0.005581514,0.04224572,0.0239924,0.00408949,0.0008281328,0.00014752064,0.00046007946,0.2760574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992415,0.004917567,0.00019686708,0.00073238043,0.001281201,0.00045695552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470043,0.003597131,0.00021153713,0.0008259353,0.0004602242,0.0002047906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070748907,0.00085760275,0.0011311533,0.0015120223,0.005103289,0.00899265,0.001749707,0.007981147,0.005465028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007921901,0.00075714715,0.001113217,0.0013648187,0.06283318,0.014892546,0.0039166724,0.014183582,0.0018221185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015623536,0.0000012849904,0.0000039914976,0.0000057198026,7.877652e-7,0.0000031189627,0.00014485545,0.000025259518,0.0000076189426,0.99833727,0.0010460631,0.00042244262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029720693,0.0000022313884,0.000011423101,0.00001811232,0.0000011132215,0.000012136286,0.000054056796,0.000056458273,0.00002310961,0.98508954,0.014726695,0.0000020674515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034795038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037047844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00899265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052231997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004817121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03789717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402449079","doi":"10.1017/s0266267124000166","title":"Narrowly person-affecting axiology: a reconsideration","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of St Andrews; London School of Economics and Political Science; McGill University","keywords":"Axiology; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.06650113448350334,"score_gpt":0.23606095185339657,"score_spread":0.16955981736989323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402449079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0676252,0.0019323801,0.24433699,0.02844078,0.0010238179,0.000104715036,0.00020591759,0.00013954038,0.65619063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694009,0.00042968045,0.01727978,0.0023349104,0.000370843,0.000107364496,0.000045502016,0.000060800583,0.009970272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928392,0.004393189,0.00023767505,0.0009605088,0.0011214032,0.0004479549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99512,0.0025285387,0.00040316538,0.0007672347,0.00087419763,0.00030687035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009011806,0.0004682089,0.00071620167,0.0017059605,0.0030331179,0.0067227026,0.0014472028,0.0027638832,0.009156786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00883193,0.00029897317,0.00078500557,0.0011863733,0.022252765,0.00846065,0.006005935,0.0066997176,0.0010993556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031358923,0.0000039923284,0.000061358136,0.0000063270986,0.0000015505652,0.000014291732,0.00023704753,0.00007886952,0.00003369547,0.9985164,0.00021912338,0.00082416565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043294085,0.00000979053,0.00012777487,0.00002608399,0.0000030296926,0.00003073457,0.00028265652,0.0006009958,0.00006166634,0.9925236,0.006324405,0.0000049027335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060920074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055330264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009156786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029506735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012797175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047659576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402632863","doi":"10.7202/1113565ar","title":"Étienne Brown, \"Moral Judgement: An Introduction through Anglo-American, German and French Philosophy\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"George Brown College","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; German; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07842517541256724,"score_gpt":0.3203051863580741,"score_spread":0.24188001094550685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402632863","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009748037,0.9554428,0.0004183953,0.03651121,0.0036102054,0.000009054056,0.0000747937,0.000012023492,0.0038241257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0076224306,0.92368,0.0013623291,0.04478345,0.005993768,0.000119642085,0.00017543681,0.00006615624,0.016196655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99175733,0.004523665,0.0003974822,0.000524652,0.0024671971,0.00032966485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98606306,0.010163801,0.0005961674,0.0001701557,0.0027079026,0.00029887957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074149403,0.0013071813,0.00135481,0.0053278445,0.0025932612,0.0044092927,0.0016403307,0.0049692946,0.006837134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013749632,0.0007713605,0.00064150593,0.007884073,0.005300831,0.010607572,0.002334415,0.006387988,0.0034815096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063193045,0.000023973073,0.0002670191,0.0034785657,0.000053872838,0.00009222803,0.0029205875,0.000081608116,0.00013901707,0.08511279,0.8548675,0.05289959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001988562,0.000017618542,0.0014702646,0.0037166364,0.000027858097,0.00012091362,0.00092895277,0.00003700089,0.00013386496,0.026065195,0.9674309,0.000030871117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035943057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04264005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035943057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006160505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078815445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0714677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402793858","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-66249-2_1","title":"Smoke and Flickering Shadows: Strawson and Evans on Truth and Factuality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Synthese Library/Synthese library","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Flicker; Smoke; Philosophy; Art; Computer vision; Psychology; Computer science; Geography; Computer graphics (images); Meteorology","score_opus":0.06270557572097085,"score_gpt":0.23431321507345987,"score_spread":0.17160763935248902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402793858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032354824,0.05304606,0.015307717,0.10722122,0.00250354,0.000049812486,0.00011146359,0.000070684546,0.7893348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8813374,0.0119263865,0.0038300543,0.0071736583,0.0023626387,0.00008828287,0.00006122715,0.00025163413,0.092968754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846625,0.0009906004,0.000029190613,0.00017227368,0.00019039083,0.00015130185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99423546,0.004838287,0.00016857503,0.00028403001,0.00032663517,0.00014702886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028934153,0.00055413623,0.0005477909,0.0015657217,0.0062992373,0.009930008,0.0010489528,0.0044261836,0.0128767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008082479,0.0004790022,0.00037686058,0.0024346632,0.03664506,0.019320874,0.0034625037,0.0070724124,0.00094787544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000955297,0.000008113983,0.000056458102,0.000029179224,0.0000023799803,0.00003723924,0.023368629,0.000058157908,0.00002851566,0.9628481,0.009228203,0.0043254565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009338125,0.000005838614,0.00015191997,0.00016656512,0.00000561237,0.000037025256,0.015048416,0.00012980928,0.00007012228,0.9180811,0.066286005,0.000008305818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009976711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01593618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0128767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040250197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027939156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043076813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403451698","doi":"10.1080/1354571x.2024.2410662","title":"Animality in contemporary Italian philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modern Italian Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Philosophy; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.2577002335989322,"score_gpt":0.35617598852099747,"score_spread":0.09847575492206528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403451698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035407975,0.021062443,0.0017390972,0.045590926,0.0005189609,0.000011868805,0.000031111114,0.000046100693,0.8955915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88993806,0.0091433665,0.0011403726,0.014105969,0.0018407296,0.000061113635,0.000040416187,0.00005568032,0.083674274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864906,0.000816496,0.00001839804,0.0001102154,0.0001571203,0.0002486117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995521,0.00020272,0.00006160198,0.000060687373,0.000055999986,0.00006686099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023846931,0.00027920853,0.00022069788,0.0009839629,0.0036541254,0.0036997069,0.00032651017,0.0016755722,0.003682807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012531852,0.00014313588,0.00021759876,0.00090888626,0.020448487,0.0019081625,0.0014738651,0.0019893772,0.00066255126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007308083,0.000008272634,0.00028684828,0.000029543648,0.0000015133885,0.000028808896,0.006929215,0.000048813316,0.0000678786,0.98090243,0.007764561,0.0039248406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012558809,0.00003605168,0.004938501,0.00021025639,0.000007721218,0.00012786685,0.0029080857,0.00028864882,0.00009033895,0.21352223,0.7778413,0.000016515627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012756497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017669689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012756497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076719495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023170488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05566418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403634150","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198854586.013.4","title":"Kant on the Metaphysical Deduction of the Categories","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05448379132986782,"score_gpt":0.1978982881470101,"score_spread":0.1434144968171423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403634150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012325693,0.009428422,0.11224463,0.015180727,0.0006707984,0.000055632863,0.00026438842,0.0001532669,0.84967643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8518892,0.00417164,0.046341512,0.0042108335,0.0005574533,0.00033733342,0.00031272665,0.00023240772,0.09194698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970107,0.001737023,0.00008047753,0.00020160593,0.0008265574,0.00014365853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871576,0.0006581354,0.000049047958,0.00023793385,0.00028246047,0.00005671915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027264098,0.0005139293,0.00045319737,0.0018409998,0.0026807294,0.0039233994,0.0009807484,0.0015644357,0.0032510154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036553373,0.0004764457,0.0005672438,0.0012581378,0.023981057,0.005134971,0.0021646733,0.00508326,0.001158951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011991236,0.0000010470758,0.0000051510724,0.0000066744688,6.9229867e-7,0.0000037707657,0.00020612947,0.00008131075,0.000020083946,0.9981756,0.0007229221,0.00077534514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014985839,0.0000013988839,0.000020472598,0.000016025815,6.057823e-7,0.000007868404,0.00006902429,0.00018104252,0.000056735018,0.98471224,0.014931046,0.0000019879612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002898197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020205027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006435912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006435912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002448081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046696067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403634164","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198854586.013.5","title":"Kant on the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Calculus (dental); Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0508357876640591,"score_gpt":0.19348795922219147,"score_spread":0.14265217155813237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403634164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014382305,0.01514409,0.061228927,0.013486471,0.00087420084,0.000032687956,0.00017710267,0.00010951281,0.89456475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9027918,0.0049918834,0.016370753,0.0031385417,0.00084036554,0.00013993675,0.00016057711,0.00014031668,0.071425654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955134,0.002887057,0.0000862895,0.00030989756,0.0009883927,0.00021491192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973368,0.0016995639,0.000065276945,0.00039517417,0.00043207704,0.00007108419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003547946,0.00043876606,0.0006328606,0.002010168,0.0024265966,0.00475541,0.00091814983,0.0015892418,0.0038984134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043711746,0.0003554913,0.00067065755,0.0012134064,0.024204794,0.005700434,0.002273398,0.0046423217,0.0009797497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017406795,0.000001091596,0.000004886044,0.0000069813623,7.959902e-7,0.000004510202,0.00020489594,0.00007040505,0.000016526312,0.99829763,0.0006431631,0.0007474076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016407351,0.0000015485829,0.000013354426,0.000014966721,7.0404997e-7,0.000007884283,0.00006812982,0.000111861424,0.000034556422,0.98913586,0.010607531,0.0000019009892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002452202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016821849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00475541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004682527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015842649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03397429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403734468","doi":"10.1007/s11406-024-00792-8","title":"The Categorial and the Relational in Rational Choice: On Chrisoula Andreou’s Choosing Well","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Linguistics; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.044646008064095445,"score_gpt":0.2663845919467018,"score_spread":0.22173858388260634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403734468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034810517,0.016607651,0.14578983,0.2564252,0.002205314,0.00009039622,0.00017769415,0.0001453697,0.5437481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90663505,0.002784529,0.02962855,0.011417351,0.0007603811,0.00015989761,0.00004411718,0.00021014016,0.048360076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514294,0.0030008685,0.0001434359,0.0005433207,0.00080079143,0.00036866363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945945,0.003703991,0.00022314354,0.0005539088,0.00060576235,0.000318689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053733583,0.00054652826,0.00096918346,0.00212334,0.005732953,0.006777861,0.001383012,0.00603743,0.008676097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011474091,0.0004301981,0.0007635189,0.0021801912,0.027471118,0.011634041,0.0037516248,0.0070193657,0.0013202224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003392035,0.0000022881545,0.00003093885,0.000005010025,0.0000013765656,0.000007923084,0.00026991125,0.00004258188,0.000008344782,0.997778,0.0009112742,0.0009388782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048118563,0.0000015794245,0.00002686127,0.00001766686,0.0000016532775,0.000012554661,0.00015422533,0.00016953239,0.00002126525,0.9892729,0.010313468,0.0000036681663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007628321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008293864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008676097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005313838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027124782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038554788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403800152","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2024.2416983","title":"Timeslice Prioritarianism, Prudence, and Weak Pareto","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Pareto principle; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Economics; Epistemology; Operations management","score_opus":0.0330754927230233,"score_gpt":0.2620185579520702,"score_spread":0.2289430652290469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403800152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09143333,0.007374298,0.20228107,0.1135798,0.001784667,0.00012217369,0.00035406082,0.00014704741,0.58292353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9345756,0.0012032836,0.03284144,0.009473181,0.0008671382,0.00023287917,0.0001097113,0.000086973545,0.020609742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392855,0.0025336267,0.00034105201,0.00094548846,0.0017033293,0.00054791593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924193,0.0035218622,0.00086837035,0.0015709077,0.0011547831,0.00046477365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008539974,0.0006905513,0.00069458643,0.0012930386,0.0031088134,0.004105909,0.0012183732,0.005364136,0.0045909556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013867775,0.00042963377,0.0011984457,0.00092917995,0.02440594,0.007323409,0.0049766703,0.008486944,0.00094450294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065336117,0.0000031404627,0.00005179454,0.0000065740255,0.0000025453157,0.000009232991,0.0001733128,0.00007524506,0.00004259024,0.9983347,0.00045953022,0.0008347748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062988747,0.000008004697,0.000111399866,0.000014663366,0.0000020040964,0.000028653265,0.000078146804,0.00021275306,0.00009287024,0.99340546,0.0060339617,0.000005736154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011378186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014535493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008539974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032427283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019530014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045164227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404464264","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2024.2418619","title":"Schelling’s Metametaphysical Critique of Hegel","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1132134972055257,"score_gpt":0.38269788466052457,"score_spread":0.26948438745499886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404464264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047073808,0.005693794,0.19419526,0.07364594,0.0010331644,0.00007097903,0.0002050238,0.00050247624,0.6775795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94153386,0.0015793359,0.019118128,0.0066530523,0.00054545474,0.00014787336,0.000069329726,0.00016655939,0.03018637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763596,0.0010173061,0.00009181059,0.00044673786,0.0006246061,0.00018352304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824274,0.0010513344,0.00011264139,0.0002802857,0.00024700214,0.00006585841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027765238,0.00061005336,0.0005120316,0.001506871,0.0021221654,0.0034461664,0.0013244477,0.0034364183,0.005500818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004881668,0.0002857682,0.00077760377,0.00067982863,0.03628186,0.006488549,0.0031639314,0.0047871047,0.0011688393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046463033,0.0000018127396,0.000025592084,0.000010237775,0.00000166479,0.000009454318,0.0005944385,0.000090439215,0.000060689476,0.9977837,0.0005725795,0.0008448574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046625214,0.000006069782,0.00004355306,0.00001916195,0.000002172575,0.000031009444,0.00016601697,0.00021757226,0.00020684785,0.98721373,0.012084283,0.000004818772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001633442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014571241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005500818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00467758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022414748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03393835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404530785","doi":"10.1017/s0012217324000052","title":"The Art of Being with Steven Burns: A Celebration of a Life in Philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Advanced Research Projects Agency","keywords":"Philosophy of life; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Art history; Art; Epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.028359381432823023,"score_gpt":0.22940749800568064,"score_spread":0.20104811657285762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404530785","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04774124,0.044698633,0.0038176724,0.5664783,0.017782494,0.000025975136,0.00004088872,0.00015782546,0.31925696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82460254,0.016337559,0.0014761089,0.046037786,0.006454001,0.00004161589,0.000016737738,0.00021101447,0.10482262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902896,0.0069646267,0.00008314012,0.00040159505,0.0017074569,0.0005535044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930306,0.004299684,0.00042688937,0.0002959404,0.00067836145,0.0012686593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005157472,0.00039159541,0.00047986,0.000936874,0.011842252,0.0091681145,0.00058590557,0.0033355544,0.004694701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008063273,0.00024056327,0.00025869365,0.0011443365,0.026476074,0.0062423917,0.005811121,0.009772989,0.00094652403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071984534,0.000046264355,0.0004201334,0.00015028426,0.000015389078,0.00061136927,0.20452641,0.00018968112,0.0007103325,0.4136588,0.35618716,0.02341212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005773229,0.000030416237,0.00035926644,0.00026922414,0.0000054755105,0.0005585308,0.07135898,0.00013263442,0.0003390458,0.03611669,0.89080024,0.000023722327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005378904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008160983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011842252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044436646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031942101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032241166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404614732","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a944570","title":"A Virtuous Way of Doing Philosophy: The Moderation of Curiosity and Hume’s Philosophical Method in A Treatise of Human Nature","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Moderation; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07158601419422901,"score_gpt":0.35926988944735494,"score_spread":0.28768387525312594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404614732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13988568,0.008687313,0.3404558,0.11785545,0.002448083,0.00048250824,0.00011467441,0.0002421435,0.38982835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568122,0.00093683787,0.027979458,0.0032696999,0.00048474886,0.0005513976,0.000014868395,0.00010085788,0.009849915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9638494,0.033423055,0.0001896174,0.000769849,0.0014014398,0.0003666485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9554406,0.03891119,0.0017031308,0.0021290355,0.0012270561,0.0005890439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02269063,0.0004734965,0.00053500663,0.0017932806,0.0045625214,0.00561435,0.0013124382,0.0020827358,0.0032091008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020248849,0.000287786,0.0004547906,0.0011978854,0.041935485,0.007213895,0.0053253737,0.005420893,0.00029547332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019371468,0.000018449264,0.0003092275,0.000049515293,0.000010341247,0.000046306668,0.021898672,0.0001854248,0.00012935481,0.9727781,0.0013639841,0.0031913228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038903305,0.00005658152,0.000618909,0.00029239236,0.00002034545,0.00009613659,0.007879877,0.0017019155,0.00080530345,0.91385704,0.07460405,0.000028597218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006780292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010454083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02269063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00497719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003043396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1200009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405483114","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.40","title":"Kant on Hope’s Value and Misanthropy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Shanghai","keywords":"Humanity; Hatred; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05974680944149803,"score_gpt":0.24922708153567022,"score_spread":0.18948027209417218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405483114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040486574,0.019241832,0.031040248,0.13397981,0.0016763622,0.000042302574,0.000091123205,0.00006394099,0.77337784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805474,0.0022536041,0.00179468,0.004876362,0.00035230236,0.000027035887,0.000011752968,0.000024628947,0.010112221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99390817,0.0042501763,0.00012213996,0.0002855389,0.0009654896,0.00046840863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99489045,0.003340216,0.00032740625,0.0004444541,0.0006394813,0.00035792557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066552646,0.00040395066,0.00043609756,0.0012121733,0.0045678196,0.005711391,0.0006858014,0.0032577778,0.0019456001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062528867,0.00025194953,0.00038800508,0.0007911782,0.055340484,0.0062662284,0.00465159,0.006225403,0.00040573272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005119765,0.000002394344,0.000030212246,0.000010050606,0.0000018710888,0.000020428362,0.0009821136,0.00009517887,0.000013734509,0.9968252,0.0012063493,0.00080741174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050751373,0.0000055065875,0.000051427804,0.000054801705,0.0000027609676,0.000028063101,0.00070566544,0.00014063851,0.00005817583,0.9800631,0.01887847,0.0000063746147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016810594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016576753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066552646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004909849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025348088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03562355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405598758","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-69654-5_5","title":"Performativity and Truth in Fichte","year":2024,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Abhandlungen zur Philosophie","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Performativity; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.045937208575189244,"score_gpt":0.24633500852719814,"score_spread":0.2003977999520089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405598758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008913247,0.005989061,0.0047430405,0.007050872,0.0004436394,0.000024912284,0.000055400506,0.000027038135,0.97275275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81912535,0.0024121494,0.0019036079,0.0016378724,0.00093072327,0.0001079714,0.00007673555,0.00008249775,0.17372307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977533,0.0012311956,0.0000737463,0.00025195614,0.00036848948,0.00032132302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806815,0.0014113368,0.00007596327,0.0001999366,0.00016968205,0.00007501228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002069096,0.00070003595,0.00076537434,0.0019584657,0.009306807,0.009429682,0.0010803044,0.005209568,0.011687401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040645557,0.00041863983,0.00038500273,0.00189875,0.050976083,0.0076029296,0.0030233774,0.005429718,0.0014305484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027014055,0.000002102226,0.000008065306,0.000010602263,7.3144656e-7,0.000012090417,0.0025355923,0.00002529652,0.000020117448,0.9952989,0.001166793,0.0009169747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072805897,0.00000774267,0.00009616773,0.00006610652,0.0000026713892,0.00006333837,0.001910911,0.00008088857,0.00011553583,0.9293799,0.06826156,0.000007863624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054376298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006275318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011687401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056085153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019817255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040692806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406400636","doi":"10.1007/s10892-024-09506-4","title":"Tusian Perfectionism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectionism (psychology); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychotherapist; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07609038762312755,"score_gpt":0.31918329603523465,"score_spread":0.24309290841210712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406400636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2178627,0.00073951494,0.0053845365,0.010495191,0.00024336678,0.000039915645,0.000045370758,0.00006974516,0.76511973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786349,0.0001245445,0.00044821145,0.00035894517,0.00002257257,0.0000105716335,0.00001539292,0.000015163932,0.020369742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780864,0.00080907973,0.00007003607,0.00021341033,0.00071085506,0.00038804355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944629,0.0018454145,0.0007605358,0.0011543012,0.00090739585,0.0008694666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023159445,0.00025753552,0.00028648018,0.00126064,0.002978446,0.004569429,0.00058518903,0.0011588837,0.011958134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011933719,0.0002253624,0.00028416878,0.0007670654,0.009545617,0.0030302973,0.003519386,0.002591179,0.0009785892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003356233,0.000040866922,0.0048925276,0.000028827193,0.000013001206,0.00032665365,0.010275727,0.00014815063,0.0001912358,0.95961356,0.005112974,0.01932298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036637,0.000060390954,0.010885348,0.00013237048,0.000022967204,0.001443625,0.013787895,0.00082904205,0.00059931993,0.90091676,0.071261615,0.000024058614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017743609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022356159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011958134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002041992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022984159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040003896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407551551","doi":"10.70902/t41qnq51","title":"Burckhardt, Hesse and Nietzsche: Which Pathway?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philanthropia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035650696970418054,"score_gpt":0.25469559309472456,"score_spread":0.2190448961243065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407551551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0088628065,0.06770045,0.004038659,0.7626532,0.002775587,0.000017023305,0.000057118712,0.000030410916,0.15386483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7063339,0.090873376,0.0064513204,0.10390832,0.0031866436,0.0001841244,0.000099653196,0.00020856825,0.08875415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958247,0.0022306868,0.000088848545,0.00039319776,0.00090618123,0.0005564766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569196,0.0025383665,0.00024688774,0.00027694926,0.00069985853,0.00054601184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006220829,0.00044879084,0.0007084946,0.0014213461,0.0069881505,0.013231804,0.0012704222,0.007429551,0.00851873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136960335,0.0003258848,0.00024793512,0.0022049798,0.032944206,0.018346978,0.007282204,0.008930727,0.0012449411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005739966,0.000006078,0.00004711764,0.00004167196,0.0000017994038,0.000021865564,0.0037986417,0.00002342935,0.00001997929,0.9775367,0.013286384,0.0052106376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071539494,0.0000067385417,0.00015785951,0.00043140614,0.000003504107,0.000051287076,0.010555378,0.00006746699,0.00012082542,0.7344582,0.25412545,0.000014676754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01231127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016126629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013231804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077359183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013858526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056128323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407554605","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.003.0008","title":"The Abuse of Philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.04655405374230435,"score_gpt":0.20458565918227709,"score_spread":0.15803160543997274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407554605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010254718,0.031463813,0.011480475,0.098422766,0.0022608908,0.00002019784,0.00004755135,0.00009521284,0.84595436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7758599,0.019022154,0.00499483,0.028168749,0.0031000625,0.0001333219,0.000061960134,0.00026021167,0.16839881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990889,0.005972944,0.00013682731,0.0006703369,0.0017405914,0.000590394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964077,0.0023261667,0.00017023478,0.00047865295,0.00036199667,0.0002552392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054103113,0.00053052395,0.00057136116,0.0016316639,0.0061923414,0.008875561,0.00084997347,0.002785593,0.0061672702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006532391,0.0003412451,0.0004073059,0.0012402814,0.052432314,0.009210871,0.0060001877,0.008825329,0.0013849832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027013325,0.0000024604149,0.000018293678,0.000010546513,8.4039675e-7,0.000012133753,0.0020249914,0.000021918398,0.000022686268,0.9916009,0.00408722,0.0021952423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063910443,0.00001083729,0.00011061205,0.00019699203,0.000001992434,0.000082509185,0.0017853855,0.00016825278,0.00008050399,0.6062591,0.39128974,0.000007633906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029861208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002760954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009001846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009001846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004689755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06531328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407554656","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.002.0005","title":"Note on Translations and Key to Abbreviations and Citations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Information retrieval; Computer science; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.05241310228352645,"score_gpt":0.2933695845954659,"score_spread":0.24095648231193947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407554656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029977033,0.000521701,0.0025622565,0.003957827,0.011133248,0.00038242358,0.046107076,0.0012055781,0.9338301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022949087,0.0006188172,0.0021091837,0.0011730897,0.0015216899,0.000663523,0.02273117,0.002114059,0.96677345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980683,0.00041870624,0.00019610074,0.00022507818,0.00085336936,0.00023856528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98720145,0.004301896,0.00034921672,0.0010412192,0.006508288,0.0005979721],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025096256,0.0016364518,0.0015385726,0.007827038,0.0033219021,0.0068761148,0.0025541005,0.002241252,0.6990207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020620897,0.000677262,0.00086095935,0.011720577,0.0010296421,0.0040417514,0.0025953639,0.0036406987,0.55742216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019504816,0.000014220156,0.000023946734,0.00012256735,0.0000013394568,0.000015110854,0.00006488591,0.00003163418,0.000059857735,0.011055486,0.9792046,0.009386858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014833669,0.0000042970455,0.0003166365,0.00014211742,0.0000024774326,0.0000172068,0.000129532,0.00007325806,0.00013373877,0.004874967,0.99428046,0.000010513872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029963447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029176638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6990207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044543133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047441325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42931044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407554859","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.003.0012","title":"G. F. Meier on the Fate of the Soul","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06053781809066057,"score_gpt":0.1981144745212826,"score_spread":0.13757665643062206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407554859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015777556,0.0705509,0.01135313,0.121205375,0.0027157546,0.000029692148,0.00011288257,0.00008981186,0.7781648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58426297,0.030296328,0.0037318438,0.018328466,0.0022790406,0.000053992622,0.00008676821,0.00020497089,0.3607556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995291,0.00019586593,0.0000074448562,0.00008089046,0.00013246508,0.00005424217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962175,0.00022792183,0.000024032548,0.000028445504,0.00006639625,0.000031448937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010503753,0.00040444196,0.00028518875,0.0008539268,0.002633021,0.0026097118,0.0003838862,0.0021234178,0.005669051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020193693,0.00012712738,0.00020220673,0.00048069685,0.0107597355,0.0045672753,0.0013016423,0.0030279243,0.0015010951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066855227,0.000003988786,0.000055016666,0.000016092969,9.052333e-7,0.000045715326,0.00204091,0.00009262074,0.00007145064,0.9609658,0.026894905,0.009805939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003168444,0.000013737706,0.00016944052,0.00018246331,0.0000018788331,0.0001878921,0.0009252043,0.00013017673,0.0002466829,0.44219083,0.5559407,0.00000793125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031538338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028064314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005669051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027871393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011735623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020222247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407555015","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.001.0001","title":"Wolff and the First Fifty Years of German Metaphysics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"German; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Art; History; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0267773118693139,"score_gpt":0.20385924642188824,"score_spread":0.17708193455257434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407555015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06914837,0.12597951,0.0057869838,0.033891167,0.0025838956,0.000046561156,0.00023741173,0.00008979461,0.7622363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87013197,0.021754164,0.0013458171,0.0031880136,0.0005580632,0.000053856867,0.000080299775,0.00005717363,0.10283064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984856,0.0006176029,0.000070748414,0.00014928212,0.00038016945,0.00029666984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994823,0.00026938808,0.00005408518,0.000056800804,0.00008667665,0.00005084371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002336226,0.00047660604,0.00028140502,0.0029579957,0.0028181418,0.004114499,0.0003509742,0.0012515391,0.004617828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024134342,0.00027227038,0.0002492501,0.0015156672,0.013541912,0.0036689865,0.0017508474,0.0018904741,0.00073096505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001137996,0.0000075808393,0.000116107476,0.00003118741,0.0000027503413,0.000044200242,0.004488196,0.00007594418,0.00008043466,0.97998786,0.007154798,0.007999586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012933745,0.000022616905,0.0013734413,0.00030309695,0.000005643129,0.00014370128,0.0022395372,0.00018931595,0.00037953118,0.18062755,0.81468296,0.000019646068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010144786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00939133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010243708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010243708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029579743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074323714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407555370","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.003.0007","title":"Women and the Wolffian Philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mesonephric duct; Biology; Endocrinology","score_opus":0.03997915463896819,"score_gpt":0.18992097601160637,"score_spread":0.14994182137263817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407555370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033989225,0.07408726,0.003984196,0.07018421,0.0015945928,0.00002666333,0.000045482895,0.00003689786,0.81605136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7377248,0.017418154,0.0012385985,0.007896205,0.0014110571,0.00006252992,0.000024267514,0.0000678715,0.23415653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814105,0.0011090516,0.00003228446,0.00018829253,0.0002927179,0.00023669054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992212,0.0004897061,0.00006849512,0.000048831615,0.00008398691,0.00008781069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021868548,0.00051357277,0.00031942554,0.0014638158,0.0053562415,0.0056856507,0.00040569712,0.002282866,0.0060182624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016978581,0.00016703698,0.0001952883,0.0010536329,0.023946147,0.004382761,0.002588936,0.002828515,0.0008982782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072727744,0.0000071979703,0.00009965198,0.000024154011,0.000001698764,0.00004961241,0.011401042,0.000027196713,0.00005726916,0.97501886,0.006556262,0.0067496556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066764233,0.000022364933,0.00036595576,0.00033790563,0.0000039854845,0.00013401388,0.007203461,0.0000928441,0.0001950441,0.25041807,0.7412111,0.000008561177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057824585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063586575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00873378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00873378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031860722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06336832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407555402","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.003.0010","title":"Reason beyond Proof","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.041253572849884144,"score_gpt":0.20470233715127503,"score_spread":0.16344876430139088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407555402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030278245,0.051810842,0.050681464,0.088757955,0.0036545736,0.000056720783,0.00017381157,0.00026229327,0.80157447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5745105,0.038867954,0.032089185,0.037699528,0.009221822,0.0004133531,0.0005080724,0.0006127085,0.30607685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633056,0.001914554,0.00015374838,0.00052563695,0.00089494255,0.00018065523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920621,0.005893815,0.00023513734,0.00085500005,0.00074305903,0.00021100142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049629067,0.00065255404,0.00068288157,0.0021893387,0.0023340753,0.006480347,0.0012116226,0.0042448915,0.01431222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008674325,0.00038919164,0.0007687389,0.0009374388,0.01993017,0.010995277,0.0022367076,0.0069343946,0.0035536198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019670056,0.0000025734887,0.000012393987,0.000025474796,0.0000015695771,0.000011377105,0.000114007016,0.00006955684,0.000021531618,0.991013,0.0061965985,0.0025300004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043452296,0.000004781631,0.000022320459,0.00011854492,0.0000019989382,0.000030591716,0.00005556778,0.00021854273,0.00006631642,0.8881418,0.11133176,0.0000033819808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017653628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010716977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01431222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004459139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035858627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0478791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407666274","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2025.2466694","title":"Three grades of self involvement and the deduction of objectivity in <i>The Practical Self</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07279050464082575,"score_gpt":0.31217791442225234,"score_spread":0.23938740978142659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407666274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0811988,0.0038761753,0.06177189,0.042881552,0.00058253715,0.00014093581,0.00006919637,0.0001300859,0.8093489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96259695,0.0008635408,0.011323384,0.0030528822,0.000208889,0.00019461241,0.000046185105,0.00007460437,0.021638982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944898,0.0030006766,0.00022469356,0.0005524373,0.0012522211,0.00048019775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99253356,0.0042429343,0.0006080882,0.0010419823,0.0010732557,0.0005002169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062570097,0.00053575094,0.00045742406,0.002521784,0.006172416,0.009455131,0.0013245732,0.0029314067,0.003302121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010882276,0.00043639203,0.0008693596,0.00140533,0.060123503,0.012792674,0.0073518194,0.007815762,0.000564015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008764411,0.0000086434475,0.00018165054,0.000014950454,0.0000020343527,0.00003562032,0.0050177625,0.0000309648,0.000073965486,0.99282235,0.00048125468,0.001321994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013398916,0.000014864851,0.00039352715,0.00004665896,0.0000054241473,0.00004785723,0.002399801,0.00020493421,0.00034848036,0.9776899,0.018826157,0.000008935653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033247434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024250988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009455131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046180314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002726678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033506334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407864969","doi":"10.1017/9781108580588","title":"Sidgwick's Ethics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06386592709856423,"score_gpt":0.23121938208570256,"score_spread":0.16735345498713833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407864969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008618365,0.017971052,0.0043390035,0.02841439,0.0026306268,0.000053388238,0.000102561884,0.000050713646,0.9455765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049311828,0.014206316,0.007149828,0.013682995,0.0013847575,0.00024218138,0.00013898067,0.0001391609,0.913744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970747,0.0011668844,0.000100968624,0.00039991777,0.0010270405,0.00023052712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865615,0.00060133653,0.00007438656,0.00016387556,0.00033968763,0.00016461755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020986232,0.0008813424,0.00041606135,0.0016803305,0.005417968,0.007774675,0.0008676594,0.003590174,0.014355135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005268256,0.00032982745,0.0003428671,0.0017256859,0.012037334,0.00498717,0.0031752128,0.0048815035,0.005569136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002907527,0.000002834227,0.000028859009,0.00002853784,7.295409e-7,0.00002602653,0.0011304201,0.00004566452,0.000027315631,0.8894078,0.095951386,0.013347618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011827285,0.0000019938577,0.000033402222,0.00008505383,3.6561033e-7,0.000045983634,0.00020778469,0.00003982931,0.00003064748,0.08571434,0.91383654,0.0000028429984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011865851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013198611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014355135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0098251505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010842454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0712868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407946188","doi":"10.1007/s10892-025-09512-0","title":"The Moral Worth of Mixed Actions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Moral philosophy; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.18644264202956898,"score_gpt":0.3461628066321411,"score_spread":0.15972016460257213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407946188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17840667,0.0040978035,0.063744225,0.024014056,0.00063749705,0.00007779127,0.00017217174,0.000050284627,0.7287994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98634493,0.0003310226,0.0032395099,0.00041232785,0.00022827198,0.000048660906,0.00003071371,0.00002394606,0.009340635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913061,0.0054945126,0.0003769379,0.0007401326,0.001519085,0.0005631654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97122306,0.019772029,0.0021698063,0.0031555328,0.0022400545,0.0014394993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101035405,0.00055917504,0.0008013364,0.0022883639,0.003544076,0.009209766,0.0012509772,0.0045524063,0.0108089615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035125867,0.00059497706,0.0006261942,0.0014678151,0.019058572,0.0153002255,0.0032453989,0.004201891,0.0004923027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003929653,0.000016537746,0.00042555825,0.000015127323,0.000012366039,0.000049505503,0.0005598706,0.00026744534,0.000027565604,0.9947066,0.0005071218,0.0033732047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075516373,0.00000784505,0.0001820738,0.000021021247,0.0000072179478,0.000052876705,0.0004011226,0.0007365903,0.00003308116,0.99645567,0.0020919496,0.000003156658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009272202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010939274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108089615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027084346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014975436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05343324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408017332","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2024-0060","title":"Future People as Future Victims: An Anti-Natalist Justification of Longtermism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.02848644227320614,"score_gpt":0.2708779099556877,"score_spread":0.2423914676824816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408017332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082144275,0.0030269162,0.1010793,0.19139887,0.002071153,0.000103041624,0.00007741042,0.00010052123,0.61999846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631124,0.0004895726,0.004689177,0.009723866,0.00046549065,0.00008877396,0.000015643434,0.000049105372,0.021365996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919654,0.0051318,0.00018912651,0.00078225794,0.0013796741,0.00055175886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99308735,0.0035980646,0.00060256297,0.0011353033,0.0012217883,0.00035490093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0127048185,0.00039223675,0.00039690064,0.0008850557,0.005100099,0.0043354253,0.0015269578,0.006648343,0.004321675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013111569,0.00024339292,0.0006522161,0.0004150807,0.03651041,0.008973705,0.0059731035,0.007576008,0.0006681822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028570462,0.0000031833526,0.00006795438,0.000005005314,0.00000112342,0.000030925625,0.0013844045,0.000033584274,0.000026320882,0.9971118,0.0007468466,0.00058587856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013655646,0.000011603686,0.00014188574,0.000063004,0.000006522034,0.00013386358,0.0013956737,0.00046683563,0.00021067934,0.93968505,0.057858102,0.000013078665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023877795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018572693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127048185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035765332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024760445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06719029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408266428","doi":"10.1017/9781009304559","title":"Kant on Marriage","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"","keywords":"German; Relation (database); Context (archaeology); Element (criminal law); State (computer science); Sociology; Gender equality; Population; Philosophy; Gender studies; Epistemology; Political science; Law; History; Mathematics; Demography; Linguistics","score_opus":0.036787036915423614,"score_gpt":0.20305867667819544,"score_spread":0.16627163976277182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408266428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003528269,0.018184956,0.006026789,0.01895664,0.0010367997,0.000021264967,0.00007084194,0.00004575225,0.9521287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40650022,0.01870454,0.0062678405,0.012892931,0.0011626128,0.00013829213,0.000115730465,0.00012454466,0.55409336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988348,0.0006436681,0.000025935002,0.00010151969,0.00022861807,0.00016544249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996841,0.00014477724,0.000027099006,0.000038149923,0.00006504261,0.000040915114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092483714,0.00049165625,0.00024791222,0.00094697595,0.0038386579,0.0034266505,0.00047619984,0.0019928159,0.0076822187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013197942,0.00018252892,0.00026305916,0.0009594602,0.011649414,0.0033735393,0.0020756174,0.0032402726,0.002310039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036384452,0.0000031108777,0.000026803908,0.000011121904,6.5887906e-7,0.00001417354,0.0011029609,0.00006451986,0.00001629716,0.9846348,0.0103162555,0.0038055873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004398651,0.000008071462,0.00014534735,0.00011132166,0.0000017525717,0.00007132029,0.0011097075,0.0001424058,0.000089342815,0.61346656,0.38484347,0.0000063264933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037598673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040615047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076822187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040417844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031040113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029325366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408727117","doi":"10.1177/00483931251327336","title":"Foresight as Consolation: Kant on the Capability of Future Making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consolation; Futures studies; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Theology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08244627859248173,"score_gpt":0.3258579510535721,"score_spread":0.2434116724610904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408727117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05815147,0.0216376,0.14645213,0.11358719,0.0008917678,0.00007002841,0.0001343354,0.0001744927,0.6589009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97500706,0.0038629058,0.0102664875,0.0015651535,0.00023257987,0.000038148803,0.000024463503,0.000049392664,0.008953769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948319,0.0035671087,0.00013495212,0.0003449734,0.00067742553,0.00044360818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422026,0.004069675,0.0003773571,0.0005352411,0.00048520032,0.00031227156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074092573,0.0005334177,0.00027146115,0.0016808329,0.0030318047,0.007717727,0.00068231457,0.0028472631,0.0024532531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008575154,0.0003191534,0.0005692819,0.0014479437,0.039891943,0.015592041,0.005216925,0.0052752676,0.000479573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040898885,0.0000019183333,0.000042643514,0.000011619915,0.0000015898141,0.000023372113,0.0017992645,0.00027335726,0.000021330045,0.99571687,0.0005829503,0.0015210445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029178902,0.00000355394,0.00004790207,0.00004430817,0.0000019707538,0.000024469693,0.000857464,0.000250649,0.0000666633,0.9834963,0.015197274,0.0000064886176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003841215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023889428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007717727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004765167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004397707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03918439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408775883","doi":"10.63485/zft4z-td978","title":"Free philosophy pledge","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10891045535284118,"score_gpt":0.26036252378800234,"score_spread":0.15145206843516118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408775883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002396519,0.002108083,0.010198886,0.06501861,0.0123405,0.000503726,0.0013432328,0.0026539206,0.90343654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013480453,0.000512383,0.0023334564,0.016418848,0.0025520255,0.00039730416,0.0006094713,0.0007418981,0.9629541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99360704,0.0013818743,0.00031442766,0.00080605096,0.0027090525,0.0011815999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900685,0.002896018,0.00025151382,0.0015860145,0.0023377729,0.0028602537],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009096411,0.0010769869,0.0011157676,0.0021306865,0.0060849837,0.009304288,0.0014952986,0.013639055,0.3969545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021782534,0.0011341615,0.0012838282,0.0010825988,0.0028794706,0.0062652603,0.008382011,0.011103333,0.19891359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006283464,0.000095197676,0.00012263055,0.0000414621,0.0000067774085,0.00014498674,0.00013158823,0.0000821812,0.00023713429,0.09566355,0.8857878,0.017623918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001826341,0.000017936778,0.00015512842,0.000019067744,0.0000016211244,0.00006148179,0.00003198778,0.00005996417,0.00008915969,0.0078508435,0.9916819,0.000012765659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021023073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040688156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036606323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056817597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8601712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409089001","doi":"10.7202/1117241ar","title":"L’idée de Dieu dans la pensée éthique kantienne","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.022694414935674676,"score_gpt":0.28861578991944176,"score_spread":0.26592137498376706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409089001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04532804,0.0060766754,0.059386075,0.030945117,0.00064793206,0.000050004437,0.00007912783,0.00007802188,0.85740894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94212115,0.0021131407,0.0064345486,0.0022032256,0.00025151944,0.00007846487,0.000034384586,0.000069573856,0.04669396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928381,0.004321838,0.00017865101,0.00070622814,0.001146047,0.0008091967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971826,0.001520199,0.00023970033,0.00042789106,0.00041430804,0.00021538626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006370032,0.00052035606,0.00063191826,0.0017957644,0.006307729,0.011387303,0.001102054,0.004251661,0.007208788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047986065,0.0003684096,0.00059763656,0.0013393181,0.046150964,0.009553206,0.0060624504,0.006744338,0.0008726735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029484822,0.0000017202447,0.000042523243,0.000008391342,0.0000012542012,0.000008912396,0.001532494,0.00004249896,0.000022464834,0.9972939,0.00019896563,0.00084399263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012675484,0.000014405841,0.00036302124,0.00009567387,0.000006616794,0.00006503115,0.002737111,0.00033190817,0.00024996838,0.9216562,0.07445139,0.000016014834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048378143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00555306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011387303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060927034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005398404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044205844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409184114","doi":"10.1111/phpr.70002","title":"Is Kant's critique of metaphysics obsolete?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of mind","score_opus":0.2882508546577211,"score_gpt":0.4160416371722606,"score_spread":0.1277907825145395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409184114","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026658777,0.023137908,0.073894925,0.5574349,0.0027001223,0.0000340898,0.00022979378,0.0002804794,0.31562904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9364607,0.0041334713,0.008822001,0.026345892,0.0029114392,0.00013640893,0.000066120934,0.0002549582,0.020869061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98228204,0.010562539,0.0005028575,0.0011898393,0.004562312,0.00090045895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870538,0.008564715,0.00075887673,0.001479742,0.0016529746,0.00048992067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015591892,0.0007115022,0.0011772498,0.0032594271,0.005071989,0.009017812,0.002975754,0.01048306,0.0055610337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016159391,0.0006230521,0.00097313995,0.002548338,0.06423902,0.012446799,0.005578637,0.012384786,0.0012638806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051461607,0.0000031099153,0.000022490285,0.000016258484,0.0000035892326,0.000011416287,0.00073770946,0.00012808866,0.000018246603,0.996011,0.0021884325,0.000854522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059183667,0.0000028818356,0.00006222696,0.000058094025,0.0000032817507,0.000016739137,0.00049691804,0.00027859828,0.000050950588,0.9791564,0.019861167,0.0000068519116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003945774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031069815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015591892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012334793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004014482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0894956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409445394","doi":"10.59277/rrp.2024.68.2.04","title":"Kant’s Argument in the Third Analogy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue roumaine de philosophie","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.05622683160464379,"score_gpt":0.27521534867015457,"score_spread":0.21898851706551078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409445394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018291038,0.0044175964,0.05390583,0.06016669,0.0016688838,0.000056814657,0.0001972688,0.00012569422,0.8611703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86902165,0.0018701205,0.02042695,0.021168893,0.0013712139,0.00028770696,0.00014142707,0.00016149321,0.08555062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939482,0.002629716,0.00017026685,0.00084731437,0.0016130408,0.00079139206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801695,0.0008482956,0.00013007062,0.00044303582,0.00039165973,0.00017004544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036222069,0.00062264426,0.0007536967,0.0019131182,0.0034787878,0.0048216037,0.0015159601,0.006951013,0.00951603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005801066,0.00039084858,0.0014709472,0.000999885,0.01881613,0.006857758,0.0057580266,0.008093903,0.0019181133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007129003,0.0000046030364,0.000021008389,0.0000074395693,0.0000025243567,0.00001417735,0.00020518317,0.0000974626,0.000024426163,0.9970853,0.0018043622,0.0007264038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010541968,0.000006696551,0.00007509132,0.000023750938,0.000004142294,0.000039799164,0.00012512707,0.00030701765,0.0000958586,0.96693224,0.032371756,0.000007949455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001716671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009744787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00951603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004668735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002255729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033874154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409780598","doi":"10.1017/s1369415425000147","title":"Much Ado about ‘Something ( <i>Etwas</i> )’: ‘Noumenon’, ‘Thing in Itself’, and ‘Transcendental Distinction’ in Kant’s Meta-metaphysical Thought Experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Noumenon; Transcendental number; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05134330559465825,"score_gpt":0.3074323804039058,"score_spread":0.25608907480924753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409780598","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054930756,0.7842099,0.009783884,0.11765165,0.0068699303,0.000014344131,0.00008448124,0.000035271132,0.07585753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5312261,0.36235645,0.0066201235,0.0617418,0.009942221,0.000100647114,0.0002136196,0.0001474633,0.027651642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934149,0.004853791,0.00016138711,0.0003789376,0.0010109576,0.0001799648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916602,0.0063592866,0.00036241673,0.00051829504,0.00092134834,0.00017848518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006616098,0.00039439587,0.00065966364,0.0025638323,0.001248629,0.004901048,0.0009837262,0.002194972,0.00428365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009498329,0.00018133128,0.0002996352,0.0021809072,0.013655725,0.006432468,0.0015253782,0.0056698676,0.00081063947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006028028,0.000011468105,0.00013486782,0.0010721324,0.0000380745,0.000030032385,0.0015231761,0.00015202649,0.00022908013,0.9444341,0.019581513,0.032733206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016206224,0.000027768094,0.00085578783,0.003390163,0.0000441863,0.000113333204,0.002551131,0.00022786071,0.00061188405,0.35849357,0.63364387,0.000024198358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002591354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003177967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006616098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028668179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024001205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034989715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409845283","doi":"10.1111/rati.12446","title":"The Motive of Duty, Emotional Motives, and the Kantian Criterion of Summonability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Social psychology; Psychology; Kantian ethics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.01497038065176664,"score_gpt":0.24603274913944248,"score_spread":0.23106236848767583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409845283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11777414,0.0051612076,0.08651698,0.036848214,0.00065879396,0.00009651601,0.00011693773,0.00009942621,0.7527278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830809,0.00036681883,0.004860826,0.0007754743,0.0001630623,0.000060187263,0.000019817257,0.000023856534,0.010649149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532324,0.0026992918,0.00018901787,0.00034515624,0.0010195976,0.00042373242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964097,0.0017458046,0.00042995348,0.0003662474,0.0006249108,0.00042330645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055350885,0.0004826728,0.0004295533,0.0016907573,0.0022667935,0.0042888597,0.0008602389,0.0024261074,0.0051680645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005295519,0.0002467433,0.00055314123,0.00060975895,0.027352534,0.0046447176,0.0041275597,0.0029791766,0.0005527505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036999961,0.000004141247,0.00007244299,0.000007789641,0.0000015619597,0.000013131093,0.00021659807,0.0000736347,0.000039448638,0.9985482,0.00027359836,0.00074580073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007614935,0.0000076161987,0.00023787416,0.000027960332,0.0000023316115,0.00003718725,0.00020349385,0.00040812517,0.00007749956,0.99279094,0.006193609,0.000005848766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075250294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005151579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055350885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032825898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013299856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029272676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409957464","doi":"10.7203/rek.10.1.27492","title":"On missing elements in Kant's metaphysics: Beauty and Life","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Estudios Kantianos","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Beauty; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.026583611401708004,"score_gpt":0.2736689222578809,"score_spread":0.2470853108561729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409957464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06773728,0.04796045,0.102181815,0.13135746,0.0015519675,0.000050606912,0.00010354395,0.00012995202,0.648927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569251,0.0069386247,0.008157886,0.006305714,0.0008883891,0.00007048282,0.000035842135,0.00010526155,0.020572715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955961,0.002675915,0.00009075055,0.00024837197,0.00097011105,0.00041865298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672145,0.002293748,0.00019660091,0.00030177014,0.0003193425,0.000166999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005535551,0.0005675415,0.00057544967,0.0018820892,0.0048546847,0.005327584,0.0010614085,0.0033194653,0.0034137715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005512844,0.0002885019,0.00044590884,0.0014308883,0.053900473,0.010366631,0.00355967,0.006115157,0.00065527845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046762448,0.000002842598,0.000027269103,0.000013641335,0.0000012817774,0.000014804633,0.0016816173,0.00009155184,0.000022756696,0.99621624,0.00064374326,0.0012795767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020458249,0.0000041971634,0.000068501395,0.000038041053,0.000001199525,0.00001706532,0.0006533601,0.00009465623,0.000059601836,0.9859388,0.01311834,0.0000041456906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021184818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018835479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005535551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048677824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024349275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035318375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410132230","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.11","title":"Kant on the Theoretical Use of the Ideas of Reason: A Transcendental Interpretation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Princeton University","keywords":"Philosophy; Transcendental number; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); General interest; Transcendental philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Transcendental idealism; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04577995721313702,"score_gpt":0.23030685003607468,"score_spread":0.18452689282293766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410132230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04915502,0.018751763,0.21202159,0.08835973,0.002165605,0.000071481765,0.00021068286,0.00021964789,0.6290445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960235,0.0028476103,0.019549804,0.004226579,0.00088203826,0.00009118342,0.00004881777,0.00010785816,0.012011254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897159,0.006711079,0.00027899566,0.0007260456,0.002001969,0.00056602893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913782,0.0058340775,0.0003651905,0.0011608663,0.0009775232,0.00028425638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00934686,0.00067573367,0.00094381924,0.0035201118,0.0027954532,0.007545977,0.0017320904,0.0047445353,0.0028548965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075113205,0.000499737,0.0012145923,0.0016622269,0.058416717,0.010659167,0.0039568674,0.007615799,0.000628109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046997206,0.0000038255025,0.000014234803,0.000011036212,0.0000026258938,0.000013741299,0.0006629717,0.0001675349,0.000030209258,0.99789643,0.0004741336,0.0007184812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004702793,0.00000253634,0.000021224972,0.000023100565,0.0000022834647,0.000013121285,0.00019455512,0.00023884862,0.000049613944,0.9945182,0.004926645,0.000005127913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018920115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001235472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00934686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058413674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023027116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049431503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411044418","doi":"10.1111/phib.12378","title":"From Moral Supervenience to Moral Contingentism (In One Easy Step!)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytic Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation","keywords":"Supervenience; Epistemology; Philosophy; Moral dilemma; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Social psychology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.08882184717245818,"score_gpt":0.2768946346016341,"score_spread":0.18807278742917594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411044418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10105725,0.005674442,0.1675088,0.11501776,0.0014531302,0.000075573946,0.00016507778,0.00023251235,0.60881543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746528,0.00065544224,0.01057331,0.0034822095,0.00045615947,0.000052597723,0.000036015135,0.00005302734,0.010038423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867505,0.0006804064,0.000029645416,0.0001940431,0.00032136595,0.00009955957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795073,0.0010593192,0.00016249083,0.00035901507,0.00030203743,0.00016637657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025116464,0.00028698647,0.00038052734,0.00085384544,0.0015016542,0.002746726,0.0010054407,0.0021249803,0.007139283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046577817,0.00025274348,0.0005235872,0.0004865765,0.017563442,0.006039668,0.003993444,0.006242714,0.0005831823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028868435,0.000004821826,0.00003425442,0.000009818483,0.0000018276663,0.000015169475,0.00014428473,0.00008860027,0.000044288365,0.99767905,0.0008118656,0.0011630608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033767253,0.0000019798183,0.00007291832,0.000010004973,0.0000012188644,0.00001704486,0.00006177918,0.00053546997,0.00005180159,0.9955687,0.003673031,0.0000026038597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018830156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013800656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007139283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024492631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009623367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023883343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411502960","doi":"10.5840/dap2022-2023312","title":"Preface","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Directory of American Philosophers","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.06604111705334738,"score_gpt":0.2954824279219166,"score_spread":0.22944131086856923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411502960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012286734,0.014127441,0.0038918864,0.029294703,0.13746159,0.00041591277,0.022101827,0.001412323,0.7900656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055318475,0.008833264,0.0024826624,0.0054720268,0.02645727,0.0002746905,0.0189822,0.0008072725,0.93115884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901235,0.00012921423,0.000074255644,0.00014653806,0.00056583376,0.00007176577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99410903,0.00098962,0.00020462513,0.00044061829,0.0036908984,0.00056518096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013656983,0.0008799566,0.00065483234,0.0036310512,0.002445026,0.0040812767,0.0011837499,0.0009703088,0.40312356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01002992,0.0003049893,0.00045139084,0.0030867425,0.00073392875,0.0028547866,0.0015292089,0.0028941596,0.27024597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010808659,0.00000711367,0.000057271125,0.000064424945,7.547729e-7,0.000017132872,0.000059911938,0.000022459051,0.00004833514,0.0027954367,0.97417676,0.022739537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014119503,0.000004780996,0.00019383368,0.000078929144,6.3518377e-7,0.000025152127,0.000057746623,0.000012287147,0.000022301067,0.0010333597,0.9985672,0.0000022516876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005451712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005529818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40312356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018874515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026664203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411701558","doi":"10.1515/dzph-2025-0008","title":"Edward Wilmot Blyden and Fichte’s Nationalist Philosophy of History","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0397799791501612,"score_gpt":0.2695225108264432,"score_spread":0.22974253167628197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411701558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049557757,0.03661527,0.003208653,0.09168842,0.0009523526,0.000018015002,0.000041038747,0.000019210056,0.8178993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9358032,0.0072655706,0.001292493,0.0035880269,0.0004513475,0.000034723387,0.000015509768,0.000014451661,0.051534694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991104,0.0005814055,0.000016172055,0.00008811619,0.00012131748,0.00008246697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889416,0.00075880974,0.000085384534,0.00005947304,0.00010790323,0.000094296985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012421577,0.00019062041,0.0002158469,0.0010830299,0.005132353,0.0031403855,0.0004041512,0.0016713899,0.003620464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017694193,0.0001326853,0.000111420166,0.0008008891,0.01842352,0.0035628711,0.0015067525,0.0018516231,0.000225629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004084152,0.000006989536,0.00010467336,0.000018622843,9.1288405e-7,0.00003489809,0.004868782,0.00008293043,0.000025951626,0.9886262,0.004250487,0.0019754793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008853105,0.000016697248,0.00086929434,0.00038323877,0.000004130455,0.0001844601,0.005842437,0.00036717695,0.00012504701,0.54556066,0.4466273,0.000010770195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018410295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021584995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018410295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007775682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002331403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05641675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411814584","doi":"10.1163/18795811-50120040","title":"What is ‘Real’ in Fichte? Being, Activity, and (In-)Determinacy in the Jena Period","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fichte-Studien","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Determinacy; Period (music); Philosophy; Mathematics; Aesthetics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.04315797764955567,"score_gpt":0.27585780738545895,"score_spread":0.23269982973590328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411814584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27757782,0.07908916,0.011219352,0.042741045,0.0014660441,0.000072843526,0.000282957,0.00016031804,0.58739054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846837,0.0020451704,0.00073733355,0.0005438647,0.00022814564,0.000008688346,0.000043446456,0.000019282172,0.011690273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985374,0.00063617475,0.000045260516,0.00025267896,0.00016710284,0.0003613789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897563,0.00063125306,0.00009840094,0.00008069299,0.000101828016,0.00011228591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013760357,0.00022274636,0.0003211137,0.001376813,0.0058102696,0.004846366,0.00052870583,0.0019383664,0.0032123376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017961868,0.00017826264,0.00022829065,0.001647751,0.02625938,0.0034316515,0.0022661036,0.0021662721,0.00031884774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013671239,0.000007958075,0.00050839793,0.000060272436,0.0000052182418,0.0002120273,0.026484763,0.00022054226,0.00018077172,0.9573962,0.0043687657,0.01054136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065544345,0.00002951886,0.010971715,0.00023735217,0.000009210008,0.00049432926,0.01821807,0.00051200297,0.0006349378,0.2625654,0.70625734,0.00006364907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030226115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030786568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030226115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012176443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018047935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08834666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411933491","doi":"10.1515/agph-2024-0107","title":"Getting at the Root of Evil: Kant and Fichte on the Murderer at the Door","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Universität Heidelberg; Concordia University; Syracuse University; Rice University; Yale University","keywords":"Root (linguistics); Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.032152990000784774,"score_gpt":0.2684333903151958,"score_spread":0.23628040031441103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411933491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078968935,0.038235914,0.020658245,0.31259137,0.003038594,0.000040947398,0.000074066935,0.00008922641,0.5463027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97353756,0.0020419525,0.0011229016,0.010776991,0.000605783,0.000021365353,0.00000921134,0.000029976583,0.011854301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99146396,0.006332006,0.00011147465,0.00039702182,0.0009689258,0.0007266385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99285525,0.0054692035,0.00037171645,0.00041833761,0.00056770194,0.00031788574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065064547,0.00044479658,0.00058479514,0.0017859438,0.00822341,0.009018869,0.0010027952,0.009512673,0.0027978083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01105251,0.0003366478,0.0003971798,0.0008184193,0.0870116,0.0088888435,0.004238213,0.009825248,0.0005849233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012032449,0.000008108198,0.00004936989,0.00001362904,0.0000025139593,0.00007486392,0.01149781,0.00010918585,0.000023416047,0.9823454,0.004473931,0.0013897683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010475453,0.0000115664425,0.00011401015,0.00016169962,0.000003636566,0.00010666757,0.00634216,0.00023107001,0.00011300021,0.943884,0.049002808,0.000018802788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032309531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025375143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009512673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006406027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019949072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046479166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412537762","doi":"10.1093/analys/anae050","title":"Relational virtues and the charge of normative superfluity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Charge (physics); Literature; Philosophy; Art; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.04200824617128574,"score_gpt":0.24462011165657468,"score_spread":0.20261186548528895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412537762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50404,0.0005662619,0.054680414,0.008620841,0.00011802062,0.0000838271,0.000079681624,0.0001404488,0.43167058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973105,0.000033970693,0.0017304075,0.0001687792,0.000013132214,0.000017207172,0.0000081471835,0.0000062501426,0.00071164087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993586,0.0035820568,0.00027480422,0.00053467916,0.0015745237,0.00044805868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754867,0.01427905,0.0029040985,0.00326567,0.0028035382,0.0012608658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007737214,0.00020398361,0.00033757318,0.0014550949,0.0018459861,0.0029332903,0.0006856632,0.0011253715,0.004239896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016635176,0.00016872949,0.0002670733,0.0005864327,0.03144611,0.004786423,0.0035469146,0.0024140659,0.00021071361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001938686,0.000023742292,0.0021494746,0.000023013532,0.000003884019,0.00006460469,0.0024160668,0.00016338886,0.00034248084,0.9915189,0.000262468,0.003012557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015448988,0.000037630707,0.005268745,0.000049226415,0.0000064382602,0.00019110339,0.002037756,0.0018373617,0.000581926,0.98417413,0.005785558,0.000014667917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010753911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009738527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007737214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017048238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015852827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040918827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413001238","doi":"10.1163/17455243-20254686","title":"A Theory of Imposition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05403297771204898,"score_gpt":0.2659840794786118,"score_spread":0.21195110176656282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413001238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033229403,0.0024446603,0.17726332,0.023668077,0.0006421912,0.00011948413,0.00016065915,0.00017802267,0.76229423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581108,0.0007148483,0.015446063,0.0020337002,0.0003337845,0.0002079129,0.00011626577,0.00008886378,0.022947716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874958,0.0062230458,0.0006042285,0.002045833,0.0024665692,0.0011644551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831125,0.0097414395,0.0012999942,0.003038809,0.0019350768,0.00087225484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008843211,0.000735082,0.0010541305,0.0033027863,0.0054737013,0.008952104,0.0025227293,0.0052515552,0.0098390775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015885528,0.0005984426,0.0016012624,0.0015873549,0.05489168,0.012338354,0.00924917,0.008054666,0.0011791207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018875453,0.0000031412335,0.000063895735,0.000007685707,0.0000017726959,0.000021371146,0.00034400236,0.00010304056,0.000010784433,0.9987664,0.0002591193,0.00041695384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004747454,0.000004636445,0.00006956124,0.00004295527,0.0000034049106,0.00006147914,0.00025641118,0.0008199315,0.000035403194,0.98986477,0.008831596,0.000005162915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029629502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016375366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098390775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076439963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038606578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055461347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414105455","doi":"10.1017/9781009604987.007","title":"On Virtues","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Information system; Key (lock); Variety (cybernetics)","score_opus":0.03680738335512897,"score_gpt":0.2009238492090021,"score_spread":0.16411646585387313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414105455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011873572,0.01810419,0.0013502635,0.014122638,0.0011290003,0.000009818753,0.00012981889,0.00003480731,0.96393216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14826742,0.02617064,0.0012816525,0.0074782628,0.0029404026,0.00006364341,0.00038249066,0.00009892091,0.8133166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995321,0.00017197653,0.000012590586,0.000053974105,0.00017277924,0.000056592544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958533,0.0001728476,0.000021577152,0.000045277262,0.00013316906,0.00004179563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006257748,0.0003406766,0.00028819565,0.0010009544,0.0012597386,0.0031404288,0.00033275082,0.0008133871,0.03603753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015572106,0.00009705005,0.00024023984,0.00087688613,0.003267058,0.0022940505,0.00089521555,0.0017821862,0.006998551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004870069,0.0000050409417,0.000046978617,0.00005718128,0.0000015222333,0.000019315466,0.00033363936,0.00011639844,0.000035879257,0.82128924,0.15894406,0.019146005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001838833,0.000005465211,0.0002959025,0.00020325069,0.0000014180375,0.000038838745,0.00031206905,0.00008732653,0.000041451767,0.19752246,0.8014865,0.0000034562265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031949012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035724961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03603753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027561581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014211574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414105677","doi":"10.1017/9781009604987.009","title":"On Happiness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Relation (database)","score_opus":0.0399013399125833,"score_gpt":0.19981636809969563,"score_spread":0.15991502818711234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414105677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016811393,0.070675276,0.0010598794,0.033674356,0.0062806206,0.000028234826,0.0013120814,0.00008476739,0.8852037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.065867126,0.10952718,0.0008960599,0.0076128705,0.005483102,0.00010386826,0.002735454,0.00019313,0.8075812],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996183,0.00012935883,0.000013669303,0.00005243999,0.00013487144,0.00005124056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996302,0.00010747184,0.000021228883,0.000028349006,0.00016287672,0.00004986369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004945033,0.00048030616,0.00035046032,0.0013956624,0.0009053219,0.003084129,0.0004389204,0.00063787843,0.1051272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018588566,0.000098361874,0.0002747576,0.0017553121,0.00083542336,0.0023606499,0.0014016478,0.0014382175,0.02120824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014845565,0.00000816051,0.00007479316,0.00026424538,0.0000048987513,0.00002381513,0.0003760365,0.00015767365,0.00003800301,0.13053893,0.77949625,0.08900235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.721286e-7,0.0000049278306,0.0003698202,0.00033620626,0.0000017174502,0.000016370006,0.00030555838,0.00002573515,0.000030322259,0.01173882,0.98716646,0.0000029719913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029227508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032294774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1051272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018220572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009334583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35168552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414105765","doi":"10.1017/9781009604987.046","title":"On Whether or Not There Are Ideas of Individuals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Information system; Context (archaeology); Variety (cybernetics)","score_opus":0.057917800545045,"score_gpt":0.22331720076849437,"score_spread":0.16539940022344937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414105765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010226895,0.0077776155,0.0036419614,0.014632409,0.0021868288,0.000037404934,0.000250317,0.000064658416,0.97038615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07141607,0.01130137,0.0029586318,0.006113939,0.0014482696,0.00013498373,0.0006664569,0.00020181415,0.9057585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928445,0.00025366942,0.000031256477,0.0001241643,0.00024768402,0.000058855025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867487,0.0007278041,0.000057426176,0.00014030938,0.00032192143,0.000077782795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001377892,0.00036725678,0.00035446894,0.0008069102,0.0013219625,0.00436314,0.00077406433,0.0012713107,0.0794431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003897606,0.00015651842,0.00030225734,0.0011861636,0.0033025667,0.00535996,0.0009902098,0.0020507523,0.016783988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014791447,0.0000060001794,0.000040464976,0.00014560079,0.0000028361765,0.000045450804,0.0013701762,0.00008063554,0.000121529236,0.7684003,0.20161791,0.028154222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032118646,0.0000075468784,0.00017094988,0.00035797455,0.000004509826,0.00005831172,0.000975712,0.000081960636,0.00012861392,0.09628003,0.90192676,0.000004393034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020781416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002785013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0794431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022830658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013666827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26576364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414141462","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2025.2554624","title":"Acting Solely from Good Motives and the Problem of Indifference","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Mechanism (biology)","score_opus":0.02940299023779971,"score_gpt":0.25067025211202987,"score_spread":0.22126726187423015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414141462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10656729,0.0065622497,0.2460639,0.08113358,0.0014485978,0.00034098132,0.00014678323,0.00023814982,0.5574985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9415235,0.0011465497,0.03600483,0.008218114,0.00045631005,0.00034222225,0.00004070842,0.00015273382,0.012114969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95398885,0.026477052,0.0019040783,0.0068840864,0.007995412,0.0027505283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9582694,0.026068458,0.003741969,0.0051558637,0.00424307,0.0025212108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038840767,0.0009866792,0.0018412793,0.0027836717,0.006561563,0.0076465327,0.0033805654,0.007778508,0.00779989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07077313,0.0009931419,0.001890342,0.0013561816,0.05316966,0.016352948,0.011166173,0.012543018,0.0011826634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026369173,0.00002197603,0.00052146724,0.000042664215,0.00001952219,0.00008119737,0.001376493,0.0002725646,0.0000726312,0.9896712,0.000858573,0.0070355562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018254916,0.000013899903,0.00026336676,0.000041968826,0.0000065637582,0.000099063625,0.00032651724,0.0005535191,0.000089864814,0.9939942,0.0045775753,0.000015185382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023996388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014803016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038840767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054914798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036565254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20541209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414239603","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v7i1.8212","title":"Seeing Differences Differently: Peter Best and Morally Relevant Differences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Normative; Treaty; Argument (complex analysis); Human rights","score_opus":0.13228138722616667,"score_gpt":0.2867569309677777,"score_spread":0.15447554374161104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414239603","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01537944,0.022273913,0.007703365,0.6574219,0.0025947175,0.00003728089,0.00006357576,0.000036726502,0.29448903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8194582,0.00822463,0.005912256,0.11039666,0.0013018603,0.00007897398,0.00003164521,0.000106199586,0.054489672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371296,0.0033212977,0.00012627058,0.0007432656,0.0011926766,0.00090349285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455875,0.00363488,0.00029546392,0.0002680664,0.0007535605,0.00048930454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006196909,0.0005080698,0.00051195256,0.0011334055,0.013910442,0.00971715,0.0015185869,0.007537697,0.0039975774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009046604,0.00039773525,0.00038738505,0.0012583289,0.065065935,0.014631349,0.0041768514,0.013553094,0.00054978515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006419118,0.000005084599,0.00009486919,0.000019465253,0.0000026162318,0.00007280237,0.008254816,0.0000548664,0.000020972282,0.9701474,0.01959535,0.0017253205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014312617,0.000009922271,0.00032303683,0.00018746803,0.0000108618315,0.00015319588,0.012291032,0.00021673772,0.00017233494,0.7744003,0.21218343,0.00003755333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06242452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07550491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06242452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014795866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009355244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12412232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414239607","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v8i1.7798","title":"Is The Naturalistic Fallacy Really a Fallacy?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Naturalism; Statement (logic); Term (time); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.09336740934882677,"score_gpt":0.2919711157261695,"score_spread":0.19860370637734276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414239607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026971692,0.0056656813,0.14682955,0.34541312,0.0067854444,0.00016186722,0.0003498405,0.00030250673,0.46752024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89062464,0.0022576433,0.034622315,0.046189506,0.005192136,0.0006141465,0.0002576864,0.00029263756,0.019949386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98158914,0.006951987,0.00084771035,0.003740377,0.005532494,0.0013383192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857168,0.008342513,0.0010920471,0.0021430063,0.0020795476,0.0006260901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014747162,0.0006905076,0.002275181,0.0024268066,0.0068946187,0.007990228,0.0031337913,0.007077658,0.012759703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03467513,0.00079638493,0.0013291548,0.0017789004,0.058286007,0.02228899,0.0072354283,0.013065313,0.0022491063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014767538,0.0000149598645,0.0001467654,0.000028355984,0.000009724344,0.000048503993,0.00058751804,0.000052366056,0.00002540835,0.9930361,0.0038620303,0.0021734543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011336316,0.0000052122764,0.00007854418,0.000029947361,0.0000029189605,0.00008559422,0.0002983381,0.00020333719,0.000037995396,0.987931,0.011309488,0.0000062147988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00415746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046883575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014747162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006670729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050907396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07799137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414995708","doi":"10.48106/dial.v76.i2","title":"The Metaphysics of Relational States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"dialectica","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stanford Bio-X; University of Cambridge; Leverhulme Trust; Harvard University; University of Oxford; McMaster University","keywords":"Metaphysics; Status quo; Relational view; Proposition","score_opus":0.05622375956589613,"score_gpt":0.2652545114499816,"score_spread":0.20903075188408546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414995708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020727038,0.0265739,0.073249936,0.09812389,0.001292625,0.0000443795,0.00047722878,0.00017601346,0.7793349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9209164,0.0068896688,0.011296502,0.0067616734,0.0018426618,0.0002237055,0.00020161788,0.000098011486,0.05176981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978492,0.0011605743,0.00007642985,0.0002597417,0.0005113888,0.00014264237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813074,0.0011205466,0.00010848852,0.00034081965,0.00021578482,0.000083501975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028262925,0.00041608096,0.0005010057,0.0012915554,0.0026605343,0.0076895207,0.0008775506,0.0027271605,0.006626351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052600093,0.00031989027,0.0005068079,0.0014946117,0.029721994,0.013117586,0.0022774865,0.004243781,0.0012388044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.678216e-7,8.6805534e-7,0.000005602484,0.0000032711491,5.4557114e-7,0.000002009627,0.0001155944,0.000041257426,0.000010298415,0.9989096,0.00056611473,0.0003438975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017549627,8.525114e-7,0.000023281618,0.000009231575,4.815339e-7,0.0000042192937,0.00008223157,0.00016107655,0.000015401012,0.99142563,0.008274646,0.0000011856498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063699866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00273128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076895207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006493574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026223527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047114372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415393455","doi":"10.5840/idpp2011/2012172","title":"Preface","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Index (typography); Latin Americans; Information system","score_opus":0.11708777771361777,"score_gpt":0.2775593941484039,"score_spread":0.16047161643478614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415393455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012097677,0.0113480855,0.003630582,0.032325953,0.1564354,0.00038830124,0.016839731,0.0015749463,0.7762472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046834145,0.006728978,0.0018489227,0.0054968027,0.022565644,0.00020022369,0.012888981,0.0007887014,0.9447983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990361,0.000113181086,0.000068688336,0.00013487018,0.0005759102,0.00007125489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994534,0.000912982,0.0001728436,0.00041986958,0.003422798,0.0005375578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012714464,0.0009007458,0.00070733996,0.0027236585,0.0021187519,0.0040732585,0.0013017742,0.0010521981,0.43553784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009814029,0.00030299826,0.0004967535,0.002181727,0.0007190155,0.0029239904,0.0015274596,0.0030485494,0.27638453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010101882,0.0000072766406,0.00004288273,0.00005856541,8.2572893e-7,0.000019880892,0.000059278707,0.00002975194,0.00004718806,0.0023173753,0.9754655,0.021941278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018130651,0.000005956309,0.00019369513,0.00008313969,7.1184934e-7,0.000029578907,0.000054177268,0.0000150676,0.000025039453,0.0008710061,0.99871695,0.000002816458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055116313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057008695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43553784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019751997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025839023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415462494","doi":"10.1007/s11406-025-00907-9","title":"Love’s Concern","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophia","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Manitoba Beekeepers' Association","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Simulacrum; Cultural assimilation; Impermanence","score_opus":0.07733230905404669,"score_gpt":0.29126189770343014,"score_spread":0.21392958864938344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415462494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006769781,0.002668946,0.0020508727,0.07611824,0.0019705084,0.000023810851,0.0000655783,0.000039290047,0.9102929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4408196,0.0020060625,0.0010602729,0.098695084,0.004374861,0.000091911046,0.00012607049,0.0001791043,0.45264703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215335,0.0032371895,0.00022484675,0.0011602764,0.002203969,0.0010203985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99158365,0.0031024448,0.0006823049,0.0014712072,0.0017803834,0.00138003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005473138,0.0003792674,0.0006930848,0.0011521972,0.007447667,0.010084977,0.00096598134,0.0073960694,0.03910704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0205515,0.00030093867,0.0005790714,0.0008186891,0.013559233,0.008390374,0.0046201185,0.0099500315,0.0076933643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021706313,0.000024754376,0.00086024415,0.00003571504,0.000014002759,0.00023684911,0.0060549174,0.00002701013,0.00013434235,0.9186411,0.0615905,0.012358836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010737789,0.0000174139,0.00055254326,0.00009353184,0.000010875714,0.0010450194,0.0036400277,0.00006184047,0.00014259861,0.19770944,0.7967008,0.000015193497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020319219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030414013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03910704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036023208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031013917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13082612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415647448","doi":"10.5840/idpp2013/2014182","title":"Preface","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Index (typography); Latin Americans; Information system","score_opus":0.0416839147548366,"score_gpt":0.2671651852120273,"score_spread":0.2254812704571907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415647448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001226489,0.012029777,0.0036032414,0.036223236,0.20252071,0.00035985128,0.015305925,0.0016221695,0.7271086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005103819,0.0075098313,0.0019007864,0.006460363,0.031684734,0.0002067509,0.012082549,0.0009137332,0.9341374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896026,0.00012186648,0.00007179035,0.0001415065,0.0006277604,0.00007671207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99383706,0.0010832105,0.00020254828,0.00046423005,0.0037924221,0.000620469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013466919,0.0009356983,0.00075943244,0.0027813376,0.0022198206,0.004342526,0.0013466836,0.0010720851,0.40136367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010893014,0.00031301606,0.00049575587,0.0022270796,0.0007889591,0.0030344143,0.0016288466,0.0032823652,0.25444955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094884745,0.0000064696146,0.000038131126,0.000054467127,7.7341815e-7,0.000018373743,0.000058383674,0.00002742258,0.000043428834,0.0021308481,0.9785963,0.019015899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017770894,0.0000057434836,0.0001823778,0.00008612412,7.040107e-7,0.00003018401,0.00005437165,0.000015231907,0.000025573607,0.00086420187,0.9987307,0.0000029390735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005042944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054850434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40136367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020147946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026457428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415647460","doi":"10.5840/idpp2013/2014183","title":"Countries Included","year":2013,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Directory; Government (linguistics); Developed country; Developing country","score_opus":0.03631581074579993,"score_gpt":0.26959971282324524,"score_spread":0.23328390207744532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415647460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040116217,0.011611162,0.0010013377,0.0013263102,0.0033026058,0.00042371431,0.43710607,0.0014824469,0.5397348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021492235,0.017497675,0.0035119923,0.0024276916,0.0006623143,0.0008309707,0.5043408,0.0010055983,0.44823077],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886835,0.00013503425,0.00016910459,0.0002121164,0.00037836455,0.00023704222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736977,0.0002714997,0.0003953846,0.00024513714,0.0014867234,0.0002316255],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005254954,0.0009815118,0.00083258946,0.006803977,0.0011459778,0.0034115498,0.00089754374,0.0007549436,0.3339611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031146782,0.00030145326,0.00052130973,0.015802668,0.00019262638,0.0018618044,0.0015587452,0.0008562502,0.25213575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089695364,0.000022013857,0.0018786071,0.0013417435,0.000023168306,0.00012538124,0.00020916064,0.00008560122,0.0002784502,0.0074978815,0.93396974,0.05447846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006085247,0.000005731867,0.00201786,0.0002706696,0.0000069885905,0.00007045032,0.00014314742,0.000008731715,0.00006262194,0.00021329451,0.99719006,0.000004345435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008033556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008402534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3339611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006720265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022823915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95002365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416278692","doi":"10.3982/te6114","title":"Ex post approaches to prioritarianism and sufficientarianism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Tohoku University; Seoul National University","keywords":"Ex-ante; Axiom; Independence (probability theory); Extension (predicate logic); Class (philosophy); Independence of irrelevant alternatives","score_opus":0.06318566698365898,"score_gpt":0.21320165427321064,"score_spread":0.15001598728955168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416278692","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064828046,0.0017243869,0.5121074,0.0145832095,0.0003261981,0.00008630489,0.00028782844,0.00016345805,0.4058931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.904293,0.00069945137,0.06985885,0.0012747108,0.00045082154,0.00017138236,0.00015026848,0.00009939151,0.023002181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597013,0.0018335645,0.000236153,0.00067112345,0.0009208559,0.00036818098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943252,0.0026523997,0.0007266144,0.0011551022,0.0008367664,0.00030395255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053530447,0.0005305126,0.00058865314,0.0014420645,0.002419568,0.0035321633,0.0013402132,0.002294046,0.009994359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006482082,0.0004228139,0.0012285438,0.0010400227,0.01503373,0.008256072,0.003968404,0.005034924,0.0009889817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025101629,0.0000034021502,0.00003019583,0.0000053658105,0.0000012909313,0.000005016547,0.000038673057,0.00010502938,0.000033783617,0.99915326,0.00008661937,0.0005347553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004295796,0.00000913908,0.000079423706,0.0000070045303,0.000001656575,0.00002206878,0.00003071392,0.0005468093,0.000107814005,0.99586993,0.003317955,0.000003250802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064559263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012203959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009994359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034884631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00214354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03343445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416623191","doi":"10.1515/kant-2025-2027","title":"Introduction: Kant and the Berlin Academy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kant-Studien","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Doctrine; Institution; Competition (biology); Connection (principal bundle); Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.021298276072605284,"score_gpt":0.2525311577615372,"score_spread":0.23123288168893188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416623191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053239996,0.19700204,0.0023557283,0.08423851,0.017195744,0.000019326531,0.00073838345,0.0001406139,0.69298565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39778876,0.10293368,0.0021159167,0.029976886,0.027429916,0.00009803891,0.00077365764,0.00025527485,0.43862787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993043,0.00023638408,0.000028806868,0.00013899906,0.00018868121,0.000102789556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994141,0.00033718304,0.000058758338,0.00003623664,0.00007853719,0.00007526337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059365697,0.0007112673,0.00032448256,0.0017830449,0.0029292877,0.0063659046,0.0005705082,0.0024848885,0.027558537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020118016,0.00025180928,0.00033917616,0.0013784551,0.003926535,0.0036550052,0.0019827094,0.0035336122,0.0053241663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028800629,0.000016857997,0.00028897292,0.00012461994,0.0000043598293,0.00006029624,0.0013199874,0.00012494635,0.000072494935,0.77327025,0.20859866,0.016089767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044144517,0.000007924144,0.00065686385,0.00040359405,0.0000027550634,0.00011760006,0.0004793977,0.00007147124,0.00005799515,0.121248476,0.8769402,0.000009413932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019501259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017591094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027558537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003548285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013096718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09219247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416758761","doi":"10.1007/s11245-025-10331-z","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on the Principle of Charity in Argumentation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topoi","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.030866923382628947,"score_gpt":0.2871933432045827,"score_spread":0.2563264198219537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416758761","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031806645,0.040718164,0.008732788,0.15454064,0.73544925,0.000067185494,0.0004391645,0.00018997959,0.05954473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042294436,0.017817106,0.0026309919,0.03477748,0.8575155,0.00014141409,0.0005100104,0.00053440983,0.08184362],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970994,0.0009888762,0.00026237263,0.0004952816,0.000964278,0.00018988302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855958,0.009993851,0.00048392388,0.00069995085,0.0021282625,0.0010981465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045807427,0.0018296578,0.0021940437,0.0039969184,0.0031593826,0.010434348,0.0018937754,0.007851564,0.049415436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013456636,0.00079315295,0.002088177,0.0027421257,0.0048943968,0.008472956,0.0037811245,0.018750295,0.01814475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012767744,0.000025971189,0.000053657972,0.00018048979,0.000009941642,0.000039125855,0.000112968526,0.000080067424,0.00008985376,0.037836906,0.9463698,0.015188333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008072989,0.000015595324,0.00021837573,0.0003737902,0.000010167445,0.00008833415,0.00007754783,0.00015923378,0.00004488231,0.03459411,0.9643938,0.000015960817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015390781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025240316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049415436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030346597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026079414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1653111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416983807","doi":"10.5840/idpp2007/2008152","title":"Preface","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Directory of Philosophy and Philosophers","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Index (typography); Fifteenth; Latin Americans","score_opus":0.08048677221267354,"score_gpt":0.2799047370671111,"score_spread":0.19941796485443758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416983807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00139361,0.0099460855,0.0039862287,0.02863356,0.11990055,0.0004693426,0.026460608,0.0020012064,0.80720884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005242057,0.005305321,0.0021326966,0.0049865427,0.017130539,0.0002715524,0.019615332,0.0008446884,0.9444712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913377,0.00011168986,0.00006702213,0.00013158137,0.00048508553,0.00007076585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941916,0.0008855556,0.0001933559,0.00041210168,0.003748089,0.00056937593],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012313284,0.00074419525,0.00062859495,0.0028721306,0.0024413816,0.0037294964,0.0011906651,0.0009313369,0.45914215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00877881,0.00028499388,0.00037287598,0.0024586292,0.00063191913,0.002801966,0.0014639255,0.0025758713,0.30198526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009703763,0.000006367289,0.00004407189,0.000047386475,5.1629985e-7,0.000014720805,0.00005374422,0.00001769346,0.00003870084,0.0019812374,0.97947466,0.018311253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014849649,0.0000046701125,0.00017807788,0.000063109204,4.77137e-7,0.000023464567,0.000054002507,0.000010287783,0.000020206515,0.0006830363,0.99895906,0.0000022165912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006010144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066880505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54085785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018310491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025260132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417000655","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5679443","title":"&lt;p&gt;Setting Boundaries and Standards in Transportation: In Between Principles of Sufficient Arianism and Limitarianism&lt;/p&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Work (physics); Set (abstract data type); Context (archaeology); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.021494946273267507,"score_gpt":0.25856163480793337,"score_spread":0.23706668853466586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417000655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022127828,0.0034425014,0.272829,0.059810184,0.0009041004,0.0000847047,0.00043493707,0.0002686965,0.64009804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8743503,0.0015330812,0.06618482,0.004008648,0.00051471125,0.00029380232,0.00015714111,0.00038177372,0.052575685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695575,0.0017315645,0.00016331361,0.0004956563,0.0004213305,0.00023247034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997177,0.0014051682,0.00027572614,0.0005297444,0.00044072128,0.00017145548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038648706,0.00047971864,0.00060615514,0.0013482672,0.003901362,0.004966294,0.0014804094,0.0043724156,0.017891401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007961035,0.00060580776,0.0010662082,0.0016865475,0.018529091,0.013785676,0.0040075993,0.0052193385,0.002106048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030000633,0.0000021003082,0.000017366454,0.000008818045,0.0000014234305,0.0000037612754,0.00011344954,0.00010707936,0.000016990827,0.99770796,0.0011305758,0.00088737166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031925363,0.0000018178905,0.000043431104,0.000010218348,0.000001601771,0.000008898944,0.00009252251,0.00040295374,0.00008374048,0.99152815,0.007820201,0.0000033223191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007295367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060327216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017891401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006234629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002934649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05985272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417155380","doi":"10.1353/hms.2025.a976688","title":"From Moral Theology to Moral Philosophy: Cicero and Visions of Humanity from Locke to Hume by Tim Stuart-Buttle (review)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Cicero; Humanity; Moral theology; Moral philosophy","score_opus":0.09262444428748452,"score_gpt":0.3382264091885602,"score_spread":0.24560196490107566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417155380","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004696632,0.98451334,0.000062638814,0.013112942,0.0013621881,0.0000014462023,0.0000043643176,0.0000016408137,0.0008944475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029733204,0.981282,0.00017859336,0.0102059655,0.0029267473,0.000014958472,0.000018444984,0.000009387951,0.002390552],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981675,0.0009778381,0.000092016984,0.00017040943,0.00046680545,0.0001254765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99382365,0.004456755,0.00031021005,0.00010813942,0.0008751675,0.00042618587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036070084,0.0007496761,0.0017200812,0.0033228274,0.00203503,0.006588823,0.001083465,0.0042564557,0.0076695387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009208082,0.00041141038,0.00046100782,0.0060229423,0.007871603,0.009650181,0.004202663,0.007567426,0.0018324265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007053413,0.00005350307,0.00024284536,0.012110351,0.00009278905,0.00009405999,0.0030375551,0.00019647853,0.00013693325,0.068783715,0.57890916,0.33627212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021961594,0.000023638908,0.0007569033,0.020731736,0.00004416001,0.00024389349,0.0019488399,0.00006282038,0.00006901213,0.03215029,0.9439159,0.000030886364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014476363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02680856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014476363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038277043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010917388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028784215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417155575","doi":"10.1353/hms.2025.a976679","title":"Christianity in Crisis: David Hume and the Genesis of Thomas Reid’s An Inquiry into the Human Mind, on the Principles of Common Sense","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Atheism; Common sense; Epicureanism; Calvinism; Christianity; Enlightenment; Relativism; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.1694936195391003,"score_gpt":0.35817630664358285,"score_spread":0.18868268710448255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417155575","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1590324,0.03627366,0.0037886507,0.5843657,0.0032344745,0.000036101774,0.000058689893,0.00005541211,0.21315494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774498,0.0022516013,0.00053692225,0.0112497425,0.0005227465,0.000012032349,0.000005301684,0.000021570047,0.007950351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950045,0.003758068,0.000073530224,0.00029630985,0.00050383527,0.00036378115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318975,0.004742474,0.00045028623,0.00033879373,0.00055498804,0.00072359346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063787485,0.00031818697,0.0004191,0.0014965123,0.01167112,0.0051343837,0.001181373,0.0048706033,0.002169061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009117608,0.00029063263,0.00018455637,0.00084949576,0.065732986,0.0064770784,0.004272042,0.006318432,0.00031712942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036843016,0.000031089377,0.0007298602,0.0000605187,0.0000094229335,0.0007230996,0.19831015,0.00016520935,0.00014980324,0.7635122,0.030083803,0.006187914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031775297,0.00005667558,0.001400317,0.000352245,0.000008958669,0.0009000872,0.10288425,0.00038349113,0.00041606455,0.42164564,0.47185856,0.000061889084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012667455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014263439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012667455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008368154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003955597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060715437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417155606","doi":"10.1353/hms.2025.a976680","title":"Humean Loyalty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Loyalty; Virtue; Relation (database); Self","score_opus":0.13247372223163484,"score_gpt":0.3602470128070686,"score_spread":0.22777329057543377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417155606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23431262,0.0029016926,0.013321447,0.026814869,0.00034502725,0.0000503619,0.000054123568,0.000045675042,0.72215414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98501915,0.00043302827,0.0005093282,0.0019440637,0.000084972344,0.000011936367,0.0000099415765,0.000005798748,0.011981799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768806,0.0014052322,0.000048119036,0.00018577842,0.0003795316,0.00029320014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960551,0.0015852415,0.00054232246,0.0003930681,0.00071764353,0.0007066419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002375043,0.00012587025,0.0002459818,0.0008785245,0.0024066612,0.0036596397,0.00040631913,0.0013878121,0.0073527703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058888965,0.00008966847,0.00016783556,0.00059511286,0.007006429,0.0019656396,0.0022010512,0.0017059018,0.000689675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031708605,0.00006415536,0.0059031574,0.000058855087,0.000014854285,0.00010661041,0.0052977414,0.00022003838,0.000110030465,0.9560855,0.00480962,0.027297758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035418205,0.000156341,0.019266853,0.00044973622,0.000030046429,0.0007242598,0.01297259,0.0034061745,0.00084638066,0.7848916,0.17716925,0.00005134294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018947888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00214435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073527703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001961682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017672502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024597466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417343760","doi":"10.1017/9781009292030","title":"Law and Morality in Kant","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Morality; Autonomy; Punishment (psychology); Politics; Jurisprudence; Moral philosophy; Legal realism; Private law","score_opus":0.03696465850082356,"score_gpt":0.21850641712965022,"score_spread":0.18154175862882665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417343760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009722192,0.032435257,0.011524532,0.031008383,0.00077152974,0.000019717876,0.00005014033,0.00007733943,0.914391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.756692,0.016715595,0.00840146,0.008591153,0.001252012,0.00010207252,0.000068733636,0.00013601904,0.20804097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718165,0.0017733665,0.00006457447,0.00016890408,0.00058275793,0.00022879738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988393,0.000669395,0.00008178873,0.00011890173,0.0001901373,0.000100471465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017101511,0.00044410428,0.00036728953,0.0011673594,0.0038671512,0.0069709746,0.0004970626,0.002322567,0.0037119933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031083864,0.00027818396,0.00028034594,0.0011405059,0.029974606,0.005206984,0.0022339586,0.004522844,0.0011919638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024417839,0.0000035165376,0.00003139617,0.000013993832,0.0000011060245,0.000010024125,0.0011571179,0.000138655,0.000027280092,0.9915193,0.003961761,0.0031334283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002623298,0.000003755487,0.00013939608,0.000058449303,0.0000016908994,0.000027699005,0.0006197101,0.00019112733,0.000057003483,0.91336983,0.085524,0.0000048258903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032171248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002514594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069709746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005436454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034430348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039444387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417415662","doi":"10.1007/s11098-025-02426-5","title":"The structure of critical sets","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Equivalence (formal languages); Population; Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Interval (graph theory)","score_opus":0.0811562597054753,"score_gpt":0.35464581364954345,"score_spread":0.27348955394406815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417415662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050806664,0.005013092,0.38222423,0.03200119,0.00054411695,0.00032436865,0.00062116305,0.00038524964,0.52807987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340204,0.00085302914,0.0495754,0.0007698792,0.00037007296,0.0006031273,0.00026396694,0.00016240522,0.013381717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799256,0.01352833,0.0008478578,0.0022042803,0.0026224486,0.00087148097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.895436,0.08757571,0.0033610242,0.0075006033,0.0047487984,0.0013778654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015748452,0.00083930313,0.0016182985,0.008645641,0.00847274,0.014025873,0.002667429,0.0035335114,0.016156897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06745287,0.0013685648,0.0012203611,0.0062021357,0.04506758,0.022992421,0.0058056167,0.005469622,0.0014186733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025714264,0.0000019221275,0.000030083887,0.000008332312,0.0000019842096,0.000003806412,0.00030171825,0.00008306151,0.0000073179735,0.9987307,0.0002239852,0.00060448993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004251254,0.0000010992217,0.000022030965,0.00001259808,0.0000016893168,0.000004583634,0.00009932336,0.00029500478,0.000026050406,0.99790704,0.0016246923,0.0000015370157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022023155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017482426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016156897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00992856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053005493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08328676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417513414","doi":"10.1086/738314","title":": <i>Kant’s Reason: The Unity of Reason and the Limits of Comprehension in Kant</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Comprehension; Limit (mathematics)","score_opus":0.09361536783431028,"score_gpt":0.31371269324973977,"score_spread":0.22009732541542948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417513414","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013982822,0.044726912,0.032663863,0.4624921,0.010073433,0.00006304563,0.0005464773,0.00031280663,0.43513852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69501525,0.012564291,0.014062338,0.16396157,0.014582869,0.00033458637,0.0003669585,0.00076046964,0.09835168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974668,0.0014818286,0.00008915195,0.00040758835,0.00036274124,0.00019176259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953709,0.003238559,0.00030053264,0.0003416473,0.0005872584,0.000161027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033786846,0.00077099964,0.00060210354,0.0015530658,0.0042079645,0.009087416,0.0018420436,0.00876732,0.008737479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007425472,0.0004545453,0.0007788371,0.0022658405,0.031717144,0.017900337,0.0033077868,0.011347518,0.002510366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012793633,0.000004738314,0.00006158221,0.00004286354,0.00000649481,0.000019714058,0.0034100546,0.00006064371,0.000051011008,0.9556059,0.038907044,0.0018171387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001028899,0.0000059612366,0.0003471824,0.00019412623,0.000010109815,0.00010029117,0.0025058298,0.00030354247,0.00030893093,0.87071866,0.12546818,0.000026891896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009116427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006384578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009116427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033906212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030857187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02922976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47482545","doi":"10.1023/a:1017543131839","title":"Fiona Cowie, What's Within? Nativism Reconsidered, Philosophy of Mind Series.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Minds and Machines","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Epistemology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.04566698216266881,"score_gpt":0.2510462193455794,"score_spread":0.2053792371829106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47482545","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007710917,0.63697284,0.0020035487,0.31668365,0.01134049,0.000011833689,0.00010836676,0.000055393215,0.032052774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052107252,0.6846562,0.0051526837,0.10523017,0.025956571,0.00018238142,0.00018917322,0.00025696514,0.12626855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916065,0.0002815418,0.000041118357,0.00014520157,0.00029308983,0.00007839555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691665,0.0022388424,0.00010550222,0.000091562666,0.0004560324,0.00019139434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023268224,0.0008670374,0.000848975,0.0022115137,0.004986148,0.004484319,0.0020722777,0.00651581,0.010859542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050630625,0.00071254576,0.00052882655,0.0024001547,0.008550489,0.0126562,0.0021017853,0.008475836,0.0032706733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030175606,0.00001942936,0.00015053913,0.0002884471,0.000015930174,0.00009719972,0.0027057135,0.00012890952,0.000102023405,0.1590513,0.81237984,0.025030581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020326866,0.000008023695,0.00078974915,0.00059627753,0.000016941092,0.00014799842,0.0014859276,0.00010249166,0.00026435807,0.13250077,0.8640432,0.00002403451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032027945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068103746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032027945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004669693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034596191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06368309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W572001530","doi":"","title":"Heiner Bielefeldt , Symbolic Representation in Kant's Practical Philosophy . Reviewed by","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08514676212067014,"score_gpt":0.3228521717228403,"score_spread":0.23770540960217018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W572001530","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000476336,0.94169533,0.001273302,0.036706675,0.0047946805,0.0000043755963,0.000081974984,0.000020677855,0.014946555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029183485,0.9160273,0.0012901389,0.010256054,0.009118949,0.000027962304,0.00015434898,0.00007191612,0.033869866],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990451,0.00039869256,0.00006618932,0.00015436941,0.00027146962,0.00006425072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787784,0.0015516825,0.00009879182,0.00006799627,0.00030776777,0.00009599351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011875672,0.0012009271,0.0010431862,0.0032534515,0.002232847,0.0033358638,0.0009787215,0.0038632771,0.019521575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031938627,0.0006960867,0.00044766755,0.005578994,0.0047320593,0.0088006705,0.0014959145,0.0054979525,0.0061001056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007805717,0.00004846721,0.00034184087,0.0021169155,0.00006419546,0.00013195162,0.0023796717,0.0006236747,0.00027512282,0.31015947,0.58460456,0.099176094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024135517,0.000012352718,0.0015127292,0.0019752998,0.000030275407,0.00026876386,0.0011453399,0.00030115372,0.00028664139,0.1721798,0.8222289,0.00003453388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011094221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017133286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019521575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002779767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001659293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06530613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W587872364","doi":"10.1002/9780470776377","title":"The Blackwell Guide to Hume's Treatise","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02478602166072085,"score_gpt":0.25022691787397094,"score_spread":0.22544089621325009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W587872364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037668872,0.11894439,0.0038616026,0.02045314,0.008397571,0.000075488846,0.0033950226,0.00068883423,0.8438073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010376134,0.061413586,0.0034401463,0.0049332436,0.004940195,0.00022622962,0.0024954476,0.001159084,0.9110159],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983069,0.0004808728,0.000112146336,0.00027847587,0.00067155843,0.0001500668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813336,0.00071731315,0.000118732845,0.00029926392,0.0006016328,0.00012975906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013962893,0.0016189982,0.001123565,0.0045184367,0.0027653067,0.0045909556,0.001414094,0.0019085292,0.14613903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056802705,0.0006871102,0.0007678311,0.0050992277,0.0023031444,0.0042442163,0.002072901,0.0039273947,0.08703812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010112433,0.000010848829,0.000050122257,0.00019171306,0.0000032348294,0.000028902665,0.0003600413,0.00007170151,0.000042745032,0.053195927,0.9048444,0.04119016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010848818,0.0000021463727,0.000065987166,0.00020595804,7.732868e-7,0.000026353304,0.00008710423,0.000017756649,0.00001972789,0.00621619,0.99335396,0.0000029982155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009940829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01331415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14613903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004210225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004570377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48888373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W634572341","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0010","title":"The Moral Sentiments in Hume’s Treatise : A Classificatory Problem","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12537655131939265,"score_gpt":0.30236279971171254,"score_spread":0.17698624839231988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W634572341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03491148,0.017678268,0.027328258,0.17228633,0.0032506427,0.00006395095,0.00024008757,0.00008550428,0.7441555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9294458,0.0054098396,0.0062866416,0.014931519,0.005435964,0.0001943856,0.00014662447,0.00016059441,0.037988625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99473417,0.0027558182,0.00015949512,0.0005347077,0.0012674975,0.000548304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993555,0.0040859412,0.00053144124,0.0004311237,0.0011784913,0.00021794897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053376355,0.00057909207,0.0007372129,0.0031702225,0.007251036,0.007485858,0.0014947383,0.004383829,0.0050846543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011740473,0.0003610453,0.00043503632,0.0029139456,0.026573503,0.009532565,0.0025291545,0.007120579,0.0008921624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008006453,0.0000058995133,0.0001370958,0.000030237225,0.0000030285375,0.000025213049,0.0046477322,0.000032290725,0.000028511333,0.9795116,0.01003245,0.00553787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012021327,0.000007642825,0.0009815199,0.00023218822,0.000005859828,0.00006165327,0.003972893,0.000325234,0.0001119785,0.8604824,0.1337853,0.00002133563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104932105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009003803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104932105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076500066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025800243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055504918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W67419089","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-9077-6_10","title":"Value, Obligation, and Luck","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Library of ethics and applied philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Obligation; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.06003138342664225,"score_gpt":0.22574842878053294,"score_spread":0.1657170453538907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W67419089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023396981,0.022548206,0.004073743,0.0114867175,0.00046855098,0.000012821075,0.000040543888,0.000028630488,0.959001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41953608,0.024371348,0.0046317345,0.0053545223,0.0016649702,0.00014324831,0.00009895003,0.00013919502,0.54406005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990829,0.0004301321,0.00002800088,0.000082879335,0.0003136436,0.000062477426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912065,0.00057220866,0.000042303647,0.000078261226,0.00011848024,0.00006804773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012955378,0.00041946952,0.00044129815,0.00088276487,0.0025889345,0.007313308,0.00059270347,0.002032334,0.011837014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027032131,0.00029986154,0.0001729915,0.0011099471,0.013943832,0.0053494023,0.00157333,0.004226609,0.0021219049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035016699,0.000008812537,0.000045154175,0.000020136002,0.0000012555906,0.0000127287185,0.0009157802,0.00005179831,0.000024219613,0.9783991,0.011482557,0.009034863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034205573,0.0000051447464,0.0002019334,0.00018264419,0.0000021987394,0.000048842496,0.0008856257,0.0001167322,0.00005570221,0.8099434,0.18854828,0.0000061065957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029249904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053424123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011837014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003426017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031904047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039598703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6925259134","doi":"10.17863/cam.119474","title":"Knowledge and Cognition in Kant","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Apollo (University of Cambridge)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Corpus Christi College, University of Cambridge; Arts and Humanities Research Council; Gates Cambridge Trust; University of Toronto; Mitacs; Cambridge Trust","keywords":"Transcendental number; Transcendental philosophy; Meaning (existential); Cognition; A priori and a posteriori; Experiential learning; Experiential knowledge","score_opus":0.023240461045839593,"score_gpt":0.23106836654627763,"score_spread":0.20782790550043803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6925259134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02535008,0.096408434,0.031932253,0.06045071,0.0015073989,0.000045454846,0.00016824125,0.00013462317,0.7840028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92221177,0.017118197,0.011054946,0.007475726,0.001268338,0.00010948275,0.00009680671,0.000100403995,0.040564332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628973,0.0024088041,0.000102592705,0.00040043244,0.0004576686,0.00034069474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986339,0.0008850864,0.000113271126,0.00014714467,0.0001225932,0.00009794809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026751324,0.0007024023,0.00050696515,0.0019142578,0.004030956,0.008292963,0.00086717913,0.0043797013,0.0028717674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031125855,0.00033143026,0.0007029943,0.0016453124,0.035955083,0.008878103,0.0036374344,0.005142977,0.00090891955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005056366,0.000003935086,0.00004247049,0.000018142371,0.0000024792635,0.000013213214,0.0015997889,0.00018841485,0.000017337561,0.9945351,0.0014594658,0.002114704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033660099,0.000004687011,0.00011583412,0.000050957802,0.000002678843,0.000024917883,0.0004920484,0.00017198194,0.000047124806,0.96862555,0.030453192,0.000007637203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005300381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029976177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008292963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0079573905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032472026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057735145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6932104910","doi":"10.5683/sp3/cccidb","title":"Graves et al. 2024 data for \"Investigating the potential uptake of microplastic-derived carbon into a boreal lake food web using carbon-13 labelled plastic\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Borealis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Food web; Stable isotope ratio; Carbon fibers; Carbon-14; Isotopes of carbon; Boreal; Dissolved organic carbon","score_opus":0.06381898251837159,"score_gpt":0.28751704111535153,"score_spread":0.22369805859697994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6932104910","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001182419,0.000039401097,0.000044691682,0.000045422446,0.000015393754,0.0000059678077,0.9991831,0.00009457908,0.0004532794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005717687,0.000042506774,0.0004667056,0.00005729717,0.0000071477725,0.000079434314,0.9979102,0.00006239684,0.00080259563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990164,0.00020194736,0.00012493147,0.00025013436,0.00025193684,0.00015472533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968047,0.0010691837,0.00040720287,0.0006421336,0.000825754,0.00025099292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015758212,0.0013460853,0.001032386,0.0029668123,0.000910603,0.0022767088,0.0023721354,0.0019633332,0.057707533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008578945,0.0006528278,0.0012387112,0.004393659,0.0005168937,0.001108502,0.0020963857,0.0016370035,0.045271493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000820437,0.00002124516,0.0018967841,0.0013532738,0.00007077338,0.000030204563,0.000069932576,0.00035396888,0.00018459286,0.0010909364,0.9922226,0.0026236512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023785811,0.000011165864,0.006410696,0.00038004888,0.000052675266,0.00002927364,0.00009212304,0.000247305,0.0002934809,0.0013419408,0.990873,0.00003047471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056432307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12322132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057707533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014015851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029108936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19305092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6948086381","doi":"10.48336/85kk-ft75","title":"Hegel's critique of modern presupposition and Plato's aporetic moment. Masters thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Hegelianism; Greeks; Hubris; Dialectic; Skepticism; Reading (process); Materialism","score_opus":0.03888665199409196,"score_gpt":0.24907607056375722,"score_spread":0.21018941856966525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6948086381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016469782,0.0839125,0.010249883,0.12644342,0.0018018748,0.000021406486,0.00016517525,0.00011355707,0.7608225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7966378,0.027239187,0.0037897832,0.0101492815,0.0013395991,0.00008707598,0.00010484645,0.00012946919,0.16052297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998643,0.00055452884,0.000047022437,0.00015060129,0.00037304952,0.00023175734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886924,0.0007173045,0.0000952159,0.00006916865,0.00017636476,0.00007260678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016952067,0.0004787502,0.0003944852,0.0011222969,0.004499341,0.0037771282,0.00095510104,0.0023543302,0.004205256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023386811,0.00038221554,0.0002758174,0.0013412264,0.027559873,0.00483495,0.0019017345,0.004457082,0.0008263308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010832798,0.000009616861,0.00007184738,0.000029994922,0.0000027541364,0.00003906886,0.0027525153,0.0001296795,0.000040349456,0.97763443,0.0154952705,0.0037835666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016226319,0.000014973696,0.0009815225,0.00026511596,0.000008351366,0.000109365195,0.0026280647,0.0003847155,0.00028784556,0.7134579,0.28182596,0.000019921516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11393969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12790908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11393969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02427315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008765327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22655302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958336980","doi":"10.60692/6m1c5-y6894","title":"International Asteroid Warning Network Timing Campaign: 2019 XS","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Abbey Ridge Observatory; Dominion Astrophysical Observatory","funders":"","keywords":"Asteroid; Observer (physics); Minor planet; Position (finance); Astrometry; Near-Earth object","score_opus":0.06384253954195869,"score_gpt":0.21572681037637328,"score_spread":0.15188427083441458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958336980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7333294,0.00018207372,0.00806628,0.00063416536,0.00028996074,0.0006304685,0.19819398,0.00085382955,0.057819795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7714162,0.00011253748,0.0076913484,0.00015833502,0.00015085858,0.00053505966,0.20735061,0.00014308715,0.012441988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942124,0.00011930914,0.00007286269,0.00009044581,0.00023386387,0.00006229126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997766,0.00029764272,0.0006174509,0.000266419,0.0009093733,0.00014314419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012321062,0.00021283783,0.00014798543,0.001294286,0.00039660712,0.00039881276,0.00022319728,0.00020541604,0.0034833713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023695505,0.00008610298,0.00008398659,0.0016089274,0.00014397706,0.00029405975,0.00052492495,0.00028927255,0.0010794059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012618533,0.00039509236,0.75088036,0.00030154546,0.00010361899,0.00047019118,0.0018704546,0.008270761,0.01588586,0.0027909349,0.12704034,0.090729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047037764,0.00035831044,0.90731,0.00004641905,0.000029001523,0.000092642156,0.0007837217,0.004187805,0.007097379,0.00024646262,0.079769194,0.00003202943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025946274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04890645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025946274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065873854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006958685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051590443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983364804","doi":"","title":"Meaning and Social Phenomena","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Oxford","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Narrative; Intelligibility (philosophy); Social life; Ask price; Meaning-making","score_opus":0.03421032326991803,"score_gpt":0.21971280199186452,"score_spread":0.18550247872194647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983364804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03588724,0.05525207,0.069888905,0.09518858,0.001273273,0.00025693057,0.00046835173,0.00022445494,0.7415602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9475387,0.013909073,0.014048436,0.005544526,0.0011366147,0.0004907872,0.00028392274,0.00011902068,0.01692894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99281913,0.005309927,0.00018198635,0.00069382647,0.0006787391,0.00031632764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960588,0.002989027,0.0002858172,0.00032002592,0.00019761178,0.00014873393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004724323,0.000807788,0.0008406402,0.0029863664,0.0072516985,0.008312794,0.0014424806,0.004225347,0.008949443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058506485,0.00031093968,0.0005734657,0.004122821,0.05401906,0.013273625,0.0045871395,0.0038712071,0.0009605007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020701855,0.0000032742585,0.00007853628,0.000040177034,0.000002245113,0.000024760002,0.0078015383,0.000061446386,0.000029964745,0.9890911,0.0010982397,0.0017666689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036686831,0.0000067462356,0.00018450977,0.000118896576,0.000002190132,0.000057836307,0.006287671,0.0001538488,0.00003479419,0.9084225,0.08472065,0.000006782555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021515826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00142691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008949443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064271553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014703039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04663247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987119502","doi":"","title":"\"The Self-Preference Principle: Benthamâs Transition to Epistemological and Democratic Radicalism\"","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Democracy; Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.04197352052778993,"score_gpt":0.2212308065869384,"score_spread":0.17925728605914845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987119502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1130702,0.0011589157,0.057255223,0.15587339,0.0017549335,0.00008407292,0.00014107642,0.00020350724,0.6704586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94862086,0.00019521597,0.008109732,0.005151196,0.00026363393,0.00008070595,0.000021067426,0.00008678838,0.037470832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667585,0.0016940173,0.00009332903,0.0005024794,0.00057336735,0.00046090427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974311,0.0011610945,0.0001412414,0.00053362746,0.00044216495,0.0002907323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054631387,0.00027623135,0.00039123403,0.0006479007,0.00766248,0.006185936,0.0012280084,0.003699457,0.0070843096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009609425,0.00031570467,0.0006107672,0.00069317326,0.016652035,0.0069366707,0.004509782,0.009238183,0.0008066534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004287779,0.000004988361,0.00003079738,0.0000027510066,8.6083816e-7,0.000007430538,0.00092513365,0.000031770287,0.00002171413,0.99637836,0.0014076212,0.001184211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007910527,0.0000041297217,0.00010345397,0.000009323386,0.0000023042844,0.000012119004,0.0005751794,0.00027687935,0.00009109586,0.98426765,0.014643692,0.0000062579984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008277695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015025005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008277695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047196387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041136607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034243584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987126486","doi":"","title":"Scanlonian contractualism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Dismissal","score_opus":0.08657595891514842,"score_gpt":0.31472968086596126,"score_spread":0.22815372195081285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987126486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039540958,0.040133312,0.003289235,0.041958813,0.0005972938,0.00002093866,0.00048278886,0.00007896223,0.9094846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29263666,0.021825591,0.002727824,0.0044350955,0.00085217564,0.00009345181,0.00036104917,0.00016041871,0.67690766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998949,0.00025924624,0.000022939912,0.0001795529,0.00037449095,0.00021471948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900097,0.00024637685,0.00006754899,0.00015540083,0.0003896596,0.00014013746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013511588,0.0005845819,0.00045524733,0.001498924,0.004950884,0.0065617906,0.0012632868,0.0018550149,0.03406641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026199392,0.00025621374,0.00027233086,0.0031008935,0.009867194,0.0031191602,0.001850684,0.0025800439,0.0024476058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065383506,0.000005418214,0.00011284804,0.000033359218,0.0000032927157,0.000021665956,0.00085426104,0.00008269417,0.00003299806,0.9293976,0.060515206,0.008934051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016630436,0.000005279426,0.001574831,0.00019777149,0.0000099360195,0.000062707804,0.0009402651,0.00027231744,0.00014621274,0.19045429,0.80630624,0.000013494428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5945365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6323657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5945365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034853287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02069774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81570274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6988134770","doi":"","title":"Williams, Scanlon, and the Normativity of Morality","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Nucleofection; Hyporeflexia; Circumstantial evidence; Pretext; Demotion","score_opus":0.011271308674741772,"score_gpt":0.1887796122043005,"score_spread":0.17750830352955874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6988134770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029433763,0.0105192885,0.015066476,0.08077515,0.0005417541,0.000029994768,0.00005918039,0.00004737602,0.863527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91424954,0.0039307917,0.0037480663,0.004228654,0.0004626909,0.0000918022,0.00003761896,0.00010370587,0.073147245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951233,0.0034212451,0.00009322427,0.00043237637,0.000710553,0.00021926213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955124,0.0029682831,0.0003034197,0.00044661187,0.00056761346,0.00020153559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003750249,0.00031852903,0.0003349715,0.0009848863,0.0046071596,0.0065212226,0.00082577276,0.0018874964,0.00447279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008132406,0.0002563706,0.00032177995,0.0011673098,0.044319388,0.006164845,0.0030313795,0.003720268,0.0008056401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003503989,0.000002384846,0.000041564355,0.000009236573,8.633567e-7,0.000007093795,0.0011396854,0.000071252995,0.000015803082,0.9962029,0.0015665183,0.0009391069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065514964,0.000003837446,0.00016276828,0.000058947215,0.0000023548437,0.00001929362,0.0008261933,0.00018142033,0.00005855379,0.95328414,0.045390796,0.0000050968342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016485222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008759649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016485222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010244008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048230635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07432586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995233423","doi":"","title":"Opposites","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Sketch; Attunement; Phenomenon; Irony; Economic Justice; Moral imperative","score_opus":0.03049832940574171,"score_gpt":0.20238350923627177,"score_spread":0.17188517983053006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995233423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008390961,0.0013408595,0.0056803348,0.021427957,0.011416353,0.00007956199,0.00034132312,0.00012283989,0.95119965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3749935,0.0028533188,0.0070623816,0.037447296,0.0057802224,0.0002650072,0.000783504,0.00047431322,0.5703404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937733,0.0016197161,0.0003925455,0.0014317568,0.0018083064,0.00097434974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948843,0.0013084809,0.0005996218,0.0009854371,0.0016667268,0.0005554164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004422365,0.00063457043,0.00064407923,0.0015600199,0.0056005907,0.0069465484,0.0011862941,0.0036254937,0.06886288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012616832,0.00028911125,0.0007653492,0.0011337872,0.008043396,0.0056326925,0.0048701204,0.0055455556,0.015633525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102028534,0.000018996843,0.00066866144,0.000098405035,0.000014033065,0.00035245277,0.0022366724,0.00004328445,0.00037201695,0.93779564,0.03942298,0.018874796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037945876,0.00004944565,0.00094838016,0.0002192112,0.000030304605,0.00071999594,0.0035427408,0.00013529394,0.0005379376,0.17935997,0.8143897,0.000029066046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004120946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042671724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06886288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023017062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995602450","doi":"","title":"Parfit’s non-identity problem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Library of the Belarusian State University (Belarusian State University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Harm; Debt; Metaphysics; Proposition; Term (time)","score_opus":0.011290764659028308,"score_gpt":0.1676481942448039,"score_spread":0.1563574295857756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995602450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03318393,0.0024856683,0.05357768,0.13505623,0.0024257458,0.00010985455,0.00018814781,0.000110486515,0.77286226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8560652,0.0014836962,0.017991917,0.021184178,0.0019269467,0.00030749335,0.00013580415,0.0001139552,0.1007908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942439,0.0016451984,0.0002649042,0.0016852753,0.001383144,0.00077754597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617034,0.0018341561,0.00022317802,0.00064325525,0.0008103538,0.00031869815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004962728,0.00041880406,0.001263184,0.0011151045,0.010141071,0.003932343,0.0018465637,0.006443412,0.014476336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011184004,0.0004716671,0.0011449156,0.0008439167,0.021543268,0.013165735,0.0069581927,0.010944392,0.0023530526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034248485,0.0000037139666,0.000037570742,0.0000052036025,9.4474717e-7,0.000027139551,0.00037223657,0.000011659826,0.000019278015,0.9964742,0.0019179671,0.0011267181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012348449,0.0000050457447,0.000067255554,0.000014434488,0.0000021662067,0.00015921448,0.0003919893,0.00018318834,0.000072928815,0.972293,0.026792482,0.000005841662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00527529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025487696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014476336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042919274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029034202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04842812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995764778","doi":"","title":"Peter R. Sedgwick, Nietzsche's Justice: Naturalism in Search of an Ethics, Montreal, McGill-Queen's University Press, 2013, 239 pp.","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.024615876166471904,"score_gpt":0.2679951710354603,"score_spread":0.24337929486898838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995764778","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045154354,0.90189826,0.002313054,0.060159143,0.0029786434,0.000019304221,0.0002668678,0.00006155421,0.03185156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030960064,0.86571884,0.0054217987,0.016142897,0.0053490796,0.000121637306,0.00027968027,0.00021161728,0.075794384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834,0.0006260041,0.00013377673,0.00017255788,0.00060565915,0.00012202902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736255,0.0017294394,0.0001683737,0.00009654993,0.0004764561,0.00016667445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032408563,0.0014913973,0.0010978302,0.0033000016,0.0035183611,0.0046218056,0.0021236825,0.0041647367,0.01705689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047400817,0.0011651142,0.0007137283,0.004693576,0.008569209,0.010784272,0.0017973148,0.006136728,0.006060528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004776409,0.000029866325,0.00028989732,0.00070432894,0.000025002535,0.0001589201,0.0038812773,0.00023994662,0.00013526197,0.15425484,0.79144734,0.04878556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026593965,0.00001154061,0.0021239622,0.0012370775,0.000016029244,0.00024671524,0.0018727677,0.00013541513,0.00023091766,0.10671919,0.8873445,0.000035302917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08819746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20919155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08819746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063911667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064635263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17536819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998875239","doi":"","title":"Avoiding Anthropomoralism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Sentience; Morality; Animal rights; Appeal; Discounting; Utilitarianism; Abortion; Natural (archaeology); Animal ethics","score_opus":0.04459174136700354,"score_gpt":0.22969386312302126,"score_spread":0.1851021217560177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998875239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03067577,0.0056147235,0.05459042,0.17306694,0.0027453883,0.00007260388,0.00006361174,0.00013943421,0.7330311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84176296,0.0022440492,0.015914513,0.07413329,0.0019065759,0.00030019402,0.000047977523,0.00016889603,0.06352146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914091,0.0051352135,0.00017215761,0.00094436714,0.001611669,0.00072735606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963594,0.0015466885,0.00040481405,0.0007290208,0.0005953225,0.00036473366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009131584,0.0005486596,0.00041914394,0.0009309132,0.0051377197,0.005429502,0.0012590494,0.0033657218,0.0049790414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009489948,0.00025462595,0.00041246435,0.00045983947,0.050961908,0.0057717278,0.008457751,0.007985162,0.0009393248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063243924,0.000005563581,0.00013150058,0.000017076056,0.0000022541587,0.000024398907,0.0014254815,0.000047117846,0.000059827034,0.9906026,0.0043091895,0.0033687032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013698833,0.000022912871,0.0003809609,0.00012596551,0.0000055945147,0.0001325814,0.0019213698,0.00030241112,0.00017914668,0.7713511,0.22555223,0.000012036044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054345927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009118228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009131584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051778997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045001074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048292994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998904995","doi":"","title":"Beyond abstract morality: towards a Hegelian conception of solidarity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Solidarity; Hegelianism; Work (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.04504143773802319,"score_gpt":0.2798442735391176,"score_spread":0.23480283580109443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998904995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018641636,0.009763422,0.05605279,0.2433167,0.0019299894,0.0000433254,0.000037874626,0.00009752622,0.6701168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91076666,0.0038804617,0.011363387,0.016095696,0.0012128935,0.0001135395,0.000030097744,0.00013546305,0.056401778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99341017,0.005191181,0.000087202505,0.0002894686,0.0006507351,0.0003713095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936925,0.0032223663,0.00045795715,0.0006494892,0.0008857249,0.0010919368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075619845,0.00040037534,0.0003667713,0.0013152343,0.0062060226,0.009924562,0.0013113518,0.0030937202,0.0051836874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0104242535,0.00021519509,0.0003278074,0.0009973134,0.055051323,0.011197729,0.0055336035,0.008925798,0.0010334197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035640655,0.0000044042827,0.000041836196,0.000008008112,0.0000010475765,0.000010336696,0.0020642243,0.00006312789,0.000011716809,0.99319917,0.0029052196,0.001687412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053711915,0.0000064712485,0.00008879382,0.000063391664,0.0000013895312,0.00002037336,0.001821864,0.00020692192,0.000038872025,0.9512589,0.046482787,0.0000048686165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037462942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041624457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009924562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054713213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005109944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039992034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999305668","doi":"","title":"Collected Essays in Speculative Philosophy, by James Bradley, ed. Sean J. McGrath, Edinburgh University Press, 2021","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Litmus; Power (physics); Reputation; Obituary; Commonwealth","score_opus":0.011889428259699616,"score_gpt":0.20894465564439182,"score_spread":0.19705522738469222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999305668","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013983223,0.75534445,0.0014821702,0.12785065,0.013355419,0.00003429415,0.00039901008,0.00006656139,0.10006905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032524068,0.54516786,0.0023170845,0.021469459,0.00915762,0.00014856199,0.00080981123,0.00021737131,0.38818812],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857116,0.00065013894,0.00008196789,0.00013421883,0.00046851937,0.00009391124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642736,0.0021463335,0.00022143542,0.00019393528,0.0006683408,0.00034256547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027152128,0.0013881035,0.0007392411,0.002474249,0.005129785,0.0063742315,0.0012697309,0.0018052455,0.014154563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073224427,0.00078060845,0.00043064126,0.00519087,0.0071606836,0.0062871072,0.002292197,0.0042856922,0.006201895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013286255,0.000013520629,0.00011342967,0.00021343489,0.0000054132283,0.00006413938,0.0042875987,0.000058448706,0.00006690385,0.02489519,0.94012135,0.030147286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004669928,0.0000026212263,0.0004673824,0.00054278254,0.0000028962218,0.000053256645,0.0017876934,0.000016615299,0.000026904401,0.00738425,0.98970544,0.000005562446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039738096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07472921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039738096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008400194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010754422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079013586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7013478337","doi":"","title":"Human Agency","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Praise; Position (finance); Moral agency; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.08111947190717722,"score_gpt":0.3080374774594442,"score_spread":0.226918005552267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7013478337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005039491,0.0050588823,0.024031179,0.040205248,0.0008749167,0.000064060805,0.00011620419,0.00008916527,0.9245208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77390945,0.0050528,0.014432304,0.02310862,0.0013705408,0.0003058443,0.0002509727,0.00012517086,0.1814443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334466,0.0031413084,0.0002328944,0.0014048209,0.0011213787,0.0007549277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651897,0.0010230714,0.00032474592,0.0010395815,0.0006497068,0.00044391738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052571506,0.00052730774,0.00051822467,0.0008950399,0.0046401806,0.0083087385,0.0011230316,0.004396772,0.019396825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065778494,0.00025746334,0.0005888445,0.000600713,0.03094869,0.0065756305,0.005204532,0.0038263844,0.004921007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003716611,0.0000036783379,0.00010767707,0.000015894399,0.000003585766,0.000017608401,0.000882162,0.000052808053,0.000029321249,0.9918704,0.0043196003,0.0026935511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068031222,0.000016224853,0.00024626474,0.00011041225,0.0000054268608,0.00012274984,0.0011863736,0.00012877012,0.00009312828,0.6228984,0.375173,0.000012485167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040291334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025345036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019396825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031104158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036973907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064888775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016083406","doi":"","title":"Virtue (Charles F. Sawhill) Papers, 1917-1975","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Subject (documents); Work (physics); Head (geology); Miller","score_opus":0.02582201142802676,"score_gpt":0.2142024013344702,"score_spread":0.18838038990644343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016083406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066594766,0.19804807,0.00059786177,0.059262127,0.014712806,0.00004124447,0.0011698656,0.00004460212,0.719464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07648955,0.061946243,0.0004272653,0.004747304,0.0035265647,0.000048555306,0.00035678694,0.000060985978,0.85239667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996724,0.00005448248,0.000015443697,0.00008145403,0.00012992493,0.00004628346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937123,0.0002450862,0.00004501353,0.0000354263,0.00020463273,0.00009851522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006867079,0.00030740118,0.00019572079,0.0017221187,0.003192442,0.0029961485,0.00022570236,0.001051448,0.028251177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022380713,0.00023239883,0.00012195275,0.002042785,0.0021041136,0.0014804954,0.0010380755,0.0016211006,0.0057571316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019901036,0.000015439562,0.0005864794,0.00007701464,0.0000040608234,0.000050178376,0.0007299065,0.000057812817,0.00007404371,0.15895516,0.80166936,0.03776059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019732572,0.000002328578,0.001395141,0.00010535186,0.000001132186,0.000020557263,0.000114594055,0.000008626225,0.000046229194,0.004049319,0.99425286,0.0000018589811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02731898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07540446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028251177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071032555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043218043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0945096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016401929","doi":"","title":"سوق المدينة | ولاية نينوى","year":2022,"lang":"ar","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brother; Islam; Supporter; State (computer science); Hinduism","score_opus":0.011753707548999364,"score_gpt":0.18730986946588066,"score_spread":0.17555616191688128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016401929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032050833,0.001781869,0.0035252892,0.006864069,0.008770679,0.00025089315,0.0017043974,0.0017761447,0.97212154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010584472,0.0022253727,0.0029326202,0.0017229976,0.0011673793,0.00022323575,0.0014653567,0.0019126195,0.9777659],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849284,0.00020746113,0.00009801704,0.000178387,0.00077687565,0.00024644606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742895,0.0003313674,0.00012939054,0.00028400638,0.0013900488,0.0004362556],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015179298,0.00080897426,0.0005730024,0.001717105,0.0033985483,0.009084397,0.00080506003,0.0013505619,0.6449264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005735359,0.00059680274,0.0006268979,0.0020716062,0.0020453348,0.0032004535,0.003066271,0.00429565,0.6176752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016585036,0.00006488663,0.00060674676,0.00045851173,0.000011017308,0.0004276613,0.002136091,0.00008187497,0.002438863,0.03306383,0.78947437,0.17107028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056777467,0.0000088597535,0.00041040816,0.000100313235,0.0000020806524,0.00011733276,0.0007116878,0.000016915901,0.00039233456,0.0006776897,0.9975479,0.000008772649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046649785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061890474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35507357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022031844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003283484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50646937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026721917","doi":"","title":"Anxiety, alexithymia and attitude to the disease in children with severe bronchial asthma","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"DSpace BSMU","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alexithymia; Toronto Alexithymia Scale; Anxiety; Asthma; Personality; Disease; State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; Trait","score_opus":0.011492421747186652,"score_gpt":0.23936510110490444,"score_spread":0.2278726793577178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026721917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994092,0.00023119383,0.000015106832,0.000040761963,0.000003797971,0.000003505344,0.00003724084,0.0000013354287,0.00025790304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996234,0.00014315282,0.000038326507,0.000017262628,0.0000074781938,0.000003989104,0.00007318144,5.777904e-7,0.00009264014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996284,0.0001187406,0.000033309934,0.00004841471,0.0001098633,0.00006119982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905926,0.00019229122,0.0004541262,0.000030086065,0.00006241157,0.00020181431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045021775,0.00019985429,0.0002677857,0.0005653899,0.00033233073,0.00037001038,0.00018546841,0.00037001516,0.0009277288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018958127,0.00026362913,0.0002528013,0.00043652806,0.00040636832,0.00027069173,0.00036756223,0.0005423785,0.00011344654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037386864,0.000019909447,0.9985952,0.0000064510327,0.000008770099,0.000086007785,0.00006490338,0.000010860729,0.00014727205,0.0000069193975,0.000044691802,0.00097173284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001530536,0.000036897847,0.99959964,0.0000024433998,0.0000036568601,0.00021826451,0.00007904873,0.000019819277,0.000009772937,0.000003130824,0.00002508686,6.47568e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005030977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071277493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005030977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022164048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023666077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010003388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027603648","doi":"","title":"Dave O Rama Interviews Humans","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Qualitative research; Identity (music); Negotiation","score_opus":0.023955301482155782,"score_gpt":0.21231783260774487,"score_spread":0.1883625311255891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027603648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014615265,0.0018796488,0.0018239964,0.034184895,0.0019200769,0.00033841986,0.0016229815,0.00031854093,0.943296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09386117,0.001707418,0.0011510402,0.015860818,0.0003626902,0.00073153654,0.00046769044,0.0002316608,0.8856259],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970943,0.0015844955,0.000061820945,0.00034745244,0.0004919509,0.0004199869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99556774,0.0015520409,0.00024151546,0.00034459995,0.0008646461,0.0014295114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003571505,0.00048508574,0.0002977966,0.0013918942,0.0078005544,0.00469114,0.00057798816,0.0021087674,0.16462101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007665722,0.000429452,0.00019454287,0.0015062605,0.003301843,0.0048158895,0.005034776,0.0030383624,0.0362117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086909255,0.00008287817,0.0010641123,0.00015492926,0.0000023212299,0.00038149903,0.07544061,0.0000446378,0.00044964926,0.029941471,0.8484892,0.04386185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039388306,0.000005736159,0.00032259896,0.0000715366,3.6993436e-7,0.000053054264,0.024983613,0.000011219336,0.00005483714,0.00091610645,0.97357076,0.00000615356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023347622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052243665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16462101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033000738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037470576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5507121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027907590","doi":"","title":"Does Jordan Peterson's Appeal to Authenticity Make Him a Hypocrite?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Situated; Vision; Essentialism; Autonomy; Argument (complex analysis); Self; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.027322632330618535,"score_gpt":0.24264662072184706,"score_spread":0.21532398839122852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027907590","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018069975,0.010688081,0.015567222,0.55658305,0.0022084073,0.00003260905,0.000024224,0.0000727164,0.3967538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7808769,0.010663924,0.007112107,0.10538249,0.002051123,0.00012672124,0.00002538532,0.00020446535,0.093556896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927033,0.0042069107,0.0001883841,0.0006875585,0.0016990423,0.00051483593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875908,0.008066752,0.0007893427,0.00086168473,0.0013028831,0.001388475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008048347,0.00033072292,0.0005006333,0.00069877855,0.007881172,0.014149826,0.0014512291,0.007062788,0.0037833112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014743603,0.00032874217,0.00038755444,0.00076067133,0.049665757,0.01634387,0.0072095357,0.014601791,0.0013953947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005387068,0.000009749717,0.00018186307,0.000035758545,0.0000019053199,0.000075610216,0.013127946,0.000045713983,0.000033315308,0.97013825,0.011804824,0.004539697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012052643,0.00002163065,0.0002637589,0.00027019178,0.0000052899213,0.0004291306,0.01593326,0.00023788512,0.00019110322,0.6001054,0.38250512,0.000025233216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038144977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004377843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014149826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045605404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007291345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042564213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038742711","doi":"","title":"Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Idealism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Indiana University Bloomington; Freie Universität Berlin","keywords":"Transcendental idealism; Transcendental number; Idealism; Interpretation (philosophy); Doctrine; Metaphysics; Transcendental philosophy","score_opus":0.03243054876433981,"score_gpt":0.2468130016851886,"score_spread":0.2143824529208488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038742711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014098492,0.008992931,0.17644659,0.033402555,0.0018024531,0.000092327806,0.00025159557,0.00025670568,0.76465625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8574617,0.005789268,0.055212535,0.009613547,0.0018451469,0.0003858189,0.00020816305,0.00026992842,0.06921387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98939383,0.0045575197,0.0004677888,0.0011717511,0.0035263842,0.00088276336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99613625,0.0018278019,0.00026953936,0.00068955205,0.00087323174,0.00020354729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007438871,0.0008375938,0.0010831846,0.0022817694,0.0037900168,0.008798162,0.0020935633,0.005000512,0.003942979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007466091,0.0006370628,0.0015900695,0.0015160165,0.033479348,0.009475678,0.0058971285,0.009831151,0.0017748534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026468542,0.0000022152908,0.000012915315,0.0000111111685,0.0000024942674,0.000008458697,0.00028569877,0.00013855564,0.000020391088,0.9977991,0.0007832952,0.00093308295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050696144,0.0000039366655,0.00002794592,0.000030434285,0.0000025197014,0.000027727914,0.00008875336,0.00030513204,0.00006989576,0.9802111,0.019220019,0.0000075395756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016886467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009409075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008798162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006089993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040094764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044186234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7065916663","doi":"","title":"Fixing the Hole in the Ozone Layer: A Success in the Making (continued)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Ozone layer; Treaty; Ozone depletion; Harm; Ozone; Sustainability","score_opus":0.04660181927348792,"score_gpt":0.27699521286803097,"score_spread":0.23039339359454306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7065916663","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009529255,0.091619104,0.0005256653,0.5547079,0.21892966,0.00007840267,0.00034215563,0.00016483088,0.13267937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073725963,0.0626479,0.0011285397,0.48852408,0.059544962,0.00012446234,0.0003474959,0.00032526968,0.37998474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969619,0.0005252619,0.0001469021,0.0003555997,0.0016286303,0.0003816591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957801,0.000910553,0.00016838766,0.00016913105,0.0019267346,0.0010450279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034950285,0.0007191155,0.00046289075,0.0010557711,0.00567168,0.012047058,0.0013799623,0.008002839,0.028661016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011163332,0.00042506366,0.0006583322,0.0014632131,0.0028758529,0.010234681,0.0050386107,0.010988575,0.0156108085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081405415,0.000021502869,0.00013064587,0.000101640726,0.000003413239,0.000060966668,0.0003682853,0.0000065377976,0.000094908595,0.0077285124,0.96199137,0.029484237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022398597,0.000008189777,0.0002521964,0.00010824625,0.0000019237775,0.000031959895,0.00028547522,0.0000039307383,0.00003459606,0.00059263303,0.99867415,0.0000044424532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024551695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06177361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028661016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037513697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008490034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09588063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067812600","doi":"","title":"Neonatal Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants from Taiwan: Comparison with Canada, Japan, and the USA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"NTUR (臺灣機構典藏)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Incidence (geometry); MEDLINE; Gestational age; Birth weight","score_opus":0.03724361868299009,"score_gpt":0.24167353696305788,"score_spread":0.2044299182800678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067812600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974765,0.00036388484,0.00002005073,0.00007268506,0.000008354579,0.0000069158195,0.0011943524,0.0000014808179,0.0008558254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687624,0.0006002233,0.000040507326,0.000049766786,0.000009928262,0.000021759646,0.0019037274,0.000002776737,0.0004949369],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999749,0.000032137134,0.00003963807,0.000040037787,0.000039559367,0.000099511155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991817,0.000065635686,0.00022657153,0.000031364933,0.00020163512,0.0002930463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002891774,0.00032683188,0.00033560197,0.0014899629,0.00065788964,0.00057924393,0.00050593016,0.00046747594,0.001897469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014679456,0.00016740178,0.00061194977,0.0025184986,0.00022443093,0.0002978315,0.0008475274,0.0005255741,0.00018653995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031270675,0.00006358175,0.9948949,0.000044461485,0.000120168115,0.00039733783,0.00035489188,0.00006995634,0.0001114614,0.00006035786,0.00047264912,0.0030974864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016539263,0.000086083935,0.9972362,0.00004636331,0.00009300875,0.00017633622,0.001896378,0.000086419626,0.000036717694,0.000027220463,0.00029182708,0.000006937515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31743914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32098812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68256086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017651914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002048281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6311829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070895101","doi":"","title":"Remarks on the historical mis-statements and fallacies of Mr. Goldwin Smith, in his Lecture \"On the foundation of the American colonies,\" and his Letters \"On the emancipation of the colonies\".","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Particle Physics","funders":"","keywords":"Emancipation; Empire; Globe; Newspaper; Foundation (evidence); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.013991162121120676,"score_gpt":0.19486867195887503,"score_spread":0.18087750983775436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070895101","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048559337,0.002388831,0.00013243886,0.97858286,0.010410429,0.0000075737835,0.000038361337,0.000028570952,0.007925443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013661578,0.0027832657,0.00047900632,0.9124268,0.015443428,0.00004784712,0.000036556266,0.00014862185,0.054972924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934422,0.0025800038,0.0004001033,0.00085371116,0.0020432675,0.00068082876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764995,0.012686566,0.0018737811,0.00090072176,0.0060616382,0.0019778127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011386825,0.0011629908,0.00093008036,0.0010759342,0.014208499,0.009353636,0.0035868683,0.01430943,0.014162629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02846983,0.0008840132,0.0007902913,0.0018304121,0.01433767,0.008860682,0.005210544,0.03530635,0.006814335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011301754,0.0000044473245,0.00017497815,0.000044497447,0.000004283338,0.00013281671,0.0027787008,0.000023022312,0.000049214275,0.010622419,0.98342484,0.0027294008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070942633,0.000011970412,0.0009409915,0.00028528998,0.0000075361063,0.00021207867,0.008784671,0.000053290467,0.00022926097,0.0063138353,0.98311734,0.000036593006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06422248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15437646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93577754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066685206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055789016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12769735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071973731","doi":"","title":"Towards a reintegration of the human being in law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Samsung","keywords":"Private law; Aside; Set (abstract data type); Human being; Philosophy of law; Public law; Abstraction; Center (category theory)","score_opus":0.032177322110815004,"score_gpt":0.257196271858799,"score_spread":0.225018949747984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071973731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060033603,0.0077257883,0.0068566413,0.16826119,0.00080124923,0.000038196926,0.000031996977,0.00009485184,0.8101868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5043702,0.013002798,0.0102227535,0.022636676,0.00080943864,0.00014331737,0.000054102085,0.0001934042,0.44856724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962786,0.0022795408,0.00008970051,0.0003119985,0.00058920763,0.00045099406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955205,0.0016599705,0.00029311806,0.0006958052,0.00074920227,0.0010814276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080872625,0.00030892654,0.00034870463,0.0013594786,0.0068221777,0.017242786,0.0011037309,0.005966145,0.024061244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051928256,0.00025726558,0.00029424735,0.0014169451,0.033559527,0.009093618,0.0071975933,0.0073774126,0.0049356613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000243667,0.000010009698,0.00011711593,0.000015693522,7.952851e-7,0.000022891676,0.0035030963,0.000036958383,0.0000608631,0.9715589,0.01390828,0.010763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071015147,0.000012909611,0.0007716813,0.0003023501,0.0000029880039,0.000060956525,0.008072683,0.00019326697,0.00012381702,0.25995263,0.7304906,0.000008930789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07652042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09146538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07652042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014211306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020758215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15215003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093711843","doi":"","title":"Rebecca, Rebecca!","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; George (robot); Association (psychology); Natural (archaeology); Representation (politics)","score_opus":0.01970118115522036,"score_gpt":0.18194312431588489,"score_spread":0.16224194316066454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093711843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027643738,0.03444751,0.0013988458,0.33858958,0.049562898,0.00011526883,0.0022212388,0.00065516203,0.5702452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011465907,0.004208882,0.00074936496,0.027881358,0.0006443554,0.000054916156,0.00032924814,0.00030998245,0.9543559],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873644,0.00018906416,0.000035170386,0.00023760658,0.00044933165,0.00035246543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795544,0.0001384129,0.00006533412,0.00015195536,0.0012081808,0.00048070258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017684409,0.0009129677,0.00061584066,0.0008247583,0.0064536706,0.0037989013,0.0010191931,0.002574017,0.19106904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003714417,0.00045445538,0.00045022092,0.0010852427,0.0017703477,0.002881,0.002152069,0.006100834,0.04207534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019238587,0.000004158573,0.00013429462,0.000032262782,0.0000022291315,0.00006650431,0.000179227,0.000015432683,0.000115409945,0.0055128443,0.9795502,0.014368234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021072185,0.0000013301764,0.0003002875,0.000032441912,0.0000011159125,0.00001958014,0.00022192189,0.000009367752,0.000041463965,0.00025664823,0.9991079,0.000005911058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73900145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8791826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73900145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017018301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01627507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6391896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094516476","doi":"","title":"Commentary on G. Thomas Goodnight’s “Blind Spots, Moral Hazards &amp; Wounded Narratives”","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Exposition (narrative); Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.07105078200492114,"score_gpt":0.2583237676240499,"score_spread":0.18727298561912875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094516476","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026358446,0.0015255113,0.00009348513,0.9846795,0.01067591,0.0000041907715,0.000030163947,0.000007568364,0.0027200212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007102743,0.0010731554,0.000118102886,0.9748161,0.0075749513,0.000028498866,0.0000162925,0.00004927225,0.009220988],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886696,0.0051764566,0.000446516,0.0015593675,0.002765085,0.0013829935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96341217,0.027145734,0.0015343664,0.00076320535,0.004618703,0.0025257783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01048266,0.0012393821,0.0012170578,0.0013081547,0.019107059,0.009396593,0.005146858,0.05572927,0.007308875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05505225,0.00093379454,0.00112488,0.0018939801,0.025961814,0.010694258,0.0063361526,0.060693156,0.0028624076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103006505,0.0000021499266,0.000024587505,0.000034843095,0.0000035629412,0.00015524082,0.0041906727,0.00001645024,0.000033150856,0.010803575,0.9839414,0.00078394054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012241429,0.0000062190325,0.00027518737,0.000566697,0.000008766127,0.0002015319,0.009835422,0.00004794437,0.00015118593,0.009687879,0.9791628,0.00004418856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085066445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16161618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085066445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0106005175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01159694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1691426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100979348","doi":"","title":"Research Khandor et al. Access to primary health care among homeless adults in Toronto, Canada: results from the Street Health survey","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Odds ratio; Logistic regression; Odds; Primary health care; Confidence interval; Primary care; Health equity; Public health","score_opus":0.10526070855743104,"score_gpt":0.36463023057373295,"score_spread":0.2593695220163019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100979348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781396,0.0030002024,0.00008701751,0.0010817299,0.00002840224,0.00009230189,0.013089626,0.000010024756,0.004470994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99395305,0.0015873024,0.00010442098,0.00018845854,0.000011481133,0.00003181157,0.0024820282,0.0000036078097,0.0016377842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992092,0.00008782136,0.00007901921,0.00008974893,0.00029958197,0.00023463249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973369,0.0001491064,0.00047514046,0.00009045115,0.0013206676,0.0006277243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005951061,0.00019915408,0.00029061656,0.0012988781,0.001925497,0.0011857067,0.00079331285,0.00030710356,0.0037763407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003125838,0.00030035968,0.0005312169,0.003391983,0.0004329574,0.00031717902,0.00085304363,0.00041580325,0.0004075541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002879738,0.000016895621,0.99411494,0.00007914187,0.000040477258,0.00005018469,0.0007434251,0.00003534141,0.000059197355,0.000046552534,0.0017770983,0.0030080033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037313223,0.0000071056247,0.9983687,0.000045646782,0.000020555357,0.000020690355,0.000874327,0.000033979766,0.000015416084,0.0000049874593,0.0006020287,0.000002961472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011516701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011516701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017589822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08355993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115036270","doi":"","title":"The I and the absolute: Schelling’s adaptation of Kant and Fichte from 1795 to 1800","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Normative","score_opus":0.03152030364449513,"score_gpt":0.2373509052225219,"score_spread":0.20583060157802677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115036270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010423828,0.027790291,0.020870605,0.032557815,0.0016803056,0.000040126004,0.0001856744,0.0000755594,0.9063758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82133216,0.008934882,0.011600375,0.010587702,0.0014732359,0.00014577886,0.00013444514,0.00020863743,0.14558268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987669,0.0006449829,0.000032136195,0.00017832199,0.0002454798,0.00013216122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951303,0.0002777945,0.000035694888,0.00005136393,0.0000923208,0.000029781928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013527491,0.0006171239,0.0002828036,0.0020920995,0.0031980127,0.003757068,0.0006113875,0.002473429,0.004922431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026924005,0.00025070086,0.0003902938,0.0011143634,0.019809948,0.006253334,0.0020354174,0.0039303564,0.0012529745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006033158,0.0000023852285,0.00003394375,0.000010086252,9.296557e-7,0.000017419903,0.0014486853,0.000053888616,0.00001797659,0.99081576,0.004931845,0.0026611232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054327083,0.0000062987892,0.00014540365,0.00009006673,0.0000022122008,0.000045730172,0.00063578004,0.00012712339,0.000103152866,0.8546717,0.1441594,0.0000077183795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057651587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008327202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062795444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062795444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023208857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045561492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115174133","doi":"10.1017/9781009530453.001","title":"Introduction","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Proposition; Interpretation (philosophy); Exposition (narrative)","score_opus":0.030353121817797004,"score_gpt":0.1994217351295651,"score_spread":0.1690686133117681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115174133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015821938,0.008596035,0.004187376,0.016612653,0.009373433,0.0001020835,0.00257831,0.00054838514,0.95641947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0164727,0.0062382333,0.0023352527,0.006140827,0.0035644046,0.00012282269,0.0027973237,0.0004015213,0.96192694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985688,0.00021311472,0.00006216084,0.00038194118,0.000619191,0.00015481007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868935,0.00025918407,0.0000776917,0.00018083872,0.00056978664,0.00022310976],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009273289,0.00074782554,0.00048644614,0.0011709873,0.0023252135,0.0054111686,0.0015519151,0.0027362043,0.3294371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040770285,0.00024362115,0.0004358721,0.0013253436,0.0014824711,0.0036631932,0.0030523806,0.0028121916,0.1934499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044689725,0.000037041027,0.00044600375,0.0002808244,0.0000053723725,0.00012553064,0.001376421,0.000117175376,0.0004171084,0.16434908,0.7292759,0.10352498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001176147,0.000005236118,0.00014404202,0.0000857212,7.7740333e-7,0.000055185177,0.00014737282,0.0000135472665,0.000047419813,0.0057692877,0.99372756,0.0000026397165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026367502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002903746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3294371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002241285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019327365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95647657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115811089","doi":"","title":"PESSIMISM, WELL-BEING, AND THE GOODNESS OF LIVES","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Value (mathematics); German; German philosophy; Human life; Principle of sufficient reason; State (computer science); The good life","score_opus":0.015693442894742865,"score_gpt":0.2056361753891572,"score_spread":0.18994273249441435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115811089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35987785,0.03412092,0.021607533,0.089665905,0.00096628646,0.000059133876,0.00013552063,0.000081767015,0.49348503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99381894,0.0019980075,0.00091887574,0.0012196925,0.00012180946,0.000012721097,0.000015586438,0.000008888043,0.0018854691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682534,0.0017592266,0.00011162166,0.00032888408,0.0006646151,0.000310335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959579,0.0018323944,0.0007242241,0.000398313,0.00047585677,0.00061133073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004625367,0.0004625533,0.00039091363,0.0013220998,0.0027980637,0.0055268714,0.00058354094,0.0017726421,0.0022423838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006814008,0.00021504537,0.00038169778,0.0008846401,0.03212537,0.004775179,0.0038143073,0.0039718454,0.00029957466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036309837,0.00002085381,0.002578233,0.0000528161,0.000021666878,0.000104604704,0.011742185,0.0006017198,0.00012912745,0.972796,0.0017867592,0.010129604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009812007,0.000026860389,0.0039245775,0.00015246122,0.000010745287,0.00013832789,0.0043582753,0.0005021688,0.00009548634,0.97484225,0.015912646,0.000026531687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022266645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017886168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055268714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035143108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013026958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025498211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115938682","doi":"10.5287/ora-5jenna7pe","title":"Kant &amp; Moral Character","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sympathy; Moral psychology; Analogy; Moral disengagement; Moral character; Character (mathematics); Moral authority; Value (mathematics); Raising (metalworking); Element (criminal law)","score_opus":0.08238631716031282,"score_gpt":0.29089175270558737,"score_spread":0.20850543554527456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115938682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024444193,0.0054234765,0.0034810477,0.009753742,0.00035908815,0.00001345322,0.00007217336,0.000068578294,0.978384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65679926,0.006510319,0.0045271516,0.0035328255,0.000665784,0.00012279121,0.00014973369,0.00015668359,0.32753548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847585,0.0008295621,0.00003724937,0.00018070871,0.0003232782,0.00015339121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992995,0.0003209419,0.000069821566,0.00010949793,0.00011387699,0.000086292996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009445695,0.00049459713,0.00025228388,0.0011009529,0.0035395592,0.0058751586,0.0006805067,0.0028669173,0.028021855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019843546,0.00021863946,0.0002024944,0.0013626382,0.011498991,0.0049027065,0.002591296,0.0033267192,0.0074554016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000497422,0.0000052705345,0.00004974398,0.00002478588,9.895016e-7,0.000018785582,0.00068208517,0.00008408522,0.00001641913,0.9793113,0.011978059,0.007823558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037045859,0.000006523296,0.00025101218,0.00010631566,0.000001788865,0.00013358671,0.00084356003,0.00026800192,0.00009381224,0.6735253,0.3247588,0.000007548517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017436127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013939276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028021855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047989935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016125906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09374243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116746772","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i4.9704","title":"Paley’s Principle:","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Miracle; Argument (complex analysis); Obligation; Norm (philosophy); Empirical evidence","score_opus":0.04450280406767941,"score_gpt":0.2860722504427748,"score_spread":0.24156944637509536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116746772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011116333,0.0055818846,0.24392147,0.13521686,0.003934777,0.00036840892,0.00032962387,0.00021904663,0.59931165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73287517,0.0032377576,0.12094544,0.045868907,0.006080066,0.002056911,0.00028260602,0.00042375101,0.08822941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709863,0.0130690755,0.0012678504,0.006565511,0.0066049006,0.0015064507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712901,0.017828912,0.0015849976,0.0050021065,0.0035515283,0.0007423302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025328508,0.0009546657,0.0015084178,0.0032041003,0.008482243,0.009196505,0.003330122,0.012656307,0.010499915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062398236,0.0012323421,0.0022067544,0.0017192813,0.052868508,0.021310631,0.0129278395,0.016802324,0.0030945644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013811567,0.000004744947,0.00009565502,0.000036234676,0.000009088028,0.000058682344,0.0009366499,0.000085379455,0.00003929682,0.99245113,0.0032211978,0.0030480765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014188974,0.0000071509858,0.00006922059,0.000072368704,0.0000068744916,0.000091481044,0.00016491498,0.00020971477,0.00009460765,0.9655583,0.033701427,0.00000979289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022947819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017920545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025328508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004267341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054520667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13395154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117233543","doi":"10.1017/9781009214049.012","title":"<i>Ambiguity and ‘Atheism’ in Hume’s</i> Dialogues","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Perspective (graphical); Natural (archaeology); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.04761060009206845,"score_gpt":0.2061732080574886,"score_spread":0.15856260796542015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117233543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04772597,0.0082208235,0.02756938,0.060455427,0.0010072397,0.000054801094,0.00007385195,0.00020141527,0.85469115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91435784,0.0013045411,0.0056137484,0.0076481528,0.00047807544,0.00009849353,0.00004566788,0.00017808122,0.07027541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98726696,0.010542984,0.00014233911,0.00039999047,0.0009784489,0.0006692705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947954,0.0039361706,0.00028417478,0.00030979756,0.00038908268,0.0002853877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062209796,0.0005814332,0.000601606,0.0015997727,0.012587509,0.010937823,0.0014182432,0.0053342083,0.0043210755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008124182,0.00048379533,0.00042554492,0.0016007754,0.04948689,0.010452629,0.0058920435,0.0067251236,0.0009966703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013977288,0.000008623773,0.000060997503,0.000032906846,0.0000028593795,0.00011629111,0.07936748,0.00007590017,0.00013221933,0.9091725,0.0077456725,0.0032705024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015505615,0.0000234526,0.00034556913,0.00035565006,0.000006781269,0.00041747285,0.05717693,0.00086484314,0.0006571839,0.528976,0.41111365,0.00004699643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005455879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060221856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012587509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006903724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002455301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050090253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117244175","doi":"10.59209/ircep.v5i15.131","title":"Scientific, Philosophical, and Practical Elements of Two New Philosophical Group Practices: Dialectic into Dialogos and the Socratic Search Space","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Interdisciplinary Research in Counseling Ethics and Philosophy - IRCEP","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Socratic method; Dialogical self; Virtue; Transformative learning; Utterance; Argumentation theory; Intelligibility (philosophy)","score_opus":0.2406726697131141,"score_gpt":0.484614496418173,"score_spread":0.2439418267050589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117244175","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10506933,0.004265795,0.53099823,0.037339944,0.0010028798,0.0003681412,0.00007373838,0.00028270192,0.3205993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91726446,0.00065083586,0.07175832,0.001130962,0.0001558438,0.00038107374,0.000034355708,0.000083254796,0.008540965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97713405,0.017568579,0.0008594195,0.0015105543,0.002243292,0.00068416155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98419106,0.009346889,0.0012449361,0.003164425,0.00094010937,0.0011126063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021462644,0.00072985067,0.0005071215,0.0023401002,0.005383186,0.01059163,0.001443437,0.0027711843,0.003489584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017444396,0.00044768056,0.0006534527,0.0016111365,0.070029795,0.015947849,0.012371177,0.0053754332,0.0004840142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018772593,0.000015783284,0.00020398272,0.000085438434,0.000003967767,0.000029684985,0.025468998,0.00016691795,0.00028125144,0.96683985,0.00027408855,0.0066112247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039659168,0.00009467425,0.0004241885,0.00024152343,0.000010478359,0.0002619765,0.023528436,0.0015511533,0.0010677897,0.87516147,0.09758213,0.00003662036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001179529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014704746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021462644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054063667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063506966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113506675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117318996","doi":"10.1017/s1369415425101131","title":"Alternative to Ontology or Alternative Ontology? Allison on the ‘Proud Name’ of Ontology (A247/B303)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Sketch; Idealism; Metaphysics; Process ontology; Ontology components; Transcendental number","score_opus":0.09990276976493487,"score_gpt":0.3499085954415656,"score_spread":0.25000582567663077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117318996","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058298972,0.66435295,0.013878264,0.23361118,0.008555496,0.000012503931,0.000044760884,0.000033113218,0.073681876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5102229,0.36477098,0.009409453,0.0762503,0.013851417,0.00014034066,0.000102076825,0.00015776396,0.025094708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903487,0.0070172166,0.00022738177,0.00060155214,0.0014737747,0.000331424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939878,0.004324206,0.00031740332,0.00044041732,0.000744413,0.00018571372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076078493,0.0004429891,0.0010087793,0.002900167,0.0019486563,0.006595709,0.0011873726,0.003811489,0.0024039072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008382217,0.00022993928,0.00050004764,0.002440851,0.025324896,0.013171579,0.0027459462,0.006838791,0.00062887184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010716759,0.00000373717,0.00003262564,0.00027221855,0.000007653212,0.000024876063,0.0010509794,0.000054714423,0.000043191543,0.9818308,0.007644525,0.009023917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008086977,0.000014481331,0.00024429278,0.0020635128,0.000017573437,0.0001232204,0.0024994486,0.00017977136,0.00018099585,0.5538841,0.44076768,0.000016861362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028461788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002723353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076078493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004209407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004606329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040234625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117386559","doi":"10.1111/phpr.70080","title":"On the Practical Necessity of the Categories","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Causation; Set (abstract data type); Point (geometry); Rational agent; Common knowledge (logic); Existential quantification","score_opus":0.31819024795289513,"score_gpt":0.40220212197564315,"score_spread":0.08401187402274801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117386559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043543376,0.0069972896,0.11836283,0.094589375,0.00075709086,0.000116532276,0.00031796217,0.00019999647,0.7351156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97274226,0.000894018,0.012330768,0.0027538904,0.00038872776,0.0001797801,0.00014594819,0.000058451835,0.010506155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97945684,0.013422179,0.0007078784,0.0019030563,0.0033483107,0.0011616676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97085166,0.020032514,0.0010100433,0.003866713,0.003433933,0.00080512784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012742081,0.0004928304,0.00093230593,0.0029518115,0.0071186917,0.008836428,0.0021292889,0.0057322,0.008081393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023261646,0.00070104847,0.0008462984,0.002182321,0.069264576,0.014595801,0.00876427,0.006218884,0.0009396229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020732336,0.0000011766907,0.000018390485,0.000006729343,9.66841e-7,0.0000073611377,0.0003529098,0.00003850378,0.000010603042,0.99875903,0.0003466177,0.000455601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028440363,0.0000017395362,0.000030172072,0.000014848954,8.21191e-7,0.000012528674,0.00023993447,0.00009767997,0.00001545523,0.9935913,0.005990356,0.0000022744935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004342011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022894735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012742081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006572162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038023568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0673874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118363983","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10048","title":"Aiding the Impermissible? Kant and the Morality of Medical Assistance in Dying","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; Università di Catania; University of Toronto; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; McMaster University","keywords":"Morality; Duty; Public morality; Applied philosophy; General interest","score_opus":0.04104709792010615,"score_gpt":0.27069176917266174,"score_spread":0.2296446712525556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118363983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054915894,0.023192331,0.034659307,0.3738749,0.0023348192,0.000047057758,0.0000730811,0.00008416382,0.5108184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973781,0.0029128075,0.003524262,0.009840284,0.0004860328,0.000028263226,0.000012871637,0.000027450329,0.0093870275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839181,0.013039427,0.0002706449,0.0004210075,0.0014571662,0.00089373277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149233,0.005720463,0.0006349672,0.0005548663,0.0008971975,0.0007001766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01160941,0.00038561135,0.00042729525,0.0010478451,0.0054549915,0.0073549035,0.0010730507,0.0066425195,0.002980191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012244365,0.0002675586,0.00042665706,0.0007043087,0.07644131,0.0056584864,0.0043357094,0.0074577383,0.0006918803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011914485,0.0000059323343,0.000069026384,0.000028021388,0.0000030579238,0.000040307146,0.002733703,0.00019380909,0.00002793936,0.992759,0.0023063663,0.0018209338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010661105,0.000010158008,0.00012368,0.00017569742,0.000003734599,0.00009031097,0.002184286,0.00025339282,0.00008913199,0.95894814,0.038094033,0.000016780466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025018146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019414908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01160941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051750783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043583205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061397135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118552910","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzaf068","title":"<i>Lectures on Ethics, 1946</i> , by P. F. Strawson. Edited by Jonathan Dancy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Agnosticism; Analytic philosophy","score_opus":0.029308814001741856,"score_gpt":0.27557681911132853,"score_spread":0.24626800510958669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118552910","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051267433,0.73287183,0.0027126977,0.034388386,0.031098757,0.000019079303,0.0006225745,0.00014459829,0.1976294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023133334,0.44394138,0.0058234227,0.008314292,0.016880618,0.00009708806,0.0006640385,0.00033142976,0.5008143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951077,0.00013968366,0.0000350219,0.000083344756,0.00018219782,0.000049029648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995478,0.00017906884,0.000055319622,0.00003365538,0.00012517447,0.000058893667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008613483,0.0017035445,0.0006187352,0.001851454,0.0019375209,0.0028945245,0.00056009623,0.0014256807,0.02900706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021390966,0.0004887743,0.00047330785,0.0023055146,0.002742684,0.0042381827,0.001287124,0.0036936111,0.0148760555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015255212,0.000009470677,0.00008842298,0.00017400835,0.000005389317,0.000026866192,0.00032797715,0.00009712439,0.00013079116,0.061188024,0.89348745,0.04444923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002268125,0.000004583023,0.00029572283,0.00029279027,0.0000019987788,0.000069679816,0.000109556524,0.000028753728,0.0000769911,0.02779635,0.9713173,0.000003973886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075828726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017080009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02900706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036411744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031706777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09703827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7123337286","doi":"10.33182/agon.v19i1-2.3586","title":"Truthful Dying","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"The Agonist","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Perspective (graphical); Philosophy of technology; Literal (mathematical logic); Semantics (computer science); Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.03651175782869591,"score_gpt":0.27466874136997516,"score_spread":0.23815698354127923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7123337286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026869588,0.007114602,0.036490828,0.08320392,0.002580971,0.000078242156,0.00009153805,0.00013001647,0.84344023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92542636,0.0023109857,0.006191824,0.011683226,0.0007188408,0.00008173558,0.00005319067,0.00005836918,0.053475413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950766,0.0028149313,0.00019008588,0.00056010485,0.0008977056,0.00046056032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962519,0.0019199088,0.00030878204,0.0006439131,0.00057384616,0.0003017212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057649375,0.0003843976,0.0003217005,0.00083604216,0.005312122,0.0060223085,0.00089932175,0.0034106404,0.0050987247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009574572,0.00015566232,0.0004591168,0.00036219985,0.033309884,0.0064696628,0.004367312,0.004442568,0.0012664354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040959476,0.000003871558,0.00007474421,0.000021870412,0.0000017485227,0.000041155272,0.0041054687,0.00005081271,0.000046548743,0.98998296,0.002538273,0.0031283943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006095312,0.000017019167,0.00013831623,0.00017577903,0.000006252332,0.00024398197,0.0037671095,0.00020053549,0.00035379655,0.8194186,0.17566083,0.000011671629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001342581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015632905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060223085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037097968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027540957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030488253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125381077","doi":"10.7202/1122714ar","title":"Matthew Cipa, 'Is Harpo Free? And Other Questions of the Metaphysical Screen'","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy of religion; Analytic philosophy","score_opus":0.06505757702677761,"score_gpt":0.30713422006050595,"score_spread":0.24207664303372833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125381077","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012258437,0.87421,0.00016669788,0.11866332,0.0028308132,0.0000070104757,0.00008548404,0.0000111058225,0.0039030807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013566524,0.8616746,0.00073506444,0.10489184,0.009966391,0.00009862286,0.00017371475,0.000041337913,0.00885192],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474466,0.002616723,0.00031701764,0.00036657302,0.0017475608,0.00020751363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890772,0.0073815617,0.0008426041,0.00027013686,0.0021419544,0.00028662008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005325275,0.0004908726,0.00097248686,0.0033316368,0.0018931861,0.0034544147,0.0013566583,0.004322395,0.0052308785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020334976,0.0005443634,0.0003886503,0.0047494397,0.004927444,0.01206263,0.0017360135,0.0053145667,0.002589617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053338565,0.000007554657,0.00020499575,0.004002564,0.00007293083,0.000058307505,0.0015306945,0.000032892665,0.0001313286,0.04406799,0.90789104,0.041946415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000290439,0.0000130894,0.0017569718,0.0027285353,0.00005089717,0.00017016736,0.0010114518,0.000025668114,0.00018185153,0.031613816,0.9623879,0.000030605377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022279287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034301646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022279287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030753918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007206321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044299245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127146086","doi":"10.5860/choice.240037","title":"Review Of \"Engaging Raz: Themes In Normative Philosophy\" Edited By A. Marmor, K. Brownlee, And D. Enoch","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Normative; Economic Justice; Politics; Interrogation","score_opus":0.06431062789699452,"score_gpt":0.36851198622094056,"score_spread":0.304201358323946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127146086","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000445913,0.8630153,0.0010888719,0.06844573,0.048624463,0.000021879034,0.00016185963,0.000068219735,0.01812782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013146327,0.88164836,0.0012365322,0.026592687,0.044623945,0.00009819348,0.00041149656,0.00015431408,0.032088257],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972715,0.000998528,0.00015435438,0.00022304534,0.0012016998,0.0001509016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99341875,0.003004365,0.00038877295,0.00017703944,0.0026577262,0.00035336186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026596095,0.0010976781,0.0010170426,0.0044557448,0.0020098314,0.004475889,0.0012675136,0.0019540882,0.005833715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009325617,0.0005481612,0.00051403,0.005730461,0.0036218332,0.0040944424,0.002298906,0.003518779,0.0033843026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130859435,0.000012111525,0.00009387241,0.0011120082,0.000008846028,0.000029247949,0.00046270707,0.00006621405,0.000076163444,0.012198669,0.920243,0.06568396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032296523,0.000008451805,0.0005514106,0.002157992,0.000006444362,0.00005979865,0.00027926546,0.000029206807,0.00004572285,0.0026067877,0.99424213,0.000009648619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062354654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014501133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062354654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041343686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006583435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02999711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128504655","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10049","title":"On the Possibility and the Form of Acquired Rights to External Things","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Surrey","keywords":"Rest (music); Root (linguistics); Lying; Action (physics); Human rights; Practical reason","score_opus":0.021248925732625618,"score_gpt":0.2517292418604598,"score_spread":0.23048031612783418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128504655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059774887,0.0023749233,0.08085529,0.017999874,0.000197823,0.00006140491,0.00016276015,0.00007363314,0.8384994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777648,0.0005323982,0.004391492,0.0009652367,0.00016720028,0.000086183136,0.000047517206,0.000032777072,0.016012454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908223,0.0047513605,0.00036152048,0.0015477648,0.0016646808,0.0008522726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99305177,0.0035995939,0.0004389736,0.001796709,0.00078434113,0.00032865175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008529353,0.00039751938,0.0007135886,0.0014081615,0.004063635,0.0104247015,0.0016889595,0.004528488,0.0093440665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008314127,0.0005589997,0.00087603804,0.0009066064,0.05897321,0.01681661,0.00973621,0.007760679,0.0008701113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025514857,0.0000020830462,0.00002492577,0.0000037497227,0.0000012133152,0.0000147088,0.00025157456,0.0000383943,0.000028257477,0.9991756,0.00011321687,0.0003437305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006873628,0.000005761745,0.000055973116,0.000029551284,0.0000031238535,0.000046930767,0.00021207843,0.00018780222,0.00012661004,0.9918622,0.0074575297,0.0000054938705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014605743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010959232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104247015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038488698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018102635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04510808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132886440","doi":"","title":"Thinking as a Mere Citizen of the World: Kantian Morality in a Pluralist Frame","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Pluralism (philosophy); Objectivity (philosophy); Normative; Relativism; Normative ethics; Cultural relativism; Cultural diversity","score_opus":0.03995933792849681,"score_gpt":0.3546798353822807,"score_spread":0.3147204974537839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132886440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05759141,0.011234002,0.13718712,0.1694345,0.0026069665,0.00009816958,0.000083594154,0.0001973159,0.621567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.945867,0.0022152618,0.02249996,0.007975027,0.0011908063,0.00014113038,0.00003993926,0.00014654985,0.019924205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782485,0.015139281,0.00044072486,0.0014534395,0.003275687,0.001442408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951964,0.002464465,0.00042123208,0.000609137,0.0005802601,0.00072850706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017310904,0.000689981,0.00088617334,0.0019065058,0.012124562,0.017061591,0.0019736202,0.006553838,0.0021748098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076782396,0.00065729214,0.0011140885,0.0015201522,0.08021965,0.017188562,0.0093145,0.015035593,0.000732864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033723973,0.0000060000852,0.000029655723,0.0000087510625,0.0000024177268,0.000018447667,0.0041025695,0.00015241535,0.000024493951,0.99418074,0.0007840019,0.00068699766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051401967,0.0000048452125,0.000034216137,0.00003103991,0.0000031403385,0.000018241157,0.0011809827,0.00037479398,0.00003828446,0.98511904,0.013181241,0.000009114522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045917816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036878649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017310904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011135095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006858482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09154987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132891940","doi":"","title":"Kant on Personhood","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Personhood; Natural (archaeology); Intentionality","score_opus":0.0582900250561272,"score_gpt":0.35454930737636425,"score_spread":0.29625928232023707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132891940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00933173,0.02696046,0.043146353,0.042104363,0.001616587,0.00004674717,0.00029507122,0.00010939902,0.87638927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7459337,0.014087317,0.023814848,0.01903533,0.0022275825,0.00029702683,0.00033707565,0.00027400843,0.19399306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603325,0.002386369,0.00011571608,0.0004061083,0.00071219297,0.00034631678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882776,0.0005925951,0.000072594274,0.00020863643,0.00021383927,0.000084571955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029759987,0.00072122767,0.00052805716,0.0012723913,0.003475875,0.004899948,0.00076858397,0.0032166983,0.0058542606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031139557,0.00039160307,0.00059749366,0.000965004,0.024026338,0.006399875,0.0030925057,0.006057542,0.0023511886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035799308,0.0000017610226,0.000019824281,0.000010801994,0.000001710327,0.00000852413,0.00043958254,0.00007210095,0.000020668775,0.99496573,0.0030639588,0.0013915912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034419472,0.0000039203524,0.00006083677,0.000041804928,0.0000015495677,0.000020121948,0.00019152061,0.00008302121,0.00004559268,0.93672067,0.06282346,0.0000041258213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030133887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019371454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058542606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046673506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025041932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0338642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132932394","doi":"","title":"A Pragmatic Approach to Metaethics","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Normative; Normative social influence; Ask price; Normative model of decision-making; Expressivism","score_opus":0.10634494074943343,"score_gpt":0.3724882655684867,"score_spread":0.26614332481905323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132932394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004407134,0.0075568785,0.38799486,0.15559039,0.0015764568,0.0002865771,0.00016166457,0.00020495671,0.4422211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64148355,0.0066897394,0.25949854,0.025408227,0.004065699,0.0017028967,0.00022854295,0.00047839028,0.060444348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764886,0.016637301,0.0007480805,0.0015929908,0.003862479,0.0006705756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855138,0.00833786,0.0008961317,0.002361953,0.0021444948,0.00074568787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026950704,0.0011689361,0.0012592528,0.003856327,0.0074532675,0.011451355,0.0030116905,0.007256836,0.008353151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019109368,0.0009142098,0.0015937756,0.0025458967,0.0488883,0.018946866,0.007269956,0.012715737,0.0017925245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011318207,0.000004432665,0.000012648616,0.000014616688,0.0000025203553,0.0000076982815,0.0004144368,0.000049382114,0.000023241988,0.9981401,0.0005730431,0.00075674336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064970513,0.000005122239,0.000026938005,0.00004806805,0.0000026579605,0.00001874286,0.00023144111,0.00024523298,0.000041521704,0.9793314,0.020038312,0.00000407509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021459963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023551646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026950704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010313005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008547514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14253062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132935350","doi":"","title":"Belief Internalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Temptation; Normative; Moral psychology; Externalism; Incompatibilism; Philosophy of mind; Theism","score_opus":0.057995336808069675,"score_gpt":0.32969145854763554,"score_spread":0.27169612173956587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132935350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025895054,0.0015688586,0.14542967,0.026205044,0.00063799904,0.00009326671,0.00029728084,0.0002623612,0.7996104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92532545,0.0008664408,0.021595249,0.0049288925,0.000603758,0.00020909001,0.0002491312,0.00015246798,0.046069503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970108,0.0009117731,0.00013247148,0.00074911234,0.0007722489,0.0004234421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971589,0.0009247606,0.00034458828,0.0006012274,0.000693375,0.00027711084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026831746,0.00047969513,0.00045114395,0.0012688036,0.0020065792,0.004876556,0.0014990232,0.002405314,0.015995633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005855043,0.00031209763,0.0010731244,0.0006915633,0.008208098,0.005392385,0.0038605807,0.004920096,0.0024798254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004084156,0.0000070227907,0.00014510633,0.00001341943,0.0000036926106,0.000012199366,0.00043624762,0.000098175886,0.00003906538,0.9953231,0.0010634125,0.0028544476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011282061,0.000015714102,0.00043358598,0.00004909456,0.000011199805,0.00007001167,0.00026887248,0.001294929,0.0001880324,0.95184475,0.045803007,0.0000095287405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021703113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013419585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015995633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041782185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017042487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053510666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132952705","doi":"","title":"The Epigenesis of Pure Reason: Systematicity in Kant&apos;s Critical Philosophy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Critical philosophy; Epigenesis; Interpretation (philosophy); Doctrine; Transcendental number; Interpreter; Critical theory","score_opus":0.07605054091404408,"score_gpt":0.3603520321066351,"score_spread":0.284301491192591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132952705","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12027474,0.02130561,0.38682672,0.12890862,0.0010590437,0.00025078838,0.00019459362,0.00057646976,0.3406034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94831544,0.0025015117,0.035042204,0.0024397187,0.0002327754,0.00018832379,0.000041071275,0.00015137106,0.011087522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932653,0.0039306562,0.00023053307,0.00064490514,0.0015917207,0.00033683074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421567,0.0035028956,0.00046129632,0.00067660824,0.0008923299,0.0002511965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011195179,0.00043438675,0.0005266984,0.0023589558,0.003341698,0.00726923,0.0010829654,0.0022954347,0.0013906909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076353746,0.00045839525,0.000712757,0.0014945754,0.055169463,0.008228877,0.0033833843,0.004634168,0.00038966813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002864791,0.0000033231775,0.000091885784,0.000022552116,0.0000025822699,0.000014874316,0.0028202396,0.00020305268,0.0001175375,0.99456996,0.0003555901,0.0017955388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058291475,0.000006255337,0.00014827806,0.00004209802,0.000003602265,0.000024894249,0.0007583764,0.0005215109,0.00022763098,0.9846235,0.013629839,0.000008254306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035515842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002276748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011195179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00948893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008901501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0688473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132987147","doi":"","title":"Hegel&apos;s critique of the concept of consciousness, its relevance to contemporary epistemology and philosophy of mind","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Philosophy of mind; Social epistemology; Philosophy of science; Foundationalism; Contemporary philosophy","score_opus":0.06902495950848384,"score_gpt":0.3491712184850695,"score_spread":0.2801462589765856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132987147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075907656,0.063337184,0.052312676,0.26043552,0.01091757,0.00010053144,0.0004766166,0.00032771035,0.6045014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52933806,0.036642905,0.04518632,0.07270249,0.011582923,0.00045279763,0.00018242028,0.00079913513,0.30311295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739695,0.0009975237,0.00013141076,0.0003383152,0.0009281271,0.00020770234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99584466,0.0029586765,0.00015601423,0.00022029184,0.000650607,0.0001698756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038345598,0.0007877208,0.0008312513,0.003251417,0.0044231107,0.0067487764,0.0018305732,0.006334256,0.006323017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005944771,0.00064586493,0.0007461702,0.002881007,0.04433472,0.0074071153,0.0028123574,0.008427732,0.0017441722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005063843,0.000002658577,0.000016414755,0.00003802344,0.0000039211036,0.000021320106,0.0008213498,0.00006533534,0.000021346064,0.97403073,0.022799503,0.0021741686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013043228,0.00000385438,0.00012749645,0.000115283896,0.000008397475,0.00010777199,0.00048383453,0.00020035659,0.00023385066,0.83256966,0.16612175,0.000014673486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030184897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04127564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030184897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013201001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073257396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09578037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132997561","doi":"","title":"The virtue of freedom, the development and meaning of Hegel&apos;s idea of the good life","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Virtue; The good life; Form of the Good; Meaning of life","score_opus":0.05426385654528011,"score_gpt":0.31011933263222835,"score_spread":0.25585547608694825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132997561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016521184,0.037300996,0.020204853,0.08921278,0.0013562124,0.00005224747,0.0001515386,0.00006165704,0.8351385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90393364,0.009460313,0.0057172924,0.00401217,0.00083563715,0.00010010747,0.000046804304,0.0001083465,0.075785734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745625,0.001691963,0.000060361202,0.00021414584,0.00035775057,0.00021946974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600923,0.0028339298,0.00019388107,0.00033877048,0.000334568,0.00028956463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044058696,0.0005266066,0.00054153654,0.0015507679,0.0049365116,0.009737483,0.0008359211,0.003693437,0.0044362703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005842101,0.00042350937,0.00033161926,0.0016095885,0.068134874,0.009394946,0.0027335018,0.00628532,0.00042179137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022546144,0.0000018484293,0.000012364517,0.000007041563,6.0614855e-7,0.0000061568494,0.0011470626,0.000043710446,0.000007694916,0.99661404,0.0013857537,0.00077137124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074108207,0.0000028508764,0.00008435449,0.000035364723,0.0000016547102,0.000019796196,0.0007647914,0.00010812114,0.000034087887,0.95668626,0.04225086,0.000004262057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031076148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033774953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031076148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012184361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007750596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08840418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133025982","doi":"","title":"Analysis, Systematicity and the Transcendental in Hermann Cohen&apos;s System of Critical Idealism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Yale University","keywords":"Transcendental number; Hegelianism; Judgement; Absoluteness; Transcendental idealism; Intuition; A priori and a posteriori; Empiricism; Critical philosophy","score_opus":0.041456558155238306,"score_gpt":0.34588992448901623,"score_spread":0.30443336633377793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133025982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055775903,0.014269951,0.26603281,0.05122887,0.0016730567,0.0003523698,0.00029340805,0.0003443027,0.6100294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9107896,0.002783439,0.05223643,0.0027629833,0.0007258449,0.00043468492,0.000079537574,0.00018524936,0.030002227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942034,0.0032362093,0.00018464448,0.0006924063,0.0012590201,0.00042433635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581605,0.0025363897,0.00026142717,0.00041347873,0.00080303755,0.00016959281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00936868,0.00067213306,0.0007171165,0.0035495635,0.004462364,0.0067062546,0.0010182298,0.0016938039,0.003105462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007726938,0.00040903798,0.00092489435,0.001358154,0.028872663,0.0061392062,0.0031803092,0.0039704344,0.00048750083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002317229,0.0000021935402,0.00002271895,0.000008276928,0.0000011713427,0.0000053289077,0.00053901755,0.000093628536,0.000035065295,0.99808997,0.00055988267,0.00064042833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052841187,0.0000048206743,0.00004646742,0.000023409111,0.000002106352,0.0000119409815,0.0002677739,0.00045935894,0.00011320486,0.98223996,0.016820025,0.0000057341936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029955562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021665143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012371071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012371071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005694192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08975887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133050802","doi":"","title":"Kant&apos;s Hypothetical Imperative","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Temptation; Categorical variable; Stupidity; Categorical imperative; Set (abstract data type); Consequentialism","score_opus":0.08213387461769794,"score_gpt":0.3879207960383661,"score_spread":0.30578692142066816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133050802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049465913,0.0021080321,0.0753108,0.025797533,0.0015048209,0.000054456716,0.0006293868,0.00088355894,0.888765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5244645,0.0033838432,0.06184043,0.010089744,0.0015102471,0.00023356758,0.0004928527,0.0007875024,0.39719728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977514,0.0008208072,0.0000883485,0.00034281757,0.0007858706,0.00021072496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990181,0.0003402858,0.00007792233,0.00016975724,0.0003274954,0.00006653929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018062219,0.0005293647,0.0002588155,0.0011111557,0.0028220573,0.004487211,0.0008276319,0.0028075688,0.012536937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036240367,0.0004933131,0.00056581234,0.0008871441,0.0085884575,0.0050297068,0.0019839099,0.003613662,0.0051181223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049325795,0.0000017053466,0.000015351765,0.00001417882,9.775159e-7,0.000014694552,0.00020954569,0.000080078215,0.000035001303,0.9883044,0.008767597,0.0025516779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006576879,0.0000080307345,0.00012027282,0.000043275217,0.000005911138,0.00013313748,0.00019036031,0.00093893096,0.00037548086,0.71935,0.27880868,0.000019254645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034719687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036440978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012536937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039174575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002179996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04194027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139614570","doi":"","title":"Commentary on Patrick Bondy, âBias in Legitimate Ad Hominem Argumentsâ","year":2016,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Exposition (narrative); Meaning (existential); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03566149692537196,"score_gpt":0.22982000567798336,"score_spread":0.1941585087526114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139614570","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002412255,0.002330742,0.00006706369,0.9798789,0.014115946,0.0000068563404,0.000027767968,0.000005452564,0.0033260146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061970185,0.0012601502,0.00012463995,0.96690893,0.01440624,0.00005033585,0.000011608288,0.000046182402,0.010994921],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98112583,0.006755653,0.0011912545,0.0031664465,0.005136029,0.002624811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9368861,0.048323285,0.001683919,0.0011449573,0.008071656,0.0038901765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02012396,0.0012803394,0.0028933466,0.0019516867,0.027337886,0.014724159,0.0069730477,0.10532814,0.00914116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109195955,0.0016708703,0.0014993044,0.0024289605,0.022183625,0.014847849,0.00724723,0.13015963,0.0047221035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021736909,0.000006675365,0.000055016175,0.000052405663,0.000010395631,0.00016825464,0.0025238679,0.0000192468,0.000031417127,0.02183413,0.9741047,0.0011720627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004823589,0.000012913364,0.00039450114,0.00088585005,0.000036736546,0.00021103279,0.007592173,0.000110246816,0.00017764576,0.032881953,0.95757073,0.00007784926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07689709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13392209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10532814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014348491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020466633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15289897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148366894","doi":"10.5406/21521026.42.4.09","title":"Kant's Epochal Lecture Announcement on Teaching and Autonomy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Autonomy; Doctrine; Absolute (philosophy); Term (time)","score_opus":0.02633811095443788,"score_gpt":0.23019797121769883,"score_spread":0.20385986026326094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148366894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046553127,0.05648858,0.007975508,0.25032866,0.060303606,0.000023998351,0.00043535186,0.00029242612,0.61949646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37958676,0.025918147,0.004901188,0.024107778,0.028903933,0.00009039281,0.00030328252,0.00032063675,0.5358678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786454,0.0010044585,0.00006943042,0.00018751183,0.0006185345,0.00025552197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987696,0.00062083197,0.00007694205,0.00010426564,0.00023483094,0.00019354247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024529498,0.0005519323,0.00026262164,0.00074211066,0.0023948082,0.00388086,0.00049397186,0.00263309,0.010828588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004141761,0.00022320898,0.00028178786,0.0007322713,0.0068582934,0.0030004806,0.001598242,0.006608227,0.004477574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029729577,0.0000072364514,0.000029937359,0.000031237552,0.000001422183,0.000028450853,0.00043777592,0.00016231358,0.0001139296,0.768245,0.22092581,0.009987128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057515767,0.000011628902,0.00018795251,0.000117391646,0.0000028827642,0.00003600977,0.00015145463,0.00016653672,0.00027716346,0.11672281,0.8823065,0.000013871647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036626642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025969716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010828588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058927666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029373236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042755246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148495683","doi":"10.36253/ds-15898","title":"Scottish Common Sense Philosophy: Twelve Theses","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Diciottesimo Secolo","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Common sense; Principal (computer security); Common knowledge (logic); Period (music); Questions and answers; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.026587456107829897,"score_gpt":0.27927632885038234,"score_spread":0.2526888727425524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148495683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05013274,0.034724943,0.015062229,0.18774852,0.0076918015,0.00040275874,0.00085673603,0.00026972746,0.70311046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76460236,0.044880744,0.016591571,0.0102649,0.009018742,0.0006595298,0.0008464025,0.0001597815,0.15297592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733955,0.0009199999,0.00020162838,0.00023452692,0.00096252636,0.00034168956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99397486,0.0022973253,0.00060078263,0.00042326914,0.0014665658,0.0012372398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008726774,0.0006853803,0.0007303941,0.0035632877,0.005329088,0.008380156,0.00086269167,0.0022124914,0.009560113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008950195,0.00033312757,0.00062008033,0.004998164,0.020256896,0.005260962,0.004008376,0.0054386198,0.0012804723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034504727,0.00005874923,0.00047653384,0.00016838158,0.000004881105,0.0000635901,0.0052373805,0.000075283504,0.000116658644,0.9488698,0.02048898,0.02440529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023899232,0.00008371666,0.0037396154,0.0006003164,0.000009344145,0.00012705922,0.009897082,0.00026303242,0.00019648786,0.50178844,0.4832302,0.000040770094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061833886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00884848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009560113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006888969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048247874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049983203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7152338500","doi":"","title":"How to Leap Without Looking: The Role of Habits in Rational Life","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; King's College London","keywords":"Rationality; Narrative; Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Practical reason; Period (music); Dialectic; Rational agent","score_opus":0.028257363818882643,"score_gpt":0.24155050928394525,"score_spread":0.21329314546506262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7152338500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21702576,0.015125953,0.035410013,0.16051961,0.00048228272,0.00010153539,0.00013308978,0.0002529006,0.57094884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98447186,0.0020364933,0.0034186991,0.0024185667,0.000100316414,0.00007185122,0.000027342352,0.0000500135,0.0074048024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949437,0.0037229504,0.00009023048,0.00039788175,0.00033917735,0.00050601753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99258053,0.004849416,0.0007835578,0.00073288236,0.00041125386,0.0006422435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00589206,0.0004996179,0.00038474516,0.0012869824,0.004751942,0.008262372,0.0015682188,0.004448,0.0027532591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009209457,0.0004482549,0.0005766813,0.001435135,0.07519202,0.014511774,0.0045228763,0.0046112114,0.00074347615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021775277,0.000017829623,0.00067828206,0.00003055563,0.000005727474,0.00010985335,0.030014943,0.0003633026,0.000050456718,0.96140844,0.0023120495,0.004986714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013953462,0.000016800186,0.000893488,0.00007864832,0.00000497881,0.00006480673,0.009428676,0.0007837746,0.000063851236,0.96908265,0.019546593,0.000021769916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106656905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060981717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0106656905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052763163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027503453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038282573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7157158287","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10043","title":"Agency and Objectivity: Gomesian Faith or Cartesian Clarity?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Faith; Agency (philosophy); Objectivity (philosophy); CLARITY; Omniscience; Defeasible estate; Denial","score_opus":0.03544088546000915,"score_gpt":0.24543252651944825,"score_spread":0.2099916410594391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7157158287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10921086,0.007751486,0.113637194,0.14661418,0.0009623049,0.000072043105,0.00015769899,0.00024868324,0.6213455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98374605,0.0006484431,0.006144318,0.0022050324,0.0001451484,0.000037319696,0.00002222565,0.00005134837,0.0070001674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951769,0.0032251584,0.00015496313,0.00045327243,0.00070012116,0.0002895302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944401,0.0031903454,0.00042923968,0.0010466257,0.0006453106,0.00024834377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006152315,0.00043651724,0.0005729355,0.0014154178,0.0025738114,0.0058912835,0.00091775495,0.002602549,0.0047291657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011070145,0.00034992964,0.00046080965,0.0008658857,0.044135965,0.01003765,0.005989282,0.0046000625,0.00059229234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073007495,0.0000027133426,0.000035690187,0.000010418957,0.0000018013566,0.000017219125,0.0018893762,0.0000561614,0.000041170533,0.99662423,0.000500654,0.0008133173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008971487,0.0000072770436,0.00011464091,0.000053768483,0.0000044737235,0.00003516005,0.00095280056,0.00025448197,0.000089194175,0.98254824,0.015922964,0.000008049647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028160051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024712582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006152315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031603589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016550865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032536924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164842621","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-27828-0_327-1","title":"Moral Authority","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.09152466457761864,"score_gpt":0.2586174774799579,"score_spread":0.16709281290233924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164842621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032444566,0.0005111275,0.0014753648,0.0016886742,0.00014059937,0.000014179422,0.000024063811,0.000014137334,0.9958074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053725503,0.00073775783,0.0012167782,0.0020248126,0.00034522987,0.00009965469,0.000066690445,0.0000642552,0.94171935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998609,0.0005391254,0.000034714532,0.00020426576,0.0004597887,0.00015306869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992176,0.0003103727,0.000034566132,0.00014058151,0.00023255865,0.00006432351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001398621,0.0005977121,0.00048513804,0.0011280162,0.0038973468,0.0065776836,0.0010348147,0.0035790356,0.06377715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032106205,0.00031579466,0.00028855665,0.0008431511,0.009138275,0.0049117757,0.0022305325,0.0046144626,0.015988069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012220088,0.0000040437376,0.000007199254,0.000006442645,4.5353255e-7,0.0000057681978,0.00025521978,0.00002164262,0.000014528434,0.98341227,0.013635082,0.0026361921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047743633,0.0000037843242,0.00006381713,0.000069817885,0.0000017867326,0.000035682922,0.00038461116,0.00014326656,0.00008050294,0.61418074,0.38502717,0.000004088659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055259857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008170824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06377715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044808914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030381903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21335584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165005367","doi":"10.7202/1126061ar","title":"Incertitude et présomption de bonté dans les premières Lumières allemandes","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Christian tradition","score_opus":0.17443432998590233,"score_gpt":0.3788036414641195,"score_spread":0.20436931147821716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165005367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21903305,0.018366482,0.012039719,0.017526962,0.000872584,0.00003816304,0.00015027905,0.00009608032,0.73187673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8403571,0.0039185807,0.0022334617,0.0013623328,0.00030321002,0.00004293556,0.000055138975,0.0000750335,0.15165213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980261,0.0006759791,0.00004441016,0.00035875553,0.00039911538,0.0004956417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987526,0.0004619986,0.00023499587,0.00013592115,0.00021109356,0.00020336304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024525544,0.00047992813,0.00038875925,0.0010614784,0.0055880006,0.0051900106,0.00051749113,0.0013185549,0.012730154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030810237,0.0003355196,0.00029975577,0.0010896277,0.014691928,0.0034314413,0.0026279406,0.002784323,0.0013383082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005472557,0.000011645392,0.00091226643,0.00004239359,0.0000033249778,0.00005251235,0.0095918495,0.00014594237,0.0001969432,0.9738618,0.0018822342,0.013244524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026120002,0.00014129055,0.013425911,0.0004975112,0.000013971566,0.00022113505,0.008829877,0.00037445716,0.0011417043,0.2678777,0.707389,0.00006121836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012810995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02803224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012810995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058751423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004039825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042627335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165028081","doi":"10.7202/1126080ar","title":"Maria Baghramian, J. Adam Carter et Rach Cosker-Rowland (dir.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Disagreement, New York : Routledge, 2024, 548 pages","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Cover (algebra)","score_opus":0.1580012003171719,"score_gpt":0.33397807200073604,"score_spread":0.17597687168356413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165028081","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022266785,0.93899465,0.0009316894,0.040226314,0.004757329,0.000012766993,0.00015995973,0.000053287506,0.014641423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0076825432,0.9018335,0.002637629,0.011506871,0.00634841,0.00012570583,0.0003316084,0.00024155654,0.069292165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974371,0.0011296821,0.0001260763,0.00036236324,0.0007660742,0.00017869241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983448,0.00088846404,0.000257649,0.000065268054,0.00030850872,0.00013530704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028726235,0.00176892,0.0013017898,0.0029753381,0.002848483,0.0070001716,0.0014471634,0.0050502135,0.032896493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064975065,0.0016640781,0.0007091688,0.0052837664,0.0040430496,0.012933128,0.0028274795,0.0051899543,0.027965073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040704053,0.000013547918,0.00014736303,0.0011270106,0.000018440145,0.00005721849,0.0021592325,0.000055086555,0.00013231298,0.028625747,0.8892857,0.07833761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006827401,0.0000058967794,0.0005151731,0.00089117466,0.000008291987,0.0001345556,0.0008553547,0.000024697785,0.000094764815,0.015020829,0.9824248,0.00001755757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018697763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030330343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032896493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042173658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005938471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110049725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W852737998","doi":"","title":"Review of: Freedom and Anthropology in Kant's Moral Philosophy by Patrick R. Frierson.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moral philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.029669555535469117,"score_gpt":0.2375459646578869,"score_spread":0.20787640912241778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W852737998","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007150602,0.9263361,0.0002137218,0.038976014,0.025233043,0.000006830825,0.000053727475,0.000012468797,0.009096635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029231913,0.891218,0.00031554198,0.027019817,0.040937126,0.000024387995,0.00018370888,0.000039978862,0.03733826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890864,0.0002581658,0.0000728097,0.00016535724,0.00050054194,0.00009464467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978015,0.00090411544,0.00017926283,0.000052782805,0.0008196554,0.00024270458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011925544,0.0012411665,0.0011138571,0.003467043,0.0011822404,0.00300506,0.001343243,0.0030709214,0.016710281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004203467,0.00050899177,0.0005486821,0.005226109,0.0023723824,0.005269998,0.0016999067,0.0049263146,0.010333632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010931614,0.000009008427,0.00004577523,0.0006412419,0.000006300379,0.000022490514,0.00006559244,0.00004238918,0.000045901386,0.004387169,0.94906586,0.045657277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003646907,0.0000065250797,0.0003914755,0.0008754965,0.000005698651,0.000116267394,0.00007758533,0.000017412813,0.000027342181,0.001792021,0.9966793,0.0000072070275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073881517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014988445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016710281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028596623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038121373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055901468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W913265252","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498855.004","title":"The Basic Framework: From Desire to Value and Action","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Physics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.10529191476721482,"score_gpt":0.24629593162357225,"score_spread":0.14100401685635744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W913265252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064796284,0.013542803,0.08028129,0.027573863,0.00049083127,0.00008274914,0.00020877742,0.00009258824,0.8712474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8495209,0.011465978,0.043684263,0.0067003416,0.000797142,0.00049350894,0.00026516162,0.00015829207,0.086914465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975038,0.0015445454,0.000053997377,0.0002732963,0.00038841905,0.00023603131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989843,0.0005627365,0.000063464715,0.00012352817,0.00014529964,0.000120699566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002448684,0.0007659157,0.0005837949,0.0014212434,0.0026201596,0.008379855,0.0014363233,0.00358913,0.00902207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024767432,0.00036215392,0.00048939086,0.0015140927,0.025566781,0.010610105,0.0031163606,0.004312347,0.0015430849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002055086,0.0000024645042,0.000021505848,0.000014316518,9.1541114e-7,0.000011206908,0.00058799575,0.000046050933,0.000015971305,0.99715173,0.0008638376,0.0012819153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005507932,0.0000061415317,0.00008419834,0.00008066692,0.000001772023,0.00005081998,0.00075713865,0.00019744493,0.00003337245,0.95053595,0.048243355,0.000003686193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005298096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040806914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00902207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054545105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036798127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039575458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W91372609","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0418-3_17","title":"The a priori Grounds of Proof of the Existence of a supremely perfect, necessary, independent Being.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in German idealism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Subject (documents); Philosophy; Existence of God; Computer science","score_opus":0.06522169258240189,"score_gpt":0.308290350920019,"score_spread":0.2430686583376171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W91372609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015078427,0.011426358,0.041868247,0.01933392,0.0009566765,0.0000547661,0.00022069286,0.00003989927,0.91102093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317831,0.0037833098,0.021937901,0.0021707215,0.0007521624,0.00016822568,0.00024201498,0.00007925001,0.03908333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958954,0.0020269204,0.00021982707,0.0004892877,0.0010196498,0.0003488875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649507,0.0021089672,0.00020791448,0.00056839106,0.00044370908,0.00017601202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004622051,0.00042726938,0.00051405473,0.0013835614,0.002985154,0.005122667,0.0011958708,0.002440636,0.004336852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072191088,0.0005976902,0.00055161753,0.0007406521,0.033744108,0.007843731,0.0027379275,0.005672476,0.0009825119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020696862,0.0000017715258,0.000013284684,0.0000066818066,0.0000013696199,0.000006351058,0.00010827945,0.000025017653,0.00002335603,0.99844897,0.00075624185,0.0006066826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043918667,0.0000034197828,0.0001229587,0.000035648005,0.000002312564,0.000026252874,0.00011933353,0.00010692501,0.000094297204,0.98568416,0.013797,0.0000033360204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018685503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002394986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005122667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003395686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025110443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02463758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W963884259","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0002","title":"Hume on Art Critics, Wise Men, and the Virtues of Taste","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Beauty; Taste; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Exposition (narrative); Epistemic virtue; Clearance; Psychology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.06293815843604779,"score_gpt":0.2829823822691093,"score_spread":0.22004422383306155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W963884259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11439459,0.008080851,0.016092742,0.069070674,0.0007824268,0.00003054462,0.000027500291,0.000047783582,0.79147285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727798,0.0010932552,0.001427467,0.005965855,0.00033123005,0.000022804317,0.00000503757,0.000019704084,0.018354803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954157,0.0032535256,0.00005184824,0.00027913818,0.00060966826,0.0003901489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99465925,0.0034802936,0.00047743952,0.00035777193,0.00061118696,0.00041390507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061157285,0.00038695917,0.00041277666,0.0016603882,0.006549734,0.005394383,0.00054640044,0.0035601316,0.003170515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006915791,0.00016023597,0.00027380625,0.0006525469,0.043265104,0.0075776214,0.0037627977,0.0034059014,0.0004929543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008226248,0.000006380037,0.0002872811,0.000015867521,0.0000022589998,0.000050306266,0.006602744,0.0000694547,0.00003475463,0.9881357,0.002026295,0.002760764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012680318,0.000027640155,0.0008332158,0.00019812403,0.000007002857,0.00015035097,0.008526863,0.00036113494,0.0002543349,0.9120154,0.077592336,0.000020937234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018582615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032899778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006549734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002713487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016129469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032343507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98105299","doi":"10.22329/p.v3i1.296","title":"Hegel's Guilty Conscience: Three Forms of &lt;i&gt;Schuld&lt;/i&gt; in the &lt;i&gt;Phenomenology of Spirit&lt;/i&gt;","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Shame; Forgiveness; Confession (law); Phenomenology (philosophy); Psychoanalysis; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Feeling; Punishment (psychology); Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.06116282654042276,"score_gpt":0.2638228221457751,"score_spread":0.20265999560535236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98105299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45736894,0.010478174,0.01026367,0.044213913,0.00065976195,0.00011560606,0.00013843704,0.00012822615,0.47663325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874607,0.000987467,0.0010356558,0.0020601407,0.00006035649,0.000070160866,0.00002572753,0.00002006071,0.008279642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818087,0.0009878031,0.00005221528,0.00012922815,0.00031452326,0.00033541932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989214,0.0006111378,0.00010874731,0.00010419868,0.0000922768,0.0001622416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015055966,0.00033507496,0.00030016157,0.0010349823,0.004853657,0.0041605723,0.00059064734,0.002267074,0.0013030376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032108126,0.00019430964,0.00044307212,0.00079351244,0.042123884,0.0042881756,0.006253198,0.004447225,0.00015941942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025300895,0.000022385955,0.00080043206,0.00006847894,0.000004516211,0.0004635964,0.297855,0.000098227945,0.00026727392,0.6911814,0.004357582,0.004855778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046542376,0.00009368765,0.004849561,0.0005951672,0.0000151903005,0.0018438377,0.39543155,0.00059943506,0.0007402392,0.41688907,0.17879242,0.00010326085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005617335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056965435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005617335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043338714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002130872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03144455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W997711300","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i4.3833","title":"Reason in the Balance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.0743684308359901,"score_gpt":0.26310020116898947,"score_spread":0.18873177033299937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W997711300","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011821957,0.5939715,0.0072288276,0.06467012,0.00963868,0.000025553578,0.0001784505,0.00014444417,0.32296014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.086180255,0.4336926,0.0061687124,0.026364047,0.019262291,0.00014263461,0.000556983,0.00043974462,0.42719272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840516,0.000566492,0.000074455864,0.00023984065,0.00059131795,0.00012273507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983157,0.00094296044,0.00009232389,0.000111176574,0.0004229265,0.0001149304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018871741,0.0007238235,0.0009127873,0.002259359,0.001817463,0.006817007,0.0008300652,0.00277344,0.025985723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004516063,0.00037186532,0.0005404866,0.0022933902,0.0077930144,0.009925625,0.0019683554,0.0034852321,0.009113551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028897537,0.0000169174,0.00009611966,0.0005475208,0.000016160748,0.00003939247,0.00062878337,0.0003552501,0.00011501879,0.5129787,0.3732081,0.1119692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005545858,0.0000060781967,0.00010989542,0.00055828906,0.0000053043846,0.00004903904,0.00021979136,0.000066740686,0.000044328484,0.12388801,0.87503976,0.0000071972718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041322075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005423946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025985723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005194999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005074196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08693087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}